Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From Aerospace Manufacture and Rework Facilities, 19674-19676 [2020-06464]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
19674
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 68 / Wednesday, April 8, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
EPA—APPROVED OHIO REGULATIONS—Continued
Ohio citation
*
*
*
Ohio effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
Table of Contents
[EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0024; FRL–10007–
12–Region 7]
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
III. The EPA’s Response to Comments
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of
Emissions From Aerospace
Manufacture and Rework Facilities
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State
of Missouri for two rules related to
emissions from aerospace manufacture
and rework facilities in the Kansas City
and St. Louis areas. This final action
will amend the SIP to include adding
incorporations by reference, revising
unnecessarily restrictive language, and
making other administrative wording
changes. The EPA’s approval of these
rule revisions is being done in
accordance with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
May 8, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0024. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Will
Stone, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:34 Apr 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
The EPA is approving revisions to 10
Code of State Regulation (CSR) 10–
2.205, Control of Emissions from
Aerospace Manufacture and Rework
Facilities and 10 CSR 10–5.295, Control
of Emissions from Aerospace
Manufacture and Rework Facilities in
the Missouri SIP. Missouri made several
revisions to the rules. These revisions
are described in detail in the technical
support document (TSD) included in
the docket for this action. The EPA is
finalizing this action because the
revisions to these rules will not have a
negative impact on air quality.
II. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. The State provided
public notice on this SIP revision from
August 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018
and received fourteen comments on the
two rules. Missouri responded to all
comments. In addition, the revision
meets the substantive SIP requirements
of the CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
III. The EPA’s Response to Comments
The public comment period on the
EPA’s proposed rule opened February 4,
2020, the date of its publication in the
Federal Register and closed on March 4,
2020 (85 FR 6121). During this period,
EPA received one comment that was
supportive of the revisions to the rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Notes
*
Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219;
telephone number (913) 551–7714;
email address stone.william@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
[FR Doc. 2020–06819 Filed 4–7–20; 8:45 am]
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with RULES
EPA approval date
Sfmt 4700
*
*
The comment can be found in the
docket for this action.
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is taking final action to
amend 10 CSR 10–2.205 and 10 CSR
10–5.295, Control of Emissions from
Aerospace Manufacture and Rework
Facilities, which apply in the Kansas
City and St. Louis areas, respectively.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
Missouri Regulations described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 7 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by the EPA for inclusion in
the State Implementation Plan, have
been incorporated by reference by EPA
into that plan, are fully federally
enforceable under sections 110 and 113
of the CAA as of the effective date of the
final rulemaking of the EPA’s approval,
and will be incorporated by reference in
the next update to the SIP compilation.1
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
1 62
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
08APR1
19675
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 68 / Wednesday, April 8, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act CAA, petitions for judicial
review of this action must be filed in the
United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by June 8, 2020.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: March 24, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entries
‘‘10–2.205’’ and ‘‘10–5.295’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.1320
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri
citation
State
effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 2—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
*
10–2.205 ......
*
*
*
Control of Emissions from Aerospace Manufacturing
and Rework Facilities.
*
*
*
3/30/2019
*
*
*
4/8/2020, [insert Federal
Register citation].
*
*
*
*
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with RULES
Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
*
10–5.295 ......
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
Control of Emissions from Aerospace Manufacturing
and Rework Facilities.
*
19:34 Apr 07, 2020
*
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
*
3/30/2019
*
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
*
*
4/8/2020, [insert Federal
Register citation].
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
*
08APR1
*
*
19676
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 68 / Wednesday, April 8, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–06464 Filed 4–7–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 261
[EPA–R10–RCRA–2018–0662; FRL–10006–
64–Region 10]
Hazardous Waste Management
System; Final Exclusion for Identifying
and Listing Hazardous Waste
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with RULES
The
information in this section is organized
as follows:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) (also, ‘‘the Agency ‘‘or
‘‘we’’ in this preamble) is taking final
action to grant three petitions submitted
jointly by Emerald Kalama Chemical,
LLC (Emerald) and Fire Mountain
Farms, Inc (FMF) (Petitioners), in Lewis
County, Washington to exclude (or
‘‘delist’’) a one-time amount up to
20,100 cubic yards of U019 (benzene)
and U220 (toluene) mixed material from
the list of federal hazardous wastes as
proposed on November 12, 2019. The
EPA has decided to grant these petitions
as proposed and under the same
conditions based on an evaluation of
waste-specific information provided by
the Petitioners and a consideration of
public comments received.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
April 8, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. [EPA–R10–RCRA–2018–0662]. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the RCRA Records Center, 16th Floor,
U.S. EPA, Region 10, 1200 6th Avenue,
Suite 155, OAW–150, Seattle,
Washington 98101. This facility is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The EPA recommends you
telephone Dr. David Bartus at (206) 553–
2804 before visiting the Region 10
office. The public may copy material
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:34 Apr 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
from the regulatory docket at 15 cents
per page.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
David Bartus, EPA, Region 10, 1200 6th
Avenue, Suite 155, OAW–150, Seattle,
Washington 98070; telephone number:
(206) 553–2804; email address:
bartus.dave@epa.gov.
As discussed below, Ecology is
evaluating the petitions submitted by
Emerald and FMF under state authority.
Information on Ecology’s action may be
found at https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/
publications/SummaryPages/
1804023.html.
I. Background
A. What is a delisting petition?
B. What regulations allow a waste to be
delisted?
II. Emerald Kalama’s and FMF’s Petitions
A. What wastes did petitioners petition epa
to delist?
B. What information was submitted in
support of these petitions?
III. EPA’s Evaluation and Public Comments
A. What decision is EPA finalizing and
why?
B. Public Comments Received and EPA’s
Response
IV. Final Rule
A. What are the terms of this exclusion?
B. When is the delisting effective?
C. How does this action affect the states?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
A. What is a delisting petition?
A delisting petition is a request from
a generator to exclude waste from the
list of hazardous wastes under RCRA
regulations. In a delisting petition, the
petitioner must show that waste
generated at a particular facility does
not meet any of the criteria for which
EPA listed the waste as set forth in 40
CFR 261.11 and the background
document for the waste. In addition, a
petitioner must demonstrate that the
waste does not exhibit any of the
hazardous waste characteristics (that is,
ignitability, reactivity, corrosivity, and
toxicity) and must present sufficient
information for us to decide whether
factors other than those for which the
waste was listed warrant retaining it as
a hazardous waste. See 40 CFR 260.22,
Section 3001(f) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C.
6921(f) and the background document
for a listed waste.
A generator of a waste excluded from
the hazardous waste lists of 40 CFR part
261 subpart D remains obligated under
RCRA to confirm that its waste remains
nonhazardous based on the hazardous
waste characteristics in order to
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
continue to manage the waste as nonhazardous.
B. What regulations allow a waste to be
delisted?
Under 40 CFR 260.20, 260.22, and 42
U.S.C. 6921(f), facilities may petition
the EPA to remove their wastes from
otherwise applicable hazardous waste
storage, treatment and disposal
requirements by excluding them from
the lists of hazardous wastes contained
in 40 CFR 261.31 and 261.32.
Specifically, 40 CFR 260.20 allows any
person to petition the Administrator to
modify or revoke any provision of 40
CFR parts 260 through 266, 268, and
273. 40 CFR 260.22 provides a generator
the opportunity to petition the
Administrator to exclude a waste from
the lists of hazardous wastes on a
‘‘generator specific’’ basis.
II. Emerald Kalama’s and FMF’s
Petitions
A. What wastes did petitioners petition
EPA to delist?
Emerald manufactures various organic
chemicals used as artificial flavors and
fragrances, food preservatives,
plasticizers, and intermediates at their
facility in Kalama, Washington. Most of
the chemicals produced are derived
from toluene or from the oxidation
products of toluene, including benzoic
acid and benzaldehyde. Additional
products are produced as derivatives of
benzoic acid and benzaldehyde.
Products are typically purified by
continuous or batch distillation. In
conjunction with its manufacturing
processes, Emerald operates an
industrial wastewater treatment system,
consisting of an anaerobic digestion
process and an aerobic oxidation
system, both of which are biological
treatment systems very similar to
municipal wastewater treatment
systems. This treatment system
produces industrial wastewater
treatment plant biological solids (IWBS).
As documented in the Petitioners’
delisting petitions, the IWBS designates
as U019 (benzene) and U220 (toluene).
FMF operates receiving, storage,
treatment, and land application
facilities in Lewis County, Washington
for wastewater treatment plant
treatment solids received from
municipal, industrial, and private
wastewater treatment plants. FMF is not
permitted or otherwise authorized to
manage, treat, or dispose of hazardous
or dangerous wastes. Emerald
contracted with FMF to land apply
Emerald’s IWBS beginning in October
1995. FMF mixed Emerald’s IWBS with
treatment solids from other facilities
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 8, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19674-19676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-06464]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0024; FRL-10007-12-Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From Aerospace
Manufacture and Rework Facilities
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for
the State of Missouri for two rules related to emissions from aerospace
manufacture and rework facilities in the Kansas City and St. Louis
areas. This final action will amend the SIP to include adding
incorporations by reference, revising unnecessarily restrictive
language, and making other administrative wording changes. The EPA's
approval of these rule revisions is being done in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on May 8, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0024. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Will Stone, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913) 551-7714; email
address [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
III. The EPA's Response to Comments
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is being addressed in this document?
The EPA is approving revisions to 10 Code of State Regulation (CSR)
10-2.205, Control of Emissions from Aerospace Manufacture and Rework
Facilities and 10 CSR 10-5.295, Control of Emissions from Aerospace
Manufacture and Rework Facilities in the Missouri SIP. Missouri made
several revisions to the rules. These revisions are described in detail
in the technical support document (TSD) included in the docket for this
action. The EPA is finalizing this action because the revisions to
these rules will not have a negative impact on air quality.
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
State provided public notice on this SIP revision from August 1, 2018
to September 30, 2018 and received fourteen comments on the two rules.
Missouri responded to all comments. In addition, the revision meets the
substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
III. The EPA's Response to Comments
The public comment period on the EPA's proposed rule opened
February 4, 2020, the date of its publication in the Federal Register
and closed on March 4, 2020 (85 FR 6121). During this period, EPA
received one comment that was supportive of the revisions to the rule.
The comment can be found in the docket for this action.
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is taking final action to amend 10 CSR 10-2.205 and 10 CSR
10-5.295, Control of Emissions from Aerospace Manufacture and Rework
Facilities, which apply in the Kansas City and St. Louis areas,
respectively.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that
includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of
1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
Missouri Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set
forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region 7 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for
inclusion in the State Implementation Plan, have been incorporated by
reference by EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final
rulemaking of the EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference
in the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under
[[Page 19675]]
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR
3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act CAA, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 8, 2020. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 24, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entries ``10-2.205'' and ``10-5.295'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 2--Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
10-2.205....................... Control of Emissions 3/30/2019 4/8/2020, [insert
from Aerospace Federal Register
Manufacturing and citation].
Rework Facilities.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 5--Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
10-5.295....................... Control of Emissions 3/30/2019 4/8/2020, [insert
from Aerospace Federal Register
Manufacturing and citation].
Rework Facilities.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 19676]]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-06464 Filed 4-7-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
