VA Acquisition Regulation: Acquisition of Commercial Items and Simplified Acquisition Procedures, 16900-16907 [2020-05589]
Download as PDF
16900
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 58 / Wednesday, March 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
G. Environmental Analysis
The FAA has analyzed this action
under Executive Order 12114,
Environmental Effects Abroad of Major
Federal Actions, and DOT Order
5610.1C, Paragraph 16. Executive Order
12114 requires the FAA to be informed
of environmental considerations and
take those considerations into account
when making decisions on major
Federal actions that could have
environmental impacts anywhere
beyond the borders of the United States.
The FAA has determined this action is
exempt pursuant to Section 2–5(a)(i) of
Executive Order 12114, because it does
not have the potential for a significant
effect on the environment outside the
United States.
In accordance with FAA Order
1050.1F, ‘‘Environmental Impacts:
Policies and Procedures,’’ paragraph 8–
6(c), FAA has prepared a memorandum
for the record stating the reason(s) for
this determination; this memorandum
has been placed in the docket for this
rulemaking.
VIII. Executive Order Determinations
A. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The FAA has analyzed this rule under
the principles and criteria of Executive
Order 13132, Federalism. The agency
has determined this action would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, or the relationship between the
Federal Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, and, therefore,
would not have Federalism
implications.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
B. Executive Order 13211, Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
The FAA analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The agency has
determined that it would not be a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under the
executive order and would not be likely
to have a significant adverse effect on
the supply, distribution, or use of
energy.
C. Executive Order 13609, Promoting
International Regulatory Cooperation
Executive Order 13609, Promoting
International Regulatory Cooperation,
promotes international regulatory
cooperation to meet shared challenges
involving health, safety, labor, security,
environmental, and other issues and to
reduce, eliminate, or prevent
unnecessary differences in regulatory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 Mar 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
requirements. The FAA has analyzed
this action under the policies and
agency responsibilities of Executive
Order 13609, and has determined that
this action would have no effect on
international regulatory cooperation.
D. Executive Order 13771, Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This rule is not an E.O. 13771
regulatory action because this rule is not
significant under E.O. 12866.
IX. Additional Information
A. Availability of Rulemaking
Documents
An electronic copy of a rulemaking
document may be obtained from the
internet by—
• Searching the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov;
• Visiting the FAA’s Regulations and
Policies web page at https://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies; or
• Accessing the Government
Publishing Office’s website at https://
www.govinfo.gov.
Copies may also be obtained by
sending a request (identified by
amendment or docket number of this
rulemaking) to the Federal Aviation
Administration, Office of Rulemaking,
ARM–1, 800 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20591, or by calling
(202) 267–9677.
All documents the FAA considered in
developing this rule, including
economic analyses and technical
reports, may be accessed from the
internet through the Federal Document
Management System Portal referenced
previously.
B. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA) (Pub. L. 104–121) (set forth as
a note to 5 U.S.C. 601) requires FAA to
comply with small entity requests for
information or advice about compliance
with statutes and regulations within its
jurisdiction. A small entity with
questions regarding this document may
contact its local FAA official, or the
persons listed under the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT heading at the
beginning of the preamble. To find out
more about SBREFA on the internet,
visit https://www.faa.gov/regulations_
policies/rulemaking/sbre_act/.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 121
Air carriers, Aircraft, Airmen,
Aviation safety, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Safety,
Transportation.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends chapter I of title 14, Code of
Federal Regulations, part 121, as
follows:
PART 121—OPERATING
REQUIREMENTS: DOMESTIC, FLAG,
AND SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 121
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103,
40113, 40119, 41706, 42301 preceding note
added by Pub. L. 112–95, sec. 412, 126 Stat.
89, 44101, 44701–44702, 44705, 44709–
44711, 44713, 44716–44717, 44722, 44729,
44732; 46105; Pub. L. 111–216, 124 Stat.
2348 (49 U.S.C. 44701 note); Pub. L. 112–95,
126 Stat. 62 (49 U.S.C. 44732 note).
2. Amend § 121.333 by revising
paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows:
■
§ 121.333 Supplemental oxygen for
emergency descent and for first aid; turbine
engine powered airplanes with pressurized
cabins.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(2)
of this section, if for any reason at any
time it is necessary for one pilot to leave
his station at the controls of the airplane
when operating at flight altitudes above
flight level 410, the remaining pilot at
the controls shall put on and use his
oxygen mask until the other pilot has
returned to his duty station.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, under the
authority of 49 U.S.C. 106(f) and (g), and
44701(a)(5), on March 20, 2020.
Steve Dickson,
Administrator, Federal Aviation
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2020–06312 Filed 3–23–20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
48 CFR Parts 812, 813, 852, and 853
RIN 2900–AP58
VA Acquisition Regulation: Acquisition
of Commercial Items and Simplified
Acquisition Procedures
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is amending and updating
its VA Acquisition Regulation (VAAR)
in phased increments to revise or
remove any policy superseded by
changes in the Federal Acquisition
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 58 / Wednesday, March 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Regulation (FAR), to remove procedural
guidance internal to VA into the VA
Acquisition Manual (VAAM), and to
incorporate any new agency specific
regulations or policies. These changes
seek to streamline and align the VAAR
with the FAR and remove outdated and
duplicative requirements and reduce
burden on contractors. The VAAM
incorporates portions of the removed
VAAR as well as other internal agency
acquisition policy. VA will rewrite
certain parts of the VAAR and VAAM,
and as VAAR parts are rewritten, VA
will publish them in the Federal
Register. In particular, this rulemaking
revises the VAAR concerning
Acquisition of Commercial Items and
Simplified Acquisition Procedures, and
affected parts Solicitation Provisions
and Contract Clauses, and Forms.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 24,
2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Rafael N. Taylor, Senior Procurement
Analyst, Procurement Policy and
Warrant Management Services, 003A2A,
425 I Street NW, Washington, DC 20001,
(202) 382–2787. (This is not a toll-free
number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 11, 2018, VA published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register
(83 FR 1321) which announced VA’s
intent to amend regulations for VAAR
Case RIN 2900–AP58 (parts 812 and
813). VA provided a 60-day comment
period for the public to respond to the
proposed rule and submit comments.
The comment period for the proposed
rule ended on March 12, 2018 and VA
received comments from a total of five
respondents. This rule adopts as a final
rule, with changes, the proposed rule
published in the Federal Register on
January 11, 2018.
This final rule adds language to
VAAR part 812 to state that VA’s
Veterans First Contracting Program
(VFCP) under VAAR subpart 819.70
applies to VAAR part 812, Acquisition
of Commercial Items; to update a list of
unique VA solicitation provisions and
contract clauses that contracting officers
can apply to solicitations and contracts
for the acquisition of commercial items;
and to add a new clause on Gray Market
Items to ensure that new medical
equipment and associated services and
support for VA Medical Centers are
purchased from Original Equipment
Manufacturers (OEM) or their
authorized distributors and resellers. In
VAAR part 813, this final rule adds
language to reference the applicability
of the VFCP in contracts awarded using
Simplified Acquisition Procedures; to
require contracting officers to use the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 Mar 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
Vendor Information Pages (VIP)
database to confirm Service-Disabled
Veteran-Owned Small Business
(SDVOSB) and Veteran-Owned Small
Business (VOSB) status; and to add
language in VAAR part 813 that
emphasizes that contracting officers can
use other than competitive procedures
under specified circumstances when
awarding to SDVOSBs and VOSBs. VA
had proposed removing the language at
813.202, Purchase guidelines, and to
replace it with proposed text at 813.203,
Purchase guidelines, to comport with
the numbering and arrangement of the
FAR. VA is removing the current text
contained in 813.202 as described in the
Technical Non-Substantive Changes to
the Proposed Rule section.
This final rule includes changes as a
result of public comments, minor
formatting and/or grammatical edits, as
well as Federal Register administrative
format changes in the amendatory text
which result in no substantive changes
at the affected sections.
There were five respondents that
submitted public comments. There were
15 separate comments submitted by
these 6 respondents. Because there was
redundancy in terms of the comments
submitted, VA has separated the
comments and responses into 9 distinct
issues and themes for clarity. A
discussion of the issues raised in the
comments as well as the changes made
to the rule as a result of those comments
are provided as follows:
1. Positive Feedback on the Proposed
Rule
A respondent commends VA for its
thoughtful development of this rule and
of the agency’s overarching goal of
revising and streamlining the VAAR.
They believe that SDVOSBs and VOSBs,
as well as VA contracting officers, will
benefit from the clarity this rulemaking
provides regarding the applicability of
the Veterans First Contracting Program
policy and VAAR provisions to VA
acquisition of commercial items. They
also commend VA for removing some
unnecessary or duplicative provisions
and for adding a VAAR provision to
make clear when ‘‘gray market’’ items
are not permitted.
VA appreciates the feedback from
these commenters on the VA’s
overarching goal to streamline the
VAAR. VA is also pleased the
commenters support overall the
revisions to VAAR parts 812 and 813.
2. Clarification of the VA Acquisition of
Commercial Items Clauses
One commenter raised the issue that
the proposed provision, 852.212–70,
Provisions Applicable to VA
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16901
Acquisition of Commercial Items, and
the clause, 852.212–71, Contract Terms
and Conditions Applicable to VA
Acquisition of Commercial Items, may
be confusing and proposes that VA
consider combining them into one list
for clarity and consistency.
VA has reexamined the proposed
clause and provision, and agrees that
combining the previously proposed
separate clause and provision into one
clause will eliminate unnecessary
duplication when it must be included in
both solicitations and in contracts, BPAs
and orders. Accordingly, section
812.301 has been amended to reflect the
updated prescription, numbering and
title for the new combined clause,
852.212–70, Provisions and Clauses
Applicable to VA Acquisition of
Commercial Items, and the renumbered
remaining clause originally prescribed
in this section, now 852.212–71, Gray
Market Items. VA has also updated the
list of unique VA solicitation provisions
and contract clauses that contracting
officers can apply to solicitations and
contracts for the acquisition of
commercial items based on current
prescribed provisions or clauses and
current VA practice.
3. Concerns About Gray Market Items,
Pass-Through Entities and High Tech
Medical Equipment
A commenter expressed concern with
business entities which do not possess
the clinical and technical knowledge of
high tech medical equipment and
supporting ancillary services and acting
as a ‘‘pass-through’’ entity. The
commenter expresses concern that such
‘‘pass-through’’ entities will have a
negative effect on the delivery of quality
patient care and services to VA Medical
Centers if such business entities are
allowed to participate in VA
procurements. The commenter believes
that new medical equipment for VA
Medical Centers should be purchased
from an OEM or its authorized dealer,
distributor, or reseller. The commenter
also expressed concern that allowing
set-asides for firms that are not
manufacturers (i.e., nonmanufacturers)
may create potential pass-throughs.
VA is always concerned with the
fidelity and quality of equipment
purchased to support Veterans
healthcare. VA believes the inclusion of
clause 852.212–71, Gray Market Items,
will appropriately address the use of
authorized Original Equipment
Manufacturer (OEM) distributors or
resellers. Policy governing the SBA
nonmanufacturer rule and limitations
on subcontracting requirements are
covered in the FAR and other parts of
the VAAR and permit the use of
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
16902
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 58 / Wednesday, March 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
businesses that comply with those
regulations. We are making no changes
to this rule based on this comment.
4. Potential Conflicts Between the
Proposed Rule, VA’s Veterans Small
Business Regulations at 38 CFR Part 74
and the SBA’s Regulations on
Government Contracting Programs at
13 CFR Part 125
One commenter provided comments
in response to both the proposed rule
under this case, and proposed changes
to VA’s Veterans Small Business
Regulations at 38 CFR part 74,
published January 10, 2018 in the
Federal Register (83 FR 1203). The
commenter states that ‘‘a VeteranOwned Small Business (VOSB)/ServiceDisabled Veteran-Owned Small
Business (SDVOSB) must be verified by
the VA’s Center for Verification and
Evaluation (CVE) and listed in the
Vendor Information Pages (VIP)
database in order to be eligible for setaside contract awards in the VA. This
eligibility continues for 3 years unless
there are circumstances which require
the business to exit the program as
outlined in 38 CFR 74.21. One of those
circumstances is failure to maintain its
eligibility for program participation.
Presumably, when a VOSB/SDVOSB
finds that it is no longer small for a
particular NAICS code for which it is
registered, it is also no longer eligible to
be listed in VIP for that NAICS code and
will be removed. This appears to be in
conflict with the Small Business
Administration (SBA) policy.’’
VA will not revise VAAR part 812 or
813 based on this comment. Title 38
U.S.C. 8127 requires a firm must be
listed as verified in the VA database to
be eligible to receive an award under the
VFCP. This comment is beyond the
scope of this rule as it mostly applies to
certification and verification
requirements under the VA’s Veterans
Small Business Regulations at 38 CFR
part 74, published January 10, 2018 in
the Federal Register (83 FR 1203) and
which became effective October 1, 2018
(83 FR 48221). Note that a new SBA
regulation related to SDVOSB
certification also became effective on
the same date. The changes in both SBA
and VA regulations comply with the
directive in the National Defense
Authorization Act of 2017 (Pub. L. 114–
328), section 1832, to standardize
definitions for SDVOSBs and VOSBs
between VA and SBA. As required by
section 1832, the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs will use SBA’s regulations to
determine ownership and control of
SDVOSBs and VOSBs. The Secretary
would continue to determine whether
individuals are Veterans or service-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 Mar 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
disabled Veterans and would be
responsible for verification of applicant
firms. Challenges to the status of an
SDVOSB or VOSB based upon issues of
ownership or control would be decided
by the administrative judges at the
SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals
(OHA).
The commenter also provided
comments indicating that SDVOSB/
VOSB verification and representation
requirements should not apply to
orders. The commenter argued that
requiring the verification of SDVOSB/
VOSB status at the order level would be
in conflict with the SBA regulations
which do not require verification at the
task order level for certain types of
contracts. The commenter believes that
the proposed VAAR conflicts with that
SBA policy. In effect, the commenter
submits, that while the SBA rules may
allow an SDVOSB that has ‘‘organically
outgrown’’ its size to compete for orders
under an IDIQ for up to 5 years without
recertifying its status or size (unless the
[contracting officer] CO requests it),
VA’s Veterans First Contracting Program
requires ‘‘recertification’’ within 30 days
of a business outgrowing its size by
removing it from the VIP database
(which must be checked by the CO prior
to task order award). Furthermore, the
commenter believes that ‘‘it may be
argued that the VA rule is tantamount
to eliminating the CO’s discretion to ask
for recertification at the task order level
by requiring the CO to, effectively, ask
for a recertification for every task order
by checking VIP’’. Another commenter
argued the opposite. The second
commenter believes that VA should
revise VAAR 813.003–70 to make clear
that the Veterans First Contracting
Program mandate and the requirement
to confirm SDVOSB or VOSB status
apply to task orders. However, they
recommend VA follow the SBA
guidance on small business
representation. They also believe that
replacing ‘‘prior to award’’ with ‘‘at the
time of award’’ would provide more
clarity on the specific point of time at
which VA judges SDVOSB and VOSB
eligibility.
We are unable to make the overall
recommended changes due to VA’s
statutory mandate. The Veterans First
Contracting Program (VFCP) applies to
all contracts, BPAs and orders under
this part. VA legislation is very clear
that only small businesses listed in the
VA database of eligible firms (the
Vendor Information Pages or VIP) can be
awarded a contract under the VFCP. The
Supreme Court confirmed this
requirement and issued a decision in
2016 that for purposes of the program,
an order is a contract. Therefore,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
verifying VIP eligibility shall occur both
at the time of submission of offers and
prior to award for contracts and orders
is consistent with the current VAAR
819.7003 class deviation issued on July
25, 2016. A future VAAR case for part
819 will further examine the issue of
‘‘prior to award’’ or ‘‘at time of award.’’
5. Use of the Veterans First Contracting
Program (38 U.S.C. 8127–8128) as an
Authority for the Proposed Rule
One of the commenters objected to the
use of 38 U.S.C. 8127–8128 as an
authority citation in parts 812 and 813.
The commenter requested an
explanation to why this specific statute
is included in a document that
explicitly excludes internal guidance on
processes and procedures. The
commenter believes it is inappropriate
to include the statute by reference at a
time when many questions regarding
guidance, applicability, and impact are
unanswered.
We are making no change to VAAR
part 812 or 813 based on this comment.
The inclusion of the authority is
appropriate because many of the issues
addressed in these parts are based on
the unique and special requirements
imposed by legislation and statute and
make it necessary to include the
referenced citation.
6. Applicability of the Veterans First
Contracting Program in the Proposed
Rule
A commenter indicated that the
proposed policy at VAAR 813.003–70
references contracts as defined in FAR
2.101, but does not explicitly reference
task orders. To avoid confusion, the
commenter recommends that VA revise
VAAR 813.003–70(a) to include a
reference to orders.
VA notes that orders are part of the
definition of contracts as set forth in
FAR 2.101, Definitions. However, to
ensure clarity to the specific types of
actions covered under VAAR part 813,
we are revising 813.003–70, Policy, to
indicate that the VFCP applies to
contracts, orders and BPAs under this
part. We also added a reference to FAR
part 13 to indicate that the VFCP takes
precedence over the small business
programs referenced in FAR part 13,
and references to 819 which includes
additional information regarding
compliance with the VFCP.
One commenter requested that VA
include the use of a fixed percentage
figure to define ‘‘fair and reasonable’’ in
the context of the VA Rule of Two. They
also believe that the nonmanufacturer
rule should be waived to allow Veteran
small businesses the ability to compete.
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 58 / Wednesday, March 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
We are making no change to VAAR
part 812 or 813 based on this comment.
How to conduct a price analysis and
establishing a fair and reasonable price
is already addressed in the FAR.
Specifically, FAR subpart 15.4, Contract
Pricing, provides guidance to
contracting officers to assist in making
a fair and reasonable determination.
Additional internal agency guidance
would be contained in the VA
Acquisition Manual. However, VA
acknowledges this is an area of interest
for the public as well as VA’s
acquisition workforce. VA is preparing
additional internal training for its
acquisition workforce to strengthen and
refresh contracting officer’s skillsets in
this area.
Regarding the nonmanufacturer rule
and Veteran small businesses, VA will
continue to comply with SBA
regulations. VA legislation requires VA
to use the small business definitions
and requirements in the Small Business
Act, where not in conflict with VA’s
unique statutory authority and 38 U.S.C.
8127–8128. This includes the
application of the nonmanufacturers
rule. The nonmanufacturer rule is a
requirement in the Small Business Act
as implemented by the SBA under 13
CFR 121.401 through 121.413 and
applies to all Federal procurement
programs for which status as a small
business is required or advantageous.
A commenter applauds VA for
addressing the SDVOSB/VOSB sole
source option in its regulations. The
commenter believes that the sole source
requirement in this section is consistent
with the legislation, but believes it is
not consistent with those in VAAR
subpart 819.70, as a result of restrictions
added to VAAR 819.7007 and 819.7008
through a class deviation implementing
the program as a result of the
Kingdomware Supreme Court Decision.
The commenter believes that the
legislation does not impose
requirements on when or how to use the
sole source authority and that VA
should make clear that its contracting
officers need not do more than what is
set forth in VAAR 813.106–70(c) to
make sole source awards to SDVOSBs
and VOSBs above the simplified
acquisition threshold. The commenter
requests that VA go so far as to
encourage the award of sole source
contracts when certain conditions are
met. The commenter suggested revision
language to VAAR 813.106–70(c).
VA concurs that the VA legislation
provides a unique sole source authority
that is less restrictive than a sole source
award otherwise permitted under FAR
6.302–1, ‘‘Only one responsible source
and no other supplies or services will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 Mar 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
satisfy agency requirements.’’ VA does
not concur, however, with the latter part
of the commenter’s analogy that a sole
source is acceptable under any
circumstance or that the use of sole
source contracts should be encouraged.
Consistent with the FAR, VA
encourages the use of competitive
procedures for all its procurements to
the maximum extent practicable.
Therefore, VA declines to make
changes to the language as suggested but
will add a FAR reference in VAAR
813.106–70(b) and (c) that contracts
awarded using the VA legislative
authority shall be conducted as
authorized by FAR 6.302–5 and in
accordance with 819.7007 and
819.7008, and to remove redundant
language in the remaining paragraph
that is covered in the referenced
sections and is also applicable under
part 813. This language is consistent
with the legislative mandate, FAR and
the language in VAAR subpart 819.70,
as provided in the July 25, 2016, VAAR
Class Deviation—Implementation of the
Veterans First Contracting Program as a
Result of the U.S. Supreme Court
Decision (Class Deviation—Veterans
First Contracting Program (VFCP 2016).
One commenter stated that to make
the statutory priority clear, VAAR
813.003–70(c) should state that, under
38 U.S.C. 8127, contracts shall be set
aside for SDVOSBs when market
research provides a reasonable basis for
receiving two or more offers from
SDVOSBs. The commenter believes the
proposed VAAR 813.003–70, paragraph
(c) does not make the statutory priority
clear, and paragraph (c)(1), as proposed,
says only that ‘‘contracts under this part
shall be set aside for SDVOSBs or
VOSBs, when supported by market
research.’’
The commenter also recommended
VA revise VAAR 813.003–70(c)(2),
VAAR 852.212–70, and VAAR 852.212–
71 to make clear the priorities for
SDVOSBs, and then VOSBs applies to
all commercial items acquisitions
except for SDVOSB set-asides. The
commenter stated in their opinion that
VA has appropriately recognized in
VAAR 813.003–70(c)(2) that the first
priority is for SDVOSBs and second
priority for VOSBs and applies to
procurements that are not set-aside for
SDVOSBs or VOSBs. The commenter
believes that VAAR 813.003–70(c)(2)
does not go far enough because VAAR
852.215–70 should be inserted into any
solicitation, except those that are setaside for SDVOSBs. The commenter
further asserts that requiring insertion of
VAAR 852.215–70 into all solicitations
except for SDVOSB set-asides is the
only way to ensure that contracting
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16903
officers develop an appropriate means
(such as full/partial credit) to
implement the statutory mandate to
prioritize award of contracts to
SDVOSBs first, then VOSBs second,
before all other small businesses, and
finally large businesses.
The intent of the language at VAAR
813.003–70(c) is to highlight the
requirement that set-asides are
mandatory and that if a set-aside is not
feasible, then evaluation preferences
should be used in accordance with
815.304–70. Any prescription changes
to clauses 852.215–70 or -71 will be
addressed in a separate VAAR case and
is not appropriate to make such changes
to VAAR part 812 or 813 at this time.
While VA concurs that SDVOSBs have
priority over VOSBs in every instance,
the evaluation preference prescribed in
this section provides recognition to the
requirement in 38 U.S.C. 8128 that
small business concerns owned and
controlled by veterans have a priority
over other small businesses. The
priority of SDVOSBs over VOSBs is well
established, including at VAAR
813.003–70(c)(2). Therefore, the
language remains unchanged and any
further clarification of the language
would be addressed in a future VAAR
rulemaking case with VAAR part 819.
Additionally, references to the VFCP
program are included in the section to
set forth that the Veterans First
Contracting Program developed
pursuant to the authority in 38 U.S.C.
8127–8128 applies to both commercial
acquisitions and procurements under
the simplified acquisition threshold at
the VA.
7. Market Research
A commenter noted the importance of
reinforcing, especially for delivery of
patient care and services procurements
for Veterans Affairs Medical Centers
(VAMCs), that robust market research be
conducted, and that set-asides and
awards be determined in accordance
with those findings.
VA agrees that market research
including industry engagement are key
elements in the decision-making process
for any acquisition. It is VA’s intention
to comply with all legislative and legal
requirements, including VFCP, while
providing the best care and maximum
resources to address the needs of the
Veteran community we serve. VA is in
the process of releasing other parts
dealing with competition, acquisition
planning and market research. They will
be published in the Federal Register for
public comment once the appropriate
approvals are obtained. Accordingly, no
language will be changed in the rule
based on these comments.
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
16904
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 58 / Wednesday, March 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
8. Training of the VA Acquisition
Workforce on This Proposed Rule
A commenter would like to know
how and when contracting officers,
staff, and local Veterans Affairs Medical
Centers (VAMCs) will be trained on
these revised requirements. The
commenter recommends VA release an
implementation plan and deadline for
each phase of the large-scale VAAR
revision. Currently, no implementation
date is listed in the Federal Register
notice.
VA also supports the importance of
training as highlighted by our
investment in training for the
acquisition workforce at the VA
Acquisition Academy (VAAA). Training
on various VAAR revised policy and
procedures, as well as internal agency
guidance, is currently being provided on
an ongoing basis through the VAAA, as
well as local and national conferences
and other training events as necessary.
We continue to update and revise
internal training material to address VA
acquisition workforce needs and will
continue to ensure appropriate training
is scheduled and accomplished on both
a one-time or recurring basis as the
topics and needs may dictate. VA
continues to publish proposed rules for
public comment in phased increments
and is working closely with the Office
of Small and Disadvantaged Business
Utilization (OSDBU) to address
concerns of the small business
community, in particular SDVOSBs and
VOSBs. VA submits updates to its
planned regulatory agenda two times a
year. Any updates and new planned
regulatory actions concerning specific
VAAR parts will be published there.
The case containing the proposed rule
for VAAR part 819, including the
Veterans First Contracting Program
under subpart 819.70, and key affected
parts is planned for publication in the
Federal Register for public comment in
2019.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
9. Removal of Internal Procedural
Guidance From the VAAR
A commenter inquired if VA
anticipates the need to develop and
issue specific procurement policy
memorandums, directives, handbooks,
and standard operating procedures
given the removal of internal procedural
guidance from the VAAR. The
commenter also questioned the timely
issuance of information and updates to
internal procedural manuals.
VA is currently updating its
acquisition policies and regulations. As
each part is completed, any internal
documents that require updating would
be updated to comport with the new
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 Mar 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
regulations. The VA Acquisition Manual
will incorporate many of the related
internal procedural guidance at the VAwide level and will be published on the
VA OAL/PPS website when any new
VAAR parts are published as effective in
the Federal Register. Any additional
internal policy and procedures at
various levels and activities in the VA
are being examined and will be
appropriately updated or created, as
needed.
Technical Non-Substantive Changes to
the Proposed Rule
1. Under section 813.003–70(a), this
final rule adds a reference to FAR part
13 in conjunction with FAR part 19 as
a more accurate reference; and in
paragraph (d) changes a reference from
FAR part 19 to the Small Business
Administration (SBA) regulations at 13
CFR part 121 and 13 CFR 125.6 to
provide clarity.
2. In the proposed rule, VA intended
to remove 813.202, Purchase guidelines,
include a new section 813.203, and add
revised language at 813.203, Purchase
guidelines, to comport with the FAR.
VA is removing the guidance from the
VAAR and may place the guidance in
the VAAM. As a part of this final rule,
VA will remove the current section
813.202 and take no action on proposed
813.203.
3. This final rule revises the VAAR
part 852 authorities to reflect the
authorities recently codified in a
previous rule.
4. Under 813.307, VA proposed to
remove the section which references the
use of forms and move mention of forms
as internal VA guidance to the VA
Acquisition Manual. The forms
referenced in 813.307 which will be
removed with this final rule, are both
referenced, and in some cases, were
prescribed at 853.213 as well. With the
removal of 813.307 in this final rule, the
forms require removal from the VAAR
as well, so with this final rule, section
853.213 will be removed and any of the
noted forms if and when still used at
VA, are available on VA’s public facing
website at https://www.va.gov/vaforms/
or upon request from any VA
contracting office.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This final rule will have no
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
such effect on State, local, and tribal
governments or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking impacts two existing
information collection requirements
associated with two Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) control
numbers. The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (at 44 U.S.C. 3507) requires that
VA consider the impact of paperwork
and other information collection
burdens imposed on the public. Under
44 U.S.C. 3507(a), an agency may not
collect or sponsor the collection of
information, nor may it impose an
information collection requirement
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
Although this action contains
provisions constituting collections of
information at 48 CFR part 813, under
the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3521), no new or revised collections of
information are associated with this
final rule. The information collection
requirements for 48 CFR part 813 are
currently approved by OMB and have
been assigned OMB control number
2900–0393.
Although this final rule removes
813.307, Forms, with this action
853.213, Simplified acquisition
procedures (SF’s 18, 30, 44, 1165, 1449,
and OF’s 336, 347, and 348), will also
be removed as the forms now shown in
the text at 853.213 are also referenced
within section 813.307, making their
continued inclusion in VAAR part 853
unnecessary. In particular, one of the
forms referenced at 813.307(f), VA Form
10–2421, Prosthetic Authorization for
Items or Services, and at 853.213(d), has
an associated OMB Control Number
although it is not currently associated
with the VAAR. Under the provisions of
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3521), no new or revised
collections of information are associated
with this final rule. The information
collection requirements for VA Form
10–2421 are currently approved by
OMB and have been assigned OMB
control number 2900–0188 under the
administrative management of the
Veterans Health Administration. This
form will no longer be referenced in the
VAAR and its OMB control number is
not now associated with the VAAR.
Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
designated this rule as not a major rule,
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 58 / Wednesday, March 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612). This rulemaking
does not change VA’s policy regarding
small businesses, does not have an
economic impact to individual
businesses, and there are no increased
or decreased costs to small business
entities. On this basis, the final rule
would not have an economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
the initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603
and 604 do not apply.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563 and
13771
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. The Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs has determined
that this rule is a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866.
VA’s impact analysis can be found as a
supporting document at https://
www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is
published. Additionally, a copy of the
rulemaking and its impact analysis are
available on VA’s website at https://
www.va.gov/orpm by following the link
for ‘‘VA Regulations Published from FY
2004 Through Fiscal Year to Date.’’ This
final rule is not subject to the
requirements of E.O. 13771 because this
final rule is expected to result in no
more than de minimis costs.
List of Subjects
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
48 CFR Parts 812, 813, and 853
Government procurement.
48 CFR Part 852
Government procurement, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 Mar 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Pamela Powers, Chief of Staff,
Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on March 2,
2020, for publication.
Consuela Benjamin,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office
of Regulation Policy & Management, Office
of the Secretary, Department of Veterans
Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, VA amends 48 CFR parts 812,
813, 852, and 853 as follows:
PART 812—ACQUISITION OF
COMMERCIAL ITEMS
1. The authority citation for part 812
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127–8128; 40 U.S.C.
121(c); 41 U.S.C. 1702 and 48 CFR 1.301
through 1.304.
Subpart 812.1—Acquisition of
Commercial Items—General
2. Section 812.102 is revised to read
as follows:
■
812.102
Applicability.
3. Section 812.102–70 is added to
subpart 812.1 to read as follows:
■
812.102–70 Applicability of Veterans
preferences.
Based on the authority under 38
U.S.C. 8127 and 8128, the Veterans First
Contracting Program in subpart 819.70
applies to VA contracts under this part.
The provisions and clauses prescribed
reflect agency unique statutes applicable
to the acquisition of commercial items.
Subpart 812.3—Solicitation Provisions
and Contract Clauses for the
Acquisition of Commercial Items
4. Section 812.301 is revised to read
as follows:
■
812.301 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses for the acquisition of
commercial items.
(f)(1) Contracting officers shall insert
the clause 852.212–70, Provisions and
Clauses Applicable to VA Acquisition of
Commercial Items, in all solicitations
and contracts for commercial
acquisitions and check only those
provisions and clauses that apply to the
individual acquisition.
(2) Contracting officers shall insert the
clause 852.212–71, Gray Market Items,
in solicitations and contracts for new
medical equipment for VA Medical
Centers and that include FAR
provisions 52.212–1, Instruction to
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Offerors—Commercial Items, and
52.212–2, Evaluation—Commercial
Items.
812.302
■
[Removed]
5. Section 812.302 is removed.
PART 813—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
PROCEDURES
6. The authority citation for part 813
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127–8128; 40 U.S.C.
121(c); 41 U.S.C. 1702 and 48 CFR 1.301
through 1.304.
7. Section 813.003–70 is added to read
as follows:
■
813.003–70
■
16905
Policy.
(a) The Veterans First Contracting
Program in subpart 819.70 applies to VA
contracts, orders and BPAs under this
part and has precedence over other
small business programs referenced in
FAR parts 13 and 19.
(b) Notwithstanding FAR 13.003(b)(2),
the contracting officer shall make an
award utilizing the priorities for
veteran-owned small businesses as
implemented within the VA hierarchy
of small business program preferences,
the Veterans First Contracting Program
in subpart 819.70. Specifically, the
contracting officer shall consider
preferences for verified service-disabled
veteran-owned small businesses
(SDVOSBs) first, then preferences for
verified veteran-owned small businesses
(VOSBs). These priorities will be
followed by preferences for other small
businesses in accordance with FAR
19.203, and 819.7004.
(c) When using competitive
procedures, the preference for
restricting competition to verified
SDVOSBs/VOSBs in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section is
mandatory whenever market research
provides a reasonable expectation of
receiving two or more offers/quotes
from eligible, capable and verified firms
at fair and reasonable prices that offer
best value to the Government.
(1) Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8127,
contracts under this part shall be setaside for SDVOSBs/VOSBs, in
accordance with 819.7005 or 819.7006
when supported by market research.
Contracting officers shall use the
applicable set-aside clause prescribed at
819.7009.
(2) Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8128 and to
the extent that market research does not
support an SDVOSB or VOSB set-aside,
the contracting officer shall include
evaluation factors as prescribed at
815.304 and the evaluation criteria
clause prescribed at 815.304–71(a).
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
16906
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 58 / Wednesday, March 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(d) The SDVOSB and VOSB eligibility
requirements in 819.7003 apply,
including verification of the SDVOSB
and VOSB status of an offeror, and other
small business requirements in 13 CFR
part 121 and 13 CFR 125.6 (e.g., small
business representation,
nonmanufacturer rule, and
subcontracting limitations).
Subpart 813.1—Procedures
8. Section 813.102 is added to subpart
813.1 to read as follows:
■
813.102
Source list.
Pursuant to 819.7003, contracting
officers shall use the Vendor
Information Pages (VIP) database to
verify SDVOSB/VOSB status.
Subpart 813.3—Simplified Acquisition
Methods
813.302
■
[Removed]
13. Section 813.302 is removed.
813.302–5
[Removed]
14. Section 813.302–5 is removed.
15. Section 813.305–70 is added to
subpart 813.3 to read as follows:
■
■
813.305–70 VA’s imprest funds and third
party drafts policy.
VA’s Governmentwide commercial
purchase card and/or convenience
checks shall be used in lieu of imprest
funds and third party drafts.
813.307
■
[Removed]
16. Section 813.307 is removed.
9. Revise section 813.106 to read as
follows:
PART 852—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
813.106 Soliciting competition, evaluation
of quotations or offers, award and
documentation.
■
■
813.106–3
■
17. The authority citation for part 852
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127–8128, and 8151–
8153; 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 41 U.S.C. 1121(c)(3),
41 U.S.C. 1303; 41 U.S.C. 1702; and 48 CFR
1.301 through 1.304.
[Removed]
10. Section 813.106–3 is removed.
11. Section 813.106–70 is revised to
read as follows:
■
Subpart 852.2—Texts of Provisions
and Clauses
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
813.106–70 Soliciting competition,
evaluation of quotations or offers, award
and documentation—the Veterans First
Contracting Program.
18. Section 852.212–70 is added to
read as follows:
■
(a) When using competitive
procedures under this part, the
contracting officer shall use the
Veterans First Contracting Program in
subpart 819.70 and the guidance set
forth in 813.003–70.
(b) Pursuant to 38 U.S.C 8127(b),
contracting officers may use other than
competitive procedures to enter into a
contract with a verified SDVOSB or
VOSB for procurements under the
simplified acquisition threshold, as
authorized by FAR 6.302–5.
(c) For procurements above the
simplified acquisition threshold,
pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8127(c),
contracting officers may also award a
contract under this part to a firm
verified under the Veterans First
Contracting Program at subpart 819.70,
using procedures other than competitive
procedures, as authorized by FAR
6.302–5 and in accordance with
819.7007 and 819.7008.
Subpart 813.2—[Removed and
Reserved]
12. Subpart 813.2 is removed and
reserved.
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 Mar 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
852.212–70 Provisions and Clauses
Applicable to VA Acquisition of Commercial
Items.
As prescribed in 812.301(f)(1), insert
the following clause to indicate
provisions and clauses applicable to this
acquisition:
Provisions and Clauses Applicable to
VA Acquisition of Commercial Items
(APR 2020)
(a) The Contractor agrees to comply with
any provision or clause that is incorporated
herein by reference or full text to implement
agency policy applicable to acquisition of
commercial items or components. The
following provisions and clauses that have
been checked by the Contracting Officer are
incorporated by reference or in full text. Text
requiring fill-ins is shown under the clause
or provision title:
ll852.203–70, Commercial Advertising.
ll852.209–70, Organizational Conflicts of
Interest.
ll852.214–71, Restrictions on Alternate
Item(s).
ll852.214–72, Alternate Item(s).
Bids on [Contracting Officer will insert an
alternate item that is considered acceptable]
will be given equal consideration along with
bids on [Contracting Officer will insert the
required item and item number]** and any
such bids received may be accepted if to the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
advantage of the Government. Tie bids will
be decided in favor of [Contracting Officer
will insert the required item and item
number].
(End of provision)
ll852.214–73, Alternate Packaging and
Packing.
ll852.214–74, Marking of Bid Samples.
ll852.215–70, Service-Disabled VeteranOwned and Veteran-Owned Small
Business Evaluation Factors.
ll852.215–71, Evaluation Factor
Commitments.
ll852.216–71, Economic Price Adjustment
of Contract Price(s) Based on a Price
Index.
ll852.216–72, Proportional Economic
Price Adjustment of Contract Price(s)
Based on a Price Index.
ll852.216–73, Economic Price
Adjustment—State Nursing Home Care
for Veterans.
ll852.216–74, Economic Price
Adjustment—Medicaid Labor Rates.
ll852.216–75, Economic Price
Adjustment—Fuel Surcharge.
ll852.219–9, VA Small Business
Subcontracting Plan Minimum
Requirements.
ll852.219–10, VA Notice of Total ServiceDisabled Veteran-Owned Small Business
Set-Aside.
ll852.219–11, VA Notice of Total VeteranOwned Small Business Set-Aside.
ll852.222–70, Contract Work Hours and
Safety Standards Act—Nursing Home
Care Contract Supplement.
ll852.228–70, Bond Premium Adjustment.
ll852.228–71, Indemnification and
Insurance.
ll852.228–72, Assisting Service-Disabled
Veteran-Owned and Veteran-Owned
Small Businesses in Obtaining Bonds.
ll852.229–70, Sales and Use Taxes.
ll852.232–72, Electronic Submission of
Payment Requests.
ll852.233–70, Protest Content/Alternative
Dispute Resolution.
ll852.233–71, Alternate Protest Procedure.
ll852.237–7, Indemnification and Medical
Liability Insurance.
ll852.237–70, Contractor Responsibilities.
The Contractor shall obtain all necessary
licenses and/or permits required to perform
this work. He/she shall take all reasonable
precautions necessary to protect persons and
property from injury or damage during the
performance of this contract. He/she shall be
responsible for any injury to himself/herself,
his/her employees, as well as for any damage
to personal or public property that occurs
during the performance of this contract that
is caused by his/her employees fault or
negligence, and shall maintain personal
liability and property damage insurance
having coverage for a limit as required by the
laws of the State of lll[Insert name of
State]. Further, it is agreed that any
negligence of the Government, its officers,
agents, servants and employees, shall not be
the responsibility of the Contractor
hereunder with the regard to any claims, loss,
damage, injury, and liability resulting
therefrom.
(End of clause)
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 58 / Wednesday, March 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
ll852.246–70, Guarantee.
The Contractor guarantees the equipment
against defective material, workmanship and
performance for a period of lll[Normally,
insert one year. If industry policy covers a
shorter or longer period, i.e., 90 days or for
the life of the equipment, insert such period.],
said guarantee to run from date of acceptance
of the equipment by the Government. The
Contractor agrees to furnish, without cost to
the Government, replacement of all parts and
material that are found to be defective during
the guarantee period. Replacement of
material and parts will be furnished to the
Government at the point of installation, if
installation is within the continental United
States, or f.o.b. the continental U.S. port to
be designated by the Contracting Officer if
installation is outside of the continental
United States. Cost of installation of
replacement material and parts shall be borne
by the contractor. [The above clause will be
modified to conform to standards of the
industry involved.]
(End of clause)
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
ll852.246–71, Inspection or Alternate I.
ll852.246–72, Frozen Processed Foods.
ll852.246–73, Noncompliance with
packaging, packing, and/or marking
requirements.
ll852.270–1, Representatives of
Contracting Officers.
ll852.270–2, Bread and Bakery Products—
Quantities.
ll852.270–3, Purchase of Shellfish.
ll852.271–72, Time Spent by Counselee in
Counseling Process.
ll852.271–73, Use and Publication of
Counseling Results.
ll852.271–74, Inspection.
ll852.271–75, Extension of Contract
Period.
ll852.273–70, Late Offers.
ll852.273–71, Alternative Negotiation
Techniques.
ll852.273–72, Alternative Evaluation.
ll852.273–73, Evaluation—Health-Care
Resources.
ll852.273–74, Award without Exchanges.
(b) When appropriate and in accordance
with the prescriptions for the clause, the
contracting officer may use the following
clause in requests for quotations,
solicitations, and contracts for the acquisition
of commercial items if the contracting officer
determines that the use is consistent with
customary commercial practices:
ll852.211–70, Service Data Manuals or
Alternate I.
(c) All requests for quotations,
solicitations, and contracts for commercial
item services to be provided to beneficiaries
must include the following clause at
ll852.271–70, Nondiscrimination in
Services Provided to Beneficiaries.
(End of clause)
■ 19. Section 852.212–71 is added to
read as follows:
852.212–71
Gray Market Items.
As prescribed in 812.301(f)(2), insert
the following provision in solicitations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:49 Mar 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
and contracts for new medical
equipment:
Gray Market Items (APR 2020)
(a) No gray market or remanufactured items
will be acceptable. Gray market items are
Original Equipment Manufacturers’ (OEM)
goods sold through unauthorized channels in
direct competition with authorized
distributors. This procurement is for new
OEM medical equipment only for VA
medical facilities.
(b) Vendor shall be an OEM, authorized
dealer, authorized distributor or authorized
reseller for the proposed equipment/system,
verified by an authorization letter or other
documents from the OEM. All software
licensing, warranty and service associated
with the equipment/system shall be in
accordance with the OEM terms and
conditions.
(End of clause)
PART 853—FORMS
20. The authority citation for part 853
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501; 40 U.S.C. 121(c);
and 48 CFR 1.301 through 1.304.
853.213
■
[Removed]
21. Section 853.213 is removed.
[FR Doc. 2020–05589 Filed 3–24–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
48 CFR Parts 1603 and 1652
RIN 3206–AN56
Federal Employees Health Benefits
Acquisition Regulations: Self Plus One
and Contract Matrix Update
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) is making a
technical correction to the Federal
Employees Health Benefits Acquisition
Regulations (FEHBAR) to add the self
plus one enrollment type to carrier
advertising instructions. OPM is also
updating and amending the Federal
Employees Health Benefits (FEHB)
Program contract clause matrix.
DATES: This rule is effective March 25,
2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael W. Kaszynski, Senior Policy
Analyst, at Michael.Kaszynski@
opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
2, 2019, OPM issued proposed
regulations to the FEHBAR (84 FR
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16907
12569) to list a self plus one enrollment
type in carrier advertising instructions.
The proposed rule clarified that carriers
are required to list all current
enrollment types when advertising their
health plans enrollment codes and
premium rates to enrollees. This change
is a technical correction and does not
alter current FEHB family member
eligibility guidelines.
Section 706 of the Bipartisan Budget
Act of 2013 amended chapter 89 of title
5 United States Code by adding a self
plus one enrollment type for Federal
employees and annuitants under the
FEHB Program. The self plus one
enrollment type became available
during the 2015 Open Season for the
2016 plan year and was codified in a
final rule at https://
www.federalregister.gov/documents/
2015/09/17/2015-23348/federalemployees-health-benefits-program-selfplus-one-enrollment-type. A self plus
one enrollment covers the enrollee and
one eligible family member, designated
by the enrollee. Eligible family members
under a self plus one enrollment
include a spouse or eligible child as set
forth in § 890.302 of title 5 CFR.
This final rule amends the FEHBAR at
48 CFR part 1603 to list a self plus one
enrollment type in the advertising
instructions. OPM considers this change
a technical correction as it does not
change the operational requirements of
the FEHB Program and does not alter
current FEHB family member eligibility
guidelines.
This final rule also updates and
amends the contract clause matrix to
align with current FAR and FEHBAR
requirements. OPM publishes
applicable contract clauses and clause
headings in the FEHBAR. Annually,
OPM determines which Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and
FEHBAR contract clauses are applicable
to FEHB carrier contracts and includes
them in these contracts.
The proposed regulation provided
notice to interested stakeholders that
OPM is updating the FEHBAR contract
clause matrix at 48 CFR 1652.370. This
final regulation updates the contract
clause matrix to align with current FAR
and FEHBAR requirements and include
clauses currently incorporated in all
Federal Employees Health Benefits
(FEHB) Program carrier contracts.
Response to Comments
The 30-day comment period for the
proposed rule ended on May 2, 2019.
OPM received comments from a citizen
and an association of FEHB health
organizations. The citizen commenter,
who supports the regulatory change,
asserted that is important that federal
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 58 (Wednesday, March 25, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16900-16907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-05589]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
48 CFR Parts 812, 813, 852, and 853
RIN 2900-AP58
VA Acquisition Regulation: Acquisition of Commercial Items and
Simplified Acquisition Procedures
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending and
updating its VA Acquisition Regulation (VAAR) in phased increments to
revise or remove any policy superseded by changes in the Federal
Acquisition
[[Page 16901]]
Regulation (FAR), to remove procedural guidance internal to VA into the
VA Acquisition Manual (VAAM), and to incorporate any new agency
specific regulations or policies. These changes seek to streamline and
align the VAAR with the FAR and remove outdated and duplicative
requirements and reduce burden on contractors. The VAAM incorporates
portions of the removed VAAR as well as other internal agency
acquisition policy. VA will rewrite certain parts of the VAAR and VAAM,
and as VAAR parts are rewritten, VA will publish them in the Federal
Register. In particular, this rulemaking revises the VAAR concerning
Acquisition of Commercial Items and Simplified Acquisition Procedures,
and affected parts Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses, and
Forms.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 24, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Rafael N. Taylor, Senior
Procurement Analyst, Procurement Policy and Warrant Management
Services, 003A2A, 425 I Street NW, Washington, DC 20001, (202) 382-
2787. (This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 11, 2018, VA published a proposed
rule in the Federal Register (83 FR 1321) which announced VA's intent
to amend regulations for VAAR Case RIN 2900-AP58 (parts 812 and 813).
VA provided a 60-day comment period for the public to respond to the
proposed rule and submit comments. The comment period for the proposed
rule ended on March 12, 2018 and VA received comments from a total of
five respondents. This rule adopts as a final rule, with changes, the
proposed rule published in the Federal Register on January 11, 2018.
This final rule adds language to VAAR part 812 to state that VA's
Veterans First Contracting Program (VFCP) under VAAR subpart 819.70
applies to VAAR part 812, Acquisition of Commercial Items; to update a
list of unique VA solicitation provisions and contract clauses that
contracting officers can apply to solicitations and contracts for the
acquisition of commercial items; and to add a new clause on Gray Market
Items to ensure that new medical equipment and associated services and
support for VA Medical Centers are purchased from Original Equipment
Manufacturers (OEM) or their authorized distributors and resellers. In
VAAR part 813, this final rule adds language to reference the
applicability of the VFCP in contracts awarded using Simplified
Acquisition Procedures; to require contracting officers to use the
Vendor Information Pages (VIP) database to confirm Service-Disabled
Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) and Veteran-Owned Small Business
(VOSB) status; and to add language in VAAR part 813 that emphasizes
that contracting officers can use other than competitive procedures
under specified circumstances when awarding to SDVOSBs and VOSBs. VA
had proposed removing the language at 813.202, Purchase guidelines, and
to replace it with proposed text at 813.203, Purchase guidelines, to
comport with the numbering and arrangement of the FAR. VA is removing
the current text contained in 813.202 as described in the Technical
Non-Substantive Changes to the Proposed Rule section.
This final rule includes changes as a result of public comments,
minor formatting and/or grammatical edits, as well as Federal Register
administrative format changes in the amendatory text which result in no
substantive changes at the affected sections.
There were five respondents that submitted public comments. There
were 15 separate comments submitted by these 6 respondents. Because
there was redundancy in terms of the comments submitted, VA has
separated the comments and responses into 9 distinct issues and themes
for clarity. A discussion of the issues raised in the comments as well
as the changes made to the rule as a result of those comments are
provided as follows:
1. Positive Feedback on the Proposed Rule
A respondent commends VA for its thoughtful development of this
rule and of the agency's overarching goal of revising and streamlining
the VAAR. They believe that SDVOSBs and VOSBs, as well as VA
contracting officers, will benefit from the clarity this rulemaking
provides regarding the applicability of the Veterans First Contracting
Program policy and VAAR provisions to VA acquisition of commercial
items. They also commend VA for removing some unnecessary or
duplicative provisions and for adding a VAAR provision to make clear
when ``gray market'' items are not permitted.
VA appreciates the feedback from these commenters on the VA's
overarching goal to streamline the VAAR. VA is also pleased the
commenters support overall the revisions to VAAR parts 812 and 813.
2. Clarification of the VA Acquisition of Commercial Items Clauses
One commenter raised the issue that the proposed provision,
852.212-70, Provisions Applicable to VA Acquisition of Commercial
Items, and the clause, 852.212-71, Contract Terms and Conditions
Applicable to VA Acquisition of Commercial Items, may be confusing and
proposes that VA consider combining them into one list for clarity and
consistency.
VA has reexamined the proposed clause and provision, and agrees
that combining the previously proposed separate clause and provision
into one clause will eliminate unnecessary duplication when it must be
included in both solicitations and in contracts, BPAs and orders.
Accordingly, section 812.301 has been amended to reflect the updated
prescription, numbering and title for the new combined clause, 852.212-
70, Provisions and Clauses Applicable to VA Acquisition of Commercial
Items, and the renumbered remaining clause originally prescribed in
this section, now 852.212-71, Gray Market Items. VA has also updated
the list of unique VA solicitation provisions and contract clauses that
contracting officers can apply to solicitations and contracts for the
acquisition of commercial items based on current prescribed provisions
or clauses and current VA practice.
3. Concerns About Gray Market Items, Pass-Through Entities and High
Tech Medical Equipment
A commenter expressed concern with business entities which do not
possess the clinical and technical knowledge of high tech medical
equipment and supporting ancillary services and acting as a ``pass-
through'' entity. The commenter expresses concern that such ``pass-
through'' entities will have a negative effect on the delivery of
quality patient care and services to VA Medical Centers if such
business entities are allowed to participate in VA procurements. The
commenter believes that new medical equipment for VA Medical Centers
should be purchased from an OEM or its authorized dealer, distributor,
or reseller. The commenter also expressed concern that allowing set-
asides for firms that are not manufacturers (i.e., nonmanufacturers)
may create potential pass-throughs.
VA is always concerned with the fidelity and quality of equipment
purchased to support Veterans healthcare. VA believes the inclusion of
clause 852.212-71, Gray Market Items, will appropriately address the
use of authorized Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) distributors or
resellers. Policy governing the SBA nonmanufacturer rule and
limitations on subcontracting requirements are covered in the FAR and
other parts of the VAAR and permit the use of
[[Page 16902]]
businesses that comply with those regulations. We are making no changes
to this rule based on this comment.
4. Potential Conflicts Between the Proposed Rule, VA's Veterans Small
Business Regulations at 38 CFR Part 74 and the SBA's Regulations on
Government Contracting Programs at 13 CFR Part 125
One commenter provided comments in response to both the proposed
rule under this case, and proposed changes to VA's Veterans Small
Business Regulations at 38 CFR part 74, published January 10, 2018 in
the Federal Register (83 FR 1203). The commenter states that ``a
Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB)/Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned
Small Business (SDVOSB) must be verified by the VA's Center for
Verification and Evaluation (CVE) and listed in the Vendor Information
Pages (VIP) database in order to be eligible for set-aside contract
awards in the VA. This eligibility continues for 3 years unless there
are circumstances which require the business to exit the program as
outlined in 38 CFR 74.21. One of those circumstances is failure to
maintain its eligibility for program participation. Presumably, when a
VOSB/SDVOSB finds that it is no longer small for a particular NAICS
code for which it is registered, it is also no longer eligible to be
listed in VIP for that NAICS code and will be removed. This appears to
be in conflict with the Small Business Administration (SBA) policy.''
VA will not revise VAAR part 812 or 813 based on this comment.
Title 38 U.S.C. 8127 requires a firm must be listed as verified in the
VA database to be eligible to receive an award under the VFCP. This
comment is beyond the scope of this rule as it mostly applies to
certification and verification requirements under the VA's Veterans
Small Business Regulations at 38 CFR part 74, published January 10,
2018 in the Federal Register (83 FR 1203) and which became effective
October 1, 2018 (83 FR 48221). Note that a new SBA regulation related
to SDVOSB certification also became effective on the same date. The
changes in both SBA and VA regulations comply with the directive in the
National Defense Authorization Act of 2017 (Pub. L. 114-328), section
1832, to standardize definitions for SDVOSBs and VOSBs between VA and
SBA. As required by section 1832, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs
will use SBA's regulations to determine ownership and control of
SDVOSBs and VOSBs. The Secretary would continue to determine whether
individuals are Veterans or service-disabled Veterans and would be
responsible for verification of applicant firms. Challenges to the
status of an SDVOSB or VOSB based upon issues of ownership or control
would be decided by the administrative judges at the SBA's Office of
Hearings and Appeals (OHA).
The commenter also provided comments indicating that SDVOSB/VOSB
verification and representation requirements should not apply to
orders. The commenter argued that requiring the verification of SDVOSB/
VOSB status at the order level would be in conflict with the SBA
regulations which do not require verification at the task order level
for certain types of contracts. The commenter believes that the
proposed VAAR conflicts with that SBA policy. In effect, the commenter
submits, that while the SBA rules may allow an SDVOSB that has
``organically outgrown'' its size to compete for orders under an IDIQ
for up to 5 years without recertifying its status or size (unless the
[contracting officer] CO requests it), VA's Veterans First Contracting
Program requires ``recertification'' within 30 days of a business
outgrowing its size by removing it from the VIP database (which must be
checked by the CO prior to task order award). Furthermore, the
commenter believes that ``it may be argued that the VA rule is
tantamount to eliminating the CO's discretion to ask for
recertification at the task order level by requiring the CO to,
effectively, ask for a recertification for every task order by checking
VIP''. Another commenter argued the opposite. The second commenter
believes that VA should revise VAAR 813.003-70 to make clear that the
Veterans First Contracting Program mandate and the requirement to
confirm SDVOSB or VOSB status apply to task orders. However, they
recommend VA follow the SBA guidance on small business representation.
They also believe that replacing ``prior to award'' with ``at the time
of award'' would provide more clarity on the specific point of time at
which VA judges SDVOSB and VOSB eligibility.
We are unable to make the overall recommended changes due to VA's
statutory mandate. The Veterans First Contracting Program (VFCP)
applies to all contracts, BPAs and orders under this part. VA
legislation is very clear that only small businesses listed in the VA
database of eligible firms (the Vendor Information Pages or VIP) can be
awarded a contract under the VFCP. The Supreme Court confirmed this
requirement and issued a decision in 2016 that for purposes of the
program, an order is a contract. Therefore, verifying VIP eligibility
shall occur both at the time of submission of offers and prior to award
for contracts and orders is consistent with the current VAAR 819.7003
class deviation issued on July 25, 2016. A future VAAR case for part
819 will further examine the issue of ``prior to award'' or ``at time
of award.''
5. Use of the Veterans First Contracting Program (38 U.S.C. 8127-8128)
as an Authority for the Proposed Rule
One of the commenters objected to the use of 38 U.S.C. 8127-8128 as
an authority citation in parts 812 and 813. The commenter requested an
explanation to why this specific statute is included in a document that
explicitly excludes internal guidance on processes and procedures. The
commenter believes it is inappropriate to include the statute by
reference at a time when many questions regarding guidance,
applicability, and impact are unanswered.
We are making no change to VAAR part 812 or 813 based on this
comment. The inclusion of the authority is appropriate because many of
the issues addressed in these parts are based on the unique and special
requirements imposed by legislation and statute and make it necessary
to include the referenced citation.
6. Applicability of the Veterans First Contracting Program in the
Proposed Rule
A commenter indicated that the proposed policy at VAAR 813.003-70
references contracts as defined in FAR 2.101, but does not explicitly
reference task orders. To avoid confusion, the commenter recommends
that VA revise VAAR 813.003-70(a) to include a reference to orders.
VA notes that orders are part of the definition of contracts as set
forth in FAR 2.101, Definitions. However, to ensure clarity to the
specific types of actions covered under VAAR part 813, we are revising
813.003-70, Policy, to indicate that the VFCP applies to contracts,
orders and BPAs under this part. We also added a reference to FAR part
13 to indicate that the VFCP takes precedence over the small business
programs referenced in FAR part 13, and references to 819 which
includes additional information regarding compliance with the VFCP.
One commenter requested that VA include the use of a fixed
percentage figure to define ``fair and reasonable'' in the context of
the VA Rule of Two. They also believe that the nonmanufacturer rule
should be waived to allow Veteran small businesses the ability to
compete.
[[Page 16903]]
We are making no change to VAAR part 812 or 813 based on this
comment. How to conduct a price analysis and establishing a fair and
reasonable price is already addressed in the FAR. Specifically, FAR
subpart 15.4, Contract Pricing, provides guidance to contracting
officers to assist in making a fair and reasonable determination.
Additional internal agency guidance would be contained in the VA
Acquisition Manual. However, VA acknowledges this is an area of
interest for the public as well as VA's acquisition workforce. VA is
preparing additional internal training for its acquisition workforce to
strengthen and refresh contracting officer's skillsets in this area.
Regarding the nonmanufacturer rule and Veteran small businesses, VA
will continue to comply with SBA regulations. VA legislation requires
VA to use the small business definitions and requirements in the Small
Business Act, where not in conflict with VA's unique statutory
authority and 38 U.S.C. 8127-8128. This includes the application of the
nonmanufacturers rule. The nonmanufacturer rule is a requirement in the
Small Business Act as implemented by the SBA under 13 CFR 121.401
through 121.413 and applies to all Federal procurement programs for
which status as a small business is required or advantageous.
A commenter applauds VA for addressing the SDVOSB/VOSB sole source
option in its regulations. The commenter believes that the sole source
requirement in this section is consistent with the legislation, but
believes it is not consistent with those in VAAR subpart 819.70, as a
result of restrictions added to VAAR 819.7007 and 819.7008 through a
class deviation implementing the program as a result of the Kingdomware
Supreme Court Decision. The commenter believes that the legislation
does not impose requirements on when or how to use the sole source
authority and that VA should make clear that its contracting officers
need not do more than what is set forth in VAAR 813.106-70(c) to make
sole source awards to SDVOSBs and VOSBs above the simplified
acquisition threshold. The commenter requests that VA go so far as to
encourage the award of sole source contracts when certain conditions
are met. The commenter suggested revision language to VAAR 813.106-
70(c).
VA concurs that the VA legislation provides a unique sole source
authority that is less restrictive than a sole source award otherwise
permitted under FAR 6.302-1, ``Only one responsible source and no other
supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements.'' VA does not
concur, however, with the latter part of the commenter's analogy that a
sole source is acceptable under any circumstance or that the use of
sole source contracts should be encouraged. Consistent with the FAR, VA
encourages the use of competitive procedures for all its procurements
to the maximum extent practicable.
Therefore, VA declines to make changes to the language as suggested
but will add a FAR reference in VAAR 813.106-70(b) and (c) that
contracts awarded using the VA legislative authority shall be conducted
as authorized by FAR 6.302-5 and in accordance with 819.7007 and
819.7008, and to remove redundant language in the remaining paragraph
that is covered in the referenced sections and is also applicable under
part 813. This language is consistent with the legislative mandate, FAR
and the language in VAAR subpart 819.70, as provided in the July 25,
2016, VAAR Class Deviation--Implementation of the Veterans First
Contracting Program as a Result of the U.S. Supreme Court Decision
(Class Deviation--Veterans First Contracting Program (VFCP 2016).
One commenter stated that to make the statutory priority clear,
VAAR 813.003-70(c) should state that, under 38 U.S.C. 8127, contracts
shall be set aside for SDVOSBs when market research provides a
reasonable basis for receiving two or more offers from SDVOSBs. The
commenter believes the proposed VAAR 813.003-70, paragraph (c) does not
make the statutory priority clear, and paragraph (c)(1), as proposed,
says only that ``contracts under this part shall be set aside for
SDVOSBs or VOSBs, when supported by market research.''
The commenter also recommended VA revise VAAR 813.003-70(c)(2),
VAAR 852.212-70, and VAAR 852.212-71 to make clear the priorities for
SDVOSBs, and then VOSBs applies to all commercial items acquisitions
except for SDVOSB set-asides. The commenter stated in their opinion
that VA has appropriately recognized in VAAR 813.003-70(c)(2) that the
first priority is for SDVOSBs and second priority for VOSBs and applies
to procurements that are not set-aside for SDVOSBs or VOSBs. The
commenter believes that VAAR 813.003-70(c)(2) does not go far enough
because VAAR 852.215-70 should be inserted into any solicitation,
except those that are set-aside for SDVOSBs. The commenter further
asserts that requiring insertion of VAAR 852.215-70 into all
solicitations except for SDVOSB set-asides is the only way to ensure
that contracting officers develop an appropriate means (such as full/
partial credit) to implement the statutory mandate to prioritize award
of contracts to SDVOSBs first, then VOSBs second, before all other
small businesses, and finally large businesses.
The intent of the language at VAAR 813.003-70(c) is to highlight
the requirement that set-asides are mandatory and that if a set-aside
is not feasible, then evaluation preferences should be used in
accordance with 815.304-70. Any prescription changes to clauses
852.215-70 or -71 will be addressed in a separate VAAR case and is not
appropriate to make such changes to VAAR part 812 or 813 at this time.
While VA concurs that SDVOSBs have priority over VOSBs in every
instance, the evaluation preference prescribed in this section provides
recognition to the requirement in 38 U.S.C. 8128 that small business
concerns owned and controlled by veterans have a priority over other
small businesses. The priority of SDVOSBs over VOSBs is well
established, including at VAAR 813.003-70(c)(2). Therefore, the
language remains unchanged and any further clarification of the
language would be addressed in a future VAAR rulemaking case with VAAR
part 819.
Additionally, references to the VFCP program are included in the
section to set forth that the Veterans First Contracting Program
developed pursuant to the authority in 38 U.S.C. 8127-8128 applies to
both commercial acquisitions and procurements under the simplified
acquisition threshold at the VA.
7. Market Research
A commenter noted the importance of reinforcing, especially for
delivery of patient care and services procurements for Veterans Affairs
Medical Centers (VAMCs), that robust market research be conducted, and
that set-asides and awards be determined in accordance with those
findings.
VA agrees that market research including industry engagement are
key elements in the decision-making process for any acquisition. It is
VA's intention to comply with all legislative and legal requirements,
including VFCP, while providing the best care and maximum resources to
address the needs of the Veteran community we serve. VA is in the
process of releasing other parts dealing with competition, acquisition
planning and market research. They will be published in the Federal
Register for public comment once the appropriate approvals are
obtained. Accordingly, no language will be changed in the rule based on
these comments.
[[Page 16904]]
8. Training of the VA Acquisition Workforce on This Proposed Rule
A commenter would like to know how and when contracting officers,
staff, and local Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) will be
trained on these revised requirements. The commenter recommends VA
release an implementation plan and deadline for each phase of the
large-scale VAAR revision. Currently, no implementation date is listed
in the Federal Register notice.
VA also supports the importance of training as highlighted by our
investment in training for the acquisition workforce at the VA
Acquisition Academy (VAAA). Training on various VAAR revised policy and
procedures, as well as internal agency guidance, is currently being
provided on an ongoing basis through the VAAA, as well as local and
national conferences and other training events as necessary. We
continue to update and revise internal training material to address VA
acquisition workforce needs and will continue to ensure appropriate
training is scheduled and accomplished on both a one-time or recurring
basis as the topics and needs may dictate. VA continues to publish
proposed rules for public comment in phased increments and is working
closely with the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization
(OSDBU) to address concerns of the small business community, in
particular SDVOSBs and VOSBs. VA submits updates to its planned
regulatory agenda two times a year. Any updates and new planned
regulatory actions concerning specific VAAR parts will be published
there. The case containing the proposed rule for VAAR part 819,
including the Veterans First Contracting Program under subpart 819.70,
and key affected parts is planned for publication in the Federal
Register for public comment in 2019.
9. Removal of Internal Procedural Guidance From the VAAR
A commenter inquired if VA anticipates the need to develop and
issue specific procurement policy memorandums, directives, handbooks,
and standard operating procedures given the removal of internal
procedural guidance from the VAAR. The commenter also questioned the
timely issuance of information and updates to internal procedural
manuals.
VA is currently updating its acquisition policies and regulations.
As each part is completed, any internal documents that require updating
would be updated to comport with the new regulations. The VA
Acquisition Manual will incorporate many of the related internal
procedural guidance at the VA-wide level and will be published on the
VA OAL/PPS website when any new VAAR parts are published as effective
in the Federal Register. Any additional internal policy and procedures
at various levels and activities in the VA are being examined and will
be appropriately updated or created, as needed.
Technical Non-Substantive Changes to the Proposed Rule
1. Under section 813.003-70(a), this final rule adds a reference to
FAR part 13 in conjunction with FAR part 19 as a more accurate
reference; and in paragraph (d) changes a reference from FAR part 19 to
the Small Business Administration (SBA) regulations at 13 CFR part 121
and 13 CFR 125.6 to provide clarity.
2. In the proposed rule, VA intended to remove 813.202, Purchase
guidelines, include a new section 813.203, and add revised language at
813.203, Purchase guidelines, to comport with the FAR. VA is removing
the guidance from the VAAR and may place the guidance in the VAAM. As a
part of this final rule, VA will remove the current section 813.202 and
take no action on proposed 813.203.
3. This final rule revises the VAAR part 852 authorities to reflect
the authorities recently codified in a previous rule.
4. Under 813.307, VA proposed to remove the section which
references the use of forms and move mention of forms as internal VA
guidance to the VA Acquisition Manual. The forms referenced in 813.307
which will be removed with this final rule, are both referenced, and in
some cases, were prescribed at 853.213 as well. With the removal of
813.307 in this final rule, the forms require removal from the VAAR as
well, so with this final rule, section 853.213 will be removed and any
of the noted forms if and when still used at VA, are available on VA's
public facing website at https://www.va.gov/vaforms/ or upon request
from any VA contracting office.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This final rule will have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking impacts two existing information collection
requirements associated with two Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
control numbers. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (at 44 U.S.C.
3507) requires that VA consider the impact of paperwork and other
information collection burdens imposed on the public. Under 44 U.S.C.
3507(a), an agency may not collect or sponsor the collection of
information, nor may it impose an information collection requirement
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Although this action contains provisions constituting collections
of information at 48 CFR part 813, under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521), no new or
revised collections of information are associated with this final rule.
The information collection requirements for 48 CFR part 813 are
currently approved by OMB and have been assigned OMB control number
2900-0393.
Although this final rule removes 813.307, Forms, with this action
853.213, Simplified acquisition procedures (SF's 18, 30, 44, 1165,
1449, and OF's 336, 347, and 348), will also be removed as the forms
now shown in the text at 853.213 are also referenced within section
813.307, making their continued inclusion in VAAR part 853 unnecessary.
In particular, one of the forms referenced at 813.307(f), VA Form 10-
2421, Prosthetic Authorization for Items or Services, and at
853.213(d), has an associated OMB Control Number although it is not
currently associated with the VAAR. Under the provisions of Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521), no new or revised
collections of information are associated with this final rule. The
information collection requirements for VA Form 10-2421 are currently
approved by OMB and have been assigned OMB control number 2900-0188
under the administrative management of the Veterans Health
Administration. This form will no longer be referenced in the VAAR and
its OMB control number is not now associated with the VAAR.
Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs designated this rule
as not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
[[Page 16905]]
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-
612). This rulemaking does not change VA's policy regarding small
businesses, does not have an economic impact to individual businesses,
and there are no increased or decreased costs to small business
entities. On this basis, the final rule would not have an economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities as they are defined in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612. Therefore, pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do not apply.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563 and 13771
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. VA's impact analysis can be found as a supporting document at
https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48 hours after the
rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy of the
rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA's website at
https://www.va.gov/orpm by following the link for ``VA Regulations
Published from FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to Date.'' This final rule
is not subject to the requirements of E.O. 13771 because this final
rule is expected to result in no more than de minimis costs.
List of Subjects
48 CFR Parts 812, 813, and 853
Government procurement.
48 CFR Part 852
Government procurement, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Pamela
Powers, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on March 2, 2020, for publication.
Consuela Benjamin,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office of Regulation Policy &
Management, Office of the Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, VA amends 48 CFR parts
812, 813, 852, and 853 as follows:
PART 812--ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 812 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127-8128; 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 41 U.S.C. 1702
and 48 CFR 1.301 through 1.304.
Subpart 812.1--Acquisition of Commercial Items--General
0
2. Section 812.102 is revised to read as follows:
812.102 Applicability.
0
3. Section 812.102-70 is added to subpart 812.1 to read as follows:
812.102-70 Applicability of Veterans preferences.
Based on the authority under 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128, the Veterans
First Contracting Program in subpart 819.70 applies to VA contracts
under this part. The provisions and clauses prescribed reflect agency
unique statutes applicable to the acquisition of commercial items.
Subpart 812.3--Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses for the
Acquisition of Commercial Items
0
4. Section 812.301 is revised to read as follows:
812.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for the
acquisition of commercial items.
(f)(1) Contracting officers shall insert the clause 852.212-70,
Provisions and Clauses Applicable to VA Acquisition of Commercial
Items, in all solicitations and contracts for commercial acquisitions
and check only those provisions and clauses that apply to the
individual acquisition.
(2) Contracting officers shall insert the clause 852.212-71, Gray
Market Items, in solicitations and contracts for new medical equipment
for VA Medical Centers and that include FAR provisions 52.212-1,
Instruction to Offerors--Commercial Items, and 52.212-2, Evaluation--
Commercial Items.
812.302 [Removed]
0
5. Section 812.302 is removed.
PART 813--SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
0
6. The authority citation for part 813 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127-8128; 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 41 U.S.C.
1702 and 48 CFR 1.301 through 1.304.
0
7. Section 813.003-70 is added to read as follows:
813.003-70 Policy.
(a) The Veterans First Contracting Program in subpart 819.70
applies to VA contracts, orders and BPAs under this part and has
precedence over other small business programs referenced in FAR parts
13 and 19.
(b) Notwithstanding FAR 13.003(b)(2), the contracting officer shall
make an award utilizing the priorities for veteran-owned small
businesses as implemented within the VA hierarchy of small business
program preferences, the Veterans First Contracting Program in subpart
819.70. Specifically, the contracting officer shall consider
preferences for verified service-disabled veteran-owned small
businesses (SDVOSBs) first, then preferences for verified veteran-owned
small businesses (VOSBs). These priorities will be followed by
preferences for other small businesses in accordance with FAR 19.203,
and 819.7004.
(c) When using competitive procedures, the preference for
restricting competition to verified SDVOSBs/VOSBs in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section is mandatory whenever market research
provides a reasonable expectation of receiving two or more offers/
quotes from eligible, capable and verified firms at fair and reasonable
prices that offer best value to the Government.
(1) Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8127, contracts under this part shall be
set-aside for SDVOSBs/VOSBs, in accordance with 819.7005 or 819.7006
when supported by market research. Contracting officers shall use the
applicable set-aside clause prescribed at 819.7009.
(2) Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8128 and to the extent that market
research does not support an SDVOSB or VOSB set-aside, the contracting
officer shall include evaluation factors as prescribed at 815.304 and
the evaluation criteria clause prescribed at 815.304-71(a).
[[Page 16906]]
(d) The SDVOSB and VOSB eligibility requirements in 819.7003 apply,
including verification of the SDVOSB and VOSB status of an offeror, and
other small business requirements in 13 CFR part 121 and 13 CFR 125.6
(e.g., small business representation, nonmanufacturer rule, and
subcontracting limitations).
Subpart 813.1--Procedures
0
8. Section 813.102 is added to subpart 813.1 to read as follows:
813.102 Source list.
Pursuant to 819.7003, contracting officers shall use the Vendor
Information Pages (VIP) database to verify SDVOSB/VOSB status.
0
9. Revise section 813.106 to read as follows:
813.106 Soliciting competition, evaluation of quotations or offers,
award and documentation.
813.106-3 [Removed]
0
10. Section 813.106-3 is removed.
0
11. Section 813.106-70 is revised to read as follows:
813.106-70 Soliciting competition, evaluation of quotations or offers,
award and documentation--the Veterans First Contracting Program.
(a) When using competitive procedures under this part, the
contracting officer shall use the Veterans First Contracting Program in
subpart 819.70 and the guidance set forth in 813.003-70.
(b) Pursuant to 38 U.S.C 8127(b), contracting officers may use
other than competitive procedures to enter into a contract with a
verified SDVOSB or VOSB for procurements under the simplified
acquisition threshold, as authorized by FAR 6.302-5.
(c) For procurements above the simplified acquisition threshold,
pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8127(c), contracting officers may also award a
contract under this part to a firm verified under the Veterans First
Contracting Program at subpart 819.70, using procedures other than
competitive procedures, as authorized by FAR 6.302-5 and in accordance
with 819.7007 and 819.7008.
Subpart 813.2--[Removed and Reserved]
0
12. Subpart 813.2 is removed and reserved.
Subpart 813.3--Simplified Acquisition Methods
813.302 [Removed]
0
13. Section 813.302 is removed.
813.302-5 [Removed]
0
14. Section 813.302-5 is removed.
0
15. Section 813.305-70 is added to subpart 813.3 to read as follows:
813.305-70 VA's imprest funds and third party drafts policy.
VA's Governmentwide commercial purchase card and/or convenience
checks shall be used in lieu of imprest funds and third party drafts.
813.307 [Removed]
0
16. Section 813.307 is removed.
PART 852--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
17. The authority citation for part 852 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127-8128, and 8151-8153; 40 U.S.C. 121(c);
41 U.S.C. 1121(c)(3), 41 U.S.C. 1303; 41 U.S.C. 1702; and 48 CFR
1.301 through 1.304.
Subpart 852.2--Texts of Provisions and Clauses
0
18. Section 852.212-70 is added to read as follows:
852.212-70 Provisions and Clauses Applicable to VA Acquisition of
Commercial Items.
As prescribed in 812.301(f)(1), insert the following clause to
indicate provisions and clauses applicable to this acquisition:
Provisions and Clauses Applicable to VA Acquisition of Commercial Items
(APR 2020)
(a) The Contractor agrees to comply with any provision or clause
that is incorporated herein by reference or full text to implement
agency policy applicable to acquisition of commercial items or
components. The following provisions and clauses that have been
checked by the Contracting Officer are incorporated by reference or
in full text. Text requiring fill-ins is shown under the clause or
provision title:
__852.203-70, Commercial Advertising.
__852.209-70, Organizational Conflicts of Interest.
__852.214-71, Restrictions on Alternate Item(s).
__852.214-72, Alternate Item(s).
Bids on [Contracting Officer will insert an alternate item that
is considered acceptable] will be given equal consideration along
with bids on [Contracting Officer will insert the required item and
item number]** and any such bids received may be accepted if to the
advantage of the Government. Tie bids will be decided in favor of
[Contracting Officer will insert the required item and item number].
(End of provision)
__852.214-73, Alternate Packaging and Packing.
__852.214-74, Marking of Bid Samples.
__852.215-70, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned and Veteran-Owned Small
Business Evaluation Factors.
__852.215-71, Evaluation Factor Commitments.
__852.216-71, Economic Price Adjustment of Contract Price(s) Based
on a Price Index.
__852.216-72, Proportional Economic Price Adjustment of Contract
Price(s) Based on a Price Index.
__852.216-73, Economic Price Adjustment--State Nursing Home Care for
Veterans.
__852.216-74, Economic Price Adjustment--Medicaid Labor Rates.
__852.216-75, Economic Price Adjustment--Fuel Surcharge.
__852.219-9, VA Small Business Subcontracting Plan Minimum
Requirements.
__852.219-10, VA Notice of Total Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned
Small Business Set-Aside.
__852.219-11, VA Notice of Total Veteran-Owned Small Business Set-
Aside.
__852.222-70, Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act--Nursing
Home Care Contract Supplement.
__852.228-70, Bond Premium Adjustment.
__852.228-71, Indemnification and Insurance.
__852.228-72, Assisting Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned and Veteran-
Owned Small Businesses in Obtaining Bonds.
__852.229-70, Sales and Use Taxes.
__852.232-72, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests.
__852.233-70, Protest Content/Alternative Dispute Resolution.
__852.233-71, Alternate Protest Procedure.
__852.237-7, Indemnification and Medical Liability Insurance.
__852.237-70, Contractor Responsibilities.
The Contractor shall obtain all necessary licenses and/or
permits required to perform this work. He/she shall take all
reasonable precautions necessary to protect persons and property
from injury or damage during the performance of this contract. He/
she shall be responsible for any injury to himself/herself, his/her
employees, as well as for any damage to personal or public property
that occurs during the performance of this contract that is caused
by his/her employees fault or negligence, and shall maintain
personal liability and property damage insurance having coverage for
a limit as required by the laws of the State of ___[Insert name of
State]. Further, it is agreed that any negligence of the Government,
its officers, agents, servants and employees, shall not be the
responsibility of the Contractor hereunder with the regard to any
claims, loss, damage, injury, and liability resulting therefrom.
(End of clause)
[[Page 16907]]
__852.246-70, Guarantee.
The Contractor guarantees the equipment against defective
material, workmanship and performance for a period of ___[Normally,
insert one year. If industry policy covers a shorter or longer
period, i.e., 90 days or for the life of the equipment, insert such
period.], said guarantee to run from date of acceptance of the
equipment by the Government. The Contractor agrees to furnish,
without cost to the Government, replacement of all parts and
material that are found to be defective during the guarantee period.
Replacement of material and parts will be furnished to the
Government at the point of installation, if installation is within
the continental United States, or f.o.b. the continental U.S. port
to be designated by the Contracting Officer if installation is
outside of the continental United States. Cost of installation of
replacement material and parts shall be borne by the contractor.
[The above clause will be modified to conform to standards of the
industry involved.]
(End of clause)
__852.246-71, Inspection or Alternate I.
__852.246-72, Frozen Processed Foods.
__852.246-73, Noncompliance with packaging, packing, and/or marking
requirements.
__852.270-1, Representatives of Contracting Officers.
__852.270-2, Bread and Bakery Products--Quantities.
__852.270-3, Purchase of Shellfish.
__852.271-72, Time Spent by Counselee in Counseling Process.
__852.271-73, Use and Publication of Counseling Results.
__852.271-74, Inspection.
__852.271-75, Extension of Contract Period.
__852.273-70, Late Offers.
__852.273-71, Alternative Negotiation Techniques.
__852.273-72, Alternative Evaluation.
__852.273-73, Evaluation--Health-Care Resources.
__852.273-74, Award without Exchanges.
(b) When appropriate and in accordance with the prescriptions
for the clause, the contracting officer may use the following clause
in requests for quotations, solicitations, and contracts for the
acquisition of commercial items if the contracting officer
determines that the use is consistent with customary commercial
practices:
__852.211-70, Service Data Manuals or Alternate I.
(c) All requests for quotations, solicitations, and contracts
for commercial item services to be provided to beneficiaries must
include the following clause at
__852.271-70, Nondiscrimination in Services Provided to
Beneficiaries.
(End of clause)
0
19. Section 852.212-71 is added to read as follows:
852.212-71 Gray Market Items.
As prescribed in 812.301(f)(2), insert the following provision in
solicitations and contracts for new medical equipment:
Gray Market Items (APR 2020)
(a) No gray market or remanufactured items will be acceptable.
Gray market items are Original Equipment Manufacturers' (OEM) goods
sold through unauthorized channels in direct competition with
authorized distributors. This procurement is for new OEM medical
equipment only for VA medical facilities.
(b) Vendor shall be an OEM, authorized dealer, authorized
distributor or authorized reseller for the proposed equipment/
system, verified by an authorization letter or other documents from
the OEM. All software licensing, warranty and service associated
with the equipment/system shall be in accordance with the OEM terms
and conditions.
(End of clause)
PART 853--FORMS
0
20. The authority citation for part 853 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501; 40 U.S.C. 121(c); and 48 CFR 1.301
through 1.304.
853.213 [Removed]
0
21. Section 853.213 is removed.
[FR Doc. 2020-05589 Filed 3-24-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P