Request for Information: Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications, Data and Code Resulting From Federally Funded Research, 17907-17908 [2020-06622]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 62 / Tuesday, March 31, 2020 / Notices
Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue,
Alexandria, VA 22314.
STATUS: Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Committee
Chair’s welcome and remarks;
presentation of nominated candidates
for Board Chair and Vice Chair;
discussion of nominees; review of
election procedures; virtual meeting
modifications/accommodations;
approval of slate of candidates; and
closing remarks.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Point of contact for this meeting is: Brad
Gutierrez, bgutierr@nsf.gov, 703–292–
7000. Please refer to the National
Science Board website www.nsf.gov/nsb
for additional information. You may
find meeting information and any
updates (time, place, matters to be
considered, or status of meeting) at
https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/meetings/
notices.jsp#sunshine.
Chris Blair,
Executive Assistant to the National Science
Board Office.
[FR Doc. 2020–06771 Filed 3–27–20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2020–106 and CP2020–112;
MC2020–107 and CP2020–113]
New Postal Products
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing for the
Commission’s consideration concerning
negotiated service agreements. This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: April 2,
2020.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
ADDRESSES:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
19:01 Mar 30, 2020
The Commission gives notice that the
Postal Service filed request(s) for the
Commission to consider matters related
to negotiated service agreement(s). The
request(s) may propose the addition or
removal of a negotiated service
agreement from the market dominant or
the competitive product list, or the
modification of an existing product
currently appearing on the market
dominant or the competitive product
list.
Section II identifies the docket
number(s) associated with each Postal
Service request, the title of each Postal
Service request, the request’s acceptance
date, and the authority cited by the
Postal Service for each request. For each
request, the Commission appoints an
officer of the Commission to represent
the interests of the general public in the
proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505
(Public Representative). Section II also
establishes comment deadline(s)
pertaining to each request.
The public portions of the Postal
Service’s request(s) can be accessed via
the Commission’s website (https://
www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of
the Postal Service’s request(s), if any,
can be accessed through compliance
with the requirements of 39 CFR
3007.301.1
The Commission invites comments on
whether the Postal Service’s request(s)
in the captioned docket(s) are consistent
with the policies of title 39. For
request(s) that the Postal Service states
concern market dominant product(s),
applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39
U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3010, and 39
CFR part 3020, subpart B. For request(s)
that the Postal Service states concern
competitive product(s), applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements
include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633,
39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and
39 CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comment
deadline(s) for each request appear in
section II.
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
1. Docket No(s).: MC2020–106 and
CP2020–112; Filing Title: USPS Request
to Add Priority Mail Express & Priority
Mail Contract 113 to Competitive
Product List and Notice of Filing
Materials Under Seal; Filing Acceptance
Date: March 25, 2020; Filing Authority:
39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq.,
and 39 CFR 3015.5; Public
1 See Docket No. RM2018–3, Order Adopting
Final Rules Relating to Non-Public Information,
June 27, 2018, Attachment A at 19–22 (Order No.
4679).
I. Introduction
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
I. Introduction
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17907
Representative: Christopher C. Mohr;
Comments Due: April 2, 2020.
2. Docket No(s).: MC2020–107 and
CP2020–113; Filing Title: USPS Request
to Add Priority Mail Contract 598 to
Competitive Product List and Notice of
Filing Materials Under Seal; Filing
Acceptance Date: March 25, 2020; Filing
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR
3020.30 et seq., and 39 CFR 3015.5;
Public Representative: Christopher C.
Mohr; Comments Due: April 2, 2020.
This Notice will be published in the
Federal Register.
Erica A. Barker,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–06638 Filed 3–30–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Request for Information: Public
Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly
Publications, Data and Code Resulting
From Federally Funded Research
Office of Science and
Technology Policy (OSTP).
ACTION: Notice of Request for
Information (RFI), extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
OSTP, and the National
Science and Technology Council’s
(NSTC) Subcommittee on Open Science
(SOS), are engaged in ongoing efforts to
facilitate implementation and
compliance with the 2013 memorandum
Increasing Access to the Results of
Federally Funded Scientific Research
and to address recommended actions
made by the Government Accountability
Office in a November 2019 report. OSTP
and the SOS continue to explore
opportunities to increase access to
unclassified published research, digital
scientific data, and code supported by
the U.S. Government. This RFI aims to
provide all interested individuals and
organizations with the opportunity to
provide recommendations on
approaches for ensuring broad public
access to the peer-reviewed scholarly
publications, data, and code that result
from federally funded scientific
research.
DATES: The comment period for the
request for information published
February 19, 2020, at 85 FR 9488, is
extended. Comments will be accepted
until 11:59 p.m. ET on May 6, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Comments submitted in
response to this notice may be
submitted online to Lisa Nichols,
Assistant Director for Academic
Engagement, OSTP, at
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
17908
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 62 / Tuesday, March 31, 2020 / Notices
publicaccess@ostp.eop.gov. Email
submissions should be machinereadable [pdf, doc, txt] and not copyprotected. Submissions should include
‘‘RFI Response: Public Access’’ in the
subject line of the message.
Instructions: Response to this RFI is
voluntary. Each individual or institution
is requested to submit only one
response. Submission must not exceed 5
pages in 12 point or larger font, with a
page number provided on each page.
Responses should include the name of
the person(s) or organization(s) filing
the comment. Comments containing
references, studies, research, and other
empirical data that are not widely
published should include copies or
electronic links of the referenced
materials. No business proprietary
information, copyrighted information,
or personally identifiable information
should be submitted in response to this
RFI.
In accordance with FAR 15.202(3),
responses to this notice are not offers
and cannot be accepted by the Federal
Government to form a binding contract.
Additionally, those submitting
responses are solely responsible for all
expenses associated with response
preparation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information, please direct
your questions to Lisa Nichols at
publicaccess@ostp.eop.gov or call Lisa
Nichols at 202–456–4444.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
In February of 2013, OSTP issued the
memorandum Increasing Access to the
Results of Federally Funded Scientific
Research. The memorandum directed
Federal agencies with more than $100M
in research and development (R&D)
expenditures to develop plans to make
the results of federally funded
unclassified research that are published
in peer-reviewed publications, and
digitally formatted scientific data,
publicly available. Federal agency plans
required that published work be made
available following a twelve-month
post-publication embargo period.
OSTP and the NSTC SOS continue to
explore opportunities to make the
knowledge, information and data
generated by federally funded research
more readily accessible to students,
clinicians, businesses, entrepreneurs,
researchers, technologists, and the
general public who support these
investments as a means to accelerate
knowledge and innovation. Over the
course of the last two years, OSTP has
had nearly 100 meetings with
stakeholders on open science, current
policy on public access to the results of
federally funded research, the evolution
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:01 Mar 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
of scholarly communications, and
access to data and code associated with
published results. This RFI aims to
expand on these consultations and
provide all interested individuals and
organizations with the opportunity to
provide recommendations on
approaches for ensuring broad public
access to the peer-reviewed scholarly
publications, data and code that result
from federally funded scientific
research. OSTP is interested in
perspectives on the following topics:
• What current limitations exist to the
effective communication of research
outputs (publications, data, and code)
and how might communications evolve
to accelerate public access while
advancing the quality of scientific
research? What are the barriers to and
opportunities for change?
• What more can Federal agencies do
to make tax-payer funded research
results, including peer-reviewed author
manuscripts, data, and code funded by
the Federal Government, freely and
publicly accessible in a way that
minimizes delay, maximizes access, and
enhances usability? How can the
Federal Government engage with other
sectors to achieve these goals?
• How would American science
leadership and American
competitiveness benefit from immediate
access to these resources? What are
potential challenges and effective
approaches for overcoming them?
Analyses that weigh the trade-offs of
different approaches and models,
especially those that provide data, will
be particularly helpful.
• Any additional information that
might be considered for Federal policies
related to public access to peerreviewed author manuscripts, data, and
code resulting from federally supported
research.
Dated: March 25, 2020.
Sean Bonyun,
Chief of Staff, Office of Science and
Technology Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020–06622 Filed 3–30–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–88468; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2020–028]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Expand the
Trading Hours Applicable to Managed
Portfolio Shares To Include all Trading
Sessions
March 25, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 23,
2020, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) proposes to
expand the trading hours applicable to
Managed Portfolio Shares to include all
trading sessions instead of just Regular
Trading Hours. The text of the proposed
rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1 15
2 17
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 62 (Tuesday, March 31, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17907-17908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-06622]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Request for Information: Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly
Publications, Data and Code Resulting From Federally Funded Research
AGENCY: Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP).
ACTION: Notice of Request for Information (RFI), extension of comment
period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: OSTP, and the National Science and Technology Council's (NSTC)
Subcommittee on Open Science (SOS), are engaged in ongoing efforts to
facilitate implementation and compliance with the 2013 memorandum
Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific
Research and to address recommended actions made by the Government
Accountability Office in a November 2019 report. OSTP and the SOS
continue to explore opportunities to increase access to unclassified
published research, digital scientific data, and code supported by the
U.S. Government. This RFI aims to provide all interested individuals
and organizations with the opportunity to provide recommendations on
approaches for ensuring broad public access to the peer-reviewed
scholarly publications, data, and code that result from federally
funded scientific research.
DATES: The comment period for the request for information published
February 19, 2020, at 85 FR 9488, is extended. Comments will be
accepted until 11:59 p.m. ET on May 6, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Comments submitted in response to this notice may be
submitted online to Lisa Nichols, Assistant Director for Academic
Engagement, OSTP, at
[[Page 17908]]
[email protected]. Email submissions should be machine-readable
[pdf, doc, txt] and not copy-protected. Submissions should include
``RFI Response: Public Access'' in the subject line of the message.
Instructions: Response to this RFI is voluntary. Each individual or
institution is requested to submit only one response. Submission must
not exceed 5 pages in 12 point or larger font, with a page number
provided on each page. Responses should include the name of the
person(s) or organization(s) filing the comment. Comments containing
references, studies, research, and other empirical data that are not
widely published should include copies or electronic links of the
referenced materials. No business proprietary information, copyrighted
information, or personally identifiable information should be submitted
in response to this RFI.
In accordance with FAR 15.202(3), responses to this notice are not
offers and cannot be accepted by the Federal Government to form a
binding contract. Additionally, those submitting responses are solely
responsible for all expenses associated with response preparation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information, please
direct your questions to Lisa Nichols at [email protected] or
call Lisa Nichols at 202-456-4444.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
In February of 2013, OSTP issued the memorandum Increasing Access
to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research. The memorandum
directed Federal agencies with more than $100M in research and
development (R&D) expenditures to develop plans to make the results of
federally funded unclassified research that are published in peer-
reviewed publications, and digitally formatted scientific data,
publicly available. Federal agency plans required that published work
be made available following a twelve-month post-publication embargo
period.
OSTP and the NSTC SOS continue to explore opportunities to make the
knowledge, information and data generated by federally funded research
more readily accessible to students, clinicians, businesses,
entrepreneurs, researchers, technologists, and the general public who
support these investments as a means to accelerate knowledge and
innovation. Over the course of the last two years, OSTP has had nearly
100 meetings with stakeholders on open science, current policy on
public access to the results of federally funded research, the
evolution of scholarly communications, and access to data and code
associated with published results. This RFI aims to expand on these
consultations and provide all interested individuals and organizations
with the opportunity to provide recommendations on approaches for
ensuring broad public access to the peer-reviewed scholarly
publications, data and code that result from federally funded
scientific research. OSTP is interested in perspectives on the
following topics:
What current limitations exist to the effective
communication of research outputs (publications, data, and code) and
how might communications evolve to accelerate public access while
advancing the quality of scientific research? What are the barriers to
and opportunities for change?
What more can Federal agencies do to make tax-payer funded
research results, including peer-reviewed author manuscripts, data, and
code funded by the Federal Government, freely and publicly accessible
in a way that minimizes delay, maximizes access, and enhances
usability? How can the Federal Government engage with other sectors to
achieve these goals?
How would American science leadership and American
competitiveness benefit from immediate access to these resources? What
are potential challenges and effective approaches for overcoming them?
Analyses that weigh the trade-offs of different approaches and models,
especially those that provide data, will be particularly helpful.
Any additional information that might be considered for
Federal policies related to public access to peer-reviewed author
manuscripts, data, and code resulting from federally supported
research.
Dated: March 25, 2020.
Sean Bonyun,
Chief of Staff, Office of Science and Technology Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-06622 Filed 3-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P