Director, Shareholder, and Member Meetings, 31943-31949 [2020-11525]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Rapeseed will be used to calculate any
replanting payment that may be due. A
revised acreage report will be required
to reflect the replanted type.
(2) Notwithstanding section 10(d)(1),
the following will have a replanting
payment based on your production
guarantee and your projected price for
the crop type initially planted:
(i) Any damaged winter crop type that
is replanted to a spring crop type, but
that retains insurance based on the
winter crop type; and
(ii) Any acreage replanted at a
reduced seeding rate into a partially
damaged stand of the insured crop.
*
*
*
*
*
14. Prevented Planting.
In counties for which the Special
Provisions designate a spring final
planting date, your prevented planting
production guarantee will be based on
your approved yield for spring-planted
acreage of the insured crop. Your
prevented planting coverage will be a
percentage specified in the actuarial
documents of your production
guarantee for timely planted acreage. If
you have additional coverage and pay
an additional premium, you may
increase your prevented planting
coverage if such additional coverage is
specified in the actuarial documents.
Martin Barbre,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2020–10240 Filed 5–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
12 CFR Parts 5 and 7
[Docket No. OCC–2020–0020]
RIN 1557–AE94
Director, Shareholder, and Member
Meetings
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Treasury (OCC).
ACTION: Interim final rule and request
for comment.
AGENCY:
The Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency (OCC) is amending its
regulations on activities and operations
of national banks and corporate
activities of Federal savings associations
to provide that these institutions may
permit telephonic and electronic
participation at all board of directors,
shareholder, and as applicable, member,
meetings. This Interim Final Rule (IFR)
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
will update the OCC’s regulations to
conform with modern technologies and
enable national banks and Federal
savings associations to hold these
meetings without violating social
distancing restrictions imposed in
response to the coronavirus disease
2019 (COVID–19) emergency.
DATES: The effective date of this interim
final rule is May 28, 2020. Comments on
the interim final rule must be received
no later than July 13, 2020.
ADDRESSES:
OCC: Commenters are encouraged to
submit comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal or email, if possible.
Please use the title ‘‘Director,
Shareholder, and Member Meetings’’ to
facilitate the organization and
distribution of the comments. You may
submit comments by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal—
Regulations.gov Classic or
Regulations.gov Beta:
Regulations.gov Classic: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov/. Enter ‘‘Docket ID
OCC–2020–0020’’ in the Search Box and
click ‘‘Search.’’ Click on ‘‘Comment
Now’’ to submit public comments. For
help with submitting effective
comments please click on ‘‘View
Commenter’s Checklist.’’ Click on the
‘‘Help’’ tab on the Regulations.gov home
page to get information on using
Regulations.gov, including instructions
for submitting public comments.
Regulations.gov Beta: Go to https://
beta.regulations.gov/ or click ‘‘Visit
New Regulations.gov Site’’ from the
Regulations.gov Classic homepage.
Enter ‘‘Docket ID OCC–2020–0020’’ in
the Search Box and click ‘‘Search.’’
Public comments can be submitted via
the ‘‘Comment’’ box below the
displayed document information or by
clicking on the document title and then
clicking the ‘‘Comment’’ box on the topleft side of the screen. For help with
submitting effective comments please
click on ‘‘Commenter’s Checklist.’’ For
assistance with the Regulations.gov Beta
site, please call (877) 378–5457 (toll
free) or (703) 454–9859 Monday–Friday,
9 a.m.–5 p.m. ET or email regulations@
erulemakinghelpdesk.com.
• Email: regs.comments@
occ.treas.gov.
• Mail: Chief Counsel’s Office,
Attention: Comment Processing, Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400
7th Street SW, Suite 3E–218,
Washington, DC 20219.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: 400 7th
Street SW, Suite 3E–218, Washington,
DC 20219.
• Fax: (571) 465–4326.
Instructions: You must include
‘‘OCC’’ as the agency name and ‘‘Docket
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31943
ID OCC–2020–0020’’ in your comment.
In general, the OCC will enter all
comments received into the docket and
publish the comments on the
Regulations.gov website without
change, including any business or
personal information provided such as
name and address information, email
addresses, or phone numbers.
Comments received, including
attachments and other supporting
materials, are part of the public record
and subject to public disclosure. Do not
include any information in your
comment or supporting materials that
you consider confidential or
inappropriate for public disclosure.
You may review comments and other
related materials that pertain to this
rulemaking action by any of the
following methods:
• Viewing Comments Electronically—
Regulations.gov Classic or
Regulations.gov Beta:
Regulations.gov Classic: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov/. Enter ‘‘Docket ID
OCC–2020–0020’’ in the Search box and
click ‘‘Search.’’ Click on ‘‘Open Docket
Folder’’ on the right side of the screen.
Comments and supporting materials can
be viewed and filtered by clicking on
‘‘View all documents and comments in
this docket’’ and then using the filtering
tools on the left side of the screen. Click
on the ‘‘Help’’ tab on the
Regulations.gov home page to get
information on using Regulations.gov.
The docket may be viewed after the
close of the comment period in the same
manner as during the comment period.
Regulations.gov Beta: Go to https://
beta.regulations.gov/ or click ‘‘Visit
New Regulations.gov Site’’ from the
Regulations.gov Classic homepage.
Enter ‘‘Docket ID OCC–2020–0020’’ in
the Search Box and click ‘‘Search.’’
Click on the ‘‘Comments’’ tab.
Comments can be viewed and filtered
by clicking on the ‘‘Sort By’’ drop-down
on the right side of the screen or the
‘‘Refine Results’’ options on the left side
of the screen. Supporting materials can
be viewed by clicking on the
‘‘Documents’’ tab and filtered by
clicking on the ‘‘Sort By’’ drop-down on
the right side of the screen or the
‘‘Refine Results’’ options on the left side
of the screen.’’ For assistance with the
Regulations.gov Beta site, please call
(877) 378–5457 (toll free) or (703) 454–
9859 Monday–Friday, 9 a.m.–5 p.m. ET
or email regulations@
erulemakinghelpdesk.com.
The docket may be viewed after the
close of the comment period in the same
manner as during the comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frances C. Augello, Special Counsel, or
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
31944
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Heidi M. Thomas, Special Counsel,
Chief Counsel’s Office, (202) 649–5490,
or Donald W. Dwyer, Thrift Licensing
Lead Expert, (202) 649–6260, for
persons who are deaf or hearing
impaired, TTY, (202) 649–5597, Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400
7th Street SW, Washington, DC 20219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
necessary meetings remotely during the
COVID–19 emergency as well as during
any other future emergency when inperson meetings may not be feasible.
Because these amendments will be
permanent and will not expire after the
COVID–19 emergency has ended, they
also will provide national banks and
Federal savings associations, on an
ongoing basis, with more flexibility in
planning and holding director,
shareholder, and, as applicable, member
meetings; could permit greater director,
shareholder, and member participation
at these meetings for those participants
not able to attend in person; and may
reduce the burden and costs of inperson meetings for national banks and
Federal savings associations, as well as
meeting participants. The OCC expects
that national banks and Federal savings
associations allowing remote
participation will provide fair treatment
and transparency for shareholders or
members participating telephonically or
electronically.
I. Background
The OCC recognizes the recent
disruptions and significant challenges
faced by national banks and Federal
savings associations as a result of the
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19)
emergency. Health and safety advisories
declared in response to the COVID–19
emergency, including those relating to
social distancing, are impeding the
ability of national banks and Federal
savings associations to hold in-person
meetings, such as board of director,
shareholder, and member meetings.
However, neither the National Bank Act
or the Home Owners’ Loan Act, as
applicable, nor OCC regulations require
that director, shareholder, or member
meetings take place in person.1
Furthermore, remote communication
tools such as telephone or internetbased conferencing are available to
institutions so that they may comply
with internal and regulatory meeting
requirements within the parameters of
the social distancing guidelines. The
OCC is issuing this IFR to clarify that
national banks and Federal savings
associations may use remote
communication tools to conduct these
meetings. Specifically, this IFR allows
national banks and Federal savings
associations to permit remote
participation by shareholders, directors,
and as applicable, members at
shareholder, board of directors, and
member meetings. Under this authority,
institutions could hold in-person
meetings with some participants
attending remotely or hold these
meetings exclusively by means of
remote communication.
The amendments made by this IFR
will enable national banks and Federal
savings associations to conduct
Federal Savings Associations (§§ 5.21,
5.22) 2
Member and Shareholder Meetings.
Twelve CFR 5.21 governs the
procedures and requirements for
charters and bylaws of Federal mutual
savings associations. Paragraph (j)(2)(i)
of § 5.21 requires the association’s
bylaws to indicate that the association
will provide for and conduct an annual
meeting of its members for the election
of directors and any other business of
the association. Paragraph (j)(2)(i) also
provides that the annual meeting must
be held at any convenient place the
board of directors may designate, and at
a date and time within 150 days after
the end of the association’s fiscal year.3
Paragraph (j)(2)(ii) of § 5.21 requires the
bylaws to include procedures for calling
and conducting special meetings of
Federal mutual savings association
members.
Section 5.22 governs the procedures
and requirements for Federal stock
savings association charters and bylaws
1 Although the National Bank Act does not
specifically address the manner in which a national
bank’s board of directors must conduct its meetings,
it does authorize national banks ‘‘[t]o prescribe by
its board of directors, bylaws not inconsistent with
law, regulating the manner . . . its general business
[is to be] conducted.’’ 12 U.S.C. 24 (Sixth). In a 1999
interpretive letter, the OCC stated that ‘‘[t]his
authority to prescribe bylaws to conduct a national
bank’s general business is sufficiently broad to
permit a national bank to adopt procedures
governing the practice of conducting board
meetings, including the ability to conduct regular
board meetings by telephone or video
conferencing.’’ OCC Interpretive Letter No. 860
(Apr. 5, 1999).
2 On March 5, the OCC issued a proposal to
amend 12 CFR part 5 to update and clarify its
policies and procedures for corporate activities and
transactions involving national banks and Federal
savings associations, eliminate unnecessary
requirements consistent with safety and soundness,
and make other technical and conforming changes.
85 FR 18728 (Apr. 2, 2020). This proposed rule
includes amendments to §§ 5.21 and 5.22. The OCC
will reconcile these proposed changes with the
amendments made by this IFR when issuing the
part 5 final rule.
3 On May 12, 2020, the OCC issued guidance to
institutions considering changes to the date, time or
location of their annual meetings as a result of the
COVID–19 emergency. See OCC Bulletin 2020–51.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
II. Description of the Interim Final Rule
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and generally parallels § 5.21. Paragraph
(k)(1) of § 5.22 provides that all annual
and special meetings of shareholders
must be held at any convenient place
the board of directors may designate.
To clarify that both a Federal mutual
savings association and a Federal stock
savings association may use remote
communication tools to conduct these
meetings, the OCC is amending
§§ 5.21(j)(2)(i) and (j)(2)(ii) and
5.22(k)(1) to permit an association’s
bylaws to provide for telephonic or
electronic participation of members and
shareholders, as applicable, at both
annual and special meetings. This
amendment also provides that members
or shareholders participating
telephonically or electronically in an
annual or special meeting will be
deemed present in person for purposes
of the quorum requirement in
§§ 5.21(j)(2)(v) or 5.22(k)(5), as
applicable.4 As noted below, OCC
regulations and model bylaw provisions
governing annual and special meetings
of the board of directors of Federal
mutual savings associations and special
meetings of the board of directors of
Federal stock savings associations
currently permit ‘‘telephonic and
electronic participation.’’ The OCC is
using the phrase ‘‘telephonic and
electronic participation’’ in its
amendments to the shareholder meeting
provisions and maintaining the use of
this phrase in its board of director
provisions to provide consistent
terminology for Federal savings
associations and to avoid the cost and
burden of any bylaw changes that could
result from modifying this terminology
in this IFR. The OCC requests comment
on whether this terminology is
appropriate in light of current
technology or whether the OCC should
use a different phrase in describing
remote participation at shareholder and
board of directors meetings.
This IFR also requires Federal savings
associations to have procedures in place
for telephonic and electronic
participation at member or shareholder
meetings and provides associations with
a choice of procedures to follow. The
procedures available to Federal mutual
savings associations and those available
to Federal stock savings associations
differ only with respect to the State law
procedures they may choose. As
explained below, this difference is
4 Section 5.21(j)(2)(v) provides that any number of
members present and voting, represented in person
or by proxy, at a regular or special meeting of the
members constitutes a quorum. Section 5.22(k)(5)
provides that a majority of the outstanding shares
of the association entitled to vote, represented in
person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum at a
meeting of shareholders.
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
based on the State corporate governance
procedures available to each type of
entity under current OCC regulations.
With respect to Federal mutual
savings associations, the IFR amends
§ 5.21(j)(2)(i) (annual meetings of
members) and § 5.21(j)(2)(ii) (special
meetings of members) to require the
association to follow the procedures for
telephonic or electronic participation of:
(1) The State corporate governance
procedures it is permitted to elect
pursuant to § 5.21(j)(3)(iii), if those State
corporate governance procedures
include telephonic or electronic
participation procedures; (2) the
Delaware General Corporation Law 5
(with ‘‘member’’ substituting for
‘‘stockholder’’); or (3) the Model
Business Corporation Act 6 (with
‘‘member’’ substituting for
‘‘shareholder’’), provided that such
procedures are not inconsistent with
applicable Federal statutes and
regulations and safety and soundness.
With certain exceptions, § 5.21(j)(3)(iii)
provides that a Federal mutual savings
association may elect to follow the
corporate governance procedures of the
laws of the State where the home office
of the institution is located. Therefore,
pursuant to this IFR, a Federal mutual
savings association has the choice of
following either the procedures for
remote participation of the laws of its
home State if these procedures exist, the
procedures for remote participation
under Delaware General Corporation
Law, or the procedures for remote
5 Delaware law provides that stockholders and
proxyholders not physically present at a
stockholders meeting may, by means of remote
communication, participate in the meeting and be
deemed present in person and vote at the meeting
provided that: (1) The corporation implements
reasonable measures to verify that each person
deemed present and permitted to vote remotely is
a stockholder or proxyholder, (2) the corporation
implements reasonable measures to provide such
stockholders and proxyholders a reasonable
opportunity to participate in the meeting and to
vote on matters submitted to the stockholders,
including an opportunity to read or hear the
proceedings of the meeting substantially
concurrently with such proceedings, and (3) if any
stockholder or proxyholder votes or takes other
action at the meeting by means of remote
communication, a record of such vote or other
action is maintained by the corporation. 8 Del. C.
§ 211.
6 The Model Business Corporation Act provides
that shareholders participating in a shareholders’
meeting by means of remote communication shall
be deemed present and may vote at such meeting
if the corporation has implemented reasonable
measures to: (1) Verify that each person
participating remotely as a shareholder is a
shareholder; and (2) provide such shareholders a
reasonable opportunity to participate in the meeting
and to vote on matters submitted to the
shareholders, including an opportunity to
communicate, and to read or hear the proceedings
of the meeting, substantially concurrently with such
proceedings. Section 7.09, The Model Business
Corporation Act (as amended 2019).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
participation under the Model Business
Corporation Act. To inform members of
its choice of procedures, the IFR
requires the association to indicate the
use of these procedures in its bylaws.
With respect to Federal stock savings
associations, § 5.22(k)(1) as amended by
this IFR requires the association to elect
to follow, pursuant to § 5.22(j)(2)(iii),
corporate governance procedures for
shareholder meetings that include
procedures for telephonic or electronic
participation. With certain exceptions,
§ 5.22(j)(2)(iii) provides that a Federal
stock association may elect to follow the
corporate governance procedures of: (1)
The laws of the State where the home
office of the association is located; (2)
the laws of the State where the
association’s holding company, if any, is
incorporated or chartered; (3) the
Delaware General Corporation Law; or
(4) the Model Business Corporation Act,
provided that such procedures are not
inconsistent with applicable Federal
statutes and regulations and safety and
soundness. This amendment, therefore,
permits a Federal stock savings
association to choose from any of the
sources listed in § 5.22(j)(2)(iii) for its
telephonic and electronic participation
procedures. As with the amendments
for Federal mutual savings associations,
this IFR requires a Federal stock savings
association to indicate in its bylaws
which procedures it will use to inform
its shareholders of these procedures.
As a result of these amendments, this
IFR will ensure that if a Federal savings
association’s bylaws provide for
telephonic or electronic participation at
member or shareholder meetings, the
Federal savings association must have
procedures in place for this remote
participation even if it has not elected
to follow any particular corporate
governance law pursuant to
§§ 5.21(j)(3)(iii) or 5.22(j)(2)(iii), or if the
corporate governance law it has elected
to follow does not contain procedures
for remote participation at meetings.
As indicated above, the IFR requires
a Federal savings association to amend
its bylaws if it wishes to utilize remote
means of communication for its
meetings. Current §§ 5.21(j)(3) and
5.22(j)(2) provide that, in general, a
Federal savings association must submit
an amendment to its bylaws to the OCC
30 days prior to adoption by its board
of directors and that the amendment is
effective 30 days after filing with the
OCC. However, pursuant to
§§ 5.21(j)(3)(i)(B) and 5.22(j)(2)(i)(B), if
an association adopts a bylaw
amendment that includes the language
of the OCC’s model or optional bylaws
without change and files the bylaw with
the OCC within 30 days after adoption,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31945
the bylaw is effective upon adoption. To
permit Federal savings associations to
utilize the remote communication
provisions included in this IFR as
quickly as possible during the COVID–
19 emergency, the OCC is issuing
concurrent with this IFR optional model
bylaw provisions for telephonic and
electronic participation at shareholder
and member meetings.7
The OCC also is considering updating
the member and shareholder meeting
notice requirements contained in
§§ 5.21 and 5.22. Section 5.21(j)(2)(iii)
requires a Federal mutual savings
association to publish a notice of the
annual or special meeting in a
newspaper of general circulation in the
city or county in which the principal
place of business of the association is
located or to mail the notice postage
prepaid to each of its members of
record. This provision also requires the
Federal mutual savings association to
post notice of the meeting in a
conspicuous place in each of its offices
during the 14 days immediately
preceding the date on which the
meeting convenes. The OCC requests
comment on whether it should amend
this provision to permit a Federal
mutual savings association to deliver
the meeting notice to a member
electronically if the member receives
electronic communications. In addition,
the OCC requests comment on whether
it should amend this provision to permit
the Federal mutual savings association
to post the notice of the meeting on its
website instead of in its offices. Section
5.22(k)(2) requires a Federal savings
association to deliver a written notice of
a shareholder meeting either personally
or by mail to each shareholder of record
entitled to vote at the meeting. If mailed,
the notice is deemed delivered when
deposited in the mail, addressed to the
shareholder at the address appearing on
the stock transfer books or records of the
association as of the record date, with
postage thereon prepaid. As with
§ 5.21(j)(2)(iii), the OCC requests
comment on whether it should amend
§ 5.22(k)(2) to permit the Federal stock
savings association to deliver the
meeting notice to the shareholder
electronically if the shareholder receives
electronic communications and that this
electronic notice be deemed delivered
when sent to the shareholder’s
electronic address appearing on the
books or records of the association as of
the record date. The OCC believes that
7 Model bylaw provisions for mutual savings
associations are available at https://www.occ.gov/
static/licensing/model-mutual-fsa-bylaws.pdf.
Model bylaw provisions for stock savings
associations are available at https://www.occ.gov/
static/licensing/model-stock-fsa-bylaws.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
31946
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
these amendments to the notice
provisions would update the OCC’s
rules to reflect modern communication
methods and complement the
amendments made by this IFR. The OCC
also believes that these amendments
would benefit members and
shareholders by providing them with
notice by means consistent with other
communications they receive from the
association and allow a Federal savings
association to announce a member or
shareholder meeting through less costly
or burdensome methods.
Board of Directors Meetings. Current
§ 5.21(j)(2)(ix) provides that the board of
directors of a Federal mutual savings
association may permit telephonic or
electronic participation at its meetings.
Current § 5.22(l)(8) permits the bylaws
of a Federal stock savings association to
provide for electronic participation at
special meetings of the board of
directors. The OCC’s model bylaws for
Federal mutual and stock savings
associations also permit telephonic or
similar communication at meetings of
the board of directors.8 However,
current § 5.22(l)(3), which provides
requirements for regular meetings of the
board of directors of a Federal stock
savings association, is silent with
respect to electronic participation. To
make these provisions consistent with
each other, as well as with the model
bylaws, the OCC is amending § 5.22(l)(3)
to provide that the bylaws of a Federal
stock savings association may provide
for telephonic or electronic
participation of board members at
regular meetings. The OCC also is
making technical changes to § 5.22(l)(8)
by revising it to include telephonic in
addition to electronic participation so
that it is consistent with the other
provisions of this IFR and to specify that
this telephonic and electronic
participation provision applies to
special meetings of the board.
National Banks (§ 7.2003)
As with the amendments to §§ 5.21
and 5.22, the OCC is permitting national
banks to provide for telephonic or
electronic participation at shareholder
and board of directors meetings. To
accomplish this, the OCC is combining
current 12 CFR 7.2001, which provides
procedures for notifying shareholders of
shareholder meetings, into current
§ 7.2003, which provides the rule for
annual shareholder meetings that fall on
a holiday; adding new telephonic and
electronic participation language to 12
CFR 7.2003 as new paragraphs (c) and
8 See ‘‘Articles of Association, Charter, and Bylaw
Amendments,’’ Comptroller’s Licensing Manual,
(June 2017).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
(d); and retitling § 7.2003 as
‘‘Shareholder meetings; Board of
directors meetings.’’ The OCC is not
making any substantive changes to
current § 7.2001, which becomes
§ 7.2003(a), or current § 7.2003, which
becomes § 7.2003(b). Combining
§§ 7.2001 and 7.2003 puts all
amendments related to shareholder
meetings are held in one section.
New paragraph (c) to § 7.2003 permits
a national bank to provide for
telephonic or electronic participation at
shareholder meetings. Further, new
paragraph (c) requires a national bank to
have procedures for telephonic or
electronic participation in shareholder
meetings. As with Federal savings
associations, a national bank may
choose these procedures from several
sources: (1) The corporate governance
procedures it has elected to follow
pursuant to § 7.2000(b),9 if those elected
procedures include telephonic or
electronic participation procedures; (2)
the Delaware General Corporation Law;
or (3) the Model Business Corporation
Act. However, these procedures must
not be inconsistent with applicable
Federal statutes and regulations and
safety and soundness. To inform
shareholders of its choice of procedures,
the IFR requires the national bank to
indicate the use of these procedures in
its bylaws. In general, Federal law does
not require a national bank to file its
bylaws and any amendments with, or to
seek approval of its bylaws from, the
OCC.10
As with the amendments to
§§ 5.21(j)(2)(i) and (j)(2)(ii) and
5.22(k)(1) for Federal savings
associations, this provision will ensure
that a national bank has procedures in
place for remote participation at
shareholder meetings even if the
corporate governance law it has elected
to follow does not contain procedures
for remote participation at shareholder
meetings or if it has not elected to
9 Section 7.2000(b) provides that to the extent not
inconsistent with applicable Federal banking
statutes or regulations or bank safety and
soundness, a national bank may elect to follow the
corporate governance procedures of the law of the
State in which the main office of the bank is
located, the law of the State in which the holding
company of the bank is incorporated, Delaware
General Corporation Law, or the Model Business
Corporation Act. Further, § 7.2000 requires that a
national bank designate in its bylaws the body of
law selected for its corporate governance
procedures.
10 See Articles of Association, Charter, and Bylaw
Amendments booklet of the Comptroller’s Licensing
Manual at page 4 (June 2017). Should it come to the
OCC’s attention, however, that a national bank’s
bylaws are inconsistent with a law or regulation or
the national bank’s articles of association, or the
bylaws promote unsafe or unsound operation of the
national bank, the OCC will consider appropriate
supervisory action to address any concerns. Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
follow any particular corporate
governance law pursuant to § 7.2000(b).
New paragraph (d) of § 7.2003
provides that a national bank may
provide for telephonic or electronic
participation at a meeting of its board of
directors. This provision codifies OCC
Interpretive Letter No. 860 11 and makes
the national bank rule consistent with
rules for Federal savings associations.
III. Request for Comment
The OCC seeks comment on all
aspects of the IFR in addition to those
specific requests noted in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. In
addition, please comment on the
following:
• Should the OCC limit the ability of
national banks and Federal savings
associations to hold shareholder or
member meetings exclusively by means
of remote communication to emergency
situations or when extenuating
circumstances exist? If so, in what
extenuating circumstances should
national banks and Federal savings
associations have authority to hold
meetings exclusively by means of
remote communication?
• Would holding shareholder or
member meetings exclusively by means
of remote communication limit
participation by some shareholders or
members, and if so, how?
• Should the OCC require national
banks and Federal savings associations
to provide in-person options for each
shareholder or member meeting or
require national banks or Federal
savings associations to adopt procedures
that permit shareholder participation at
virtual meetings? If so, why?
• Should the OCC adopt regulatory
procedures governing telephonic and
electronic participation at shareholder
meetings instead of requiring national
banks and Federal savings associations
to follow State corporate law, Delaware
General Corporation Law, or Model
Business Corporation Act procedures? If
so, what specific procedures should the
OCC adopt?
• Should the OCC provide risk
management standards to mitigate any
security risks arising from telephonic or
electronic meetings? If so, what specific
standards should the OCC adopt?
IV. Administrative Law Matters
A. Administrative Procedure Act
The OCC is issuing the IFR without
prior notice and the opportunity for
public comment and the delayed
effective date ordinarily prescribed by
the Administrative Procedure Act
11 See
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
footnote 1.
28MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(APA).12 Pursuant to section 553(b)(B)
of the APA, general notice and the
opportunity for public comment are not
required with respect to a rulemaking
when an ‘‘agency for good cause finds
(and incorporates the finding and a brief
statement of reasons therefor in the
rules issued) that notice and public
procedure thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ 13
The OCC believes that the public
interest is best served by implementing
the IFR immediately upon publication
in the Federal Register. National banks
and Federal savings associations are
acutely impacted by the COVID–19
emergency. Health and safety advisories
in response to the COVID–19
emergency, including those relating to
social distancing, are impeding the
ability of national banks and Federal
savings associations to hold in-person
meetings, such as board of director,
shareholder, and member meetings. The
IFR amends the OCC’s rules to permit
telephonic and electronic participation
at these meetings, thereby allowing
national banks and Federal savings
associations to conduct all necessary
board of director, shareholder, and
member meetings during the COVID–19
emergency. For these reasons, the OCC
finds that there is good cause consistent
with the public interest to issue the rule
without advance notice and comment.14
The APA also requires a 30-day
delayed effective date, except for: (1)
Substantive rules which grant or
recognize an exemption or relieve a
restriction; (2) interpretative rules and
statements of policy; or (3) as otherwise
provided by the agency for good
cause.15 As described above, the OCC
believes it has good cause to issue this
rule without a delayed effective date.
Therefore, the IFR is exempt from the
APA’s delayed effective date
requirement.16
While the OCC believes that there is
good cause to issue the rule without
advance notice and comment and with
an immediate effective date, the OCC is
interested in the views of the public and
requests comment on all aspects of the
IFR.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
B. Congressional Review Act
For purposes of the Congressional
Review Act, the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) makes a
determination as to whether a final rule
U.S.C. 553.
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A).
14 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B); 553(d)(3).
15 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
16 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1).
constitutes a ‘‘major rule.’’ 17 If a rule is
deemed a ‘‘major rule’’ by the OMB, the
Congressional Review Act generally
provides that the rule may not take
effect until at least 60 days following its
publication.18
The Congressional Review Act defines
a ‘‘major rule’’ as any rule that the
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of
the OMB finds has resulted in or is
likely to result in: (1) An annual effect
on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; (2) a major increase in costs or
prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local
government agencies, or geographic
regions; or (3) significant adverse effects
on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets.19
The delayed effective date required by
the Congressional Review Act does not
apply to any rule for which an agency
for good cause finds (and incorporates
the finding and a brief statement of
reasons therefor in the rule issued) that
notice and public procedure thereon are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.20 For the same
reasons set forth above, the OCC is
adopting the IFR without the delayed
effective date generally prescribed
under the Congressional Review Act. In
light of the COVID–19 emergency, the
OCC believes that delaying the effective
date of the rule would be contrary to the
public interest.
As required by the Congressional
Review Act, the OCC will submit the
IFR and other appropriate reports to
Congress and the Government
Accountability Office for review.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
Certain provisions of the proposed
rulemaking contain ‘‘collection of
information’’ requirements within the
meaning of the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3521). In accordance with the
requirements of the PRA, the OCC may
not conduct or sponsor, and a
respondent is not required to respond
to, an information collection unless it
displays a currently valid Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) control
number.
The OCC reviewed the IFR and
determined that it revises certain
information collection requirements
12 5
13 5
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 May 27, 2020
17 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.
U.S.C. 801(a)(3).
19 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
20 5 U.S.C. 808.
18 5
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31947
previously cleared by OMB under OMB
Control No. 1557–0014. The OCC has
submitted the revised information
collection to OMB for review under
section 3507(d) of the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3507(d)) and section 1320.11 of the
OMB’s implementing regulations (5 CFR
1320).
Current Actions
The information collection
requirements are as follows:
• National banks and FSAs must have
procedures in place for holding remote
meetings.
• FSAs will need to amend their
bylaws if they wish to utilize remote
means of communication for its
meetings.
• Depending on which state or law
the FSA elects to follow for procedures
for remote means of communication, the
FSA may have to amend its bylaws and
file with the OCC.
• National banks must indicate the
use of telephonic or electronic
participation at shareholder meetings in
their bylaws.
• The OCC is considering allowing
alternative/electronic means of notifying
members/shareholders of meetings.
The OCC estimates that there will be
no change in burden as a result of these
changes.
Title of Information Collection:
Licensing Manual.
Frequency: Event generated.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profit.
Estimated number of respondents:
1,174
Total estimated annual burden for the
collection: 12,534 hours.
Comments are invited on:
a. Whether the collections of
information are necessary for the proper
performance of the agencies’ functions,
including whether the information has
practical utility;
b. The accuracy or the estimate of the
burden of the information collections,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
c. Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
d. Ways to minimize the burden of the
information collections on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and
e. Estimates of capital or startup costs
and costs of operation, maintenance,
and purchase of services to provide
information.
All comments will become a matter of
public record. Comments on aspects of
this notice that may affect reporting,
recordkeeping, or disclosure
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
31948
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
requirements and burden estimates
should be sent to the addresses listed in
the ADDRESSES section of this document.
A copy of the comments may also be
submitted to the OMB desk officer by
mail to U.S. Office of Management and
Budget, 725 17th Street NW, #10235,
Washington, DC 20503; facsimile to
(202) 395–6974; or email to oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov, Attention,
Federal Banking Agency Desk Officer.
D. Riegle Community Development and
Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994
Pursuant to section 302(a) of the
Riegle Community Development and
Regulatory Improvement Act
(RCDRIA),21 in determining the effective
date and administrative compliance
requirements for new regulations that
impose additional reporting, disclosure,
or other requirements on insured
depository institutions (IDIs), each
Federal banking agency must consider,
consistent with the principle of safety
and soundness and the public interest,
any administrative burdens that such
regulations would place on depository
institutions, including small depository
institutions, and customers of
depository institutions, as well as the
benefits of such regulations. In addition,
section 302(b) of RCDRIA requires new
regulations and amendments to
regulations that impose additional
reporting, disclosures, or other new
requirements on IDIs generally to take
effect on the first day of a calendar
quarter that begins on or after the date
on which the regulations are published
in final form, with certain exceptions,
including for good cause.22 For the
reasons described above, the OCC finds
good cause exists under section 302 of
RCDRIA to publish this IFR with an
immediate effective date.
As such, the IFR will be effective
immediately. Nevertheless, the OCC
seeks comment on RCDRIA.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) 23 requires an agency to consider
whether the rules it proposes will have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.24
The RFA applies only to rules for which
an agency publishes a general notice of
proposed rulemaking pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b). As discussed previously,
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
21 12
U.S.C. 4802(a).
U.S.C. 4802.
23 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
24 Under regulations issued by the Small Business
Administration, a small entity includes a depository
institution, bank holding company, or savings and
loan holding company with total assets of $600
million or less and trust companies with total assets
of $41.5 million or less. See 13 CFR 121.201.
22 12
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
consistent with section 553(b)(B) of the
APA, the OCC has determined for good
cause that general notice and
opportunity for public comment is
unnecessary, and therefore the OCC is
not issuing a notice of proposed
rulemaking. Accordingly, the OCC has
concluded that the RFA’s requirements
relating to initial and final regulatory
flexibility analysis do not apply.
Nevertheless, the OCC seeks comment
on whether, and the extent to which, the
IFR would affect a significant number of
small entities.
F. Unfunded Mandates
As a general matter, the Unfunded
Mandates Act of 1995 (UMRA) 25
requires the preparation of a budgetary
impact statement before promulgating a
rule that includes a Federal mandate
that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year.
However, the UMRA does not apply to
final rules for which a general notice of
proposed rulemaking was not
published.26 Therefore, because the
OCC has found good cause to dispense
with notice and comment for this IFR,
the OCC has not prepared an economic
analysis of the rule under the UMRA.
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 5
Administrative practice and
procedure, Federal savings associations,
National banks, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Securities.
12 CFR Part 7
Computer technology, Credit,
Derivatives, Federal savings
associations, Insurance, Investments,
Metals, National banks, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Securities,
Security bonds.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the OCC amends 12 CFR part
5 and part 7 as follows:
PART 5—RULES, POLICIES, AND
PROCIDURES FOR CORPORATE
ACTIVITIES
1. The authority citation for part 5
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 et seq., 24a, 93a,
215a–2, 215a–3, 481, 1462a, 1463, 1464, 2901
et seq., 3907, and 5412(b)(2)(B).
2. Amend 5.21 by:
a. Adding two sentences at the end of
paragraph (j)(2)(i)(A);
■ b. Adding a new paragraph (j)(2)(i)(C);
and
■
■
25 2
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
26 See 2 U.S.C. 1532(a).
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
c. Adding two sentences after the
second sentence of paragraph (j)(2)(ii).
The additions read as follows:
■
§ 5.21 Federal mutual savings association
charter and bylaws.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * * The association’s bylaws
may provide for telephonic or electronic
participation of members at an annual
meeting. Members participating in an
annual meeting telephonically or
electronically will be deemed present in
person for purposes of the quorum
requirement in paragraph (j)(2)(v) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(C) If the association’s bylaws provide
for telephonic or electronic
participation in member meetings, the
association must follow the procedures
for telephonic or electronic
participation of the State corporate
governance procedures it is permitted to
elect pursuant to paragraph (j)(3)(iii) of
this section, if those State corporate
governance procedures include
telephonic or electronic participation
procedures; the Delaware General
Corporation Law, Del. Code Ann. Tit. 8
(1991, as amended 1994, and as
amended thereafter) (with ‘‘member’’
substituting for ‘‘stockholder’’); or the
Model Business Corporation Act (with
‘‘member’’ substituting for
‘‘shareholder’’), provided, however, that
such procedures are not inconsistent
with applicable Federal statutes and
regulations and safety and soundness.
The association must indicate the use of
these procedures in its bylaws.
(ii) * * * The association’s bylaws
may provide for telephonic or electronic
participation of members at a special
meeting pursuant to the procedures
specified in paragraph (j)(2)(i)(C) of this
section. Members participating in a
special meeting telephonically or
electronically will be deemed present in
person for purposes of the quorum
requirement in paragraph (j)(2)(v) of this
section. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 5.22 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (k)(1);
■ b. Adding a sentence at the end of
paragraph (l)(3); and
■ c. Revising the last sentence of
paragraph (l)(8).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 5.22 Federal Stock savings association
charter and bylaws.
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
*
*
28MYR1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(k) Shareholders of Federal stock
savings associations—(1) Shareholder
meetings. (i) In general. A meeting of the
shareholders of the association for the
election of directors and for the
transaction of any other business of the
association shall be held annually
within 150 days after the end of the
association’s fiscal year. Unless
otherwise provided in the association’s
charter, special meetings of the
shareholders may be called by the board
of directors or on the request of the
holders of 10 percent or more of the
shares entitled to vote at the meeting, or
by such other persons as may be
specified in the bylaws of the
association.
(ii) Location of shareholder meetings.
(A) In general. All annual and special
meetings of shareholders of the
association shall be held at any
convenient place the board of directors
may designate. The association’s bylaws
may provide for the telephonic or
electronic participation of shareholders
in these meetings. Shareholders
participating in an annual or special
meeting telephonically or electronically
will be deemed present in person for
purposes of the quorum requirement in
paragraph (k)(5) of this section.
(B) Procedures for telephonic or
electronic participation. If the
association’s bylaws provide for
telephonic or electronic participation in
shareholder meetings, the association
must elect to follow corporate
governance procedures for these
meetings pursuant to paragraph (j)(2)(iii)
of this section that include procedures
for telephonic or electronic
participation in shareholder meetings.
The association must indicate the use of
these elected procedures in its bylaws.
(l) * * *
(3) * * * The bylaws may provide for
telephonic or electronic participation at
these meetings.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) * * * The bylaws may provide for
telephonic or electronic participation at
a special meeting.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 7—ACTIVITIES AND
OPERATIONS
4. The authority citation for part 7
continues to read as follows:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
[FR Doc. 2020–11525 Filed 5–27–20; 8:45 am]
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 et seq., 25b, 29, 71,
71a, 92, 92a, 93, 93a, 95(b)(1), 371, 371d, 481,
484, 1463, 1464, 1465, 1818, 1828(m),
3102(b), and 5412(b)(2)(B).
■
■
(a) Notice of shareholders’ meetings.
A national bank must mail shareholders
notice of the time, place, and purpose of
all shareholders’ meetings at least 10
days prior to the meeting by first class
mail, unless the OCC determines that an
emergency circumstance exists. Where a
national bank is a wholly-owned
subsidiary, the sole shareholder is
permitted to waive notice of the
shareholder’s meeting. The articles of
association, bylaws, or law applicable to
a national bank may require a longer
period of notice.
(b) Annual meeting for election of
directors. When the day fixed for the
regular annual meeting of the
shareholders falls on a legal holiday in
the State in which the bank is located,
the shareholders’ meeting must be held,
and the directors elected, on the next
following banking day.
(c) Virtual participation at
shareholder meetings—(1) In general. A
national bank may provide for
telephonic or electronic participation at
shareholder meetings.
(2) Procedures. A national bank must
follow the procedures for telephonic or
electronic participation in a shareholder
meeting of the corporate governance
procedures it has elected to follow
pursuant to § 7.2000(b), if those elected
procedures include telephonic or
electronic participation procedures; the
Delaware General Corporation Law, Del.
Code Ann. Tit. 8 (1991, as amended
1994, and as amended thereafter); or the
Model Business Corporation Act,
provided, however, that such
procedures are not inconsistent with
applicable Federal statutes and
regulations and safety and soundness.
The national bank must indicate the use
of these procedures in its bylaws.
(d) Virtual participation at board of
directors meetings. A national bank may
provide for telephonic or electronic
participation at a meeting of its board of
directors.
Brian P. Brooks,
First Deputy Comptroller, Comptroller of the
Currency.
■
§ 7.1001
§ 7.2003 Shareholder meetings; Board of
directors meetings.
BILLING CODE 4810–33–P
[Reserved]
6. Remove and reserve § 7.1001.
7. Revise § 7.2003 to read as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31949
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 252
[Regulation YY; Docket No. R–1534]
RIN 7100–AE 38
Single-Counterparty Credit Limits for
Bank Holding Companies and Foreign
Banking Organizations
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (Board).
ACTION: Final rule to extend compliance
dates.
AGENCY:
The Board is adopting a final
rule to amend the compliance dates
related to Single-Counterparty Credit
Limits for Bank Holding Companies and
Foreign Banking Organizations (final
SCCL rule). The final rule revises the
final SCCL rule to modify the initial
compliance dates of January 1, 2020, for
a foreign banking organization that has
the characteristics of a global
systemically important banking
organization, and July 1, 2020, for any
other foreign banking organization
subject to the final SCCL rule to July 1,
2021, and January 1, 2022, respectively,
regarding the SCCL applicable to a
foreign banking organization’s
combined U.S. operations only.
DATES: The final rule is effective on May
28, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Constance M. Horsley, Deputy Associate
Director, (202) 452–5239; Kathryn
Ballintine, Manager, (202) 452–2555;
Lesley Chao, Lead Financial Institution
Policy Analyst, (202) 974–7063; or
Donald Gabbai, Lead Financial
Institution Policy Analyst, (202) 452–
3358, Division of Supervision and
Regulation; or Laurie Schaffer, Deputy
General Counsel, (202) 452–2272;
Benjamin W. McDonough, Assistant
General Counsel, (202) 452–2036; Chris
Callanan, Counsel, (202) 452–3594;
Lucy Chang, Counsel, (202) 475–6331;
or Jeffery Zhang, Attorney, (202) 736–
1968, Legal Division, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, 20th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Discussion
On August 6, 2018, the Board
published in the Federal Register a final
rule to establish single-counterparty
credit limits (SCCL) for bank holding
companies and foreign banking
organizations (FBOs) with total
consolidated assets of at least $250
billion, pursuant to section 165(e) of the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (final SCCL
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 103 (Thursday, May 28, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31943-31949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11525]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
12 CFR Parts 5 and 7
[Docket No. OCC-2020-0020]
RIN 1557-AE94
Director, Shareholder, and Member Meetings
AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury (OCC).
ACTION: Interim final rule and request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is
amending its regulations on activities and operations of national banks
and corporate activities of Federal savings associations to provide
that these institutions may permit telephonic and electronic
participation at all board of directors, shareholder, and as
applicable, member, meetings. This Interim Final Rule (IFR) will update
the OCC's regulations to conform with modern technologies and enable
national banks and Federal savings associations to hold these meetings
without violating social distancing restrictions imposed in response to
the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emergency.
DATES: The effective date of this interim final rule is May 28, 2020.
Comments on the interim final rule must be received no later than July
13, 2020.
ADDRESSES:
OCC: Commenters are encouraged to submit comments through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal or email, if possible. Please use the title
``Director, Shareholder, and Member Meetings'' to facilitate the
organization and distribution of the comments. You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal--Regulations.gov Classic or
Regulations.gov Beta:
Regulations.gov Classic: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/. Enter
``Docket ID OCC-2020-0020'' in the Search Box and click ``Search.''
Click on ``Comment Now'' to submit public comments. For help with
submitting effective comments please click on ``View Commenter's
Checklist.'' Click on the ``Help'' tab on the Regulations.gov home page
to get information on using Regulations.gov, including instructions for
submitting public comments.
Regulations.gov Beta: Go to https://beta.regulations.gov/ or click
``Visit New Regulations.gov Site'' from the Regulations.gov Classic
homepage. Enter ``Docket ID OCC-2020-0020'' in the Search Box and click
``Search.'' Public comments can be submitted via the ``Comment'' box
below the displayed document information or by clicking on the document
title and then clicking the ``Comment'' box on the top-left side of the
screen. For help with submitting effective comments please click on
``Commenter's Checklist.'' For assistance with the Regulations.gov Beta
site, please call (877) 378-5457 (toll free) or (703) 454-9859 Monday-
Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. ET or email [email protected].
Email: [email protected].
Mail: Chief Counsel's Office, Attention: Comment
Processing, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th Street
SW, Suite 3E-218, Washington, DC 20219.
Hand Delivery/Courier: 400 7th Street SW, Suite 3E-218,
Washington, DC 20219.
Fax: (571) 465-4326.
Instructions: You must include ``OCC'' as the agency name and
``Docket ID OCC-2020-0020'' in your comment. In general, the OCC will
enter all comments received into the docket and publish the comments on
the Regulations.gov website without change, including any business or
personal information provided such as name and address information,
email addresses, or phone numbers. Comments received, including
attachments and other supporting materials, are part of the public
record and subject to public disclosure. Do not include any information
in your comment or supporting materials that you consider confidential
or inappropriate for public disclosure.
You may review comments and other related materials that pertain to
this rulemaking action by any of the following methods:
Viewing Comments Electronically--Regulations.gov Classic
or Regulations.gov Beta:
Regulations.gov Classic: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/. Enter
``Docket ID OCC-2020-0020'' in the Search box and click ``Search.''
Click on ``Open Docket Folder'' on the right side of the screen.
Comments and supporting materials can be viewed and filtered by
clicking on ``View all documents and comments in this docket'' and then
using the filtering tools on the left side of the screen. Click on the
``Help'' tab on the Regulations.gov home page to get information on
using Regulations.gov. The docket may be viewed after the close of the
comment period in the same manner as during the comment period.
Regulations.gov Beta: Go to https://beta.regulations.gov/ or click
``Visit New Regulations.gov Site'' from the Regulations.gov Classic
homepage. Enter ``Docket ID OCC-2020-0020'' in the Search Box and click
``Search.'' Click on the ``Comments'' tab. Comments can be viewed and
filtered by clicking on the ``Sort By'' drop-down on the right side of
the screen or the ``Refine Results'' options on the left side of the
screen. Supporting materials can be viewed by clicking on the
``Documents'' tab and filtered by clicking on the ``Sort By'' drop-down
on the right side of the screen or the ``Refine Results'' options on
the left side of the screen.'' For assistance with the Regulations.gov
Beta site, please call (877) 378-5457 (toll free) or (703) 454-9859
Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. ET or email
[email protected].
The docket may be viewed after the close of the comment period in
the same manner as during the comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frances C. Augello, Special Counsel,
or
[[Page 31944]]
Heidi M. Thomas, Special Counsel, Chief Counsel's Office, (202) 649-
5490, or Donald W. Dwyer, Thrift Licensing Lead Expert, (202) 649-6260,
for persons who are deaf or hearing impaired, TTY, (202) 649-5597,
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The OCC recognizes the recent disruptions and significant
challenges faced by national banks and Federal savings associations as
a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emergency. Health
and safety advisories declared in response to the COVID-19 emergency,
including those relating to social distancing, are impeding the ability
of national banks and Federal savings associations to hold in-person
meetings, such as board of director, shareholder, and member meetings.
However, neither the National Bank Act or the Home Owners' Loan Act, as
applicable, nor OCC regulations require that director, shareholder, or
member meetings take place in person.\1\ Furthermore, remote
communication tools such as telephone or internet-based conferencing
are available to institutions so that they may comply with internal and
regulatory meeting requirements within the parameters of the social
distancing guidelines. The OCC is issuing this IFR to clarify that
national banks and Federal savings associations may use remote
communication tools to conduct these meetings. Specifically, this IFR
allows national banks and Federal savings associations to permit remote
participation by shareholders, directors, and as applicable, members at
shareholder, board of directors, and member meetings. Under this
authority, institutions could hold in-person meetings with some
participants attending remotely or hold these meetings exclusively by
means of remote communication.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Although the National Bank Act does not specifically address
the manner in which a national bank's board of directors must
conduct its meetings, it does authorize national banks ``[t]o
prescribe by its board of directors, bylaws not inconsistent with
law, regulating the manner . . . its general business [is to be]
conducted.'' 12 U.S.C. 24 (Sixth). In a 1999 interpretive letter,
the OCC stated that ``[t]his authority to prescribe bylaws to
conduct a national bank's general business is sufficiently broad to
permit a national bank to adopt procedures governing the practice of
conducting board meetings, including the ability to conduct regular
board meetings by telephone or video conferencing.'' OCC
Interpretive Letter No. 860 (Apr. 5, 1999).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The amendments made by this IFR will enable national banks and
Federal savings associations to conduct necessary meetings remotely
during the COVID-19 emergency as well as during any other future
emergency when in-person meetings may not be feasible. Because these
amendments will be permanent and will not expire after the COVID-19
emergency has ended, they also will provide national banks and Federal
savings associations, on an ongoing basis, with more flexibility in
planning and holding director, shareholder, and, as applicable, member
meetings; could permit greater director, shareholder, and member
participation at these meetings for those participants not able to
attend in person; and may reduce the burden and costs of in-person
meetings for national banks and Federal savings associations, as well
as meeting participants. The OCC expects that national banks and
Federal savings associations allowing remote participation will provide
fair treatment and transparency for shareholders or members
participating telephonically or electronically.
II. Description of the Interim Final Rule
Federal Savings Associations (Sec. Sec. 5.21, 5.22) \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ On March 5, the OCC issued a proposal to amend 12 CFR part 5
to update and clarify its policies and procedures for corporate
activities and transactions involving national banks and Federal
savings associations, eliminate unnecessary requirements consistent
with safety and soundness, and make other technical and conforming
changes. 85 FR 18728 (Apr. 2, 2020). This proposed rule includes
amendments to Sec. Sec. 5.21 and 5.22. The OCC will reconcile these
proposed changes with the amendments made by this IFR when issuing
the part 5 final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Member and Shareholder Meetings. Twelve CFR 5.21 governs the
procedures and requirements for charters and bylaws of Federal mutual
savings associations. Paragraph (j)(2)(i) of Sec. 5.21 requires the
association's bylaws to indicate that the association will provide for
and conduct an annual meeting of its members for the election of
directors and any other business of the association. Paragraph
(j)(2)(i) also provides that the annual meeting must be held at any
convenient place the board of directors may designate, and at a date
and time within 150 days after the end of the association's fiscal
year.\3\ Paragraph (j)(2)(ii) of Sec. 5.21 requires the bylaws to
include procedures for calling and conducting special meetings of
Federal mutual savings association members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ On May 12, 2020, the OCC issued guidance to institutions
considering changes to the date, time or location of their annual
meetings as a result of the COVID-19 emergency. See OCC Bulletin
2020-51.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 5.22 governs the procedures and requirements for Federal
stock savings association charters and bylaws and generally parallels
Sec. 5.21. Paragraph (k)(1) of Sec. 5.22 provides that all annual and
special meetings of shareholders must be held at any convenient place
the board of directors may designate.
To clarify that both a Federal mutual savings association and a
Federal stock savings association may use remote communication tools to
conduct these meetings, the OCC is amending Sec. Sec. 5.21(j)(2)(i)
and (j)(2)(ii) and 5.22(k)(1) to permit an association's bylaws to
provide for telephonic or electronic participation of members and
shareholders, as applicable, at both annual and special meetings. This
amendment also provides that members or shareholders participating
telephonically or electronically in an annual or special meeting will
be deemed present in person for purposes of the quorum requirement in
Sec. Sec. 5.21(j)(2)(v) or 5.22(k)(5), as applicable.\4\ As noted
below, OCC regulations and model bylaw provisions governing annual and
special meetings of the board of directors of Federal mutual savings
associations and special meetings of the board of directors of Federal
stock savings associations currently permit ``telephonic and electronic
participation.'' The OCC is using the phrase ``telephonic and
electronic participation'' in its amendments to the shareholder meeting
provisions and maintaining the use of this phrase in its board of
director provisions to provide consistent terminology for Federal
savings associations and to avoid the cost and burden of any bylaw
changes that could result from modifying this terminology in this IFR.
The OCC requests comment on whether this terminology is appropriate in
light of current technology or whether the OCC should use a different
phrase in describing remote participation at shareholder and board of
directors meetings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Section 5.21(j)(2)(v) provides that any number of members
present and voting, represented in person or by proxy, at a regular
or special meeting of the members constitutes a quorum. Section
5.22(k)(5) provides that a majority of the outstanding shares of the
association entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy,
constitutes a quorum at a meeting of shareholders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This IFR also requires Federal savings associations to have
procedures in place for telephonic and electronic participation at
member or shareholder meetings and provides associations with a choice
of procedures to follow. The procedures available to Federal mutual
savings associations and those available to Federal stock savings
associations differ only with respect to the State law procedures they
may choose. As explained below, this difference is
[[Page 31945]]
based on the State corporate governance procedures available to each
type of entity under current OCC regulations.
With respect to Federal mutual savings associations, the IFR amends
Sec. 5.21(j)(2)(i) (annual meetings of members) and Sec.
5.21(j)(2)(ii) (special meetings of members) to require the association
to follow the procedures for telephonic or electronic participation of:
(1) The State corporate governance procedures it is permitted to elect
pursuant to Sec. 5.21(j)(3)(iii), if those State corporate governance
procedures include telephonic or electronic participation procedures;
(2) the Delaware General Corporation Law \5\ (with ``member''
substituting for ``stockholder''); or (3) the Model Business
Corporation Act \6\ (with ``member'' substituting for ``shareholder''),
provided that such procedures are not inconsistent with applicable
Federal statutes and regulations and safety and soundness. With certain
exceptions, Sec. 5.21(j)(3)(iii) provides that a Federal mutual
savings association may elect to follow the corporate governance
procedures of the laws of the State where the home office of the
institution is located. Therefore, pursuant to this IFR, a Federal
mutual savings association has the choice of following either the
procedures for remote participation of the laws of its home State if
these procedures exist, the procedures for remote participation under
Delaware General Corporation Law, or the procedures for remote
participation under the Model Business Corporation Act. To inform
members of its choice of procedures, the IFR requires the association
to indicate the use of these procedures in its bylaws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Delaware law provides that stockholders and proxyholders not
physically present at a stockholders meeting may, by means of remote
communication, participate in the meeting and be deemed present in
person and vote at the meeting provided that: (1) The corporation
implements reasonable measures to verify that each person deemed
present and permitted to vote remotely is a stockholder or
proxyholder, (2) the corporation implements reasonable measures to
provide such stockholders and proxyholders a reasonable opportunity
to participate in the meeting and to vote on matters submitted to
the stockholders, including an opportunity to read or hear the
proceedings of the meeting substantially concurrently with such
proceedings, and (3) if any stockholder or proxyholder votes or
takes other action at the meeting by means of remote communication,
a record of such vote or other action is maintained by the
corporation. 8 Del. C. Sec. 211.
\6\ The Model Business Corporation Act provides that
shareholders participating in a shareholders' meeting by means of
remote communication shall be deemed present and may vote at such
meeting if the corporation has implemented reasonable measures to:
(1) Verify that each person participating remotely as a shareholder
is a shareholder; and (2) provide such shareholders a reasonable
opportunity to participate in the meeting and to vote on matters
submitted to the shareholders, including an opportunity to
communicate, and to read or hear the proceedings of the meeting,
substantially concurrently with such proceedings. Section 7.09, The
Model Business Corporation Act (as amended 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to Federal stock savings associations, Sec.
5.22(k)(1) as amended by this IFR requires the association to elect to
follow, pursuant to Sec. 5.22(j)(2)(iii), corporate governance
procedures for shareholder meetings that include procedures for
telephonic or electronic participation. With certain exceptions, Sec.
5.22(j)(2)(iii) provides that a Federal stock association may elect to
follow the corporate governance procedures of: (1) The laws of the
State where the home office of the association is located; (2) the laws
of the State where the association's holding company, if any, is
incorporated or chartered; (3) the Delaware General Corporation Law; or
(4) the Model Business Corporation Act, provided that such procedures
are not inconsistent with applicable Federal statutes and regulations
and safety and soundness. This amendment, therefore, permits a Federal
stock savings association to choose from any of the sources listed in
Sec. 5.22(j)(2)(iii) for its telephonic and electronic participation
procedures. As with the amendments for Federal mutual savings
associations, this IFR requires a Federal stock savings association to
indicate in its bylaws which procedures it will use to inform its
shareholders of these procedures.
As a result of these amendments, this IFR will ensure that if a
Federal savings association's bylaws provide for telephonic or
electronic participation at member or shareholder meetings, the Federal
savings association must have procedures in place for this remote
participation even if it has not elected to follow any particular
corporate governance law pursuant to Sec. Sec. 5.21(j)(3)(iii) or
5.22(j)(2)(iii), or if the corporate governance law it has elected to
follow does not contain procedures for remote participation at
meetings.
As indicated above, the IFR requires a Federal savings association
to amend its bylaws if it wishes to utilize remote means of
communication for its meetings. Current Sec. Sec. 5.21(j)(3) and
5.22(j)(2) provide that, in general, a Federal savings association must
submit an amendment to its bylaws to the OCC 30 days prior to adoption
by its board of directors and that the amendment is effective 30 days
after filing with the OCC. However, pursuant to Sec. Sec.
5.21(j)(3)(i)(B) and 5.22(j)(2)(i)(B), if an association adopts a bylaw
amendment that includes the language of the OCC's model or optional
bylaws without change and files the bylaw with the OCC within 30 days
after adoption, the bylaw is effective upon adoption. To permit Federal
savings associations to utilize the remote communication provisions
included in this IFR as quickly as possible during the COVID-19
emergency, the OCC is issuing concurrent with this IFR optional model
bylaw provisions for telephonic and electronic participation at
shareholder and member meetings.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Model bylaw provisions for mutual savings associations are
available at https://www.occ.gov/static/licensing/model-mutual-fsa-bylaws.pdf. Model bylaw provisions for stock savings associations
are available at https://www.occ.gov/static/licensing/model-stock-fsa-bylaws.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The OCC also is considering updating the member and shareholder
meeting notice requirements contained in Sec. Sec. 5.21 and 5.22.
Section 5.21(j)(2)(iii) requires a Federal mutual savings association
to publish a notice of the annual or special meeting in a newspaper of
general circulation in the city or county in which the principal place
of business of the association is located or to mail the notice postage
prepaid to each of its members of record. This provision also requires
the Federal mutual savings association to post notice of the meeting in
a conspicuous place in each of its offices during the 14 days
immediately preceding the date on which the meeting convenes. The OCC
requests comment on whether it should amend this provision to permit a
Federal mutual savings association to deliver the meeting notice to a
member electronically if the member receives electronic communications.
In addition, the OCC requests comment on whether it should amend this
provision to permit the Federal mutual savings association to post the
notice of the meeting on its website instead of in its offices. Section
5.22(k)(2) requires a Federal savings association to deliver a written
notice of a shareholder meeting either personally or by mail to each
shareholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting. If mailed, the
notice is deemed delivered when deposited in the mail, addressed to the
shareholder at the address appearing on the stock transfer books or
records of the association as of the record date, with postage thereon
prepaid. As with Sec. 5.21(j)(2)(iii), the OCC requests comment on
whether it should amend Sec. 5.22(k)(2) to permit the Federal stock
savings association to deliver the meeting notice to the shareholder
electronically if the shareholder receives electronic communications
and that this electronic notice be deemed delivered when sent to the
shareholder's electronic address appearing on the books or records of
the association as of the record date. The OCC believes that
[[Page 31946]]
these amendments to the notice provisions would update the OCC's rules
to reflect modern communication methods and complement the amendments
made by this IFR. The OCC also believes that these amendments would
benefit members and shareholders by providing them with notice by means
consistent with other communications they receive from the association
and allow a Federal savings association to announce a member or
shareholder meeting through less costly or burdensome methods.
Board of Directors Meetings. Current Sec. 5.21(j)(2)(ix) provides
that the board of directors of a Federal mutual savings association may
permit telephonic or electronic participation at its meetings. Current
Sec. 5.22(l)(8) permits the bylaws of a Federal stock savings
association to provide for electronic participation at special meetings
of the board of directors. The OCC's model bylaws for Federal mutual
and stock savings associations also permit telephonic or similar
communication at meetings of the board of directors.\8\ However,
current Sec. 5.22(l)(3), which provides requirements for regular
meetings of the board of directors of a Federal stock savings
association, is silent with respect to electronic participation. To
make these provisions consistent with each other, as well as with the
model bylaws, the OCC is amending Sec. 5.22(l)(3) to provide that the
bylaws of a Federal stock savings association may provide for
telephonic or electronic participation of board members at regular
meetings. The OCC also is making technical changes to Sec. 5.22(l)(8)
by revising it to include telephonic in addition to electronic
participation so that it is consistent with the other provisions of
this IFR and to specify that this telephonic and electronic
participation provision applies to special meetings of the board.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See ``Articles of Association, Charter, and Bylaw
Amendments,'' Comptroller's Licensing Manual, (June 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
National Banks (Sec. 7.2003)
As with the amendments to Sec. Sec. 5.21 and 5.22, the OCC is
permitting national banks to provide for telephonic or electronic
participation at shareholder and board of directors meetings. To
accomplish this, the OCC is combining current 12 CFR 7.2001, which
provides procedures for notifying shareholders of shareholder meetings,
into current Sec. 7.2003, which provides the rule for annual
shareholder meetings that fall on a holiday; adding new telephonic and
electronic participation language to 12 CFR 7.2003 as new paragraphs
(c) and (d); and retitling Sec. 7.2003 as ``Shareholder meetings;
Board of directors meetings.'' The OCC is not making any substantive
changes to current Sec. 7.2001, which becomes Sec. 7.2003(a), or
current Sec. 7.2003, which becomes Sec. 7.2003(b). Combining
Sec. Sec. 7.2001 and 7.2003 puts all amendments related to shareholder
meetings are held in one section.
New paragraph (c) to Sec. 7.2003 permits a national bank to
provide for telephonic or electronic participation at shareholder
meetings. Further, new paragraph (c) requires a national bank to have
procedures for telephonic or electronic participation in shareholder
meetings. As with Federal savings associations, a national bank may
choose these procedures from several sources: (1) The corporate
governance procedures it has elected to follow pursuant to Sec.
7.2000(b),\9\ if those elected procedures include telephonic or
electronic participation procedures; (2) the Delaware General
Corporation Law; or (3) the Model Business Corporation Act. However,
these procedures must not be inconsistent with applicable Federal
statutes and regulations and safety and soundness. To inform
shareholders of its choice of procedures, the IFR requires the national
bank to indicate the use of these procedures in its bylaws. In general,
Federal law does not require a national bank to file its bylaws and any
amendments with, or to seek approval of its bylaws from, the OCC.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Section 7.2000(b) provides that to the extent not
inconsistent with applicable Federal banking statutes or regulations
or bank safety and soundness, a national bank may elect to follow
the corporate governance procedures of the law of the State in which
the main office of the bank is located, the law of the State in
which the holding company of the bank is incorporated, Delaware
General Corporation Law, or the Model Business Corporation Act.
Further, Sec. 7.2000 requires that a national bank designate in its
bylaws the body of law selected for its corporate governance
procedures.
\10\ See Articles of Association, Charter, and Bylaw Amendments
booklet of the Comptroller's Licensing Manual at page 4 (June 2017).
Should it come to the OCC's attention, however, that a national
bank's bylaws are inconsistent with a law or regulation or the
national bank's articles of association, or the bylaws promote
unsafe or unsound operation of the national bank, the OCC will
consider appropriate supervisory action to address any concerns. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As with the amendments to Sec. Sec. 5.21(j)(2)(i) and (j)(2)(ii)
and 5.22(k)(1) for Federal savings associations, this provision will
ensure that a national bank has procedures in place for remote
participation at shareholder meetings even if the corporate governance
law it has elected to follow does not contain procedures for remote
participation at shareholder meetings or if it has not elected to
follow any particular corporate governance law pursuant to Sec.
7.2000(b).
New paragraph (d) of Sec. 7.2003 provides that a national bank may
provide for telephonic or electronic participation at a meeting of its
board of directors. This provision codifies OCC Interpretive Letter No.
860 \11\ and makes the national bank rule consistent with rules for
Federal savings associations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See footnote 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Request for Comment
The OCC seeks comment on all aspects of the IFR in addition to
those specific requests noted in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. In
addition, please comment on the following:
Should the OCC limit the ability of national banks and
Federal savings associations to hold shareholder or member meetings
exclusively by means of remote communication to emergency situations or
when extenuating circumstances exist? If so, in what extenuating
circumstances should national banks and Federal savings associations
have authority to hold meetings exclusively by means of remote
communication?
Would holding shareholder or member meetings exclusively
by means of remote communication limit participation by some
shareholders or members, and if so, how?
Should the OCC require national banks and Federal savings
associations to provide in-person options for each shareholder or
member meeting or require national banks or Federal savings
associations to adopt procedures that permit shareholder participation
at virtual meetings? If so, why?
Should the OCC adopt regulatory procedures governing
telephonic and electronic participation at shareholder meetings instead
of requiring national banks and Federal savings associations to follow
State corporate law, Delaware General Corporation Law, or Model
Business Corporation Act procedures? If so, what specific procedures
should the OCC adopt?
Should the OCC provide risk management standards to
mitigate any security risks arising from telephonic or electronic
meetings? If so, what specific standards should the OCC adopt?
IV. Administrative Law Matters
A. Administrative Procedure Act
The OCC is issuing the IFR without prior notice and the opportunity
for public comment and the delayed effective date ordinarily prescribed
by the Administrative Procedure Act
[[Page 31947]]
(APA).\12\ Pursuant to section 553(b)(B) of the APA, general notice and
the opportunity for public comment are not required with respect to a
rulemaking when an ``agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the
finding and a brief statement of reasons therefor in the rules issued)
that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' \13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 5 U.S.C. 553.
\13\ 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The OCC believes that the public interest is best served by
implementing the IFR immediately upon publication in the Federal
Register. National banks and Federal savings associations are acutely
impacted by the COVID-19 emergency. Health and safety advisories in
response to the COVID-19 emergency, including those relating to social
distancing, are impeding the ability of national banks and Federal
savings associations to hold in-person meetings, such as board of
director, shareholder, and member meetings. The IFR amends the OCC's
rules to permit telephonic and electronic participation at these
meetings, thereby allowing national banks and Federal savings
associations to conduct all necessary board of director, shareholder,
and member meetings during the COVID-19 emergency. For these reasons,
the OCC finds that there is good cause consistent with the public
interest to issue the rule without advance notice and comment.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B); 553(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The APA also requires a 30-day delayed effective date, except for:
(1) Substantive rules which grant or recognize an exemption or relieve
a restriction; (2) interpretative rules and statements of policy; or
(3) as otherwise provided by the agency for good cause.\15\ As
described above, the OCC believes it has good cause to issue this rule
without a delayed effective date. Therefore, the IFR is exempt from the
APA's delayed effective date requirement.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
\16\ 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While the OCC believes that there is good cause to issue the rule
without advance notice and comment and with an immediate effective
date, the OCC is interested in the views of the public and requests
comment on all aspects of the IFR.
B. Congressional Review Act
For purposes of the Congressional Review Act, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) makes a determination as to whether a final
rule constitutes a ``major rule.'' \17\ If a rule is deemed a ``major
rule'' by the OMB, the Congressional Review Act generally provides that
the rule may not take effect until at least 60 days following its
publication.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.
\18\ 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Congressional Review Act defines a ``major rule'' as any rule
that the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs of the OMB finds has resulted in or is likely to result in: (1)
An annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; (2) a major
increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries,
Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; or
(3) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and
export markets.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The delayed effective date required by the Congressional Review Act
does not apply to any rule for which an agency for good cause finds
(and incorporates the finding and a brief statement of reasons therefor
in the rule issued) that notice and public procedure thereon are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.\20\ For
the same reasons set forth above, the OCC is adopting the IFR without
the delayed effective date generally prescribed under the Congressional
Review Act. In light of the COVID-19 emergency, the OCC believes that
delaying the effective date of the rule would be contrary to the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 5 U.S.C. 808.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As required by the Congressional Review Act, the OCC will submit
the IFR and other appropriate reports to Congress and the Government
Accountability Office for review.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
Certain provisions of the proposed rulemaking contain ``collection
of information'' requirements within the meaning of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). In accordance with
the requirements of the PRA, the OCC may not conduct or sponsor, and a
respondent is not required to respond to, an information collection
unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number.
The OCC reviewed the IFR and determined that it revises certain
information collection requirements previously cleared by OMB under OMB
Control No. 1557-0014. The OCC has submitted the revised information
collection to OMB for review under section 3507(d) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3507(d)) and section 1320.11 of the OMB's implementing
regulations (5 CFR 1320).
Current Actions
The information collection requirements are as follows:
National banks and FSAs must have procedures in place for
holding remote meetings.
FSAs will need to amend their bylaws if they wish to
utilize remote means of communication for its meetings.
Depending on which state or law the FSA elects to follow
for procedures for remote means of communication, the FSA may have to
amend its bylaws and file with the OCC.
National banks must indicate the use of telephonic or
electronic participation at shareholder meetings in their bylaws.
The OCC is considering allowing alternative/electronic
means of notifying members/shareholders of meetings.
The OCC estimates that there will be no change in burden as a
result of these changes.
Title of Information Collection: Licensing Manual.
Frequency: Event generated.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit.
Estimated number of respondents: 1,174
Total estimated annual burden for the collection: 12,534 hours.
Comments are invited on:
a. Whether the collections of information are necessary for the
proper performance of the agencies' functions, including whether the
information has practical utility;
b. The accuracy or the estimate of the burden of the information
collections, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used;
c. Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected;
d. Ways to minimize the burden of the information collections on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology; and
e. Estimates of capital or startup costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.
All comments will become a matter of public record. Comments on
aspects of this notice that may affect reporting, recordkeeping, or
disclosure
[[Page 31948]]
requirements and burden estimates should be sent to the addresses
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. A copy of the
comments may also be submitted to the OMB desk officer by mail to U.S.
Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street NW, #10235,
Washington, DC 20503; facsimile to (202) 395-6974; or email to
[email protected], Attention, Federal Banking Agency Desk
Officer.
D. Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994
Pursuant to section 302(a) of the Riegle Community Development and
Regulatory Improvement Act (RCDRIA),\21\ in determining the effective
date and administrative compliance requirements for new regulations
that impose additional reporting, disclosure, or other requirements on
insured depository institutions (IDIs), each Federal banking agency
must consider, consistent with the principle of safety and soundness
and the public interest, any administrative burdens that such
regulations would place on depository institutions, including small
depository institutions, and customers of depository institutions, as
well as the benefits of such regulations. In addition, section 302(b)
of RCDRIA requires new regulations and amendments to regulations that
impose additional reporting, disclosures, or other new requirements on
IDIs generally to take effect on the first day of a calendar quarter
that begins on or after the date on which the regulations are published
in final form, with certain exceptions, including for good cause.\22\
For the reasons described above, the OCC finds good cause exists under
section 302 of RCDRIA to publish this IFR with an immediate effective
date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 12 U.S.C. 4802(a).
\22\ 12 U.S.C. 4802.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As such, the IFR will be effective immediately. Nevertheless, the
OCC seeks comment on RCDRIA.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) \23\ requires an agency to
consider whether the rules it proposes will have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.\24\ The RFA applies
only to rules for which an agency publishes a general notice of
proposed rulemaking pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b). As discussed
previously, consistent with section 553(b)(B) of the APA, the OCC has
determined for good cause that general notice and opportunity for
public comment is unnecessary, and therefore the OCC is not issuing a
notice of proposed rulemaking. Accordingly, the OCC has concluded that
the RFA's requirements relating to initial and final regulatory
flexibility analysis do not apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
\24\ Under regulations issued by the Small Business
Administration, a small entity includes a depository institution,
bank holding company, or savings and loan holding company with total
assets of $600 million or less and trust companies with total assets
of $41.5 million or less. See 13 CFR 121.201.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nevertheless, the OCC seeks comment on whether, and the extent to
which, the IFR would affect a significant number of small entities.
F. Unfunded Mandates
As a general matter, the Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995 (UMRA) \25\
requires the preparation of a budgetary impact statement before
promulgating a rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in
the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one
year. However, the UMRA does not apply to final rules for which a
general notice of proposed rulemaking was not published.\26\ Therefore,
because the OCC has found good cause to dispense with notice and
comment for this IFR, the OCC has not prepared an economic analysis of
the rule under the UMRA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
\26\ See 2 U.S.C. 1532(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 5
Administrative practice and procedure, Federal savings
associations, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Securities.
12 CFR Part 7
Computer technology, Credit, Derivatives, Federal savings
associations, Insurance, Investments, Metals, National banks, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Securities, Security bonds.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the OCC amends 12 CFR part
5 and part 7 as follows:
PART 5--RULES, POLICIES, AND PROCIDURES FOR CORPORATE ACTIVITIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 et seq., 24a, 93a, 215a-2, 215a-3, 481,
1462a, 1463, 1464, 2901 et seq., 3907, and 5412(b)(2)(B).
0
2. Amend 5.21 by:
0
a. Adding two sentences at the end of paragraph (j)(2)(i)(A);
0
b. Adding a new paragraph (j)(2)(i)(C); and
0
c. Adding two sentences after the second sentence of paragraph
(j)(2)(ii).
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 5.21 Federal mutual savings association charter and bylaws.
* * * * *
(j) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * * The association's bylaws may provide for telephonic or
electronic participation of members at an annual meeting. Members
participating in an annual meeting telephonically or electronically
will be deemed present in person for purposes of the quorum requirement
in paragraph (j)(2)(v) of this section.
* * * * *
(C) If the association's bylaws provide for telephonic or
electronic participation in member meetings, the association must
follow the procedures for telephonic or electronic participation of the
State corporate governance procedures it is permitted to elect pursuant
to paragraph (j)(3)(iii) of this section, if those State corporate
governance procedures include telephonic or electronic participation
procedures; the Delaware General Corporation Law, Del. Code Ann. Tit. 8
(1991, as amended 1994, and as amended thereafter) (with ``member''
substituting for ``stockholder''); or the Model Business Corporation
Act (with ``member'' substituting for ``shareholder''), provided,
however, that such procedures are not inconsistent with applicable
Federal statutes and regulations and safety and soundness. The
association must indicate the use of these procedures in its bylaws.
(ii) * * * The association's bylaws may provide for telephonic or
electronic participation of members at a special meeting pursuant to
the procedures specified in paragraph (j)(2)(i)(C) of this section.
Members participating in a special meeting telephonically or
electronically will be deemed present in person for purposes of the
quorum requirement in paragraph (j)(2)(v) of this section. * * *
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 5.22 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (k)(1);
0
b. Adding a sentence at the end of paragraph (l)(3); and
0
c. Revising the last sentence of paragraph (l)(8).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 5.22 Federal Stock savings association charter and bylaws.
* * * * *
[[Page 31949]]
(k) Shareholders of Federal stock savings associations--(1)
Shareholder meetings. (i) In general. A meeting of the shareholders of
the association for the election of directors and for the transaction
of any other business of the association shall be held annually within
150 days after the end of the association's fiscal year. Unless
otherwise provided in the association's charter, special meetings of
the shareholders may be called by the board of directors or on the
request of the holders of 10 percent or more of the shares entitled to
vote at the meeting, or by such other persons as may be specified in
the bylaws of the association.
(ii) Location of shareholder meetings. (A) In general. All annual
and special meetings of shareholders of the association shall be held
at any convenient place the board of directors may designate. The
association's bylaws may provide for the telephonic or electronic
participation of shareholders in these meetings. Shareholders
participating in an annual or special meeting telephonically or
electronically will be deemed present in person for purposes of the
quorum requirement in paragraph (k)(5) of this section.
(B) Procedures for telephonic or electronic participation. If the
association's bylaws provide for telephonic or electronic participation
in shareholder meetings, the association must elect to follow corporate
governance procedures for these meetings pursuant to paragraph
(j)(2)(iii) of this section that include procedures for telephonic or
electronic participation in shareholder meetings. The association must
indicate the use of these elected procedures in its bylaws.
(l) * * *
(3) * * * The bylaws may provide for telephonic or electronic
participation at these meetings.
* * * * *
(8) * * * The bylaws may provide for telephonic or electronic
participation at a special meeting.
* * * * *
PART 7--ACTIVITIES AND OPERATIONS
0
4. The authority citation for part 7 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1 et seq., 25b, 29, 71, 71a, 92, 92a, 93,
93a, 95(b)(1), 371, 371d, 481, 484, 1463, 1464, 1465, 1818, 1828(m),
3102(b), and 5412(b)(2)(B).
Sec. 7.1001 [Reserved]
0
6. Remove and reserve Sec. 7.1001.
0
7. Revise Sec. 7.2003 to read as follows:
Sec. 7.2003 Shareholder meetings; Board of directors meetings.
(a) Notice of shareholders' meetings. A national bank must mail
shareholders notice of the time, place, and purpose of all
shareholders' meetings at least 10 days prior to the meeting by first
class mail, unless the OCC determines that an emergency circumstance
exists. Where a national bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary, the sole
shareholder is permitted to waive notice of the shareholder's meeting.
The articles of association, bylaws, or law applicable to a national
bank may require a longer period of notice.
(b) Annual meeting for election of directors. When the day fixed
for the regular annual meeting of the shareholders falls on a legal
holiday in the State in which the bank is located, the shareholders'
meeting must be held, and the directors elected, on the next following
banking day.
(c) Virtual participation at shareholder meetings--(1) In general.
A national bank may provide for telephonic or electronic participation
at shareholder meetings.
(2) Procedures. A national bank must follow the procedures for
telephonic or electronic participation in a shareholder meeting of the
corporate governance procedures it has elected to follow pursuant to
Sec. 7.2000(b), if those elected procedures include telephonic or
electronic participation procedures; the Delaware General Corporation
Law, Del. Code Ann. Tit. 8 (1991, as amended 1994, and as amended
thereafter); or the Model Business Corporation Act, provided, however,
that such procedures are not inconsistent with applicable Federal
statutes and regulations and safety and soundness. The national bank
must indicate the use of these procedures in its bylaws.
(d) Virtual participation at board of directors meetings. A
national bank may provide for telephonic or electronic participation at
a meeting of its board of directors.
Brian P. Brooks,
First Deputy Comptroller, Comptroller of the Currency.
[FR Doc. 2020-11525 Filed 5-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-P