National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the Omaha Lead Superfund Site, 27979-27984 [2020-09681]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 12, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
110(k)(3), the EPA proposes to approve,
as a revision to the California SIP, the
PM2.5 Prior Commitment Revision. We
also propose to find that District has
complied with its revised aggregate
commitment of 0.86 tpd of direct PM2.5
emissions reductions by 2017.
The EPA is soliciting public
comments on the issues discussed in
this document. We will accept
comments from the public on this
proposal for the next 30 days.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this
proposed action merely proposes to
approve state plans as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law.
For these reasons, this proposed
action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 May 11, 2020
Jkt 250001
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address
disproportionate human health or
environmental effects with practical,
appropriate, and legally permissible
methods under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the proposed rule does
not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Ammonia, Carbon
monoxide, Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 1, 2020.
John Busterud,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2020–09731 Filed 5–11–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–2003–0010; FRL–10008–
93–Region 7]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List: Partial
Deletion of the Omaha Lead Superfund
Site
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 7 is issuing a
Notice of Intent to Delete 117 residential
parcels of the Omaha Lead Superfund
site (Site or OLS) located in Omaha,
Nebraska, from the National Priorities
List (NPL) and requests public
comments on this proposed action. The
NPL, promulgated pursuant to section
105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27979
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an
appendix of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and
the State of Nebraska, through the
Nebraska Department of Environment
and Energy, determined that all
appropriate Response Actions under
CERCLA were completed at the
identified parcels. However, this
deletion does not preclude future
actions under CERCLA.
This partial deletion pertains to 117
residential parcels. The remaining
parcels will remain on the NPL and are
not being considered for deletion as part
of this action.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 11, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–
SFUND–2003–0010, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow on-line instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from Regulations.gov. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e. on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
• Email: hagenmaier.elizabeth@
epa.gov or houston.pamela@epa.gov.
• Mail: Environmental Protection
Agency Region 7, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, KS 66219 Attention:
Elizabeth Hagenmaier, SUPR Division or
Pamela Houston, ECO Office.
• Hand delivery: Environmental
Protection Agency Region 7, 11201
Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, KS 66219.
Such deliveries are only accepted
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.,
Monday–Friday excluding Federal
holidays and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
27980
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 12, 2020 / Proposed Rules
• For additional submission methods,
please contact the persons identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–SFUND–2003–
0010. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. The
https://www.regulations.gov website is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means the EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to the EPA without
going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, the EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If the EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, the EPA may not
be able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: The docket contains the
information that was the basis for the
partial deletion, specifically the
documentation regarding the results of
soil cleanup activities. Information
regarding the optional voluntary
cleanup activities such as the lead-based
paint stabilization and interior dust
sampling is not provided in the docket
but is available from the EPA on a caseby-case basis. Certain other material,
such as copyrighted material, will be
publicly available only in the hard copy.
All documents in the docket are listed
in the https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in the hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 May 11, 2020
Jkt 250001
either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:
EPA Region 7 Records Center at 11201
Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas
66219, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.
Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays and facility closures
due to COVID–19. We recommend that
you contact the person identified in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section before visiting the Region 7
office.
The Omaha public libraries also have
computer resources available to assist
the public. The W. Dale Clark Library,
located at 215 S. 15th Street, Omaha, NE
68102 is centrally located within the
site boundary.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Hagenmaier, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region 7, SUPR/LMSE, 11201
Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, KS 66219,
telephone (913) 551–7939, email:
hagenmaier.elizabeth@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. This section
provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Background and Basis for Intended Partial
Site Deletion
I. Introduction
The EPA Region 7 is proposing to
delete 117 residential parcels of the
Omaha Lead Superfund site (Site or
OLS), from the National Priorities List
(NPL) and is requesting public comment
on this proposed action. The table of
117 Properties Proposed for the 2020
Partial Deletion of Properties from the
Omaha Lead Superfund site, (EPA–HQ–
SFUND–2003–0010–1985) identifies
specific properties included for this
proposed partial deletion. The location
of the 117 properties are shown on
Figure 1 ‘‘Map for the 2020 Partial
Deletion Omaha Lead Site’’ (EPA–HQ–
SFUND–2003–0010–1983). The NPL
constitutes appendix B of 40 CFR part
300, which is the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP), which the EPA
promulgated pursuant to section 105 of
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended. The
EPA maintains the NPL as those sites
that appear to present a significant risk
to public health, welfare, or the
environment. Sites on the NPL may be
the subject of remedial actions financed
by the Hazardous Substance Superfund
(Fund). This partial deletion of the
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Omaha Lead Superfund site is proposed
in accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e)
and is consistent with the Notice of
Policy Change: Partial Deletion of Sites
Listed on the National Priorities List 60
FR 55466 (November 1, 1995). As
described in 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, a
portion of a site deleted from the NPL
remains eligible for Fund-financed
remedial action if future conditions
warrant such actions.
The EPA will accept comments on the
proposal to partially delete this site for
thirty (30) days after publication of this
document in the Federal Register.
Section II of this document explains
the criteria for deleting sites from the
NPL. Section III discusses procedures
that the EPA is using for this action.
Section IV discusses the 117 residential
parcels of the Omaha Lead Superfund
site and demonstrates how they meet
the deletion criteria.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that
the EPA uses to delete sites from the
NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR
300.425(e), sites may be deleted from
the NPL where no further response is
appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR
300.425(e), the EPA will consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any
of the following criteria have been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons
have implemented all appropriate
response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed
response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response
action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has
shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the
environment and, therefore, the taking
of remedial measures is not appropriate.
Pursuant to CERCLA section 121(c)
and the NCP, the EPA conducts fiveyear reviews to ensure the continued
protectiveness of remedial actions
where hazardous substances, pollutants,
or contaminants remain at a site above
levels that allow for unlimited use and
unrestricted exposure. The EPA
conducts such five-year reviews even if
a site is deleted from the NPL. The EPA
may initiate further action to ensure
continued protectiveness at a deleted
site if new information becomes
available that indicates it is appropriate.
Whenever there is a significant release
from a site deleted from the NPL, the
deleted site may be restored to the NPL
without application of the hazard
ranking system.
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 12, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to
deletion of the 117 residential parcels of
the Site:
(1) The EPA consulted with the State
before developing this Notice of Intent
for Partial Deletion.
(2) The EPA has provided the State 30
working days for review of this
document prior to publication of it
today.
(3) In accordance with the criteria
discussed above, the EPA has
determined that no further response is
appropriate.
(4) The State of Nebraska, through the
Nebraska Department of Environment
and Energy, has concurred with the
deletion of the 117 residential parcels of
the Omaha Lead Superfund site, from
the NPL.
(5) Concurrently, with the publication
of this Notice of Intent for Partial
Deletion in the Federal Register, a
notice is being published in a major
local newspaper, the Omaha World
Herald. The newspaper announces the
30-day public comment period
concerning the Notice of Intent for
Partial Deletion of the Site from the
NPL.
(6) The EPA placed copies of
documents supporting the proposed
partial deletion in the deletion docket
and made these items available for
public inspection and copying at the
Site information repositories identified
above.
If comments are received within the
30-day comment period on this
document, the EPA will evaluate and
respond appropriately to the comments
before making a final decision to delete
the 117 residential parcels. If necessary,
the EPA will prepare a Responsiveness
Summary to address any significant
public comments received. After the
public comment period, if the EPA
determines it is still appropriate to
delete the 117 residential parcels of the
Omaha Lead Superfund site, the
Regional Administrator will publish a
final Notice of Partial Deletion in the
Federal Register. Public notices, public
submissions and copies of the
Responsiveness Summary, if prepared,
will be made available to interested
parties and included in the site
information repositories listed above.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the
NPL does not itself create, alter, or
revoke any individual’s rights or
obligations. Deletion of a portion of a
site from the NPL does not in any way
alter EPA’s right to take enforcement
actions, as appropriate. The NPL is
designed primarily for informational
purposes and to assist EPA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 May 11, 2020
Jkt 250001
management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of
the NCP states that the deletion of a site
from the NPL does not preclude
eligibility for future response actions,
should future conditions warrant such
actions.
IV. Background and Basis for Intended
Partial Site Deletion
The following information provides
EPA’s rationale for deleting the 117
residential parcels of the Omaha Lead
Superfund site from the NPL, as
previously identified.
Site Background and History
The Omaha Lead Superfund site (Site
or OLS [CERCLIS ID # NESFN0703481])
includes surface soils present at
residential properties, child-care
centers, and other residential-type
properties in the city of Omaha, Douglas
County, Nebraska. The properties were
contaminated as a result of deposition of
aerial emissions from historic lead
smelting and refining operations. The
OLS encompasses the eastern portion of
the greater metropolitan area in Omaha,
Nebraska. The site extends from the
Douglas-Sarpy County line on the south,
north to Read Street and from the
Missouri River on the east to 56th Street
on the west. The Site is centered around
downtown Omaha, Nebraska, where two
former lead-processing facilities
operated. American Smelting and
Refining Company, Inc. (ASARCO)
operated a lead refinery at 500 Douglas
Street in Omaha, Nebraska, for over 120
years. Aaron Ferer & Sons Company
(Aaron Ferer), and later Gould
Electronics, Inc., (Gould) operated a
lead battery recycling plant located at
555 Farnam Street. Both ASARCO and
Aaron Ferer/Gould facilities released
lead-containing particulates into the
atmosphere from their smokestacks. The
lead particles were subsequently
deposited on surrounding residential
properties.
Beginning in 1984, the Douglas
County Health Department (DCHD)
monitored ambient air quality around
the ASARCO facility. This air
monitoring routinely measured ambient
air lead concentrations in excess of the
ambient air standard. Between 1972 and
1998 the DCHD measured the blood lead
level in children within the county. The
results of the measurements indicated a
high incidence of elevated blood lead
level in children. Blood lead screening
of children living in zip codes located
east of 45th Street consistently exceeded
10 micrograms per deciliter (mg/dl) more
frequently than children living
elsewhere in the county.
In 1998, the Omaha City Council
requested assistance from the EPA to
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27981
address the high incidence of children
found with elevated blood lead levels by
the DCHD. In 1999, the EPA initiated an
investigation into the lead
contamination under the authority of
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA). On February 26, 2002,
the OLS was proposed for the NPL (67
FR 8836), and on April 30, 2003, the
OLS was listed on the NPL (68 FR
23077).
The OLS includes those residential
properties where the EPA determined
through soil sampling that soil lead
levels represent an unacceptable risk to
human health. Residential properties
where soil sampling indicates that lead
concentrations in the soil are below a
level that represent an unacceptable risk
are not included in the Site. Residential
properties include those with high
accessibility to sensitive populations
(children seven years of age and
younger [0 to 84 months] and pregnant
or nursing women). The properties
include single and multi-family
dwellings, apartment complexes, child
daycare facilities, vacant lots in
residential areas, schools, churches,
community centers, parks, greenways,
and any other areas where children may
be exposed to site-related contaminated
media. Commercial and industrial
properties are excluded from the
definition of the Site.
The residential properties proposed
for deletion from the NPL site were
cleaned up under both CERCLA removal
and remedial authority. Regardless of
the authority used for the remediation of
yards, the cleanup levels for soils for all
the properties proposed for deletion
were the same.
Response Actions
The initial EPA response was
conducted under CERCLA removal
authority. Due to the size of the site and
the very large number of individual
properties, it was necessary to prioritize
sites for cleanup. The prioritization was
based on factors such as the elevated
blood level of children at each property
and the lead concentration in the soil at
each property. The result was a series of
action levels that reflected the priority
of categories of sites. Consequently, the
action level for the site soils changed
over time from 2500 mg/kg to 400 mg/
kg, as the highest priority sites were
cleaned up first. The cleanup level was
established using the Integrated
Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK)
model to determine the concentration to
which the lead is cleaned up at each
property within the site. The cleanup
level for the OLS is 400 mg/kg of lead
in the soil. The cleanup level of 400 mg/
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
27982
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 12, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
kg was selected to allow for unlimited
use and unrestricted exposure. The
cleanup level has not changed, and all
properties, regardless of the action level,
were cleaned up to 400 mg/kg.
Removal Activities
Beginning in March 1999, the EPA
began collecting soil samples from
properties that provided licensed child
daycare services. The initial removal
action dated August 2, 1999, consisted
of excavation and replacement of
contaminated soil where the lead
concentration exceeded the action levels
identified in the Action Memorandum.
Response actions were implemented at
properties that met either of the
following criteria:
• A child seven years of age or
younger (0 to 84 months) residing at the
property was identified with an elevated
blood level (EBL) exceeding 15 mg/dl
(this EBL was reduced to 10 mg/dl in
August 2001) and a soil sample
collected from a non-foundation
quadrant exhibited lead concentrations
greater than 400 mg/kg, or
• A property was used as a child-care
facility and a soil sample collected from
a non-foundation quadrant exhibited a
lead concentration greater than 400 mg/
kg.
On August 22, 2002, the EPA initiated
a second removal action. This second
removal action included all other
residential type properties where the
maximum non-foundation soil lead
concentration exceeded an action level
of 2,500 mg/kg. The 2002 Action
Memorandum explicitly identifies the
possibility of lead-based paint as a
potential contributor to lead
contamination of soils within thirty
inches of the foundation of a painted
structure. Due to the potential
contribution of deteriorating lead-based
paint near the foundations of structures,
a lead concentration greater than 400
mg/kg in the soil in the drip zone (areas
near structure foundations) was not, in
itself, sufficient to trigger soil removal.
However, if a soil sample from any midyard quadrant exceeded the action level,
soil was removed from all areas of the
property exceeding the 400 mg/kg
cleanup level, including the drip zone.
In November 2003, the EPA amended
the second removal action to reduce the
action level to 1,200 mg/kg
concentration of lead in soil. In March
2004, the EPA amended the second
removal action to combine the two
removal actions. In March 2005, the
EPA amended the removal action to
reduce the action level from 1200 mg/
kg to 800 mg/kg.
At properties determined to be
eligible for response under either of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 May 11, 2020
Jkt 250001
Action Memoranda, soil with lead
concentrations greater than the cleanup
level was excavated and replaced with
clean soil and the excavated areas were
revegetated.
EPA signed an Interim Recored of
Decision on December 15, 2004.
Beginning with the construction season
of 2005, the scope of the removal action
was expanded to address the
requirements of the 2004 Interim ROD
to include: (1) Stabilization of
deteriorating exterior lead-based paint at
properties where the continued
effectiveness of the soil remediation was
threatened; (2) response to interior dust
at properties where interior dust lead
levels exceeded applicable criteria; (3)
public health education; and (4)
participation in a comprehensive
remedy with other agencies and
organizations that addresses all
identified lead hazards in the Omaha
community.
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
(RI/FS)—Human Health Risk
Assessment
As part of the RI/FS, the EPA
developed a Human Health Risk
Assessment (HHRA) for the Site using
site-specific information collected
during the OLS Remedial Investigation.
Lead was identified as the primary
contaminant of concern. The HHRA also
identified arsenic as a potential
contaminant of concern, but arsenic was
eliminated based on its relatively low
overall risk to residents and lack of
connection to the release from the
industrial sources being addressed by
this Superfund action.
The risk assessment for lead focused
on young children under the age of
seven (0 to 84 months) who are site
residents. Young children are most
susceptible to lead exposure because
they have higher contact rates with soil
or dust, absorb lead more readily than
adults, and are more sensitive to the
adverse effects of lead than are older
children and adults. The effect of
greatest concern in children is
impairment of the nervous system,
including learning deficits, reduced
intelligence, and adverse effects on
behavior. The IEUBK model for lead in
children was used to evaluate the risks
posed to young children (0 to 84
months) resulting from the lead
contamination at the site. Because lead
does not have a nationally-approved
reference dose (RfD), cancer slope
factor, or other accepted toxicological
factor which can be used to assess risk,
standard risk assessment methods
cannot be used to evaluate the health
risks associated with lead
contamination. The modeling results
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
determined that there was an
unacceptable risk to young children
from exposure to soils above 400 mg/kg.
In October 2008, the EPA released a
draft Final Remedial Investigation.
Based on the 2008 data set, EPA
established the boundary of the Final
Focus Area for the Site. The Final Focus
Area is generally bounded by Read
Street to the north, 56th Street to the
west, Harrison Street (Sarpy County
line) to the south, and the Missouri
River to the east, and encompasses
17,280 acres (27.0 square miles). By the
time the Final Remedial Investigation
was completed, the EPA had collected
soil samples from 37,076 residential
properties, including 34,565 properties
within the Final Focus Area’s boundary.
In total, 34.2 percent of properties
sampled through completion of the 2008
RI had at least one mid-yard sample
with a soil lead level exceeding 400 mg/
kg. In addition to soil sampling, the EPA
collected dust samples from the interior
of 159 residences to support the OLS
Human Health Risk Assessment.
Record of Decision
The EPA completed the Final Record
of Decision (ROD) for the OLS in May
2009. The Remedial Action Objective is
to reduce the risk of exposure of young
children to lead such that an individual
child, or group of similarly exposed
children, have no greater than a 5
percent chance of having a blood-lead
concentration exceeding 10 mg/dl. The
selected remedy includes the following
components:
• Excavation and Replacement of Soils
Exceeding 400 mg/kg Lead
• Stabilization of Deteriorating Exterior
Lead-Based Paint
• Response to Lead-Contaminated
Interior Dust
• Health Education
• Operation of a Local Lead Hazard
Registry as a type of Institutional
Control
Each of these components is described
below.
Remedial Actions
Excavation and Replacement of Soils
Exceeding 400 mg/kg Lead
Excavation of soils was accomplished
using lightweight excavation equipment
and hand tools in the portions of the
yard where the concentration of lead in
the surface soil exceeded 400 mg/kg.
Excavation continued in all quadrants,
play zones, and drip zone areas
exceeding 400 mg/kg lead until the
residual lead concentration measured at
the exposed surface of the excavation
was less than 400 mg/kg in the upper
foot, or less than 1,200 mg/kg at depths
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 12, 2020 / Proposed Rules
greater than one foot. Typically, soil
excavation depths were between six and
ten inches in depth. Soils in garden
areas were excavated until reaching a
residual concentration of less than 400
mg/kg in the upper two feet measured
from the original surface, or less than
1,200 mg/kg at depths greater than two
feet.
After confirmation sampling verified
that cleanup goals were achieved, the
excavated areas were backfilled with
clean soil to original grade and sod was
placed over the remediated areas.
The EPA’s remediation contractors
stockpiled contaminated soil in staging
areas, collected samples, and
subsequently transported soil to an offsite subtitle D solid waste disposal
landfill for use as daily cover and/or
disposal.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Stabilization of Deteriorating Exterior
Lead-Based Paint
The EPA used the lead-based paint
assessment protocol, presented in the
Final Lead-Based Paint
Recontamination Study Report prepared
for the OLS, to determine eligibility for
exterior lead-based paint stabilization at
those properties where soil lead
concentrations exceeded 400 mg/kg. At
those properties where the exterior leadbased paint assessment identified a
threat from deteriorating paint to the
continued protectiveness of the soil
remedy, the owner of the property was
offered stabilization of painted surfaces
on structures located on the property.
Exterior lead-based paint stabilization is
not mandatory and was provided to
those qualifying property owners who
chose to have their exterior paint
stabilized. Removal of loose and flaking
lead-based paint was performed using
lead-safe practices as described in EPA’s
Renovate, Repair and Painting Rule. The
practices include wet scraping, and
collection of paint chips using plastic
sheeting. Scraped areas were primed
and all previously painted surfaces had
two coats of paint applied.
Response to Lead-Contaminated Interior
Dust
As part of the final remedy, residents
at eligible properties are provided the
opportunity to have interior dust
sampled. The interior dust response is
not mandatory, and the resident may
choose to decline. If the property owner
agrees, the EPA collects samples of dust
from interior surfaces. The analytical
data is provided to the resident/tenant
in a letter and the letter informs them
whether any HUD criteria are exceeded.
The Douglas County Health Department
conducts follow up activities at any
residence where the concentration of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 May 11, 2020
Jkt 250001
lead in the interior dust levels exceed
the HUD criteria. For those residences
that qualify and where the resident
agrees, the residents are provided with
a high-efficiency household vacuum
cleaner, training on the maintenance
and the importance of proper usage of
the vacuum, and education on
mitigation of household lead hazards.
The Douglas County Health Department
also provides training and education
regarding the need to mitigate interior
dust.
Exterior lead-based paint stabilization
and interior dust response were
conducted retroactively at properties
where soil cleanups were performed
under CERCLA removal authority, as
well as to properties addressed under
CERCLA remedial authority.
Health Education
There are a number of identified lead
hazards within the OLS, not all of
which are connected to the contaminant
source of the OLS. To better address all
potential lead sources within the OLS,
a health education program was
developed and continues to be
implemented to increase public
awareness and mitigate exposure. An
active educational program continues in
cooperation with agencies and
organizations that include Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR), the Nebraska Department of
Health and Human Services (NDHHS),
DCHD, local non-governmental
organizations, and other interested
parties. The following, although not an
exhaustive list, indicate the types of
educational activities provided at the
Site:
• Support for in-home assessments
for children identified with elevated
blood lead levels.
• Development and implementation
of lead poisoning prevention curriculum
in schools.
• Support for efforts to increase
community-wide blood lead monitoring.
• Physicians’ education for diagnosis,
treatment, and surveillance of lead
exposure.
• Operation of Public Information
Centers to distribute information and
respond to questions about the EPA
response activities and lead hazards in
the community.
• Use of mass media (television,
radio, internet, print media, etc.) to
distribute health education messages.
• Development and distribution of
informational tools such as fact sheets,
brochures, refrigerator magnets, etc., to
inform the public about lead hazards
and measures that can be taken to avoid
or eliminate exposure.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27983
Institutional Controls
The Omaha Lead Registry, (available
at www.omahalead.org) is a GIS based
database that provides the public with
on-line access to the status of the EPA
investigation and response actions. The
EPA notifies residents and property
owners about the information that is
available through the lead hazard
registry as part of the transmittal sent at
the completion of soil remediation at
each individual property.
Community Involvement
The EPA worked extensively with the
Omaha community through a variety of
communication vehicles including, but
not limited to: local speaking
engagements, participation in citizens’
groups and city council meetings, local
public access television, public service
announcements on local cable
television, coverage on radio, television,
in local and national newspapers, mass
mailings of informational materials,
public outreach by telephone,
conducting public meetings, and
through the EPA website.
The EPA has been performing
outreach to Omaha citizens, elected
officials, school officials, health
officials, the media, nonprofit groups,
and others since becoming involved in
the project in an effort to convey
information about the hazards of lead
poisoning, particularly the ways that
lead affects the health of children. The
EPA participated in numerous formal
and informal meetings to explain EPA’s
role and commitment in Omaha, convey
information about the Superfund
process, and provide general
information about the site and lead
contamination. The EPA responds to
inquiries on a daily basis regarding the
site and individual property owner’s
sampling results.
In January 2004, a Community
Advisory Group (CAG) was formed for
the OLS site. A CAG is a committee,
task force, or board made up of residents
affected by a Superfund site. The CAG
provided a public forum where
representatives with diverse community
interests could present and discuss their
needs and concerns related to the site
and the cleanup process. The CAG was
discontinued after the last meeting was
held in October 2011. A new group,
Child Lead Poisoning Prevention Group,
formed. The first meeting of the Child
Lead Poisoning Group was held at City
Hall in May 2012. The Group is no
longer active.
Five-Year Review
The EPA completed the second FiveYear Review for the site in August 2019.
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
27984
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 12, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Five-Year Reviews for the site are
statutory. The triggering action for the
Five-Year Review is the completion of
the first Five-Year Review for the site in
September 2014.
The protectiveness of the remedy was
deferred in the Five-Year Review
because the remedy had not been
completed at all of the properties within
the site boundary. However, cleanup
activities at the 117 residential parcels
included in this partial deletion action
are complete and protective of human
health. There are no issues or
recommendations in the Five-Year
Review related to these 117 residential
parcels proposed for deletion.
The next Five-Year Review will be
completed in August 2024.
Summary of EPA Work Completed
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Soil Testing and Remediation
The EPA Region 7 completed the EPA
lead portion of the remedial action on
December 29, 2015. The city of Omaha
and the Douglas County Health
Department will be performing the
remaining field work. As of December
29, 2015, the EPA collected soil samples
from 42,047 properties. There are 489
remaining properties to be sampled. The
EPA has obtained access to collect
samples from 163 of the 489 properties.
Based on the soil sampling results,
14,019 properties were eligible for soil
remediation. The EPA remediated lead
contaminated soil at 13,090 properties
(93 percent) of the properties that were
eligible for remediation. There are
approximately 929 remaining properties
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 May 11, 2020
Jkt 250001
that are eligible for soil remediation.
The EPA obtained access to remediate
fifty-one of the remaining properties.
Lead-based Paint Testing and
Stabilization
The EPA tested 12,057 properties for
the presence of lead-based paint (LBP).
Six thousand seven hundred and eightytwo (6,782) properties qualify for LBP
stabilization. The EPA completed LBP
stabilization on 6,249, (92 percent) of
the eligible properties.
Dust Sampling
The EPA collected dust samples from
3,933 properties consisting of 4,477
residences for lead contaminated dust.
These numbers reflect the fact that some
of the properties are multi-residence
properties.
Continuing Remedial Action
The EPA completed Cooperative
Agreements with the city of Omaha and
the Douglas County Health Department
that provide funds to allow these local
government agencies to continue efforts
to obtain access to the remaining
properties and conduct sampling and
remediation activities at those
properties where they obtain access.
Determination That the Criteria for
Deletion Has Been Achieved
In accordance with 40 CFR
300.425(e), Region 7 of the EPA finds
that the 117 residential parcels of the
Omaha Lead Superfund site (the subject
of this deletion action) meet the
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
substantive criteria for deletion from the
NPL. The EPA has consulted with and
has the concurrence of the state of
Nebraska. All responsible parties or
other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required.
All appropriate Fund-financed response
under CERCLA was implemented, and
no further response action by
responsible parties is appropriate.
The implemented remedy at the 117
residential parcels has achieved the
degree of cleanup specified in the ROD
for all pathways of exposure. All
selected remedial action objectives and
associated cleanup levels are consistent
with agency policy and guidance. No
further Superfund response is needed to
protect human health and the
environment.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental Protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
substances, Hazardous waste,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 13626, 77 FR 56749, 3 CFR,
2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757,
3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52
FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Dated: April 29, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2020–09681 Filed 5–11–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 92 (Tuesday, May 12, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27979-27984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-09681]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA-HQ-SFUND-2003-0010; FRL-10008-93-Region 7]
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the Omaha Lead Superfund
Site
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 7 is issuing
a Notice of Intent to Delete 117 residential parcels of the Omaha Lead
Superfund site (Site or OLS) located in Omaha, Nebraska, from the
National Priorities List (NPL) and requests public comments on this
proposed action. The NPL, promulgated pursuant to section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an appendix of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and the
State of Nebraska, through the Nebraska Department of Environment and
Energy, determined that all appropriate Response Actions under CERCLA
were completed at the identified parcels. However, this deletion does
not preclude future actions under CERCLA.
This partial deletion pertains to 117 residential parcels. The
remaining parcels will remain on the NPL and are not being considered
for deletion as part of this action.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 11, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-2003-0010, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow on-line instructions
for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
Email: [email protected] or
[email protected].
Mail: Environmental Protection Agency Region 7, 11201
Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, KS 66219 Attention: Elizabeth Hagenmaier,
SUPR Division or Pamela Houston, ECO Office.
Hand delivery: Environmental Protection Agency Region 7,
11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, KS 66219. Such deliveries are only
accepted between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday-Friday excluding
Federal holidays and special arrangements should be made for deliveries
of boxed information.
[[Page 27980]]
For additional submission methods, please contact the
persons identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
2003-0010. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or email. The https://www.regulations.gov website is
an ``anonymous access'' system, which means the EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to the EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with
any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If the EPA cannot read your comment due
to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, the
EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should
avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be
free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: The docket contains the information that was the basis for
the partial deletion, specifically the documentation regarding the
results of soil cleanup activities. Information regarding the optional
voluntary cleanup activities such as the lead-based paint stabilization
and interior dust sampling is not provided in the docket but is
available from the EPA on a case-by-case basis. Certain other material,
such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in the
hard copy.
All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in the hard
copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at: EPA
Region 7 Records Center at 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas
66219, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays and facility closures due to COVID-19. We recommend
that you contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section before visiting the Region 7 office.
The Omaha public libraries also have computer resources available
to assist the public. The W. Dale Clark Library, located at 215 S. 15th
Street, Omaha, NE 68102 is centrally located within the site boundary.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Hagenmaier, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 7, SUPR/LMSE,
11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, KS 66219, telephone (913) 551-7939,
email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to the EPA. This section provides additional information
by addressing the following:
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Background and Basis for Intended Partial Site Deletion
I. Introduction
The EPA Region 7 is proposing to delete 117 residential parcels of
the Omaha Lead Superfund site (Site or OLS), from the National
Priorities List (NPL) and is requesting public comment on this proposed
action. The table of 117 Properties Proposed for the 2020 Partial
Deletion of Properties from the Omaha Lead Superfund site, (EPA-HQ-
SFUND-2003-0010-1985) identifies specific properties included for this
proposed partial deletion. The location of the 117 properties are shown
on Figure 1 ``Map for the 2020 Partial Deletion Omaha Lead Site'' (EPA-
HQ-SFUND-2003-0010-1983). The NPL constitutes appendix B of 40 CFR part
300, which is the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP), which the EPA promulgated pursuant to section
105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended. The EPA maintains the NPL
as those sites that appear to present a significant risk to public
health, welfare, or the environment. Sites on the NPL may be the
subject of remedial actions financed by the Hazardous Substance
Superfund (Fund). This partial deletion of the Omaha Lead Superfund
site is proposed in accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e) and is consistent
with the Notice of Policy Change: Partial Deletion of Sites Listed on
the National Priorities List 60 FR 55466 (November 1, 1995). As
described in 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, a portion of a site deleted from
the NPL remains eligible for Fund-financed remedial action if future
conditions warrant such actions.
The EPA will accept comments on the proposal to partially delete
this site for thirty (30) days after publication of this document in
the Federal Register.
Section II of this document explains the criteria for deleting
sites from the NPL. Section III discusses procedures that the EPA is
using for this action. Section IV discusses the 117 residential parcels
of the Omaha Lead Superfund site and demonstrates how they meet the
deletion criteria.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites
from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be
deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. In
making such a determination pursuant to 40 CFR 300.425(e), the EPA will
consider, in consultation with the State, whether any of the following
criteria have been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore,
the taking of remedial measures is not appropriate.
Pursuant to CERCLA section 121(c) and the NCP, the EPA conducts
five-year reviews to ensure the continued protectiveness of remedial
actions where hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain
at a site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure. The EPA conducts such five-year reviews even if a site is
deleted from the NPL. The EPA may initiate further action to ensure
continued protectiveness at a deleted site if new information becomes
available that indicates it is appropriate. Whenever there is a
significant release from a site deleted from the NPL, the deleted site
may be restored to the NPL without application of the hazard ranking
system.
[[Page 27981]]
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to deletion of the 117 residential
parcels of the Site:
(1) The EPA consulted with the State before developing this Notice
of Intent for Partial Deletion.
(2) The EPA has provided the State 30 working days for review of
this document prior to publication of it today.
(3) In accordance with the criteria discussed above, the EPA has
determined that no further response is appropriate.
(4) The State of Nebraska, through the Nebraska Department of
Environment and Energy, has concurred with the deletion of the 117
residential parcels of the Omaha Lead Superfund site, from the NPL.
(5) Concurrently, with the publication of this Notice of Intent for
Partial Deletion in the Federal Register, a notice is being published
in a major local newspaper, the Omaha World Herald. The newspaper
announces the 30-day public comment period concerning the Notice of
Intent for Partial Deletion of the Site from the NPL.
(6) The EPA placed copies of documents supporting the proposed
partial deletion in the deletion docket and made these items available
for public inspection and copying at the Site information repositories
identified above.
If comments are received within the 30-day comment period on this
document, the EPA will evaluate and respond appropriately to the
comments before making a final decision to delete the 117 residential
parcels. If necessary, the EPA will prepare a Responsiveness Summary to
address any significant public comments received. After the public
comment period, if the EPA determines it is still appropriate to delete
the 117 residential parcels of the Omaha Lead Superfund site, the
Regional Administrator will publish a final Notice of Partial Deletion
in the Federal Register. Public notices, public submissions and copies
of the Responsiveness Summary, if prepared, will be made available to
interested parties and included in the site information repositories
listed above.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not itself
create, alter, or revoke any individual's rights or obligations.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not in any way alter
EPA's right to take enforcement actions, as appropriate. The NPL is
designed primarily for informational purposes and to assist EPA
management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP states that the deletion
of a site from the NPL does not preclude eligibility for future
response actions, should future conditions warrant such actions.
IV. Background and Basis for Intended Partial Site Deletion
The following information provides EPA's rationale for deleting the
117 residential parcels of the Omaha Lead Superfund site from the NPL,
as previously identified.
Site Background and History
The Omaha Lead Superfund site (Site or OLS [CERCLIS ID #
NESFN0703481]) includes surface soils present at residential
properties, child-care centers, and other residential-type properties
in the city of Omaha, Douglas County, Nebraska. The properties were
contaminated as a result of deposition of aerial emissions from
historic lead smelting and refining operations. The OLS encompasses the
eastern portion of the greater metropolitan area in Omaha, Nebraska.
The site extends from the Douglas-Sarpy County line on the south, north
to Read Street and from the Missouri River on the east to 56th Street
on the west. The Site is centered around downtown Omaha, Nebraska,
where two former lead-processing facilities operated. American Smelting
and Refining Company, Inc. (ASARCO) operated a lead refinery at 500
Douglas Street in Omaha, Nebraska, for over 120 years. Aaron Ferer &
Sons Company (Aaron Ferer), and later Gould Electronics, Inc., (Gould)
operated a lead battery recycling plant located at 555 Farnam Street.
Both ASARCO and Aaron Ferer/Gould facilities released lead-containing
particulates into the atmosphere from their smokestacks. The lead
particles were subsequently deposited on surrounding residential
properties.
Beginning in 1984, the Douglas County Health Department (DCHD)
monitored ambient air quality around the ASARCO facility. This air
monitoring routinely measured ambient air lead concentrations in excess
of the ambient air standard. Between 1972 and 1998 the DCHD measured
the blood lead level in children within the county. The results of the
measurements indicated a high incidence of elevated blood lead level in
children. Blood lead screening of children living in zip codes located
east of 45th Street consistently exceeded 10 micrograms per deciliter
([mu]g/dl) more frequently than children living elsewhere in the
county.
In 1998, the Omaha City Council requested assistance from the EPA
to address the high incidence of children found with elevated blood
lead levels by the DCHD. In 1999, the EPA initiated an investigation
into the lead contamination under the authority of Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). On
February 26, 2002, the OLS was proposed for the NPL (67 FR 8836), and
on April 30, 2003, the OLS was listed on the NPL (68 FR 23077).
The OLS includes those residential properties where the EPA
determined through soil sampling that soil lead levels represent an
unacceptable risk to human health. Residential properties where soil
sampling indicates that lead concentrations in the soil are below a
level that represent an unacceptable risk are not included in the Site.
Residential properties include those with high accessibility to
sensitive populations (children seven years of age and younger [0 to 84
months] and pregnant or nursing women). The properties include single
and multi-family dwellings, apartment complexes, child daycare
facilities, vacant lots in residential areas, schools, churches,
community centers, parks, greenways, and any other areas where children
may be exposed to site-related contaminated media. Commercial and
industrial properties are excluded from the definition of the Site.
The residential properties proposed for deletion from the NPL site
were cleaned up under both CERCLA removal and remedial authority.
Regardless of the authority used for the remediation of yards, the
cleanup levels for soils for all the properties proposed for deletion
were the same.
Response Actions
The initial EPA response was conducted under CERCLA removal
authority. Due to the size of the site and the very large number of
individual properties, it was necessary to prioritize sites for
cleanup. The prioritization was based on factors such as the elevated
blood level of children at each property and the lead concentration in
the soil at each property. The result was a series of action levels
that reflected the priority of categories of sites. Consequently, the
action level for the site soils changed over time from 2500 mg/kg to
400 mg/kg, as the highest priority sites were cleaned up first. The
cleanup level was established using the Integrated Exposure Uptake
Biokinetic (IEUBK) model to determine the concentration to which the
lead is cleaned up at each property within the site. The cleanup level
for the OLS is 400 mg/kg of lead in the soil. The cleanup level of 400
mg/
[[Page 27982]]
kg was selected to allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure.
The cleanup level has not changed, and all properties, regardless of
the action level, were cleaned up to 400 mg/kg.
Removal Activities
Beginning in March 1999, the EPA began collecting soil samples from
properties that provided licensed child daycare services. The initial
removal action dated August 2, 1999, consisted of excavation and
replacement of contaminated soil where the lead concentration exceeded
the action levels identified in the Action Memorandum. Response actions
were implemented at properties that met either of the following
criteria:
A child seven years of age or younger (0 to 84 months)
residing at the property was identified with an elevated blood level
(EBL) exceeding 15 [mu]g/dl (this EBL was reduced to 10 [mu]g/dl in
August 2001) and a soil sample collected from a non-foundation quadrant
exhibited lead concentrations greater than 400 mg/kg, or
A property was used as a child-care facility and a soil
sample collected from a non-foundation quadrant exhibited a lead
concentration greater than 400 mg/kg.
On August 22, 2002, the EPA initiated a second removal action. This
second removal action included all other residential type properties
where the maximum non-foundation soil lead concentration exceeded an
action level of 2,500 mg/kg. The 2002 Action Memorandum explicitly
identifies the possibility of lead-based paint as a potential
contributor to lead contamination of soils within thirty inches of the
foundation of a painted structure. Due to the potential contribution of
deteriorating lead-based paint near the foundations of structures, a
lead concentration greater than 400 mg/kg in the soil in the drip zone
(areas near structure foundations) was not, in itself, sufficient to
trigger soil removal. However, if a soil sample from any mid-yard
quadrant exceeded the action level, soil was removed from all areas of
the property exceeding the 400 mg/kg cleanup level, including the drip
zone. In November 2003, the EPA amended the second removal action to
reduce the action level to 1,200 mg/kg concentration of lead in soil.
In March 2004, the EPA amended the second removal action to combine the
two removal actions. In March 2005, the EPA amended the removal action
to reduce the action level from 1200 mg/kg to 800 mg/kg.
At properties determined to be eligible for response under either
of the Action Memoranda, soil with lead concentrations greater than the
cleanup level was excavated and replaced with clean soil and the
excavated areas were revegetated.
EPA signed an Interim Recored of Decision on December 15, 2004.
Beginning with the construction season of 2005, the scope of the
removal action was expanded to address the requirements of the 2004
Interim ROD to include: (1) Stabilization of deteriorating exterior
lead-based paint at properties where the continued effectiveness of the
soil remediation was threatened; (2) response to interior dust at
properties where interior dust lead levels exceeded applicable
criteria; (3) public health education; and (4) participation in a
comprehensive remedy with other agencies and organizations that
addresses all identified lead hazards in the Omaha community.
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS)--Human Health Risk
Assessment
As part of the RI/FS, the EPA developed a Human Health Risk
Assessment (HHRA) for the Site using site-specific information
collected during the OLS Remedial Investigation. Lead was identified as
the primary contaminant of concern. The HHRA also identified arsenic as
a potential contaminant of concern, but arsenic was eliminated based on
its relatively low overall risk to residents and lack of connection to
the release from the industrial sources being addressed by this
Superfund action.
The risk assessment for lead focused on young children under the
age of seven (0 to 84 months) who are site residents. Young children
are most susceptible to lead exposure because they have higher contact
rates with soil or dust, absorb lead more readily than adults, and are
more sensitive to the adverse effects of lead than are older children
and adults. The effect of greatest concern in children is impairment of
the nervous system, including learning deficits, reduced intelligence,
and adverse effects on behavior. The IEUBK model for lead in children
was used to evaluate the risks posed to young children (0 to 84 months)
resulting from the lead contamination at the site. Because lead does
not have a nationally-approved reference dose (RfD), cancer slope
factor, or other accepted toxicological factor which can be used to
assess risk, standard risk assessment methods cannot be used to
evaluate the health risks associated with lead contamination. The
modeling results determined that there was an unacceptable risk to
young children from exposure to soils above 400 mg/kg.
In October 2008, the EPA released a draft Final Remedial
Investigation. Based on the 2008 data set, EPA established the boundary
of the Final Focus Area for the Site. The Final Focus Area is generally
bounded by Read Street to the north, 56th Street to the west, Harrison
Street (Sarpy County line) to the south, and the Missouri River to the
east, and encompasses 17,280 acres (27.0 square miles). By the time the
Final Remedial Investigation was completed, the EPA had collected soil
samples from 37,076 residential properties, including 34,565 properties
within the Final Focus Area's boundary. In total, 34.2 percent of
properties sampled through completion of the 2008 RI had at least one
mid-yard sample with a soil lead level exceeding 400 mg/kg. In addition
to soil sampling, the EPA collected dust samples from the interior of
159 residences to support the OLS Human Health Risk Assessment.
Record of Decision
The EPA completed the Final Record of Decision (ROD) for the OLS in
May 2009. The Remedial Action Objective is to reduce the risk of
exposure of young children to lead such that an individual child, or
group of similarly exposed children, have no greater than a 5 percent
chance of having a blood-lead concentration exceeding 10 [mu]g/dl. The
selected remedy includes the following components:
Excavation and Replacement of Soils Exceeding 400 mg/kg Lead
Stabilization of Deteriorating Exterior Lead-Based Paint
Response to Lead-Contaminated Interior Dust
Health Education
Operation of a Local Lead Hazard Registry as a type of
Institutional Control
Each of these components is described below.
Remedial Actions
Excavation and Replacement of Soils Exceeding 400 mg/kg Lead
Excavation of soils was accomplished using lightweight excavation
equipment and hand tools in the portions of the yard where the
concentration of lead in the surface soil exceeded 400 mg/kg.
Excavation continued in all quadrants, play zones, and drip zone areas
exceeding 400 mg/kg lead until the residual lead concentration measured
at the exposed surface of the excavation was less than 400 mg/kg in the
upper foot, or less than 1,200 mg/kg at depths
[[Page 27983]]
greater than one foot. Typically, soil excavation depths were between
six and ten inches in depth. Soils in garden areas were excavated until
reaching a residual concentration of less than 400 mg/kg in the upper
two feet measured from the original surface, or less than 1,200 mg/kg
at depths greater than two feet.
After confirmation sampling verified that cleanup goals were
achieved, the excavated areas were backfilled with clean soil to
original grade and sod was placed over the remediated areas.
The EPA's remediation contractors stockpiled contaminated soil in
staging areas, collected samples, and subsequently transported soil to
an off-site subtitle D solid waste disposal landfill for use as daily
cover and/or disposal.
Stabilization of Deteriorating Exterior Lead-Based Paint
The EPA used the lead-based paint assessment protocol, presented in
the Final Lead-Based Paint Recontamination Study Report prepared for
the OLS, to determine eligibility for exterior lead-based paint
stabilization at those properties where soil lead concentrations
exceeded 400 mg/kg. At those properties where the exterior lead-based
paint assessment identified a threat from deteriorating paint to the
continued protectiveness of the soil remedy, the owner of the property
was offered stabilization of painted surfaces on structures located on
the property. Exterior lead-based paint stabilization is not mandatory
and was provided to those qualifying property owners who chose to have
their exterior paint stabilized. Removal of loose and flaking lead-
based paint was performed using lead-safe practices as described in
EPA's Renovate, Repair and Painting Rule. The practices include wet
scraping, and collection of paint chips using plastic sheeting. Scraped
areas were primed and all previously painted surfaces had two coats of
paint applied.
Response to Lead-Contaminated Interior Dust
As part of the final remedy, residents at eligible properties are
provided the opportunity to have interior dust sampled. The interior
dust response is not mandatory, and the resident may choose to decline.
If the property owner agrees, the EPA collects samples of dust from
interior surfaces. The analytical data is provided to the resident/
tenant in a letter and the letter informs them whether any HUD criteria
are exceeded. The Douglas County Health Department conducts follow up
activities at any residence where the concentration of lead in the
interior dust levels exceed the HUD criteria. For those residences that
qualify and where the resident agrees, the residents are provided with
a high-efficiency household vacuum cleaner, training on the maintenance
and the importance of proper usage of the vacuum, and education on
mitigation of household lead hazards. The Douglas County Health
Department also provides training and education regarding the need to
mitigate interior dust.
Exterior lead-based paint stabilization and interior dust response
were conducted retroactively at properties where soil cleanups were
performed under CERCLA removal authority, as well as to properties
addressed under CERCLA remedial authority.
Health Education
There are a number of identified lead hazards within the OLS, not
all of which are connected to the contaminant source of the OLS. To
better address all potential lead sources within the OLS, a health
education program was developed and continues to be implemented to
increase public awareness and mitigate exposure. An active educational
program continues in cooperation with agencies and organizations that
include Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), the
Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (NDHHS), DCHD, local
non-governmental organizations, and other interested parties. The
following, although not an exhaustive list, indicate the types of
educational activities provided at the Site:
Support for in-home assessments for children identified
with elevated blood lead levels.
Development and implementation of lead poisoning
prevention curriculum in schools.
Support for efforts to increase community-wide blood lead
monitoring.
Physicians' education for diagnosis, treatment, and
surveillance of lead exposure.
Operation of Public Information Centers to distribute
information and respond to questions about the EPA response activities
and lead hazards in the community.
Use of mass media (television, radio, internet, print
media, etc.) to distribute health education messages.
Development and distribution of informational tools such
as fact sheets, brochures, refrigerator magnets, etc., to inform the
public about lead hazards and measures that can be taken to avoid or
eliminate exposure.
Institutional Controls
The Omaha Lead Registry, (available at www.omahalead.org) is a GIS
based database that provides the public with on-line access to the
status of the EPA investigation and response actions. The EPA notifies
residents and property owners about the information that is available
through the lead hazard registry as part of the transmittal sent at the
completion of soil remediation at each individual property.
Community Involvement
The EPA worked extensively with the Omaha community through a
variety of communication vehicles including, but not limited to: local
speaking engagements, participation in citizens' groups and city
council meetings, local public access television, public service
announcements on local cable television, coverage on radio, television,
in local and national newspapers, mass mailings of informational
materials, public outreach by telephone, conducting public meetings,
and through the EPA website.
The EPA has been performing outreach to Omaha citizens, elected
officials, school officials, health officials, the media, nonprofit
groups, and others since becoming involved in the project in an effort
to convey information about the hazards of lead poisoning, particularly
the ways that lead affects the health of children. The EPA participated
in numerous formal and informal meetings to explain EPA's role and
commitment in Omaha, convey information about the Superfund process,
and provide general information about the site and lead contamination.
The EPA responds to inquiries on a daily basis regarding the site and
individual property owner's sampling results.
In January 2004, a Community Advisory Group (CAG) was formed for
the OLS site. A CAG is a committee, task force, or board made up of
residents affected by a Superfund site. The CAG provided a public forum
where representatives with diverse community interests could present
and discuss their needs and concerns related to the site and the
cleanup process. The CAG was discontinued after the last meeting was
held in October 2011. A new group, Child Lead Poisoning Prevention
Group, formed. The first meeting of the Child Lead Poisoning Group was
held at City Hall in May 2012. The Group is no longer active.
Five-Year Review
The EPA completed the second Five-Year Review for the site in
August 2019.
[[Page 27984]]
Five-Year Reviews for the site are statutory. The triggering action for
the Five-Year Review is the completion of the first Five-Year Review
for the site in September 2014.
The protectiveness of the remedy was deferred in the Five-Year
Review because the remedy had not been completed at all of the
properties within the site boundary. However, cleanup activities at the
117 residential parcels included in this partial deletion action are
complete and protective of human health. There are no issues or
recommendations in the Five-Year Review related to these 117
residential parcels proposed for deletion.
The next Five-Year Review will be completed in August 2024.
Summary of EPA Work Completed
Soil Testing and Remediation
The EPA Region 7 completed the EPA lead portion of the remedial
action on December 29, 2015. The city of Omaha and the Douglas County
Health Department will be performing the remaining field work. As of
December 29, 2015, the EPA collected soil samples from 42,047
properties. There are 489 remaining properties to be sampled. The EPA
has obtained access to collect samples from 163 of the 489 properties.
Based on the soil sampling results, 14,019 properties were eligible
for soil remediation. The EPA remediated lead contaminated soil at
13,090 properties (93 percent) of the properties that were eligible for
remediation. There are approximately 929 remaining properties that are
eligible for soil remediation. The EPA obtained access to remediate
fifty-one of the remaining properties.
Lead-based Paint Testing and Stabilization
The EPA tested 12,057 properties for the presence of lead-based
paint (LBP). Six thousand seven hundred and eighty-two (6,782)
properties qualify for LBP stabilization. The EPA completed LBP
stabilization on 6,249, (92 percent) of the eligible properties.
Dust Sampling
The EPA collected dust samples from 3,933 properties consisting of
4,477 residences for lead contaminated dust. These numbers reflect the
fact that some of the properties are multi-residence properties.
Continuing Remedial Action
The EPA completed Cooperative Agreements with the city of Omaha and
the Douglas County Health Department that provide funds to allow these
local government agencies to continue efforts to obtain access to the
remaining properties and conduct sampling and remediation activities at
those properties where they obtain access.
Determination That the Criteria for Deletion Has Been Achieved
In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), Region 7 of the EPA finds
that the 117 residential parcels of the Omaha Lead Superfund site (the
subject of this deletion action) meet the substantive criteria for
deletion from the NPL. The EPA has consulted with and has the
concurrence of the state of Nebraska. All responsible parties or other
persons have implemented all appropriate response actions required. All
appropriate Fund-financed response under CERCLA was implemented, and no
further response action by responsible parties is appropriate.
The implemented remedy at the 117 residential parcels has achieved
the degree of cleanup specified in the ROD for all pathways of
exposure. All selected remedial action objectives and associated
cleanup levels are consistent with agency policy and guidance. No
further Superfund response is needed to protect human health and the
environment.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental Protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
13626, 77 FR 56749, 3 CFR, 2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR
54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, 3 CFR,
1987 Comp., p. 193.
Dated: April 29, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2020-09681 Filed 5-11-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P