Air Plan Approvals; GA and NC; Prevention of Significant Deterioration Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS, 20836-20838 [2020-06584]

Download as PDF 20836 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 15, 2020 / Rules and Regulations Points 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 (b) The penalty will not exceed $17,112 for each violation. * * * Dollars ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... ...................................... 5,133 5,475 5,819 6,160 6,502 6,843 7,188 7,529 7,870 8,213 8,555 8,898 9,239 9,583 9,924 10,266 10,607 10,952 11,294 11,635 11,979 12,320 12,661 13,003 13,347 13,688 14,030 14,373 14,716 15,058 15,399 15,743 16,084 16,426 16,768 17,112 8. In § 845.15, revise introductory text of paragraph (b) to read as follows: ■ § 845.15 Assessment of separate violations for each day. * * * * * (b) In addition to the civil penalty provided for in paragraph (a) of this section, whenever a violation contained in a notice of violation or cessation order has not been abated within the abatement period set in the notice or order or as subsequently extended pursuant to section 521(a) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. 1271(a), a civil penalty of not less than $2,566 will be assessed for each day during which such failure to abate continues, except that: * * * * * PART 846—INDIVIDUAL CIVIL PENALTIES 9. The authority citation for part 846 continues to read as follows: ■ jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2461, 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq., and 31 U.S.C. 3701. 10. In § 846.14, revise the first sentence of paragraph (b) to read as follows: ■ § 846.14 * * Amount of individual civil penalty. * VerDate Sep<11>2014 * * 16:09 Apr 14, 2020 Jkt 250001 [FR Doc. 2020–07390 Filed 4–14–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–05–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R04–OAR–2019–0503; FRL–10007– 45–Region 4] Air Plan Approvals; GA and NC; Prevention of Significant Deterioration Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is conditionally approving portions of the Georgia and North Carolina infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions for the 2015 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) provided to EPA on September 24, 2018, and September 27, 2018, respectively. Whenever EPA promulgates a new or revised NAAQS, the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP submission to establish that the state’s SIP meets infrastructure requirements for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each such NAAQS. Specifically, EPA is taking final action to conditionally approve the portions of the Georgia and North Carolina infrastructure SIP submissions related to the prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) infrastructure elements for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS. SUMMARY: This rule will be effective May 15, 2020. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– 2019–0503. All documents in the docket are listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation DATES: PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nacosta C. Ward of the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. Ward can be reached by telephone at (404) 562–9140 or via electronic mail at ward.nacosta@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background and Overview On October 1, 2015, EPA promulgated revised primary and secondary NAAQS for ozone, revising the 8-hour ozone standards from 0.075 parts per million (ppm) to a new more protective level of 0.070 ppm. See 80 FR 65292 (October 26, 2015). Pursuant to section 110(a)(1) of the CAA, states are required to submit SIP revisions meeting the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2) within three years after promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS or within such shorter period as EPA may prescribe. Section 110(a)(2) requires states to address basic SIP elements such as requirements for monitoring, basic program requirements, and legal authority that are designed to assure attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS. This particular type of SIP is commonly referred to as an ‘‘infrastructure SIP.’’ States were required to submit such SIP revisions for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS to EPA no later than October 1, 2018.1 As explained in a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published on February 11, 2020 (85 FR 7695), Georgia and North Carolina cite to several regulations 2 3 to demonstrate that their 1 In infrastructure SIP submissions, states generally certify evidence of compliance with sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA through a combination of state regulations and statutes, some of which have been incorporated into the SIP. In addition, certain federally-approved, non-SIP regulations may also be appropriate for demonstrating compliance with sections 110(a)(1) and (2). 2 Georgia’s September 24, 2018, infrastructure SIP submission cites the following rules to meet the PSD program requirements of 110(a)(2)(C): Georgia Rules for Air Quality Control 391–3–1-.02— ‘‘Provisions. Amended,’’ including PSD requirements under Rule 391–3–1–.02(7)— ‘‘Prevention of Significant Deterioration,’’ 391–3–1– E:\FR\FM\15APR1.SGM 15APR1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 15, 2020 / Rules and Regulations jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES respective SIPs meet the PSD-related requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (Prong 3),4 and 110(a)(2)(J). Each of these requirements are met if the state’s implementation plan includes a PSD program that meets current Federal requirements, however, Georgia’s and North Carolina’s SIPapproved PSD programs do not contain or reference the most recent version of 40 CFR part 51, appendix W, Guideline on Air Quality Models.5 Therefore, on November 14, 2019, and December 16, 2019, GA EPD and NC DEQ, respectively, submitted commitment letters to EPA requesting conditional approval of the PSD-related requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (Prong 3), and 110(a)(2)(J) of the aforementioned infrastructure SIP revisions. In these letters, Georgia and North Carolina commit to satisfying the PSD program requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (Prong 3), and 110(a)(2)(J) for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS by revising their PSD regulations to reflect the most recent version of appendix W and submitting SIP revisions containing these revised rules within one year of final conditional approval. If Georgia and North Carolina meet their respective commitments within one year of the final conditional approval, the PSD-related program requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (Prong 3), and 110(a)(2)(J) of the conditionally approved infrastructure SIP submissions will remain a part of the SIP until EPA takes final action approving or disapproving the new SIP revision(s). However, if Georgia or North Carolina fails to submit these revisions within the one-year timeframe, the conditional approval will automatically become a disapproval one year from EPA’s final .03—‘‘Permits. Amended,’’ including 391–3–1– .03(1)—‘‘Construction (SIP) Permit,’’ and 391–3–1– .03—‘‘Permits. Amended,’’ including 391–3–1– .03(2)—‘‘Operating (SIP) Permit.’’ For the PSD program requirements of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)—prong 3 and 110(a)(2)(J), Georgia cites Rule 391–3–1– .02(7)—‘‘Prevention of Significant Deterioration.’’ 3 North Carolina’s September 27, 2018, infrastructure SIP submission cites the following rules to meet the PSD program requirements of 110(a)(2)(C): 15A North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 2D .0500—‘‘Emission Control Standards’’ and 15A NCAC 2D .0530—‘‘Prevention of Significant Deterioration.’’ For the PSD program requirements of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)—prong 3 and 110(a)(2)(J), North Carolina cites 15A NCAC 2D .0530—‘‘Prevention of Significant Deterioration.’’ 4 Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) contains a provision that prohibits emissions activity in one state from interfering with measures required to prevent significant deterioration of air quality in another state, which is commonly referred to as ‘‘prong 3.’’ 5 EPA approved the most recent version of appendix W on January 17, 2017, at 82 FR 5182. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:09 Apr 14, 2020 Jkt 250001 conditional approval and EPA will provide notification of the disapproval of these requirements. If the conditional approval is converted to a disapproval, the final disapproval triggers the FIP requirement under CAA section 110(c). In the NPRM published on February 11, 2020, EPA proposed to conditionally approve Georgia and North Carolina’s SIP submissions provided on September 24, 2018, and September 27, 2018, for the applicable infrastructure SIP requirements of the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The NPRM provides additional detail regarding the background and rationale for EPA’s action. Comments on the NPRM were due on or before March 12, 2020. EPA received one comment in support of this action and did not receive any adverse comments. II. Final Action EPA is taking final action to conditionally approve the portions of Georgia’s and North Carolina’s September 24, 2018, and September 27, 2018, 2015 8-hour ozone infrastructure SIP submission, respectively, that address the PSD-related requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (Prong 3), and 110(a)(2)(J). All other outstanding applicable infrastructure requirements for this SIP submission have been or will be addressed in separate rulemakings. III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. These actions merely approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and do not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, these actions: • Are not significant regulatory actions subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Are not Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory actions because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; • Do not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Are certified as not having a significant economic impact on a PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 20837 substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4); • Do not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Are not an economically significant regulatory actions based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Are not significant regulatory actions subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Are not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • Do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIPs subject to these actions are not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 15, 2020. Filing a E:\FR\FM\15APR1.SGM 15APR1 20838 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 15, 2020 / Rules and Regulations petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2). 110(a)(2)(J) for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA conditionally approved these portions of North Carolina’s September 27, 2018 infrastructure SIP submission in an action published in the Federal Register on April 15, 2020. If North Carolina fails to meet its commitment by April 15, 2021, the conditional approval will become a disapproval on that date and EPA will issue a notification to that effect. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. [FR Doc. 2020–06584 Filed 4–14–20; 8:45 am] Dated: March 17, 2020. Mary S. Walker, Regional Administrator, Region 4. 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. Subpart L—Georgia 2. Add § 52.569 to read as follows: Conditional approval. Subpart II— North Carolina 3. Add § 52.1769 to read as follows: jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES Conditional approval. North Carolina submitted a letter to EPA on December 16, 2019, with a commitment to address the State Implementation Plan deficiencies regarding the PSD-related requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (Prong 3), and VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:09 Apr 14, 2020 Jkt 250001 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action establishing a subcategory of certain existing electric utility steam generating units (EGUs) firing eastern bituminous coal refuse (EBCR) for acid gas hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions that was noticed in a February 7, 2019, proposed rule titled ‘‘National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and OilFired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units—Reconsideration of Supplemental Finding and Residual Risk and Technology Review’’ (2019 Proposal). After consideration of public comments, the EPA has determined that there is a need for such a subcategory under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Coal- and Oil-Fired EGUs, commonly known as the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), and the Agency is establishing acid gas HAP emission standards applicable only to the new subcategory. The EPA’s final decisions on the other two distinct actions in the 2019 Proposal (i.e., reconsideration of the 2016 Supplemental Finding that it is appropriate and necessary to regulate EGUs under Clean Air Act (CAA) SUMMARY: Georgia submitted a letter to EPA on November 14, 2019, with a commitment to address the State Implementation Plan deficiencies regarding the PSDrelated requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (Prong 3), and 110(a)(2)(J) for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA conditionally approved these portions of Georgia’s September 24, 2018 infrastructure SIP submission in an action published in the Federal Register on April 15, 2020. If Georgia fails to meet its commitment by April 15, 2021, the conditional approval will become a disapproval on that date and EPA will issue a notification to that effect. § 52.1769 [EPA–HQ–OAR–2018–0794; FRL–10007–26– OAR] AGENCY: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ■ 40 CFR Part 63 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units—Subcategory of Certain Existing Electric Utility Steam Generating Units Firing Eastern Bituminous Coal Refuse for Emissions of Acid Gas Hazardous Air Pollutants PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS § 52.569 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RIN 2060–AU48 Title 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: ■ BILLING CODE 6560–50–P PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 section 112 and the residual risk and technology review of MATS) will be announced in a separate final action. DATES: This final rule is effective on April 15, 2020. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2018–0794. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov/ website. Although listed, some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through https:// www.regulations.gov/, or in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center, Room Number 3334, WJC West Building, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room hours of operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Eastern Standard Time (EST), Monday through Friday. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the EPA Docket Center is (202) 566– 1742. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about this final action, contact Mary Johnson, Sector Policies and Programs Division (D243–01), Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number: (919) 541– 5025; and email address: johnson.mary@epa.gov. For information about the applicability of the NESHAP to a particular entity, contact your EPA Regional representative as listed in 40 CFR 63.13 (General Provisions). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Preamble acronyms and abbreviations. The EPA uses multiple acronyms and terms in this preamble. While this list may not be exhaustive, to ease the reading of this preamble and for reference purposes, the EPA defines the following terms and acronyms here: ARIPPA Appalachian Region Independent Power Producers Association CAA Clean Air Act CEMS continuous emissions monitoring systems CFR Code of Federal Regulations CRA Congressional Review Act DSI dry sorbent injection EBCR eastern bituminous coal refuse ECMPS Emissions Collection and Monitoring Plan System EGU electric utility steam generating unit EPA Environmental Protection Agency FBC fluidized bed combustors E:\FR\FM\15APR1.SGM 15APR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 15, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20836-20838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-06584]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2019-0503; FRL-10007-45-Region 4]


Air Plan Approvals; GA and NC; Prevention of Significant 
Deterioration Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is conditionally 
approving portions of the Georgia and North Carolina infrastructure 
State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions for the 2015 8-hour ozone 
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) provided to EPA on 
September 24, 2018, and September 27, 2018, respectively. Whenever EPA 
promulgates a new or revised NAAQS, the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) 
requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP submission to establish 
that the state's SIP meets infrastructure requirements for the 
implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each such NAAQS. 
Specifically, EPA is taking final action to conditionally approve the 
portions of the Georgia and North Carolina infrastructure SIP 
submissions related to the prevention of significant deterioration 
(PSD) infrastructure elements for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS.

DATES: This rule will be effective May 15, 2020.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket 
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2019-0503. All documents in the docket 
are listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the 
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential 
Business Information or other information whose disclosure is 
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted 
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available 
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are 
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard 
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and 
Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 
30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the 
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 
schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of 
business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 
Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nacosta C. Ward of the Air Regulatory 
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and 
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Ms. Ward can be reached 
by telephone at (404) 562-9140 or via electronic mail at 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background and Overview

    On October 1, 2015, EPA promulgated revised primary and secondary 
NAAQS for ozone, revising the 8-hour ozone standards from 0.075 parts 
per million (ppm) to a new more protective level of 0.070 ppm. See 80 
FR 65292 (October 26, 2015). Pursuant to section 110(a)(1) of the CAA, 
states are required to submit SIP revisions meeting the applicable 
requirements of section 110(a)(2) within three years after promulgation 
of a new or revised NAAQS or within such shorter period as EPA may 
prescribe. Section 110(a)(2) requires states to address basic SIP 
elements such as requirements for monitoring, basic program 
requirements, and legal authority that are designed to assure 
attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS. This particular type of SIP is 
commonly referred to as an ``infrastructure SIP.'' States were required 
to submit such SIP revisions for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS to EPA no 
later than October 1, 2018.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In infrastructure SIP submissions, states generally certify 
evidence of compliance with sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA 
through a combination of state regulations and statutes, some of 
which have been incorporated into the SIP. In addition, certain 
federally-approved, non-SIP regulations may also be appropriate for 
demonstrating compliance with sections 110(a)(1) and (2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As explained in a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published on 
February 11, 2020 (85 FR 7695), Georgia and North Carolina cite to 
several regulations 2 3 to demonstrate that their

[[Page 20837]]

respective SIPs meet the PSD-related requirements of sections 
110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (Prong 3),\4\ and 110(a)(2)(J). Each 
of these requirements are met if the state's implementation plan 
includes a PSD program that meets current Federal requirements, 
however, Georgia's and North Carolina's SIP-approved PSD programs do 
not contain or reference the most recent version of 40 CFR part 51, 
appendix W, Guideline on Air Quality Models.\5\ Therefore, on November 
14, 2019, and December 16, 2019, GA EPD and NC DEQ, respectively, 
submitted commitment letters to EPA requesting conditional approval of 
the PSD-related requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (Prong 3), and 110(a)(2)(J) of the aforementioned 
infrastructure SIP revisions. In these letters, Georgia and North 
Carolina commit to satisfying the PSD program requirements of sections 
110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (Prong 3), and 110(a)(2)(J) for the 
2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS by revising their PSD regulations to reflect 
the most recent version of appendix W and submitting SIP revisions 
containing these revised rules within one year of final conditional 
approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Georgia's September 24, 2018, infrastructure SIP submission 
cites the following rules to meet the PSD program requirements of 
110(a)(2)(C): Georgia Rules for Air Quality Control 391-3-1-.02--
``Provisions. Amended,'' including PSD requirements under Rule 391-
3-1-.02(7)--``Prevention of Significant Deterioration,'' 391-3-
1-.03--``Permits. Amended,'' including 391-3-1-.03(1)--
``Construction (SIP) Permit,'' and 391-3-1-.03--``Permits. 
Amended,'' including 391-3-1-.03(2)--``Operating (SIP) Permit.'' For 
the PSD program requirements of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)--prong 3 and 
110(a)(2)(J), Georgia cites Rule 391-3-1-.02(7)--``Prevention of 
Significant Deterioration.''
    \3\ North Carolina's September 27, 2018, infrastructure SIP 
submission cites the following rules to meet the PSD program 
requirements of 110(a)(2)(C): 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 
(NCAC) 2D .0500--``Emission Control Standards'' and 15A NCAC 2D 
.0530--``Prevention of Significant Deterioration.'' For the PSD 
program requirements of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)--prong 3 and 
110(a)(2)(J), North Carolina cites 15A NCAC 2D .0530--``Prevention 
of Significant Deterioration.''
    \4\ Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) contains a provision that 
prohibits emissions activity in one state from interfering with 
measures required to prevent significant deterioration of air 
quality in another state, which is commonly referred to as ``prong 
3.''
    \5\ EPA approved the most recent version of appendix W on 
January 17, 2017, at 82 FR 5182.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If Georgia and North Carolina meet their respective commitments 
within one year of the final conditional approval, the PSD-related 
program requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) 
(Prong 3), and 110(a)(2)(J) of the conditionally approved 
infrastructure SIP submissions will remain a part of the SIP until EPA 
takes final action approving or disapproving the new SIP revision(s). 
However, if Georgia or North Carolina fails to submit these revisions 
within the one-year timeframe, the conditional approval will 
automatically become a disapproval one year from EPA's final 
conditional approval and EPA will provide notification of the 
disapproval of these requirements. If the conditional approval is 
converted to a disapproval, the final disapproval triggers the FIP 
requirement under CAA section 110(c).
    In the NPRM published on February 11, 2020, EPA proposed to 
conditionally approve Georgia and North Carolina's SIP submissions 
provided on September 24, 2018, and September 27, 2018, for the 
applicable infrastructure SIP requirements of the 2015 8-hour ozone 
NAAQS. The NPRM provides additional detail regarding the background and 
rationale for EPA's action. Comments on the NPRM were due on or before 
March 12, 2020. EPA received one comment in support of this action and 
did not receive any adverse comments.

II. Final Action

    EPA is taking final action to conditionally approve the portions of 
Georgia's and North Carolina's September 24, 2018, and September 27, 
2018, 2015 8-hour ozone infrastructure SIP submission, respectively, 
that address the PSD-related requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C), 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (Prong 3), and 110(a)(2)(J). All other outstanding 
applicable infrastructure requirements for this SIP submission have 
been or will be addressed in separate rulemakings.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. These actions merely 
approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and do not impose 
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that 
reason, these actions:
     Are not significant regulatory actions subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Are not Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 
2017) regulatory actions because SIP approvals are exempted under 
Executive Order 12866;
     Do not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Are certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
     Do not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Are not an economically significant regulatory actions 
based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Are not significant regulatory actions subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Are not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     Do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

The SIPs subject to these actions are not approved to apply on any 
Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian 
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified 
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it 
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal 
law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by June 15, 2020. Filing a

[[Page 20838]]

petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of 
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for 
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness 
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in 
proceedings to enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 
organic compounds.

    Dated: March 17, 2020.
Mary S. Walker,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.

    Title 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart L--Georgia

0
2. Add Sec.  52.569 to read as follows:


Sec.  52.569  Conditional approval.

    Georgia submitted a letter to EPA on November 14, 2019, with a 
commitment to address the State Implementation Plan deficiencies 
regarding the PSD-related requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C), 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (Prong 3), and 110(a)(2)(J) for the 2015 8-hour 
ozone NAAQS. EPA conditionally approved these portions of Georgia's 
September 24, 2018 infrastructure SIP submission in an action published 
in the Federal Register on April 15, 2020. If Georgia fails to meet its 
commitment by April 15, 2021, the conditional approval will become a 
disapproval on that date and EPA will issue a notification to that 
effect.

Subpart II-- North Carolina

0
3. Add Sec.  52.1769 to read as follows:


Sec.  52.1769  Conditional approval.

    North Carolina submitted a letter to EPA on December 16, 2019, with 
a commitment to address the State Implementation Plan deficiencies 
regarding the PSD-related requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C), 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (Prong 3), and 110(a)(2)(J) for the 2015 8-hour 
ozone NAAQS. EPA conditionally approved these portions of North 
Carolina's September 27, 2018 infrastructure SIP submission in an 
action published in the Federal Register on April 15, 2020. If North 
Carolina fails to meet its commitment by April 15, 2021, the 
conditional approval will become a disapproval on that date and EPA 
will issue a notification to that effect.

[FR Doc. 2020-06584 Filed 4-14-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.