Determination of Attainment by the Attainment Date for the Salt Lake City, Utah and Provo, Utah 2006 24-Hour PM2.5, 34673-34675 [2020-12074]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 110 / Monday, June 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2020–0002; FRL–10009–
92–Region 8]
Determination of Attainment by the
Attainment Date for the Salt Lake City,
Utah and Provo, Utah 2006 24-Hour
PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing a
determination of attainment by the
attainment date for the 2006 24-hour
fine particulate matter (PM2.5) Salt Lake
City, Utah (Salt Lake City) and Provo,
Utah (Provo) Serious nonattainment
areas (NAAs). The determination is
based upon quality-assured, qualitycontrolled and certified ambient air
monitoring data showing that the area
has attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) based on the 2017–2019 data
available in the EPA’s Air Quality
System (AQS) database.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before July 8, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2020–0002, to the Federal
Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from
www.regulations.gov. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Jun 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
electronically in www.regulations.gov.
To reduce the risk of COVID–19
transmission, for this action we do not
plan to offer hard copy review of the
docket. Please email or call the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section if you need to make
alternative arrangements for access to
the docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Crystal Ostigaard, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode
8ARD–QP, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, (303)
312–6602, ostigaard.crystal@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
I. Background
A. Designation and Classification of
PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas
On October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61144),
the EPA revised the level of the 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS, lowering the primary
and secondary standards from the 1997
standard of 65 micrograms per cubic
meter (mg/m3) to 35 mg/m3. The EPA
retained the form of the 1997 24-hour
standard, that is, the 98th percentile of
the annual 24-hour concentrations at
each population-oriented monitor
within an area, averaged over 3 years.
See 71 FR 61164–5 (October 17, 2006).
On November 13, 2009 (74 FR 58688),
the EPA designated a number of areas as
nonattainment for the 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS of 35 mg/m3, including the Salt
Lake City and Provo NAAs. The EPA
originally designated these areas under
the general provisions of Clean Air Act
(CAA) title I, part D, subpart 1 (‘‘subpart
1’’), under which attainment plans must
provide for the attainment of a specific
NAAQS (in this case, the 2006 PM2.5
standards) as expeditiously as
practicable, but no later than 5 years
from the date the areas were designated
nonattainment.
Subsequently, on January 4, 2013, the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit held in NRDC v. EPA
that the EPA should have implemented
the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard based
on both the general NAA requirements
in subpart 1 and the PM-specific
requirements of CAA title I, part D,
subpart 4 (‘‘subpart 4’’). In response to
the Court’s decision in NRDC v. EPA, on
June 2, 2014 (79 FR 31566), the EPA
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34673
finalized the ‘‘Identification of
Nonattainment Classification and
Deadlines for Submission of State
Implementation Plan (SIP) Provisions
for the 1997 Fine Particulate (PM2.5)
NAAQS and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.’’ This
rule classified the areas that were
designated in 2009 as nonattainment to
Moderate and set the attainment SIP
submittal due date for those areas at
December 31, 2014.
After the court’s decision, on
December 16, 2014, the Utah Division of
Air Quality (UDAQ) withdrew all prior
Salt Lake City and Provo PM2.5 SIP
submissions and submitted a new SIP to
address both the general requirements of
subpart 1 and the PM-specific
requirements of subpart 4 for Moderate
areas.
On August 24, 2016, the EPA
finalized the Fine Particulate Matter
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards: State Implementation Plan
Requirements (‘‘PM2.5 SIP Requirements
Rule’’), 81 FR 58010, which addressed
the January 4, 2013 court ruling. The
final PM2.5 SIP Requirements Rule
provides the EPA’s interpretation of the
requirements applicable to PM2.5 NAAs
and explains how air agencies can meet
the statutory SIP requirements that
apply under subparts 1 and 4 to areas
designated nonattainment for any PM2.5
NAAQS.
B. Reclassification of Salt Lake City and
Provo Nonattainment Area
CAA section 188(b)(2) requires the
EPA to determine whether any PM2.5
NAA classified as ‘‘Moderate’’ attained
the relevant PM2.5 standard by the area’s
attainment date and requires EPA to
make such determination within 6
months after that date.1 The CAA
requires that a Moderate area that has
not attained the standard by the relevant
attainment date be reclassified to
‘‘Serious.’’
On May 10, 2017 (82 FR 21711), the
EPA finalized the determination that the
Salt Lake City and Provo PM2.5 NAAs
failed to attain by the Moderate area
attainment date of December 31, 2015
and were reclassified to Serious PM2.5
NAAs. A Serious PM2.5 NAA is required
to attain the standard as expeditiously
as practicable, but no later than by the
1 An area’s highest design value for the 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS is the highest of the 3-year average
of annual 98th percentile 24-hour average PM2.5
mass concentration values recorded at each eligible
monitoring site (40 CFR part 50, appendix N,
1.0(c)(2)).
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
34674
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 110 / Monday, June 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
end of the tenth year after designation
(December 31, 2019).
II. EPA Evaluation
A. Determination of Attainment by the
Attainment Date
Under CAA section 188(c)(2), the EPA
is required to determine within 6
months of the applicable attainment
date whether a NAA attained the
standard by that date. The 2006 primary
and secondary 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS
are met when the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS
design value at each eligible monitoring
site is less than or equal to 35 mg/m3.
See 40 CFR 50.13 and 40 CFR part 50,
appendix N, section 4.2. For the 24-hour
PM2.5 standards, appendix N defines
eligible monitoring sites as those that
meet the technical requirements in 40
CFR 58.11 and 58.30. Three years of
valid annual PM2.5 98th percentile mass
concentrations are required to produce
a valid 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS design
value. A year meets data completeness
requirements when quarterly data
capture rates for all four quarters are at
least 75%. Nonetheless, where the 75%
data capture requirement is not met, the
24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS design value
shall still be considered valid if it passes
the maximum quarterly value data
substitution test.
In accordance with the EPA
regulations at 40 CFR part 50, appendix
N, a finding of attainment of the 2006
24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS must be based
upon complete, quality-assured data
gathered at established state and local
air monitoring stations (SLAMS) and
national air monitoring stations (NAMS)
in the NAA and entered in AQS. Data
from air monitors operated by state/
local/tribal agencies in compliance with
the EPA monitoring requirements must
be submitted to AQS. Monitoring
agencies annually certify that these data
are accurate to the best of their
knowledge. Accordingly, the EPA relies
primarily on data in AQS when
determining the attainment status of
areas.
A determination that an area attained
by their attainment date is not
equivalent to a redesignation, and the
state must still meet the statutory
requirements for redesignation in order
to be redesignated to attainment.
B. Monitoring Network and Data
Considerations
Determining whether an area has
attained the NAAQS pursuant to CAA
section 188(b)(2) is based on monitored
air quality data. Thus, the validity of a
determination of attainment depends in
part on whether the monitoring network
adequately measures ambient PM2.5
levels in the NAA.
The UDAQ is the governmental
agency with the authority and
responsibility under the State’s laws for
collecting ambient air quality data for
the Salt Lake City and Provo NAAs.
UDAQ submits annual monitoring
network plans (AMNPs) to the EPA.
These plans document the
establishment and maintenance of the
air monitoring network, as required
under 40 CFR part 58. With respect to
PM2.5 monitoring in the Salt Lake City
and Provo NAAs, the EPA has found
that UDAQ’s AMNPs met the applicable
requirements under 40 CFR part 58 for
the relevant period, 2017–2019. Also,
UDAQ annually certifies that the data
they submit to AQS are quality assured.
The UDAQ operated PM2.5 SLAMS
monitors during the 2017–2019 period
within the Salt Lake City and Provo
PM2.5 NAAs. The UDAQ operated five
PM2.5 SLAMS monitors throughout the
2017–2019 period within the Salt Lake
City PM2.5 NAA: Bountiful; Rose Park;
Hawthorn; Herrimam #3; and Erda.2
Additionally, UDAQ operated two PM2.5
SLAMS monitors throughout the 2017–
2019 period within the Provo, UT PM2.5
NAA: Lindon and Spanish Fork.3
On October 27, 2017, March 20, 2019
and April 29, 2020, the EPA approved
Utah’s 2017, 2018 and 2019 AMNPs,
respectively, and on April 10, 2018,
February 1, 2019 and February 24, 2020,
the UDAQ submitted letters to certify
the 2017, 2018 and 2019 air quality
data.
Based on our review, the PM2.5
monitoring network for the Salt Lake
City and Provo, NAAs meets the
requirements stated above and is
therefore adequate for use in
determining whether the areas attained
the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
C. Evaluation of Current Attainment
As discussed above, the EPA’s
evaluation on whether the Salt Lake
City and Provo PM2.5 NAAs have
attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS
are based on our review of the
monitoring data, and takes into account
the adequacy of the PM2.5 monitoring
network in the NAAs and the reliability
of the data collected by the network as
discussed in the previous section of this
document.
The EPA reviewed the PM2.5 ambient
air monitoring data from the Salt Lake
City and Provo, NAA monitors. These
monitoring sites are consistent with the
requirements contained in 40 CFR part
50, as recorded in the EPA AQS
database for the NAAs. For purposes of
determining attainment by the
December 31, 2019 Serious attainment
date, the EPA determined that UDAQ
met the minimum monitoring site
requirements under 40 CFR part 58
where the Provo NAA is required to
have at least two monitors and the Salt
Lake City NAA is required to have at
least three monitors. The design values
for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS for
the years 2017–2019 at the monitors in
the Salt Lake City and Provo NAAs are
less than the standard of 35 mg/m3. See
Table 1 below for the annual 98th
percentiles and 3-year design value for
the 2017–2019 monitoring period. On
the basis of this review, we are
proposing to determine that the Salt
Lake City and Provo NAAs attained the
2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS by the
Serious area attainment date.
TABLE 1—SALT LAKE CITY AND PROVO NAAS 2017–2019 24-HOUR PM2.5 AIR QUALITY DATA
[μg/m3]
98th percentile values
NAA
Monitor site
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
2017
Salt Lake City ......................
Bountiful .............................
Rose Park ..........................
Hawthorn ............................
Herrimam #3 ......................
2 The Salt Lake City, UT NAA had two monitors
shutdown due to the loss of each site and UDAQ
is working to re-establish new sites. These monitors
are Brigham City (49–003–0003), which shutdown
in June 2019, and Ogden 2 (49–057–0002), which
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Jun 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
49–011–0004
49–035–3010
49–035–3006
49–035–3013
2018
35.2
32.4
35.7
28.2
shutdown in May 2019. A new site for Ogden 2 was
established in Weber County (Harrisville, 49–057–
1003) in September 2019. UDAQ is still working
with Box Elder County on new potential sites.
PO 00000
2017–2019
design value
Monitor ID
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2019
25.7
29.2
26.2
29.0
19.3
27.9
27.3
18.8
27
30
30
25
3 The Provo, UT NAA had one monitor (North
Provo, 49–049–0002) shutdown the end of 2018 due
to safety issues at the site and UDAQ is working to
re-establish a new site.
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
34675
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 110 / Monday, June 8, 2020 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—SALT LAKE CITY AND PROVO NAAS 2017–2019 24-HOUR PM2.5 AIR QUALITY DATA—Continued
[μg/m3]
98th percentile values
NAA
Monitor site
2017
Provo ...................................
Erda ....................................
Lindon .................................
Spanish Fork ......................
III. Proposed Action
Pursuant to CAA section 188(c)(2), the
EPA is proposing to determine, based on
the most recent 3 years (2017–2019) of
valid data,4 that the Salt Lake City and
Provo NAAs have attained the 2006
primary and secondary 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS by the December 31, 2019
attainment date.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action proposes to make a
determination of attainment based on
air quality and thus would not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
4 Meeting the requirements of 40 CFR part 50,
appendix N, and 40 CFR part 58.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Jun 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
2017–2019
design value
Monitor ID
49–045–0004
49–049–4001
49–049–5010
2018
20.9
27.6
27.6
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the proposed rule does
not apply on any Indian reservation
land or in any other area where EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the proposed rule does
not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Greenhouse gases, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 29, 2020.
Gregory Sopkin,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2020–12074 Filed 6–5–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2020–0170; FRL–10010–
10–Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; Alabama: Air
Quality Control, VOC Definition
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2019
30.6
49.6
49.6
22.9
17.5
17.5
25
32
32
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of
Alabama, through the Alabama
Department of Environmental
Management (ADEM) on February 27,
2020. The revision modifies the State’s
air quality regulations as incorporated
into the SIP by changing the definition
of ‘‘volatile organic compounds’’ (VOC)
to be consistent with federal regulations.
EPA is proposing to approve this SIP
revision because the State has
demonstrated that these changes are
consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA
or Act).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 8, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2020–0170 at
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah LaRocca, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 110 (Monday, June 8, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34673-34675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-12074]
[[Page 34673]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R08-OAR-2020-0002; FRL-10009-92-Region 8]
Determination of Attainment by the Attainment Date for the Salt
Lake City, Utah and Provo, Utah 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing a
determination of attainment by the attainment date for the 2006 24-hour
fine particulate matter (PM2.5) Salt Lake City, Utah (Salt
Lake City) and Provo, Utah (Provo) Serious nonattainment areas (NAAs).
The determination is based upon quality-assured, quality-controlled and
certified ambient air monitoring data showing that the area has
attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) based on the 2017-2019 data available in the EPA's
Air Quality System (AQS) database.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before July 8, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
OAR-2020-0002, to the Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
www.regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available electronically in
www.regulations.gov. To reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission, for
this action we do not plan to offer hard copy review of the docket.
Please email or call the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section if you need to make alternative arrangements for access
to the docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Crystal Ostigaard, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode 8ARD-QP, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6602, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.
I. Background
A. Designation and Classification of PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas
On October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61144), the EPA revised the level of the
24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS, lowering the primary and secondary
standards from the 1997 standard of 65 micrograms per cubic meter
([micro]g/m\3\) to 35 [micro]g/m\3\. The EPA retained the form of the
1997 24-hour standard, that is, the 98th percentile of the annual 24-
hour concentrations at each population-oriented monitor within an area,
averaged over 3 years. See 71 FR 61164-5 (October 17, 2006).
On November 13, 2009 (74 FR 58688), the EPA designated a number of
areas as nonattainment for the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS of 35
[micro]g/m\3\, including the Salt Lake City and Provo NAAs. The EPA
originally designated these areas under the general provisions of Clean
Air Act (CAA) title I, part D, subpart 1 (``subpart 1''), under which
attainment plans must provide for the attainment of a specific NAAQS
(in this case, the 2006 PM2.5 standards) as expeditiously as
practicable, but no later than 5 years from the date the areas were
designated nonattainment.
Subsequently, on January 4, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit held in NRDC v. EPA that the EPA should
have implemented the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard based on
both the general NAA requirements in subpart 1 and the PM-specific
requirements of CAA title I, part D, subpart 4 (``subpart 4''). In
response to the Court's decision in NRDC v. EPA, on June 2, 2014 (79 FR
31566), the EPA finalized the ``Identification of Nonattainment
Classification and Deadlines for Submission of State Implementation
Plan (SIP) Provisions for the 1997 Fine Particulate (PM2.5)
NAAQS and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.'' This rule classified the areas
that were designated in 2009 as nonattainment to Moderate and set the
attainment SIP submittal due date for those areas at December 31, 2014.
After the court's decision, on December 16, 2014, the Utah Division
of Air Quality (UDAQ) withdrew all prior Salt Lake City and Provo
PM2.5 SIP submissions and submitted a new SIP to address
both the general requirements of subpart 1 and the PM-specific
requirements of subpart 4 for Moderate areas.
On August 24, 2016, the EPA finalized the Fine Particulate Matter
National Ambient Air Quality Standards: State Implementation Plan
Requirements (``PM2.5 SIP Requirements Rule''), 81 FR 58010,
which addressed the January 4, 2013 court ruling. The final
PM2.5 SIP Requirements Rule provides the EPA's
interpretation of the requirements applicable to PM2.5 NAAs
and explains how air agencies can meet the statutory SIP requirements
that apply under subparts 1 and 4 to areas designated nonattainment for
any PM2.5 NAAQS.
B. Reclassification of Salt Lake City and Provo Nonattainment Area
CAA section 188(b)(2) requires the EPA to determine whether any
PM2.5 NAA classified as ``Moderate'' attained the relevant
PM2.5 standard by the area's attainment date and requires
EPA to make such determination within 6 months after that date.\1\ The
CAA requires that a Moderate area that has not attained the standard by
the relevant attainment date be reclassified to ``Serious.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ An area's highest design value for the 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS is the highest of the 3-year average of
annual 98th percentile 24-hour average PM2.5 mass
concentration values recorded at each eligible monitoring site (40
CFR part 50, appendix N, 1.0(c)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 10, 2017 (82 FR 21711), the EPA finalized the determination
that the Salt Lake City and Provo PM2.5 NAAs failed to
attain by the Moderate area attainment date of December 31, 2015 and
were reclassified to Serious PM2.5 NAAs. A Serious
PM2.5 NAA is required to attain the standard as
expeditiously as practicable, but no later than by the
[[Page 34674]]
end of the tenth year after designation (December 31, 2019).
II. EPA Evaluation
A. Determination of Attainment by the Attainment Date
Under CAA section 188(c)(2), the EPA is required to determine
within 6 months of the applicable attainment date whether a NAA
attained the standard by that date. The 2006 primary and secondary 24-
hour PM2.5 NAAQS are met when the 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS design value at each eligible monitoring site is less than or
equal to 35 [micro]g/m\3\. See 40 CFR 50.13 and 40 CFR part 50,
appendix N, section 4.2. For the 24-hour PM2.5 standards,
appendix N defines eligible monitoring sites as those that meet the
technical requirements in 40 CFR 58.11 and 58.30. Three years of valid
annual PM2.5 98th percentile mass concentrations are
required to produce a valid 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS design
value. A year meets data completeness requirements when quarterly data
capture rates for all four quarters are at least 75%. Nonetheless,
where the 75% data capture requirement is not met, the 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS design value shall still be considered valid if
it passes the maximum quarterly value data substitution test.
In accordance with the EPA regulations at 40 CFR part 50, appendix
N, a finding of attainment of the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS
must be based upon complete, quality-assured data gathered at
established state and local air monitoring stations (SLAMS) and
national air monitoring stations (NAMS) in the NAA and entered in AQS.
Data from air monitors operated by state/local/tribal agencies in
compliance with the EPA monitoring requirements must be submitted to
AQS. Monitoring agencies annually certify that these data are accurate
to the best of their knowledge. Accordingly, the EPA relies primarily
on data in AQS when determining the attainment status of areas.
A determination that an area attained by their attainment date is
not equivalent to a redesignation, and the state must still meet the
statutory requirements for redesignation in order to be redesignated to
attainment.
B. Monitoring Network and Data Considerations
Determining whether an area has attained the NAAQS pursuant to CAA
section 188(b)(2) is based on monitored air quality data. Thus, the
validity of a determination of attainment depends in part on whether
the monitoring network adequately measures ambient PM2.5
levels in the NAA.
The UDAQ is the governmental agency with the authority and
responsibility under the State's laws for collecting ambient air
quality data for the Salt Lake City and Provo NAAs. UDAQ submits annual
monitoring network plans (AMNPs) to the EPA. These plans document the
establishment and maintenance of the air monitoring network, as
required under 40 CFR part 58. With respect to PM2.5
monitoring in the Salt Lake City and Provo NAAs, the EPA has found that
UDAQ's AMNPs met the applicable requirements under 40 CFR part 58 for
the relevant period, 2017-2019. Also, UDAQ annually certifies that the
data they submit to AQS are quality assured.
The UDAQ operated PM2.5 SLAMS monitors during the 2017-
2019 period within the Salt Lake City and Provo PM2.5 NAAs.
The UDAQ operated five PM2.5 SLAMS monitors throughout the
2017-2019 period within the Salt Lake City PM2.5 NAA:
Bountiful; Rose Park; Hawthorn; Herrimam #3; and Erda.\2\ Additionally,
UDAQ operated two PM2.5 SLAMS monitors throughout the 2017-
2019 period within the Provo, UT PM2.5 NAA: Lindon and
Spanish Fork.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Salt Lake City, UT NAA had two monitors shutdown due to
the loss of each site and UDAQ is working to re-establish new sites.
These monitors are Brigham City (49-003-0003), which shutdown in
June 2019, and Ogden 2 (49-057-0002), which shutdown in May 2019. A
new site for Ogden 2 was established in Weber County (Harrisville,
49-057-1003) in September 2019. UDAQ is still working with Box Elder
County on new potential sites.
\3\ The Provo, UT NAA had one monitor (North Provo, 49-049-0002)
shutdown the end of 2018 due to safety issues at the site and UDAQ
is working to re-establish a new site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On October 27, 2017, March 20, 2019 and April 29, 2020, the EPA
approved Utah's 2017, 2018 and 2019 AMNPs, respectively, and on April
10, 2018, February 1, 2019 and February 24, 2020, the UDAQ submitted
letters to certify the 2017, 2018 and 2019 air quality data.
Based on our review, the PM2.5 monitoring network for
the Salt Lake City and Provo, NAAs meets the requirements stated above
and is therefore adequate for use in determining whether the areas
attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
C. Evaluation of Current Attainment
As discussed above, the EPA's evaluation on whether the Salt Lake
City and Provo PM2.5 NAAs have attained the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS are based on our review of the monitoring data,
and takes into account the adequacy of the PM2.5 monitoring
network in the NAAs and the reliability of the data collected by the
network as discussed in the previous section of this document.
The EPA reviewed the PM2.5 ambient air monitoring data
from the Salt Lake City and Provo, NAA monitors. These monitoring sites
are consistent with the requirements contained in 40 CFR part 50, as
recorded in the EPA AQS database for the NAAs. For purposes of
determining attainment by the December 31, 2019 Serious attainment
date, the EPA determined that UDAQ met the minimum monitoring site
requirements under 40 CFR part 58 where the Provo NAA is required to
have at least two monitors and the Salt Lake City NAA is required to
have at least three monitors. The design values for the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS for the years 2017-2019 at the monitors in the
Salt Lake City and Provo NAAs are less than the standard of 35
[micro]g/m\3\. See Table 1 below for the annual 98th percentiles and 3-
year design value for the 2017-2019 monitoring period. On the basis of
this review, we are proposing to determine that the Salt Lake City and
Provo NAAs attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS by the
Serious area attainment date.
Table 1--Salt Lake City and Provo NAAs 2017-2019 24-Hour PM Air Quality Data
[[micro]g/m\3\]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
98th percentile values
NAA Monitor site Monitor ID ------------------------------------------------ 2017-2019
2017 2018 2019 design value
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Salt Lake City............................ Bountiful................... 49-011-0004 35.2 25.7 19.3 27
Rose Park................... 49-035-3010 32.4 29.2 27.9 30
Hawthorn.................... 49-035-3006 35.7 26.2 27.3 30
Herrimam #3................. 49-035-3013 28.2 29.0 18.8 25
[[Page 34675]]
Erda........................ 49-045-0004 20.9 30.6 22.9 25
Provo..................................... Lindon...................... 49-049-4001 27.6 49.6 17.5 32
Spanish Fork................ 49-049-5010 27.6 49.6 17.5 32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Proposed Action
Pursuant to CAA section 188(c)(2), the EPA is proposing to
determine, based on the most recent 3 years (2017-2019) of valid
data,\4\ that the Salt Lake City and Provo NAAs have attained the 2006
primary and secondary 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS by the December
31, 2019 attainment date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Meeting the requirements of 40 CFR part 50, appendix N, and
40 CFR part 58.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action proposes to make a determination of attainment based on
air quality and thus would not impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the proposed rule does not apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will
not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Greenhouse gases, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental
relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic
compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 29, 2020.
Gregory Sopkin,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2020-12074 Filed 6-5-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P