Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Back Bay of Biloxi, Biloxi, MS, 28540-28541 [2020-09856]
Download as PDF
28540
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
regulated area unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Maryland-National
Capital Region or the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander.
Withdrawal
The proposed rule is being withdrawn
due to a regulated area no longer being
necessary following a cancellation of the
power boat races by the event sponsor.
Authority
We issue this notice of withdrawal
under the authority of 46 U.S.C. 70034.
Dated: April 23, 2020.
Joseph B. Loring,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2020–09221 Filed 5–12–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2018–0987]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Back Bay of Biloxi, Biloxi, MS
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
change the operating schedule that
governs the I–110 bascule bridge across
the Back Bay of Biloxi, mile 3.0, Biloxi,
Harrison County, Mississippi. This
proposed action would require a 12
hour notification to open the bridge to
vessels on Thanksgiving Day, Christmas
Day and New Year’s Day. The bridge has
not opened for vessels on these holidays
over a four year period. This proposed
action is intended to allow the bridge
owner to effectively manage bridge
tender resources during these federal
holidays.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 13, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–0981 using Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Mr. Doug
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 May 12, 2020
Jkt 250001
Blakemore, Eighth Coast Guard District
Bridge Administrator; telephone (504)
671–2128, email Douglas.A.Blakemore@
uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
MDOT Mississippi Department of
Transportation
OMB Office of Management and Budget
Pub. L. Public Law
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose and Legal
Basis
MDOT has requested to change the
operating requirements for the I–110
bascule bridge across the Back Bay of
Biloxi, mile 3.0, Biloxi, Harrison
County, Mississippi. This bridge
currently opens according to 33 CFR
part 117.675(a) and opens on signal if at
least six hour notice is given. MDOT has
requested that on Thanksgiving Day,
Christmas Day and New Year’s Day the
bridge will open on signal if at least 12
hour notice is given.
At this bridge location the waterway
is used by small commercial,
recreational and fishing vessels. From
2014 through 2017 this bridge did not
open for vessels on Thanksgiving Day,
Christmas Day and New Year’s Day. The
bridge has a vertical clearance of 60’
above mean high water in the closed to
vessel position. Requiring a 12 hour
notice to open provides a reasonable
ability to use the waterway.
The Coast Guard is issuing this NPRM
under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard’s decision to
promulgate a drawbridge regulation
depends primarily upon the effect of the
proposed rule on navigation to assure
that the rule provides for the reasonable
needs of navigation after consideration
of the impact to the public. The Coast
Guard must ensure that bridges across
navigable waters do not unreasonably
obstruct waterway traffic and at the
same time provide for the reasonable
needs of land traffic. Drawbridge
operations must balance the needs of
vessel, vehicle, rail, pedestrian, and
recreational traffic in the overall public
interest.
Since this bridge has not opened for
vessel traffic over a four year period on
these federal holidays the Coast Guard
proposes that it is reasonable for vessels
to provide a 12 hour notice to open the
drawbridge. We have not identified any
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
impacts on marine navigation with this
proposed rule. Additionally the bridge
is required to open for emergencies
according to 33 CFR 117.31.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and Executive
orders and we discuss First Amendment
rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the ability that vessels can
still open the draw and transit given
advance notice. Those vessels with a
vertical clearance requirement of less
than 60 feet above mean high water may
transit the bridge at any time.
Additionally according to 33 CFR
117.31 (b) the drawtender shall take all
reasonable measures to have the draw
opened, regardless of the operating
schedule of the draw, for passage of
certain vessels during emergency
situations. We believe this proposed
change to the drawbridge operation
regulations at 33 CFR 117.675(a) will
meet the reasonable needs of navigation.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The bridge provides a 60 foot vertical
clearance at mean high water that
should accommodate most present
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
vessel traffic and the bridge will
continue to open on signal for any
vessel provided at least 12 hour notice
is given. While some owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
the bridge may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
proposed rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Government
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 May 12, 2020
Jkt 250001
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and U.S.
Coast Guard Environmental Planning
Policy COMDTINST 5090.1 (series)
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f). We
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. Normally this action is
categorically excluded from further
review, under paragraph L49, of Chapter
3, Table 3–1 of the U.S. Coast Guard
Environmental Planning
Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental
Consideration nor a Memorandum for
the Record are required for this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
28541
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in this docket and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 117.675 paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 117.675
Back Bay of Biloxi
(a) The draw of the I–110 bridge, mile
3.0 at Biloxi, shall open on signal if at
least six hour notice is given; except
that on Thanksgiving Day, Christmas
Day and New Year’s Day the draw shall
open on signal if at least 12 hour notice
is given. The draw shall open anytime
at the direction of the District
Commander.
(b) The draw of the Popps Ferry Road
bridge, mile 8.0, at Biloxi, shall open on
signal; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to 9
a.m. and from 4:30 p.m. to 6 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays, the draw need not be opened
for passage of vessels. The draw shall
open at any time for a vessel in distress.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 4, 2020.
John P. Nadeau,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2020–09856 Filed 5–12–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 93 (Wednesday, May 13, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28540-28541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-09856]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2018-0987]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Back Bay of Biloxi, Biloxi, MS
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that
governs the I-110 bascule bridge across the Back Bay of Biloxi, mile
3.0, Biloxi, Harrison County, Mississippi. This proposed action would
require a 12 hour notification to open the bridge to vessels on
Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Year's Day. The bridge has not
opened for vessels on these holidays over a four year period. This
proposed action is intended to allow the bridge owner to effectively
manage bridge tender resources during these federal holidays.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before July 13, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0981 using Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Doug Blakemore, Eighth Coast
Guard District Bridge Administrator; telephone (504) 671-2128, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
MDOT Mississippi Department of Transportation
OMB Office of Management and Budget
Pub. L. Public Law
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis
MDOT has requested to change the operating requirements for the I-
110 bascule bridge across the Back Bay of Biloxi, mile 3.0, Biloxi,
Harrison County, Mississippi. This bridge currently opens according to
33 CFR part 117.675(a) and opens on signal if at least six hour notice
is given. MDOT has requested that on Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day
and New Year's Day the bridge will open on signal if at least 12 hour
notice is given.
At this bridge location the waterway is used by small commercial,
recreational and fishing vessels. From 2014 through 2017 this bridge
did not open for vessels on Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New
Year's Day. The bridge has a vertical clearance of 60' above mean high
water in the closed to vessel position. Requiring a 12 hour notice to
open provides a reasonable ability to use the waterway.
The Coast Guard is issuing this NPRM under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard's decision to promulgate a drawbridge regulation
depends primarily upon the effect of the proposed rule on navigation to
assure that the rule provides for the reasonable needs of navigation
after consideration of the impact to the public. The Coast Guard must
ensure that bridges across navigable waters do not unreasonably
obstruct waterway traffic and at the same time provide for the
reasonable needs of land traffic. Drawbridge operations must balance
the needs of vessel, vehicle, rail, pedestrian, and recreational
traffic in the overall public interest.
Since this bridge has not opened for vessel traffic over a four
year period on these federal holidays the Coast Guard proposes that it
is reasonable for vessels to provide a 12 hour notice to open the
drawbridge. We have not identified any impacts on marine navigation
with this proposed rule. Additionally the bridge is required to open
for emergencies according to 33 CFR 117.31.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes and Executive orders and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that
vessels can still open the draw and transit given advance notice. Those
vessels with a vertical clearance requirement of less than 60 feet
above mean high water may transit the bridge at any time. Additionally
according to 33 CFR 117.31 (b) the drawtender shall take all reasonable
measures to have the draw opened, regardless of the operating schedule
of the draw, for passage of certain vessels during emergency
situations. We believe this proposed change to the drawbridge operation
regulations at 33 CFR 117.675(a) will meet the reasonable needs of
navigation.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The bridge provides a 60 foot vertical clearance at mean high water
that should accommodate most present
[[Page 28541]]
vessel traffic and the bridge will continue to open on signal for any
vessel provided at least 12 hour notice is given. While some owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit the bridge may be small
entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A above, this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this proposed
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this proposed
rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning
Policy COMDTINST 5090.1 (series) which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42
U.S.C. 4321-4370f). We have made a preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
proposed rule promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. Normally this action is categorically excluded from
further review, under paragraph L49, of Chapter 3, Table 3-1 of the
U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental Consideration nor a Memorandum
for the Record are required for this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit https://www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in this docket
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 117.675 paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.675 Back Bay of Biloxi
(a) The draw of the I-110 bridge, mile 3.0 at Biloxi, shall open on
signal if at least six hour notice is given; except that on
Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Year's Day the draw shall open
on signal if at least 12 hour notice is given. The draw shall open
anytime at the direction of the District Commander.
(b) The draw of the Popps Ferry Road bridge, mile 8.0, at Biloxi,
shall open on signal; except that, from 7:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. and from
4:30 p.m. to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, the
draw need not be opened for passage of vessels. The draw shall open at
any time for a vessel in distress.
* * * * *
Dated: May 4, 2020.
John P. Nadeau,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2020-09856 Filed 5-12-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P