List of Fisheries for 2020, 21079-21103 [2020-06908]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
§ 76.1700 Records to be maintained by
cable system operators.
(a) Public inspection file. The
following records must be placed in the
online public file hosted by the
Commission, except as indicated in
paragraph (d) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Location of records. For cable
television systems exempt from the
online public file requirement pursuant
to paragraph (d) of this section, public
file material that continues to be
retained at the system shall be retained
in a public inspection file maintained at
the office in the community served by
the system that the system operator
maintains for the ordinary collection of
subscriber charges, resolution of
subscriber complaints, and other
business and, if the system operator
does not maintain such an office in the
community, at any accessible place in
the communities served by the system
(such as a public registry for documents
or an attorney’s office). Public file
locations will be open at least during
normal business hours and will be
conveniently located. The public
inspection file shall be available for
public inspection at any time during
regular business hours for the facility
where they are kept. All or part of the
public inspection file may be
maintained in a computer database, as
long as a computer terminal capable of
accessing the database is made
available, at the location of the file, to
members of the public who wish to
review the file.
(f) Links and contact and geographic
information. A system must provide a
link to the public inspection file hosted
on the Commission’s website from the
home page of its own website, if the
system has a website, and provide
contact information on its website for a
system representative who can assist
any person with disabilities with issues
related to the content of the public files.
A system also is required to include in
the online public file the address of the
system’s local public file, if the system
is exempt from the online public file
requirement pursuant to paragraph (d)
of this section but opts to use it in part
while retaining certain documents in
the local file that are not available in the
Commission’s online file, and the name,
phone number, and email address of the
system’s designated contact for
questions about the public file. In
addition, a system must provide on the
online public file a list of the five digit
ZIP codes served by the system. To the
extent this section refers to the local
public inspection file, it refers to the
public file of a physical system, which
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
is either maintained at the location
described in paragraph (e) of this
section or on the Commission’s website,
depending upon where the documents
are required to be maintained under the
Commission’s rules.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–06927 Filed 4–15–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 229
[Docket No. 200327–0090]
RIN 0648–BI76
List of Fisheries for 2020
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishes its
final List of Fisheries (LOF) for 2020, as
required by the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA). The LOF for
2020 reflects new information on
interactions between commercial
fisheries and marine mammals. NMFS
must classify each commercial fishery
on the LOF into one of three categories
under the MMPA based upon the level
of mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals that occurs incidental to each
fishery. The classification of a fishery on
the LOF determines whether
participants in that fishery are subject to
certain provisions of the MMPA, such as
registration, observer coverage, and take
reduction plan (TRP) requirements.
DATES: The effective date of this final
rule is May 18, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Chief, Marine Mammal and
Sea Turtle Conservation Division, Office
of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jaclyn Taylor, Office of Protected
Resources, 301–427–8402; Allison
Rosner, Greater Atlantic Region, 978–
281–9328; Jessica Powell, Southeast
Region, 727–824–5312; Dan Lawson,
West Coast Region, 562–980–3209;
Suzie Teerlink, Alaska Region, 907–
586–7240; Kevin Brindock, Pacific
Islands Region, 808–725–5146.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the
hearing impaired may call the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21079
Information Relay Service at 1–800–
877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Eastern time, Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
What is the List of Fisheries?
Section 118 of the MMPA requires
NMFS to place all U.S. commercial
fisheries into one of three categories
based on the level of incidental
mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals occurring in each fishery (16
U.S.C. 1387(c)(1)). The classification of
a fishery on the LOF determines
whether participants in that fishery may
be required to comply with certain
provisions of the MMPA, such as
registration, observer coverage, and take
reduction plan requirements. NMFS
must reexamine the LOF annually,
considering new information in the
Marine Mammal Stock Assessment
Reports (SARs) and other relevant
sources, and publish in the Federal
Register any necessary changes to the
LOF after notice and opportunity for
public comment (16 U.S.C.
1387(c)(1)(C)).
How does NMFS determine in which
category a fishery is placed?
The definitions for the fishery
classification criteria can be found in
the implementing regulations for section
118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2). The
criteria are also summarized here.
Fishery Classification Criteria
The fishery classification criteria
consist of a two-tiered, stock-specific
approach that first addresses the total
impact of all fisheries on each marine
mammal stock and then addresses the
impact of individual fisheries on each
stock. This approach is based on
consideration of the rate, in numbers of
animals per year, of incidental
mortalities and serious injuries of
marine mammals due to commercial
fishing operations relative to the
potential biological removal (PBR) level
for each marine mammal stock. The
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1362(20)) defines the
PBR level as the maximum number of
animals, not including natural
mortalities, that may be removed from a
marine mammal stock while allowing
that stock to reach or maintain its
optimum sustainable population (OSP).
This definition can also be found in the
implementing regulations for section
118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2).
Tier 1: Tier 1 considers the
cumulative fishery mortality and serious
injury for a particular stock. If the total
annual mortality and serious injury of a
marine mammal stock, across all
fisheries, is less than or equal to 10
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
21080
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
percent of the PBR level of the stock, all
fisheries interacting with the stock will
be placed in Category III (unless those
fisheries interact with other stock(s) for
which total annual mortality and
serious injury is greater than 10 percent
of PBR). Otherwise, these fisheries are
subject to the next tier (Tier 2) of
analysis to determine their
classification.
Tier 2: Tier 2 considers fisheryspecific mortality and serious injury for
a particular stock.
Category I: Annual mortality and
serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is greater than or equal to 50
percent of the PBR level (i.e., frequent
incidental mortality and serious injury
of marine mammals).
Category II: Annual mortality and
serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is greater than 1 percent and less
than 50 percent of the PBR level (i.e.,
occasional incidental mortality and
serious injury of marine mammals).
Category III: Annual mortality and
serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is less than or equal to 1 percent
of the PBR level (i.e., a remote
likelihood of or no known incidental
mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals).
Additional details regarding how the
categories were determined are
provided in the preamble to the final
rule implementing section 118 of the
MMPA (60 FR 45086; August 30, 1995).
Because fisheries are classified on a
per-stock basis, a fishery may qualify as
one category for one marine mammal
stock and another category for a
different marine mammal stock. A
fishery is typically classified on the LOF
at its highest level of classification (e.g.,
a fishery qualifying for Category III for
one marine mammal stock and for
Category II for another marine mammal
stock will be listed under Category II).
Stocks driving a fishery’s classification
are denoted with a superscript ‘‘1’’ in
Tables 1 and 2.
Other Criteria That May Be Considered
The tier analysis requires a minimum
amount of data, and NMFS does not
have sufficient data to perform a tier
analysis on certain fisheries. Therefore,
NMFS has classified certain fisheries by
analogy to other Category I or II fisheries
that use similar fishing techniques or
gear that are known to cause mortality
or serious injury of marine mammals, or
according to factors discussed in the
final LOF for 1996 (60 FR 67063;
December 28, 1995) and listed in the
regulatory definition of a Category II
fishery. In the absence of reliable
information indicating the frequency of
incidental mortality and serious injury
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
of marine mammals by a commercial
fishery, NMFS will determine whether
the incidental mortality or serious
injury is ‘‘frequent,’’ ‘‘occasional,’’ or
‘‘remote’’ by evaluating other factors
such as fishing techniques, gear used,
methods used to deter marine mammals,
target species, seasons and areas fished,
qualitative data from logbooks or
fishermen reports, stranding data, and
the species and distribution of marine
mammals in the area, or at the
discretion of the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries (50 CFR
229.2).
Further, eligible commercial fisheries
not specifically identified on the LOF
are deemed to be Category II fisheries
until the next LOF is published (50 CFR
229.2).
How does NMFS determine which
species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a
fishery?
The LOF includes a list of marine
mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in each
commercial fishery. The list of species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured includes ‘‘serious’’ and ‘‘nonserious’’ documented injuries as
described later in the List of Species
and/or Stocks Incidentally Killed or
Injured in the Pacific Ocean and the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean sections. To determine which
species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a
fishery, NMFS annually reviews the
information presented in the current
SARs and injury determination reports.
SARs are brief reports summarizing the
status of each stock of marine mammals
occurring in waters under U.S.
jurisdiction, including information on
the identity and geographic range of the
stock, population statistics related to
abundance, trend, and annual
productivity, notable habitat concerns,
and estimates of human-caused M/SI by
source. The SARs are based upon the
best available scientific information and
provide the most current and inclusive
information on each stock’s PBR level
and level of interaction with
commercial fishing operations. The best
available scientific information used in
the SARs and reviewed for the 2020
LOF generally summarizes data from
2012–2016. NMFS also reviews other
sources of new information, including
injury determination reports, bycatch
estimation reports, observer data,
logbook data, stranding data,
disentanglement network data,
fishermen self-reports (i.e., MMPA
mortality/injury reports), and anecdotal
reports from that time period. In some
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
cases, more recent information may be
available and used in the LOF.
For fisheries with observer coverage,
species or stocks are generally removed
from the list of marine mammal species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured if no interactions are
documented in the 5-year timeframe
summarized in that year’s LOF. For
fisheries with no observer coverage and
for observed fisheries with evidence
indicating that undocumented
interactions may be occurring (e.g.,
fishery has low observer coverage and
stranding network data include
evidence of fisheries interactions that
cannot be attributed to a specific
fishery) species and stocks may be
retained for longer than 5 years. For
these fisheries, NMFS will review the
other sources of information listed
above and use its discretion to decide
when it is appropriate to remove a
species or stock.
Where does NMFS obtain information
on the level of observer coverage in a
fishery on the LOF?
The best available information on the
level of observer coverage and the
spatial and temporal distribution of
observed marine mammal interactions is
presented in the SARs. Data obtained
from the observer program and observer
coverage levels are important tools in
estimating the level of marine mammal
mortality and serious injury in
commercial fishing operations. Starting
with the 2005 SARs, each Pacific and
Alaska SAR includes an appendix with
detailed descriptions of each Category I
and II fishery on the LOF, including the
observer coverage in those fisheries. For
Atlantic fisheries, this information can
be found in the LOF Fishery Fact
Sheets. The SARs do not provide
detailed information on observer
coverage in Category III fisheries
because, under the MMPA, Category III
fisheries are not required to
accommodate observers aboard vessels
due to the remote likelihood of
mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals. Fishery information
presented in the SARs’ appendices and
other resources referenced during the
tier analysis may include: Level of
observer coverage; target species; levels
of fishing effort; spatial and temporal
distribution of fishing effort;
characteristics of fishing gear and
operations; management and
regulations; and interactions with
marine mammals. Copies of the SARs
are available on the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources website at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-stock-assessment-reports-
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
region. Information on observer
coverage levels in Category I, II, and III
fisheries can be found in the fishery fact
sheets on the NMFS Office of Protected
Resources’ website: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/listfisheries-summary-tables. Additional
information on observer programs in
commercial fisheries can be found on
the NMFS National Observer Program’s
website: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/
national/fisheries-observers/nationalobserver-program.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
How do I find out if a specific fishery
is in Category I, II, or III?
The LOF includes three tables that list
all U.S. commercial fisheries by
Category. Table 1 lists all of the
commercial fisheries in the Pacific
Ocean (including Alaska); Table 2 lists
all of the commercial fisheries in the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean; and Table 3 lists all U.S.
authorized commercial fisheries on the
high seas. A fourth table, Table 4, lists
all commercial fisheries managed under
applicable TRPs or take reduction teams
(TRT).
Are high seas fisheries included on the
LOF?
Beginning with the 2009 LOF, NMFS
includes high seas fisheries in Table 3
of the LOF, along with the number of
valid High Seas Fishing Compliance Act
(HSFCA) permits in each fishery. As of
2004, NMFS issues HSFCA permits only
for high seas fisheries analyzed in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The
authorized high seas fisheries are broad
in scope and encompass multiple
specific fisheries identified by gear type.
For the purposes of the LOF, the high
seas fisheries are subdivided based on
gear type (e.g., trawl, longline, purse
seine, gillnet, troll, etc.) to provide more
detail on composition of effort within
these fisheries. Many fisheries operate
in both U.S. waters and on the high
seas, creating some overlap between the
fisheries listed in Tables 1 and 2 and
those in Table 3. In these cases, the high
seas component of the fishery is not
considered a separate fishery, but an
extension of a fishery operating within
U.S. waters (listed in Table 1 or 2).
NMFS designates those fisheries in
Tables 1, 2, and 3 by a ‘‘*’’ after the
fishery’s name. The number of HSFCA
permits listed in Table 3 for the high
seas components of these fisheries
operating in U.S. waters does not
necessarily represent additional effort
that is not accounted for in Tables 1 and
2. Many vessels/participants holding
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
HSFCA permits also fish within U.S.
waters and are included in the number
of vessels and participants operating
within those fisheries in Tables 1 and 2.
HSFCA permits are valid for 5 years,
during which time Fishery Management
Plans (FMPs) can change. Therefore,
some vessels/participants may possess
valid HSFCA permits without the ability
to fish under the permit because it was
issued for a gear type that is no longer
authorized under the most current FMP.
For this reason, the number of HSFCA
permits displayed in Table 3 is likely
higher than the actual U.S. fishing effort
on the high seas. For more information
on how NMFS classifies high seas
fisheries on the LOF, see the preamble
text in the final 2009 LOF (73 FR 73032;
December 1, 2008). Additional
information about HSFCA permits can
be found at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/highseas-fishing-permits.
Where can I find specific information
on fisheries listed on the LOF?
Starting with the 2010 LOF, NMFS
developed summary documents, or
fishery fact sheets, for each Category I
and II fishery on the LOF. These fishery
fact sheets provide the full history of
each Category I and II fishery, including:
When the fishery was added to the LOF;
the basis for the fishery’s initial
classification; classification changes to
the fishery; changes to the list of species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the fishery; fishery gear and
methods used; observer coverage levels;
fishery management and regulation; and
applicable TRPs or TRTs, if any. These
fishery fact sheets are updated after each
final LOF and can be found under ‘‘How
Do I Find Out if a Specific Fishery is in
Category I, II, or III?’’ on the NMFS
Office of Protected Resources’ website:
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/
national/marine-mammal-protection/
marine-mammal-protection-act-listfisheries, linked to the ‘‘List of Fisheries
Summary’’ table. NMFS is developing
similar fishery fact sheets for each
Category III fishery on the LOF.
However, due to the large number of
Category III fisheries on the LOF and the
lack of accessible and detailed
information on many of these fisheries,
the development of these fishery fact
sheets is taking significant time to
complete. NMFS began posting Category
III fishery fact sheets online with the
LOF for 2016.
Am I required to register under the
MMPA?
Owners of vessels or gear engaging in
a Category I or II fishery are required
under the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(2)),
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21081
as described in 50 CFR 229.4, to register
with NMFS and obtain a marine
mammal authorization to lawfully take
non-endangered and non-threatened
marine mammals incidental to
commercial fishing operations. Owners
of vessels or gear engaged in a Category
III fishery are not required to register
with NMFS or obtain a marine mammal
authorization.
How do I register, renew and receive
my Marine Mammal Authorization
Program authorization certificate?
NMFS has integrated the MMPA
registration process, implemented
through the Marine Mammal
Authorization Program (MMAP), with
existing state and Federal fishery
license, registration, or permit systems
for Category I and II fisheries on the
LOF. Participants in these fisheries are
automatically registered under the
MMAP and are not required to submit
registration or renewal materials.
In the Pacific Islands, West Coast, and
Alaska regions, NMFS will issue vessel
or gear owners an authorization
certificate via U.S. mail or with their
state or Federal license or permit at the
time of issuance or renewal. In the
Greater Atlantic and Southeast Regions,
NMFS will issue vessel or gear owners
an authorization certificate via U.S. mail
automatically at the beginning of each
calendar year.
Vessel or gear owners who participate
in fisheries in these regions and have
not received authorization certificates
by the beginning of the calendar year, or
with renewed fishing licenses, must
contact the appropriate NMFS Regional
Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT). Authorization certificates
may also be obtained by visiting the
MMAP website https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-authorizationprogram#obtaining-a-marine-mammalauthorization-certificate.
The authorization certificate, or a
copy, must be on board the vessel while
it is operating in a Category I or II
fishery, or for non-vessel fisheries, in
the possession of the person in charge
of the fishing operation (50 CFR
229.4(e)). Although efforts are made to
limit the issuance of authorization
certificates to only those vessel or gear
owners that participate in Category I or
II fisheries, not all state and Federal
license or permit systems distinguish
between fisheries as classified by the
LOF. Therefore, some vessel or gear
owners in Category III fisheries may
receive authorization certificates even
though they are not required for
Category III fisheries.
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
21082
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Individuals fishing in Category I and
II fisheries for which no state or Federal
license or permit is required must
register with NMFS by contacting their
appropriate Regional Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Am I required to submit reports when
I kill or injure a marine mammal
during the course of commercial fishing
operations?
In accordance with the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1387(e)) and 50 CFR 229.6, any
vessel owner or operator, or gear owner
or operator (in the case of non-vessel
fisheries), participating in a fishery
listed on the LOF must report to NMFS
all incidental mortalities and injuries of
marine mammals that occur during
commercial fishing operations,
regardless of the category in which the
fishery is placed (I, II, or III) within 48
hours of the end of the fishing trip or,
in the case of non-vessel fisheries,
fishing activity. ‘‘Injury’’ is defined in
50 CFR 229.2 as a wound or other
physical harm. In addition, any animal
that ingests fishing gear or any animal
that is released with fishing gear
entangling, trailing, or perforating any
part of the body is considered injured,
regardless of the presence of any wound
or other evidence of injury, and must be
reported.
Mortality/injury reporting forms and
instructions for submitting forms to
NMFS can be found at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-authorizationprogram#reporting-a-death-or-injury-ofa-marine-mammal-during-commercialfishing-operations or by contacting the
appropriate regional office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Forms
may be submitted via any of the
following means: (1) Online using the
electronic form; (2) emailed as an
attachment to nmfs.mireport@noaa.gov;
(3) faxed to the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources at 301–713–0376;
or (4) mailed to the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources (mailing address is
provided on the postage-paid form that
can be printed from the web address
listed above). Reporting requirements
and procedures are found in 50 CFR
229.6.
Am I required to take an observer
aboard my vessel?
Individuals participating in a
Category I or II fishery are required to
accommodate an observer aboard their
vessel(s) upon request from NMFS.
MMPA section 118 states that the
Secretary is not required to place an
observer on a vessel if the facilities for
quartering an observer or performing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
observer functions are so inadequate or
unsafe that the health or safety of the
observer or the safe operation of the
vessel would be jeopardized; thereby
authorizing the exemption of vessels too
small to safely accommodate an
observer from this requirement.
However, U.S. Atlantic Ocean,
Caribbean, or Gulf of Mexico large
pelagics longline vessels operating in
special areas designated by the Pelagic
Longline Take Reduction Plan
implementing regulations (50 CFR
229.36(d)) will not be exempted from
observer requirements, regardless of
their size. Observer requirements are
found in 50 CFR 229.7.
Am I required to comply with any
marine mammal TRP regulations?
Table 4 provides a list of fisheries
affected by TRPs and TRTs. TRP
regulations are found at 50 CFR 229.30
through 229.37. A description of each
TRT and copies of each TRP can be
found at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-take-reduction-plans-andteams. It is the responsibility of fishery
participants to comply with applicable
take reduction regulations.
Where can I find more information
about the LOF and the MMAP?
Information regarding the LOF and
the MMAP, including registration
procedures and forms; current and past
LOFs; descriptions of each Category I
and II fishery and some Category III
fisheries; observer requirements; and
marine mammal mortality/injury
reporting forms and submittal
procedures; may be obtained at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-protection-act-list-fisheries, or
from any NMFS Regional Office at the
addresses listed below:
NMFS, Greater Atlantic Regional
Fisheries Office, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930–2298,
Attn: Allison Rosner;
NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701,
Attn: Jessica Powell;
NMFS, West Coast Region, Long
Beach Office, 501 W Ocean Blvd., Suite
4200, Long Beach, CA 90802–4213,
Attn: Dan Lawson;
NMFS, Alaska Region, Protected
Resources, P.O. Box 22668, 709 West
9th Street, Juneau, AK 99802, Attn:
Suzie Teerlink; or
NMFS, Pacific Islands Regional
Office, Protected Resources Division,
1845 Wasp Blvd., Building 176,
Honolulu, HI 96818, Attn: Kevin
Brindock.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Sources of Information Reviewed for
the 2020 LOF
NMFS reviewed the marine mammal
incidental mortality and serious injury
information presented in the SARs for
all fisheries to determine whether
changes in fishery classification are
warranted. The SARs are based on the
best scientific information available at
the time of preparation, including the
level of mortality and serious injury of
marine mammals that occurs incidental
to commercial fishery operations and
the PBR levels of marine mammal
stocks. The information contained in the
SARs is reviewed by regional Scientific
Review Groups (SRGs) representing
Alaska, the Pacific (including Hawaii),
and the U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico,
and Caribbean. The SRGs were
established by the MMPA to review the
science that informs the SARs, and to
advise NMFS on marine mammal
population status, trends, and stock
structure, uncertainties in the science,
research needs, and other issues.
NMFS also reviewed other sources of
new information, including marine
mammal stranding and entanglement
data, observer program data, fishermen
self-reports, reports to the SRGs,
conference papers, FMPs, and ESA
documents.
The LOF for 2020 was based on,
among other things, stranding data;
fishermen self-reports; and SARs,
primarily the 2018 SARs, which are
based on data from 2012–2016. The
SARs referenced in this LOF include:
2016 (82 FR 29039; June 27, 2017), 2017
(83 FR 32093; July 11, 2018) and 2018
(84 FR 28489; June 19, 2019). The SARs
are available at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-stock-assessment-reportsregion.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received six comment letters
on the proposed LOF for 2020 (84 FR
54543; October 10, 2019). Comments
were received from the Center for
Biological Diversity (CBD), Hawaii
Longline Association (HLA), Maine
Lobstermen’s Association (MLA),
Marine Mammal Commission
(Commission), Western Pacific Regional
Fishery Management Council
(WPRFMC) and a joint letter from
Lund’s Fisheries and The Town Dock.
Responses to substantive comments are
below; comments on actions not related
to the LOF are not included.
General Comments
Comment 1: CBD expresses concern
regarding the diminishing quality,
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
quantity and timeliness of marine
mammal and commercial fisheries
interactions public data. As noted in the
Commission’s 2018 report (MMC 2018),
current resources do not allow NMFS to
meet its obligations under MMPA
section 117 (16 U.S.C. 1386). The lack
of accurate and up-to-date stock
assessment reports compromises the
integrity of fishery regulations and
undermines public oversight. The LOF
is the conduit for information in the
stock assessment reports to be used in
the regulation of fisheries. The lack of
recent Scientific Review Group meeting
minutes and recommendations hinders
the public’s ability to review new
science that should be incorporated into
the LOF for 2020.
Response: When NMFS reviews the
LOF annually, we use the best available
scientific information, including the
SARs. The SARs generally provide the
most current and inclusive information
on each stock’s PBR level and level of
interaction with commercial fishing
operations; there may also be more
recent reports that include bycatch
estimates. The MMPA requires NMFS to
review the SARs at least annually for
strategic stocks and stocks for which
significant new information is available
and at least once every three years for
non-strategic stocks. NMFS publishes a
notice of availability and solicits public
comments on the draft SARs annually.
We strive to distribute the SRG meeting
recommendations, minutes and
correspondence in a timely manner, but
the timeline this year was residually
affected by the 2018–2019 partial
government shutdown.
Comments on Commercial Fisheries in
the Pacific Ocean
Comment 2: The Commission
recommends NMFS reclassify both the
Category II Yakutat salmon set gillnet
and SE Alaska salmon drift gillnet
fisheries as Category I fisheries. The
Commission notes that NMFS reported
a new abundance estimate for the
Southeast Alaska (SEAK) stock of harbor
porpoise in the 2016 SAR. That SAR
also reported a population-size estimate
of 975 porpoises and an estimated
minimum population size (Nmin) of
896, which produced a PBR of 8.9
porpoises.
The Commission states that low levels
of observer coverage of the Yakutat
salmon set gillnet fishery in 2007 and
2008 (5.3 and 7.6 percent, respectively)
documented four harbor porpoise
mortalities, which, when extrapolated,
yielded an estimated mean annual M/SI
of 22 animals. Similarly, observations of
portions of the SE Alaska salmon drift
gillnet fishery in 2012 and 2013 (6.4 and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
6.6 percent observer coverage,
respectively) documented two harbor
porpoise mortalities, which, when
extrapolated, yielded an estimated mean
annual M/SI of 12 animals. Therefore,
the total M/SI estimate was 34 harbor
porpoises annually. The Commission
notes that these estimates have not
changed in subsequent SARs. The M/SI
for the SEAK harbor porpoise stock is
nearly four times larger than its PBR,
and the M/SI for each fishery exceeds
PBR individually.
Despite the uncertainty in the stocksize and M/SI estimates, the data
reported in the SAR are the best
available estimates for this stock, and
clearly meet the criteria for a Category
I classification for the Yakutat salmon
set gillnet and SE Alaska salmon drift
gillnet fisheries.
Response: As stated in the Federal
Register notice for the final 2018 SARs
(see 84 FR 28489, June 19, 2019,
comment 17), the PBR level of 8.9 for
the SEAK harbor porpoise stock was
estimated based on a survey that
covered only a portion of the currentlyrecognized distribution of this stock,
and it included commercial fishery
mortalities or serious injuries that
occurred far north of the surveyed areas.
We are concerned about the SEAK
harbor porpoise stock, and we are
collecting additional information on
stock structure and abundance to reduce
uncertainties in the data available to
manage this stock, and we have
prioritized the Southeast Alaska drift
gillnet fishery for additional observer
coverage, should resources become
available. From these studies, we
anticipate being able to better evaluate
management concerns related to the AK
Southeast Alaska salmon drift gillnet
and AK Yakutat salmon set gillnet
fisheries, including their classification
on the future LOF. For the 2020 LOF,
NMFS retains the Category II
classification for the Yakutat salmon set
gillnet and SE Alaska salmon drift
gillnet fisheries.
Comment 3: CBD acknowledges
NMFS proposed to add the Western U.S.
stock of Steller sea lion, which is listed
as endangered under the ESA, to the list
of species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category II AK Bering Sea
Aleutian Islands Pacific cod longline
fishery. They note that the LOF includes
many fisheries that take endangered and
threatened marine mammals, but no
U.S. fishery currently has a valid MMPA
authorization under section 101(a)(5)(E)
to take ESA-listed marine mammals (16
U.S.C. 1371(a)(5)(E)). CBD recommends
NMFS monitor, analyze and mitigate
fisheries’ interactions with endangered
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21083
marine mammals in compliance with
Federal statutes.
Response: The AK Bering Sea
Aleutian Islands Pacific cod longline
fishery, along with other federallymanaged fisheries, are monitored for
marine mammal bycatch through the
North Pacific Observer Program, and
these data are then considered in the
LOF. Publication of the LOF does not
authorize take of threatened or
endangered marine mammals incidental
to commercial fishing. Under section
101(a)(5)(E) of the MMPA, NMFS issues
permits for the incidental taking of
threatened or endangered species listed
under the ESA, if it can be determined
that (1) mortality and serious injury
incidental to commercial fisheries
would have a negligible impact on the
affected species or stock, (2) a recovery
plan for that species or stock has been
developed or is being developed, and (3)
where required under section 118, a
monitoring program has been
established, vessels are registered, and a
TRP has been developed or is being
developed. Further, classifications made
under the LOF are based on the best
available science, and are not dependent
on, or related to, the current status of
other regulatory processes, including
the issuance of authorizations under
section 101(a)(5)(E) of the MMPA.
Comment 4: CBD supports
reclassifying the CA coonstripe shrimp
fishery from a Category III to a Category
II fishery based on an entangled
humpback whale that would have been
classified as a serious injury if the whale
had not been subsequently
disentangled.
Response: NMFS has reclassified the
CA coonstripe shrimp fishery from a
Category III to a Category II fishery.
Comment 5: CBD recommends NMFS
reclassify the Category III WA/OR/CA
groundfish, bottomfish longline/set line
fishery as a Category II fishery based on
observed injuries and mortalities of
sperm whales reported in Jannot et al.
2018. CBD states the CA/OR/WA stock
of sperm whales has a PBR of 2.5
animals per year, and the total annual
fishery-related M/SI of sperm whales is
above 10 percent of PBR.
Response: For the proposed 2020
LOF, NMFS reviewed Jannot et al. 2018
and considered the estimates of sperm
whale bycatch presented. Upon further
investigation, the estimates provided in
Jannot et al. 2018 were based on an
observed vessel collision in 2007 that
was characterized as a non-serious
injury. This non-serious injury was
evaluated and reported in the most
recent SAR for CA/OR/WA sperm
whales (Carretta et al. 2019). Given that
this information does not suggest that
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
21084
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
mortality or serious injury of CA/OR/
WA sperm whales has been occurring as
a result of the WA/OR/CA groundfish,
bottomfish longline/set line fishery,
NMFS will not reclassify the Category
III WA/OR/CA groundfish, bottomfish
longline/set line fishery at this time.
Comment 6: CBD recommends NMFS
add the AT1 transient stock of killer
whales to the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category II CA Dungeness crab pot
fishery, based on an entanglement in
2015 (NMFS–WCR 2018).
Response: As stated in the Federal
Register notice for the final 2018 SARs
(see 84 FR 28489, June 19, 2019,
comment 24), based on genetic analysis,
the killer whale that became entangled
in commercial California Dungeness
crab pot gear in 2015 was identified as
a transient killer whale with a
mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplotype
that has been found in transient killer
whales in the Pribilof Islands and
western Aleutian Islands. However, the
whale cannot be assigned to a specific
stock because mtDNA haplotypes are
unique to ecotypes of killer whales (e.g.,
resident, transient, offshore) but not to
populations. Therefore, we will assign
this mortality to both the Gulf of Alaska,
Aleutian Islands, and Bering Sea
Transient killer whale stock and the
West Coast Transient killer whale stock
in the next revisions of these SARs and
in the NOAA Technical Memorandum
that contains information on humancaused mortality and injury of NMFSmanaged Alaska marine mammal stocks
in 2013–2017 (Delean et al. in press).
Therefore, NMFS will not add the AT1
transient stock of killer whales to the
list of species/stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Category II CA
Dungeness crab pot fishery in the 2020
LOF. NMFS will use this information in
future LOFs when reviewing and
updating the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category II CA Dungeness crab pot
fishery.
Comment 7: CBD does not support
NMFS’ proposal to remove the Hawaii
stock of sperm whale from the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category I Hawaii deepset longline fishery because observer
coverage is only 20 percent. CBD notes
the lack of observed mortalities or
injuries does not mean injuries and
mortalities are not occurring.
Response: The 2020 LOF is based on
the 2018 SARs, which report fishery
interactions from 2012–2016; this is the
best scientific and commercial
information available for the time
period examined. There were no sperm
whale mortalities or injuries in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
Hawaii deep-set longline fishery during
the 2012–2016 time period reported in
the SARs. NMFS has removed the
Hawaii stock of sperm whale from the
list of species/stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Category I Hawaii
deep-set longline fishery.
Comment 8: The HLA recommends
NMFS remove the MHI Insular stock of
false killer whale from the list species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category I Hawaii deepset longline fishery as proposed in the
2019 LOF. NMFS retained this stock in
the final 2019 LOF, and HLA expresses
concern that this was contrary to the
best available science.
HLA notes that (a) the False Killer
Whale Take Reduction Plan (FKWTRP)
closed the deep-set longline fishery for
almost the entire range of the MHI
Insular and NWHI stocks, (b) since this
change was made in 2013 there have
been no interactions between the fishery
and an animal from either stock, and (c)
there has never been a deep-set longline
fishery interaction in the very small area
of the stocks’ respective ranges that are
not closed to longline fishing. The
commenter also states that no
information has been presented to the
False Killer Whale TRT or the Pacific
Scientific Review Group suggesting any
of the 2018 and 2019 false killer whale
interactions referenced by NMFS in the
2019 final rule (84 FR 22051) have been
or will be attributed to the MHI Insular
stock of false killer whale. HLA requests
that NMFS remove the MHI Insular
stock of false killer whales from the list
of species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category I
Hawaii deep-set longline fishery.
Response: As noted in the 2019 LOF
(84 FR 22051, June 17, 2019), for
fisheries with no observer coverage and
for observed fisheries with evidence
indicating that undocumented
interactions may be occurring (e.g.,
fishery has evidence of fisheries
interactions that cannot be attributed to
a specific fishery, and stranding
network data include evidence of
fisheries interactions that cannot be
attributed to a specific fishery), stocks
may be retained on the LOF for longer
than five years. For these fisheries,
NMFS will review the other sources of
relevant information to determine when
it is appropriate to remove a species or
stock from the LOF.
As described in the 2019 LOF (84 FR
22051, June 17, 2019), six false killer
whale mortalities and serious injuries
incidental to the deep-set longline
fishery were observed inside the EEZ
around Hawaii, including three
mortalities and serious injuries that
occurred close to the outer boundary of
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the Main Hawaiian Islands Longline
Fishing Prohibited Area, in close
proximity to the outer boundary of the
MHI Insular false killer whale stocks’
range. These interactions have not yet
been evaluated for assignment to insular
or pelagic stocks in the SAR.
Additionally, the MHI Insular false
killer whale range overlaps with areas
that are open to deep-set longline
fishing and MHI Insular false killer
whales have been documented with
injuries consistent with fisheries
interactions that have not been
attributed to a specific fishery (Baird et
al., 2014). For the above reasons, NMFS
retains the MHI Insular false killer
whale stock on the list of species and/
or stocks killed or injured incidental to
the Category I HI deep-set longline
fishery.
Comment 9: HLA restates a previous
comment and recommends NMFS
reclassify the Hawaii shallow-set
longline fishery as a Category III fishery.
HLA notes that the Hawaii shallow-set
longline fishery has 100 percent
observer coverage, and only one serious
injury has been observed in the EEZ
since 2008. HLA states the 2017 SAR
attributes a 0.1 M/SI to the shallow-set
longline fishery for the pelagic stock of
false killer whales in the U.S. EEZ.
However, the 0.1 M/SI rate is derived
entirely from a 2012 interaction on
which NMFS was unable to make a
serious injury determination, and which
was given a ‘‘cannot-be-determined’’
determination. This determination was
then prorated as 0.3 M/SI because, in
the previous five years, there were three
interactions between the shallow-set
longline fishery and the pelagic false
killer whale stock in the EEZ. HLA
believes if the ‘‘cannot-be-determined’’
determination for the 2012 interaction is
prorated based upon the five-year lookback period used in the 2017 SAR
(2011–2015), then the M/SI rate would
be 0.0, because there were only two
other interactions from 2011–2015, both
of which were determined to be nonserious. Therefore, HLA recommends
the shallow-set longline fishery should
be reclassified as a Category III fishery.
Response: This comment has been
addressed previously (see 84 FR 22051,
June 17, 2019, comment 13; 83 FR 5349,
February 7, 2018, comment 26). NMFS
uses the classification criteria described
in the preamble to classify fisheries as
Category I, Category II, or Category III.
A fishery is classified under Category II
if the annual mortality and serious
injury of a stock in a given fishery is
greater than 1 percent and less than 50
percent of the stock’s PBR level.
Additional details regarding
categorization of fisheries is provided in
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
the preamble to the final rule
implementing section 118 of the MMPA
(60 FR 45086; August 30, 1995). The
false killer whale interaction in 2012
that resulted in a ‘‘cannot be
determined’’ determination was
prorated following the methods
described in the 2017 SAR (Carretta et
al., 2018), which prorates serious versus
non-serious injuries using the historic
rate of serious injury, while accounting
for changes in gear following
implementation of the FKWTRP in
2013. This proration resulted in a 0.3 M/
SI for the pelagic false killer whale stock
as reported in the 2017 SAR, which is
1.07 percent of PBR and within the
range of 1–50 percent of PBR, requiring
NMFS to classify the fishery as a
Category II fishery, consistent with
section 118 of the MMPA.
Comment 10: HLA supports removing
the Hawaii stock of sperm whale from
the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category I Hawaii deep-set longline
fishery.
Response: NMFS has removed the
Hawaii stock of sperm whale from the
list of species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category I
Hawaii deep-set longline fishery.
Comment 11: HLA supports removing
the Hawaii stock of short-finned pilot
whale from the list of species and/or
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category II Hawaii shallow-set
longline fishery.
Response: NMFS has removed the
Hawaii stock of short-finned pilot whale
from the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category II Hawaii shallow-set longline
fishery.
Comment 12: WPRFMC provides
clarification on the source of
information used to revise the number
of vessels/persons for the American
Samoa bottomfish handline fishery in
the proposed rule from 1,092 to 2,095.
NMFS began citing the Council’s
Annual Stock Assessment and Fishery
Evaluation (SAFE) report for the fishery
participation data in the 2019 LOF,
which resulted in the number of
vessels/persons revised from 17 in the
previous LOF to 1,092 in the 2019 LOF;
and the subsequent revision to 2,095 in
the proposed 2020 LOF. WPRFMC notes
the method used in the Annual SAFE
Report estimates participation for the
American Samoa bottomfish fishery by
multiplying the average number of
fishers per trip by the number of trips
per day, and then by the number of
dates in the calendar year by gear type.
The commenter also states this method
does not generate a count of unique
fishermen in the fishery, but rather an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
estimation of the cumulative number of
fishermen participating in the
bottomfish fishery in a calendar year,
representing duplicate counts of
fishermen throughout the year. The
method also results in an overestimation
of fishery participation, as it does not
account for days without bottomfish
fishing effort and consequently assumes
that bottomfish fishing occurs every day
in the calendar year.
The WPRFMC Plan Team determined
this method to be an inappropriate
approach for tracking fishery
participation trends and removed the
metric from the 2018 Annual SAFE
Report (published in July 2019). The
Plan Team also noted that the fishery
participation metric estimate of 2,095
reported in the 2017 Annual SAFE
Report was likely an estimation error,
rather than a true doubling of effort from
2016 to 2017. WPRFMC recommends
NMFS use information from the
Environmental Assessment for the
Specification of the 2016–2017 Annual
Catch Limits for the American Samoa
bottomfish fishery for the 2020 LOF,
which describes the fishery as a small
scale fishery consisting of fewer than 30
part-time, relatively small commercial
vessels landing between 6,000–35,000
pounds (2,722–15,876 kilograms)
annually.
Response: Following review of the
2018 Annual SAFE Report and the 2017
Environmental Assessment, NMFS
updates the estimated number of
vessels/persons in the American Samoa
bottomfish handline fishery as being
fewer than 30 vessels in the LOF for
2020.
Comments on Commercial Fisheries in
the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean
Comment 13: CBD does not support
NMFS’ proposal to remove the WNA
stocks of hooded seal and long-finned
pilot whale from the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category I Northeast sink gillnet
fishery. The commenter states observer
coverage from 2012–2016 was low (15,
11, 18, 14 and 10 percent each year,
respectively) and interactions with these
stocks may be unobserved.
Response: No hooded seal or longfinned pilot whale mortalities or
injuries were observed or reported in
the Northeast sink gillnet fishery from
2012–2016 (Hayes et al., 2019). The last
observed M/SI of these stocks in the
Northeast sink gillnet fishery was in
2004 and 2010. In general, we list
species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in a particular fishery based on
data observed from the last 5 years. The
list contained in the LOF is not
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21085
intended to serve as a historical
overview of mortalities and injuries, as
that data is available in individual
species SARs, as well as in Appendix III
of the SAR.
From 2012–2016, observer coverage
for the Northeast sink gillnet fishery was
2, 3, 5, 6 and 8 percent each year,
respectively. Additionally, while some
strandings did occur during this
timeframe in Massachusetts, none of the
stranded animals (live or dead) showed
evidence of human interaction.
NMFS has removed the Western
North Atlantic stocks of hooded seals
and long-finned pilot whales from the
list of species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category I
Northeast sink gillnet fishery. NMFS
will annually monitor bycatch of marine
mammals in the Northeast sink gillnet
fishery and will make adjustments to
Table 2, should takes be observed in the
future.
Comment 14: The MLA recommends
NMFS reclassify the Maine lobster
fishery as a stand-alone fishery, instead
of including the fishery as part of the
broader Category I Northeast/midAtlantic American lobster pot fishery.
The commenter requests that NMFS
categorize Maine’s exempted waters
lobster fishery as a Category III fishery,
due to the rarity of whale sightings and
lack of documented M/SI with this
sector of the American lobster fishery.
MLA notes Maine’s exempt waters
lobster fishery is a small boat fishery
which uses smaller ropes and lighter
gear, compared to other segments of the
Northeast lobster fishery.
MLA also requests that NMFS
categorize Maine’s non-exempt waters
lobster fishery as a Category II fishery,
based on the decline in right whale
sightings, lack of documented right
whale entanglements, lack of observed
interactions from the Federal observer
program, and the efficacy of TRP
measures implemented in 2009 and
2014.
The commenter states that multiple
data sources, including acoustic
surveys, right whale sightings data, and
low copepod concentrations, document
that right whales are extremely rare in
Maine’s exempt waters, are not found in
large numbers in Maine’s non-exempt
waters, and are unlikely to feed in these
areas. In addition, MLA notes, there has
been only one right whale entangled in
Maine gear in April 2002, and the
entanglement was determined to be a
non-serious injury. There are two
additional non-serious injury
entanglement cases that involved Maine
lobster gear. However, Maine lobster
gear was not the primary entangling gear
in these cases.
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
21086
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Response: The information provided
by the commenter is insufficient for
splitting the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic
American lobster trap/pot into multiple
fisheries. Fisheries are categorized based
on the gear types used, how the gear is
fished, and the behavior of the fishery
related to the risk to marine mammals.
Multiple states participate in the
American lobster trap/pot fisheries,
using a wide variety of gear and gear
configurations throughout a large
portion of coastal waters. While we
recognize this variety within the fishery
at large, there are no clear boundaries to
divide gear use across the wider area, as
suggested by this comment. Importantly,
the state of Maine does not use unique
gear configurations, compared to gear
configurations used in other states, and
gear configurations within Maine’s
waters are not uniform or divided across
the geographic boundaries (i.e.,
exemption lines) that MLA has
identified. Further, gear marking and
right whale monitoring efforts
throughout Maine waters are
insufficient to determine that the gear or
area presents a different risk to large
whales.
MLA suggests that differences in rope
diameter used by the inshore fishery
(i.e. fisheries exempted under the
Atlantic Large Whale TRP management
requirements) are sufficient to reduce
any risk to large whales, and thereby
make it a distinct fishery. The
commenter indicates that coastal lobster
fisheries in Maine state waters utilize 3/
8th diameter line and fish doubles and,
therefore, pose less of a risk to right
whales than other fisheries. While this
may characterize a portion of the
inshore fishery, this information is
based on a small sample size from selfreported surveys conducted by Maine’s
Department of Marine Fisheries and
does not take into account varying
breaking strength or other variability
within this fishery. In this same study,
high variability in line diameter used
and number of pots trawled in the
coastal fishery was also shown.
According to Summers et al. 2019
(Assessment of Vertical Line Use in Gulf
of Maine Region Fixed Gear Fisheries
presentation to Atlantic Large Whale
TRT), of the 647 responses received
from Maine permitted lobster fishermen
(approximately 15 percent of the total of
actively fishing permitted Maine
vessels), less than 60 percent of that
sample included those who fish
between 0–3 nautical miles from shore.
While the majority of this small sample
size responded that they primarily fish
single and double pots, some voluntary
respondents answered that they fish a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
range between 5–30+ pot trawls. While
there were fewer responses citing these
higher trawl numbers, it shows the
variability of the Maine state lobster
fishery. The 3/8th line diameter and
limited trap/pots justification is not
uniform throughout the inshore area
and is not unique to Maine waters;
therefore, these areas are not
representative of a unique fishery
compared to the rest of the lobster
fishery.
MLA also cites a lack of right whale
sightings in Maine state waters as
justification for reclassifying the Maine
lobster fisheries. However, it is
important to recognize that whale
sighting information is related to
monitoring efforts, which are largely a
reflection of survey resource
prioritization. Until this point, right
whale surveys have focused on areas
where high abundance and social/
feeding aggregations are known to
occur, due to resource constraints. As
noted at the October 2018 TRT meeting,
this is an artifact of prioritizing the
monitoring of population and health
assessments through mark recapture
methods that require maximizing photoidentification opportunities, rather than
prioritizing coverage of the entire range
of right whales. Despite the lack of
directed survey efforts, from 2014–2018,
there were at least six right whale
opportunistic sightings reported and
documented in Maine waters in the
North Atlantic Right Whale
Consortium’s sightings database
(Industrial Economics Inc., personal
communication). Also, bioacoustic
gliders implemented between December
2018 and April 2019 had several
potential detections of right whales in
the Maine inshore waters (Baumgartner,
in review). This shows that the right
whales are present in Maine state
waters, even those overlapping
exempted areas. Given the population
distribution shifts and critical status of
the population, we are allocating
resources towards broader surveys that
will provide further insight into the
habitat use and distribution of these
whales; these broader surveys will
include regular aerial and acoustic
surveys of Maine waters throughout the
upcoming year.
As the commenter stated, there are
three right whale entanglement cases
(E11–11, E43–12, and E36–16) where
gear has been recovered with red
tracers, which is the gear marking
scheme required in the Northern
Inshore Trap/Pot fishery management
area, a management area that overlaps
Maine, New Hampshire, and
Massachusetts state waters. In two of
these cases, the specific trap/pot fishery
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
was not identified. Therefore, it cannot
be ruled out that the entanglements (one
of which resulted in a mortality) may
have occurred off the coast of Maine in
non-exempt waters. The commenter
referenced Case E36–16 (which was
confirmed to be Massachusetts lobster
gear from the Northern Inshore Trap/Pot
management area) as an example of why
the Maine state fisheries should have a
separate designation compared to other
lobster fisheries. However, we consider
this example as evidence as to why all
lobster fisheries should remain
classified together. Given that there are
limited differences between the gear
used in the waters throughout the
current management areas, this example
shows that lobster gear poses a potential
risk to right whales in any area where
right whale and lobster fishery
distributions overlap.
With this request, the commenter is
also not taking into consideration the
high percentage of multiple sightings of
unidentified entanglements, with first
sightings in either the U.S. or in Canada.
Over the past 5 years, there have been
4.15 M/SI entanglements documented
annually where the origin of the
entanglement is unknown (Hayes et al.,
in review). NMFS has proposed two
ways to include these M/SI in risk
assessment reduction measure metrics:
By taking the total unknown
entanglements and dividing them in
half to allocate 50 percent of the
unknown entanglements to U.S.
fisheries and 50 percent to Canadian
fisheries, or by assigning the incident to
the country the entanglement was first
sighted in as the country of origin. Both
options produced similar results; the
range of entanglements for U.S. fisheries
is 0.2–2.45 (2.075 if the risk is divided
by 50 percent). The median M/SI
entanglement potential is 1.325 animals
per year, or 165 percent of PBR.
The sample size of recovered gear
from entanglements is small, and much
of the retrieved gear is unmarked and
cannot be attributed to a particular
location. Currently, gear marking is not
required in exempted areas. The lack of
marks on retrieved gear may indicate
that the current marking scheme is
inadequate, or that entanglements are
occurring in areas where gear is not
currently marked, such as international
waters or current exempted areas. The
state of Maine is currently pursuing a
gear marking regime in these exempted
waters that will provide additional data
about entanglement risk in these areas.
The MLA states that there are ‘‘zero
instances’’ in any data set of Maine of
lobster gear associated with a right
whale serious injury or mortality, and
that the only known entanglement in
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
which Maine lobster gear was the
primary entangling gear occurred in
2002 and resulted in a non-serious
injury determination. We recognize that
there has only been one confirmed
mortality (in 2012) in American lobster
gear in the past decade. All other
documented lobster interactions were
determined to result in non-serious
injuries. However, there have been a
number of entanglements for which
interventions occurred because these
entanglements were determined to be
resulting in serious injuries (Henry et
al., 2019). According to NMFS’ ‘‘Process
for Distinguishing Serious from NonSerious Injury of Marine Mammals
(NMFS 2015, 02–238–01),’’ cases that
would have been serious injuries prior
to disentanglement are not counted
against PBR in the SAR, but they are
included in the recorded takes for the
LOF and associated management
measures. Aerial surveys, whale
watching boats, the presence of other
fisheries, and the presence of, and
associated outreach by, a
disentanglement team contribute to the
higher reporting of entanglement
sightings in certain areas (i.e.
Massachusetts) than in Maine state
waters and offshore waters. However,
that does not mean the risk is
nonexistent in other areas where
entanglements are not observed. With
85 percent of all right whales exhibiting
entanglement scars, it is reasonable and
prudent to assume that entanglements
are indeed occurring in areas where
observations have not yet been reported.
As stated above, we find that there is
insufficient information to suggest that
Maine’s fisheries should be split from
the American lobster trap/pot fisheries,
because the gear used in Maine waters
are not unique from other states.
Further, we maintain that entanglement
data indicates that the gear used across
this fishery remains a risk to right
whales. Should Maine fisheries make
significant changes to their gear
configurations that differentiate these
fisheries from other lobster trap/pot
fisheries, such as eliminating vertical
lines, we will reconsider this decision.
Comment 15: Lund’s Fisheries and
The Town Dock restate a previous
comment requesting that NMFS conduct
a tier analysis of long-finned pilot whale
M/SI in the small mesh and large mesh
bottom trawl fisheries, and that NMFS
consider classifying the small mesh and
large mesh bottom trawl fisheries as
separate fisheries on the LOF. The
commenters note the small mesh bottom
trawl longfin squid fishery is included
on the LOF in both of the Category II
Northeast and mid-Atlantic bottom
trawl fisheries. In 2018, the Marine
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
Stewardship Council determined that
the U.S. Northeastern Longfin Inshore
Squid Small Mesh Bottom Trawl
Fishery, harvested by small mesh
bottom trawls in U.S. waters between
the Gulf of Maine and Cape Hatteras,
NC, was certified as a sustainable
fishery.
Response: Separating the small mesh
and large mesh trawl fisheries is not
appropriate with respect to evaluating
the risk posed to marine mammals by
the fisheries. Further, given that the
fisheries operate in similar manners, in
similar locations, and given that many
small mesh trawl fisheries go between
coastal and offshore waters, it would be
difficult to distinguish between fisheries
for such an analysis.
As previously stated (see 84 FR
22051, June 17, 2019, comment 15), we
did not reclassify any of the trawl
fisheries based on upcoming draft
population assessments for the long
finned pilot whale. The 2019 draft SARs
(84 FR 65353, November 27, 2019)
combines the U.S. and Canadian
population assessments from 2016
survey efforts for long-finned pilot
whales throughout their range, from
central Virginia north to Labrador. This
estimate is larger than that previously
reported in the SAR, because the
updated estimate is derived from a
survey area extending from
Newfoundland to Florida, which is
about 1,300,000 km2 larger than the
2011 survey area used in the previous
SAR. In addition, the newer survey
estimates in U.S. waters were corrected
for availability bias (due to diving
behavior), whereas the earlier estimates
were not corrected.
The new minimum population
estimate for this stock is 30,627 animals,
with a PBR of 306. The Northeast
bottom trawl fishery has a mean
combined annual mortality of 15 pilot
whales (4.9 percent of PBR). Therefore,
the Category II classification for this
fishery remains appropriate.
Comment 16: CBD does not support
NMFS’ proposal to remove the Florida
stock of West Indian manatee from the
list species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category II Southeastern
U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp
trawl fishery. CBD notes that while it
may be true that, from 2008 to 2012,
there were no documented fishery
related injuries or mortalities in shrimp
trawl fisheries (USFWS 2014), it is
unknown whether the fishery
monitoring was adequate to estimate
unobserved or undocumented
interactions.
Response: In general, we list species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
a particular fishery based on data
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21087
collected from the last 5 years. The list
contained in the LOF is not intended to
serve as a historical overview of
mortalities and injuries, as that data is
available in individual species SARs.
Observer programs provide data that is
included in the SARs. All manatee
deaths and injuries are monitored
extensively through the Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation
Commission’s Marine Mammal
Pathobiology Laboratory carcass
recovery and necropsy program, as well
as their accessory field labs around the
State of Florida. There has been no
additional evidence from this effort to
suggest mortality or injury from the
shrimp trawl fishery. Following
consultation with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS), and as
included in the proposed rule, in this
2020 LOF NMFS has removed the
Florida stock of West Indian manatee
from the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category II Southeastern U.S. Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery.
Summary of Changes From the
Proposed Rule
NMFS updates the estimated number
of vessels/persons in the Category III
American Samoa bottomfish handline
fishery from 1,092 vessels/persons to
fewer than 30 vessels/persons.
Summary of Changes to the LOF for
2020
The following summarizes changes to
the LOF for 2020, including the
classification of fisheries, the estimated
number of vessels/persons in a
particular fishery, and the species and/
or stocks that are incidentally killed or
injured in a particular fishery. NMFS reclassifies one fishery in the LOF for
2020. The classifications and definitions
of U.S. commercial fisheries for 2020 are
identical to those provided in the LOF
for 2019, except for the changes
discussed below. State and regional
abbreviations used in the following
paragraphs include: AK (Alaska), CA
(California), GMX (Gulf of Mexico), HI
(Hawaii), NC (North Carolina), OR
(Oregon), WA (Washington), and WNA
(Western North Atlantic).
Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific
Ocean
Classification of Fisheries
NMFS renames the Category III CA/
OR coonstripe shrimp fishery to the CA
coonstripe shrimp fishery and clarifies
that the OR coonstripe shrimp pot
fishery is a component of the Category
III WA/OR shrimp pot/trap fishery.
NMFS also reclassifies the CA
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
21088
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
coonstripe shrimp fishery from a
Category III to a Category II fishery.
Fishery Name and Organizational
Changes and Clarification
NMFS clarifies that the Category II AK
Southeast salmon drift gillnet fishery
and Category III AK Southeast salmon
purse seine fishery include both the AK
Metlakatla salmon drift gillnet fishery
and the AK Metlakatla salmon purse
seine fishery. Based on this clarification,
NMFS also removes the Category III AK
Metlakatla salmon purse seine fishery
from the LOF.
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number
of vessels/persons in the Pacific Ocean
(Table 1) as follows:
Category I
• HI deep-set longline fishery from
142 to 145 vessels/persons;
Category II
• HI shallow-set longline fishery from
13 to 18 vessels/persons;
• American Samoa longline fishery
from 20 to 15 vessels/persons;
• CA thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet (≥14 inch (in) mesh) fishery from
18 to 14 vessels/persons;
• CA halibut/white seabass and other
species set gillnet (>3.5 in mesh) fishery
from 50 to 37 vessels/persons;
• CA yellowtail, barracuda, and white
seabass drift gillnet (mesh size ≥3.5 in
and <14 in) fishery from 30 to 22
vessels/persons;
• WA Puget Sound Region salmon
drift gillnet fishery from 210 to 154
vessels/persons;
• CA coonstripe shrimp pot fishery
from 36 to 14 vessels/persons;
• CA spiny lobster fishery from 194 to
186 vessels/persons;
• CA spot prawn pot fishery from 25
to 23 vessels/persons;
• CA Dungeness crab pot fishery from
570 to 501 vessels/persons;
• OR Dungeness crab pot fishery from
433 to 342 vessels/persons;
• WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fishery
from 309 to 155 vessels/persons;
• WA coastal Dungeness crab pot
fishery from 228 to 197 vessels/persons;
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
List of Species and/or Stocks
Incidentally Killed or Injured in the
Pacific Ocean
NMFS adds the Eastern North Pacific
stock of gray whale to the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category II CA thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet (≥14 in mesh)
fishery.
NMFS adds the Eastern North Pacific
stock of gray whale to the list of species/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category II CA halibut/white seabass
and other species set gillnet (>3.5 in
mesh) fishery.
NMFS adds the Alaska stock of ribbon
seal to the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category II AK Bering Sea Aleutian
Islands rockfish trawl fishery.
NMFS adds CA/OR/WA stock of
humpback whale to the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category II CA coonstripe shrimp
pot fishery.
NMFS adds the California stock of
long-beaked common dolphin to the list
of species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category II CA spot prawn
pot fishery.
NMFS adds the Western U.S. stock of
Steller sea lion to, and removes the
Alaska stock of Dall’s porpoise from, the
list of species/stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Category II AK Bering
Sea Aleutian Islands Pacific cod
longline fishery.
NMFS adds the Eastern U.S. stock of
Steller sea lion to the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category II AK Gulf of Alaska
sablefish longline fishery.
NMFS adds four stocks to the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category III to WA/OR/
CA groundfish, bottomfish longline/set
line fishery: (1) U.S. stock of California
sea lion; (2) California breeding stock of
Northern elephant seal; (3) CA/OR/WA
stock of sperm whale; and (4) Eastern
U.S. stock of Steller sea lion.
NMFS adds the Alaska stock of Dall’s
porpoise to the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category III AK Kodiak salmon purse
seine.
NMFS adds the Eastern U.S. stock of
Steller sea lion to the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category III AK Gulf of Alaska
halibut longline fishery.
NMFS adds two stocks to the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category III AK Bering
Sea Aleutian Islands Pacific cod trawl
fishery: (1) Alaska stock of ribbon seal;
and (2) Alaska stock of bearded seal.
NMFS removes the Hawaii stock of
sperm whale from the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category I Hawaii deep-set longline
fishery.
NMFS removes the Alaska stock of
Dall’s porpoise from the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category II AK Aleutian Islands
pollock trawl fishery.
NMFS removes the Hawaii stock of
short-finned pilot whale from the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
injured in the Category II HI shallow-set
longline fishery.
NMFS removes two stocks from the
list of species/stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Category II American
Samoa longline fishery including: (1)
Unknown stock of Cuvier’s beaked
whale; and (2) unknown stock of
bottlenose dolphin.
NMFS removes the Alaska stock of
ribbon seal from the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category III AK Aleutian Islands
Atka mackerel trawl fishery.
Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
Fishery Name and Organizational
Changes and Clarification
NMFS adds a superscript ‘‘1’’ to the
Western North Atlantic stock of gray
seals to indicate it is driving the
Category I classification of the Northeast
sink gillnet fishery.
NMFS adds a superscript ‘‘1’’ to the
Central Georgia estuarine stock of
bottlenose dolphins to indicate it is
driving the Category II classification of
the Atlantic blue crab trap/pot fishery.
NMFS adds a superscript ‘‘1’’ to the
Western North Atlantic stock of gray
seals to indicate it is driving the
Category II classification of the midAtlantic bottom trawl fishery.
NMFS removes the superscript ‘‘1’’
from the Western North Atlantic stock
of long-finned pilot whales to indicate
the stock is no longer driving the
Category I classification of the Atlantic
Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large
pelagics longline fishery.
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number
of vessels/persons in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
(Table 2) as follows:
Category I
• Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico large pelagics longline fishery
from 280 to 201 vessels/persons;
Category II
• NC inshore gillnet fishery from
2,850 to 2,676 vessels/persons;
• Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark
gillnet fishery from 23 to 21 vessels/
persons;
• Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico stone crab trap/pot fishery from
1,384 to 1,101 vessels/persons;
• Atlantic blue crab trap/pot fishery
from 7,714 to 6,679 vessels/persons;
• NC long haul seine fishery from 30
to 22 vessels/persons.
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
List of Species and/or Stocks
Incidentally Killed or Injured in the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean
NMFS adds the Western North
Atlantic stock of hooded seal to the list
of species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category I Mid-Atlantic
gillnet fishery.
NMFS adds the Sarasota Bay, Little
Sarasota Bay stock of bottlenose dolphin
to the list of species/stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category II
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico stone crab trap/pot fishery.
NMFS adds the Mississippi River
Delta stock of bottlenose dolphin to the
list species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category II Gulf of Mexico
menhaden purse seine fishery.
NMFS adds the Mobile Bay,
Bonsecour Bay stock of bottlenose
dolphin to the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category III Gulf of Mexico blue crab
trap/pot fishery.
NMFS removes two stocks from the
list of species/stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Category I Northeast
sink gillnet fishery: (1) Western North
Atlantic stock of hooded seal; and (2)
Western North Atlantic long-finned
pilot whale.
Following consultation with the
USFWS, NMFS removes the Florida
stock of West Indian manatee from the
list of species/stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Category II
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico shrimp trawl fishery.
Commercial Fisheries on the High Seas
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number
of HSFCA permits for high seas fisheries
(Table 3) as follows:
Category I
• Atlantic highly migratory species
longline fishery from 67 to 53 HSFCA
permits;
• Western Pacific pelagic longline (HI
deep-set component) fishery from 142 to
145 HSFCA permits;
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Category II
• Pacific highly migratory species
drift gillnet fishery from 6 to 5 HSFCA
permits;
• South Pacific tuna purse seine
fishery from 38 to 33 HSFCA permits;
• South Pacific albacore troll longline
fishery from 11 to 6 HSFCA permits;
• South Pacific tuna longline fishery
from 3 to 2 HSFCA permits;
• Western Pacific pelagic longline (HI
shallow-set component) fishery from 13
to 18 HSFCA permits;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
• Pacific highly migratory species
handline/pole and line fishery from 48
to 41 HSFCA permits;
• South Pacific albacore troll
handline/pole and line fishery from 15
to 11 HSFCA permits;
• Western Pacific pelagic handline/
pole and line fishery from 6 to 5 HSFCA
permits;
• Atlantic highly migratory species
troll fishery from 1 to 0 HSFCA permits;
• South Pacific albacore troll fishery
from 24 to 17 HSFCA permits;
• South Pacific tuna troll fishery from
3 to 1 HSFCA permits;
• Western Pacific pelagic troll fishery
from 6 to 5 HSFCA permits;
Category III
• Northwest Atlantic bottom longline
fishery from 2 to 3 HSFCA permits;
• Pacific highly migratory species
longline fishery from 128 to 108 HSFCA
permits;
• Pacific highly migratory species
purse seine fishery from 10 to 5 HSFCA
permits;
• Pacific highly migratory species
troll fishery from 150 to 119 HSFCA
permits.
List of Species and/or Stocks
Incidentally Killed or Injured on the
High Seas
NMFS removes the Hawaii stock of
sperm whale from the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category I Hawaii deep-set longline
fishery.
NMFS removes the Hawaii stock of
short-finned pilot whale from the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category II HI shallow-set
longline fishery.
List of Fisheries
The following tables set forth the list
of U.S. commercial fisheries according
to their classification under section 118
of the MMPA. Table 1 lists commercial
fisheries in the Pacific Ocean (including
Alaska), Table 2 lists commercial
fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of
Mexico, and Caribbean, Table 3 lists
commercial fisheries on the high seas,
and Table 4 lists fisheries affected by
TRPs or TRTs.
In Tables 1 and 2, the estimated
number of vessels or persons
participating in fisheries operating
within U.S. waters is expressed in terms
of the number of active participants in
the fishery, when possible. If this
information is not available, the
estimated number of vessels or persons
licensed for a particular fishery is
provided. If no recent information is
available on the number of participants,
vessels, or persons licensed in a fishery,
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21089
then the number from the most recent
LOF is used for the estimated number of
vessels or persons in the fishery. NMFS
acknowledges that, in some cases, these
estimates may be inflations of actual
effort. For example, the State of Hawaii
does not issue fishery-specific licenses,
and the number of participants reported
in the LOF represents the number of
commercial marine license holders who
reported using a particular fishing gear
type/method at least once in a given
year, without considering how many
times the gear was used. For these
fisheries, effort by a single participant is
counted the same whether the
fisherman used the gear only once or
every day. In the Mid-Atlantic and New
England fisheries, the numbers
represent the potential effort for each
fishery, given the multiple gear types for
which several state permits may allow.
Changes made to Mid-Atlantic and New
England fishery participants will not
affect observer coverage or bycatch
estimates, as observer coverage and
bycatch estimates are based on vessel
trip reports and landings data. Tables 1
and 2 serve to provide a description of
the fishery’s potential effort (state and
Federal). If NMFS is able to extract more
accurate information on the gear types
used by state permit holders in the
future, the numbers will be updated to
reflect this change. For additional
information on fishing effort in fisheries
found on Table 1 or 2, contact the
relevant regional office (contact
information included above in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
For high seas fisheries, Table 3 lists
the number of valid HSFCA permits
currently held. Although this likely
overestimates the number of active
participants in many of these fisheries,
the number of valid HSFCA permits is
the most reliable data on the potential
effort in high seas fisheries at this time.
As noted previously in this LOF, the
number of HSFCA permits listed in
Table 3 for the high seas components of
fisheries that also operate within U.S.
waters does not necessarily represent
additional effort that is not accounted
for in Tables 1 and 2. Many vessels
holding HSFCA permits also fish within
U.S. waters and are included in the
number of vessels and participants
operating within those fisheries in
Tables 1 and 2.
Tables 1, 2, and 3 also list the marine
mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured (seriously
or non-seriously) in each fishery based
on SARs, injury determination reports,
bycatch estimation reports, observer
data, logbook data, stranding data,
disentanglement network data,
fishermen self-reports (i.e., MMAP
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
21090
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
reports), and anecdotal reports. The best
available scientific information
included in these reports is based on
data through 2016. This list includes all
species and/or stocks known to be killed
or injured in a given fishery, but also
includes species and/or stocks for
which there are anecdotal records of a
mortality or injury. Additionally,
species identified by logbook entries,
stranding data, or fishermen self-reports
(i.e., MMAP reports) may not be
verified. In Tables 1 and 2, NMFS has
designated those species/stocks driving
a fishery’s classification (i.e., the fishery
is classified based on mortalities and
serious injuries of a marine mammal
stock that are greater than or equal to 50
percent (Category I), or greater than 1
percent and less than 50 percent
(Category II), of a stock’s PBR) by a ‘‘1’’
after the stock’s name.
In Tables 1 and 2, there are several
fisheries classified as Category II that
have no recent documented mortalities
or serious injuries of marine mammals,
or fisheries that did not result in a
mortality or serious injury rate greater
than 1 percent of a stock’s PBR level
based on known interactions. NMFS has
classified these fisheries by analogy to
other Category I or II fisheries that use
similar fishing techniques or gear that
are known to cause mortality or serious
injury of marine mammals, as discussed
in the final LOF for 1996 (60 FR 67063;
December 28, 1995), and according to
factors listed in the definition of a
‘‘Category II fishery’’ in 50 CFR 229.2
(i.e., fishing techniques, gear types,
methods used to deter marine mammals,
target species, seasons and areas fished,
qualitative data from logbooks or
fishermen reports, stranding data, and
the species and distribution of marine
mammals in the area). NMFS has
designated those fisheries listed by
analogy in Tables 1 and 2 by adding a
‘‘2’’ after the fishery’s name.
There are several fisheries in Tables 1,
2, and 3 in which a portion of the
fishing vessels cross the exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) boundary and
therefore operate both within U.S.
waters and on the high seas. These
fisheries, though listed separately on
Table 1 or 2 and Table 3, are considered
the same fisheries on either side of the
EEZ boundary. NMFS has designated
those fisheries in each table by a ‘‘*’’
after the fishery’s name.
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN
Estimated number
of vessels/persons
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured
CATEGORY I
Longline/Set Line Fisheries:
HI deep-set longline * ∧ .....................................................
145 .......................
Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic.
False killer whale, HI Pelagic.1
False killer whale, MHI Insular.1
False killer whale, NWHI.
Humpback whale. Central North Pacific.
Kogia spp. (Pygmy or dwarf sperm whale), HI.
Pygmy killer whale, HI.
Risso’s dolphin, HI.
Rough-toothed dolphin, HI.
Short-finned pilot whale, HI.
Striped dolphin, HI.
CATEGORY II
Gillnet Fisheries:
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (≥14 in mesh) *
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
CA halibut/white seabass and other species set gillnet
(>3.5 in mesh).
CA yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass drift gillnet
(mesh size ≥3.5 in and <14 in) 2.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
14 .........................
37 .........................
22 .........................
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Bottlenose dolphin, CA/OR/WA offshore.
California sea lion, U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, CA/OR/WA.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
Minke whale, CA/OR/WA.
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding.
Northern right-whale dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Pacific white-sided dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Risso’s dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Short-finned pilot whale, CA/OR/WA.1
Sperm Whale, CA/OR/WA.1
California sea lion, U.S.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Harbor seal, CA.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.1
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding.
Sea otter, CA.
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
California sea lion, U.S.
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
21091
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated number
of vessels/persons
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Fishery description
AK Bristol Bay salmon drift gillnet 2 ..................................
1,862 ....................
AK Bristol Bay salmon set gillnet 2 ...................................
979 .......................
AK Kodiak salmon set gillnet ............................................
188 .......................
AK Cook Inlet salmon set gillnet ......................................
736 .......................
AK Cook Inlet salmon drift gillnet .....................................
569 .......................
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon drift gillnet 2 .........
162 .......................
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon set gillnet 2 ..........
113 .......................
AK Prince William Sound salmon drift gillnet ...................
537 .......................
AK Southeast salmon drift gillnet .....................................
474 .......................
AK Yakutat salmon set gillnet 2 ........................................
168 .......................
WA Puget Sound Region salmon drift gillnet (includes all
inland waters south of US-Canada border and eastward of the Bonilla-Tatoosh line-Treaty Indian fishing
is excluded).
Trawl Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands flatfish trawl ..................
154 .......................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
32 .........................
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured
Beluga whale, Bristol Bay.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Harbor seal, Bering Sea.
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Pacific white-sided dolphin, North Pacific.
Spotted seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Beluga whale, Bristol Bay.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Harbor seal, Bering Sea.
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Spotted seal, AK.
Harbor porpoise, GOA.1
Harbor seal, GOA.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Humpback whale, Western North Pacific.
Sea otter, Southwest AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Beluga whale, Cook Inlet.
Dall’s porpoise, AK.
Harbor porpoise, GOA.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.1
Sea otter, South central AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Beluga whale, Cook Inlet.
Dall’s porpoise, AK.
Harbor porpoise, GOA.1
Harbor seal, GOA.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, AK.
Harbor porpoise, GOA.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea.
Northern sea otter, Southwest AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, AK.
Harbor porpoise, GOA.1
Harbor seal, GOA.
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Pacific white-sided dolphin, North Pacific.
Sea otter, South central AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.1
Dall’s porpoise, AK.
Harbor porpoise, Southeast AK.
Harbor seal, Southeast AK.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.1
Pacific white-sided dolphin, North Pacific.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Harbor Porpoise, Southeastern AK.
Harbor seal, Southeast AK.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific (Southeast AK).
Dall’s porpoise, CA/OR/WA.
Harbor porpoise, inland WA.1
Harbor seal, WA inland.
Bearded seal, AK.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea.
Harbor seal, Bering Sea.
Humpback whale, Western North Pacific.1
Killer whale, AK resident.1
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
21092
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated number
of vessels/persons
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Fishery description
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands pollock trawl .................
102 .......................
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands rockfish trawl ................
17 .........................
Pot, Ring Net, And Trap Fisheries:
CA coonstripe shrimp pot .................................................
14 .........................
CA spiny lobster ...............................................................
186 .......................
CA spot prawn pot ............................................................
23 .........................
CA Dungeness crab pot ...................................................
501 .......................
OR Dungeness crab pot ...................................................
342 .......................
WA/OR/CA sablefish pot ..................................................
WA coastal Dungeness crab pot ......................................
155 .......................
197 .......................
Longline/Set Line Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod longline ......
45 .........................
AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish longline ................................
295 .......................
HI shallow-set longline * ∧ .................................................
18 .........................
American Samoa longline 2 ...............................................
15 .........................
HI shortline 2 ......................................................................
9 ...........................
Marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured
Killer whale, GOA, AI, BS transient.1
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Ringed seal, AK.
Ribbon seal, AK.
Spotted seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.1
Walrus, AK.
Bearded Seal, AK.
Beluga whale, Bristol Bay.
Beluga whale, Eastern Bering Sea.
Beluga whale, Eastern Chukchi Sea.
Harbor seal, AK.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Humpback whale, Western North Pacific.
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Ribbon seal, AK.
Ringed seal, AK.
Spotted seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.1
Killer whale, ENP AK resident.1
Killer whale, GOA, AI, BS transient.1
Ribbon seal, AK.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Harbor seal, CA.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.
Bottlenose dolphin, CA/OR/WA offshore.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA2.1
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Southern sea otter.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.1
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
Blue whale, Eastern North Pacific.1
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.1
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.1
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.1
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.1
Killer whale, Eastern North Pacific AK resident.
Killer whale, GOA, BSAI transient.1
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Ringed seal, AK.
Spotted seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Sperm whale, North Pacific.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Blainville’s beaked whale, HI.
Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic.
False killer whale, HI Pelagic.1
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Risso’s dolphin, HI.
Rough-toothed dolphin, HI.
Striped dolphin, HI.
False killer whale, American Samoa.
Rough-toothed dolphin, American Samoa.
Short-finned pilot whale, unknown.
None documented.
CATEGORY III
Gillnet Fisheries:
AK Kuskokwim, Yukon, Norton Sound, Kotzebue salmon
gillnet.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
1,778 ....................
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea.
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated number
of vessels/persons
Fishery description
AK Prince William Sound salmon set gillnet ....................
29 .........................
AK roe herring and food/bait herring gillnet .....................
CA set gillnet (mesh size <3.5 in) ....................................
HI inshore gillnet ...............................................................
920 .......................
296 .......................
36 .........................
WA Grays Harbor salmon drift gillnet (excluding treaty
Tribal fishing).
WA/OR Mainstem Columbia River eulachon gillnet .........
WA/OR lower Columbia River (includes tributaries) drift
gillnet.
WA Willapa Bay drift gillnet ..............................................
24 .........................
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Miscellaneous Net Fisheries:
AK Cook Inlet salmon purse seine ...................................
AK Kodiak salmon purse seine ........................................
15 .........................
110 .......................
82 .........................
Harbor seal, GOA.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Sea otter, South central AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, HI.
Spinner dolphin, HI.
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast.
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S.
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast.
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast.
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding.
AK Southeast salmon purse seine ...................................
AK roe herring and food/bait herring beach seine ...........
AK roe herring and food/bait herring purse seine ............
AK salmon beach seine ....................................................
AK salmon purse seine (Prince William Sound, Chignik,
Alaska Peninsula).
WA/OR sardine purse seine .............................................
CA anchovy, mackerel, sardine purse seine ....................
315 .......................
10 .........................
356 .......................
31 .........................
936 .......................
CA squid purse seine .......................................................
80 .........................
CA tuna purse seine * .......................................................
WA/OR Lower Columbia River salmon seine ..................
WA/OR herring, smelt, squid purse seine or lampara .....
WA salmon purse seine ...................................................
WA salmon reef net ..........................................................
HI lift net ...........................................................................
HI inshore purse seine .....................................................
HI throw net, cast net .......................................................
HI seine net ......................................................................
Dip Net Fisheries:
CA squid dip net ...............................................................
Marine Aquaculture Fisheries:
CA marine shellfish aquaculture .......................................
CA salmon enhancement rearing pen ..............................
CA white seabass enhancement net pens .......................
HI offshore pen culture .....................................................
WA salmon net pens ........................................................
10 .........................
10 .........................
130 .......................
75 .........................
11 .........................
17 .........................
<3 .........................
23 .........................
24 .........................
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Dall’s porpoise, AK.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Humpback whale, Western North Pacific.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Harbor seal, Prince William Sound.
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S.
Harbor seal, CA.
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
115 .......................
None documented.
unknown ...............
>1 .........................
13 .........................
2 ...........................
14 .........................
WA/OR shellfish aquaculture ............................................
Troll Fisheries:
WA/OR/CA albacore surface hook and line/troll ..............
CA halibut hook and line/handline ....................................
CA white seabass hook and line/handline .......................
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands groundfish hand troll
and dinglebar troll.
AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish hand troll and dinglebar
troll.
AK salmon troll .................................................................
23 .........................
None documented.
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S.
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S.
Harbor seal, WA inland waters.
None documented.
705 .......................
unknown ...............
unknown ...............
unknown ...............
None
None
None
None
unknown ...............
None documented.
1,908 ....................
13 .........................
4,300 ....................
2,117 ....................
322 .......................
40 .........................
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented.
None documented.
Pantropical spotted dolphin, HI.
None documented.
None documented.
432 .......................
None documented.
4 ...........................
Killer whale, AK resident.
22 .........................
None documented.
American Samoa tuna troll ...............................................
CA/OR/WA salmon troll ....................................................
HI troll ...............................................................................
HI rod and reel ..................................................................
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands tuna
troll.
Guam tuna troll .................................................................
Longline/Set Line Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Greenland turbot
longline.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands sablefish longline .........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
83 .........................
376 .......................
Marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured
42 .........................
65 .........................
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
21093
21094
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated number
of vessels/persons
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Fishery description
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands halibut longline .............
127 .......................
AK Gulf of Alaska halibut longline ....................................
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod longline .............................
AK octopus/squid longline ................................................
AK state-managed waters longline/setline (including sablefish, rockfish, lingcod, and miscellaneous finfish).
WA/OR/CA groundfish, bottomfish longline/set line .........
855 .......................
92 .........................
3 ...........................
464 .......................
WA/OR Pacific halibut longline .........................................
CA pelagic longline ...........................................................
HI kaka line .......................................................................
HI vertical line ...................................................................
Trawl Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Atka mackerel trawl .....
350 .......................
1 ...........................
15 .........................
3 ...........................
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod trawl ...........
72 .........................
AK Gulf of Alaska flatfish trawl .........................................
36 .........................
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod trawl ..................................
55 .........................
AK Gulf of Alaska pollock trawl ........................................
67 .........................
AK Gulf of Alaska rockfish trawl .......................................
AK Kodiak food/bait herring otter trawl ............................
AK shrimp otter trawl and beam trawl ..............................
AK state-managed waters of Prince William Sound
groundfish trawl.
CA halibut bottom trawl ....................................................
43 .........................
4 ...........................
38 .........................
2 ...........................
CA sea cucumber trawl ....................................................
WA/OR/CA shrimp trawl ...................................................
WA/OR/CA groundfish trawl .............................................
16 .........................
300 .......................
160–180 ...............
Pot, Ring Net, And Trap Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands sablefish pot .................
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod pot .............
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands crab pot ........................
6 ...........................
59 .........................
540 .......................
AK Gulf of Alaska crab pot ...............................................
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod pot ....................................
AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish pot ........................................
AK Southeast Alaska crab pot .........................................
AK Southeast Alaska shrimp pot ......................................
AK shrimp pot, except Southeast .....................................
AK octopus/squid pot ........................................................
CA rock crab pot ...............................................................
271 .......................
116 .......................
248 .......................
375 .......................
99 .........................
141 .......................
15 .........................
124 .......................
WA/OR/CA hagfish pot .....................................................
WA/OR shrimp pot/trap ....................................................
WA Puget Sound Dungeness crab pot/trap .....................
HI crab trap .......................................................................
HI fish trap ........................................................................
HI lobster trap ...................................................................
HI shrimp trap ...................................................................
54 .........................
254 .......................
249 .......................
5 ...........................
9 ...........................
<3 .........................
10 .........................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
367 .......................
13 .........................
47 .........................
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Sperm whale, North Pacific.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, CA/OR/WA offshore.
California sea lion, U.S.
Northern elephant seal, California breeding.
Sperm whale, CA/OR/WA.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
None documented.
None documented in the most recent five years of data.
None documented.
None documented.
Bearded seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Bearded seal, AK.
Ribbon seal, AK.
Ringed seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Harbor seal, AK.
Northern elephant seal, North Pacific.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Harbor seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, AK.
Fin whale, Northeast Pacific.
Northern elephant seal, North Pacific.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S.
Harbor porpoise, unknown.
Harbor seal, unknown.
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding.
Steller sea lion, unknown.
None documented.
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, CA/OR/WA.
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast.
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Pacific white-sided dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
None documented.
None documented.
Bowhead whale, Western Arctic.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
None documented.
Harbor seal, GOA.
None documented.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific (Southeast AK).
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific (Southeast AK).
None documented.
None documented.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Harbor seal, CA.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
None documented.
None documented in recent years.
None documented.
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
21095
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Fishery description
Estimated number
of vessels/persons
HI crab net ........................................................................
HI Kona crab loop net ......................................................
Hook-and-Line, Handline, and Jig Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands groundfish jig ................
AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish jig ......................................
AK halibut jig .....................................................................
American Samoa bottomfish ............................................
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
bottomfish.
Guam bottomfish ..............................................................
HI aku boat, pole, and line ...............................................
HI bottomfish handline ......................................................
HI inshore handline ...........................................................
HI pelagic handline ...........................................................
WA groundfish, bottomfish jig ...........................................
Western Pacific squid jig ..................................................
Harpoon Fisheries:
CA swordfish harpoon ......................................................
Pound Net/Weir Fisheries:
AK herring spawn on kelp pound net ...............................
AK Southeast herring roe/food/bait pound net .................
HI bullpen trap ..................................................................
Bait Pens:
WA/OR/CA bait pens ........................................................
Dredge Fisheries:
AK scallop dredge ............................................................
Dive, Hand/Mechanical Collection Fisheries:
AK clam ............................................................................
AK Dungeness crab ..........................................................
AK herring spawn on kelp ................................................
AK miscellaneous invertebrates handpick ........................
HI black coral diving .........................................................
HI fish pond ......................................................................
HI handpick .......................................................................
HI lobster diving ................................................................
HI spearfishing ..................................................................
WA/CA kelp ......................................................................
WA/OR bait shrimp, clam hand, dive, or mechanical collection.
OR/CA sea urchin, sea cucumber hand, dive, or mechanical collection.
Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel (Charter Boat) Fisheries:
AK/WA/OR/CA commercial passenger fishing vessel ......
4 ...........................
33 .........................
None documented.
None documented.
2 ...........................
214 .......................
71 .........................
fewer than 30 .......
28 .........................
None documented.
Fin whale, Northeast Pacific.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
>300 .....................
<3 .........................
578 .......................
357 .......................
534 .......................
679 .......................
0 ...........................
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
6 ...........................
None documented.
291 .......................
2 ...........................
3 ...........................
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
13 .........................
California sea lion, U.S.
108 (5 AK) ...........
None documented.
130 .......................
2 ...........................
266 .......................
214 .......................
<3 .........................
5 ...........................
46 .........................
19 .........................
163 .......................
4 ...........................
201 .......................
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
10 .........................
None documented.
>7,000 (1,006 AK)
Killer whale, unknown.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
93 .........................
90 .........................
None documented.
None documented.
Live Finfish/Shellfish Fisheries:
CA nearshore finfish live trap/hook-and-line ....................
HI aquarium collecting ......................................................
Marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured
documented.
documented.
documented in recent years.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 1:
AI—Aleutian Islands; AK—Alaska; BS—Bering Sea; CA—California; ENP—Eastern North Pacific; GOA—Gulf of Alaska; HI—Hawaii; MHI—
Main Hawaiian Islands; OR—Oregon; WA—Washington;
1 Fishery classified based on mortalities and serious injuries of this stock, which are greater than or equal to 50 percent (Category I) or greater
than 1 percent and less than 50 percent (Category II) of the stock’s PBR;
2 Fishery classified by analogy;
* Fishery has an associated high seas component listed in Table 3;
∧ The list of marine mammal species and/or stocks killed or injured in this fishery is identical to the list of species and/or stocks killed or injured
in high seas component of the fishery, minus species and/or stocks that have geographic ranges exclusively on the high seas. The species and/
or stocks are found, and the fishery remains the same, on both sides of the EEZ boundary. Therefore, the EEZ components of these fisheries
pose the same risk to marine mammals as the components operating on the high seas.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN
Estimated number
of vessels/persons
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured
CATEGORY I
Gillnet Fisheries:
Mid-Atlantic gillnet .............................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
3,950 ....................
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern Migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal.1
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
21096
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Estimated number
of vessels/persons
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system.1
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Gray seal, WNA.
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Hooded seal, WNA.
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
Minke whale, Canadian east coast.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Fin whale, WNA.
Gray seal, WNA.1
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Harp seal, WNA.
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
Minke whale, Canadian east coast.
North Atlantic right whale, WNA.
Risso’s dolphin, WNA.
White-sided dolphin, WNA.
Northeast sink gillnet ........................................................
3,163 ....................
Trap/Pot Fisheries:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot .............
8,485 ....................
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
Minke whale, Canadian east coast.
North Atlantic right whale, WNA.1
201 .......................
Atlantic spotted dolphin, Northern GMX.
Longline Fisheries:
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics
longline *.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX oceanic.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Cuvier’s beaked whale, WNA.
False killer whale, WNA.
Harbor porpoise, GME, BF.
Kogia spp. (Pygmy or dwarf sperm whale), WNA.
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA.
Mesoplodon beaked whale, WNA.
Minke whale, Canadian East coast.
Pantropical spotted dolphin, Northern GMX.
Pygmy sperm whale, GMX.
Risso’s dolphin, Northern GMX.
Risso’s dolphin, WNA.
Rough-toothed dolphin, Northern GMX.
Short-finned pilot whale, Northern GMX.
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA.1
Sperm whale, Northern GMX.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
CATEGORY II
Gillnet Fisheries:
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet 2 .....................................
248 .......................
Gulf of Mexico gillnet 2 ......................................................
248 .......................
NC inshore gillnet .............................................................
2,676 ....................
Northeast anchored float gillnet 2 ......................................
852 .......................
Northeast drift gillnet 2 .......................................................
Southeast Atlantic gillnet 2 ................................................
1,036 ....................
273 .......................
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet ...........................
21 .........................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Bottlenose dolphin, unknown (Northern migratory coastal or
Southern migratory coastal).
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, and estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system.1
Harbor seal, WNA.
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
White-sided dolphin, WNA.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, unknown (Central FL, Northern FL, SC/
GA coastal, or Southern migratory coastal).
North Atlantic right whale, WNA.
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
21097
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Fishery description
Estimated number
of vessels/persons
Marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured
Trawl Fisheries:
Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl (including pair trawl) ............
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl ..................................................
320 .......................
633 .......................
Northeast mid-water trawl (including pair trawl) ...............
542 .......................
Northeast bottom trawl .....................................................
2,238 ....................
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl
4,950 ....................
Harbor seal, WNA.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore.1
Common dolphin, WNA.1
Gray seal, WNA.1
Harbor seal, WNA.
Risso’s dolphin, WNA.1
White-sided dolphin, WNA.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Gray seal, WNA.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA.1
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Gray seal, WNA.
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Harp seal, WNA.
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA.
Risso’s dolphin, WNA.
White-sided dolphin, WNA.1
Atlantic spotted dolphin, Northern Gulf of Mexico.
Bottlenose dolphin, Charleston estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.1
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine.1
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX continental shelf.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi River Delta.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mobile Bay, Bonsecour Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal.1
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal.1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Trap/Pot Fisheries:
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab
trap/pot 2.
1,101 ....................
Atlantic mixed species trap/pot 2 .......................................
3,332 ....................
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot .................................................
6,679 ....................
Purse Seine Fisheries:
Gulf of Mexico menhaden purse seine ............................
40–42 ...................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Bottlenose dolphin, Biscayne Bay estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, FL Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine (FL west
coast portion).
Bottlenose dolphin, Indian River Lagoon estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Jacksonville estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Sarasota Bay, Little Sarasota Bay.
Fin whale, WNA;
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central GA estuarine system.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Charleston estuarine system.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Indian River Lagoon estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Jacksonville estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern FL coastal.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GA/Southern SC estuarine
system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern Migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern SC estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern GA estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system.
West Indian manatee, FL.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi River Delta.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi Sound, Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal.1
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
21098
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Estimated number
of vessels/persons
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine 2 ...............................
19 .........................
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern Migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal.
Haul/Beach Seine Fisheries:
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine ...........................................
359 .......................
NC long haul seine ...........................................................
22 .........................
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Stop Net Fisheries:
NC roe mullet stop net .....................................................
1 ...........................
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, unknown (Southern migratory coastal or
Southern NC estuarine system).
Pound Net Fisheries:
VA pound net ....................................................................
26 .........................
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal.1
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
Northern Migratory coastal.1
Northern NC estuarine system.1
Southern Migratory coastal.1
Northern NC estuarine system.1
Southern NC estuarine system.
CATEGORY III
Gillnet Fisheries:
Caribbean gillnet ...............................................................
DE River inshore gillnet ....................................................
Long Island Sound inshore gillnet ....................................
RI, southern MA (to Monomoy Island), and NY Bight
(Raritan and Lower NY Bays) inshore gillnet.
Southeast Atlantic inshore gillnet .....................................
Trawl Fisheries:
Atlantic shellfish bottom trawl ...........................................
Gulf of Mexico butterfish trawl ..........................................
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Gulf of Mexico mixed species trawl ..................................
GA cannonball jellyfish trawl ............................................
Marine Aquaculture Fisheries:
Finfish aquaculture ...........................................................
Shellfish aquaculture ........................................................
Purse Seine Fisheries:
Gulf of Maine Atlantic herring purse seine .......................
Gulf of Maine menhaden purse seine ..............................
FL West Coast sardine purse seine .................................
U.S. Atlantic tuna purse seine * ........................................
Longline/Hook-and-Line Fisheries:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic bottom longline/hook-and-line ......
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic tuna, shark, swordfish
hook-and-line/harpoon.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean snapper-grouper and other reef fish bottom
longline/hook-and-line.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shark bottom
longline/hook-and-line.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean pelagic hook-and-line/harpoon.
U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico trotline ................................
Trap/Pot Fisheries:
Caribbean mixed species trap/pot ....................................
Caribbean spiny lobster trap/pot ......................................
FL spiny lobster trap/pot ...................................................
>991 .....................
unknown ...............
unknown ...............
unknown ...............
None
None
None
None
unknown ...............
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern SC estuarine system.
>58 .......................
2 ...........................
20 .........................
1 ...........................
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX oceanic.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX continental shelf.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal.
48 .........................
unknown ...............
Harbor seal, WNA.
None documented.
>7 .........................
>2 .........................
10 .........................
5 ...........................
Harbor seal, WNA.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.
None documented in most recent five years of data.
>1,207 ..................
2,846 ....................
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore.
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX continental shelf.
>5,000 ..................
39 .........................
Frm 00026
recent
recent
recent
recent
five
five
five
five
years
years
years
years
of
of
of
of
data.
data.
data.
data.
None documented.
>501 .....................
>197 .....................
1,268 ....................
None documented.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, Biscayne Bay estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, FL Bay estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, FL Keys.
Bottlenose dolphin, Barataria Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi Sound, Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mobile Bay, Bonsecour Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal.
West Indian manatee, FL.
None documented.
unknown ...............
PO 00000
most
most
most
most
unknown ...............
Gulf of Mexico mixed species trap/pot .............................
Jkt 250001
the
the
the
the
680 .......................
4,113 ....................
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
in
in
in
in
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX continental shelf.
None documented.
Gulf of Mexico blue crab trap/pot .....................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
21099
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Fishery description
Estimated number
of vessels/persons
Marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico golden crab
trap/pot.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic eel trap/pot ............................................
Stop Seine/Weir/Pound Net/Floating Trap/Fyke Net Fisheries:
Gulf of Maine herring and Atlantic mackerel stop seine/
weir.
10 .........................
None documented.
unknown ...............
None documented.
>1 .........................
U.S. Mid-Atlantic crab stop seine/weir ..............................
U.S. Mid-Atlantic mixed species stop seine/weir/pound
net (except the NC roe mullet stop net).
RI floating trap ..................................................................
Northeast and Mid-Atlantic fyke net .................................
Dredge Fisheries:
Gulf of Maine sea urchin dredge ......................................
Gulf of Maine mussel dredge ...........................................
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic sea scallop dredge .......
Mid-Atlantic blue crab dredge ...........................................
Mid-Atlantic soft-shell clam dredge ...................................
Mid-Atlantic whelk dredge ................................................
U.S. Mid-Atlantic/Gulf of Mexico oyster dredge ...............
New England and Mid-Atlantic offshore surf clam/quahog dredge.
Haul/Beach Seine Fisheries:
Caribbean haul/beach seine .............................................
Gulf of Mexico haul/beach seine ......................................
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic haul/beach seine ...................
Dive, Hand/Mechanical Collection Fisheries:
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean shellfish dive,
hand/mechanical collection.
Gulf of Maine urchin dive, hand/mechanical collection ....
Gulf of Mexico, Southeast Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, and
Caribbean cast net.
Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel (Charter Boat) Fisheries:
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean commercial
passenger fishing vessel.
2,600 ....................
unknown ...............
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Minke whale, Canadian east coast.
Atlantic white-sided dolphin, WNA.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system.
9 ...........................
unknown ...............
None documented.
None documented.
unknown ...............
unknown ...............
>403 .....................
unknown ...............
unknown ...............
unknown ...............
7,000 ....................
unknown ...............
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
15 .........................
unknown ...............
25 .........................
None documented in the most recent five years of data.
None documented.
None documented.
20,000 ..................
None documented.
unknown ...............
unknown ...............
None documented.
None documented.
4,000 ....................
Bottlenose dolphin, Barataria Bay estuarine system.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Bottlenose dolphin, Biscayne Bay estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Choctawhatchee Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, FL Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Indian River Lagoon estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Jacksonville estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi Sound, Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GA/Southern SC estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal.
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA.
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 2:
DE—Delaware; FL—Florida; GA—Georgia; GME/BF—Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy; GMX—Gulf of Mexico; MA—Massachusetts; NC—North
Carolina; NY—New York; RI—Rhode Island; SC—South Carolina; VA—Virginia; WNA—Western North Atlantic;
1 Fishery classified based on mortalities and serious injuries of this stock, which are greater than or equal to 50 percent (Category I) or greater
than 1 percent and less than 50 percent (Category II) of the stock’s PBR;
2 Fishery classified by analogy;
* Fishery has an associated high seas component listed in Table 3.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
21100
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 3—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES ON THE HIGH SEAS
Number of
HSFCA
permits
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured
Category I
Longline Fisheries:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species * ......................................
53
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI Deep-set component) * ∧ ........
145
Atlantic spotted dolphin, WNA.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX oceanic.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Cuvier’s beaked whale, WNA.
False killer whale, WNA.
Killer whale, GMX oceanic.
Kogia spp. whale (Pygmy or dwarf sperm whale), WNA.
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA.
Mesoplodon beaked whale, WNA.
Minke whale, Canadian East coast.
Pantropical spotted dolphin, WNA.
Risso’s dolphin, GMX.
Risso’s dolphin, WNA.
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA.
Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic.
False killer whale, HI Pelagic.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Kogia spp. (Pygmy or dwarf sperm whale), HI.
Pygmy killer whale, HI.
Risso’s dolphin, HI.
Short-finned pilot whale, HI.
Striped dolphin, HI.
Category II
Drift Gillnet Fisheries:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species * ∧ ....................................
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Trawl Fisheries:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species ** ....................................
CCAMLR ..............................................................................
Purse Seine Fisheries:
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries ...............................................
Western Pacific Pelagic .......................................................
Longline Fisheries:
CCAMLR ..............................................................................
South Pacific Albacore Troll ................................................
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries ** ...........................................
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI Shallow-set component) * ∧ ....
Handline/Pole And Line Fisheries:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species ........................................
Pacific Highly Migratory Species .........................................
South Pacific Albacore Troll ................................................
Western Pacific Pelagic .......................................................
Troll Fisheries:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species ........................................
South Pacific Albacore Troll ................................................
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries ** ...........................................
Western Pacific Pelagic .......................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
5
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.
Northern right-whale dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Pacific white-sided dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Risso’s dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
1
0
No information.
Antarctic fur seal.
33
1
No information.
No information.
0
6
2
18
None documented.
No information.
No information.
Blainville’s beaked whale, HI.
Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic.
False killer whale, HI Pelagic.
Fin whale, HI.
Guadalupe fur seal.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Mesoplodon sp., unknown.
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding.
Risso’s dolphin, HI.
Rough-toothed dolphin, HI.
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Striped dolphin, HI.
2
41
11
5
No
No
No
No
information.
information.
information.
information.
0
17
1
5
No
No
No
No
information.
information.
information.
information.
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
21101
TABLE 3—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES ON THE HIGH SEAS—Continued
Number of
HSFCA
permits
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured
Category III
Longline Fisheries:
Northwest Atlantic Bottom Longline ....................................
Pacific Highly Migratory Species .........................................
Purse Seine Fisheries:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species * ∧ ....................................
Trawl Fisheries:
Northwest Atlantic ................................................................
Troll Fisheries:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species * .......................................
3
108
None documented.
None documented. in the most recent 5 years of data.
5
None documented.
4
None documented.
119
None documented.
List of Terms, Abbreviations, and Symbols Used in Table 3:
CA—California; GMX—Gulf of Mexico; HI—Hawaii; OR—Oregon; WA—Washington; WNA—Western North Atlantic.
* Fishery is an extension/component of an existing fishery operating within U.S. waters listed in Table 1 or 2. The number of permits listed in
Table 3 represents only the number of permits for the high seas component of the fishery.
** These gear types are not authorized under the Pacific HMS FMP (2004), the Atlantic HMS FMP (2006), or without a South Pacific Tuna
Treaty license (in the case of the South Pacific Tuna fisheries). Because HSFCA permits are valid for 5 years, permits obtained in past years
exist in the HSFCA permit database for gear types that are now unauthorized. Therefore, while HSFCA permits exist for these gear types, it
does not represent effort. In order to land fish species, fishers must be using an authorized gear type. Once these permits for unauthorized gear
types expire, the permit-holder will be required to obtain a permit for an authorized gear type.
∧ The list of marine mammal species and/or stocks killed or injured in this fishery is identical to the list of marine mammal species and/or
stocks killed or injured in U.S. waters component of the fishery, minus species and/or stocks that have geographic ranges exclusively in coastal
waters, because the marine mammal species and/or stocks are also found on the high seas and the fishery remains the same on both sides of
the EEZ boundary. Therefore, the high seas components of these fisheries pose the same risk to marine mammals as the components of these
fisheries operating in U.S. waters.
TABLE 4—FISHERIES AFFECTED BY TAKE REDUCTION TEAMS AND PLANS
Take reduction plans
Affected fisheries
Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan (ALWTRP)—50 CFR 229.32
Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Plan. ...............................................
(BDTRP)—50 CFR 229.35 .......................................................................
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
False Killer Whale Take Reduction Plan (FKWTRP)—50 CFR 229.37 ..
Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction Plan. ...................................................
(HPTRP)—50 CFR 229.33 (New England) and 229.34 (Mid-Atlantic) ....
Pelagic Longline Take Reduction Plan ....................................................
(PLTRP)—50 CFR 229.36 .......................................................................
Pacific Offshore Cetacean Take Reduction Plan (POCTRP)—50 CFR
229.31.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Category I
Mid-Atlantic gillnet.
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot.
Northeast sink gillnet.
Category II
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot.
Atlantic mixed species trap/pot.
Northeast anchored float gillnet.
Northeast drift gillnet.
Southeast Atlantic gillnet.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet.*
Southeastern, U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/pot.∧
Category I
Mid-Atlantic gillnet.
Category II
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot.
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet fishery.
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine.
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine.
NC inshore gillnet.
NC long haul seine.
NC roe mullet stop net.
Southeast Atlantic gillnet.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl.∧
Southeastern, U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/pot.∧
VA pound net.
Category I
HI deep-set longline.
Category II
HI shallow-set longline.
Category I
Mid-Atlantic gillnet.
Northeast sink gillnet.
Category I
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics longline.
Category II
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (≥14 in mesh).
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
21102
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 4—FISHERIES AFFECTED BY TAKE REDUCTION TEAMS AND PLANS—Continued
Take reduction plans
Affected fisheries
Atlantic Trawl Gear Take Reduction Team (ATGTRT) ............................
Category II
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl.
Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl (including pair trawl).
Northeast bottom trawl.
Northeast mid-water trawl (including pair trawl).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
* Only applicable to the portion of the fishery operating in U.S. waters; ∧ Only applicable to the portion of the fishery operating in the Atlantic
Ocean.
Classification
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce has
certified to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) at the proposed
rule stage that this rule would not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. No
comments were received on that
certification, and no new information
has been discovered to change that
conclusion. Accordingly, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required, and none
has been prepared.
This rule contains existing collectionof-information (COI) requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
and would not impose additional or
new COI requirements. The COI for the
registration of individuals under the
MMPA has been approved by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
under OMB control number 0648–0293
(0.15 hours per report for new
registrants). The requirement for
reporting marine mammal mortalities or
injuries has been approved by OMB
under OMB control number 0648–0292
(0.15 hours per report). These estimates
include the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the COI. Send comments
regarding these reporting burden
estimates or any other aspect of the COI,
including suggestions for reducing
burden, to NMFS and OMB (see
ADDRESSES and SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a COI,
subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, unless that
COI displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
This rule has been determined to be
not significant for the purposes of
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563.
This rule is not expected to be an
Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because this rule is not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
In accordance with the Companion
Manual for NOAA Administrative Order
(NAO) 216–6A, NMFS determined that
publishing this LOF qualifies to be
categorically excluded from further
NEPA review, consistent with categories
of activities identified in Categorical
Exclusion G7 (‘‘Preparation of policy
directives, rules, regulations, and
guidelines of an administrative,
financial, legal, technical, or procedural
nature, or for which the environmental
effects are too broad, speculative or
conjectural to lend themselves to
meaningful analysis and will be subject
later to the NEPA process, either
collectively or on a case-by-case basis’’)
of the Companion Manual for NAO 216–
6A, and we have not identified any
extraordinary circumstances listed in
Chapter 4 of the Companion Manual
that would preclude application of this
categorical exclusion. If NMFS takes a
management action, for example,
through the development of a TRP,
NMFS would first prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement or
Environmental Assessment, as required
under NEPA, specific to that action.
This rule would not affect species
listed as threatened or endangered
under the ESA or their associated
critical habitat. The impacts of
numerous fisheries have been analyzed
in various biological opinions, and this
rule will not affect the conclusions of
those opinions. The classification of
fisheries on the LOF is not considered
to be a management action that would
adversely affect threatened or
endangered species. If NMFS takes a
management action, for example,
through the development of a TRP,
NMFS would consult under ESA section
7 on that action.
This rule would have no adverse
impacts on marine mammals, and may
have a positive impact on marine
mammals by improving knowledge of
marine mammals and the fisheries
interacting with marine mammals,
through information collected from
observer programs, stranding and
sighting data, or take reduction teams.
This rule would not affect the land or
water uses or natural resources of the
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
coastal zone, as specified under section
307 of the Coastal Zone Management
Act.
References
Baird, R.W., S.D. Mahaffy, A.M. Gorgone, T.
Cullins, D.J. McSweeney, E.M. Oelson,
A.L. Bradford, J. Barlow, D.L. Webster.
False Killer Whales and Fisheries
Interaction in Hawaiian Waters:
Evidence for Sex Bias and Variation
Among Populations and Social Groups.
2014. Marine Mammal Science 31(2):
579–590.
Carretta, J.V., K.A. Forney, E.M. Oleson, D.W.
Weller, A.R. Lang, J. Baker, M.M. Muto,
B. Hanson, A.J. Orr, H. Huber, M.S.
Lowry, J. Barlow, J.E. Moore, D. Lynch,
L. Carswell, and R.L. Brownell Jr. 2019.
U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock
Assessments: 2018. NOAA Technical
Memorandum NOAA–TM–NMFS–
SWFSC–617. 382 p.
Carretta, J.V., E. Oleson, K.A. Forney, J.
Baker, J.E. Moore, D.W. Weller, A.R.
Lang, M.M. Muto, B. Hanson, A.J. Orr, H.
Huber, M.S. Lowry, J. Barlow, D. Lynch,
L. Carswell, and R.L. Brownell Jr. 2018.
U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock
Assessments: 2017. NOAA Technical
Memorandum NOAA–TM–NMFS–
SWFSC–602. 161 p.
Delean, B.J., V.T. Helker, M. M. Muto, K.
Savage, S. Teerlink, L.A. Jemison, K.
Wilkinson, and J. Jannot. In press.
Human-caused mortality and injury of
NMFS-managed Alaska marine mammal
stocks, 2013–2017. U.S. Department of
Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo.
NMFSAFSC–XXX, XX p.
Hayes, S.A., E. Josephson, K. Maze-Foley,
and P.E. Rosel, editors. 2019. U.S.
Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine
Mammal Stocks Assessments, 2018.
NOAA Technical Memorandum NOAA
Technical Memorandum NMFS–NE–258.
306 p.
Henry A., M. Garron, A. Reid, D. Morin, W.
Ledwell, T.C.N. Cole. 2019. Serious
injury and mortality determinations for
baleen whale stocks along the Gulf of
Mexico, United States East Coast, and
Atlantic Canadian Provinces, 2012–2016.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Northeast
Fish Sci Cent Ref Doc. 19–13; 54 p.
Jannot, J.E., K.A. Somers, V. Tuttle, J.
McVeigh, J.V. Carretta, and V. Helker.
2018. Observed and Estimated Marine
Mammal Bycatch in U.S. West Coast
Groundfish Fisheries, 2002–16. U.S.
Department of Commerce, NWFSC
Processed Report 2018–03. 45 p. https://
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
doi.org/10.25923/fkf8-0x49 U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2014. West
Indian Manatee (Trichechus manatus)—
Florida stock assessment report.
Jacksonville, FL. 17 p. (Available at
https://www.fws.gov/ecological-services/
es-library/pdfs/West-Indian-Manatee-FLFinal-SAR.pdf)
Marine Mammal Commission (MMC). 2018.
Stock Assessment Reports: What is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Apr 15, 2020
Jkt 250001
missing and what are the costs? https://
www.mmc.gov/wp-content/uploads/
SARs-2018-update.pdf.
National Marine Fisheries Service West Coast
Region (NMFS–WCR). 2018. 2017 West
Coast Entanglement Summary. 8 p.
(Available at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/webdam/
download/97058165)
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
21103
Authority: MMPA, 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
Dated: March 30, 2020.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–06908 Filed 4–15–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 74 (Thursday, April 16, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21079-21103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-06908]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 229
[Docket No. 200327-0090]
RIN 0648-BI76
List of Fisheries for 2020
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishes its
final List of Fisheries (LOF) for 2020, as required by the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). The LOF for 2020 reflects new information
on interactions between commercial fisheries and marine mammals. NMFS
must classify each commercial fishery on the LOF into one of three
categories under the MMPA based upon the level of mortality and serious
injury of marine mammals that occurs incidental to each fishery. The
classification of a fishery on the LOF determines whether participants
in that fishery are subject to certain provisions of the MMPA, such as
registration, observer coverage, and take reduction plan (TRP)
requirements.
DATES: The effective date of this final rule is May 18, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Chief, Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver
Spring, MD 20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaclyn Taylor, Office of Protected
Resources, 301-427-8402; Allison Rosner, Greater Atlantic Region, 978-
281-9328; Jessica Powell, Southeast Region, 727-824-5312; Dan Lawson,
West Coast Region, 562-980-3209; Suzie Teerlink, Alaska Region, 907-
586-7240; Kevin Brindock, Pacific Islands Region, 808-725-5146.
Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the hearing
impaired may call the Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-
8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
What is the List of Fisheries?
Section 118 of the MMPA requires NMFS to place all U.S. commercial
fisheries into one of three categories based on the level of incidental
mortality and serious injury of marine mammals occurring in each
fishery (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(1)). The classification of a fishery on the
LOF determines whether participants in that fishery may be required to
comply with certain provisions of the MMPA, such as registration,
observer coverage, and take reduction plan requirements. NMFS must
reexamine the LOF annually, considering new information in the Marine
Mammal Stock Assessment Reports (SARs) and other relevant sources, and
publish in the Federal Register any necessary changes to the LOF after
notice and opportunity for public comment (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(1)(C)).
How does NMFS determine in which category a fishery is placed?
The definitions for the fishery classification criteria can be
found in the implementing regulations for section 118 of the MMPA (50
CFR 229.2). The criteria are also summarized here.
Fishery Classification Criteria
The fishery classification criteria consist of a two-tiered, stock-
specific approach that first addresses the total impact of all
fisheries on each marine mammal stock and then addresses the impact of
individual fisheries on each stock. This approach is based on
consideration of the rate, in numbers of animals per year, of
incidental mortalities and serious injuries of marine mammals due to
commercial fishing operations relative to the potential biological
removal (PBR) level for each marine mammal stock. The MMPA (16 U.S.C.
1362(20)) defines the PBR level as the maximum number of animals, not
including natural mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal
stock while allowing that stock to reach or maintain its optimum
sustainable population (OSP). This definition can also be found in the
implementing regulations for section 118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2).
Tier 1: Tier 1 considers the cumulative fishery mortality and
serious injury for a particular stock. If the total annual mortality
and serious injury of a marine mammal stock, across all fisheries, is
less than or equal to 10
[[Page 21080]]
percent of the PBR level of the stock, all fisheries interacting with
the stock will be placed in Category III (unless those fisheries
interact with other stock(s) for which total annual mortality and
serious injury is greater than 10 percent of PBR). Otherwise, these
fisheries are subject to the next tier (Tier 2) of analysis to
determine their classification.
Tier 2: Tier 2 considers fishery-specific mortality and serious
injury for a particular stock.
Category I: Annual mortality and serious injury of a stock in a
given fishery is greater than or equal to 50 percent of the PBR level
(i.e., frequent incidental mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals).
Category II: Annual mortality and serious injury of a stock in a
given fishery is greater than 1 percent and less than 50 percent of the
PBR level (i.e., occasional incidental mortality and serious injury of
marine mammals).
Category III: Annual mortality and serious injury of a stock in a
given fishery is less than or equal to 1 percent of the PBR level
(i.e., a remote likelihood of or no known incidental mortality and
serious injury of marine mammals).
Additional details regarding how the categories were determined are
provided in the preamble to the final rule implementing section 118 of
the MMPA (60 FR 45086; August 30, 1995).
Because fisheries are classified on a per-stock basis, a fishery
may qualify as one category for one marine mammal stock and another
category for a different marine mammal stock. A fishery is typically
classified on the LOF at its highest level of classification (e.g., a
fishery qualifying for Category III for one marine mammal stock and for
Category II for another marine mammal stock will be listed under
Category II). Stocks driving a fishery's classification are denoted
with a superscript ``1'' in Tables 1 and 2.
Other Criteria That May Be Considered
The tier analysis requires a minimum amount of data, and NMFS does
not have sufficient data to perform a tier analysis on certain
fisheries. Therefore, NMFS has classified certain fisheries by analogy
to other Category I or II fisheries that use similar fishing techniques
or gear that are known to cause mortality or serious injury of marine
mammals, or according to factors discussed in the final LOF for 1996
(60 FR 67063; December 28, 1995) and listed in the regulatory
definition of a Category II fishery. In the absence of reliable
information indicating the frequency of incidental mortality and
serious injury of marine mammals by a commercial fishery, NMFS will
determine whether the incidental mortality or serious injury is
``frequent,'' ``occasional,'' or ``remote'' by evaluating other factors
such as fishing techniques, gear used, methods used to deter marine
mammals, target species, seasons and areas fished, qualitative data
from logbooks or fishermen reports, stranding data, and the species and
distribution of marine mammals in the area, or at the discretion of the
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries (50 CFR 229.2).
Further, eligible commercial fisheries not specifically identified
on the LOF are deemed to be Category II fisheries until the next LOF is
published (50 CFR 229.2).
How does NMFS determine which species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a fishery?
The LOF includes a list of marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in each commercial fishery. The list of
species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured includes
``serious'' and ``non-serious'' documented injuries as described later
in the List of Species and/or Stocks Incidentally Killed or Injured in
the Pacific Ocean and the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
sections. To determine which species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a fishery, NMFS annually reviews the
information presented in the current SARs and injury determination
reports. SARs are brief reports summarizing the status of each stock of
marine mammals occurring in waters under U.S. jurisdiction, including
information on the identity and geographic range of the stock,
population statistics related to abundance, trend, and annual
productivity, notable habitat concerns, and estimates of human-caused
M/SI by source. The SARs are based upon the best available scientific
information and provide the most current and inclusive information on
each stock's PBR level and level of interaction with commercial fishing
operations. The best available scientific information used in the SARs
and reviewed for the 2020 LOF generally summarizes data from 2012-2016.
NMFS also reviews other sources of new information, including injury
determination reports, bycatch estimation reports, observer data,
logbook data, stranding data, disentanglement network data, fishermen
self-reports (i.e., MMPA mortality/injury reports), and anecdotal
reports from that time period. In some cases, more recent information
may be available and used in the LOF.
For fisheries with observer coverage, species or stocks are
generally removed from the list of marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured if no interactions are documented in the
5-year timeframe summarized in that year's LOF. For fisheries with no
observer coverage and for observed fisheries with evidence indicating
that undocumented interactions may be occurring (e.g., fishery has low
observer coverage and stranding network data include evidence of
fisheries interactions that cannot be attributed to a specific fishery)
species and stocks may be retained for longer than 5 years. For these
fisheries, NMFS will review the other sources of information listed
above and use its discretion to decide when it is appropriate to remove
a species or stock.
Where does NMFS obtain information on the level of observer coverage in
a fishery on the LOF?
The best available information on the level of observer coverage
and the spatial and temporal distribution of observed marine mammal
interactions is presented in the SARs. Data obtained from the observer
program and observer coverage levels are important tools in estimating
the level of marine mammal mortality and serious injury in commercial
fishing operations. Starting with the 2005 SARs, each Pacific and
Alaska SAR includes an appendix with detailed descriptions of each
Category I and II fishery on the LOF, including the observer coverage
in those fisheries. For Atlantic fisheries, this information can be
found in the LOF Fishery Fact Sheets. The SARs do not provide detailed
information on observer coverage in Category III fisheries because,
under the MMPA, Category III fisheries are not required to accommodate
observers aboard vessels due to the remote likelihood of mortality and
serious injury of marine mammals. Fishery information presented in the
SARs' appendices and other resources referenced during the tier
analysis may include: Level of observer coverage; target species;
levels of fishing effort; spatial and temporal distribution of fishing
effort; characteristics of fishing gear and operations; management and
regulations; and interactions with marine mammals. Copies of the SARs
are available on the NMFS Office of Protected Resources website at:
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/
marine-mammal-stock-assessment-reports-
[[Page 21081]]
region. Information on observer coverage levels in Category I, II, and
III fisheries can be found in the fishery fact sheets on the NMFS
Office of Protected Resources' website: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/list-fisheries-summary-tables.
Additional information on observer programs in commercial fisheries can
be found on the NMFS National Observer Program's website: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/fisheries-observers/national-observer-program.
How do I find out if a specific fishery is in Category I, II, or III?
The LOF includes three tables that list all U.S. commercial
fisheries by Category. Table 1 lists all of the commercial fisheries in
the Pacific Ocean (including Alaska); Table 2 lists all of the
commercial fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean; and Table 3 lists all U.S. authorized commercial fisheries
on the high seas. A fourth table, Table 4, lists all commercial
fisheries managed under applicable TRPs or take reduction teams (TRT).
Are high seas fisheries included on the LOF?
Beginning with the 2009 LOF, NMFS includes high seas fisheries in
Table 3 of the LOF, along with the number of valid High Seas Fishing
Compliance Act (HSFCA) permits in each fishery. As of 2004, NMFS issues
HSFCA permits only for high seas fisheries analyzed in accordance with
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Endangered Species
Act (ESA). The authorized high seas fisheries are broad in scope and
encompass multiple specific fisheries identified by gear type. For the
purposes of the LOF, the high seas fisheries are subdivided based on
gear type (e.g., trawl, longline, purse seine, gillnet, troll, etc.) to
provide more detail on composition of effort within these fisheries.
Many fisheries operate in both U.S. waters and on the high seas,
creating some overlap between the fisheries listed in Tables 1 and 2
and those in Table 3. In these cases, the high seas component of the
fishery is not considered a separate fishery, but an extension of a
fishery operating within U.S. waters (listed in Table 1 or 2). NMFS
designates those fisheries in Tables 1, 2, and 3 by a ``*'' after the
fishery's name. The number of HSFCA permits listed in Table 3 for the
high seas components of these fisheries operating in U.S. waters does
not necessarily represent additional effort that is not accounted for
in Tables 1 and 2. Many vessels/participants holding HSFCA permits also
fish within U.S. waters and are included in the number of vessels and
participants operating within those fisheries in Tables 1 and 2.
HSFCA permits are valid for 5 years, during which time Fishery
Management Plans (FMPs) can change. Therefore, some vessels/
participants may possess valid HSFCA permits without the ability to
fish under the permit because it was issued for a gear type that is no
longer authorized under the most current FMP. For this reason, the
number of HSFCA permits displayed in Table 3 is likely higher than the
actual U.S. fishing effort on the high seas. For more information on
how NMFS classifies high seas fisheries on the LOF, see the preamble
text in the final 2009 LOF (73 FR 73032; December 1, 2008). Additional
information about HSFCA permits can be found at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/high-seas-fishing-permits.
Where can I find specific information on fisheries listed on the LOF?
Starting with the 2010 LOF, NMFS developed summary documents, or
fishery fact sheets, for each Category I and II fishery on the LOF.
These fishery fact sheets provide the full history of each Category I
and II fishery, including: When the fishery was added to the LOF; the
basis for the fishery's initial classification; classification changes
to the fishery; changes to the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the fishery; fishery gear and methods
used; observer coverage levels; fishery management and regulation; and
applicable TRPs or TRTs, if any. These fishery fact sheets are updated
after each final LOF and can be found under ``How Do I Find Out if a
Specific Fishery is in Category I, II, or III?'' on the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources' website: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-protection-act-list-fisheries,
linked to the ``List of Fisheries Summary'' table. NMFS is developing
similar fishery fact sheets for each Category III fishery on the LOF.
However, due to the large number of Category III fisheries on the LOF
and the lack of accessible and detailed information on many of these
fisheries, the development of these fishery fact sheets is taking
significant time to complete. NMFS began posting Category III fishery
fact sheets online with the LOF for 2016.
Am I required to register under the MMPA?
Owners of vessels or gear engaging in a Category I or II fishery
are required under the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(2)), as described in 50
CFR 229.4, to register with NMFS and obtain a marine mammal
authorization to lawfully take non-endangered and non-threatened marine
mammals incidental to commercial fishing operations. Owners of vessels
or gear engaged in a Category III fishery are not required to register
with NMFS or obtain a marine mammal authorization.
How do I register, renew and receive my Marine Mammal Authorization
Program authorization certificate?
NMFS has integrated the MMPA registration process, implemented
through the Marine Mammal Authorization Program (MMAP), with existing
state and Federal fishery license, registration, or permit systems for
Category I and II fisheries on the LOF. Participants in these fisheries
are automatically registered under the MMAP and are not required to
submit registration or renewal materials.
In the Pacific Islands, West Coast, and Alaska regions, NMFS will
issue vessel or gear owners an authorization certificate via U.S. mail
or with their state or Federal license or permit at the time of
issuance or renewal. In the Greater Atlantic and Southeast Regions,
NMFS will issue vessel or gear owners an authorization certificate via
U.S. mail automatically at the beginning of each calendar year.
Vessel or gear owners who participate in fisheries in these regions
and have not received authorization certificates by the beginning of
the calendar year, or with renewed fishing licenses, must contact the
appropriate NMFS Regional Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Authorization certificates may also be obtained by visiting the MMAP
website https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-authorization-program#obtaining-a-marine-mammal-authorization-certificate.
The authorization certificate, or a copy, must be on board the
vessel while it is operating in a Category I or II fishery, or for non-
vessel fisheries, in the possession of the person in charge of the
fishing operation (50 CFR 229.4(e)). Although efforts are made to limit
the issuance of authorization certificates to only those vessel or gear
owners that participate in Category I or II fisheries, not all state
and Federal license or permit systems distinguish between fisheries as
classified by the LOF. Therefore, some vessel or gear owners in
Category III fisheries may receive authorization certificates even
though they are not required for Category III fisheries.
[[Page 21082]]
Individuals fishing in Category I and II fisheries for which no
state or Federal license or permit is required must register with NMFS
by contacting their appropriate Regional Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
Am I required to submit reports when I kill or injure a marine mammal
during the course of commercial fishing operations?
In accordance with the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(e)) and 50 CFR 229.6,
any vessel owner or operator, or gear owner or operator (in the case of
non-vessel fisheries), participating in a fishery listed on the LOF
must report to NMFS all incidental mortalities and injuries of marine
mammals that occur during commercial fishing operations, regardless of
the category in which the fishery is placed (I, II, or III) within 48
hours of the end of the fishing trip or, in the case of non-vessel
fisheries, fishing activity. ``Injury'' is defined in 50 CFR 229.2 as a
wound or other physical harm. In addition, any animal that ingests
fishing gear or any animal that is released with fishing gear
entangling, trailing, or perforating any part of the body is considered
injured, regardless of the presence of any wound or other evidence of
injury, and must be reported.
Mortality/injury reporting forms and instructions for submitting
forms to NMFS can be found at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-authorization-program#reporting-a-death-or-injury-of-a-marine-mammal-during-commercial-fishing-operations or by contacting the appropriate regional office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Forms may be submitted via any of the
following means: (1) Online using the electronic form; (2) emailed as
an attachment to [email protected]; (3) faxed to the NMFS Office
of Protected Resources at 301-713-0376; or (4) mailed to the NMFS
Office of Protected Resources (mailing address is provided on the
postage-paid form that can be printed from the web address listed
above). Reporting requirements and procedures are found in 50 CFR
229.6.
Am I required to take an observer aboard my vessel?
Individuals participating in a Category I or II fishery are
required to accommodate an observer aboard their vessel(s) upon request
from NMFS. MMPA section 118 states that the Secretary is not required
to place an observer on a vessel if the facilities for quartering an
observer or performing observer functions are so inadequate or unsafe
that the health or safety of the observer or the safe operation of the
vessel would be jeopardized; thereby authorizing the exemption of
vessels too small to safely accommodate an observer from this
requirement. However, U.S. Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, or Gulf of Mexico
large pelagics longline vessels operating in special areas designated
by the Pelagic Longline Take Reduction Plan implementing regulations
(50 CFR 229.36(d)) will not be exempted from observer requirements,
regardless of their size. Observer requirements are found in 50 CFR
229.7.
Am I required to comply with any marine mammal TRP regulations?
Table 4 provides a list of fisheries affected by TRPs and TRTs. TRP
regulations are found at 50 CFR 229.30 through 229.37. A description of
each TRT and copies of each TRP can be found at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-take-reduction-plans-and-teams. It is the responsibility of fishery
participants to comply with applicable take reduction regulations.
Where can I find more information about the LOF and the MMAP?
Information regarding the LOF and the MMAP, including registration
procedures and forms; current and past LOFs; descriptions of each
Category I and II fishery and some Category III fisheries; observer
requirements; and marine mammal mortality/injury reporting forms and
submittal procedures; may be obtained at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-protection-act-list-fisheries, or from any NMFS Regional Office at the
addresses listed below:
NMFS, Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-2298, Attn: Allison Rosner;
NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL
33701, Attn: Jessica Powell;
NMFS, West Coast Region, Long Beach Office, 501 W Ocean Blvd.,
Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802-4213, Attn: Dan Lawson;
NMFS, Alaska Region, Protected Resources, P.O. Box 22668, 709 West
9th Street, Juneau, AK 99802, Attn: Suzie Teerlink; or
NMFS, Pacific Islands Regional Office, Protected Resources
Division, 1845 Wasp Blvd., Building 176, Honolulu, HI 96818, Attn:
Kevin Brindock.
Sources of Information Reviewed for the 2020 LOF
NMFS reviewed the marine mammal incidental mortality and serious
injury information presented in the SARs for all fisheries to determine
whether changes in fishery classification are warranted. The SARs are
based on the best scientific information available at the time of
preparation, including the level of mortality and serious injury of
marine mammals that occurs incidental to commercial fishery operations
and the PBR levels of marine mammal stocks. The information contained
in the SARs is reviewed by regional Scientific Review Groups (SRGs)
representing Alaska, the Pacific (including Hawaii), and the U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean. The SRGs were established by
the MMPA to review the science that informs the SARs, and to advise
NMFS on marine mammal population status, trends, and stock structure,
uncertainties in the science, research needs, and other issues.
NMFS also reviewed other sources of new information, including
marine mammal stranding and entanglement data, observer program data,
fishermen self-reports, reports to the SRGs, conference papers, FMPs,
and ESA documents.
The LOF for 2020 was based on, among other things, stranding data;
fishermen self-reports; and SARs, primarily the 2018 SARs, which are
based on data from 2012-2016. The SARs referenced in this LOF include:
2016 (82 FR 29039; June 27, 2017), 2017 (83 FR 32093; July 11, 2018)
and 2018 (84 FR 28489; June 19, 2019). The SARs are available at:
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessment-reports-region.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received six comment letters on the proposed LOF for 2020 (84
FR 54543; October 10, 2019). Comments were received from the Center for
Biological Diversity (CBD), Hawaii Longline Association (HLA), Maine
Lobstermen's Association (MLA), Marine Mammal Commission (Commission),
Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council (WPRFMC) and a
joint letter from Lund's Fisheries and The Town Dock. Responses to
substantive comments are below; comments on actions not related to the
LOF are not included.
General Comments
Comment 1: CBD expresses concern regarding the diminishing quality,
[[Page 21083]]
quantity and timeliness of marine mammal and commercial fisheries
interactions public data. As noted in the Commission's 2018 report (MMC
2018), current resources do not allow NMFS to meet its obligations
under MMPA section 117 (16 U.S.C. 1386). The lack of accurate and up-
to-date stock assessment reports compromises the integrity of fishery
regulations and undermines public oversight. The LOF is the conduit for
information in the stock assessment reports to be used in the
regulation of fisheries. The lack of recent Scientific Review Group
meeting minutes and recommendations hinders the public's ability to
review new science that should be incorporated into the LOF for 2020.
Response: When NMFS reviews the LOF annually, we use the best
available scientific information, including the SARs. The SARs
generally provide the most current and inclusive information on each
stock's PBR level and level of interaction with commercial fishing
operations; there may also be more recent reports that include bycatch
estimates. The MMPA requires NMFS to review the SARs at least annually
for strategic stocks and stocks for which significant new information
is available and at least once every three years for non-strategic
stocks. NMFS publishes a notice of availability and solicits public
comments on the draft SARs annually. We strive to distribute the SRG
meeting recommendations, minutes and correspondence in a timely manner,
but the timeline this year was residually affected by the 2018-2019
partial government shutdown.
Comments on Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
Comment 2: The Commission recommends NMFS reclassify both the
Category II Yakutat salmon set gillnet and SE Alaska salmon drift
gillnet fisheries as Category I fisheries. The Commission notes that
NMFS reported a new abundance estimate for the Southeast Alaska (SEAK)
stock of harbor porpoise in the 2016 SAR. That SAR also reported a
population-size estimate of 975 porpoises and an estimated minimum
population size (Nmin) of 896, which produced a PBR of 8.9 porpoises.
The Commission states that low levels of observer coverage of the
Yakutat salmon set gillnet fishery in 2007 and 2008 (5.3 and 7.6
percent, respectively) documented four harbor porpoise mortalities,
which, when extrapolated, yielded an estimated mean annual M/SI of 22
animals. Similarly, observations of portions of the SE Alaska salmon
drift gillnet fishery in 2012 and 2013 (6.4 and 6.6 percent observer
coverage, respectively) documented two harbor porpoise mortalities,
which, when extrapolated, yielded an estimated mean annual M/SI of 12
animals. Therefore, the total M/SI estimate was 34 harbor porpoises
annually. The Commission notes that these estimates have not changed in
subsequent SARs. The M/SI for the SEAK harbor porpoise stock is nearly
four times larger than its PBR, and the M/SI for each fishery exceeds
PBR individually.
Despite the uncertainty in the stock-size and M/SI estimates, the
data reported in the SAR are the best available estimates for this
stock, and clearly meet the criteria for a Category I classification
for the Yakutat salmon set gillnet and SE Alaska salmon drift gillnet
fisheries.
Response: As stated in the Federal Register notice for the final
2018 SARs (see 84 FR 28489, June 19, 2019, comment 17), the PBR level
of 8.9 for the SEAK harbor porpoise stock was estimated based on a
survey that covered only a portion of the currently-recognized
distribution of this stock, and it included commercial fishery
mortalities or serious injuries that occurred far north of the surveyed
areas. We are concerned about the SEAK harbor porpoise stock, and we
are collecting additional information on stock structure and abundance
to reduce uncertainties in the data available to manage this stock, and
we have prioritized the Southeast Alaska drift gillnet fishery for
additional observer coverage, should resources become available. From
these studies, we anticipate being able to better evaluate management
concerns related to the AK Southeast Alaska salmon drift gillnet and AK
Yakutat salmon set gillnet fisheries, including their classification on
the future LOF. For the 2020 LOF, NMFS retains the Category II
classification for the Yakutat salmon set gillnet and SE Alaska salmon
drift gillnet fisheries.
Comment 3: CBD acknowledges NMFS proposed to add the Western U.S.
stock of Steller sea lion, which is listed as endangered under the ESA,
to the list of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the
Category II AK Bering Sea Aleutian Islands Pacific cod longline
fishery. They note that the LOF includes many fisheries that take
endangered and threatened marine mammals, but no U.S. fishery currently
has a valid MMPA authorization under section 101(a)(5)(E) to take ESA-
listed marine mammals (16 U.S.C. 1371(a)(5)(E)). CBD recommends NMFS
monitor, analyze and mitigate fisheries' interactions with endangered
marine mammals in compliance with Federal statutes.
Response: The AK Bering Sea Aleutian Islands Pacific cod longline
fishery, along with other federally-managed fisheries, are monitored
for marine mammal bycatch through the North Pacific Observer Program,
and these data are then considered in the LOF. Publication of the LOF
does not authorize take of threatened or endangered marine mammals
incidental to commercial fishing. Under section 101(a)(5)(E) of the
MMPA, NMFS issues permits for the incidental taking of threatened or
endangered species listed under the ESA, if it can be determined that
(1) mortality and serious injury incidental to commercial fisheries
would have a negligible impact on the affected species or stock, (2) a
recovery plan for that species or stock has been developed or is being
developed, and (3) where required under section 118, a monitoring
program has been established, vessels are registered, and a TRP has
been developed or is being developed. Further, classifications made
under the LOF are based on the best available science, and are not
dependent on, or related to, the current status of other regulatory
processes, including the issuance of authorizations under section
101(a)(5)(E) of the MMPA.
Comment 4: CBD supports reclassifying the CA coonstripe shrimp
fishery from a Category III to a Category II fishery based on an
entangled humpback whale that would have been classified as a serious
injury if the whale had not been subsequently disentangled.
Response: NMFS has reclassified the CA coonstripe shrimp fishery
from a Category III to a Category II fishery.
Comment 5: CBD recommends NMFS reclassify the Category III WA/OR/CA
groundfish, bottomfish longline/set line fishery as a Category II
fishery based on observed injuries and mortalities of sperm whales
reported in Jannot et al. 2018. CBD states the CA/OR/WA stock of sperm
whales has a PBR of 2.5 animals per year, and the total annual fishery-
related M/SI of sperm whales is above 10 percent of PBR.
Response: For the proposed 2020 LOF, NMFS reviewed Jannot et al.
2018 and considered the estimates of sperm whale bycatch presented.
Upon further investigation, the estimates provided in Jannot et al.
2018 were based on an observed vessel collision in 2007 that was
characterized as a non-serious injury. This non-serious injury was
evaluated and reported in the most recent SAR for CA/OR/WA sperm whales
(Carretta et al. 2019). Given that this information does not suggest
that
[[Page 21084]]
mortality or serious injury of CA/OR/WA sperm whales has been occurring
as a result of the WA/OR/CA groundfish, bottomfish longline/set line
fishery, NMFS will not reclassify the Category III WA/OR/CA groundfish,
bottomfish longline/set line fishery at this time.
Comment 6: CBD recommends NMFS add the AT1 transient stock of
killer whales to the list of species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category II CA Dungeness crab pot fishery, based on an
entanglement in 2015 (NMFS-WCR 2018).
Response: As stated in the Federal Register notice for the final
2018 SARs (see 84 FR 28489, June 19, 2019, comment 24), based on
genetic analysis, the killer whale that became entangled in commercial
California Dungeness crab pot gear in 2015 was identified as a
transient killer whale with a mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplotype that
has been found in transient killer whales in the Pribilof Islands and
western Aleutian Islands. However, the whale cannot be assigned to a
specific stock because mtDNA haplotypes are unique to ecotypes of
killer whales (e.g., resident, transient, offshore) but not to
populations. Therefore, we will assign this mortality to both the Gulf
of Alaska, Aleutian Islands, and Bering Sea Transient killer whale
stock and the West Coast Transient killer whale stock in the next
revisions of these SARs and in the NOAA Technical Memorandum that
contains information on human-caused mortality and injury of NMFS-
managed Alaska marine mammal stocks in 2013-2017 (Delean et al. in
press). Therefore, NMFS will not add the AT1 transient stock of killer
whales to the list of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category II CA Dungeness crab pot fishery in the 2020 LOF. NMFS
will use this information in future LOFs when reviewing and updating
the list of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the
Category II CA Dungeness crab pot fishery.
Comment 7: CBD does not support NMFS' proposal to remove the Hawaii
stock of sperm whale from the list of species/stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category I Hawaii deep-set longline fishery
because observer coverage is only 20 percent. CBD notes the lack of
observed mortalities or injuries does not mean injuries and mortalities
are not occurring.
Response: The 2020 LOF is based on the 2018 SARs, which report
fishery interactions from 2012-2016; this is the best scientific and
commercial information available for the time period examined. There
were no sperm whale mortalities or injuries in the Hawaii deep-set
longline fishery during the 2012-2016 time period reported in the SARs.
NMFS has removed the Hawaii stock of sperm whale from the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category I Hawaii
deep-set longline fishery.
Comment 8: The HLA recommends NMFS remove the MHI Insular stock of
false killer whale from the list species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category I Hawaii deep-set longline fishery as
proposed in the 2019 LOF. NMFS retained this stock in the final 2019
LOF, and HLA expresses concern that this was contrary to the best
available science.
HLA notes that (a) the False Killer Whale Take Reduction Plan
(FKWTRP) closed the deep-set longline fishery for almost the entire
range of the MHI Insular and NWHI stocks, (b) since this change was
made in 2013 there have been no interactions between the fishery and an
animal from either stock, and (c) there has never been a deep-set
longline fishery interaction in the very small area of the stocks'
respective ranges that are not closed to longline fishing. The
commenter also states that no information has been presented to the
False Killer Whale TRT or the Pacific Scientific Review Group
suggesting any of the 2018 and 2019 false killer whale interactions
referenced by NMFS in the 2019 final rule (84 FR 22051) have been or
will be attributed to the MHI Insular stock of false killer whale. HLA
requests that NMFS remove the MHI Insular stock of false killer whales
from the list of species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured
in the Category I Hawaii deep-set longline fishery.
Response: As noted in the 2019 LOF (84 FR 22051, June 17, 2019),
for fisheries with no observer coverage and for observed fisheries with
evidence indicating that undocumented interactions may be occurring
(e.g., fishery has evidence of fisheries interactions that cannot be
attributed to a specific fishery, and stranding network data include
evidence of fisheries interactions that cannot be attributed to a
specific fishery), stocks may be retained on the LOF for longer than
five years. For these fisheries, NMFS will review the other sources of
relevant information to determine when it is appropriate to remove a
species or stock from the LOF.
As described in the 2019 LOF (84 FR 22051, June 17, 2019), six
false killer whale mortalities and serious injuries incidental to the
deep-set longline fishery were observed inside the EEZ around Hawaii,
including three mortalities and serious injuries that occurred close to
the outer boundary of the Main Hawaiian Islands Longline Fishing
Prohibited Area, in close proximity to the outer boundary of the MHI
Insular false killer whale stocks' range. These interactions have not
yet been evaluated for assignment to insular or pelagic stocks in the
SAR. Additionally, the MHI Insular false killer whale range overlaps
with areas that are open to deep-set longline fishing and MHI Insular
false killer whales have been documented with injuries consistent with
fisheries interactions that have not been attributed to a specific
fishery (Baird et al., 2014). For the above reasons, NMFS retains the
MHI Insular false killer whale stock on the list of species and/or
stocks killed or injured incidental to the Category I HI deep-set
longline fishery.
Comment 9: HLA restates a previous comment and recommends NMFS
reclassify the Hawaii shallow-set longline fishery as a Category III
fishery. HLA notes that the Hawaii shallow-set longline fishery has 100
percent observer coverage, and only one serious injury has been
observed in the EEZ since 2008. HLA states the 2017 SAR attributes a
0.1 M/SI to the shallow-set longline fishery for the pelagic stock of
false killer whales in the U.S. EEZ. However, the 0.1 M/SI rate is
derived entirely from a 2012 interaction on which NMFS was unable to
make a serious injury determination, and which was given a ``cannot-be-
determined'' determination. This determination was then prorated as 0.3
M/SI because, in the previous five years, there were three interactions
between the shallow-set longline fishery and the pelagic false killer
whale stock in the EEZ. HLA believes if the ``cannot-be-determined''
determination for the 2012 interaction is prorated based upon the five-
year look-back period used in the 2017 SAR (2011-2015), then the M/SI
rate would be 0.0, because there were only two other interactions from
2011-2015, both of which were determined to be non-serious. Therefore,
HLA recommends the shallow-set longline fishery should be reclassified
as a Category III fishery.
Response: This comment has been addressed previously (see 84 FR
22051, June 17, 2019, comment 13; 83 FR 5349, February 7, 2018, comment
26). NMFS uses the classification criteria described in the preamble to
classify fisheries as Category I, Category II, or Category III. A
fishery is classified under Category II if the annual mortality and
serious injury of a stock in a given fishery is greater than 1 percent
and less than 50 percent of the stock's PBR level. Additional details
regarding categorization of fisheries is provided in
[[Page 21085]]
the preamble to the final rule implementing section 118 of the MMPA (60
FR 45086; August 30, 1995). The false killer whale interaction in 2012
that resulted in a ``cannot be determined'' determination was prorated
following the methods described in the 2017 SAR (Carretta et al.,
2018), which prorates serious versus non-serious injuries using the
historic rate of serious injury, while accounting for changes in gear
following implementation of the FKWTRP in 2013. This proration resulted
in a 0.3 M/SI for the pelagic false killer whale stock as reported in
the 2017 SAR, which is 1.07 percent of PBR and within the range of 1-50
percent of PBR, requiring NMFS to classify the fishery as a Category II
fishery, consistent with section 118 of the MMPA.
Comment 10: HLA supports removing the Hawaii stock of sperm whale
from the list of species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured
in the Category I Hawaii deep-set longline fishery.
Response: NMFS has removed the Hawaii stock of sperm whale from the
list of species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the
Category I Hawaii deep-set longline fishery.
Comment 11: HLA supports removing the Hawaii stock of short-finned
pilot whale from the list of species and/or stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Category II Hawaii shallow-set longline fishery.
Response: NMFS has removed the Hawaii stock of short-finned pilot
whale from the list of species and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category II Hawaii shallow-set longline fishery.
Comment 12: WPRFMC provides clarification on the source of
information used to revise the number of vessels/persons for the
American Samoa bottomfish handline fishery in the proposed rule from
1,092 to 2,095. NMFS began citing the Council's Annual Stock Assessment
and Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) report for the fishery participation data
in the 2019 LOF, which resulted in the number of vessels/persons
revised from 17 in the previous LOF to 1,092 in the 2019 LOF; and the
subsequent revision to 2,095 in the proposed 2020 LOF. WPRFMC notes the
method used in the Annual SAFE Report estimates participation for the
American Samoa bottomfish fishery by multiplying the average number of
fishers per trip by the number of trips per day, and then by the number
of dates in the calendar year by gear type. The commenter also states
this method does not generate a count of unique fishermen in the
fishery, but rather an estimation of the cumulative number of fishermen
participating in the bottomfish fishery in a calendar year,
representing duplicate counts of fishermen throughout the year. The
method also results in an overestimation of fishery participation, as
it does not account for days without bottomfish fishing effort and
consequently assumes that bottomfish fishing occurs every day in the
calendar year.
The WPRFMC Plan Team determined this method to be an inappropriate
approach for tracking fishery participation trends and removed the
metric from the 2018 Annual SAFE Report (published in July 2019). The
Plan Team also noted that the fishery participation metric estimate of
2,095 reported in the 2017 Annual SAFE Report was likely an estimation
error, rather than a true doubling of effort from 2016 to 2017. WPRFMC
recommends NMFS use information from the Environmental Assessment for
the Specification of the 2016-2017 Annual Catch Limits for the American
Samoa bottomfish fishery for the 2020 LOF, which describes the fishery
as a small scale fishery consisting of fewer than 30 part-time,
relatively small commercial vessels landing between 6,000-35,000 pounds
(2,722-15,876 kilograms) annually.
Response: Following review of the 2018 Annual SAFE Report and the
2017 Environmental Assessment, NMFS updates the estimated number of
vessels/persons in the American Samoa bottomfish handline fishery as
being fewer than 30 vessels in the LOF for 2020.
Comments on Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico,
and Caribbean
Comment 13: CBD does not support NMFS' proposal to remove the WNA
stocks of hooded seal and long-finned pilot whale from the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category I
Northeast sink gillnet fishery. The commenter states observer coverage
from 2012-2016 was low (15, 11, 18, 14 and 10 percent each year,
respectively) and interactions with these stocks may be unobserved.
Response: No hooded seal or long-finned pilot whale mortalities or
injuries were observed or reported in the Northeast sink gillnet
fishery from 2012-2016 (Hayes et al., 2019). The last observed M/SI of
these stocks in the Northeast sink gillnet fishery was in 2004 and
2010. In general, we list species/stocks incidentally killed or injured
in a particular fishery based on data observed from the last 5 years.
The list contained in the LOF is not intended to serve as a historical
overview of mortalities and injuries, as that data is available in
individual species SARs, as well as in Appendix III of the SAR.
From 2012-2016, observer coverage for the Northeast sink gillnet
fishery was 2, 3, 5, 6 and 8 percent each year, respectively.
Additionally, while some strandings did occur during this timeframe in
Massachusetts, none of the stranded animals (live or dead) showed
evidence of human interaction.
NMFS has removed the Western North Atlantic stocks of hooded seals
and long-finned pilot whales from the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the Category I Northeast sink gillnet
fishery. NMFS will annually monitor bycatch of marine mammals in the
Northeast sink gillnet fishery and will make adjustments to Table 2,
should takes be observed in the future.
Comment 14: The MLA recommends NMFS reclassify the Maine lobster
fishery as a stand-alone fishery, instead of including the fishery as
part of the broader Category I Northeast/mid-Atlantic American lobster
pot fishery.
The commenter requests that NMFS categorize Maine's exempted waters
lobster fishery as a Category III fishery, due to the rarity of whale
sightings and lack of documented M/SI with this sector of the American
lobster fishery. MLA notes Maine's exempt waters lobster fishery is a
small boat fishery which uses smaller ropes and lighter gear, compared
to other segments of the Northeast lobster fishery.
MLA also requests that NMFS categorize Maine's non-exempt waters
lobster fishery as a Category II fishery, based on the decline in right
whale sightings, lack of documented right whale entanglements, lack of
observed interactions from the Federal observer program, and the
efficacy of TRP measures implemented in 2009 and 2014.
The commenter states that multiple data sources, including acoustic
surveys, right whale sightings data, and low copepod concentrations,
document that right whales are extremely rare in Maine's exempt waters,
are not found in large numbers in Maine's non-exempt waters, and are
unlikely to feed in these areas. In addition, MLA notes, there has been
only one right whale entangled in Maine gear in April 2002, and the
entanglement was determined to be a non-serious injury. There are two
additional non-serious injury entanglement cases that involved Maine
lobster gear. However, Maine lobster gear was not the primary
entangling gear in these cases.
[[Page 21086]]
Response: The information provided by the commenter is insufficient
for splitting the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot into
multiple fisheries. Fisheries are categorized based on the gear types
used, how the gear is fished, and the behavior of the fishery related
to the risk to marine mammals. Multiple states participate in the
American lobster trap/pot fisheries, using a wide variety of gear and
gear configurations throughout a large portion of coastal waters. While
we recognize this variety within the fishery at large, there are no
clear boundaries to divide gear use across the wider area, as suggested
by this comment. Importantly, the state of Maine does not use unique
gear configurations, compared to gear configurations used in other
states, and gear configurations within Maine's waters are not uniform
or divided across the geographic boundaries (i.e., exemption lines)
that MLA has identified. Further, gear marking and right whale
monitoring efforts throughout Maine waters are insufficient to
determine that the gear or area presents a different risk to large
whales.
MLA suggests that differences in rope diameter used by the inshore
fishery (i.e. fisheries exempted under the Atlantic Large Whale TRP
management requirements) are sufficient to reduce any risk to large
whales, and thereby make it a distinct fishery. The commenter indicates
that coastal lobster fisheries in Maine state waters utilize 3/8th
diameter line and fish doubles and, therefore, pose less of a risk to
right whales than other fisheries. While this may characterize a
portion of the inshore fishery, this information is based on a small
sample size from self-reported surveys conducted by Maine's Department
of Marine Fisheries and does not take into account varying breaking
strength or other variability within this fishery. In this same study,
high variability in line diameter used and number of pots trawled in
the coastal fishery was also shown. According to Summers et al. 2019
(Assessment of Vertical Line Use in Gulf of Maine Region Fixed Gear
Fisheries presentation to Atlantic Large Whale TRT), of the 647
responses received from Maine permitted lobster fishermen
(approximately 15 percent of the total of actively fishing permitted
Maine vessels), less than 60 percent of that sample included those who
fish between 0-3 nautical miles from shore. While the majority of this
small sample size responded that they primarily fish single and double
pots, some voluntary respondents answered that they fish a range
between 5-30+ pot trawls. While there were fewer responses citing these
higher trawl numbers, it shows the variability of the Maine state
lobster fishery. The 3/8th line diameter and limited trap/pots
justification is not uniform throughout the inshore area and is not
unique to Maine waters; therefore, these areas are not representative
of a unique fishery compared to the rest of the lobster fishery.
MLA also cites a lack of right whale sightings in Maine state
waters as justification for reclassifying the Maine lobster fisheries.
However, it is important to recognize that whale sighting information
is related to monitoring efforts, which are largely a reflection of
survey resource prioritization. Until this point, right whale surveys
have focused on areas where high abundance and social/feeding
aggregations are known to occur, due to resource constraints. As noted
at the October 2018 TRT meeting, this is an artifact of prioritizing
the monitoring of population and health assessments through mark
recapture methods that require maximizing photo-identification
opportunities, rather than prioritizing coverage of the entire range of
right whales. Despite the lack of directed survey efforts, from 2014-
2018, there were at least six right whale opportunistic sightings
reported and documented in Maine waters in the North Atlantic Right
Whale Consortium's sightings database (Industrial Economics Inc.,
personal communication). Also, bioacoustic gliders implemented between
December 2018 and April 2019 had several potential detections of right
whales in the Maine inshore waters (Baumgartner, in review). This shows
that the right whales are present in Maine state waters, even those
overlapping exempted areas. Given the population distribution shifts
and critical status of the population, we are allocating resources
towards broader surveys that will provide further insight into the
habitat use and distribution of these whales; these broader surveys
will include regular aerial and acoustic surveys of Maine waters
throughout the upcoming year.
As the commenter stated, there are three right whale entanglement
cases (E11-11, E43-12, and E36-16) where gear has been recovered with
red tracers, which is the gear marking scheme required in the Northern
Inshore Trap/Pot fishery management area, a management area that
overlaps Maine, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts state waters. In two
of these cases, the specific trap/pot fishery was not identified.
Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that the entanglements (one of which
resulted in a mortality) may have occurred off the coast of Maine in
non-exempt waters. The commenter referenced Case E36-16 (which was
confirmed to be Massachusetts lobster gear from the Northern Inshore
Trap/Pot management area) as an example of why the Maine state
fisheries should have a separate designation compared to other lobster
fisheries. However, we consider this example as evidence as to why all
lobster fisheries should remain classified together. Given that there
are limited differences between the gear used in the waters throughout
the current management areas, this example shows that lobster gear
poses a potential risk to right whales in any area where right whale
and lobster fishery distributions overlap.
With this request, the commenter is also not taking into
consideration the high percentage of multiple sightings of unidentified
entanglements, with first sightings in either the U.S. or in Canada.
Over the past 5 years, there have been 4.15 M/SI entanglements
documented annually where the origin of the entanglement is unknown
(Hayes et al., in review). NMFS has proposed two ways to include these
M/SI in risk assessment reduction measure metrics: By taking the total
unknown entanglements and dividing them in half to allocate 50 percent
of the unknown entanglements to U.S. fisheries and 50 percent to
Canadian fisheries, or by assigning the incident to the country the
entanglement was first sighted in as the country of origin. Both
options produced similar results; the range of entanglements for U.S.
fisheries is 0.2-2.45 (2.075 if the risk is divided by 50 percent). The
median M/SI entanglement potential is 1.325 animals per year, or 165
percent of PBR.
The sample size of recovered gear from entanglements is small, and
much of the retrieved gear is unmarked and cannot be attributed to a
particular location. Currently, gear marking is not required in
exempted areas. The lack of marks on retrieved gear may indicate that
the current marking scheme is inadequate, or that entanglements are
occurring in areas where gear is not currently marked, such as
international waters or current exempted areas. The state of Maine is
currently pursuing a gear marking regime in these exempted waters that
will provide additional data about entanglement risk in these areas.
The MLA states that there are ``zero instances'' in any data set of
Maine of lobster gear associated with a right whale serious injury or
mortality, and that the only known entanglement in
[[Page 21087]]
which Maine lobster gear was the primary entangling gear occurred in
2002 and resulted in a non-serious injury determination. We recognize
that there has only been one confirmed mortality (in 2012) in American
lobster gear in the past decade. All other documented lobster
interactions were determined to result in non-serious injuries.
However, there have been a number of entanglements for which
interventions occurred because these entanglements were determined to
be resulting in serious injuries (Henry et al., 2019). According to
NMFS' ``Process for Distinguishing Serious from Non-Serious Injury of
Marine Mammals (NMFS 2015, 02-238-01),'' cases that would have been
serious injuries prior to disentanglement are not counted against PBR
in the SAR, but they are included in the recorded takes for the LOF and
associated management measures. Aerial surveys, whale watching boats,
the presence of other fisheries, and the presence of, and associated
outreach by, a disentanglement team contribute to the higher reporting
of entanglement sightings in certain areas (i.e. Massachusetts) than in
Maine state waters and offshore waters. However, that does not mean the
risk is nonexistent in other areas where entanglements are not
observed. With 85 percent of all right whales exhibiting entanglement
scars, it is reasonable and prudent to assume that entanglements are
indeed occurring in areas where observations have not yet been
reported.
As stated above, we find that there is insufficient information to
suggest that Maine's fisheries should be split from the American
lobster trap/pot fisheries, because the gear used in Maine waters are
not unique from other states. Further, we maintain that entanglement
data indicates that the gear used across this fishery remains a risk to
right whales. Should Maine fisheries make significant changes to their
gear configurations that differentiate these fisheries from other
lobster trap/pot fisheries, such as eliminating vertical lines, we will
reconsider this decision.
Comment 15: Lund's Fisheries and The Town Dock restate a previous
comment requesting that NMFS conduct a tier analysis of long-finned
pilot whale M/SI in the small mesh and large mesh bottom trawl
fisheries, and that NMFS consider classifying the small mesh and large
mesh bottom trawl fisheries as separate fisheries on the LOF. The
commenters note the small mesh bottom trawl longfin squid fishery is
included on the LOF in both of the Category II Northeast and mid-
Atlantic bottom trawl fisheries. In 2018, the Marine Stewardship
Council determined that the U.S. Northeastern Longfin Inshore Squid
Small Mesh Bottom Trawl Fishery, harvested by small mesh bottom trawls
in U.S. waters between the Gulf of Maine and Cape Hatteras, NC, was
certified as a sustainable fishery.
Response: Separating the small mesh and large mesh trawl fisheries
is not appropriate with respect to evaluating the risk posed to marine
mammals by the fisheries. Further, given that the fisheries operate in
similar manners, in similar locations, and given that many small mesh
trawl fisheries go between coastal and offshore waters, it would be
difficult to distinguish between fisheries for such an analysis.
As previously stated (see 84 FR 22051, June 17, 2019, comment 15),
we did not reclassify any of the trawl fisheries based on upcoming
draft population assessments for the long finned pilot whale. The 2019
draft SARs (84 FR 65353, November 27, 2019) combines the U.S. and
Canadian population assessments from 2016 survey efforts for long-
finned pilot whales throughout their range, from central Virginia north
to Labrador. This estimate is larger than that previously reported in
the SAR, because the updated estimate is derived from a survey area
extending from Newfoundland to Florida, which is about 1,300,000 km\2\
larger than the 2011 survey area used in the previous SAR. In addition,
the newer survey estimates in U.S. waters were corrected for
availability bias (due to diving behavior), whereas the earlier
estimates were not corrected.
The new minimum population estimate for this stock is 30,627
animals, with a PBR of 306. The Northeast bottom trawl fishery has a
mean combined annual mortality of 15 pilot whales (4.9 percent of PBR).
Therefore, the Category II classification for this fishery remains
appropriate.
Comment 16: CBD does not support NMFS' proposal to remove the
Florida stock of West Indian manatee from the list species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the Category II Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery. CBD notes that while it
may be true that, from 2008 to 2012, there were no documented fishery
related injuries or mortalities in shrimp trawl fisheries (USFWS 2014),
it is unknown whether the fishery monitoring was adequate to estimate
unobserved or undocumented interactions.
Response: In general, we list species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in a particular fishery based on data collected from the last 5
years. The list contained in the LOF is not intended to serve as a
historical overview of mortalities and injuries, as that data is
available in individual species SARs. Observer programs provide data
that is included in the SARs. All manatee deaths and injuries are
monitored extensively through the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission's Marine Mammal Pathobiology Laboratory carcass
recovery and necropsy program, as well as their accessory field labs
around the State of Florida. There has been no additional evidence from
this effort to suggest mortality or injury from the shrimp trawl
fishery. Following consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS), and as included in the proposed rule, in this 2020 LOF NMFS
has removed the Florida stock of West Indian manatee from the list of
species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category II
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery.
Summary of Changes From the Proposed Rule
NMFS updates the estimated number of vessels/persons in the
Category III American Samoa bottomfish handline fishery from 1,092
vessels/persons to fewer than 30 vessels/persons.
Summary of Changes to the LOF for 2020
The following summarizes changes to the LOF for 2020, including the
classification of fisheries, the estimated number of vessels/persons in
a particular fishery, and the species and/or stocks that are
incidentally killed or injured in a particular fishery. NMFS re-
classifies one fishery in the LOF for 2020. The classifications and
definitions of U.S. commercial fisheries for 2020 are identical to
those provided in the LOF for 2019, except for the changes discussed
below. State and regional abbreviations used in the following
paragraphs include: AK (Alaska), CA (California), GMX (Gulf of Mexico),
HI (Hawaii), NC (North Carolina), OR (Oregon), WA (Washington), and WNA
(Western North Atlantic).
Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
Classification of Fisheries
NMFS renames the Category III CA/OR coonstripe shrimp fishery to
the CA coonstripe shrimp fishery and clarifies that the OR coonstripe
shrimp pot fishery is a component of the Category III WA/OR shrimp pot/
trap fishery. NMFS also reclassifies the CA
[[Page 21088]]
coonstripe shrimp fishery from a Category III to a Category II fishery.
Fishery Name and Organizational Changes and Clarification
NMFS clarifies that the Category II AK Southeast salmon drift
gillnet fishery and Category III AK Southeast salmon purse seine
fishery include both the AK Metlakatla salmon drift gillnet fishery and
the AK Metlakatla salmon purse seine fishery. Based on this
clarification, NMFS also removes the Category III AK Metlakatla salmon
purse seine fishery from the LOF.
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number of vessels/persons in the Pacific
Ocean (Table 1) as follows:
Category I
HI deep-set longline fishery from 142 to 145 vessels/
persons;
Category II
HI shallow-set longline fishery from 13 to 18 vessels/
persons;
American Samoa longline fishery from 20 to 15 vessels/
persons;
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 inch (in)
mesh) fishery from 18 to 14 vessels/persons;
CA halibut/white seabass and other species set gillnet
(>3.5 in mesh) fishery from 50 to 37 vessels/persons;
CA yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass drift gillnet
(mesh size >=3.5 in and <14 in) fishery from 30 to 22 vessels/persons;
WA Puget Sound Region salmon drift gillnet fishery from
210 to 154 vessels/persons;
CA coonstripe shrimp pot fishery from 36 to 14 vessels/
persons;
CA spiny lobster fishery from 194 to 186 vessels/persons;
CA spot prawn pot fishery from 25 to 23 vessels/persons;
CA Dungeness crab pot fishery from 570 to 501 vessels/
persons;
OR Dungeness crab pot fishery from 433 to 342 vessels/
persons;
WA/OR/CA sablefish pot fishery from 309 to 155 vessels/
persons;
WA coastal Dungeness crab pot fishery from 228 to 197
vessels/persons;
List of Species and/or Stocks Incidentally Killed or Injured in the
Pacific Ocean
NMFS adds the Eastern North Pacific stock of gray whale to the list
of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category II CA
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh) fishery.
NMFS adds the Eastern North Pacific stock of gray whale to the list
of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category II CA
halibut/white seabass and other species set gillnet (>3.5 in mesh)
fishery.
NMFS adds the Alaska stock of ribbon seal to the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category II AK Bering Sea
Aleutian Islands rockfish trawl fishery.
NMFS adds CA/OR/WA stock of humpback whale to the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category II CA coonstripe
shrimp pot fishery.
NMFS adds the California stock of long-beaked common dolphin to the
list of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category
II CA spot prawn pot fishery.
NMFS adds the Western U.S. stock of Steller sea lion to, and
removes the Alaska stock of Dall's porpoise from, the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category II AK Bering Sea
Aleutian Islands Pacific cod longline fishery.
NMFS adds the Eastern U.S. stock of Steller sea lion to the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category II AK
Gulf of Alaska sablefish longline fishery.
NMFS adds four stocks to the list of species/stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category III to WA/OR/CA groundfish,
bottomfish longline/set line fishery: (1) U.S. stock of California sea
lion; (2) California breeding stock of Northern elephant seal; (3) CA/
OR/WA stock of sperm whale; and (4) Eastern U.S. stock of Steller sea
lion.
NMFS adds the Alaska stock of Dall's porpoise to the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category III AK
Kodiak salmon purse seine.
NMFS adds the Eastern U.S. stock of Steller sea lion to the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category III AK
Gulf of Alaska halibut longline fishery.
NMFS adds two stocks to the list of species/stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category III AK Bering Sea Aleutian Islands
Pacific cod trawl fishery: (1) Alaska stock of ribbon seal; and (2)
Alaska stock of bearded seal.
NMFS removes the Hawaii stock of sperm whale from the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category I Hawaii
deep-set longline fishery.
NMFS removes the Alaska stock of Dall's porpoise from the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category II AK
Aleutian Islands pollock trawl fishery.
NMFS removes the Hawaii stock of short-finned pilot whale from the
list of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category
II HI shallow-set longline fishery.
NMFS removes two stocks from the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the Category II American Samoa
longline fishery including: (1) Unknown stock of Cuvier's beaked whale;
and (2) unknown stock of bottlenose dolphin.
NMFS removes the Alaska stock of ribbon seal from the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category III AK
Aleutian Islands Atka mackerel trawl fishery.
Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean
Fishery Name and Organizational Changes and Clarification
NMFS adds a superscript ``1'' to the Western North Atlantic stock
of gray seals to indicate it is driving the Category I classification
of the Northeast sink gillnet fishery.
NMFS adds a superscript ``1'' to the Central Georgia estuarine
stock of bottlenose dolphins to indicate it is driving the Category II
classification of the Atlantic blue crab trap/pot fishery.
NMFS adds a superscript ``1'' to the Western North Atlantic stock
of gray seals to indicate it is driving the Category II classification
of the mid-Atlantic bottom trawl fishery.
NMFS removes the superscript ``1'' from the Western North Atlantic
stock of long-finned pilot whales to indicate the stock is no longer
driving the Category I classification of the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean,
Gulf of Mexico large pelagics longline fishery.
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number of vessels/persons in the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean (Table 2) as follows:
Category I
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics
longline fishery from 280 to 201 vessels/persons;
Category II
NC inshore gillnet fishery from 2,850 to 2,676 vessels/
persons;
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet fishery from 23
to 21 vessels/persons;
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab
trap/pot fishery from 1,384 to 1,101 vessels/persons;
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot fishery from 7,714 to 6,679
vessels/persons;
NC long haul seine fishery from 30 to 22 vessels/persons.
[[Page 21089]]
List of Species and/or Stocks Incidentally Killed or Injured in the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
NMFS adds the Western North Atlantic stock of hooded seal to the
list of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category I
Mid-Atlantic gillnet fishery.
NMFS adds the Sarasota Bay, Little Sarasota Bay stock of bottlenose
dolphin to the list of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category II Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab
trap/pot fishery.
NMFS adds the Mississippi River Delta stock of bottlenose dolphin
to the list species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the
Category II Gulf of Mexico menhaden purse seine fishery.
NMFS adds the Mobile Bay, Bonsecour Bay stock of bottlenose dolphin
to the list of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the
Category III Gulf of Mexico blue crab trap/pot fishery.
NMFS removes two stocks from the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the Category I Northeast sink gillnet
fishery: (1) Western North Atlantic stock of hooded seal; and (2)
Western North Atlantic long-finned pilot whale.
Following consultation with the USFWS, NMFS removes the Florida
stock of West Indian manatee from the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the Category II Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery.
Commercial Fisheries on the High Seas
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number of HSFCA permits for high seas
fisheries (Table 3) as follows:
Category I
Atlantic highly migratory species longline fishery from 67
to 53 HSFCA permits;
Western Pacific pelagic longline (HI deep-set component)
fishery from 142 to 145 HSFCA permits;
Category II
Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery
from 6 to 5 HSFCA permits;
South Pacific tuna purse seine fishery from 38 to 33 HSFCA
permits;
South Pacific albacore troll longline fishery from 11 to 6
HSFCA permits;
South Pacific tuna longline fishery from 3 to 2 HSFCA
permits;
Western Pacific pelagic longline (HI shallow-set
component) fishery from 13 to 18 HSFCA permits;
Pacific highly migratory species handline/pole and line
fishery from 48 to 41 HSFCA permits;
South Pacific albacore troll handline/pole and line
fishery from 15 to 11 HSFCA permits;
Western Pacific pelagic handline/pole and line fishery
from 6 to 5 HSFCA permits;
Atlantic highly migratory species troll fishery from 1 to
0 HSFCA permits;
South Pacific albacore troll fishery from 24 to 17 HSFCA
permits;
South Pacific tuna troll fishery from 3 to 1 HSFCA
permits;
Western Pacific pelagic troll fishery from 6 to 5 HSFCA
permits;
Category III
Northwest Atlantic bottom longline fishery from 2 to 3
HSFCA permits;
Pacific highly migratory species longline fishery from 128
to 108 HSFCA permits;
Pacific highly migratory species purse seine fishery from
10 to 5 HSFCA permits;
Pacific highly migratory species troll fishery from 150 to
119 HSFCA permits.
List of Species and/or Stocks Incidentally Killed or Injured on the
High Seas
NMFS removes the Hawaii stock of sperm whale from the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category I Hawaii
deep-set longline fishery.
NMFS removes the Hawaii stock of short-finned pilot whale from the
list of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category
II HI shallow-set longline fishery.
List of Fisheries
The following tables set forth the list of U.S. commercial
fisheries according to their classification under section 118 of the
MMPA. Table 1 lists commercial fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
(including Alaska), Table 2 lists commercial fisheries in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean, Table 3 lists commercial
fisheries on the high seas, and Table 4 lists fisheries affected by
TRPs or TRTs.
In Tables 1 and 2, the estimated number of vessels or persons
participating in fisheries operating within U.S. waters is expressed in
terms of the number of active participants in the fishery, when
possible. If this information is not available, the estimated number of
vessels or persons licensed for a particular fishery is provided. If no
recent information is available on the number of participants, vessels,
or persons licensed in a fishery, then the number from the most recent
LOF is used for the estimated number of vessels or persons in the
fishery. NMFS acknowledges that, in some cases, these estimates may be
inflations of actual effort. For example, the State of Hawaii does not
issue fishery-specific licenses, and the number of participants
reported in the LOF represents the number of commercial marine license
holders who reported using a particular fishing gear type/method at
least once in a given year, without considering how many times the gear
was used. For these fisheries, effort by a single participant is
counted the same whether the fisherman used the gear only once or every
day. In the Mid-Atlantic and New England fisheries, the numbers
represent the potential effort for each fishery, given the multiple
gear types for which several state permits may allow. Changes made to
Mid-Atlantic and New England fishery participants will not affect
observer coverage or bycatch estimates, as observer coverage and
bycatch estimates are based on vessel trip reports and landings data.
Tables 1 and 2 serve to provide a description of the fishery's
potential effort (state and Federal). If NMFS is able to extract more
accurate information on the gear types used by state permit holders in
the future, the numbers will be updated to reflect this change. For
additional information on fishing effort in fisheries found on Table 1
or 2, contact the relevant regional office (contact information
included above in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
For high seas fisheries, Table 3 lists the number of valid HSFCA
permits currently held. Although this likely overestimates the number
of active participants in many of these fisheries, the number of valid
HSFCA permits is the most reliable data on the potential effort in high
seas fisheries at this time. As noted previously in this LOF, the
number of HSFCA permits listed in Table 3 for the high seas components
of fisheries that also operate within U.S. waters does not necessarily
represent additional effort that is not accounted for in Tables 1 and
2. Many vessels holding HSFCA permits also fish within U.S. waters and
are included in the number of vessels and participants operating within
those fisheries in Tables 1 and 2.
Tables 1, 2, and 3 also list the marine mammal species and/or
stocks incidentally killed or injured (seriously or non-seriously) in
each fishery based on SARs, injury determination reports, bycatch
estimation reports, observer data, logbook data, stranding data,
disentanglement network data, fishermen self-reports (i.e., MMAP
[[Page 21090]]
reports), and anecdotal reports. The best available scientific
information included in these reports is based on data through 2016.
This list includes all species and/or stocks known to be killed or
injured in a given fishery, but also includes species and/or stocks for
which there are anecdotal records of a mortality or injury.
Additionally, species identified by logbook entries, stranding data, or
fishermen self-reports (i.e., MMAP reports) may not be verified. In
Tables 1 and 2, NMFS has designated those species/stocks driving a
fishery's classification (i.e., the fishery is classified based on
mortalities and serious injuries of a marine mammal stock that are
greater than or equal to 50 percent (Category I), or greater than 1
percent and less than 50 percent (Category II), of a stock's PBR) by a
``1'' after the stock's name.
In Tables 1 and 2, there are several fisheries classified as
Category II that have no recent documented mortalities or serious
injuries of marine mammals, or fisheries that did not result in a
mortality or serious injury rate greater than 1 percent of a stock's
PBR level based on known interactions. NMFS has classified these
fisheries by analogy to other Category I or II fisheries that use
similar fishing techniques or gear that are known to cause mortality or
serious injury of marine mammals, as discussed in the final LOF for
1996 (60 FR 67063; December 28, 1995), and according to factors listed
in the definition of a ``Category II fishery'' in 50 CFR 229.2 (i.e.,
fishing techniques, gear types, methods used to deter marine mammals,
target species, seasons and areas fished, qualitative data from
logbooks or fishermen reports, stranding data, and the species and
distribution of marine mammals in the area). NMFS has designated those
fisheries listed by analogy in Tables 1 and 2 by adding a ``2'' after
the fishery's name.
There are several fisheries in Tables 1, 2, and 3 in which a
portion of the fishing vessels cross the exclusive economic zone (EEZ)
boundary and therefore operate both within U.S. waters and on the high
seas. These fisheries, though listed separately on Table 1 or 2 and
Table 3, are considered the same fisheries on either side of the EEZ
boundary. NMFS has designated those fisheries in each table by a ``*''
after the fishery's name.
Table 1--List of Fisheries--Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marine mammal species and/or
Fishery description Estimated number of vessels/persons stocks incidentally killed or
injured
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CATEGORY I
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Longline/Set Line Fisheries:
HI deep-set longline * [caret]....... 145................................ Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic.
False killer whale, HI
Pelagic.\1\
False killer whale, MHI
Insular.\1\
False killer whale, NWHI.
Humpback whale. Central North
Pacific.
Kogia spp. (Pygmy or dwarf sperm
whale), HI.
Pygmy killer whale, HI.
Risso's dolphin, HI.
Rough-toothed dolphin, HI.
Short-finned pilot whale, HI.
Striped dolphin, HI.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CATEGORY II
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gillnet Fisheries:
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift 14................................. Bottlenose dolphin, CA/OR/WA
gillnet (>=14 in mesh) *. offshore.
California sea lion, U.S.
Dall's porpoise, CA/OR/WA.
Gray whale, Eastern North
Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
Minke whale, CA/OR/WA.
Northern elephant seal, CA
breeding.
Northern right-whale dolphin, CA/
OR/WA.
Pacific white-sided dolphin, CA/
OR/WA.
Risso's dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/
OR/WA.
Short-finned pilot whale, CA/OR/
WA.\1\
Sperm Whale, CA/OR/WA.\1\
CA halibut/white seabass and other 37................................. California sea lion, U.S.
species set gillnet (>3.5 in mesh).
Gray whale, Eastern North
Pacific.
Harbor seal, CA.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.\1\
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
Northern elephant seal, CA
breeding.
Sea otter, CA.
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/
OR/WA.
CA yellowtail, barracuda, and white 22................................. California sea lion, U.S.
seabass drift gillnet (mesh size Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
>=3.5 in and <14 in) \2\. Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/
OR/WA.
[[Page 21091]]
AK Bristol Bay salmon drift gillnet 1,862.............................. Beluga whale, Bristol Bay.
\2\. Gray whale, Eastern North
Pacific.
Harbor seal, Bering Sea.
Northern fur seal, Eastern
Pacific.
Pacific white-sided dolphin,
North Pacific.
Spotted seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Bristol Bay salmon set gillnet \2\ 979................................ Beluga whale, Bristol Bay.
Gray whale, Eastern North
Pacific.
Harbor seal, Bering Sea.
Northern fur seal, Eastern
Pacific.
Spotted seal, AK.
AK Kodiak salmon set gillnet......... 188................................ Harbor porpoise, GOA.\1\
Harbor seal, GOA.
Humpback whale, Central North
Pacific.
Humpback whale, Western North
Pacific.
Sea otter, Southwest AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Cook Inlet salmon set gillnet..... 736................................ Beluga whale, Cook Inlet.
Dall's porpoise, AK.
Harbor porpoise, GOA.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Humpback whale, Central North
Pacific.\1\
Sea otter, South central AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Cook Inlet salmon drift gillnet... 569................................ Beluga whale, Cook Inlet.
Dall's porpoise, AK.
Harbor porpoise, GOA.\1\
Harbor seal, GOA.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon 162................................ Dall's porpoise, AK.
drift gillnet \2\. Harbor porpoise, GOA.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Northern fur seal, Eastern
Pacific.
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon 113................................ Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea.
set gillnet \2\. Northern sea otter, Southwest
AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Prince William Sound salmon drift 537................................ Dall's porpoise, AK.
gillnet. Harbor porpoise, GOA.\1\
Harbor seal, GOA.
Northern fur seal, Eastern
Pacific.
Pacific white-sided dolphin,
North Pacific.
Sea otter, South central AK.
Steller sea lion, Western
U.S.\1\
AK Southeast salmon drift gillnet.... 474................................ Dall's porpoise, AK.
Harbor porpoise, Southeast AK.
Harbor seal, Southeast AK.
Humpback whale, Central North
Pacific.\1\
Pacific white-sided dolphin,
North Pacific.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
AK Yakutat salmon set gillnet \2\.... 168................................ Gray whale, Eastern North
Pacific.
Harbor Porpoise, Southeastern
AK.
Harbor seal, Southeast AK.
Humpback whale, Central North
Pacific (Southeast AK).
WA Puget Sound Region salmon drift 154................................ Dall's porpoise, CA/OR/WA.
gillnet (includes all inland waters Harbor porpoise, inland WA.\1\
south of US-Canada border and Harbor seal, WA inland.
eastward of the Bonilla-Tatoosh line-
Treaty Indian fishing is excluded).
Trawl Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands 32................................. Bearded seal, AK.
flatfish trawl.
Gray whale, Eastern North
Pacific.
Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea.
Harbor seal, Bering Sea.
Humpback whale, Western North
Pacific.\1\
Killer whale, AK resident.\1\
[[Page 21092]]
Killer whale, GOA, AI, BS
transient.\1\
Northern fur seal, Eastern
Pacific.
Ringed seal, AK.
Ribbon seal, AK.
Spotted seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western
U.S.\1\
Walrus, AK.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands 102................................ Bearded Seal, AK.
pollock trawl.
Beluga whale, Bristol Bay.
Beluga whale, Eastern Bering
Sea.
Beluga whale, Eastern Chukchi
Sea.
Harbor seal, AK.
Humpback whale, Central North
Pacific.
Humpback whale, Western North
Pacific.
Northern fur seal, Eastern
Pacific.
Ribbon seal, AK.
Ringed seal, AK.
Spotted seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western
U.S.\1\
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands 17................................. Killer whale, ENP AK
rockfish trawl. resident.\1\
Killer whale, GOA, AI, BS
transient.\1\
Ribbon seal, AK.
Pot, Ring Net, And Trap Fisheries:
CA coonstripe shrimp pot............. 14................................. Gray whale, Eastern North
Pacific.
Harbor seal, CA.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.
CA spiny lobster..................... 186................................ Bottlenose dolphin, CA/OR/WA
offshore.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA2.\1\
Gray whale, Eastern North
Pacific.
Southern sea otter.
CA spot prawn pot.................... 23................................. Gray whale, Eastern North
Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.\1\
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
CA Dungeness crab pot................ 501................................ Blue whale, Eastern North
Pacific.\1\
Gray whale, Eastern North
Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.\1\
OR Dungeness crab pot................ 342................................ Gray whale, Eastern North
Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.\1\
WA/OR/CA sablefish pot............... 155................................ Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.\1\
WA coastal Dungeness crab pot........ 197................................ Gray whale, Eastern North
Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.\1\
Longline/Set Line Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands 45................................. Killer whale, Eastern North
Pacific cod longline. Pacific AK resident.
Killer whale, GOA, BSAI
transient.\1\
Northern fur seal, Eastern
Pacific.
Ringed seal, AK.
Spotted seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish longline. 295................................ Sperm whale, North Pacific.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
HI shallow-set longline * [caret].... 18................................. Blainville's beaked whale, HI.
Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic.
False killer whale, HI
Pelagic.\1\
Humpback whale, Central North
Pacific.
Risso's dolphin, HI.
Rough-toothed dolphin, HI.
Striped dolphin, HI.
American Samoa longline \2\.......... 15................................. False killer whale, American
Samoa.
Rough-toothed dolphin, American
Samoa.
Short-finned pilot whale,
unknown.
HI shortline \2\..................... 9.................................. None documented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CATEGORY III
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gillnet Fisheries:
AK Kuskokwim, Yukon, Norton Sound, 1,778.............................. Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea.
Kotzebue salmon gillnet.
[[Page 21093]]
AK Prince William Sound salmon set 29................................. Harbor seal, GOA.
gillnet. Humpback whale, Central North
Pacific.
Sea otter, South central AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK roe herring and food/bait herring 920................................ None documented.
gillnet.
CA set gillnet (mesh size <3.5 in)... 296................................ None documented.
HI inshore gillnet................... 36................................. Bottlenose dolphin, HI.
Spinner dolphin, HI.
WA Grays Harbor salmon drift gillnet 24................................. Harbor seal, OR/WA coast.
(excluding treaty Tribal fishing).
WA/OR Mainstem Columbia River 15................................. None documented.
eulachon gillnet.
WA/OR lower Columbia River (includes 110................................ California sea lion, U.S.
tributaries) drift gillnet. Harbor seal, OR/WA coast.
WA Willapa Bay drift gillnet......... 82................................. Harbor seal, OR/WA coast.
Northern elephant seal, CA
breeding.
Miscellaneous Net Fisheries:
AK Cook Inlet salmon purse seine..... 83................................. Humpback whale, Central North
Pacific.
AK Kodiak salmon purse seine......... 376................................ Dall's porpoise, AK.
Humpback whale, Central North
Pacific.
Humpback whale, Western North
Pacific.
AK Southeast salmon purse seine...... 315................................ Humpback whale, Central North
Pacific.
AK roe herring and food/bait herring 10................................. None documented.
beach seine.
AK roe herring and food/bait herring 356................................ None documented.
purse seine.
AK salmon beach seine................ 31................................. None documented.
AK salmon purse seine (Prince William 936................................ Harbor seal, GOA.
Sound, Chignik, Alaska Peninsula). Harbor seal, Prince William
Sound.
WA/OR sardine purse seine............ 42................................. None documented.
CA anchovy, mackerel, sardine purse 65................................. California sea lion, U.S.
seine. Harbor seal, CA.
CA squid purse seine................. 80................................. Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/
OR/WA.
CA tuna purse seine *................ 10................................. None documented.
WA/OR Lower Columbia River salmon 10................................. None documented.
seine.
WA/OR herring, smelt, squid purse 130................................ None documented.
seine or lampara.
WA salmon purse seine................ 75................................. None documented.
WA salmon reef net................... 11................................. None documented.
HI lift net.......................... 17................................. None documented.
HI inshore purse seine............... <3................................. None documented.
HI throw net, cast net............... 23................................. None documented.
HI seine net......................... 24................................. None documented.
Dip Net Fisheries:
CA squid dip net..................... 115................................ None documented.
Marine Aquaculture Fisheries:
CA marine shellfish aquaculture...... unknown............................ None documented.
CA salmon enhancement rearing pen.... >1................................. None documented.
CA white seabass enhancement net pens 13................................. California sea lion, U.S.
HI offshore pen culture.............. 2.................................. None documented.
WA salmon net pens................... 14................................. California sea lion, U.S.
Harbor seal, WA inland waters.
WA/OR shellfish aquaculture.......... 23................................. None documented.
Troll Fisheries:
WA/OR/CA albacore surface hook and 705................................ None documented.
line/troll.
CA halibut hook and line/handline.... unknown............................ None documented.
CA white seabass hook and line/ unknown............................ None documented.
handline.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands unknown............................ None documented.
groundfish hand troll and dinglebar
troll.
AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish hand unknown............................ None documented.
troll and dinglebar troll.
AK salmon troll...................... 1,908.............................. Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
American Samoa tuna troll............ 13................................. None documented.
CA/OR/WA salmon troll................ 4,300.............................. None documented.
HI troll............................. 2,117.............................. Pantropical spotted dolphin, HI.
HI rod and reel...................... 322................................ None documented.
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 40................................. None documented.
Islands tuna troll.
Guam tuna troll...................... 432................................ None documented.
Longline/Set Line Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands 4.................................. Killer whale, AK resident.
Greenland turbot longline.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands 22................................. None documented.
sablefish longline.
[[Page 21094]]
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands 127................................ Northern fur seal, Eastern
halibut longline. Pacific.
Sperm whale, North Pacific.
AK Gulf of Alaska halibut longline... 855................................ Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod 92................................. Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
longline.
AK octopus/squid longline............ 3.................................. None documented.
AK state-managed waters longline/ 464................................ None documented.
setline (including sablefish,
rockfish, lingcod, and miscellaneous
finfish).
WA/OR/CA groundfish, bottomfish 367................................ Bottlenose dolphin, CA/OR/WA
longline/set line. offshore.
California sea lion, U.S.
Northern elephant seal,
California breeding.
Sperm whale, CA/OR/WA.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
WA/OR Pacific halibut longline....... 350................................ None documented.
CA pelagic longline.................. 1.................................. None documented in the most
recent five years of data.
HI kaka line......................... 15................................. None documented.
HI vertical line..................... 3.................................. None documented.
Trawl Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Atka 13................................. Bearded seal, AK.
mackerel trawl. Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands 72................................. Bearded seal, AK.
Pacific cod trawl. Ribbon seal, AK.
Ringed seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska flatfish trawl..... 36................................. Harbor seal, AK.
Northern elephant seal, North
Pacific.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod trawl.. 55................................. Harbor seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska pollock trawl...... 67................................. Dall's porpoise, AK.
Fin whale, Northeast Pacific.
Northern elephant seal, North
Pacific.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska rockfish trawl..... 43................................. Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
AK Kodiak food/bait herring otter 4.................................. None documented.
trawl.
AK shrimp otter trawl and beam trawl. 38................................. None documented.
AK state-managed waters of Prince 2.................................. None documented.
William Sound groundfish trawl.
CA halibut bottom trawl.............. 47................................. California sea lion, U.S.
Harbor porpoise, unknown.
Harbor seal, unknown.
Northern elephant seal, CA
breeding.
Steller sea lion, unknown.
CA sea cucumber trawl................ 16................................. None documented.
WA/OR/CA shrimp trawl................ 300................................ None documented.
WA/OR/CA groundfish trawl............ 160-180............................ California sea lion, U.S.
Dall's porpoise, CA/OR/WA.
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast.
Northern fur seal, Eastern
Pacific.
Pacific white-sided dolphin, CA/
OR/WA.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Pot, Ring Net, And Trap Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands 6.................................. None documented.
sablefish pot.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands 59................................. None documented.
Pacific cod pot.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands crab 540................................ Bowhead whale, Western Arctic.
pot. Gray whale, Eastern North
Pacific.
AK Gulf of Alaska crab pot........... 271................................ None documented.
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod pot.... 116................................ Harbor seal, GOA.
AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish pot...... 248................................ None documented.
AK Southeast Alaska crab pot......... 375................................ Humpback whale, Central North
Pacific (Southeast AK).
AK Southeast Alaska shrimp pot....... 99................................. Humpback whale, Central North
Pacific (Southeast AK).
AK shrimp pot, except Southeast...... 141................................ None documented.
AK octopus/squid pot................. 15................................. None documented.
CA rock crab pot..................... 124................................ Gray whale, Eastern North
Pacific.
Harbor seal, CA.
WA/OR/CA hagfish pot................. 54................................. None documented.
WA/OR shrimp pot/trap................ 254................................ None documented.
WA Puget Sound Dungeness crab pot/ 249................................ None documented.
trap.
HI crab trap......................... 5.................................. Humpback whale, Central North
Pacific.
HI fish trap......................... 9.................................. None documented.
HI lobster trap...................... <3................................. None documented in recent years.
HI shrimp trap....................... 10................................. None documented.
[[Page 21095]]
HI crab net.......................... 4.................................. None documented.
HI Kona crab loop net................ 33................................. None documented.
Hook-and-Line, Handline, and Jig
Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands 2.................................. None documented.
groundfish jig.
AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish jig..... 214................................ Fin whale, Northeast Pacific.
AK halibut jig....................... 71................................. None documented.
American Samoa bottomfish............ fewer than 30...................... None documented.
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 28................................. None documented.
Islands bottomfish.
Guam bottomfish...................... >300............................... None documented.
HI aku boat, pole, and line.......... <3................................. None documented.
HI bottomfish handline............... 578................................ None documented in recent years.
HI inshore handline.................. 357................................ None documented.
HI pelagic handline.................. 534................................ None documented.
WA groundfish, bottomfish jig........ 679................................ None documented.
Western Pacific squid jig............ 0.................................. None documented.
Harpoon Fisheries:
CA swordfish harpoon................. 6.................................. None documented.
Pound Net/Weir Fisheries:
AK herring spawn on kelp pound net... 291................................ None documented.
AK Southeast herring roe/food/bait 2.................................. None documented.
pound net.
HI bullpen trap...................... 3.................................. None documented.
Bait Pens:
WA/OR/CA bait pens................... 13................................. California sea lion, U.S.
Dredge Fisheries:
AK scallop dredge.................... 108 (5 AK)......................... None documented.
Dive, Hand/Mechanical Collection
Fisheries:
AK clam.............................. 130................................ None documented.
AK Dungeness crab.................... 2.................................. None documented.
AK herring spawn on kelp............. 266................................ None documented.
AK miscellaneous invertebrates 214................................ None documented.
handpick.
HI black coral diving................ <3................................. None documented.
HI fish pond......................... 5.................................. None documented.
HI handpick.......................... 46................................. None documented.
HI lobster diving.................... 19................................. None documented.
HI spearfishing...................... 163................................ None documented.
WA/CA kelp........................... 4.................................. None documented.
WA/OR bait shrimp, clam hand, dive, 201................................ None documented.
or mechanical collection.
OR/CA sea urchin, sea cucumber hand, 10................................. None documented.
dive, or mechanical collection.
Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel
(Charter Boat) Fisheries:
AK/WA/OR/CA commercial passenger >7,000 (1,006 AK).................. Killer whale, unknown.
fishing vessel. Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Live Finfish/Shellfish Fisheries:
CA nearshore finfish live trap/hook- 93................................. None documented.
and-line.
HI aquarium collecting............... 90................................. None documented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 1:
AI--Aleutian Islands; AK--Alaska; BS--Bering Sea; CA--California; ENP--Eastern North Pacific; GOA--Gulf of
Alaska; HI--Hawaii; MHI--Main Hawaiian Islands; OR--Oregon; WA--Washington;
\1\ Fishery classified based on mortalities and serious injuries of this stock, which are greater than or equal
to 50 percent (Category I) or greater than 1 percent and less than 50 percent (Category II) of the stock's
PBR;
\2\ Fishery classified by analogy;
* Fishery has an associated high seas component listed in Table 3;
[caret] The list of marine mammal species and/or stocks killed or injured in this fishery is identical to the
list of species and/or stocks killed or injured in high seas component of the fishery, minus species and/or
stocks that have geographic ranges exclusively on the high seas. The species and/or stocks are found, and the
fishery remains the same, on both sides of the EEZ boundary. Therefore, the EEZ components of these fisheries
pose the same risk to marine mammals as the components operating on the high seas.
Table 2--List of Fisheries--Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marine mammal species and/or
Fishery description Estimated number of vessels/ stocks incidentally killed or
persons injured
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CATEGORY I
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gillnet Fisheries:
Mid-Atlantic gillnet................. 3,950.............................. Bottlenose dolphin, Northern
Migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern
Migratory coastal.\1\
[[Page 21096]]
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC
estuarine system.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC
estuarine system.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA
offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Gray seal, WNA.
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Hooded seal, WNA.
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
Minke whale, Canadian east
coast.
Northeast sink gillnet............... 3,163.............................. Bottlenose dolphin, WNA
offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Fin whale, WNA.
Gray seal, WNA.\1\
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Harp seal, WNA.
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
Minke whale, Canadian east
coast.
North Atlantic right whale, WNA.
Risso's dolphin, WNA.
White-sided dolphin, WNA.
Trap/Pot Fisheries:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American 8,485.............................. Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
lobster trap/pot. Minke whale, Canadian east
coast.
North Atlantic right whale,
WNA.\1\
Longline Fisheries:
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of 201................................ Atlantic spotted dolphin,
Mexico large pelagics longline *. Northern GMX.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX
oceanic.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA
offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Cuvier's beaked whale, WNA.
False killer whale, WNA.
Harbor porpoise, GME, BF.
Kogia spp. (Pygmy or dwarf sperm
whale), WNA.
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA.
Mesoplodon beaked whale, WNA.
Minke whale, Canadian East
coast.
Pantropical spotted dolphin,
Northern GMX.
Pygmy sperm whale, GMX.
Risso's dolphin, Northern GMX.
Risso's dolphin, WNA.
Rough-toothed dolphin, Northern
GMX.
Short-finned pilot whale,
Northern GMX.
Short-finned pilot whale,
WNA.\1\
Sperm whale, Northern GMX.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CATEGORY II
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gillnet Fisheries:
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet \2\... 248................................ Bottlenose dolphin, unknown
(Northern migratory coastal or
Southern migratory coastal).
Gulf of Mexico gillnet \2\........... 248................................ Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay,
sound, and estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX
coastal.
NC inshore gillnet................... 2,676.............................. Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC
estuarine system.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC
estuarine system.\1\
Northeast anchored float gillnet \2\. 852................................ Harbor seal, WNA.
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
White-sided dolphin, WNA.
Northeast drift gillnet \2\.......... 1,036.............................. None documented.
Southeast Atlantic gillnet \2\....... 273................................ Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern FL
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern
migratory coastal.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark 21................................. Bottlenose dolphin, unknown
gillnet. (Central FL, Northern FL, SC/GA
coastal, or Southern migratory
coastal).
North Atlantic right whale, WNA.
[[Page 21097]]
Trawl Fisheries:
Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl 320................................ Harbor seal, WNA.
(including pair trawl).
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl............ 633................................ Bottlenose dolphin, WNA
offshore.\1\
Common dolphin, WNA.\1\
Gray seal, WNA.\1\
Harbor seal, WNA.
Risso's dolphin, WNA.\1\
White-sided dolphin, WNA.
Northeast mid-water trawl (including 542................................ Common dolphin, WNA.
pair trawl). Gray seal, WNA.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA.\1\
Northeast bottom trawl............... 2,238.............................. Bottlenose dolphin, WNA
offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Gray seal, WNA.
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Harp seal, WNA.
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA.
Risso's dolphin, WNA.
White-sided dolphin, WNA.\1\
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of 4,950.............................. Atlantic spotted dolphin,
Mexico shrimp trawl. Northern Gulf of Mexico.
Bottlenose dolphin, Charleston
estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX
coastal.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay,
sound, estuarine.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX
continental shelf.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi
River Delta.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mobile Bay,
Bonsecour Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX
coastal.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA
coastal.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern
migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX
coastal.\1\
Trap/Pot Fisheries:
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of 1,101.............................. Bottlenose dolphin, Biscayne Bay
Mexico stone crab trap/pot \2\. estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, FL Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay,
sound, estuarine (FL west coast
portion).
Bottlenose dolphin, Indian River
Lagoon estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Jacksonville
estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Sarasota
Bay, Little Sarasota Bay.
Atlantic mixed species trap/pot \2\.. 3,332.............................. Fin whale, WNA;
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot.......... 6,679.............................. Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central GA
estuarine system.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, Charleston
estuarine system.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, Indian River
Lagoon estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Jacksonville
estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern FL
coastal.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GA/
Southern SC estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern
Migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC
estuarine system.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern SC
estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern GA
estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern
Migratory coastal.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC
estuarine system.
West Indian manatee, FL.
Purse Seine Fisheries:
Gulf of Mexico menhaden purse seine.. 40-42.............................. Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay,
sound, estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi
River Delta.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi
Sound, Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX
coastal.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX
coastal.\1\
[[Page 21098]]
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine \2\ 19................................. Bottlenose dolphin, Northern
Migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern
Migratory coastal.
Haul/Beach Seine Fisheries:
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine........ 359................................ Bottlenose dolphin, Northern
Migratory coastal.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC
estuarine system.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern
Migratory coastal.\1\
NC long haul seine................... 22................................. Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC
estuarine system.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC
estuarine system.
Stop Net Fisheries:
NC roe mullet stop net............... 1.................................. Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC
estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, unknown
(Southern migratory coastal or
Southern NC estuarine system).
Pound Net Fisheries:
VA pound net......................... 26................................. Bottlenose dolphin, Northern
migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC
estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern
Migratory coastal.\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CATEGORY III
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gillnet Fisheries:
Caribbean gillnet.................... >991............................... None documented. in the most
recent five years of data.
DE River inshore gillnet............. unknown............................ None documented. in the most
recent five years of data.
Long Island Sound inshore gillnet.... unknown............................ None documented. in the most
recent five years of data.
RI, southern MA (to Monomoy Island), unknown............................ None documented. in the most
and NY Bight (Raritan and Lower NY recent five years of data.
Bays) inshore gillnet.
Southeast Atlantic inshore gillnet... unknown............................ Bottlenose dolphin, Northern SC
estuarine system.
Trawl Fisheries:
Atlantic shellfish bottom trawl...... >58................................ None documented.
Gulf of Mexico butterfish trawl...... 2.................................. Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX
oceanic.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX
continental shelf.
Gulf of Mexico mixed species trawl... 20................................. None documented.
GA cannonball jellyfish trawl........ 1.................................. Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA
coastal.
Marine Aquaculture Fisheries:
Finfish aquaculture.................. 48................................. Harbor seal, WNA.
Shellfish aquaculture................ unknown............................ None documented.
Purse Seine Fisheries:
Gulf of Maine Atlantic herring purse >7................................. Harbor seal, WNA.
seine.
Gulf of Maine menhaden purse seine... >2................................. None documented.
FL West Coast sardine purse seine.... 10................................. Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX
coastal.
U.S. Atlantic tuna purse seine *..... 5.................................. None documented in most recent
five years of data.
Longline/Hook-and-Line Fisheries:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic bottom >1,207............................. None documented.
longline/hook-and-line.
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic 2,846.............................. Bottlenose dolphin, WNA
tuna, shark, swordfish hook-and-line/ offshore.
harpoon. Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of >5,000............................. Bottlenose dolphin, GMX
Mexico, and Caribbean snapper- continental shelf.
grouper and other reef fish bottom
longline/hook-and-line.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of 39................................. Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX
Mexico shark bottom longline/hook- coastal.
and-line. Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX
continental shelf.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of 680................................ None documented.
Mexico, and Caribbean pelagic hook-
and-line/harpoon.
U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico unknown............................ None documented.
trotline.
Trap/Pot Fisheries:
Caribbean mixed species trap/pot..... >501............................... None documented.
Caribbean spiny lobster trap/pot..... >197............................... None documented.
FL spiny lobster trap/pot............ 1,268.............................. Bottlenose dolphin, Biscayne Bay
estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, FL Bay
estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, FL Keys.
Gulf of Mexico blue crab trap/pot.... 4,113.............................. Bottlenose dolphin, Barataria
Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay,
sound, estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi
Sound, Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mobile Bay,
Bonsecour Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX
coastal.
West Indian manatee, FL.
Gulf of Mexico mixed species trap/pot unknown............................ None documented.
[[Page 21099]]
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of 10................................. None documented.
Mexico golden crab trap/pot.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic eel trap/pot....... unknown............................ None documented.
Stop Seine/Weir/Pound Net/Floating Trap/
Fyke Net Fisheries:
Gulf of Maine herring and Atlantic >1................................. Harbor porpoise, GME/BF.
mackerel stop seine/weir. Harbor seal, WNA.
Minke whale, Canadian east
coast.
Atlantic white-sided dolphin,
WNA.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic crab stop seine/ 2,600.............................. None documented.
weir.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic mixed species stop unknown............................ Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC
seine/weir/pound net (except the NC estuarine system.
roe mullet stop net).
RI floating trap..................... 9.................................. None documented.
Northeast and Mid-Atlantic fyke net.. unknown............................ None documented.
Dredge Fisheries:
Gulf of Maine sea urchin dredge...... unknown............................ None documented.
Gulf of Maine mussel dredge.......... unknown............................ None documented.
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic sea >403............................... None documented.
scallop dredge.
Mid-Atlantic blue crab dredge........ unknown............................ None documented.
Mid-Atlantic soft-shell clam dredge.. unknown............................ None documented.
Mid-Atlantic whelk dredge............ unknown............................ None documented.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic/Gulf of Mexico 7,000.............................. None documented.
oyster dredge.
New England and Mid-Atlantic offshore unknown............................ None documented.
surf clam/quahog dredge.
Haul/Beach Seine Fisheries:
Caribbean haul/beach seine........... 15................................. None documented in the most
recent five years of data.
Gulf of Mexico haul/beach seine...... unknown............................ None documented.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic haul/beach 25................................. None documented.
seine.
Dive, Hand/Mechanical Collection
Fisheries:
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, 20,000............................. None documented.
Caribbean shellfish dive, hand/
mechanical collection.
Gulf of Maine urchin dive, hand/ unknown............................ None documented.
mechanical collection.
Gulf of Mexico, Southeast Atlantic, unknown............................ None documented.
Mid-Atlantic, and Caribbean cast net.
Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel
(Charter Boat) Fisheries:
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, 4,000.............................. Bottlenose dolphin, Barataria
Caribbean commercial passenger Bay estuarine system.
fishing vessel.
Bottlenose dolphin, Biscayne Bay
estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Choctawhatchee Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, FL Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay,
sound, estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Indian River
Lagoon estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Jacksonville
estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi
Sound, Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern FL
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GA/
Southern SC estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern
migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC
estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern
migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC
estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX
coastal.
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 2:
DE--Delaware; FL--Florida; GA--Georgia; GME/BF--Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy; GMX--Gulf of Mexico; MA--
Massachusetts; NC--North Carolina; NY--New York; RI--Rhode Island; SC--South Carolina; VA--Virginia; WNA--
Western North Atlantic;
\1\ Fishery classified based on mortalities and serious injuries of this stock, which are greater than or equal
to 50 percent (Category I) or greater than 1 percent and less than 50 percent (Category II) of the stock's
PBR;
\2\ Fishery classified by analogy;
* Fishery has an associated high seas component listed in Table 3.
[[Page 21100]]
Table 3--List of Fisheries--Commercial Fisheries on the High Seas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marine mammal species
Number of and/or stocks
Fishery description HSFCA permits incidentally killed or
injured
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category I
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Longline Fisheries:
Atlantic Highly Migratory 53 Atlantic spotted
Species *. dolphin, WNA.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX oceanic.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA
offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Cuvier's beaked whale,
WNA.
False killer whale,
WNA.
Killer whale, GMX
oceanic.
Kogia spp. whale (Pygmy
or dwarf sperm whale),
WNA.
Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA.
Mesoplodon beaked
whale, WNA.
Minke whale, Canadian
East coast.
Pantropical spotted
dolphin, WNA.
Risso's dolphin, GMX.
Risso's dolphin, WNA.
Short-finned pilot
whale, WNA.
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI 145 Bottlenose dolphin, HI
Deep-set component) * Pelagic.
[caret].
False killer whale, HI
Pelagic.
Humpback whale, Central
North Pacific.
Kogia spp. (Pygmy or
dwarf sperm whale),
HI.
Pygmy killer whale, HI.
Risso's dolphin, HI.
Short-finned pilot
whale, HI.
Striped dolphin, HI.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category II
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Drift Gillnet Fisheries:
Pacific Highly Migratory 5 Long-beaked common
Species * [caret]. dolphin, CA.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA.
Northern right-whale
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Pacific white-sided
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Risso's dolphin, CA/OR/
WA.
Short-beaked common
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Trawl Fisheries:
Atlantic Highly Migratory 1 No information.
Species **.
CCAMLR..................... 0 Antarctic fur seal.
Purse Seine Fisheries:
South Pacific Tuna 33 No information.
Fisheries.
Western Pacific Pelagic.... 1 No information.
Longline Fisheries:
CCAMLR..................... 0 None documented.
South Pacific Albacore 6 No information.
Troll.
South Pacific Tuna 2 No information.
Fisheries **.
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI 18 Blainville's beaked
Shallow-set component) * whale, HI.
[caret].
Bottlenose dolphin, HI
Pelagic.
False killer whale, HI
Pelagic.
Fin whale, HI.
Guadalupe fur seal.
Humpback whale, Central
North Pacific.
Mesoplodon sp.,
unknown.
Northern elephant seal,
CA breeding.
Risso's dolphin, HI.
Rough-toothed dolphin,
HI.
Short-beaked common
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Striped dolphin, HI.
Handline/Pole And Line
Fisheries:
Atlantic Highly Migratory 2 No information.
Species.
Pacific Highly Migratory 41 No information.
Species.
South Pacific Albacore 11 No information.
Troll.
Western Pacific Pelagic.... 5 No information.
Troll Fisheries:
Atlantic Highly Migratory 0 No information.
Species.
South Pacific Albacore 17 No information.
Troll.
South Pacific Tuna 1 No information.
Fisheries **.
Western Pacific Pelagic.... 5 No information.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 21101]]
Category III
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Longline Fisheries:
Northwest Atlantic Bottom 3 None documented.
Longline.
Pacific Highly Migratory 108 None documented. in the
Species. most recent 5 years of
data.
Purse Seine Fisheries:
Pacific Highly Migratory 5 None documented.
Species * [caret].
Trawl Fisheries:
Northwest Atlantic......... 4 None documented.
Troll Fisheries:
Pacific Highly Migratory 119 None documented.
Species *.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Terms, Abbreviations, and Symbols Used in Table 3:
CA--California; GMX--Gulf of Mexico; HI--Hawaii; OR--Oregon; WA--
Washington; WNA--Western North Atlantic.
* Fishery is an extension/component of an existing fishery operating
within U.S. waters listed in Table 1 or 2. The number of permits
listed in Table 3 represents only the number of permits for the high
seas component of the fishery.
** These gear types are not authorized under the Pacific HMS FMP (2004),
the Atlantic HMS FMP (2006), or without a South Pacific Tuna Treaty
license (in the case of the South Pacific Tuna fisheries). Because
HSFCA permits are valid for 5 years, permits obtained in past years
exist in the HSFCA permit database for gear types that are now
unauthorized. Therefore, while HSFCA permits exist for these gear
types, it does not represent effort. In order to land fish species,
fishers must be using an authorized gear type. Once these permits for
unauthorized gear types expire, the permit-holder will be required to
obtain a permit for an authorized gear type.
[caret] The list of marine mammal species and/or stocks killed or
injured in this fishery is identical to the list of marine mammal
species and/or stocks killed or injured in U.S. waters component of
the fishery, minus species and/or stocks that have geographic ranges
exclusively in coastal waters, because the marine mammal species and/
or stocks are also found on the high seas and the fishery remains the
same on both sides of the EEZ boundary. Therefore, the high seas
components of these fisheries pose the same risk to marine mammals as
the components of these fisheries operating in U.S. waters.
Table 4--Fisheries Affected by Take Reduction Teams and Plans
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take reduction plans Affected fisheries
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Category I
Plan (ALWTRP)--50 CFR 229.32.
Mid-Atlantic gillnet.
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot.
Northeast sink gillnet.
Category II
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot.
Atlantic mixed species trap/
pot.
Northeast anchored float
gillnet.
Northeast drift gillnet.
Southeast Atlantic gillnet.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic
shark gillnet.*
Southeastern, U.S. Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/
pot.[caret]
Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Plan. Category I
(BDTRP)--50 CFR 229.35................. Mid-Atlantic gillnet.
Category II
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot.
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet
fishery.
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine.
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse
seine.
NC inshore gillnet.
NC long haul seine.
NC roe mullet stop net.
Southeast Atlantic gillnet.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic
shark gillnet.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico shrimp
trawl.[caret]
Southeastern, U.S. Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/
pot.[caret]
VA pound net.
False Killer Whale Take Reduction Plan Category I
(FKWTRP)--50 CFR 229.37. HI deep-set longline.
Category II
HI shallow-set longline.
Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction Plan.... Category I
(HPTRP)--50 CFR 229.33 (New England) Mid-Atlantic gillnet.
and 229.34 (Mid-Atlantic). Northeast sink gillnet.
Pelagic Longline Take Reduction Plan... Category I
(PLTRP)--50 CFR 229.36................. Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf
of Mexico large pelagics
longline.
Pacific Offshore Cetacean Take Category II
Reduction Plan (POCTRP)--50 CFR 229.31. CA thresher shark/swordfish
drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh).
[[Page 21102]]
Atlantic Trawl Gear Take Reduction Team Category II
(ATGTRT). Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl.
Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl
(including pair trawl).
Northeast bottom trawl.
Northeast mid-water trawl
(including pair trawl).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Only applicable to the portion of the fishery operating in U.S.
waters; [caret] Only applicable to the portion of the fishery
operating in the Atlantic Ocean.
Classification
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce has
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) at the proposed rule stage that this rule would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. No comments were received on that certification, and no new
information has been discovered to change that conclusion. Accordingly,
no regulatory flexibility analysis is required, and none has been
prepared.
This rule contains existing collection-of-information (COI)
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act and would not
impose additional or new COI requirements. The COI for the registration
of individuals under the MMPA has been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB control number 0648-0293 (0.15
hours per report for new registrants). The requirement for reporting
marine mammal mortalities or injuries has been approved by OMB under
OMB control number 0648-0292 (0.15 hours per report). These estimates
include the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the COI. Send comments regarding these reporting burden
estimates or any other aspect of the COI, including suggestions for
reducing burden, to NMFS and OMB (see ADDRESSES and SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with a COI, subject to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, unless that COI displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
This rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Orders 12866 and 13563.
This rule is not expected to be an Executive Order 13771 regulatory
action because this rule is not significant under Executive Order
12866.
In accordance with the Companion Manual for NOAA Administrative
Order (NAO) 216-6A, NMFS determined that publishing this LOF qualifies
to be categorically excluded from further NEPA review, consistent with
categories of activities identified in Categorical Exclusion G7
(``Preparation of policy directives, rules, regulations, and guidelines
of an administrative, financial, legal, technical, or procedural
nature, or for which the environmental effects are too broad,
speculative or conjectural to lend themselves to meaningful analysis
and will be subject later to the NEPA process, either collectively or
on a case-by-case basis'') of the Companion Manual for NAO 216-6A, and
we have not identified any extraordinary circumstances listed in
Chapter 4 of the Companion Manual that would preclude application of
this categorical exclusion. If NMFS takes a management action, for
example, through the development of a TRP, NMFS would first prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement or Environmental Assessment, as required
under NEPA, specific to that action.
This rule would not affect species listed as threatened or
endangered under the ESA or their associated critical habitat. The
impacts of numerous fisheries have been analyzed in various biological
opinions, and this rule will not affect the conclusions of those
opinions. The classification of fisheries on the LOF is not considered
to be a management action that would adversely affect threatened or
endangered species. If NMFS takes a management action, for example,
through the development of a TRP, NMFS would consult under ESA section
7 on that action.
This rule would have no adverse impacts on marine mammals, and may
have a positive impact on marine mammals by improving knowledge of
marine mammals and the fisheries interacting with marine mammals,
through information collected from observer programs, stranding and
sighting data, or take reduction teams.
This rule would not affect the land or water uses or natural
resources of the coastal zone, as specified under section 307 of the
Coastal Zone Management Act.
References
Baird, R.W., S.D. Mahaffy, A.M. Gorgone, T. Cullins, D.J. McSweeney,
E.M. Oelson, A.L. Bradford, J. Barlow, D.L. Webster. False Killer
Whales and Fisheries Interaction in Hawaiian Waters: Evidence for
Sex Bias and Variation Among Populations and Social Groups. 2014.
Marine Mammal Science 31(2): 579-590.
Carretta, J.V., K.A. Forney, E.M. Oleson, D.W. Weller, A.R. Lang, J.
Baker, M.M. Muto, B. Hanson, A.J. Orr, H. Huber, M.S. Lowry, J.
Barlow, J.E. Moore, D. Lynch, L. Carswell, and R.L. Brownell Jr.
2019. U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock Assessments: 2018. NOAA
Technical Memorandum NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-617. 382 p.
Carretta, J.V., E. Oleson, K.A. Forney, J. Baker, J.E. Moore, D.W.
Weller, A.R. Lang, M.M. Muto, B. Hanson, A.J. Orr, H. Huber, M.S.
Lowry, J. Barlow, D. Lynch, L. Carswell, and R.L. Brownell Jr. 2018.
U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock Assessments: 2017. NOAA Technical
Memorandum NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-602. 161 p.
Delean, B.J., V.T. Helker, M. M. Muto, K. Savage, S. Teerlink, L.A.
Jemison, K. Wilkinson, and J. Jannot. In press. Human-caused
mortality and injury of NMFS-managed Alaska marine mammal stocks,
2013-2017. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFSAFSC-
XXX, XX p.
Hayes, S.A., E. Josephson, K. Maze-Foley, and P.E. Rosel, editors.
2019. U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine Mammal Stocks
Assessments, 2018. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOAA Technical
Memorandum NMFS-NE-258. 306 p.
Henry A., M. Garron, A. Reid, D. Morin, W. Ledwell, T.C.N. Cole.
2019. Serious injury and mortality determinations for baleen whale
stocks along the Gulf of Mexico, United States East Coast, and
Atlantic Canadian Provinces, 2012-2016. U.S. Department of Commerce,
Northeast Fish Sci Cent Ref Doc. 19-13; 54 p.
Jannot, J.E., K.A. Somers, V. Tuttle, J. McVeigh, J.V. Carretta, and
V. Helker. 2018. Observed and Estimated Marine Mammal Bycatch in
U.S. West Coast Groundfish Fisheries, 2002-16. U.S. Department of
Commerce, NWFSC Processed Report 2018-03. 45 p. https://
[[Page 21103]]
doi.org/10.25923/fkf8-0x49 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS).
2014. West Indian Manatee (Trichechus manatus)--Florida stock
assessment report. Jacksonville, FL. 17 p. (Available at https://www.fws.gov/ecological-services/es-library/pdfs/West-Indian-Manatee-FL-Final-SAR.pdf)
Marine Mammal Commission (MMC). 2018. Stock Assessment Reports: What
is missing and what are the costs? https://www.mmc.gov/wp-content/uploads/SARs-2018-update.pdf.
National Marine Fisheries Service West Coast Region (NMFS-WCR).
2018. 2017 West Coast Entanglement Summary. 8 p. (Available at:
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/webdam/download/97058165)
Authority: MMPA, 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
Dated: March 30, 2020.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-06908 Filed 4-15-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P