Modification of License Exception Additional Permissive Reexports (APR), 23496-23498 [2020-07239]
Download as PDF
23496
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 82 / Tuesday, April 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
This area would provide airspace for
new Area Navigation Procedures at
Gove County Airport, Quinter, KS.
Class E airspace designations are
published in paragraph 6005 of FAA
Order 7400.11D, dated August 8, 2019
and effective September 15, 2019, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on
September 15.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current, is noncontroversial, and unlikely to result in
adverse or negative comments. It,
therefore: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a regulatory evaluation as
the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Given this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this
proposed rule, when promulgated,
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Apr 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2019, and
effective September 15, 2019, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
ANM WA E5 Quinter, KS
Gove County Airport, KS
(Lat. 39°02′19″ N, long. 100°14′02″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 5.5-mile
radius of the Gove County airport, Quinter,
KS.
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on April 21,
2020.
Shawn M. Kozica,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western
Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2020–08956 Filed 4–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Part 740
[Docket No. 190524472–9472–01]
RIN 0694–AH65
Modification of License Exception
Additional Permissive Reexports (APR)
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In this rule, the Bureau of
Industry and Security (BIS) proposes to
amend the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR) by modifying License
Exception Additional Permissive
Reexports (APR). Specifically, BIS is
proposing to remove provisions which
authorize reexports of certain national
security-controlled items on the
Commerce Control List (CCL) to gain
better visibility into transactions of
national security or foreign policy
interest to the United States.
DATES: Comments must be received by
BIS no later than June 29, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this rule may
be submitted to the Federal rulemaking
portal (www.regulations.gov). The
regulations.gov ID for this rule is: BIS–
2020–0010. All relevant comments
(including any personally identifying
information) will be made available for
public inspection and copying.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eileen Albanese, Director, Office of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
National Security and Technology
Transfer Controls, Bureau of Industry
and Security, Department of Commerce,
Phone: (202) 482–0092 or Email:
eileen.albanese@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department of Commerce’s
Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is
proposing to revise part 740 of the
Export Administration Regulations
(EAR) (15 CFR, Subchapter C, parts
730–774), which provides information
on license exceptions. An export license
exception is an authorization allowing
the export, re-export, or transfer (incountry), under stated conditions, of
items subject to the EAR that would
otherwise require a license. Because
there are a number of circumstances
under which a license exception may
replace the need for a license, there are
several types of license exceptions
described in part 740.
With this rule, BIS is proposing to
modify License Exception Additional
Permissive Reexports (APR) (§ 740.16 of
the EAR) which, among other things,
authorizes certain reexports between
and among certain countries. To
advance the objectives discussed in the
Administration’s December 2017
National Security Strategy as well as
address the challenges discussed in the
Administration’s January 2018 National
Defense Strategy available at https://
dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/
pubs/2018-National-Defense-StrategySummary.pdf, BIS proposes to remove a
provision of License Exception APR due
to variations in how the United States
and its partners, including partners
located in Country Group A:1, perceive
the threat caused by the increasing
integration of civilian and military
technology development in countries of
concern. A current listing of country
groups can be found at https://
www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/
regulation-docs/2255-supplement-no-1to-part-740-country-groups-1/file.
Based on discussions with partner
governments and U.S. companies, BIS
has evidence of differences in licensing
review standards for national-security
controlled items destined to Country
Group D:1, so that countries in Country
Group A:1 or Hong Kong may approve
a license for the reexport of a U.S.-origin
item that would have been denied if
exported directly from the United
States.
Proposed Revision to License Exception
APR (§ 740.16 Additional Permissive
Reexports)
Currently, paragraph (a) of License
Exception APR authorizes the reexport
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 82 / Tuesday, April 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
of certain items from a country in
Country Group A:1 or Hong Kong to
certain destinations, provided that the
reexport is consistent with an export
authorization from the country of
reexport, and that the item is not subject
to reasons for control described in
§ 740.16(a)(2), which includes missile
technology and nuclear nonproliferation
controls. BIS is proposing to remove
countries in Country Group D:1 as a
category of eligible destination for
national security-controlled items under
paragraph (a) of License Exception APR
by amending § 740.16(a)(3). BIS is
considering this change because, as
described above, the Department
acknowledges there may be variations of
national security or foreign policy
concerns between other countries and
the United States. Even Wassenaar
participating states in Country Group
A:1 may have export authorization
policies that do not align with the
national security or foreign policy
interests of the U.S. government.
As such, BIS believes that reexports of
national security-controlled items
currently permitted under
§ 740.16(a)(3)(ii) should be reviewed by
the U.S. government before proceeding.
Removing the provision currently found
in § 740.16(a)(3)(ii) and requiring a
reexport license for national securitycontrolled items to Country Group D:1
will allow the U.S. government prior
review of these reexports to ensure that
the reexports are authorized consistent
with U.S. policy.
Request for Comment
Overall, license exceptions can be of
significant benefit to exporters and
reexporters, although they can be
complex and may require detailed
analysis before use. BIS has historically
encouraged exporters and reexporters to
use license exceptions since they reflect
U.S. policy, reduce the burden for both
exporters/reexporters and BIS staff, and
reduce obstacles and costs that can
inhibit trade.
The main advantage of using a license
exception is that it provides relief from
the requirement to apply for a license.
The resources needed to apply for and
administer a BIS license include those
necessary to access the BIS electronic
systems, complete the application and
supporting documentation, and track
license use if the license covers multiple
transactions. Additionally, a licensing
requirement can have a significant
impact on the timing and predictability
of order fulfilment due to license
processing time, which involves
interagency review and can vary
according to the transaction.
Recordkeeping requirements for license
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Apr 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
exceptions generally parallel those for
licenses.
BIS is requesting comment on how
the proposed change would impact
persons who currently use or plan to
use License Exception APR. Currently,
BIS does not have a way to readily
account for how many items are being
authorized for reexport or transfer (incountry) under the provisions of License
Exception APR, so BIS is seeking
information as to the volume of
transactions affected by this proposed
change, how the proposed change
would affect the amount of time
necessary to complete such transactions
in the future, and how the proposed
change would otherwise affect current
business. Please also see the Paperwork
Reduction Act section of the rulemaking
requirements for additional areas
available for comment.
Export Control Reform Act of 2018
On August 13, 2018, the President
signed into law the John S. McCain
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2019, which included the
Export Control Reform Act of 2018
(ECRA) (50 U.S.C. 4801–4852). ECRA
provides the legal basis for BIS’s
principal authorities and serves as the
authority under which BIS issues this
rule. As set forth in § 1768 of ECRA, all
delegations, rules, regulations, orders,
determinations, licenses, or other forms
of administrative action that have been
made, issued, conducted, or allowed to
become effective under the Export
Administration Act of 1979 (previously,
50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.) (as in effect prior
to August 13, 2018 and as continued in
effect pursuant to the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)) or the Export
Administration Regulations, and are in
effect as of August 13, 2018, shall
continue in effect according to their
terms until modified, superseded, set
aside, or revoked under the authority of
ECRA.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This
proposed rule has been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ although
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23497
not economically significant, under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
2. This proposed rule is not subject to
the requirements of Executive Order
13771 because it is issued with respect
to a national security function of the
United States. As described in this rule
and consistent with the
Administration’s National Security
Strategy and National Defense Strategy,
modification of the license exception
described herein would enhance the
national security of the United States by
reducing the risk that exports, reexports,
and transfers (in-country) of items
subject to the EAR could take place
contrary to U.S. national security or
foreign policy interests. This proposed
rule would allow the United States
government to review transactions
involving items and destinations of
national security concern prior to their
completion to mitigate this risk. The
cost-benefit analysis required pursuant
to Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
indicates that this rule is intended to
improve national security as its primary
direct benefit. Accordingly, this rule
meets the requirements set forth in the
April 5, 2017, OMB guidance
implementing Executive Order 13771,
regarding what constitutes a regulation
issued ‘‘with respect to a national
security function of the United States’’
and it is, therefore, exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 13771.
3. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to respond to nor be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with a collection
of information, subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Control Number. This regulation
involves collections previously
approved by OMB under control
number 0694–0088, Simplified Network
Application Processing System, which
includes, among other things, license
applications and carries a burden
estimate of 43.8 minutes for a manual or
electronic submission.
BIS is not able to estimate the increase
in total burden hours associated with
the PRA and OMB control number
0694–0088 as a result of this rule
because, prior to publication of this
proposed rule, BIS did not have a way
to readily account for how many items
were being authorized for reexport or
transfer (in-country) under provisions of
License Exception APR. BIS encourages
public comments from reexporters to
assist the agency in developing
estimates for the impact on burden
hours if the changes included in this
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
23498
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 82 / Tuesday, April 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
proposed rule were published in final
form.
4. This proposed rule does not
contain policies with Federalism
implications as that term is defined in
Executive Order 13132.
5. Pursuant to section 1762 of the
Export Control Reform Act of 2018
(Title XVII, Subtitle B of Pub. L. 115–
232, 132 Stat. 2208), which was
included in the John S. McCain National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2019, this action is exempt from
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
(5 U.S.C. 553) requirements for notice of
proposed rulemaking, opportunity for
public participation, and delay in
effective date. Nonetheless, BIS is
providing the public with an
opportunity to review and comment on
this rule, despite its being exempted
from that requirement of the APA.
6. Because a notice of proposed
rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment are not required to be
given for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or
by any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., are
not applicable. Accordingly, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is required
and none has been prepared.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 740
Administrative practice and
procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, 15 CFR part 740 of the
EAR (15 CFR parts 730–774) is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 740—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 740 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4801–4852; 50 U.S.C.
4601 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C.
7201 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR,
1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025,
3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783.
2. Amend § 740.16 by revising
paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows:
■
§ 740.16
(APR).
Additional permissive reexports
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(3) The reexport is destined to a
country in Country Group B that is not
also included in Country Group D:2,
D:3, or D:4; and the commodity being
reexported is both controlled for
national security reasons and not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Apr 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
controlled for export to Country Group
A:1.
*
*
*
*
*
Matthew S. Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2020–07239 Filed 4–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2020–0156; FRL–10008–
17-Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; KY: Jefferson
County Performance Tests
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
changes to the Jefferson County portion
of the Kentucky State Implementation
Plan (SIP), submitted by the
Commonwealth of Kentucky, through
the Energy and Environment Cabinet
(Cabinet), Division of Air Quality
(DAQ), through a letter dated September
5, 2019. The changes were submitted by
the Cabinet on behalf of the Louisville
Metro Air Pollution Control District
(District, also referred to herein as
Jefferson County). The SIP revision
includes changes to Jefferson County
regulations regarding performance tests.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 28, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2020–0156 at
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: D.
Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management
Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
Mr. Akers can be reached via electronic
mail at akers.brad@epa.gov or via
telephone at (404) 562–9089.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What action is EPA proposing?
EPA is proposing to approve changes
to the Jefferson County portion of the
Kentucky SIP that were provided to EPA
through DAQ via a letter dated
September 5, 2019.1 EPA is proposing to
approve the changes to Jefferson
County’s Regulation 1.04, Performance
Tests.2 The September 5, 2019, SIP
revision first makes minor changes to
Regulation 1.04 that do not alter the
meaning of the regulation such as
clarifying changes to its notification
requirements under the SIP. In addition,
other changes strengthen the SIP by
adding a specific reporting requirement
to communicate results from any
required performance testing. The SIP
revision updates the current SIPapproved version of Regulation 1.04
(Version 6) to Version 7. The changes to
this rule and EPA’s rationale for
proposing approval are described in
more detail in Section II of this notice
of proposed rulemaking.
II. EPA’s Analysis of the
Commonwealth’s Submittal
As mentioned in Section I of this
proposed action, the September 5, 2019,
SIP revision that EPA is proposing to
approve makes changes to Jefferson
County Air Quality Regulations at
Regulation 1.04, Performance Tests. The
1 In 2003, the City of Louisville and Jefferson
County governments merged and the ‘‘Jefferson
County Air Pollution Control District’’ was renamed
the ‘‘Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control
District.’’ See The History of Air Pollution Control
in Louisville, available at https://louisvilleky.gov/
government/air-pollution-control-district/historyair-pollution-control-louisville. However, each of
the regulations in the Jefferson County portion of
the Kentucky SIP still has the subheading ‘‘Air
Pollution Control District of Jefferson County.’’
Thus, to be consistent with the terminology used in
the SIP, we refer throughout this notice to
regulations contained in the Jefferson County
portion of the Kentucky SIP as the ‘‘Jefferson
County’’ regulations.
2 EPA notes that the Agency received several
submittals revising the Jefferson County portion of
the Kentucky SIP transmitted with the same
September 5, 2019, cover letter. EPA will be
considering action for these other SIP revisions in
separate rulemakings.
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 82 (Tuesday, April 28, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23496-23498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-07239]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Part 740
[Docket No. 190524472-9472-01]
RIN 0694-AH65
Modification of License Exception Additional Permissive Reexports
(APR)
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
proposes to amend the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by
modifying License Exception Additional Permissive Reexports (APR).
Specifically, BIS is proposing to remove provisions which authorize
reexports of certain national security-controlled items on the Commerce
Control List (CCL) to gain better visibility into transactions of
national security or foreign policy interest to the United States.
DATES: Comments must be received by BIS no later than June 29, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this rule may be submitted to the Federal
rulemaking portal (www.regulations.gov). The regulations.gov ID for
this rule is: BIS-2020-0010. All relevant comments (including any
personally identifying information) will be made available for public
inspection and copying.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen Albanese, Director, Office of
National Security and Technology Transfer Controls, Bureau of Industry
and Security, Department of Commerce, Phone: (202) 482-0092 or Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
is proposing to revise part 740 of the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR) (15 CFR, Subchapter C, parts 730-774), which provides
information on license exceptions. An export license exception is an
authorization allowing the export, re-export, or transfer (in-country),
under stated conditions, of items subject to the EAR that would
otherwise require a license. Because there are a number of
circumstances under which a license exception may replace the need for
a license, there are several types of license exceptions described in
part 740.
With this rule, BIS is proposing to modify License Exception
Additional Permissive Reexports (APR) (Sec. 740.16 of the EAR) which,
among other things, authorizes certain reexports between and among
certain countries. To advance the objectives discussed in the
Administration's December 2017 National Security Strategy as well as
address the challenges discussed in the Administration's January 2018
National Defense Strategy available at https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf, BIS
proposes to remove a provision of License Exception APR due to
variations in how the United States and its partners, including
partners located in Country Group A:1, perceive the threat caused by
the increasing integration of civilian and military technology
development in countries of concern. A current listing of country
groups can be found at https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/regulation-docs/2255-supplement-no-1-to-part-740-country-groups-1/file.
Based on discussions with partner governments and U.S. companies,
BIS has evidence of differences in licensing review standards for
national-security controlled items destined to Country Group D:1, so
that countries in Country Group A:1 or Hong Kong may approve a license
for the reexport of a U.S.-origin item that would have been denied if
exported directly from the United States.
Proposed Revision to License Exception APR (Sec. 740.16 Additional
Permissive Reexports)
Currently, paragraph (a) of License Exception APR authorizes the
reexport
[[Page 23497]]
of certain items from a country in Country Group A:1 or Hong Kong to
certain destinations, provided that the reexport is consistent with an
export authorization from the country of reexport, and that the item is
not subject to reasons for control described in Sec. 740.16(a)(2),
which includes missile technology and nuclear nonproliferation
controls. BIS is proposing to remove countries in Country Group D:1 as
a category of eligible destination for national security-controlled
items under paragraph (a) of License Exception APR by amending Sec.
740.16(a)(3). BIS is considering this change because, as described
above, the Department acknowledges there may be variations of national
security or foreign policy concerns between other countries and the
United States. Even Wassenaar participating states in Country Group A:1
may have export authorization policies that do not align with the
national security or foreign policy interests of the U.S. government.
As such, BIS believes that reexports of national security-
controlled items currently permitted under Sec. 740.16(a)(3)(ii)
should be reviewed by the U.S. government before proceeding. Removing
the provision currently found in Sec. 740.16(a)(3)(ii) and requiring a
reexport license for national security-controlled items to Country
Group D:1 will allow the U.S. government prior review of these
reexports to ensure that the reexports are authorized consistent with
U.S. policy.
Request for Comment
Overall, license exceptions can be of significant benefit to
exporters and reexporters, although they can be complex and may require
detailed analysis before use. BIS has historically encouraged exporters
and reexporters to use license exceptions since they reflect U.S.
policy, reduce the burden for both exporters/reexporters and BIS staff,
and reduce obstacles and costs that can inhibit trade.
The main advantage of using a license exception is that it provides
relief from the requirement to apply for a license. The resources
needed to apply for and administer a BIS license include those
necessary to access the BIS electronic systems, complete the
application and supporting documentation, and track license use if the
license covers multiple transactions. Additionally, a licensing
requirement can have a significant impact on the timing and
predictability of order fulfilment due to license processing time,
which involves interagency review and can vary according to the
transaction. Recordkeeping requirements for license exceptions
generally parallel those for licenses.
BIS is requesting comment on how the proposed change would impact
persons who currently use or plan to use License Exception APR.
Currently, BIS does not have a way to readily account for how many
items are being authorized for reexport or transfer (in-country) under
the provisions of License Exception APR, so BIS is seeking information
as to the volume of transactions affected by this proposed change, how
the proposed change would affect the amount of time necessary to
complete such transactions in the future, and how the proposed change
would otherwise affect current business. Please also see the Paperwork
Reduction Act section of the rulemaking requirements for additional
areas available for comment.
Export Control Reform Act of 2018
On August 13, 2018, the President signed into law the John S.
McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, which
included the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA) (50 U.S.C. 4801-
4852). ECRA provides the legal basis for BIS's principal authorities
and serves as the authority under which BIS issues this rule. As set
forth in Sec. 1768 of ECRA, all delegations, rules, regulations,
orders, determinations, licenses, or other forms of administrative
action that have been made, issued, conducted, or allowed to become
effective under the Export Administration Act of 1979 (previously, 50
U.S.C. 4601 et seq.) (as in effect prior to August 13, 2018 and as
continued in effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)) or the Export Administration
Regulations, and are in effect as of August 13, 2018, shall continue in
effect according to their terms until modified, superseded, set aside,
or revoked under the authority of ECRA.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This proposed rule has been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' although not economically significant, under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
2. This proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of
Executive Order 13771 because it is issued with respect to a national
security function of the United States. As described in this rule and
consistent with the Administration's National Security Strategy and
National Defense Strategy, modification of the license exception
described herein would enhance the national security of the United
States by reducing the risk that exports, reexports, and transfers (in-
country) of items subject to the EAR could take place contrary to U.S.
national security or foreign policy interests. This proposed rule would
allow the United States government to review transactions involving
items and destinations of national security concern prior to their
completion to mitigate this risk. The cost-benefit analysis required
pursuant to Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 indicates that this rule
is intended to improve national security as its primary direct benefit.
Accordingly, this rule meets the requirements set forth in the April 5,
2017, OMB guidance implementing Executive Order 13771, regarding what
constitutes a regulation issued ``with respect to a national security
function of the United States'' and it is, therefore, exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 13771.
3. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to nor be subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with a collection of information, subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This regulation involves
collections previously approved by OMB under control number 0694-0088,
Simplified Network Application Processing System, which includes, among
other things, license applications and carries a burden estimate of
43.8 minutes for a manual or electronic submission.
BIS is not able to estimate the increase in total burden hours
associated with the PRA and OMB control number 0694-0088 as a result of
this rule because, prior to publication of this proposed rule, BIS did
not have a way to readily account for how many items were being
authorized for reexport or transfer (in-country) under provisions of
License Exception APR. BIS encourages public comments from reexporters
to assist the agency in developing estimates for the impact on burden
hours if the changes included in this
[[Page 23498]]
proposed rule were published in final form.
4. This proposed rule does not contain policies with Federalism
implications as that term is defined in Executive Order 13132.
5. Pursuant to section 1762 of the Export Control Reform Act of
2018 (Title XVII, Subtitle B of Pub. L. 115-232, 132 Stat. 2208), which
was included in the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2019, this action is exempt from the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) requirements for notice of proposed
rulemaking, opportunity for public participation, and delay in
effective date. Nonetheless, BIS is providing the public with an
opportunity to review and comment on this rule, despite its being
exempted from that requirement of the APA.
6. Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment are not required to be given for this rule by 5 U.S.C.
553, or by any other law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., are not applicable.
Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required and none
has been prepared.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 740
Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, 15 CFR part 740 of the EAR (15 CFR parts 730-774) is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 740--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 740 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4801-4852; 50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR
58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR,
2001 Comp., p. 783.
0
2. Amend Sec. 740.16 by revising paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 740.16 Additional permissive reexports (APR).
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(3) The reexport is destined to a country in Country Group B that
is not also included in Country Group D:2, D:3, or D:4; and the
commodity being reexported is both controlled for national security
reasons and not controlled for export to Country Group A:1.
* * * * *
Matthew S. Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2020-07239 Filed 4-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P