Central Arizona Project, Arizona; Water Allocations, 34232-34234 [2020-11906]
Download as PDF
34232
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 107 / Wednesday, June 3, 2020 / Notices
between the Native American human
remains and the Buena Vista Rancheria
of Me-Wuk Indians of California; Cachil
DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the
Colusa Indian Community of the Colusa
Rancheria, California; California Valley
Miwok Tribe, California; Chicken Ranch
Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of
California; Ione Band of Miwok Indians
of California; Jackson Band of Miwuk
Indians (previously listed as Jackson
Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of
California); Kletsel Dehe Band of
Wintun Indians (previously listed as
Cortina Indian Rancheria and the
Cortina Indian Rancheria of Wintun
Indians of California); Picayune
Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians of
California; Santa Rosa Indian
Community of the Santa Rosa
Rancheria, California; Shingle Springs
Band of Miwok Indians, Shingle Springs
Rancheria (Verona Tract), California;
Susanville Indian Rancheria, California;
Table Mountain Rancheria (previously
listed as Table Mountain Rancheria of
California); Tejon Indian Tribe; Tule
River Indian Tribe of the Tule River
Reservation, California; Tuolumne Band
of Me-Wuk Indians of the Tuolumne
Rancheria of California; United Auburn
Indian Community of the Auburn
Rancheria of California; Wilton
Rancheria, California; Wiyot Tribe,
California (previously listed as Table
Bluff Reservation—Wiyot Tribe); and
the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation,
California (previously listed as Rumsey
Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians of
California) (hereafter referred to as ‘‘The
Affiliated Tribes’’).
Additional Requestors and Disposition
Lineal descendants or representatives
of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian
organization not identified in this notice
that wish to request transfer of control
of these human remains should submit
a written request with information in
support of the request to Dorothy
Dechant, University of the Pacific,
Dugoni School of Dentistry, 155 Fifth
Street, San Francisco, CA 94103–2919,
telephone (415) 929–6627, email
ddechant@pacific.edu, by July 6, 2020.
After that date, if no additional
requestors have come forward, transfer
of control of the human remains to The
Affiliated Tribes may proceed. If joined
to a request from one or more of The
Affiliated Tribes, the following nonfederally recognized Indian groups may
receive transfer of control of the human
remains: the Colfax-Todds Valley
Consolidate Tribe; Miwok Tribe of El
Dorado Rancheria; Nashville Enterprise
Miwok-Maidu-Nishinam Tribe; and Tsi
Akim Maidu.
The University of the Pacific, Dugoni
School of Dentistry is responsible for
notifying The Consulted Tribes and
Groups and The Affiliated Tribes that
this notice has been published.
Dated: April 23, 2020.
Melanie O’Brien,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2020–11964 Filed 6–2–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
[RR03240000, XXXR4079G1,
RX.03441994.0209100]
Office of the Secretary, Interior.
Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Interior (Department) is proposing to
reallocate non-Indian agricultural (NIA)
priority Central Arizona Project (CAP)
water in accordance with the Arizona
Department of Water Resources’
(ADWR) recommendation for
reallocation, as provided by ADWR’s
SUMMARY:
Submit comments on or before
July 6, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments
concerning the proposed decision to Ms.
Leslie Meyers, Area Manager, Phoenix
Area Office, Bureau of Reclamation,
6150 West Thunderbird Road, Glendale,
AZ 85306–4001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Leslie Meyers, Bureau of Reclamation,
Phoenix Area Office, 6150 West
Thunderbird Road, Glendale, AZ
85306–4001; telephone 623–773–6211;
facsimile 623–773–6480; email
lmeyers@usbr.gov. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
may call the Federal Relay Service (Fed
Relay) at 1–800–877–8339 TTY/ASCII to
contact the above individual during
normal business hours or to leave a
message or question after hours. You
will receive a reply during normal
business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Proposed Decision
Central Arizona Project, Arizona; Water
Allocations
ACTION:
letter dated January 16, 2014, to the
Department. The Department is
requesting public comments on the
proposed decision. If the proposed
decision is implemented, the
Department would offer to enter into a
subcontract with the entities listed in
the table below, as recommended by
ADWR.
The Department is publishing this
proposed decision of the reallocation of
NIA priority CAP water in accordance
with the Arizona Water Settlements Act
(Settlements Act) (Pub. L. 108–451, 118
Stat. 3478), and the Secretary of the
Interior’s (Secretary) Final Decision of
CAP Water Reallocation (71 FR 50449,
August 25, 2006). The following table
lists the entities recommended by
ADWR to receive NIA priority CAP
water and the quantities proposed to be
reallocated to each.
ADWR RECOMMENDATION FOR REALLOCATION OF NIA PRIORITY CAP WATER
Municipal pool
Industrial pool
Amount in
acre-feet per
year
lotter on DSK9F5VC42PROD with NOTICES
State of Arizona entity
Carefree Water Company ............................................
Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District .....
Town of Cave Creek ....................................................
EPCOR—Sun City West ..............................................
Town of Queen Creek (Acquired H2O Water Company).
Town of Marana ...........................................................
Apache Junction Water Utilities Community Facilities
District.
City of El Mirage ...........................................................
Town of Gilbert .............................................................
City of Buckeye (Formerly was Town of Buckeye) ......
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Jun 02, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
State of Arizona entity
Amount in
acre-feet per
year
112
299
386
1,000
4,162
Viewpoint RV and Golf Resort .....................................
New Harquahala Generating Company .......................
Rosemont Copper Company ........................................
Salt River Project ..........................................................
Resolution Copper Mining ............................................
400
400
1,124
2,160
2,238
515
817
Freeport-McMoRan-Sierrita Inc ....................................
.......................................................................................
5,678
........................
1,318
1,832
2,786
.......................................................................................
.......................................................................................
.......................................................................................
........................
........................
........................
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 107 / Wednesday, June 3, 2020 / Notices
34233
ADWR RECOMMENDATION FOR REALLOCATION OF NIA PRIORITY CAP WATER—Continued
Municipal pool
Industrial pool
Amount in
acre-feet per
year
State of Arizona entity
State of Arizona entity
Amount in
acre-feet per
year
3,217
18,185
34,629
.......................................................................................
.......................................................................................
Total NIA Priority CAP Water Reallocated to Industrial
........................
........................
12,000
........................
.......................................................................................
46,629
Johnson Utilities ...........................................................
Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District
Total NIA Priority CAP Water Reallocated to Municipal.
Total NIA Priority CAP Water To Be Reallocated
Previous Notices Related to CAP Water
Previous notices related to CAP water
were published in the Federal Register
at 37 FR 28082, December 20, 1972; 40
FR 17297, April 18, 1975; 41 FR 45883,
October 18, 1976; 45 FR 52938, August
8, 1980; 45 FR 81265, December 10,
1980; 48 FR 12446, March 24, 1983; 56
FR 28404, June 20, 1991; 56 FR 29704,
June 28, 1991; 57 FR 4470, February 5,
1992; 57 FR 48388, October 23, 1992; 65
FR 39177, June 23, 2000; 65 FR 43037,
July 12, 2000; 67 FR 38514, June 4,
2002; 68 FR 36578, June 18, 2003; 69 FR
9378, February 27, 2004; and, 71 FR
50449, August 25, 2006. These notices
and decisions were made pursuant to
the authority vested in the Secretary by
the Reclamation Act of 1902, as
amended and supplemented (32 Stat.
388, 43 U.S.C. 391), the Boulder Canyon
Project Act of December 21, 1928 (45
Stat. 1057, 43 U.S.C. 617), the Colorado
River Basin Project Act of September 30,
1968 (82 Stat. 885, 43 U.S.C. 1501), the
Settlements Act, and in recognition of
the Secretary’s trust responsibility to
Indian tribes.
lotter on DSK9F5VC42PROD with NOTICES
Background of CAP Water Allocations
In a Record of Decision (ROD)
published on March 24, 1983 (48 FR
12446), the Secretary, among other
actions, superseded and replaced the
1980 ROD (45 FR 81265, December 10,
1980), reiterated the allocations to
Indian tribes reflected in that 1980 ROD,
allocated CAP water for non-Indian
municipal and industrial (M&I) uses,
and allocated the remaining amount for
NIA uses. Subject to certain conditions,
the CAP water for Indian uses was
allocated to 12 Indian tribes for
irrigation use or for maintaining tribal
homelands. Also subject to certain
conditions, the CAP water for M&I uses
was allocated based on the State of
Arizona’s 1982 allocation
recommendations for non-Indian
entities that provided an amount of CAP
water for M&I use to certain non-Indian
entities, with the remaining amount of
CAP water allocated for NIA use. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Jun 02, 2020
Jkt 250001
CAP NIA water was allocated to 23 nonIndian irrigation districts or other
agricultural entities as a percentage of
the NIA water supply that was available
in any given year.
Two-party CAP water service
contracts were executed between the
United States and individual Indian
tribes in 1980 pursuant to the 1980
ROD. CAP non-Indian M&I water
service subcontracts and CAP NIA water
service subcontracts were executed with
those entities desiring to enter into
subcontracts for CAP water. The CAP
water service subcontracts for the nonIndian M&I water and the NIA water are
three-party subcontracts among the
entity, the Central Arizona Water
Conservation District (CAWCD), and the
Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation).
Some of the entities that were allocated
NIA water and M&I priority water
elected not to contract for the offered
allocations. After completing the initial
subcontracting process, 29.3 percent of
the NIA water supply and 65,647 acrefeet of M&I water was not under
contract.
Congress enacted the Salt River PimaMaricopa Indian Community Water
Rights Settlement Act of 1988 (102 Stat.
2558) (SRPMIC Act). Pursuant to section
11(h) of the SRPMIC Act, the Secretary
was required to request a reallocation
recommendation from ADWR for the
remaining NIA water that was not under
contract. The Secretary was also
required to reallocate the uncontracted
CAP water for NIA use and to offer new
or amendatory subcontracts for such
water.
By letter dated January 7, 1991,
ADWR recommended an allocation to
the Secretary. The Secretary published a
notice on June 20, 1991 (56 FR 28404),
inviting public comments on the
proposed reallocation of CAP water.
After considering the public comments,
the Secretary published a final decision
on February 5, 1992 (57 FR 4470). That
decision contemplated that new or
amendatory CAP water service
subcontracts would be offered soon
thereafter.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CAP water service subcontracts for
the reallocated water were not executed
for several reasons, including but not
limited to the following: (1) Some
entities could not meet the financial
feasibility requirements for receipt of
CAP water; (2) lack of agreement on the
form of the CAP water service
subcontract, and (3) financial
difficulties in the CAP NIA sector.
Beginning in the early 1990s, longterm utilization of the CAP water
available for reallocation under the 1992
decision and of the uncontracted CAP
M&I priority water was a central issue
in negotiations to resolve various
operational and financial disputes
between Reclamation and CAWCD.
After attempts at negotiations failed,
water contracting issues were included
in litigation and the resulting stipulated
settlement between the United States
and CAWCD. To implement some of the
conditions contained in the stipulated
settlement, new Federal legislation was
required.
After the 1992 decision but before
Federal legislation was enacted, the
Secretary published on June 4, 2002 (67
FR 38514), a notice of proposed
modification to the 1983 decision. The
1983 decision provided that the M&I
allocation can be made more firm by
execution of feasible non-potable
effluent exchanges with Indian tribes
and the M&I allocation was subject to
adoption of a pooling concept, whereby
all M&I entities share in the benefits of
effluent exchanges. The pooling concept
provision was included in the CAP M&I
water service subcontracts. The 2002
proposed modification to the 1983
decision was to delete the mandatory
effluent pooling provision in M&I
subcontracts with the cities of Chandler
and Mesa, and from other M&I water
service subcontracts upon request. That
provision in the CAP M&I water service
subcontracts was an impediment to
effluent exchanges and effective water
management in central Arizona. After
review and consideration of the public
comments, the final decision was
published on June 18, 2003 (68 FR
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
lotter on DSK9F5VC42PROD with NOTICES
34234
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 107 / Wednesday, June 3, 2020 / Notices
36578), deleting the mandatory effluent
pooling provision.
The Settlements Act was enacted on
December 10, 2004, and provides,
among other things, for: (1) A final
allocation of CAP water, with a CAP
supply permanently designated for
Indian uses and a CAP supply
designated for non-Indian M&I or NIA
uses; (2) a reallocation by the Secretary
of 65,647 acre-feet of currently
uncontracted CAP M&I water to 20
specific M&I entities; (3) ratification of
the Arizona Water Settlement
Agreement (the ‘‘Master Agreement’’)
among the United States, ADWR, and
CAWCD, which provides a statutorybased framework to enable the CAP NIA
districts to relinquish existing rights to
the delivery of CAP NIA priority water
under their CAP water service
subcontracts, including their rights, if
any, to the reallocated water; and, (4) a
reallocation of the relinquished and
uncontracted NIA water supply to
various Arizona Indian tribes and
ADWR for future M&I use.
On August 25, 2006, the Secretary
published a final reallocation decision
(71 FR 50449) that, among other things,
reallocated the CAP NIA water and the
uncontracted CAP M&I water. The
August 2006 reallocation decision is
summarized below:
The Secretary’s decision reallocated
up to 96,295 acre-feet of agricultural
priority water per year to ADWR,
pursuant to section 104(a)(2)(A) of the
Settlements Act and subject to
subparagraph 9.3 of the Master
Agreement, to be held under contract in
trust for further allocation pursuant to
section 104(a)(2)(C) of the Settlements
Act. Direct use of the agricultural
priority water by ADWR is prohibited
under the Master Agreement and this
notice.
In accordance with section
104(a)(2)(C) of the Settlements Act,
before water may be further allocated
the Director of ADWR shall submit to
the Secretary of the Interior a
recommendation for reallocation. After
receiving the recommendation, the
Secretary shall carry out all of the
necessary reviews for the proposed
reallocation in accordance with
applicable Federal law. If the Director’s
recommendation is rejected, the
Secretary shall request a revised
recommendation from the Director of
ADWR and proceed with any reviews
required.
The reallocation of agricultural
priority water to ADWR pursuant to
section 104(a)(2)(A) and section
104(a)(2)(C) of the Settlements Act is
subject to the Master Agreement,
including certain rights provided by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Jun 02, 2020
Jkt 250001
Master Agreement to water users in
Pinal County, Arizona. The agricultural
priority water reallocated to the ADWR
shall be subject to the condition that the
water retain its non-Indian agricultural
delivery priority.
As required in Section
104(a)(2)(C)(i)(I) of the Settlements Act
and the August 25, 2006 final
reallocation decision, ADWR submitted
to the Secretary a recommendation for
reallocation of agricultural priority
water. This recommendation was
transmitted by letter dated January 16,
2014, and ADWR requested the
Secretary carry out all of the necessary
reviews of the proposed reallocation in
accordance with applicable Federal law.
Reclamation prepared an
Environmental Assessment (EA) in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended, and pursuant to
Section 104 of the Settlements Act.
Public scoping was initiated on
November 30, 2015, with a newsletter
that was sent to interested parties and
published on Reclamation’s website.
Scoping comments were accepted via
facsimile, email, U.S. mail, and inperson at the scoping meetings, which
were held on December 8–10, 2015, in
Phoenix, Casa Grande, and Tucson,
Arizona, respectively. Reclamation
received two public responses during
this initial scoping period, one of which
resulted in Reclamation honoring a
request for a comment period extension
to January 18, 2016.
In June 2016, Reclamation mailed
Notices of Availability (NOA) of the
Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) to
Federal, state, and local agencies, Indian
tribes, organizations, proposed
recipients, and other interested
stakeholders. A public meeting was held
on June 22, 2016, in Casa Grande,
Arizona, and the commenting period
closed on July 22, 2016. Reclamation
conducted in-person consultation with
the Tohono O’odham Nation on
February 17, 2017, and with the San
Carlos Apache Tribe on June 16, 2017.
The draft EA was revised in response to
the comments received. A NOA for the
Final Environmental Assessment—
Arizona Department of Water Resources
Recommendation for the Reallocation of
Non-Indian Agricultural Priority Central
Arizona Project Water in Accordance
with the Arizona Water Settlements Act
of 2004 was issued on November 15,
2019, and the Final Finding of No
Significant Impact—Arizona
Department of Water Resources
Recommendation for the Reallocation of
Non-Indian Agricultural Priority Central
Arizona Project Water in Accordance
with the Arizona Water Settlements Act
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
of 2004 was signed on November 8,
2019.
Rationale for Proposed Decision
The Department is proposing to
allocate CAP NIA water in accordance
with ADWR’s recommendation. The
ADWR recommendation covered the
initial phase, reallocating 46,629 acrefeet per year of NIA priority CAP water
of the 96,295 acre-feet per year to be
reallocated, as shown in the table above.
The total of 46,629 acre-feet per year of
CAP NIA priority water in this phase is
in two pools: (1) A municipal pool of
34,629 acre-feet for M&I water providers
within the CAP service area and the
Central Arizona Groundwater
Replenishment District, and (2) an
industrial pool of 12,000 acre-feet for
industrial water users within the CAP
service area. The rationale for the
proposed decision is based on the
following:
(1) ADWR’s extensive public
outreach, in consultation with
Reclamation, to interested parties
regarding its recommendation.
(2) An EA evaluating impacts of the
proposed reallocation, in accordance
with NEPA, and the resulting FONSI.
The Final EA and FONSI can be
found on Reclamation’s website at:
https://www.usbr.gov/lc/phoenix/
reports/reports.html.
Request for Public Comments
We request public comments on the
proposed reallocation prior to the
Department making a final decision.
Our practice is to make comments,
including names and home addresses of
respondents, available for public
review. Individual respondents may
request that we withhold their home
address from public disclosure, which
we will honor to the extent allowable by
law. There also may be circumstances in
which we would withhold a
respondent’s identity from public
disclosure, as allowable by law. If you
wish for us to withhold your name and/
or address, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comment. We will make all submissions
from organizations or businesses, and
from individuals identifying themselves
as representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public disclosure in their entirety.
Timothy R. Petty,
Assistant Secretary for Water and Science.
[FR Doc. 2020–11906 Filed 6–2–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332–90–P
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 107 (Wednesday, June 3, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34232-34234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11906]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
[RR03240000, XXXR4079G1, RX.03441994.0209100]
Central Arizona Project, Arizona; Water Allocations
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior (Department) is proposing to
reallocate non-Indian agricultural (NIA) priority Central Arizona
Project (CAP) water in accordance with the Arizona Department of Water
Resources' (ADWR) recommendation for reallocation, as provided by
ADWR's letter dated January 16, 2014, to the Department. The Department
is requesting public comments on the proposed decision. If the proposed
decision is implemented, the Department would offer to enter into a
subcontract with the entities listed in the table below, as recommended
by ADWR.
DATES: Submit comments on or before July 6, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments concerning the proposed decision to
Ms. Leslie Meyers, Area Manager, Phoenix Area Office, Bureau of
Reclamation, 6150 West Thunderbird Road, Glendale, AZ 85306-4001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Leslie Meyers, Bureau of
Reclamation, Phoenix Area Office, 6150 West Thunderbird Road, Glendale,
AZ 85306-4001; telephone 623-773-6211; facsimile 623-773-6480; email
[email protected]. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the
deaf may call the Federal Relay Service (Fed Relay) at 1-800-877-8339
TTY/ASCII to contact the above individual during normal business hours
or to leave a message or question after hours. You will receive a reply
during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Decision
The Department is publishing this proposed decision of the
reallocation of NIA priority CAP water in accordance with the Arizona
Water Settlements Act (Settlements Act) (Pub. L. 108-451, 118 Stat.
3478), and the Secretary of the Interior's (Secretary) Final Decision
of CAP Water Reallocation (71 FR 50449, August 25, 2006). The following
table lists the entities recommended by ADWR to receive NIA priority
CAP water and the quantities proposed to be reallocated to each.
ADWR Recommendation for Reallocation of NIA Priority CAP Water
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Municipal pool Industrial pool
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amount in acre- Amount in acre-
State of Arizona entity feet per year State of Arizona entity feet per year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carefree Water Company..................... 112 Viewpoint RV and Golf Resort....... 400
Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement 299 New Harquahala Generating Company.. 400
District.
Town of Cave Creek......................... 386 Rosemont Copper Company............ 1,124
EPCOR--Sun City West....................... 1,000 Salt River Project................. 2,160
Town of Queen Creek (Acquired H2O Water 4,162 Resolution Copper Mining........... 2,238
Company).
Town of Marana............................. 515 Freeport-McMoRan-Sierrita Inc...... 5,678
Apache Junction Water Utilities Community 817 ................................... ..............
Facilities District.
City of El Mirage.......................... 1,318 ................................... ..............
Town of Gilbert............................ 1,832 ................................... ..............
City of Buckeye (Formerly was Town of 2,786 ................................... ..............
Buckeye).
[[Page 34233]]
Johnson Utilities.......................... 3,217 ................................... ..............
Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment 18,185 ................................... ..............
District.
Total NIA Priority CAP Water Reallocated to 34,629 Total NIA Priority CAP Water 12,000
Municipal. Reallocated to Industrial.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Total NIA Priority CAP Water To Be .............. ................................... 46,629
Reallocated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Previous Notices Related to CAP Water
Previous notices related to CAP water were published in the Federal
Register at 37 FR 28082, December 20, 1972; 40 FR 17297, April 18,
1975; 41 FR 45883, October 18, 1976; 45 FR 52938, August 8, 1980; 45 FR
81265, December 10, 1980; 48 FR 12446, March 24, 1983; 56 FR 28404,
June 20, 1991; 56 FR 29704, June 28, 1991; 57 FR 4470, February 5,
1992; 57 FR 48388, October 23, 1992; 65 FR 39177, June 23, 2000; 65 FR
43037, July 12, 2000; 67 FR 38514, June 4, 2002; 68 FR 36578, June 18,
2003; 69 FR 9378, February 27, 2004; and, 71 FR 50449, August 25, 2006.
These notices and decisions were made pursuant to the authority vested
in the Secretary by the Reclamation Act of 1902, as amended and
supplemented (32 Stat. 388, 43 U.S.C. 391), the Boulder Canyon Project
Act of December 21, 1928 (45 Stat. 1057, 43 U.S.C. 617), the Colorado
River Basin Project Act of September 30, 1968 (82 Stat. 885, 43 U.S.C.
1501), the Settlements Act, and in recognition of the Secretary's trust
responsibility to Indian tribes.
Background of CAP Water Allocations
In a Record of Decision (ROD) published on March 24, 1983 (48 FR
12446), the Secretary, among other actions, superseded and replaced the
1980 ROD (45 FR 81265, December 10, 1980), reiterated the allocations
to Indian tribes reflected in that 1980 ROD, allocated CAP water for
non-Indian municipal and industrial (M&I) uses, and allocated the
remaining amount for NIA uses. Subject to certain conditions, the CAP
water for Indian uses was allocated to 12 Indian tribes for irrigation
use or for maintaining tribal homelands. Also subject to certain
conditions, the CAP water for M&I uses was allocated based on the State
of Arizona's 1982 allocation recommendations for non-Indian entities
that provided an amount of CAP water for M&I use to certain non-Indian
entities, with the remaining amount of CAP water allocated for NIA use.
The CAP NIA water was allocated to 23 non-Indian irrigation districts
or other agricultural entities as a percentage of the NIA water supply
that was available in any given year.
Two-party CAP water service contracts were executed between the
United States and individual Indian tribes in 1980 pursuant to the 1980
ROD. CAP non-Indian M&I water service subcontracts and CAP NIA water
service subcontracts were executed with those entities desiring to
enter into subcontracts for CAP water. The CAP water service
subcontracts for the non-Indian M&I water and the NIA water are three-
party subcontracts among the entity, the Central Arizona Water
Conservation District (CAWCD), and the Bureau of Reclamation
(Reclamation). Some of the entities that were allocated NIA water and
M&I priority water elected not to contract for the offered allocations.
After completing the initial subcontracting process, 29.3 percent of
the NIA water supply and 65,647 acre-feet of M&I water was not under
contract.
Congress enacted the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community
Water Rights Settlement Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 2558) (SRPMIC Act).
Pursuant to section 11(h) of the SRPMIC Act, the Secretary was required
to request a reallocation recommendation from ADWR for the remaining
NIA water that was not under contract. The Secretary was also required
to reallocate the uncontracted CAP water for NIA use and to offer new
or amendatory subcontracts for such water.
By letter dated January 7, 1991, ADWR recommended an allocation to
the Secretary. The Secretary published a notice on June 20, 1991 (56 FR
28404), inviting public comments on the proposed reallocation of CAP
water. After considering the public comments, the Secretary published a
final decision on February 5, 1992 (57 FR 4470). That decision
contemplated that new or amendatory CAP water service subcontracts
would be offered soon thereafter.
CAP water service subcontracts for the reallocated water were not
executed for several reasons, including but not limited to the
following: (1) Some entities could not meet the financial feasibility
requirements for receipt of CAP water; (2) lack of agreement on the
form of the CAP water service subcontract, and (3) financial
difficulties in the CAP NIA sector.
Beginning in the early 1990s, long-term utilization of the CAP
water available for reallocation under the 1992 decision and of the
uncontracted CAP M&I priority water was a central issue in negotiations
to resolve various operational and financial disputes between
Reclamation and CAWCD. After attempts at negotiations failed, water
contracting issues were included in litigation and the resulting
stipulated settlement between the United States and CAWCD. To implement
some of the conditions contained in the stipulated settlement, new
Federal legislation was required.
After the 1992 decision but before Federal legislation was enacted,
the Secretary published on June 4, 2002 (67 FR 38514), a notice of
proposed modification to the 1983 decision. The 1983 decision provided
that the M&I allocation can be made more firm by execution of feasible
non-potable effluent exchanges with Indian tribes and the M&I
allocation was subject to adoption of a pooling concept, whereby all
M&I entities share in the benefits of effluent exchanges. The pooling
concept provision was included in the CAP M&I water service
subcontracts. The 2002 proposed modification to the 1983 decision was
to delete the mandatory effluent pooling provision in M&I subcontracts
with the cities of Chandler and Mesa, and from other M&I water service
subcontracts upon request. That provision in the CAP M&I water service
subcontracts was an impediment to effluent exchanges and effective
water management in central Arizona. After review and consideration of
the public comments, the final decision was published on June 18, 2003
(68 FR
[[Page 34234]]
36578), deleting the mandatory effluent pooling provision.
The Settlements Act was enacted on December 10, 2004, and provides,
among other things, for: (1) A final allocation of CAP water, with a
CAP supply permanently designated for Indian uses and a CAP supply
designated for non-Indian M&I or NIA uses; (2) a reallocation by the
Secretary of 65,647 acre-feet of currently uncontracted CAP M&I water
to 20 specific M&I entities; (3) ratification of the Arizona Water
Settlement Agreement (the ``Master Agreement'') among the United
States, ADWR, and CAWCD, which provides a statutory-based framework to
enable the CAP NIA districts to relinquish existing rights to the
delivery of CAP NIA priority water under their CAP water service
subcontracts, including their rights, if any, to the reallocated water;
and, (4) a reallocation of the relinquished and uncontracted NIA water
supply to various Arizona Indian tribes and ADWR for future M&I use.
On August 25, 2006, the Secretary published a final reallocation
decision (71 FR 50449) that, among other things, reallocated the CAP
NIA water and the uncontracted CAP M&I water. The August 2006
reallocation decision is summarized below:
The Secretary's decision reallocated up to 96,295 acre-feet of
agricultural priority water per year to ADWR, pursuant to section
104(a)(2)(A) of the Settlements Act and subject to subparagraph 9.3 of
the Master Agreement, to be held under contract in trust for further
allocation pursuant to section 104(a)(2)(C) of the Settlements Act.
Direct use of the agricultural priority water by ADWR is prohibited
under the Master Agreement and this notice.
In accordance with section 104(a)(2)(C) of the Settlements Act,
before water may be further allocated the Director of ADWR shall submit
to the Secretary of the Interior a recommendation for reallocation.
After receiving the recommendation, the Secretary shall carry out all
of the necessary reviews for the proposed reallocation in accordance
with applicable Federal law. If the Director's recommendation is
rejected, the Secretary shall request a revised recommendation from the
Director of ADWR and proceed with any reviews required.
The reallocation of agricultural priority water to ADWR pursuant to
section 104(a)(2)(A) and section 104(a)(2)(C) of the Settlements Act is
subject to the Master Agreement, including certain rights provided by
the Master Agreement to water users in Pinal County, Arizona. The
agricultural priority water reallocated to the ADWR shall be subject to
the condition that the water retain its non-Indian agricultural
delivery priority.
As required in Section 104(a)(2)(C)(i)(I) of the Settlements Act
and the August 25, 2006 final reallocation decision, ADWR submitted to
the Secretary a recommendation for reallocation of agricultural
priority water. This recommendation was transmitted by letter dated
January 16, 2014, and ADWR requested the Secretary carry out all of the
necessary reviews of the proposed reallocation in accordance with
applicable Federal law.
Reclamation prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) in accordance
with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended,
and pursuant to Section 104 of the Settlements Act. Public scoping was
initiated on November 30, 2015, with a newsletter that was sent to
interested parties and published on Reclamation's website. Scoping
comments were accepted via facsimile, email, U.S. mail, and in-person
at the scoping meetings, which were held on December 8-10, 2015, in
Phoenix, Casa Grande, and Tucson, Arizona, respectively. Reclamation
received two public responses during this initial scoping period, one
of which resulted in Reclamation honoring a request for a comment
period extension to January 18, 2016.
In June 2016, Reclamation mailed Notices of Availability (NOA) of
the Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) to Federal, state, and local
agencies, Indian tribes, organizations, proposed recipients, and other
interested stakeholders. A public meeting was held on June 22, 2016, in
Casa Grande, Arizona, and the commenting period closed on July 22,
2016. Reclamation conducted in-person consultation with the Tohono
O'odham Nation on February 17, 2017, and with the San Carlos Apache
Tribe on June 16, 2017. The draft EA was revised in response to the
comments received. A NOA for the Final Environmental Assessment--
Arizona Department of Water Resources Recommendation for the
Reallocation of Non-Indian Agricultural Priority Central Arizona
Project Water in Accordance with the Arizona Water Settlements Act of
2004 was issued on November 15, 2019, and the Final Finding of No
Significant Impact--Arizona Department of Water Resources
Recommendation for the Reallocation of Non-Indian Agricultural Priority
Central Arizona Project Water in Accordance with the Arizona Water
Settlements Act of 2004 was signed on November 8, 2019.
Rationale for Proposed Decision
The Department is proposing to allocate CAP NIA water in accordance
with ADWR's recommendation. The ADWR recommendation covered the initial
phase, reallocating 46,629 acre-feet per year of NIA priority CAP water
of the 96,295 acre-feet per year to be reallocated, as shown in the
table above. The total of 46,629 acre-feet per year of CAP NIA priority
water in this phase is in two pools: (1) A municipal pool of 34,629
acre-feet for M&I water providers within the CAP service area and the
Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District, and (2) an
industrial pool of 12,000 acre-feet for industrial water users within
the CAP service area. The rationale for the proposed decision is based
on the following:
(1) ADWR's extensive public outreach, in consultation with
Reclamation, to interested parties regarding its recommendation.
(2) An EA evaluating impacts of the proposed reallocation, in
accordance with NEPA, and the resulting FONSI.
The Final EA and FONSI can be found on Reclamation's website at:
https://www.usbr.gov/lc/phoenix/reports/reports.html.
Request for Public Comments
We request public comments on the proposed reallocation prior to
the Department making a final decision. Our practice is to make
comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available
for public review. Individual respondents may request that we withhold
their home address from public disclosure, which we will honor to the
extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which we
would withhold a respondent's identity from public disclosure, as
allowable by law. If you wish for us to withhold your name and/or
address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your
comment. We will make all submissions from organizations or businesses,
and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or
officials of organizations or businesses, available for public
disclosure in their entirety.
Timothy R. Petty,
Assistant Secretary for Water and Science.
[FR Doc. 2020-11906 Filed 6-2-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332-90-P