Findings of Research Misconduct, 28643-28645 [2020-10253]
Download as PDF
28643
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 13, 2020 / Notices
understandings of the target audience
early in the development of a
questionnaire or tool. When focus
groups are used, the focus group
discussion guide will be provided to
OMB for review.
• Expert/Gatekeeper review of tools—
In some instances, tools designed for
patients may be reviewed in-depth by
medical providers or other gatekeepers
to provide feedback on the acceptability
and usability of a particular tool. This
would usually be in addition to
pretesting of the tool by the actual
patient or other user.
• Record abstractions—On occasion,
the development of a tool or other
information collection requires review
and interaction with records rather than
individuals.
• ‘‘Dress rehearsal’’ of a specific
protocol—In some instances, the
proposed pretesting will constitute a
walkthrough of the intended data
collection procedure. In these instances,
the request will mirror what is expected
to occur for the larger scale data
collection.
Likely Respondents: Respondents will
be recruited by means of advertisements
in public venues or through techniques
that replicate prospective data
collection activities that are the focus of
the project. For instance, a survey on
physician communication, designed to
be administered following an office
visit, might be pretested using the same
procedure. Each submission to OMB
will specify the specific recruitment
procedure to be used.
Burden Statement: Burden in this
context means the time expended by
persons to generate, maintain, retain,
disclose or provide the information
requested. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; to
develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purpose
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; to train
personnel and to be able to respond to
a collection of information; to search
data sources; to complete and review
the collection of information; and to
transmit or otherwise disclose the
information. The total annual burden
hours estimated for this ICR are
summarized in the table below.
TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN—HOURS
Type of
information
collection
Number of
respondents
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total
responses
Total
burden
hours
Mail/email 1 ...........................................................................
Telephone ............................................................................
Web-based ...........................................................................
Focus Groups ......................................................................
In-person ..............................................................................
Automated 2 ..........................................................................
Cognitive Testing .................................................................
1,000
1,000
1,000
725
500
500
500
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1,000
1,000
1,000
725
500
500
500
0.26
0.26
0.25
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.41
260
260
250
725
500
500
705
Total ..............................................................................
5,225
........................
5,225
........................
3,200
1 May
2 May
include telephone non-response follow-up in which case the burden will not change.
include testing of database software, CAPI software, or other automated technologies.
Maria G. Button,
Director, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2020–10247 Filed 5–12–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
Findings of Research Misconduct
Office of the Secretary, HHS.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Findings of research
misconduct have been made against Dr.
Shin-Hee Kim (Respondent), who was
an Assistant Professor of Veterinary
Medicine, University of Maryland
(UMD). Dr. Kim engaged in research
misconduct in research supported by
U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) funds,
specifically National Institute of Allergy
and Infectious Diseases (NIAID),
National Institutes of Health (NIH),
grants R21 AI100195 and ZIA AI000938
and contract N01 AO60009. The
administrative actions, including
SUMMARY:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Number of
responses per
respondent
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:53 May 12, 2020
Jkt 250001
supervision for a period of three (3)
years, were implemented beginning on
March 27, 2020, and are detailed below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elisabeth A. Handley, Director, Office of
Research Integrity, 1101 Wootton
Parkway, Suite 240, Rockville, MD
20852, (240) 453–8200.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that the Office of Research
Integrity (ORI) has taken final action in
the following case:
Dr. Shin-Hee Kim, University of
Maryland: Based on an investigation
conducted by UMD and additional
analysis conducted by ORI in its
oversight review, ORI found that Dr.
Shin-Hee Kim, former Assistant
Professor of Veterinary Medicine, UMD,
engaged in research misconduct in
research supported by PHS funds,
specifically NIAID, NIH, grants R21
AI100195 and ZIA AI000938 and
contract N01 AO60009.
ORI found that Respondent engaged
in research misconduct by intentionally,
knowingly, and/or recklessly falsifying
and/or fabricating data by altering,
reusing, and relabeling same source
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Western blot images, microscopy fields,
and data of viral titers and mouse
immune response from non-correlated
experiments to represent the results of
different viral strains in the following
seven (7) published papers and two (2)
grant applications submitted to NIAID,
NIH:
• Mutations in the fusion protein
cleavage site of avian paramyxovirus
serotype 4 confer increased replication
and syncytium formation in vitro but
not increased replication and
pathogenicity in chickens and ducks.
PLoS One 2013;8(1):e50598 (hereafter
referred to as ‘‘PLoS One 2013A’’).
• Newcastle disease virus fusion
protein is the major contributor to
protective immunity of genotypematched vaccine. PLoS One
2013;8(8):e74022 (hereafter referred to
as ‘‘PLoS One 2013B’’).
• Role of C596 in the C-terminal
extension of the haemagglutininneuraminidase protein in replication
and pathogenicity of a highly virulent
Indonesian strain of Newcastle disease
virus. J Gen Virol. 2014;95(Pt 2):331–6
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
28644
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 13, 2020 / Notices
(hereafter referred to as ‘‘J Gen Virol.
2014’’).
• Newcastle disease virus vector
producing human norovirus-like
particles induces serum, cellular, and
mucosal immune responses in mice. J
Virol. 2014;88(17):9718–27 (hereafter
referred to as ‘‘J Virol. 2014’’).
• Modified Newcastle disease virus
vectors expressing the H5
hemagglutinin induce enhanced
protection against highly pathogenic
H5N1 avian influenza virus in chickens.
Vaccine 2014;32(35):4428–35 (hereafter
referred to as ‘‘Vaccine 2014’’).
• Immunogenicity of Newcastle
disease virus vectors expressing
Norwalk virus capsid protein in the
presence or absence of VP2 protein.
Virology 2015;484:163–9 (hereafter
referred to as ‘‘Virology 2015’’).
• LaSota fusion (F) cleavage motifmediated fusion activity is affected by
other regions of the F protein from
different genotype Newcastle disease
virus in a chimeric virus: Implication
for virulence attenuation. J Gen Virol.
2016;97(6):1297–1303 (hereafter referred
to as ‘‘J Gen Virol. 2016’’).
• R01 AI118879–01, ‘‘Avian
paramyxovirus vectored vaccines for
Norovirus infection,’’ submitted to
NIAID, NIH, on October 3, 2014.
• R01 AI118879–01A1, ‘‘Avian
paramyxovirus vectored vaccines for
Norovirus infection,’’ submitted to
NIAID, NIH, on November 5, 2015.
Specifically, ORI finds that
Respondent knowingly, intentionally,
and/or recklessly falsified and/or
fabricated:
• Western blot images in four (4)
figures of three (3) published papers by
reusing and relabeling images from noncorrelated blots and using blank
backgrounds as blot images with
negative expression of proteins.
Specifically:
—The blot that was used for Figure 3A,
first blot of the second band, in
Vaccine 2014, representing the
negative expression of HA0 protein of
the rLaSota virus in DF1 cells after 24
hour infection at Multiplicity of
Infection (MOI) of 1, was fabricated by
using the blank background from an
uncorrelated original film
—the six (6) blots that were used for
Figure 3A, bottom band, in Vaccine
2014, representing the expression of
Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV)
haemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN)
proteins in DF1 cells after 24 hour
infection with six modified rNDV
virus strains at MOI of 1, also were
used in Figure 1B, bottom band, in J
Gen Virol. 2014 to represent the
expression of HN proteins of six
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:53 May 12, 2020
Jkt 250001
different virus strains evaluated in
infected DF1 cells at MOI of 0.1 in the
presence of trypsin
—the four (4) blots that were used for
Figure 1B, upper band, in J Virol.
2014, Figure 1B in grant application
R01 AI118879–01, and Figure 1A in
grant application R01 AI118879–
01A1, representing the expression of
VP1 proteins of four modified NDV
strains in DF1 cells after 24 hour
infection at MOI of 1, were fabricated
by using blots from an uncorrelated
film: The first two blots were from the
blank background and the last two
blots were from samples labeled with
a different viral name—BC/NV101
—the four (4) blots that were used for
Figure 3A, third band, in J Virol. 2014,
representing the VP1 protein
expression of the modified rNDV
virus strain in DF1 cells at four time
points, were fabricated by using four
blots labeled with a different viral
name (BC/NV101) from the same
uncorrelated film of the last hyphen
bullet
• nine (9) microscopy fields
presented in four (4) figures of four (4)
published papers by reusing and
relabeling same source images to
representing different results.
Specifically:
—The microscope field that was used
for Figure 1B in J Gen Virol. 2016,
representing the cytopathic effect of
rLaSota virus infection with allantoic
fluid in DF1 cells, also was used in
Figure 1B in J Gen Virol. 2016 to
represent the cytopathic effect of rBC/
AKO-F virus infection with allantoic
fluid in DF1 cells
—the microscope field that was used for
Figure 1B in J Gen Virol. 2016,
representing the cytopathic effect of
rBC/Las-Fc-AKO-F virus infection
without allantoic fluid in DF1 cells,
also was used in a PowerPoint
presentation on Respondent’s laptop
to represent the cytopathic effect of
rBan 010 Las Fc virus and rBan 010
Las Fc/D403N virus
—the microscope field that was used for
Figure 1B in J Gen Virol. 2016,
representing the cytopathic effect of
rLaSota virus infection without
allantoic fluid in DF1 cells, also was
used in a PowerPoint presentation on
Respondent’s laptop to represent the
cytopathic effect of rAPMV-2/BC F
virus
—the microscope field that was used for
Figure 1B in J Gen Virol. 2016,
representing the cytopathic effect of
rBC/Las-Fc virus infection without
allantoic fluid in DF1 cells, also was
used in a PowerPoint presentation on
Respondent’s laptop to represent the
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
cytopathic effect of mock infected
sample
—the two images that were used for
Figure 2B in Virology 2015,
representing rLaSota-NV (the middle
one) and rBCm-NV (the right one)
expressed VLP in allantoic fluid of
chicken eggs, were fabricated by
splitting a microscopy field into two
parts
—the image that was used for Figure 3A
in PLoS One 2013A, representing a
mock control in the experiment in
which DF1 cells were infected by a
group of viruses at MOI of 0.1 for 72
hours, also was used in Figure 2A of
PLoS One 2013B to represent a mock
control in a different experiment in
which DF1 cells were infected by a
different group of viruses at MOI of
0.01 for 72 hours
• data of viral titers and mouse
immune responses to viral
immunization presented in five (5)
figures of one (1) published paper by
altering, reusing, and relabeling data
from non-correlated experiments or by
fabricating data that did not exist.
Specifically:
—The data that were used for Figure 2
in J Virol. 2014, representing titers of
four virus strains, also were used to
represent titers of another group of
four different virus strains in
Respondent’s research records
—the data that were used for Figures 5,
6, 7, and 8 in J Virol. 2014,
representing the results of mouse
immune responses to the
immunization of rLaSota-VP1,
Modified rNDV-VP1, and VLP viruses,
also were used to represent the results
of mouse responses to the
immunization of different virus
strains in Respondent’s research
records
—the data that were used for Figures 5,
6, 7, and 8 in J Virol. 2014,
representing the results of mouse
immune responses to PBS injection as
negative controls, were fabricated as
the data did not exist
Dr. Kim entered into an Agreement
and agreed to the following:
(1) Respondent agreed to have her
research supervised for a period of three
(3) years beginning on March 27, 2020.
Respondent agreed that prior to the
submission of an application for PHS
support for a research project on which
Respondent’s participation is proposed
and prior to Respondent’s participation
in any capacity on PHS-supported
research, Respondent shall ensure that a
plan for supervision of Respondent’s
duties is submitted to ORI for approval.
The supervision plan must be designed
to ensure the scientific integrity of
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 13, 2020 / Notices
Respondent’s research contribution.
Respondent agreed that she shall not
participate in any PHS-supported
research until such a supervision plan is
submitted to and approved by ORI.
Respondent agreed to maintain
responsibility for compliance with the
agreed upon supervision plan.
(2) The requirements for Respondent’s
supervision plan are as follows:
i. A committee of 2–3 senior faculty
members at the institution who are
familiar with Respondent’s field of
research, but not including
Respondent’s supervisor or
collaborators, will provide oversight and
guidance for three (3) years from the
effective date of the Agreement. The
committee will review primary data
from Respondent’s laboratory on a
quarterly basis and submit a report to
ORI at six (6) month intervals, setting
forth the committee meeting dates and
Respondent’s compliance with
appropriate research standards and
confirming the integrity of Respondent’s
research.
ii. The committee will conduct an
advance review of any PHS grant
applications (including supplements,
resubmissions, etc.), manuscripts
reporting PHS-funded research
submitted for publication, and abstracts.
The review will include a discussion
with Respondent of the primary data
represented in those documents and
will include a certification to ORI that
the data presented in the proposed
application/publication is supported by
the research record.
(3) Respondent agreed that for a
period of three (3) years beginning on
March 27, 2020, any institution
employing her shall submit, in
conjunction with each application of
PHS funds, or report, manuscript, or
abstract involving PHS-supported
research in which Respondent is
involved, a certification to ORI that the
data provided by Respondent are based
on actual experiments or are otherwise
legitimately derived and that the data,
procedures, and methodology are
accurately reported in the application,
report, manuscript, or abstract.
(4) If no supervisory plan is provided
to ORI, Respondent agreed to provide
certification to ORI at the conclusion of
the supervision period that she has not
engaged in, applied for, or had her name
included on any application, proposal,
or other request for PHS funds without
prior notification to ORI.
(5) Respondent agreed to exclude
herself voluntarily from serving in any
advisory capacity to PHS including, but
not limited to, service on any PHS
advisory committee, board, and/or peer
review committee, or as a consultant for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:53 May 12, 2020
Jkt 250001
a period of three (3) years, beginning on
March 27, 2020.
(6) As a condition of the Agreement,
Respondent will request that the
following papers be corrected or
retracted in accordance with 42 CFR
93.407(a)(1):
• PLoS One 2013;8(1):e50598
• PLoS One 2013;8(8):e74022
• J Gen Virol. 2014;95(Pt 2):331–6
• J Virol. 2014;88(17):9718–27
• Vaccine 2014;32(35):4428–35
• Virology 2015;484:163–9
• J Gen Virol. 2016;97(6):1297–1303
Respondent will copy ORI and the
Research Integrity Officer at UMD on
the correspondence.
Dated: May 8, 2020.
Elisabeth A. Handley,
Director, Office of Research Integrity, Office
of the Assistant Secretary for Health.
[FR Doc. 2020–10253 Filed 5–12–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Biodefense Science Board
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Preparedness and
Response (ASPR), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The National Biodefense
Science Board (NBSB) is authorized
under Section 319M of the Public PHS
Act, as added by Section 402 of the
Pandemic and All-Hazards
Preparedness Act of 2006 and amended
by Section 404 of the Pandemic and AllHazards Preparedness Reauthorization
Act. The Board is governed by the
Federal Advisory Committee, which sets
forth standards for the formation and
use of advisory committees. The NBSB
provides expert advice and guidance on
scientific, technical, and other matters
of special interest to the Department
regarding current and future chemical,
biological, nuclear, and radiological
agents, whether naturally occurring,
accidental, or deliberate.
Background: The May 13, 2020, NBSB
public teleconference is dedicated to the
discussion of recommendations on two
topics: (1) NBSB Rapid medical
countermeasures (MCM) for Disease X
and (2) Integrating Clinical Disaster
Response Training with Community and
State Based Emergency Planning. We
will post modifications to the agenda
and/or topics on the NBSB meeting
website, which is located at https://
www.phe.gov/nbsb.
Availability of Materials: We will post
all teleconference materials prior to the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28645
teleconference on May 13, 2020, on the
website located at https://www.phe.gov/
nbsb.
Procedures for Providing Public Input:
Members of the public may attend the
public teleconference via a toll-free callin phone number, which is available on
the NBSB website at https://
www.phe.gov/nbsb.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maxine Kellman, DVM, Ph.D., PMP,
Alternate Designated Federal Official for
National Advisory Committees,
Washington, DC, Office (202) 260–0447
or email maxine.kellman@hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We
encourage members of the public to
provide written comments that are
relevant to the NBSB public
teleconference prior to May 13, 2020.
Send written comments by email to
nbsb@hhs.gov with ‘‘NBSB Public
Comment’’ in the subject line. The
NBSB Chair will respond to comments
received by May 13, 2020, via email
and/or during the public teleconference.
Due to the Coronavirus Disease 2019
(COVID–19) pandemic response, there
was an administrative delay with the
posting of this Federal Register notice
to announce the National Biodefense
Science Board (NBSB) May 13, 2020
Public Teleconference.
Robert P. Kadlec,
Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and
Response.
[FR Doc. 2020–10156 Filed 5–12–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–37–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences; Notice of Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended, notice is hereby given of a
meeting of the National Advisory
Environmental Health Sciences Council.
The meeting will be open to the
public as indicated below. Individuals
who plan to attend virtually and will
need special assistance, such as sign
language interpretation or other
reasonable accommodations, should
notify the Contact Person listed below
in advance of the meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 93 (Wednesday, May 13, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28643-28645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-10253]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
Findings of Research Misconduct
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Findings of research misconduct have been made against Dr.
Shin-Hee Kim (Respondent), who was an Assistant Professor of Veterinary
Medicine, University of Maryland (UMD). Dr. Kim engaged in research
misconduct in research supported by U.S. Public Health Service (PHS)
funds, specifically National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grants R21
AI100195 and ZIA AI000938 and contract N01 AO60009. The administrative
actions, including supervision for a period of three (3) years, were
implemented beginning on March 27, 2020, and are detailed below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elisabeth A. Handley, Director, Office
of Research Integrity, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 240, Rockville, MD
20852, (240) 453-8200.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Office of
Research Integrity (ORI) has taken final action in the following case:
Dr. Shin-Hee Kim, University of Maryland: Based on an investigation
conducted by UMD and additional analysis conducted by ORI in its
oversight review, ORI found that Dr. Shin-Hee Kim, former Assistant
Professor of Veterinary Medicine, UMD, engaged in research misconduct
in research supported by PHS funds, specifically NIAID, NIH, grants R21
AI100195 and ZIA AI000938 and contract N01 AO60009.
ORI found that Respondent engaged in research misconduct by
intentionally, knowingly, and/or recklessly falsifying and/or
fabricating data by altering, reusing, and relabeling same source
Western blot images, microscopy fields, and data of viral titers and
mouse immune response from non-correlated experiments to represent the
results of different viral strains in the following seven (7) published
papers and two (2) grant applications submitted to NIAID, NIH:
Mutations in the fusion protein cleavage site of avian
paramyxovirus serotype 4 confer increased replication and syncytium
formation in vitro but not increased replication and pathogenicity in
chickens and ducks. PLoS One 2013;8(1):e50598 (hereafter referred to as
``PLoS One 2013A'').
Newcastle disease virus fusion protein is the major
contributor to protective immunity of genotype-matched vaccine. PLoS
One 2013;8(8):e74022 (hereafter referred to as ``PLoS One 2013B'').
Role of C596 in the C-terminal extension of the
haemagglutinin-neuraminidase protein in replication and pathogenicity
of a highly virulent Indonesian strain of Newcastle disease virus. J
Gen Virol. 2014;95(Pt 2):331-6
[[Page 28644]]
(hereafter referred to as ``J Gen Virol. 2014'').
Newcastle disease virus vector producing human norovirus-
like particles induces serum, cellular, and mucosal immune responses in
mice. J Virol. 2014;88(17):9718-27 (hereafter referred to as ``J Virol.
2014'').
Modified Newcastle disease virus vectors expressing the H5
hemagglutinin induce enhanced protection against highly pathogenic H5N1
avian influenza virus in chickens. Vaccine 2014;32(35):4428-35
(hereafter referred to as ``Vaccine 2014'').
Immunogenicity of Newcastle disease virus vectors
expressing Norwalk virus capsid protein in the presence or absence of
VP2 protein. Virology 2015;484:163-9 (hereafter referred to as
``Virology 2015'').
LaSota fusion (F) cleavage motif-mediated fusion activity
is affected by other regions of the F protein from different genotype
Newcastle disease virus in a chimeric virus: Implication for virulence
attenuation. J Gen Virol. 2016;97(6):1297-1303 (hereafter referred to
as ``J Gen Virol. 2016'').
R01 AI118879-01, ``Avian paramyxovirus vectored vaccines
for Norovirus infection,'' submitted to NIAID, NIH, on October 3, 2014.
R01 AI118879-01A1, ``Avian paramyxovirus vectored vaccines
for Norovirus infection,'' submitted to NIAID, NIH, on November 5,
2015.
Specifically, ORI finds that Respondent knowingly, intentionally,
and/or recklessly falsified and/or fabricated:
Western blot images in four (4) figures of three (3)
published papers by reusing and relabeling images from non-correlated
blots and using blank backgrounds as blot images with negative
expression of proteins. Specifically:
--The blot that was used for Figure 3A, first blot of the second band,
in Vaccine 2014, representing the negative expression of HA0
protein of the rLaSota virus in DF1 cells after 24 hour infection at
Multiplicity of Infection (MOI) of 1, was fabricated by using the blank
background from an uncorrelated original film
--the six (6) blots that were used for Figure 3A, bottom band, in
Vaccine 2014, representing the expression of Newcastle Disease Virus
(NDV) haemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) proteins in DF1 cells after 24
hour infection with six modified rNDV virus strains at MOI of 1, also
were used in Figure 1B, bottom band, in J Gen Virol. 2014 to represent
the expression of HN proteins of six different virus strains evaluated
in infected DF1 cells at MOI of 0.1 in the presence of trypsin
--the four (4) blots that were used for Figure 1B, upper band, in J
Virol. 2014, Figure 1B in grant application R01 AI118879-01, and Figure
1A in grant application R01 AI118879-01A1, representing the expression
of VP1 proteins of four modified NDV strains in DF1 cells after 24 hour
infection at MOI of 1, were fabricated by using blots from an
uncorrelated film: The first two blots were from the blank background
and the last two blots were from samples labeled with a different viral
name--BC/NV101
--the four (4) blots that were used for Figure 3A, third band, in J
Virol. 2014, representing the VP1 protein expression of the modified
rNDV virus strain in DF1 cells at four time points, were fabricated by
using four blots labeled with a different viral name (BC/NV101) from
the same uncorrelated film of the last hyphen bullet
nine (9) microscopy fields presented in four (4) figures
of four (4) published papers by reusing and relabeling same source
images to representing different results. Specifically:
--The microscope field that was used for Figure 1B in J Gen Virol.
2016, representing the cytopathic effect of rLaSota virus infection
with allantoic fluid in DF1 cells, also was used in Figure 1B in J Gen
Virol. 2016 to represent the cytopathic effect of rBC/AKO-F virus
infection with allantoic fluid in DF1 cells
--the microscope field that was used for Figure 1B in J Gen Virol.
2016, representing the cytopathic effect of rBC/Las-Fc-AKO-F virus
infection without allantoic fluid in DF1 cells, also was used in a
PowerPoint presentation on Respondent's laptop to represent the
cytopathic effect of rBan 010 Las Fc virus and rBan 010 Las Fc/D403N
virus
--the microscope field that was used for Figure 1B in J Gen Virol.
2016, representing the cytopathic effect of rLaSota virus infection
without allantoic fluid in DF1 cells, also was used in a PowerPoint
presentation on Respondent's laptop to represent the cytopathic effect
of rAPMV-2/BC F virus
--the microscope field that was used for Figure 1B in J Gen Virol.
2016, representing the cytopathic effect of rBC/Las-Fc virus infection
without allantoic fluid in DF1 cells, also was used in a PowerPoint
presentation on Respondent's laptop to represent the cytopathic effect
of mock infected sample
--the two images that were used for Figure 2B in Virology 2015,
representing rLaSota-NV (the middle one) and rBCm-NV (the right one)
expressed VLP in allantoic fluid of chicken eggs, were fabricated by
splitting a microscopy field into two parts
--the image that was used for Figure 3A in PLoS One 2013A, representing
a mock control in the experiment in which DF1 cells were infected by a
group of viruses at MOI of 0.1 for 72 hours, also was used in Figure 2A
of PLoS One 2013B to represent a mock control in a different experiment
in which DF1 cells were infected by a different group of viruses at MOI
of 0.01 for 72 hours
data of viral titers and mouse immune responses to viral
immunization presented in five (5) figures of one (1) published paper
by altering, reusing, and relabeling data from non-correlated
experiments or by fabricating data that did not exist. Specifically:
--The data that were used for Figure 2 in J Virol. 2014, representing
titers of four virus strains, also were used to represent titers of
another group of four different virus strains in Respondent's research
records
--the data that were used for Figures 5, 6, 7, and 8 in J Virol. 2014,
representing the results of mouse immune responses to the immunization
of rLaSota-VP1, Modified rNDV-VP1, and VLP viruses, also were used to
represent the results of mouse responses to the immunization of
different virus strains in Respondent's research records
--the data that were used for Figures 5, 6, 7, and 8 in J Virol. 2014,
representing the results of mouse immune responses to PBS injection as
negative controls, were fabricated as the data did not exist
Dr. Kim entered into an Agreement and agreed to the following:
(1) Respondent agreed to have her research supervised for a period
of three (3) years beginning on March 27, 2020. Respondent agreed that
prior to the submission of an application for PHS support for a
research project on which Respondent's participation is proposed and
prior to Respondent's participation in any capacity on PHS-supported
research, Respondent shall ensure that a plan for supervision of
Respondent's duties is submitted to ORI for approval. The supervision
plan must be designed to ensure the scientific integrity of
[[Page 28645]]
Respondent's research contribution. Respondent agreed that she shall
not participate in any PHS-supported research until such a supervision
plan is submitted to and approved by ORI. Respondent agreed to maintain
responsibility for compliance with the agreed upon supervision plan.
(2) The requirements for Respondent's supervision plan are as
follows:
i. A committee of 2-3 senior faculty members at the institution who
are familiar with Respondent's field of research, but not including
Respondent's supervisor or collaborators, will provide oversight and
guidance for three (3) years from the effective date of the Agreement.
The committee will review primary data from Respondent's laboratory on
a quarterly basis and submit a report to ORI at six (6) month
intervals, setting forth the committee meeting dates and Respondent's
compliance with appropriate research standards and confirming the
integrity of Respondent's research.
ii. The committee will conduct an advance review of any PHS grant
applications (including supplements, resubmissions, etc.), manuscripts
reporting PHS-funded research submitted for publication, and abstracts.
The review will include a discussion with Respondent of the primary
data represented in those documents and will include a certification to
ORI that the data presented in the proposed application/publication is
supported by the research record.
(3) Respondent agreed that for a period of three (3) years
beginning on March 27, 2020, any institution employing her shall
submit, in conjunction with each application of PHS funds, or report,
manuscript, or abstract involving PHS-supported research in which
Respondent is involved, a certification to ORI that the data provided
by Respondent are based on actual experiments or are otherwise
legitimately derived and that the data, procedures, and methodology are
accurately reported in the application, report, manuscript, or
abstract.
(4) If no supervisory plan is provided to ORI, Respondent agreed to
provide certification to ORI at the conclusion of the supervision
period that she has not engaged in, applied for, or had her name
included on any application, proposal, or other request for PHS funds
without prior notification to ORI.
(5) Respondent agreed to exclude herself voluntarily from serving
in any advisory capacity to PHS including, but not limited to, service
on any PHS advisory committee, board, and/or peer review committee, or
as a consultant for a period of three (3) years, beginning on March 27,
2020.
(6) As a condition of the Agreement, Respondent will request that
the following papers be corrected or retracted in accordance with 42
CFR 93.407(a)(1):
PLoS One 2013;8(1):e50598
PLoS One 2013;8(8):e74022
J Gen Virol. 2014;95(Pt 2):331-6
J Virol. 2014;88(17):9718-27
Vaccine 2014;32(35):4428-35
Virology 2015;484:163-9
J Gen Virol. 2016;97(6):1297-1303
Respondent will copy ORI and the Research Integrity Officer at UMD on
the correspondence.
Dated: May 8, 2020.
Elisabeth A. Handley,
Director, Office of Research Integrity, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Health.
[FR Doc. 2020-10253 Filed 5-12-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-31-P