Chlormequat Chloride; Pesticide Tolerances, 31383-31386 [2020-10331]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 26, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
31383
ILLINOIS—2010 SULFUR DIOXIDE NAAQS—Continued
[Primary]
Designation
Designated area 1 2
Date 3
McLean County ...................................................................................................................
Macoupin County ................................................................................................................
Madison County (part) (remainder) 5 ..................................................................................
Marion County ....................................................................................................................
Marshall County ..................................................................................................................
Mason County .....................................................................................................................
Massac County ...................................................................................................................
Menard County ...................................................................................................................
Mercer County ....................................................................................................................
Monroe County ...................................................................................................................
Montgomery County ...........................................................................................................
Morgan County ...................................................................................................................
Moultrie County ...................................................................................................................
Ogle County ........................................................................................................................
Peoria County (part) (remainder) ........................................................................................
Perry County .......................................................................................................................
Piatt County ........................................................................................................................
Pike County ........................................................................................................................
Pope County .......................................................................................................................
Pulaski County ....................................................................................................................
Putnam County ...................................................................................................................
Randolph County ................................................................................................................
Richland County .................................................................................................................
Rock Island County ............................................................................................................
St. Clair County ...................................................................................................................
Saline County .....................................................................................................................
Sangamon County ..............................................................................................................
Schuyler County .................................................................................................................
Scott County .......................................................................................................................
Shelby County ....................................................................................................................
Stark County .......................................................................................................................
Stephenson County ............................................................................................................
Tazewell County (part) (remainder) ....................................................................................
Union County ......................................................................................................................
Vermilion County ................................................................................................................
Wabash County ..................................................................................................................
Warren County ....................................................................................................................
Washington County ............................................................................................................
Wayne County ....................................................................................................................
White County ......................................................................................................................
Whiteside County ................................................................................................................
Will County (part) (remainder) ............................................................................................
Williamson County ..............................................................................................................
Winnebago County .............................................................................................................
Woodford County ................................................................................................................
Type
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
9/12/16
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
9/12/16
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
4 10/15/19
........................
........................
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
1 Includes any Indian country in each county or area, unless otherwise specified. EPA is not determining the boundaries of any area of Indian
country in this table, including any area of Indian country located in the larger designation area. The inclusion of any Indian country in the designation area is not a determination that the state has regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act for such Indian country.
2 Macon County will be designated by December 31, 2020.
3 This date is April 9, 2018, unless otherwise noted.
4 Williamson County was initially designated on September 12, 2016. The initial designation was reconsidered and modified on October 15,
2019.
5 A portion of Madison County, specifically all of Wood River Township, and the area in Chouteau Township north of Cahokia Diversion Channel, was designated attainment/unclassifiable on September 12, 2016.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–09549 Filed 5–22–20; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0297; FRL–10008–50]
Chlormequat Chloride; Pesticide
Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
16:12 May 22, 2020
Final rule.
This regulation amends a
tolerance for residues of chlormequat
chloride in or on oat grain. Taminco US
LLC, a subsidiary of Eastman Chemical
Company, requested this amendment
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
SUMMARY:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
ACTION:
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This regulation is effective May
26, 2020. Objections and requests for
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM
26MYR1
31384
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 26, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
hearings must be received on or before
July 27, 2020, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0297, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Goodis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Publishing Office’s eCFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/
text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/
Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 May 22, 2020
Jkt 250001
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2019–0297 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before July 27, 2020. Addresses for mail
and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2019–0297, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Tolerance
In the Federal Register of June 28,
2019 (84 FR 30976) (FRL–9995–27),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 9F8758) by
Taminco US LLC, a subsidiary of
Eastman Chemical Company, 200 S
Wilcox Drive, Kingsport, TN 37660–
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5147. The petition requested that 40
CFR 180.698 be amended by modifying
the tolerance for residues of the plant
regulator, chlormequat chloride, in or
on the raw agricultural commodity oat,
grain from 10 parts per million (ppm) to
30.0 ppm. That document referenced a
summary of the petition prepared by
Taminco US LLC, the registrant, which
is available in the docket, https://
www.regulations.gov. A comment was
received in response to the notice of
filing. EPA’s response to this comment
is discussed in Unit IV.C.
Based upon review of the data
supporting the petition, EPA has
modified the level to which the
tolerance is being amended. The reason
for this change is explained in Unit
IV.D.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for chlormequat
chloride including exposure resulting
from the tolerance modified by this
action. EPA’s assessment of exposures
and risks associated with chlormequat
chloride follows.
On April 25, 2018, EPA published in
the Federal Register a final rule
establishing tolerances for residues of
chlormequat chloride in or on barley,
grain; cattle, meat byproduct; cattle,
meat; egg; goat, meat byproduct; goat,
meat; hog, meat byproduct; hog, meat;
E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM
26MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 26, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
milk; oat, grain; poultry, meat
byproduct; poultry, meat; sheep, meat
byproduct; sheep, meat; and wheat,
grain based on the Agency’s conclusion
that aggregate exposure to chlormequat
chloride is safe for the general
population, including infants and
children. See 83 FR 17925 (FRL–9974–
42). That document contains a summary
of the toxicological profile and points of
departure, assumptions for exposure
assessment, and the Agency’s
determination regarding the children’s
safety factor, which have not changed.
EPA’s dietary exposure assessments
have been updated to include the
potential additional exposure from the
increased tolerance of chlormequat
chloride on oat grain, i.e., reliance on
tolerance-level residues for all crops,
and an assumption of 100 percent crop
treated (PCT). EPA’s aggregate exposure
assessment incorporated this additional
assumed dietary exposure, as well as
exposure in drinking water and from
residential sources, although those latter
exposures are not impacted by the
increased tolerance on oat grain and
thus have not changed since the last
assessment. Further information about
EPA’s risk assessment and
determination of safety supporting the
tolerances established in the April 25,
2018 Federal Register action, as well as
the amended chlormequat chloride
tolerance, can be found at https://
www.regulations.gov in the document
titled, ‘‘Chlormequat Chloride. HumanHealth Risk Assessment to Support
Establishment of a Tolerance Without
U.S. Registration on Wheat, Barley, and
Oats,’’ dated February 27, 2018 in
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–
0661 and the document titled,
‘‘Chlormequat Chloride. Human Health
Risk Assessment to Support Tolerance
Amendment for Residues in/on
Imported Oat Grains,’’ dated April 14,
2020 in docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2019–0297.
Acute aggregate dietary risks (food
and water) are below the Agency’s level
of concern of 100% of the acute
population adjusted dose: 52% of the
aPAD at the 95th percentile of exposure
for all infants less than 1-year old, the
population subgroup with the highest
exposure estimate. Chronic dietary risks
are below the Agency’s level of concern
of 100% of the chronic population
adjusted dose (cPAD): 72% of the cPAD
for children 1 to 2 years old, the
population subgroup with the highest
exposure estimate. There are no
residential uses for chlormequat
chloride; therefore, no aggregate shortor intermediate-term assessment was
necessary.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 May 22, 2020
Jkt 250001
Therefore, based on the risk
assessments and information described
above, EPA concludes there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population, or to
infants and children, from aggregate
exposure to chlormequat chloride
residues. More detailed information on
the subject action to modify the oat
grain tolerance can be found in the
document entitled, ‘‘Chlormequat
Chloride. Human Health Risk
Assessment to Support Tolerance
Amendment for Residues in/on
Imported Oat Grains’’ by going to https://
www.regulations.gov. The referenced
document is available in the docket
established by this action, which is
described under ADDRESSES. Locate and
click on the hyperlink for docket ID
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0297.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An adequate high-performance liquid
chromatography method with tandem
mass spectrometry detection (HPLC/
MS/MS), BASF Method No. 530/0, is
available for the determination of
residues of chlormequat chloride in/on
plant commodities. An adequate LC/
MS/MS method, BASF Method No. 397/
0 is available for the determination of
residues of chlormequat chloride in
livestock commodities for enforcement
purposes.
The methods may be requested from:
Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch,
Environmental Science Center, 701
Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755–5350;
telephone number: (410) 305–2905;
email address: residuemethods@
epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
The Codex Alimentarius is a joint
United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health
Organization food standards program,
and it is recognized as an international
food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to
which the United States is a party. EPA
may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that
EPA explain the reasons for departing
from the Codex level.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31385
There is an established Codex MRL
for chlormequat chloride in/on oat
grains at 4 ppm. Based on the oat grain
residue from the field trials (40 ppm),
harmonization with the Codex MRL is
not possible.
C. Response to Comments
One comment was received to the
notice of filing that stated in part that
‘‘this shoudl [sic] be denied. it shudl
[sic] be disapproved.’’
Although the Agency recognizes that
some individuals believe that pesticides
should be banned on agricultural crops,
the existing legal framework provided
by section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) authorizes
EPA to establish tolerances when it
determines that the tolerance is safe.
Upon consideration of the validity,
completeness, and reliability of the
available data as well as other factors
the FFDCA requires EPA to consider,
EPA has determined that this
chlormequat chloride tolerance is safe.
The commenter has provided no
information supporting a contrary
conclusion.
D. Revisions to Petitioned-For
Tolerances
The petitioner requested the oat, grain
tolerance be amended from 10 ppm to
30.0 ppm. The analytical method
detected chlormequat cation; therefore,
the residues were converted to
chlormequat chloride equivalents using
a molecular weight conversion factor
(MWCF) of 1.29. The petitionerproposed tolerances on oat grains are
without the MWCF; therefore, the
Agency has determined that the
tolerance needs to be higher.
Additionally, the Agency is
harmonizing the tolerance level with the
MRL that is currently being established
by Canada.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, the tolerance for residues
of chlormequat chloride in or on oat,
grain is amended from 10 ppm to 40
ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action amends a tolerance under
FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a
petition submitted to the Agency. The
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted these types of
actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM
26MYR1
31386
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 101 / Tuesday, May 26, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order
13771, entitled ‘‘Reducing Regulations
and Controlling Regulatory Costs’’ (82
FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action
does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does
it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or Tribal Governments, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States or Tribal
Governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132,
entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999) and Executive Order
13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In
addition, this action does not impose
any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.). This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 May 22, 2020
Jkt 250001
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: May 6, 2020.
Michael Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.698, revise the entry for
‘‘Oat, grain’’ and the footnote in
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 180.698 Chlormequat chloride;
tolerances for residues.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Parts per
million
*
*
*
Oat, grain 2 ............................
*
*
*
40
*
This regulation is effective May
26, 2020. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
July 27, 2020, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
DATES:
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0384 is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460. The Public Reading Room is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
*
Commodity
indoxacarb in or on corn, pop, grain at
0.02 parts per million (ppm) and corn,
pop, stover at 15 ppm. FMC Corporation
requested this tolerance under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).
*
Michael L. Goodis, Director,
Registration Division (7505P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460–
0001; main telephone number: (703)
305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
2 There are no U.S. registrations for this
commodity.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–10331 Filed 5–22–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0384; FRL–9995–89]
Indoxacarb; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes a
tolerance for residues of the insecticide
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM
26MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 101 (Tuesday, May 26, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31383-31386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-10331]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0297; FRL-10008-50]
Chlormequat Chloride; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation amends a tolerance for residues of chlormequat
chloride in or on oat grain. Taminco US LLC, a subsidiary of Eastman
Chemical Company, requested this amendment under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective May 26, 2020. Objections and
requests for
[[Page 31384]]
hearings must be received on or before July 27, 2020, and must be filed
in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see
also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0297, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Goodis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305-7090; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Publishing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0297 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
July 27, 2020. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0297, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance
In the Federal Register of June 28, 2019 (84 FR 30976) (FRL-9995-
27), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
9F8758) by Taminco US LLC, a subsidiary of Eastman Chemical Company,
200 S Wilcox Drive, Kingsport, TN 37660-5147. The petition requested
that 40 CFR 180.698 be amended by modifying the tolerance for residues
of the plant regulator, chlormequat chloride, in or on the raw
agricultural commodity oat, grain from 10 parts per million (ppm) to
30.0 ppm. That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared
by Taminco US LLC, the registrant, which is available in the docket,
https://www.regulations.gov. A comment was received in response to the
notice of filing. EPA's response to this comment is discussed in Unit
IV.C.
Based upon review of the data supporting the petition, EPA has
modified the level to which the tolerance is being amended. The reason
for this change is explained in Unit IV.D.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for chlormequat chloride including
exposure resulting from the tolerance modified by this action. EPA's
assessment of exposures and risks associated with chlormequat chloride
follows.
On April 25, 2018, EPA published in the Federal Register a final
rule establishing tolerances for residues of chlormequat chloride in or
on barley, grain; cattle, meat byproduct; cattle, meat; egg; goat, meat
byproduct; goat, meat; hog, meat byproduct; hog, meat;
[[Page 31385]]
milk; oat, grain; poultry, meat byproduct; poultry, meat; sheep, meat
byproduct; sheep, meat; and wheat, grain based on the Agency's
conclusion that aggregate exposure to chlormequat chloride is safe for
the general population, including infants and children. See 83 FR 17925
(FRL-9974-42). That document contains a summary of the toxicological
profile and points of departure, assumptions for exposure assessment,
and the Agency's determination regarding the children's safety factor,
which have not changed.
EPA's dietary exposure assessments have been updated to include the
potential additional exposure from the increased tolerance of
chlormequat chloride on oat grain, i.e., reliance on tolerance-level
residues for all crops, and an assumption of 100 percent crop treated
(PCT). EPA's aggregate exposure assessment incorporated this additional
assumed dietary exposure, as well as exposure in drinking water and
from residential sources, although those latter exposures are not
impacted by the increased tolerance on oat grain and thus have not
changed since the last assessment. Further information about EPA's risk
assessment and determination of safety supporting the tolerances
established in the April 25, 2018 Federal Register action, as well as
the amended chlormequat chloride tolerance, can be found at https://www.regulations.gov in the document titled, ``Chlormequat Chloride.
Human-Health Risk Assessment to Support Establishment of a Tolerance
Without U.S. Registration on Wheat, Barley, and Oats,'' dated February
27, 2018 in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0661 and the document
titled, ``Chlormequat Chloride. Human Health Risk Assessment to Support
Tolerance Amendment for Residues in/on Imported Oat Grains,'' dated
April 14, 2020 in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0297.
Acute aggregate dietary risks (food and water) are below the
Agency's level of concern of 100% of the acute population adjusted
dose: 52% of the aPAD at the 95th percentile of exposure for all
infants less than 1-year old, the population subgroup with the highest
exposure estimate. Chronic dietary risks are below the Agency's level
of concern of 100% of the chronic population adjusted dose (cPAD): 72%
of the cPAD for children 1 to 2 years old, the population subgroup with
the highest exposure estimate. There are no residential uses for
chlormequat chloride; therefore, no aggregate short- or intermediate-
term assessment was necessary.
Therefore, based on the risk assessments and information described
above, EPA concludes there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population, or to infants and children, from
aggregate exposure to chlormequat chloride residues. More detailed
information on the subject action to modify the oat grain tolerance can
be found in the document entitled, ``Chlormequat Chloride. Human Health
Risk Assessment to Support Tolerance Amendment for Residues in/on
Imported Oat Grains'' by going to https://www.regulations.gov. The
referenced document is available in the docket established by this
action, which is described under ADDRESSES. Locate and click on the
hyperlink for docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0297.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An adequate high-performance liquid chromatography method with
tandem mass spectrometry detection (HPLC/MS/MS), BASF Method No. 530/0,
is available for the determination of residues of chlormequat chloride
in/on plant commodities. An adequate LC/MS/MS method, BASF Method No.
397/0 is available for the determination of residues of chlormequat
chloride in livestock commodities for enforcement purposes.
The methods may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry
Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD
20755-5350; telephone number: (410) 305-2905; email address:
[email protected].
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
There is an established Codex MRL for chlormequat chloride in/on
oat grains at 4 ppm. Based on the oat grain residue from the field
trials (40 ppm), harmonization with the Codex MRL is not possible.
C. Response to Comments
One comment was received to the notice of filing that stated in
part that ``this shoudl [sic] be denied. it shudl [sic] be
disapproved.''
Although the Agency recognizes that some individuals believe that
pesticides should be banned on agricultural crops, the existing legal
framework provided by section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) authorizes EPA to establish tolerances when it
determines that the tolerance is safe. Upon consideration of the
validity, completeness, and reliability of the available data as well
as other factors the FFDCA requires EPA to consider, EPA has determined
that this chlormequat chloride tolerance is safe. The commenter has
provided no information supporting a contrary conclusion.
D. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances
The petitioner requested the oat, grain tolerance be amended from
10 ppm to 30.0 ppm. The analytical method detected chlormequat cation;
therefore, the residues were converted to chlormequat chloride
equivalents using a molecular weight conversion factor (MWCF) of 1.29.
The petitioner-proposed tolerances on oat grains are without the MWCF;
therefore, the Agency has determined that the tolerance needs to be
higher. Additionally, the Agency is harmonizing the tolerance level
with the MRL that is currently being established by Canada.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, the tolerance for residues of chlormequat chloride in or
on oat, grain is amended from 10 ppm to 40 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action amends a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
[[Page 31386]]
entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or
Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), nor is it considered a regulatory action under Executive Order
13771, entitled ``Reducing Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs'' (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action does not contain
any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require Agency consideration of
voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: May 6, 2020.
Michael Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.698, revise the entry for ``Oat, grain'' and the
footnote in paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 180.698 Chlormequat chloride; tolerances for residues.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Oat, grain \2\.......................................... 40
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ There are no U.S. registrations for this commodity.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-10331 Filed 5-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P