Petition for Waiver of Compliance, 20805-20806 [2020-07787]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 14, 2020 / Notices
constitutional presence in the United
States would render ineffectual the
blocking and other measures authorized
in the Order because of the ability to
transfer funds instantaneously, I
determine that no prior notice needs to
be provided to any person subject to this
determination who might have a
constitutional presence in the United
States, because to do so would render
ineffectual the measures authorized in
the Order.
This notice shall be published in the
Federal Register.
Dated: March 27, 2020.
Michael R. Pompeo,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2020–07854 Filed 4–13–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–AD–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement;
Multnomah County, Oregon
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
AGENCY:
The FHWA is issuing this
notice to advise the public that an
environmental impact statement will be
prepared for a proposed bridge retrofit
or replacement project in Multnomah
County, Oregon.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily Cline, Environmental Program
Manager, Federal Highway
Administration, Oregon Division, 530
Center Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97301,
Telephone: (503) 316–2547, Email:
emily.cline@dot.gov, or Megan Neill,
Project Manager, Multnomah County
Transportation Division, 1403 SE Water
Ave., Portland, Oregon 97214,
Telephone: (503) 988–0437, Email:
megan.neill@multco.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
FHWA, together with Multnomah
County and the Oregon Department of
Transportation (DOT), will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS)
on a proposal to create a seismically
resilient Burnside Street crossing of the
Willamette River in downtown
Portland, Oregon. The purpose of this
project is to create a seismically resilient
Burnside Street lifeline crossing of the
Willamette River that will remain fully
operational and accessible for vehicles
and other modes of transportation
immediately following a major
earthquake. The project is intended to
address the need to support the region’s
ability to provide rapid and reliable
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Apr 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
emergency response, rescue and
evacuation after a major earthquake; the
need for long-term, multi-modal travel
access across the river; and to enable
post-earthquake economic recovery.
The EIS will be prepared in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), 23 U.S.C. 139, Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ)
regulations implementing NEPA (40
CFR 1500–1508), FHWA regulations
implementing NEPA (23 CFR 771.101–
771.139), and applicable Executive
Orders and DOT NEPA policies. The EIS
will also document compliance with
other applicable environmental review
laws, regulations, Executive Orders,
policies, and guidance. For example, an
evaluation under Section 4(f) of the
DOT Act of 1966 may also be required
due to the potential for impacts to
public recreational areas and resources
on or eligible for the National Register
of Historic Places. The FHWA intends to
issue a combined Final EIS/Record of
Decision pursuant to 23 CFR 771.124,
unless FHWA determines the regulatory
criteria or practicability considerations
preclude issuance of a combined
document.
Analyses developed and decisions
reached during the transportation
planning stage have helped narrow the
range of alternatives and focus the
NEPA evaluation for the project. These
analyses and decisions, captured in the
2015 Willamette River Bridges Capital
Improvement Program and the 2018
Earthquake Ready Burnside Bridge
Feasibility Study, include the purpose
and need, and the identification and
screening of alternatives.
Multnomah County and the Oregon
DOT submitted this planning work to
extensive public involvement. This
‘‘informal’’ scoping included multiple
public and agency meetings, held
between August 2018 and October 2019,
to invite comment on the statement of
purpose and need, the range of
alternatives, issues to be studied in the
EIS, screening criteria, and evaluation
criteria for selecting a preferred
alternative. Multnomah County and the
Oregon DOT held an online open house
between September 3 and October 4,
2019. With the Feasibility Study and the
informal scoping process, Multnomah
County and the Oregon DOT evaluated
over 100 potential alternatives and
options, ultimately deciding to carry
forward three build alternatives plus a
No-build alternative for further analysis
in an EIS.
In accordance with 23 U.S.C. 168 and
23 U.S.C. 139(f)(4), FHWA intends to
adopt the planning analyses, purpose
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20805
and need, and decisions on the
alternatives, and rely on them for the
NEPA process.
This notice begins the formal scoping
period. The FHWA will use this
opportunity to determine the scope and
the significant issues to be analyzed in
depth in the EIS, and identify and
eliminate from detailed study the issues
which are not significant or which have
been covered by prior environmental
review.
Letters describing the proposed action
and soliciting comments have been sent
to appropriate Federal, State, and local
agencies; Tribes; and private
organizations and citizens who have
previously expressed or are known to
have interest in this proposal. Agencies
that were identified as potential
Cooperating and Participating agencies
are being invited to review and
comment on the Agency Coordination
Plan. In addition, with this notice, the
lead agencies (FHWA, Multnomah
County, and the Oregon DOT) invite
comments and suggestions from all
interested parties to ensure that the full
range of issues related to this proposed
action are considered and that all
significant issues are identified.
Comments or questions concerning
this proposed action and the EIS should
be directed to FHWA at the address
provided above. The lead agencies have
developed a project website at
www.burnsidebridge.org that includes
project schedules, the Public
Involvement Plan, and information
about past and upcoming project
meetings.
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48.
Phillip Ditzler,
Oregon Division Administrator, Portland,
Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2020–07827 Filed 4–13–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA–2020–0030]
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
Under part 211 of title 49 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR), this
document provides the public notice
that on March 31, 2020, the American
Short Line and Regional Railroad
Association (ASLRRA), on behalf of its
member railroads Allegheny Valley
Railroad, Southwest Pennsylvania
Railroad, Ohio Terminal Railway, and
Delmarva Central Railroad, petitioned
the Federal Railroad Administration
(FRA) for a waiver of compliance from
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
20806
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 14, 2020 / Notices
certain provisions of the Federal
railroad safety regulations contained at
49 CFR part 236. FRA assigned the
petition Docket Number FRA–2020–
0030.
Specifically, ASLRRA seeks relief
from 49 CFR 236.586, Daily or after trip
test, and § 236.588, Periodic test.
Section 236.586(a) provides that, except
where tests prescribed by § 236.588 are
performed at intervals of not more than
two months, each locomotive equipped
with an automatic cab signal or train
stop or train control device operating in
equipped territory shall be inspected for
damage to the equipment and tested at
least once each calendar day or within
24 hours before departure upon each
trip. Section 236.588 requires that
except as provided in § 236.586,
periodic tests of the automatic train
stop, train control, or cab signal
apparatus be made at least once every
92 days, and on multiple-unit cars as
specified by the carrier, subject to
approval by FRA. ASLRRA petitions to
increase the time between inspections
under § 236.588 to 184 days for a fiveyear waiver period, subject to
conditions, during which time it aims to
show that there would be no
degradation in safety resulting from this
change.
ASLRRA states that like the
locomotive controls covered under 49
CFR 229.23, today’s automatic train
stop, train control, and cab signal
apparatus devices use microprocessorbased technology. This technology
provides enhanced safety for the
following reasons: (1) The
microprocessor-based system has
diagnostics that monitor the functioning
of cab signal equipment and records
faults, particularly with respect to
features relevant to the periodic
inspection; (2) major faults are instantly
addressed; (3) minor faults are
addressed through later data analysis;
(4) in some cases, railroads have the
capability of analyzing the data
remotely, without the need for the
locomotive to be shopped; and (5) if the
system detects a failure, the system goes
into fail-safe mode and triggers a
penalty air brake application. ALSRRA
contends performing signal inspections
pursuant to § 236.588 in conjunction
with and under the same schedule as
the locomotive inspections under
§ 229.23(b) would increase efficiency
without compromising safety.
A copy of the petition, as well as any
written communications concerning the
petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at
the Department of Transportation’s
Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New
Jersey Ave. SE, W12–140, Washington,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:26 Apr 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
DC 20590. The Docket Operations
Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Website: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE, W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Ave. SE, Room W12–140, Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
Communications received by May 29,
2020 will be considered by FRA before
final action is taken. Comments received
after that date will be considered if
practicable.
Anyone can search the electronic
form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better
inform its processes. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any
personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as
described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
See also https://www.regulations.gov/
#!privacyNotice for the privacy notice of
regulations.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC.
John Karl Alexy,
Associate Administrator for Safety, Chief
Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–07787 Filed 4–13–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2019–0221 (Notice No.
2020–03)]
Hazardous Materials: Information
Collection Activities
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces that the Information
Collection Requests (ICRs) discussed
below will be forwarded to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
renewal and extension. These ICRs
describe the nature of the information
collections and their expected burdens.
A Federal Register notice with a 60-day
comment period soliciting comments on
these ICRs was published in the Federal
Register on January 16, 2020 under
Docket No. PHMSA–2019–0221 (Notice
No. 2019–12).
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on, or before May 14,
2020.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
We invite comments on: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
the Department’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed information collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Docket: For access to the Dockets to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven Andrews or Shelby Geller,
Standards and Rulemaking Division,
(202) 366–8553, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, U.S.
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 14, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20805-20806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-07787]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA-2020-0030]
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
Under part 211 of title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), this document provides the public notice that on March 31, 2020,
the American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association (ASLRRA), on
behalf of its member railroads Allegheny Valley Railroad, Southwest
Pennsylvania Railroad, Ohio Terminal Railway, and Delmarva Central
Railroad, petitioned the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for a
waiver of compliance from
[[Page 20806]]
certain provisions of the Federal railroad safety regulations contained
at 49 CFR part 236. FRA assigned the petition Docket Number FRA-2020-
0030.
Specifically, ASLRRA seeks relief from 49 CFR 236.586, Daily or
after trip test, and Sec. 236.588, Periodic test. Section 236.586(a)
provides that, except where tests prescribed by Sec. 236.588 are
performed at intervals of not more than two months, each locomotive
equipped with an automatic cab signal or train stop or train control
device operating in equipped territory shall be inspected for damage to
the equipment and tested at least once each calendar day or within 24
hours before departure upon each trip. Section 236.588 requires that
except as provided in Sec. 236.586, periodic tests of the automatic
train stop, train control, or cab signal apparatus be made at least
once every 92 days, and on multiple-unit cars as specified by the
carrier, subject to approval by FRA. ASLRRA petitions to increase the
time between inspections under Sec. 236.588 to 184 days for a five-
year waiver period, subject to conditions, during which time it aims to
show that there would be no degradation in safety resulting from this
change.
ASLRRA states that like the locomotive controls covered under 49
CFR 229.23, today's automatic train stop, train control, and cab signal
apparatus devices use microprocessor-based technology. This technology
provides enhanced safety for the following reasons: (1) The
microprocessor-based system has diagnostics that monitor the
functioning of cab signal equipment and records faults, particularly
with respect to features relevant to the periodic inspection; (2) major
faults are instantly addressed; (3) minor faults are addressed through
later data analysis; (4) in some cases, railroads have the capability
of analyzing the data remotely, without the need for the locomotive to
be shopped; and (5) if the system detects a failure, the system goes
into fail-safe mode and triggers a penalty air brake application.
ALSRRA contends performing signal inspections pursuant to Sec. 236.588
in conjunction with and under the same schedule as the locomotive
inspections under Sec. 229.23(b) would increase efficiency without
compromising safety.
A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at the Department of Transportation's
Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations Facility is open from 9
a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
Website: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received by May 29, 2020 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments received after that date will be
considered if practicable.
Anyone can search the electronic form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better
inform its processes. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/
ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy. See also
https://www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice for the privacy notice of
regulations.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC.
John Karl Alexy,
Associate Administrator for Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020-07787 Filed 4-13-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P