New Source Performance Standards; Delegation of Authority to Oklahoma, 31423-31427 [2020-10834]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 26, 2020 / Proposed Rules submissions are not required under title I part D of the CAA, and in this instance are not in response to a SIP call under section 110(k)(5) of the CAA. covered by the PSD FIP), (K), (L), and (M). III. The EPA Approach To Review of Infrastructure SIP Submissions Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Due to ambiguity in some of the language of CAA section 110(a)(2), the EPA believes that it is appropriate to interpret these provisions in the specific context of taking action on infrastructure SIP submissions. The EPA has previously provided comprehensive guidance on the application of these provisions in the 2013 Guidance and through regional actions on infrastructure submissions.6 Unless otherwise noted below, we are following that existing approach in taking action on these submissions. In addition, in the context of taking action on such infrastructure submissions, the EPA evaluates the submitting state’s SIP for facial compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements, not for the state’s implementation of its SIP.7 The EPA has other authority to address any issues concerning a state’s implementation of the rules, regulations, consent orders, etc. that comprise its SIP. IV. The EPA Evaluation The EPA’s evaluation and rationale for proposing action on Washington’s September 30, 2019 and April 3, 2020 infrastructure SIP revisions are detailed in the ‘‘Technical Support Document for the EPA’s Proposed Rulemaking for the Washington Implementation Plan Revision for Meeting the Infrastructure Requirements in the Clean Air Act’’ (TSD). The TSD is available in the docket for this action. V. Proposed Action We are proposing to approve the September 2019 and April 2020 Washington infrastructure SIP revisions as meeting certain infrastructure requirements for the 2010 SO2 and 2015 ozone NAAQS, specifically CAA section 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C) (except for those provisions covered by the PSD FIP), (D)(i)(II) (except for those provisions covered by the PSD and regional haze FIPs), (D)(ii) (except for those provisions covered by the PSD FIP), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J) (except for those provisions 6 The EPA explains and elaborates on these ambiguities and its approach to address them in its September 13, 2013 Infrastructure SIP Guidance) available in the docket for this action and at https:// www.epa.gov/air-quality-implementation-plans/ infrastructure-sip-requirements-and-guidance). 7 See U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision in Montana Environmental Information Center v. EPA, No. 16–71933 (August 30, 2018). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:17 May 22, 2020 Jkt 250001 VI. Statutory and Executive Orders Review PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 31423 The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land in Washington except as specifically noted below and is also not approved to apply in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. Washington’s SIP is approved to apply on non-trust land within the exterior boundaries of the Puyallup Indian Reservation, also known as the 1873 Survey Area. Under the Puyallup Tribe of Indians Settlement Act of 1989, 25 U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly provided state and local agencies in Washington authority over activities on non-trust lands within the 1873 Survey Area. Consistent with EPA policy, the EPA provided a consultation opportunity to the Puyallup Tribe in a letter dated July 15, 2019. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: May 14, 2020. Christopher Hladick, Regional Administrator, Region 10. [FR Doc. 2020–10853 Filed 5–22–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 60 [EPA–R06–OAR–2010–0580; FRL–10009– 48–Region 6] New Source Performance Standards; Delegation of Authority to Oklahoma Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of delegation. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to update the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to reflect Oklahoma’s current New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) delegation status and mailing address for the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ). The ODEQ has submitted updated SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM 26MYP1 31424 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 26, 2020 / Proposed Rules regulations for delegation of the EPA authority for implementation and enforcement of certain NSPS. The updated State regulations incorporate by reference certain NSPS promulgated by the EPA, as they existed through June 30, 2018. DATES: Written comments on this proposed rule must be received on or before June 25, 2020. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06– OAR–2010–0580, at https:// www.regulations.gov or via email to pitre.randy@epa.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact Randy Pitre, (214) 665–7229; email: pitre.randy@epa.gov. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at www.regulations.gov. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may not be publicly available due to docket file size restrictions or content (e.g., CBI). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Randy Pitre, EPA Region 6 Office, Infrastructure and Ozone Section, 214– 665–7229, pitre.randy@epa.gov. Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our staff, the EPA Region 6 office will be closed to the public to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID– 19. We encourage the public to submit comments via https:// www.regulations.gov, as there will be a delay in processing mail and no courier or hand deliveries will be accepted. Please call or email the contact listed above if you need alternative access to material indexed but not provided in the docket. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:17 May 22, 2020 Jkt 250001 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean the EPA. I. Background Section 111(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7411(c)(1), authorizes the EPA to delegate to a state the authority to implement and enforce NSPS promulgated by the EPA under CAA section 111(b) and codified at part 60 of title 40 of the CFR. CAA section 111(c)(2) states that the EPA retains the authority to enforce any applicable NSPS delegated to a state. On March 25, 1982, the EPA approved the delegation of authority to implement and enforce NSPS to Oklahoma (1982 NSPS Delegation). See 47 FR 1785 (April 22, 1982). On October 8, 1999, the EPA updated Oklahoma’s NSPS delegation, including specific provisions setting forth the terms and conditions of the delegation of authority for NSPS responsibility to the ODEQ (1999 NSPS Delegation). See 64 FR 57392 (October 25, 1999). Copies of the initial 1982 NSPS Delegation and the 1999 NSPS Delegation updates are included in the docket for this action, both of which contain provisions specifying conditions and limitations applicable to the EPA’s delegation of authority to implement and enforce the NSPS in Oklahoma. Under the terms and conditions of the 1999 NSPS Delegation, ‘‘[f]uture provisions of 40 CFR part 60 shall be delegated to ODEQ pursuant to this agreement provided that (1) ODEQ requests delegation and provides copies of the proposed or adopted rules, (2) ODEQ adopts the federal standard without change (e.g., incorporation by reference) and (3) EPA does not object to the delegation within thirty (30) days of ODEQ’s request.’’ See Specific Provision 1 of the 1999 NSPS Delegation. II. ODEQ’s December 23, 2019 NSPS Delegation Update By letter dated December 23, 2019, the ODEQ requested an update to its NSPS delegation. ODEQ reaffirmed that it retains all required authorities set forth in 40 CFR 60.4 for delegation of a CAA section 111(c) program and all authority identified in the 1982 and 1999 NSPS Delegations. ODEQ provided copies of the duly adopted state regulations which incorporate specifically identified NSPS found at 40 CFR part 60 into the Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC) 252:100–2 and OAC 252:100 Appendix A, as published in the Oklahoma Register on September 3, 2019 (36 Okla. Reg. 1573) PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 with an effective date of September 15, 2019.1 These ODEQ regulations are, therefore, at least as stringent as the EPA’s rules. See 40 CFR 60.10(a). ODEQ’s December 23, 2019, request included the following NSPS in 40 CFR part 60, as they existed through June 30, 2018: 40 CFR part 60, subparts A (except sections 60.4, 60.9, 60.10, and 60.16), D, Da, Db, Dc, E, Ea, Eb, Ec, F, G, Ga, H, I, J, Ja, K, Ka, Kb, L, M, N, Na, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, AA, AAa, BB, BBa, CC, DD, EE, GG, HH, KK, LL, MM, NN, PP, QQ, RR, SS, TT, UU, VV, VVa, WW, XX, BBB, DDD, FFF, GGG, GGGa, HHH, III, JJJ, KKK, LLL, NNN, OOO, PPP, QQQ, RRR, SSS, TTT, UUU, VVV, WWW, XXX, AAAA, CCCC, EEEE, IIII, JJJJ, KKKK, LLLL, OOOO, OOOOa, TTTT, and Appendices A and B to 40 CFR part 60.2 In accordance with the authority provided by CAA section 111(c)(1) and consistent with the provisions of the 1982 NSPS Delegation and the 1999 NSPS Delegation, the EPA has determined that the ODEQ has met the conditions required for approval of the ODEQ’s requested update to its NSPS delegation, as described above. All authorities not affirmatively and expressly requested by the ODEQ are not delegated. In addition, the provisions and conditions contained in the 1982 and 1999 NSPS Delegations remain in effect, including Specific Provision 7 of the 1999 NSPS Delegation which states that the delegation excludes the State’s authority for sources located on Indian lands.3 Furthermore, no authorities are delegated that require rulemaking in the Federal Register to implement, or where Federal overview is the only way to ensure national consistency in the application of the standards. All inquiries and requests concerning implementation and enforcement of the excluded standards in the State of Oklahoma should be directed to the EPA Region 6 Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. Furthermore, the EPA retains any authority in an individual NSPS that may not be delegated according to provisions of the standard. Finally, the EPA retains the 1 The ODEQ previously submitted requests to the EPA for updates to the Oklahoma NSPS delegation, by letters dated June 29, 2018, November 2, 2016, March 17, 2015, August 23, 2012, and May 5, 2000. EPA has determined that such requests meet the requirements of the CAA and the 1982 and 1999 NSPS Delegations concerning the approval of the EPA’s delegation of authority for the enforcement and implementation of the NSPS in Oklahoma. 2 See EPA Docket No. EPA–R06–OAR–2010–0580 in www.regulations.gov. 3 For purposes of the ODEQ’s NSPS delegation, the term ‘‘Indian lands’’ is synonymous with the term ‘‘Indian county,’’ as defined at 18 U.S.C. 1151. E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM 26MYP1 31425 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 26, 2020 / Proposed Rules authorities stated in the 1982 and 1999 NSPS Delegations. III. Proposed Action Apart from the notification of the updated NSPS delegation to the ODEQ as discussed above, the EPA is proposing to amend 40 CFR part 60 to include a table of the specific NSPS delegated to the ODEQ and update the mailing address for the ODEQ. If finalized as proposed, 40 CFR 60.4(b)(38) will be amended to read: State of Oklahoma: State of Oklahoma, Department of Environmental Quality, Air Quality Division, P.O. Box 1677, Oklahoma City, OK 73101–1677, and the following language and table will be added to 40 CFR 60.4(e): DELEGATION STATUS FOR PART 60 STANDARDS—STATE OF OKLAHOMA [Excluding Indian Country] Subpart Source category A ................... D ................... Da ................. Db ................. Dc ................. E ................... Ea ................. Eb ................. Ec .................. F .................... G ................... Ga ................. H ................... I ..................... J .................... Ja .................. K ................... Ka ................. Kb ................. L .................... M ................... N ................... Na ................. General Provisions (except Sections 60.4, 60.9, 60.10 and 60.16) .......................................................................... Fossil Fueled Steam Generators (250 MM BTU/hr) .................................................................................................. Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (250 MM BTU/hr) ......................................................................................... Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units (100 to 250 MM BTU/hr) ............................................. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Small Steam Generating Units (10 to 100 MM BTU/hr ...................................... Incinerators (>50 tons per day) .................................................................................................................................. Municipal Waste Combustors ..................................................................................................................................... Large Municipal Waste Combustors ........................................................................................................................... Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators .......................................................................................................... Portland Cement Plants .............................................................................................................................................. Nitric Acid Plants ......................................................................................................................................................... Nitric Acid Plants (after October 14, 2011) ................................................................................................................ Sulfuric Acid Plants ..................................................................................................................................................... Hot Mix Asphalt Facilities ........................................................................................................................................... Petroleum Refineries .................................................................................................................................................. Petroleum Refineries (After May 14, 2007) ................................................................................................................ Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids (After 6/11/73 & Before 5/19/78) ................................................................. Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids (After 6/11/73 & Before 5/19/78) ................................................................. Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid Stg/Vessels) After 7/23/84 ............................ Secondary Lead Smelters .......................................................................................................................................... Secondary Brass and Bronze Production Plants ....................................................................................................... Primary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Process Furnaces (Construction Commenced After June 11, 1973) ......... Secondary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Process Steelmaking Facilities Construction is Commenced After January 20, 1983. Sewage Treatment Plants .......................................................................................................................................... Primary Copper Smelters ........................................................................................................................................... Primary Zinc Smelters ................................................................................................................................................ Primary Lead Smelters ............................................................................................................................................... Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants .......................................................................................................................... Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Wet Process Phosphoric Plants ................................................................................. Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Superphosphoric Acid Plants ..................................................................................... Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Diammonium Phosphate Plants ................................................................................. Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Triple Superphosphate Plants .................................................................................... Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Granular Triple Superphosphate Storage Facilities ................................................... Coal Preparation Plants .............................................................................................................................................. Ferroalloy Production Facilities ................................................................................................................................... Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces After 10/21/74 & On or Before 8/17/83 ............................................................. Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces & Argon-Oxygen Decarburization Vessels After 8/07/83 .................................. Kraft Pulp Mills ............................................................................................................................................................ Kraft Pulp Mill Affected Sources for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced After May 23, 2013. Glass Manufacturing Plants ........................................................................................................................................ Grain Elevators ........................................................................................................................................................... Surface Coating of Metal Furniture ............................................................................................................................ Stationary Gas Turbines ............................................................................................................................................. Lime Manufacturing Plants ......................................................................................................................................... Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Plants .................................................................................................................... Metallic Mineral Processing Plants ............................................................................................................................. Automobile & Light Duty Truck Surface Coating Operations ..................................................................................... Phosphate Manufacturing Plants ................................................................................................................................ Ammonium Sulfate Manufacture ................................................................................................................................ Graphic Arts Industry: Publication Rotogravure Printing ............................................................................................ Pressure Sensitive Tape and Label Surface Coating Operations ............................................................................. Industrial Surface Coating: Large Appliances ............................................................................................................ Metal Coil Surface Coating ......................................................................................................................................... Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacture .............................................................................................. VOC Equipment Leaks in the SOCMI Industry .......................................................................................................... VOC Equipment Leaks in the SOCMI Industry (After November 7, 2006) ................................................................ Beverage Can Surface Coating Industry .................................................................................................................... Bulk Gasoline Terminals ............................................................................................................................................. New Residential Wood Heaters .................................................................................................................................. Rubber Tire Manufacturing Industry ........................................................................................................................... O ................... P ................... Q ................... R ................... S ................... T .................... U ................... V ................... W .................. X ................... Y ................... Z .................... AA ................. AAa ............... BB ................. BBa ............... CC ................. DD ................. EE ................. GG ................ HH ................. KK ................. LL .................. MM ................ NN ................. PP ................. QQ ................ RR ................. SS ................. TT ................. UU ................. VV ................. VVa ............... WW ............... XX ................. AAA ............... BBB ............... VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:17 May 22, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 ODEQ E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM 26MYP1 Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. No. Yes. 31426 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 26, 2020 / Proposed Rules DELEGATION STATUS FOR PART 60 STANDARDS—STATE OF OKLAHOMA—Continued [Excluding Indian Country] Subpart Source category DDD .............. FFF ............... GGG ............. GGGa ........... Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions from the Polymer Manufacturing Industry ........................................ Flexible Vinyl and Urethane Coating and Printing ..................................................................................................... VOC Equipment Leaks in Petroleum Refineries ........................................................................................................ Standards of Performance for Equipment Leaks of VOC in Petroleum Refineries for Which Construction, Reconstruction or Modification Commenced After November 7, 2006. Synthetic Fiber Production .......................................................................................................................................... VOC Emissions from the SOCMI Air Oxidation Unit Processes ................................................................................ Petroleum Dry Cleaners ............................................................................................................................................. VOC Equipment Leaks From Onshore Natural Gas Processing Plants .................................................................... Onshore Natural Gas Processing: SO2 Emissions .................................................................................................... VOC Emissions from SOCMI Distillation Operations ................................................................................................. Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants ...................................................................................................................... Wool Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing Plants ...................................................................................................... VOC Emissions From Petroleum Refinery Wastewater Systems .............................................................................. VOC Emissions from SOCMI Reactor Processes ...................................................................................................... Magnetic Tape Coating Operations ............................................................................................................................ Industrial Surface Coating: Plastic Parts for Business Machines .............................................................................. Calciners and Dryers in Mineral Industries ................................................................................................................ Polymeric Coating of Supporting Substrates Facilities .............................................................................................. Municipal Solid Waste Landfills .................................................................................................................................. Municipal Solid Waste Landfills that Commenced Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification after July 17, 2014. Small Municipal Waste Combustion Units (Construction is Commenced After 8/30/99 or Modification/Reconstruction is Commenced After 6/06/2001. Commercial & Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units (Construction is Commenced After 11/30/1999 or Modification/Reconstruction is Commenced on or After 6/01/2001. Other Solid Waste Incineration Units (Constructed after 12/09/2004 or Modification/Reconstruction is commenced on or after 06/16/2004). Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines ................................................................................. Stationary Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engines ............................................................................................. Stationary Combustion Turbines (Construction Commenced After 02/18/2005) ....................................................... New Sewage Sludge Incineration Units ..................................................................................................................... Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production, Transmission and Distribution for which Construction, Modification or Reconstruction Commenced After August 23, 2011, and on or before September 18, 2015. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities for which Construction, Modification or Reconstruction Commenced After September 18, 2015. Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Electric ..................................................................................................................... Generating Units ......................................................................................................................................................... Appendices A (Test Methods) and B (Performance Specifications) .......................................................................... HHH .............. III ................... JJJ ................ KKK ............... LLL ................ NNN .............. OOO ............. PPP ............... QQQ ............. RRR .............. SSS ............... TTT ............... UUU .............. VVV ............... WWW ............ XXX ............... AAAA ............ CCCC ........... EEEE ............ IIII .................. JJJJ ............... KKKK ............ LLLL .............. OOOO ........... OOOOa ......... TTTT ............. N/A ................ IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the EPA previously delegated to the ODEQ the authority to implement and enforce certain NSPS for sources located in Oklahoma, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7411(c)(1); see also 40 CFR 60.4(b). Pursuant the terms and conditions of that delegation, this action informs the public that the EPA has found the ODEQ’s December 23, 2019, request to update the delegation status for NSPS meets Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Through this action, the EPA is proposing to add a table to 40 CFR part 60 listing the specific NSPS currently delegated to the ODEQ and update the ODEQ’s address for submittal of documents required under the delegated NSPS provisions. For these reasons, this action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:17 May 22, 2020 Jkt 250001 ODEQ of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because NSPS delegation updates are exempted under Executive Order 12866; • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the Oklahoma NSPS delegation does not extend to Indian country. If finalized as proposed, the EPA’s action will not have tribal E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM 26MYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 26, 2020 / Proposed Rules implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 60 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: May 14, 2020. David Garcia, Director, Air & Radiation Division, Region 6. [FR Doc. 2020–10834 Filed 5–22–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 300 [EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989–0011; FRL–10008– 68–Region 9] National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List: Deletion of the JASCO Chemical Corp. Superfund Site Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 9 is issuing a Notice of Intent to Delete the JASCO Chemical Corporation Superfund Site (Site) located in Mountain View, California, from the National Priorities List (NPL) and requests public comments on this proposed action. The NPL, promulgated pursuant to section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an appendix of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). EPA and the State of California, through the Department of Toxic Substances Control, have determined that all appropriate response actions under CERCLA have been completed. However, this deletion does not preclude future actions under Superfund. SUMMARY: Comments must be received by June 25, 2020. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID no. EPA–HQ– SFUND–1989–0011, by one of the following methods: DATES: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:17 May 22, 2020 Jkt 250001 • http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http:// www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets. • Email: Superfund Project Manager: Eric Canteenwala, canteenwala.eric@ epa.gov. • Written comments submitted by mail are temporarily suspended and no hand deliveries will be accepted. We encourage the public to submit comments via https:// www.regulations.gov Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989– 0011. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http:// www.regulations.gov or email. The http://www.regulations.gov website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without going through http:// www.regulations.gov your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 31427 technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http:// www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in the hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in http:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the following repositories: The EPA is temporarily suspending its Docket Center and Regional Records Centers for public visitors to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID–19. In addition, many site information repositories are closed and information in these repositories, including the deletion docket, has not been updated with hardcopy or electronic media. For further information and updates on EPA Docket Center services, please visit us online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets. The EPA continues to carefully and continuously monitor information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), local area health departments, and our Federal partners so that we can respond rapidly as conditions change regarding COVID. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Canteenwala, Superfund Project Manager, U.S. EPA, Region 9 (SFD–7–1), 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415) 972–3932, email: canteenwala.eric@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Introduction II. NPL Deletion Criteria III. Deletion Procedures IV. Basis for Site Deletion I. Introduction EPA Region 9 announces its intent to delete the JASCO Chemical Corporation Superfund Site from the NPL and requests public comment on this proposed action. The NPL constitutes Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300 which is the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), which EPA promulgated pursuant to section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended. EPA maintains the NPL as the list of E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM 26MYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 101 (Tuesday, May 26, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31423-31427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-10834]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 60

[EPA-R06-OAR-2010-0580; FRL-10009-48-Region 6]


New Source Performance Standards; Delegation of Authority to 
Oklahoma

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of delegation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
update the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to reflect Oklahoma's 
current New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) delegation status and 
mailing address for the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality 
(ODEQ). The ODEQ has submitted updated

[[Page 31424]]

regulations for delegation of the EPA authority for implementation and 
enforcement of certain NSPS. The updated State regulations incorporate 
by reference certain NSPS promulgated by the EPA, as they existed 
through June 30, 2018.

DATES: Written comments on this proposed rule must be received on or 
before June 25, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R06-
OAR-2010-0580, at https://www.regulations.gov or via email to 
[email protected]. Follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from 
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public 
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, 
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written 
comment is considered the official comment and should include 
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not 
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary 
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For 
additional submission methods, please contact Randy Pitre, (214) 665-
7229; email: [email protected]. For the full EPA public comment 
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general 
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available 
electronically at www.regulations.gov. While all documents in the 
docket are listed in the index, some information may not be publicly 
available due to docket file size restrictions or content (e.g., CBI).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Randy Pitre, EPA Region 6 Office, 
Infrastructure and Ozone Section, 214-665-7229, [email protected]. 
Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our staff, 
the EPA Region 6 office will be closed to the public to reduce the risk 
of transmitting COVID-19. We encourage the public to submit comments 
via https://www.regulations.gov, as there will be a delay in processing 
mail and no courier or hand deliveries will be accepted. Please call or 
email the contact listed above if you need alternative access to 
material indexed but not provided in the docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.

I. Background

    Section 111(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7411(c)(1), 
authorizes the EPA to delegate to a state the authority to implement 
and enforce NSPS promulgated by the EPA under CAA section 111(b) and 
codified at part 60 of title 40 of the CFR. CAA section 111(c)(2) 
states that the EPA retains the authority to enforce any applicable 
NSPS delegated to a state. On March 25, 1982, the EPA approved the 
delegation of authority to implement and enforce NSPS to Oklahoma (1982 
NSPS Delegation). See 47 FR 1785 (April 22, 1982). On October 8, 1999, 
the EPA updated Oklahoma's NSPS delegation, including specific 
provisions setting forth the terms and conditions of the delegation of 
authority for NSPS responsibility to the ODEQ (1999 NSPS Delegation). 
See 64 FR 57392 (October 25, 1999). Copies of the initial 1982 NSPS 
Delegation and the 1999 NSPS Delegation updates are included in the 
docket for this action, both of which contain provisions specifying 
conditions and limitations applicable to the EPA's delegation of 
authority to implement and enforce the NSPS in Oklahoma.
    Under the terms and conditions of the 1999 NSPS Delegation, 
``[f]uture provisions of 40 CFR part 60 shall be delegated to ODEQ 
pursuant to this agreement provided that (1) ODEQ requests delegation 
and provides copies of the proposed or adopted rules, (2) ODEQ adopts 
the federal standard without change (e.g., incorporation by reference) 
and (3) EPA does not object to the delegation within thirty (30) days 
of ODEQ's request.'' See Specific Provision 1 of the 1999 NSPS 
Delegation.

II. ODEQ's December 23, 2019 NSPS Delegation Update

    By letter dated December 23, 2019, the ODEQ requested an update to 
its NSPS delegation. ODEQ reaffirmed that it retains all required 
authorities set forth in 40 CFR 60.4 for delegation of a CAA section 
111(c) program and all authority identified in the 1982 and 1999 NSPS 
Delegations. ODEQ provided copies of the duly adopted state regulations 
which incorporate specifically identified NSPS found at 40 CFR part 60 
into the Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC) 252:100-2 and OAC 252:100 
Appendix A, as published in the Oklahoma Register on September 3, 2019 
(36 Okla. Reg. 1573) with an effective date of September 15, 2019.\1\ 
These ODEQ regulations are, therefore, at least as stringent as the 
EPA's rules. See 40 CFR 60.10(a). ODEQ's December 23, 2019, request 
included the following NSPS in 40 CFR part 60, as they existed through 
June 30, 2018: 40 CFR part 60, subparts A (except sections 60.4, 60.9, 
60.10, and 60.16), D, Da, Db, Dc, E, Ea, Eb, Ec, F, G, Ga, H, I, J, Ja, 
K, Ka, Kb, L, M, N, Na, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, AA, AAa, 
BB, BBa, CC, DD, EE, GG, HH, KK, LL, MM, NN, PP, QQ, RR, SS, TT, UU, 
VV, VVa, WW, XX, BBB, DDD, FFF, GGG, GGGa, HHH, III, JJJ, KKK, LLL, 
NNN, OOO, PPP, QQQ, RRR, SSS, TTT, UUU, VVV, WWW, XXX, AAAA, CCCC, 
EEEE, IIII, JJJJ, KKKK, LLLL, OOOO, OOOOa, TTTT, and Appendices A and B 
to 40 CFR part 60.\2\ In accordance with the authority provided by CAA 
section 111(c)(1) and consistent with the provisions of the 1982 NSPS 
Delegation and the 1999 NSPS Delegation, the EPA has determined that 
the ODEQ has met the conditions required for approval of the ODEQ's 
requested update to its NSPS delegation, as described above. All 
authorities not affirmatively and expressly requested by the ODEQ are 
not delegated. In addition, the provisions and conditions contained in 
the 1982 and 1999 NSPS Delegations remain in effect, including Specific 
Provision 7 of the 1999 NSPS Delegation which states that the 
delegation excludes the State's authority for sources located on Indian 
lands.\3\ Furthermore, no authorities are delegated that require 
rulemaking in the Federal Register to implement, or where Federal 
overview is the only way to ensure national consistency in the 
application of the standards. All inquiries and requests concerning 
implementation and enforcement of the excluded standards in the State 
of Oklahoma should be directed to the EPA Region 6 Office of 
Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. Furthermore, the EPA retains any 
authority in an individual NSPS that may not be delegated according to 
provisions of the standard. Finally, the EPA retains the

[[Page 31425]]

authorities stated in the 1982 and 1999 NSPS Delegations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The ODEQ previously submitted requests to the EPA for 
updates to the Oklahoma NSPS delegation, by letters dated June 29, 
2018, November 2, 2016, March 17, 2015, August 23, 2012, and May 5, 
2000. EPA has determined that such requests meet the requirements of 
the CAA and the 1982 and 1999 NSPS Delegations concerning the 
approval of the EPA's delegation of authority for the enforcement 
and implementation of the NSPS in Oklahoma.
    \2\ See EPA Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2010-0580 in 
www.regulations.gov.
    \3\ For purposes of the ODEQ's NSPS delegation, the term 
``Indian lands'' is synonymous with the term ``Indian county,'' as 
defined at 18 U.S.C. 1151.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Proposed Action

    Apart from the notification of the updated NSPS delegation to the 
ODEQ as discussed above, the EPA is proposing to amend 40 CFR part 60 
to include a table of the specific NSPS delegated to the ODEQ and 
update the mailing address for the ODEQ. If finalized as proposed, 40 
CFR 60.4(b)(38) will be amended to read: State of Oklahoma: State of 
Oklahoma, Department of Environmental Quality, Air Quality Division, 
P.O. Box 1677, Oklahoma City, OK 73101-1677, and the following language 
and table will be added to 40 CFR 60.4(e):

                           Delegation Status for Part 60 Standards--State of Oklahoma
                                           [Excluding Indian Country]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Subpart                               Source category                                ODEQ
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A...........................  General Provisions (except Sections 60.4, 60.9,       Yes.
                               60.10 and 60.16).
D...........................  Fossil Fueled Steam Generators (250 MM BTU/hr)......  Yes.
Da..........................  Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (250 MM BTU/  Yes.
                               hr).
Db..........................  Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating  Yes.
                               Units (100 to 250 MM BTU/hr).
Dc..........................  Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Small Steam       Yes.
                               Generating Units (10 to 100 MM BTU/hr.
E...........................  Incinerators (>50 tons per day).....................  Yes.
Ea..........................  Municipal Waste Combustors..........................  Yes.
Eb..........................  Large Municipal Waste Combustors....................  Yes.
Ec..........................  Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators......  Yes.
F...........................  Portland Cement Plants..............................  Yes.
G...........................  Nitric Acid Plants..................................  Yes.
Ga..........................  Nitric Acid Plants (after October 14, 2011).........  Yes.
H...........................  Sulfuric Acid Plants................................  Yes.
I...........................  Hot Mix Asphalt Facilities..........................  Yes.
J...........................  Petroleum Refineries................................  Yes.
Ja..........................  Petroleum Refineries (After May 14, 2007)...........  Yes.
K...........................  Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids (After 6/11/73  Yes.
                               & Before 5/19/78).
Ka..........................  Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids (After 6/11/73  Yes.
                               & Before 5/19/78).
Kb..........................  Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including    Yes.
                               Petroleum Liquid Stg/Vessels) After 7/23/84.
L...........................  Secondary Lead Smelters.............................  Yes.
M...........................  Secondary Brass and Bronze Production Plants........  Yes.
N...........................  Primary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Process Furnaces  Yes.
                               (Construction Commenced After June 11, 1973).
Na..........................  Secondary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Process         Yes.
                               Steelmaking Facilities Construction is Commenced
                               After January 20, 1983.
O...........................  Sewage Treatment Plants.............................  Yes.
P...........................  Primary Copper Smelters.............................  Yes.
Q...........................  Primary Zinc Smelters...............................  Yes.
R...........................  Primary Lead Smelters...............................  Yes.
S...........................  Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants...................  Yes.
T...........................  Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Wet Process            Yes.
                               Phosphoric Plants.
U...........................  Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Superphosphoric Acid   Yes.
                               Plants.
V...........................  Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Diammonium Phosphate   Yes.
                               Plants.
W...........................  Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Triple Superphosphate  Yes.
                               Plants.
X...........................  Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Granular Triple        Yes.
                               Superphosphate Storage Facilities.
Y...........................  Coal Preparation Plants.............................  Yes.
Z...........................  Ferroalloy Production Facilities....................  Yes.
AA..........................  Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces After 10/21/74 &  Yes.
                               On or Before 8/17/83.
AAa.........................  Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces & Argon-Oxygen    Yes.
                               Decarburization Vessels After 8/07/83.
BB..........................  Kraft Pulp Mills....................................  Yes.
BBa.........................  Kraft Pulp Mill Affected Sources for Which            Yes.
                               Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification
                               Commenced After May 23, 2013.
CC..........................  Glass Manufacturing Plants..........................  Yes.
DD..........................  Grain Elevators.....................................  Yes.
EE..........................  Surface Coating of Metal Furniture..................  Yes.
GG..........................  Stationary Gas Turbines.............................  Yes.
HH..........................  Lime Manufacturing Plants...........................  Yes.
KK..........................  Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Plants..............  Yes.
LL..........................  Metallic Mineral Processing Plants..................  Yes.
MM..........................  Automobile & Light Duty Truck Surface Coating         Yes.
                               Operations.
NN..........................  Phosphate Manufacturing Plants......................  Yes.
PP..........................  Ammonium Sulfate Manufacture........................  Yes.
QQ..........................  Graphic Arts Industry: Publication Rotogravure        Yes.
                               Printing.
RR..........................  Pressure Sensitive Tape and Label Surface Coating     Yes.
                               Operations.
SS..........................  Industrial Surface Coating: Large Appliances........  Yes.
TT..........................  Metal Coil Surface Coating..........................  Yes.
UU..........................  Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacture..  Yes.
VV..........................  VOC Equipment Leaks in the SOCMI Industry...........  Yes.
VVa.........................  VOC Equipment Leaks in the SOCMI Industry (After      Yes.
                               November 7, 2006).
WW..........................  Beverage Can Surface Coating Industry...............  Yes.
XX..........................  Bulk Gasoline Terminals.............................  Yes.
AAA.........................  New Residential Wood Heaters........................  No.
BBB.........................  Rubber Tire Manufacturing Industry..................  Yes.

[[Page 31426]]

 
DDD.........................  Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions from the    Yes.
                               Polymer Manufacturing Industry.
FFF.........................  Flexible Vinyl and Urethane Coating and Printing....  Yes.
GGG.........................  VOC Equipment Leaks in Petroleum Refineries.........  Yes.
GGGa........................  Standards of Performance for Equipment Leaks of VOC   Yes.
                               in Petroleum Refineries for Which Construction,
                               Reconstruction or Modification Commenced After
                               November 7, 2006.
HHH.........................  Synthetic Fiber Production..........................  Yes.
III.........................  VOC Emissions from the SOCMI Air Oxidation Unit       Yes.
                               Processes.
JJJ.........................  Petroleum Dry Cleaners..............................  Yes.
KKK.........................  VOC Equipment Leaks From Onshore Natural Gas          Yes.
                               Processing Plants.
LLL.........................  Onshore Natural Gas Processing: SO2 Emissions.......  Yes.
NNN.........................  VOC Emissions from SOCMI Distillation Operations....  Yes.
OOO.........................  Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants...............  Yes.
PPP.........................  Wool Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing Plants.....  Yes.
QQQ.........................  VOC Emissions From Petroleum Refinery Wastewater      Yes.
                               Systems.
RRR.........................  VOC Emissions from SOCMI Reactor Processes..........  Yes.
SSS.........................  Magnetic Tape Coating Operations....................  Yes.
TTT.........................  Industrial Surface Coating: Plastic Parts for         Yes.
                               Business Machines.
UUU.........................  Calciners and Dryers in Mineral Industries..........  Yes.
VVV.........................  Polymeric Coating of Supporting Substrates            Yes.
                               Facilities.
WWW.........................  Municipal Solid Waste Landfills.....................  Yes.
XXX.........................  Municipal Solid Waste Landfills that Commenced        Yes.
                               Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification after
                               July 17, 2014.
AAAA........................  Small Municipal Waste Combustion Units (Construction  Yes.
                               is Commenced After 8/30/99 or Modification/
                               Reconstruction is Commenced After 6/06/2001.
CCCC........................  Commercial & Industrial Solid Waste Incineration      Yes.
                               Units (Construction is Commenced After 11/30/1999
                               or Modification/Reconstruction is Commenced on or
                               After 6/01/2001.
EEEE........................  Other Solid Waste Incineration Units (Constructed     Yes.
                               after 12/09/2004 or Modification/Reconstruction is
                               commenced on or after 06/16/2004).
IIII........................  Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion   Yes.
                               Engines.
JJJJ........................  Stationary Spark Ignition Internal Combustion         Yes.
                               Engines.
KKKK........................  Stationary Combustion Turbines (Construction          Yes.
                               Commenced After 02/18/2005).
LLLL........................  New Sewage Sludge Incineration Units................  Yes.
OOOO........................  Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production, Transmission    Yes.
                               and Distribution for which Construction,
                               Modification or Reconstruction Commenced After
                               August 23, 2011, and on or before September 18,
                               2015.
OOOOa.......................  Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities for which        Yes.
                               Construction, Modification or Reconstruction
                               Commenced After September 18, 2015.
TTTT........................  Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Electric...............  Yes.
                              Generating Units....................................
N/A.........................  Appendices A (Test Methods) and B (Performance        Yes.
                               Specifications).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the EPA previously delegated to the ODEQ the 
authority to implement and enforce certain NSPS for sources located in 
Oklahoma, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7411(c)(1); see also 40 CFR 
60.4(b). Pursuant the terms and conditions of that delegation, this 
action informs the public that the EPA has found the ODEQ's December 
23, 2019, request to update the delegation status for NSPS meets 
Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond 
those imposed by state law. Through this action, the EPA is proposing 
to add a table to 40 CFR part 60 listing the specific NSPS currently 
delegated to the ODEQ and update the ODEQ's address for submittal of 
documents required under the delegated NSPS provisions. For these 
reasons, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 
2017) regulatory action because NSPS delegation updates are exempted 
under Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority 
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or 
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible 
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the Oklahoma NSPS delegation does not extend to Indian 
country. If finalized as proposed, the EPA's action will not have 
tribal

[[Page 31427]]

implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal 
governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 60

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 14, 2020.
David Garcia,
Director, Air & Radiation Division, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2020-10834 Filed 5-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P