Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 20408-20411 [2020-07645]
Download as PDF
20408
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 71 / Monday, April 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(n) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206–
231–3226; email tom.rodriguez@faa.gov.
(o) Material Incorporated by Reference
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was
approved for IBR on May 18, 2020.
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2019–0257, dated October 17,
2019.
(ii) [Reserved]
(4) The following service information was
approved for IBR on April 2, 2019 (84 FR
6059, February 26, 2019).
(i) Chapter 5–40–00, Airworthiness
Limitations, DGT 107838, Revision 7, dated
August 24, 2018, of the Dassault Falcon 7X
Maintenance Manual (MM).
(ii) [Reserved]
(5) For information about EASA AD 2019–
0257, contact the EASA, Konrad-AdenauerUfer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone
+49 221 89990 6017; email ADs@
easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu.
(6) For Dassault Aviation service
information identified in this AD, contact
Dassault Falcon Jet Corporation, Teterboro
Airport, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack,
NJ 07606; telephone 201–440–6700; internet
https://www.dassaultfalcon.com.
(7) You may view this material at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 206–231–3195. This material may
be found in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–0991.
(8) You may view this material that is
incorporated by reference at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, email fedreg.legal@
nara.gov, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued on April 3, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–07646 Filed 4–10–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Apr 10, 2020
Jkt 250001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Examining the AD Docket
Federal Aviation Administration
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0859; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The address for Docket
Operations is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0859; Product
Identifier 2019–NM–114–AD; Amendment
39–19893; AD 2020–07–14]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 747–100,
747–100B, 747–100B SUD, 747–200B,
747–200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 747–
400, 747–400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and
747SP series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by fuel system reviews
conducted by the manufacturer
indicating that the existing bond path
design provides insufficient bond
resistance margin between the fuel
pump motor/impeller and structure.
This AD requires replacement of the
bonding jumpers on the auxiliary power
unit (APU) fuel pump. This AD also
requires, for certain airplanes,
installation of a second bonding jumper;
an inspection of the override/jettison
fuel pumps and transfer/jettison fuel
pumps to determine if the bonding
jumper has a one-piece braid or twopiece braid and replacement of the
bonding jumper if necessary; and
replacement of the bonding jumper on
the electrical scavenge fuel pump. The
FAA is issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective May 18,
2020.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of May 18, 2020.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC
110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2019–0859.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Rothman, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206–
231–3558; email: jeffrey.rothman@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747–100B
SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, 747–200F,
747–300, 747–400, 747–400D, 747–
400F, 747SR, and 747SP series
airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on November 8, 2019
(84 FR 60351). The NPRM was
prompted by fuel system reviews
conducted by the manufacturer
indicating that the existing bond path
design provides insufficient bond
resistance margin between the fuel
pump motor/impeller and structure.
The NPRM proposed to require
replacement of the bonding jumpers on
the APU fuel pump. The NPRM also
proposed to require, for certain
airplanes, installation of a second
bonding jumper; an inspection of the
override/jettison fuel pumps and
transfer/jettison fuel pumps to
determine if the bonding jumper has a
one-piece braid or two-piece braid and
replacement of the bonding jumper if
necessary; and replacement of the
bonding jumper on the electrical
scavenge fuel pump.
Comments
The FAA gave the public the
opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents
the comments received on the NPRM
and the FAA’s response to each
comment.
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
20409
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 71 / Monday, April 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Support for the NPRM
The Air Line Pilots Association,
International (ALPA) and Boeing
indicated support for the NPRM. An
anonymous commenter also indicated
support for the NPRM. Two other
commenters, Patrick Imperatrice and
Gaganjyot Arora, stated that they
supported the NPRM.
Request To Clarify Requirements for
Certain Airplanes
Lufthansa Technik AG on behalf of
Lufthansa German Airlines requested
that the FAA add a note to the proposed
AD to clarify the requirements for
airplanes on which BMS 10–20 was not
used while accomplishing Boeing
Service Bulletin 747–28–2228, dated
November 4, 1999 (Boeing Service
Bulletin 747–28–2228, Revision 1, dated
September 27, 2001, is referred to as the
appropriate source of service
information for accomplishing the
proposed actions.). Lufthansa Technik
AG asked that the FAA consider
whether an airplane on which Boeing
Service Bulletin 747–28–2228, dated
November 4, 1999, was accomplished
without using BMS 10–20 is in
compliance with the proposed AD.
The FAA agrees to clarify the
requirements. Boeing Service Bulletin
747–28–2228, Revision 1, dated
September 27, 2001, specifies it is
necessary to rebond the bonding jumper
if BMS 10–20 was applied on the mating
surfaces between the bonding jumper
and rear spar while accomplishing
Boeing Service Bulletin 747–28–2228,
dated November 4, 1999. However,
Boeing Service Bulletin 747–28–2228,
dated November 4, 1999, specifies limits
to the bonding resistance values
between the pump housing and rear
spar structure. Complying with those
bonding resistance values is required to
address the unsafe condition, regardless
of whether or not BMS 10–20 was
applied. These bonding resistance limits
were unchanged between Boeing
Service Bulletin 747–28–2228, dated
November 4, 1999, and Boeing Service
Bulletin 747–28–2228, Revision 1, dated
September 27, 2001. Therefore, credit
can be given if it can be conclusively
determined that all bonding resistance
limits specified in Boeing Service
Bulletin 747–28–2228, Revision 1, dated
September 27, 2001, have been met. The
FAA has added paragraph (i) to this AD
to provide this credit and reidentified
subsequent paragraphs accordingly.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this
final rule with the changes described
previously and minor editorial changes.
The FAA has determined that these
minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
addressing the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
The FAA also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this final rule.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Boeing Service
Bulletin 747–28–2228, Revision 1, dated
September 27, 2001. This service
information describes procedures for a
replacement of the bonding jumpers on
the APU fuel pump; an inspection of the
six override/jettison fuel pumps and of
the two transfer/jettison fuel pumps to
determine if the bonding jumper has a
one-piece braid or two-piece braid, and
replacement of the existing bonding
jumper if the bonding jumper has a onepiece braid; installation of a second
bonding jumper; and replacement of the
bonding jumper on the electrical
scavenge fuel pump. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
Other Relevant Rulemaking
Boeing Service Bulletin 747–28–2228,
Revision 1, dated September 27, 2001,
identifies ‘‘Boeing Service Bulletin 747–
28–2033’’ as a concurrent requirement
for certain airplanes. Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–28A2033, Revision
1, dated December 18, 2003, is the
appropriate source of service
information for accomplishing the
installation required by AD 2005–01–07,
Amendment 39–13931 (70 FR 1336,
January 7, 2005) (‘‘AD 2005–01–07’’).
The compliance time for accomplishing
the installation required by AD 2005–
01–07 has already passed; therefore, it is
not necessary to include Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–28A2033 as a
concurrent requirement in this AD. The
FAA issued AD 2005–01–07 to ensure
adequate electrical bonding between the
housing of each fuel pump and airplane
structure outside the fuel tanks.
Inadequate electrical bonding, in the
event of a lightning strike or fuel pump
electrical fault, could cause electrical
arcing and ignition of fuel vapor in the
wing fuel tank, which could result in a
fuel tank explosion.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD
affects 74 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
FAA estimates the following costs to
comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Replacement, Installation, and Inspection.
Up to 15 work-hours × $85 per hour =
Up to $1,275.
Up to $2,000 .........
Up to $3,275 .........
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
The FAA estimates the following
costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the
results of the proposed inspection. The
FAA has no way of determining the
Cost on U.S.
operators
Up to $242,350.
number of aircraft that might need these
replacements:
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Cost per
product
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Replacement ..................................
Up to 6 work-hours × $85 per
hour = Up to $510.
Up to $950 ....................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Apr 10, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
Up to $1,460.
13APR1
20410
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 71 / Monday, April 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Apr 10, 2020
Jkt 250001
2020–07–14 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–19893; Docket No.
FAA–2019–0859; Product Identifier
2019–NM–114–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective May 18, 2020.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747–100B SUD,
747–200B, 747–200C, 747–200F, 747–300,
747–400, 747–400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and
747SP series airplanes, certificated in any
category, line numbers (L/Ns) 1 through 1229
inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 28, Fuel.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by fuel system
reviews conducted by the manufacturer
indicating that the existing bond path design
provides insufficient bond resistance margin
between the fuel pump motor/impeller and
structure. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address insufficient bond resistance margin
between the fuel pump motor/impeller and
structure. In the event of a fuel pump
electrical fault, this condition might cause
arcs at the existing fuel pump/tank interfaces
and an ignition of fuel vapor in the wing fuel
tank, which could result in a fuel tank
explosion and consequent loss of the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Definitions
The definitions specified in paragraphs
(g)(1) through (4) of this AD apply.
(1) Group 1 airplanes: L/Ns 1 through 167
inclusive.
(2) Group 2 airplanes: L/Ns 168 through
971 inclusive.
(3) Group 3 airplanes: L/Ns 972 through
1161 inclusive.
(4) Group 4 airplanes: L/Ns 1162 through
1229 inclusive.
(h) Replacement, Installation, and
Inspection
Within 60 months after the effective date
of this AD, do the applicable actions
specified in paragraphs (h)(1) through (4) of
this AD, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Service Bulletin 747–28–2228, Revision 1,
dated September 27, 2001.
(1) For Groups 1, 2, and 3 airplanes: Do the
actions specified in paragraphs (h)(1)(i) and
(ii) of this AD.
(i) Do a general visual inspection of the six
override/jettison fuel pumps to determine if
the bonding jumper has a one-piece braid or
two-piece braid. If the bonding jumper has a
one-piece braid, within 60 months after the
effective date of this AD, replace the existing
bonding jumper.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(ii) Install a second bonding jumper.
(2) For Groups 1, 2, and 3 airplanes with
horizontal stabilizer fuel tanks: Do the
actions specified in paragraphs (h)(2)(i) and
(ii) of this AD.
(i) Do a general visual inspection of the two
transfer/jettison fuel pumps to determine if
the bonding jumper has a one-piece braid or
a two-piece braid. If the bonding jumper has
a one-piece braid, within 60 months after the
effective date of this AD, replace the existing
bonding jumper.
(ii) Install a second bonding jumper.
(3) For all airplanes: Replace the bonding
jumpers on the auxiliary power unit (APU)
fuel pump.
(4) For Groups 1 and 2 airplanes: Replace
the bonding jumper on the electrical
scavenge fuel pump.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions specified in paragraph (h) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Boeing Service
Bulletin 747–28–2228, dated November 4,
1999, provided it can conclusively be
determined that all bonding resistance values
specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747–28–
2228, Revision 1, dated September 27, 2001,
have been met.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (k) of this
AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by The Boeing Company
Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, to make
those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of
the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Jeffrey Rothman, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA 98198; phone and fax: 206–231–3558;
email: jeffrey.rothman@faa.gov.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 71 / Monday, April 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 747–28–2228,
Revision 1, dated September 27, 2001.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
email fedreg.legal@nara.gov, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued on April 3, 2020.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
Examining the AD Docket
[FR Doc. 2020–07645 Filed 4–10–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0985; Product
Identifier 2019–NM–183–AD; Amendment
39–19891; AD 2020–07–12]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; ATR—GIE
Avions de Transport Re´gional
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
ATR—GIE Avions de Transport
Re´gional Model ATR42–500 airplanes.
This AD was prompted by a report of
interference between bonding braid
screws and pitch tab control rods on the
ATR final assembly line. This AD
requires an inspection of the bonding
braid screws for proper installation, a
detailed inspection for damage to the
pitch tab control rods if necessary, and
replacement of the pitch tab control
rods if necessary, as specified in a
European Union Aviation Safety Agency
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Apr 10, 2020
Jkt 250001
(EASA) AD, which is incorporated by
reference. The FAA is issuing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: This AD is effective May 18,
2020.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of May 18, 2020.
ADDRESSES: For the material
incorporated by reference (IBR) in this
AD, contact the EASA, KonradAdenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 89990
1000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu;
internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may
find this IBR material on the EASA
website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available in the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0985.
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0985; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The address for Docket
Operations is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3220.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The EASA, which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD
2019–0262, dated October 22, 2019
(‘‘EASA AD 2019–0262’’) (also referred
to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for certain ATR—GIE Avions de
Transport Re´gional Model ATR42–500
airplanes.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20411
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain ATR—GIE Avions de
Transport Re´gional Model ATR42–500
airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on December 19, 2019
(84 FR 69662). The NPRM was
prompted by a report of interference
between bonding braid screws and pitch
tab control rods on the ATR final
assembly line. The NPRM proposed to
require an inspection of the bonding
braid screws for proper installation, a
detailed inspection for damage to the
pitch tab control rods if necessary, and
replacement of the pitch tab control
rods if necessary.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address
interference between bonding braid
screws and pitch tab control rods,
which could lead to failure of the rods
and tab disconnection, possibly
resulting in reduced control of the
airplane. See the MCAI for additional
background information.
Comments
The FAA gave the public the
opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents
the comment received on the NPRM and
the FAA’s response to the comment.
Request To Allow Credit for Work Done
Using Alternative Service Information
Silver Airways requested credit for
accomplishment of the proposed
requirements on its current fleet of
affected ATR42 airplanes using
alternative service information, i.e., by
accomplishment of ATR All Operator
Message (AOM) 2019/09, Issue 2, and
compliance with ATR Service Bulletin
ATR42–27–0112, dated August 6, 2019,
referencing EASA AD 2019–0262.
The FAA disagrees with the request
because the commenter provided no
justification. The FAA has determined
that in order to address the identified
unsafe condition, operators must
comply with the requirements of EASA
AD 2019–0262, except as specified in
paragraph (h) of this AD. EASA AD
2019–0262 specifies only ATR Service
Bulletin ATR42–27–0112 for
compliance actions, and it does not
specify an AOM. However, under the
provisions of paragraph (j) of this AD,
the FAA will consider requests for
approval to use alternative service
information if sufficient data are
submitted to substantiate that the
actions specified in the alternative
service information would provide an
acceptable level of safety. The FAA has
not changed this AD with regard to this
request.
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 71 (Monday, April 13, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20408-20411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-07645]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2019-0859; Product Identifier 2019-NM-114-AD; Amendment
39-19893; AD 2020-07-14]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-
200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR,
and 747SP series airplanes. This AD was prompted by fuel system reviews
conducted by the manufacturer indicating that the existing bond path
design provides insufficient bond resistance margin between the fuel
pump motor/impeller and structure. This AD requires replacement of the
bonding jumpers on the auxiliary power unit (APU) fuel pump. This AD
also requires, for certain airplanes, installation of a second bonding
jumper; an inspection of the override/jettison fuel pumps and transfer/
jettison fuel pumps to determine if the bonding jumper has a one-piece
braid or two-piece braid and replacement of the bonding jumper if
necessary; and replacement of the bonding jumper on the electrical
scavenge fuel pump. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective May 18, 2020.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of May 18,
2020.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. It is also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0859.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0859; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Rothman, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-3558; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing
Company Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-
200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series
airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on November 8,
2019 (84 FR 60351). The NPRM was prompted by fuel system reviews
conducted by the manufacturer indicating that the existing bond path
design provides insufficient bond resistance margin between the fuel
pump motor/impeller and structure. The NPRM proposed to require
replacement of the bonding jumpers on the APU fuel pump. The NPRM also
proposed to require, for certain airplanes, installation of a second
bonding jumper; an inspection of the override/jettison fuel pumps and
transfer/jettison fuel pumps to determine if the bonding jumper has a
one-piece braid or two-piece braid and replacement of the bonding
jumper if necessary; and replacement of the bonding jumper on the
electrical scavenge fuel pump.
Comments
The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. The following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
[[Page 20409]]
Support for the NPRM
The Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA) and Boeing
indicated support for the NPRM. An anonymous commenter also indicated
support for the NPRM. Two other commenters, Patrick Imperatrice and
Gaganjyot Arora, stated that they supported the NPRM.
Request To Clarify Requirements for Certain Airplanes
Lufthansa Technik AG on behalf of Lufthansa German Airlines
requested that the FAA add a note to the proposed AD to clarify the
requirements for airplanes on which BMS 10-20 was not used while
accomplishing Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-2228, dated November 4,
1999 (Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-2228, Revision 1, dated September
27, 2001, is referred to as the appropriate source of service
information for accomplishing the proposed actions.). Lufthansa Technik
AG asked that the FAA consider whether an airplane on which Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-28-2228, dated November 4, 1999, was accomplished
without using BMS 10-20 is in compliance with the proposed AD.
The FAA agrees to clarify the requirements. Boeing Service Bulletin
747-28-2228, Revision 1, dated September 27, 2001, specifies it is
necessary to rebond the bonding jumper if BMS 10-20 was applied on the
mating surfaces between the bonding jumper and rear spar while
accomplishing Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-2228, dated November 4,
1999. However, Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-2228, dated November 4,
1999, specifies limits to the bonding resistance values between the
pump housing and rear spar structure. Complying with those bonding
resistance values is required to address the unsafe condition,
regardless of whether or not BMS 10-20 was applied. These bonding
resistance limits were unchanged between Boeing Service Bulletin 747-
28-2228, dated November 4, 1999, and Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-
2228, Revision 1, dated September 27, 2001. Therefore, credit can be
given if it can be conclusively determined that all bonding resistance
limits specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-2228, Revision 1,
dated September 27, 2001, have been met. The FAA has added paragraph
(i) to this AD to provide this credit and reidentified subsequent
paragraphs accordingly.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments
received, and determined that air safety and the public interest
require adopting this final rule with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these minor
changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
The FAA also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-2228, Revision 1,
dated September 27, 2001. This service information describes procedures
for a replacement of the bonding jumpers on the APU fuel pump; an
inspection of the six override/jettison fuel pumps and of the two
transfer/jettison fuel pumps to determine if the bonding jumper has a
one-piece braid or two-piece braid, and replacement of the existing
bonding jumper if the bonding jumper has a one-piece braid;
installation of a second bonding jumper; and replacement of the bonding
jumper on the electrical scavenge fuel pump. This service information
is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to
it through their normal course of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
Other Relevant Rulemaking
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-2228, Revision 1, dated September
27, 2001, identifies ``Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-2033'' as a
concurrent requirement for certain airplanes. Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-28A2033, Revision 1, dated December 18, 2003, is the
appropriate source of service information for accomplishing the
installation required by AD 2005-01-07, Amendment 39-13931 (70 FR 1336,
January 7, 2005) (``AD 2005-01-07''). The compliance time for
accomplishing the installation required by AD 2005-01-07 has already
passed; therefore, it is not necessary to include Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-28A2033 as a concurrent requirement in this AD. The FAA
issued AD 2005-01-07 to ensure adequate electrical bonding between the
housing of each fuel pump and airplane structure outside the fuel
tanks. Inadequate electrical bonding, in the event of a lightning
strike or fuel pump electrical fault, could cause electrical arcing and
ignition of fuel vapor in the wing fuel tank, which could result in a
fuel tank explosion.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 74 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement, Installation, and Up to 15 work- Up to $2,000...... Up to $3,275...... Up to $242,350.
Inspection. hours x $85 per
hour = Up to
$1,275.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary
replacements that would be required based on the results of the
proposed inspection. The FAA has no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these replacements:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement.......................... Up to 6 work-hours x Up to $950............. Up to $1,460.
$85 per hour = Up to
$510.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 20410]]
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2020-07-14 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19893; Docket No. FAA-
2019-0859; Product Identifier 2019-NM-114-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective May 18, 2020.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B,
747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-
400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes, certificated in
any category, line numbers (L/Ns) 1 through 1229 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer indicating that the existing bond path design provides
insufficient bond resistance margin between the fuel pump motor/
impeller and structure. The FAA is issuing this AD to address
insufficient bond resistance margin between the fuel pump motor/
impeller and structure. In the event of a fuel pump electrical
fault, this condition might cause arcs at the existing fuel pump/
tank interfaces and an ignition of fuel vapor in the wing fuel tank,
which could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of
the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Definitions
The definitions specified in paragraphs (g)(1) through (4) of
this AD apply.
(1) Group 1 airplanes: L/Ns 1 through 167 inclusive.
(2) Group 2 airplanes: L/Ns 168 through 971 inclusive.
(3) Group 3 airplanes: L/Ns 972 through 1161 inclusive.
(4) Group 4 airplanes: L/Ns 1162 through 1229 inclusive.
(h) Replacement, Installation, and Inspection
Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
applicable actions specified in paragraphs (h)(1) through (4) of
this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-2228, Revision 1, dated September 27,
2001.
(1) For Groups 1, 2, and 3 airplanes: Do the actions specified
in paragraphs (h)(1)(i) and (ii) of this AD.
(i) Do a general visual inspection of the six override/jettison
fuel pumps to determine if the bonding jumper has a one-piece braid
or two-piece braid. If the bonding jumper has a one-piece braid,
within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, replace the
existing bonding jumper.
(ii) Install a second bonding jumper.
(2) For Groups 1, 2, and 3 airplanes with horizontal stabilizer
fuel tanks: Do the actions specified in paragraphs (h)(2)(i) and
(ii) of this AD.
(i) Do a general visual inspection of the two transfer/jettison
fuel pumps to determine if the bonding jumper has a one-piece braid
or a two-piece braid. If the bonding jumper has a one-piece braid,
within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, replace the
existing bonding jumper.
(ii) Install a second bonding jumper.
(3) For all airplanes: Replace the bonding jumpers on the
auxiliary power unit (APU) fuel pump.
(4) For Groups 1 and 2 airplanes: Replace the bonding jumper on
the electrical scavenge fuel pump.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraph (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-2228,
dated November 4, 1999, provided it can conclusively be determined
that all bonding resistance values specified in Boeing Service
Bulletin 747-28-2228, Revision 1, dated September 27, 2001, have
been met.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Jeffrey Rothman,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-
3558; email: [email protected].
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this
[[Page 20411]]
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 747-28-2228, Revision 1, dated
September 27, 2001.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email [email protected], or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued on April 3, 2020.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-07645 Filed 4-10-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P