Process Reform for Executive Branch Review of Certain FCC Applications and Petitions Involving Foreign Ownership, 29914-29916 [2020-09873]
Download as PDF
29914
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 97 / Tuesday, May 19, 2020 / Proposed Rules
oxirane, mono(3,5,5trimethylhexanoate) (PMN P–20–52,
CAS No. 148263–50–7) is subject to
reporting under this section for the
significant new uses described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80(o). It is a
significant new use to manufacture,
process or use the substance in a
manner that results in inhalation
exposures. It is a significant new use to
use the substance for other than as a
liquid shrinkage reducing admixture for
concrete.
(ii) [Reserved]
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph (b).
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in § 721.125
(a) through (c), and (i) are applicable to
manufacturers and processors of this
substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
[FR Doc. 2020–10086 Filed 5–18–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 0, 1, and 63
[IB Docket No. 16–155; DA 20–452; FRS
16720]
Process Reform for Executive Branch
Review of Certain FCC Applications
and Petitions Involving Foreign
Ownership
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed record of proceeding.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
International Bureau (IB) refreshes the
record in Executive Branch Review
Process Proceeding, IB Docket 16–155,
by adding Executive Order 13913 into
the record of the proceeding and seeking
comment.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
June 18, 2020, and reply comments are
due on or before July 2, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Pursuant to §§ 1.415 and
1.419 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR
1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file
comments and reply comments on or
before the dates indicated in this
document. Comments may be filed
using the Commission’s Electronic
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 May 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
Comment Filing System (ECFS). See
Electronic Filing of Documents in
Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121
(1998).
• Electronic Filers. Comments may be
filed electronically using the internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://
www.fcc.gov/ecfs.
• Paper Filers. Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
one copy of each filing. If more than one
docket or rulemaking number appears in
the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for
each additional docket or rulemaking
number.
Filings can be sent by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
Æ Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050
Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD
20701. U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20554.
• Effective March 19, 2020, and until
further notice, the Commission no
longer accepts any hand or messenger
delivered filings. This is a temporary
measure taken to help protect the health
and safety of individuals, and to
mitigate the transmission of COVID–19.
See FCC Announces Closure of FCC
Headquarters Open Window and
Change in Hand-Delivery Policy, Public
Notice, DA 20–304 (March 19, 2020).
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcccloses-headquarters-open-window-andchanges-hand-delivery-policy.
• People with Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice) or 202–
418–0432 (TTY).
In addition, filers may provide one
copy of each filing to each of the
following: (1) Arthur Lechtman,
Attorney, Telecommunications and
Analysis Division, International Bureau,
at Arthur.Lechtman@fcc.gov, and (2)
David Krech, Associate Division Chief,
Telecommunications and Analysis
Division, International Bureau, at
David.Krech@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, please contact
Arthur Lechtman, Telecommunications
and Analysis Division, International
Bureau, at Arthur.Lechtman@fcc.gov or
(202) 418–1465.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The
Commission refers certain applications
to Executive Branch agencies when
there is reportable foreign ownership in
the applicant. Specifically, where an
applicant has a 10% or greater direct or
indirect owner that is not a U.S. citizen,
Commission practice has been to refer
an application for: (1) International
section 214 authority; (2) assignment or
transfer of control of domestic or
international section 214 authority; (3) a
submarine cable landing license; and (4)
assignment or transfer of control of a
submarine cable landing license. The
Commission also refers petitions
seeking authority to exceed the foreign
ownership limits in section 310(b) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 310(b), for
broadcast and common carrier wireless
licensees, including common carrier
satellite earth stations.
On June 24, 2016, the Commission
adopted a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) to improve the
timeliness and transparency of the
process involving referral of certain
applications with reportable foreign
ownership to Executive Branch
agencies, including the Team Telecom
agencies, for feedback on any national
security, law enforcement, foreign
policy, or trade policy concerns. Process
Reform for Executive Branch Review of
Certain FCC Applications and Petitions
Involving Foreign Ownership, 81 FR
46870 (2016) (Executive Branch Review
Process NPRM). Specifically, the
Commission sought comment on: (1)
The types of applications to be referred
to the Executive Branch; (2) the
information that should be provided by
an applicant with reportable foreign
ownership in order to facilitate
Executive Branch review; (3)
certifications to be made by an applicant
that it will comply with several
mitigation measures; and (4) time
frames for Executive Branch review of
the applications. The Commission
proposed a 90-day review period for
applications referred to the Executive
Branch, with a one-time additional 90day extension for circumstances where
the Executive Branch required
additional review time beyond the
initial period.
On April 4, 2020, the President signed
Executive Order 13913, Establishing the
Committee for the Assessment of
Foreign Participation in the United
States Telecommunications Services
Sector, 85 FR 19643 (April 8, 2020).
Importantly, among other things, the
Executive Order sets out procedures and
timeframes for the Committee’s review
of applications referred by the
Commission.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 97 / Tuesday, May 19, 2020 / Proposed Rules
The Executive Order establishes the
Committee to review applications
referred by the Commission. The
Committee may also review existing
licenses to identify any additional or
new risks to national security or law
enforcement interests of the United
States, where the Commission
previously has referred the application
for the license to the Committee or its
predecessor agencies for review. The
Committee is comprised of the Secretary
of Defense; the Secretary of Homeland
Security; and the Attorney General, who
serves as Chair (together, the Committee
Members). The President may also
appoint the head of any other
department or agency, or any Assistant
to the President, to be a member of the
Committee. The Executive Order also
provides for Committee Advisors.
Within 90 days of the signing of the
Executive Order, the Committee
Members and the Director of National
Intelligence shall enter into a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
on the process to implement the
Executive Order.
The Executive Order sets out the
following time frames for the
Committee’s review of an application
for a ‘‘license’’ or transfer of a license
referred by the Commission: 120 days
for an initial review and a 90-day
secondary assessment of an application
if the Committee determines that the
risk to national security or law
enforcement interests cannot be
mitigated by standard mitigation
measures. The Executive Order defines
a ‘‘license’’ as any license, certificate of
public interest, or other authorization
issued or granted by the Federal
Communications Commission after
referral of an application by the
Commission to the Committee or its
predecessor group of agencies. It defines
an ‘‘application’’ as any application,
petition, or other request for a license or
authorization, or the transfer of a license
or authorization, referred by the
Commission to the Committee or its
predecessor group of agencies. At the
conclusion of its review, the Committee
may advise the Commission that the
Committee has no objection to grant of
the application; recommends that the
Commission deny the application due to
the risk to the national security or law
enforcement interests of the United
States; or recommends that the
Commission condition grant on the
applicant’s compliance with standard or
non-standard mitigation measures. In
cases where the Committee Members
and Committee Advisors cannot reach
consensus on recommendations to deny
or condition on non-standard
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 May 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
mitigation, they shall submit a
recommendation to the President.
The Committee may seek information
from an applicant in furtherance of its
review and assessments of the
application, and the 120-day time frame
for review begins when the Committee
Chair determines that the applicant’s
responses are complete. The MOU will
delineate questions and requests for
applicants and licensees that may be
needed to acquire information necessary
to conduct the reviews and assessments
and define the standard mitigation
measures.
By this Public Notice, the
Commission enters the Executive Order
into the record of IB Docket No. 16–155
and seeks comment on the effect of the
Executive Order on the Commission’s
proposed rules and procedures.
Request for Comments: The
Commission seeks comment on the
effect of Executive Order 13913 on the
proposals in the Executive Branch
Review Process NPRM for Executive
Branch review of Commission
applications with reportable foreign
ownership. Commenters should address
how the Executive Order affects the
specific proposals and issues raised in
the Executive Branch Review Process
NPRM. The Commission seeks comment
generally on whether the Executive
Order warrants any further or different
rules to improve timeliness and
transparency.
In particular, the Commission invites
the Executive Branch to provide its view
on the effect of the Executive Order in
this proceeding and on the following
issues. Will the Committee make
publicly available a standard set of
questions and requests to applicants? If
so, how will applicants be able to access
them? Would the Committee expect an
applicant’s responses to such questions
to be submitted to the Committee at the
time the application is filed? Does the
Executive Branch continue to propose
that certain certifications be made by
applicants as part of the application
process? If so, are there any changes to
the proposed certifications? And does
the Executive Branch continue to
propose that all applicants make the
certifications, or that such certifications
apply solely to those applicants with
reportable foreign ownership?
Interested parties also may take this
opportunity to refresh the record of this
proceeding with new facts or
circumstances that have occurred since
the NPRM’s comment period closed in
2016. For example, how does the
passage of the Clarifying Lawful
Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act, 18
U.S.C. 2713, affect the proposed
certification on access to
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29915
communications and records? The
Commission sought comment of
requiring an applicant to certify that it
will ‘‘make communications to, from, or
within the United States, as well as
records thereof, available in a form and
location that permits them to be subject
to lawful request or valid legal process
under U.S. law, for services covered
under the requested Commission license
or authorization.’’
Ex Parte Information: This proceeding
shall be treated as a ‘‘permit-butdisclose’’ proceeding in accordance
with the Commission’s ex parte rules.
47 CFR 1.1200. Persons making ex parte
presentations must file a copy of any
written presentation or a memorandum
summarizing any oral presentation
within two business days after the
presentation (unless a different deadline
applicable to the Sunshine period
applies). Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons
attending or otherwise participating in
the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2)
summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation
consisted in whole or in part of the
presentation of data or arguments
already reflected in the presenter’s
written comments, memoranda, or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter
may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments,
memoranda, or other filings (specifying
the relevant page and/or paragraph
numbers where such data or arguments
can be found) in lieu of summarizing
them in the memorandum. Documents
shown or given to Commission staff
during ex parte meetings are deemed to
be written ex parte presentations and
must be filed consistent with § 1.1206(b)
of the Commission’s rules. In
proceedings governed by § 1.49(f) of the
Commission’s rules or for which the
Commission has made available a
method of electronic filing, written ex
parte presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments
thereto, must be filed through the
electronic comment filing system
available for that proceeding, and must
be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc,
.xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants
in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s ex
parte rules.
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
29916
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 97 / Tuesday, May 19, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Federal Communications Commission
Denise Coca,
Chief, Telecommunications & Analysis
Division, International Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2020–09873 Filed 5–18–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 200508–0132]
RIN 0648–BJ69
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Coastal
Migratory Pelagics Resources in the
Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Region;
Framework Amendment 8
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes to implement
management measures described in
Framework Amendment 8 to the Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) for Coastal
Migratory Pelagics (CMP) of the Gulf of
Mexico (Gulf) and Atlantic Region (CMP
FMP), as prepared by the South Atlantic
Fishery Management Council (Council).
This proposed rule would revise the
Atlantic migratory group king mackerel
commercial trip limit in the Atlantic
southern zone during the October
through February fishing season. The
purpose of this proposed rule is to
support increased fishing activity and
economic opportunity while continuing
to constrain harvest to the annual catch
limit (ACL).
DATES: Written comments must be
received by June 18, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rule, identified by
‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2020–0037,’’ by either
of the following methods:
• Electronic submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20200037 click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Karla Gore, NMFS Southeast Regional
Office, 263 13th Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 May 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
• Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
Electronic copies Framework
Amendment 8 may be obtained from the
Southeast Regional Office website at:
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/
framework-amendment-8-kingmackerel-trip-limits.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karla Gore, NMFS Southeast Regional
Office, telephone: 727–551–5753, or
email: karla.gore@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CMP
fishery in the Atlantic region is
managed under the CMP FMP which
includes king mackerel and Spanish
mackerel, and cobia in the Gulf of
Mexico. The Council and the Gulf of
Mexico Fishery Management Council
jointly manage the CMP FMP. The CMP
FMP was prepared by both Councils and
is implemented by NMFS through
regulations at 50 CFR part 622 under
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Under the CMP FMP, each Council has
the ability to develop individual
framework amendments to the FMP for
certain actions that are specific to each
region.
Background
The Atlantic migratory group of king
mackerel (Atlantic king mackerel) has
fishing zones, a split season, and a
commercial trip limit system
implemented through Amendment 26 to
the CMP FMP (82 FR 17387, April 11,
2017). In the exclusive economic zone
(EEZ), Atlantic king mackerel is divided
into a northern zone and a southern
zone with the quota for this migratory
group divided between the two zones.
The northern zone extends from the
North Carolina/South Carolina
boundary through New York, and the
southern zone extends from the North
Carolina/South Carolina boundary to
the Miami-Dade/Monroe County,
Florida, boundary. The fishing year for
the commercial sector for Atlantic king
mackerel is March 1 through the end of
February. Annually, the Atlantic
southern zone has two commercial
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
seasons, March 1 through September 30
(Season 1), and October 1 through the
end of February (Season 2). The Atlantic
southern zone quota is further allocated
into two seasonal quotas: 60 percent of
the zone quota is allocated to Season 1
and 40 percent of the zone quota is
allocated to Season 2. During the fishing
year, any unused quota from Season 1
transfers to Season 2. There is no
carryover of any unused quota at the
end of Season 2. When the quota for a
season is reached or projected to be
reached, commercial harvest of king
mackerel in the Atlantic southern zone
is prohibited for the remainder of the
respective season.
The Atlantic commercial trip limit
system was restructured and revised
through Amendment 26 to the CMP
FMP (82 FR 17387, April 11, 2017), with
the goal of ensuring the longest
commercial fishing season possible for
Atlantic king mackerel and providing
commercial fishermen continued access
to king mackerel. The trip limit system
for the southern zone includes a 3,500
lb (1,588 kg) year-round trip limit north
of the Flagler/Volusia County, Florida,
boundary. For the area between the
Flagler/Volusia County, Florida,
boundary (29°25′ N lat.), and the MiamiDade/Monroe County, Florida,
boundary (25°20′24’’ N lat.), the trip
limit is 50 fish during Season 2 from
October 1 through January 31. The trip
limit remains at 50 fish during the
month of February, unless NMFS
determines that less than 70 percent of
the commercial quota for the southern
zone’s second season has been landed.
In that case, NMFS announces the trip
limit increase to 75 fish for February in
the Federal Register.
Since the implementation of
Amendment 26, fishermen have
expressed concern about some of the
trip limits contained in the amendment.
Specifically, commercial king mackerel
fishermen targeting king mackerel south
of the Flagler/Volusia County, Florida,
boundary indicate that the current
Season 2 commercial trip limit of 50
fish in the Atlantic southern zone has
prevented them from fully utilizing the
available resource, and that this lower
trip limit during Season 2 also has
prevented fishermen from being able to
carry crew or make profitable trips. The
quota for Season 2 has not been met for
several years. In March 2019, the
Council voted to begin developing
Framework Amendment 8 to the FMP to
address stakeholder concerns about the
50-fish Season 2 trip limit. Stakeholders
and members of the Council’s Mackerel
Cobia Advisory Panel (AP) indicated
that the current 50-fish Season 2 trip
limit is a factor in preventing
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 97 (Tuesday, May 19, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29914-29916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-09873]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 0, 1, and 63
[IB Docket No. 16-155; DA 20-452; FRS 16720]
Process Reform for Executive Branch Review of Certain FCC
Applications and Petitions Involving Foreign Ownership
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed record of proceeding.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the International Bureau (IB) refreshes the
record in Executive Branch Review Process Proceeding, IB Docket 16-155,
by adding Executive Order 13913 into the record of the proceeding and
seeking comment.
DATES: Comments are due on or before June 18, 2020, and reply comments
are due on or before July 2, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Pursuant to Sec. Sec. 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's
rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and
reply comments on or before the dates indicated in this document.
Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing
System (ECFS). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
Electronic Filers. Comments may be filed electronically
using the internet by accessing the ECFS: https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs.
Paper Filers. Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and one copy of each filing. If more than one docket
or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or
rulemaking number.
Filings can be sent by commercial overnight courier, or by first-
class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings must be
addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary,
Federal Communications Commission.
[cir] Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050 Junction Drive,
Annapolis Junction, MD 20701. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express,
and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street SW, Washington,
DC 20554.
Effective March 19, 2020, and until further notice, the
Commission no longer accepts any hand or messenger delivered filings.
This is a temporary measure taken to help protect the health and safety
of individuals, and to mitigate the transmission of COVID-19. See FCC
Announces Closure of FCC Headquarters Open Window and Change in Hand-
Delivery Policy, Public Notice, DA 20-304 (March 19, 2020). https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-closes-headquarters-open-window-and-changes-hand-delivery-policy.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in
accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), send an email to [email protected] or
call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice)
or 202-418-0432 (TTY).
In addition, filers may provide one copy of each filing to each of
the following: (1) Arthur Lechtman, Attorney, Telecommunications and
Analysis Division, International Bureau, at [email protected],
and (2) David Krech, Associate Division Chief, Telecommunications and
Analysis Division, International Bureau, at [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, please
contact Arthur Lechtman, Telecommunications and Analysis Division,
International Bureau, at [email protected] or (202) 418-1465.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission refers certain applications
to Executive Branch agencies when there is reportable foreign ownership
in the applicant. Specifically, where an applicant has a 10% or greater
direct or indirect owner that is not a U.S. citizen, Commission
practice has been to refer an application for: (1) International
section 214 authority; (2) assignment or transfer of control of
domestic or international section 214 authority; (3) a submarine cable
landing license; and (4) assignment or transfer of control of a
submarine cable landing license. The Commission also refers petitions
seeking authority to exceed the foreign ownership limits in section
310(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 310(b),
for broadcast and common carrier wireless licensees, including common
carrier satellite earth stations.
On June 24, 2016, the Commission adopted a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) to improve the timeliness and transparency of the
process involving referral of certain applications with reportable
foreign ownership to Executive Branch agencies, including the Team
Telecom agencies, for feedback on any national security, law
enforcement, foreign policy, or trade policy concerns. Process Reform
for Executive Branch Review of Certain FCC Applications and Petitions
Involving Foreign Ownership, 81 FR 46870 (2016) (Executive Branch
Review Process NPRM). Specifically, the Commission sought comment on:
(1) The types of applications to be referred to the Executive Branch;
(2) the information that should be provided by an applicant with
reportable foreign ownership in order to facilitate Executive Branch
review; (3) certifications to be made by an applicant that it will
comply with several mitigation measures; and (4) time frames for
Executive Branch review of the applications. The Commission proposed a
90-day review period for applications referred to the Executive Branch,
with a one-time additional 90-day extension for circumstances where the
Executive Branch required additional review time beyond the initial
period.
On April 4, 2020, the President signed Executive Order 13913,
Establishing the Committee for the Assessment of Foreign Participation
in the United States Telecommunications Services Sector, 85 FR 19643
(April 8, 2020). Importantly, among other things, the Executive Order
sets out procedures and timeframes for the Committee's review of
applications referred by the Commission.
[[Page 29915]]
The Executive Order establishes the Committee to review
applications referred by the Commission. The Committee may also review
existing licenses to identify any additional or new risks to national
security or law enforcement interests of the United States, where the
Commission previously has referred the application for the license to
the Committee or its predecessor agencies for review. The Committee is
comprised of the Secretary of Defense; the Secretary of Homeland
Security; and the Attorney General, who serves as Chair (together, the
Committee Members). The President may also appoint the head of any
other department or agency, or any Assistant to the President, to be a
member of the Committee. The Executive Order also provides for
Committee Advisors. Within 90 days of the signing of the Executive
Order, the Committee Members and the Director of National Intelligence
shall enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on the process to
implement the Executive Order.
The Executive Order sets out the following time frames for the
Committee's review of an application for a ``license'' or transfer of a
license referred by the Commission: 120 days for an initial review and
a 90-day secondary assessment of an application if the Committee
determines that the risk to national security or law enforcement
interests cannot be mitigated by standard mitigation measures. The
Executive Order defines a ``license'' as any license, certificate of
public interest, or other authorization issued or granted by the
Federal Communications Commission after referral of an application by
the Commission to the Committee or its predecessor group of agencies.
It defines an ``application'' as any application, petition, or other
request for a license or authorization, or the transfer of a license or
authorization, referred by the Commission to the Committee or its
predecessor group of agencies. At the conclusion of its review, the
Committee may advise the Commission that the Committee has no objection
to grant of the application; recommends that the Commission deny the
application due to the risk to the national security or law enforcement
interests of the United States; or recommends that the Commission
condition grant on the applicant's compliance with standard or non-
standard mitigation measures. In cases where the Committee Members and
Committee Advisors cannot reach consensus on recommendations to deny or
condition on non-standard mitigation, they shall submit a
recommendation to the President.
The Committee may seek information from an applicant in furtherance
of its review and assessments of the application, and the 120-day time
frame for review begins when the Committee Chair determines that the
applicant's responses are complete. The MOU will delineate questions
and requests for applicants and licensees that may be needed to acquire
information necessary to conduct the reviews and assessments and define
the standard mitigation measures.
By this Public Notice, the Commission enters the Executive Order
into the record of IB Docket No. 16-155 and seeks comment on the effect
of the Executive Order on the Commission's proposed rules and
procedures.
Request for Comments: The Commission seeks comment on the effect of
Executive Order 13913 on the proposals in the Executive Branch Review
Process NPRM for Executive Branch review of Commission applications
with reportable foreign ownership. Commenters should address how the
Executive Order affects the specific proposals and issues raised in the
Executive Branch Review Process NPRM. The Commission seeks comment
generally on whether the Executive Order warrants any further or
different rules to improve timeliness and transparency.
In particular, the Commission invites the Executive Branch to
provide its view on the effect of the Executive Order in this
proceeding and on the following issues. Will the Committee make
publicly available a standard set of questions and requests to
applicants? If so, how will applicants be able to access them? Would
the Committee expect an applicant's responses to such questions to be
submitted to the Committee at the time the application is filed? Does
the Executive Branch continue to propose that certain certifications be
made by applicants as part of the application process? If so, are there
any changes to the proposed certifications? And does the Executive
Branch continue to propose that all applicants make the certifications,
or that such certifications apply solely to those applicants with
reportable foreign ownership?
Interested parties also may take this opportunity to refresh the
record of this proceeding with new facts or circumstances that have
occurred since the NPRM's comment period closed in 2016. For example,
how does the passage of the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data
(CLOUD) Act, 18 U.S.C. 2713, affect the proposed certification on
access to communications and records? The Commission sought comment of
requiring an applicant to certify that it will ``make communications
to, from, or within the United States, as well as records thereof,
available in a form and location that permits them to be subject to
lawful request or valid legal process under U.S. law, for services
covered under the requested Commission license or authorization.''
Ex Parte Information: This proceeding shall be treated as a
``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's
ex parte rules. 47 CFR 1.1200. Persons making ex parte presentations
must file a copy of any written presentation or a memorandum
summarizing any oral presentation within two business days after the
presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine
period applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are
reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must (1) list all
persons attending or otherwise participating in the meeting at which
the ex parte presentation was made, and (2) summarize all data
presented and arguments made during the presentation. If the
presentation consisted in whole or in part of the presentation of data
or arguments already reflected in the presenter's written comments,
memoranda, or other filings in the proceeding, the presenter may
provide citations to such data or arguments in his or her prior
comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page
and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in
lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to
Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex
parte presentations and must be filed consistent with Sec. 1.1206(b)
of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by Sec. 1.49(f) of
the Commission's rules or for which the Commission has made available a
method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and
memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments
thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system
available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format
(e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this
proceeding should familiarize themselves with the Commission's ex parte
rules.
[[Page 29916]]
Federal Communications Commission
Denise Coca,
Chief, Telecommunications & Analysis Division, International Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2020-09873 Filed 5-18-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P