Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 15930-15933 [2020-05709]
Download as PDF
15930
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 55 / Friday, March 20, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Carolina 27410; telephone (336) 662–0246;
internet: https://www.hondajet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Policy and Innovation Division,
901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148.
(5) You may view the service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
email: fedreg.legal@nara.gov, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March
16, 2020.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–05891 Filed 3–19–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0602; Product
Identifier 2019–NM–016–AD; Amendment
39–19874; AD 2020–05–24]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2010–26–
01, which applied to certain The Boeing
Company Model 777–200 series
airplanes. AD 2010–26–01 required
installing a new insulation blanket on
the latch beam firewall of each thrust
reverser (T/R) half. This AD requires
retaining the requirements of 2010–26–
01. This AD also adds airplanes to the
applicability. For those airplanes, this
AD requires an inspection to determine
if the installed T/R has an affected part
number and, if an affected part number
is found, installation of a new insulation
blanket. This AD was prompted by a
report of an in-flight shutdown due to
an engine fire indication and a
determination that additional airplanes
are affected. The FAA is issuing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: This AD is effective April 24,
2020.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of April 24, 2020.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Mar 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain other publication listed in
this AD as of January 20, 2011 (75 FR
78594, December 16, 2010).
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC
110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2019–0602.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.govby searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0602; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The address for Docket
Operations is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Laubaugh, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206–
231–3622; email: james.laubaugh@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2010–26–01,
Amendment 39–16540 (75 FR 78594,
December 16, 2010) (‘‘AD 2010–26–
01’’). AD 2010–26–01 applied to certain
Model 777–200 series airplanes. The
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on August 9, 2019 (84 FR
39241). The NPRM was prompted by a
report of an in-flight shutdown due to
an engine fire indication; an under-cowl
engine fire was extinguished after
landing. The NPRM was also prompted
by a determination that additional
airplanes are affected. The NPRM
proposed to continue to require
installing a new insulation blanket on
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the latch beam firewall of each T/R half.
The NPRM also proposed to add
airplanes to the applicability. For those
airplanes, the NPRM proposed to
require an inspection to determine if the
installed T/R has an affected part
number and, if an affected part number
is found, installation of a new insulation
blanket. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the potential for a fire from
entering the cowl or strut area, which
could weaken T/R parts and result in
reduced structural integrity of the T/R,
possible separation of T/R parts during
flight, and consequent damage to the
airplane, injury to people, and damage
to property on the ground.
Comments
The FAA gave the public the
opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the
comments received on the NPRM and
the FAA’s response to each comment.
Support for the NPRM
The Air Line Pilots Association,
International (ALPA) and United
Airlines stated their support for the
NPRM.
Request To Revise the Cost of
Compliance
Boeing requested that the FAA revise
the Cost of Compliance paragraph in the
NPRM. Boeing stated that the proposed
AD would affect 4 additional airplanes
for a total of 29 airplanes of U.S.
registry. Boeing stated that the 4
additional airplanes are equipped with
Model GE 90–90B engines with line
numbers greater than 413 and are
therefore not identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 777–78A0066, Revision
2, dated April 8, 2010, and not affected
by AD 2010–26–01.
The FAA concurs with the request
and has revised the Cost of Compliance
paragraph of this final rule to include 29
airplanes of U.S. registry. The four
additional airplanes are Model 777–200
series with the specified engines already
included in the applicability of the
proposed AD. Although the effectivity
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777–
78A0066, Revision 2, dated April 8,
2010, does not include those four
additional airplanes, the FAA
determined that the actions in that
service information are applicable to the
additional airplanes.
Request To Revise the Applicability
Boeing requested that the
applicability paragraph in the proposed
AD also include Model 777–200 series
airplanes equipped with General
Electric Company (GE) GE90–92B
engines. Boeing stated that there are two
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 55 / Friday, March 20, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
airplanes equipped with GE90–92B
engines that are affected by AD 2010–
26–01 and are not included in the
applicability of the proposed AD.
The FAA disagrees with the
commenter’s request. The FAA has
investigated the circumstances
surrounding the comment and
determined that the Model GE90–92B
engine is not identified on the existing
U.S. type certificate data sheet (TCDS).
At the engine manufacturer’s request,
the Model GE90–92B engine was
removed from the Engine TCDS No.
E00049EN at Revision 8, dated October
12, 2000. The FAA has also confirmed
with the engine manufacturer that there
are no Model GE90–92B engines in
service or certified for installation on
Boeing Model 777 airplanes, as
specified in Airplane TCDS No.
T00001SE, Revision 43, dated August
28, 2019. The FAA has not changed this
AD in this regard.
Request To Clarify T/R
Interchangeability
Boeing requested that the FAA revise
the section ‘‘Actions Since AD 2010–
26–01 Was Issued’’ of the NPRM to state
that the installation of a T/R specified
in AD 2010–26–01 onto an airplane
outside of the applicability of that AD
is possible, but it is not allowed. Boeing
commented that the interchangeability
of the T/Rs delivered on Model 777–200
series airplanes equipped with GE90–
76B, –85B, –90B, –92B, or –94B engines
is controlled by the ‘‘released
engineering’’ that defines the type
design, which includes the 315W1295
Interchangeability Drawings (Sheets 1–
9). Boeing also commented that there is
a one-way interchangeability restriction
that does not allow the earlier, affected
T/Rs specified in AD 2010–26–01 to be
installed on an airplane that is not
subject to that AD.
The FAA partially agrees. The FAA
agrees that the T/R configuration
referenced in AD 2010–26–01 is not part
of the manufacturer’s type design, based
on the drawings the manufacturer
provided. However, the FAA disagrees
with adding a clarification statement
about the manufacturer’s type design to
this AD because it is not relevant to the
purpose of this AD. The purpose of the
AD is to address the safety concern in
the design of those parts. The
manufacturer’s type design does not
preclude an owner or operator from
installing the affected parts. The FAA
has not changed this AD in this regard.
Request for Clarification of the
Inspection
Japan Airlines (JAL) requested
clarification of the inspection in
paragraph (h) of the proposed AD. JAL
asked whether it is acceptable to
determine the T/R part number with the
airplane delivery document from Boeing
if the following conditions are met: the
T/R has never been replaced since the
airplane delivery from Boeing; and no
modification requiring change of the
part number has been done on the T/R.
The FAA agrees to provide
clarification. The FAA expects that the
inspection will contain a thorough
review of all relevant airplane
configuration documentation and it is
possible documentation alone may be
used to show compliance with this
requirement. The principal maintenance
inspector responsible for accepting the
documentation will determine the
adequacy of the supplied
documentation in showing if the
affected parts are in service. The FAA
has not revised this AD in this regard.
Request for Collaboration To Address
Rotable Parts
Boeing requested that the FAA and
Boeing collaborate with its airline
partners, other original equipment
manufacturers, and the national Civil
Aviation Authorities (CAA) to develop
an action to implement safe, fair, and
consistent policy to address concerns on
rotable parts for the industry. Boeing
stated that it acknowledges there is a
difference between the Boeing service
information and the FAA’s rulemaking
in capturing the airplane effectivity.
Boeing commented that there may be
some instances where operators are
rotating parts outside of type design,
beyond effectivity limits or having T/Rs
installed onto airplane configurations in
which service information and design
changes have already been incorporated.
Boeing stated it understands the FAA’s
concerns with the possibility of parts
being rotated outside the effectivity
contained in the Boeing service
information and would like to seek an
alternative solution to address these
concerns.
15931
The FAA supports the commenter’s
proposal to address rotable parts under
the collaborative efforts of the FAA,
other civil aviation authorities, airplane
manufacturers, and airplane operators.
Any future collaborative efforts to
address rotable parts will be
coordinated outside of this AD. The
FAA has not changed this AD in this
regard.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
as proposed, except for minor editorial
changes. The FAA has determined that
these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
addressing the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Boeing Service
Bulletin 777–78A0066, Revision 3,
dated April 28, 2011. This service
information describes procedures for
installing a new insulation blanket on
the latch beam firewall of each T/R half.
The installation includes, for certain
airplanes, inspecting to determine if
fitting part number 315W1436–4 is
installed on the aft latch beam of the
right side T/R and, for affected fittings,
cutting the clevis from the affected
fitting.
This AD would also require Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 777–78A0066,
Revision 2, dated April 8, 2010, which
the Director of the Federal Register
approved for incorporation by reference
as of January 20, 2011 (75 FR 78594,
December 16, 2010).
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD
affects 29 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
FAA estimates the following costs to
comply with this AD:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Blanket installation (retained actions from AD 2010–26–01) (21
airplanes).
7 work-hours × $85 per hour =
$595.
Up to $5,253 ..............
Up to $5,848 ..............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Mar 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
Cost on U.S.
operators
Up to $122,808.
15932
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 55 / Friday, March 20, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
ESTIMATED COSTS—Continued
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Inspection and blanket installation
(new proposed action) (8 airplanes).
Up to 13 work-hours × $85 per
hour = Up to $1,105.
Up to $7,529 ..............
Up to $8,634 ..............
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701, ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA has determined that this AD
will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD
will not have a substantial direct effect
on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Mar 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2010–26–01, Amendment 39–16540 (75
FR 78594, December 16, 2010), and
adding the following new AD:
■
2020–05–24 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–19874; Docket No.
FAA–2019–0602; Product Identifier
2019–NM–016–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective April 24, 2020.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2010–26–01,
Amendment 39–16540 (75 FR 78594,
December 16, 2010) (‘‘AD 2010–26–01’’).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 777–200 series airplanes, certificated
in any category, equipped with General
Electric Company (GE) GE90–76B, –85B,
–90B, or –94B engines.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 78, Engine exhaust.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of an
in-flight shutdown due to an engine fire
indication; an under-cowl engine fire was
extinguished after landing. This AD was also
prompted by a determination that additional
airplanes are affected. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address the potential for a fire
from entering the cowl or strut area, which
could weaken thrust reverser (T/R) parts and
result in reduced structural integrity of the T/
R, possible separation of T/R parts during
flight, and consequent damage to the
airplane, injury to people, and damage to
property on the ground.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Retained Installation of Insulation
Blanket, with Revised Service Information
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (g) of AD 2010–26–01, with
revised service information. For airplanes
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Cost on U.S.
operators
Up to $69,072.
777–78A0066, Revision 2, dated April 8,
2010: Within 60 months or 4,500 flight cycles
after January 20, 2011 (the effective date of
AD 2010–26–01), whichever is first, install a
new insulation blanket on the latch beam
firewall of each T/R half by doing all the
applicable actions specified in the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Service Bulletin 777–78A0066, Revision 3,
dated April 28, 2011.
(h) New Requirement: Installation of
Insulation Blanket for Additional Airplanes
For airplanes not identified in paragraph
(g) of this AD: Within 60 months or 4,500
flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD, whichever is first, inspect to determine
if the installed T/R has any affected part
number as identified in paragraphs (h)(1)
through (5) of this AD. If an affected T/R is
found or if it cannot be determined which T/
R is installed, within 60 months or 4,500
flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD, whichever is first, install a new
insulation blanket on the latch beam firewall
of each T/R half by doing all the applicable
actions specified in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 777–
78A0066, Revision 3, dated April 28, 2011,
except as specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD. A review of airplane maintenance
records is acceptable in lieu of this
inspection if it can be conclusively
determined from that review that the
installed T/R is not an affected T/R. A review
of airplane maintenance records is also
acceptable in lieu of this inspection if it can
be conclusively determined from that review
that an affected T/R is installed and the
actions specified in Boeing Service Bulletin
777–78A0066, Revision 3, dated April 28,
2011, have already been done on that T/R.
(1) 315W1001–XX (all—where ‘‘XX’’ is any
combination of numbers and letters that
follow the dash).
(2) 315W1295–1 through 315W1295–222
inclusive.
(3) 315W1295–5001 through 315W1295–
5222 inclusive.
(4) 315W1295–5501 through 315W1295–
5722 inclusive.
(5) 315W1295–6101 through 315W1295–
6322 inclusive.
(i) Exceptions to Service Information
Specification
(1) Boeing Service Bulletin 777–78A0066,
Revision 3, dated April 28, 2011, defines
Group 1 as ‘‘all 777–200 airplanes with GE90
engines through line number 413 with a
forward insulation blanket’’; however, for
paragraph (h) of this AD, Group 1 is defined
as ‘‘all 777–200 airplanes with GE90 engines
with a forward insulation blanket.’’
(2) Boeing Service Bulletin 777–78A0066,
Revision 3, dated April 28, 2011, defines
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 55 / Friday, March 20, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Group 2 as ‘‘all 777–200 airplanes with GE90
engines through line number 413 without a
forward insulation blanket’’; however, for
paragraph (h) of this AD, Group 2 is defined
as ‘‘all 777–200 airplanes with GE90 engines
without a forward insulation blanket.’’
(3) Boeing Service Bulletin 777–78A0066,
Revision 3, dated April 28, 2011, defines
Group 2 Configuration 1 as ‘‘all 777–200
airplanes with GE90 engines through line
number 413 without a forward insulation
blanket and without the fitting assembly at
the aft insulation blanket location’’; however,
for paragraph (h) of this AD, Group 2
Configuration 1 is defined as ‘‘all 777–200
airplanes with GE90 engines without a
forward insulation blanket and without the
fitting assembly at the aft insulation blanket
location.’’
(4) Boeing Service Bulletin 777–78A0066,
Revision 3, dated April 28, 2011, defines
Group 2 Configuration 2 as ‘‘all 777–200
airplanes with GE90 engines through line
number 413 without a forward insulation
blanket and with the fitting assembly at the
aft insulation blanket location’’; however, for
paragraph (h) of this AD, Group 2
Configuration 2 is defined as ‘‘all 777–200
airplanes with GE90 engines without a
forward insulation blanket and with the
fitting assembly at the aft insulation blanket
location.’’
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of
this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using one
of the service bulletins specified in
paragraphs (j)(1) through (3) of this AD.
(1) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777–
78A0066, dated June 5, 2008.
(2) Boeing Service Bulletin 777–78A0066,
Revision 1, dated March 12, 2009.
(3) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777–
78A0066, Revision 2, dated April 8, 2010.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by The Boeing Company
Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, to make
those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Mar 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved previously for AD
2010–26–01 are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of paragraph (g) of
this AD.
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact James Laubaugh, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA 98198; phone and fax: 206–231–3622;
email: james.laubaugh@faa.gov.
(2) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference is
available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (m)(5) and (6) of this AD.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was
approved for IBR on April 24, 2020.
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 777–78A0066,
Revision 3, dated April 28, 2011.
(ii) [Reserved]
(4) The following service information was
approved for IBR on January 20, 2011 (75 FR
78594, December 16, 2010).
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777–
78A0066, Revision 2, dated April 8, 2010.
(ii) [Reserved]
(5) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717.
(6) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
(7) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
email fedreg.legal@nara.gov, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued on March 9, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–05709 Filed 3–19–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15933
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0882; Product
Identifier 2018–SW–113–AD; Amendment
39–19873; AD 2020–05–23]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for Airbus
Helicopters Model AS332C, AS332C1,
AS332L, and AS332L1 helicopters. This
AD requires inspecting the attachment
screws of each main gearbox (MGB)
suspension bar rear attachment fitting,
and depending on the outcome,
applying a sealing compound,
performing further inspections, and
replacing affected parts. This AD was
prompted by reports of an elongated
attachment screw and loss of tightening
torque of the nut. The actions of this AD
are intended to address an unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective April 24,
2020.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain document listed in this AD
as of April 24, 2020.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum
Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
telephone 972–641–0000 or 800–232–
0323; fax 972–641–3775; or at https://
www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/
technical-support.html. You may view
this referenced service information at
the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy, Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX
76177. It is also available on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2019–0882.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov in Docket No.
FAA–2019–0882; or in person at Docket
Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
AD, the European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (previously European
Aviation Safety Agency) (EASA) AD,
any service information that is
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 55 (Friday, March 20, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15930-15933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-05709]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2019-0602; Product Identifier 2019-NM-016-AD; Amendment
39-19874; AD 2020-05-24]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2010-26-
01, which applied to certain The Boeing Company Model 777-200 series
airplanes. AD 2010-26-01 required installing a new insulation blanket
on the latch beam firewall of each thrust reverser (T/R) half. This AD
requires retaining the requirements of 2010-26-01. This AD also adds
airplanes to the applicability. For those airplanes, this AD requires
an inspection to determine if the installed T/R has an affected part
number and, if an affected part number is found, installation of a new
insulation blanket. This AD was prompted by a report of an in-flight
shutdown due to an engine fire indication and a determination that
additional airplanes are affected. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective April 24, 2020.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 24,
2020.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain other publication listed in this AD as of
January 20, 2011 (75 FR 78594, December 16, 2010).
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. It is also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0602.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.govby searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0602; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Laubaugh, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-3622; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2010-26-01, Amendment 39-16540 (75 FR
78594, December 16, 2010) (``AD 2010-26-01''). AD 2010-26-01 applied to
certain Model 777-200 series airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on August 9, 2019 (84 FR 39241). The NPRM was prompted
by a report of an in-flight shutdown due to an engine fire indication;
an under-cowl engine fire was extinguished after landing. The NPRM was
also prompted by a determination that additional airplanes are
affected. The NPRM proposed to continue to require installing a new
insulation blanket on the latch beam firewall of each T/R half. The
NPRM also proposed to add airplanes to the applicability. For those
airplanes, the NPRM proposed to require an inspection to determine if
the installed T/R has an affected part number and, if an affected part
number is found, installation of a new insulation blanket. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address the potential for a fire from entering the
cowl or strut area, which could weaken T/R parts and result in reduced
structural integrity of the T/R, possible separation of T/R parts
during flight, and consequent damage to the airplane, injury to people,
and damage to property on the ground.
Comments
The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this AD. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
Support for the NPRM
The Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA) and United
Airlines stated their support for the NPRM.
Request To Revise the Cost of Compliance
Boeing requested that the FAA revise the Cost of Compliance
paragraph in the NPRM. Boeing stated that the proposed AD would affect
4 additional airplanes for a total of 29 airplanes of U.S. registry.
Boeing stated that the 4 additional airplanes are equipped with Model
GE 90-90B engines with line numbers greater than 413 and are therefore
not identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-78A0066, Revision
2, dated April 8, 2010, and not affected by AD 2010-26-01.
The FAA concurs with the request and has revised the Cost of
Compliance paragraph of this final rule to include 29 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The four additional airplanes are Model 777-200 series with
the specified engines already included in the applicability of the
proposed AD. Although the effectivity of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
777-78A0066, Revision 2, dated April 8, 2010, does not include those
four additional airplanes, the FAA determined that the actions in that
service information are applicable to the additional airplanes.
Request To Revise the Applicability
Boeing requested that the applicability paragraph in the proposed
AD also include Model 777-200 series airplanes equipped with General
Electric Company (GE) GE90-92B engines. Boeing stated that there are
two
[[Page 15931]]
airplanes equipped with GE90-92B engines that are affected by AD 2010-
26-01 and are not included in the applicability of the proposed AD.
The FAA disagrees with the commenter's request. The FAA has
investigated the circumstances surrounding the comment and determined
that the Model GE90-92B engine is not identified on the existing U.S.
type certificate data sheet (TCDS). At the engine manufacturer's
request, the Model GE90-92B engine was removed from the Engine TCDS No.
E00049EN at Revision 8, dated October 12, 2000. The FAA has also
confirmed with the engine manufacturer that there are no Model GE90-92B
engines in service or certified for installation on Boeing Model 777
airplanes, as specified in Airplane TCDS No. T00001SE, Revision 43,
dated August 28, 2019. The FAA has not changed this AD in this regard.
Request To Clarify T/R Interchangeability
Boeing requested that the FAA revise the section ``Actions Since AD
2010-26-01 Was Issued'' of the NPRM to state that the installation of a
T/R specified in AD 2010-26-01 onto an airplane outside of the
applicability of that AD is possible, but it is not allowed. Boeing
commented that the interchangeability of the T/Rs delivered on Model
777-200 series airplanes equipped with GE90-76B, -85B, -90B, -92B, or -
94B engines is controlled by the ``released engineering'' that defines
the type design, which includes the 315W1295 Interchangeability
Drawings (Sheets 1-9). Boeing also commented that there is a one-way
interchangeability restriction that does not allow the earlier,
affected T/Rs specified in AD 2010-26-01 to be installed on an airplane
that is not subject to that AD.
The FAA partially agrees. The FAA agrees that the T/R configuration
referenced in AD 2010-26-01 is not part of the manufacturer's type
design, based on the drawings the manufacturer provided. However, the
FAA disagrees with adding a clarification statement about the
manufacturer's type design to this AD because it is not relevant to the
purpose of this AD. The purpose of the AD is to address the safety
concern in the design of those parts. The manufacturer's type design
does not preclude an owner or operator from installing the affected
parts. The FAA has not changed this AD in this regard.
Request for Clarification of the Inspection
Japan Airlines (JAL) requested clarification of the inspection in
paragraph (h) of the proposed AD. JAL asked whether it is acceptable to
determine the T/R part number with the airplane delivery document from
Boeing if the following conditions are met: the T/R has never been
replaced since the airplane delivery from Boeing; and no modification
requiring change of the part number has been done on the T/R.
The FAA agrees to provide clarification. The FAA expects that the
inspection will contain a thorough review of all relevant airplane
configuration documentation and it is possible documentation alone may
be used to show compliance with this requirement. The principal
maintenance inspector responsible for accepting the documentation will
determine the adequacy of the supplied documentation in showing if the
affected parts are in service. The FAA has not revised this AD in this
regard.
Request for Collaboration To Address Rotable Parts
Boeing requested that the FAA and Boeing collaborate with its
airline partners, other original equipment manufacturers, and the
national Civil Aviation Authorities (CAA) to develop an action to
implement safe, fair, and consistent policy to address concerns on
rotable parts for the industry. Boeing stated that it acknowledges
there is a difference between the Boeing service information and the
FAA's rulemaking in capturing the airplane effectivity. Boeing
commented that there may be some instances where operators are rotating
parts outside of type design, beyond effectivity limits or having T/Rs
installed onto airplane configurations in which service information and
design changes have already been incorporated. Boeing stated it
understands the FAA's concerns with the possibility of parts being
rotated outside the effectivity contained in the Boeing service
information and would like to seek an alternative solution to address
these concerns.
The FAA supports the commenter's proposal to address rotable parts
under the collaborative efforts of the FAA, other civil aviation
authorities, airplane manufacturers, and airplane operators. Any future
collaborative efforts to address rotable parts will be coordinated
outside of this AD. The FAA has not changed this AD in this regard.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments
received, and determined that air safety and the public interest
require adopting this AD as proposed, except for minor editorial
changes. The FAA has determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin 777-78A0066, Revision 3,
dated April 28, 2011. This service information describes procedures for
installing a new insulation blanket on the latch beam firewall of each
T/R half. The installation includes, for certain airplanes, inspecting
to determine if fitting part number 315W1436-4 is installed on the aft
latch beam of the right side T/R and, for affected fittings, cutting
the clevis from the affected fitting.
This AD would also require Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
78A0066, Revision 2, dated April 8, 2010, which the Director of the
Federal Register approved for incorporation by reference as of January
20, 2011 (75 FR 78594, December 16, 2010).
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 29 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blanket installation (retained 7 work-hours x $85 Up to $5,253...... Up to $5,848...... Up to $122,808.
actions from AD 2010-26-01) (21 per hour = $595.
airplanes).
[[Page 15932]]
Inspection and blanket Up to 13 Up to $7,529...... Up to $8,634...... Up to $69,072.
installation (new proposed work[dash]hours x
action) (8 airplanes). $85 per hour = Up
to $1,105.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA has determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2010-26-01, Amendment 39-16540 (75 FR 78594, December 16, 2010), and
adding the following new AD:
2020-05-24 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19874; Docket No. FAA-
2019-0602; Product Identifier 2019-NM-016-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective April 24, 2020.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2010-26-01, Amendment 39-16540 (75 FR 78594,
December 16, 2010) (``AD 2010-26-01'').
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200 series
airplanes, certificated in any category, equipped with General
Electric Company (GE) GE90-76B, -85B, -90B, or -94B engines.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 78, Engine
exhaust.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of an in-flight shutdown due to
an engine fire indication; an under-cowl engine fire was
extinguished after landing. This AD was also prompted by a
determination that additional airplanes are affected. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address the potential for a fire from entering
the cowl or strut area, which could weaken thrust reverser (T/R)
parts and result in reduced structural integrity of the T/R,
possible separation of T/R parts during flight, and consequent
damage to the airplane, injury to people, and damage to property on
the ground.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Retained Installation of Insulation Blanket, with Revised Service
Information
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2010-26-01, with revised service information. For airplanes
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-78A0066, Revision 2,
dated April 8, 2010: Within 60 months or 4,500 flight cycles after
January 20, 2011 (the effective date of AD 2010-26-01), whichever is
first, install a new insulation blanket on the latch beam firewall
of each T/R half by doing all the applicable actions specified in
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 777-
78A0066, Revision 3, dated April 28, 2011.
(h) New Requirement: Installation of Insulation Blanket for Additional
Airplanes
For airplanes not identified in paragraph (g) of this AD: Within
60 months or 4,500 flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD, whichever is first, inspect to determine if the installed T/R
has any affected part number as identified in paragraphs (h)(1)
through (5) of this AD. If an affected T/R is found or if it cannot
be determined which T/R is installed, within 60 months or 4,500
flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever is
first, install a new insulation blanket on the latch beam firewall
of each T/R half by doing all the applicable actions specified in
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 777-
78A0066, Revision 3, dated April 28, 2011, except as specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD. A review of airplane maintenance records
is acceptable in lieu of this inspection if it can be conclusively
determined from that review that the installed T/R is not an
affected T/R. A review of airplane maintenance records is also
acceptable in lieu of this inspection if it can be conclusively
determined from that review that an affected T/R is installed and
the actions specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 777-78A0066,
Revision 3, dated April 28, 2011, have already been done on that T/
R.
(1) 315W1001-XX (all--where ``XX'' is any combination of numbers
and letters that follow the dash).
(2) 315W1295-1 through 315W1295-222 inclusive.
(3) 315W1295-5001 through 315W1295-5222 inclusive.
(4) 315W1295-5501 through 315W1295-5722 inclusive.
(5) 315W1295-6101 through 315W1295-6322 inclusive.
(i) Exceptions to Service Information Specification
(1) Boeing Service Bulletin 777-78A0066, Revision 3, dated April
28, 2011, defines Group 1 as ``all 777-200 airplanes with GE90
engines through line number 413 with a forward insulation blanket'';
however, for paragraph (h) of this AD, Group 1 is defined as ``all
777-200 airplanes with GE90 engines with a forward insulation
blanket.''
(2) Boeing Service Bulletin 777-78A0066, Revision 3, dated April
28, 2011, defines
[[Page 15933]]
Group 2 as ``all 777-200 airplanes with GE90 engines through line
number 413 without a forward insulation blanket''; however, for
paragraph (h) of this AD, Group 2 is defined as ``all 777-200
airplanes with GE90 engines without a forward insulation blanket.''
(3) Boeing Service Bulletin 777-78A0066, Revision 3, dated April
28, 2011, defines Group 2 Configuration 1 as ``all 777-200 airplanes
with GE90 engines through line number 413 without a forward
insulation blanket and without the fitting assembly at the aft
insulation blanket location''; however, for paragraph (h) of this
AD, Group 2 Configuration 1 is defined as ``all 777-200 airplanes
with GE90 engines without a forward insulation blanket and without
the fitting assembly at the aft insulation blanket location.''
(4) Boeing Service Bulletin 777-78A0066, Revision 3, dated April
28, 2011, defines Group 2 Configuration 2 as ``all 777-200 airplanes
with GE90 engines through line number 413 without a forward
insulation blanket and with the fitting assembly at the aft
insulation blanket location''; however, for paragraph (h) of this
AD, Group 2 Configuration 2 is defined as ``all 777-200 airplanes
with GE90 engines without a forward insulation blanket and with the
fitting assembly at the aft insulation blanket location.''
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using one of the service
bulletins specified in paragraphs (j)(1) through (3) of this AD.
(1) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-78A0066, dated June 5,
2008.
(2) Boeing Service Bulletin 777-78A0066, Revision 1, dated March
12, 2009.
(3) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-78A0066, Revision 2, dated
April 8, 2010.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2010-26-01 are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of paragraph (g) of this AD.
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact James Laubaugh,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-
3622; email: [email protected].
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (m)(5) and (6) of this AD.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
April 24, 2020.
(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 777-78A0066, Revision 3, dated April
28, 2011.
(ii) [Reserved]
(4) The following service information was approved for IBR on
January 20, 2011 (75 FR 78594, December 16, 2010).
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-78A0066, Revision 2, dated
April 8, 2010.
(ii) [Reserved]
(5) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone 562-797-1717.
(6) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
(7) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email [email protected], or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued on March 9, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-05709 Filed 3-19-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P