New Source Performance Standards; Delegation of Authority to Oklahoma, 31423-31427 [2020-10834]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 26, 2020 / Proposed Rules
submissions are not required under title
I part D of the CAA, and in this instance
are not in response to a SIP call under
section 110(k)(5) of the CAA.
covered by the PSD FIP), (K), (L), and
(M).
III. The EPA Approach To Review of
Infrastructure SIP Submissions
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Due to ambiguity in some of the
language of CAA section 110(a)(2), the
EPA believes that it is appropriate to
interpret these provisions in the specific
context of taking action on
infrastructure SIP submissions. The EPA
has previously provided comprehensive
guidance on the application of these
provisions in the 2013 Guidance and
through regional actions on
infrastructure submissions.6 Unless
otherwise noted below, we are following
that existing approach in taking action
on these submissions. In addition, in the
context of taking action on such
infrastructure submissions, the EPA
evaluates the submitting state’s SIP for
facial compliance with statutory and
regulatory requirements, not for the
state’s implementation of its SIP.7 The
EPA has other authority to address any
issues concerning a state’s
implementation of the rules,
regulations, consent orders, etc. that
comprise its SIP.
IV. The EPA Evaluation
The EPA’s evaluation and rationale
for proposing action on Washington’s
September 30, 2019 and April 3, 2020
infrastructure SIP revisions are detailed
in the ‘‘Technical Support Document for
the EPA’s Proposed Rulemaking for the
Washington Implementation Plan
Revision for Meeting the Infrastructure
Requirements in the Clean Air Act’’
(TSD). The TSD is available in the
docket for this action.
V. Proposed Action
We are proposing to approve the
September 2019 and April 2020
Washington infrastructure SIP revisions
as meeting certain infrastructure
requirements for the 2010 SO2 and 2015
ozone NAAQS, specifically CAA section
110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C) (except for those
provisions covered by the PSD FIP),
(D)(i)(II) (except for those provisions
covered by the PSD and regional haze
FIPs), (D)(ii) (except for those provisions
covered by the PSD FIP), (E), (F), (G),
(H), (J) (except for those provisions
6 The EPA explains and elaborates on these
ambiguities and its approach to address them in its
September 13, 2013 Infrastructure SIP Guidance)
available in the docket for this action and at https://
www.epa.gov/air-quality-implementation-plans/
infrastructure-sip-requirements-and-guidance).
7 See U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
decision in Montana Environmental Information
Center v. EPA, No. 16–71933 (August 30, 2018).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 May 22, 2020
Jkt 250001
VI. Statutory and Executive Orders
Review
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31423
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land in
Washington except as specifically noted
below and is also not approved to apply
in any other area where the EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), nor will it impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
Washington’s SIP is approved to apply
on non-trust land within the exterior
boundaries of the Puyallup Indian
Reservation, also known as the 1873
Survey Area. Under the Puyallup Tribe
of Indians Settlement Act of 1989, 25
U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly
provided state and local agencies in
Washington authority over activities on
non-trust lands within the 1873 Survey
Area. Consistent with EPA policy, the
EPA provided a consultation
opportunity to the Puyallup Tribe in a
letter dated July 15, 2019.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 14, 2020.
Christopher Hladick,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2020–10853 Filed 5–22–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 60
[EPA–R06–OAR–2010–0580; FRL–10009–
48–Region 6]
New Source Performance Standards;
Delegation of Authority to Oklahoma
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of
delegation.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to update the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to
reflect Oklahoma’s current New Source
Performance Standards (NSPS)
delegation status and mailing address
for the Oklahoma Department of
Environmental Quality (ODEQ). The
ODEQ has submitted updated
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM
26MYP1
31424
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 26, 2020 / Proposed Rules
regulations for delegation of the EPA
authority for implementation and
enforcement of certain NSPS. The
updated State regulations incorporate by
reference certain NSPS promulgated by
the EPA, as they existed through June
30, 2018.
DATES: Written comments on this
proposed rule must be received on or
before June 25, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2010–0580, at https://
www.regulations.gov or via email to
pitre.randy@epa.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact Randy Pitre, (214) 665–7229;
email: pitre.randy@epa.gov. For the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may not be
publicly available due to docket file size
restrictions or content (e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Randy Pitre, EPA Region 6 Office,
Infrastructure and Ozone Section, 214–
665–7229, pitre.randy@epa.gov. Out of
an abundance of caution for members of
the public and our staff, the EPA Region
6 office will be closed to the public to
reduce the risk of transmitting COVID–
19. We encourage the public to submit
comments via https://
www.regulations.gov, as there will be a
delay in processing mail and no courier
or hand deliveries will be accepted.
Please call or email the contact listed
above if you need alternative access to
material indexed but not provided in
the docket.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 May 22, 2020
Jkt 250001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
I. Background
Section 111(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act
(CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7411(c)(1), authorizes
the EPA to delegate to a state the
authority to implement and enforce
NSPS promulgated by the EPA under
CAA section 111(b) and codified at part
60 of title 40 of the CFR. CAA section
111(c)(2) states that the EPA retains the
authority to enforce any applicable
NSPS delegated to a state. On March 25,
1982, the EPA approved the delegation
of authority to implement and enforce
NSPS to Oklahoma (1982 NSPS
Delegation). See 47 FR 1785 (April 22,
1982). On October 8, 1999, the EPA
updated Oklahoma’s NSPS delegation,
including specific provisions setting
forth the terms and conditions of the
delegation of authority for NSPS
responsibility to the ODEQ (1999 NSPS
Delegation). See 64 FR 57392 (October
25, 1999). Copies of the initial 1982
NSPS Delegation and the 1999 NSPS
Delegation updates are included in the
docket for this action, both of which
contain provisions specifying
conditions and limitations applicable to
the EPA’s delegation of authority to
implement and enforce the NSPS in
Oklahoma.
Under the terms and conditions of the
1999 NSPS Delegation, ‘‘[f]uture
provisions of 40 CFR part 60 shall be
delegated to ODEQ pursuant to this
agreement provided that (1) ODEQ
requests delegation and provides copies
of the proposed or adopted rules, (2)
ODEQ adopts the federal standard
without change (e.g., incorporation by
reference) and (3) EPA does not object
to the delegation within thirty (30) days
of ODEQ’s request.’’ See Specific
Provision 1 of the 1999 NSPS
Delegation.
II. ODEQ’s December 23, 2019 NSPS
Delegation Update
By letter dated December 23, 2019,
the ODEQ requested an update to its
NSPS delegation. ODEQ reaffirmed that
it retains all required authorities set
forth in 40 CFR 60.4 for delegation of a
CAA section 111(c) program and all
authority identified in the 1982 and
1999 NSPS Delegations. ODEQ provided
copies of the duly adopted state
regulations which incorporate
specifically identified NSPS found at 40
CFR part 60 into the Oklahoma
Administrative Code (OAC) 252:100–2
and OAC 252:100 Appendix A, as
published in the Oklahoma Register on
September 3, 2019 (36 Okla. Reg. 1573)
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
with an effective date of September 15,
2019.1 These ODEQ regulations are,
therefore, at least as stringent as the
EPA’s rules. See 40 CFR 60.10(a).
ODEQ’s December 23, 2019, request
included the following NSPS in 40 CFR
part 60, as they existed through June 30,
2018: 40 CFR part 60, subparts A
(except sections 60.4, 60.9, 60.10, and
60.16), D, Da, Db, Dc, E, Ea, Eb, Ec, F,
G, Ga, H, I, J, Ja, K, Ka, Kb, L, M, N, Na,
O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, AA,
AAa, BB, BBa, CC, DD, EE, GG, HH, KK,
LL, MM, NN, PP, QQ, RR, SS, TT, UU,
VV, VVa, WW, XX, BBB, DDD, FFF,
GGG, GGGa, HHH, III, JJJ, KKK, LLL,
NNN, OOO, PPP, QQQ, RRR, SSS, TTT,
UUU, VVV, WWW, XXX, AAAA, CCCC,
EEEE, IIII, JJJJ, KKKK, LLLL, OOOO,
OOOOa, TTTT, and Appendices A and
B to 40 CFR part 60.2 In accordance with
the authority provided by CAA section
111(c)(1) and consistent with the
provisions of the 1982 NSPS Delegation
and the 1999 NSPS Delegation, the EPA
has determined that the ODEQ has met
the conditions required for approval of
the ODEQ’s requested update to its
NSPS delegation, as described above.
All authorities not affirmatively and
expressly requested by the ODEQ are
not delegated. In addition, the
provisions and conditions contained in
the 1982 and 1999 NSPS Delegations
remain in effect, including Specific
Provision 7 of the 1999 NSPS Delegation
which states that the delegation
excludes the State’s authority for
sources located on Indian lands.3
Furthermore, no authorities are
delegated that require rulemaking in the
Federal Register to implement, or where
Federal overview is the only way to
ensure national consistency in the
application of the standards. All
inquiries and requests concerning
implementation and enforcement of the
excluded standards in the State of
Oklahoma should be directed to the
EPA Region 6 Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Assurance. Furthermore,
the EPA retains any authority in an
individual NSPS that may not be
delegated according to provisions of the
standard. Finally, the EPA retains the
1 The ODEQ previously submitted requests to the
EPA for updates to the Oklahoma NSPS delegation,
by letters dated June 29, 2018, November 2, 2016,
March 17, 2015, August 23, 2012, and May 5, 2000.
EPA has determined that such requests meet the
requirements of the CAA and the 1982 and 1999
NSPS Delegations concerning the approval of the
EPA’s delegation of authority for the enforcement
and implementation of the NSPS in Oklahoma.
2 See EPA Docket No. EPA–R06–OAR–2010–0580
in www.regulations.gov.
3 For purposes of the ODEQ’s NSPS delegation,
the term ‘‘Indian lands’’ is synonymous with the
term ‘‘Indian county,’’ as defined at 18 U.S.C. 1151.
E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM
26MYP1
31425
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 26, 2020 / Proposed Rules
authorities stated in the 1982 and 1999
NSPS Delegations.
III. Proposed Action
Apart from the notification of the
updated NSPS delegation to the ODEQ
as discussed above, the EPA is
proposing to amend 40 CFR part 60 to
include a table of the specific NSPS
delegated to the ODEQ and update the
mailing address for the ODEQ. If
finalized as proposed, 40 CFR
60.4(b)(38) will be amended to read:
State of Oklahoma: State of Oklahoma,
Department of Environmental Quality,
Air Quality Division, P.O. Box 1677,
Oklahoma City, OK 73101–1677, and
the following language and table will be
added to 40 CFR 60.4(e):
DELEGATION STATUS FOR PART 60 STANDARDS—STATE OF OKLAHOMA
[Excluding Indian Country]
Subpart
Source category
A ...................
D ...................
Da .................
Db .................
Dc .................
E ...................
Ea .................
Eb .................
Ec ..................
F ....................
G ...................
Ga .................
H ...................
I .....................
J ....................
Ja ..................
K ...................
Ka .................
Kb .................
L ....................
M ...................
N ...................
Na .................
General Provisions (except Sections 60.4, 60.9, 60.10 and 60.16) ..........................................................................
Fossil Fueled Steam Generators (250 MM BTU/hr) ..................................................................................................
Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (250 MM BTU/hr) .........................................................................................
Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units (100 to 250 MM BTU/hr) .............................................
Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Small Steam Generating Units (10 to 100 MM BTU/hr ......................................
Incinerators (>50 tons per day) ..................................................................................................................................
Municipal Waste Combustors .....................................................................................................................................
Large Municipal Waste Combustors ...........................................................................................................................
Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators ..........................................................................................................
Portland Cement Plants ..............................................................................................................................................
Nitric Acid Plants .........................................................................................................................................................
Nitric Acid Plants (after October 14, 2011) ................................................................................................................
Sulfuric Acid Plants .....................................................................................................................................................
Hot Mix Asphalt Facilities ...........................................................................................................................................
Petroleum Refineries ..................................................................................................................................................
Petroleum Refineries (After May 14, 2007) ................................................................................................................
Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids (After 6/11/73 & Before 5/19/78) .................................................................
Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids (After 6/11/73 & Before 5/19/78) .................................................................
Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid Stg/Vessels) After 7/23/84 ............................
Secondary Lead Smelters ..........................................................................................................................................
Secondary Brass and Bronze Production Plants .......................................................................................................
Primary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Process Furnaces (Construction Commenced After June 11, 1973) .........
Secondary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Process Steelmaking Facilities Construction is Commenced After January 20, 1983.
Sewage Treatment Plants ..........................................................................................................................................
Primary Copper Smelters ...........................................................................................................................................
Primary Zinc Smelters ................................................................................................................................................
Primary Lead Smelters ...............................................................................................................................................
Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants ..........................................................................................................................
Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Wet Process Phosphoric Plants .................................................................................
Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Superphosphoric Acid Plants .....................................................................................
Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Diammonium Phosphate Plants .................................................................................
Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Triple Superphosphate Plants ....................................................................................
Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Granular Triple Superphosphate Storage Facilities ...................................................
Coal Preparation Plants ..............................................................................................................................................
Ferroalloy Production Facilities ...................................................................................................................................
Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces After 10/21/74 & On or Before 8/17/83 .............................................................
Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces & Argon-Oxygen Decarburization Vessels After 8/07/83 ..................................
Kraft Pulp Mills ............................................................................................................................................................
Kraft Pulp Mill Affected Sources for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced After May
23, 2013.
Glass Manufacturing Plants ........................................................................................................................................
Grain Elevators ...........................................................................................................................................................
Surface Coating of Metal Furniture ............................................................................................................................
Stationary Gas Turbines .............................................................................................................................................
Lime Manufacturing Plants .........................................................................................................................................
Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Plants ....................................................................................................................
Metallic Mineral Processing Plants .............................................................................................................................
Automobile & Light Duty Truck Surface Coating Operations .....................................................................................
Phosphate Manufacturing Plants ................................................................................................................................
Ammonium Sulfate Manufacture ................................................................................................................................
Graphic Arts Industry: Publication Rotogravure Printing ............................................................................................
Pressure Sensitive Tape and Label Surface Coating Operations .............................................................................
Industrial Surface Coating: Large Appliances ............................................................................................................
Metal Coil Surface Coating .........................................................................................................................................
Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacture ..............................................................................................
VOC Equipment Leaks in the SOCMI Industry ..........................................................................................................
VOC Equipment Leaks in the SOCMI Industry (After November 7, 2006) ................................................................
Beverage Can Surface Coating Industry ....................................................................................................................
Bulk Gasoline Terminals .............................................................................................................................................
New Residential Wood Heaters ..................................................................................................................................
Rubber Tire Manufacturing Industry ...........................................................................................................................
O ...................
P ...................
Q ...................
R ...................
S ...................
T ....................
U ...................
V ...................
W ..................
X ...................
Y ...................
Z ....................
AA .................
AAa ...............
BB .................
BBa ...............
CC .................
DD .................
EE .................
GG ................
HH .................
KK .................
LL ..................
MM ................
NN .................
PP .................
QQ ................
RR .................
SS .................
TT .................
UU .................
VV .................
VVa ...............
WW ...............
XX .................
AAA ...............
BBB ...............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 May 22, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ODEQ
E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM
26MYP1
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
No.
Yes.
31426
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 26, 2020 / Proposed Rules
DELEGATION STATUS FOR PART 60 STANDARDS—STATE OF OKLAHOMA—Continued
[Excluding Indian Country]
Subpart
Source category
DDD ..............
FFF ...............
GGG .............
GGGa ...........
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions from the Polymer Manufacturing Industry ........................................
Flexible Vinyl and Urethane Coating and Printing .....................................................................................................
VOC Equipment Leaks in Petroleum Refineries ........................................................................................................
Standards of Performance for Equipment Leaks of VOC in Petroleum Refineries for Which Construction, Reconstruction or Modification Commenced After November 7, 2006.
Synthetic Fiber Production ..........................................................................................................................................
VOC Emissions from the SOCMI Air Oxidation Unit Processes ................................................................................
Petroleum Dry Cleaners .............................................................................................................................................
VOC Equipment Leaks From Onshore Natural Gas Processing Plants ....................................................................
Onshore Natural Gas Processing: SO2 Emissions ....................................................................................................
VOC Emissions from SOCMI Distillation Operations .................................................................................................
Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants ......................................................................................................................
Wool Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing Plants ......................................................................................................
VOC Emissions From Petroleum Refinery Wastewater Systems ..............................................................................
VOC Emissions from SOCMI Reactor Processes ......................................................................................................
Magnetic Tape Coating Operations ............................................................................................................................
Industrial Surface Coating: Plastic Parts for Business Machines ..............................................................................
Calciners and Dryers in Mineral Industries ................................................................................................................
Polymeric Coating of Supporting Substrates Facilities ..............................................................................................
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills ..................................................................................................................................
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills that Commenced Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification after July 17,
2014.
Small Municipal Waste Combustion Units (Construction is Commenced After 8/30/99 or Modification/Reconstruction is Commenced After 6/06/2001.
Commercial & Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units (Construction is Commenced After 11/30/1999 or Modification/Reconstruction is Commenced on or After 6/01/2001.
Other Solid Waste Incineration Units (Constructed after 12/09/2004 or Modification/Reconstruction is commenced on or after 06/16/2004).
Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines .................................................................................
Stationary Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engines .............................................................................................
Stationary Combustion Turbines (Construction Commenced After 02/18/2005) .......................................................
New Sewage Sludge Incineration Units .....................................................................................................................
Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production, Transmission and Distribution for which Construction, Modification or Reconstruction Commenced After August 23, 2011, and on or before September 18, 2015.
Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities for which Construction, Modification or Reconstruction Commenced After
September 18, 2015.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Electric .....................................................................................................................
Generating Units .........................................................................................................................................................
Appendices A (Test Methods) and B (Performance Specifications) ..........................................................................
HHH ..............
III ...................
JJJ ................
KKK ...............
LLL ................
NNN ..............
OOO .............
PPP ...............
QQQ .............
RRR ..............
SSS ...............
TTT ...............
UUU ..............
VVV ...............
WWW ............
XXX ...............
AAAA ............
CCCC ...........
EEEE ............
IIII ..................
JJJJ ...............
KKKK ............
LLLL ..............
OOOO ...........
OOOOa .........
TTTT .............
N/A ................
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the EPA previously
delegated to the ODEQ the authority to
implement and enforce certain NSPS for
sources located in Oklahoma, as
provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7411(c)(1);
see also 40 CFR 60.4(b). Pursuant the
terms and conditions of that delegation,
this action informs the public that the
EPA has found the ODEQ’s December
23, 2019, request to update the
delegation status for NSPS meets
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. Through
this action, the EPA is proposing to add
a table to 40 CFR part 60 listing the
specific NSPS currently delegated to the
ODEQ and update the ODEQ’s address
for submittal of documents required
under the delegated NSPS provisions.
For these reasons, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 May 22, 2020
Jkt 250001
ODEQ
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because NSPS delegation updates
are exempted under Executive Order
12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the Oklahoma NSPS
delegation does not extend to Indian
country. If finalized as proposed, the
EPA’s action will not have tribal
E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM
26MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 26, 2020 / Proposed Rules
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 60
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 14, 2020.
David Garcia,
Director, Air & Radiation Division, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2020–10834 Filed 5–22–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989–0011; FRL–10008–
68–Region 9]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List: Deletion
of the JASCO Chemical Corp.
Superfund Site
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 9 is issuing a
Notice of Intent to Delete the JASCO
Chemical Corporation Superfund Site
(Site) located in Mountain View,
California, from the National Priorities
List (NPL) and requests public
comments on this proposed action. The
NPL, promulgated pursuant to section
105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an
appendix of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). EPA and the
State of California, through the
Department of Toxic Substances
Control, have determined that all
appropriate response actions under
CERCLA have been completed.
However, this deletion does not
preclude future actions under
Superfund.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received by
June 25, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–
SFUND–1989–0011, by one of the
following methods:
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:17 May 22, 2020
Jkt 250001
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets.
• Email: Superfund Project Manager:
Eric Canteenwala, canteenwala.eric@
epa.gov.
• Written comments submitted by
mail are temporarily suspended and no
hand deliveries will be accepted. We
encourage the public to submit
comments via https://
www.regulations.gov
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989–
0011. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. The
https://www.regulations.gov website is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your email address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31427
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in the
hard copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the following repositories:
The EPA is temporarily suspending
its Docket Center and Regional Records
Centers for public visitors to reduce the
risk of transmitting COVID–19. In
addition, many site information
repositories are closed and information
in these repositories, including the
deletion docket, has not been updated
with hardcopy or electronic media. For
further information and updates on EPA
Docket Center services, please visit us
online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
The EPA continues to carefully and
continuously monitor information from
the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), local area health
departments, and our Federal partners
so that we can respond rapidly as
conditions change regarding COVID.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric
Canteenwala, Superfund Project
Manager, U.S. EPA, Region 9 (SFD–7–1),
75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105, (415) 972–3932, email:
canteenwala.eric@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
I. Introduction
EPA Region 9 announces its intent to
delete the JASCO Chemical Corporation
Superfund Site from the NPL and
requests public comment on this
proposed action. The NPL constitutes
Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300 which
is the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), which EPA promulgated
pursuant to section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended.
EPA maintains the NPL as the list of
E:\FR\FM\26MYP1.SGM
26MYP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 101 (Tuesday, May 26, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31423-31427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-10834]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 60
[EPA-R06-OAR-2010-0580; FRL-10009-48-Region 6]
New Source Performance Standards; Delegation of Authority to
Oklahoma
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of delegation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
update the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to reflect Oklahoma's
current New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) delegation status and
mailing address for the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
(ODEQ). The ODEQ has submitted updated
[[Page 31424]]
regulations for delegation of the EPA authority for implementation and
enforcement of certain NSPS. The updated State regulations incorporate
by reference certain NSPS promulgated by the EPA, as they existed
through June 30, 2018.
DATES: Written comments on this proposed rule must be received on or
before June 25, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R06-
OAR-2010-0580, at https://www.regulations.gov or via email to
[email protected]. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio,
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written
comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please contact Randy Pitre, (214) 665-
7229; email: [email protected]. For the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may not be publicly
available due to docket file size restrictions or content (e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Randy Pitre, EPA Region 6 Office,
Infrastructure and Ozone Section, 214-665-7229, [email protected].
Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our staff,
the EPA Region 6 office will be closed to the public to reduce the risk
of transmitting COVID-19. We encourage the public to submit comments
via https://www.regulations.gov, as there will be a delay in processing
mail and no courier or hand deliveries will be accepted. Please call or
email the contact listed above if you need alternative access to
material indexed but not provided in the docket.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.
I. Background
Section 111(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7411(c)(1),
authorizes the EPA to delegate to a state the authority to implement
and enforce NSPS promulgated by the EPA under CAA section 111(b) and
codified at part 60 of title 40 of the CFR. CAA section 111(c)(2)
states that the EPA retains the authority to enforce any applicable
NSPS delegated to a state. On March 25, 1982, the EPA approved the
delegation of authority to implement and enforce NSPS to Oklahoma (1982
NSPS Delegation). See 47 FR 1785 (April 22, 1982). On October 8, 1999,
the EPA updated Oklahoma's NSPS delegation, including specific
provisions setting forth the terms and conditions of the delegation of
authority for NSPS responsibility to the ODEQ (1999 NSPS Delegation).
See 64 FR 57392 (October 25, 1999). Copies of the initial 1982 NSPS
Delegation and the 1999 NSPS Delegation updates are included in the
docket for this action, both of which contain provisions specifying
conditions and limitations applicable to the EPA's delegation of
authority to implement and enforce the NSPS in Oklahoma.
Under the terms and conditions of the 1999 NSPS Delegation,
``[f]uture provisions of 40 CFR part 60 shall be delegated to ODEQ
pursuant to this agreement provided that (1) ODEQ requests delegation
and provides copies of the proposed or adopted rules, (2) ODEQ adopts
the federal standard without change (e.g., incorporation by reference)
and (3) EPA does not object to the delegation within thirty (30) days
of ODEQ's request.'' See Specific Provision 1 of the 1999 NSPS
Delegation.
II. ODEQ's December 23, 2019 NSPS Delegation Update
By letter dated December 23, 2019, the ODEQ requested an update to
its NSPS delegation. ODEQ reaffirmed that it retains all required
authorities set forth in 40 CFR 60.4 for delegation of a CAA section
111(c) program and all authority identified in the 1982 and 1999 NSPS
Delegations. ODEQ provided copies of the duly adopted state regulations
which incorporate specifically identified NSPS found at 40 CFR part 60
into the Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC) 252:100-2 and OAC 252:100
Appendix A, as published in the Oklahoma Register on September 3, 2019
(36 Okla. Reg. 1573) with an effective date of September 15, 2019.\1\
These ODEQ regulations are, therefore, at least as stringent as the
EPA's rules. See 40 CFR 60.10(a). ODEQ's December 23, 2019, request
included the following NSPS in 40 CFR part 60, as they existed through
June 30, 2018: 40 CFR part 60, subparts A (except sections 60.4, 60.9,
60.10, and 60.16), D, Da, Db, Dc, E, Ea, Eb, Ec, F, G, Ga, H, I, J, Ja,
K, Ka, Kb, L, M, N, Na, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, AA, AAa,
BB, BBa, CC, DD, EE, GG, HH, KK, LL, MM, NN, PP, QQ, RR, SS, TT, UU,
VV, VVa, WW, XX, BBB, DDD, FFF, GGG, GGGa, HHH, III, JJJ, KKK, LLL,
NNN, OOO, PPP, QQQ, RRR, SSS, TTT, UUU, VVV, WWW, XXX, AAAA, CCCC,
EEEE, IIII, JJJJ, KKKK, LLLL, OOOO, OOOOa, TTTT, and Appendices A and B
to 40 CFR part 60.\2\ In accordance with the authority provided by CAA
section 111(c)(1) and consistent with the provisions of the 1982 NSPS
Delegation and the 1999 NSPS Delegation, the EPA has determined that
the ODEQ has met the conditions required for approval of the ODEQ's
requested update to its NSPS delegation, as described above. All
authorities not affirmatively and expressly requested by the ODEQ are
not delegated. In addition, the provisions and conditions contained in
the 1982 and 1999 NSPS Delegations remain in effect, including Specific
Provision 7 of the 1999 NSPS Delegation which states that the
delegation excludes the State's authority for sources located on Indian
lands.\3\ Furthermore, no authorities are delegated that require
rulemaking in the Federal Register to implement, or where Federal
overview is the only way to ensure national consistency in the
application of the standards. All inquiries and requests concerning
implementation and enforcement of the excluded standards in the State
of Oklahoma should be directed to the EPA Region 6 Office of
Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. Furthermore, the EPA retains any
authority in an individual NSPS that may not be delegated according to
provisions of the standard. Finally, the EPA retains the
[[Page 31425]]
authorities stated in the 1982 and 1999 NSPS Delegations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The ODEQ previously submitted requests to the EPA for
updates to the Oklahoma NSPS delegation, by letters dated June 29,
2018, November 2, 2016, March 17, 2015, August 23, 2012, and May 5,
2000. EPA has determined that such requests meet the requirements of
the CAA and the 1982 and 1999 NSPS Delegations concerning the
approval of the EPA's delegation of authority for the enforcement
and implementation of the NSPS in Oklahoma.
\2\ See EPA Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2010-0580 in
www.regulations.gov.
\3\ For purposes of the ODEQ's NSPS delegation, the term
``Indian lands'' is synonymous with the term ``Indian county,'' as
defined at 18 U.S.C. 1151.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Proposed Action
Apart from the notification of the updated NSPS delegation to the
ODEQ as discussed above, the EPA is proposing to amend 40 CFR part 60
to include a table of the specific NSPS delegated to the ODEQ and
update the mailing address for the ODEQ. If finalized as proposed, 40
CFR 60.4(b)(38) will be amended to read: State of Oklahoma: State of
Oklahoma, Department of Environmental Quality, Air Quality Division,
P.O. Box 1677, Oklahoma City, OK 73101-1677, and the following language
and table will be added to 40 CFR 60.4(e):
Delegation Status for Part 60 Standards--State of Oklahoma
[Excluding Indian Country]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart Source category ODEQ
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A........................... General Provisions (except Sections 60.4, 60.9, Yes.
60.10 and 60.16).
D........................... Fossil Fueled Steam Generators (250 MM BTU/hr)...... Yes.
Da.......................... Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (250 MM BTU/ Yes.
hr).
Db.......................... Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Yes.
Units (100 to 250 MM BTU/hr).
Dc.......................... Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Small Steam Yes.
Generating Units (10 to 100 MM BTU/hr.
E........................... Incinerators (>50 tons per day)..................... Yes.
Ea.......................... Municipal Waste Combustors.......................... Yes.
Eb.......................... Large Municipal Waste Combustors.................... Yes.
Ec.......................... Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators...... Yes.
F........................... Portland Cement Plants.............................. Yes.
G........................... Nitric Acid Plants.................................. Yes.
Ga.......................... Nitric Acid Plants (after October 14, 2011)......... Yes.
H........................... Sulfuric Acid Plants................................ Yes.
I........................... Hot Mix Asphalt Facilities.......................... Yes.
J........................... Petroleum Refineries................................ Yes.
Ja.......................... Petroleum Refineries (After May 14, 2007)........... Yes.
K........................... Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids (After 6/11/73 Yes.
& Before 5/19/78).
Ka.......................... Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids (After 6/11/73 Yes.
& Before 5/19/78).
Kb.......................... Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Yes.
Petroleum Liquid Stg/Vessels) After 7/23/84.
L........................... Secondary Lead Smelters............................. Yes.
M........................... Secondary Brass and Bronze Production Plants........ Yes.
N........................... Primary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Process Furnaces Yes.
(Construction Commenced After June 11, 1973).
Na.......................... Secondary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Process Yes.
Steelmaking Facilities Construction is Commenced
After January 20, 1983.
O........................... Sewage Treatment Plants............................. Yes.
P........................... Primary Copper Smelters............................. Yes.
Q........................... Primary Zinc Smelters............................... Yes.
R........................... Primary Lead Smelters............................... Yes.
S........................... Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants................... Yes.
T........................... Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Wet Process Yes.
Phosphoric Plants.
U........................... Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Superphosphoric Acid Yes.
Plants.
V........................... Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Diammonium Phosphate Yes.
Plants.
W........................... Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Triple Superphosphate Yes.
Plants.
X........................... Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Granular Triple Yes.
Superphosphate Storage Facilities.
Y........................... Coal Preparation Plants............................. Yes.
Z........................... Ferroalloy Production Facilities.................... Yes.
AA.......................... Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces After 10/21/74 & Yes.
On or Before 8/17/83.
AAa......................... Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces & Argon-Oxygen Yes.
Decarburization Vessels After 8/07/83.
BB.......................... Kraft Pulp Mills.................................... Yes.
BBa......................... Kraft Pulp Mill Affected Sources for Which Yes.
Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification
Commenced After May 23, 2013.
CC.......................... Glass Manufacturing Plants.......................... Yes.
DD.......................... Grain Elevators..................................... Yes.
EE.......................... Surface Coating of Metal Furniture.................. Yes.
GG.......................... Stationary Gas Turbines............................. Yes.
HH.......................... Lime Manufacturing Plants........................... Yes.
KK.......................... Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Plants.............. Yes.
LL.......................... Metallic Mineral Processing Plants.................. Yes.
MM.......................... Automobile & Light Duty Truck Surface Coating Yes.
Operations.
NN.......................... Phosphate Manufacturing Plants...................... Yes.
PP.......................... Ammonium Sulfate Manufacture........................ Yes.
QQ.......................... Graphic Arts Industry: Publication Rotogravure Yes.
Printing.
RR.......................... Pressure Sensitive Tape and Label Surface Coating Yes.
Operations.
SS.......................... Industrial Surface Coating: Large Appliances........ Yes.
TT.......................... Metal Coil Surface Coating.......................... Yes.
UU.......................... Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacture.. Yes.
VV.......................... VOC Equipment Leaks in the SOCMI Industry........... Yes.
VVa......................... VOC Equipment Leaks in the SOCMI Industry (After Yes.
November 7, 2006).
WW.......................... Beverage Can Surface Coating Industry............... Yes.
XX.......................... Bulk Gasoline Terminals............................. Yes.
AAA......................... New Residential Wood Heaters........................ No.
BBB......................... Rubber Tire Manufacturing Industry.................. Yes.
[[Page 31426]]
DDD......................... Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions from the Yes.
Polymer Manufacturing Industry.
FFF......................... Flexible Vinyl and Urethane Coating and Printing.... Yes.
GGG......................... VOC Equipment Leaks in Petroleum Refineries......... Yes.
GGGa........................ Standards of Performance for Equipment Leaks of VOC Yes.
in Petroleum Refineries for Which Construction,
Reconstruction or Modification Commenced After
November 7, 2006.
HHH......................... Synthetic Fiber Production.......................... Yes.
III......................... VOC Emissions from the SOCMI Air Oxidation Unit Yes.
Processes.
JJJ......................... Petroleum Dry Cleaners.............................. Yes.
KKK......................... VOC Equipment Leaks From Onshore Natural Gas Yes.
Processing Plants.
LLL......................... Onshore Natural Gas Processing: SO2 Emissions....... Yes.
NNN......................... VOC Emissions from SOCMI Distillation Operations.... Yes.
OOO......................... Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants............... Yes.
PPP......................... Wool Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing Plants..... Yes.
QQQ......................... VOC Emissions From Petroleum Refinery Wastewater Yes.
Systems.
RRR......................... VOC Emissions from SOCMI Reactor Processes.......... Yes.
SSS......................... Magnetic Tape Coating Operations.................... Yes.
TTT......................... Industrial Surface Coating: Plastic Parts for Yes.
Business Machines.
UUU......................... Calciners and Dryers in Mineral Industries.......... Yes.
VVV......................... Polymeric Coating of Supporting Substrates Yes.
Facilities.
WWW......................... Municipal Solid Waste Landfills..................... Yes.
XXX......................... Municipal Solid Waste Landfills that Commenced Yes.
Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification after
July 17, 2014.
AAAA........................ Small Municipal Waste Combustion Units (Construction Yes.
is Commenced After 8/30/99 or Modification/
Reconstruction is Commenced After 6/06/2001.
CCCC........................ Commercial & Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Yes.
Units (Construction is Commenced After 11/30/1999
or Modification/Reconstruction is Commenced on or
After 6/01/2001.
EEEE........................ Other Solid Waste Incineration Units (Constructed Yes.
after 12/09/2004 or Modification/Reconstruction is
commenced on or after 06/16/2004).
IIII........................ Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Yes.
Engines.
JJJJ........................ Stationary Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Yes.
Engines.
KKKK........................ Stationary Combustion Turbines (Construction Yes.
Commenced After 02/18/2005).
LLLL........................ New Sewage Sludge Incineration Units................ Yes.
OOOO........................ Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production, Transmission Yes.
and Distribution for which Construction,
Modification or Reconstruction Commenced After
August 23, 2011, and on or before September 18,
2015.
OOOOa....................... Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities for which Yes.
Construction, Modification or Reconstruction
Commenced After September 18, 2015.
TTTT........................ Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Electric............... Yes.
Generating Units....................................
N/A......................... Appendices A (Test Methods) and B (Performance Yes.
Specifications).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the EPA previously delegated to the ODEQ the
authority to implement and enforce certain NSPS for sources located in
Oklahoma, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7411(c)(1); see also 40 CFR
60.4(b). Pursuant the terms and conditions of that delegation, this
action informs the public that the EPA has found the ODEQ's December
23, 2019, request to update the delegation status for NSPS meets
Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. Through this action, the EPA is proposing
to add a table to 40 CFR part 60 listing the specific NSPS currently
delegated to the ODEQ and update the ODEQ's address for submittal of
documents required under the delegated NSPS provisions. For these
reasons, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because NSPS delegation updates are exempted
under Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the Oklahoma NSPS delegation does not extend to Indian
country. If finalized as proposed, the EPA's action will not have
tribal
[[Page 31427]]
implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 60
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 14, 2020.
David Garcia,
Director, Air & Radiation Division, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2020-10834 Filed 5-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
