Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of Cenobamate in Schedule V, 13741-13746 [2020-04963]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 10, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
*
Dated: March 2, 2020.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
■
[FR Doc. 2020–04571 Filed 3–9–20; 8:45 am]
4a, 80b–6(4), 80b–6a, and 80b–11, unless
otherwise noted.
*
*
*
*
2. Amend § 275.203(l)–1 by revising
the introductory text to paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
§ 275.203(l)–1
defined.
Venture capital fund
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
(a) Venture capital fund defined. For
purposes of section 203(l) of the Act (15
U.S.C. 80b–3(l)), a venture capital fund
is any entity described in subparagraph
(A), (B), or (C) of section 203(b)(7) of the
Act (15 U.S.C. 80b–3(b)(7)) (other than
an entity that has elected to be regulated
or is regulated as a business
development company pursuant to
section 54 of the Investment Company
Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–53)) or any
entity described in subparagraph (A) or
(B) of section 203(b)(8) of the Act (15
U.S.C. 80b–3(b)(8)) (other than an entity
that has elected to be regulated or is
regulated as a business development
company pursuant to section 54 of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (15
U.S.C. 80a–53)) or any private fund that:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 275.203(m)–1 by revising
paragraph (d)(1) to read as follows:
§ 275.203(m)–1
exemption.
Private fund adviser
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Assets under management means
the regulatory assets under management
as determined under Item 5.F of Form
ADV (§ 279.1 of this chapter), except the
following shall be excluded from the
definition of assets under management
for purposes of this section:
(i) The regulatory assets under
management attributable to a private
fund that is an entity described in
subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of section
203(b)(7) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b–
3(b)(7)) (other than an entity that has
elected to be regulated or is regulated as
a business development company
pursuant to section 54 of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–
53)); and
(ii) The regulatory assets under
management attributable to a private
fund that is an entity described in
subparagraph (A) or (B) of section
203(b)(8) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b–
3(b)(8)) (other than an entity that has
elected to be regulated or is regulated as
a business development company
pursuant to section 54 of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–
53).
*
*
*
*
*
By the Commission.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Mar 09, 2020
Jkt 250001
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–581]
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Placement of Cenobamate in Schedule
V
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Interim final rule, with request
for comments.
AGENCY:
On November 21, 2019, the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) approved a new drug application
for XCOPRI (cenobamate) tablets.
Cenobamate is chemically known as
[(1R)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(tetrazol-2yl)ethyl] carbamate. Thereafter, the
Department of Health and Human
Services provided the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) with a scheduling
recommendation to place cenobamate in
schedule V of the Controlled Substances
Act (CSA). In accordance with the CSA,
as revised by the Improving Regulatory
Transparency for New Medical
Therapies Act, DEA is hereby issuing an
interim final rule placing cenobamate,
including its salts, in schedule V of the
CSA.
DATES: The effective date of this
rulemaking is March 10, 2020.
Interested persons may file written
comments on this rulemaking in
accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(j)(3) and
21 CFR 1308.43(g). Electronic comments
must be submitted, and written
comments must be postmarked, on or
before April 9, 2020. Commenters
should be aware that the electronic
Federal Docket Management System
will not accept comments after 11:59
p.m. Eastern Time on the last day of the
comment period.
Interested persons may file a request
for hearing or waiver of hearing
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(j)(3) and 21
CFR 1308.44. Requests for hearing and
waivers of an opportunity for a hearing
or to participate in a hearing must be
received on or before April 9, 2020.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling
of comments, please reference ‘‘Docket
No. DEA–581’’ on all correspondence,
including any attachments.
• Electronic comments: The Drug
Enforcement Administration encourages
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13741
that all comments be submitted
electronically through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, which provides the
ability to type short comments directly
into the comment field on the web page
or attach a file for lengthier comments.
Please go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the online instructions at
that site for submitting comments. Upon
completion of your submission, you will
receive a Comment Tracking Number for
your comment. Please be aware that
submitted comments are not
instantaneously available for public
view on Regulations.gov. If you have
received a Comment Tracking Number,
your comment has been successfully
submitted and there is no need to
resubmit the same comment.
• Paper comments: Paper comments
that duplicate the electronic submission
are not necessary and are discouraged.
Should you wish to mail a paper
comment in lieu of an electronic
comment, it should be sent via regular
or express mail to: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Attn: DEA Federal
Register Representative/DPW, 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA
22152.
• Hearing requests: All requests for
hearing and waivers of participation
must be sent to: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Attn: Administrator,
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield,
Virginia 22152. All requests for hearing
and waivers of participation should also
be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement
Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/LJ,
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield,
Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug
Enforcement Administration, Attn: DEA
Federal Register Representative/DPW,
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield,
Virginia 22152.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Brinks, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152; Telephone: (571) 362–3261.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments
Please note that all comments
received are considered part of the
public record. They will, unless
reasonable cause is given, be made
available by the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) for public
inspection online at https://
www.regulations.gov. Such information
includes personal identifying
information (such as your name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter. The Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) applies to all
comments received. If you want to
E:\FR\FM\10MRR1.SGM
10MRR1
13742
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 10, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
submit personal identifying information
(such as your name, address, etc.) as
part of your comment, but do not want
it to be made publicly available, you
must include the phrase ‘‘PERSONAL
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION’’ in the
first paragraph of your comment. You
must also place all of the personal
identifying information you do not want
made publicly available in the first
paragraph of your comment and identify
what information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential
business information as part of your
comment, but do not want it to be made
publicly available, you must include the
phrase ‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also
prominently identify the confidential
business information to be redacted
within the comment.
Comments containing personal
identifying information and confidential
business information identified as
directed above will generally be made
publicly available in redacted form. If a
comment has so much confidential
business information or personal
identifying information that it cannot be
effectively redacted, all or part of that
comment may not be made publicly
available. Comments posted to https://
www.regulations.gov may include any
personal identifying information (such
as name, address, and phone number)
included in the text of your electronic
submission that is not identified as
directed above as confidential.
An electronic copy of this document
and supplemental information,
including the complete Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS) and
DEA eight-factor analyses, to this
interim final rule are available at https://
www.regulations.gov for easy reference.
Request for Hearing, Notice of
Appearance at Hearing, or Waiver of
Participation in Hearing
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(a), this
action is a formal rulemaking ‘‘on the
record after opportunity for a hearing.’’
Such proceedings are conducted
pursuant to the provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5
U.S.C. 551–559. 21 CFR 1308.41–
1308.45; 21 CFR part 1316, subpart D.
Interested persons may file requests for
a hearing, or notices of intent to
participate in a hearing, in conformity
with the requirements of 21 CFR
1308.44(a) or (b), and include a
statement of interest in the proceeding
and the objections or issues, if any,
concerning which the person desires to
be heard. Any interested person may file
a waiver of an opportunity for a hearing
or to participate in a hearing together
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Mar 09, 2020
Jkt 250001
with a written statement regarding the
interested person’s position on the
matters of fact and law involved in any
hearing as set forth in 21 CFR
1308.44(c).
All requests for a hearing and waivers
of participation must be sent to DEA
using the address information provided
above.
Background and Legal Authority
Under the Improving Regulatory
Transparency for New Medical
Therapies Act (Pub. L. 114–89), which
was signed into law on November 25,
2015, DEA is required to commence an
expedited scheduling action with
respect to certain new drugs approved
by the United States Food and Drug
Administration (FDA). As provided in
21 U.S.C. 811(j), this expedited
scheduling is required where both of the
following conditions apply: (1) The
Secretary of the Department of Health
and Human Services (Secretary of HHS
or the Secretary) has advised DEA that
a New Drug Application (NDA) has been
approved for a drug that has a stimulant,
depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on
the central nervous system (CNS), and
that it appears that such drug has an
abuse potential; and, (2) the Secretary
recommends that DEA control the drug
in schedule II, III, IV, or V pursuant to
21 U.S.C. 811(a) and (b). In these
circumstances, DEA is required to issue
an interim final rule controlling the
drug within 90 days.
The law further states that the 90-day
timeframe starts the later of: (1) The date
DEA receives HHS’ scientific and
medical evaluation/scheduling
recommendation or (2) the date DEA
receives notice of the NDA approval by
HHS. In addition, the law specifies that
the rulemaking shall become
immediately effective as an interim final
rule without requiring DEA to
demonstrate good cause therefor. Thus,
the purpose of subsection (j) is to speed
the process by which DEA schedules
newly approved drugs that are currently
either in schedule I or not controlled
(but which have sufficient abuse
potential to warrant control) so that
such drugs may be marketed without
undue delay following FDA approval.1
Subsection (j) further provides that
the interim final rule shall give
interested persons the opportunity to
comment and to request a hearing. After
the conclusion of such proceedings,
DEA must issue a final rule in
accordance with the scheduling criteria
1 Given the parameters of subsection (j), in DEA’s
view, it would not apply to a reformulation of a
drug containing a substance currently in schedules
II through V for which an NDA has recently been
approved.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of subsections 21 U.S.C. 811(b), (c), and
(d) and 21 U.S.C. 812(b).
Cenobamate is a new molecular entity
with CNS depressant properties, and is
chemically known as [(1R)-1-(2chlorophenyl)-2-(tetrazol-2-yl)ethyl]
carbamate. Cenobamate is a voltagegated sodium channel (NaV) blocker that
also has gamma-aminobutyric acid
(GABA)-A channel positive allosteric
modulator (PAM) activity. On
November 21, 2018, SK Life Science
(Sponsor) submitted an NDA to FDA for
XCOPRI (cenobamate) 12.5, 25, 50, 100,
150, and 200 mg oral tablets. On
November 22, 2019, DEA received
notification from HHS that FDA, on
November 21, 2019, approved the NDA
for XCOPRI (cenobamate) under section
505(c) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FDCA), for the treatment
of partial-onset seizures in adult
patients.
Determination to Schedule Cenobamate
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1),
proceedings to add a drug or substance
to those controlled under the CSA may
be initiated by request of the Secretary
of HHS.2 On December 10, 2019, DEA
received from HHS a scientific and
medical evaluation document (dated
December 3, 2019) prepared by FDA,
titled ‘‘Basis for the Recommendation to
Control Cenobamate and Its Salts in
Schedule V of the Controlled
Substances Act.’’ Pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
811(b) and (c), this document contained
an eight-factor analysis of the abuse
potential of cenobamate, along with
HHS’ recommendation to control
cenobamate under schedule V of the
CSA.
On January 15, 2020, DEA received
from HHS a supplemental letter (dated
January 15, 2020) clarifying factors 6
and 7 listed in 21 U.S.C. 811(c), as well
as the third finding under 21 U.S.C.
812(b)(5), to control cenobamate in
schedule V. This letter did not change
HHS’ overall recommendation to place
cenobamate in schedule V.
In response, DEA reviewed the
scientific and medical evaluation and
scheduling recommendation provided
by HHS, along with all other relevant
data, and completed its own eight-factor
review document pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
811(c). DEA concluded that cenobamate
2 As set forth in a memorandum of understanding
entered into by HHS, FDA, and the National
Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), FDA acts as the
lead agency within HHS in carrying out the
Secretary’s scheduling responsibilities under the
CSA, with the concurrence of NIDA. 50 FR 9518,
Mar. 8, 1985. The Secretary of HHS has delegated
to the Assistant Secretary for Health of HHS the
authority to make domestic drug scheduling
recommendations. 58 FR 35460, July 1, 1993.
E:\FR\FM\10MRR1.SGM
10MRR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 10, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
met the 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(5) criteria for
placement in schedule V of the CSA.
Pursuant to subsection 811(j), and
based on HHS recommendation, NDA
approval by HHS/FDA, and DEA’s
determination, DEA is issuing this
interim final rule to schedule
cenobamate as a schedule V controlled
substance under the CSA.
Included below is a brief summary of
each factor as analyzed by HHS and
DEA, and as considered by DEA in its
scheduling action. Please note that both
DEA and HHS analyses are available in
their entirety under ‘‘Supporting
Documents’’ in the public docket for
this interim final rule at https://
www.regulations.gov, under Docket
Number ‘‘DEA–581.’’ Full analysis of,
and citations to, the information
referenced in the summary may also be
found in the supporting and related
material.
1. Its Actual or Relative Potential for
Abuse: Cenobamate is a new molecular
entity and is not currently available or
marketed in any country. Evidence
regarding its diversion, illicit
manufacturing, or deliberate ingestions
is currently lacking. However, as
reported by HHS, preclinical studies
show that cenobamate shares similar
mechanisms of action as substances in
schedules IV or V. Cenobamate, like the
schedule V substance lacosamide, is a
voltage-gated sodium channel (Nav)
blocker. In addition, cenobamate, like
the schedule IV substances alprazolam,
chlordiazepoxide, and midazolam, has
gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A
channel positive allosteric modulator
(PAM) activity and increases the effects
of the inhibitory neurotransmitter,
GABA. Data obtained from general
behavioral studies demonstrate that
cenobamate produces abuse-related CNS
activity. In a preclinical drug
discrimination study in rats,
cenobamate mimicked the
discriminative stimulus effects of the
schedule IV substance
chlordiazepoxide. However, in a
separate drug discrimination study,
cenobamate only partially mimicked the
discriminative stimulus effects of the
schedule IV substance midazolam. In
addition, cenobamate, like midazolam,
produced reinforcing effects in a rat selfadministration assay by significantly
increasing the number of infusions
compared to saline infusions. In human
abuse potential (HAP) studies,
cenobamate produced drug-liking visual
analog scale scores that were
significantly higher compared to
placebo but significantly lower than the
schedule IV substance alprazolam.
Thus, these studies demonstrate that
cenobamate produced behavioral effects
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Mar 09, 2020
Jkt 250001
in rats comparable to that of schedule IV
substances (i.e., similar to
chlordiazepoxide but less than
midazolam); whereas in humans,
cenobamate produced drug-liking
effects that were significantly less than
that of the schedule IV substance
alprazolam. Thus, cenobamate likely
has abuse potential less than that of
schedule IV substances but similar to
that of schedule V substances of the
CSA. Based on the totality of the
available scientific data, HHS concluded
that cenobamate has an abuse potential
similar to that of substances in schedule
V of the CSA.
2. Scientific Evidence of Its
Pharmacological Effects, if Known:
Cenobamate shares similar mechanisms
of action to substances in schedule IV or
V and has anti-epileptic activity in
humans. Cenobamate, like the schedule
V substance lacosamide, is a voltagegated sodium channel blocker. In
addition, cenobamate, like the schedule
IV benzodiazepines chlordiazepoxide,
midazolam, and alprazolam, is a GABAA channel positive allosteric modulator.
Cenobamate and other GABAergic
substances interact directly with the
GABA-A receptor which is a ligandgated chloride ion channel consisting of
five subunits and a central chloride
channel to enhance the opening of the
ligand-gated chloride channel and the
influx of chloride. Cenobamate’s ability
to bind to GABA-A receptors and
sodium channel sites is consistent with
the action of anti-epileptic or sedative
drugs, such as chlordiazepoxide,
midazolam, alprazolam, and lacosamide
(schedule IV or V substances).
As described in HHS’ review
document, studies evaluating
cenobamate’s effect in these general
behavioral studies showed that
cenobamate mimicked or partially
mimicked substances such as
chlordiazepoxide, alprazolam, or
midazolam (schedule IV substances) in
producing behaviors that are associated
with abuse. In an in vivo drug
discrimination study in rats,
cenobamate produced
chlordiazepoxide-like (schedule IV)
discriminative stimulus effects. In a
separate drug discrimination study,
cenobamate produced discriminative
stimulus effects that partially mimicked
the effects of the schedule IV substance
midazolam. In self-administration
studies, cenobamate was selfadministered by rodents, but the selfadministration (i.e., number of
infusions) of cenobamate was lower
than that of midazolam, a schedule IV
substance. In HAP studies, cenobamate
produced drug-liking scores higher than
placebo but less than that of the
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13743
schedule IV substance alprazolam.
Based on these studies, HHS concluded
that cenobamate has mechanisms of
actions that are similar to that of
substances in schedule IV or V but the
abuse potential of cenobamate is less
than that of alprazolam, a schedule IV
substance.
3. The State of Current Scientific
Knowledge Regarding the Drug or Other
Substance: Cenobamate is a new
molecular entity. It is chemically known
as [(1R)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(tetrazol-2yl)ethyl] carbamate. Other chemical
names for cenobamate include: 2Htetrazole-2-ethanol, alpha-(2chlorophenyl)-, carbamate (ester),
(alphaR)-; and carbamic acid (R)-(+)-1(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(2H-tetrazol-2yl)ethyl ester. It has a molecular formula
of C10H10ClN5O2 and a molecular weight
of 267.67 g/mol. Cenobamate is a white
to off-white crystalline solid that has a
melting point between 96.8–98.3 °C. It
is partially soluble in water at a pH
between 2 and 12. Pharmacokinetic data
indicate that cenobamate is rapidly
absorbed, has good bioavailability, and
has a long half-life. Additional studies
in humans show that cenobamate is not
extensively metabolized and does not
produce any major circulating
metabolites. On November 21, 2019,
FDA approved an NDA for XCOPRI
(cenobamate) for the treatment of
partial-onset seizures in adult patients.
Thus, cenobamate has an accepted
medical use in the United States.
4. Its History and Current Pattern of
Abuse: There is no information on the
history and current pattern of abuse for
cenobamate, since it has not been
marketed, legally or illegally, in any
country.
On December 19, 2019, DEA
conducted a search on the National
Forensic Laboratory Information System
(NFLIS) 3 and the STARLiMS 4
databases for cenobamate’s encounters.
Consistent with the fact that cenobamate
is a new molecular entity, these
databases had no records of encounters
by law enforcement.
The pharmacological activity of
cenobamate, like schedule IV or V
GABAergic or anti-epileptic substances,
at sodium channels and GABA-A
receptors suggests that cenobamate’s
pattern of abuse would be less than that
3 NFLIS is a national forensic laboratory reporting
system that systematically collects results from drug
chemistry analyses conducted by Federal, State,
and local forensic laboratories in the United States.
4 STARLiMS is a laboratory information
management system that systematically collects
results from drug chemistry analyses conducted by
DEA laboratories. On October 1, 2014, STARLiMS
replaced STRIDE as the DEA laboratory drug
evidence data system of record.
E:\FR\FM\10MRR1.SGM
10MRR1
13744
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 10, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
of schedule IV substances but similar to
that of schedule V anti-epileptic drugs.
5. The Scope, Duration, and
Significance of Abuse: Cenobamate is
not marketed, legally or illegally, in any
country. However, HHS stated that
based on the preclinical and clinical
study data of cenobamate, the scope,
duration, and significance of
cenobamate abuse would likely be
similar to that of schedule V substances.
6. What, if any, Risk There is to the
Public Health: According to HHS, the
public health risk associated with
cenobamate is due to its abuse potential.
Thus, HHS concluded that the data from
preclinical and clinical studies (see
Factor 2, above) showed that
cenobamate has abuse potential and
physical or psychological dependence
(Factor 7) similar to that of substances
in schedule V.
7. Its Psychic or Physiological
Dependence Liability: The psychic or
physiological dependence liability of
drugs can be demonstrated by abuserelated animal and human studies (see
Factor 2, above). In animal studies, there
were no significant alterations in the
withdrawal phase of the study in the
measured parameters at either of the
tested doses. However, in human
studies, cenobamate led to a mild
withdrawal syndrome characterized by
insomnia, decreased appetite, depressed
mood, tremor, and amnesia. Based on
these studies, HHS concluded that
cenobamate has a psychic or
physiological dependence liability
similar to that of substances in schedule
V.
8. Whether the Substance is an
Immediate Precursor of a Substance
Already Controlled under the CSA:
Cenobamate is not an immediate
precursor of any substance already
controlled in the CSA.
Conclusion: After considering the
scientific and medical evaluation
conducted by HHS, HHS’
recommendation, and its own eightfactor analysis, DEA has determined
that these facts and all relevant data
constitute substantial evidence of a
potential for abuse of cenobamate. As
such, DEA hereby schedules
cenobamate as a controlled substance
under the CSA.
Determination of Appropriate Schedule
The CSA lists the findings required to
place a drug or other substance in any
particular schedule (I, II, III, IV, or V).
21 U.S.C. 812(b). After consideration of
the analysis and recommendation of the
Assistant Secretary for Health of HHS
and review of all available data, the
Acting Administrator of DEA, pursuant
to 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(5), finds that:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Mar 09, 2020
Jkt 250001
(1) Cenobamate has a low potential for
abuse relative to the drugs or other
substances in schedule IV.
Cenobamate, similar to the schedule
IV substance lacosamide, is a voltagegated sodium channel blocker that also
has GABA-A channel PAM activity
similar to schedule IV benzodiazepines.
In drug discrimination studies,
cenobamate partially generalized to the
discriminative stimulus effects of
midazolam (schedule IV) but fully
generalized to the discriminative
stimulus effects of chlordiazepoxide
(schedule IV) in rats. In selfadministration studies, cenobamate was
self-administered by rodents, but the
self-administration (i.e., number of
infusions) of cenobamate was lower
than that of midazolam. In the HAP
studies, cenobamate produced drugliking scores higher than placebo but
less than that of alprazolam, a schedule
IV substance. Based on all of these
studies, HHS concluded that
cenobamate has an abuse potential
similar to that of substances in schedule
V of the CSA. Thus, DEA finds that the
potential for abuse of cenobamate is less
than that of schedule IV
benzodiazepines but similar to that of
substances in schedule V of the CSA.
(2) Cenobamate has a currently
accepted medical use in the United
States.
FDA recently approved an NDA for
cenobamate as a treatment for partialonset seizures in adult patients. Thus,
cenobamate has a currently accepted
medical use in treatment in the United
States.
(3) Abuse of Cenobamate may lead to
limited physical dependence or
psychological dependence relative to
the drugs or other substances in
schedule IV.
HHS reported in Factor 7 that
cenobamate may lead to mild
withdrawal syndromes characterized by
insomnia, decreased appetite, and
amnesia in humans. Thus, based on
clinical study and preclinical data, HHS
concluded in Factor 6 that cenobamate
has a physical or psychological
dependence liability similar to that of
substances controlled in schedule V. In
a separate letter, dated January 15, 2020,
HHS further stated that based on the
totality of available scientific data,
cenobamate may lead to physical or
psychological dependence that is low
relative to substances in schedule IV of
the CSA and similar to that of
substances in schedule V. Based on
these data, DEA finds that the abuse of
cenobamate may lead to limited
physical or psychological dependence
relative to the drugs or other substances
in schedule IV.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Based on these findings, the Acting
Administrator of DEA concludes that
cenobamate warrants control in
schedule V of the CSA. 21 U.S.C.
812(b)(5).
Requirements for Handling Cenobamate
Cenobamate is subject to the CSA’s
schedule V regulatory controls and
administrative, civil, and criminal
sanctions applicable to the manufacture,
distribution, reverse distribution,
dispensing, importing, exporting,
research, and conduct of instructional
activities and chemical analysis with,
and possession involving schedule V
substances, including the following:
1. Registration. Any person who
handles (manufactures, distributes,
reverse distributes, dispenses, imports,
exports, engages in research, or
conducts instructional activities or
chemical analysis with, or possesses)
cenobamate, or who desires to handle
cenobamate, must be registered with
DEA to conduct such activities pursuant
to 21 U.S.C. 822, 823, 957, and 958 and
in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1301
and 1312. Any person who currently
handles or intends to handle
cenobamate, and is not registered with
DEA, must submit an application for
registration and may not continue to
handle cenobamate, unless DEA has
approved that application for
registration, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 822,
823, 957, and 958, and in accordance
with 21 CFR parts 1301 and 1312.
2. Disposal of stocks. Any person who
does not desire or is not able to
maintain a schedule V registration must
surrender all quantities of currently
held cenobamate or may transfer all
quantities of cenobamate to a person
registered with DEA in accordance with
21 CFR part 1317, in addition to all
other applicable federal, state, local, and
tribal laws.
3. Security. Cenobamate is subject to
schedule III–V security requirements
and must be handled and stored in
accordance with 21 CFR 1301.71–
1301.93.
4. Labeling and Packaging. All labels,
labeling, and packaging for commercial
containers of cenobamate must comply
with 21 U.S.C. 825 and 958(e), and be
in accordance with 21 CFR part 1302.
5. Inventory. Every DEA registrant
who possesses any quantity of
cenobamate must take an inventory of
cenobamate on hand, pursuant to 21
U.S.C. 827 and 958, and in accordance
with 21 CFR 1304.03, 1304.04, and
1304.11.
Any person who becomes registered
with DEA to handle cenobamate must
take an initial inventory of all stocks of
controlled substances (including
E:\FR\FM\10MRR1.SGM
10MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 10, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
cenobamate) on hand on the date the
registrant first engages in the handling
of controlled substances, pursuant to 21
U.S.C. 827 and 958(e), and in
accordance with 21 CFR 1304.03,
1304.04, and 1304.11.
After the initial inventory, every DEA
registrant must take a new inventory of
all stocks of controlled substances
(including cenobamate) on hand every
two years, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827
and 958(e), and in accordance with 21
CFR 1304.03, 1304.04, and 1304.11.
6. Records and Reports. DEA
registrants must maintain records and
submit reports for cenobamate, pursuant
to 21 U.S.C. 827 and 958(e), and in
accordance with 21 CFR parts 1304,
1312, and 1317.
7. Prescriptions. All prescriptions for
cenobamate, or products containing
cenobamate, must comply with 21
U.S.C. 829, and be issued in accordance
with 21 CFR parts 1306 and 1311,
subpart C.
8. Manufacturing and Distributing. In
addition to the general requirements of
the CSA and DEA regulations that are
applicable to manufacturers and
distributors of schedule V controlled
substances, such registrants should be
advised that (consistent with the
foregoing considerations) any
manufacturing or distribution of
cenobamate may only be for the
legitimate purposes consistent with the
drug’s labeling, or for research activities
authorized by the FDCA and the CSA.
9. Importation and Exportation. All
importation and exportation of
cenobamate must be in compliance with
21 U.S.C. 952, 953, 957, and 958, and
in accordance with 21 CFR part 1312.
10. Liability. Any activity involving
cenobamate not authorized by, or in
violation of, the CSA or its
implementing regulations, is unlawful,
and may subject the person to
administrative, civil, and/or criminal
sanctions.
Regulatory Analyses
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Administrative Procedure Act
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553)
generally requires notice and comment
for rulemakings. However, 21 U.S.C. 811
provides that in cases where a certain
new drug is (1) approved by HHS and
(2) HHS recommends control in CSA
schedule II–V, DEA shall issue an
interim final rule scheduling the drug
within 90 days. Additionally, the law
specifies that the rulemaking shall
become immediately effective as an
interim final rule without requiring DEA
to demonstrate good cause.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Mar 09, 2020
Jkt 250001
13745
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
13771, Regulatory Planning and Review,
Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review, and Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs
In accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(a)
and (j), this scheduling action is subject
to formal rulemaking procedures
performed ‘‘on the record after
opportunity for a hearing,’’ which are
conducted pursuant to the provisions of
5 U.S.C. 556 and 557. The CSA sets
forth the procedures and criteria for
scheduling a drug or other substance.
Such actions are exempt from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) pursuant to section 3(d)(1) of
Executive Order 12866 and the
principles reaffirmed in Executive Order
13563.
This interim final rule is not an
Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
pursuant to Executive Order 12866 and
OMB guidance.5
are subject to notice and comment
under section 553(b) of the APA. Under
21 U.S.C. 811(j), DEA is not required to
publish a general notice of proposed
rulemaking. Consequently, the RFA
does not apply to this interim final rule.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
This regulation meets the applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to
eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity,
minimize litigation, provide a clear legal
standard for affected conduct, and
promote simplification and burden
reduction.
This action does not impose a new
collection of information requirement
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521. This action
would not impose recordkeeping or
reporting requirements on State or local
governments, individuals, businesses, or
organizations. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This rulemaking does not have
federalism implications warranting the
application of Executive Order 13132.
The rule does not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications warranting the application
of Executive Order 13175. It does not
have substantial direct effects on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian tribes.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612) applies to rules that
5 Office of Mgmt. & Budget, Exec. Office of The
President, Interim Guidance Implementing Section
2 of the Executive Order of January 30, 2017 Titled
‘‘Reducing Regulating and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’’ (Feb. 2, 2017).
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
In accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995,
2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq., DEA has
determined that this action would not
result in any Federal mandate that may
result ‘‘in the expenditure by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more (adjusted
annually for inflation) in any 1 year.’’
Therefore, neither a Small Government
Agency Plan nor any other action is
required under UMRA of 1995.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by the Congressional Review
Act (CRA), 5 U.S.C. 804. This rule will
not result in: An annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries,
Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of U.S.-based companies to
compete with foreign based companies
in domestic and export markets.
However, pursuant to the CRA, DEA has
submitted a copy of this interim final
rule to both Houses of Congress and to
the Comptroller General.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and
procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set out above, DEA
amends 21 CFR part 1308 as follows:
E:\FR\FM\10MRR1.SGM
10MRR1
13746
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 10, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b),
unless otherwise noted.
PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
1. The authority citation for part 1308
continues to read as follows:
■
2. Amend § 1308.15 by:
a. Redesignating paragraphs (e)(2)
through (5) as (e)(3) through (6),
respectively;
■
■
■
b. Adding new paragraph (e)(2).
The addition reads as follows:
§ 1308.15
*
Schedule V.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
(2) Cenobamate ([(1R)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(tetrazol-2-yl)ethyl] carbamate; 2H-tetrazole-2-ethanol, alpha-(2-chlorophenyl)-,
carbamate (ester), (alphaR)-; carbamic acid (R)-(+)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(2H-tetrazol-2-yl)ethyl ester) .......................................
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: March 5, 2020.
Uttam Dhillon,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020–04963 Filed 3–9–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
31 CFR Part 595
Removal of Terrorism Sanctions
Regulations
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) is removing from the
Code of Federal Regulations the
Terrorism Sanctions Regulations as a
result of the termination of the national
emergency on which the regulations
were based.
DATES: Effective Date: March 10, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OFAC: Assistant Director for Licensing,
202–622–2480; Assistant Director for
Regulatory Affairs, 202–622–4855; or
Assistant Director for Sanctions
Compliance & Evaluation, 202–622–
2490.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Electronic Availability
This document and additional
information concerning OFAC are
available on OFAC’s website
(www.treasury.gov/ofac).
Background
On January 23, 1995, the President
issued Executive Order 12947,
‘‘Prohibiting Transactions With
Terrorists Who Threaten To Disrupt the
Middle East Peace Process’’ (E.O.
12947), declaring a national emergency
with respect to ‘‘grave acts of violence
committed by foreign terrorists that
disrupt the Middle East peace process,’’
and invoking the authority, inter alia, of
the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706). In
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Mar 09, 2020
Jkt 250001
E.O. 12947, the President blocked all
property and interests in property of (1)
persons listed in the Annex to E.O.
12947; (2) foreign persons designated by
the Secretary of State, in coordination
with the Secretary of the Treasury and
the Attorney General, because they are
found (a) to have committed, or to pose
a significant risk of committing, acts of
violence that have the purpose or effect
of disrupting the Middle East peace
process, or (b) to assist in, sponsor, or
provide financial, material, or
technological support for, or services in
support of, such acts of violence; and (3)
persons determined by the Secretary of
the Treasury, in coordination with the
Secretary of State and the Attorney
General, to be owned or controlled by,
or to act for or on behalf of, any of the
foregoing persons.
On February 2, 1996, OFAC issued
the Terrorism Sanctions Regulations, 31
CFR part 595 (the ‘‘Regulations’’), as a
final rule to implement E.O. 12947. The
Regulations were amended on several
occasions.
On August 20, 1998, the President
issued Executive Order 13099,
‘‘Prohibiting Transactions With
Terrorists Who Threaten To Disrupt the
Middle East Peace Process’’ (E.O.
13099), amending the Annex to E.O.
12947 in order to take additional steps
with respect to the national emergency
declared in E.O. 12947. On February 16,
2005, the President issued Executive
Order 13372, ‘‘Clarification of Certain
Executive Orders Blocking Property and
Prohibiting Certain Transactions,’’
further amending E.O. 12947 in order to
clarify steps taken in E.O. 12947 as
amended by E.O. 13099.
On September 9, 2019, the President
issued Executive Order 13886,
‘‘Modernizing Sanctions To Combat
Terrorism’’ (E.O. 13886). In E.O. 13886,
the President found that it was
necessary to consolidate and enhance
sanctions to combat acts of terrorism
and threats of terrorism by foreign
terrorists. Accordingly, he terminated
the national emergency declared in E.O.
12947, as amended, and revoked that
order.
As a result, OFAC is removing the
Regulations from the Code of Federal
Regulations. Pursuant to section 202 of
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2720
the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C.
1622), termination of the national
emergency declared in E.O. 12947, as
amended, shall not affect any action
taken or proceeding pending and not
finally concluded or determined as of
12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on
September 10, 2019 (the effective date of
E.O. 13886), any action or proceeding
based on any act committed prior to the
effective date, or any rights or duties
that matured or penalties that were
incurred prior to the effective date.
Public Participation
Because the Regulations involve a
foreign affairs function, the provisions
of Executive Order 12866 and the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) requiring notice of proposed
rulemaking, opportunity for public
participation, and delay in effective
date, as well as the provisions of
Executive Order 13771, are
inapplicable. Because no notice of
proposed rulemaking is required for this
rule, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–612) does not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because this rule does not
impose information collection
requirements that would require the
approval of the Office of Management
and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 595
Administrative practice and
procedure, Banks, Banking and finance,
Blocking of assets, Fines and penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Specially designated
terrorists, Terrorism, Transfer of assets.
PART 595—[REMOVED]
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, and under the authority of 3
U.S.C. 301; 31 U.S.C. 321(b); 50 U.S.C.
1601–1651, 1701–1706; Public Law
101–410, 104 Stat. 890 (28 U.S.C. 2461
note); Public Law 110–96, 121
Stat.1011; E.O. 12947, 60 FR 5079, 3
CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 319; E.O. 13099, 63
FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208;
E.O. 13372, 70 FR 8499, 3 CFR, 2006
Comp., p. 159; and E.O. 13886, 84 FR
48041 (September 12, 2019), OFAC
■
E:\FR\FM\10MRR1.SGM
10MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 10, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13741-13746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-04963]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA-581]
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of Cenobamate in
Schedule V
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Interim final rule, with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On November 21, 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) approved a new drug application for XCOPRI (cenobamate) tablets.
Cenobamate is chemically known as [(1R)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(tetrazol-
2-yl)ethyl] carbamate. Thereafter, the Department of Health and Human
Services provided the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) with a
scheduling recommendation to place cenobamate in schedule V of the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA). In accordance with the CSA, as revised
by the Improving Regulatory Transparency for New Medical Therapies Act,
DEA is hereby issuing an interim final rule placing cenobamate,
including its salts, in schedule V of the CSA.
DATES: The effective date of this rulemaking is March 10, 2020.
Interested persons may file written comments on this rulemaking in
accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(j)(3) and 21 CFR 1308.43(g). Electronic
comments must be submitted, and written comments must be postmarked, on
or before April 9, 2020. Commenters should be aware that the electronic
Federal Docket Management System will not accept comments after 11:59
p.m. Eastern Time on the last day of the comment period.
Interested persons may file a request for hearing or waiver of
hearing pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(j)(3) and 21 CFR 1308.44. Requests
for hearing and waivers of an opportunity for a hearing or to
participate in a hearing must be received on or before April 9, 2020.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling of comments, please reference
``Docket No. DEA-581'' on all correspondence, including any
attachments.
Electronic comments: The Drug Enforcement Administration
encourages that all comments be submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, which provides the ability to type short
comments directly into the comment field on the web page or attach a
file for lengthier comments. Please go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the online instructions at that site for submitting
comments. Upon completion of your submission, you will receive a
Comment Tracking Number for your comment. Please be aware that
submitted comments are not instantaneously available for public view on
Regulations.gov. If you have received a Comment Tracking Number, your
comment has been successfully submitted and there is no need to
resubmit the same comment.
Paper comments: Paper comments that duplicate the
electronic submission are not necessary and are discouraged. Should you
wish to mail a paper comment in lieu of an electronic comment, it
should be sent via regular or express mail to: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 22152.
Hearing requests: All requests for hearing and waivers of
participation must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn:
Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All
requests for hearing and waivers of participation should also be sent
to: (1) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug
Enforcement Administration, Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/
DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Brinks, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; Telephone: (571) 362-
3261.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments
Please note that all comments received are considered part of the
public record. They will, unless reasonable cause is given, be made
available by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for public
inspection online at https://www.regulations.gov. Such information
includes personal identifying information (such as your name, address,
etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter. The Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) applies to all comments received. If you want to
[[Page 13742]]
submit personal identifying information (such as your name, address,
etc.) as part of your comment, but do not want it to be made publicly
available, you must include the phrase ``PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION'' in the first paragraph of your comment. You must also
place all of the personal identifying information you do not want made
publicly available in the first paragraph of your comment and identify
what information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential business information as part of
your comment, but do not want it to be made publicly available, you
must include the phrase ``CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION'' in the
first paragraph of your comment. You must also prominently identify the
confidential business information to be redacted within the comment.
Comments containing personal identifying information and
confidential business information identified as directed above will
generally be made publicly available in redacted form. If a comment has
so much confidential business information or personal identifying
information that it cannot be effectively redacted, all or part of that
comment may not be made publicly available. Comments posted to https://www.regulations.gov may include any personal identifying information
(such as name, address, and phone number) included in the text of your
electronic submission that is not identified as directed above as
confidential.
An electronic copy of this document and supplemental information,
including the complete Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
and DEA eight-factor analyses, to this interim final rule are available
at https://www.regulations.gov for easy reference.
Request for Hearing, Notice of Appearance at Hearing, or Waiver of
Participation in Hearing
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(a), this action is a formal rulemaking
``on the record after opportunity for a hearing.'' Such proceedings are
conducted pursuant to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 551-559. 21 CFR 1308.41-1308.45; 21 CFR part 1316,
subpart D. Interested persons may file requests for a hearing, or
notices of intent to participate in a hearing, in conformity with the
requirements of 21 CFR 1308.44(a) or (b), and include a statement of
interest in the proceeding and the objections or issues, if any,
concerning which the person desires to be heard. Any interested person
may file a waiver of an opportunity for a hearing or to participate in
a hearing together with a written statement regarding the interested
person's position on the matters of fact and law involved in any
hearing as set forth in 21 CFR 1308.44(c).
All requests for a hearing and waivers of participation must be
sent to DEA using the address information provided above.
Background and Legal Authority
Under the Improving Regulatory Transparency for New Medical
Therapies Act (Pub. L. 114-89), which was signed into law on November
25, 2015, DEA is required to commence an expedited scheduling action
with respect to certain new drugs approved by the United States Food
and Drug Administration (FDA). As provided in 21 U.S.C. 811(j), this
expedited scheduling is required where both of the following conditions
apply: (1) The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
(Secretary of HHS or the Secretary) has advised DEA that a New Drug
Application (NDA) has been approved for a drug that has a stimulant,
depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central nervous system
(CNS), and that it appears that such drug has an abuse potential; and,
(2) the Secretary recommends that DEA control the drug in schedule II,
III, IV, or V pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(a) and (b). In these
circumstances, DEA is required to issue an interim final rule
controlling the drug within 90 days.
The law further states that the 90-day timeframe starts the later
of: (1) The date DEA receives HHS' scientific and medical evaluation/
scheduling recommendation or (2) the date DEA receives notice of the
NDA approval by HHS. In addition, the law specifies that the rulemaking
shall become immediately effective as an interim final rule without
requiring DEA to demonstrate good cause therefor. Thus, the purpose of
subsection (j) is to speed the process by which DEA schedules newly
approved drugs that are currently either in schedule I or not
controlled (but which have sufficient abuse potential to warrant
control) so that such drugs may be marketed without undue delay
following FDA approval.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Given the parameters of subsection (j), in DEA's view, it
would not apply to a reformulation of a drug containing a substance
currently in schedules II through V for which an NDA has recently
been approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsection (j) further provides that the interim final rule shall
give interested persons the opportunity to comment and to request a
hearing. After the conclusion of such proceedings, DEA must issue a
final rule in accordance with the scheduling criteria of subsections 21
U.S.C. 811(b), (c), and (d) and 21 U.S.C. 812(b).
Cenobamate is a new molecular entity with CNS depressant
properties, and is chemically known as [(1R)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-
(tetrazol-2-yl)ethyl] carbamate. Cenobamate is a voltage-gated sodium
channel (NaV) blocker that also has gamma-aminobutyric acid
(GABA)-A channel positive allosteric modulator (PAM) activity. On
November 21, 2018, SK Life Science (Sponsor) submitted an NDA to FDA
for XCOPRI (cenobamate) 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 150, and 200 mg oral
tablets. On November 22, 2019, DEA received notification from HHS that
FDA, on November 21, 2019, approved the NDA for XCOPRI (cenobamate)
under section 505(c) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FDCA), for the treatment of partial-onset seizures in adult patients.
Determination to Schedule Cenobamate
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1), proceedings to add a drug or
substance to those controlled under the CSA may be initiated by request
of the Secretary of HHS.\2\ On December 10, 2019, DEA received from HHS
a scientific and medical evaluation document (dated December 3, 2019)
prepared by FDA, titled ``Basis for the Recommendation to Control
Cenobamate and Its Salts in Schedule V of the Controlled Substances
Act.'' Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(b) and (c), this document contained an
eight-factor analysis of the abuse potential of cenobamate, along with
HHS' recommendation to control cenobamate under schedule V of the CSA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ As set forth in a memorandum of understanding entered into
by HHS, FDA, and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), FDA
acts as the lead agency within HHS in carrying out the Secretary's
scheduling responsibilities under the CSA, with the concurrence of
NIDA. 50 FR 9518, Mar. 8, 1985. The Secretary of HHS has delegated
to the Assistant Secretary for Health of HHS the authority to make
domestic drug scheduling recommendations. 58 FR 35460, July 1, 1993.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 15, 2020, DEA received from HHS a supplemental letter
(dated January 15, 2020) clarifying factors 6 and 7 listed in 21 U.S.C.
811(c), as well as the third finding under 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(5), to
control cenobamate in schedule V. This letter did not change HHS'
overall recommendation to place cenobamate in schedule V.
In response, DEA reviewed the scientific and medical evaluation and
scheduling recommendation provided by HHS, along with all other
relevant data, and completed its own eight-factor review document
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 811(c). DEA concluded that cenobamate
[[Page 13743]]
met the 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(5) criteria for placement in schedule V of the
CSA.
Pursuant to subsection 811(j), and based on HHS recommendation, NDA
approval by HHS/FDA, and DEA's determination, DEA is issuing this
interim final rule to schedule cenobamate as a schedule V controlled
substance under the CSA.
Included below is a brief summary of each factor as analyzed by HHS
and DEA, and as considered by DEA in its scheduling action. Please note
that both DEA and HHS analyses are available in their entirety under
``Supporting Documents'' in the public docket for this interim final
rule at https://www.regulations.gov, under Docket Number ``DEA-581.''
Full analysis of, and citations to, the information referenced in the
summary may also be found in the supporting and related material.
1. Its Actual or Relative Potential for Abuse: Cenobamate is a new
molecular entity and is not currently available or marketed in any
country. Evidence regarding its diversion, illicit manufacturing, or
deliberate ingestions is currently lacking. However, as reported by
HHS, preclinical studies show that cenobamate shares similar mechanisms
of action as substances in schedules IV or V. Cenobamate, like the
schedule V substance lacosamide, is a voltage-gated sodium channel
(Nav) blocker. In addition, cenobamate, like the schedule IV
substances alprazolam, chlordiazepoxide, and midazolam, has gamma-
aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A channel positive allosteric modulator (PAM)
activity and increases the effects of the inhibitory neurotransmitter,
GABA. Data obtained from general behavioral studies demonstrate that
cenobamate produces abuse-related CNS activity. In a preclinical drug
discrimination study in rats, cenobamate mimicked the discriminative
stimulus effects of the schedule IV substance chlordiazepoxide.
However, in a separate drug discrimination study, cenobamate only
partially mimicked the discriminative stimulus effects of the schedule
IV substance midazolam. In addition, cenobamate, like midazolam,
produced reinforcing effects in a rat self-administration assay by
significantly increasing the number of infusions compared to saline
infusions. In human abuse potential (HAP) studies, cenobamate produced
drug-liking visual analog scale scores that were significantly higher
compared to placebo but significantly lower than the schedule IV
substance alprazolam. Thus, these studies demonstrate that cenobamate
produced behavioral effects in rats comparable to that of schedule IV
substances (i.e., similar to chlordiazepoxide but less than midazolam);
whereas in humans, cenobamate produced drug-liking effects that were
significantly less than that of the schedule IV substance alprazolam.
Thus, cenobamate likely has abuse potential less than that of schedule
IV substances but similar to that of schedule V substances of the CSA.
Based on the totality of the available scientific data, HHS concluded
that cenobamate has an abuse potential similar to that of substances in
schedule V of the CSA.
2. Scientific Evidence of Its Pharmacological Effects, if Known:
Cenobamate shares similar mechanisms of action to substances in
schedule IV or V and has anti-epileptic activity in humans. Cenobamate,
like the schedule V substance lacosamide, is a voltage-gated sodium
channel blocker. In addition, cenobamate, like the schedule IV
benzodiazepines chlordiazepoxide, midazolam, and alprazolam, is a GABA-
A channel positive allosteric modulator. Cenobamate and other GABAergic
substances interact directly with the GABA-A receptor which is a
ligand-gated chloride ion channel consisting of five subunits and a
central chloride channel to enhance the opening of the ligand-gated
chloride channel and the influx of chloride. Cenobamate's ability to
bind to GABA-A receptors and sodium channel sites is consistent with
the action of anti-epileptic or sedative drugs, such as
chlordiazepoxide, midazolam, alprazolam, and lacosamide (schedule IV or
V substances).
As described in HHS' review document, studies evaluating
cenobamate's effect in these general behavioral studies showed that
cenobamate mimicked or partially mimicked substances such as
chlordiazepoxide, alprazolam, or midazolam (schedule IV substances) in
producing behaviors that are associated with abuse. In an in vivo drug
discrimination study in rats, cenobamate produced chlordiazepoxide-like
(schedule IV) discriminative stimulus effects. In a separate drug
discrimination study, cenobamate produced discriminative stimulus
effects that partially mimicked the effects of the schedule IV
substance midazolam. In self-administration studies, cenobamate was
self-administered by rodents, but the self-administration (i.e., number
of infusions) of cenobamate was lower than that of midazolam, a
schedule IV substance. In HAP studies, cenobamate produced drug-liking
scores higher than placebo but less than that of the schedule IV
substance alprazolam. Based on these studies, HHS concluded that
cenobamate has mechanisms of actions that are similar to that of
substances in schedule IV or V but the abuse potential of cenobamate is
less than that of alprazolam, a schedule IV substance.
3. The State of Current Scientific Knowledge Regarding the Drug or
Other Substance: Cenobamate is a new molecular entity. It is chemically
known as [(1R)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(tetrazol-2-yl)ethyl] carbamate.
Other chemical names for cenobamate include: 2H-tetrazole-2-ethanol,
alpha-(2-chlorophenyl)-, carbamate (ester), (alphaR)-; and carbamic
acid (R)-(+)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(2H-tetrazol-2-yl)ethyl ester. It has
a molecular formula of
C10H10ClN5O2 and a
molecular weight of 267.67 g/mol. Cenobamate is a white to off-white
crystalline solid that has a melting point between 96.8-98.3 [deg]C. It
is partially soluble in water at a pH between 2 and 12. Pharmacokinetic
data indicate that cenobamate is rapidly absorbed, has good
bioavailability, and has a long half-life. Additional studies in humans
show that cenobamate is not extensively metabolized and does not
produce any major circulating metabolites. On November 21, 2019, FDA
approved an NDA for XCOPRI (cenobamate) for the treatment of partial-
onset seizures in adult patients. Thus, cenobamate has an accepted
medical use in the United States.
4. Its History and Current Pattern of Abuse: There is no
information on the history and current pattern of abuse for cenobamate,
since it has not been marketed, legally or illegally, in any country.
On December 19, 2019, DEA conducted a search on the National
Forensic Laboratory Information System (NFLIS) \3\ and the STARLiMS \4\
databases for cenobamate's encounters. Consistent with the fact that
cenobamate is a new molecular entity, these databases had no records of
encounters by law enforcement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ NFLIS is a national forensic laboratory reporting system
that systematically collects results from drug chemistry analyses
conducted by Federal, State, and local forensic laboratories in the
United States.
\4\ STARLiMS is a laboratory information management system that
systematically collects results from drug chemistry analyses
conducted by DEA laboratories. On October 1, 2014, STARLiMS replaced
STRIDE as the DEA laboratory drug evidence data system of record.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The pharmacological activity of cenobamate, like schedule IV or V
GABAergic or anti-epileptic substances, at sodium channels and GABA-A
receptors suggests that cenobamate's pattern of abuse would be less
than that
[[Page 13744]]
of schedule IV substances but similar to that of schedule V anti-
epileptic drugs.
5. The Scope, Duration, and Significance of Abuse: Cenobamate is
not marketed, legally or illegally, in any country. However, HHS stated
that based on the preclinical and clinical study data of cenobamate,
the scope, duration, and significance of cenobamate abuse would likely
be similar to that of schedule V substances.
6. What, if any, Risk There is to the Public Health: According to
HHS, the public health risk associated with cenobamate is due to its
abuse potential. Thus, HHS concluded that the data from preclinical and
clinical studies (see Factor 2, above) showed that cenobamate has abuse
potential and physical or psychological dependence (Factor 7) similar
to that of substances in schedule V.
7. Its Psychic or Physiological Dependence Liability: The psychic
or physiological dependence liability of drugs can be demonstrated by
abuse-related animal and human studies (see Factor 2, above). In animal
studies, there were no significant alterations in the withdrawal phase
of the study in the measured parameters at either of the tested doses.
However, in human studies, cenobamate led to a mild withdrawal syndrome
characterized by insomnia, decreased appetite, depressed mood, tremor,
and amnesia. Based on these studies, HHS concluded that cenobamate has
a psychic or physiological dependence liability similar to that of
substances in schedule V.
8. Whether the Substance is an Immediate Precursor of a Substance
Already Controlled under the CSA: Cenobamate is not an immediate
precursor of any substance already controlled in the CSA.
Conclusion: After considering the scientific and medical evaluation
conducted by HHS, HHS' recommendation, and its own eight-factor
analysis, DEA has determined that these facts and all relevant data
constitute substantial evidence of a potential for abuse of cenobamate.
As such, DEA hereby schedules cenobamate as a controlled substance
under the CSA.
Determination of Appropriate Schedule
The CSA lists the findings required to place a drug or other
substance in any particular schedule (I, II, III, IV, or V). 21 U.S.C.
812(b). After consideration of the analysis and recommendation of the
Assistant Secretary for Health of HHS and review of all available data,
the Acting Administrator of DEA, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(5), finds
that:
(1) Cenobamate has a low potential for abuse relative to the drugs
or other substances in schedule IV.
Cenobamate, similar to the schedule IV substance lacosamide, is a
voltage-gated sodium channel blocker that also has GABA-A channel PAM
activity similar to schedule IV benzodiazepines. In drug discrimination
studies, cenobamate partially generalized to the discriminative
stimulus effects of midazolam (schedule IV) but fully generalized to
the discriminative stimulus effects of chlordiazepoxide (schedule IV)
in rats. In self-administration studies, cenobamate was self-
administered by rodents, but the self-administration (i.e., number of
infusions) of cenobamate was lower than that of midazolam. In the HAP
studies, cenobamate produced drug-liking scores higher than placebo but
less than that of alprazolam, a schedule IV substance. Based on all of
these studies, HHS concluded that cenobamate has an abuse potential
similar to that of substances in schedule V of the CSA. Thus, DEA finds
that the potential for abuse of cenobamate is less than that of
schedule IV benzodiazepines but similar to that of substances in
schedule V of the CSA.
(2) Cenobamate has a currently accepted medical use in the United
States.
FDA recently approved an NDA for cenobamate as a treatment for
partial-onset seizures in adult patients. Thus, cenobamate has a
currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.
(3) Abuse of Cenobamate may lead to limited physical dependence or
psychological dependence relative to the drugs or other substances in
schedule IV.
HHS reported in Factor 7 that cenobamate may lead to mild
withdrawal syndromes characterized by insomnia, decreased appetite, and
amnesia in humans. Thus, based on clinical study and preclinical data,
HHS concluded in Factor 6 that cenobamate has a physical or
psychological dependence liability similar to that of substances
controlled in schedule V. In a separate letter, dated January 15, 2020,
HHS further stated that based on the totality of available scientific
data, cenobamate may lead to physical or psychological dependence that
is low relative to substances in schedule IV of the CSA and similar to
that of substances in schedule V. Based on these data, DEA finds that
the abuse of cenobamate may lead to limited physical or psychological
dependence relative to the drugs or other substances in schedule IV.
Based on these findings, the Acting Administrator of DEA concludes
that cenobamate warrants control in schedule V of the CSA. 21 U.S.C.
812(b)(5).
Requirements for Handling Cenobamate
Cenobamate is subject to the CSA's schedule V regulatory controls
and administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions applicable to the
manufacture, distribution, reverse distribution, dispensing, importing,
exporting, research, and conduct of instructional activities and
chemical analysis with, and possession involving schedule V substances,
including the following:
1. Registration. Any person who handles (manufactures, distributes,
reverse distributes, dispenses, imports, exports, engages in research,
or conducts instructional activities or chemical analysis with, or
possesses) cenobamate, or who desires to handle cenobamate, must be
registered with DEA to conduct such activities pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
822, 823, 957, and 958 and in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1301 and
1312. Any person who currently handles or intends to handle cenobamate,
and is not registered with DEA, must submit an application for
registration and may not continue to handle cenobamate, unless DEA has
approved that application for registration, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 822,
823, 957, and 958, and in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1301 and 1312.
2. Disposal of stocks. Any person who does not desire or is not
able to maintain a schedule V registration must surrender all
quantities of currently held cenobamate or may transfer all quantities
of cenobamate to a person registered with DEA in accordance with 21 CFR
part 1317, in addition to all other applicable federal, state, local,
and tribal laws.
3. Security. Cenobamate is subject to schedule III-V security
requirements and must be handled and stored in accordance with 21 CFR
1301.71-1301.93.
4. Labeling and Packaging. All labels, labeling, and packaging for
commercial containers of cenobamate must comply with 21 U.S.C. 825 and
958(e), and be in accordance with 21 CFR part 1302.
5. Inventory. Every DEA registrant who possesses any quantity of
cenobamate must take an inventory of cenobamate on hand, pursuant to 21
U.S.C. 827 and 958, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1304.03, 1304.04, and
1304.11.
Any person who becomes registered with DEA to handle cenobamate
must take an initial inventory of all stocks of controlled substances
(including
[[Page 13745]]
cenobamate) on hand on the date the registrant first engages in the
handling of controlled substances, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827 and
958(e), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1304.03, 1304.04, and 1304.11.
After the initial inventory, every DEA registrant must take a new
inventory of all stocks of controlled substances (including cenobamate)
on hand every two years, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827 and 958(e), and in
accordance with 21 CFR 1304.03, 1304.04, and 1304.11.
6. Records and Reports. DEA registrants must maintain records and
submit reports for cenobamate, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 827 and 958(e),
and in accordance with 21 CFR parts 1304, 1312, and 1317.
7. Prescriptions. All prescriptions for cenobamate, or products
containing cenobamate, must comply with 21 U.S.C. 829, and be issued in
accordance with 21 CFR parts 1306 and 1311, subpart C.
8. Manufacturing and Distributing. In addition to the general
requirements of the CSA and DEA regulations that are applicable to
manufacturers and distributors of schedule V controlled substances,
such registrants should be advised that (consistent with the foregoing
considerations) any manufacturing or distribution of cenobamate may
only be for the legitimate purposes consistent with the drug's
labeling, or for research activities authorized by the FDCA and the
CSA.
9. Importation and Exportation. All importation and exportation of
cenobamate must be in compliance with 21 U.S.C. 952, 953, 957, and 958,
and in accordance with 21 CFR part 1312.
10. Liability. Any activity involving cenobamate not authorized by,
or in violation of, the CSA or its implementing regulations, is
unlawful, and may subject the person to administrative, civil, and/or
criminal sanctions.
Regulatory Analyses
Administrative Procedure Act
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
553) generally requires notice and comment for rulemakings. However, 21
U.S.C. 811 provides that in cases where a certain new drug is (1)
approved by HHS and (2) HHS recommends control in CSA schedule II-V,
DEA shall issue an interim final rule scheduling the drug within 90
days. Additionally, the law specifies that the rulemaking shall become
immediately effective as an interim final rule without requiring DEA to
demonstrate good cause.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771, Regulatory Planning and
Review, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, and Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs
In accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(a) and (j), this scheduling action
is subject to formal rulemaking procedures performed ``on the record
after opportunity for a hearing,'' which are conducted pursuant to the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557. The CSA sets forth the procedures
and criteria for scheduling a drug or other substance. Such actions are
exempt from review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
pursuant to section 3(d)(1) of Executive Order 12866 and the principles
reaffirmed in Executive Order 13563.
This interim final rule is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory
action pursuant to Executive Order 12866 and OMB guidance.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Office of Mgmt. & Budget, Exec. Office of The President,
Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017 Titled ``Reducing Regulating and Controlling
Regulatory Costs'' (Feb. 2, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable standards set forth in
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize litigation, provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct, and promote simplification and
burden reduction.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This rulemaking does not have federalism implications warranting
the application of Executive Order 13132. The rule does not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications warranting the
application of Executive Order 13175. It does not have substantial
direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612) applies to
rules that are subject to notice and comment under section 553(b) of
the APA. Under 21 U.S.C. 811(j), DEA is not required to publish a
general notice of proposed rulemaking. Consequently, the RFA does not
apply to this interim final rule.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
In accordance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995,
2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq., DEA has determined that this action would not
result in any Federal mandate that may result ``in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any 1 year.'' Therefore, neither a Small Government
Agency Plan nor any other action is required under UMRA of 1995.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This action does not impose a new collection of information
requirement under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521. This action would not impose recordkeeping or reporting
requirements on State or local governments, individuals, businesses, or
organizations. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule as defined by the Congressional
Review Act (CRA), 5 U.S.C. 804. This rule will not result in: An annual
effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State,
or local government agencies, or geographic regions; or significant
adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or on the ability of U.S.-based companies to compete with
foreign based companies in domestic and export markets. However,
pursuant to the CRA, DEA has submitted a copy of this interim final
rule to both Houses of Congress and to the Comptroller General.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set out above, DEA amends 21 CFR part 1308 as
follows:
[[Page 13746]]
PART 1308--SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1308 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b), unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1308.15 by:
0
a. Redesignating paragraphs (e)(2) through (5) as (e)(3) through (6),
respectively;
0
b. Adding new paragraph (e)(2).
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 1308.15 Schedule V.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(2) Cenobamate ([(1R)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(tetrazol-2- 2720
yl)ethyl] carbamate; 2H-tetrazole-2-ethanol, alpha-(2-
chlorophenyl)-, carbamate (ester), (alphaR)-; carbamic
acid (R)-(+)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(2H-tetrazol-2-yl)ethyl
ester)....................................................
* * * * *
Dated: March 5, 2020.
Uttam Dhillon,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020-04963 Filed 3-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P