Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Belle River, LA, 28542-28544 [2020-09855]
Download as PDF
28542
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
§ Section
SR State Road
U.S.C. United States Code
Coast Guard
II. Background, Purpose and Legal
Basis
LA DOTD has requested to change the
operating requirements for the SR 70
pontoon bridge across the Belle River
mile 23.8, near Pierre Part, Assumption
Parish, LA. This bridge currently opens
on signal, except that from 10 p.m. to 6
a.m. the draw shall open on signal if at
least four hour notice is given according
to 33 CFR part 117.424. LA DOTD
requested this change because vehicle
traffic has become heavily congested
during June, July, and August. This
waterway is heavily used by
recreational vessels during the summer
months. This bridge has a vertical
clearance of zero feet in the closed to
vessel traffic position and unlimited
vertical clearance in the open to vessel
traffic position.
The Coast Guard allowed LA DOTD to
temporarily change the bridge operating
schedule to collect additional vehicle
traffic data to measure the impact of
bridge closures on traffic congestion.
From 6 a.m. on June 1, 2019 through 6
p.m. on August 31, 2019 the draw was
allowed to open on signal on the hour
from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., and from 10 p.m.
to 6 a.m. the draw opened on signal if
at least four hour notice is given. The
bridge opened on signal for
emergencies.
The Coast Guard published a Notice
of Temporary Deviation from the
regulations and a request for comments
concerning these changes on April 16,
2019 Federal Register Number 2019–
07515. The comment period closed on
September 23, 2019. Four comments
were received. All commenters favored
changing the regulation.
After this temporary deviation the
bridge returned to its normal operating
schedule. Over this 105 day period LA
DOTD measured the vehicle and vessel
queues created when the bridge opened
on the hour. LA DOTDs analysis of this
data demonstrated that the average
number of vehicles that were held in
queue because of the bridge opening for
vessels was reduced from 105 vehicles
to 25 vehicles on average. During this
period there were no vessel queues
created by this temporary operating
schedule.
The Coast Guard is issuing this NPRM
under the authority of 33 U.S.C. 499.
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2018–0955]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Belle River, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
change the operating schedule that
governs the State Route 70 (SR 70),
pontoon bridge across the Belle River
mile 23.8, near Pierre Part, Assumption
Parish, Louisiana. The bridge owner, the
Louisiana Department of Transportation
and Development (LA DOTD) provided
the Coast Guard with information that
demonstrated that significant vehicle
queues were created during daylight
hours in the months June, July and
August and that these queues could be
significantly decreased by changing the
drawbridge operating schedule to open
the bridge during the day on the hour
instead of on signal as currently
prescribed by regulations. This
proposed action is intended to enhance
vehicle safety and allow the bridge
owner to effectively manage bridge
operations during federal holidays.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 12, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–0955 using Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Mr. Doug
Blakemore, Eighth Coast Guard District
Bridge Administrator; telephone (504)
671–2128, email Douglas.A.Blakemore@
uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
LA DOTD Louisiana Department of
Transportation and Development
OMB Office of Management and Budget
Pub. L. Public Law
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 May 12, 2020
Jkt 250001
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard’s decision to
promulgate a drawbridge regulation
depends primarily upon the effect of the
proposed rule on navigation to assure
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that the rule provides for the reasonable
needs of navigation after consideration
of the rule on the impact to the public.
The Coast Guard must ensure that
bridges across navigable waters do not
unreasonably obstruct waterway traffic
and at the same time provide for the
reasonable needs of land traffic.
Drawbridge operations must balance the
needs of vessel, vehicle, rail, pedestrian
and recreational traffic in the overall
public interest.
Opening the bridge to vessel traffic on
the hour instead of on signal appears to
reduce vehicle queues while not
creating vessel queues. The reduction in
vehicle queues enhances safety by
preventing vehicles from backing up on
SR 70.
Since vessel queues were not created
during this test the Coast Guard has
determined that this operating schedule
continues to provide vessels with the
reasonability to use the waterway.
Additionally the bridge is required to
open for emergencies according to 33
CFR 117.31.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and Executive
orders and we discuss First Amendment
rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the ability that vessels can
still open the draw and transit given
advance notice. Additionally according
to 33 CFR 117.31 (b) the drawtender
shall take all reasonable measures to
have the draw opened, regardless of the
operating schedule of the draw, for
passage of certain vessels during
emergency situations. We believe this
proposed change to the drawbridge
operation regulations at 33 CFR 117.424
will meet the reasonable needs of
navigation.
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The bridge will continue to open on
signal on the hour during most daylight
hours. While some owners or operators
of vessels intending to transit the bridge
may be small entities, for the reasons
stated in section IV.A above this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above section. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Government
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism) if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 May 12, 2020
Jkt 250001
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01, Rev.1,
associated implementing instructions,
and Environmental Planning Policy
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f). The Coast Guard has determined
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further
review, under paragraph L49, of Chapter
3, Table 3–1 of the U.S. Coast Guard
Environmental Planning
Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental
Consideration nor a Memorandum for
the Record are required for this rule. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28543
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in this docket and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
■
2. Revise § 117.424 to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
28544
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
§ 117.424
Belle River
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The draw of the SR70 bridge, mile
23.8 near Belle River, shall open on
signal; except that, from 10 p.m. to 6
a.m., the draw shall open on signal if at
least four hours notice is given, and
from June 1 through August 31 the draw
shall open on signal on the hour from
6 a.m. to 10 p.m. The bridge shall open
anytime at the direction of the District
Commander.
Dated: May 4, 2020.
John P. Nadeau,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2020–09855 Filed 5–12–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2018–0952]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Industrial Seaway Canal, MS
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
change the operating schedule that
governs the State Route 605 highway,
Wilkes Road bascule bridge across the
Industrial Seaway Canal mile 11.3,
Hansboro, Harrison County, Mississippi.
The Mississippi Department of
Transportation (MDOT) submitted this
request for a change in schedule, which
would allow the bridge to close to vessel
traffic. This change is expected to better
serve the needs of the community while
continuing to meet the reasonable needs
of vessel navigation.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 13, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–0952 using Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Mr. Doug
Blakemore, Eighth Coast Guard District
Bridge Administrator; telephone (504)
671–2128, email Douglas.A.Blakemore@
uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 May 12, 2020
Jkt 250001
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
MDOT Mississippi Department of
Transportation
OMB Office of Management and Budget
Pub. L. Public Law
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
SR State Road
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose and Legal
Basis
MDOT has requested to change the
operating requirements for the SR 605
highway bascule bridge across the
Industrial Seaway Canal mile 11.3,
Hansboro, Harrison County, MS. This
bridge currently operates according to
33 CFR part 117.5 and opens on signal.
At this bridge location the waterway is
used by small commercial, recreational
and fishing vessels. The bridge has a
vertical clearance of 37′ above mean
high water in the closed to vessel
position.
MDOT has requested two changes to
the regulations. They asked to close the
bridge to vessel traffic from 6:00 a.m. to
8:30 a.m. and from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays and require a 12 hour
notification to open the bridge to vessels
on Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day
and New Year’s Day. The first change is
needed to prevent unsafe driving
conditions created when the bridge
opens to vessels during morning and
evening commuting hours. The second
change would allow MDOT to remove
the bridge tender during three federal
holidays when there has been almost no
bridge openings.
The Coast Guard allowed MDOT to
temporarily change the bridge operating
schedule to measure the impacts to
vehicle traffic that were created when
the bridge opened to vessels. For a 120
day period the bridge did not open to
vessel traffic from 6:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.
and from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. Monday
through Friday, except federal holidays.
The Coast Guard published a Notice of
Temporary Deviation from the
regulations and a request for comments
concerning these changes on February 8,
2019, Federal Register Number 2019–
01549. No comments were received
during this temporary deviation. During
this period there were no vehicle or
vessel queues created by this temporary
operating schedule.
After this temporary deviation the
bridge returned to its normal operating
schedule. Over 88 days MDOT
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
measured the vehicle and vessel queues
created when the bridge opened for
vessels during the above commute
hours. MDOTs analysis of this data
demonstrated that during the above
commuting periods vehicle queues were
created when the bridge opened for
vessels and that the queues backed up
traffic on SR 605 and at times on the
I–10 highway on ramps located about
11⁄2 miles north of the bridge. These
vehicle queues presented an increased
potential for rear end vehicle collisions
on the I–10 highway. There were no
vessel queues during this period.
From 2014 through 2017 this bridge
opened once for vessels on
Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and
New Year’s Day.
The Coast Guard is issuing this NPRM
under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard’s decision to
promulgate a drawbridge regulation
depends primarily upon the effect of the
proposed rule on navigation to assure
that the rule provides for the reasonable
needs of navigation after consideration
of the rule on the impact to the public.
The Coast Guard must ensure that
bridges across navigable waters do not
unreasonably obstruct waterway traffic
and at the same time provide for the
reasonable needs of land traffic.
Drawbridge operations must balance the
needs of vessel, vehicle, rail, pedestrian,
and recreational traffic in the overall
public interest.
Closing the bridge to vessel traffic in
the morning and evening commuting
hours appears to reduce vehicle queues
while not creating vessel queues. The
reduction in vehicle queues enhances
safety by preventing vehicles from
backing up on I–10 highway.
Since vessel queues were not created
during this test the Coast Guard has
determined that closing the bridge to
vessel traffic in the morning and
evening commute hours continues to
provide vessels with the reasonability to
use the waterway.
MDOT requested to close this bridge
to vessels for 21⁄2 hours during the
morning commute; from 6:00 a.m. to
8:30 a.m. The Coast Guard however
proposed to close the bridge to vessel
traffic from 6:30 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. to
provide additional time for vessels to
transit through this bridge.
Since this bridge opened once to
vessels from 2014 through 2017 on
Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and
New Year’s Day, requiring a 12 hour
notice to open would not impact
navigation.
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 93 (Wednesday, May 13, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28542-28544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-09855]
[[Page 28542]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2018-0955]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Belle River, LA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that
governs the State Route 70 (SR 70), pontoon bridge across the Belle
River mile 23.8, near Pierre Part, Assumption Parish, Louisiana. The
bridge owner, the Louisiana Department of Transportation and
Development (LA DOTD) provided the Coast Guard with information that
demonstrated that significant vehicle queues were created during
daylight hours in the months June, July and August and that these
queues could be significantly decreased by changing the drawbridge
operating schedule to open the bridge during the day on the hour
instead of on signal as currently prescribed by regulations. This
proposed action is intended to enhance vehicle safety and allow the
bridge owner to effectively manage bridge operations during federal
holidays.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 12, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0955 using Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Doug Blakemore, Eighth Coast
Guard District Bridge Administrator; telephone (504) 671-2128, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
LA DOTD Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development
OMB Office of Management and Budget
Pub. L. Public Law
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
SR State Road
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis
LA DOTD has requested to change the operating requirements for the
SR 70 pontoon bridge across the Belle River mile 23.8, near Pierre
Part, Assumption Parish, LA. This bridge currently opens on signal,
except that from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. the draw shall open on signal if at
least four hour notice is given according to 33 CFR part 117.424. LA
DOTD requested this change because vehicle traffic has become heavily
congested during June, July, and August. This waterway is heavily used
by recreational vessels during the summer months. This bridge has a
vertical clearance of zero feet in the closed to vessel traffic
position and unlimited vertical clearance in the open to vessel traffic
position.
The Coast Guard allowed LA DOTD to temporarily change the bridge
operating schedule to collect additional vehicle traffic data to
measure the impact of bridge closures on traffic congestion. From 6
a.m. on June 1, 2019 through 6 p.m. on August 31, 2019 the draw was
allowed to open on signal on the hour from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., and from
10 p.m. to 6 a.m. the draw opened on signal if at least four hour
notice is given. The bridge opened on signal for emergencies.
The Coast Guard published a Notice of Temporary Deviation from the
regulations and a request for comments concerning these changes on
April 16, 2019 Federal Register Number 2019-07515. The comment period
closed on September 23, 2019. Four comments were received. All
commenters favored changing the regulation.
After this temporary deviation the bridge returned to its normal
operating schedule. Over this 105 day period LA DOTD measured the
vehicle and vessel queues created when the bridge opened on the hour.
LA DOTDs analysis of this data demonstrated that the average number of
vehicles that were held in queue because of the bridge opening for
vessels was reduced from 105 vehicles to 25 vehicles on average. During
this period there were no vessel queues created by this temporary
operating schedule.
The Coast Guard is issuing this NPRM under the authority of 33
U.S.C. 499.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard's decision to promulgate a drawbridge regulation
depends primarily upon the effect of the proposed rule on navigation to
assure that the rule provides for the reasonable needs of navigation
after consideration of the rule on the impact to the public. The Coast
Guard must ensure that bridges across navigable waters do not
unreasonably obstruct waterway traffic and at the same time provide for
the reasonable needs of land traffic. Drawbridge operations must
balance the needs of vessel, vehicle, rail, pedestrian and recreational
traffic in the overall public interest.
Opening the bridge to vessel traffic on the hour instead of on
signal appears to reduce vehicle queues while not creating vessel
queues. The reduction in vehicle queues enhances safety by preventing
vehicles from backing up on SR 70.
Since vessel queues were not created during this test the Coast
Guard has determined that this operating schedule continues to provide
vessels with the reasonability to use the waterway.
Additionally the bridge is required to open for emergencies
according to 33 CFR 117.31.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes and Executive orders and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that
vessels can still open the draw and transit given advance notice.
Additionally according to 33 CFR 117.31 (b) the drawtender shall take
all reasonable measures to have the draw opened, regardless of the
operating schedule of the draw, for passage of certain vessels during
emergency situations. We believe this proposed change to the drawbridge
operation regulations at 33 CFR 117.424 will meet the reasonable needs
of navigation.
[[Page 28543]]
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The bridge will continue to open on signal on the hour during most
daylight hours. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit the bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in
section IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism) if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this proposed
rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01, Rev.1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning Policy COMDTINST 5090.1
(series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f). The
Coast Guard has determined that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule promulgates the
operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from further review, under paragraph
L49, of Chapter 3, Table 3-1 of the U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental Consideration nor a Memorandum
for the Record are required for this rule. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in this docket
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 117.424 to read as follows:
[[Page 28544]]
Sec. 117.424 Belle River
The draw of the SR70 bridge, mile 23.8 near Belle River, shall open
on signal; except that, from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m., the draw shall open on
signal if at least four hours notice is given, and from June 1 through
August 31 the draw shall open on signal on the hour from 6 a.m. to 10
p.m. The bridge shall open anytime at the direction of the District
Commander.
Dated: May 4, 2020.
John P. Nadeau,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2020-09855 Filed 5-12-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P