Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Greater Amberjack Management Measures, 20611-20615 [2020-07253]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Maximum exhalation resistance
must be less than 89 mm of watercolumn height.
§ 84.179 Silica dust loading test—PAPR
series HE filtration.
(a) Three powered air-purifying
particulate respirators will be tested for
a period of 4 hours each at a flowrate
not less than 115 liters per minute for
tight-fitting facepieces, and not less than
170 liters per minute for loose-fitting
hoods and helmets.
(b) The relative humidity in the test
chamber will be 20–80 percent, and the
room temperature approximately 25 °C.
(c) The test suspension in the
chamber will not be less than 50 nor
more than 60 mg of flint (99 + percent
free silica) per m3 of air.
(d) The flint in suspension will be 99
+ percent through a 270-mesh sieve.
(e) The particle-size distribution of
the test suspension will have a
geometric mean of 0.4 to 0.6 mm and the
standard geometric deviation will not
exceed 2.
(f) The total amount of unretained test
suspension in samples taken during
testing must not exceed 14.4 mg for a
powered air-purifying particulate
respirator with tight-fitting facepiece,
and 21.3 mg for a powered air-purifying
particulate respirator with loose-fitting
hood or helmet.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
§ 84.180 Particulate loading test—PAPR
series PAPR100–N and PAPR100–P
filtration.
(a) Twenty filters of each powered airpurifying particulate respirator design
will be tested for filter efficiency
against:
(1) A solid sodium chloride
particulate aerosol, in accordance with
paragraph (d)(1) of this section, if series
PAPR100–N approval is requested by
the applicant.
(2) A dioctyl phthalate or equivalent
liquid particulate aerosol, in accordance
with paragraph (d)(2) of this section, if
series PAPR100–P approval is requested
by the applicant.
(b) Prior to filter efficiency testing of
20 series PAPR100–N filters, the 20 to
be tested will be taken out of their
packaging and placed in an
environment of 85 ±5 percent relative
humidity at 38 ±2.5 °C for 25 ±1 hours.
Following the pre-conditioning, filters
will be sealed in a gas-tight container
and tested within 10 hours.
(c) For powered air-purifying
particulate respirators with a single
filter, filters will be tested at a
continuous airflow rate of 85 ±4 liters
per minute. Where filters are to be used
in pairs, the test-aerosol airflow rate will
be 42.5 ±2 liters per minute through
each filter.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Apr 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
(d) Filter efficiency test aerosols:
(1) Series PAPR100–N filters:
(i) A sodium chloride or equivalent
solid aerosol at 25 ±5 °C and relative
humidity of 30 ±10 percent that has
been neutralized to the Boltzmann
equilibrium state will be used. Each
filter will be challenged with a
concentration not exceeding 200 mg/m3.
(ii) The sodium chloride test aerosol
will have a particle size distribution
with count median diameter of 0.075
±0.020 mm and a standard geometric
deviation not exceeding 1.86 at the
specified test conditions as determined
with a scanning mobility particle sizer
or equivalent.
(2) Series PAPR100–P filters:
(i) A neat cold-nebulized dioctyl
phthalate (DOP) or equivalent aerosol at
25 ± 5 °C that has been neutralized to
the Boltzmann equilibrium state will be
used. Each filter will be challenged with
a concentration not exceeding 200 mg/
m3.
(ii) The DOP aerosol shall have a
particle size distribution with count
median diameter of 0.185 ±0.020 mm
and a standard geometric deviation not
exceeding 1.60 at the specified test
conditions as determined with a
scanning mobility particle sizer or
equivalent.
(e) The test will continue until
minimum efficiency is achieved or until
an aerosol mass of at least 200 ±5 mg has
contacted the filter. For PAPR100–P
series filters, if the filter efficiency is
decreasing when the 200 ±5 mg
challenge point is reached, the test will
be continued until there is no further
decrease in efficiency.
(f) The efficiency of the filter will be
monitored and recorded throughout the
test period by a suitable forward-light
scattering photometer or equivalent
instrumentation.
(g) The minimum efficiency for each
of the 20 filters will be determined and
recorded and must be equal to or greater
than the filter efficiency criterion for
PAPR100–N and PAPR100–P, efficiency
≥99.97 percent, pursuant to § 84.170(b).
§ 84.181 Communication performance
test—PAPR class PAPR100.
(a) Powered air-purifying respirators
must be designed to allow for proper
communication while worn.
(b) A Modified Rhyme Test 7 will be
used to test the wearer’s ability to
communicate efficiently.
(c) The communications requirement
is met if the overall performance rating
is greater than or equal to 70 percent.
7 The Modified Rhyme Test is used in speech
intelligibility experiments. See https://
www.nist.gov/ctl/pscr/modified-rhyme-test-audiolibrary.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20611
Subpart KK [Removed]
12. Subpart KK, consisting of
§§ 84.1100 through 84.1158 and the
tables, is removed.
■
Dated: April 7, 2020.
Eric D. Hargan,
Deputy Secretary, Department of Health and
Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2020–07804 Filed 4–9–20; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4150–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 200401–0096]
RIN 0648–BJ08
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Greater
Amberjack Management Measures
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues regulations to
implement management measures
described in a framework action to the
Fishery Management Plan for the Reef
Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico
(FMP). This final rule revises the
commercial trip limit in the Gulf of
Mexico (Gulf) exclusive economic zone
(EEZ) for greater amberjack. In addition,
this final rule revises the boundaries of
several Gulf reef fish management areas
to reflect a change in the seaward
boundary of Louisiana, Mississippi, and
Alabama. The purpose of this final rule
is to extend the commercial fishing
season for greater amberjack by
constraining the harvest rate while
continuing to prevent overfishing and
rebuild the stock in the Gulf, and to
update the boundaries of reef fish
management areas to reflect the current
state water’s boundaries for reef fish
management.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
May 14, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the
framework action, which includes an
environmental assessment, a regulatory
impact review, and a Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) analysis may be
obtained from the Southeast Regional
Office website at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/
framework-action-greater-amberjackcommercial-trip-limits.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
20612
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kelli O’Donnell, Southeast Regional
Office, NMFS, telephone: 727–824–
5305, email: kelli.odonnell@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Gulf
reef fish fishery includes greater
amberjack and is managed under the
FMP. The FMP was prepared by the
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council (Council) and is implemented
by NMFS through regulations at 50 CFR
part 622 under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act).
On December 19, 2019, NMFS
published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register for the framework
action and requested public comment
(84 FR 69715, December 19, 2019). The
proposed rule and the framework action
outline the rationale for the actions
contained in this final rule. A summary
of the management measures described
in the framework action and
implemented by this final rule is
provided below.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Management Measure Contained in
This Final Rule
This final rule reduces the Gulf
greater amberjack commercial trip limit
from 1,500 lb gutted weight (680 kg;
1,560 lb (708 kg) round weight) to 1,000
lb gutted weight (454 kg; 1,040 lb (472
kg) round weight). Additionally, this
final rule reduces the commercial trip
limit to 250 lb gutted weight (113 kg;
260 lb (118 kg) round weight) when 75
percent of the commercial annual catch
target (commercial quota) has been
landed.
This commercial trip limit reduction
is expected to extend the length of the
commercial fishing season while
continuing to allow enough harvest per
trip to support vessels that engage in
directed trips for greater amberjack. An
in-season closure of the commercial
sector for greater amberjack is still
expected to occur as a result of the
commercial quota being reached, but
will likely occur later in the January
through December fishing year than has
occurred in recent years.
Changes in This Final Rule Not in the
Framework Action
This final rule revises the boundaries
of three Gulf reef fish management areas
to reflect a change in the seaward
boundaries of Louisiana, Mississippi,
and Alabama for purposes of
management under the FMP. Language
included in the 2016 and 2017
Consolidated Appropriations Acts (Pub.
L. 114–113, December 18, 2015, and
Pub. L. 115–31, May 5, 2017), changed
the state and Federal boundary for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Apr 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
management of the Gulf reef fish fishery
to 9 nautical miles (nm; 16.7 km) off the
Gulf coasts of all the Gulf States.
Therefore, some existing Federal reef
fish management areas that were
exclusively in Federal waters now
extend into state managed areas.
This final rule updates the FMP
regulations by revising the coordinates
of the inshore boundaries for the reef
fish stressed area (Table 2 of appendix
B to 50 CFR part 622), the reef fish
longline and buoy gear restricted area
(Table 1 of appendix B to 50 CFR part
622), and the recreational shallow-water
grouper closure (50 CFR 622.34(d)). This
rule also updates the terminology in the
coordinate tables to reflect that this
boundary is specific to Gulf reef fish
management. This rule does not change
the management measures associated
with each area.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received a total of 20
comments on the proposed rule for the
framework action. Most commenters
supported the measures for Gulf greater
amberjack in the proposed rule. Other
comments suggested changes to
management measures that were outside
the scope of the proposed rule, such as
gear restrictions and a prohibition on
commercial harvest, and therefore, are
not addressed further. Specific
comments related to the framework
action and the proposed rule are
grouped by topic and summarized
below, followed by NMFS’ respective
responses.
Comment 1: The commercial trip
limit for Gulf greater amberjack should
be reduced further than 1,000 lb gutted
weight (454 kg) with a trip limit
reduction to 250 lb gutted weight (113
kg) when 75 percent of the commercial
quota is harvested.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the
trip limit should be reduced more than
specified in this final rule. The Council
considered three other alternatives for a
commercial trip limit that ranged from
750 lb to 250 lb gutted weight (340 kg
to 113 kg). However, the Council
determined that these trip limits were
too small to allow for directed
commercial trips for Gulf greater
amberjack based on public testimony by
commercial fishermen, who indicated
that they needed to harvest at least as
1,000 lb gutted weight (454 kg) or more
per trip. Additionally, the alternative
trip limits of 250 lb gutted weight (113
kg) year-round, or 500 lb gutted weight
(227-kg; 520-lb (236-kg) round weight)
with a reduction to 250 lb gutted weight
(113 kg) at 75 percent of the commercial
quota, were not expected to allow
fishermen to harvest all of the
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
commercial quota during a fishing year.
Therefore, the Council determined, and
NMFS agrees, that the reduction in the
trip limit to 1,000 lb gutted weight (454
kg), and a further reduction to 250 lb
gutted weight (113 kg) when 75 percent
of the commercial quota is harvested,
best balances the need of fishermen who
rely on directed trips for Gulf greater
amberjack and fishermen who rely on
having a longer season.
Comment 2: The commercial trip
limit for greater amberjack in the Gulf
should remain the same or be increased.
Response: NMFS disagrees. The
previous commercial trip limit of 1,500
lb gutted weight (680 kg) has been in
effect since 2016 (80 FR 75432;
December 2, 2015). From 2013 to 2016,
a 2,000-lb round weight (907-kg)
commercial trip limit was in effect (77
FR 67574; November 13, 2012). These
commercial trip limits did not reduce
harvest of Gulf greater amberjack
enough to prevent yearly in-season
commercial closures. Therefore,
maintaining the previous trip limit or
increasing the trip limit would not help
achieve the purpose of this rule, which
is to extend the Gulf greater amberjack
commercial fishing season. Analysis
included in the framework action
predicted that, when compared to the
alternatives considered, the shortest
commercial fishing season would occur
under the 1,500-lb gutted weight (680kg) commercial trip limit, even with the
current March through May seasonal
closure. A larger commercial trip limit
would result in an even shorter
commercial fishing season. While
NMFS still predicts that an in-season
closure will occur with the reduced trip
limit implemented through this final
rule, the closure should occur later in
the fishing year, thereby extending the
opportunity for commercial harvest.
Comment 3: If commercial harvest for
greater amberjack in the Gulf extends
into the summer spawning season, the
stock will be harmed.
Response: NMFS disagrees. This final
rule does not change the commercial
seasonal closure for greater amberjack of
March 1 through May 31, which is in
place to protect the stock during the
majority of spawning activity in the
Gulf. In addition, the harvest by the
commercial sector will still be
constrained by the commercial quota,
which will not change through this final
rule. Furthermore, extending the
commercial season may help to reduce
discards and discard mortality because
it will allow harvest later in the year.
Comment 4: The greater amberjack
commercial trip limit of 1,000 lb gutted
weight (454 kg) will negatively impact
business owners harvesting more than
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
20613
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
this amount per trip. In addition, the
further reduction in the trip limit to 250
lb gutted weight (113 kg) when 75
percent of the commercial quota is
harvested will not allow fishermen on
directed commercial trips for greater
amberjack to effectively harvest the
remaining 25 percent of the commercial
quota.
Response: NMFS agrees that the
reduction in the trip limit may have
negative economic impacts on Gulf
commercial reef fish permit holders
who have historically harvested more
than 1,000 lb gutted weight (454 kg) of
greater amberjack per trip. The
economic analysis in the framework
action estimated that the 1,000-lb gutted
weight (454-kg) commercial trip limit
will reduce the catch per trip by
approximately 18 percent, and on
average, greater amberjack accounts for
about 1.7 percent of total revenues from
commercial Gulf reef fish trips.
Therefore, the potential revenue
reduction from the reduced commercial
trip limit will be approximately 0.3
percent. However, the 1,000-lb gutted
weight (454-kg) trip limit in
combination with the 250-lb gutted
weight (113-kg) trip limit reduction
when 75 percent of the commercial
quota is harvested is estimated to extend
the fishing season from 85 days to 170
days. This may allow commercial
vessels to recoup revenue losses from
reduced trip limits. Further, as noted in
response to Comment 1, the commercial
trip limit in this final rule balances the
need of fishermen who rely on directed
trips and fishermen who rely on having
a longer season.
Comment 5: Reducing the commercial
trip limit for Gulf greater amberjack will
increase discards and will be bad for the
stock.
Response: NMFS disagrees. As
explained in the framework action,
studies have documented low bycatch
and bycatch mortality of greater
amberjack because fishermen who want
to target the species are able to find
schools when the season is open and
avoid them when there is a closure. For
fishermen who incidentally catch
greater amberjack when targeting other
species, extending the commercial
season may help reduce discards and
discard mortality by allowing those fish
to be kept later in the year.
Comment 6: Moving the boundary
between state and Federal waters off
Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama
could cause confusion.
Response: This rule does not change
the boundary between state and Federal
waters off Louisiana, Mississippi, and
Alabama. The 2016 and 2017
Appropriations Acts moved state and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Apr 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
Federal boundary off Louisiana,
Mississippi, and Louisiana to 9 nm (16.7
km) for Gulf reef fish management only.
This rule revises the boundaries of three
Gulf reef fish management areas to
reflect the change in the seaward
boundary of these states for
management purposes under the FMP.
As previously codified, the boundaries
for these Federal management areas
extended into state managed areas.
NMFS expects that updating the
boundaries for the affected Gulf reef fish
management areas will reduce
confusion because these regulatory
boundaries will be consistent with the
boundaries specified in the
Appropriations Acts.
Classification
The Regional Administrator for the
NMFS Southeast Region has determined
that this final rule is consistent with the
framework action, the FMP, the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable laws.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
This final rule is not an Executive
Order 13771 regulatory action because
this action is not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides
the statutory basis for this final rule. No
duplicative, overlapping, or conflicting
Federal rules have been identified. In
addition, no new reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements are introduced by this
final rule.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
during the proposed rule stage that this
rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The factual basis for this determination
was published in the proposed rule and
is not repeated here. One comment from
the public on economic impacts was
received, and is addressed in the
Comments and Responses section in the
response to Comment 4. No comments
from the public or the SBA’s Chief
Counsel for Advocacy were received
regarding the certification, and NMFS
has not received any new information
that would affect its determination. As
a result, a final regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required and none has
been prepared.
List of subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Boundary, Commercial, Coordinates,
Fisheries, Fishing, Greater amberjack,
Gulf of Mexico, Reef fish, Trip limits.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: April 1, 2020.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is amended
as follows:
PART 622—FISHERIES OF THE
CARIBBEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND
SOUTH ATLANTIC
1. The authority citation for part 622
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 622.34, revise paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
■
§ 622.34 Seasonal and area closures
designed to protect Gulf reef fish.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Seasonal closure of the
recreational sector for shallow-water
grouper (SWG). The recreational sector
for SWG in or from the Gulf EEZ is
closed each year from February 1
through March 31 in the portion of the
Gulf EEZ seaward of rhumb lines
connecting the following points in
order. During the closure, the bag and
possession limits for SWG in or from the
Gulf EEZ seaward of the following
rhumb lines are zero.
TABLE 4 TO PARAGRAPH (d)
Point
North lat.
1 ........
2 ........
3 ........
4 ........
5 ........
6 ........
7 ........
8 ........
9 ........
10 ......
11 ......
12 ......
13 ......
14 ......
15 ......
16 ......
17 ......
18 ......
19 ......
24°48.0′
25°07.5′
26°26.0′
27°30.0′
28°10.0′
28°11.0′
28°11.0′
28°26.6′
28°42.5′
29°05.0′
29°02.5′
29°21.0′
29°27.9′
29°45.8′
30°05.6′
30°07.5′
29°43.9′
29°43.0′
29°18.9′
20 ......
28°58.98′ ...........
21 ......
29°02.0′ .............
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
.............
West long.
82°48.0′
82°34.0′
82°59.0′
83°21.5′
83°45.0′
84°00.0′
84°07.0′
84°24.8′
84°24.8′
84°47.0′
85°09.0′
85°30.0′
85°51.7′
85°51.0′
86°18.5′
86°56.5′
87°33.8′
88°18.5′
88°50.7′ at State
and Federal
Reef Fish
Management
Boundary, follow Reef Fish
Management
Boundary to
point 20
89°35.1′ at State
and Federal
Reef Fish
Management
Boundary
89°45.5′
20614
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 4 TO PARAGRAPH (d)—
Continued
Point
North lat.
West long.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 622.43, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 622.43
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
28°32.7′ .............
28°24.8′ .............
28°42.3′ .............
28°34.2′ .............
28°27.6′ .............
28°20.0′ .............
28°02.2′ .............
27°46.5′ .............
27°15.0′ .............
26°45.5′ .............
At EEZ boundary
90°21.5′
90°52.7′
92°14.4′
92°30.4′
95°00.0′
95°06.9′
96°11.1′
96°38.1′
97°00.0′
97°01.4′
96°51.0′
Commercial trip limits.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Gulf greater amberjack. (1) Until
75 percent of the quota specified in
§ 622.39(a)(1)(v) is reached, 1,000 lb
(454 kg), gutted weight; 1,040 lb (472
kg), round weight.
(2) After 75 percent of the quota is
reached or projected to be reached, 250
lb (113 kg), gutted weight; 260 lb (118
kg), round weight. See § 622.39(b) for
the limitations regarding greater
amberjack after the quota is reached.
When the conditions in this paragraph
(a)(2) have been reached, the Assistant
Administrator will implement this trip
limit change by filing a notification with
the Office of the Federal Register.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Revise appendix B to read as
follows:
■
Appendix B to Part 622—Gulf Areas
TABLE 1 OF APPENDIX B TO PART 622—SEAWARD COORDINATES OF THE LONGLINE AND BUOY GEAR RESTRICTED AREA
Point number and reference location 1
North lat.
1 Seaward limit of State and Federal Reef Fish Management Boundary north of Dry Tortugas.
2 North of Rebecca Shoal ......................................................................
3 Off Sanibel Island—Offshore ..............................................................
4 West of Egmont Key ...........................................................................
5 Off Anclote Keys—Offshore ................................................................
6 Southeast corner of Florida Middle Ground ........................................
7 Southwest corner of Florida Middle Ground .......................................
8 West corner of Florida Middle Ground ................................................
9 Northwest corner of Florida Middle Ground ........................................
10 South of Carrabelle ...........................................................................
11 South of Cape St. George ................................................................
12 South of Cape San Blas lighted bell buoy—20 fathoms ..................
13 South of Cape San Blas lighted bell buoy—50 fathoms ..................
14 De Soto Canyon ................................................................................
15 South of Pensacola ...........................................................................
16 South of Perdido Bay ........................................................................
17 East of North Pass of Mississippi River ............................................
18 East of South Pass of Mississippi River ...........................................
24°48.0′ .........................................
82°48.0′
25°07.5′
26°26.0′
27°30.0′
28°10.0′
28°11.0′
28°11.0′
28°26.6′
28°42.5′
29°05.0′
29°02.5′
29°21.0′
28°58.7′
30°06.0′
29°46.0′
29°29.0′
29°14.5′
29°04.0′
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
82°34.0′
82°59.0′
83°21.5′
83°45.0′
84°00.0′
84°07.0′
84°24.8′
84°24.8′
84°47.0′
85°09.0′
85°30.0′
85°30.0′
86°55.0′
87°19.0′
87°27.5′
88°28.0′
88°49.7′ at State and Federal
Reef Fish Management Boundary
28°46.5′
28°38.5′
28°34.5′
28°22.5′
28°10.5′
27°58.0′
27°43.0′
27°30.0′
27°00.0′
26°44.0′
26°22.0′
26°00.5′
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
89°26.0′
90°08.5′
89°59.5′
90°02.5′
90°31.5′
95°00.0′
96°02.0′
96°23.5′
96°39.0′
96°37.5′
96°21.0′
96°24.5′
Then westerly along the seaward limit of the State and Federal Reef
Fish Management Boundary to:
19 South of Southwest Pass of Mississippi River .................................
20 Northwest tip of Mississippi Canyon .................................................
21 West side of Mississippi Canyon ......................................................
22 South of Timbalier Bay ......................................................................
23 South of Terrebonne Bay ..................................................................
24 South of Freeport ..............................................................................
25 Off Matagorda Island .........................................................................
26 Off Aransas Pass ..............................................................................
27 Northeast of Port Mansfield ..............................................................
28 East of Port Mansfield .......................................................................
29 Northeast of Port Isabel ....................................................................
30 U.S. and Mexico EEZ boundary .......................................................
Then westerly along U.S. and Mexico EEZ boundary to seaward limit
of the State and Federal Reef Fish Management Boundary
1 Nearest
West long.
identifiable landfall, boundary, navigational aid, or submarine area.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
TABLE 2 OF APPENDIX B TO PART 622—SEAWARD COORDINATES OF THE STRESSED AREA
Point number and reference location 1
North lat.
1 Seaward limit of State and Federal Reef Fish Management Boundary northeast of Dry Tortugas.
2 North of Marquesas Keys ...................................................................
3 Off Cape Sable ....................................................................................
4 Off Sanibel Island—Inshore ................................................................
5 Off Sanibel Island—Offshore ..............................................................
6 West of Egmont Key ...........................................................................
7 Off Anclote Keys—Offshore ................................................................
8 Off Anclote Keys—Inshore ..................................................................
9 Off Deadman Bay ................................................................................
24°45.5′ .........................................
82°41.5′
24°48.0′
25°15.0′
26°26.0′
26°26.0′
27°30.0′
28°10.0′
28°10.0′
29°38.0′
82°06.5′
82°02.0′
82°29.0′
82°59.0′
83°21.5′
83°45.0′
83°14.0′
84°00.0′
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Apr 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
West long.
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
20615
TABLE 2 OF APPENDIX B TO PART 622—SEAWARD COORDINATES OF THE STRESSED AREA—Continued
Point number and reference location 1
North lat.
10 Seaward limit of State and Federal Reef Fish Management Boundary east of Cape St. George.
Then westerly along the seaward limit of State and Federal Reef Fish
Management Boundary to:
11 Seaward limit of State and Federal Reef Fish Management Boundary south of Cape San Blas.
12 Southwest of Cape San Blas ............................................................
13 Off St. Andrew Bay ...........................................................................
14 De Soto Canyon ................................................................................
15 South of Florida and Alabama border ...............................................
16 Off Mobile Bay ...................................................................................
17 South of Alabama and Mississippi border ........................................
18 Horn and Chandeleur Islands ...........................................................
29°35.5′ .........................................
84°38.6′
29°32.2′ .........................................
85°27.1′
29°30.5′
29°53.0′
30°06.0′
29°34.5′
29°41.0′
30°01.5′
30°01.5′
85°52.0′
86°10.0′
86°55.0′
87°38.0′
88°00.0′
88°23.7′
88°39.8′ at State and Federal
Reef Fish Management Boundary
Then southerly along the seaward limit of State and Federal Reef Fish
Management Boundary to:
19 Seaward limit of State and Federal Reef Fish Management Boundary off Chandeleur Islands.
20 Chandeleur Islands ...........................................................................
21 Seaward limit of State and Federal Reef Fish Management Boundary off North Pass of Mississippi River.
Then southerly and westerly along the seaward limit of State and Federal Reef Fish Management Boundary to:
22 Seaward limit of State and Federal Reef Fish Management Boundary off Southwest Pass of Mississippi River.
23 Seaward limit of the State and Federal Reef Fish Management
Boundary west of Mississippi River.
Then westerly along the seaward limit of the State and Federal Reef
Fish Management Boundary to:
24 Seaward limit of State and Federal Reef Fish Management Boundary south of Grand Isle.
25 Quick flashing horn buoy south of Isles Dernieres ...........................
26 Southeast of Calcasieu Pass ............................................................
27 South of Sabine Pass—10 fathoms ..................................................
28 South of Sabine Pass—30 fathoms ..................................................
29 East of Aransas Pass ........................................................................
30 East of Baffin Bay .............................................................................
31 Northeast of Port Mansfield ..............................................................
32 Northeast of Port Isabel ....................................................................
33 U.S. and Mexico EEZ boundary .......................................................
Then westerly along U.S. and Mexico EEZ boundary to seaward limit
of the State and Federal Reef Fish Management Boundary
1 Nearest
West long.
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
29°50.8′ .........................................
29°35.5′ .........................................
29°21.0′ .........................................
29°01.3′ .........................................
29°5.24′ at State and Federal
Reef Fish Management Boundary.
29°3.03′ at State and Federal
Reef Fish Management Boundary.
28°32.5′ .........................................
29°10.0′ .........................................
29°09.0′ .........................................
28°21.5′ .........................................
27°49.0′ .........................................
27°12.0′ .........................................
26°46.5′ .........................................
26°21.5′ .........................................
26°00.5′ .........................................
88°39.07′ at State and
Reef Fish Management
ary
88°37.0′
88°54.43′ at State and
Reef Fish Management
ary
Federal
Bound-
89°34.67′ at State and Federal
Reef Fish Management Boundary
89°41.0′
89°56.0′
90°42.0′
92°37.0′
93°41.0′
93°28.0′
96°19.5′
96°51.0′
96°52.0′
96°35.0′
96°36.0′
identifiable landfall, boundary, navigational aid, or submarine area.
[FR Doc. 2020–07253 Filed 4–13–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final specifications.
We are approving
specifications for the 2020 Atlantic
deep-sea red crab fishery, including an
annual catch limit and total allowable
landings limit and are clarifying the
specifications process. This action
establishes the allowable 2020 harvest
levels, consistent with the Atlantic
Deep-Sea Red Crab Fishery Management
Plan. This action is necessary to
establish allowable red crab harvest
levels that will prevent overfishing.
DATES: The final specifications for the
2020 Atlantic deep-sea red crab fishery
SUMMARY:
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 200402–0097]
RIN 0648–BI31
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal
Bound-
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Atlantic Deep-Sea Red Crab
Fishery; 2020 Atlantic Deep-Sea Red
Crab Specifications
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Apr 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 14, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20611-20615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-07253]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 200401-0096]
RIN 0648-BJ08
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;
Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Greater Amberjack Management
Measures
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues regulations to implement management measures
described in a framework action to the Fishery Management Plan for the
Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico (FMP). This final rule
revises the commercial trip limit in the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf)
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) for greater amberjack. In addition, this
final rule revises the boundaries of several Gulf reef fish management
areas to reflect a change in the seaward boundary of Louisiana,
Mississippi, and Alabama. The purpose of this final rule is to extend
the commercial fishing season for greater amberjack by constraining the
harvest rate while continuing to prevent overfishing and rebuild the
stock in the Gulf, and to update the boundaries of reef fish management
areas to reflect the current state water's boundaries for reef fish
management.
DATES: This final rule is effective on May 14, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the framework action, which includes an
environmental assessment, a regulatory impact review, and a Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) analysis may be obtained from the Southeast
Regional Office website at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/framework-action-greater-amberjack-commercial-trip-limits.
[[Page 20612]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelli O'Donnell, Southeast Regional
Office, NMFS, telephone: 727-824-5305, email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Gulf reef fish fishery includes greater
amberjack and is managed under the FMP. The FMP was prepared by the
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council) and is implemented
by NMFS through regulations at 50 CFR part 622 under the authority of
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-
Stevens Act).
On December 19, 2019, NMFS published a proposed rule in the Federal
Register for the framework action and requested public comment (84 FR
69715, December 19, 2019). The proposed rule and the framework action
outline the rationale for the actions contained in this final rule. A
summary of the management measures described in the framework action
and implemented by this final rule is provided below.
Management Measure Contained in This Final Rule
This final rule reduces the Gulf greater amberjack commercial trip
limit from 1,500 lb gutted weight (680 kg; 1,560 lb (708 kg) round
weight) to 1,000 lb gutted weight (454 kg; 1,040 lb (472 kg) round
weight). Additionally, this final rule reduces the commercial trip
limit to 250 lb gutted weight (113 kg; 260 lb (118 kg) round weight)
when 75 percent of the commercial annual catch target (commercial
quota) has been landed.
This commercial trip limit reduction is expected to extend the
length of the commercial fishing season while continuing to allow
enough harvest per trip to support vessels that engage in directed
trips for greater amberjack. An in-season closure of the commercial
sector for greater amberjack is still expected to occur as a result of
the commercial quota being reached, but will likely occur later in the
January through December fishing year than has occurred in recent
years.
Changes in This Final Rule Not in the Framework Action
This final rule revises the boundaries of three Gulf reef fish
management areas to reflect a change in the seaward boundaries of
Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama for purposes of management under
the FMP. Language included in the 2016 and 2017 Consolidated
Appropriations Acts (Pub. L. 114-113, December 18, 2015, and Pub. L.
115-31, May 5, 2017), changed the state and Federal boundary for
management of the Gulf reef fish fishery to 9 nautical miles (nm; 16.7
km) off the Gulf coasts of all the Gulf States. Therefore, some
existing Federal reef fish management areas that were exclusively in
Federal waters now extend into state managed areas.
This final rule updates the FMP regulations by revising the
coordinates of the inshore boundaries for the reef fish stressed area
(Table 2 of appendix B to 50 CFR part 622), the reef fish longline and
buoy gear restricted area (Table 1 of appendix B to 50 CFR part 622),
and the recreational shallow-water grouper closure (50 CFR 622.34(d)).
This rule also updates the terminology in the coordinate tables to
reflect that this boundary is specific to Gulf reef fish management.
This rule does not change the management measures associated with each
area.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received a total of 20 comments on the proposed rule for the
framework action. Most commenters supported the measures for Gulf
greater amberjack in the proposed rule. Other comments suggested
changes to management measures that were outside the scope of the
proposed rule, such as gear restrictions and a prohibition on
commercial harvest, and therefore, are not addressed further. Specific
comments related to the framework action and the proposed rule are
grouped by topic and summarized below, followed by NMFS' respective
responses.
Comment 1: The commercial trip limit for Gulf greater amberjack
should be reduced further than 1,000 lb gutted weight (454 kg) with a
trip limit reduction to 250 lb gutted weight (113 kg) when 75 percent
of the commercial quota is harvested.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the trip limit should be reduced more
than specified in this final rule. The Council considered three other
alternatives for a commercial trip limit that ranged from 750 lb to 250
lb gutted weight (340 kg to 113 kg). However, the Council determined
that these trip limits were too small to allow for directed commercial
trips for Gulf greater amberjack based on public testimony by
commercial fishermen, who indicated that they needed to harvest at
least as 1,000 lb gutted weight (454 kg) or more per trip.
Additionally, the alternative trip limits of 250 lb gutted weight (113
kg) year-round, or 500 lb gutted weight (227-kg; 520-lb (236-kg) round
weight) with a reduction to 250 lb gutted weight (113 kg) at 75 percent
of the commercial quota, were not expected to allow fishermen to
harvest all of the commercial quota during a fishing year. Therefore,
the Council determined, and NMFS agrees, that the reduction in the trip
limit to 1,000 lb gutted weight (454 kg), and a further reduction to
250 lb gutted weight (113 kg) when 75 percent of the commercial quota
is harvested, best balances the need of fishermen who rely on directed
trips for Gulf greater amberjack and fishermen who rely on having a
longer season.
Comment 2: The commercial trip limit for greater amberjack in the
Gulf should remain the same or be increased.
Response: NMFS disagrees. The previous commercial trip limit of
1,500 lb gutted weight (680 kg) has been in effect since 2016 (80 FR
75432; December 2, 2015). From 2013 to 2016, a 2,000-lb round weight
(907-kg) commercial trip limit was in effect (77 FR 67574; November 13,
2012). These commercial trip limits did not reduce harvest of Gulf
greater amberjack enough to prevent yearly in-season commercial
closures. Therefore, maintaining the previous trip limit or increasing
the trip limit would not help achieve the purpose of this rule, which
is to extend the Gulf greater amberjack commercial fishing season.
Analysis included in the framework action predicted that, when compared
to the alternatives considered, the shortest commercial fishing season
would occur under the 1,500-lb gutted weight (680-kg) commercial trip
limit, even with the current March through May seasonal closure. A
larger commercial trip limit would result in an even shorter commercial
fishing season. While NMFS still predicts that an in-season closure
will occur with the reduced trip limit implemented through this final
rule, the closure should occur later in the fishing year, thereby
extending the opportunity for commercial harvest.
Comment 3: If commercial harvest for greater amberjack in the Gulf
extends into the summer spawning season, the stock will be harmed.
Response: NMFS disagrees. This final rule does not change the
commercial seasonal closure for greater amberjack of March 1 through
May 31, which is in place to protect the stock during the majority of
spawning activity in the Gulf. In addition, the harvest by the
commercial sector will still be constrained by the commercial quota,
which will not change through this final rule. Furthermore, extending
the commercial season may help to reduce discards and discard mortality
because it will allow harvest later in the year.
Comment 4: The greater amberjack commercial trip limit of 1,000 lb
gutted weight (454 kg) will negatively impact business owners
harvesting more than
[[Page 20613]]
this amount per trip. In addition, the further reduction in the trip
limit to 250 lb gutted weight (113 kg) when 75 percent of the
commercial quota is harvested will not allow fishermen on directed
commercial trips for greater amberjack to effectively harvest the
remaining 25 percent of the commercial quota.
Response: NMFS agrees that the reduction in the trip limit may have
negative economic impacts on Gulf commercial reef fish permit holders
who have historically harvested more than 1,000 lb gutted weight (454
kg) of greater amberjack per trip. The economic analysis in the
framework action estimated that the 1,000-lb gutted weight (454-kg)
commercial trip limit will reduce the catch per trip by approximately
18 percent, and on average, greater amberjack accounts for about 1.7
percent of total revenues from commercial Gulf reef fish trips.
Therefore, the potential revenue reduction from the reduced commercial
trip limit will be approximately 0.3 percent. However, the 1,000-lb
gutted weight (454-kg) trip limit in combination with the 250-lb gutted
weight (113-kg) trip limit reduction when 75 percent of the commercial
quota is harvested is estimated to extend the fishing season from 85
days to 170 days. This may allow commercial vessels to recoup revenue
losses from reduced trip limits. Further, as noted in response to
Comment 1, the commercial trip limit in this final rule balances the
need of fishermen who rely on directed trips and fishermen who rely on
having a longer season.
Comment 5: Reducing the commercial trip limit for Gulf greater
amberjack will increase discards and will be bad for the stock.
Response: NMFS disagrees. As explained in the framework action,
studies have documented low bycatch and bycatch mortality of greater
amberjack because fishermen who want to target the species are able to
find schools when the season is open and avoid them when there is a
closure. For fishermen who incidentally catch greater amberjack when
targeting other species, extending the commercial season may help
reduce discards and discard mortality by allowing those fish to be kept
later in the year.
Comment 6: Moving the boundary between state and Federal waters off
Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama could cause confusion.
Response: This rule does not change the boundary between state and
Federal waters off Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. The 2016 and
2017 Appropriations Acts moved state and Federal boundary off
Louisiana, Mississippi, and Louisiana to 9 nm (16.7 km) for Gulf reef
fish management only. This rule revises the boundaries of three Gulf
reef fish management areas to reflect the change in the seaward
boundary of these states for management purposes under the FMP. As
previously codified, the boundaries for these Federal management areas
extended into state managed areas. NMFS expects that updating the
boundaries for the affected Gulf reef fish management areas will reduce
confusion because these regulatory boundaries will be consistent with
the boundaries specified in the Appropriations Acts.
Classification
The Regional Administrator for the NMFS Southeast Region has
determined that this final rule is consistent with the framework
action, the FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable laws.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
This final rule is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because this action is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides the statutory basis for this
final rule. No duplicative, overlapping, or conflicting Federal rules
have been identified. In addition, no new reporting, recordkeeping, or
other compliance requirements are introduced by this final rule.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) during the proposed rule stage that this rule, if
adopted, would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The factual basis for this determination was
published in the proposed rule and is not repeated here. One comment
from the public on economic impacts was received, and is addressed in
the Comments and Responses section in the response to Comment 4. No
comments from the public or the SBA's Chief Counsel for Advocacy were
received regarding the certification, and NMFS has not received any new
information that would affect its determination. As a result, a final
regulatory flexibility analysis is not required and none has been
prepared.
List of subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Boundary, Commercial, Coordinates, Fisheries, Fishing, Greater
amberjack, Gulf of Mexico, Reef fish, Trip limits.
Dated: April 1, 2020.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is amended
as follows:
PART 622--FISHERIES OF THE CARIBBEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND SOUTH
ATLANTIC
0
1. The authority citation for part 622 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 622.34, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 622.34 Seasonal and area closures designed to protect Gulf reef
fish.
* * * * *
(d) Seasonal closure of the recreational sector for shallow-water
grouper (SWG). The recreational sector for SWG in or from the Gulf EEZ
is closed each year from February 1 through March 31 in the portion of
the Gulf EEZ seaward of rhumb lines connecting the following points in
order. During the closure, the bag and possession limits for SWG in or
from the Gulf EEZ seaward of the following rhumb lines are zero.
Table 4 to Paragraph (d)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point North lat. West long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................. 24[deg]48.0'............. 82[deg]48.0'
2................. 25[deg]07.5'............. 82[deg]34.0'
3................. 26[deg]26.0'............. 82[deg]59.0'
4................. 27[deg]30.0'............. 83[deg]21.5'
5................. 28[deg]10.0'............. 83[deg]45.0'
6................. 28[deg]11.0'............. 84[deg]00.0'
7................. 28[deg]11.0'............. 84[deg]07.0'
8................. 28[deg]26.6'............. 84[deg]24.8'
9................. 28[deg]42.5'............. 84[deg]24.8'
10................ 29[deg]05.0'............. 84[deg]47.0'
11................ 29[deg]02.5'............. 85[deg]09.0'
12................ 29[deg]21.0'............. 85[deg]30.0'
13................ 29[deg]27.9'............. 85[deg]51.7'
14................ 29[deg]45.8'............. 85[deg]51.0'
15................ 30[deg]05.6'............. 86[deg]18.5'
16................ 30[deg]07.5'............. 86[deg]56.5'
17................ 29[deg]43.9'............. 87[deg]33.8'
18................ 29[deg]43.0'............. 88[deg]18.5'
19................ 29[deg]18.9'............. 88[deg]50.7' at State and
Federal Reef Fish
Management Boundary,
follow Reef Fish
Management Boundary to
point 20
20................ 28[deg]58.98'............ 89[deg]35.1' at State and
Federal Reef Fish
Management Boundary
21................ 29[deg]02.0'............. 89[deg]45.5'
[[Page 20614]]
22................ 28[deg]32.7'............. 90[deg]21.5'
23................ 28[deg]24.8'............. 90[deg]52.7'
24................ 28[deg]42.3'............. 92[deg]14.4'
25................ 28[deg]34.2'............. 92[deg]30.4'
26................ 28[deg]27.6'............. 95[deg]00.0'
27................ 28[deg]20.0'............. 95[deg]06.9'
28................ 28[deg]02.2'............. 96[deg]11.1'
29................ 27[deg]46.5'............. 96[deg]38.1'
30................ 27[deg]15.0'............. 97[deg]00.0'
31................ 26[deg]45.5'............. 97[deg]01.4'
32................ At EEZ boundary.......... 96[deg]51.0'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 622.43, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 622.43 Commercial trip limits.
* * * * *
(a) Gulf greater amberjack. (1) Until 75 percent of the quota
specified in Sec. 622.39(a)(1)(v) is reached, 1,000 lb (454 kg),
gutted weight; 1,040 lb (472 kg), round weight.
(2) After 75 percent of the quota is reached or projected to be
reached, 250 lb (113 kg), gutted weight; 260 lb (118 kg), round weight.
See Sec. 622.39(b) for the limitations regarding greater amberjack
after the quota is reached. When the conditions in this paragraph
(a)(2) have been reached, the Assistant Administrator will implement
this trip limit change by filing a notification with the Office of the
Federal Register.
* * * * *
0
4. Revise appendix B to read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 622--Gulf Areas
Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 622--Seaward Coordinates of the Longline
and Buoy Gear Restricted Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point number and reference
location 1 North lat. West long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Seaward limit of State and 24[deg]48.0'...... 82[deg]48.0'
Federal Reef Fish Management
Boundary north of Dry Tortugas.
2 North of Rebecca Shoal........ 25[deg]07.5'...... 82[deg]34.0'
3 Off Sanibel Island--Offshore.. 26[deg]26.0'...... 82[deg]59.0'
4 West of Egmont Key............ 27[deg]30.0'...... 83[deg]21.5'
5 Off Anclote Keys--Offshore.... 28[deg]10.0'...... 83[deg]45.0'
6 Southeast corner of Florida 28[deg]11.0'...... 84[deg]00.0'
Middle Ground.
7 Southwest corner of Florida 28[deg]11.0'...... 84[deg]07.0'
Middle Ground.
8 West corner of Florida Middle 28[deg]26.6'...... 84[deg]24.8'
Ground.
9 Northwest corner of Florida 28[deg]42.5'...... 84[deg]24.8'
Middle Ground.
10 South of Carrabelle.......... 29[deg]05.0'...... 84[deg]47.0'
11 South of Cape St. George..... 29[deg]02.5'...... 85[deg]09.0'
12 South of Cape San Blas 29[deg]21.0'...... 85[deg]30.0'
lighted bell buoy--20 fathoms.
13 South of Cape San Blas 28[deg]58.7'...... 85[deg]30.0'
lighted bell buoy--50 fathoms.
14 De Soto Canyon............... 30[deg]06.0'...... 86[deg]55.0'
15 South of Pensacola........... 29[deg]46.0'...... 87[deg]19.0'
16 South of Perdido Bay......... 29[deg]29.0'...... 87[deg]27.5'
17 East of North Pass of 29[deg]14.5'...... 88[deg]28.0'
Mississippi River.
18 East of South Pass of 29[deg]04.0'...... 88[deg]49.7' at
Mississippi River. State and Federal
Reef Fish
Management
Boundary
Then westerly along the seaward
limit of the State and Federal
Reef Fish Management Boundary
to:
19 South of Southwest Pass of 28[deg]46.5'...... 89[deg]26.0'
Mississippi River.
20 Northwest tip of Mississippi 28[deg]38.5'...... 90[deg]08.5'
Canyon.
21 West side of Mississippi 28[deg]34.5'...... 89[deg]59.5'
Canyon.
22 South of Timbalier Bay....... 28[deg]22.5'...... 90[deg]02.5'
23 South of Terrebonne Bay...... 28[deg]10.5'...... 90[deg]31.5'
24 South of Freeport............ 27[deg]58.0'...... 95[deg]00.0'
25 Off Matagorda Island......... 27[deg]43.0'...... 96[deg]02.0'
26 Off Aransas Pass............. 27[deg]30.0'...... 96[deg]23.5'
27 Northeast of Port Mansfield.. 27[deg]00.0'...... 96[deg]39.0'
28 East of Port Mansfield....... 26[deg]44.0'...... 96[deg]37.5'
29 Northeast of Port Isabel..... 26[deg]22.0'...... 96[deg]21.0'
30 U.S. and Mexico EEZ boundary. 26[deg]00.5'...... 96[deg]24.5'
Then westerly along U.S. and
Mexico EEZ boundary to seaward
limit of the State and Federal
Reef Fish Management Boundary
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Nearest identifiable landfall, boundary, navigational aid, or
submarine area.
Table 2 of Appendix B to Part 622--Seaward Coordinates of the Stressed
Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point number and reference
location 1 North lat. West long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Seaward limit of State and 24[deg]45.5'...... 82[deg]41.5'
Federal Reef Fish Management
Boundary northeast of Dry
Tortugas.
2 North of Marquesas Keys....... 24[deg]48.0'...... 82[deg]06.5'
3 Off Cape Sable................ 25[deg]15.0'...... 82[deg]02.0'
4 Off Sanibel Island--Inshore... 26[deg]26.0'...... 82[deg]29.0'
5 Off Sanibel Island--Offshore.. 26[deg]26.0'...... 82[deg]59.0'
6 West of Egmont Key............ 27[deg]30.0'...... 83[deg]21.5'
7 Off Anclote Keys--Offshore.... 28[deg]10.0'...... 83[deg]45.0'
8 Off Anclote Keys--Inshore..... 28[deg]10.0'...... 83[deg]14.0'
9 Off Deadman Bay............... 29[deg]38.0'...... 84[deg]00.0'
[[Page 20615]]
10 Seaward limit of State and 29[deg]35.5'...... 84[deg]38.6'
Federal Reef Fish Management
Boundary east of Cape St.
George.
Then westerly along the seaward
limit of State and Federal Reef
Fish Management Boundary to:
11 Seaward limit of State and 29[deg]32.2'...... 85[deg]27.1'
Federal Reef Fish Management
Boundary south of Cape San Blas.
12 Southwest of Cape San Blas... 29[deg]30.5'...... 85[deg]52.0'
13 Off St. Andrew Bay........... 29[deg]53.0'...... 86[deg]10.0'
14 De Soto Canyon............... 30[deg]06.0'...... 86[deg]55.0'
15 South of Florida and Alabama 29[deg]34.5'...... 87[deg]38.0'
border.
16 Off Mobile Bay............... 29[deg]41.0'...... 88[deg]00.0'
17 South of Alabama and 30[deg]01.5'...... 88[deg]23.7'
Mississippi border.
18 Horn and Chandeleur Islands.. 30[deg]01.5'...... 88[deg]39.8' at
State and Federal
Reef Fish
Management
Boundary
Then southerly along the seaward
limit of State and Federal Reef
Fish Management Boundary to:
19 Seaward limit of State and 29[deg]50.8'...... 88[deg]39.07' at
Federal Reef Fish Management State and Federal
Boundary off Chandeleur Islands. Reef Fish
Management
Boundary
20 Chandeleur Islands........... 29[deg]35.5'...... 88[deg]37.0'
21 Seaward limit of State and 29[deg]21.0'...... 88[deg]54.43' at
Federal Reef Fish Management State and Federal
Boundary off North Pass of Reef Fish
Mississippi River. Management
Boundary
Then southerly and westerly
along the seaward limit of
State and Federal Reef Fish
Management Boundary to:
22 Seaward limit of State and 29[deg]01.3'...... 89[deg]34.67' at
Federal Reef Fish Management State and Federal
Boundary off Southwest Pass of Reef Fish
Mississippi River. Management
Boundary
23 Seaward limit of the State 29[deg]5.24' at 89[deg]41.0'
and Federal Reef Fish State and Federal
Management Boundary west of Reef Fish
Mississippi River. Management
Boundary.
Then westerly along the seaward
limit of the State and Federal
Reef Fish Management Boundary
to:
24 Seaward limit of State and 29[deg]3.03' at 89[deg]56.0'
Federal Reef Fish Management State and Federal
Boundary south of Grand Isle. Reef Fish
Management
Boundary.
25 Quick flashing horn buoy 28[deg]32.5'...... 90[deg]42.0'
south of Isles Dernieres.
26 Southeast of Calcasieu Pass.. 29[deg]10.0'...... 92[deg]37.0'
27 South of Sabine Pass--10 29[deg]09.0'...... 93[deg]41.0'
fathoms.
28 South of Sabine Pass--30 28[deg]21.5'...... 93[deg]28.0'
fathoms.
29 East of Aransas Pass......... 27[deg]49.0'...... 96[deg]19.5'
30 East of Baffin Bay........... 27[deg]12.0'...... 96[deg]51.0'
31 Northeast of Port Mansfield.. 26[deg]46.5'...... 96[deg]52.0'
32 Northeast of Port Isabel..... 26[deg]21.5'...... 96[deg]35.0'
33 U.S. and Mexico EEZ boundary. 26[deg]00.5'...... 96[deg]36.0'
Then westerly along U.S. and
Mexico EEZ boundary to seaward
limit of the State and Federal
Reef Fish Management Boundary
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Nearest identifiable landfall, boundary, navigational aid, or
submarine area.
[FR Doc. 2020-07253 Filed 4-13-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P