Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Department of Agriculture, 12859-12860 [2020-03058]
Download as PDF
12859
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 85, No. 44
Thursday, March 5, 2020
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Office of the Secretary
5 CFR Part 8301
RIN 3209–AA48
[Docket No. USDA–2019–0005]
Supplemental Standards of Ethical
Conduct for Employees of the
Department of Agriculture
Department of Agriculture,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Agriculture (‘‘USDA’’ or ‘‘Department’’),
with the concurrence of the U.S. Office
of Government Ethics (OGE), is issuing
this final rule for attorneys of USDA’s
Office of the General Counsel (OGC).
The final rule supplements the
Standards of Ethical Conduct for
Employees of the Executive Branch
(OGE Standards) issued by OGE by
revising the Supplemental Standards of
Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Department of Agriculture (USDA
Supplemental Ethics Regulations)
concerning the outside practice of law
by USDA OGC attorneys. To more fully
address ethical issues unique to OGC
attorneys, the final rule imposes
additional restrictions on the outside
practice of law, subject to certain
exceptions.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective March
5, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stuart Bender, Director of the Office of
Ethics, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
at (202) 720–2251, Stuart.Bender@
usda.gov.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 8, 2019, USDA, with
OGE’s concurrence, published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register,
84 FR 60346, proposing to amend the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:45 Mar 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
USDA Supplemental Ethics Regulations
as they relate to OGC attorneys who
engage in the outside practice of law.
The proposed rule provided a 45-day
comment period, which ended on
December 23, 2019. During the
comment period USDA received two
comments from members of the public.
Analysis of Comments Received
USDA received two sets of comments
from members of the public pertaining
to the proposed amendment of USDA
Supplemental Ethics Regulations as
they relate to OGC attorneys that engage
in the outside practice of law. Neither
of the comments referred specifically to
the proposed revision of the USDA
Supplemental Ethics Regulations as
they relate to OGC attorneys who seek
to engage in the outside practice of law.
Instead each comment addressed
unrelated general topics. The first
comment recommended that USDA
conduct greater environmental
protection.1 The second comment
recommended that USDA more fully
place an array of reports and other
documents concerning the Animal
Welfare Act and the Horse Protection
Act in a public, searchable public
database.2 Neither comment addressed
the substance of or suggested changes to
the proposed rule. The proposed rule
clarifies and strengthens the ethical
requirements for attorneys in the
Department’s Office of the General
Counsel regarding the outside practice
of law. The proposed rule also
encourages OGC attorneys to consider
voluntary pro bono publico legal
service, provided that such pro bono
legal work would be compliant with the
legal and ethical requirements provided
in the proposed rule. Finally, the
proposed rule updates and improves the
procedures and standards related to
OGC attorneys seeking to engage in the
outside practice of law and
uncompensated pro bono publico legal
services to benefit the public, and will
enhance adherence to ethics conduct
related to the outside practice of law. As
noted above, the two comments
addressed wholly unrelated topics and
1 Comment
received from Jean Publieee,
November 8, 2019. For transparency, this comment
was posted, in full, to the public Regulations.gov
page associated with this docket.
2 Comment received from Jacqui Marcella Urban,
December 21, 2019. For transparency, this comment
was posted, in full, to the public Regulations.gov
page associated with this docket.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
did not address the substance of the
proposed rule. Therefore, for the reasons
detailed in the preamble of the
previously issued Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (at 84 FR 60346), USDA,
with the concurrence of OGE, is issuing
this rule in final without changes,
besides the typographical edit noted
below.
During the review of the proposed
rule, USDA noted an inadvertent
typographical error in Section
8301.105(c)(iii)(B). Specifically, the
words ‘‘exception’’ and ‘‘does’’ in that
provision should read ‘‘exceptions’’ and
‘‘do.’’ The revised sentence now reads:
‘‘The exceptions to 18 U.S.C. 205
described in paragraphs (c)(ii)(B) and
(c)(ii)(C) do not apply unless the
employee has obtained the prior
approval of a supervisory official who
has authority to determine whether the
employee’s proposed representation is
consistent with the faithful performance
of the employee’s duties.’’ This
grammatical edit does not alter the
substance or meaning of the proposed
rule.
Matters of Regulatory Procedure
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (the RFA), requires
each agency to consider the potential
impact of its regulations on small
entities, including small businesses,
small governmental units, and small
not-for-profit organizations, unless the
head of the agency certifies that the
rules will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The Secretary
of Agriculture so certifies. The rule does
not impose any obligations or standards
of conduct for purposes of analysis
under the RFA, and it therefore does not
give rise to a regulatory compliance
burden for small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Department has determined that
this rule does not impose any new
recordkeeping, reporting, or disclosure
requirements on members of the public
that would be collections of information
requiring approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
E:\FR\FM\05MRR1.SGM
05MRR1
12860
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 44 / Thursday, March 5, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 8301
Conflict of interests, Government
employees.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department, in
concurrence with OGE, is amending 5
CFR part 8301 as follows:
PART 8301—SUPPLEMENTAL
STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT
FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
1. The authority citation for
§ 8301.105 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 7301; 5 U.S.C. App.
(Ethics in Government Act of 1978); E.O.
12674, 54 FR 15159 (April 12, 1989); 3 CFR,
1989 Comp., p. 215, as modified by E.O.
12731, 55 FR 42547 (October 17, 1990); 3
CFR, 1990 Comp., p. 306; 5 CFR 2635.105,
2635.403, 2635.502 and 2635.803.
2. Revise § 8301.105 to read as
follows:
■
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 8301.105 Additional rules for attorneys in
the Office of the General Counsel.
(a) Additional rules for attorneys in
the Office of the General Counsel
regarding the outside practice of law.
Any attorney serving within the Office
of the General Counsel shall obtain
written approval, in accordance with
the procedures set forth in § 8301.102(c)
and the standard for approval set forth
in paragraph (b) of this section, before
engaging in the outside practice of law,
whether compensated or not. For
purposes of this section the ‘‘outside
practice of law’’ means those activities
requiring professional licensure by a
state bar as an attorney and include, but
are not limited to, providing legal
advice to a client, drafting legal
documents, and representing clients in
legal negotiations or litigation.
(b) Standard for approval. Approval
shall be granted by the agency designee
unless it is determined that the outside
practice of law is expected to involve
conduct prohibited by statute or Federal
regulation, including 5 CFR part 2635,
or paragraph (c) of this section.
(c)(1) Prohibited outside practice of
law applicable to attorneys in the Office
of the General Counsel. An employee
who serves as an attorney within the
Office of the General Counsel shall not
engage in any outside practice of law
that might require the attorney to:
(i) Assert a legal position that is or
appears to be in conflict with the
interests of the Department of
Agriculture, the client to which the
attorney owes a professional
responsibility; or
(ii) Interpret any statute, regulation, or
rule administered or issued by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:45 Mar 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
Department of Agriculture, or where a
supervisory attorney determines that the
outside practice of law would conflict
with the employee’s official duties or
create the appearance of a loss of the
attorney’s impartiality, as prohibited by
5 CFR 2635.802; or
(iii) Act as an agent or attorney in any
matter in which the U.S. government is
a party or has a direct and substantial
interest, as prohibited by 18 U.S.C. 205.
(2) Exceptions. Nothing in paragraph
(c)(1) of this section prevents an
attorney in the Office of the General
Counsel from:
(i) Acting, with or without
compensation, as an agent or attorney
for, or otherwise representing, the
employee’s parents, spouse, child, or
any other person for whom, or for any
estate for which, the employee is
serving as guardian, executor,
administrator, trustee, or other personal
fiduciary to the extent permitted by 18
U.S.C. 203(d) and 205(e), or from
providing advice or counsel to such
persons or estates; or
(ii) Acting, without compensation, as
an agent or attorney for, or otherwise
representing, any person who is the
subject of disciplinary, loyalty, or other
personnel administration proceedings in
connection with those proceedings, or
from providing uncompensated advice
and counsel to such person to the extent
permitted by 18 U.S.C. 205; or
(iii) Acting, without compensation, as
an agent or attorney for, or otherwise
representing any cooperative, voluntary,
professional, recreational, or similar
organization or group not established or
operated for profit, if a majority of the
organization’s or group’s members are
current employees of the United States
or the District of Columbia, or their
spouses or dependent children. As
limited by 18 U.S.C. 205(d), this
exception is not permitted for any
representation with respect to a matter
which involves prosecuting a claim
against the United States under 18
U.S.C. 205(a)(1) or 18 U.S.C. 205(b)(1),
or involves a judicial or administrative
proceeding where the organization or
group is a party, or involves a grant,
contract, or other agreement providing
for the disbursement of Federal funds to
the organization or group; or
(iv) Giving testimony under oath or
from making statements required to be
made under penalty for perjury or
contempt.
(3) Specific approval procedures for
paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
(i) The exceptions to 18 U.S.C. 203
and 205 described in paragraph (c)(2)(i)
of this section do not apply unless the
employee obtained the prior approval of
the Government official responsible for
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the appointment of the employee to a
Federal position.
(ii) The exceptions to 18 U.S.C. 205
described in paragraphs (c)(2)(ii) and
(c)(2)(iii) of this section do not apply
unless the employee has obtained the
prior approval of a supervisory official
who has authority to determine whether
the employee’s proposed representation
is consistent with the faithful
performance of the employee’s duties.
(d) Pro Bono activity. Subject to
compliance with paragraph (c) of this
section, attorneys within the Office of
the General Counsel are permitted to
provide outside pro bono legal services
(without compensation other than
reimbursement of expenses) to
organizations or individuals through a
non-profit organization, without
obtaining prior written approval in
accordance with the procedures set
forth in § 8301.102(c).
Stephen Alexander Vaden,
General Counsel, U.S. Department of
Agriculture.
Emory A. Rounds, III,
Director, U.S. Office of Government Ethics.
[FR Doc. 2020–03058 Filed 3–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 920
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–20–0016; SC20–920–1
CR]
Kiwifruit Grown in California;
Continuance Referendum
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Referendum order.
AGENCY:
This document directs that a
referendum be conducted among
eligible California kiwifruit growers to
determine whether they favor
continuance of the marketing order
regulating the handling of kiwifruit
grown in California.
DATES: The referendum will be
conducted from May 18 through May
29, 2020. Only current producers of
kiwifruit within the California
production area that produced kiwifruit
during the period August 1, 2018,
through July 31, 2019, are eligible to
vote in this referendum.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the marketing
order may be obtained from the
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05MRR1.SGM
05MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 44 (Thursday, March 5, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12859-12860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03058]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 44 / Thursday, March 5, 2020 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 12859]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Office of the Secretary
5 CFR Part 8301
RIN 3209-AA48
[Docket No. USDA-2019-0005]
Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Department of Agriculture
AGENCY: Department of Agriculture, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture (``USDA'' or
``Department''), with the concurrence of the U.S. Office of Government
Ethics (OGE), is issuing this final rule for attorneys of USDA's Office
of the General Counsel (OGC). The final rule supplements the Standards
of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch (OGE
Standards) issued by OGE by revising the Supplemental Standards of
Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Department of Agriculture (USDA
Supplemental Ethics Regulations) concerning the outside practice of law
by USDA OGC attorneys. To more fully address ethical issues unique to
OGC attorneys, the final rule imposes additional restrictions on the
outside practice of law, subject to certain exceptions.
DATES: This final rule is effective March 5, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stuart Bender, Director of the Office
of Ethics, U.S. Department of Agriculture, at (202) 720-2251,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 8, 2019, USDA, with OGE's concurrence, published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register, 84 FR 60346, proposing to amend
the USDA Supplemental Ethics Regulations as they relate to OGC
attorneys who engage in the outside practice of law. The proposed rule
provided a 45-day comment period, which ended on December 23, 2019.
During the comment period USDA received two comments from members of
the public.
Analysis of Comments Received
USDA received two sets of comments from members of the public
pertaining to the proposed amendment of USDA Supplemental Ethics
Regulations as they relate to OGC attorneys that engage in the outside
practice of law. Neither of the comments referred specifically to the
proposed revision of the USDA Supplemental Ethics Regulations as they
relate to OGC attorneys who seek to engage in the outside practice of
law. Instead each comment addressed unrelated general topics. The first
comment recommended that USDA conduct greater environmental
protection.\1\ The second comment recommended that USDA more fully
place an array of reports and other documents concerning the Animal
Welfare Act and the Horse Protection Act in a public, searchable public
database.\2\ Neither comment addressed the substance of or suggested
changes to the proposed rule. The proposed rule clarifies and
strengthens the ethical requirements for attorneys in the Department's
Office of the General Counsel regarding the outside practice of law.
The proposed rule also encourages OGC attorneys to consider voluntary
pro bono publico legal service, provided that such pro bono legal work
would be compliant with the legal and ethical requirements provided in
the proposed rule. Finally, the proposed rule updates and improves the
procedures and standards related to OGC attorneys seeking to engage in
the outside practice of law and uncompensated pro bono publico legal
services to benefit the public, and will enhance adherence to ethics
conduct related to the outside practice of law. As noted above, the two
comments addressed wholly unrelated topics and did not address the
substance of the proposed rule. Therefore, for the reasons detailed in
the preamble of the previously issued Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (at
84 FR 60346), USDA, with the concurrence of OGE, is issuing this rule
in final without changes, besides the typographical edit noted below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Comment received from Jean Publieee, November 8, 2019. For
transparency, this comment was posted, in full, to the public
Regulations.gov page associated with this docket.
\2\ Comment received from Jacqui Marcella Urban, December 21,
2019. For transparency, this comment was posted, in full, to the
public Regulations.gov page associated with this docket.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the review of the proposed rule, USDA noted an inadvertent
typographical error in Section 8301.105(c)(iii)(B). Specifically, the
words ``exception'' and ``does'' in that provision should read
``exceptions'' and ``do.'' The revised sentence now reads: ``The
exceptions to 18 U.S.C. 205 described in paragraphs (c)(ii)(B) and
(c)(ii)(C) do not apply unless the employee has obtained the prior
approval of a supervisory official who has authority to determine
whether the employee's proposed representation is consistent with the
faithful performance of the employee's duties.'' This grammatical edit
does not alter the substance or meaning of the proposed rule.
Matters of Regulatory Procedure
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (the
RFA), requires each agency to consider the potential impact of its
regulations on small entities, including small businesses, small
governmental units, and small not-for-profit organizations, unless the
head of the agency certifies that the rules will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
Secretary of Agriculture so certifies. The rule does not impose any
obligations or standards of conduct for purposes of analysis under the
RFA, and it therefore does not give rise to a regulatory compliance
burden for small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Department has determined that this rule does not impose any
new recordkeeping, reporting, or disclosure requirements on members of
the public that would be collections of information requiring approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
[[Page 12860]]
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 8301
Conflict of interests, Government employees.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department, in
concurrence with OGE, is amending 5 CFR part 8301 as follows:
PART 8301--SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
0
1. The authority citation for Sec. 8301.105 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 7301; 5 U.S.C. App. (Ethics in Government
Act of 1978); E.O. 12674, 54 FR 15159 (April 12, 1989); 3 CFR, 1989
Comp., p. 215, as modified by E.O. 12731, 55 FR 42547 (October 17,
1990); 3 CFR, 1990 Comp., p. 306; 5 CFR 2635.105, 2635.403, 2635.502
and 2635.803.
0
2. Revise Sec. [thinsp]8301.105 to read as follows:
Sec. 8301.105 Additional rules for attorneys in the Office of the
General Counsel.
(a) Additional rules for attorneys in the Office of the General
Counsel regarding the outside practice of law. Any attorney serving
within the Office of the General Counsel shall obtain written approval,
in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sec. 8301.102(c) and
the standard for approval set forth in paragraph (b) of this section,
before engaging in the outside practice of law, whether compensated or
not. For purposes of this section the ``outside practice of law'' means
those activities requiring professional licensure by a state bar as an
attorney and include, but are not limited to, providing legal advice to
a client, drafting legal documents, and representing clients in legal
negotiations or litigation.
(b) Standard for approval. Approval shall be granted by the agency
designee unless it is determined that the outside practice of law is
expected to involve conduct prohibited by statute or Federal
regulation, including 5 CFR part 2635, or paragraph (c) of this
section.
(c)(1) Prohibited outside practice of law applicable to attorneys
in the Office of the General Counsel. An employee who serves as an
attorney within the Office of the General Counsel shall not engage in
any outside practice of law that might require the attorney to:
(i) Assert a legal position that is or appears to be in conflict
with the interests of the Department of Agriculture, the client to
which the attorney owes a professional responsibility; or
(ii) Interpret any statute, regulation, or rule administered or
issued by the Department of Agriculture, or where a supervisory
attorney determines that the outside practice of law would conflict
with the employee's official duties or create the appearance of a loss
of the attorney's impartiality, as prohibited by 5 CFR 2635.802; or
(iii) Act as an agent or attorney in any matter in which the U.S.
government is a party or has a direct and substantial interest, as
prohibited by 18 U.S.C. 205.
(2) Exceptions. Nothing in paragraph (c)(1) of this section
prevents an attorney in the Office of the General Counsel from:
(i) Acting, with or without compensation, as an agent or attorney
for, or otherwise representing, the employee's parents, spouse, child,
or any other person for whom, or for any estate for which, the employee
is serving as guardian, executor, administrator, trustee, or other
personal fiduciary to the extent permitted by 18 U.S.C. 203(d) and
205(e), or from providing advice or counsel to such persons or estates;
or
(ii) Acting, without compensation, as an agent or attorney for, or
otherwise representing, any person who is the subject of disciplinary,
loyalty, or other personnel administration proceedings in connection
with those proceedings, or from providing uncompensated advice and
counsel to such person to the extent permitted by 18 U.S.C. 205; or
(iii) Acting, without compensation, as an agent or attorney for, or
otherwise representing any cooperative, voluntary, professional,
recreational, or similar organization or group not established or
operated for profit, if a majority of the organization's or group's
members are current employees of the United States or the District of
Columbia, or their spouses or dependent children. As limited by 18
U.S.C. 205(d), this exception is not permitted for any representation
with respect to a matter which involves prosecuting a claim against the
United States under 18 U.S.C. 205(a)(1) or 18 U.S.C. 205(b)(1), or
involves a judicial or administrative proceeding where the organization
or group is a party, or involves a grant, contract, or other agreement
providing for the disbursement of Federal funds to the organization or
group; or
(iv) Giving testimony under oath or from making statements required
to be made under penalty for perjury or contempt.
(3) Specific approval procedures for paragraph (c)(2) of this
section.
(i) The exceptions to 18 U.S.C. 203 and 205 described in paragraph
(c)(2)(i) of this section do not apply unless the employee obtained the
prior approval of the Government official responsible for the
appointment of the employee to a Federal position.
(ii) The exceptions to 18 U.S.C. 205 described in paragraphs
(c)(2)(ii) and (c)(2)(iii) of this section do not apply unless the
employee has obtained the prior approval of a supervisory official who
has authority to determine whether the employee's proposed
representation is consistent with the faithful performance of the
employee's duties.
(d) Pro Bono activity. Subject to compliance with paragraph (c) of
this section, attorneys within the Office of the General Counsel are
permitted to provide outside pro bono legal services (without
compensation other than reimbursement of expenses) to organizations or
individuals through a non-profit organization, without obtaining prior
written approval in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sec.
8301.102(c).
Stephen Alexander Vaden,
General Counsel, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Emory A. Rounds, III,
Director, U.S. Office of Government Ethics.
[FR Doc. 2020-03058 Filed 3-4-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-18-P