Air Plan Approval; Nebraska; Infrastructure SIP Requirements for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), 21325-21329 [2020-07477]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 75 / Friday, April 17, 2020 / Rules and Regulations legitimate pharmaceutical fentanyl produced in the United States. Additionally, DEA is not aware of norfentanyl being used for the manufacturing of legitimate pharmaceutical fentanyl; however, DEA cannot rule out the possibility that minimal quantities of norfentanyl are used for this purpose. If there are any quantities of norfentanyl used for the manufacturing of legitimate pharmaceutical fentanyl, the quantities are believed to be small and economically insignificant. The DEA has identified 30 domestic suppliers of norfentanyl. Based on the Small Business Administration size standard for chemical distributors and Statistics of United States Business data, 94.5 percent or 28.4 (rounded to 28) are estimated to be small entities. It is difficult to know how much norfentanyl is distributed by these suppliers. It is common for chemical distributors to have items on their catalog while not actually having any material level of sales. Based on the review of import and quota information for fentanyl and ANPP, where the quantities of ANPP imported and manufactured generally correspond with the quantities of fentanyl produced, DEA believes any quantity of sales from these distributors for the legitimate pharmaceutical fentanyl manufacturing is minimal. Therefore, DEA estimates the cost of this rule on any affected small entity is minimal. Because of these facts, this rule will not result in a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 On the basis of information contained in the ‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Act’’ section above, DEA determined and certifies pursuant to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq., that this action will not result in any Federal mandate that may result ‘‘in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted for inflation) in any one year * * *.’’ Therefore, neither a Small Government Agency Plan nor any other action is required under provisions of UMRA. 3501–3521. This action does not impose recordkeeping or reporting requirements on State or local governments, individuals, businesses, or organizations. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308 Administrative practice and procedure, drug traffic control, reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set out above, DEA amends 21 CFR part 1308 as follows: PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 1308 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b), 956(b), unless otherwise noted. 2. Amend § 1308.12 by adding paragraph (g)(3)(ii) to read as follows. ■ Paperwork Reduction Act § 1308.12 This action does not impose a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. * Schedule II. * * (g) * * * (3) * * * * * (ii) N-phenyl-N-(piperidin-4-yl)propionamide (norfentanyl) ........................................................................................................................ * * * * * Dated: March 5, 2020. Uttam Dhillon, Acting Administrator. [FR Doc. 2020–07381 Filed 4–16–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–09–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R07–OAR–2019–0083; FRL–10007– 78–Region 7] Air Plan Approval; Nebraska; Infrastructure SIP Requirements for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve elements of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from the State of Nebraska addressing the applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110 for the 2015 Ozone (O3) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Whenever jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:51 Apr 16, 2020 Jkt 250001 the EPA promulgates a new or revised NAAQS, CAA section 110 requires that each State adopt and submit a SIP submission to establish that the State’s SIP meets infrastructure requirements for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each such new or revised NAAQS. These SIP submissions are commonly referred to as ‘‘infrastructure’’ SIPs. The infrastructure requirements are designed to ensure that the structural components of each State’s air quality management program are adequate to meet the State’s responsibilities under the CAA. This final rule is effective on May 18, 2020. DATES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2019–0083. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through https:// ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 21325 8366 www.regulations.gov or please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lachala Kemp, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913) 551–7214; email address kemp.lachala@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. Table of Contents I. Background II. What is the EPA addressing in this document? III. Has the State met the requirements for approval of the infrastructure SIP submission? IV. What is the EPA’s response to comments? V. What sction is the EPA taking? VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background On May 9, 2019, the EPA proposed to approve Nebraska’s infrastructure SIP submission for the 2015 O3 NAAQS in the Federal Register. 84 FR 20318 (May 9, 2019). The EPA solicited comments on the proposed approval of the infrastructure SIP submission and E:\FR\FM\17APR1.SGM 17APR1 21326 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 75 / Friday, April 17, 2020 / Rules and Regulations received one set of comments that is addressed in this document. II. What is the EPA addressing in this document? The EPA is approving the infrastructure SIP submission received from the State of Nebraska on September 24, 2018. Specifically, the EPA is approving the following infrastructure elements of section 110(a)(2): (A) Through (C)(the permitting portion relevant to Part C), (D)(i)(I)—prongs 1 and 2, (D)(i)(II)— prong 3, (D)(ii), (E) through (H), and (J) through (M). A Technical Support Document (TSD) in the docket provides additional details of this action, including an analysis of how the infrastructure SIP submission meets the applicable 110(a)(1) and (2) requirements for infrastructure SIPs. The EPA plans to take separate action on the infrastructure elements under section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)—prong 4. The EPA is not addressing section 110(a)(2)(I)—Nonattainment Area Plan or Plan Revisions under Part D, as it is the EPA’s interpretation of the CAA that these elements do not need to be addressed in the context of an infrastructure SIP submission. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES III. Has the State met the requirements for approval of the infrastructure SIP submission? The State met the public notice requirements for SIP submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The EPA determined that the submission satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The State provided a public comment period for this SIP revision from August 7, 2018 to September 7, 2018, and at the same time, offered an opportunity for a public hearing. The State received no comments and no requests for a public hearing. In addition, as explained in more detail in the TSD, the infrastructure SIP submission meets the substantive requirements of the CAA for SIP submissions, including section 110 and implementing regulations. IV. What is the EPA’s response to comments? The public comment period on the EPA’s proposed rule opened May 9, 2019, the date of its publication in the Federal Register and closed on June 10, 2019. During this period, the EPA received one comment which consisted of several observations as summarized below. Comment 1: The EPA states in the TSD that Nebraska’s minor source new source review (NSR) program does not meet the requirements of CAA section VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:51 Apr 16, 2020 Jkt 250001 110(a)(2)(C) and therefore the EPA must make the State correct the deficiency or make a finding under CAA section 110(k). Response 1: The EPA’s review of a State’s infrastructure SIP submission focuses on assuring that the State’s SIP meets basic structural requirements. Section 110(a)(2)(C) includes, inter alia, the requirement that States have a program to regulate minor new sources. The EPA evaluates whether the State has an EPA-approved minor NSR program and whether the program addresses the pollutants relevant to that NAAQS. As discussed in the TSD, the EPA approved Nebraska’s minor NSR program into the SIP in 1972 and 1995. See 37 FR 10842 (May 31, 1972) and 60 FR 372 (January 4, 1995). Notwithstanding the EPA statement from the TSD referenced by the commenter, the EPA does not currently see a deficiency in the Nebraska minor NSR program that warrants a disapproval of the infrastructure SIP submission with respect to section 110(a)(2)(C) or a finding under section 110(k) of the Act. In the TSD, the EPA stated that that Nebraska’s minor NSR program adequately regulates construction and modification of stationary sources to protect the 2015 O3 NAAQS. While the EPA also said that Nebraska’s minor NSR program ‘‘likely does not meet’’ all the requirements found in the EPA’s regulations implementing that provision, this was not intended as a definitive determination that Nebraska’s program did not in fact meet all requirements of the implementing regulations of 40 CFR 51.160 through 51.164. This statement was made in error and was not the result of a comprehensive review of Nebraska’s minor source NSR program, and the EPA did not identify a specific deficiency in Nebraska’s minor source NSR program. The commenter does not identify a specific deficiency with the Nebraska regulations or any intervening change in the EPA regulations that Nebraska has failed to address with respect to its minor NSR program. Nebraska has an approved minor NSR program that addresses the relevant pollutants. After further review of this issue, the EPA reaffirms its position that the State’s minor source NSR program adequately regulates the construction and modification of stationary sources to protect the 2015 O3 NAAQS. Because the EPA has determined that Nebraska’s minor NSR program is not deficient, the EPA is not disapproving the SIP submission with respect to CAA section 110(a)(2)(C) and is not compelled to issue a finding under CAA section 110(k). PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Comment 2: Nebraska failed to assure that the appropriate modeling is being performed through the State’s PSD and NSR permitting programs, as chapter 19, section 001 of Nebraska’s regulations does not appear to allow for incorporation by reference on an ongoing basis. The EPA must demonstrate that Nebraska is able to incorporate 40 CFR part 51, appendix W modeling guidelines on an ongoing basis. In addition, for the reasons listed above, the State fails to meet CAA 110(a)(2)(k). Response 2: Appendix W was revised in 2017, and the EPA required States to integrate the revisions to 40 CFR part 51, appendix W, into regulatory processes and require applicants to follow the revisions by no later than January 17, 2018. 82 FR 5182 (January 17, 2017). The EPA has reviewed the title 129, chapter 19, section 001 of the Nebraska Administrative Code and has determined that this State rule neither applies to nor limits the incorporation by reference of 40 CFR part 51, appendix W, as it does not pertain to appendix W. As stated in the TSD, Nebraska’s authority to require or perform air quality modeling for PSD construction permitting is in the SIPapproved State regulations at title 129, chapter 19, section 019, which requires air quality modeling to be based on the applicable models, data bases, and other requirements specified in 40 CFR part 51, appendix W (Guideline on Air Quality Models). Title 129, chapter 19, section 019 does not contain an incorporation by reference date. To the extent the commenter is concerned that title 129, chapter 019, section 019.01 adopts an older version of appendix W and that the State therefore lacks the requisite authority to use the 2017 revision to appendix W in PSD modeling, title 129, chapter 19, section 019.02 provides a process for modification or substitution with another model where an air quality model specified in 40 CFR part 51, appendix W, is inappropriate, and includes provisions for public comment concerning the modified or substituted model. The EPA interprets this provision to allow for Nebraska and it’s sources to use updated appendix W models reflected in the most recent version of appendix W even if the undated reference in appendix W in title 129, chapter 19, section 019.02 could be interpreted to adopt a previous version of appendix W. These provisions are thus adequate to meet PSD and NSR requirements under section 110(a)(2)(C) and contribute to satisfying section 110(a)(2)(K). E:\FR\FM\17APR1.SGM 17APR1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 75 / Friday, April 17, 2020 / Rules and Regulations With respect to CAA section 110(a)(2)(K) more generally, the EPA explained in its TSD that Neb. Rev. Stat. section 81–1504(5) provides Nebraska with the authority to encourage, participate in, or conduct studies, investigations, research and demonstrations relating to air pollution and its causes and effects. This statute is interpreted by the EPA to give Nebraska broad authority to conduct air quality modeling to predict the effect on ambient air quality of any emission of any air pollutant for which a NAAQS has been promulgated. Nebraska’s September 24, 2018 infrastructure SIP submission also references Neb. Rev. Stat. section 81–1527, which provides for public inspection of information furnished to or obtained by Nebraska related to air sources, including emissions data. Thus, considering this statutory authority and the Nebraska regulations described above, the EPA finds that Nebraska’s SIP has the authority to provide air quality modelling data to the EPA upon request. For these reasons, the EPA finds that Nebraska’s SIP satisfies the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(K). Comment 3: Nebraska failed to identify ammonia as a precursor to Particulate Matter (PM) in its NSR and PSD permitting program. Because of this, the State fails to meet elements C, D and J (CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C), (D), and (J)). Response 3: The EPA interprets the commenter’s reference to Particulate Matter as Particulate Matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) in accordance with the precursor language in the definition of ‘‘regulated NSR pollutant’’ in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49). Nebraska’s PSD regulations at title 129, chapter 19, section 010 define the appropriate precursors for all NSR pollutants and mirror the EPA’s definitions in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49). In that provision, the EPA regulations define ‘‘regulated NSR pollutant’’ for purposes of the PSD permitting requirements to include precursors specifically identified by the Administrator in that paragraph. The provisions indicate that sulfur dioxide is a precursor to PM2.5, that nitrogen oxides are presumptively a precursor to PM2.5 (unless a demonstration is made to the contrary), and that volatile organic compounds are presumptively not a precursor to PM2.5 (unless a demonstration is made to the contrary). The provision does not identify ammonia as a precursor to PM2.5 for purposes of the PSD permitting requirements, and thus Nebraska was not required to identify ammonia as a VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:51 Apr 16, 2020 Jkt 250001 PM2.5 precursor in its SIP for purposes of satisfying the requirement to have an adequate PSD permitting program under CAA section 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), or (J). To the extent the commenter suggests that the State’s nonattainment NSR permitting program should regulate ammonia as a PM2.5 precursor, the EPA interprets the portion of CAA section 110(a)(2)(C) that pertains to a permitting program that applies to nonattainment NSR within nonattainment areas is outside of the scope of this infrastructure SIP action. Because CAA section 110(a)(2)(C) refers to permit programs for purposes of nonattainment NSR under part D of the CAA that a State is required to submit to the EPA on a schedule that is separate from what is required for infrastructure SIP submissions, the State is not required to address nonattainment NSR requirements in the infrastructure SIP submission. In addition, as explained in the TSD, there are currently no nonattainment areas in the State of Nebraska, and thus, Nebraska is not at this time required to have an approved nonattainment NSR program addressing PM2.5. Accordingly, the EPA finds that Nebraska’s 2015 O3 NAAQS Infrastructure SIP submission meets the requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C), (D), and (J) as it is not required to identify ammonia as a precursor to PM2.5 in its PSD permitting program and any purported deficiencies related to the State’s nonattainment NSR permitting program are outside of the scope of this action. Comment 4: In the TSD, the EPA discusses CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) in its approval of CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) prongs 1 and 2 and CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) prong 3, but it is not clear if 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) is the basis for approval of those prongs. Response 4: The TSD contains the EPA’s analysis of whether the State meets the separate requirements found in CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and 2), and CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3), as well as CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii). Because the EPA did not reference CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) in its approval of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) prongs 1 and 2 and CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) prong 3, the EPA is unable to determine the commenter’s concern with the EPA’s approval of these elements. Comment 5: The EPA should make periodic reviews of Nebraska’s Air Quality program publicly available in order for the public to determine if Nebraska has adequate resources and personnel. The EPA should re-propose PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 21327 approval of the Infrastructure SIP and should clearly state whether it has found that Nebraska has adequate funding to support the State’s permitting programs in accordance with CAA section 110(a)(2)(L). Response 5: The EPA’s statement that it conducts periodic reviews of Nebraska’s Air Quality Program was made in the section of the TSD that contained an analysis of whether Nebraska meets the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(E). The basis for the EPA’s approval of Nebraska’s provisions for meeting the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(E) are fully articulated in the TSD, and the statement concerning periodic reviews of Nebraska’s Air Quality Program was informational in nature and did not serve as a basis for approval of Nebraska’s provisions that meet the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(E). As discussed in the TSD, the State has adopted requirements for sources to pay fees sufficient to pay the reasonable direct and indirect costs of developing and administering the air quality operating permit program. These costs include overhead charges for personnel, equipment, buildings and vehicles; enforcement costs; costs of emissions and ambient monitoring; and modeling analyses and demonstrations. The EPA therefore finds that Nebraska has adequate personnel, funding, and authority to carry out the state implementation plan with respect to the relevant NAAQS in accordance with CAA section 110(a)(2)(E). Concerning the EPA’s analysis of whether Nebraska has adequate infrastructure and adequate funding to address CAA section 110(a)(2)(L), the EPA addressed the adequacy of Nebraska’s Title V fee program, which was approved by the EPA on October 18, 1995. See 60 FR 53872 (October 18, 1995). Nebraska included its environmental agency’s 2017 Annual Report to the Legislature with its September 24, 2018 infrastructure SIP submission for the 2015 O3 NAAQS, which is available in the docket. The Annual Report details how emission fees are established in order to provide the minimum amount to pay the direct and indirect costs of developing and administering the air quality permit program, which includes an analysis of whether the fees support administration of the program. Because the EPA articulated its proposed finding in the TSD based on information that was available in the docket during the public comment period, the EPA disagrees with the commenter that it must re-propose approval for its finding that Nebraska E:\FR\FM\17APR1.SGM 17APR1 21328 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 75 / Friday, April 17, 2020 / Rules and Regulations has the adequate infrastructure to satisfy CAA section 110(a)(2)(L). V. What action is the EPA taking? The EPA is approving elements of the September 24, 2018, infrastructure SIP submission from the State of Nebraska, which address the requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as applicable to the 2015 O3 NAAQS. Specifically, the EPA is approving the following infrastructure elements of 110(a)(2): (A) through (C) (the part C permitting portion), (D)(i)(I)–(prongs 1 and 2), (D)(i)(II)—(prong 3), (D)(ii), (E) through (H), and (J) through (M). As explained in the TSD, the EPA intends to act on section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)—prong 4, in a subsequent rulemaking. The EPA is not addressing section 110(a)(2)(I)– Nonattainment Area Plan or Plan Revisions under part D, as it is the EPA’s interpretation of the CAA that these elements do not need to be addressed in the context of an infrastructure SIP submission. Based upon review of the State’s infrastructure SIP submissions and relevant statutory and regulatory authorities and provisions referenced in those submissions or referenced in Nebraska’s SIP, the EPA finds that Nebraska’s SIP meets all applicable required elements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2) (except as otherwise noted) with respect to the 2015 O3 NAAQS. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:51 Apr 16, 2020 Jkt 250001 action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866. • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not involve technical standards; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 16, 2020. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: April 3, 2020. Edward Chu, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7. For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part 52 as set forth below: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et. seq. Subpart CC—Nebraska 2. In § 52.1420, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding entry ‘‘(35)’’ in numerical order to read as follows: ■ § 52.1420 * Identification of plan. * * (e)* * * E:\FR\FM\17APR1.SGM 17APR1 * * 21329 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 75 / Friday, April 17, 2020 / Rules and Regulations EPA-APPROVED NEBRASKA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS Name of nonregulatory SIP revision Applicable geographic or nonattainment area * (35) Sections 110 (a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 O3 NAAQS. * Statewide ........... * ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 52 and 70 [EPA–R07–OAR–2019–0532; FRL–10007– 72–Region 7] Air Plan Approval; Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska and Approval of Operating Permit Program for Iowa and Nebraska; Definition of Chemical Process Plants Under State Prevention of Significant Deterioration Regulations and Operating Permit Programs Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving revisions to the State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for Iowa, Kansas, Missouri and Nebraska and is also approving revisions to the Operating Permit Programs for Iowa and Nebraska. The SIP revisions incorporate changes to the definition of chemical process plants under the States’ Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) regulations and change the same definition in the approved State operating permit programs. Consistent with an EPA regulation finalized in 2007, this action approves several State rules that modify the definition of chemical process plant to exclude ethanol manufacturing facilities that produce ethanol by natural fermentation processes. Approving these modified definitions into the SIP establishes that the PSD major source applicability threshold in the SIPs for these ethanol plants is 250 tons per year (tpy) (rather than 100 tpy) and removes the requirement to include fugitive emissions when determining if the source is major for PSD. In addition, this action approves changes to the Iowa and Nebraska Title V operating permit programs that remove the requirement SUMMARY: jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES 9/24/2018 Jkt 250001 EPA approval date Explanation * 4/17/2020, [insert Federal Register citation]. * * * This action approves for the O3 NAAQS: The following CAA elements: 110(a)(1) and (2): (A) through (C), (D)(i)(I)—prongs 1 and 2, (D)(i)(II)—prong 3, (D)(ii), (E) through (H), and (J) through (M). EPA–R07–OAR–2019–0083; FRL–10007–78–Region 7. * BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 15:51 Apr 16, 2020 * * [FR Doc. 2020–07477 Filed 4–16–20; 8:45 a.m.] VerDate Sep<11>2014 State submittal date * * to include fugitive emissions when determining if a source is major for Title V purposes. The EPA concludes that the changes to the State rules described herein are approvable because they are consistent with EPA regulations governing State PSD and Title V programs and will not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress (as defined in section 171 of the Clean Air Act (CAA)), or any other applicable requirement of the CAA. DATES: This final rule is effective on May 18, 2020. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2019–0532. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through https:// www.regulations.gov or please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Stone, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913) 551–7714; email address stone.william@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. Table of Contents I. What is being addressed in this document? II. Have the requirements for approval of the SIP and Operating Permit Plan revisions been met? III. The EPA’s Response to Comments IV. What actions are the EPA taking? V. Incorporation by Reference VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 * * I. What is being addressed in this document? The EPA is approving revisions to SIPs received by EPA from Iowa on November 15, 2007, Kansas on November 23, 2009, Missouri on December 7, 2009, and March 20, 2019, and Nebraska on August 28, 2007, and September 11, 2018. The EPA is also approving revisions to the Iowa and Nebraska Operating Permit Programs. These revisions conform the State rules to changes to EPA regulations reflected in the EPA’s final rule entitled ‘‘Prevention of Significant Deterioration, Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR), and Title V: Treatment of Certain Ethanol Production Facilities Under the ‘Major Emitting Facility’ Definition’’ (hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘2007 Ethanol Rule’’) as published in the Federal Register on May 1, 2007 (72 FR 24059). The 2007 Ethanol Rule amended the PSD definition of ‘‘major stationary source’’ to exclude certain ethanol facilities from the ‘‘chemical process plant’’ source category and clarified that the PSD major source applicability threshold for certain ethanol plants is 250 tpy (rather than 100 tpy). The 2007 Ethanol Rule also removed the requirement to include fugitive emissions when determining if the source is major for PSD and Title V permitting. II. Have the requirements for approval of the SIP and Operating Permit Plan revisions been met? All of the aforementioned regulations are consistent with EPA’s PSD program requirements in 40 CFR 51.166 and Title V program requirements in 40 CFR part 70, as amended in the 2007 Ethanol Rule. Further, all submissions have met the public notice requirements for SIP submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. Iowa published a Notice of Intended Action in the Iowa Administrative Bulletin on August 1, 2007. A public hearing was held on September 5, 2007. The public comment period closed on September 6, 2007. Iowa received six E:\FR\FM\17APR1.SGM 17APR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 75 (Friday, April 17, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21325-21329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-07477]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2019-0083; FRL-10007-78-Region 7]


Air Plan Approval; Nebraska; Infrastructure SIP Requirements for 
the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final 
action to approve elements of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
submission from the State of Nebraska addressing the applicable 
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110 for the 2015 Ozone 
(O3) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). 
Whenever the EPA promulgates a new or revised NAAQS, CAA section 110 
requires that each State adopt and submit a SIP submission to establish 
that the State's SIP meets infrastructure requirements for the 
implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each such new or 
revised NAAQS. These SIP submissions are commonly referred to as 
``infrastructure'' SIPs. The infrastructure requirements are designed 
to ensure that the structural components of each State's air quality 
management program are adequate to meet the State's responsibilities 
under the CAA.

DATES: This final rule is effective on May 18, 2020.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2019-0083. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in 
the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or 
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain 
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the 
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. 
Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov or please contact the person identified in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lachala Kemp, Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner 
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913) 551-7214; email 
address [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and 
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. What is the EPA addressing in this document?
III. Has the State met the requirements for approval of the 
infrastructure SIP submission?
IV. What is the EPA's response to comments?
V. What sction is the EPA taking?
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    On May 9, 2019, the EPA proposed to approve Nebraska's 
infrastructure SIP submission for the 2015 O3 NAAQS in the 
Federal Register. 84 FR 20318 (May 9, 2019). The EPA solicited comments 
on the proposed approval of the infrastructure SIP submission and

[[Page 21326]]

received one set of comments that is addressed in this document.

II. What is the EPA addressing in this document?

    The EPA is approving the infrastructure SIP submission received 
from the State of Nebraska on September 24, 2018. Specifically, the EPA 
is approving the following infrastructure elements of section 
110(a)(2): (A) Through (C)(the permitting portion relevant to Part C), 
(D)(i)(I)--prongs 1 and 2, (D)(i)(II)--prong 3, (D)(ii), (E) through 
(H), and (J) through (M).
    A Technical Support Document (TSD) in the docket provides 
additional details of this action, including an analysis of how the 
infrastructure SIP submission meets the applicable 110(a)(1) and (2) 
requirements for infrastructure SIPs. The EPA plans to take separate 
action on the infrastructure elements under section 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)--prong 4. The EPA is not addressing section 
110(a)(2)(I)--Nonattainment Area Plan or Plan Revisions under Part D, 
as it is the EPA's interpretation of the CAA that these elements do not 
need to be addressed in the context of an infrastructure SIP 
submission.

III. Has the State met the requirements for approval of the 
infrastructure SIP submission?

    The State met the public notice requirements for SIP submissions in 
accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The EPA determined that the submission 
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The 
State provided a public comment period for this SIP revision from 
August 7, 2018 to September 7, 2018, and at the same time, offered an 
opportunity for a public hearing. The State received no comments and no 
requests for a public hearing. In addition, as explained in more detail 
in the TSD, the infrastructure SIP submission meets the substantive 
requirements of the CAA for SIP submissions, including section 110 and 
implementing regulations.

IV. What is the EPA's response to comments?

    The public comment period on the EPA's proposed rule opened May 9, 
2019, the date of its publication in the Federal Register and closed on 
June 10, 2019. During this period, the EPA received one comment which 
consisted of several observations as summarized below.
    Comment 1: The EPA states in the TSD that Nebraska's minor source 
new source review (NSR) program does not meet the requirements of CAA 
section 110(a)(2)(C) and therefore the EPA must make the State correct 
the deficiency or make a finding under CAA section 110(k).
    Response 1: The EPA's review of a State's infrastructure SIP 
submission focuses on assuring that the State's SIP meets basic 
structural requirements. Section 110(a)(2)(C) includes, inter alia, the 
requirement that States have a program to regulate minor new sources. 
The EPA evaluates whether the State has an EPA-approved minor NSR 
program and whether the program addresses the pollutants relevant to 
that NAAQS. As discussed in the TSD, the EPA approved Nebraska's minor 
NSR program into the SIP in 1972 and 1995. See 37 FR 10842 (May 31, 
1972) and 60 FR 372 (January 4, 1995).
    Notwithstanding the EPA statement from the TSD referenced by the 
commenter, the EPA does not currently see a deficiency in the Nebraska 
minor NSR program that warrants a disapproval of the infrastructure SIP 
submission with respect to section 110(a)(2)(C) or a finding under 
section 110(k) of the Act. In the TSD, the EPA stated that that 
Nebraska's minor NSR program adequately regulates construction and 
modification of stationary sources to protect the 2015 O3 
NAAQS. While the EPA also said that Nebraska's minor NSR program 
``likely does not meet'' all the requirements found in the EPA's 
regulations implementing that provision, this was not intended as a 
definitive determination that Nebraska's program did not in fact meet 
all requirements of the implementing regulations of 40 CFR 51.160 
through 51.164. This statement was made in error and was not the result 
of a comprehensive review of Nebraska's minor source NSR program, and 
the EPA did not identify a specific deficiency in Nebraska's minor 
source NSR program. The commenter does not identify a specific 
deficiency with the Nebraska regulations or any intervening change in 
the EPA regulations that Nebraska has failed to address with respect to 
its minor NSR program.
    Nebraska has an approved minor NSR program that addresses the 
relevant pollutants. After further review of this issue, the EPA 
reaffirms its position that the State's minor source NSR program 
adequately regulates the construction and modification of stationary 
sources to protect the 2015 O3 NAAQS. Because the EPA has 
determined that Nebraska's minor NSR program is not deficient, the EPA 
is not disapproving the SIP submission with respect to CAA section 
110(a)(2)(C) and is not compelled to issue a finding under CAA section 
110(k).
    Comment 2: Nebraska failed to assure that the appropriate modeling 
is being performed through the State's PSD and NSR permitting programs, 
as chapter 19, section 001 of Nebraska's regulations does not appear to 
allow for incorporation by reference on an ongoing basis. The EPA must 
demonstrate that Nebraska is able to incorporate 40 CFR part 51, 
appendix W modeling guidelines on an ongoing basis. In addition, for 
the reasons listed above, the State fails to meet CAA 110(a)(2)(k).
    Response 2: Appendix W was revised in 2017, and the EPA required 
States to integrate the revisions to 40 CFR part 51, appendix W, into 
regulatory processes and require applicants to follow the revisions by 
no later than January 17, 2018. 82 FR 5182 (January 17, 2017).
    The EPA has reviewed the title 129, chapter 19, section 001 of the 
Nebraska Administrative Code and has determined that this State rule 
neither applies to nor limits the incorporation by reference of 40 CFR 
part 51, appendix W, as it does not pertain to appendix W. As stated in 
the TSD, Nebraska's authority to require or perform air quality 
modeling for PSD construction permitting is in the SIP-approved State 
regulations at title 129, chapter 19, section 019, which requires air 
quality modeling to be based on the applicable models, data bases, and 
other requirements specified in 40 CFR part 51, appendix W (Guideline 
on Air Quality Models). Title 129, chapter 19, section 019 does not 
contain an incorporation by reference date.
    To the extent the commenter is concerned that title 129, chapter 
019, section 019.01 adopts an older version of appendix W and that the 
State therefore lacks the requisite authority to use the 2017 revision 
to appendix W in PSD modeling, title 129, chapter 19, section 019.02 
provides a process for modification or substitution with another model 
where an air quality model specified in 40 CFR part 51, appendix W, is 
inappropriate, and includes provisions for public comment concerning 
the modified or substituted model. The EPA interprets this provision to 
allow for Nebraska and it's sources to use updated appendix W models 
reflected in the most recent version of appendix W even if the undated 
reference in appendix W in title 129, chapter 19, section 019.02 could 
be interpreted to adopt a previous version of appendix W. These 
provisions are thus adequate to meet PSD and NSR requirements under 
section 110(a)(2)(C) and contribute to satisfying section 110(a)(2)(K).

[[Page 21327]]

    With respect to CAA section 110(a)(2)(K) more generally, the EPA 
explained in its TSD that Neb. Rev. Stat. section 81-1504(5) provides 
Nebraska with the authority to encourage, participate in, or conduct 
studies, investigations, research and demonstrations relating to air 
pollution and its causes and effects. This statute is interpreted by 
the EPA to give Nebraska broad authority to conduct air quality 
modeling to predict the effect on ambient air quality of any emission 
of any air pollutant for which a NAAQS has been promulgated. Nebraska's 
September 24, 2018 infrastructure SIP submission also references Neb. 
Rev. Stat. section 81-1527, which provides for public inspection of 
information furnished to or obtained by Nebraska related to air 
sources, including emissions data. Thus, considering this statutory 
authority and the Nebraska regulations described above, the EPA finds 
that Nebraska's SIP has the authority to provide air quality modelling 
data to the EPA upon request. For these reasons, the EPA finds that 
Nebraska's SIP satisfies the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(K).
    Comment 3: Nebraska failed to identify ammonia as a precursor to 
Particulate Matter (PM) in its NSR and PSD permitting program. Because 
of this, the State fails to meet elements C, D and J (CAA sections 
110(a)(2)(C), (D), and (J)).
    Response 3: The EPA interprets the commenter's reference to 
Particulate Matter as Particulate Matter less than 2.5 microns in 
diameter (PM2.5) in accordance with the precursor language 
in the definition of ``regulated NSR pollutant'' in 40 CFR 
51.166(b)(49). Nebraska's PSD regulations at title 129, chapter 19, 
section 010 define the appropriate precursors for all NSR pollutants 
and mirror the EPA's definitions in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49). In that 
provision, the EPA regulations define ``regulated NSR pollutant'' for 
purposes of the PSD permitting requirements to include precursors 
specifically identified by the Administrator in that paragraph. The 
provisions indicate that sulfur dioxide is a precursor to 
PM2.5, that nitrogen oxides are presumptively a precursor to 
PM2.5 (unless a demonstration is made to the contrary), and 
that volatile organic compounds are presumptively not a precursor to 
PM2.5 (unless a demonstration is made to the contrary). The 
provision does not identify ammonia as a precursor to PM2.5 
for purposes of the PSD permitting requirements, and thus Nebraska was 
not required to identify ammonia as a PM2.5 precursor in its 
SIP for purposes of satisfying the requirement to have an adequate PSD 
permitting program under CAA section 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), or (J).
    To the extent the commenter suggests that the State's nonattainment 
NSR permitting program should regulate ammonia as a PM2.5 
precursor, the EPA interprets the portion of CAA section 110(a)(2)(C) 
that pertains to a permitting program that applies to nonattainment NSR 
within nonattainment areas is outside of the scope of this 
infrastructure SIP action. Because CAA section 110(a)(2)(C) refers to 
permit programs for purposes of nonattainment NSR under part D of the 
CAA that a State is required to submit to the EPA on a schedule that is 
separate from what is required for infrastructure SIP submissions, the 
State is not required to address nonattainment NSR requirements in the 
infrastructure SIP submission. In addition, as explained in the TSD, 
there are currently no nonattainment areas in the State of Nebraska, 
and thus, Nebraska is not at this time required to have an approved 
nonattainment NSR program addressing PM2.5.
    Accordingly, the EPA finds that Nebraska's 2015 O3 NAAQS 
Infrastructure SIP submission meets the requirements of CAA sections 
110(a)(2)(C), (D), and (J) as it is not required to identify ammonia as 
a precursor to PM2.5 in its PSD permitting program and any 
purported deficiencies related to the State's nonattainment NSR 
permitting program are outside of the scope of this action.
    Comment 4: In the TSD, the EPA discusses CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) in 
its approval of CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) prongs 1 and 2 and CAA 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) prong 3, but it is not clear if 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) is 
the basis for approval of those prongs.
    Response 4: The TSD contains the EPA's analysis of whether the 
State meets the separate requirements found in CAA section 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and 2), and CAA section 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3), as well as CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii). 
Because the EPA did not reference CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) in its 
approval of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) prongs 1 and 2 and CAA 
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) prong 3, the EPA is unable to determine the 
commenter's concern with the EPA's approval of these elements.
    Comment 5: The EPA should make periodic reviews of Nebraska's Air 
Quality program publicly available in order for the public to determine 
if Nebraska has adequate resources and personnel. The EPA should re-
propose approval of the Infrastructure SIP and should clearly state 
whether it has found that Nebraska has adequate funding to support the 
State's permitting programs in accordance with CAA section 
110(a)(2)(L).
    Response 5: The EPA's statement that it conducts periodic reviews 
of Nebraska's Air Quality Program was made in the section of the TSD 
that contained an analysis of whether Nebraska meets the requirements 
of CAA section 110(a)(2)(E). The basis for the EPA's approval of 
Nebraska's provisions for meeting the requirements of CAA section 
110(a)(2)(E) are fully articulated in the TSD, and the statement 
concerning periodic reviews of Nebraska's Air Quality Program was 
informational in nature and did not serve as a basis for approval of 
Nebraska's provisions that meet the requirements of CAA section 
110(a)(2)(E). As discussed in the TSD, the State has adopted 
requirements for sources to pay fees sufficient to pay the reasonable 
direct and indirect costs of developing and administering the air 
quality operating permit program. These costs include overhead charges 
for personnel, equipment, buildings and vehicles; enforcement costs; 
costs of emissions and ambient monitoring; and modeling analyses and 
demonstrations. The EPA therefore finds that Nebraska has adequate 
personnel, funding, and authority to carry out the state implementation 
plan with respect to the relevant NAAQS in accordance with CAA section 
110(a)(2)(E).
    Concerning the EPA's analysis of whether Nebraska has adequate 
infrastructure and adequate funding to address CAA section 
110(a)(2)(L), the EPA addressed the adequacy of Nebraska's Title V fee 
program, which was approved by the EPA on October 18, 1995. See 60 FR 
53872 (October 18, 1995). Nebraska included its environmental agency's 
2017 Annual Report to the Legislature with its September 24, 2018 
infrastructure SIP submission for the 2015 O3 NAAQS, which 
is available in the docket. The Annual Report details how emission fees 
are established in order to provide the minimum amount to pay the 
direct and indirect costs of developing and administering the air 
quality permit program, which includes an analysis of whether the fees 
support administration of the program.
    Because the EPA articulated its proposed finding in the TSD based 
on information that was available in the docket during the public 
comment period, the EPA disagrees with the commenter that it must re-
propose approval for its finding that Nebraska

[[Page 21328]]

has the adequate infrastructure to satisfy CAA section 110(a)(2)(L).

V. What action is the EPA taking?

    The EPA is approving elements of the September 24, 2018, 
infrastructure SIP submission from the State of Nebraska, which address 
the requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as applicable to the 
2015 O3 NAAQS. Specifically, the EPA is approving the 
following infrastructure elements of 110(a)(2): (A) through (C) (the 
part C permitting portion), (D)(i)(I)-(prongs 1 and 2), (D)(i)(II)--
(prong 3), (D)(ii), (E) through (H), and (J) through (M). As explained 
in the TSD, the EPA intends to act on section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)--
prong 4, in a subsequent rulemaking. The EPA is not addressing section 
110(a)(2)(I)-Nonattainment Area Plan or Plan Revisions under part D, as 
it is the EPA's interpretation of the CAA that these elements do not 
need to be addressed in the context of an infrastructure SIP 
submission.
    Based upon review of the State's infrastructure SIP submissions and 
relevant statutory and regulatory authorities and provisions referenced 
in those submissions or referenced in Nebraska's SIP, the EPA finds 
that Nebraska's SIP meets all applicable required elements of sections 
110(a)(1) and (2) (except as otherwise noted) with respect to the 2015 
O3 NAAQS.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under 
Executive Order 12866.
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology 
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not 
involve technical standards; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal 
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by June 16, 2020. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 
organic compounds.

    Dated: April 3, 2020.
Edward Chu,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part 
52 as set forth below:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et. seq.

Subpart CC--Nebraska

0
2. In Sec.  52.1420, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding 
entry ``(35)'' in numerical order to read as follows:


Sec.  52.1420  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e)* * *

[[Page 21329]]



                                 EPA-Approved Nebraska Nonregulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Applicable
  Name of non- regulatory SIP       geographic or         State       EPA approval date        Explanation
            revision             nonattainment area  submittal date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
(35) Sections 110 (a)(1) and     Statewide.........       9/24/2018  4/17/2020, [insert  This action approves
 (2) Infrastructure                                                   Federal Register    for the O3 NAAQS: The
 Requirements for the 2015 O3                                         citation].          following CAA
 NAAQS.                                                                                   elements: 110(a)(1)
                                                                                          and (2): (A) through
                                                                                          (C), (D)(i)(I)--prongs
                                                                                          1 and 2, (D)(i)(II)--
                                                                                          prong 3, (D)(ii), (E)
                                                                                          through (H), and (J)
                                                                                          through (M). EPA-R07-
                                                                                          OAR-2019-0083; FRL-
                                                                                          10007-78-Region 7.
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2020-07477 Filed 4-16-20; 8:45 a.m.]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.