Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 26893-26896 [2020-09396]
Download as PDF
26893
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Install EEC software version B205 or later ....
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 .................
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:25 May 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA–
2020–0443; Project Identifier AD–2020–
00178–E.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by June
22, 2020.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to General Electric
Company (GE) GEnx–1B64, 1B64/P1, –1B64/
P2, –1B67, –1B67/P1, –1B67P2, –1B70,
–1B70/75/P1, –1B70/75/P2, –1B70/P1,
–1B70/P2, –1B70C/P1, –1B70C/P2, –1B74/
75/P1, –1B74/75/P2, –1B76/P2, and –1B76A/
P2 model turbofan engines.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code 7240, Turbine Engine Combustion
Section.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by two reports of
combustor case burn-through. The FAA is
issuing this AD to prevent failure of the fuel
nozzle. The unsafe condition, if not
addressed, could result in damage to the
combustor case, engine fire, and damage to
the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Required Actions
Within 120 days after the effective date of
this AD, install electronic engine control
(EEC) software that is eligible for installation.
(h) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, EEC software
that is eligible for installation is EEC software
that is version B205 or later.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD,
if requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Cost per
product
Parts cost
$0
Cost on U.S.
operators
$85
$14,960
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the certification office,
send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. You
may email your request to: ANE–AD–AMOC@
faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Mehdi Lamnyi, Aerospace Engineer,
ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA, 01803; phone: (781) 238–
7743; fax: (781) 238–7199; email:
Mehdi.Lamnyi@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact General Electric Company,
1 Neumann Way, Cincinnati, OH 45215,
United States; phone: (513) 552–3272; email:
aviation.fleetsupport@ae.ge.com; website:
www.ge.com. You may view this referenced
service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 781–238–7759.
Issued on April 29, 2020.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–09437 Filed 5–5–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0331; Product
Identifier 2020–NM–019–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model
737–600, –700, –700C, –800, –900, and
–900ER series airplanes. This proposed
AD was prompted by a report that the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
26894
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
necessary sealant was not applied to the
side of body (SOB) slot as a result of a
production drawing that provided
unclear SOB slot sealant application
instructions. This proposed AD would
require a general visual inspection for
insufficient sealant in the SOB slot, and
related investigative and corrective
actions. The FAA is proposing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by June 22, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster
Blvd., MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740–5600; telephone 562–797–1717;
internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2020–0331.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0331; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Laubaugh, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:25 May 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
231–3622; email: james.laubaugh@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include
‘‘Docket No. FAA–2020–0331; Product
Identifier 2020–NM–019–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. The FAA
specifically invites comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
this NPRM. The FAA will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend this NPRM because of
those comments.
The FAA will post all comments,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
FAA will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.
Discussion
The FAA has received a report
indicating that the necessary sealant
was not applied to the SOB slot as a
result of a production drawing
providing unclear SOB slot sealant
application instructions on certain The
Boeing Company Model 737–600, –700,
–700C, –800, –900, and –900ER series
airplanes. In 2019, an operator of a
Model 737–800 airplane reported a fuel
smell in the cabin, and the airplane was
diverted. During post-flight inspection,
insulation blankets in the air
distribution mix bay (ADMB) were
found to be soaked with fuel. The
ADMB is located in the fuselage lower
lobe immediately forward of the body
station (BS) 540 front spar bulkhead. An
investigation of this incident led to the
finding that there was no sealant
applied in the SOB slot. For any part of
a fuel tank that is inside the pressurized
boundary, a secondary fuel barrier is
required. On The Boeing Company
Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800,
–900, and –900ER series airplanes, the
areas requiring secondary barrier are the
wing center section upper surface and
the part of the wing center section front
spar that is inside the pressure
boundary. The secondary barrier is
achieved by application of BMS 5–81
secondary fuel barrier sealant
(commonly referred to as ‘‘vapor
barrier’’). On the reporting airplane,
sealant inside the center fuel tank was
repaired to correct the primary leak in
the tank, and the SOB slot sealant was
restored. The investigation concluded
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that the production drawing lacked
clarity regarding the SOB slot sealant
application. The drawing was revised
beginning at line number (L/N) 937, but
production planning did not reflect the
drawing change until L/N 1935. The
ADMB is not a flammable fluid leakage
zone and therefore does not have
ignition prevention and fire detection
features, and is also immediately
adjacent to the passenger compartment.
Fuel leaking into the ADMB, if not
addressed, could possibly lead to an
ignition of flammable fluid vapors, fire,
or explosion, or fuel vapor inhalation by
passengers and crew.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Boeing Multiple
Operator Message MOM–MOM–20–
0049–01B (R1), dated January 29, 2020.
This service information describes
procedures for a general visual
inspection for insufficient sealant in the
SOB slot. The service information also
describes procedures for related
investigative actions including a general
visual inspection of the ADMB for fuel
contamination, a check for external
leaks of the center fuel tank external
surfaces inside the pressure boundary,
and an internal leak check of the center
fuel tank to identify the leakage path(s).
The service information also describes
procedures for corrective actions
including removal of all insulation
blankets below the crease beam left side
to right side, clean-up of all fuel
contamination, repair of any leak,
preparation of the SOB slot for sealing,
application of sealant, and repair of the
secondary fuel barrier. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination
The FAA is proposing this AD
because the FAA evaluated all the
relevant information and determined
the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop
in other products of the same type
design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously. For information on the
procedures, see this service information
at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2020–0331.
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed
AD affects 731 airplanes of U.S. registry.
26895
The FAA estimates the following costs
to comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Inspection for sealant .......................
30 work-hours × $85 per hour = $2,550 .......................
The FAA estimates the following
costs to do any necessary repairs that
Cost per
product
Parts cost
would be required based on the results
of the proposed inspection. The FAA
$0
$2,550
Cost on U.S.
operators
$1,864,050
has no way of determining the number
of aircraft that might need these repairs:
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Repair of sealant .........................................
Insulation blanket replacement ...................
Leak checks ................................................
2 work-hours × $85 per hour = $170 ............................................
24 work-hours × $85 per hour = $2,040 .......................................
6 work-hours × $85 per hour = $510 ............................................
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:25 May 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
Parts cost
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2020–0331; Product Identifier 2020–
NM–019–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by June
22, 2020.
$129
6,312
0
Cost per
product
$299
8,352
510
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report that
sealant was not applied to the side of body
(SOB) slot inside of a pressurized boundary,
which could lead to inconsistent application
of the required secondary fuel barrier sealant
(vapor barrier). The FAA is issuing this AD
to address possible ignition of flammable
fluid vapors, fire, or explosion, or fuel vapor
inhalation by passengers and crew.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Inspection Definition
For the purposes of this AD, a general
visual inspection is defined as: ‘‘A visual
examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious
damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of
inspection is made from within touching
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror
may be necessary to enhance visual access to
all exposed surfaces in the inspection area.
This level of inspection is made under
normally available lighting conditions such
as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or
droplight and may require removal or
opening of access panels or doors. Stands,
ladders, or platforms may be required to gain
proximity to the area being checked.’’
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800, –900,
and –900ER series airplanes, certificated in
any category, line numbers 1 through 1934
inclusive.
(h) SOB Slot Inspection and Related
Investigative and Corrective Actions
Within 9 months after the effective date of
this AD: Do a general visual inspection for
insufficient sealant in the SOB slot, and do
all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions, in accordance with Boeing
Multiple Operator Message MOM–MOM–20–
0049–01B (R1), dated January 29, 2020. Do
all related investigative and corrective
actions before further flight.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 28, Fuel.
(i) Deferred Repair
Repair of insufficient sealant as required by
paragraph (h) may be deferred for 10 days
(b) Affected ADs
None.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
26896
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
provided there is no fuel present in the
center tank as specified in the procedures in
item 28–02A of the operator’s existing
minimum equipment list, and there is no fuel
contamination in the ADMB.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(j) Reporting Provisions
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0348; Product
Identifier 2020–NM–054–AD]
Although the service information
referenced in Boeing Multiple Operator
Message MOM–MOM–20–0049–01B (R1),
dated January 29, 2020, specifies to report
inspection findings, this AD does not require
any report.
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by The Boeing Company
Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, to make
those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of
the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact James Laubaugh, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA 98198; phone and fax: 206–231–3622;
email: james.laubaugh@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this
referenced service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195.
[FR Doc. 2020–09396 Filed 5–5–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:25 May 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
14 CFR Part 39
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
Issued on April 23, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
Federal Aviation Administration
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus SAS Model A330–202,
–203, –223, –223F, –243, –243F, –302,
–303, –323, –343, and –941 airplanes;
and Model A340–313, –541, and –642
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by the results of laboratory
tests on non-rechargeable lithium
batteries installed in emergency locator
transmitters (ELT), which highlighted a
lack of protection against currents of 28
volts DC or 115 volts AC that could lead
to thermal runaway and a battery fire.
This proposed AD would require
modifying a certain ELT by installing a
diode between the ELT and the terminal
block, as specified in a European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD,
which will be incorporated by reference.
The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
SUMMARY:
The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by June 22, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For the material identified in this
proposed AD that will be incorporated
by reference (IBR), contact the EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
89990 1000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu;
internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may
find this IBR material on the EASA
website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available in the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0348.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0348; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3229; email
vladimir.ulyanov@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include
‘‘Docket No. FAA–2020–0348; Product
Identifier 2020–NM–054–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. The FAA
specifically invites comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
this NPRM. The FAA will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend this NPRM based on
those comments.
The FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
FAA will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.
Discussion
The EASA, which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD
2020–0083, dated April 3, 2020 (‘‘EASA
AD 2020–0083’’) (also referred to as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for certain Airbus
SAS Model A330–202, –203, –223,
E:\FR\FM\06MYP1.SGM
06MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 88 (Wednesday, May 6, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26893-26896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-09396]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2020-0331; Product Identifier 2020-NM-019-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900,
and -900ER series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report
that the
[[Page 26894]]
necessary sealant was not applied to the side of body (SOB) slot as a
result of a production drawing that provided unclear SOB slot sealant
application instructions. This proposed AD would require a general
visual inspection for insufficient sealant in the SOB slot, and related
investigative and corrective actions. The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 22,
2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS),
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600;
telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
view this service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 206-231-3195. It is also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0331.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0331; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for Docket Operations is listed above. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Laubaugh, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-3622; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2020-0331;
Product Identifier 2020-NM-019-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
The FAA specifically invites comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. The FAA will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
NPRM because of those comments.
The FAA will post all comments, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.
The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.
Discussion
The FAA has received a report indicating that the necessary sealant
was not applied to the SOB slot as a result of a production drawing
providing unclear SOB slot sealant application instructions on certain
The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER
series airplanes. In 2019, an operator of a Model 737-800 airplane
reported a fuel smell in the cabin, and the airplane was diverted.
During post-flight inspection, insulation blankets in the air
distribution mix bay (ADMB) were found to be soaked with fuel. The ADMB
is located in the fuselage lower lobe immediately forward of the body
station (BS) 540 front spar bulkhead. An investigation of this incident
led to the finding that there was no sealant applied in the SOB slot.
For any part of a fuel tank that is inside the pressurized boundary, a
secondary fuel barrier is required. On The Boeing Company Model 737-
600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes, the areas
requiring secondary barrier are the wing center section upper surface
and the part of the wing center section front spar that is inside the
pressure boundary. The secondary barrier is achieved by application of
BMS 5-81 secondary fuel barrier sealant (commonly referred to as
``vapor barrier''). On the reporting airplane, sealant inside the
center fuel tank was repaired to correct the primary leak in the tank,
and the SOB slot sealant was restored. The investigation concluded that
the production drawing lacked clarity regarding the SOB slot sealant
application. The drawing was revised beginning at line number (L/N)
937, but production planning did not reflect the drawing change until
L/N 1935. The ADMB is not a flammable fluid leakage zone and therefore
does not have ignition prevention and fire detection features, and is
also immediately adjacent to the passenger compartment. Fuel leaking
into the ADMB, if not addressed, could possibly lead to an ignition of
flammable fluid vapors, fire, or explosion, or fuel vapor inhalation by
passengers and crew.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Boeing Multiple Operator Message MOM-MOM-20-0049-
01B (R1), dated January 29, 2020. This service information describes
procedures for a general visual inspection for insufficient sealant in
the SOB slot. The service information also describes procedures for
related investigative actions including a general visual inspection of
the ADMB for fuel contamination, a check for external leaks of the
center fuel tank external surfaces inside the pressure boundary, and an
internal leak check of the center fuel tank to identify the leakage
path(s). The service information also describes procedures for
corrective actions including removal of all insulation blankets below
the crease beam left side to right side, clean-up of all fuel
contamination, repair of any leak, preparation of the SOB slot for
sealing, application of sealant, and repair of the secondary fuel
barrier. This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination
The FAA is proposing this AD because the FAA evaluated all the
relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously. For information on the
procedures, see this service information at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0331.
[[Page 26895]]
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 731 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection for sealant................ 30 work-hours x $85 per $0 $2,550 $1,864,050
hour = $2,550.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary repairs
that would be required based on the results of the proposed inspection.
The FAA has no way of determining the number of aircraft that might
need these repairs:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repair of sealant............................. 2 work-hours x $85 per hour = $129 $299
$170.
Insulation blanket replacement................ 24 work-hours x $85 per hour = 6,312 8,352
$2,040.
Leak checks................................... 6 work-hours x $85 per hour = 0 510
$510.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2020-0331; Product Identifier
2020-NM-019-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by June 22, 2020.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -
700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in any
category, line numbers 1 through 1934 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report that sealant was not applied to
the side of body (SOB) slot inside of a pressurized boundary, which
could lead to inconsistent application of the required secondary
fuel barrier sealant (vapor barrier). The FAA is issuing this AD to
address possible ignition of flammable fluid vapors, fire, or
explosion, or fuel vapor inhalation by passengers and crew.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspection Definition
For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection is
defined as: ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or
irregularity. This level of inspection is made from within touching
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror may be necessary to
enhance visual access to all exposed surfaces in the inspection
area. This level of inspection is made under normally available
lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight,
or droplight and may require removal or opening of access panels or
doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be required to gain
proximity to the area being checked.''
(h) SOB Slot Inspection and Related Investigative and Corrective
Actions
Within 9 months after the effective date of this AD: Do a
general visual inspection for insufficient sealant in the SOB slot,
and do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions,
in accordance with Boeing Multiple Operator Message MOM-MOM-20-0049-
01B (R1), dated January 29, 2020. Do all related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight.
(i) Deferred Repair
Repair of insufficient sealant as required by paragraph (h) may
be deferred for 10 days
[[Page 26896]]
provided there is no fuel present in the center tank as specified in
the procedures in item 28-02A of the operator's existing minimum
equipment list, and there is no fuel contamination in the ADMB.
(j) Reporting Provisions
Although the service information referenced in Boeing Multiple
Operator Message MOM-MOM-20-0049-01B (R1), dated January 29, 2020,
specifies to report inspection findings, this AD does not require
any report.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact James Laubaugh,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-
3622; email: [email protected].
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
Issued on April 23, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-09396 Filed 5-5-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P