Flonicamid; Pesticide Tolerances, 31983-31986 [2020-10565]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
DATES:
This final rule is effective May
28, 2020.
requirements, Travel and transportation
expenses, Veterans.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey M. Martin,
Assistant Director, Office of Regulation Policy
& Management, Office of the Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Patricia M. Hayes, Ph.D. Chief
Consultant, Women’s Health Services,
Patient Care Services, Veterans Health
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20420. (202) 461–0373.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
In a
document published in the Federal
Register on December 13, 2019, VA
adopted as final, with changes, an
interim final rule providing for
reimbursement of qualifying adoption
expenses incurred by certain veterans
(84 FR 68046). The Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507)
requires that VA consider the impact of
paperwork and other information
collection burdens imposed on the
public. Under 44 U.S.C. 3507(a), an
agency may not collect or sponsor the
collection of information, nor may it
impose an information collection
requirement unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) control number. See
also 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3)(vi). As required
by 44 U.S.C. 3507(d), VA submitted the
information collection associated with
§ 17.390 to OMB for its review. OMB
approved the new information
collection requirements associated with
the interim final rule under a 6-month
emergency clearance and assigned OMB
control number 2900–0860, although
the control number did not appear in
§ 17.390 as revised by the final rule
because the OMB control number 2900–
0860 expired on March 31, 2019. VA
applied to OMB for a renewal of this
information collection under a separate
document and OMB approved the
renewal of this information collection
requirement associated with the final
rule on March 10, 2020. This document
revises § 17.390 by adding the approved
OMB control number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug
abuse, Government contracts, Grant
programs—health, Grant programs—
veterans, Health care, Health facilities,
Health professions, Health records,
Homeless, Medical and Dental schools,
Medical devices, Medical research,
Mental health programs, Nursing
homes, Reporting and recordkeeping
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 17 as
follows:
PART 17—MEDICAL
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read in part as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, and as noted in
specific sections.
*
*
*
*
*
2. Amend § 17.390 by revising the
parenthetical sentence at the end of the
section to read as follows:
■
§ 17.390 Reimbursement for qualifying
adoption expenses incurred by certain
veterans.
*
*
*
*
*
(The Office of Management and Budget
has approved the information collection
requirement in this section under
control number 2900–0860)
[FR Doc. 2020–10012 Filed 5–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0250; FRL–10009–26]
Flonicamid; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation revises the
tolerance for residues of flonicamid in
or on Leafy greens subgroup 4–16A,
except spinach. Interregional Research
Project Number 4 (IR–4) requested these
tolerances under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective May
28, 2020. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
July 27, 2020 and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
SUMMARY:
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0250, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
ADDRESSES:
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805.
Please note that due to the public
health emergency, the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room
was closed to public visitors on March
31, 2020. Our EPA/DC staff will
continue to provide customer service
via email, phone, and webform. For
further information on EPA/DC services,
docket contact information and the
current status of the EPA/DC and
Reading Room, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Goodis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
PO 00000
31983
Sfmt 4700
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Publishing Office’s eCFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/
text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/
Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
31984
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2019–0250 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing and must be received
by the Hearing Clerk on or before July
27, 2020. Addresses for mail and hand
delivery of objections and hearing
requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2019–0250, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Tolerance
In the Federal Register of August 2,
2019 (84 FR 37818) (FRL–9996–78),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 9E8743) by IR–4,
Rutgers, The State University of New
Jersey, 500 College Road East, Suite 201
W, Princeton, NJ 08540. The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180.613 be
amended by increasing the existing
tolerance for residues of the insecticide
flonicamid, including its metabolites
and degradates, to be determined by
measuring only the sum of flonicamid,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
N-(cyanomethyl)-4-(trifluoromethyl)-3pyridinecarboxamide, and its
metabolites, TFNA (4trifluoromethylnicotinic acid), TFNAAM (4-trifluoromethylnicotinamide),
and TFNG, N-(4trifluoromethylnicotinoyl)glycine,
calculated as the stoichiometric
equivalent of flonicamid, in or on Leafy
greens subgroup 4–16A, except spinach,
from 4.0 parts per million (ppm) to 8.0
ppm. That document referenced a
summary of the petition prepared by
ISK Biosciences Corporation, the
registrant, for IR–4 which is available in
the docket, https://www.regulations.gov.
One comment was received on the
notice of filing. EPA’s response to this
comment is discussed in Unit IV.C.
EPA is establishing the tolerance at 8
ppm rather than 8.0 ppm to be
consistent with the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) Rounding Class
Practice.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for flonicamid
including exposure resulting from the
tolerances established by this action.
EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks
associated with flonicamid follows.
On April 8, 2019, EPA published in
the Federal Register a final rule
establishing tolerances for residues of
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
flonicamid on sunflower subgroup 20B
based on the Agency’s conclusion that
aggregate exposure to flonicamid is safe
for the general population, including
infants and children. See 84 FR 13805
(FRL–9990–52). That document
contains a short discussion of the
toxicological profile, assumptions for
exposure assessment, cumulative risk,
and Agency’s determination regarding
the children’s safety factor, which have
not changed. In addition, the April 8,
2019 final rule referred to a summary of
the toxicological profile and the
toxicological endpoints and the points
of departure for flonicamid used for
human risk assessment in Unit III.B. of
the final rule published in the Federal
Register of July 23, 2018 (83 FR 34775)
(FRL–9977–82). Those discussions are
also incorporated here, as they have not
changed since those documents were
published.
EPA’s exposure assessments have
been updated to include the additional
exposure from use of flonicamid in
greenhouses on commodities in the
Leafy greens subgroup 4–16A, except
spinach. EPA relied on tolerance-level
residues and an assumption of 100
percent crop treated for all
commodities. EPA’s aggregate exposure
assessment incorporated this additional
dietary exposure, as well as exposure in
drinking water, although the drinking
water exposures are not impacted by
this new greenhouse use and thus have
not changed since the last assessment.
Flonicamid is not registered for any
specific use patterns that would result
in residential exposure. Further
information about EPA’s risk assessment
and determination of safety supporting
the tolerances established in the April 8,
2019 Federal Register action, as well as
the new flonicamid tolerance can be
found at https://www.regulations.gov in
‘‘Flonicamid. Human Health Risk
Assessment for the Establishment of
Permanent Tolerances in or on
Sunflower Subgroup 20B,’’ dated
December 6, 2018 in docket ID number
EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0273 and the
document titled, ‘‘Flonicamid. Human
Health Risk Assessment for a Petition to
Increase the Tolerance for Leafy Greens,
Except Spinach (Subgroup 4–16A) to
Support Use on Greenhouse-Grown
Commodities,’’ dated April 28, 2020 in
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–
0250.
No adverse effects resulting from a
single oral exposure was identified and
no acute dietary endpoint was selected;
therefore, an acute dietary assessment
was not conducted. Chronic dietary
risks are below the Agency’s level of
concern: 62% of the chronic populationadjusted dose (cPAD) for children 1 to
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
2 years old, the group with the highest
exposure. Flonicamid is not registered
for any use patterns that would result in
short- or intermediate-term residential
exposures. EPA has concluded that the
cPAD is protective of possible cancer
effects from flonicamid. Because
aggregate exposure to flonicamid is
below the cPAD, EPA concludes that
there is not an aggregate cancer risk
from exposures to flonicamid.
Therefore, based on these risk
assessments and information described
above, EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population, or to
infants and children from aggregate
exposure to flonicamid residues. More
detailed information on the subject
action to revise the tolerance in or on
the Leafy greens subgroup 4–16A,
except spinach, can be found in the
document entitled, ‘‘Flonicamid.
Human Health Risk Assessment for a
Petition to Increase the Tolerance for
Leafy Greens, Except Spinach
(Subgroup 4–16A) to Support Use on
Greenhouse-Grown Commodities’’ by
going to https://www.regulations.gov.
The referenced document is available in
the docket established by this action,
which is described under ADDRESSES.
Locate and click on the hyperlink for
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–
0250.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology
is available to enforce the tolerance
expression. FMC Method No. P–3561M,
a liquid chromatography-tandem mass
spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method, is an
acceptable enforcement method for
flonicamid and its metabolites in plant
commodities.
The method may be requested from:
Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch,
Environmental Science Center, 701
Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755–5350;
telephone number: (410) 305–2905;
email address: residuemethods@
epa.gov.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
The Codex Alimentarius is a joint
United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
Organization food standards program,
and it is recognized as an international
food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to
which the United States is a party. EPA
may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that
EPA explain the reasons for departing
from the Codex level.
The Codex has established MRLs for
flonicamid in or on leaf lettuce at 8.0
ppm and head lettuce at 1.5 ppm. No
other Codex MRLs are established for
the crops within this subgroup. While
the tolerance expression for U.S.
flonicamid tolerances is different than
the expression for the Codex flonicamid
MRLs, the level of the new U.S.
tolerance for Leafy greens subgroup 4–
16A, except spinach, is harmonized
with the Codex MRL for leaf lettuce.
Because the U.S. tolerance is for a crop
subgroup, it not possible to harmonize
with the Codex MRL for head lettuce,
which is another commodity in the
Leafy greens subgroup 4–16A.
C. Response to Comments
One commenter opposed approval of
this tolerance claiming it could have
detrimental effects on beneficial insects.
Whether a pesticide has detrimental
effects on beneficial insects, however, is
a question outside the scope of analysis
under the FFDCA because it is not
relevant to whether tolerances are safe.
The existing legal framework provided
by section 408 of the FFDCA states that
tolerances may be set when persons
seeking such tolerances or exemptions
have demonstrated that the pesticide
meets the safety standard imposed by
that statute. This comment provides no
information relevant the Agency’s safety
determination. Concerns about
environmental impacts of a pesticide are
more appropriately raised in actions
related to pesticides being registered
under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide
and Rodenticide Act.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, the existing tolerance for
residues of flonicamid, including its
metabolites and degradates, in or on
Leafy greens subgroup 4–16A, except
spinach, is modified to be 8 ppm, rather
than 4.0 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action modifies tolerances under
FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a
petition submitted to the Agency. The
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted these types of
actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31985
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order
13771, entitled ‘‘Reducing Regulations
and Controlling Regulatory Costs’’ (82
FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action
does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does
it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerances in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
31986
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
VII. Congressional Review Act
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2018–0321; FRL–10008–
14]
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
RIN 2070–AK57
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
40 CFR Parts 704 and 712
Small Manufacturer Definition Update
for Reporting and Recordkeeping
Requirements Under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA)
Section 8(a)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is finalizing amendments
to the definition of small manufacturer,
including a new definition for small
government, in accordance with the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).
Changes to the small manufacturer
definition impact certain reporting and
Dated: May 6, 2020.
recordkeeping requirements established
Michael Goodis,
under TSCA. EPA is also finalizing
other minor changes.
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
DATES: This final rule is effective June
29, 2020.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
amended as follows:
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2018–0321, is
PART 180—[AMENDED]
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pollution Prevention
■ 1. The authority citation for part 180
and Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket),
continues to read as follows:
Environmental Protection Agency
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
■ 2. In § 180.613, revise the entry ‘‘Leafy
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC.
greens subgroup 4–16A, except
The Public Reading Room is open from
spinach’’ in the table in paragraph (a)(1) 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
to read as follows:
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public
§ 180.613 Flonicamid; tolerances for
Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and
residues.
the telephone number for the OPPT
(a) * * *
Docket is (202) 566–0280. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
(1) * * *
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
Parts
per
Commodity
Please note that due to the public
million
health emergency the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room
*
*
*
*
*
was closed to public visitors on March
Leafy greens subgroup 4–16A,
31, 2020. Our EPA/DC staff will
except spinach ........................
8 continue to provide customer service
via email, phone, and webform. For
*
*
*
*
*
further information on EPA/DC services,
docket contact information and the
*
*
*
*
*
current status of the EPA/DC and
[FR Doc. 2020–10565 Filed 5–27–20; 8:45 am]
Reading Room, please visit https://
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For technical information contact:
Tyler Lloyd, Chemical Control Division
(7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
SUMMARY:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 564–4016; email address:
lloyd.tyler@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you manufacture (defined
by statute at 15 U.S.C. 2602(9) to
include import) chemical substances,
including byproduct chemical
substances, and are subject to either of
the following: (1) Reporting under the
TSCA Chemical Data Reporting (CDR)
requirements at 40 CFR part 711 or (2)
TSCA reporting and recordkeeping
requirements at 40 CFR part 704 or
other TSCA reporting requirements
which reference the small manufacturer
standards at 40 CFR 704.3. Any use of
the term ‘‘manufacture’’ in this
document will encompass ‘‘import’’ and
the term ‘‘manufacturer’’ will
encompass ‘‘importer’’ unless otherwise
stated.
The potentially regulated community
consists of entities that produce
domestically or import into the United
States chemical substances listed on the
TSCA Inventory. The Agency’s previous
experience with TSCA section 8(a) data
collections has shown that most
respondents affected by this collection
activity are from the following North
American Industrial Classification
System (NAICS) code categories:
• Chemical manufacturing or
processing (NAICS code 325); and
• Petroleum and coal products
manufacturing (NAICS code 324).
The NAICS codes have been provided
to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. To determine whether
you or your business may be affected by
this action, you should carefully
examine the applicable provisions at 40
CFR 711.8. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the
technical contact person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What is the Agency’s authority for
taking this action?
TSCA section 8(a)(1) authorizes EPA
to promulgate rules under which
manufacturers and processors of
chemical substances must maintain
such records and submit such reports as
EPA may reasonably require (15 U.S.C.
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 103 (Thursday, May 28, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31983-31986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-10565]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0250; FRL-10009-26]
Flonicamid; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation revises the tolerance for residues of
flonicamid in or on Leafy greens subgroup 4-16A, except spinach.
Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) requested these
tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective May 28, 2020. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before July 27, 2020 and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0250, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805.
Please note that due to the public health emergency, the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room was closed to public visitors on March
31, 2020. Our EPA/DC staff will continue to provide customer service
via email, phone, and webform. For further information on EPA/DC
services, docket contact information and the current status of the EPA/
DC and Reading Room, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Goodis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305-7090; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Publishing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
[[Page 31984]]
and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your
objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with
the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt
by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0250 in the
subject line on the first page of your submission. All objections and
requests for a hearing must be in writing and must be received by the
Hearing Clerk on or before July 27, 2020. Addresses for mail and hand
delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0250, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance
In the Federal Register of August 2, 2019 (84 FR 37818) (FRL-9996-
78), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
9E8743) by IR-4, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 500
College Road East, Suite 201 W, Princeton, NJ 08540. The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180.613 be amended by increasing the existing
tolerance for residues of the insecticide flonicamid, including its
metabolites and degradates, to be determined by measuring only the sum
of flonicamid, N-(cyanomethyl)-4-(trifluoromethyl)-3-
pyridinecarboxamide, and its metabolites, TFNA (4-
trifluoromethylnicotinic acid), TFNA-AM (4-
trifluoromethylnicotinamide), and TFNG, N-(4-
trifluoromethylnicotinoyl)glycine, calculated as the stoichiometric
equivalent of flonicamid, in or on Leafy greens subgroup 4-16A, except
spinach, from 4.0 parts per million (ppm) to 8.0 ppm. That document
referenced a summary of the petition prepared by ISK Biosciences
Corporation, the registrant, for IR-4 which is available in the docket,
https://www.regulations.gov. One comment was received on the notice of
filing. EPA's response to this comment is discussed in Unit IV.C.
EPA is establishing the tolerance at 8 ppm rather than 8.0 ppm to
be consistent with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) Rounding Class Practice.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for flonicamid including exposure
resulting from the tolerances established by this action. EPA's
assessment of exposures and risks associated with flonicamid follows.
On April 8, 2019, EPA published in the Federal Register a final
rule establishing tolerances for residues of flonicamid on sunflower
subgroup 20B based on the Agency's conclusion that aggregate exposure
to flonicamid is safe for the general population, including infants and
children. See 84 FR 13805 (FRL-9990-52). That document contains a short
discussion of the toxicological profile, assumptions for exposure
assessment, cumulative risk, and Agency's determination regarding the
children's safety factor, which have not changed. In addition, the
April 8, 2019 final rule referred to a summary of the toxicological
profile and the toxicological endpoints and the points of departure for
flonicamid used for human risk assessment in Unit III.B. of the final
rule published in the Federal Register of July 23, 2018 (83 FR 34775)
(FRL-9977-82). Those discussions are also incorporated here, as they
have not changed since those documents were published.
EPA's exposure assessments have been updated to include the
additional exposure from use of flonicamid in greenhouses on
commodities in the Leafy greens subgroup 4-16A, except spinach. EPA
relied on tolerance-level residues and an assumption of 100 percent
crop treated for all commodities. EPA's aggregate exposure assessment
incorporated this additional dietary exposure, as well as exposure in
drinking water, although the drinking water exposures are not impacted
by this new greenhouse use and thus have not changed since the last
assessment. Flonicamid is not registered for any specific use patterns
that would result in residential exposure. Further information about
EPA's risk assessment and determination of safety supporting the
tolerances established in the April 8, 2019 Federal Register action, as
well as the new flonicamid tolerance can be found at https://www.regulations.gov in ``Flonicamid. Human Health Risk Assessment for
the Establishment of Permanent Tolerances in or on Sunflower Subgroup
20B,'' dated December 6, 2018 in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0273
and the document titled, ``Flonicamid. Human Health Risk Assessment for
a Petition to Increase the Tolerance for Leafy Greens, Except Spinach
(Subgroup 4-16A) to Support Use on Greenhouse-Grown Commodities,''
dated April 28, 2020 in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0250.
No adverse effects resulting from a single oral exposure was
identified and no acute dietary endpoint was selected; therefore, an
acute dietary assessment was not conducted. Chronic dietary risks are
below the Agency's level of concern: 62% of the chronic population-
adjusted dose (cPAD) for children 1 to
[[Page 31985]]
2 years old, the group with the highest exposure. Flonicamid is not
registered for any use patterns that would result in short- or
intermediate-term residential exposures. EPA has concluded that the
cPAD is protective of possible cancer effects from flonicamid. Because
aggregate exposure to flonicamid is below the cPAD, EPA concludes that
there is not an aggregate cancer risk from exposures to flonicamid.
Therefore, based on these risk assessments and information
described above, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty
that no harm will result to the general population, or to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to flonicamid residues. More detailed
information on the subject action to revise the tolerance in or on the
Leafy greens subgroup 4-16A, except spinach, can be found in the
document entitled, ``Flonicamid. Human Health Risk Assessment for a
Petition to Increase the Tolerance for Leafy Greens, Except Spinach
(Subgroup 4-16A) to Support Use on Greenhouse-Grown Commodities'' by
going to https://www.regulations.gov. The referenced document is
available in the docket established by this action, which is described
under ADDRESSES. Locate and click on the hyperlink for docket ID number
EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0250.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology is available to enforce the
tolerance expression. FMC Method No. P-3561M, a liquid chromatography-
tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method, is an acceptable
enforcement method for flonicamid and its metabolites in plant
commodities.
The method may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry
Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD
20755-5350; telephone number: (410) 305-2905; email address:
[email protected].
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
The Codex has established MRLs for flonicamid in or on leaf lettuce
at 8.0 ppm and head lettuce at 1.5 ppm. No other Codex MRLs are
established for the crops within this subgroup. While the tolerance
expression for U.S. flonicamid tolerances is different than the
expression for the Codex flonicamid MRLs, the level of the new U.S.
tolerance for Leafy greens subgroup 4-16A, except spinach, is
harmonized with the Codex MRL for leaf lettuce. Because the U.S.
tolerance is for a crop subgroup, it not possible to harmonize with the
Codex MRL for head lettuce, which is another commodity in the Leafy
greens subgroup 4-16A.
C. Response to Comments
One commenter opposed approval of this tolerance claiming it could
have detrimental effects on beneficial insects. Whether a pesticide has
detrimental effects on beneficial insects, however, is a question
outside the scope of analysis under the FFDCA because it is not
relevant to whether tolerances are safe. The existing legal framework
provided by section 408 of the FFDCA states that tolerances may be set
when persons seeking such tolerances or exemptions have demonstrated
that the pesticide meets the safety standard imposed by that statute.
This comment provides no information relevant the Agency's safety
determination. Concerns about environmental impacts of a pesticide are
more appropriately raised in actions related to pesticides being
registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide
Act.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, the existing tolerance for residues of flonicamid,
including its metabolites and degradates, in or on Leafy greens
subgroup 4-16A, except spinach, is modified to be 8 ppm, rather than
4.0 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action modifies tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs'' (82 FR 9339, February 3,
2017). This action does not contain any information collections subject
to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerances in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary
[[Page 31986]]
consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: May 6, 2020.
Michael Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.613, revise the entry ``Leafy greens subgroup 4-16A,
except spinach'' in the table in paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 180.613 Flonicamid; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Leafy greens subgroup 4-16A, except spinach................. 8
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-10565 Filed 5-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P