Safety Zone; San Juan Harbor, San Juan, PR, 26615-26617 [2020-09162]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 87 / Tuesday, May 5, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0460]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; San Juan Harbor, San
Juan, PR
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
By this final rule, the Coast
Guard is making non-substantive
changes to the final rule that published
on March 19, 2020. The final rule
became effective on April 20, 2020.
However, the amendatory instruction in
the rule issued on March 19, 2020
erroneously created a new section rather
than amend the section that already
existed in the CFR. We are reissuing this
final rule with updated amendatory
instructions in order to implement the
changes that were intended to be
implemented by the final rule that
published on March 19, 2020.
DATES: This correction is effective on
May 5, 2020.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2019–
0460 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Commander Pedro
Mendoza, Sector San Juan Prevention
Department, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
787–729–2374, email
Pedro.L.Mendoza@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
LG Liquefied Gas
LNG Liquefied Natural Gas
LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
TFR Temporary Final Rule
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
without prior final rule pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 May 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
26615
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice when the agency
for good cause finds that those
procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’
On December 17, 2019, a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) entitled,
‘‘Safety Zone; San Juan Harbor, San
Juan, PR’’ was published in the Federal
Register under USCG–2019–0460 (84 FR
68860) with a 30 day comment period.
The comment period ended on January
16, 2020. No comments were submitted
during the NPRMs 30 day comment
period. The Coast Guard published a
final rule on March 19, 2020, 85 FR
15724, announcing the same changes to
33 CFR 165.754 that this rule
implements. The final rule became
effective on April 20, 2020. However,
the amendatory instruction in the rule
issued on March 19, 2020 erroneously
created a new 33 CFR 165.754 rather
than amend 33 CFR 165.754 that already
existed in the CFR. We are reissuing this
final rule with updated amendatory
instructions in order to implement the
changes that were intended to be
implemented by the final rule that
published on March 19, 2020. Under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds
that correcting the amendatory
instructions on a final rulemaking
action that had been completed, and
published in the Federal Register with
a 30 day delayed effective date;
therefore, this technical amendment is
exempt from notice and comment
rulemaking requirements because the
only amendment being made is to
clarify in the amendatory instructions
that existing 33 CFR 165.754 is being
‘‘revised’’ and not being added as a new
section to the CFR. This revision is a
non-substantive change. This change
will have no substantive effect on the
public; therefore, it is unnecessary to
publish an NPRM.
For the same reasons provided in the
preceding paragraph, the Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for making
this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
the amendatory instruction in the rule
issued on March 19, 2020 erroneously
created a new 33 CFR 165.764. We are
reissuing this final rule; correction
document with updated amendatory
instructions in order to implement the
changes into the existing 33 CFR
165.754 that were intended by the final
rule on March 19, 2020.
III. Legal Authority, Need for Rule, and
Discussion
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The
Coast Guard published a final rule on
March 19, 2020, 85 FR 15724,
announcing the same changes to 33 CFR
165.754 that this rule implements. The
final rule was supposed to become
effective on April 20, 2020. However,
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
Because this rule is not a significant
regulatory action, this rule is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771. See the OMB
Memorandum titled ‘‘Guidance
Implementing Executive Order 13771,
titled ‘Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (April 5,
2017). This rule involves a nonsubstantive change in the amendatory
instruction; it will not impose any
additional costs on the public. The
benefit of the non-substantive change is
33 CFR 165.754 will be revised, and the
addition of a second 33 CFR 165.754,
which was erroneously added to the the
CFR will be removed.
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
26616
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 87 / Tuesday, May 5, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard did not receive any
comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
16:29 May 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This final rule involves a
non-substantive technical amendment.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded under paragraph L54 in Table
3–1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementing Procedures
5090.1. Paragraph L54 pertains to
regulations which are editorial or
procedural.
G. Protest Activities
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
■
2. Revise § 165.754 to read as follows:
§ 165.754 Safety Zone; San Juan Harbor,
San Juan, PR.
(a) Regulated area. A moving safety
zone is established in the following
area:
(1) The waters around liquefied gas
(LG) carriers entering San Juan Harbor
in an area one half mile around each
vessel, beginning one mile north of the
Bahia de San Juan Lighted Buoy #3, in
approximate position 18°28′17.8″ N,
066°07′36.4″ W and continuing until the
vessel is moored at the Puma Energy
dock, Catan˜o Oil dock, or Wharf B in
approximate position 18°25′47″ N,
066°6′32″ W. All coordinates are North
American Datum 1983.
(2) The waters around LG carriers in
a 50-yard radius around each vessel
when moored at the Puma Energy dock,
Catan˜o Oil dock, or Wharf B.
(3) The waters around LG carriers
departing San Juan Harbor in an area
one half mile around each vessel
beginning at the Puma Energy Dock,
Catan˜o Oil dock, or Wharf B in
approximate position 18°25′47″ N,
066°6′32″ W when the vessel gets
underway, and continuing until the
stern passes the Bahia de San Juan
Lighted Buoy #3, in approximate
position 18°28′17.8″ N, 066°07′36.4″ W.
All coordinates referenced use datum:
NAD 83.
(b) Regulations. (1) No person or
vessel may enter, transit or remain in
the safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP), San Juan,
Puerto Rico, or a designated Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer. Those operating in the safety
zone with the COTP’s authorization
must comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or
his designated representative.
(2) Persons desiring to transit the area
of the safety zones may contact the
COTP San Juan or his designated
representative to seek permission to
transit the area. If permission is granted,
all persons and vessels must comply
with the instructions of the COTP or his
designated representative.
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 87 / Tuesday, May 5, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(3) Vessels encountering emergencies,
which require transit through the
moving safety zone, should contact the
Coast Guard patrol craft or Duty Officer
on VHF Channel 16. In the event of an
emergency, the Coast Guard patrol craft
may authorize a vessel to transit through
the safety zone with a Coast Guard
designated escort.
(4) The Captain of the Port and the
Duty Officer at Sector San Juan, Puerto
Rico, can be contacted at telephone
number 787–289–2041. The Coast
Guard Patrol Commander enforcing the
safety zone can be contacted on VHF–
FM channels 16 and 22A.
(5) Coast Guard Sector San Juan will,
when necessary and practicable, notify
the maritime community of periods
during which the safety zones will be in
effect by providing advance notice of
scheduled arrivals and departure of
liquefied gas carriers via a Marine
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(6) All persons and vessels must
comply with the instructions of onscene patrol personnel. On-scene patrol
personnel include commissioned,
warrant, or petty officers of the U.S.
Coast Guard. Coast Guard Auxiliary and
local or state officials may be present to
inform vessel operators of the
requirements of this section, and other
applicable laws.
Dated: April 24, 2020.
E.P. King,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Juan.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 9 and 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2019–0226; FRL–10007–
58]
RIN 2070–AB27
Significant New Use Rules on Certain
Chemical Substances (19–3.B)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is issuing significant new
use rules (SNURs) under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) for
chemical substances which are the
subject of premanufacture notices
(PMNs). This action requires persons to
notify EPA least 90 days before
commencing manufacture (defined by
statute to include import) or processing
of any of these chemical substances for
an activity that is designated as a
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 May 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
significant new use by this rule. The
required notification initiates EPA’s
evaluation of the chemical under the
conditions of use within the applicable
review period. Persons may not
commence manufacture or processing
for the significant new use until EPA
has conducted a review of the notice,
made an appropriate determination on
the notice, and has taken such actions
as are required as a result of that
determination.
at 40 CFR part 707, subpart B. In
addition, any persons who export or
intend to export a chemical substance
that is the subject of this rule on or after
June 4, 2020 are subject to the export
notification provisions of TSCA section
12(b) (15 U.S.C. 2611(b)) (see 40 CFR
721.20), and must comply with the
export notification requirements in 40
CFR part 707, subpart D.
This rule is effective on July 6,
2020. For purposes of judicial review,
this rule shall be promulgated at 1 p.m.
(e.s.t.) on May 19, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information contact: Kenneth
Moss, Chemical Control Division
(7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 564–9232; email address:
moss.kenneth@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.
A. What action is the Agency taking?
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
[FR Doc. 2020–09162 Filed 5–4–20; 8:45 am]
26617
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you manufacture, process,
or use the chemical substances
contained in this rule. The following list
of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Manufacturers or processors of one
or more subject chemical substances
(NAICS codes 325 and 324110), e.g.,
chemical manufacturing and petroleum
refineries.
This action may also affect certain
entities through pre-existing import
certification and export notification
rules under TSCA. Chemical importers
are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15
U.S.C. 2612) import certification
requirements promulgated at 19 CFR
12.118 through 12.127 and 19 CFR
127.28. Chemical importers must certify
that the shipment of the chemical
substance complies with all applicable
rules and Orders under TSCA. Importers
of chemicals subject to these SNURs
must certify their compliance with the
SNUR requirements. The EPA policy in
support of import certification appears
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. Background
EPA is finalizing a SNUR under TSCA
section 5(a)(2) for chemical substances
which were the subject of PMNs P–16–
417, P–18–239, and P–18–240. These
SNURs require persons who intend to
manufacture or process any of these
chemical substances for an activity that
is designated as a significant new use to
notify EPA at least 90 days before
commencing that activity.
Previously, in the Federal Register of
July 8, 2019 (84 FR 32366) (FRL–9996–
13), EPA proposed a SNUR for these
chemical substances in 40 CFR part 721,
subpart E. More information on the
specific chemical substances subject to
this final rule can be found in the
Federal Register documents proposing
the SNUR. The record for the SNUR was
established in the docket under docket
ID number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2019–0226.
That docket includes information
considered by the Agency in developing
the proposed and final rules.
EPA received a number of public
comments on this rule. Those comments
and EPA’s responses are found in Unit
IV.
B. What is the Agency’s authority for
taking this action?
TSCA section 5(a)(2) (15 U.S.C.
2604(a)(2)) authorizes EPA to determine
that a use of a chemical substance is a
‘‘significant new use.’’ EPA must make
this determination by rule after
considering all relevant factors,
including the four bulleted TSCA
section 5(a)(2) factors listed in Unit III.
As described in Unit V., the general
SNUR provisions are found at 40 CFR
part 721, subpart A.
C. Applicability of General Provisions
General provisions for SNURs appear
in 40 CFR part 721, subpart A. These
provisions describe persons subject to
the rule, recordkeeping requirements,
exemptions to reporting requirements,
and applicability of the rule to uses
occurring before the effective date of the
rule. Provisions relating to user fees
appear at 40 CFR part 700. According to
40 CFR 721.1(c), persons subject to
these SNURs must comply with the
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 87 (Tuesday, May 5, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26615-26617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-09162]
[[Page 26615]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2019-0460]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; San Juan Harbor, San Juan, PR
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: By this final rule, the Coast Guard is making non-substantive
changes to the final rule that published on March 19, 2020. The final
rule became effective on April 20, 2020. However, the amendatory
instruction in the rule issued on March 19, 2020 erroneously created a
new section rather than amend the section that already existed in the
CFR. We are reissuing this final rule with updated amendatory
instructions in order to implement the changes that were intended to be
implemented by the final rule that published on March 19, 2020.
DATES: This correction is effective on May 5, 2020.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0460 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Commander Pedro Mendoza, Sector San Juan
Prevention Department, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 787-729-2374, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
LG Liquefied Gas
LNG Liquefied Natural Gas
LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
TFR Temporary Final Rule
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule without prior final rule
pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an
agency to issue a rule without prior notice when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest.''
On December 17, 2019, a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled, ``Safety Zone; San Juan Harbor, San Juan, PR'' was published
in the Federal Register under USCG-2019-0460 (84 FR 68860) with a 30
day comment period. The comment period ended on January 16, 2020. No
comments were submitted during the NPRMs 30 day comment period. The
Coast Guard published a final rule on March 19, 2020, 85 FR 15724,
announcing the same changes to 33 CFR 165.754 that this rule
implements. The final rule became effective on April 20, 2020. However,
the amendatory instruction in the rule issued on March 19, 2020
erroneously created a new 33 CFR 165.754 rather than amend 33 CFR
165.754 that already existed in the CFR. We are reissuing this final
rule with updated amendatory instructions in order to implement the
changes that were intended to be implemented by the final rule that
published on March 19, 2020. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard
finds that correcting the amendatory instructions on a final rulemaking
action that had been completed, and published in the Federal Register
with a 30 day delayed effective date; therefore, this technical
amendment is exempt from notice and comment rulemaking requirements
because the only amendment being made is to clarify in the amendatory
instructions that existing 33 CFR 165.754 is being ``revised'' and not
being added as a new section to the CFR. This revision is a non-
substantive change. This change will have no substantive effect on the
public; therefore, it is unnecessary to publish an NPRM.
For the same reasons provided in the preceding paragraph, the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less
than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3).
III. Legal Authority, Need for Rule, and Discussion
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034. The Coast Guard published a final rule on March 19, 2020, 85 FR
15724, announcing the same changes to 33 CFR 165.754 that this rule
implements. The final rule was supposed to become effective on April
20, 2020. However, the amendatory instruction in the rule issued on
March 19, 2020 erroneously created a new 33 CFR 165.764. We are
reissuing this final rule; correction document with updated amendatory
instructions in order to implement the changes into the existing 33 CFR
165.754 that were intended by the final rule on March 19, 2020.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
Because this rule is not a significant regulatory action, this rule
is exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. See the OMB
Memorandum titled ``Guidance Implementing Executive Order 13771, titled
`Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs'[thinsp]'' (April
5, 2017). This rule involves a non-substantive change in the amendatory
instruction; it will not impose any additional costs on the public. The
benefit of the non-substantive change is 33 CFR 165.754 will be
revised, and the addition of a second 33 CFR 165.754, which was
erroneously added to the the CFR will be removed.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
[[Page 26616]]
operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental
jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard did
not receive any comments from the Small Business Administration on this
rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This final rule involves a
non-substantive technical amendment. Therefore, this rule is
categorically excluded under paragraph L54 in Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast
Guard Environmental Planning Implementing Procedures 5090.1. Paragraph
L54 pertains to regulations which are editorial or procedural.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 165.754 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.754 Safety Zone; San Juan Harbor, San Juan, PR.
(a) Regulated area. A moving safety zone is established in the
following area:
(1) The waters around liquefied gas (LG) carriers entering San Juan
Harbor in an area one half mile around each vessel, beginning one mile
north of the Bahia de San Juan Lighted Buoy #3, in approximate position
18[deg]28'17.8'' N, 066[deg]07'36.4'' W and continuing until the vessel
is moored at the Puma Energy dock, Cata[ntilde]o Oil dock, or Wharf B
in approximate position 18[deg]25'47'' N, 066[deg]6'32'' W. All
coordinates are North American Datum 1983.
(2) The waters around LG carriers in a 50-yard radius around each
vessel when moored at the Puma Energy dock, Cata[ntilde]o Oil dock, or
Wharf B.
(3) The waters around LG carriers departing San Juan Harbor in an
area one half mile around each vessel beginning at the Puma Energy
Dock, Cata[ntilde]o Oil dock, or Wharf B in approximate position
18[deg]25'47'' N, 066[deg]6'32'' W when the vessel gets underway, and
continuing until the stern passes the Bahia de San Juan Lighted Buoy
#3, in approximate position 18[deg]28'17.8'' N, 066[deg]07'36.4'' W.
All coordinates referenced use datum: NAD 83.
(b) Regulations. (1) No person or vessel may enter, transit or
remain in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP), San Juan, Puerto Rico, or a designated Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer. Those operating in the safety
zone with the COTP's authorization must comply with all lawful orders
or directions given to them by the COTP or his designated
representative.
(2) Persons desiring to transit the area of the safety zones may
contact the COTP San Juan or his designated representative to seek
permission to transit the area. If permission is granted, all persons
and vessels must comply with the instructions of the COTP or his
designated representative.
[[Page 26617]]
(3) Vessels encountering emergencies, which require transit through
the moving safety zone, should contact the Coast Guard patrol craft or
Duty Officer on VHF Channel 16. In the event of an emergency, the Coast
Guard patrol craft may authorize a vessel to transit through the safety
zone with a Coast Guard designated escort.
(4) The Captain of the Port and the Duty Officer at Sector San
Juan, Puerto Rico, can be contacted at telephone number 787-289-2041.
The Coast Guard Patrol Commander enforcing the safety zone can be
contacted on VHF-FM channels 16 and 22A.
(5) Coast Guard Sector San Juan will, when necessary and
practicable, notify the maritime community of periods during which the
safety zones will be in effect by providing advance notice of scheduled
arrivals and departure of liquefied gas carriers via a Marine Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.
(6) All persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of
on-scene patrol personnel. On-scene patrol personnel include
commissioned, warrant, or petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard. Coast
Guard Auxiliary and local or state officials may be present to inform
vessel operators of the requirements of this section, and other
applicable laws.
Dated: April 24, 2020.
E.P. King,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Juan.
[FR Doc. 2020-09162 Filed 5-4-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P