Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Revisions to Catch Sharing Plan and Domestic Management Measures in Alaska, 20657-20661 [2020-07097]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 14, 2020 / Proposed Rules
G. Federal Rules That May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed
Rule
39. None
H. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 Analysis
40. This document may result in new
or modified information collections
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3501–3520). If the Commission adopts
any new or revised information
collection requirement, the Commission
will publish a notice in the Federal
Register inviting the public to comment
on the requirement, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act. In addition,
pursuant to the Small Business
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public
Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4),
the Commission will seek comment on
how it might further reduce the
information collection burden for small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Ex Parte Rules
41. Permit-But-Disclose. This
proceeding shall be treated as a ‘‘permitbut-disclose’’ proceeding in accordance
with the Commission’s ex parte rules.
Persons making ex parte presentations
must file a copy of any written
presentation or a memorandum
summarizing any oral presentation
within two business days after the
presentation (unless a different deadline
applicable to the Sunshine period
applies). Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons
attending or otherwise participating in
the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2)
summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation
consisted in whole or in part of the
presentation of data or arguments
already reflected in the presenter’s
written comments, memoranda, or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter
may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments,
memoranda, or other filings (specifying
the relevant page and/or paragraph
numbers where such data or arguments
can be found) in lieu of summarizing
them in the memorandum. Documents
shown or given to Commission staff
during ex parte meetings are deemed to
be written ex parte presentations and
must be filed consistent with section
1.1206(b) of the rules. In proceedings
governed by section 1.49(f) of the rules
or for which the Commission has made
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Apr 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
available a method of electronic filing,
written ex parte presentations and
memoranda summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments
thereto, must be filed through the
electronic comment filing system
available for that proceeding, and must
be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc,
.xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants
in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s ex
parte rules.
J. Filing Procedures
42. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and
1.419 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR
1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file
comments and reply comments on or
before the dates indicated on the first
page of this document. Comments may
be filed using the Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS).
D Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://apps.fcc.gov/
ecfs/.
D Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
one copy of each filing. If more than one
docket or rulemaking number appears in
the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for
each additional docket or rulemaking
number.
D Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
D All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th Street SW, TW–A325, Washington,
DC 20554. The filing hours are 8:00 a.m.
to 7:00 p.m. All hand deliveries must be
held together with rubber bands or
fasteners. Any envelopes and boxes
must be disposed of before entering the
building.
D Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050
Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD
20701.
D U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20554.
43. Availability of Documents.
Comments, reply comments, and ex
parte submissions will be available for
public inspection during regular
business hours in the FCC Reference
Center, Federal Communications
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20657
Commission, 445 12th Street SW, CY–
A257, Washington, DC 20554. These
documents will also be available via
ECFS. Documents will be available
electronically in ASCII, Microsoft Word,
and/or Adobe Acrobat.
44. People with Disabilities. To
request materials in accessible formats
for people with disabilities (Braille,
large print, electronic files, audio
format), send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov
or call the FCC’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY).
45. Additional Information. For
additional information on this
proceeding, contact Kathy Berthot,
Kathy.Berthot@fcc.gov, of the Media
Bureau, Policy Division, (202) 418–
7454.
V. Ordering Clauses
46. Accordingly, it is ordered that,
pursuant to the authority found in
sections 303, 325, 339, 340, and 614 of
the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 303, 325, 339, 340,
and 534, this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking is adopted.
47. It is further ordered that the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of
this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
including the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
Federal Communications Commission.
Cecilia Sigmund,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–07505 Filed 4–13–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 200330–0092]
RIN 0648–BJ34
Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Revisions to
Catch Sharing Plan and Domestic
Management Measures in Alaska
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes regulations
that would implement a ‘‘fish up’’
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
20658
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 14, 2020 / Proposed Rules
provision in the halibut and sablefish
Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program
to allow Community Quota Entities
(CQEs) located in IFQ regulatory Area
3A (Southcentral Alaska) holding
category D halibut quota share (QS) (i.e.,
for use on catcher vessel less than or
equal to 35 ft (10.7 m) length overall) to
have the associated IFQ harvested on
category C vessels (catcher vessels less
than or equal to 60 ft (18.3 m) length
overall) beginning August 15 of each
IFQ fishing season. This action would
also make a minor change to regulations
implementing the IFQ Program to
consolidate temporary IFQ transfer
forms. This proposed rule is intended to
promote the goals and objectives of the
Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982
and other applicable laws.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than May 14, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket number NOAA–
NMFS–2019–0134, by either of the
following methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=
NOAA-NMFS-2019-0134, click the
‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the
required fields, and enter or attach your
comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region NMFS. Mail
comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau,
AK 99802–1668.
Instructions: NMFS may not consider
comments if they are sent by any other
method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the
comment period ends. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and NMFS will post the comments for
public viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender is
publicly accessible. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
Electronic copies of the Categorical
Exclusion and the Regulatory Impact
Review (RIR) prepared for this action
are available from www.regulations.gov.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this rule may
be submitted by mail to NMFS at the
above address; by email to OIRA_
Submission@omb.eop.gov; or by fax to
202–395–5806.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Apr 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Duncan, 907–586–7228 or
doug.duncan@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for Action
NMFS manages the groundfish
fisheries in the exclusive economic zone
off Alaska under the Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) for Groundfish
of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) and under
the FMP for Groundfish of the Bering
Sea and Aleutian Islands Management
Area (BSAI). The North Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council)
prepared the FMPs under the authority
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq. Regulations governing U.S.
fisheries and implementing the FMPs
appear at 50 CFR parts 600 and 679.
The International Pacific Halibut
Commission (IPHC) and NMFS manage
fishing for Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus
stenolepis) through regulations
established under authority of the
Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982
(Halibut Act). The IPHC adopts
regulations governing the Pacific halibut
fishery under the Convention between
the United States and Canada for the
Preservation of the Halibut Fishery of
the North Pacific Ocean and Bering Sea
(Convention), signed at Ottawa, Ontario,
on March 2, 1953, as amended by a
Protocol Amending the Convention
(signed at Washington, DC, on March
29, 1979). For the United States,
regulations developed by the IPHC are
subject to acceptance by the Secretary of
State with the concurrence from the
Secretary of Commerce. After
acceptance by the Secretary of State and
concurrence from the Secretary of
Commerce, NMFS publishes the IPHC
regulations in the Federal Register as
annual management measures at 50 CFR
300.62.
The Halibut Act, 16 U.S.C. 773c (a)
and (b), provides the Secretary of
Commerce with general responsibility to
carry out the Convention and the
Halibut Act. In adopting regulations that
may be necessary to carry out the
purposes and objectives of the
Convention and the Halibut Act, the
Secretary of Commerce is directed to
consult with the Secretary of the
department in which the U.S. Coast
Guard is operating, currently the
Department of Homeland Security.
The Halibut Act, 16 U.S.C. 773c (c),
also provides the Council with authority
to develop regulations, including
limited access regulations, that are in
addition to, and not in conflict with,
approved IPHC regulations. Regulations
developed by the Council may be
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
implemented by NMFS only after
approval by the Secretary of Commerce.
The Council has exercised this authority
in the development of the IFQ Program
for the commercial halibut and sablefish
fisheries, codified at 50 CFR part 679,
under the authority of section 5 of the
Halibut Act (16 U.S.C. 773c (c)) and
section 303(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act (16 U.S.C. 1853(b)).
Background
This proposed rule includes two
elements. The first would modify
regulations pertaining to the use of
halibut QS and halibut IFQ held by
CQEs in Area 3A. The second element
includes minor changes to regulations
implementing the IFQ Program that
would consolidate temporary IFQ
transfer forms. The following sections
summarize the IFQ Program, the CQE
Program, and this proposed rule.
IFQ Program
The IFQ Program, a limited access
privilege program for the fixed-gear
halibut and sablefish (Anoplopoma
fimbria) fisheries off Alaska, was
recommended by the Council in 1992
and approved by NMFS in 1993. A
comprehensive explanation of the IFQ
Program can be found in the final rule
implementing the program (58 FR
59375, November 9, 1993). The IFQ
Program for the sablefish fishery is
implemented by the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area and Federal
regulations at 50 CFR part 679 under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
The IFQ Program for the halibut fishery
is implemented by Federal regulations
at 50 CFR part 679 under the authority
of the Halibut Act.
The IFQ Program changed the
management structure of the fixed-gear
halibut and sablefish fishery by issuing
QS to qualified persons who owned or
leased a vessel that made fixed-gear
landings of those species from 1988 to
1990. Halibut QS was issued specific to
one of eight IPHC halibut management
areas throughout the BSAI and GOA,
and four vessel categories: Catcher/
processor of any length (category A);
catcher vessel of any length (category B);
catcher vessel less than or equal to 60
ft (18.3 m) LOA (category C); and
catcher vessel less than or equal to 35
ft (10.7 m) LOA (category D). The
amount of halibut that each QS holder
may harvest is calculated annually and
issued as IFQ in pounds on an IFQ
permit. Under typical circumstances,
the category of halibut IFQ must be
matched to the category of vessel used
to harvest it. Exceptions to allow a
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 14, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
smaller category of IFQ to be harvested
on a larger vessel category (i.e., fishing
category D IFQ on a category C vessel)
are referred to as ‘‘fish-up’’ provisions.
Although the IFQ Program resulted in
significant safety and economic benefits
for fishermen, many residents of
Alaska’s small, remote, coastal
communities who held QS have
transferred their QS to non-community
residents or moved out of these
communities. As a result, the number of
resident QS holders has declined
substantially in most remote coastal
communities throughout Alaska. This
transfer of halibut QS and the associated
fishing effort out of small, remote,
coastal communities has limited the
ability of residents to locally purchase
or lease QS.
CQE Program
The Council developed the CQE
Program to improve the ability for rural
coastal communities to maintain longterm opportunities to access the halibut
and sablefish resources. The Council
recommended the CQE Program in the
GOA as an amendment to the IFQ
Program in 2002, and NMFS
implemented the program in 2004 (69
FR 23681, April 30, 2004).
The CQE Program allows 45 small,
remote, coastal communities in the GOA
to purchase and hold catcher vessel
halibut QS in halibut Areas 2C, 3A, and
3B, and catcher vessel sablefish QS in
the GOA. Communities eligible to
participate in the CQE Program in the
GOA include those that meet criteria for
geographic location, population size,
historic participation in the halibut and
sablefish fisheries, and are listed in
Table 21 to 50 CFR part 679. Additional
detail on these criteria is available in the
final rule implementing the CQE
Program (69 FR 23681, April 30, 2004).
Participating communities are
represented by a CQE, which is a
NMFS-approved non-profit
organization. The CQE holds QS and
leases the IFQ derived from the
underlying QS to community residents.
With limited exceptions, QS must
remain with the CQE in order to create
a permanent asset for the community to
use. Community residents who lease
IFQ from the CQE can use the revenue
to purchase their own QS. These
program features promote community
access to QS to generate participation
in, and fishery revenues from, the
commercial halibut and sablefish
fisheries.
The Council established limitations in
the original CQE Program to prevent
excessive consolidation of IFQ harvest
into CQE communities, limit demand
driven QS price increases for all IFQ
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Apr 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
Program participants, and broadly
distribute the benefits from fishing
activities among CQE communities. One
limitation prohibited CQEs in some
areas (i.e., Southcentral Alaska; Area
3A) from purchasing entry level
category D QS. However, subsequent
review by the Council and NMFS found
that few CQEs held any halibut QS and
there was no clear evidence
demonstrating a potential conflict
between the limited number of new IFQ
Program entrants and CQEs. In 2013,
NMFS revised regulations on vessel use
caps that apply to CQE-held QS and
IFQ, expanded the list of eligible CQE
communities, and allowed CQEs to hold
category D halibut QS in Area 3A.
Additional detail is available in the final
rule implementing these regulatory
provisions (78 FR 33243, June 4, 2013).
Generally, these changes were intended
to improve the effectiveness of the CQE
Program by minimizing program
limitations.
Need for This Action
While the expanded CQE Program has
provided additional flexibility for
eligible communities to purchase,
maintain, and use QS, challenges still
remain due to difficulties in securing
favorable financing terms and limited
available revenue streams (see Section
2.9.2 of the Analysis for additional
detail). As of 2019, only two out of
fourteen eligible CQEs in Area 3A had
purchased halibut QS. Furthermore,
public testimony has indicated that in
those Area 3A CQE communities that
have acquired category D halibut QS,
smaller category D vessels are
sometimes unavailable to harvest the
IFQ, and that the skiffs often used as
category D vessels are not ideal for the
harsh weather and ocean conditions
later in the season when halibut can
move offshore (Section 2.11.3 of the
RIR). IFQ Program regulations in Area
3A do not allow category D IFQ to be
harvested on larger category C vessels
which could limit a CQE’s ability to
fully utilize its halibut IFQ in certain
circumstances. If a CQE is unable to
fully harvest its annual IFQ and realize
the associated revenue, it may face
financial challenges fulfilling any debt
service on financed QS. If no alternative
funding is available, a CQE could be
forced to sell QS, potentially
eliminating fishery access and economic
opportunities for the community.
Modifying the regulations to allow
category D IFQ to be harvested on larger
category C vessels near the end of the
IFQ season would provide more
flexibility to CQE participants to fully
harvest their category D IFQ in Area 3A.
This would further the Council’s intent
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20659
of facilitating CQE community access to
the halibut resource. By limiting use of
the exemption to the end of the season
as a contingency plan, this action is also
consistent with the intent of the IFQ
Program to maintain the historical
vessel size characteristics of the fleet
when possible.
The Council’s intent is reflected in the
purpose and need statement adopted at
final action at the April 2018 Council
meeting. The Council’s purpose and
need, and final motion is available in
the RIR (see ADDRESSES). Section 1.1 of
the RIR also provides a summary of the
history of this action.
This Proposed Rule
This proposed rule includes two
elements. The first element would
modify regulations to allow halibut IFQ
derived from CQE held category D QS
in Area 3A to be used to harvest halibut
on a vessel less than or equal to 60 ft
(18.3 m) LOA beginning on August 15
of each IFQ fishing season. The second
element of this action would make
minor changes to regulations
implementing the IFQ Program to
consolidate temporary IFQ transfer
forms.
CQE Fish-Up Provision
The first element of this proposed rule
would add a paragraph at
§ 679.42(a)(2)(ii)(A) specifying that IFQ
derived from CQE held QS assigned to
category D in Area 3A could be
harvested on a vessel less than or equal
to 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA from August 15
to the end of the IFQ season. This action
would allow eligible community
residents leasing category D IFQ from a
CQE to fish it on larger vessels near the
end of the season. This proposed rule
does not prevent category D IFQ held by
a CQE from being fished on a category
D vessel on or after the August 15.
Currently, if a CQE in Area 3A has
category D IFQ it cannot be harvested on
a vessel larger than 35 ft (10.7 m). Any
unharvested category D IFQ in excess of
10 percent of the CQE’s account cannot
be rolled over to the following year and
becomes forgone harvest and
subsequently forgone revenue to the
CQE and community harvester.
This proposed rule would only apply
to Area 3A category D halibut QS held
by a CQE located in Area 3A. CQEs
located in other IFQ regulatory areas are
not eligible to hold category D halibut
QS assigned to Area 3A. Currently, one
CQE in Area 3A owns 159,075 units of
Area 3A category D halibut QS (6,324
IFQ pounds in 2018). If CQEs held the
maximum amount of Area 3A category
D halibut QS allowed by regulation, this
proposed rule would apply to 1,233,740
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
20660
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 14, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
halibut QS units (approximately 10
percent of the total Area 3A category D
halibut QS, or about 0.7 percent of the
total halibut QS in Area 3A).
This proposed rule would provide
additional flexibility for using category
D halibut QS held by CQEs in Area 3A.
Increases in demand driven by the
additional flexibility of category D
halibut QS could increase QS prices.
However, changes in halibut QS price as
a result of this action are expected to be
limited for the following reasons. First,
the flexibility to fish up afforded by this
action is currently limited to one CQE
in Area 3A that holds approximately
6,000 pounds of category D halibut IFQ.
Second, increased flexibility for a
narrow group of users for a limited
amount of time is not likely to
significantly increase halibut QS
demand. Third, the market power of
CQEs to purchase QS is already
constrained due to the lack of
availability of category D halibut QS and
CQE funding barriers (described in
Section 2.9.2 of the RIR), as well as the
regulatory caps previously described.
Non-CQE participants would continue
to have access to roughly 90 percent of
the category D halibut QS in Area 3A
without potential competition from
CQEs. While upward pressure on the
value of halibut QS (such as being able
to fish up) could cumulatively impact
transfer prices, the impact of this action
is expected to be minimal, given the
present constraints on CQEs’ access to
investment capital and historical
investment patterns, as well as the
broad range of other factors that
influence halibut QS prices. Section
2.11.2 of the RIR provides a more
complete discussion of the potential
impacts to other IFQ Program
participants.
While evaluating a fish-up provision,
the Council considered three
alternatives, which are described in
Sections 2.10 and 2.11 of the RIR. These
included alternatives that would have
limited the number of times the fish-up
provision could be used over a period
of years or would have extended the use
of this provision to the entire fishing
season. These alternatives were not
recommended by the Council.
Additional detail of the Council’s
rationale in support of this action is
provided in Section 2.5 of the RIR
prepared for this action.
Additional Changes to IFQ Program
Regulations
This action also includes a minor
change to regulations implementing the
IFQ Program to consolidate the
Application for Temporary Military
Transfer of IFQ form into the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Apr 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
Application for Temporary Transfer of
Halibut/Sablefish Individual Fishing
Quota (IFQ) form. This would centralize
all non-medical temporary IFQ transfers
onto a single form. To implement this
form consolidation, this action would
eliminate regulatory reference to the
previously required form fields of
‘‘number of QS units’’ and ‘‘range of QS
serial numbers for IFQ to be transferred’’
because they are no longer used to
process temporary IFQ transfers. This
would simplify the temporary IFQ
transfer process for the public and for
agency administrators. There would be
no changes to the eligibility
requirements for, or agency processing
of, a temporary military transfer of IFQ.
Regulations at § 679.41(m)(3)
introductory text and (m)(3)(iii) would
be modified to reference the
‘‘application for temporary transfer of
halibut/sablefish IFQ’’ and the
corresponding contents of a complete
application.
Classification
Pursuant to section 305(d) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined
that this proposed rule is consistent
with the BSAI and GOA FMPs, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, the Halibut Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
Regulations governing the U.S.
fisheries for Pacific halibut are
developed by the IPHC, the Pacific
Fishery Management Council, the
Council, and the Secretary of
Commerce. Section 5 of the Halibut Act
(16 U.S.C. 773c) allows the regional
fishery management council having
authority for a particular geographical
area to develop regulations governing
the allocation and catch of halibut in
U.S. Convention waters which are in
addition to, and not in conflict with,
IPHC regulations. This proposed rule is
consistent with the Council’s authority
to allocate halibut catches among
fishery participants in the waters in and
off Alaska.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule is expected to be
an Executive Order 13771 deregulatory
action.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
that this proposed rule, if adopted,
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
entities. NMFS requests comments on
the decision to certify this proposed
rule. The factual basis for this
determination is as follows:
This proposed rule would directly
regulate CQEs located in Area 3A
holding halibut QS assigned to category
D in Area 3A. As of 2019, one CQE
located in Area 3A held halibut QS
assigned to category D in Area 3A. This
QS holder is non-profit entity and
unlikely to be considered a large entity
under SBA standards; however, this
cannot be confirmed because NMFS
does not have or collect economic data
on permit holders necessary to
definitively determine total annual
receipts. Thus, this QS holder is
considered a small entity, based on SBA
criteria.
Eligible CQEs in Area 3A may obtain
halibut QS assigned to category D in
Area 3A; therefore, this proposed rule
directly regulates entities representing
small, remote communities in Area 3A.
There are 14 communities in Area 3A
eligible to obtain halibut QS assigned to
category D in Area 3A through CQEs. Of
these, all have populations less than
50,000 and are considered to be small
government jurisdictions.
This proposed action would provide
increased flexibility for CQEs in Area
3A to harvest their category D IFQ on
category C vessels from August 15 to the
end of the IFQ season each year. Use of
this provision is voluntary. Currently,
this action would only apply to
approximately 6,000 pounds of halibut
IFQ held by a single CQE in Area 3A.
The maximum potential impact of this
action is limited to the amount of
category D IFQ that CQEs in Area 3A are
allowed to hold by regulation, which is
roughly 10 percent of the total category
D QS in Area 3A. No agency imposed
cost burdens are associated with the use
of this voluntary provision. This
proposed action, therefore, is not
expected to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of the
small entities directly regulated by this
proposed action. As a result, an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required, and none has been prepared.
Regulatory Impact Review
An RIR was prepared to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives. A copy of the RIR is
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
The Council recommended this
proposed action based on those
measures that maximized net benefits to
the Nation.
Collection-of-Information Requirements
This proposed rule contains
collection-of-information requirements
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 14, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
subject to review and approval by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA). NMFS has submitted these
requirements to OMB for approval
under Control Number 0648–0272.
Public reporting burden is estimated to
average per response: Two hours for
Application for Temporary Transfer of
Halibut/Sablefish Individual Fishing
Quota (IFQ). These estimates include
the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection information.
Public comment is sought regarding
whether these proposed collections of
information are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimate;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collections of information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments
on these or any other aspects of the
collections of information to NMFS (see
ADDRESSES), and by email to OIRA_
Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
(202) 395–5806.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Apr 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
All currently approved NOAA
collections of information may be
viewed at https://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRASearch.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 31, 2020.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 679 as follows:
PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE
EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF
ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 679
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et
seq.; 3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 108–447; Pub. L.
111–281.
2. In § 679.41, revise paragraphs
(m)(3) introductory text and (m)(3)(iii)
to read as follows:
■
§ 679.41
Transfer of quota shares and IFQ.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) * * *
(3) Application. A QS holder may
apply for a temporary military transfer
by submitting an application for
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
20661
temporary transfer of halibut/sablefish
IFQ to the Alaska Region, NMFS. NMFS
will transfer, upon approval of the
application, the applicable IFQ from the
applicant (transferor) to the recipient
(transferee). An application for
temporary transfer of halibut/sablefish
IFQ is available at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/alaska or
by calling 1–800–304–4846. A complete
application must include all of the
following:
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) The identification characteristics
of the IFQ including whether the
transfer is for halibut or sablefish IFQ,
IFQ regulatory area, actual number of
IFQ pounds, transferor (seller) IFQ
permit number, and fishing year.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 679.42, add paragraph
(a)(2)(ii)(A) and reserve paragraph
(a)(2)(ii)(B) to read as follows:
§ 679.42
Limitations on use of QS and IFQ.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) Halibut IFQ derived from QS
assigned to vessel category D in Area 3A
that is held by a CQE located in Area 3A
may be used to harvest IFQ halibut on
a vessel less than or equal to 60 ft (18.3
m) LOA from August 15 to the end of
the IFQ fishing season.
(B) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–07097 Filed 4–13–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 14, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20657-20661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-07097]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 200330-0092]
RIN 0648-BJ34
Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Revisions to Catch Sharing Plan and
Domestic Management Measures in Alaska
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations that would implement a ``fish up''
[[Page 20658]]
provision in the halibut and sablefish Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ)
Program to allow Community Quota Entities (CQEs) located in IFQ
regulatory Area 3A (Southcentral Alaska) holding category D halibut
quota share (QS) (i.e., for use on catcher vessel less than or equal to
35 ft (10.7 m) length overall) to have the associated IFQ harvested on
category C vessels (catcher vessels less than or equal to 60 ft (18.3
m) length overall) beginning August 15 of each IFQ fishing season. This
action would also make a minor change to regulations implementing the
IFQ Program to consolidate temporary IFQ transfer forms. This proposed
rule is intended to promote the goals and objectives of the Northern
Pacific Halibut Act of 1982 and other applicable laws.
DATES: Comments must be received no later than May 14, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket number NOAA-NMFS-
2019-0134, by either of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2019-0134, click the ``Comment Now!'' icon,
complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Glenn Merrill, Assistant
Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region
NMFS. Mail comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802-1668.
Instructions: NMFS may not consider comments if they are sent by
any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after
the comment period ends. All comments received are a part of the public
record and NMFS will post the comments for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address), confidential business information,
or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender
is publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/
A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
Electronic copies of the Categorical Exclusion and the Regulatory
Impact Review (RIR) prepared for this action are available from
www.regulations.gov.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
rule may be submitted by mail to NMFS at the above address; by email to
[email protected]; or by fax to 202-395-5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Duncan, 907-586-7228 or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for Action
NMFS manages the groundfish fisheries in the exclusive economic
zone off Alaska under the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Groundfish
of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) and under the FMP for Groundfish of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area (BSAI). The North
Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) prepared the FMPs under
the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Regulations governing U.S. fisheries and implementing the FMPs appear
at 50 CFR parts 600 and 679.
The International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) and NMFS manage
fishing for Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) through
regulations established under authority of the Northern Pacific Halibut
Act of 1982 (Halibut Act). The IPHC adopts regulations governing the
Pacific halibut fishery under the Convention between the United States
and Canada for the Preservation of the Halibut Fishery of the North
Pacific Ocean and Bering Sea (Convention), signed at Ottawa, Ontario,
on March 2, 1953, as amended by a Protocol Amending the Convention
(signed at Washington, DC, on March 29, 1979). For the United States,
regulations developed by the IPHC are subject to acceptance by the
Secretary of State with the concurrence from the Secretary of Commerce.
After acceptance by the Secretary of State and concurrence from the
Secretary of Commerce, NMFS publishes the IPHC regulations in the
Federal Register as annual management measures at 50 CFR 300.62.
The Halibut Act, 16 U.S.C. 773c (a) and (b), provides the Secretary
of Commerce with general responsibility to carry out the Convention and
the Halibut Act. In adopting regulations that may be necessary to carry
out the purposes and objectives of the Convention and the Halibut Act,
the Secretary of Commerce is directed to consult with the Secretary of
the department in which the U.S. Coast Guard is operating, currently
the Department of Homeland Security.
The Halibut Act, 16 U.S.C. 773c (c), also provides the Council with
authority to develop regulations, including limited access regulations,
that are in addition to, and not in conflict with, approved IPHC
regulations. Regulations developed by the Council may be implemented by
NMFS only after approval by the Secretary of Commerce. The Council has
exercised this authority in the development of the IFQ Program for the
commercial halibut and sablefish fisheries, codified at 50 CFR part
679, under the authority of section 5 of the Halibut Act (16 U.S.C.
773c (c)) and section 303(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act (16 U.S.C.
1853(b)).
Background
This proposed rule includes two elements. The first would modify
regulations pertaining to the use of halibut QS and halibut IFQ held by
CQEs in Area 3A. The second element includes minor changes to
regulations implementing the IFQ Program that would consolidate
temporary IFQ transfer forms. The following sections summarize the IFQ
Program, the CQE Program, and this proposed rule.
IFQ Program
The IFQ Program, a limited access privilege program for the fixed-
gear halibut and sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria) fisheries off Alaska,
was recommended by the Council in 1992 and approved by NMFS in 1993. A
comprehensive explanation of the IFQ Program can be found in the final
rule implementing the program (58 FR 59375, November 9, 1993). The IFQ
Program for the sablefish fishery is implemented by the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area and Federal regulations at 50 CFR part 679 under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The IFQ Program for the halibut
fishery is implemented by Federal regulations at 50 CFR part 679 under
the authority of the Halibut Act.
The IFQ Program changed the management structure of the fixed-gear
halibut and sablefish fishery by issuing QS to qualified persons who
owned or leased a vessel that made fixed-gear landings of those species
from 1988 to 1990. Halibut QS was issued specific to one of eight IPHC
halibut management areas throughout the BSAI and GOA, and four vessel
categories: Catcher/processor of any length (category A); catcher
vessel of any length (category B); catcher vessel less than or equal to
60 ft (18.3 m) LOA (category C); and catcher vessel less than or equal
to 35 ft (10.7 m) LOA (category D). The amount of halibut that each QS
holder may harvest is calculated annually and issued as IFQ in pounds
on an IFQ permit. Under typical circumstances, the category of halibut
IFQ must be matched to the category of vessel used to harvest it.
Exceptions to allow a
[[Page 20659]]
smaller category of IFQ to be harvested on a larger vessel category
(i.e., fishing category D IFQ on a category C vessel) are referred to
as ``fish-up'' provisions.
Although the IFQ Program resulted in significant safety and
economic benefits for fishermen, many residents of Alaska's small,
remote, coastal communities who held QS have transferred their QS to
non-community residents or moved out of these communities. As a result,
the number of resident QS holders has declined substantially in most
remote coastal communities throughout Alaska. This transfer of halibut
QS and the associated fishing effort out of small, remote, coastal
communities has limited the ability of residents to locally purchase or
lease QS.
CQE Program
The Council developed the CQE Program to improve the ability for
rural coastal communities to maintain long-term opportunities to access
the halibut and sablefish resources. The Council recommended the CQE
Program in the GOA as an amendment to the IFQ Program in 2002, and NMFS
implemented the program in 2004 (69 FR 23681, April 30, 2004).
The CQE Program allows 45 small, remote, coastal communities in the
GOA to purchase and hold catcher vessel halibut QS in halibut Areas 2C,
3A, and 3B, and catcher vessel sablefish QS in the GOA. Communities
eligible to participate in the CQE Program in the GOA include those
that meet criteria for geographic location, population size, historic
participation in the halibut and sablefish fisheries, and are listed in
Table 21 to 50 CFR part 679. Additional detail on these criteria is
available in the final rule implementing the CQE Program (69 FR 23681,
April 30, 2004).
Participating communities are represented by a CQE, which is a
NMFS-approved non-profit organization. The CQE holds QS and leases the
IFQ derived from the underlying QS to community residents. With limited
exceptions, QS must remain with the CQE in order to create a permanent
asset for the community to use. Community residents who lease IFQ from
the CQE can use the revenue to purchase their own QS. These program
features promote community access to QS to generate participation in,
and fishery revenues from, the commercial halibut and sablefish
fisheries.
The Council established limitations in the original CQE Program to
prevent excessive consolidation of IFQ harvest into CQE communities,
limit demand driven QS price increases for all IFQ Program
participants, and broadly distribute the benefits from fishing
activities among CQE communities. One limitation prohibited CQEs in
some areas (i.e., Southcentral Alaska; Area 3A) from purchasing entry
level category D QS. However, subsequent review by the Council and NMFS
found that few CQEs held any halibut QS and there was no clear evidence
demonstrating a potential conflict between the limited number of new
IFQ Program entrants and CQEs. In 2013, NMFS revised regulations on
vessel use caps that apply to CQE-held QS and IFQ, expanded the list of
eligible CQE communities, and allowed CQEs to hold category D halibut
QS in Area 3A. Additional detail is available in the final rule
implementing these regulatory provisions (78 FR 33243, June 4, 2013).
Generally, these changes were intended to improve the effectiveness of
the CQE Program by minimizing program limitations.
Need for This Action
While the expanded CQE Program has provided additional flexibility
for eligible communities to purchase, maintain, and use QS, challenges
still remain due to difficulties in securing favorable financing terms
and limited available revenue streams (see Section 2.9.2 of the
Analysis for additional detail). As of 2019, only two out of fourteen
eligible CQEs in Area 3A had purchased halibut QS. Furthermore, public
testimony has indicated that in those Area 3A CQE communities that have
acquired category D halibut QS, smaller category D vessels are
sometimes unavailable to harvest the IFQ, and that the skiffs often
used as category D vessels are not ideal for the harsh weather and
ocean conditions later in the season when halibut can move offshore
(Section 2.11.3 of the RIR). IFQ Program regulations in Area 3A do not
allow category D IFQ to be harvested on larger category C vessels which
could limit a CQE's ability to fully utilize its halibut IFQ in certain
circumstances. If a CQE is unable to fully harvest its annual IFQ and
realize the associated revenue, it may face financial challenges
fulfilling any debt service on financed QS. If no alternative funding
is available, a CQE could be forced to sell QS, potentially eliminating
fishery access and economic opportunities for the community.
Modifying the regulations to allow category D IFQ to be harvested
on larger category C vessels near the end of the IFQ season would
provide more flexibility to CQE participants to fully harvest their
category D IFQ in Area 3A. This would further the Council's intent of
facilitating CQE community access to the halibut resource. By limiting
use of the exemption to the end of the season as a contingency plan,
this action is also consistent with the intent of the IFQ Program to
maintain the historical vessel size characteristics of the fleet when
possible.
The Council's intent is reflected in the purpose and need statement
adopted at final action at the April 2018 Council meeting. The
Council's purpose and need, and final motion is available in the RIR
(see ADDRESSES). Section 1.1 of the RIR also provides a summary of the
history of this action.
This Proposed Rule
This proposed rule includes two elements. The first element would
modify regulations to allow halibut IFQ derived from CQE held category
D QS in Area 3A to be used to harvest halibut on a vessel less than or
equal to 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA beginning on August 15 of each IFQ fishing
season. The second element of this action would make minor changes to
regulations implementing the IFQ Program to consolidate temporary IFQ
transfer forms.
CQE Fish-Up Provision
The first element of this proposed rule would add a paragraph at
Sec. 679.42(a)(2)(ii)(A) specifying that IFQ derived from CQE held QS
assigned to category D in Area 3A could be harvested on a vessel less
than or equal to 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA from August 15 to the end of the
IFQ season. This action would allow eligible community residents
leasing category D IFQ from a CQE to fish it on larger vessels near the
end of the season. This proposed rule does not prevent category D IFQ
held by a CQE from being fished on a category D vessel on or after the
August 15.
Currently, if a CQE in Area 3A has category D IFQ it cannot be
harvested on a vessel larger than 35 ft (10.7 m). Any unharvested
category D IFQ in excess of 10 percent of the CQE's account cannot be
rolled over to the following year and becomes forgone harvest and
subsequently forgone revenue to the CQE and community harvester.
This proposed rule would only apply to Area 3A category D halibut
QS held by a CQE located in Area 3A. CQEs located in other IFQ
regulatory areas are not eligible to hold category D halibut QS
assigned to Area 3A. Currently, one CQE in Area 3A owns 159,075 units
of Area 3A category D halibut QS (6,324 IFQ pounds in 2018). If CQEs
held the maximum amount of Area 3A category D halibut QS allowed by
regulation, this proposed rule would apply to 1,233,740
[[Page 20660]]
halibut QS units (approximately 10 percent of the total Area 3A
category D halibut QS, or about 0.7 percent of the total halibut QS in
Area 3A).
This proposed rule would provide additional flexibility for using
category D halibut QS held by CQEs in Area 3A. Increases in demand
driven by the additional flexibility of category D halibut QS could
increase QS prices. However, changes in halibut QS price as a result of
this action are expected to be limited for the following reasons.
First, the flexibility to fish up afforded by this action is currently
limited to one CQE in Area 3A that holds approximately 6,000 pounds of
category D halibut IFQ. Second, increased flexibility for a narrow
group of users for a limited amount of time is not likely to
significantly increase halibut QS demand. Third, the market power of
CQEs to purchase QS is already constrained due to the lack of
availability of category D halibut QS and CQE funding barriers
(described in Section 2.9.2 of the RIR), as well as the regulatory caps
previously described. Non-CQE participants would continue to have
access to roughly 90 percent of the category D halibut QS in Area 3A
without potential competition from CQEs. While upward pressure on the
value of halibut QS (such as being able to fish up) could cumulatively
impact transfer prices, the impact of this action is expected to be
minimal, given the present constraints on CQEs' access to investment
capital and historical investment patterns, as well as the broad range
of other factors that influence halibut QS prices. Section 2.11.2 of
the RIR provides a more complete discussion of the potential impacts to
other IFQ Program participants.
While evaluating a fish-up provision, the Council considered three
alternatives, which are described in Sections 2.10 and 2.11 of the RIR.
These included alternatives that would have limited the number of times
the fish-up provision could be used over a period of years or would
have extended the use of this provision to the entire fishing season.
These alternatives were not recommended by the Council. Additional
detail of the Council's rationale in support of this action is provided
in Section 2.5 of the RIR prepared for this action.
Additional Changes to IFQ Program Regulations
This action also includes a minor change to regulations
implementing the IFQ Program to consolidate the Application for
Temporary Military Transfer of IFQ form into the Application for
Temporary Transfer of Halibut/Sablefish Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ)
form. This would centralize all non-medical temporary IFQ transfers
onto a single form. To implement this form consolidation, this action
would eliminate regulatory reference to the previously required form
fields of ``number of QS units'' and ``range of QS serial numbers for
IFQ to be transferred'' because they are no longer used to process
temporary IFQ transfers. This would simplify the temporary IFQ transfer
process for the public and for agency administrators. There would be no
changes to the eligibility requirements for, or agency processing of, a
temporary military transfer of IFQ. Regulations at Sec. 679.41(m)(3)
introductory text and (m)(3)(iii) would be modified to reference the
``application for temporary transfer of halibut/sablefish IFQ'' and the
corresponding contents of a complete application.
Classification
Pursuant to section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the BSAI and GOA FMPs, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the Halibut Act, and other applicable law,
subject to further consideration after public comment.
Regulations governing the U.S. fisheries for Pacific halibut are
developed by the IPHC, the Pacific Fishery Management Council, the
Council, and the Secretary of Commerce. Section 5 of the Halibut Act
(16 U.S.C. 773c) allows the regional fishery management council having
authority for a particular geographical area to develop regulations
governing the allocation and catch of halibut in U.S. Convention waters
which are in addition to, and not in conflict with, IPHC regulations.
This proposed rule is consistent with the Council's authority to
allocate halibut catches among fishery participants in the waters in
and off Alaska.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule is expected to be an Executive Order 13771
deregulatory action.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. NMFS requests comments on the decision to certify this
proposed rule. The factual basis for this determination is as follows:
This proposed rule would directly regulate CQEs located in Area 3A
holding halibut QS assigned to category D in Area 3A. As of 2019, one
CQE located in Area 3A held halibut QS assigned to category D in Area
3A. This QS holder is non-profit entity and unlikely to be considered a
large entity under SBA standards; however, this cannot be confirmed
because NMFS does not have or collect economic data on permit holders
necessary to definitively determine total annual receipts. Thus, this
QS holder is considered a small entity, based on SBA criteria.
Eligible CQEs in Area 3A may obtain halibut QS assigned to category
D in Area 3A; therefore, this proposed rule directly regulates entities
representing small, remote communities in Area 3A. There are 14
communities in Area 3A eligible to obtain halibut QS assigned to
category D in Area 3A through CQEs. Of these, all have populations less
than 50,000 and are considered to be small government jurisdictions.
This proposed action would provide increased flexibility for CQEs
in Area 3A to harvest their category D IFQ on category C vessels from
August 15 to the end of the IFQ season each year. Use of this provision
is voluntary. Currently, this action would only apply to approximately
6,000 pounds of halibut IFQ held by a single CQE in Area 3A. The
maximum potential impact of this action is limited to the amount of
category D IFQ that CQEs in Area 3A are allowed to hold by regulation,
which is roughly 10 percent of the total category D QS in Area 3A. No
agency imposed cost burdens are associated with the use of this
voluntary provision. This proposed action, therefore, is not expected
to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of the
small entities directly regulated by this proposed action. As a result,
an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not required, and none
has been prepared.
Regulatory Impact Review
An RIR was prepared to assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives. A copy of the RIR is available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES). The Council recommended this proposed action based on those
measures that maximized net benefits to the Nation.
Collection-of-Information Requirements
This proposed rule contains collection-of-information requirements
[[Page 20661]]
subject to review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). NMFS has submitted these
requirements to OMB for approval under Control Number 0648-0272. Public
reporting burden is estimated to average per response: Two hours for
Application for Temporary Transfer of Halibut/Sablefish Individual
Fishing Quota (IFQ). These estimates include the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection information.
Public comment is sought regarding whether these proposed
collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; the accuracy of the burden estimate; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collections of
information, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Send comments on
these or any other aspects of the collections of information to NMFS
(see ADDRESSES), and by email to [email protected], or fax to
(202) 395-5806.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB control number. All currently approved NOAA
collections of information may be viewed at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRASearch.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 31, 2020.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 679 as follows:
PART 679--FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA
0
1. The authority citation for part 679 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et seq.; 3631 et seq.;
Pub. L. 108-447; Pub. L. 111-281.
0
2. In Sec. 679.41, revise paragraphs (m)(3) introductory text and
(m)(3)(iii) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.41 Transfer of quota shares and IFQ.
* * * * *
(m) * * *
(3) Application. A QS holder may apply for a temporary military
transfer by submitting an application for temporary transfer of
halibut/sablefish IFQ to the Alaska Region, NMFS. NMFS will transfer,
upon approval of the application, the applicable IFQ from the applicant
(transferor) to the recipient (transferee). An application for
temporary transfer of halibut/sablefish IFQ is available at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/alaska or by calling 1-800-304-4846. A
complete application must include all of the following:
* * * * *
(iii) The identification characteristics of the IFQ including
whether the transfer is for halibut or sablefish IFQ, IFQ regulatory
area, actual number of IFQ pounds, transferor (seller) IFQ permit
number, and fishing year.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 679.42, add paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(A) and reserve paragraph
(a)(2)(ii)(B) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.42 Limitations on use of QS and IFQ.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) Halibut IFQ derived from QS assigned to vessel category D in
Area 3A that is held by a CQE located in Area 3A may be used to harvest
IFQ halibut on a vessel less than or equal to 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA from
August 15 to the end of the IFQ fishing season.
(B) [Reserved]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-07097 Filed 4-13-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P