Ohio Regulatory Program, 26413-26418 [2020-08805]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 86 / Monday, May 4, 2020 / Proposed Rules
should be allocating its resources during
these unprecedented times.
Appendix 6—Statement of
Commissioner Dan M. Berkovitz
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
I am voting in favor of this proposed rule
to amend Regulation 4.27 and Form CPO–
PQR (‘‘Proposal’’). The information in Form
CPO–PQR that no longer would be required
under the Proposal has not proven to be
useful to the Commission in identifying or
measuring systemic or idiosyncratic risk.
In the wake of the financial crisis and the
enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, the
Commission required certain commodity
pool operators (‘‘CPOs’’) to report on Form
CPO–PQR a variety of data that, at the time,
the Commission believed would enable it to
assess risks presented by pooled commodity
investment vehicles, such as a pool’s
exposure to certain asset classes and
susceptibility to market stress.1 As the
Proposal explains, however, the
Commission’s experience over the past seven
years has unfortunately demonstrated that
some of the information on Schedules B and
C of Form CPO–PQR has not been useful for
these purposes. The Proposal would amend
the Form CPO–PQR requirements to
eliminate the information that has not proven
to be of value to the Commission, yet retain
the requirements to report useful
information, such as the pool schedule of
investments.2
At the same time as the Commission
streamlines its data collection requirements,
it must also make better use of the data that
it does collect. The Commission gathers a
diverse and large array of data on a daily
basis for over-the-counter and exchangetraded derivatives transactions.3 As the
Proposal notes, these data sets have the
potential to be more useful for risk
monitoring and surveillance purposes than
certain static information collected quarterly
through Form CPO–PQR. But the
Commission still has a long way to go before
it can use such data to perform a
comprehensive, forward-looking analysis of
our markets. The Commission should
improve its strategies and capabilities for
aggregating and analyzing the information it
will continue to receive.
The Proposal would take one step in this
direction by requiring CPOs using the swap
markets to report legal entity identifiers
(‘‘LEIs’’). Collecting LEIs is important
because they allow the Commission to
aggregate SDR data from related pools,
thereby furthering our understanding of the
role these pools play in our markets.
1 See Final Rule, Commodity Pool Operators and
Commodity Trading Advisors: Amendments to
Compliance Obligations, 77 FR 11252, 11252 (Feb.
24, 2012).
2 ‘‘The eliminated data elements include detailed,
pool-specific information, provided on both the
individual and aggregate level, such as questions
about investment strategy and counterparty credit
exposure, asset liquidity and concentration of
positions, clearing relationships, risk metrics,
financing, and investor composition.’’ Proposal,
Amendments to Compliance Requirements for
Commodity Pool Operators on Form CPO–PQR, at
Sect. III.A.
3 See generally id. at Sect. III.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 May 01, 2020
Jkt 250001
However, the Proposal does not require all
firms, such as those that do not trade swaps,
to obtain and report LEIs, so this amendment
will not allow the Commission to aggregate
all derivatives transactions by pools under
common control. The Commission can and
should do more to integrate and analyze all
of the data at its disposal.
Finally, I am pleased that the comment
period for this Proposal is 60 days. Providing
the public with sufficient time to prepare
meaningful comments to our rules in these
extraordinary times is good public policy.
I encourage the public to comment on this
Proposal. In particular, the Proposal
acknowledges that by removing from Form
CPO–PQR some of the pool-specific data in
Schedules B and C, less information would
be available to the Financial Stability
Oversight Counsel (‘‘FSOC’’). The Proposal
also notes, however, that FSOC otherwise
receives comparable data for the large portion
of dually registered CPOs via Form PF. I am
interested in commenters’ views on whether
this amendment would affect FSOC’s ability
to monitor for systemic risk.
I would like to thank the staff, particularly
the Division of Swap Dealer and
Intermediary Oversight, for their engagement
with my office on this Proposal. I look
forward to the Commission articulating
further steps to enhance its surveillance of
commodity pools, and our markets more
broadly.
[FR Doc. 2020–08496 Filed 5–1–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 935
[SATS No. OH–258–FOR; Docket ID: OSM–
2017–0005; S1D1S SS08011000 SX064A000
201S180110 S2D2S SS08011000 SX064A000
20XS501520]
Ohio Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
AGENCY:
We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), are announcing receipt of a
proposed amendment to the Ohio
regulatory program (hereinafter, the
Ohio program) under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of
1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Through this
proposed amendment, Ohio is
requesting to modify 41 rules to the
Ohio Administrative Code, including,
but not limited to, permit applications,
hydrologic map and cross sections,
general map requirements, requirements
for permits for special categories of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26413
mining, underground mining permit
application, small operator assistance
program, and self-bonding etc. This
document gives the times and locations
that the Ohio program and this
proposed amendment to that program
are available for your inspection, the
comment period during which you may
submit written comments on the
amendment, and the procedures that we
will follow for the public hearing, if one
is requested.
DATES: We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4
p.m., Eastern Standard Time (e.s.t.),
June 3, 2020. If requested, we will hold
a public hearing on the amendment on
May 29, 2020. We will accept requests
to speak at a hearing until 4 p.m., e.s.t.
on May 19, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by SATS No. OH–258–FOR,
by any of the following methods:
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Mr. Ben
Owens, Field Office Director, Pittsburgh
Field Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 3
Parkway Center, Pittsburgh, Pa 15220.
• Fax: (412) 937–2177.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: The
amendment has been assigned Docket
ID: OSM–2017–0005. If you would like
to submit comments go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Comment Procedures’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
review copies of the Ohio program, this
amendment, a listing of any scheduled
public hearings, and all written
comments received in response to this
document, you must go to the address
listed below during normal business
hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may receive
one free copy of the amendment by
contacting OSMRE’s Pittsburgh Field
Office or the full text of the program
amendment is available for you to read
at www.regulations.gov.
Mr. Ben Owens, Field Office Director,
Pittsburgh Field Office, Office of
Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, 3 Parkway Center,
Pittsburgh, Pa 15220, Telephone:
(412) 937–2827, email: bowens@
osmre.gov.
In addition, you may review a copy of
the amendment during regular business
hours at the following location:
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
26414
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 86 / Monday, May 4, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Mr. Dave Crow, Acting Chief, Ohio
Department of Natural Resources,
Division of Mineral Resources
Management, 2045 Morse Road,
Building H2, Telephone: (614) 265–
1020, email: dave.crow@
dnr.state.oh.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ben Owens, Field Office Director,
Pittsburgh Field Office, 3 Parkway
Center, Pittsburgh, Pa 15220.
Telephone: (412) 937–2827, email:
bowens@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Ohio Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background on the Ohio Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, State laws
and regulations that govern surface coal
mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the Act and consistent
with the Federal regulations. See 30
U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis
of these criteria, the Secretary of the
Interior conditionally approved the
Ohio program on August 16, 1982. You
can find background information on the
Ohio program, including the Secretary’s
findings, the disposition of comments,
and conditions of approval of the Ohio
program in the August 10, 1982, Federal
Register (47 FR 34717). You can also
find later actions concerning the Ohio
program and program amendments at 30
CFR 935.10, State Regulatory Program
Approval; and 935.11, Conditions of
State Regulatory Program Approval; and
935.15, Approval of Ohio Regulatory
Program Amendments.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
By letter dated November 20, 2015
(Administrative Record No. OH–2194–
01), Ohio sent us an amendment to its
program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201
et seq.) Ohio seeks to revise its program
to amend 41 revised rules to the Ohio
Administrative Code to include the
following:
Proposed New Rules
1. Section 1501:13–4–08.1—Proposed
new rule—Application, supplemental
and hydrologic maps, and crosssections, designs and plans for
underground workings. This new rule is
proposed to contain all the mapping
rules specific to underground workings.
A companion rule, 1501:13–4–08, is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 May 01, 2020
Jkt 250001
proposed to be amended to contain all
the mapping rules for surface
affectment, including surface coal
mining operations and underground
mining surface operations.
2. Section 1501:13–4–10—Proposed
new rule with the same number and
title—will have updated and new map
symbols. The new proposed rule, is to
be replaced. The rescinded rule with the
same number and title, will have
updated and new map symbols.
Rule Rescissions
1. Section 1501:13–7–04—Rule
proposed for rescission—Self-bonding—
This rule is proposed for rescission due
to the Division of Mineral Resources
Management no longer wanting to
accepting self-bonds as performance
security.
2. Section 1501:13–4–10—Rule
proposed for rescission—Uniform color
code and map symbols. The current rule
proposed for rescission, is to be
replaced with a proposed new rule with
the same number and title, which will
have updated and new map symbols.
Rule Revisions
Ohio’s proposed rule changes are for
the purpose of complying with the fiveyear-review requirements of Section
106.03 of the Ohio Revised Code, to
make revisions that are as effective as
the Federal requirements, to revise the
mapping requirements so they are easier
to understand and follow, to rescind the
self-bonding rule and revise other
performance bond rules so that selfbonding cannot be used as performance
security, to allow the applicant/
permittee to certify that a current proof
of liability insurance and rider is part of
the centralized ownership and control
file, to protect underground mining
from other underground mining and
from coal exploration drilling, to clarify
a Phase III bond release requirement
related to seeding after minor repairs, to
update the publication dates of the Code
of Federal Regulations and the United
States Code, and to make numerous
administrative corrections and
clarifications.
A. Minor Revision to Ohio Rules
The minor wording, editorial,
punctuation, grammatical, and
recodification changes being addressed
in this finding are non-substantive.
1. Section 1501:13–1–02—Effective
date and applicability—Proposed to
include two new rules 1501:13–3–01
and 1501:13–3–02, that became effective
October 28,2010.
2. Section 1501:13–1–02—
Definitions—Proposed to remove the
definition of self bonds. The Division
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
will no longer accept self bonds as
performance security.
3. Section 1501:13–1–13—Rule
references—Proposed paragraph
renumbering.
4. Section 1501:13–3–01—Standards
for demonstration of valid existing
right—Proposed to change paragraph
(A)(2)(b)(iv) which references to the lifeof-mine map.
5. Section 1501:13–5–03—Form,
conditions and terms of performance
security—Paragraph (A)(3) is proposed
to be removed. Paragraph (C)(2) is
proposed to be revised to state that the
Division will no longer accept self
bonds as performance security.
6. Section 1501:13–6–03 Small
operator assistance program—Paragraph
(F)(2)(c) is proposed to revise the
references to cross section maps and
plans, since these are being moved to
rules 1501:13–4–08 and 1501:13–4–
08.1.
7. Section 1501:13–7–01 General
requirements for providing performance
security for coal mining and
reclamation operations—Paragraph
(E)(4) is proposed to be removed. The
Division will no longer accept self
bonds as performance security.
8. Section 1501:13–7–03 Form,
conditions, and terms of performance
security—Paragraphs (A)(3) and (C)(2)
are proposed to be removed. The
Division will no longer accept self
bonds as performance security.
9. Section 1501:13–7–05 Procedures,
criteria, and schedule for release of
performance security for permits reliant
on the reclamation forfeiture fund—
Paragraph (B)(4)(a) is proposed to be
removed. The Division will no longer
accept self bonds as performance
security.
10. Section 1501:13–7–05.1
Procedures, criteria, and schedule for
release of performance security for
permits not reliant on the reclamation
forfeiture fund—Paragraph (B)(4)(a) is
proposed to be removed. The Division
will no longer accept self bonds as
performance security.
11. Section 1501:13–7–06
Performance security forfeiture criteria
and procedures—Paragraph (C)(4)(b) is
proposed to add the word ‘‘or’’ to the
end of this paragraph, since current
paragraph (c) is proposed to be
removed. Paragraph (C)(4)(c) is
proposed to be removed. The Division
will no longer accept self bonds as
performance security.
12. Section 1501:13–8–01 Coal
exploration; performance standards—
Paragraph (J) is proposed to correct a
paragraph Reference.
13. Section 1501:13–9–02 Casing and
sealing of drilled holes— Paragraph (A)
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 86 / Monday, May 4, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
is proposed to correct grammatical
errors. Paragraph (C) is proposed to
correct grammatical errors and an
addition to clarify that it is the Chief
who makes the finding of no adverse
environmental or health and safety
effect.
14. Section 1501:13–9–16 Cessation of
operations— Paragraphs (A)(1), (A)(2)
and (B)(1) are proposed to correct
grammatical errors and use consistent
terms. Paragraph (B)(1) is proposed to
add a reference to Chapter 1513 of the
Revised Code
15. Section 1501:13–10–01 Roads:
performance standards— Paragraphs
(B)(2) and (G)(1)(a) are proposed to
correct grammatical errors. Paragraph
(G)(4)(f) has a sentence re-worded to
clarify its meaning and to mirror the
language of 30 CFR 816.151(d)(6) and 30
CFR 817.151(d)(6).
16. Section 1501:13–12–01
Underground operations— Paragraph
(B) is proposed to clarify that
underground operations must meet all
applicable requirements of Chapter 1513
of the Revised Code.
17. Section 1501:13–13–03 Operations
on prime farmland—Paragraph (B) has
Minor corrections. Paragraph (D) has a
paragraph reference corrected.
Paragraph (E)(1) is proposed to correct
grammar, the proposed language is to
change ‘‘of’’ to ‘‘to’’ to mirror the
language of 30 CFR 823.14 (b).
18. Section 1501:13–14–01
Inspections— Paragraph (A)(2)(b) is
proposed to move the phrase
‘‘Conducted under a D-permit’’ because
it is outdated and no longer needed; all
coal mining in Ohio is now conducted
under D permits
B. Revisions to Ohio’s Rules That Have
the Same Meaning as the Corresponding
Provisions of the Federal Regulations
Ohio proposed revisions to the
following rules containing language that
is the same as or similar to the
corresponding sections of the Federal
regulations.
1. Section 1501:13–1–10 Availability
of records— Proposed to add provision
(B)(2) in order for it to be as effective as
the federal program. The federal
regulations at 30 CFR 840.14 (c)(1) and
(2) require that either a copy of the
records be available for inspection in
the county where mining is taking place
or a description of the records and a
description of the procedure for
obtaining the records be available in the
county where mining is taking place.
Paragraphs (B)(2)(b) and (b)(i)
provisions in subparagraph (b) is
revised and (b)(i) is added for
clarification to keep Ohio’s program as
effective as the federal program. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 May 01, 2020
Jkt 250001
federal regulations at 30 CFR 840.14
(c)(2) requires that any resident of the
area where mining is taking place either
be able to inspect copies of the records
in the county where the mining is taking
place or be provided copies of the
records at no charge. Paragraph
(B)(2)(b)(ii) is revised for other persons
who request copies of the records, the
Division will follow ODNR policy in
charging for the copies.
2. Section 1501:13–1–14
Incorporation by reference—Proposed
changes to paragraphs (A) and (B) are
annual updates of the editions of the
Code of Federal Regulations and the
United States Code that are incorporated
by reference. The website address is
simplified. Paragraphs (B)(16) and (17)
are proposed to be removed from this
list
3. Section 1501:13–4–03 Permit
applications; requirements for legal,
financial, compliance and related
information—Proposed to change
grammatical issues in paragraphs
(B)(11), (C)(5), (D)(1) and (F)(3).
Proposed to add paragraph (D)(2)
requiring information about lands
within the permit area where the private
mineral estate to be mined has been
severed from the private surface estate
will be revised to limit this information
to lands where surface disturbance will
result from the applicant’s proposed use
of a surface mining method. Paragraphs
(D)(2)(a) to (c) are revised to add
‘‘surface disturbance’’ qualifications to
all paragraphs due to HB 163 (effective
September 30, 2011). Paragraph (D)(3) is
proposed to change ‘‘title’’ to ‘‘rights’’ to
mirror the language of ORC Section
1513.07 (E)(2)Ö(iii). Paragraphs (E)(3)
and (4) are proposed to add ‘‘measured
horizontally’’ due to HB 163 (effective
September 30,2011). Paragraph (H) is
proposed to be revised by reorganizing
provisions and removal of a comma to
clarify the requirements for newspaper
advertisement.
4. Section 1501:13–4–04 Permit
application requirements for
information on environmental
resources—Proposed changes to
paragraph (C)(2)(a)(i) include a
Refererence to rule 1501:13–4–08 due to
the revisions in paragraphs (J) and (K),
as explained below. Paragraphs (D)(5)
and(E)(3) is proposed to reference to
new paragraphs (D)(6) and (D)(7) added.
Paragraph (D)(6) is proposed to add a
new paragraph and sub-paragraphs
regarding seasonal variations which
provide a standard method for
collection and submitting water samples
to identify seasonal variations in water
quality and quantity. The provisions
include a chart showing the flow
periods and their duration. These new
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26415
paragraphs contain the requirements of
the Division’s Permitting & Hydrology
Policy/Procedure Directive 2000–2 (also
known as PPD 2000–2). Paragraph (D)(7)
is proposed to add a new paragraph
regarding seasonal variations that states:
Water quality and quantity data
collected and described other than as
required by paragraph (D)(6) of this rule
may be submitted to identify seasonal
variations in ground water and surface
water, provided the chief determines
that that alternative data are sufficient to
identify seasonal Revised Code and the
rules adopted thereunder. Paragraphs (J)
and (K) which are the mapping
provisions of this rule are proposed to
be moved to rule 1501:13–4–08, which
will apply to coal mining operations
including underground mining surface
operations. The mapping requirements
for underground workings will be in
rule 1501:13–4–08.1. Paragraphs (L) and
(M) are proposed to be re-numbered (J)
and (K) due to the revisions in
paragraphs (J) and (K), as explained
above. Paragraphs (L)(3), and (L)(4)(a)
and (b) are proposed to be revised to
address references changed due to the
revisions in paragraphs (J) and (K), as
explained above.
5. Section 1501:13–4–05 Permit
application requirements for
reclamation and operations plans—
Paragraph (A)(2)(b) is proposed to
restore the word ‘‘necessary’’ to this
provision. It was removed effective
April 30, 2009 but OSMRE requires that
it be put back for the provision to be as
effective as the Federal provision.
Paragraph (G)(2) is proposed to add
additional language per HB 163,
effective September 30, 2011, that
explains that the provisions of (G)(2) do
not apply in cases where no surface
disturbance will result from the
applicant’s proposed use of auger/
highwall mining. Paragraph (H)(7) is
proposed as a new paragraph to address
incorporation by reference
requirements. The paragraph refers the
reader to rule 1501:13–9–04, which
contains information on where a copy of
Soil Conservation Service Technical
Release No. 60 can be obtained.
6. Section 1501:13–4–08 Hydrologic
map and cross-sections—Proposed
revision to contain all the mapping rules
specific to surface coal mining
operations, including underground
mining surface operations. A new rule,
1501:13–4–08.1, is being proposed to
contain all the mapping rules specific to
underground workings.
7. Section 1501:13–4–09 General map
requirements—Proposed to add (B) to
require that a map’s legend indicate
which of the map symbols listed in rule
1501:13–4–10 appear on the map.
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
26416
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 86 / Monday, May 4, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Paragraph (D)(1) is proposed to add
supplemental map and hydrologic map
to the list of maps that are submitted to
DMRM
8. Section 1501:13–4–11 Maps
showing reaffection of permit area—
Paragraph (A) is proposed to eliminate
the word ‘‘former’’ to clarify the
meaning of the sentence. The rule
applies to maps showing land affected
under a permit that is reaffected under
a subsequent permit. Paragraphs (A) and
(B) are proposed to change a rule
reference change to 1501:13–4–08 (A),
because the mapping requirements of
rule 1501:13–4–04 are proposed to be
moved to that rule. Paragraph (B) is
proposed to correct punctuation
throughout. Paragraphs (B), (B)(2) and
(B)(5) are proposed to restore valid
existing rights language to correct an
error that was made when the rule was
revised in 2009. At that time, the phrase
‘‘valid existing rights’’ was removed
from the rule, when in fact it needs to
remain in the rule to appropriately
distinguish the requirements of (B) from
those of (A). A person having valid
existing rights to land generally means
that his or her rights were secured prior
to the enactment of the Federal Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act
(SMCRA) of 1977. If land under an
existing permit is reaffected by a person
with valid existing rights, mapping and
certification requirements for that land
would follow (B), rather than (A). The
term ‘‘valid existing rights’’ is defined in
OAC 1501:13–1–02.
9. Section 1501:13–4–12
Requirements for permits for special
categories of mining—Paragraph (F)(2)
is proposed to change the references to
the prime farmland requirements
because of changes proposed for rules
1501:13–4–04 and 1501:13–4–13
10. Section 1501:13–4–13
Underground mining permit application
requirements for information on
environmental resources—Paragraph
(C)(2)(a)(i) is proposed to refer to rules
1501:13–4–08 and new rule 1501:13–4–
08.1 due to the revisions in paragraphs
(J) and (K), as explained below.
Paragraphs (D)(5) and (E)(3) is proposed
to reference to new paragraph (0)(6) and
(0)(7) added. Paragraph (D)(6) is
proposed as a new paragraph and subparagraphs regarding seasonal variations
which provide a standard method for
collecting and submitting water samples
to identify seasonal variations in water
quality and quantity. The provisions
include a chart showing the flow
periods and their duration. These new
paragraphs contain the requirements of
the Division’s Permitting & Hydrology
Policy/Procedure Directive 2000–2 (also
know as PPD 2000–2). The Division is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 May 01, 2020
Jkt 250001
proposing to put these requirements
into rule due to a 2007 court decision,
Buckeye Forest Council, Inc. v. Div. of
Mineral Res. Mgmt., 172 Ohio App.3d
440. In this decision, the court stated
that, since PPD 2000–2 uniformly
applies to all mining permit application
statewide, it qualifies as a rule and its
requirements should therefore be
adopted by the Division through rulemaking. Paragraph (0)(7) is proposed as
a new paragraph regarding seasonal
variations that states: Water quality and
quantity data collected and described
other than as required by paragraph
(D)(6) of this rule may be submitted to
identify seasonal variations in ground
water and surface water, provided the
chief determines that the alternative
data are sufficient to identify seasonal
variations needed for the hydrologic
assessments required by Chapter 1513 of
the Revised Code and the rules adopted
thereunder. Paragraphs (J) and (K) are
proposed to address the mapping
provisions of this rule and are proposed
to be moved to rule 150I:13–4–08,
which will apply to coal mining
operations including underground
mining surface operations. The mapping
requirements for underground workings
will be in rule 1501:13–4–08.l.
Paragraphs (L) and (M) are proposed to
be re-numbered (J) and (K) due to the
revisions in paragraphs (J) and (K), as
explained above. Paragraphs (L)(3), and
(L)(4)(a) and (b) are proposed to have
references changed due to the revisions
in paragraphs (J) and (K), as explained
above.
11. Section 1501:13–4–14
Underground mining permit application
requirements for reclamation and
operations plans—Paragraph (A)(2)(b) is
proposed to restore ‘‘necessary’’ to this
provision. It was removed effective
April 30, 2009, but OSMRE requires that
it be put back for the provision to be as
effective as the Federal provision.
Paragraph (H)(7) is proposed as a new
paragraph to address incorporation by
reference requirements. The paragraph
refers the reader to rule 1501:13–9–04,
which contains information on where a
copy of Soil Conservation Service
Technical Release No. 60 can be
obtained.
12. Section 1501:13–5–01 Review,
public participation, and approval or
disapproval of permit applications and
permit terms and conditions—Paragraph
(E)(6) is proposed to add additional
language per HB 163 (effective
September 30,2011) so that this rule
agrees with the language of rule
1501:13–4–03 (D)(2). (G)(3). Added a
reference to proposed new mapping rule
1501:13–4–08.1
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13. Section 1501:13–7–07 Liability
insurance—Paragraph (A) is proposed to
specify that, for an application to satisfy
the liability insurance requirement of
this rule, the application can contain a
notarized certification acknowledging
that a current proof of liability
insurance and rider is part of the
applicant’s Central File for Identity
Information. Having the liability
insurance information in the Central
File for Identity Information will avoid
duplication of paperwork; the Central
File contains up-to-date application
information about a coal operator in one
place in the Division, rather than
requiring the coal operator to submit
such information repeatedly in each
individual application.
14. Section 1501:13–9–01 Signs and
markers—Paragraph (C)(l) is proposed
to remove ‘‘but shall not be limited to’’.
Paragraph (C)(2) is proposed to be
reworded for clarity. Paragraphs (C)(3)
to (5) is proposed to correct
conjunctions and punctuation.
Paragraph (E) is proposed to clarify
buffer zone marking requirements and a
reference to the stream buffer zone
provisions of rule 150I:13–9–04 added
15. Section 1501:13–9–07 Disposal of
excess spoil—Proposed to add
paragraph (K). Reference to 1501:13–4–
14 (O) added because (O) also contains
requirements for the disposal of excess
spoil. Paragraph (M)(1) is proposed to
correct a reference. Paragraph (N)(1) is
proposed to add a reference to
paragraph (B). Through a rule
amendment in 1988, a reference to (B)
was removed, although it’s not clear
why. 30 CFR 816.74 (c) and 30 CFR
817.74 (c) require that the design be
certified by a registered professional
engineer. (The definition of engineer in
rule 1501:13–1–02 already specifies that
engineer means a professional engineer
registered in accordance with ORC
Chapter 4733.) (N)(5)(d). Reference to
rule 1501:13–9–14 added because
1501:13–9–14 also contains
requirements for postmining graded
slopes.
16. Section 1501:13–9–08 Protection
of underground—Proposed amendment
to clarify that paragraph (A) is for
surface mining operations, while new
paragraphs (B) and (C) are for
underground mining operations and
coal exploration drilling, respectively.
The distance limit requirements for
surface mining operations are not being
revised. Paragraph (A)(1) is proposed to
be revised to comply with LSC’s ruledrafting protocol. Paragraphs (B) and
(B)(1) and (2) are proposed new
provisions to protect underground
mining operations from other
underground mining operations. The
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 86 / Monday, May 4, 2020 / Proposed Rules
requirements are similar to those of (A),
which protect underground mining
operations from surface mining
operations, except that the distance
limit in (B) is 200 feet instead of 500
feet. The distance limit of 200 feet
already exists in Mine Safety law, ORC
section 1563.39, as well as in federal
MSHA regulations, 30 CFR 75.388(a)(2),
for underground mining operations near
other underground mines. Paragraph (C)
is a proposed new provision to protect
underground mining operations from
coal exploration drilling. The
requirements mirror those of (B), and
are proposed to establish a clear
distance limit for coal exploration
drilling near underground mines in the
interest of mine safety.
17. Section 1501:13–9–11 Protection
of fish, wildlife, and related
environmental values—Paragraph (C)(1)
is proposed tp be revised to mirror the
requirements of, and to make the rule as
effective as, 30 CFR 816.97(f) and 30
CFR 817.97(f) with regard to the
protection of wetlands and riparian
vegetation. Paragraph (C)(2) is proposed
to make a small change in the word
order of the requirements of this
paragraph to match (C)(1) and 30 CFR
816.97(f) and 30 CFR 817.97(f). Also, the
word ‘‘disturbance’’ changed to
‘‘disturbances’’ to be consistent with
(C)(1) and 30 CFR 816.97(f) and 30 CFR
817.97(f).
18. Section 1501:13–9–15
Revegetation—Paragraph (F)(1), (F)(4)(c)
and (F)(4)(c)(ii) is proposed to make
small changes to correct grammatical
errors and to conform to rule-writing
standards. Paragraphs (F)(3) and
(O)(5)(b) are proposed to correct
paragraph references. Paragraph (F)(6) is
proposed to add language to clarify that
the Chief has the authority to not
require the permittee to wait an
additional 12 months after seeding for
minor repairs before applying for a
phase III release, provided the Chief
determines the extent of the area of
repair was limited in size and the
permittee remains in compliance with
paragraph (G)(3)(b). Paragraphs (I)(1), (5)
and (6) are proposed to update
information about target yields and how
the public can access this information.
19. Section 1501:13–9–17 Postmining
use of land—Paragraph (B) is proposed
to make grammatical changes to mirror
30 CFR 816.133 (b) and to match the
singular noun use of (B)(1) and (2). A
comma is proposed to be added to
paragraph (B)(1). Paragraphs (D)(2) and
(D)(7) are proposed to be added from 30
CFR 816.133 (c)(3)(i) and (iv). Two
criteria that must be met to have an
alternative postmining land use
approved are: The use will not be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 May 01, 2020
Jkt 250001
impractical or unreasonable, and the use
will not cause or contribute to violation
of Federal State, or local law. Paragraph
(D)(8) is proposed to correct a rule
reference.
20. Section 1501:13–11–02 Support
facilities and utility installations—
Proposed to make changes to paragraph
(A). Rule referencing changes to
1501:13–4–08 and 1501:13–4–08.1 due
to the mapping requirements of rules
1501:13–4–04 and 1501:13–4–13 are
proposed to be moved to those rules.
Paragraph (C) is proposed to be
amended to require that coal mining
operations minimize damage,
destruction, or disruption of services
provided by oil, gas, and water wells,
and by water and sewage lines, to mirror
the requirements of 30 CFR 816.180.
Paragraph also amended to include
telephone ‘‘and other
telecommunication lines.’’
The full text of the program
amendment is available for you to read
at the locations listed above under
ADDRESSES or at www.regulations.gov.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment
satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we
approve the amendment, it will become
part of the State program.
Electric or Written Comments
If you submit written or electronic
comments on the proposed rule during
the 30-day comment period, they should
be specific, confined to issues pertinent
to the proposed regulations, and explain
the reason for any recommended
change(s). We appreciate any and all
comments, but those most useful and
likely to influence decisions on the final
regulations will be those that either
involve personal experience or include
citations to and analyses of SMCRA, its
legislative history, its implementing
regulations, case law, other pertinent
State or Federal laws or regulations,
technical literature, or other relevant
publications.
We cannot ensure that comments
received after the close of the comment
period (see DATES) or sent to an address
other than those listed (see ADDRESSES)
will be included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment including your
personal identifying information, may
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26417
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by
4:00 p.m., e.s.t. on May 19, 2020. If you
are disabled and need reasonable
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
that each person who speaks at the
public hearing provide us with a written
copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak, and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an
opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public
hearing. If you wish to meet with us to
discuss the amendment, please request
a meeting by contacting the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings are open to
the public and, if possible, we will post
notices of meetings at the locations
listed under ADDRESSES. We will make
a written summary of each meeting a
part of the administrative record.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563—Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs in the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) will review all significant
rules. Pursuant to OMB guidance, dated
October 12, 1993, the approval of State
program amendments is exempted from
OMB review under Executive Order
12866. Executive Order 13563, which
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
26418
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 86 / Monday, May 4, 2020 / Proposed Rules
reaffirms and supplements Executive
Order 12866, retains this exemption.
Other Laws and Executive Orders
Affecting Rulemaking
When a State submits a program
amendment to OSMRE for review, our
regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(h) require
us to publish a notice in the Federal
Register indicating receipt of the
proposed amendment, its text or a
summary of its terms, and an
opportunity for public comment. We
conclude our review of the proposed
amendment after the close of the public
comment period and determine whether
the amendment should be approved,
approved in part, or not approved. At
that time, we will also make the
determinations and certifications
required by the various laws and
executive orders governing the
rulemaking process and include them in
the final rule.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR part 935
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director, North Atlantic—
Appalachian Region.
[FR Doc. 2020–08805 Filed 5–1–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2020–0103; FRL–10008–
44—Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; KY; Jefferson
County Existing and New
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and
Products Surface Coating Operations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the Jefferson County portion
of the Kentucky State Implementation
Plan (SIP), submitted by the
Commonwealth of Kentucky
(Commonwealth), through the Energy
and Environment Cabinet (Cabinet) on
September 5, 2019. The revisions were
submitted by the Cabinet on behalf of
the Louisville Metro Air Pollution
Control District and makes a singular
change to two regulations for clarity
purposes regarding the applicability of
exempt surface coating standards for
existing and new miscellaneous metal
parts and products operations. EPA is
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 May 01, 2020
Jkt 250001
proposing to approve the changes as
they are consistent with the Clean Air
Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 3, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2020–0103 at
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah LaRocca, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
The telephone number is (404) 562–
8994. Ms. LaRocca can also be reached
via electronic mail at larocca.sarah@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
EPA is proposing to approve a change
to Regulation 6.31, Standard of
Performance for Existing Miscellaneous
Metal Parts and Products Surface
Coating Operations, and Regulation
7.59, Standard of Performance for New
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products
Surface Coating Operations, of the
Jefferson County portion of the
Kentucky SIP, submitted by the
Commonwealth on September 5, 2019.
The SIP revisions clarify the
applicability of the surface coating
standard exemptions as it pertains to
Section 3 of Regulations 6.31 and 7.59.
The SIP revisions ensure consistency
across the regulations and updates the
current SIP-approved version of
Regulation 6.31 (Version 6) and
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Regulation 7.59 (Version 6) to Version 7
of each.
EPA has found that surface coatings of
miscellaneous metal parts and products
operations emit hazardous air pollutants
(HAP). See 69 FR 129 (January 2, 2004).
Regulation of these sources protects air
quality and promotes public health by
reducing HAP emissions into the
environment. The organic HAP emitted
by surface coatings and miscellaneous
metal parts and products operations are
volatile organic compounds (VOC), as
defined by 40 CFR 51.100(s).1
Tropospheric ozone, commonly
known as smog, occurs when VOC and
nitrogen oxides (NOX) react in the
atmosphere. Because of the harmful
health effects of ozone, EPA limits the
VOC and NOx emissions that can be
released into the atmosphere. VOC are
compounds of carbon excluding carbon
monoxide, carbon dioxide, and
carbonates, and ammonium carbonate,
which participate in atmospheric
photochemical reactions, including in
the formation of ozone. The compounds
of carbon (or organic compounds) have
different levels of photochemical
reactivity; therefore, they do not form
ozone to the same extent.
II. EPA’s Analysis of the Submittal
Jefferson County Air Quality
Regulations 6.31 and 7.59 address VOC
emitted by miscellaneous metal parts
and products surface coating operations
at existing and new facilities,
respectively. In this proposed action,
EPA is proposing to approve a change
to these two regulations. In Paragraph
5.1 of Section 5, Exemptions, of both
regulations, clarifying text is being
added to ensure consistency with
Paragraph 5.2. In the SIP-approved
versions of these regulations, Paragraph
5.1 lists the types of surface coatings
that are ‘‘exempt from this regulation’’
and Paragraph 5.2 exempts any affected
facility from Section 3 (Standards for
Volatile Organic Compounds) if the total
VOC emissions 2 from all affected
facilities subject to this regulation are
less than or equal to five tons per year.
The SIP revisions create consistency
between Paragraphs 5.1 and 5.2 by
clarifying that the exemption in
Paragraph 5.1 applies only to Section 3
(i.e., the phrase ‘‘exempt from this
regulation’’ is replaced with ‘‘exempt
1 Specifically, the organic HAP emitted by these
operations include xylenes, toluene, methyl ethyl
ketone (MEK), phenol, cresols/cresylic acid, glycol
ethers (including ethylene glycol monobutyl ether
(EGBE)), styrene, methyl isobutyl ketone MIBK),
and ethyl benzene. See 69 FR 129. The
aforementioned compounds are identified as VOC
in 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1).
2 Potential emissions prior to any add-on controls.
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 86 (Monday, May 4, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26413-26418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-08805]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 935
[SATS No. OH-258-FOR; Docket ID: OSM-2017-0005; S1D1S SS08011000
SX064A000 201S180110 S2D2S SS08011000 SX064A000 20XS501520]
Ohio Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the Ohio
regulatory program (hereinafter, the Ohio program) under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Through
this proposed amendment, Ohio is requesting to modify 41 rules to the
Ohio Administrative Code, including, but not limited to, permit
applications, hydrologic map and cross sections, general map
requirements, requirements for permits for special categories of
mining, underground mining permit application, small operator
assistance program, and self-bonding etc. This document gives the times
and locations that the Ohio program and this proposed amendment to that
program are available for your inspection, the comment period during
which you may submit written comments on the amendment, and the
procedures that we will follow for the public hearing, if one is
requested.
DATES: We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4 p.m.,
Eastern Standard Time (e.s.t.), June 3, 2020. If requested, we will
hold a public hearing on the amendment on May 29, 2020. We will accept
requests to speak at a hearing until 4 p.m., e.s.t. on May 19, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by SATS No. OH-258-FOR,
by any of the following methods:
Mail/Hand Delivery: Mr. Ben Owens, Field Office Director,
Pittsburgh Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, 3 Parkway Center, Pittsburgh, Pa 15220.
Fax: (412) 937-2177.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: The amendment has been
assigned Docket ID: OSM-2017-0005. If you would like to submit comments
go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking
process, see the ``Public Comment Procedures'' heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to review copies of the Ohio
program, this amendment, a listing of any scheduled public hearings,
and all written comments received in response to this document, you
must go to the address listed below during normal business hours,
Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. You may receive one free
copy of the amendment by contacting OSMRE's Pittsburgh Field Office or
the full text of the program amendment is available for you to read at
www.regulations.gov.
Mr. Ben Owens, Field Office Director, Pittsburgh Field Office, Office
of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 3 Parkway Center,
Pittsburgh, Pa 15220, Telephone: (412) 937-2827, email:
[email protected].
In addition, you may review a copy of the amendment during regular
business hours at the following location:
[[Page 26414]]
Mr. Dave Crow, Acting Chief, Ohio Department of Natural Resources,
Division of Mineral Resources Management, 2045 Morse Road, Building H2,
Telephone: (614) 265-1020, email: [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ben Owens, Field Office Director,
Pittsburgh Field Office, 3 Parkway Center, Pittsburgh, Pa 15220.
Telephone: (412) 937-2827, email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Ohio Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background on the Ohio Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, State laws and regulations
that govern surface coal mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the Act and consistent with the Federal regulations.
See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these criteria, the
Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved the Ohio program on
August 16, 1982. You can find background information on the Ohio
program, including the Secretary's findings, the disposition of
comments, and conditions of approval of the Ohio program in the August
10, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR 34717). You can also find later
actions concerning the Ohio program and program amendments at 30 CFR
935.10, State Regulatory Program Approval; and 935.11, Conditions of
State Regulatory Program Approval; and 935.15, Approval of Ohio
Regulatory Program Amendments.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By letter dated November 20, 2015 (Administrative Record No. OH-
2194-01), Ohio sent us an amendment to its program under SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1201 et seq.) Ohio seeks to revise its program to amend 41
revised rules to the Ohio Administrative Code to include the following:
Proposed New Rules
1. Section 1501:13-4-08.1--Proposed new rule--Application,
supplemental and hydrologic maps, and cross-sections, designs and plans
for underground workings. This new rule is proposed to contain all the
mapping rules specific to underground workings. A companion rule,
1501:13-4-08, is proposed to be amended to contain all the mapping
rules for surface affectment, including surface coal mining operations
and underground mining surface operations.
2. Section 1501:13-4-10--Proposed new rule with the same number and
title--will have updated and new map symbols. The new proposed rule, is
to be replaced. The rescinded rule with the same number and title, will
have updated and new map symbols.
Rule Rescissions
1. Section 1501:13-7-04--Rule proposed for rescission--Self-
bonding--This rule is proposed for rescission due to the Division of
Mineral Resources Management no longer wanting to accepting self-bonds
as performance security.
2. Section 1501:13-4-10--Rule proposed for rescission--Uniform
color code and map symbols. The current rule proposed for rescission,
is to be replaced with a proposed new rule with the same number and
title, which will have updated and new map symbols.
Rule Revisions
Ohio's proposed rule changes are for the purpose of complying with
the five-year-review requirements of Section 106.03 of the Ohio Revised
Code, to make revisions that are as effective as the Federal
requirements, to revise the mapping requirements so they are easier to
understand and follow, to rescind the self-bonding rule and revise
other performance bond rules so that self-bonding cannot be used as
performance security, to allow the applicant/permittee to certify that
a current proof of liability insurance and rider is part of the
centralized ownership and control file, to protect underground mining
from other underground mining and from coal exploration drilling, to
clarify a Phase III bond release requirement related to seeding after
minor repairs, to update the publication dates of the Code of Federal
Regulations and the United States Code, and to make numerous
administrative corrections and clarifications.
A. Minor Revision to Ohio Rules
The minor wording, editorial, punctuation, grammatical, and
recodification changes being addressed in this finding are non-
substantive.
1. Section 1501:13-1-02--Effective date and applicability--Proposed
to include two new rules 1501:13-3-01 and 1501:13-3-02, that became
effective October 28,2010.
2. Section 1501:13-1-02--Definitions--Proposed to remove the
definition of self bonds. The Division will no longer accept self bonds
as performance security.
3. Section 1501:13-1-13--Rule references--Proposed paragraph
renumbering.
4. Section 1501:13-3-01--Standards for demonstration of valid
existing right--Proposed to change paragraph (A)(2)(b)(iv) which
references to the life-of-mine map.
5. Section 1501:13-5-03--Form, conditions and terms of performance
security--Paragraph (A)(3) is proposed to be removed. Paragraph (C)(2)
is proposed to be revised to state that the Division will no longer
accept self bonds as performance security.
6. Section 1501:13-6-03 Small operator assistance program--
Paragraph (F)(2)(c) is proposed to revise the references to cross
section maps and plans, since these are being moved to rules 1501:13-4-
08 and 1501:13-4-08.1.
7. Section 1501:13-7-01 General requirements for providing
performance security for coal mining and reclamation operations--
Paragraph (E)(4) is proposed to be removed. The Division will no longer
accept self bonds as performance security.
8. Section 1501:13-7-03 Form, conditions, and terms of performance
security--Paragraphs (A)(3) and (C)(2) are proposed to be removed. The
Division will no longer accept self bonds as performance security.
9. Section 1501:13-7-05 Procedures, criteria, and schedule for
release of performance security for permits reliant on the reclamation
forfeiture fund--Paragraph (B)(4)(a) is proposed to be removed. The
Division will no longer accept self bonds as performance security.
10. Section 1501:13-7-05.1 Procedures, criteria, and schedule for
release of performance security for permits not reliant on the
reclamation forfeiture fund--Paragraph (B)(4)(a) is proposed to be
removed. The Division will no longer accept self bonds as performance
security.
11. Section 1501:13-7-06 Performance security forfeiture criteria
and procedures--Paragraph (C)(4)(b) is proposed to add the word ``or''
to the end of this paragraph, since current paragraph (c) is proposed
to be removed. Paragraph (C)(4)(c) is proposed to be removed. The
Division will no longer accept self bonds as performance security.
12. Section 1501:13-8-01 Coal exploration; performance standards--
Paragraph (J) is proposed to correct a paragraph Reference.
13. Section 1501:13-9-02 Casing and sealing of drilled holes--
Paragraph (A)
[[Page 26415]]
is proposed to correct grammatical errors. Paragraph (C) is proposed to
correct grammatical errors and an addition to clarify that it is the
Chief who makes the finding of no adverse environmental or health and
safety effect.
14. Section 1501:13-9-16 Cessation of operations-- Paragraphs
(A)(1), (A)(2) and (B)(1) are proposed to correct grammatical errors
and use consistent terms. Paragraph (B)(1) is proposed to add a
reference to Chapter 1513 of the Revised Code
15. Section 1501:13-10-01 Roads: performance standards-- Paragraphs
(B)(2) and (G)(1)(a) are proposed to correct grammatical errors.
Paragraph (G)(4)(f) has a sentence re-worded to clarify its meaning and
to mirror the language of 30 CFR 816.151(d)(6) and 30 CFR
817.151(d)(6).
16. Section 1501:13-12-01 Underground operations-- Paragraph (B) is
proposed to clarify that underground operations must meet all
applicable requirements of Chapter 1513 of the Revised Code.
17. Section 1501:13-13-03 Operations on prime farmland--Paragraph
(B) has Minor corrections. Paragraph (D) has a paragraph reference
corrected. Paragraph (E)(1) is proposed to correct grammar, the
proposed language is to change ``of'' to ``to'' to mirror the language
of 30 CFR 823.14 (b).
18. Section 1501:13-14-01 Inspections-- Paragraph (A)(2)(b) is
proposed to move the phrase ``Conducted under a D-permit'' because it
is outdated and no longer needed; all coal mining in Ohio is now
conducted under D permits
B. Revisions to Ohio's Rules That Have the Same Meaning as the
Corresponding Provisions of the Federal Regulations
Ohio proposed revisions to the following rules containing language
that is the same as or similar to the corresponding sections of the
Federal regulations.
1. Section 1501:13-1-10 Availability of records-- Proposed to add
provision (B)(2) in order for it to be as effective as the federal
program. The federal regulations at 30 CFR 840.14 (c)(1) and (2)
require that either a copy of the records be available for inspection
in the county where mining is taking place or a description of the
records and a description of the procedure for obtaining the records be
available in the county where mining is taking place. Paragraphs
(B)(2)(b) and (b)(i) provisions in subparagraph (b) is revised and
(b)(i) is added for clarification to keep Ohio's program as effective
as the federal program. The federal regulations at 30 CFR 840.14 (c)(2)
requires that any resident of the area where mining is taking place
either be able to inspect copies of the records in the county where the
mining is taking place or be provided copies of the records at no
charge. Paragraph (B)(2)(b)(ii) is revised for other persons who
request copies of the records, the Division will follow ODNR policy in
charging for the copies.
2. Section 1501:13-1-14 Incorporation by reference--Proposed
changes to paragraphs (A) and (B) are annual updates of the editions of
the Code of Federal Regulations and the United States Code that are
incorporated by reference. The website address is simplified.
Paragraphs (B)(16) and (17) are proposed to be removed from this list
3. Section 1501:13-4-03 Permit applications; requirements for
legal, financial, compliance and related information--Proposed to
change grammatical issues in paragraphs (B)(11), (C)(5), (D)(1) and
(F)(3). Proposed to add paragraph (D)(2) requiring information about
lands within the permit area where the private mineral estate to be
mined has been severed from the private surface estate will be revised
to limit this information to lands where surface disturbance will
result from the applicant's proposed use of a surface mining method.
Paragraphs (D)(2)(a) to (c) are revised to add ``surface disturbance''
qualifications to all paragraphs due to HB 163 (effective September 30,
2011). Paragraph (D)(3) is proposed to change ``title'' to ``rights''
to mirror the language of ORC Section 1513.07 (E)(2)[euro](iii).
Paragraphs (E)(3) and (4) are proposed to add ``measured horizontally''
due to HB 163 (effective September 30,2011). Paragraph (H) is proposed
to be revised by reorganizing provisions and removal of a comma to
clarify the requirements for newspaper advertisement.
4. Section 1501:13-4-04 Permit application requirements for
information on environmental resources--Proposed changes to paragraph
(C)(2)(a)(i) include a Refererence to rule 1501:13-4-08 due to the
revisions in paragraphs (J) and (K), as explained below. Paragraphs
(D)(5) and(E)(3) is proposed to reference to new paragraphs (D)(6) and
(D)(7) added. Paragraph (D)(6) is proposed to add a new paragraph and
sub-paragraphs regarding seasonal variations which provide a standard
method for collection and submitting water samples to identify seasonal
variations in water quality and quantity. The provisions include a
chart showing the flow periods and their duration. These new paragraphs
contain the requirements of the Division's Permitting & Hydrology
Policy/Procedure Directive 2000-2 (also known as PPD 2000-2). Paragraph
(D)(7) is proposed to add a new paragraph regarding seasonal variations
that states: Water quality and quantity data collected and described
other than as required by paragraph (D)(6) of this rule may be
submitted to identify seasonal variations in ground water and surface
water, provided the chief determines that that alternative data are
sufficient to identify seasonal Revised Code and the rules adopted
thereunder. Paragraphs (J) and (K) which are the mapping provisions of
this rule are proposed to be moved to rule 1501:13-4-08, which will
apply to coal mining operations including underground mining surface
operations. The mapping requirements for underground workings will be
in rule 1501:13-4-08.1. Paragraphs (L) and (M) are proposed to be re-
numbered (J) and (K) due to the revisions in paragraphs (J) and (K), as
explained above. Paragraphs (L)(3), and (L)(4)(a) and (b) are proposed
to be revised to address references changed due to the revisions in
paragraphs (J) and (K), as explained above.
5. Section 1501:13-4-05 Permit application requirements for
reclamation and operations plans--Paragraph (A)(2)(b) is proposed to
restore the word ``necessary'' to this provision. It was removed
effective April 30, 2009 but OSMRE requires that it be put back for the
provision to be as effective as the Federal provision. Paragraph (G)(2)
is proposed to add additional language per HB 163, effective September
30, 2011, that explains that the provisions of (G)(2) do not apply in
cases where no surface disturbance will result from the applicant's
proposed use of auger/highwall mining. Paragraph (H)(7) is proposed as
a new paragraph to address incorporation by reference requirements. The
paragraph refers the reader to rule 1501:13-9-04, which contains
information on where a copy of Soil Conservation Service Technical
Release No. 60 can be obtained.
6. Section 1501:13-4-08 Hydrologic map and cross-sections--Proposed
revision to contain all the mapping rules specific to surface coal
mining operations, including underground mining surface operations. A
new rule, 1501:13-4-08.1, is being proposed to contain all the mapping
rules specific to underground workings.
7. Section 1501:13-4-09 General map requirements--Proposed to add
(B) to require that a map's legend indicate which of the map symbols
listed in rule 1501:13-4-10 appear on the map.
[[Page 26416]]
Paragraph (D)(1) is proposed to add supplemental map and hydrologic map
to the list of maps that are submitted to DMRM
8. Section 1501:13-4-11 Maps showing reaffection of permit area--
Paragraph (A) is proposed to eliminate the word ``former'' to clarify
the meaning of the sentence. The rule applies to maps showing land
affected under a permit that is reaffected under a subsequent permit.
Paragraphs (A) and (B) are proposed to change a rule reference change
to 1501:13-4-08 (A), because the mapping requirements of rule 1501:13-
4-04 are proposed to be moved to that rule. Paragraph (B) is proposed
to correct punctuation throughout. Paragraphs (B), (B)(2) and (B)(5)
are proposed to restore valid existing rights language to correct an
error that was made when the rule was revised in 2009. At that time,
the phrase ``valid existing rights'' was removed from the rule, when in
fact it needs to remain in the rule to appropriately distinguish the
requirements of (B) from those of (A). A person having valid existing
rights to land generally means that his or her rights were secured
prior to the enactment of the Federal Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act (SMCRA) of 1977. If land under an existing permit is
reaffected by a person with valid existing rights, mapping and
certification requirements for that land would follow (B), rather than
(A). The term ``valid existing rights'' is defined in OAC 1501:13-1-02.
9. Section 1501:13-4-12 Requirements for permits for special
categories of mining--Paragraph (F)(2) is proposed to change the
references to the prime farmland requirements because of changes
proposed for rules 1501:13-4-04 and 1501:13-4-13
10. Section 1501:13-4-13 Underground mining permit application
requirements for information on environmental resources--Paragraph
(C)(2)(a)(i) is proposed to refer to rules 1501:13-4-08 and new rule
1501:13-4-08.1 due to the revisions in paragraphs (J) and (K), as
explained below. Paragraphs (D)(5) and (E)(3) is proposed to reference
to new paragraph (0)(6) and (0)(7) added. Paragraph (D)(6) is proposed
as a new paragraph and sub-paragraphs regarding seasonal variations
which provide a standard method for collecting and submitting water
samples to identify seasonal variations in water quality and quantity.
The provisions include a chart showing the flow periods and their
duration. These new paragraphs contain the requirements of the
Division's Permitting & Hydrology Policy/Procedure Directive 2000-2
(also know as PPD 2000-2). The Division is proposing to put these
requirements into rule due to a 2007 court decision, Buckeye Forest
Council, Inc. v. Div. of Mineral Res. Mgmt., 172 Ohio App.3d 440. In
this decision, the court stated that, since PPD 2000-2 uniformly
applies to all mining permit application statewide, it qualifies as a
rule and its requirements should therefore be adopted by the Division
through rule-making. Paragraph (0)(7) is proposed as a new paragraph
regarding seasonal variations that states: Water quality and quantity
data collected and described other than as required by paragraph (D)(6)
of this rule may be submitted to identify seasonal variations in ground
water and surface water, provided the chief determines that the
alternative data are sufficient to identify seasonal variations needed
for the hydrologic assessments required by Chapter 1513 of the Revised
Code and the rules adopted thereunder. Paragraphs (J) and (K) are
proposed to address the mapping provisions of this rule and are
proposed to be moved to rule 150I:13-4-08, which will apply to coal
mining operations including underground mining surface operations. The
mapping requirements for underground workings will be in rule 1501:13-
4-08.l. Paragraphs (L) and (M) are proposed to be re-numbered (J) and
(K) due to the revisions in paragraphs (J) and (K), as explained above.
Paragraphs (L)(3), and (L)(4)(a) and (b) are proposed to have
references changed due to the revisions in paragraphs (J) and (K), as
explained above.
11. Section 1501:13-4-14 Underground mining permit application
requirements for reclamation and operations plans--Paragraph (A)(2)(b)
is proposed to restore ``necessary'' to this provision. It was removed
effective April 30, 2009, but OSMRE requires that it be put back for
the provision to be as effective as the Federal provision. Paragraph
(H)(7) is proposed as a new paragraph to address incorporation by
reference requirements. The paragraph refers the reader to rule
1501:13-9-04, which contains information on where a copy of Soil
Conservation Service Technical Release No. 60 can be obtained.
12. Section 1501:13-5-01 Review, public participation, and approval
or disapproval of permit applications and permit terms and conditions--
Paragraph (E)(6) is proposed to add additional language per HB 163
(effective September 30,2011) so that this rule agrees with the
language of rule 1501:13-4-03 (D)(2). (G)(3). Added a reference to
proposed new mapping rule 1501:13-4-08.1
13. Section 1501:13-7-07 Liability insurance--Paragraph (A) is
proposed to specify that, for an application to satisfy the liability
insurance requirement of this rule, the application can contain a
notarized certification acknowledging that a current proof of liability
insurance and rider is part of the applicant's Central File for
Identity Information. Having the liability insurance information in the
Central File for Identity Information will avoid duplication of
paperwork; the Central File contains up-to-date application information
about a coal operator in one place in the Division, rather than
requiring the coal operator to submit such information repeatedly in
each individual application.
14. Section 1501:13-9-01 Signs and markers--Paragraph (C)(l) is
proposed to remove ``but shall not be limited to''. Paragraph (C)(2) is
proposed to be reworded for clarity. Paragraphs (C)(3) to (5) is
proposed to correct conjunctions and punctuation. Paragraph (E) is
proposed to clarify buffer zone marking requirements and a reference to
the stream buffer zone provisions of rule 150I:13-9-04 added
15. Section 1501:13-9-07 Disposal of excess spoil--Proposed to add
paragraph (K). Reference to 1501:13-4-14 (O) added because (O) also
contains requirements for the disposal of excess spoil. Paragraph
(M)(1) is proposed to correct a reference. Paragraph (N)(1) is proposed
to add a reference to paragraph (B). Through a rule amendment in 1988,
a reference to (B) was removed, although it's not clear why. 30 CFR
816.74 (c) and 30 CFR 817.74 (c) require that the design be certified
by a registered professional engineer. (The definition of engineer in
rule 1501:13-1-02 already specifies that engineer means a professional
engineer registered in accordance with ORC Chapter 4733.) (N)(5)(d).
Reference to rule 1501:13-9-14 added because 1501:13-9-14 also contains
requirements for postmining graded slopes.
16. Section 1501:13-9-08 Protection of underground--Proposed
amendment to clarify that paragraph (A) is for surface mining
operations, while new paragraphs (B) and (C) are for underground mining
operations and coal exploration drilling, respectively. The distance
limit requirements for surface mining operations are not being revised.
Paragraph (A)(1) is proposed to be revised to comply with LSC's rule-
drafting protocol. Paragraphs (B) and (B)(1) and (2) are proposed new
provisions to protect underground mining operations from other
underground mining operations. The
[[Page 26417]]
requirements are similar to those of (A), which protect underground
mining operations from surface mining operations, except that the
distance limit in (B) is 200 feet instead of 500 feet. The distance
limit of 200 feet already exists in Mine Safety law, ORC section
1563.39, as well as in federal MSHA regulations, 30 CFR 75.388(a)(2),
for underground mining operations near other underground mines.
Paragraph (C) is a proposed new provision to protect underground mining
operations from coal exploration drilling. The requirements mirror
those of (B), and are proposed to establish a clear distance limit for
coal exploration drilling near underground mines in the interest of
mine safety.
17. Section 1501:13-9-11 Protection of fish, wildlife, and related
environmental values--Paragraph (C)(1) is proposed tp be revised to
mirror the requirements of, and to make the rule as effective as, 30
CFR 816.97(f) and 30 CFR 817.97(f) with regard to the protection of
wetlands and riparian vegetation. Paragraph (C)(2) is proposed to make
a small change in the word order of the requirements of this paragraph
to match (C)(1) and 30 CFR 816.97(f) and 30 CFR 817.97(f). Also, the
word ``disturbance'' changed to ``disturbances'' to be consistent with
(C)(1) and 30 CFR 816.97(f) and 30 CFR 817.97(f).
18. Section 1501:13-9-15 Revegetation--Paragraph (F)(1), (F)(4)(c)
and (F)(4)(c)(ii) is proposed to make small changes to correct
grammatical errors and to conform to rule-writing standards. Paragraphs
(F)(3) and (O)(5)(b) are proposed to correct paragraph references.
Paragraph (F)(6) is proposed to add language to clarify that the Chief
has the authority to not require the permittee to wait an additional 12
months after seeding for minor repairs before applying for a phase III
release, provided the Chief determines the extent of the area of repair
was limited in size and the permittee remains in compliance with
paragraph (G)(3)(b). Paragraphs (I)(1), (5) and (6) are proposed to
update information about target yields and how the public can access
this information.
19. Section 1501:13-9-17 Postmining use of land--Paragraph (B) is
proposed to make grammatical changes to mirror 30 CFR 816.133 (b) and
to match the singular noun use of (B)(1) and (2). A comma is proposed
to be added to paragraph (B)(1). Paragraphs (D)(2) and (D)(7) are
proposed to be added from 30 CFR 816.133 (c)(3)(i) and (iv). Two
criteria that must be met to have an alternative postmining land use
approved are: The use will not be impractical or unreasonable, and the
use will not cause or contribute to violation of Federal State, or
local law. Paragraph (D)(8) is proposed to correct a rule reference.
20. Section 1501:13-11-02 Support facilities and utility
installations--Proposed to make changes to paragraph (A). Rule
referencing changes to 1501:13-4-08 and 1501:13-4-08.1 due to the
mapping requirements of rules 1501:13-4-04 and 1501:13-4-13 are
proposed to be moved to those rules. Paragraph (C) is proposed to be
amended to require that coal mining operations minimize damage,
destruction, or disruption of services provided by oil, gas, and water
wells, and by water and sewage lines, to mirror the requirements of 30
CFR 816.180. Paragraph also amended to include telephone ``and other
telecommunication lines.''
The full text of the program amendment is available for you to read
at the locations listed above under ADDRESSES or at
www.regulations.gov.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the State program.
Electric or Written Comments
If you submit written or electronic comments on the proposed rule
during the 30-day comment period, they should be specific, confined to
issues pertinent to the proposed regulations, and explain the reason
for any recommended change(s). We appreciate any and all comments, but
those most useful and likely to influence decisions on the final
regulations will be those that either involve personal experience or
include citations to and analyses of SMCRA, its legislative history,
its implementing regulations, case law, other pertinent State or
Federal laws or regulations, technical literature, or other relevant
publications.
We cannot ensure that comments received after the close of the
comment period (see DATES) or sent to an address other than those
listed (see ADDRESSES) will be included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment including your personal identifying
information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4:00 p.m., e.s.t. on
May 19, 2020. If you are disabled and need reasonable accommodations to
attend a public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests
an opportunity to speak, we will not hold a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at the public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak, and others present
in the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with
us to discuss the amendment, please request a meeting by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings
are open to the public and, if possible, we will post notices of
meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. We will make a
written summary of each meeting a part of the administrative record.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563--Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will
review all significant rules. Pursuant to OMB guidance, dated October
12, 1993, the approval of State program amendments is exempted from OMB
review under Executive Order 12866. Executive Order 13563, which
[[Page 26418]]
reaffirms and supplements Executive Order 12866, retains this
exemption.
Other Laws and Executive Orders Affecting Rulemaking
When a State submits a program amendment to OSMRE for review, our
regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(h) require us to publish a notice in the
Federal Register indicating receipt of the proposed amendment, its text
or a summary of its terms, and an opportunity for public comment. We
conclude our review of the proposed amendment after the close of the
public comment period and determine whether the amendment should be
approved, approved in part, or not approved. At that time, we will also
make the determinations and certifications required by the various laws
and executive orders governing the rulemaking process and include them
in the final rule.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR part 935
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director, North Atlantic--Appalachian Region.
[FR Doc. 2020-08805 Filed 5-1-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P