Off-Road Vehicle Use, 20463-20466 [2020-07213]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 71 / Monday, April 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
c. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
I certify that this action will not have
a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
d. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act
Due to the procedural nature of this
action and because there is no intended
change in the use of the areas subject to
this regulation, the Corps expects that
this regulation, if adopted, will not have
a significant impact to the quality of the
human environment. Therefore,
preparation of an environmental impact
statement will not be required. A draft
environmental assessment has been
prepared for publication in conjunction
with the public notice period and is
included as a supporting document in
the docket for this action.
e. Unfunded Mandates Act
This proposed rule does not impose
an enforceable duty among the private
sector and, therefore, it is not a Federal
private sector mandate and it is not
subject to the requirements of either
Section 202 or Section 205 of the
Unfunded Mandates Act. We have also
found under Section 203 of the Act, that
small governments will not be
significantly and uniquely affected by
this rulemaking.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
f. Paperwork Reduction Act
PART 327—RULES AND
REGULATIONS GOVERNING PUBLIC
USE OF WATER RESOURCE
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
ADMINISTERED BY THE CHIEF OF
ENGINEERS
1. The authority citation for part 327
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 460d; 16 U.S.C.
4601–6a; Sec. 210, Pub. L. 90–483, 82 Stat.
746; 33 U.S.C. 1, 28 Stat. 362.
2. In § 327.13:
a. Revise paragraph (a);
b. Redesignate paragraph (b) as
paragraph (d); and
■ c. Add new paragraphs (b) and (c).
The revision and additions read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 327.13 Explosives, firearms, other
weapons and fireworks.
(a) An individual may possess or
transport a weapon on any project
provided that:
(1) The individual is not otherwise
prohibited by Federal, state, or local law
from possessing or transporting such
weapon; and
(2) The possession or transportation of
such weapon is in compliance with
applicable Federal, state, and local law.
(b) As used in this section, ‘‘weapon’’
includes any firearm as defined in 18
U.S.C. 921(a)(3)(A), bow and arrow,
crossbow, or other projectile firing
device.
(c) The District Commander may
modify or revoke the permissions
granted by this section when issuing a
special event permit under § 327.21.
(d) Possession of explosives or
explosive devices of any kind, including
fireworks or other pyrotechnics, is
prohibited unless written permission
has been received from the District
Commander.
R.D. James,
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works).
The information collection activities
in this proposal have not been approved
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA). However, if
finalized, this rule would remove the
requirement for that collection of
information by eliminating the need to
submit a letter to the District
Commander asking for approval to
possess weapon.
[FR Doc. 2020–07184 Filed 4–10–20; 8:45 am]
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 327
RIN 1006–AA57
Penalties, Recreation and recreation
areas, Water resources.
Off-Road Vehicle Use
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Corps proposes to amend
36 CFR part 327 as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Apr 10, 2020
Jkt 250001
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
43 CFR Part 420
[Cost Center: RR8567200, Fund:
20XR0680A2, WBS: RX.31480001.0040000]
Bureau of Reclamation;
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20463
Secretarial Order 3376
addresses regulatory uncertainty on how
agencies within the Department of the
Interior manage recreational
opportunities for electric bikes (E-bikes)
on trails and paths where traditional
bikes are allowed. To provide
consistency in Federal policy among
agencies with recreational opportunities
pertinent to Secretarial Order 3376, the
Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) is
proposing to amend this regulation to
add a definition for E-bikes and exempt
E-bikes from the regulatory definition of
an off-road vehicle where E-bikes are
being used on roads and trails where
mechanized, non-motorized use is
allowed, they are not being propelled
exclusively by a motorized source, and
the appropriate regional director
expressly determines through a formal
decision that E-bikes should be treated
the same as non-motorized bicycles.
This proposed change would facilitate
increased E-bike use where other types
of bicycles are allowed in a manner
consistent with existing use of
Reclamation land, and increase
recreational opportunities for all
Americans, especially those with
physical limitations.
DATES: Comments on the proposed
rulemaking must be submitted on or
before June 12, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rulemaking by either of
the methods listed below. Please use
Regulation Identifier Number 1006–
AA57 in your comment.
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions on the website for
submitting comments.
2. U.S. mail, courier, or hand delivery:
Bureau of Reclamation, Asset
Management Division, 8667200, P.O.
Box 25007, Denver, CO 80225.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ryan Alcorn, Asset Management
Division, Bureau of Reclamation, 303–
445–2711; ralcorn@usbr.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Why we are publishing this proposed
rule and what it does?
Secretarial Order 3376 set forth the
policy of the Department of the Interior
that E-bikes should be allowed where
other, non-motorized types of bicycles
are allowed and not allowed where
other, non-motorized types of bicycles
are prohibited. Accordingly, the
proposed rule would include a
definition for electric bicycles, or ebikes. E-bikes may have 2 or 3 wheels
and must have fully operable pedals.
The electric motor for an E-bike may not
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
20464
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 71 / Monday, April 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
exceed 750 watts (one horsepower). Ebikes must fall into one of three classes:
a. ‘‘Class 1 electric bicycle’’ shall
mean an electric bicycle equipped with
a motor that provides assistance only
when the rider is pedaling, and that
ceases to provide assistance when the
bicycle reaches the speed of 20 miles
per hour;
b. ‘‘Class 2 electric bicycles’’ shall
mean an electric bicycle equipped with
a motor that may be used exclusively to
propel the bicycle, and that is not
capable of providing assistance when
the bicycle reaches the speed of 20
miles per hour; and
c. ‘‘Class 3 electric bicycle’’ shall
mean an electric bicycle equipped with
a motor that provides assistance only
when the rider is pedaling, and that
ceases to provide assistance when the
bicycle reaches the speed of 28 miles
per hour.
The Bureau of Reclamation is
proposing to make the following
changes to 43 CFR part 420:
• Section 420.5(a) will be amended to
include E-bikes that satisfy certain
criteria in the specified exemptions to
the definition of off-road vehicles.
• Section 420.5(h) will be added to
define electric bicycles consistent with
Secretarial Order 3376.
• Section 420.21(d) will be added to
clarify applicability to E-bikes with
pedal-assisted propulsion.
Reclamation expects that the changes
directed by the proposed rule could
facilitate increased E-bike ridership on
Reclamation lands in the future.
However, the proposed rule would not
be self-executing. The proposed rule, in
and of itself, would not change existing
allowances for E-bike usage on
Reclamation-administered public lands.
It would neither allow E-bikes on roads
and trails that are currently closed to
off-road vehicles but open to
mechanized, non-motorized bicycle use,
nor affect the use of E-bikes and other
motorized vehicles on roads and trails
where off-road vehicle use is currently
allowed. While Reclamation intends for
this proposed rule to increase
accessibility to public lands, E-bikes
would not be given special access
beyond what traditional, non-motorized
bicycles are allowed. To address sitespecific issues, Reclamation would
consider the environmental impacts
from the use of E-bikes through
subsequent analysis in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Apr 10, 2020
Jkt 250001
II. Compliance With Other Laws,
Executive Orders, and Department
Policy
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of
Management and Budget will review all
significant rules. The OIRA has waived
review of this proposed rule and, at the
final rule stage, will make a separate
decision as to whether the rule is a
significant regulatory action as defined
by Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of Executive Order 12866
while calling for improvements in the
nation’s regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process
must allow for public participation and
an open exchange of ideas. We have
developed this proposed rule in a
manner consistent with these
requirements.
This proposed rule is not an
Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because it is not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This proposed rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act. This proposed rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
b. Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This proposed rule does not impose
an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. This
proposed rule does not have a
significant or unique effect on State,
local, or tribal governments or the
private sector. A statement containing
information required by the UMRA (2
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
This proposed rule does not affect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630. This proposed
rule is not a government action capable
of interfering with constitutionally
protected property rights. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of
Executive Order 13132, this proposed
rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement. It does not have a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the levels of
government. A federalism summary
impact statement is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
This proposed rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this proposed rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes
(Executive Order 13175)
Under the criteria in Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated this proposed
rule and determined that it has no
potential effects on federally recognized
Indian tribes. This proposed rule does
not have tribal implications that impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian Tribal governments.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This proposed rule does not contain
information collection requirements,
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 71 / Monday, April 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
and a submission to the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act is not
required.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
National Environmental Policy Act
This proposed rule is categorically
excluded from NEPA analysis under
DOI categorical exclusion, 43 CFR
46.210(i), which covers ‘‘Policies,
directives, regulations, and guidelines:
That are of an administrative, financial,
legal, technical, or procedural nature; or
whose environmental effects are too
broad, speculative, or conjectural to
lend themselves to meaningful analysis
and will later be subject to the NEPA
process, either collectively, or case-bycase.’’ This proposed rule would not
change the existing allowances for Ebike usage on Reclamation lands.
Rather, it adds a new definition for Ebikes and directs Reclamation to
specifically address E-bike usage in
future recreation and land-use
decisions. The categorical exclusion is
appropriate and applicable because the
proposed rule is for an administrative
change and the environmental effects of
the proposed rule in future land use and
implementation-level decisions to open
or close lands are too speculative to
lend themselves to meaningful analysis
in this proposed rulemaking. The
environmental consequences of these
decisions will be subject to the NEPA
process before a land use decision is
made to ensure the appropriate
management of resources on a case-bycase basis.
Pursuant to 43 CFR 46.205(c),
Reclamation has reviewed its reliance
upon this categorical exclusion against
the list of extraordinary circumstances,
at 43 CFR 46.215, and has found that
none are applicable for this proposed
rule. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required for this proposed rulemaking.
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive
Order 13211)
This proposed rule is not a significant
energy action under the definition in
Executive Order 13211. A Statement of
Energy Effects is not required. This
proposed rule will not have a significant
effect on the nation’s energy supply,
distribution, or use.
Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1,
1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we
publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Apr 10, 2020
Jkt 250001
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
proposed rule, your comments should
be as specific as possible. For example,
you should tell us which sections or
paragraphs that you find unclear, which
sections or sentences are too long, the
sections where you feel lists or tables
would be useful, etc.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 420
E-bikes, Recreation.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, Reclamation proposes to
amend part 420 of title 43 of the Code
of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 420—OFF-ROAD VEHICLE USE
1. The authority citation for part 420
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 32 Stat. 388 (43 U.S.C. 391 et
seq.) and act amendatory thereof and
supplementary thereto; E.O. 11644 (37 FR
2877).
2. Amend § 420.5 by revising
paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (h)
to read as follows:
■
§ 420.5
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Off-road vehicle means any
motorized vehicle (including the
standard automobile) designed for or
capable of cross-country travel on or
immediately over land, water, sand,
snow, ice, marsh, swampland, or natural
terrain. The term excludes:
(1) Nonamphibious registered
motorboats;
(2) Military, fire, emergency, or law
enforcement vehicles when used for
emergency purpose;
(3) Self-propelled lawnmowers,
snowblowers, garden or lawn tractors,
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20465
and golf carts while being used for their
designed purpose;
(4) Agricultural, timbering,
construction, exploratory, and
development equipment and vehicles
while being used exclusively as
authorized by permit, lease, license,
agreement, or contract with the Bureau;
(5) Any combat or combat support
vehicle when used in times of national
defense emergencies;
(6) ‘‘Official use’’ vehicles; and
(7) Electric bikes as defined by
§ 420.5(h), except those being used in a
manner where the motor is being used
exclusively to propel the E-bike.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Electric Bicycle (also known as an
E-bike) shall mean a two- or threewheeled cycle with fully operable
pedals and an electric motor of not more
than 750 watts (1 h.p.) that meets the
requirements of one of the following
three classes:
(1) Class 1 electric bicycle shall mean
an electric bicycle equipped with a
motor that provides assistance only
when the rider is pedaling, and that
ceases to provide assistance when the
bicycle reaches the speed of 20 miles
per hour.
(2) Class 2 electric bicycle shall mean
an electric bicycle equipped with a
motor that may be used exclusively to
propel the bicycle, and that is not
capable of providing assistance when
the bicycle reaches the speed of 20
miles per hour.
(3) Class 3 electric bicycle shall mean
an electric bicycle equipped with a
motor that provides assistance only
when the rider is pedaling, and that
ceases to provide assistance when the
bicycle reaches the speed of 28 miles
per hour.
Subpart B—Designated Areas and
Permitted Events
3. Amend § 420.21 by adding
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 420.21 Procedure for designating areas
for off-road vehicle use.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The appropriate regional director
should generally allow E-bikes whose
mechanical features are being used as an
assist to human propulsion on roads
and trails upon which mechanized, nonmotorized use is allowed, in compliance
with the requirements of this section,
unless the authorized officer determines
that E-bike use would be inappropriate
on such roads and trails. If the
appropriate regional director allows Ebikes in accordance with this paragraph,
an E-bike user shall be afforded the
rights and privileges, and be subject to
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
20466
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 71 / Monday, April 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
all the duties, of non-motorized
bicycles.
Aubrey J.D. Bettencourt,
Deputy Assistant Secretary—Water and
Science.
[FR Doc. 2020–07213 Filed 4–10–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332–90–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
49 CFR Part 273
[Docket No. FRA–2019–0069, Notice No. 2]
RIN 2130–AC85
Metrics and Minimum Standards for
Intercity Passenger Rail Service
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Proposed rule; announcement of
public hearing.
AGENCY:
On March 31, 2020, FRA
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) that proposed
metrics and minimum standards for
measuring the performance and service
quality of intercity passenger train
operations. FRA is announcing a public
hearing to provide members of the
public an opportunity to provide oral
comments on the proposal. The public
hearing will be held telephonically,
instead of in-person.
DATES: The public hearing will be held
on April 30, 2020, from 1:00 p.m. (EDT)
to 4:00 p.m. (EDT). The comment period
for the NPRM published on March 31,
2020, (85 FR 17835) is open through
June 1, 2020. Written comments in
response to views or information
provided at the public hearing must be
received by that date.
ADDRESSES: The public hearing will be
held telephonically. If you are interested
in participating in the public hearing
please visit https://railroads.dot.gov/
legislation-regulations/regulationsrulemaking/metrics-and-minimum-
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Apr 10, 2020
Jkt 250001
standards-intercity-passenger. For
assistance registering for the public
hearing, contact Katie List at Katie.List@
dot.gov or (202) 493–0530.
Written comments in response to
views or information provided at the
public hearing may be submitted by any
of the methods listed in the NPRM. See
85 FR 17835.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Ferriter, Office of Railroad
Policy and Development, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590, (202) 493–0197, Kristin.Ferriter@
dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Members
of the public are invited to present oral
statements, and to offer information and
views about the NPRM at the public
hearing. The hearing will be informal
and will be conducted by a
representative FRA designates under
FRA’s Rules of Practice (49 CFR 211.25).
The hearing will be a non-adversarial
proceeding; therefore, there will be no
cross examination of persons presenting
statements or offering evidence. An FRA
representative will make an opening
statement outlining the scope of the
hearing. After all initial statements are
completed those persons wishing to
make a brief rebuttal will be given the
opportunity to do so in the same order
the initial statements were made. FRA
will announce additional procedures
necessary to conduct the hearing, at the
beginning of the hearing. The purpose of
this hearing is to receive oral comments
in response to an NPRM for metrics and
minimum standards for intercity
passenger rail service. FRA will add a
transcript of the discussions to the
public docket in this proceeding.
Public Participation Procedures. Any
person wishing to make a statement at
the hearing should notify Katie List by
telephone or email (Katie.List@dot.gov;
(202) 493–0530) at least 5 working days
before the date of the hearing and
should submit a copy of the oral
statement they intend to make at the
proceeding (late filers will be
accommodated to the extent possible).
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
The notification should identify the
party the person represents, the
particular subject(s) the person plans to
address, and the time requested. The
notification should also provide the
participant’s mailing address and other
contact information. FRA reserves the
right to limit participation in the
hearing of persons who fail to provide
such notification. FRA also reserves the
right to limit the duration of
presentations if necessary to afford as
many people as possible the
opportunity to speak.
For information on services for
persons with disabilities, or to request
special assistance in connection with
the hearing, contact Kristin Ferriter, by
telephone or email, at least 5 working
days before the date of the hearing by
one of the means listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
See https://www.regulations.gov/
#!privacyNotice for the privacy notice of
www.regulations.gov. Interested parties
may also review DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477). Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c),
DOT solicits comments from the public
to better inform its rulemaking process.
DOT posts these comments, without
edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–
14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 7,
2020.
Brett A. Jortland,
Acting Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2020–07624 Filed 4–10–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 71 (Monday, April 13, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20463-20466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-07213]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
43 CFR Part 420
[Cost Center: RR8567200, Fund: 20XR0680A2, WBS: RX.31480001.0040000]
RIN 1006-AA57
Off-Road Vehicle Use
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation; Interior.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Secretarial Order 3376 addresses regulatory uncertainty on how
agencies within the Department of the Interior manage recreational
opportunities for electric bikes (E-bikes) on trails and paths where
traditional bikes are allowed. To provide consistency in Federal policy
among agencies with recreational opportunities pertinent to Secretarial
Order 3376, the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) is proposing to
amend this regulation to add a definition for E-bikes and exempt E-
bikes from the regulatory definition of an off-road vehicle where E-
bikes are being used on roads and trails where mechanized, non-
motorized use is allowed, they are not being propelled exclusively by a
motorized source, and the appropriate regional director expressly
determines through a formal decision that E-bikes should be treated the
same as non-motorized bicycles. This proposed change would facilitate
increased E-bike use where other types of bicycles are allowed in a
manner consistent with existing use of Reclamation land, and increase
recreational opportunities for all Americans, especially those with
physical limitations.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rulemaking must be submitted on or
before June 12, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the proposed rulemaking by either
of the methods listed below. Please use Regulation Identifier Number
1006-AA57 in your comment.
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions on the website for submitting comments.
2. U.S. mail, courier, or hand delivery: Bureau of Reclamation,
Asset Management Division, 8667200, P.O. Box 25007, Denver, CO 80225.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Alcorn, Asset Management
Division, Bureau of Reclamation, 303-445-2711; [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why we are publishing this proposed rule and what it does?
Secretarial Order 3376 set forth the policy of the Department of
the Interior that E-bikes should be allowed where other, non-motorized
types of bicycles are allowed and not allowed where other, non-
motorized types of bicycles are prohibited. Accordingly, the proposed
rule would include a definition for electric bicycles, or e-bikes. E-
bikes may have 2 or 3 wheels and must have fully operable pedals. The
electric motor for an E-bike may not
[[Page 20464]]
exceed 750 watts (one horsepower). E-bikes must fall into one of three
classes:
a. ``Class 1 electric bicycle'' shall mean an electric bicycle
equipped with a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is
pedaling, and that ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle
reaches the speed of 20 miles per hour;
b. ``Class 2 electric bicycles'' shall mean an electric bicycle
equipped with a motor that may be used exclusively to propel the
bicycle, and that is not capable of providing assistance when the
bicycle reaches the speed of 20 miles per hour; and
c. ``Class 3 electric bicycle'' shall mean an electric bicycle
equipped with a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is
pedaling, and that ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle
reaches the speed of 28 miles per hour.
The Bureau of Reclamation is proposing to make the following
changes to 43 CFR part 420:
Section 420.5(a) will be amended to include E-bikes that
satisfy certain criteria in the specified exemptions to the definition
of off-road vehicles.
Section 420.5(h) will be added to define electric bicycles
consistent with Secretarial Order 3376.
Section 420.21(d) will be added to clarify applicability
to E-bikes with pedal-assisted propulsion.
Reclamation expects that the changes directed by the proposed rule
could facilitate increased E-bike ridership on Reclamation lands in the
future. However, the proposed rule would not be self-executing. The
proposed rule, in and of itself, would not change existing allowances
for E-bike usage on Reclamation-administered public lands. It would
neither allow E-bikes on roads and trails that are currently closed to
off-road vehicles but open to mechanized, non-motorized bicycle use,
nor affect the use of E-bikes and other motorized vehicles on roads and
trails where off-road vehicle use is currently allowed. While
Reclamation intends for this proposed rule to increase accessibility to
public lands, E-bikes would not be given special access beyond what
traditional, non-motorized bicycles are allowed. To address site-
specific issues, Reclamation would consider the environmental impacts
from the use of E-bikes through subsequent analysis in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).
II. Compliance With Other Laws, Executive Orders, and Department Policy
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget will
review all significant rules. The OIRA has waived review of this
proposed rule and, at the final rule stage, will make a separate
decision as to whether the rule is a significant regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order
12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public
participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have developed this
proposed rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
This proposed rule is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory
action because it is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of
small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.).
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This proposed rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This proposed rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more.
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This proposed rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100
million per year. This proposed rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or tribal governments or the private
sector. A statement containing information required by the UMRA (2
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
This proposed rule does not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630. This
proposed rule is not a government action capable of interfering with
constitutionally protected property rights. A takings implication
assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, this
proposed rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. It
does not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the levels of
government. A federalism summary impact statement is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
This proposed rule complies with the requirements of Executive
Order 12988. Specifically, this proposed rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (Executive Order 13175)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated this
proposed rule and determined that it has no potential effects on
federally recognized Indian tribes. This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications that impose substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian Tribal governments.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This proposed rule does not contain information collection
requirements,
[[Page 20465]]
and a submission to the Office of Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This proposed rule is categorically excluded from NEPA analysis
under DOI categorical exclusion, 43 CFR 46.210(i), which covers
``Policies, directives, regulations, and guidelines: That are of an
administrative, financial, legal, technical, or procedural nature; or
whose environmental effects are too broad, speculative, or conjectural
to lend themselves to meaningful analysis and will later be subject to
the NEPA process, either collectively, or case-by-case.'' This proposed
rule would not change the existing allowances for E-bike usage on
Reclamation lands. Rather, it adds a new definition for E-bikes and
directs Reclamation to specifically address E-bike usage in future
recreation and land-use decisions. The categorical exclusion is
appropriate and applicable because the proposed rule is for an
administrative change and the environmental effects of the proposed
rule in future land use and implementation-level decisions to open or
close lands are too speculative to lend themselves to meaningful
analysis in this proposed rulemaking. The environmental consequences of
these decisions will be subject to the NEPA process before a land use
decision is made to ensure the appropriate management of resources on a
case-by-case basis.
Pursuant to 43 CFR 46.205(c), Reclamation has reviewed its reliance
upon this categorical exclusion against the list of extraordinary
circumstances, at 43 CFR 46.215, and has found that none are applicable
for this proposed rule. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement is required for this proposed
rulemaking.
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211)
This proposed rule is not a significant energy action under the
definition in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is
not required. This proposed rule will not have a significant effect on
the nation's energy supply, distribution, or use.
Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To
better help us revise the proposed rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you should tell us which sections or
paragraphs that you find unclear, which sections or sentences are too
long, the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful, etc.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 420
E-bikes, Recreation.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, Reclamation proposes to
amend part 420 of title 43 of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 420--OFF-ROAD VEHICLE USE
0
1. The authority citation for part 420 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 32 Stat. 388 (43 U.S.C. 391 et seq.) and act
amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto; E.O. 11644 (37 FR
2877).
0
2. Amend Sec. 420.5 by revising paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (h)
to read as follows:
Sec. 420.5 Definitions.
* * * * *
(a) Off-road vehicle means any motorized vehicle (including the
standard automobile) designed for or capable of cross-country travel on
or immediately over land, water, sand, snow, ice, marsh, swampland, or
natural terrain. The term excludes:
(1) Nonamphibious registered motorboats;
(2) Military, fire, emergency, or law enforcement vehicles when
used for emergency purpose;
(3) Self-propelled lawnmowers, snowblowers, garden or lawn
tractors, and golf carts while being used for their designed purpose;
(4) Agricultural, timbering, construction, exploratory, and
development equipment and vehicles while being used exclusively as
authorized by permit, lease, license, agreement, or contract with the
Bureau;
(5) Any combat or combat support vehicle when used in times of
national defense emergencies;
(6) ``Official use'' vehicles; and
(7) Electric bikes as defined by Sec. 420.5(h), except those being
used in a manner where the motor is being used exclusively to propel
the E-bike.
* * * * *
(h) Electric Bicycle (also known as an E-bike) shall mean a two- or
three-wheeled cycle with fully operable pedals and an electric motor of
not more than 750 watts (1 h.p.) that meets the requirements of one of
the following three classes:
(1) Class 1 electric bicycle shall mean an electric bicycle
equipped with a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is
pedaling, and that ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle
reaches the speed of 20 miles per hour.
(2) Class 2 electric bicycle shall mean an electric bicycle
equipped with a motor that may be used exclusively to propel the
bicycle, and that is not capable of providing assistance when the
bicycle reaches the speed of 20 miles per hour.
(3) Class 3 electric bicycle shall mean an electric bicycle
equipped with a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is
pedaling, and that ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle
reaches the speed of 28 miles per hour.
Subpart B--Designated Areas and Permitted Events
0
3. Amend Sec. 420.21 by adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 420.21 Procedure for designating areas for off-road vehicle
use.
* * * * *
(d) The appropriate regional director should generally allow E-
bikes whose mechanical features are being used as an assist to human
propulsion on roads and trails upon which mechanized, non-motorized use
is allowed, in compliance with the requirements of this section, unless
the authorized officer determines that E-bike use would be
inappropriate on such roads and trails. If the appropriate regional
director allows E-bikes in accordance with this paragraph, an E-bike
user shall be afforded the rights and privileges, and be subject to
[[Page 20466]]
all the duties, of non-motorized bicycles.
Aubrey J.D. Bettencourt,
Deputy Assistant Secretary--Water and Science.
[FR Doc. 2020-07213 Filed 4-10-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332-90-P