60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: The Outcomes Evaluation of the Choice Neighborhoods Program, 33189-33191 [2020-11731]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 105 / Monday, June 1, 2020 / Notices
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection:
Mortgage Record Change.
OMB Approval Number: 2502–0422.
Type of Request: Extension.
Form Number: 92080 (FHA
Connection).
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use:
Servicing of insured mortgages must be
performed by a mortgagee that is
approved by HUD to service insured
mortgages. The Mortgage Record Change
information is used by FHA-approved
mortgagees to comply with HUD
requirements for reporting the sale of a
mortgage between investors and/or the
transfer of the mortgage servicing
responsibility, as appropriate.
Respondents (i.e., affected public):
Not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
10,000.
Estimated Number of Responses:
3,500,000.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
at sale or transfer.
Average Hours per Response: 1.
Total Estimated Burdens: 350,000.
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (3) Ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond,; including through the
use of appropriate automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comments in response to these
questions.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Authority: Section 2 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507.
Dated: May 27, 2020.
Nacheshia Foxx,
Federal Register Liaison, Department of
Housing and Urban Development.
[FR Doc. 2020–11720 Filed 5–29–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:40 May 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–7029–N–04]
60-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: The Outcomes Evaluation
of the Choice Neighborhoods Program
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Policy Development and
Research, HUD.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
The U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
is seeking approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for the
information collection described below.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, HUD is requesting
comment from all interested parties on
the proposed collection of information.
The purpose of this notice is to allow for
60 days of public comment.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Comments Due Date: July 31,
2020.
Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:
Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Room 4176, Washington, DC
20410–5000; telephone 202–402–5534
(this is not a toll-free number) or email
at Anna.P.Guido@hud.gov for a copy of
the proposed forms or other available
information. Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Washington, DC 20410; email Anna
P. Guido at Anna.P.Guido@hud.gov or
telephone 202–402–5535. This is not a
toll-free number. Persons with hearing
or speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339.
Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Guido.
This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33189
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: The
Outcomes Evaluation of the Choice
Neighborhoods Program.
OMB Approval Number: Pending.
Type of Request: New collection.
Form Number: N/A.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: This
request is for the collection of
information for an outcomes evaluation
of the Choice Neighborhoods Program
(Choice). Choice leverages significant
public and private dollars to support
locally driven strategies that address
struggling neighborhoods with
distressed public or HUD-assisted
housing through a comprehensive
approach to neighborhood
transformation; local leaders, residents,
and stakeholders come together to create
and implement a plan that revitalizes
distressed HUD housing and addresses
the challenges in the surrounding
neighborhood. Launched in 2010,
Choice provides direct investments
through competitive grants targeted to
neighborhoods marked by high rates of
poverty with distressed public or HUDassisted housing. Today, Choice remains
one of HUD’s primary tools to support
planning and implementation efforts to
catalyze redevelopment efforts in cities
across the nation.
Under contract with HUD’s Office of
Policy Development and Research, the
Urban Institute (Urban) is conducting an
evaluation of Choice, focusing on the
neighborhoods that received grants in
2011 and 2013: Quincy Corridor
neighborhood in Boston, Massachusetts;
Woodlawn neighborhood in Chicago,
Illinois; Iberville/Treme´ neighborhood
in New Orleans, Louisiana; Eastern
Bayview neighborhood in San
Francisco, California; Yesler
neighborhood in Seattle, Washington;
Near East Side neighborhood in
Columbus, Ohio; South Norwalk
neighborhood in Norwalk, Connecticut;
North Central Philadelphia
neighborhood in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; and Larimer/East Liberty
neighborhood in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania. The overarching goal of
the current evaluation is to understand
the impact of the Choice program and
the investment it brings, with an
emphasis on understanding the first
cohort of grantees, funded in 2011 and
four additional grantees from the third
cohort of grantees, funded in 2013.
The evaluation will use qualitative
and quantitative methods to answer the
following overarching research
question: Whether public and private
dollars were successfully leveraged to
(1) replace distressed public and
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
33190
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 105 / Monday, June 1, 2020 / Notices
assisted housing with high-quality
mixed-income housing that is wellmanaged and responsive to the needs of
the surrounding neighborhood, (2)
improve outcomes for households in the
target housing, including employment
and income, health, and education, and
(3) create the conditions necessary for
public and private reinvestment in
distressed neighborhoods to improve
amenities and assets. The evaluation is
a follow-up to an initial evaluation
completed by Urban in 2016, and will
employ analysis of administrative/
secondary data, including HUD data, as
well as primary data collection in the
form of a large household survey of
households living in the Choice sites,
and interviews and observations from
stakeholders regarding the Choice
program. In total, Urban expects to field
the survey to up to 2,388 Choice
residents and contact 257 respondents
for qualitative interviews. This
information is necessary to evaluate
Choice and to understand differences
across sites, over time, in different types
of HUD-assisted housing, by grantee
type, and for different contextual
conditions.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Information collection
Number of
respondents
Respondents: Residents who are
living in Choice Neighborhoods
(Choice) sites in the Quincy Corridor
neighborhood in Boston, Massachusetts;
Woodlawn neighborhood in Chicago,
Illinois; Iberville/Treme´ neighborhood
in New Orleans, Louisiana; Eastern
Bayview neighborhood in San
Francisco, California; Yesler
neighborhood in Seattle, Washington;
Near East Side neighborhood in
Columbus, Ohio; South Norwalk
neighborhood in Norwalk, Connecticut;
North Central Philadelphia
neighborhood in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; and Larimer/East Liberty
neighborhood in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, as well as stakeholders
who were, or remain, engaged with the
Choice program. Stakeholders include
the lead grantee, implementation leads
for housing, people, and neighborhood
pillars, HUD managers of Choice grants,
city agency officials and staff, public
housing and affordable-housing
property management staff, housing
developers, early education providers,
case management providers, other
service providers, community and
resident leaders, local police precinct
Frequency of
response
Responses
per annum
Burden hour
per response
commanders, and staff from local
anchor institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
2,388 respondents to the household
survey and 257 respondents to
qualitative interviews.
Estimated Time per Response: The
survey is designed to be completed in
35 minutes. We expect qualitative
interviews to last 1 hour with 30
minutes of preparatory time needed per
interview for review of materials related
to the Choice Neighborhoods program.
Frequency of Response: 1 time.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,385 burden hours for the
household survey and 385.5 burden
hours for the qualitative interviews.
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$23,545.68 for the household survey
and $13,836.48 for the qualitative
interviews.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: The survey is
conducted under Title 12, United States
Code, Section 1701z and Section 3507
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
44, U.S.C., 35, as amended.
Annual burden
hours
Hourly cost
per response
Cost
Household survey ........
Interviews with resident
leaders ......................
Interviews with Highlevel informants:
Lead grantees, City
officials and staff ......
Interviews with HUD
staff ...........................
Interviews with housing
informants: Housing
implementation lead,
Housing developers,
Public housing and
affordable-housing
property management staff ..................
Interviews with people
informants: People
implementation lead,
Case management
staff, Other service
providers ...................
Interviews with Neighborhood informants:
Implementation lead,
Local police precinct
commanders, ............
Local anchor institution
staff, Community
leaders ......................
2,388
1
1
.58
1,385
$17.00
$23,545.68
5
1
1
1.5
7.5
17.00
127.50
45
1
1
1.5
67.5
42.30
2,855.25
18
1
1
1.5
27
75.82
2,047.14
54
1
1
1.5
81
35.39
2,866.59
72
1
1
1.5
108
23.92
2,583.36
63
1
1
1.5
94.5
35.52
3,356.64
Total ......................
2,645
........................
........................
........................
1,770.5
........................
37,382.16
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:40 May 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 105 / Monday, June 1, 2020 / Notices
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
Authority
Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
The Assistant Secretary for Policy
Development and Research, Seth
Appleton, having reviewed and
approved this document, is delegating
the authority to electronically sign this
document to submitter, Nacheshia Foxx,
who is the Federal Register Liaison for
HUD, for purposes of publication in the
Federal Register.
Dated: May 27, 2020.
Nacheshia Foxx,
Federal Register Liaison for the Department
of Housing and Urban Development.
[FR Doc. 2020–11731 Filed 5–29–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–7027–N–17]
60-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: HUD Conditional
Commitment/Direct Endorsement
Statement of Appraised Value; OMB
Control No.: 2502–0494
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:40 May 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
33191
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comments from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for 60 days of public
comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: July 31,
2020.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:
Colette Pollard, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Room 4176, Washington, DC
20410–5000; telephone (202) 402–3400
(this is not a toll free number) or email
at Colette.Pollard@hud.gov for a copy of
the proposed forms or other available
information. Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access the
telephone number through TTY by
calling the toll free Federal Relay
Service at (800) 877–8339.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colette Pollard, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Room 4176, Washington, DC
20410–5000; email Colette Pollard at
Colette.Pollard@hud.gov or telephone
(202) 402–3400 (this is not a toll free
number). Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access the
telephone number through TTY by
calling the toll free Federal Relay
Service at (800) 877–8339.
Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Pollard.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
insurance on the property. The form
provides a section for the statement of
the property’s appraised value and other
required FHA disclosures to the
borrower, including specific conditions
that must be met before HUD can
endorse a mortgage for FHA insurance.
HUD uses the information to determine
the eligibility of a property for mortgage
insurance.
Respondents: Mortgagees.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,483.
Estimated Number of Responses:
1,059,459.
Frequency of Response: Yearly.
Average Hours per Response: 0.12.
Total Estimated Burdens: 127,135.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: HUD
Conditional Commitment/Direct
Endorsement Statement of Appraised
Value.
OMB Control Number, if applicable:
2502–0494.
Type of Request: Extension of
currently approved collection.
Form Number: HUD 92800.5B.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: Lenders
must provide loan applicants a
completed copy of Form HUD–92800.5B
at or before loan closing. Form HUD–
92800.5B serves as the mortgagee’s
conditional commitment/direct
endorsement statement of appraised
value of Federal Housing
Administration (FHA) mortgage
C. Authority
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (3) Ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond; including through the
use of appropriate automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507).
The General Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Housing, John L. Garvin,
having reviewed and approved this
document, is delegating the authority to
electronically sign this document to
submitter, Nacheshia Foxx, who is the
Federal Register Liaison for HUD, for
purposes of publication in the Federal
Register.
Dated: May 27, 2020.
Nacheshia Foxx,
Federal Register Liaison for the Department
of Housing and Urban Development.
[FR Doc. 2020–11713 Filed 5–29–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 105 (Monday, June 1, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33189-33191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11731]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-7029-N-04]
60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: The Outcomes
Evaluation of the Choice Neighborhoods Program
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and
Research, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is
seeking approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the
information collection described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of information. The purpose of this
notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: July 31, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to: Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th
Street SW, Room 4176, Washington, DC 20410-5000; telephone 202-402-5534
(this is not a toll-free number) or email at [email protected] for a
copy of the proposed forms or other available information. Persons with
hearing or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20410; email Anna P. Guido at
[email protected] or telephone 202-402-5535. This is not a toll-free
number. Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at
(800) 877-8339.
Copies of available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from
Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in
Section A.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: The Outcomes Evaluation of the
Choice Neighborhoods Program.
OMB Approval Number: Pending.
Type of Request: New collection.
Form Number: N/A.
Description of the need for the information and proposed use: This
request is for the collection of information for an outcomes evaluation
of the Choice Neighborhoods Program (Choice). Choice leverages
significant public and private dollars to support locally driven
strategies that address struggling neighborhoods with distressed public
or HUD-assisted housing through a comprehensive approach to
neighborhood transformation; local leaders, residents, and stakeholders
come together to create and implement a plan that revitalizes
distressed HUD housing and addresses the challenges in the surrounding
neighborhood. Launched in 2010, Choice provides direct investments
through competitive grants targeted to neighborhoods marked by high
rates of poverty with distressed public or HUD-assisted housing. Today,
Choice remains one of HUD's primary tools to support planning and
implementation efforts to catalyze redevelopment efforts in cities
across the nation.
Under contract with HUD's Office of Policy Development and
Research, the Urban Institute (Urban) is conducting an evaluation of
Choice, focusing on the neighborhoods that received grants in 2011 and
2013: Quincy Corridor neighborhood in Boston, Massachusetts; Woodlawn
neighborhood in Chicago, Illinois; Iberville/Trem[eacute] neighborhood
in New Orleans, Louisiana; Eastern Bayview neighborhood in San
Francisco, California; Yesler neighborhood in Seattle, Washington; Near
East Side neighborhood in Columbus, Ohio; South Norwalk neighborhood in
Norwalk, Connecticut; North Central Philadelphia neighborhood in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Larimer/East Liberty neighborhood in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The overarching goal of the current
evaluation is to understand the impact of the Choice program and the
investment it brings, with an emphasis on understanding the first
cohort of grantees, funded in 2011 and four additional grantees from
the third cohort of grantees, funded in 2013.
The evaluation will use qualitative and quantitative methods to
answer the following overarching research question: Whether public and
private dollars were successfully leveraged to (1) replace distressed
public and
[[Page 33190]]
assisted housing with high-quality mixed-income housing that is well-
managed and responsive to the needs of the surrounding neighborhood,
(2) improve outcomes for households in the target housing, including
employment and income, health, and education, and (3) create the
conditions necessary for public and private reinvestment in distressed
neighborhoods to improve amenities and assets. The evaluation is a
follow-up to an initial evaluation completed by Urban in 2016, and will
employ analysis of administrative/secondary data, including HUD data,
as well as primary data collection in the form of a large household
survey of households living in the Choice sites, and interviews and
observations from stakeholders regarding the Choice program. In total,
Urban expects to field the survey to up to 2,388 Choice residents and
contact 257 respondents for qualitative interviews. This information is
necessary to evaluate Choice and to understand differences across
sites, over time, in different types of HUD-assisted housing, by
grantee type, and for different contextual conditions.
Respondents: Residents who are living in Choice Neighborhoods
(Choice) sites in the Quincy Corridor neighborhood in Boston,
Massachusetts; Woodlawn neighborhood in Chicago, Illinois; Iberville/
Trem[eacute] neighborhood in New Orleans, Louisiana; Eastern Bayview
neighborhood in San Francisco, California; Yesler neighborhood in
Seattle, Washington; Near East Side neighborhood in Columbus, Ohio;
South Norwalk neighborhood in Norwalk, Connecticut; North Central
Philadelphia neighborhood in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Larimer/
East Liberty neighborhood in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as well as
stakeholders who were, or remain, engaged with the Choice program.
Stakeholders include the lead grantee, implementation leads for
housing, people, and neighborhood pillars, HUD managers of Choice
grants, city agency officials and staff, public housing and affordable-
housing property management staff, housing developers, early education
providers, case management providers, other service providers,
community and resident leaders, local police precinct commanders, and
staff from local anchor institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,388 respondents to the household
survey and 257 respondents to qualitative interviews.
Estimated Time per Response: The survey is designed to be completed
in 35 minutes. We expect qualitative interviews to last 1 hour with 30
minutes of preparatory time needed per interview for review of
materials related to the Choice Neighborhoods program.
Frequency of Response: 1 time.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,385 burden hours for the
household survey and 385.5 burden hours for the qualitative interviews.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: $23,545.68 for the household survey
and $13,836.48 for the qualitative interviews.
Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: The survey is conducted under Title 12, United
States Code, Section 1701z and Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44, U.S.C., 35, as amended.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Frequency of Responses per Burden hour Annual burden Hourly cost
Information collection respondents response annum per response hours per response Cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Household survey........................ 2,388 1 1 .58 1,385 $17.00 $23,545.68
Interviews with resident leaders........ 5 1 1 1.5 7.5 17.00 127.50
Interviews with High-level informants: 45 1 1 1.5 67.5 42.30 2,855.25
Lead grantees, City officials and staff
Interviews with HUD staff............... 18 1 1 1.5 27 75.82 2,047.14
Interviews with housing informants: 54 1 1 1.5 81 35.39 2,866.59
Housing implementation lead, Housing
developers, Public housing and
affordable-housing property management
staff..................................
Interviews with people informants: 72 1 1 1.5 108 23.92 2,583.36
People implementation lead, Case
management staff, Other service
providers..............................
Interviews with Neighborhood informants: 63 1 1 1.5 94.5 35.52 3,356.64
Implementation lead, Local police
precinct commanders,...................
Local anchor institution staff,
Community leaders......................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... 2,645 .............. .............. .............. 1,770.5 .............. 37,382.16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 33191]]
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and
affected parties concerning the collection of information described in
Section A on the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to
these questions.
Authority
Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
The Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research, Seth
Appleton, having reviewed and approved this document, is delegating the
authority to electronically sign this document to submitter, Nacheshia
Foxx, who is the Federal Register Liaison for HUD, for purposes of
publication in the Federal Register.
Dated: May 27, 2020.
Nacheshia Foxx,
Federal Register Liaison for the Department of Housing and Urban
Development.
[FR Doc. 2020-11731 Filed 5-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
