Air Plan Approval; California; Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District; Reasonably Available Control Technology; Correcting Amendment, 18872-18873 [2020-06353]
Download as PDF
18872
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 65 / Friday, April 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas
Designated as an Extension to a Class D or
Class E Surface Area.
*
*
*
*
*
AWP NV E4 Battle Mountain, NV [NEW]
Battle Mountain Airport, NV
(Lat. 40°35′57″ N, long. 116°52′28″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface within 1.3 miles each side of the 228°
bearing from the Battle Mountain Airport
extending from the 4.2 mile radius to 7 miles
southwest of Battle Mountain Airport, Battle
Mountain NV.
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
AWP NV E5 Battle Mountain, NV
[Amended]
Battle Mountain Airport, NV
(Lat. 40°35′57″ N, long. 116°52′28″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within 16.5-mile radius
of the Battle Mountain Airport beginning at
the point where the 205° bearing intersects
the 16.5-mile radius thence clockwise to the
point where the 266° bearing intersects the
16.5-mile radius thence northeast along the
266° bearing to within 7 miles of the airport,
thence clockwise along the 7-mile radius to
the point where the 65° bearing intersects the
7-mile radius thence to the point where the
77° bearing intersects the 4.2-mile radius
thence clockwise to the point where the 158°
bearing intersects the 4.2 mile radius, thence
to the point of beginning; and that airspace
within 2 miles each side of the 49° bearing
extending from the 4.2 mile radius to 10.5
miles from the airport.
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on March
26, 2020.
Shawn M. Kozica,
Group Manager, Western Service Center,
Operations Support Group.
[FR Doc. 2020–07031 Filed 4–2–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0528; FRL–10007–
00–Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; California; Northern
Sierra Air Quality Management District;
Reasonably Available Control
Technology; Correcting Amendment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
On January 15, 2020, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
published in the Federal Register a final
rule entitled ‘‘Air Plan Approval;
California; Northern Sierra Air Quality
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Apr 02, 2020
Jkt 250001
Management District; Reasonably
Available Control Technology.’’ That
publication inadvertently listed in the
regulatory text the wrong document
number for a document entitled
‘‘Control Techniques Guidelines for the
Oil and Natural Gas Industry.’’ This
document corrects this error in the
regulatory text.
DATES: This document is effective on
April 3, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stanley Tong, Rules Office (Air 3–2),
EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San
Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415)
947–4122 or by email at tong.stanley@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 15, 2020 (85 FR 2313), the EPA
published a final rule entitled ‘‘Air Plan
Approval; California; Northern Sierra
Air Quality Management District;
Reasonably Available Control
Technology’’. This rule approved a
revision to the California State
Implementation Plan under the Clean
Air Act consisting of the Northern Sierra
Air Quality Management District’s
demonstration that its rules satisfied
applicable requirements regarding
reasonably available control technology.
Due to a typographical error, the EPA’s
final rule published on January 15,
2020, inadvertently listed the wrong
document number for a document
entitled ‘‘Control Techniques
Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas
Industry,’’ which could make it difficult
for members of the public to locate the
document. The correct document
number and title are: EPA–453/B–16–
001 Oil and Natural Gas Industry. This
action corrects the erroneous document
number in Table 1 of 40 CFR
52.222(a)(9)(iv).
The EPA has determined that this
action falls under the ‘‘good cause’’
exemption in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
which, upon finding ‘‘good cause,’’
authorizes agencies to dispense with
public participation where public notice
and comment procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest. Public notice and
comment for this action is unnecessary
because the underlying rule for which
this correcting amendment has been
prepared was already subject to a 30-day
comment period, and this action is
merely correcting a minor typographical
error in the rule text. Further, this action
is consistent with the purpose and
rationale of the final rule, which is
corrected herein. Because this action
does not change the EPA’s analyses or
overall actions, no purpose would be
served by additional public notice and
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
comment. Consequently, additional
public notice and comment are
unnecessary.
The EPA also finds that there is good
cause under APA section 553(d)(3) for
this correction to become effective on
the date of publication of this action.
Section 553(d)(3) of the APA allows an
effective date of less than 30 days after
publication ‘‘as otherwise provided by
the agency for good cause found and
published with the rule.’’ 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). The purpose of the 30-day
waiting period prescribed in APA
section 553(d)(3) is to give affected
parties a reasonable time to adjust their
behavior and prepare before the final
rule takes effect. This rule does not
create any new regulatory requirements
such that affected parties would need
time to prepare before the rule takes
effect. This action merely corrects a
typographical error in a previous
rulemaking. For these reasons, the EPA
finds good cause under APA section
553(d)(3) for this correction to become
effective on the date of publication of
this action.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ and is therefore not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to E.O. 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action is not an E.O.
13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017)
regulatory action because this action is
not significant under E.O. 12866.
Because the agency has made a ‘‘good
cause’’ finding that this action is not
subject to notice-and-comment
requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute as
indicated in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section above, it is not
subject to the regulatory flexibility
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), or to sections
202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments or impose a significant
intergovernmental mandate, as
described in sections 203 and 204 of
UMRA. In addition, the SIP is not
approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
E:\FR\FM\03APR1.SGM
03APR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 65 / Friday, April 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by E.O. 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000). This rule will not
have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of governments, as specified by
E.O. 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). This rule also is not subject to
E.O. 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it is not economically
significant. This typographical
correction action does not involve
technical standards; thus the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The rule also
does not involve special consideration
of environmental justice related issues
as required by E.O. 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994). In issuing this rule,
the EPA has taken the necessary steps
to eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, as required by section
3 of E.O. 12988 (61 FR 4729, February
7, 1996). The EPA has complied with
E.O. 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15,
1998) by examining the takings
implications of the rule in accordance
with the ‘‘Attorney General’s
Supplemental Guidelines for the
Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under
the executive order. This rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 808 allows
the issuing agency to make a rule
effective sooner than otherwise
provided by the CRA if the agency
makes a good cause finding that notice
and public procedure is impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest. This determination must be
supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C.
808(2). As stated previously, the EPA
had made such a good cause finding,
including the reasons therefore, and
established an effective date April 3,
2020. The EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Apr 02, 2020
Jkt 250001
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This correction to
40 CFR part 52 for California is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. In section 52.222(a)(9)(iv), amend
the Table titled ‘‘Table-1 To paragraph
(a)(9)(iv)—Negative Declarations for the
2008 Ozone NAAQS’’ by removing the
entry for ‘‘EPA 452/B16–001 Oil and
Natural Gas Industry.’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘EPA–453/B–16–001 Oil and
Natural Gas Industry.’’, to read as
follows:
■
Negative declarations.
(a) * * *
(9) * * *
(iv) * * *
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(9)(iv)—
NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS FOR THE
2008 OZONE NAAQS
CTG document No.
Title
*
*
EPA–453/B–
16–001.
*
*
*
Oil and Natural Gas Industry.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–06353 Filed 4–2–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No.: 200324–0086; RTID 0648–
XX040]
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Northeast Multispecies
Fishery; Adjustment of Georges Bank
and Southern New England/MidAtlantic Yellowtail Flounder Annual
Catch Limits
This action transfers unused
quota of Georges Bank and Southern
New England/Mid-Atlantic yellowtail
flounder from the Atlantic scallop
fishery to the Northeast multispecies
fishery for the remainder of the 2019
fishing year. This quota transfer is
authorized when the scallop fishery is
not expected to catch its entire
allocations of yellowtail flounder. The
quota transfer is intended to provide
additional fishing opportunities for
groundfish vessels to help achieve the
optimum yield for these stocks while
ensuring sufficient amounts of
yellowtail flounder remain available for
the scallop fishery.
DATES: Effective April 2, 2020, through
April 30, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria Fenton, Fishery Management
Specialist, (978) 281–9196.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS is
required to estimate the total amount of
yellowtail flounder catch from the
scallop fishery by January 15 each year.
If the scallop fishery is expected to
catch less than 90 percent of its Georges
Bank (GB) or Southern New England/
Mid-Atlantic (SNE/MA) yellowtail
flounder sub-annual catch limit (ACL),
the Regional Administrator has the
authority to reduce the scallop fishery
sub-ACL for these stocks to the amount
projected to be caught, and increase the
groundfish fishery sub-ACL by the same
amount. This adjustment is intended to
help achieve optimum yield for these
stocks, while not threatening an overage
of the ACLs for the stocks by the
groundfish and scallop fisheries.
Based on the most current available
catch data, we project that the scallop
fishery will have unused quota in the
2019 fishing year. Using the highest
SUMMARY:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
*
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary final rule;
adjustment of annual catch limits.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
*
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AGENCY:
Dated: March 21, 2020.
John Busterud,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
§ 52.222
18873
E:\FR\FM\03APR1.SGM
03APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 65 (Friday, April 3, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18872-18873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-06353]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2019-0528; FRL-10007-00-Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; California; Northern Sierra Air Quality
Management District; Reasonably Available Control Technology;
Correcting Amendment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On January 15, 2020, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
published in the Federal Register a final rule entitled ``Air Plan
Approval; California; Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District;
Reasonably Available Control Technology.'' That publication
inadvertently listed in the regulatory text the wrong document number
for a document entitled ``Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and
Natural Gas Industry.'' This document corrects this error in the
regulatory text.
DATES: This document is effective on April 3, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley Tong, Rules Office (Air 3-2),
EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone:
(415) 947-4122 or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 15, 2020 (85 FR 2313), the EPA
published a final rule entitled ``Air Plan Approval; California;
Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District; Reasonably Available
Control Technology''. This rule approved a revision to the California
State Implementation Plan under the Clean Air Act consisting of the
Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District's demonstration that
its rules satisfied applicable requirements regarding reasonably
available control technology. Due to a typographical error, the EPA's
final rule published on January 15, 2020, inadvertently listed the
wrong document number for a document entitled ``Control Techniques
Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry,'' which could make it
difficult for members of the public to locate the document. The correct
document number and title are: EPA-453/B-16-001 Oil and Natural Gas
Industry. This action corrects the erroneous document number in Table 1
of 40 CFR 52.222(a)(9)(iv).
The EPA has determined that this action falls under the ``good
cause'' exemption in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) which, upon finding ``good cause,'' authorizes
agencies to dispense with public participation where public notice and
comment procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest. Public notice and comment for this action is
unnecessary because the underlying rule for which this correcting
amendment has been prepared was already subject to a 30-day comment
period, and this action is merely correcting a minor typographical
error in the rule text. Further, this action is consistent with the
purpose and rationale of the final rule, which is corrected herein.
Because this action does not change the EPA's analyses or overall
actions, no purpose would be served by additional public notice and
comment. Consequently, additional public notice and comment are
unnecessary.
The EPA also finds that there is good cause under APA section
553(d)(3) for this correction to become effective on the date of
publication of this action. Section 553(d)(3) of the APA allows an
effective date of less than 30 days after publication ``as otherwise
provided by the agency for good cause found and published with the
rule.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). The purpose of the 30-day waiting period
prescribed in APA section 553(d)(3) is to give affected parties a
reasonable time to adjust their behavior and prepare before the final
rule takes effect. This rule does not create any new regulatory
requirements such that affected parties would need time to prepare
before the rule takes effect. This action merely corrects a
typographical error in a previous rulemaking. For these reasons, the
EPA finds good cause under APA section 553(d)(3) for this correction to
become effective on the date of publication of this action.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
this action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore
not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to E.O. 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action is not
an E.O. 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because
this action is not significant under E.O. 12866. Because the agency has
made a ``good cause'' finding that this action is not subject to
notice-and-comment requirements under the Administrative Procedures Act
or any other statute as indicated in the Supplementary Information
section above, it is not subject to the regulatory flexibility
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), or
to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this action does not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments or impose a significant
intergovernmental mandate, as described in sections 203 and 204 of
UMRA. In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose
[[Page 18873]]
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by E.O. 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This rule will
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of governments,
as specified by E.O. 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This rule
also is not subject to E.O. 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically significant. This typographical
correction action does not involve technical standards; thus the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. The rule
also does not involve special consideration of environmental justice
related issues as required by E.O. 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994). In issuing this rule, the EPA has taken the necessary steps to
eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct, as required by
section 3 of E.O. 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996). The EPA has
complied with E.O. 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by examining the
takings implications of the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney
General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and
Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive order.
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
As stated previously, the EPA had made such a good cause finding,
including the reasons therefore, and established an effective date
April 3, 2020. The EPA will submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This correction to
40 CFR part 52 for California is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 21, 2020.
John Busterud,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. In section 52.222(a)(9)(iv), amend the Table titled ``Table-1 To
paragraph (a)(9)(iv)--Negative Declarations for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS''
by removing the entry for ``EPA 452/B16-001 Oil and Natural Gas
Industry.'' and adding in its place ``EPA-453/B-16-001 Oil and Natural
Gas Industry.'', to read as follows:
Sec. 52.222 Negative declarations.
(a) * * *
(9) * * *
(iv) * * *
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)(9)(iv)--Negative Declarations for the 2008
Ozone NAAQS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CTG document No. Title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
EPA-453/B-16-001....................... Oil and Natural Gas Industry.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-06353 Filed 4-2-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P