Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) Determinations for Case-By-Case Sources Under the 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards, 16021-16027 [2020-05662]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 55 / Friday, March 20, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(3) Inspect the collective arm assembly P/
N 429–001–525–101, the lateral arm
assembly P/N 429–001–527–101, and the
longitudinal arm assembly P/N 429–001–
530–101, by rotating each bearing and
ensuring each bearing rotates freely. If there
is any binding in any arm end bearing or on
the longitudinal bellcrank assembly, before
further flight, replace each arm end bearing.
Copyright Office
37 CFR Parts 201 and 202
[Docket No. 2018–9]
Registration Modernization
U.S. Copyright Office, Library
of Congress.
ACTION: Statement of policy and
notification of inquiry; extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
(f) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits are prohibited.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA,
may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your
proposal to: David Hatfield, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Section,
Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177;
telephone 817–222–5110; email 9-ASW-FTWAMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, the FAA suggests
that you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(h) Additional Information
(1) Bell Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin
429–15–21, Revision B, dated May 11, 2017,
which is not incorporated by reference,
contains additional information about the
subject of this AD. For service information
identified in this AD, contact Bell Helicopter
Textron Canada Limited, 12,800 Rue de
l’Avenir, Mirabel, Quebec J7J1R4; telephone
450–437–2862 or 800–363–8023; fax 450–
433–0272; or at https://
www.bellcustomer.com. You may view the
referenced service information at the FAA,
Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest
Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Room 6N–
321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (Transport
Canada) AD No. CF–2016–11R2, dated
October 18, 2017. You may view the
Transport Canada AD on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov in the AD
Docket.
(i) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 2700, Flight Control System.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Issued on March 11, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–05379 Filed 3–19–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
SUMMARY: The U.S. Copyright Office is
extending the deadline for the
submission of written comments in
response to its March 3, 2020, statement
of policy and notification of inquiry
regarding registration modernization.
DATES: The comment period for the
notification of inquiry published March
3, 2020, at 85 FR 12704, is extended.
Written comments must be received no
later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on
June 1, 2020.
ADDRESSES: For reasons of government
efficiency, the Copyright Office is using
the regulations.gov system for the
submission and posting of public
comments in this proceeding. All
comments are therefore to be submitted
electronically through regulations.gov.
Specific instructions for submitting
comments are available on the
Copyright Office’s website at https://
www.copyright.gov/rulemaking/onlinepublication/. If electronic submission of
comments is not feasible due to lack of
access to a computer and/or the
internet, please contact the Office using
the contact information below for
special instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regan A. Smith, General Counsel and
Associate Register of Copyrights,
regans@copyright.gov; Robert J. Kasunic,
Associate Register of Copyrights and
Director of Registration Policy and
Practice, rkas@copyright.gov; Kevin
Amer, Deputy General Counsel, kamer@
copyright.gov; Erik Bertin, Deputy
Director of Registration Policy and
Practice, ebertin@copyright.gov; or
Jalyce E. Mangum, Attorney-Advisor,
jmang@copyright.gov. They can be
reached by telephone at 202–707–3000.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Following
an extensive public inquiry,1 on March
3, 2020, the U.S. Copyright Office issued
a statement of policy and notification of
inquiry announcing several intended
practice updates to be adopted with the
deployment of a new Enterprise
1 Registration Modernization, 83 FR 52336 (Oct.
17, 2018).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Mar 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16021
Copyright System (ECS) and soliciting
further comment on additional
proposed reforms under consideration.
85 FR 12704 (Mar. 3, 2020).
To ensure that members of the public
have sufficient time to comment, and to
ensure that the Office has the benefit of
a complete record, the Office is
extending the deadline for the
submission of comments to no later than
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 1,
2020.
Dated: March 13, 2020.
Regan A. Smith,
General Counsel and Associate Register of
Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2020–05696 Filed 3–19–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2019–0686; FRL–10006–
62–Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACT)
Determinations for Case-By-Case
Sources Under the 1997 and 2008 8Hour Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
multiple state implementation plan
(SIP) revisions submitted by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. These
revisions were submitted by the
Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection (PADEP) to
establish and require reasonably
available control technology (RACT) for
26 major sources of volatile organic
compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides
(NOX) pursuant to the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania’s conditionally
approved RACT regulations. In this
rulemaking action, EPA is only
proposing to approve source-specific
(also referred to as ‘‘case-by-case’’)
RACT determinations for 19 of the 26
major sources submitted by PADEP.
These RACT evaluations were
submitted to meet RACT requirements
for the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone
national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS). This action is being taken
under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before April 20, 2020.
E:\FR\FM\20MRP1.SGM
20MRP1
16022
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 55 / Friday, March 20, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2019–0686 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
opila.marycate@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Emily Bertram, Permits Branch (3AD10),
Air and Radiation Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The
telephone number is (215) 814–5273.
Ms. Bertram can also be reached via
electronic mail at bertram.emily@
epa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
On July
31, 2019 EPA proposed to approve 21
case-by-case RACT determinations for
sources in Pennsylvania (Approval and
Promulgation of Air Quality
Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) Determinations for
Case-by-Case Sources under the 1997
and 2008 8-Hour Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standards; Part 1;
84 FR 37167 (July 31, 2019)). On August
30, 2019, the last day of the comment
period, EPA became aware through a
comment submitted to Regulations.gov
that one of the files contained in the SIP
submission—which EPA made public in
the docket for that rulemaking
proposing to approve the submission
(Docket No. EPA–R03–OAR–2017–
0290–0064)—contained potential CBI.
EPA restricted public access in
Regulations.gov to that file containing
potential CBI the same day, prior to the
end of the comment period. On
September 30, 2019, EPA became aware
through additional comments submitted
to Regulations.gov during the comment
period that additional potential CBI was
contained in other files EPA had posted
to Docket No. EPA–R03–OAR–2017–
0290–0064. EPA restricted public access
in Regulations.gov to the entire docket
that same day. In accordance with EPA’s
CBI regulations at 40 CFR part 2,
subpart B, EPA has contacted each
business affected by the inclusion of
potential CBI in the docket files to
inform them that potential CBI was
made publicly available on
Regulations.gov, and afforded each
business an opportunity to assert a
claim of business confidentiality for any
of their information posted by EPA to
Docket No. EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0290–
0064.
EPA is now proposing to approve 19
of the 21 Pennsylvania case-by-case
RACT determinations in this new
rulemaking.1 EPA has established a
docket for this new rulemaking that
does not include any materials claimed
as CBI (Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–
2019–0686). Commenters must submit
any comments they have on EPA’s
proposed approval of these 19 case-bycase RACT determinations to this new
docket number. Because this is a new
rulemaking, EPA will not consider any
comments on its prior proposal made at
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2017–
0290–0064. Any prior comments will
need to be resubmitted to Docket ID No.
EPA–R03–OAR–2019–0686 during the
comment period for this proposed
rulemaking for EPA to consider them.
The commenters are reminded that their
comments should not include or rely on
any information considered to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. If a comment
includes any CBI or other restricted
information, EPA will redact the
comment or withhold from the public
docket those submissions (or those
portions containing the restricted
information) as appropriate.
On multiple dates, PADEP submitted
multiple revisions to its SIP to address
case-by-case NOX and/or VOC RACT for
26 major facilities. These SIP revisions
are intended to address the NOX and/or
VOC RACT requirements under sections
182 and 184 of the CAA for the 1997
and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Table
1 below lists each SIP submittal date
and the facilities included in its
submittals. Although submitted in
multiple packages by PADEP, EPA
views each facility as a separable SIP
revision and may take separate final
action on one or more facilities. In this
rulemaking action, EPA is only
proposing to approve case-by-case
RACT determinations for 19 of the 26
sources submitted to EPA by PADEP.
The remaining seven major sources are
either now exempt from the sourcespecific RACT requirements or will be
acted on in a future rulemaking action,
once resubmitted to EPA by PADEP.
For additional background
information on Pennsylvania’s
‘‘presumptive’’ RACT II SIP see 84 FR
20274 (May 9, 2019) and on
Pennsylvania’s source-specific or ‘‘caseby-case’’ RACT determinations see the
appropriate technical support document
(TSD) which is available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No.
EPA–R03–OAR–2019–0686.
TABLE 1—PADEP SIP SUBMITTALS FOR MAJOR NOX AND/OR VOC SOURCES IN PENNSYLVANIA SUBJECT TO SOURCE–
SPECIFIC RACT UNDER THE 1997 AND 2008 8-HOUR OZONE STANDARD
Major source
(county)
SIP submittal date
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
8/14/2017 ........................................
11/21/2017 ......................................
Exelon Generation—Fairless Hills (Bucks).
The Boeing Co. (Delaware).
Cherokee Pharmaceuticals, LLC (Northumberland).
Dominion Transmission—Finnefrock Station (Clinton). a
First Quality Tissue, LLC (Clinton).
JW Aluminum Company (Lycoming).
Transco—Salladasburg Station 520 (Lycoming). b
1 In this action, EPA is proposing approval of 19
of the 21 sources it proposed approval of on July
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Mar 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
31, 2019. EPA will take action on the remaining two
facilities in a different rulemaking action.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\20MRP1.SGM
20MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 55 / Friday, March 20, 2020 / Proposed Rules
16023
TABLE 1—PADEP SIP SUBMITTALS FOR MAJOR NOX AND/OR VOC SOURCES IN PENNSYLVANIA SUBJECT TO SOURCE–
SPECIFIC RACT UNDER THE 1997 AND 2008 8-HOUR OZONE STANDARD—Continued
Major source
(county)
SIP submittal date
4/26/2018 ........................................
6/26/2018 ........................................
10/29/2018 ......................................
Ward Manufacturing, LLC (Tioga).
Wood-Mode Inc. (Snyder).
Foam Fabricators Inc. (Columbia).
Novipax (Berks). c
Resilite Sports Products Inc. (Northumberland).
Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals (Delaware). d
Texas Eastern—Bernville (Berks).
Truck Accessories Group (Northumberland). e
Texas Eastern—Shermans Dale (Perry).
Texas Eastern—Perulack (Juniata).
Texas Eastern—Grantville (Dauphin).
NRG Energy Center Paxton, LLC (Dauphin).
Texas Eastern—Bechtelsville (Berks).
Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation (Montgomery). f
Containment Solutions/Mt. Union Plant (Huntingdon).
Armstrong World Ind./Marietta Ceiling Plant (Lancaster).
Jeraco Enterprises Inc. (Northumberland).
Global Advanced Metals USA Inc. (Montgomery). g
Blommer Chocolate Company (Montgomery).
a Dominion Transmission—Finnefrock Station was withdrawn from EPA consideration on August 27, 2018. PADEP determined this source was
no longer subject to source-specific RACT requirements for the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
b Transco—Salladasburg Station 520 will be acted on in a future rulemaking action.
c Novipax will be acted on in a future rulemaking action.
d —Sunoco Partners Marketing and Terminal will be acted on in a future rulemaking action.
e Truck Accessories Group was withdrawn from EPA consideration on July 11, 2019. EPA will be taking action on this source in a future rulemaking action, once resubmitted by PADEP for approval into the PA SIP.
f Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation was withdrawn from EPA consideration on July 11, 2019. EPA will be taking action on this source in a future rulemaking action, once resubmitted by PADEP for approval into the PA SIP.
g Global Advanced Metals USA Inc. will be acted on in a future rulemaking action.
I. Background
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
A. 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone
NAAQS
Ground level ozone is not emitted
directly into the air but is created by
chemical reaction between NOX and
VOC in the presence of sunlight.
Emissions from industrial facilities,
electric utilities, motor vehicle exhaust,
gasoline vapors, and chemical solvents
are some of the major sources of NOX
and VOC. Breathing ozone can trigger a
variety of health problems, particularly
for children, the elderly, and people of
all ages who have lung diseases such as
asthma. Ground level ozone can also
have harmful effects on sensitive
vegetation and ecosystems.
On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a
standard for ground level ozone based
on 8-hour average concentrations. 62 FR
38856. The 8-hour averaging period
replaced the previous 1-hour averaging
period, and the level of the NAAQS was
changed from 0.12 parts per million
(ppm) to 0.08 ppm. EPA has designated
two moderate nonattainment areas in
Pennsylvania under the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS, namely PhiladelphiaWilmington-Atlantic City, PA–NJ–MD–
DE (the Philadelphia Area) and
Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley (the Pittsburgh
Area). See 40 CFR 81.339.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Mar 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
On March 12, 2008, EPA strengthened
the 8-hour ozone standards, by revising
its level to 0.075 ppm averaged over an
8-hour period (2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS). On May 21, 2012, EPA
designated five marginal nonattainment
areas in Pennsylvania for the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS: AllentownBethlehem-Easton, Lancaster, Reading,
the Philadelphia Area, and the
Pittsburgh Area. 77 FR 30088; see also
40 CFR 81.339.
On March 6, 2015, EPA announced its
revocation of the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS for all purposes
and for all areas in the country, effective
on April 6, 2015. 80 FR 12264. EPA has
determined that certain nonattainment
planning requirements continue to be in
effect under the revoked standard for
nonattainment areas under the 1997 8hour ozone NAAQS, including RACT.
B. RACT Requirements for Ozone
The CAA regulates emissions of NOX
and VOC to prevent photochemical
reactions that result in ozone formation.
RACT is an important strategy for
reducing NOX and VOC emissions from
major stationary sources within areas
not meeting the ozone NAAQS.
Areas designated nonattainment for
the ozone NAAQS are subject to the
general nonattainment planning
requirements of CAA section 172.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides
that SIPs for nonattainment areas must
include reasonably available control
measures (RACM) for demonstrating
attainment of all NAAQS, including
emissions reductions from existing
sources through the adoption of RACT.
Further, section 182(b)(2) of the CAA
sets forth additional RACT requirements
for ozone nonattainment areas classified
as moderate or higher.
Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA sets
forth requirements regarding RACT for
the ozone NAAQS for VOC sources.
Section 182(f) subjects major stationary
sources of NOX to the same RACT
requirements applicable to major
stationary sources of VOC.2
Section 184(b)(1)(B) of the CAA
applies the RACT requirements in
section 182(b)(2) to nonattainment areas
classified as marginal and to attainment
areas located within ozone transport
regions established pursuant to section
184 of the CAA. Section 184(a) of the
CAA established by law the current
Ozone Transport Region (OTR)
comprised of 12 eastern states,
including Pennsylvania. This
2 A ‘‘major source’’ is defined based on the
source’s potential to emit (PTE) of NOX or VOC, and
the applicable thresholds for RACT differs based on
the classification of the nonattainment area in
which the source is located. See sections 182(c)–(f)
and 302 of the CAA.
E:\FR\FM\20MRP1.SGM
20MRP1
16024
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 55 / Friday, March 20, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
requirement is referred to as OTR RACT.
As noted previously, a ‘‘major source’’
is defined based on the source’s PTE of
NOX, VOC, or both pollutants, and the
applicable thresholds differ based on
the classification of the nonattainment
area in which the source is located. See
sections 182(c)–(f) and 302 of the CAA.
Since the 1970’s, EPA has
consistently defined ‘‘RACT’’ as the
lowest emission limit that a particular
source is capable of meeting by the
application of the control technology
that is reasonably available considering
technological and economic feasibility.3
EPA has provided more substantive
RACT requirements through
implementation rules for each ozone
NAAQS as well as through guidance. In
2004 and 2005, EPA promulgated an
implementation rule for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS in two phases (‘‘Phase 1
of the 1997 Ozone Implementation
Rule’’ and ‘‘Phase 2 of the 1997 Ozone
Implementation Rule’’). 69 FR 23951
(April 30, 2004) and 70 FR 71612
(November 29, 2005), respectively.
Particularly, the Phase 2 Ozone
Implementation Rule addressed RACT
statutory requirements under the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS. See 70 FR 71652.
On March 6, 2015, EPA issued its
final rule for implementing the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS (‘‘the 2008 Ozone
SIP Requirements Rule’’). 80 FR 12264.
At the same time, EPA revoked the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS, effective on April
6, 2015.4 The 2008 Ozone SIP
Requirements Rule provided
comprehensive requirements to
transition from the revoked 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS to the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, as codified in 40 CFR part 51,
subpart AA, following revocation.
Consistent with previous policy, EPA
determined that areas designated
nonattainment for both the 1997 and
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS at the time
of revocation, must retain
implementation of certain
nonattainment area requirements (i.e.,
anti-backsliding requirements) for the
3 See December 9, 1976 memorandum from Roger
Strelow, Assistant Administrator for Air and Waste
Management, to Regional Administrators,
‘‘Guidance for Determining Acceptability of SIP
Regulations in Non-Attainment Areas,’’ and also 44
FR 53762 (September 17, 1979).
4 On February 16, 2018, the United States Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C.
Cir. Court) issued an opinion on the 2008 Ozone
SIP Requirements Rule. South Coast Air Quality
Mgmt. Dist. v. EPA, No. 15–1115 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 16,
2018). The D.C. Cir. Court found certain parts
reasonable and denied the petition for appeal on
those. In particular, the D.C. Cir. Court upheld the
use of NOX averaging to meet RACT requirements
for 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. However, the Court
also found certain other provisions unreasonable.
The D.C. Cir. Court vacated the provisions it found
unreasonable.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Mar 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS as specified
under section 182 of the CAA, including
RACT. See 40 CFR 51.1100(o). An area
remains subject to the anti-backsliding
requirements for a revoked NAAQS
until EPA approves a redesignation to
attainment for the area for the 2008 8hour ozone NAAQS. There are no
effects on applicable requirements for
areas within the OTR, as a result of the
revocation of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. Thus, Pennsylvania, as a state
within the OTR, remains subject to
RACT requirements for both the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS and the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS.
In addressing RACT, the 2008 Ozone
SIP Requirements Rule is consistent
with existing policy and Phase 2 of the
1997 Ozone Implementation Rule. In the
2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule,
EPA requires RACT measures to be
implemented by January 1, 2017 for
areas classified as moderate
nonattainment or above and all areas of
the OTR. EPA also provided in the 2008
Ozone SIP Requirements Rule that
RACT SIPs must contain adopted RACT
regulations, certifications where
appropriate that existing provisions are
RACT, and/or negative declarations
stating that there are no sources in the
nonattainment area covered by a
specific control technique guidelines
(CTG) source category. In the preamble
to the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements
Rule, EPA clarified that states must
provide notice and opportunity for
public comment on their RACT SIP
submissions, even when submitting a
certification that the existing provisions
remain RACT or a negative declaration.
States must submit appropriate
supporting information for their RACT
submissions, in accordance with the
Phase 2 of the 1997 Ozone
Implementation Rule. Adequate
documentation must support that states
have considered control technology that
is economically and technologically
feasible in determining RACT, based on
information that is current as of the time
of development of the RACT SIP.
In addition, in the 2008 Ozone SIP
Requirements Rule, EPA clarified that
states can use weighted average NOX
emissions rates from sources in the
nonattainment area for meeting the
major NOX RACT requirement under the
CAA, as consistent with existing
policy.5 EPA also recognized that states
5 EPA’s NO RACT guidance ‘‘Nitrogen Oxides
X
Supplement to the General Preamble’’ (57 FR
55625; November 25, 1992) encouraged states to
develop RACT programs that are based on ‘‘area
wide average emission rates.’’ Additional guidance
on area-wide RACT provisions is provided by EPA’s
January 2001 economic incentive program guidance
titled ‘‘Improving Air Quality with Economic
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
may conclude in some cases that
sources already addressed by RACT
determinations for the 1979 1-hour and/
or 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS may not
need to implement additional controls
to meet the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS
RACT requirement. See 80 FR 12278–
12279.
C. Applicability of RACT Requirements
in Pennsylvania
As indicated earlier, RACT
requirements apply to any ozone
nonattainment areas classified as
moderate or higher (serious, severe or
extreme) under CAA sections 182(b)(2)
and 182(f). Pennsylvania has
outstanding ozone RACT requirements
for both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. The entire Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania is part of the OTR
established under section 184 of the
CAA and thus is subject statewide to the
RACT requirements of CAA sections
182(b)(2) and 182(f), pursuant to section
184(b).
At the time of revocation of the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS (effective April 6,
2015), only two moderate
nonattainment areas remained in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for this
standard, the Philadelphia and the
Pittsburgh Areas. As required under
EPA’s anti-backsliding provisions, these
two moderate nonattainment areas
continue to be subject to RACT under
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Given
its location in the OTR, the remainder
of the Commonwealth is also treated as
moderate nonattainment area under the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for any
planning requirements under the
revoked standard, including RACT. The
OTR RACT requirement is also in effect
under the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS
throughout the Commonwealth, since
EPA did not designate any
nonattainment areas above marginal for
this standard in Pennsylvania. Thus, in
practice, the same RACT requirements
continue to be applicable in
Pennsylvania for both the 1997 and
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. RACT must
be evaluated and satisfied as separate
requirements under each applicable
standard.
RACT applies to major sources of
NOX and VOC under each ozone
NAAQS or any VOC sources subject to
CTG RACT. Which NOX and VOC
sources in Pennsylvania are considered
‘‘major’’ and are therefore subject to
Incentive Programs,’’ available at https://
www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t1/memoranda/eipfin.pdf.
In addition, as mentioned previously, the D.C. Cir.
Court recently upheld the use of NOX averaging to
meet RACT requirements for 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. v.
EPA, No. 15–1115 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 16, 2018).
E:\FR\FM\20MRP1.SGM
20MRP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 55 / Friday, March 20, 2020 / Proposed Rules
RACT is dependent on the location of
each source within the Commonwealth.
Sources located in nonattainment areas
would be subject to the ‘‘major source’’
definitions established under the CAA.
In the case of Pennsylvania, sources
located in any areas outside of moderate
or above nonattainment areas, as part of
the OTR, shall be treated as if these
areas were moderate.
In Pennsylvania, the SIP program is
implemented primarily by the PADEP,
but also by local air agencies in
Philadelphia County (the City of
Philadelphia’s Air Management Services
[AMS]) and Allegheny County, (the
Allegheny County Health Department
[ACHD]). These agencies have
implemented numerous RACT
regulations and source-specific
measures in Pennsylvania to meet the
applicable ozone RACT requirements.
Historically, statewide RACT controls
have been promulgated by PADEP in
Pennsylvania Code Title 25—
Environmental Resources, part I—
Department of Environmental
Protection, Subpart C—Protection of
Natural Resources, Article III—Air
Resources, (25 Pa. Code) Chapter 129.
AMS and ACHD have incorporated by
reference Pennsylvania regulations, but
have also promulgated regulations
adopting RACT controls for their own
jurisdictions. In addition, AMS and
ACHD have submitted separate sourcespecific RACT determinations as SIP
revisions for sources within their
respective jurisdictions, which have
been approved by EPA. See 40 CFR
52.2020(d)(1).
States were required to make RACT
SIP submissions for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS by September 15, 2006.
PADEP submitted a SIP revision on
September 25, 2006, certifying that a
number of previously approved VOC
RACT rules continued to satisfy RACT
under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
for the remainder of Pennsylvania.6
PADEP has met its obligations under the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for its CTG
and non-CTG VOC sources. See 82 FR
31464 (July 7, 2017). RACT control
measures addressing all applicable CAA
RACT requirements under the 1997 8hour ozone NAAQS have been
implemented and fully approved in the
jurisdictions of ACHD and AMS. See 78
FR 34584 (June 10, 2013) and 81 FR
69687 (October 7, 2016). For the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS, states were
required to submit RACT SIP revisions
by July 20, 2014. On May 16, 2016,
September 15, 2006 SIP submittal initially
included Pennsylvania’s certification of NOX RACT
regulations; however, NOX RACT portions were
withdrawn by PADEP on June 27, 2016.
PADEP submitted a SIP revision
addressing RACT under both the 1997
and 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS in Pennsylvania.
Specifically, the May 16, 2016 SIP
submittal intended to satisfy sections
182(b)(2)(C), 182(f), and 184 of the CAA
for both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS for Pennsylvania’s major NOX
and VOC non-CTG sources, except
ethylene production plants, surface
active agents manufacturing, and mobile
equipment repair and refinishing.7
D. EPA’s Conditional Approval for
Pennsylvania’s RACT Requirements
Under the 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone
NAAQS
On May 16, 2016, PADEP submitted
a SIP revision addressing RACT under
both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS in Pennsylvania. PADEP’s May
16, 2016 SIP revision intended to
address certain outstanding non-CTG
VOC RACT, VOC CTG RACT, and major
NOX RACT requirements under the
CAA for both standards. The SIP
revision requested approval of
Pennsylvania’s 25 Pa. Code 129.96–100,
Additional RACT Requirements for
Major Sources of NOX and VOCs (the
‘‘presumptive’’ RACT II rule). Prior to
the adoption of the RACT II rule,
Pennsylvania relied on the NOX and
VOC control measures in 25 Pa. Code
129.92–95, Stationary Sources of NOX
and VOCs, (the RACT I rule) to meet
RACT for non-CTG major VOC sources
and major NOX sources. The
requirements of the RACT I rule remain
in effect and continue to be
implemented as RACT.8 On September
26, 2017, PADEP submitted a
supplemental SIP revision which
committed to address various
deficiencies identified by EPA in their
May 16, 2016 ‘‘presumptive’’ RACT II
rule SIP revision.
On May 9, 2019, EPA conditionally
approved the RACT II rule based on
PADEP’s September 26, 2017
commitment letter. See 84 FR 20274. In
EPA’s final conditional approval, EPA
noted that PADEP would be required to
submit, for EPA’s approval, SIP
revisions to address any facility-wide or
system-wide averaging plan approved
under 25 Pa. Code 129.98 and any caseby-case RACT determinations under 25
Pa. Code 129.99. PADEP committed to
submitting these additional SIP
revisions within 12 months of EPA’s
final conditional approval, specifically
May 9, 2020.
6 The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Mar 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
8 These requirements were initially approved as
RACT for Pennsylvania under the 1979 1-hour
ozone NAAQS.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16025
Therefore, as authorized in CAA
section 110(k)(3) and (k)(4),
Pennsylvania shall submit the following
as case-by-case SIP revisions, by May 9,
2020, for EPA’s approval as a condition
of approval of 25 Pa. Code 128 and 129
in the May 16, 2016 SIP revision: (1) All
facility-wide or system-wide averaging
plans approved by PADEP under 25 Pa.
Code 129.98 including, but not limited
to, any terms and conditions that ensure
the enforceability of the averaging plan
as a practical matter (i.e., any
monitoring, reporting, recordkeeping, or
testing requirements); and (2) all sourcespecific RACT determinations approved
by PADEP under 25 Pa. Code 129.99,
including any alternative compliance
schedules approved under 25 Pa. Code
129.97(k) and 129.99(i); the case-by-case
RACT determinations submitted to EPA
for approval into the SIP should include
any terms and conditions that ensure
the enforceability of the case-by-case or
source-specific RACT emission
limitation as a practical matter (i.e., any
monitoring, reporting, recordkeeping, or
testing requirements). See May 9, 2019
(84 FR 20274).
II. Summary of SIP Revisions
In order to satisfy a requirement from
EPA’s May 9, 2019 conditional
approval, PADEP has submitted to EPA,
SIP revisions addressing case-by-case
RACT requirements for major sources in
Pennsylvania subject to 25 Pa. Code
129.99. As noted in Table 1, on multiple
dates PADEP submitted to EPA, five
separate SIP revisions pertaining to
Pennsylvania’s case-by-case NOX and/or
VOC RACT determinations for 26 major
sources located in the Commonwealth.
PADEP provided documentation in its
SIP revisions to support its case-by-case
RACT determinations for affected
emission units at each major source
subject to 25 Pa. Code 129.99.
Specifically, in these SIP submittals,
PADEP evaluated a total of 26 major
NOX and/or VOC sources in
Pennsylvania for case-by-case RACT.9
In the Pennsylvania RACT SIP
revisions, PADEP included a case-bycase RACT determination for the
existing emissions units at each of these
major sources of NOX and/or VOC that
required a source specific RACT
determination. In PADEP’s RACT
determinations an evaluation was
completed to determine if previously
SIP-approved, case-by-case RACT
requirements (herein referred to as
RACT I) were more stringent and
9 As noted previously, EPA, in this action, is
proposing approval for 19 of the 26 case-by-case
RACT determinations submitted by PADEP in the
applicable five SIP revisions. See Table 1 for
information specific to each SIP revision.
E:\FR\FM\20MRP1.SGM
20MRP1
16026
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 55 / Friday, March 20, 2020 / Proposed Rules
required to be retained in the sources
Title V air quality permit and
subsequently, the Federally-approved
SIP, or if the new case-by-case RACT
requirements are more stringent and
replace the previous Federally-approved
provisions.
EPA, in this action, is taking action on
19 major sources of NOX and/or VOC in
Pennsylvania, subject to Pennsylvania’s
case-by-case RACT requirements, as
summarized in Table 2.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
TABLE 2—NINETEEN MAJOR NOX AND/OR VOC SOURCES IN PENNSYLVANIA SUBJECT TO CASE-BY-CASE RACT II
UNDER THE 1997 AND 2008 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS
Major Source
(county)
1-Hour ozone
RACT source?
(RACT I)
Major source pollutant
(NOX and/or VOC)
Exelon Generation—Fairless Hills (Bucks) ...................................
The Boeing Co. (Delaware) ..........................................................
Cherokee Pharmaceuticals, LLC (Northumberland) .....................
First Quality Tissue, LLC (Clinton) ................................................
JW Aluminum Company (Lycoming) ............................................
Ward Manufacturing, LLC (Tioga) ................................................
Wood-Mode Inc. (Snyder) .............................................................
Foam Fabricators Inc. (Columbia) ................................................
Resilite Sports Products Inc. (Northumberland) ...........................
NRG Energy Center Paxton, LLC (Dauphin) ................................
Containment Solutions/Mt. Union Plant (Huntingdon) ..................
Armstrong World Ind./Marietta Ceiling Plant (Lancaster) .............
Jeraco Enterprises Inc. (Northumberland) ....................................
Blommer Chocolate Company (Montgomery) ..............................
Texas Eastern—Bernville (Berks) .................................................
Texas Eastern—Shermans Dale (Perry) ......................................
Texas Eastern—Perulack (Juniata) ..............................................
Texas Eastern—Grantville (Dauphin) ...........................................
Texas Eastern—Bechtelsville (Berks) ...........................................
Yes ..........................
Yes ..........................
Yes ..........................
No ............................
No ............................
No ............................
Yes ..........................
No ............................
Yes ..........................
Yes ..........................
Yes ..........................
Yes ..........................
Yes ..........................
No ............................
Yes ..........................
Yes ..........................
Yes ..........................
Yes ..........................
Yes ..........................
NOX ....................................
NOX and VOC ....................
VOC ....................................
VOC ....................................
VOC ....................................
VOC ....................................
VOC ....................................
VOC ....................................
VOC ....................................
NOX ....................................
VOC ....................................
VOC ....................................
VOC ....................................
VOC ....................................
VOC ....................................
NOX ....................................
NOX and VOC ....................
NOX ....................................
NOX ....................................
The case-by-case RACT
determinations submitted by PADEP
consist of an evaluation of all
reasonably available controls at the time
of evaluation for each affected emissions
unit, resulting in a PADEP
determination of what specific control
requirements, if any, satisfy RACT for
that particular unit. The adoption of
new or additional controls or the
revisions to existing controls as RACT
were specified as requirements in new
or revised Federally enforceable permits
(hereafter RACT II permits) issued by
PADEP to the source. The RACT II
permits, which revise or adopt
additional source-specific controls, have
been submitted as part of the
Pennsylvania RACT SIP revisions for
EPA’s approval in the Pennsylvania SIP
under 40 CFR 52.2020(d)(1). The RACT
II permits submitted by PADEP are
listed in the last column of Table 2,
along with the permit effective date, and
are part of the docket for this
rulemaking, which is available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No.
EPA–R03–OAR–2019–0686.10 EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference in
the Pennsylvania SIP, via the RACT II
permits, source-specific RACT
determinations under the 1997 and 2008
10 The RACT II permits are redacted versions of
a facility’s Federally enforceable permits and reflect
the specific RACT requirements being approved
into the Pennsylvania SIP.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Mar 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
8-hour ozone NAAQS for certain major
sources of NOX and VOC emissions.
III. EPA’s Evaluation of SIP Revisions
After thorough review and evaluation
of the information provided by PADEP
in its five SIP revision submittals for 19
major sources of NOX and/or VOC in
Pennsylvania, EPA finds that PADEP’s
case-by-case RACT determinations and
conclusions provided are reasonable
and appropriately considered
technically and economically feasible
controls, while setting lowest achievable
limits. EPA finds that the proposed
source-specific RACT controls for the
sources subject to this rulemaking
action adequately meet the CAA RACT
requirements for the 1997 and 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS for the major
sources of NOX and/or VOC in
Pennsylvania, as they are not covered by
or cannot meet Pennsylvania’s
presumptive RACT regulation.
EPA also finds that all the proposed
revisions to previously SIP approved
RACT requirements, under the 1979
1-hour ozone standard (RACT I), as
discussed in PADEP’s SIP revisions,
will result in equivalent or additional
reductions of NOX and/or VOC
emissions and should not interfere with
any applicable requirement concerning
attainment or reasonable further
progress with the NAAQS or interfere
with other applicable CAA requirement
in section 110(l) of the CAA.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
RACT II permit
(effective date)
09–00066
23–00009
49–00007
18–00030
41–00013
59–00004
55–00005
19–00002
49–00004
22–05005
31–05005
36–05001
49–00014
46–00198
06–05033
50–05001
34–05002
22–05010
06–05034
(01/27/17)
(01/03/17)
(04/24/17)
(09/18/17)
(03/01/17)
(01/10/17)
(07/12/17)
(12/20/17)
(08/25/17)
(03/16/18)
(07/10/18)
(06/28/18)
(01/26/18)
(01/26/17)
(03/16/18)
(03/26/18)
(03/27/18)
(03/16/18)
(04/19/18)
EPA’s complete analysis of PADEP’s
case-by-case RACT SIP revisions is
included in the TSD available in the
docket for this rulemaking action and
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket number
EPA–R03–OAR–2019–0686.
IV. Proposed Action
Based on EPA’s review, EPA is
proposing to approve the Pennsylvania
SIP revisions for the 19 case-by-case
RACT facilities listed in Table 2 and
incorporate by reference in the
Pennsylvania SIP, via the RACT II
permits, source specific RACT
determinations under the 1997 and 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS for certain major
sources of NOX and VOC emissions.
EPA is soliciting public comments on
the issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered
before taking final action. As EPA views
each facility as a separable SIP revision,
should EPA receive comment on one
facility but not others, EPA may take
separate, final action on the remaining
facilities.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
source specific RACT determinations
E:\FR\FM\20MRP1.SGM
20MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 55 / Friday, March 20, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
via the RACT II permits as described in
Sections II and III—Summary of SIP
Revisions and EPA’s Evaluation of SIP
Revisions. EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through https://
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region III Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Mar 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule,
addressing the NOX and VOC RACT
requirements for 19 case-by-case
facilities for the 1997 and 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS, does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because the SIP is not approved
to apply in Indian country located in the
state, and EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: March 5, 2020.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2020–05662 Filed 3–19–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2019–0689; FRL–10006–
14–Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; North
Dakota; Revisions to Permitting Rules
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with section
110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is proposing to approve State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by North Dakota on May 2,
2019. The revisions contain
amendments to the State’s Ambient Air
Quality Standards, Permit to Construct,
and Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) regulations.
DATES: Comments: Written comments
must be received on or before April 20,
2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2019–0689, to the Federal
Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16027
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from
www.regulations.gov. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air and Radiation Division,
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. The EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the individual listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m., excluding federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Leone, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode 8P–
ARD–QP, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado, 80202–1129, (303) 312–6227,
leone.kevin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
I. Background
On May 2, 2019, the State of North
Dakota submitted SIP revisions
containing amendments to N.D. Admin.
Code Chapter 33.1–15 (Air Pollution
Control). The amendments address
changes to the State’s Ambient Air
E:\FR\FM\20MRP1.SGM
20MRP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 55 (Friday, March 20, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16021-16027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-05662]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2019-0686; FRL-10006-62-Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT)
Determinations for Case-By-Case Sources Under the 1997 and 2008 8-Hour
Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve multiple state implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. These revisions were submitted by the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) to
establish and require reasonably available control technology (RACT)
for 26 major sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen
oxides (NOX) pursuant to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's
conditionally approved RACT regulations. In this rulemaking action, EPA
is only proposing to approve source-specific (also referred to as
``case-by-case'') RACT determinations for 19 of the 26 major sources
submitted by PADEP. These RACT evaluations were submitted to meet RACT
requirements for the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS). This action is being taken under the Clean
Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 20, 2020.
[[Page 16022]]
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2019-0686 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
opila.[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Emily Bertram, Permits Branch
(3AD10), Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
The telephone number is (215) 814-5273. Ms. Bertram can also be reached
via electronic mail at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 31, 2019 EPA proposed to approve 21
case-by-case RACT determinations for sources in Pennsylvania (Approval
and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania
Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) Determinations for Case-
by-Case Sources under the 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standards; Part 1; 84 FR 37167 (July 31, 2019)). On August
30, 2019, the last day of the comment period, EPA became aware through
a comment submitted to Regulations.gov that one of the files contained
in the SIP submission--which EPA made public in the docket for that
rulemaking proposing to approve the submission (Docket No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2017-0290-0064)--contained potential CBI. EPA restricted public access
in Regulations.gov to that file containing potential CBI the same day,
prior to the end of the comment period. On September 30, 2019, EPA
became aware through additional comments submitted to Regulations.gov
during the comment period that additional potential CBI was contained
in other files EPA had posted to Docket No. EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0290-0064.
EPA restricted public access in Regulations.gov to the entire docket
that same day. In accordance with EPA's CBI regulations at 40 CFR part
2, subpart B, EPA has contacted each business affected by the inclusion
of potential CBI in the docket files to inform them that potential CBI
was made publicly available on Regulations.gov, and afforded each
business an opportunity to assert a claim of business confidentiality
for any of their information posted by EPA to Docket No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2017-0290-0064.
EPA is now proposing to approve 19 of the 21 Pennsylvania case-by-
case RACT determinations in this new rulemaking.\1\ EPA has established
a docket for this new rulemaking that does not include any materials
claimed as CBI (Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-2019-0686). Commenters must
submit any comments they have on EPA's proposed approval of these 19
case-by-case RACT determinations to this new docket number. Because
this is a new rulemaking, EPA will not consider any comments on its
prior proposal made at Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0290-0064. Any
prior comments will need to be resubmitted to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2019-0686 during the comment period for this proposed rulemaking
for EPA to consider them. The commenters are reminded that their
comments should not include or rely on any information considered to be
CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. If
a comment includes any CBI or other restricted information, EPA will
redact the comment or withhold from the public docket those submissions
(or those portions containing the restricted information) as
appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In this action, EPA is proposing approval of 19 of the 21
sources it proposed approval of on July 31, 2019. EPA will take
action on the remaining two facilities in a different rulemaking
action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On multiple dates, PADEP submitted multiple revisions to its SIP to
address case-by-case NOX and/or VOC RACT for 26 major
facilities. These SIP revisions are intended to address the
NOX and/or VOC RACT requirements under sections 182 and 184
of the CAA for the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Table 1 below
lists each SIP submittal date and the facilities included in its
submittals. Although submitted in multiple packages by PADEP, EPA views
each facility as a separable SIP revision and may take separate final
action on one or more facilities. In this rulemaking action, EPA is
only proposing to approve case-by-case RACT determinations for 19 of
the 26 sources submitted to EPA by PADEP. The remaining seven major
sources are either now exempt from the source-specific RACT
requirements or will be acted on in a future rulemaking action, once
resubmitted to EPA by PADEP.
For additional background information on Pennsylvania's
``presumptive'' RACT II SIP see 84 FR 20274 (May 9, 2019) and on
Pennsylvania's source-specific or ``case-by-case'' RACT determinations
see the appropriate technical support document (TSD) which is available
online at https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No. EPA-R03-OAR-2019-
0686.
Table 1--Padep SIP Submittals for Major NOX and/or VOC Sources in
Pennsylvania Subject to Source-Specific RACT Under the 1997 and 2008 8-
Hour Ozone Standard
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIP submittal date Major source (county)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8/14/2017......................... Exelon Generation--Fairless Hills
(Bucks).
11/21/2017........................ The Boeing Co. (Delaware).
Cherokee Pharmaceuticals, LLC
(Northumberland).
Dominion Transmission--Finnefrock
Station (Clinton). \a\
First Quality Tissue, LLC (Clinton).
JW Aluminum Company (Lycoming).
Transco--Salladasburg Station 520
(Lycoming). \b\
[[Page 16023]]
Ward Manufacturing, LLC (Tioga).
Wood-Mode Inc. (Snyder).
4/26/2018......................... Foam Fabricators Inc. (Columbia).
Novipax (Berks). \c\
Resilite Sports Products Inc.
(Northumberland).
Sunoco Partners Marketing &
Terminals (Delaware). \d\
Texas Eastern--Bernville (Berks).
Truck Accessories Group
(Northumberland). \e\
6/26/2018......................... Texas Eastern--Shermans Dale
(Perry).
Texas Eastern--Perulack (Juniata).
Texas Eastern--Grantville (Dauphin).
NRG Energy Center Paxton, LLC
(Dauphin).
Texas Eastern--Bechtelsville
(Berks).
Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation
(Montgomery). \f\
10/29/2018........................ Containment Solutions/Mt. Union
Plant (Huntingdon).
Armstrong World Ind./Marietta
Ceiling Plant (Lancaster).
Jeraco Enterprises Inc.
(Northumberland).
Global Advanced Metals USA Inc.
(Montgomery). \g\
Blommer Chocolate Company
(Montgomery).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Dominion Transmission--Finnefrock Station was withdrawn from EPA
consideration on August 27, 2018. PADEP determined this source was no
longer subject to source-specific RACT requirements for the 1997 and
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
\b\ Transco--Salladasburg Station 520 will be acted on in a future
rulemaking action.
\c\ Novipax will be acted on in a future rulemaking action.
\d\ --Sunoco Partners Marketing and Terminal will be acted on in a
future rulemaking action.
\e\ Truck Accessories Group was withdrawn from EPA consideration on July
11, 2019. EPA will be taking action on this source in a future
rulemaking action, once resubmitted by PADEP for approval into the PA
SIP.
\f\ Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation was withdrawn from EPA
consideration on July 11, 2019. EPA will be taking action on this
source in a future rulemaking action, once resubmitted by PADEP for
approval into the PA SIP.
\g\ Global Advanced Metals USA Inc. will be acted on in a future
rulemaking action.
I. Background
A. 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
Ground level ozone is not emitted directly into the air but is
created by chemical reaction between NOX and VOC in the
presence of sunlight. Emissions from industrial facilities, electric
utilities, motor vehicle exhaust, gasoline vapors, and chemical
solvents are some of the major sources of NOX and VOC.
Breathing ozone can trigger a variety of health problems, particularly
for children, the elderly, and people of all ages who have lung
diseases such as asthma. Ground level ozone can also have harmful
effects on sensitive vegetation and ecosystems.
On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a standard for ground level ozone
based on 8-hour average concentrations. 62 FR 38856. The 8-hour
averaging period replaced the previous 1-hour averaging period, and the
level of the NAAQS was changed from 0.12 parts per million (ppm) to
0.08 ppm. EPA has designated two moderate nonattainment areas in
Pennsylvania under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, namely Philadelphia-
Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE (the Philadelphia Area) and
Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley (the Pittsburgh Area). See 40 CFR 81.339.
On March 12, 2008, EPA strengthened the 8-hour ozone standards, by
revising its level to 0.075 ppm averaged over an 8-hour period (2008 8-
hour ozone NAAQS). On May 21, 2012, EPA designated five marginal
nonattainment areas in Pennsylvania for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS:
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, Lancaster, Reading, the Philadelphia Area,
and the Pittsburgh Area. 77 FR 30088; see also 40 CFR 81.339.
On March 6, 2015, EPA announced its revocation of the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS for all purposes and for all areas in the country,
effective on April 6, 2015. 80 FR 12264. EPA has determined that
certain nonattainment planning requirements continue to be in effect
under the revoked standard for nonattainment areas under the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS, including RACT.
B. RACT Requirements for Ozone
The CAA regulates emissions of NOX and VOC to prevent
photochemical reactions that result in ozone formation. RACT is an
important strategy for reducing NOX and VOC emissions from
major stationary sources within areas not meeting the ozone NAAQS.
Areas designated nonattainment for the ozone NAAQS are subject to
the general nonattainment planning requirements of CAA section 172.
Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides that SIPs for nonattainment areas
must include reasonably available control measures (RACM) for
demonstrating attainment of all NAAQS, including emissions reductions
from existing sources through the adoption of RACT. Further, section
182(b)(2) of the CAA sets forth additional RACT requirements for ozone
nonattainment areas classified as moderate or higher.
Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA sets forth requirements regarding RACT
for the ozone NAAQS for VOC sources. Section 182(f) subjects major
stationary sources of NOX to the same RACT requirements
applicable to major stationary sources of VOC.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A ``major source'' is defined based on the source's
potential to emit (PTE) of NOX or VOC, and the applicable
thresholds for RACT differs based on the classification of the
nonattainment area in which the source is located. See sections
182(c)-(f) and 302 of the CAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 184(b)(1)(B) of the CAA applies the RACT requirements in
section 182(b)(2) to nonattainment areas classified as marginal and to
attainment areas located within ozone transport regions established
pursuant to section 184 of the CAA. Section 184(a) of the CAA
established by law the current Ozone Transport Region (OTR) comprised
of 12 eastern states, including Pennsylvania. This
[[Page 16024]]
requirement is referred to as OTR RACT. As noted previously, a ``major
source'' is defined based on the source's PTE of NOX, VOC,
or both pollutants, and the applicable thresholds differ based on the
classification of the nonattainment area in which the source is
located. See sections 182(c)-(f) and 302 of the CAA.
Since the 1970's, EPA has consistently defined ``RACT'' as the
lowest emission limit that a particular source is capable of meeting by
the application of the control technology that is reasonably available
considering technological and economic feasibility.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See December 9, 1976 memorandum from Roger Strelow,
Assistant Administrator for Air and Waste Management, to Regional
Administrators, ``Guidance for Determining Acceptability of SIP
Regulations in Non-Attainment Areas,'' and also 44 FR 53762
(September 17, 1979).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA has provided more substantive RACT requirements through
implementation rules for each ozone NAAQS as well as through guidance.
In 2004 and 2005, EPA promulgated an implementation rule for the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS in two phases (``Phase 1 of the 1997 Ozone
Implementation Rule'' and ``Phase 2 of the 1997 Ozone Implementation
Rule''). 69 FR 23951 (April 30, 2004) and 70 FR 71612 (November 29,
2005), respectively. Particularly, the Phase 2 Ozone Implementation
Rule addressed RACT statutory requirements under the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. See 70 FR 71652.
On March 6, 2015, EPA issued its final rule for implementing the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS (``the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule''). 80
FR 12264. At the same time, EPA revoked the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS,
effective on April 6, 2015.\4\ The 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule
provided comprehensive requirements to transition from the revoked 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS to the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, as codified in 40
CFR part 51, subpart AA, following revocation. Consistent with previous
policy, EPA determined that areas designated nonattainment for both the
1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS at the time of revocation, must retain
implementation of certain nonattainment area requirements (i.e., anti-
backsliding requirements) for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS as specified
under section 182 of the CAA, including RACT. See 40 CFR 51.1100(o). An
area remains subject to the anti-backsliding requirements for a revoked
NAAQS until EPA approves a redesignation to attainment for the area for
the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. There are no effects on applicable
requirements for areas within the OTR, as a result of the revocation of
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Thus, Pennsylvania, as a state within the
OTR, remains subject to RACT requirements for both the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS and the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ On February 16, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Cir. Court) issued an opinion
on the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule. South Coast Air Quality
Mgmt. Dist. v. EPA, No. 15-1115 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 16, 2018). The D.C.
Cir. Court found certain parts reasonable and denied the petition
for appeal on those. In particular, the D.C. Cir. Court upheld the
use of NOX averaging to meet RACT requirements for 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS. However, the Court also found certain other
provisions unreasonable. The D.C. Cir. Court vacated the provisions
it found unreasonable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addressing RACT, the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule is
consistent with existing policy and Phase 2 of the 1997 Ozone
Implementation Rule. In the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule, EPA
requires RACT measures to be implemented by January 1, 2017 for areas
classified as moderate nonattainment or above and all areas of the OTR.
EPA also provided in the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule that RACT
SIPs must contain adopted RACT regulations, certifications where
appropriate that existing provisions are RACT, and/or negative
declarations stating that there are no sources in the nonattainment
area covered by a specific control technique guidelines (CTG) source
category. In the preamble to the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule, EPA
clarified that states must provide notice and opportunity for public
comment on their RACT SIP submissions, even when submitting a
certification that the existing provisions remain RACT or a negative
declaration. States must submit appropriate supporting information for
their RACT submissions, in accordance with the Phase 2 of the 1997
Ozone Implementation Rule. Adequate documentation must support that
states have considered control technology that is economically and
technologically feasible in determining RACT, based on information that
is current as of the time of development of the RACT SIP.
In addition, in the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule, EPA clarified
that states can use weighted average NOX emissions rates
from sources in the nonattainment area for meeting the major
NOX RACT requirement under the CAA, as consistent with
existing policy.\5\ EPA also recognized that states may conclude in
some cases that sources already addressed by RACT determinations for
the 1979 1-hour and/or 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS may not need to
implement additional controls to meet the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS RACT
requirement. See 80 FR 12278-12279.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ [thinsp]EPA's NOX RACT guidance ``Nitrogen Oxides
Supplement to the General Preamble'' (57 FR 55625; November 25,
1992) encouraged states to develop RACT programs that are based on
``area wide average emission rates.'' Additional guidance on area-
wide RACT provisions is provided by EPA's January 2001 economic
incentive program guidance titled ``Improving Air Quality with
Economic Incentive Programs,'' available at https://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t1/memoranda/eipfin.pdf. In addition, as mentioned previously,
the D.C. Cir. Court recently upheld the use of NOX
averaging to meet RACT requirements for 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. v. EPA, No. 15-1115 (D.C. Cir.
Feb. 16, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Applicability of RACT Requirements in Pennsylvania
As indicated earlier, RACT requirements apply to any ozone
nonattainment areas classified as moderate or higher (serious, severe
or extreme) under CAA sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f). Pennsylvania has
outstanding ozone RACT requirements for both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS. The entire Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is part of the OTR
established under section 184 of the CAA and thus is subject statewide
to the RACT requirements of CAA sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f), pursuant
to section 184(b).
At the time of revocation of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS (effective
April 6, 2015), only two moderate nonattainment areas remained in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for this standard, the Philadelphia and
the Pittsburgh Areas. As required under EPA's anti-backsliding
provisions, these two moderate nonattainment areas continue to be
subject to RACT under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Given its location
in the OTR, the remainder of the Commonwealth is also treated as
moderate nonattainment area under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for any
planning requirements under the revoked standard, including RACT. The
OTR RACT requirement is also in effect under the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS throughout the Commonwealth, since EPA did not designate any
nonattainment areas above marginal for this standard in Pennsylvania.
Thus, in practice, the same RACT requirements continue to be applicable
in Pennsylvania for both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. RACT
must be evaluated and satisfied as separate requirements under each
applicable standard.
RACT applies to major sources of NOX and VOC under each
ozone NAAQS or any VOC sources subject to CTG RACT. Which
NOX and VOC sources in Pennsylvania are considered ``major''
and are therefore subject to
[[Page 16025]]
RACT is dependent on the location of each source within the
Commonwealth. Sources located in nonattainment areas would be subject
to the ``major source'' definitions established under the CAA. In the
case of Pennsylvania, sources located in any areas outside of moderate
or above nonattainment areas, as part of the OTR, shall be treated as
if these areas were moderate.
In Pennsylvania, the SIP program is implemented primarily by the
PADEP, but also by local air agencies in Philadelphia County (the City
of Philadelphia's Air Management Services [AMS]) and Allegheny County,
(the Allegheny County Health Department [ACHD]). These agencies have
implemented numerous RACT regulations and source-specific measures in
Pennsylvania to meet the applicable ozone RACT requirements.
Historically, statewide RACT controls have been promulgated by PADEP in
Pennsylvania Code Title 25-- Environmental Resources, part I--
Department of Environmental Protection, Subpart C--Protection of
Natural Resources, Article III--Air Resources, (25 Pa. Code) Chapter
129. AMS and ACHD have incorporated by reference Pennsylvania
regulations, but have also promulgated regulations adopting RACT
controls for their own jurisdictions. In addition, AMS and ACHD have
submitted separate source-specific RACT determinations as SIP revisions
for sources within their respective jurisdictions, which have been
approved by EPA. See 40 CFR 52.2020(d)(1).
States were required to make RACT SIP submissions for the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS by September 15, 2006. PADEP submitted a SIP revision
on September 25, 2006, certifying that a number of previously approved
VOC RACT rules continued to satisfy RACT under the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS for the remainder of Pennsylvania.\6\ PADEP has met its
obligations under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for its CTG and non-CTG
VOC sources. See 82 FR 31464 (July 7, 2017). RACT control measures
addressing all applicable CAA RACT requirements under the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS have been implemented and fully approved in the
jurisdictions of ACHD and AMS. See 78 FR 34584 (June 10, 2013) and 81
FR 69687 (October 7, 2016). For the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, states
were required to submit RACT SIP revisions by July 20, 2014. On May 16,
2016, PADEP submitted a SIP revision addressing RACT under both the
1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS in Pennsylvania. Specifically, the May
16, 2016 SIP submittal intended to satisfy sections 182(b)(2)(C),
182(f), and 184 of the CAA for both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS for Pennsylvania's major NOX and VOC non-CTG sources,
except ethylene production plants, surface active agents manufacturing,
and mobile equipment repair and refinishing.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The September 15, 2006 SIP submittal initially included
Pennsylvania's certification of NOX RACT regulations;
however, NOX RACT portions were withdrawn by PADEP on
June 27, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. EPA's Conditional Approval for Pennsylvania's RACT Requirements
Under the 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
On May 16, 2016, PADEP submitted a SIP revision addressing RACT
under both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS in Pennsylvania.
PADEP's May 16, 2016 SIP revision intended to address certain
outstanding non-CTG VOC RACT, VOC CTG RACT, and major NOX
RACT requirements under the CAA for both standards. The SIP revision
requested approval of Pennsylvania's 25 Pa. Code 129.96-100, Additional
RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NOX and VOCs (the
``presumptive'' RACT II rule). Prior to the adoption of the RACT II
rule, Pennsylvania relied on the NOX and VOC control
measures in 25 Pa. Code 129.92-95, Stationary Sources of NOX
and VOCs, (the RACT I rule) to meet RACT for non-CTG major VOC sources
and major NOX sources. The requirements of the RACT I rule
remain in effect and continue to be implemented as RACT.\8\ On
September 26, 2017, PADEP submitted a supplemental SIP revision which
committed to address various deficiencies identified by EPA in their
May 16, 2016 ``presumptive'' RACT II rule SIP revision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ These requirements were initially approved as RACT for
Pennsylvania under the 1979 1-hour ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 9, 2019, EPA conditionally approved the RACT II rule based
on PADEP's September 26, 2017 commitment letter. See 84 FR 20274. In
EPA's final conditional approval, EPA noted that PADEP would be
required to submit, for EPA's approval, SIP revisions to address any
facility-wide or system-wide averaging plan approved under 25 Pa. Code
129.98 and any case-by-case RACT determinations under 25 Pa. Code
129.99. PADEP committed to submitting these additional SIP revisions
within 12 months of EPA's final conditional approval, specifically May
9, 2020.
Therefore, as authorized in CAA section 110(k)(3) and (k)(4),
Pennsylvania shall submit the following as case-by-case SIP revisions,
by May 9, 2020, for EPA's approval as a condition of approval of 25 Pa.
Code 128 and 129 in the May 16, 2016 SIP revision: (1) All facility-
wide or system-wide averaging plans approved by PADEP under 25 Pa. Code
129.98 including, but not limited to, any terms and conditions that
ensure the enforceability of the averaging plan as a practical matter
(i.e., any monitoring, reporting, recordkeeping, or testing
requirements); and (2) all source-specific RACT determinations approved
by PADEP under 25 Pa. Code 129.99, including any alternative compliance
schedules approved under 25 Pa. Code 129.97(k) and 129.99(i); the case-
by-case RACT determinations submitted to EPA for approval into the SIP
should include any terms and conditions that ensure the enforceability
of the case-by-case or source-specific RACT emission limitation as a
practical matter (i.e., any monitoring, reporting, recordkeeping, or
testing requirements). See May 9, 2019 (84 FR 20274).
II. Summary of SIP Revisions
In order to satisfy a requirement from EPA's May 9, 2019
conditional approval, PADEP has submitted to EPA, SIP revisions
addressing case-by-case RACT requirements for major sources in
Pennsylvania subject to 25 Pa. Code 129.99. As noted in Table 1, on
multiple dates PADEP submitted to EPA, five separate SIP revisions
pertaining to Pennsylvania's case-by-case NOX and/or VOC
RACT determinations for 26 major sources located in the Commonwealth.
PADEP provided documentation in its SIP revisions to support its case-
by-case RACT determinations for affected emission units at each major
source subject to 25 Pa. Code 129.99. Specifically, in these SIP
submittals, PADEP evaluated a total of 26 major NOX and/or
VOC sources in Pennsylvania for case-by-case RACT.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ As noted previously, EPA, in this action, is proposing
approval for 19 of the 26 case-by-case RACT determinations submitted
by PADEP in the applicable five SIP revisions. See Table 1 for
information specific to each SIP revision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Pennsylvania RACT SIP revisions, PADEP included a case-by-
case RACT determination for the existing emissions units at each of
these major sources of NOX and/or VOC that required a source
specific RACT determination. In PADEP's RACT determinations an
evaluation was completed to determine if previously SIP-approved, case-
by-case RACT requirements (herein referred to as RACT I) were more
stringent and
[[Page 16026]]
required to be retained in the sources Title V air quality permit and
subsequently, the Federally-approved SIP, or if the new case-by-case
RACT requirements are more stringent and replace the previous
Federally-approved provisions.
EPA, in this action, is taking action on 19 major sources of
NOX and/or VOC in Pennsylvania, subject to Pennsylvania's
case-by-case RACT requirements, as summarized in Table 2.
Table 2--Nineteen Major NOX and/or VOC Sources in Pennsylvania Subject to Case-By-Case RACT II Under the 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RACT II permit
Major Source (county) 1-Hour ozone RACT source? (RACT I) Major source pollutant (NOX and/or VOC) (effective date)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exelon Generation--Fairless Hills (Bucks) Yes.................................. NOX.......................................... 09-00066 (01/27/17)
The Boeing Co. (Delaware)................ Yes.................................. NOX and VOC.................................. 23-00009 (01/03/17)
Cherokee Pharmaceuticals, LLC Yes.................................. VOC.......................................... 49-00007 (04/24/17)
(Northumberland).
First Quality Tissue, LLC (Clinton)...... No................................... VOC.......................................... 18-00030 (09/18/17)
JW Aluminum Company (Lycoming)........... No................................... VOC.......................................... 41-00013 (03/01/17)
Ward Manufacturing, LLC (Tioga).......... No................................... VOC.......................................... 59-00004 (01/10/17)
Wood-Mode Inc. (Snyder).................. Yes.................................. VOC.......................................... 55-00005 (07/12/17)
Foam Fabricators Inc. (Columbia)......... No................................... VOC.......................................... 19-00002 (12/20/17)
Resilite Sports Products Inc. Yes.................................. VOC.......................................... 49-00004 (08/25/17)
(Northumberland).
NRG Energy Center Paxton, LLC (Dauphin).. Yes.................................. NOX.......................................... 22-05005 (03/16/18)
Containment Solutions/Mt. Union Plant Yes.................................. VOC.......................................... 31-05005 (07/10/18)
(Huntingdon).
Armstrong World Ind./Marietta Ceiling Yes.................................. VOC.......................................... 36-05001 (06/28/18)
Plant (Lancaster).
Jeraco Enterprises Inc. (Northumberland). Yes.................................. VOC.......................................... 49-00014 (01/26/18)
Blommer Chocolate Company (Montgomery)... No................................... VOC.......................................... 46-00198 (01/26/17)
Texas Eastern--Bernville (Berks)......... Yes.................................. VOC.......................................... 06-05033 (03/16/18)
Texas Eastern--Shermans Dale (Perry)..... Yes.................................. NOX.......................................... 50-05001 (03/26/18)
Texas Eastern--Perulack (Juniata)........ Yes.................................. NOX and VOC.................................. 34-05002 (03/27/18)
Texas Eastern--Grantville (Dauphin)...... Yes.................................. NOX.......................................... 22-05010 (03/16/18)
Texas Eastern--Bechtelsville (Berks)..... Yes.................................. NOX.......................................... 06-05034 (04/19/18)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The case-by-case RACT determinations submitted by PADEP consist of
an evaluation of all reasonably available controls at the time of
evaluation for each affected emissions unit, resulting in a PADEP
determination of what specific control requirements, if any, satisfy
RACT for that particular unit. The adoption of new or additional
controls or the revisions to existing controls as RACT were specified
as requirements in new or revised Federally enforceable permits
(hereafter RACT II permits) issued by PADEP to the source. The RACT II
permits, which revise or adopt additional source-specific controls,
have been submitted as part of the Pennsylvania RACT SIP revisions for
EPA's approval in the Pennsylvania SIP under 40 CFR 52.2020(d)(1). The
RACT II permits submitted by PADEP are listed in the last column of
Table 2, along with the permit effective date, and are part of the
docket for this rulemaking, which is available online at https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No. EPA-R03-OAR-2019-0686.\10\ EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference in the Pennsylvania SIP, via the
RACT II permits, source-specific RACT determinations under the 1997 and
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for certain major sources of NOX and
VOC emissions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The RACT II permits are redacted versions of a facility's
Federally enforceable permits and reflect the specific RACT
requirements being approved into the Pennsylvania SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. EPA's Evaluation of SIP Revisions
After thorough review and evaluation of the information provided by
PADEP in its five SIP revision submittals for 19 major sources of
NOX and/or VOC in Pennsylvania, EPA finds that PADEP's case-
by-case RACT determinations and conclusions provided are reasonable and
appropriately considered technically and economically feasible
controls, while setting lowest achievable limits. EPA finds that the
proposed source-specific RACT controls for the sources subject to this
rulemaking action adequately meet the CAA RACT requirements for the
1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the major sources of
NOX and/or VOC in Pennsylvania, as they are not covered by
or cannot meet Pennsylvania's presumptive RACT regulation.
EPA also finds that all the proposed revisions to previously SIP
approved RACT requirements, under the 1979 1-hour ozone standard (RACT
I), as discussed in PADEP's SIP revisions, will result in equivalent or
additional reductions of NOX and/or VOC emissions and should
not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment or
reasonable further progress with the NAAQS or interfere with other
applicable CAA requirement in section 110(l) of the CAA.
EPA's complete analysis of PADEP's case-by-case RACT SIP revisions
is included in the TSD available in the docket for this rulemaking
action and available online at https://www.regulations.gov, Docket
number EPA-R03-OAR-2019-0686.
IV. Proposed Action
Based on EPA's review, EPA is proposing to approve the Pennsylvania
SIP revisions for the 19 case-by-case RACT facilities listed in Table 2
and incorporate by reference in the Pennsylvania SIP, via the RACT II
permits, source specific RACT determinations under the 1997 and 2008 8-
hour ozone NAAQS for certain major sources of NOX and VOC
emissions. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in
this document. These comments will be considered before taking final
action. As EPA views each facility as a separable SIP revision, should
EPA receive comment on one facility but not others, EPA may take
separate, final action on the remaining facilities.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference source specific RACT determinations
[[Page 16027]]
via the RACT II permits as described in Sections II and III--Summary of
SIP Revisions and EPA's Evaluation of SIP Revisions. EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these materials generally available through
https://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region III Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule, addressing the NOX and
VOC RACT requirements for 19 case-by-case facilities for the 1997 and
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 5, 2020.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2020-05662 Filed 3-19-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
