DoD Guidance Documents, 32296-32300 [2020-11551]
Download as PDF
32296
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 104 / Friday, May 29, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
standards, and reduce burden. No
retroactive effect will be given to this
rule, and no administrative appeal
procedures must be exhausted before an
action against the Department may be
initiated.
implications, will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments, and will not
preempt tribal law. Accordingly,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply
to this rulemaking.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Executive Order 12372,
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 12372. This rule updates the
Department’s NEPA regulations and
does not implicate provision of nonFederal funds by State and local
governments. Similarly, the
Department’s NEPA regulations do not
implicate Federal financial assistance or
direct Federal development within the
scope of Executive Order 12372.
Paperwork Reduction Act
RIN 0790–AK97
The Department has determined that
this rulemaking does not create or revise
any information collection that would
require approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
DoD Guidance Documents
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
National Environmental Policy Act
In this final rule, the Department
proposes to implement the Presidential
directive in Section 2(j) of Executive
Order 13867 to bring the Department of
State’s regulations into conformity with
Executive Order 13867. The Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) does not
direct agencies to prepare a NEPA
analysis before establishing agency
NEPA procedures as required by the
CEQ regulations for implementing the
procedural provisions of NEPA
pursuant to 40 CFR 1505.1 and 1507.3.
The determination that establishing
agency NEPA procedures does not
require NEPA analysis and
documentation has been upheld in
Heartwood, Inc. v. U.S. Forest Service,
73 F. Supp. 2d 962, 972–73 (S.D. Ill.
1999), aff’d, 230 F. 3d 947, 954–55 (7th
Cir. 2000). Moreover, the Department of
State has no discretion to deviate from
the presidential instructions set forth in
Executive Order 13867, and
nondiscretionary actions are not subject
to NEPA analytical requirements.
Department of Transportation v. Public
Citizen, 541 U.S. 752, 756, 770 (2004).
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 161
Environmental impact statements.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
above, title 22, chapter I, subtitle Q, part
161 is amended as follows:
PART 161—REGULATIONS FOR
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
(NEPA)
1. The authority citation for part 161
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a and 2656; 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; E.O. 11514, 34 FR 4247,
3 CFR, 1966–1970, Comp., p. 902, as
amended by E.O. 11991, 42 FR 26927, 3 CFR,
1977 Comp., p. 123; E.O. 13867, 84 FR 15491.
2. In part 161, remove the words
‘‘Office of Environment and Health’’ and
add in their place the words ‘‘Office of
Environmental Quality and
Transboundary Issues’’ wherever they
occur.
■
§ 161.6
[Amended]
3. Amend § 161.6in paragraph (a)(2)
introductory text by removing the words
‘‘Congressional Relations’’ and adding
in their place the words ‘‘Legislative
Affairs’’.
■
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The policies contained in this final
rule do not have any substantial direct
effect on states, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the states, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Nor does
this final rule impose substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments. Therefore, consultation
with the states is not required.
§ 161.7
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department has determined that
this rulemaking will not have tribal
BILLING CODE 4710–09–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 May 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
[Amended]
4. Amend § 161.7 by removing and
reserving paragraph (c)(1).
■
§ 161.10
■
[Removed and Reserved]
5. Remove and reserve § 161.10.
Zachary A. Parker,
Director, Office of Directives Management,
U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2020–10991 Filed 5–28–20; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 339
[Docket ID: DoD–2020–OS–0019]
Office of the Secretary of
Defense, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule sets forth the
Department of Defense’s (DoD) policies
and processes governing the issuance
and use of guidance documents. By
issuing this final rule, DoD also
responds to the Executive Order titled:
‘‘Promoting the Rule of Law Through
Improved Agency Guidance
Documents,’’ which requires federal
agencies to finalize regulations, or
amend existing regulations as necessary,
to set forth processes and procedures for
issuing guidance documents.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective May 29, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patricia Toppings, 571–372–0485.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule codifies the Department’s policies
and procedures regarding guidance
documents. The policies and procedures
in this final rule apply to all nonexempt DoD guidance documents,
which DoD defines in § 339.1. These
procedures require all DoD guidance
documents to receive appropriate
coordination and review. Before
guidance documents are issued, they
must be reviewed to ensure they are
written in plain language and do not
impose any substantive legal
requirements on the public above and
beyond statute or regulation. All
guidance documents must include a
clear and prominent statement
effectively stating that the contents of
the guidance document do not have the
force and effect of law and are not
meant to bind the public in any way,
and the guidance document is intended
only to provide clarity to the public
regarding existing requirements under
the law or agency regulations.
Recognizing the fact that, even though
guidance documents are not legally
binding, they could nevertheless have a
substantial economic impact on
regulated entities that alter their
conduct to conform to the guidance, this
final rule requires a good faith
assessment of the cost impact on the
public of the guidance document.
This final rule also incorporates other
policies and procedures, such as
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 104 / Friday, May 29, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
describing when guidance documents
are subject to notice and an opportunity
for public comment and how they will
be made available to the public after
issuance. These procedures are intended
to ensure that the public has a fair and
sufficient opportunity to comment on
guidance documents when appropriate
and practicable and has access to
guidance documents issued by the
Department. The final rule also provides
a process for interested parties to
petition the Department for the
withdrawal or modification of guidance
documents.
Administrative Procedure
Under the Administrative Procedure
Act, an agency may waive the normal
notice and comment procedures if the
action is a rule of agency organization,
procedure, or practice. See 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(A). Since this final rule merely
incorporates procedures applicable to
the Department’s administrative
procedures into the Code of Federal
Regulations, notice and comment are
not necessary.
Rulemaking Analyses
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
This rulemaking is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. The Department does not
anticipate that this rulemaking will have
an economic impact on regulated
entities. This is a rule of agency
procedure and practice. The final rule
describes the Department’s internal
policies and procedures for its guidance
documents. The Department has
adopted these internal policies and
procedures as part of its regulatory
reform initiative, and has not incurred
any additional resource costs in doing
so. Regulated entities and the public
will benefit from these policies and
procedures through increased agency
deliberations and more opportunities to
comment on guidance documents.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Executive Order 13771, ‘‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’’
This rule is not an Executive Order
13771 regulatory action because this
rule is not significant under Executive
Order 12866.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601)
Since notice and comment
rulemaking is not necessary for this
rule, the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–354, 5 U.S.C.
601–612) do not apply.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 May 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
Executive Order 13132 requires
agencies to ensure meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that may have a substantial,
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. This action has
been analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in
Executive Order 13132, and it has been
determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect or
federalism implications on the States
and would not preempt any State law or
regulation or affect the States’ ability to
discharge traditional State governmental
functions. Therefore, consultation with
the States is not necessary.
Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments’’
This final rule has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13175. Because this rulemaking does
not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of the Indian tribal
governments or impose substantial
direct compliance costs on them, the
funding and consultation requirements
of Executive Order 13175 do not apply.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) requires
that DoD consider the impact of
paperwork and other information
collection burdens imposed on the
public and, under the provisions of PRA
section 3507(d), obtain approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
for each collection of information it
conducts, sponsors, or requires through
regulations. It has been determined
there are no new information collection
requirements associated with this final
rule.
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
It has been determined that this final
rule does not contain a Federal mandate
that may result in expenditure by State,
local and tribal governments, in
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 339
Administrative practice and
procedure, Guidance documents.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32297
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Office of the Secretary of Defense adds
32 CFR part 339 to read as follows:
■
PART 339—DOD GUIDANCE
DOCUMENTS
Sec.
339.1 General.
339.2 Initial review process.
339.3 Good faith cost estimates.
339.4 Departmental review and submission
to OIRA.
339.5 Designation procedures.
339.6 Non-significant guidance documents.
339.7 Significant guidance document.
339.8 Notice-and-comment procedures.
339.9 Public access to effective guidance
documents.
339.10 Petitions for guidance.
339.11 Rescinded guidance.
339.12 Exigent circumstances.
339.13 Reports to Congress and GAO.
339.14 Use of guidance documents.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a.
§ 339.1
General.
(a) This part provides policies and
procedures governing all phases of
issuing, modifying, or rescinding
guidance documents within DoD.
(b) Subject to the qualifications and
exemptions contained in this part, these
policies and procedures apply to all
guidance documents intended to have
future effect on the behavior of
regulated parties issued by all
components of the Department,
including regional and district offices.
(c) For purposes of this part, the term
guidance document includes any
statement of agency policy or
interpretation concerning a statute,
regulation, or technical matter within
the jurisdiction of the Department that
is intended to have general applicability
and future effect on the behavior of
regulated parties, but which is not
intended to have the force or effect of
law in its own right and is not otherwise
required by statute to satisfy the
rulemaking procedures specified in 5
U.S.C. 553 or 5 U.S.C. 556. The term is
not confined to formal written
documents; guidance may come in a
variety of forms, including, but not
limited to, letters, memoranda,
circulars, bulletins, advisories, and may
include video, audio, and Web-based
formats. See OMB Memorandum M–20–
02, ‘‘Guidance Implementing Executive
Order 13891, Titled ‘‘Promoting the
Rule of Law Through Improved Agency
Guidance Documents,’’ ’’ dated October
31, 2019.
(d) This part does not apply to:
(1) Agency statements of specific
applicability, including advisory or
legal opinions directed to particular
parties about circumstance-specific
questions (e.g., case or investigatory
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
32298
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 104 / Friday, May 29, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
letters responding to complaints,
warning letters), notices regarding
particular locations or facilities (e.g.,
guidance pertaining to the use,
operation, or control of a government
facility or property), and
correspondence with individual persons
or entities (e.g., congressional
correspondence), except documents
ostensibly directed to a particular party
but designed to guide the conduct of the
broader regulated public;
(2) Agency statements that do not set
forth a policy on a statutory, regulatory,
or technical issue or an interpretation of
a statute or regulation, including
speeches and individual presentations,
editorials, media interviews, press
materials, or congressional testimony
that do not set forth for the first time a
new regulatory policy;
(3) Rules promulgated pursuant to
notice and comment under 5 U.S.C. 553,
or similar statutory provisions;
(4) Rules exempt from rulemaking
requirements under 5 U.S.C. 553(a);
(5) Rules of agency organization,
procedure, or practice;
(6) Decisions of agency adjudications
under 5 U.S.C. 554, or similar statutory
provisions;
(7) Internal guidance directed solely
to the issuing agency or other agencies
(or personnel of such agencies) that is
not intended to have substantial future
effect on the behavior of regulated
parties or the public;
(8) Internal guidance that is made
public only because release is required
under the Freedom of Information Act
or agency disclosure policies;
(9) Legal briefs, other court filings, or
positions taken in litigation or
enforcement actions;
(10) Legal opinions by the Office of
Legal Counsel at the Department of
Justice.
(11) Internal executive branch legal
advice or legal advisory opinions
addressed to executive branch officials;
(12) Guidance pertaining to military
or foreign affairs functions, or to a
national security or homeland security
function of the United States (other than
guidance documents involving
procurement or the import or export of
non-defense articles and services);
(13) Grant solicitations and awards; or
(14) Contract solicitations and awards.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
§ 339.2
Initial review process.
(a) Prior to submitting guidance
documents for departmental review,
Components seeking to issue, modify, or
rescind a guidance document should
submit a draft copy of that document,
along with the component’s designation
request (see § 339.5 of this part) and
good faith cost estimate (see § 339.3 of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 May 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
this part), to their Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
(b) Before such a guidance document
can be cleared for departmental review,
the appropriate DoD or OSD Federal
Register Liaison Officer will review it to
ensure that it satisfies the following
requirements:
(1) For significant guidance (see
§ 339.7 of this part), Federal Register
required formatting.
(2) The guidance document complies
with all relevant statutes and
regulations (including any statutory
deadlines for agency action);
(3) The guidance document identifies
or includes:
(i) The term ‘‘guidance’’ or its
functional equivalent;
(ii) The issuing component of the
Department;
(iii) A unique identifier, including, at
a minimum, the date of issuance and
title of the document and its Z–RIN (a
regulation identifier number), if
applicable;
(iv) The activity or entities to which
the guidance applies;
(v) Citations to applicable statutes and
regulations;
(vi) A statement noting whether the
guidance is intended to revise or replace
any previously issued guidance and, if
so, sufficient information to identify the
previously issued guidance; and
(vii) A short summary of the subject
matter covered in the guidance
document at the top of the document.
(4) The guidance document avoids
using mandatory language, such as
‘‘shall,’’ ‘‘must,’’ ‘‘required,’’ or
‘‘requirement,’’ unless the language is
describing an established statutory or
regulatory requirement or is addressed
to DoD staff and will not foreclose the
Department’s consideration of positions
advanced by affected private parties or
is intended to have a substantial future
effect on the behavior of regulated
parties;
(5) The guidance document is written
in plain and understandable English;
(6) All guidance documents include
the following disclaimer prominently:
‘‘The contents of this document do not
have the force and effect of law and are
not meant to bind the public in any
way. This document is intended only to
provide clarity to the public regarding
existing requirements under the law or
departmental policies.’’
§ 339.3
Good faith cost estimates.
Even though not legally binding, some
agency guidance may result in a
substantial economic impact. For
example, the issuance of departmental
guidance may induce private parties to
alter their conduct to conform to
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
recommended standards or practices,
thereby incurring costs beyond the costs
of complying with existing statutes and
regulations. While it may be difficult to
predict with precision the economic
impact of voluntary guidance, the
proposing component of the Department
must, to the extent practicable, make a
good faith effort to estimate the likely
economic cost impact of the guidance
document to determine whether the
document might be significant. When
the component is assessing or
explaining whether it believes a
guidance document is significant, it
will, at a minimum, provide the same
level of analysis that would be required
for a major determination under the
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 8). When it is determined that
a guidance document will be
economically significant (see
§ 339.7(a)(1) of this part), the component
must conduct and publish a Regulatory
Impact Analysis of the sort that would
accompany an economically significant
rulemaking (see requirements in E.O.
12866, E.O. 13563, and OMB Circular
A–4), to the extent reasonably possible.
§ 339.4 Departmental review and
submission to OIRA.
(a) After the appropriate FRLO
completes his or her initial review, a
guidance document will be internally
coordinated within the proposing
component and formally coordinated
throughout the Department with other
components who have equities.
Mandatory coordinators on all guidance
documents are the Chief Management
Officer, Department of Defense and the
component’s General Counsel.
(b) The proposing component will
adjudicate DoD and OSD Component
comments and return a final guidance
document package to the appropriate
DoD or OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer for submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), Office
of Information and Regulations Affairs
(OIRA) for a significance determination.
(c) Guidance documents deemed by
OIRA to be ‘‘significant’’ (see § 339.7 of
this part) must be reviewed and
approved by the Department’s
Regulatory Policy Officer before OIRA
formally reviews them.
§ 339.5
Designation procedures.
(a) The proposing component will
prepare a designation request for
guidance documents. Designation
requests must include the following
information:
(1) A summary of the guidance
document; and
(2) The component’s recommended
designation of ‘‘not significant,’’
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 104 / Friday, May 29, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘significant,’’ or ‘‘economically
significant,’’ as well as a justification for
that designation.
(b) The appropriate DoD or OSD
Federal Register Liaison Officer will
seek a significance determination from
OIRA for guidance documents in the
same manner as for rulemakings. OIRA
review will occur prior to the
publishing of guidance documents, and
with sufficient time to allow OIRA to
review the designation request and the
guidance document to determine if it
meets the definition of ‘‘significant’’ or
‘‘economically significant’’ under
Executive Order 13891.
(c) Prior to being published, guidance
documents determined to be
‘‘significant’’ or ‘‘economically
significant’’ are subject to formal review
and interagency coordination by OIRA.
The OIRA review, to include
interagency coordination, is to be
consistent with Executive Order 12866.
(d) Significant guidance documents
(see § 339.7 of this part) must be
reviewed and approved by the
Department’s Regulatory Policy Officer
before OIRA formally reviews them.
(e) Once the OMB/OIRA has cleared
a guidance document for publication,
the appropriate DoD or OSD Federal
Register Liaison Officer will coordinate
the guidance document with the
Defense Office of Prepublication and
Security Review (DOPSR). The FRLO
will notify the component of DOPSR’s
approval and that the guidance
document can be approved for Federal
Register publication or signed for
placement on the central website.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
§ 339.6 Non-significant guidance
documents.
(a) If the guidance document is
determined to be non-significant within
the meaning of § 339.7 of this part, the
appropriate DoD or OSD Federal
Register Liaison Officer will advise the
proposing component to proceed with
issuance of the guidance.
(b) For each such guidance document,
the proposing component should
forward it to the appropriate authority
for approval. OSD PSAs or equivalents
can delegate in writing the authority to
approve non-significant guidance
documents to subordinate officials at or
above the level of a General/Flag
Officer, Senior Executive Service
member, or equivalent. The proposing
component should include a statement
in the action memorandum to the
approving authority that the guidance
document has been reviewed and
cleared as non-significant by OIRA.
(c) After the approving authority signs
the non-significant guidance document,
it should be forwarded to the DoD
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 May 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
Regulatory Program staff for publication
on the department’s guidance document
website located at https://
open.defense.gov/Regulatory-Program/
Guidance-Documents/.
§ 339.7
Significant guidance documents.
(a) The term ‘‘significant guidance
document’’ means a guidance document
that will be disseminated to regulated
entities or the general public and that
may reasonably be anticipated:
(1) To lead to an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
U.S. economy, a sector of the U.S.
economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities (a
guidance document is economically
significant if it meets the criteria in this
paragraph);
(2) To create serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another Federal agency;
(3) To alter materially the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) To raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in E.O. 12866, as further
amended.
(b) The term ‘‘significant guidance
document’’ does not include the
categories of documents excluded by
§ 339.1(d) or any other category of
guidance documents exempted in
writing in consultation with OIRA.
(c) Significant guidance documents, to
include economically significant
guidance documents, must be reviewed
by OIRA under E.O. 12866 before
issuance; and must demonstrate
compliance with the applicable
requirements for regulations or rules,
including significant regulatory actions,
set forth in E.O. 12866, E.O. 13563, E.O.
13609, E.O. 13771, and E.O. 13777.
(d) Each proposed DoD guidance
document determined by OIRA to be
significant must be approved by an OSD
Principal Staff Assistant or equivalent
appointed by the President.
(e) Significant guidance documents
have to be published for notice and
comment in accordance with § 339.8 of
this part before they can be issued.
§ 339.8
Notice-and-comment procedures.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, all proposed DoD
guidance documents determined to be a
‘‘significant guidance document’’ within
the meaning of § 339.7 shall be subject
to the following notice and comment
procedures. After receiving clearance
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32299
from OIRA to publish a proposed
significant guidance document, the
proposing component shall publish a
notice in the Federal Register
announcing that a draft of the proposed
guidance document is publicly available
on Regulations.gov, shall invite public
comment on the draft document for a
minimum of 30 days. After the comment
period ends, the proposing component
shall prepare and post a public response
to major concerns raised in the
comments, as appropriate, in the docket
on Regulations.gov. Then the
component will prepare a final notice
that will be coordinated within the
department and submitted to OIRA for
review, interagency coordination, and
clearance for publishing in the Federal
Register. Both the proposed and final
notices shall be approved by the DoD
RPO before OIRA review, and by an
OSD Principal Staff Assistant or
equivalent appointed by the President
after OIRA clearance and DOPSR
approval.
(b) The notice and comment
requirements of paragraph (a) of this
section will not apply to any significant
guidance document or categories of
significant guidance documents for
which the proposing component finds,
in consultation with their component
OGC and OIRA, good cause that notice
and public procedure thereon are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest (and incorporates
the finding of good cause and a brief
statement of reasons therefor in the
guidance issued).
§ 339.9 Public access to effective
guidance documents.
(a) The DoD Regulatory Policy Team
shall:
(1) Ensure all final guidance
documents in effect are identified by a
unique identifier which includes, at a
minimum, the document’s title and date
of issuance or revision and its Z–RIN, if
applicable, are published and
maintained on a central website located
at https://open.defense.gov/RegulatoryProgram/Guidance-Documents/ in a
single, searchable, indexed database,
and available to the public;
(2) Note on its website that guidance
documents do not bind the public,
except as authorized by law or as
incorporated into a contract;
(3) Announce on its website a means
for the public to comment electronically
on any guidance documents that are
subject to the notice and comment
procedures; and
(4) Receive complaints from the
public that a component of the
Department is not following the
requirements of OMB’s Memorandum
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
32300
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 104 / Friday, May 29, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
M–20–02, ‘‘Guidance Implementing
Executive Order 13891, Titled
‘‘Promoting the Rule of Law Through
Improved Agency Guidance
Documents’’,’’ dated October 31, 2019,
or is improperly treating a guidance
document as a binding requirement.
(b) Each component responsible for
issuing guidance documents shall:
(1) Submit final guidance documents
to the DoD Regulatory Policy Team at
the email address osd.mcalex.ocmo.mbx.guidance-documents@
mail.mil for posting to the Department’s
central website.
(2) Address complaints from the
public that they are not following the
requirements of OMB’s Memorandum
M–20–02, ‘‘Guidance Implementing
Executive Order 13891, Titled
‘‘Promoting the Rule of Law Through
Improved Agency Guidance
Documents’’,’’ dated October 31, 2019,
or are improperly treating a guidance
document as a binding requirement.
§ 339.10
Petitions for guidance.
(a) Any person may petition the
Department to withdraw or modify a
particular guidance document by
sending a written request to the DoD
Regulatory Program staff at email
address osd.mcalex.ocmo.mbx.guidance-documents@
mail.mil. Please use the words
‘‘GUIDANCE: [Insert the title of the
guidance document]’’ in the subject line
of the email message. The DoD
Regulatory Program staff will provide
the request to the issuing component of
the guidance document for response.
(b) The issuing component should
respond to all requests within 90 days
after receipt of the request, or as timely
as possible given any constraints of the
request. For recordkeeping purposes,
the issuing component will provide a
copy of their response to the DoD
Regulatory Program staff at email
address osd.mcalex.ocmo.mbx.guidance-documents@
mail.mil.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
§ 339.11
Rescinded guidance.
(a) All effective guidance documents
must appear on the central website. If
the guidance document does not appear
on the central website, the guidance is
rescinded and without effect.
(b) No component may cite, use, or
rely on guidance documents that are
rescinded, except to establish historical
facts.
§ 339.12
Exigent circumstances.
In emergency situations or when the
proposing component is required by
statutory deadline, court order, or
executive order to act more quickly than
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 May 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
normal review procedures allow, the
proposing component shall coordinate
with OGC and the appropriate DoD or
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer to
notify OIRA as soon as possible and, to
the extent practicable, shall comply
with the requirements of this part at the
earliest opportunity.
§ 339.13
Reports to Congress and GAO.
Upon the issuance of a final guidance
document, the appropriate Federal
Register Liaison Officer will submit a
report to Congress and GAO in
accordance with the procedures
described in 5 U.S.C. 801 (the
‘‘Congressional Review Act’’). If the
CRA procedures are not followed, the
guidance document can be nullified.
§ 339.14
Use of guidance documents.
Guidance documents cannot create
binding requirements that do not
already exist by statute or regulation.
Accordingly, noncompliance with
guidance documents cannot be used as
a basis for proving violations of
applicable law. Guidance documents
can do no more, with respect to
prohibition of conduct, than articulate
the Department’s understanding of how
a statute or regulation applies to
particular circumstances.
Dated: May 26, 2020.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2020–11551 Filed 5–28–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2007–0113; FRL–10009–
10-Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; Georgia: Definition
for Permitting
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a portion of
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of
Georgia, through the Georgia
Department of Natural Resources’
Environmental Protection Division (GA
EPD) on September 19, 2006, with a
clarification submitted on November 6,
2006, and a supplemental submittal
transmitted on November 27, 2019. EPA
is approving portions of a definition that
impacts existing minor new source
review (NSR) permitting regulations
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
because the State has demonstrated it is
consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA
or Act).
DATES:
This rule is effective June 29,
2020.
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
2007–0113. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information may not be publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Regulatory Management Section,
Air Planning and Implementation
Branch, Air and Radiation Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303–8960. EPA requests that
if at all possible, you contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
ADDRESSES:
D.
Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management
Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
Mr. Akers can also be reached via
telephone at (404) 562–9089 or via
electronic mail at akers.brad@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What action is EPA finalizing?
EPA is approving certain changes to
the Georgia SIP that were provided to
EPA by GA EPD via a letter dated
September 19, 2006. EPA previously
approved the majority of the changes to
Georgia rules originally included in the
September 19, 2006, submittal.1 In
addition, GA EPD has withdrawn
several portions of the SIP revision from
1 EPA approved portions of the September 19,
2006, SIP revision as follows: Changes to Rule 391–
3–1–.01, Definitions, were approved on February 9,
2010 (75 FR 6309); changes to Rule 391–3–1–.02,
Provisions, were approved on February 9, 2010 (75
FR 6309), December 1, 2010 (75 FR 74642), and
September 1, 2015 (80 FR 52627); and changes to
Rule 391–3–1–.03, Permits, were approved on April
9, 2013 (78 FR 21065) and November 22, 2019 (84
FR 64427).
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 104 (Friday, May 29, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32296-32300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11551]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 339
[Docket ID: DoD-2020-OS-0019]
RIN 0790-AK97
DoD Guidance Documents
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of Defense, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule sets forth the Department of Defense's (DoD)
policies and processes governing the issuance and use of guidance
documents. By issuing this final rule, DoD also responds to the
Executive Order titled: ``Promoting the Rule of Law Through Improved
Agency Guidance Documents,'' which requires federal agencies to
finalize regulations, or amend existing regulations as necessary, to
set forth processes and procedures for issuing guidance documents.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective May 29, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Toppings, 571-372-0485.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule codifies the Department's
policies and procedures regarding guidance documents. The policies and
procedures in this final rule apply to all non-exempt DoD guidance
documents, which DoD defines in Sec. 339.1. These procedures require
all DoD guidance documents to receive appropriate coordination and
review. Before guidance documents are issued, they must be reviewed to
ensure they are written in plain language and do not impose any
substantive legal requirements on the public above and beyond statute
or regulation. All guidance documents must include a clear and
prominent statement effectively stating that the contents of the
guidance document do not have the force and effect of law and are not
meant to bind the public in any way, and the guidance document is
intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing
requirements under the law or agency regulations. Recognizing the fact
that, even though guidance documents are not legally binding, they
could nevertheless have a substantial economic impact on regulated
entities that alter their conduct to conform to the guidance, this
final rule requires a good faith assessment of the cost impact on the
public of the guidance document.
This final rule also incorporates other policies and procedures,
such as
[[Page 32297]]
describing when guidance documents are subject to notice and an
opportunity for public comment and how they will be made available to
the public after issuance. These procedures are intended to ensure that
the public has a fair and sufficient opportunity to comment on guidance
documents when appropriate and practicable and has access to guidance
documents issued by the Department. The final rule also provides a
process for interested parties to petition the Department for the
withdrawal or modification of guidance documents.
Administrative Procedure
Under the Administrative Procedure Act, an agency may waive the
normal notice and comment procedures if the action is a rule of agency
organization, procedure, or practice. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A). Since
this final rule merely incorporates procedures applicable to the
Department's administrative procedures into the Code of Federal
Regulations, notice and comment are not necessary.
Rulemaking Analyses
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
This rulemaking is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. The Department does not anticipate that this
rulemaking will have an economic impact on regulated entities. This is
a rule of agency procedure and practice. The final rule describes the
Department's internal policies and procedures for its guidance
documents. The Department has adopted these internal policies and
procedures as part of its regulatory reform initiative, and has not
incurred any additional resource costs in doing so. Regulated entities
and the public will benefit from these policies and procedures through
increased agency deliberations and more opportunities to comment on
guidance documents.
Executive Order 13771, ``Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs''
This rule is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because
this rule is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. 601)
Since notice and comment rulemaking is not necessary for this rule,
the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354, 5
U.S.C. 601-612) do not apply.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
Executive Order 13132 requires agencies to ensure meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that may have a substantial, direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. This action has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and criteria contained in Executive
Order 13132, and it has been determined that this action will not have
a substantial direct effect or federalism implications on the States
and would not preempt any State law or regulation or affect the States'
ability to discharge traditional State governmental functions.
Therefore, consultation with the States is not necessary.
Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments''
This final rule has been analyzed in accordance with the principles
and criteria contained in Executive Order 13175. Because this
rulemaking does not significantly or uniquely affect the communities of
the Indian tribal governments or impose substantial direct compliance
costs on them, the funding and consultation requirements of Executive
Order 13175 do not apply.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
requires that DoD consider the impact of paperwork and other
information collection burdens imposed on the public and, under the
provisions of PRA section 3507(d), obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget for each collection of information it conducts,
sponsors, or requires through regulations. It has been determined there
are no new information collection requirements associated with this
final rule.
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been determined that this final rule does not contain a
Federal mandate that may result in expenditure by State, local and
tribal governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 339
Administrative practice and procedure, Guidance documents.
0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Office of the Secretary of
Defense adds 32 CFR part 339 to read as follows:
PART 339--DOD GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS
Sec.
339.1 General.
339.2 Initial review process.
339.3 Good faith cost estimates.
339.4 Departmental review and submission to OIRA.
339.5 Designation procedures.
339.6 Non-significant guidance documents.
339.7 Significant guidance document.
339.8 Notice-and-comment procedures.
339.9 Public access to effective guidance documents.
339.10 Petitions for guidance.
339.11 Rescinded guidance.
339.12 Exigent circumstances.
339.13 Reports to Congress and GAO.
339.14 Use of guidance documents.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a.
Sec. 339.1 General.
(a) This part provides policies and procedures governing all phases
of issuing, modifying, or rescinding guidance documents within DoD.
(b) Subject to the qualifications and exemptions contained in this
part, these policies and procedures apply to all guidance documents
intended to have future effect on the behavior of regulated parties
issued by all components of the Department, including regional and
district offices.
(c) For purposes of this part, the term guidance document includes
any statement of agency policy or interpretation concerning a statute,
regulation, or technical matter within the jurisdiction of the
Department that is intended to have general applicability and future
effect on the behavior of regulated parties, but which is not intended
to have the force or effect of law in its own right and is not
otherwise required by statute to satisfy the rulemaking procedures
specified in 5 U.S.C. 553 or 5 U.S.C. 556. The term is not confined to
formal written documents; guidance may come in a variety of forms,
including, but not limited to, letters, memoranda, circulars,
bulletins, advisories, and may include video, audio, and Web-based
formats. See OMB Memorandum M-20-02, ``Guidance Implementing Executive
Order 13891, Titled ``Promoting the Rule of Law Through Improved Agency
Guidance Documents,'' '' dated October 31, 2019.
(d) This part does not apply to:
(1) Agency statements of specific applicability, including advisory
or legal opinions directed to particular parties about circumstance-
specific questions (e.g., case or investigatory
[[Page 32298]]
letters responding to complaints, warning letters), notices regarding
particular locations or facilities (e.g., guidance pertaining to the
use, operation, or control of a government facility or property), and
correspondence with individual persons or entities (e.g., congressional
correspondence), except documents ostensibly directed to a particular
party but designed to guide the conduct of the broader regulated
public;
(2) Agency statements that do not set forth a policy on a
statutory, regulatory, or technical issue or an interpretation of a
statute or regulation, including speeches and individual presentations,
editorials, media interviews, press materials, or congressional
testimony that do not set forth for the first time a new regulatory
policy;
(3) Rules promulgated pursuant to notice and comment under 5 U.S.C.
553, or similar statutory provisions;
(4) Rules exempt from rulemaking requirements under 5 U.S.C.
553(a);
(5) Rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice;
(6) Decisions of agency adjudications under 5 U.S.C. 554, or
similar statutory provisions;
(7) Internal guidance directed solely to the issuing agency or
other agencies (or personnel of such agencies) that is not intended to
have substantial future effect on the behavior of regulated parties or
the public;
(8) Internal guidance that is made public only because release is
required under the Freedom of Information Act or agency disclosure
policies;
(9) Legal briefs, other court filings, or positions taken in
litigation or enforcement actions;
(10) Legal opinions by the Office of Legal Counsel at the
Department of Justice.
(11) Internal executive branch legal advice or legal advisory
opinions addressed to executive branch officials;
(12) Guidance pertaining to military or foreign affairs functions,
or to a national security or homeland security function of the United
States (other than guidance documents involving procurement or the
import or export of non-defense articles and services);
(13) Grant solicitations and awards; or
(14) Contract solicitations and awards.
Sec. 339.2 Initial review process.
(a) Prior to submitting guidance documents for departmental review,
Components seeking to issue, modify, or rescind a guidance document
should submit a draft copy of that document, along with the component's
designation request (see Sec. 339.5 of this part) and good faith cost
estimate (see Sec. 339.3 of this part), to their Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
(b) Before such a guidance document can be cleared for departmental
review, the appropriate DoD or OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer
will review it to ensure that it satisfies the following requirements:
(1) For significant guidance (see Sec. 339.7 of this part),
Federal Register required formatting.
(2) The guidance document complies with all relevant statutes and
regulations (including any statutory deadlines for agency action);
(3) The guidance document identifies or includes:
(i) The term ``guidance'' or its functional equivalent;
(ii) The issuing component of the Department;
(iii) A unique identifier, including, at a minimum, the date of
issuance and title of the document and its Z-RIN (a regulation
identifier number), if applicable;
(iv) The activity or entities to which the guidance applies;
(v) Citations to applicable statutes and regulations;
(vi) A statement noting whether the guidance is intended to revise
or replace any previously issued guidance and, if so, sufficient
information to identify the previously issued guidance; and
(vii) A short summary of the subject matter covered in the guidance
document at the top of the document.
(4) The guidance document avoids using mandatory language, such as
``shall,'' ``must,'' ``required,'' or ``requirement,'' unless the
language is describing an established statutory or regulatory
requirement or is addressed to DoD staff and will not foreclose the
Department's consideration of positions advanced by affected private
parties or is intended to have a substantial future effect on the
behavior of regulated parties;
(5) The guidance document is written in plain and understandable
English;
(6) All guidance documents include the following disclaimer
prominently: ``The contents of this document do not have the force and
effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way. This
document is intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding
existing requirements under the law or departmental policies.''
Sec. 339.3 Good faith cost estimates.
Even though not legally binding, some agency guidance may result in
a substantial economic impact. For example, the issuance of
departmental guidance may induce private parties to alter their conduct
to conform to recommended standards or practices, thereby incurring
costs beyond the costs of complying with existing statutes and
regulations. While it may be difficult to predict with precision the
economic impact of voluntary guidance, the proposing component of the
Department must, to the extent practicable, make a good faith effort to
estimate the likely economic cost impact of the guidance document to
determine whether the document might be significant. When the component
is assessing or explaining whether it believes a guidance document is
significant, it will, at a minimum, provide the same level of analysis
that would be required for a major determination under the
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 8). When it is determined
that a guidance document will be economically significant (see Sec.
339.7(a)(1) of this part), the component must conduct and publish a
Regulatory Impact Analysis of the sort that would accompany an
economically significant rulemaking (see requirements in E.O. 12866,
E.O. 13563, and OMB Circular A-4), to the extent reasonably possible.
Sec. 339.4 Departmental review and submission to OIRA.
(a) After the appropriate FRLO completes his or her initial review,
a guidance document will be internally coordinated within the proposing
component and formally coordinated throughout the Department with other
components who have equities. Mandatory coordinators on all guidance
documents are the Chief Management Officer, Department of Defense and
the component's General Counsel.
(b) The proposing component will adjudicate DoD and OSD Component
comments and return a final guidance document package to the
appropriate DoD or OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer for submission
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of Information and
Regulations Affairs (OIRA) for a significance determination.
(c) Guidance documents deemed by OIRA to be ``significant'' (see
Sec. 339.7 of this part) must be reviewed and approved by the
Department's Regulatory Policy Officer before OIRA formally reviews
them.
Sec. 339.5 Designation procedures.
(a) The proposing component will prepare a designation request for
guidance documents. Designation requests must include the following
information:
(1) A summary of the guidance document; and
(2) The component's recommended designation of ``not significant,''
[[Page 32299]]
``significant,'' or ``economically significant,'' as well as a
justification for that designation.
(b) The appropriate DoD or OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer
will seek a significance determination from OIRA for guidance documents
in the same manner as for rulemakings. OIRA review will occur prior to
the publishing of guidance documents, and with sufficient time to allow
OIRA to review the designation request and the guidance document to
determine if it meets the definition of ``significant'' or
``economically significant'' under Executive Order 13891.
(c) Prior to being published, guidance documents determined to be
``significant'' or ``economically significant'' are subject to formal
review and interagency coordination by OIRA. The OIRA review, to
include interagency coordination, is to be consistent with Executive
Order 12866.
(d) Significant guidance documents (see Sec. 339.7 of this part)
must be reviewed and approved by the Department's Regulatory Policy
Officer before OIRA formally reviews them.
(e) Once the OMB/OIRA has cleared a guidance document for
publication, the appropriate DoD or OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer will coordinate the guidance document with the Defense Office
of Prepublication and Security Review (DOPSR). The FRLO will notify the
component of DOPSR's approval and that the guidance document can be
approved for Federal Register publication or signed for placement on
the central website.
Sec. 339.6 Non-significant guidance documents.
(a) If the guidance document is determined to be non-significant
within the meaning of Sec. 339.7 of this part, the appropriate DoD or
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer will advise the proposing
component to proceed with issuance of the guidance.
(b) For each such guidance document, the proposing component should
forward it to the appropriate authority for approval. OSD PSAs or
equivalents can delegate in writing the authority to approve non-
significant guidance documents to subordinate officials at or above the
level of a General/Flag Officer, Senior Executive Service member, or
equivalent. The proposing component should include a statement in the
action memorandum to the approving authority that the guidance document
has been reviewed and cleared as non-significant by OIRA.
(c) After the approving authority signs the non-significant
guidance document, it should be forwarded to the DoD Regulatory Program
staff for publication on the department's guidance document website
located at https://open.defense.gov/Regulatory-Program/Guidance-Documents/.
Sec. 339.7 Significant guidance documents.
(a) The term ``significant guidance document'' means a guidance
document that will be disseminated to regulated entities or the general
public and that may reasonably be anticipated:
(1) To lead to an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more or adversely affect in a material way the U.S. economy, a sector
of the U.S. economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities (a guidance document is economically significant if it
meets the criteria in this paragraph);
(2) To create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another Federal agency;
(3) To alter materially the budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or
(4) To raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
E.O. 12866, as further amended.
(b) The term ``significant guidance document'' does not include the
categories of documents excluded by Sec. 339.1(d) or any other
category of guidance documents exempted in writing in consultation with
OIRA.
(c) Significant guidance documents, to include economically
significant guidance documents, must be reviewed by OIRA under E.O.
12866 before issuance; and must demonstrate compliance with the
applicable requirements for regulations or rules, including significant
regulatory actions, set forth in E.O. 12866, E.O. 13563, E.O. 13609,
E.O. 13771, and E.O. 13777.
(d) Each proposed DoD guidance document determined by OIRA to be
significant must be approved by an OSD Principal Staff Assistant or
equivalent appointed by the President.
(e) Significant guidance documents have to be published for notice
and comment in accordance with Sec. 339.8 of this part before they can
be issued.
Sec. 339.8 Notice-and-comment procedures.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, all
proposed DoD guidance documents determined to be a ``significant
guidance document'' within the meaning of Sec. 339.7 shall be subject
to the following notice and comment procedures. After receiving
clearance from OIRA to publish a proposed significant guidance
document, the proposing component shall publish a notice in the Federal
Register announcing that a draft of the proposed guidance document is
publicly available on Regulations.gov, shall invite public comment on
the draft document for a minimum of 30 days. After the comment period
ends, the proposing component shall prepare and post a public response
to major concerns raised in the comments, as appropriate, in the docket
on Regulations.gov. Then the component will prepare a final notice that
will be coordinated within the department and submitted to OIRA for
review, interagency coordination, and clearance for publishing in the
Federal Register. Both the proposed and final notices shall be approved
by the DoD RPO before OIRA review, and by an OSD Principal Staff
Assistant or equivalent appointed by the President after OIRA clearance
and DOPSR approval.
(b) The notice and comment requirements of paragraph (a) of this
section will not apply to any significant guidance document or
categories of significant guidance documents for which the proposing
component finds, in consultation with their component OGC and OIRA,
good cause that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest (and incorporates the
finding of good cause and a brief statement of reasons therefor in the
guidance issued).
Sec. 339.9 Public access to effective guidance documents.
(a) The DoD Regulatory Policy Team shall:
(1) Ensure all final guidance documents in effect are identified by
a unique identifier which includes, at a minimum, the document's title
and date of issuance or revision and its Z-RIN, if applicable, are
published and maintained on a central website located at https://open.defense.gov/Regulatory-Program/Guidance-Documents/ in a single,
searchable, indexed database, and available to the public;
(2) Note on its website that guidance documents do not bind the
public, except as authorized by law or as incorporated into a contract;
(3) Announce on its website a means for the public to comment
electronically on any guidance documents that are subject to the notice
and comment procedures; and
(4) Receive complaints from the public that a component of the
Department is not following the requirements of OMB's Memorandum
[[Page 32300]]
M-20-02, ``Guidance Implementing Executive Order 13891, Titled
``Promoting the Rule of Law Through Improved Agency Guidance
Documents'','' dated October 31, 2019, or is improperly treating a
guidance document as a binding requirement.
(b) Each component responsible for issuing guidance documents
shall:
(1) Submit final guidance documents to the DoD Regulatory Policy
Team at the email address [email protected] for posting to the Department's central website.
(2) Address complaints from the public that they are not following
the requirements of OMB's Memorandum M-20-02, ``Guidance Implementing
Executive Order 13891, Titled ``Promoting the Rule of Law Through
Improved Agency Guidance Documents'','' dated October 31, 2019, or are
improperly treating a guidance document as a binding requirement.
Sec. 339.10 Petitions for guidance.
(a) Any person may petition the Department to withdraw or modify a
particular guidance document by sending a written request to the DoD
Regulatory Program staff at email address [email protected]. Please use the words
``GUIDANCE: [Insert the title of the guidance document]'' in the
subject line of the email message. The DoD Regulatory Program staff
will provide the request to the issuing component of the guidance
document for response.
(b) The issuing component should respond to all requests within 90
days after receipt of the request, or as timely as possible given any
constraints of the request. For recordkeeping purposes, the issuing
component will provide a copy of their response to the DoD Regulatory
Program staff at email address [email protected].
Sec. 339.11 Rescinded guidance.
(a) All effective guidance documents must appear on the central
website. If the guidance document does not appear on the central
website, the guidance is rescinded and without effect.
(b) No component may cite, use, or rely on guidance documents that
are rescinded, except to establish historical facts.
Sec. 339.12 Exigent circumstances.
In emergency situations or when the proposing component is required
by statutory deadline, court order, or executive order to act more
quickly than normal review procedures allow, the proposing component
shall coordinate with OGC and the appropriate DoD or OSD Federal
Register Liaison Officer to notify OIRA as soon as possible and, to the
extent practicable, shall comply with the requirements of this part at
the earliest opportunity.
Sec. 339.13 Reports to Congress and GAO.
Upon the issuance of a final guidance document, the appropriate
Federal Register Liaison Officer will submit a report to Congress and
GAO in accordance with the procedures described in 5 U.S.C. 801 (the
``Congressional Review Act''). If the CRA procedures are not followed,
the guidance document can be nullified.
Sec. 339.14 Use of guidance documents.
Guidance documents cannot create binding requirements that do not
already exist by statute or regulation. Accordingly, noncompliance with
guidance documents cannot be used as a basis for proving violations of
applicable law. Guidance documents can do no more, with respect to
prohibition of conduct, than articulate the Department's understanding
of how a statute or regulation applies to particular circumstances.
Dated: May 26, 2020.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2020-11551 Filed 5-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P