Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of Homeland Security/ALL-043 Enterprise Biometric Administrative Records (EBAR) System of Records, 14805-14807 [2020-04985]
Download as PDF
14805
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 85, No. 51
Monday, March 16, 2020
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS–2019–0046]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of
Exemptions; Department of Homeland
Security/ALL–043 Enterprise Biometric
Administrative Records (EBAR)
System of Records
Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Department of Homeland
Security is giving concurrent notice of a
newly established system of records
pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 for
the ‘‘Department of Homeland Security/
ALL–043 Enterprise Biometric
Administrative Records (EBAR) System
of Records’’ and this proposed
rulemaking. In this proposed
rulemaking, the Department proposes to
exempt portions of the system of records
from one or more provisions of the
Privacy Act because of criminal, civil,
and administrative enforcement
requirements.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before April 15, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number DHS–
2019–043 by one of the following
methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–343–4010.
• Mail: Jonathan R. Cantor, Acting
Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office,
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528–0655.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Mar 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions please contact: Jonathan R.
Cantor, (202–343–1717), Acting Chief
Privacy Officer, Privacy Office,
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528–0655.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with the Privacy Act of
1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) proposes to
establish a new DHS system of records
titled ‘‘DHS/ALL–043 Enterprise
Biometric Administrative Records
(EBAR) System of Records (SOR).’’
This system of records allows the
DHS to collect and maintain
administrative and technical records
associated with the enterprise biometric
system known as the Automated
Biometric Identification System (IDENT)
and its successor information
technology system, currently in
development, called the Homeland
Advanced Recognition Technology
(HART).
The information is collected by, on
behalf of, in support of, or in
cooperation with DHS and its
components that may contain
personally identifiable information
collected by Federal, state, local, tribal,
foreign, or international agencies,
consistent with any applicable laws,
rules, regulations, and information
sharing and access agreements or
arrangements.
Component system SORNs and the
DHS/ALL–041 Enterprise Biometric
Records (EBR) SORN cover the
biometric data itself, but OBIM’s
biometric repository generates technical
and administrative information
necessary to carry out functions that are
not explicitly outlined in component
source-system SORNs. For example, to
more accurately identify individuals
and ensure that all encounters are
appropriately linked, IDENT and its
successor information technology (IT)
system, HART, will generate, store, and
retrieve data by unique numbers or
sequence of numbers and characters.
These unique numbers or sequence of
numbers and characters, also known as
enumerators, link individuals with their
encounters, biometrics, records, and
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
other data elements. The EBAR SOR
will be used for OBIM analysis and
reporting functions in support of
international data sharing efforts,
redress functions, and the reporting and
analysis functions of OBIM.
Consistent with DHS’s mission,
information covered by DHS/ALL–043
EBAR may be shared with DHS
Components that have a need to know
the information to carry out their
national security, law enforcement,
immigration, intelligence, or other
homeland security functions. In
addition, DHS may share information
with appropriate Federal, state, local,
tribal, territorial, foreign, or
international government agencies
consistent with the routine uses set
forth in the EBAR system of records
notice.
Additionally, DHS is issuing this
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
exempt this system of records from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act.
The system of records notice is
published elsewhere in this Federal
Register. This newly established system
will be included in DHS’s inventory of
record systems.
II. Privacy Act
The Privacy Act embodies fair
information practice principles in a
statutory framework governing the
means by which Federal Government
agencies collect, maintain, use, and
disseminate individuals’ records. The
Privacy Act applies to information that
is maintained in a ‘‘system of records.’’
A ‘‘system of records’’ is a group of any
records under the control of an agency
from which information is retrieved by
the name of the individual or by some
identifying number, symbol, or other
identifying particular assigned to the
individual. In the Privacy Act, an
individual is defined to encompass U.S.
citizens and lawful permanent
residents. Additionally, the Judicial
Redress Act (JRA) provides a statutory
right to covered persons to make
requests for access and amendment to
covered records, as defined by the JRA,
along with judicial review for denials of
such requests. In addition, the JRA
prohibits disclosures of covered records,
except as otherwise permitted by the
Privacy Act.
The Privacy Act allows government
agencies to exempt certain records from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act. If
an agency claims an exemption,
E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM
16MRP1
14806
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 51 / Monday, March 16, 2020 / Proposed Rules
however, it must issue a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking to make clear to
the public the reasons why a particular
exemption is claimed.
DHS is claiming exemptions from
certain requirements of the Privacy Act
for DHS/ALL–043 Enterprise Biometric
Administrative Records System of
Records. Some information in this
system of records relates to official DHS
national security, law enforcement, and
intelligence activities. These
exemptions are needed to protect
information relating to DHS activities
from disclosure to subjects or others
related to these activities. Specifically,
the exemptions are required to: Preclude
subjects of these activities from
frustrating these processes; avoid
disclosure of insider threat techniques;
protect the identities and physical safety
of confidential informants and law
enforcement personnel; ensure DHS’s
ability to obtain information from third
parties and other sources; protect the
privacy of third parties; and safeguard
classified information. Disclosure of
information to the subject of the inquiry
could also permit the subject to avoid
detection or apprehension.
In appropriate circumstances, when
compliance would not appear to
interfere with or adversely affect the law
enforcement purposes of this system
and the overall law enforcement
process, the applicable exemptions may
be waived on a case by case basis.
A notice of system of records DHS/
ALL–043 Enterprise Biometric
Administrative Records System of
Records is also published in this issue
of the Federal Register.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information; Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DHS proposes to amend
chapter I of title 6, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for Part 5
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Pub. L.
107–296, 116 Stat. 2135; 5 U.S.C. 301.
2. Add at the end of Appendix C to
Part 5, the following new paragraph 84:
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
■
Appendix C to Part 5—DHS Systems of
Records Exempt From the Privacy Act
*
*
*
*
*
84. The DHS/ALL–043 Enterprise
Biometric Administrative Records
(EBAR) System of Records consists of
electronic and paper records and will be
used by DHS and its components. The
DHS/ALL–043 EBAR System of Records
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Mar 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
covers information held by DHS in
connection with various missions and
functions, including, but not limited to
the enforcement of civil and criminal
laws; investigations, inquiries, and
proceedings there under; and national
security and intelligence activities. The
system of records covers information
that is collected by, on behalf of, in
support of, or in cooperation with DHS
and its components and may contain
personally identifiable information
collected by other federal, state, local,
tribal, foreign, or international
government agencies.
The Secretary of Homeland Security,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), has
exempted this system from the
following provisions of the Privacy Act:
5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (c)(4); (d); (e)(1),
(e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I),
(e)(5), (e)(8); (f); and (g). Additionally,
the Secretary of Homeland Security,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)((1), (k)(2),
and (k)(5), has exempted this system
from the following provisions of the
Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d);
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I); and
(f).
Where a record received from another
system has been exempted in that
source system under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2),
5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), (k)(2), and (k)(5),
DHS will claim the same exemptions for
those records that are claimed for the
original primary systems of records from
which they originated and claims any
additional exemptions set forth here.
Exemptions from these particular
subsections are justified on a case-bycase basis and determined at the time a
request is made, for the following
reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4)
(Accounting for Disclosures) because
release of the accounting of disclosures
could alert the subject of an
investigation of an actual or potential
criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to
the existence of that investigation and
reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS and the recipient agency.
Disclosure of the accounting would
therefore present a serious impediment
to law enforcement efforts and efforts to
preserve national security. Disclosure of
the accounting would also permit the
subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses
or evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension, which would undermine
the entire investigative process. When
an investigation has been completed,
information on disclosures made may
continue to be exempted if the fact that
an investigation occurred remains
sensitive after completion.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access and
Amendment to Records) because
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
providing access or permitting
amendment to the records contained in
this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual
or potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of that
investigation and reveal investigative
interest on the part of DHS or another
agency. Access to the records could
permit the subject of a record to impede
the investigation, to tamper with
witnesses or evidence, and to avoid
detection or apprehension. Amendment
of the records could interfere with
ongoing investigations and law
enforcement activities and would
impose an unreasonable administrative
burden by requiring investigations to be
continually reinvestigated. In addition,
permitting access and amendment to
such information could disclose
security-sensitive information that
could be detrimental to homeland
security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy
and Necessity of Information) because
in the course of investigations into
potential violations of federal law, the
accuracy of information obtained or
introduced occasionally may be unclear,
or the information may not be strictly
relevant or necessary to a specific
investigation. In the interests of effective
law enforcement, it is appropriate to
retain all information that may aid in
establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection
of Information from Individuals)
because requiring that information be
collected from the subject of an
investigation would alert the subject to
the nature or existence of the
investigation, thereby interfering with
that investigation and related law
enforcement activities.
(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to
Subjects) because providing such
detailed information could impede law
enforcement by compromising the
existence of a confidential investigation
or reveal the identity of witnesses or
confidential informants.
(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G),
(e)(4)(H), and (e)(4)(I) (Agency
Requirements) and (f) (Agency Rules),
because portions of this system are
exempt from the individual access
provisions of subsection (d) for the
reasons noted above, and therefore DHS
is not required to establish
requirements, rules, or procedures with
respect to such access. Providing notice
to individuals with respect to existence
of records pertaining to them in the
system of records or otherwise setting
up procedures pursuant to which
individuals may access and view
records pertaining to themselves in the
E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM
16MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 51 / Monday, March 16, 2020 / Proposed Rules
system would undermine investigative
efforts and reveal the identities of
witnesses, and potential witnesses, and
confidential informants.
(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection
of Information) because with the
collection of information for law
enforcement purposes, it is impossible
to determine in advance what
information is accurate, relevant, timely,
and complete. Compliance with
subsection (e)(5) would preclude DHS
agents from using their investigative
training and exercise of good judgment
to both conduct and report on
investigations.
(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on
Individuals) because compliance would
interfere with DHS’s ability to obtain,
serve, and issue subpoenas, warrants,
and other law enforcement mechanisms
that may be filed under seal and could
result in disclosure of investigative
techniques, procedures, and evidence.
(i) From subsection (g) (Civil
Remedies) to the extent that the system
is exempt from other specific
subsections of the Privacy Act.
Jonathan R. Cantor,
Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2020–04985 Filed 3–13–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9B–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0258; Product
Identifier 2018–SW–002–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Leonardo
S.p.A. Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Leonardo S.p.A. Model AW169
helicopters. This proposed AD would
require modifying the weight on wheels
(WoW) support installation on the main
landing gear (MLG). This proposed AD
is prompted by a report that an
inappropriately tightened WoW support
could result in a rotation of the support
and improper WoW switch
performance. The actions of this
proposed AD are intended to correct an
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by May 15, 2020.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Mar 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
ADDRESSES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0258; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this proposed
AD, the European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (previously European
Aviation Safety Agency) (EASA) AD,
any comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in
this proposed rule, contact Leonardo
S.p.A. Helicopters, Emanuele Bufano,
Head of Airworthiness, Viale G.Agusta
520, 21017 C. Costa di Samarate (Va)
Italy; telephone +39–0331–225074; fax
+39–0331–229046; or at https://
www.leonardocompany.com/en/home.
You may view the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt
Fuller, Senior Aviation Safety Engineer,
Safety Management Section, Rotorcraft
Standards Branch, FAA, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177;
telephone 817–222–5110; email
matthew.fuller@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
14807
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should send only one copy
of written comments, or if comments are
filed electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
The FAA will file in the docket all
comments received, as well as a report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning
this proposed rulemaking. Before acting
on this proposal, the FAA will consider
all comments received on or before the
closing date for comments. The FAA
will consider comments filed after the
comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. The FAA may change
this proposal in light of the comments
received.
Discussion
EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD No. 2017–
0255, dated December 22, 2017, to
correct an unsafe condition for
Leonardo S.p.A Helicopters (formerly
Finmeccanica Helicopter Division,
AgustaWestland) Model AW169
helicopters, with left-hand (LH) MLG
assembly part number (P/N)
6F3210V00132 or P/N 6F3210V00133
and serial number (S/N) MN01 to MN84
inclusive, and/or a right-hand (RH) MLG
assembly P/N 6F3210V00232 or P/N
6F3210V00233 with S/N MN01 to
MN81 inclusive installed, except those
with an MLG modified per Magnaghi
Aeronautica S.p.A. Service Bulletin SB–
07–2017–AW169.
EASA advises that an in-service event
revealed that an inappropriately
tightened WoW support could result in
a rotation of this support and improper
WoW switch performance. EASA
advises this condition, if not corrected,
could result in degraded attitude
stabilization, possibly resulting in
reduced control of the helicopter.
Accordingly, the EASA AD requires
modification of the WoW support
installation by introducing structural
glue between the WoW support and the
main fitting of the MLG.
Comments Invited
FAA’s Determination
The FAA invites you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. The FAA also
invites comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that might result
from adopting the proposals in this
document. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any
These helicopters have been approved
by EASA and are approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to the
FAA’s bilateral agreement with the
European Union, EASA has notified the
FAA about the unsafe condition
described in its AD. The FAA is
proposing this AD after evaluating all
known relevant information and
determining that an unsafe condition is
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM
16MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 51 (Monday, March 16, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14805-14807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-04985]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 51 / Monday, March 16, 2020 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 14805]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS-2019-0046]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of
Homeland Security/ALL-043 Enterprise Biometric Administrative Records
(EBAR) System of Records
AGENCY: Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security is giving concurrent
notice of a newly established system of records pursuant to the Privacy
Act of 1974 for the ``Department of Homeland Security/ALL-043
Enterprise Biometric Administrative Records (EBAR) System of Records''
and this proposed rulemaking. In this proposed rulemaking, the
Department proposes to exempt portions of the system of records from
one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil,
and administrative enforcement requirements.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 15, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number DHS-
2019-043 by one of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-343-4010.
Mail: Jonathan R. Cantor, Acting Chief Privacy Officer,
Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528-
0655.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this notice. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions please contact: Jonathan
R. Cantor, (202-343-1717), Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy
Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528-0655.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposes to establish a new DHS
system of records titled ``DHS/ALL-043 Enterprise Biometric
Administrative Records (EBAR) System of Records (SOR).''
This system of records allows the DHS to collect and maintain
administrative and technical records associated with the enterprise
biometric system known as the Automated Biometric Identification System
(IDENT) and its successor information technology system, currently in
development, called the Homeland Advanced Recognition Technology
(HART).
The information is collected by, on behalf of, in support of, or in
cooperation with DHS and its components that may contain personally
identifiable information collected by Federal, state, local, tribal,
foreign, or international agencies, consistent with any applicable
laws, rules, regulations, and information sharing and access agreements
or arrangements.
Component system SORNs and the DHS/ALL-041 Enterprise Biometric
Records (EBR) SORN cover the biometric data itself, but OBIM's
biometric repository generates technical and administrative information
necessary to carry out functions that are not explicitly outlined in
component source-system SORNs. For example, to more accurately identify
individuals and ensure that all encounters are appropriately linked,
IDENT and its successor information technology (IT) system, HART, will
generate, store, and retrieve data by unique numbers or sequence of
numbers and characters. These unique numbers or sequence of numbers and
characters, also known as enumerators, link individuals with their
encounters, biometrics, records, and other data elements. The EBAR SOR
will be used for OBIM analysis and reporting functions in support of
international data sharing efforts, redress functions, and the
reporting and analysis functions of OBIM.
Consistent with DHS's mission, information covered by DHS/ALL-043
EBAR may be shared with DHS Components that have a need to know the
information to carry out their national security, law enforcement,
immigration, intelligence, or other homeland security functions. In
addition, DHS may share information with appropriate Federal, state,
local, tribal, territorial, foreign, or international government
agencies consistent with the routine uses set forth in the EBAR system
of records notice.
Additionally, DHS is issuing this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
exempt this system of records from certain provisions of the Privacy
Act. The system of records notice is published elsewhere in this
Federal Register. This newly established system will be included in
DHS's inventory of record systems.
II. Privacy Act
The Privacy Act embodies fair information practice principles in a
statutory framework governing the means by which Federal Government
agencies collect, maintain, use, and disseminate individuals' records.
The Privacy Act applies to information that is maintained in a ``system
of records.'' A ``system of records'' is a group of any records under
the control of an agency from which information is retrieved by the
name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other
identifying particular assigned to the individual. In the Privacy Act,
an individual is defined to encompass U.S. citizens and lawful
permanent residents. Additionally, the Judicial Redress Act (JRA)
provides a statutory right to covered persons to make requests for
access and amendment to covered records, as defined by the JRA, along
with judicial review for denials of such requests. In addition, the JRA
prohibits disclosures of covered records, except as otherwise permitted
by the Privacy Act.
The Privacy Act allows government agencies to exempt certain
records from certain provisions of the Privacy Act. If an agency claims
an exemption,
[[Page 14806]]
however, it must issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to make clear to
the public the reasons why a particular exemption is claimed.
DHS is claiming exemptions from certain requirements of the Privacy
Act for DHS/ALL-043 Enterprise Biometric Administrative Records System
of Records. Some information in this system of records relates to
official DHS national security, law enforcement, and intelligence
activities. These exemptions are needed to protect information relating
to DHS activities from disclosure to subjects or others related to
these activities. Specifically, the exemptions are required to:
Preclude subjects of these activities from frustrating these processes;
avoid disclosure of insider threat techniques; protect the identities
and physical safety of confidential informants and law enforcement
personnel; ensure DHS's ability to obtain information from third
parties and other sources; protect the privacy of third parties; and
safeguard classified information. Disclosure of information to the
subject of the inquiry could also permit the subject to avoid detection
or apprehension.
In appropriate circumstances, when compliance would not appear to
interfere with or adversely affect the law enforcement purposes of this
system and the overall law enforcement process, the applicable
exemptions may be waived on a case by case basis.
A notice of system of records DHS/ALL-043 Enterprise Biometric
Administrative Records System of Records is also published in this
issue of the Federal Register.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information; Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS proposes to amend
chapter I of title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for Part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat.
2135; 5 U.S.C. 301.
0
2. Add at the end of Appendix C to Part 5, the following new paragraph
84:
Appendix C to Part 5--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy
Act
* * * * *
84. The DHS/ALL-043 Enterprise Biometric Administrative Records
(EBAR) System of Records consists of electronic and paper records and
will be used by DHS and its components. The DHS/ALL-043 EBAR System of
Records covers information held by DHS in connection with various
missions and functions, including, but not limited to the enforcement
of civil and criminal laws; investigations, inquiries, and proceedings
there under; and national security and intelligence activities. The
system of records covers information that is collected by, on behalf
of, in support of, or in cooperation with DHS and its components and
may contain personally identifiable information collected by other
federal, state, local, tribal, foreign, or international government
agencies.
The Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(j)(2), has exempted this system from the following provisions of
the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (c)(4); (d); (e)(1), (e)(2),
(e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), (e)(5), (e)(8); (f); and (g).
Additionally, the Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)((1), (k)(2), and (k)(5), has exempted this system from the
following provisions of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d);
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I); and (f).
Where a record received from another system has been exempted in
that source system under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1),
(k)(2), and (k)(5), DHS will claim the same exemptions for those
records that are claimed for the original primary systems of records
from which they originated and claims any additional exemptions set
forth here.
Exemptions from these particular subsections are justified on a
case-by-case basis and determined at the time a request is made, for
the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4) (Accounting for Disclosures)
because release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal, civil,
or regulatory violation to the existence of that investigation and
reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS and the recipient
agency. Disclosure of the accounting would therefore present a serious
impediment to law enforcement efforts and efforts to preserve national
security. Disclosure of the accounting would also permit the subject of
a record to impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension, which would undermine
the entire investigative process. When an investigation has been
completed, information on disclosures made may continue to be exempted
if the fact that an investigation occurred remains sensitive after
completion.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access and Amendment to Records) because
providing access or permitting amendment to the records contained in
this system of records could inform the subject of an investigation of
an actual or potential criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the
existence of that investigation and reveal investigative interest on
the part of DHS or another agency. Access to the records could permit
the subject of a record to impede the investigation, to tamper with
witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension.
Amendment of the records could interfere with ongoing investigations
and law enforcement activities and would impose an unreasonable
administrative burden by requiring investigations to be continually
reinvestigated. In addition, permitting access and amendment to such
information could disclose security-sensitive information that could be
detrimental to homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of Information)
because in the course of investigations into potential violations of
federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or introduced
occasionally may be unclear, or the information may not be strictly
relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In the interests of
effective law enforcement, it is appropriate to retain all information
that may aid in establishing patterns of unlawful activity.
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of Information from
Individuals) because requiring that information be collected from the
subject of an investigation would alert the subject to the nature or
existence of the investigation, thereby interfering with that
investigation and related law enforcement activities.
(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to Subjects) because providing
such detailed information could impede law enforcement by compromising
the existence of a confidential investigation or reveal the identity of
witnesses or confidential informants.
(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (e)(4)(I) (Agency
Requirements) and (f) (Agency Rules), because portions of this system
are exempt from the individual access provisions of subsection (d) for
the reasons noted above, and therefore DHS is not required to establish
requirements, rules, or procedures with respect to such access.
Providing notice to individuals with respect to existence of records
pertaining to them in the system of records or otherwise setting up
procedures pursuant to which individuals may access and view records
pertaining to themselves in the
[[Page 14807]]
system would undermine investigative efforts and reveal the identities
of witnesses, and potential witnesses, and confidential informants.
(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of Information) because with
the collection of information for law enforcement purposes, it is
impossible to determine in advance what information is accurate,
relevant, timely, and complete. Compliance with subsection (e)(5) would
preclude DHS agents from using their investigative training and
exercise of good judgment to both conduct and report on investigations.
(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on Individuals) because
compliance would interfere with DHS's ability to obtain, serve, and
issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law enforcement mechanisms that
may be filed under seal and could result in disclosure of investigative
techniques, procedures, and evidence.
(i) From subsection (g) (Civil Remedies) to the extent that the
system is exempt from other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.
Jonathan R. Cantor,
Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2020-04985 Filed 3-13-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-9B-P