Air Plan Approval; GA: Permit Requirements, 31116-31117 [2020-10680]
Download as PDF
31116
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 100 / Friday, May 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
G. Executive Order 13175: Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175, because the SIP is not
approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction, and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs
the EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. The EPA believes that this
action is not subject to the requirements
of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Population
The EPA lacks the discretionary
authority to address environmental
justice in this rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Sulfur dioxide, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 May 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
Dated: May 12, 2020.
John Busterud,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2020–10587 Filed 5–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2020–0071; FRL–10009–
07–Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; GA: Permit
Requirements
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of
Georgia, through the Georgia
Environmental Protection Division (GA
EPD), on October 18, 2019. This SIP
revision makes minor edits to Georgia’s
rule prescribing permitting
requirements. EPA has evaluated
Georgia’s submittal and preliminarily
determined that it meets the applicable
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
and EPA’s regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 22, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2020–0071 at
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pearlene Williams, Air Regulatory
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
Ms. Williams can also be reached via
phone at (404) 562–9144 or via
electronic mail at williams.pearlene@
epa.gov.
Sfmt 4702
I. Background
EPA is proposing to approve a
revision to the Georgia SIP to make
clarifying and ministerial changes to its
permitting regulations at Rule 391–3–1–
.03(8), Permit Requirements. Georgia’s
October 18, 2019,1 submittal changes
the status of five counties under
paragraph (e), which specifies counties
that are contributing to the ambient air
levels of the current nonattainment area,
and makes other minor typographical
edits to other subparagraphs for
consistent formatting.
Georgia requires compliance with
Nonattainment New Source Review
(NNSR) requirements under paragraph
(c) in nonattainment areas. The State
has one current nonattainment area,
which is in nonattainment for the 2015
8-hour ozone NAAQS.2 At subparagraph
(c)14., ‘‘Additional Provisions for Ozone
Non-Attainment Areas,’’ the State also
requires NNSR for certain counties
surrounding the current nonattainment
area. Specifically, these counties
comprise the current maintenance area
for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS,3
which was redesignated to attainment
effective June 2, 2017. See 82 FR 25523.
In addition, paragraph (e) explains
that the Director shall designate any
counties that are contributing to the
ambient air level of the nonattainment
area. Under subparagraph (c)15., those
contributing counties are required to
carry out certain elements of NNSR for
any new or modified electric generating
units (EGU). Specifically, those counties
must: Define ‘‘major source’’ and ‘‘major
stationary source’’ to include certain
sources that emit or have the potential
to emit at least 100 tons per year of
volatile organic compounds or oxides of
nitrogen; 4 identify the net emissions
increase threshold triggering the
1 EPA notes the Agency received the submittal on
October 24, 2019.
2 The current nonattainment area for the 2015 8hour ozone NAAQS consists of the following
Counties: Bartow, Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Fulton,
Gwinnett, and Henry.
3 This area is defined at (c)14. as the following
Counties: Bartow, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta,
DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton,
Gwinnett, Henry, Newton, Paulding, and Rockdale.
4 These pollutants are precursors to the formation
of ozone.
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 100 / Friday, May 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
permitting requirement as a result of a
physical or operational change at a
major stationary source; and require an
emissions offset ratio of at least 1.1:1.5
In a January 16, 2020, action (85 FR
2646), EPA approved revisions to
Georgia’s NNSR rules at Rule 391–3–1–
.03(8). As relevant here, GA EPD
removed five counties from the list of
counties subject to NNSR requirements
under subparagraph (c)14. and added
these counties to the list of contributing
counties subject to some NNSR
requirements at Subparagraph (c)15.6
Georgia’s October 18, 2019, SIP revision
is intended to align paragraph (e) with
the existing requirements in
subparagraph (c)(15) by adding those
five counties to the list at paragraph (e).
II. EPA’s Analysis of the State’s
Submittal
Georgia’s October 18, 2019, submittal
changes Rule 391–3–1–.03(e)1. to list
Barrow, Carroll, Hall, Spalding, and
Walton Counties among those
determined by the Director to contribute
to the ambient air level of ozone in a
revised list of metropolitan Atlanta
counties. As discussed above, EPA
previously approved the removal of
these counties from the list of counties
subject to NNSR requirements at
subparagraph (c)14. and, in the same
action, approved adding these counties
to the list of contributing counties at
subparagraph (c)15. EPA does not
believe that the corresponding change to
subparagraph (e)1. requested in the
current submittal will substantively
impact implementation of Georgia’s
NNSR program. To the contrary, this
change merely makes the list of counties
at subparagraph (e)1. consistent with
other SIP-approved requirements. In
addition, EPA notes that Georgia’s
October 18, 2019, submittal makes other
minor changes to Rule 391–3–1–.03(8),
which EPA believes will not
substantively impact the State’s
permitting program. Therefore, EPA is
proposing to approve the SIP revision
because EPA has preliminarily
concluded it is consistent with the CAA
and EPA’s federal regulations.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
5 This paragraph also requires these areas to
implement best available control technology,
consistent with prevention of significant
deterioration requirements, rather than the lowest
achievable emission rate. Because NNSR is not
required for these areas per federal rules, this
requirement is appropriate for these projects.
6 The five counties are Barrow, Carroll, Hall,
Spalding, and Walton.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 May 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
the Georgia Rule 391–3–1–.03(8), titled
‘‘Permit Requirements’’ State effective
September 26, 2019, which incorporates
minor revisions to the State’s permitting
requirements. EPA has made and will
continue to make the State
Implementation Plan generally available
through www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region 4 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the
Georgia SIP revision to Rule 391–3–1–
.03(8) titled ‘‘Permit Requirements,’’
submitted on October 18, 2019, to
update the status of five counties that
are designated as attainment for the
2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS, but which
the Director has determined to impact
ambient ozone concentrations in the
metropolitan Atlanta area, and therefore
must comply with certain additional
permitting requirements under
subparagraph (8)(c)15. In addition, the
October 18, 2019, submittal makes
typographical edits to Rule 391–3–
1.03(8). EPA has preliminarily
concluded that the SIP revision is
consistent with the CAA and EPA’s
regulations.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
if they meet the criteria of the CAA.
This action merely proposes to approve
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31117
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), nor will it impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 12, 2020.
Mary Walker,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2020–10680 Filed 5–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 100 (Friday, May 22, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31116-31117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-10680]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2020-0071; FRL-10009-07-Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; GA: Permit Requirements
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
State of Georgia, through the Georgia Environmental Protection Division
(GA EPD), on October 18, 2019. This SIP revision makes minor edits to
Georgia's rule prescribing permitting requirements. EPA has evaluated
Georgia's submittal and preliminarily determined that it meets the
applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA's
regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 22, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2020-0071 at www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to
its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pearlene Williams, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Ms. Williams can also
be reached via phone at (404) 562-9144 or via electronic mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Georgia SIP to make
clarifying and ministerial changes to its permitting regulations at
Rule 391-3-1-.03(8), Permit Requirements. Georgia's October 18,
2019,\1\ submittal changes the status of five counties under paragraph
(e), which specifies counties that are contributing to the ambient air
levels of the current nonattainment area, and makes other minor
typographical edits to other subparagraphs for consistent formatting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA notes the Agency received the submittal on October 24,
2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Georgia requires compliance with Nonattainment New Source Review
(NNSR) requirements under paragraph (c) in nonattainment areas. The
State has one current nonattainment area, which is in nonattainment for
the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS.\2\ At subparagraph (c)14., ``Additional
Provisions for Ozone Non-Attainment Areas,'' the State also requires
NNSR for certain counties surrounding the current nonattainment area.
Specifically, these counties comprise the current maintenance area for
the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS,\3\ which was redesignated to attainment
effective June 2, 2017. See 82 FR 25523.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The current nonattainment area for the 2015 8-hour ozone
NAAQS consists of the following Counties: Bartow, Clayton, Cobb,
DeKalb, Fulton, Gwinnett, and Henry.
\3\ This area is defined at (c)14. as the following Counties:
Bartow, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette,
Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Newton, Paulding, and Rockdale.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, paragraph (e) explains that the Director shall
designate any counties that are contributing to the ambient air level
of the nonattainment area. Under subparagraph (c)15., those
contributing counties are required to carry out certain elements of
NNSR for any new or modified electric generating units (EGU).
Specifically, those counties must: Define ``major source'' and ``major
stationary source'' to include certain sources that emit or have the
potential to emit at least 100 tons per year of volatile organic
compounds or oxides of nitrogen; \4\ identify the net emissions
increase threshold triggering the
[[Page 31117]]
permitting requirement as a result of a physical or operational change
at a major stationary source; and require an emissions offset ratio of
at least 1.1:1.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ These pollutants are precursors to the formation of ozone.
\5\ This paragraph also requires these areas to implement best
available control technology, consistent with prevention of
significant deterioration requirements, rather than the lowest
achievable emission rate. Because NNSR is not required for these
areas per federal rules, this requirement is appropriate for these
projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In a January 16, 2020, action (85 FR 2646), EPA approved revisions
to Georgia's NNSR rules at Rule 391-3-1-.03(8). As relevant here, GA
EPD removed five counties from the list of counties subject to NNSR
requirements under subparagraph (c)14. and added these counties to the
list of contributing counties subject to some NNSR requirements at
Subparagraph (c)15.\6\ Georgia's October 18, 2019, SIP revision is
intended to align paragraph (e) with the existing requirements in
subparagraph (c)(15) by adding those five counties to the list at
paragraph (e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The five counties are Barrow, Carroll, Hall, Spalding, and
Walton.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. EPA's Analysis of the State's Submittal
Georgia's October 18, 2019, submittal changes Rule 391-3-1-.03(e)1.
to list Barrow, Carroll, Hall, Spalding, and Walton Counties among
those determined by the Director to contribute to the ambient air level
of ozone in a revised list of metropolitan Atlanta counties. As
discussed above, EPA previously approved the removal of these counties
from the list of counties subject to NNSR requirements at subparagraph
(c)14. and, in the same action, approved adding these counties to the
list of contributing counties at subparagraph (c)15. EPA does not
believe that the corresponding change to subparagraph (e)1. requested
in the current submittal will substantively impact implementation of
Georgia's NNSR program. To the contrary, this change merely makes the
list of counties at subparagraph (e)1. consistent with other SIP-
approved requirements. In addition, EPA notes that Georgia's October
18, 2019, submittal makes other minor changes to Rule 391-3-1-.03(8),
which EPA believes will not substantively impact the State's permitting
program. Therefore, EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision
because EPA has preliminarily concluded it is consistent with the CAA
and EPA's federal regulations.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the Georgia Rule 391-3-1-.03(8), titled ``Permit
Requirements'' State effective September 26, 2019, which incorporates
minor revisions to the State's permitting requirements. EPA has made
and will continue to make the State Implementation Plan generally
available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 4 Office
(please contact the person identified in the For Further Information
Contact section of this preamble for more information).
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the Georgia SIP revision to Rule 391-3-
1-.03(8) titled ``Permit Requirements,'' submitted on October 18, 2019,
to update the status of five counties that are designated as attainment
for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS, but which the Director has determined
to impact ambient ozone concentrations in the metropolitan Atlanta
area, and therefore must comply with certain additional permitting
requirements under subparagraph (8)(c)15. In addition, the October 18,
2019, submittal makes typographical edits to Rule 391-3-1.03(8). EPA
has preliminarily concluded that the SIP revision is consistent with
the CAA and EPA's regulations.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, if
they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely proposes to
approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 12, 2020.
Mary Walker,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2020-10680 Filed 5-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P