Peanut Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Amendment to Primary Peanut-Producing States and Adjustment of Membership, 16229-16231 [2020-05224]
Download as PDF
16229
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 85, No. 56
Monday, March 23, 2020
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1216
[Document Number AMS–SC–19–0073]
Peanut Promotion, Research, and
Information Order; Amendment to
Primary Peanut-Producing States and
Adjustment of Membership
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule adds the State of
Missouri as a primary peanut-producing
State under the Peanut Promotion,
Research, and Information Order
(Order). The Order is administered by
the National Peanut Board (Board) with
oversight by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA). This rule also adds
a producer member and alternate
member to the Board to represent the
State of Missouri. The Board
recommended this action to ensure the
Board’s representation reflects changes
in the geographical distribution of the
production of peanuts.
DATES: Effective April 22, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeanette Palmer, Marketing Specialist,
Promotion and Economics Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
Stop 0244, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW, Room 1406–S, Washington, DC
20250–0244; telephone: (202) 720–9915;
facsimile: (202) 205–2800; or electronic
mail: Jeanette.Palmer@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
affecting the Order (7 CFR part 1216) is
authorized under the Commodity
Promotion, Research, and Information
Act of 1996 (1996 Act) (7 U.S.C. 7411–
7425).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Mar 20, 2020
Jkt 250001
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, reducing costs,
harmonizing rules and promoting
flexibility. This final rule falls within a
category of regulatory actions that the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) exempted from Executive Order
12866 review. Additionally, because
this rule does not meet the definition of
a significant regulatory action it does
not trigger the requirements contained
in Executive Order 13771. See OMB’s
Memorandum titled ‘‘Interim Guidance
Implementing Section 2 of the Executive
Order of January 30, 2017, titled
‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
Executive Order 13175
This final rule has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that
this regulation will not have substantial
and direct effects on Tribal governments
and would not have significant Tribal
implications.
Executive Order 12988
In addition, this final rule has been
reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended
to have retroactive effect. Section 524 of
the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7423) provides
that it shall not affect or preempt any
other Federal or State law authorizing
promotion or research relating to an
agricultural commodity.
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
designated this rule as not a major rule,
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 519 of the 1996 Act (7
U.S.C. 7418), a person subject to an
order may file a written petition with
USDA stating that an order, any
provision of an order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with an order, is
not established in accordance with the
law, and request a modification of an
order or an exemption from an order.
Any petition filed challenging an order,
any provision of an order, or any
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
obligation imposed in connection with
an order, shall be filed within two years
after the effective date of an order,
provision, or obligation subject to
challenge in the petition. The petitioner
will have the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. Thereafter, USDA will
issue a ruling on the petition. The 1996
Act provides that the district court of
the United States for any district in
which the petitioner resides or conducts
business shall have the jurisdiction to
review a final ruling on the petition, if
the petitioner files a complaint for that
purpose not later than 20 days after the
date of the entry of USDA’s final ruling.
Background
This final rule adds the State of
Missouri as a primary peanut-producing
State under the Order. According to the
Order, primary peanut-producing states
must maintain a 3-year average
production of at least 10,000 tons of
peanuts to maintain this classification.
Missouri’s peanut production meets this
requirement.
The Order is administered by the
Board with oversight by USDA. Primary
peanut-producing states have seats on
the Board. This final rule adds one
producer member and alternate seat to
the Board to represent the State of
Missouri. Board members and alternates
are nominated by producers or producer
groups. This final rule ensures that the
Board’s representation reflects changes
in the geographical distribution of the
production of peanuts covered by the
Order.
The Order became effective on July
30, 1999. Pursuant to the Order, the
Board administers a nationallycoordinated program of promotion,
research and information designed to
strengthen the position of peanuts in the
market place and to develop, maintain
and expand the demand for peanuts in
the United States. Under the program,
assessments are levied on all farmers
stock peanuts sold. Assessments are
levied at a rate of $3.55 per ton for
Segregation 1 peanuts and $1.25 per ton
for Segregation 2 and 3 peanuts, as those
terms are defined in § 996.13(b)–(d) of
title 7. The assessments are remitted to
the Board by handlers and, for peanuts
under loan, by the Commodity Credit
Corporation.
The Order distinguishes between the
terms ‘‘minor peanut-producing states’’
and ‘‘primary peanut-producing states’’
for purposes of Board representation
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
16230
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 56 / Monday, March 23, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
and voting at meetings. Section 1216.21
currently defines primary peanutproducing states as Alabama, Arkansas,
Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, New
Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma,
South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.
These States must maintain a 3-year
average production of at least 10,000
tons of peanuts. All other peanutproducing States are defined as minor
peanut-producing States in § 1217.15.
Pursuant to § 1216.40(b), at least once
in each five-year period, the Board must
review the geographical distribution of
peanuts in the United States and make
a recommendation to the Secretary of
Agriculture (Secretary) to continue the
program without change or recommend
that changes should be made in the
number of representatives on the Board
to reflect changes in the geographical
distribution of the production of
peanuts.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Board Recommendation
As required by the Order, the Board
met and reviewed the geographical
distribution of peanuts. According to
data from the USDA’s Federal State
Inspection Service, for the years 2016,
2017 and 2018, 9,552, 13,059 and
12,597 tons of peanuts were inspected
in Missouri, respectively. Based on this
data, the 3-year average annual peanut
production for Missouri totals 11,736
tons per year, which exceeds the
requirement in the Order of maintaining
a 3-year average of 10,000 tons per year
to be considered a primary peanutproducing State.
Based on Federal State Inspection
Service data, the Board voted
unanimously on August 28, 2019, to add
Missouri as a primary peanut-producing
State under the Order. Accordingly, one
producer member and one alternate
member will be added to the Board to
represent the State of Missouri.
These changes help ensure that the
Board’s representation reflects changes
in the geographical distribution of the
production of peanuts. Accordingly, this
final rule amends §§ 1216.15 and
1216.21 to add the State of Missouri as
a primary peanut-producing State. Prior
to the changes made in this rule, the
Board could be composed or no more
than 12 peanut producers and their
alternates. This final rule also revises
§ 1216.40(a) to specify that the Board
can be composed of no more than 13
peanut producer members and their
alternates. Further, § 1216.40(a)(1) is
revised to provide that 12 Board
members and their alternates represent
primary peanut-producing states, up
from 11.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Mar 20, 2020
Jkt 250001
Final Regulatory Flexibility Act
Analysis
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601–
612), AMS is required to examine the
impact of the rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has considered the
economic impact of this action on small
entities.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. The Small
Business Administration (SBA) defines,
in 13 CFR part 121, small agricultural
producers as those having annual
receipts of no more than $1 million and
small agricultural service firms
(handlers) as those having annual
receipts of no more than $30 million.
According to the Board, there were
approximately 8,126 producers and 34
handlers of peanuts who were subject to
the program in 2018.
Most producers would be classified as
small agricultural production businesses
under the criteria established by the
SBA (no more than $1 million in annual
sales). USDA’s National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) reports that
the crop values of the peanuts produced
in the top 11 peanut-producing states in
the years 2016 through 2018 were $1.09
billion, $1.63 billion and $1.16 billion,
respectively. The 3-year crop average
was $1.29 billion. With a 2018 crop
value of $1.16 billion and a total of
8,126 producers, average peanut sales
per producer were approximately
$142,000. With a 2015–2018 average
crop value of $1.29 billion, average sales
per producer were approximately
$159,000. Both figures are well below
the $1 million threshold for a small
producer, providing strong evidence
that most peanut producers are small
businesses.
For the 34 handlers, the average
annual peanut crop value per handler
from 2016 to 2018 ranged from $32
million to $48 million, with a 3-year
average of $38 million. With average
sales figures moderately higher than the
small business threshold size of $30
million, it appears that a number of
handlers are small businesses and there
are also a number that are large
businesses—no definitive statement can
be made.
The pounds of U.S. peanut
production from the 11-primary peanutproducing states for 2016 through 2018
are 5.58 billion, 7.12 billion and 5.46
billion, respectively. The 3-year average
was 6.05 billion pounds. Computations
based on NASS data show that Georgia
was the largest producer, with 50.8
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
percent of the 3-year average quantity,
followed by Alabama (10.3 percent),
Texas (9.6 percent), Florida (9.3
percent), North Carolina (6.7 percent),
South Carolina (6.0 percent),
Mississippi (2.3 percent), Arkansas (2.1
percent), Virginia (1.6 percent), with
Oklahoma and New Mexico both under
one percent.
This final rule amends §§ 1216.15,
1216.21 and 1216.40 to add the State of
Missouri as a primary peanut-producing
State and to add a member and alternate
to the Board to represent Missouri.
Pursuant to the Order, primary peanutproducing States must maintain a 3-year
average production of at least 10,000
tons of peanuts. Missouri’s peanut
production meets this requirement. This
final rule ensures that the Board’s
representation reflects changes in the
geographical distribution of the
production of peanuts covered under
the Order. This action is authorized
under § 1216.40(b) and section 515(b)(3)
of the 1996 Act.
Regarding the economic impact of this
rule on affected entities, this rule
imposes no costs on producers or
handlers. The changes define the State
of Missouri as a primary peanutproducing State based on recent
production data and add a seat on the
Board for the State of Missouri.
With regard to alternatives, the Board
reviewed the peanut production for all
the minor peanut-producing States and
determined that Missouri was the only
State so designated that met the Order’s
requirement for a 3-year average peanut
production of at least 10,000 tons in
order to qualify to become a primary
peanut-producing State.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the background form (AD–
755), which represents the information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements that will be imposed by
this rule, was previously approved
under OMB control number 0581–0093.
Adding a producer member and
alternate to represent the State of
Missouri on the Board requires four
additional producers to submit
background forms (AD–755) to USDA
once every three years in order to be
considered for appointment to the
Board. The Secretary requires two
names to be submitted for each open
seat on the Board. The public reporting
burden is estimated to increase the total
burden hours for this information
collection by less than one hour. This
additional burden will be included in
the existing information collection
approved for use under OMB control
number 0581–0093. In addition, serving
on the Board is optional, and the burden
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 56 / Monday, March 23, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
of submitting the background form
would be offset by the benefits of
additional representation on the Board.
As with all Federal promotion
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Regarding outreach efforts, the Board
discussed Missouri’s peanut production
level at its December 4–5, 2018 meeting.
All the Board’s meetings are open to the
public and interested persons are
invited to participate and express their
views. The Board notified the primary
peanut-producing States (Georgia,
Alabama, Texas, Florida, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi,
Arkansas, Virginia, Oklahoma and New
Mexico) of Missouri’s production
numbers by disseminating information
through the Board’s weekly newsletter,
which is titled News in a Nutshell. The
Board voted on August 28, 2019, to
recommend adding the State of Missouri
as a primary peanut-producing state.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on December 2, 2019 (84 FR
65929). A 30-day comment period
ending on January 2, 2020, was
provided to allow interested persons to
respond to the proposal.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Analysis of Comments
Four comments were received in
response to the proposed rule. Two
comments support the proposal. The
other two comments expressed concern
about the use of taxpayer dollars to fund
the peanut Order.
Both commenters in support of the
proposal pointed out that the Board’s
activities are fully funded by peanut
farmers and not by taxpayers. These
commenters explained that the Order
supports activities that benefit the entire
peanut industry, such as research to
reduce production costs and improve
quality and yield, and research about
nutrition. One commenter stated that
Missouri served on the Board as the atlarge producer member in 2019, and
that its average production over the last
three years justifies its addition to the
list of primary producing States. Both
commenters agree that farmers will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Mar 20, 2020
Jkt 250001
continue to benefit from Board activities
under the Order.
Two commenters expressed concern
regarding the use of taxpayer dollars to
fund the peanut Order. However, the
Order, which is authorized under the
1996 Act and administered by the Board
for the benefit of the peanut industry, is
funded through assessments paid by
peanut producers, as described in the
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
section of this document. The peanut
program does not receive taxpayer
funds. Further, AMS charges the Board
user fees for administrative oversight of
the program.
One commenter suggested that
Missouri should not be added to the
Board because it produces a small
amount of peanuts. However, as
described in the proposed rule, Missouri
maintained a three-year average
production of at least 10,000 tons of
peanuts, qualifying it as a primary
peanut-producing State under the Order
and producer membership on the Board.
Therefore, Missouri is being added as a
primary peanut-producing State on the
Board. USDA has considered all
comments received and has not made
any changes to the rule as proposed
based on those comments.
After consideration of all relevant
matters presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth, is
consistent with and will effectuate the
purposes of the 1996 Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1216
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Peanut promotion.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, amend 7 CFR part 1216 as
follows:
PART 1216—PEANUT PROMOTION,
RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION
ORDER
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 1216 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411–7425; 7 U.S.C.
7401.
■
2. Revise § 1216.15 to read as follows:
§ 1216.15
Minor peanut-producing states.
Minor peanut-producing states means
all peanut-producing states with the
exception of Alabama, Arkansas,
Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri,
New Mexico, North Carolina,
Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas and
Virginia.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
■
16231
3. Revise § 1216.21 to read as follows:
§ 1216.21
states.
Primary peanut-producing
Primary peanut-producing states
means Alabama, Arkansas, Florida,
Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri, New
Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma,
South Carolina, Texas and Virginia,
Provided, these states maintain a 3-year
average production of at least 10,000
tons of peanuts.
■ 4. Amend § 1216.40 by revising
paragraph (a) introductory text and
paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
§ 1216.40
Establishment and membership.
(a) Establishment of a National
Peanut Board. There is hereby
established a National Peanut Board,
hereinafter called the Board, composed
of no more than 13 peanut producers
and alternates, appointed by the
Secretary from nominations as follows:
(1) Twelve members and alternates.
One member and one alternate shall be
appointed from each primary peanutproducing state, who are producers and
whose nominations have been
submitted by certified peanut producer
organizations within a primary peanutproducing state.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: March 10, 2020.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–05224 Filed 3–20–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
7 CFR Parts 1412 and 1437
[Docket No. CCC–2019–0005; Docket ID
FSA–2019–0008]
RIN 0560–AI45; 0560–AI48
Agriculture Risk Coverage and Price
Loss Coverage Programs and
Noninsured Crop Assistance Program;
Correction
Commodity Credit Corporation
and Farm Service Agency, USDA.
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
AGENCY:
This document corrects
regulations that were published in the
Federal Register on September 3, 2019,
and March 2, 2020. The rules revised
the Agriculture Risk Coverage (ARC)
and Price Loss Coverage (PLC) Programs
and Noninsured Crop Assistance
Program (NAP) to implement changes
required by the Agriculture
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 56 (Monday, March 23, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16229-16231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-05224]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 56 / Monday, March 23, 2020 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 16229]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1216
[Document Number AMS-SC-19-0073]
Peanut Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Amendment to
Primary Peanut-Producing States and Adjustment of Membership
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule adds the State of Missouri as a primary peanut-
producing State under the Peanut Promotion, Research, and Information
Order (Order). The Order is administered by the National Peanut Board
(Board) with oversight by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).
This rule also adds a producer member and alternate member to the Board
to represent the State of Missouri. The Board recommended this action
to ensure the Board's representation reflects changes in the
geographical distribution of the production of peanuts.
DATES: Effective April 22, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanette Palmer, Marketing Specialist,
Promotion and Economics Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
Stop 0244, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room 1406-S, Washington, DC
20250-0244; telephone: (202) 720-9915; facsimile: (202) 205-2800; or
electronic mail: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule affecting the Order (7 CFR part
1216) is authorized under the Commodity Promotion, Research, and
Information Act of 1996 (1996 Act) (7 U.S.C. 7411-7425).
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules and promoting flexibility.
This final rule falls within a category of regulatory actions that the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order
12866 review. Additionally, because this rule does not meet the
definition of a significant regulatory action it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum
titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order
of January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
Executive Order 13175
This final rule has been reviewed in accordance with the
requirements of Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments. The review reveals that this regulation
will not have substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and
would not have significant Tribal implications.
Executive Order 12988
In addition, this final rule has been reviewed under Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended to have
retroactive effect. Section 524 of the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7423)
provides that it shall not affect or preempt any other Federal or State
law authorizing promotion or research relating to an agricultural
commodity.
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs designated this rule
as not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 519 of the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7418), a person subject
to an order may file a written petition with USDA stating that an
order, any provision of an order, or any obligation imposed in
connection with an order, is not established in accordance with the
law, and request a modification of an order or an exemption from an
order. Any petition filed challenging an order, any provision of an
order, or any obligation imposed in connection with an order, shall be
filed within two years after the effective date of an order, provision,
or obligation subject to challenge in the petition. The petitioner will
have the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. Thereafter, USDA
will issue a ruling on the petition. The 1996 Act provides that the
district court of the United States for any district in which the
petitioner resides or conducts business shall have the jurisdiction to
review a final ruling on the petition, if the petitioner files a
complaint for that purpose not later than 20 days after the date of the
entry of USDA's final ruling.
Background
This final rule adds the State of Missouri as a primary peanut-
producing State under the Order. According to the Order, primary
peanut-producing states must maintain a 3-year average production of at
least 10,000 tons of peanuts to maintain this classification.
Missouri's peanut production meets this requirement.
The Order is administered by the Board with oversight by USDA.
Primary peanut-producing states have seats on the Board. This final
rule adds one producer member and alternate seat to the Board to
represent the State of Missouri. Board members and alternates are
nominated by producers or producer groups. This final rule ensures that
the Board's representation reflects changes in the geographical
distribution of the production of peanuts covered by the Order.
The Order became effective on July 30, 1999. Pursuant to the Order,
the Board administers a nationally-coordinated program of promotion,
research and information designed to strengthen the position of peanuts
in the market place and to develop, maintain and expand the demand for
peanuts in the United States. Under the program, assessments are levied
on all farmers stock peanuts sold. Assessments are levied at a rate of
$3.55 per ton for Segregation 1 peanuts and $1.25 per ton for
Segregation 2 and 3 peanuts, as those terms are defined in Sec.
996.13(b)-(d) of title 7. The assessments are remitted to the Board by
handlers and, for peanuts under loan, by the Commodity Credit
Corporation.
The Order distinguishes between the terms ``minor peanut-producing
states'' and ``primary peanut-producing states'' for purposes of Board
representation
[[Page 16230]]
and voting at meetings. Section 1216.21 currently defines primary
peanut-producing states as Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia,
Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina,
Texas and Virginia. These States must maintain a 3-year average
production of at least 10,000 tons of peanuts. All other peanut-
producing States are defined as minor peanut-producing States in Sec.
1217.15.
Pursuant to Sec. 1216.40(b), at least once in each five-year
period, the Board must review the geographical distribution of peanuts
in the United States and make a recommendation to the Secretary of
Agriculture (Secretary) to continue the program without change or
recommend that changes should be made in the number of representatives
on the Board to reflect changes in the geographical distribution of the
production of peanuts.
Board Recommendation
As required by the Order, the Board met and reviewed the
geographical distribution of peanuts. According to data from the USDA's
Federal State Inspection Service, for the years 2016, 2017 and 2018,
9,552, 13,059 and 12,597 tons of peanuts were inspected in Missouri,
respectively. Based on this data, the 3-year average annual peanut
production for Missouri totals 11,736 tons per year, which exceeds the
requirement in the Order of maintaining a 3-year average of 10,000 tons
per year to be considered a primary peanut-producing State.
Based on Federal State Inspection Service data, the Board voted
unanimously on August 28, 2019, to add Missouri as a primary peanut-
producing State under the Order. Accordingly, one producer member and
one alternate member will be added to the Board to represent the State
of Missouri.
These changes help ensure that the Board's representation reflects
changes in the geographical distribution of the production of peanuts.
Accordingly, this final rule amends Sec. Sec. 1216.15 and 1216.21 to
add the State of Missouri as a primary peanut-producing State. Prior to
the changes made in this rule, the Board could be composed or no more
than 12 peanut producers and their alternates. This final rule also
revises Sec. 1216.40(a) to specify that the Board can be composed of
no more than 13 peanut producer members and their alternates. Further,
Sec. 1216.40(a)(1) is revised to provide that 12 Board members and
their alternates represent primary peanut-producing states, up from 11.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C.
601-612), AMS is required to examine the impact of the rule on small
entities. Accordingly, AMS has considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. The Small Business Administration (SBA)
defines, in 13 CFR part 121, small agricultural producers as those
having annual receipts of no more than $1 million and small
agricultural service firms (handlers) as those having annual receipts
of no more than $30 million.
According to the Board, there were approximately 8,126 producers
and 34 handlers of peanuts who were subject to the program in 2018.
Most producers would be classified as small agricultural production
businesses under the criteria established by the SBA (no more than $1
million in annual sales). USDA's National Agricultural Statistics
Service (NASS) reports that the crop values of the peanuts produced in
the top 11 peanut-producing states in the years 2016 through 2018 were
$1.09 billion, $1.63 billion and $1.16 billion, respectively. The 3-
year crop average was $1.29 billion. With a 2018 crop value of $1.16
billion and a total of 8,126 producers, average peanut sales per
producer were approximately $142,000. With a 2015-2018 average crop
value of $1.29 billion, average sales per producer were approximately
$159,000. Both figures are well below the $1 million threshold for a
small producer, providing strong evidence that most peanut producers
are small businesses.
For the 34 handlers, the average annual peanut crop value per
handler from 2016 to 2018 ranged from $32 million to $48 million, with
a 3-year average of $38 million. With average sales figures moderately
higher than the small business threshold size of $30 million, it
appears that a number of handlers are small businesses and there are
also a number that are large businesses--no definitive statement can be
made.
The pounds of U.S. peanut production from the 11-primary peanut-
producing states for 2016 through 2018 are 5.58 billion, 7.12 billion
and 5.46 billion, respectively. The 3-year average was 6.05 billion
pounds. Computations based on NASS data show that Georgia was the
largest producer, with 50.8 percent of the 3-year average quantity,
followed by Alabama (10.3 percent), Texas (9.6 percent), Florida (9.3
percent), North Carolina (6.7 percent), South Carolina (6.0 percent),
Mississippi (2.3 percent), Arkansas (2.1 percent), Virginia (1.6
percent), with Oklahoma and New Mexico both under one percent.
This final rule amends Sec. Sec. 1216.15, 1216.21 and 1216.40 to
add the State of Missouri as a primary peanut-producing State and to
add a member and alternate to the Board to represent Missouri. Pursuant
to the Order, primary peanut-producing States must maintain a 3-year
average production of at least 10,000 tons of peanuts. Missouri's
peanut production meets this requirement. This final rule ensures that
the Board's representation reflects changes in the geographical
distribution of the production of peanuts covered under the Order. This
action is authorized under Sec. 1216.40(b) and section 515(b)(3) of
the 1996 Act.
Regarding the economic impact of this rule on affected entities,
this rule imposes no costs on producers or handlers. The changes define
the State of Missouri as a primary peanut-producing State based on
recent production data and add a seat on the Board for the State of
Missouri.
With regard to alternatives, the Board reviewed the peanut
production for all the minor peanut-producing States and determined
that Missouri was the only State so designated that met the Order's
requirement for a 3-year average peanut production of at least 10,000
tons in order to qualify to become a primary peanut-producing State.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the background form (AD-755), which represents the
information collection and recordkeeping requirements that will be
imposed by this rule, was previously approved under OMB control number
0581-0093.
Adding a producer member and alternate to represent the State of
Missouri on the Board requires four additional producers to submit
background forms (AD-755) to USDA once every three years in order to be
considered for appointment to the Board. The Secretary requires two
names to be submitted for each open seat on the Board. The public
reporting burden is estimated to increase the total burden hours for
this information collection by less than one hour. This additional
burden will be included in the existing information collection approved
for use under OMB control number 0581-0093. In addition, serving on the
Board is optional, and the burden
[[Page 16231]]
of submitting the background form would be offset by the benefits of
additional representation on the Board.
As with all Federal promotion programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Regarding outreach efforts, the Board discussed Missouri's peanut
production level at its December 4-5, 2018 meeting. All the Board's
meetings are open to the public and interested persons are invited to
participate and express their views. The Board notified the primary
peanut-producing States (Georgia, Alabama, Texas, Florida, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi, Arkansas, Virginia, Oklahoma and
New Mexico) of Missouri's production numbers by disseminating
information through the Board's weekly newsletter, which is titled News
in a Nutshell. The Board voted on August 28, 2019, to recommend adding
the State of Missouri as a primary peanut-producing state.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on December 2, 2019 (84 FR 65929). A 30-day comment period
ending on January 2, 2020, was provided to allow interested persons to
respond to the proposal.
Analysis of Comments
Four comments were received in response to the proposed rule. Two
comments support the proposal. The other two comments expressed concern
about the use of taxpayer dollars to fund the peanut Order.
Both commenters in support of the proposal pointed out that the
Board's activities are fully funded by peanut farmers and not by
taxpayers. These commenters explained that the Order supports
activities that benefit the entire peanut industry, such as research to
reduce production costs and improve quality and yield, and research
about nutrition. One commenter stated that Missouri served on the Board
as the at-large producer member in 2019, and that its average
production over the last three years justifies its addition to the list
of primary producing States. Both commenters agree that farmers will
continue to benefit from Board activities under the Order.
Two commenters expressed concern regarding the use of taxpayer
dollars to fund the peanut Order. However, the Order, which is
authorized under the 1996 Act and administered by the Board for the
benefit of the peanut industry, is funded through assessments paid by
peanut producers, as described in the Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis section of this document. The peanut program does not receive
taxpayer funds. Further, AMS charges the Board user fees for
administrative oversight of the program.
One commenter suggested that Missouri should not be added to the
Board because it produces a small amount of peanuts. However, as
described in the proposed rule, Missouri maintained a three-year
average production of at least 10,000 tons of peanuts, qualifying it as
a primary peanut-producing State under the Order and producer
membership on the Board. Therefore, Missouri is being added as a
primary peanut-producing State on the Board. USDA has considered all
comments received and has not made any changes to the rule as proposed
based on those comments.
After consideration of all relevant matters presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, is consistent with and will effectuate the
purposes of the 1996 Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1216
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Peanut promotion.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, amend 7 CFR part 1216 as
follows:
PART 1216--PEANUT PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION ORDER
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1216 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411-7425; 7 U.S.C. 7401.
0
2. Revise Sec. 1216.15 to read as follows:
Sec. 1216.15 Minor peanut-producing states.
Minor peanut-producing states means all peanut-producing states
with the exception of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi,
Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas
and Virginia.
0
3. Revise Sec. 1216.21 to read as follows:
Sec. 1216.21 Primary peanut-producing states.
Primary peanut-producing states means Alabama, Arkansas, Florida,
Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma,
South Carolina, Texas and Virginia, Provided, these states maintain a
3-year average production of at least 10,000 tons of peanuts.
0
4. Amend Sec. 1216.40 by revising paragraph (a) introductory text and
paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 1216.40 Establishment and membership.
(a) Establishment of a National Peanut Board. There is hereby
established a National Peanut Board, hereinafter called the Board,
composed of no more than 13 peanut producers and alternates, appointed
by the Secretary from nominations as follows:
(1) Twelve members and alternates. One member and one alternate
shall be appointed from each primary peanut-producing state, who are
producers and whose nominations have been submitted by certified peanut
producer organizations within a primary peanut-producing state.
* * * * *
Dated: March 10, 2020.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-05224 Filed 3-20-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P