Safety Zone; Monongahela River Mile 28.0 to Mile 30.0, Pittsburgh, PA, 12439-12440 [2020-04387]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 42 / Tuesday, March 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on February
26, 2020.
Shawn M. Kozica,
Group Manager, Western Service Center,
Operations Support Group.
[FR Doc. 2020–04259 Filed 3–2–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2020–0057]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Monongahela River Mile
28.0 to Mile 30.0, Pittsburgh, PA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
mile 28.0 to mile 30.0 of the
Monongahela River. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on these navigable waters near Mitchell
Power Plant, Pittsburgh, PA, during an
electrical conducter pull from March 2,
2020 through March 20, 2020. This
rulemaking would prohibit persons and
vessels from being in the safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Pittsburgh or a designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective without
actual notice from March 3, 2020
through March 20, 2020. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from March 2, 2020 until
March 3, 2020.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2020–
0057 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email MST2 Trevor Vannatta,
Waterways Management U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 412–221–0807, email
Trevor.J.Vannata@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with RULES
DATES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Mar 02, 2020
Jkt 250001
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On November 12, 2019, the Duquesne
Light Company notified the Coast Guard
that it will be conducting an electrical
conducter pull on March 2, 2020, in
order to replace an existing electrical
conductor with a new higher ampacity
electrical conductor. In response, on
February 3, 2020, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) titled ‘‘Safety Zone;
Monongahela River Mile 28.0 to Mile
30.0, Pittsburgh, PA’’, (85 FR 5911, Feb.
3, 2020). That NPRM comment period
does not close until March 4, 2020. The
Coast Guard is unable to delay
implementing this final rule to await the
close of the comment period becuase the
start date of the electrical conductor
pull is March 2, 2020.
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
immediate action is needed to mitigate
potential safety hazards associated with
the process of pulling the new cables
across the Monongahela River. It is
impracticable to publish an NPRM and
consider the comments before issuing
this final rule because we must establish
this safety zone by March 2, 2020, when
the electrical pulling is scheduled to
start.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because immediate action is needed to
protect vessels and persons during the
replacement of old powerlines crossing
the Monongahela River beginning on
March 2, 2020.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The
Captain of the Port Pittsburgh (COTP)
has determined that potential hazards
associated with the replacement of
powerlines between March 2, 2020
through March 20, 2020 will be a safety
concern for anyone between Mile 28.0–
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12439
30.0 on the Monongahela River. The
purpose of this rule is to ensure safety
of vessels and the navigable waters in
the safety zone before, during, and after
the scheduled work.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone
from March 2, 2020 through March 20,
2020. The safety zone will cover all
navigable waters from mile 28.0 to mile
30.0 on the Monongahela River near
Pittsburgh, PA. The duration of the zone
is intended to ensure the safety of
vessels and these navigable waters
before, during, and after a scheduled
maintenance activity. No vessel or
person would be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
duration of the safety zone. The safety
zone will impact a 2-mile stretch of the
Monongahela River for 19 days, and
vessel traffic would be able to safely
transit around this safety zone.
Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue
a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule would allow vessels
to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM
03MRR1
12440
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 42 / Tuesday, March 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received 0 comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
thisrule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with RULES
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Mar 02, 2020
Jkt 250001
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting from March 2, 2020 through
March 20, 2020 from mile 28.0 to mile
30.0 on the Monongahela River near
Pittsburgh, PA. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table
1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
001–01, Rev. 1. A Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0057 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0057 Safety Zone;
Monongahela, Mile 28.0 to Mile 30.0,
Pittsburgh, PA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of the
Monongahela River from mile 28.0 to
mile 30.0.
(b) Effective period. This section is
effective from March 2, 2020 through
March 20, 2020.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23, entry
of persons and vessels into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit
Pittsburgh (COTP) or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through the zone must
request permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. The COTP’s
representative may be contacted at 412–
221–0807.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
COTP or a designated representative.
Designated COTP representatives
include United States Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officer.
(d) Information broadcasts. The
Captain COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public
through Local Notice to Mariners
(LNMs), Broadcast Notices to Mariners
(BNMs), and/or Marine Safety
Information Bulletins (MSIBs), as
appropriate.
Dated: February 27, 2020.
A.W. Demo,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh.
[FR Doc. 2020–04387 Filed 3–2–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\03MRR1.SGM
03MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 3, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12439-12440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-04387]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2020-0057]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Monongahela River Mile 28.0 to Mile 30.0,
Pittsburgh, PA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
mile 28.0 to mile 30.0 of the Monongahela River. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters
near Mitchell Power Plant, Pittsburgh, PA, during an electrical
conducter pull from March 2, 2020 through March 20, 2020. This
rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or a
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from March 3, 2020
through March 20, 2020. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from March 2, 2020 until March 3, 2020.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2020-0057 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email MST2 Trevor Vannatta, Waterways Management U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 412-221-0807, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On November 12, 2019, the Duquesne Light Company notified the Coast
Guard that it will be conducting an electrical conducter pull on March
2, 2020, in order to replace an existing electrical conductor with a
new higher ampacity electrical conductor. In response, on February 3,
2020, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
titled ``Safety Zone; Monongahela River Mile 28.0 to Mile 30.0,
Pittsburgh, PA'', (85 FR 5911, Feb. 3, 2020). That NPRM comment period
does not close until March 4, 2020. The Coast Guard is unable to delay
implementing this final rule to await the close of the comment period
becuase the start date of the electrical conductor pull is March 2,
2020.
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because immediate action is needed to
mitigate potential safety hazards associated with the process of
pulling the new cables across the Monongahela River. It is
impracticable to publish an NPRM and consider the comments before
issuing this final rule because we must establish this safety zone by
March 2, 2020, when the electrical pulling is scheduled to start.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to
protect vessels and persons during the replacement of old powerlines
crossing the Monongahela River beginning on March 2, 2020.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034. The Captain of the Port Pittsburgh (COTP) has determined that
potential hazards associated with the replacement of powerlines between
March 2, 2020 through March 20, 2020 will be a safety concern for
anyone between Mile 28.0-30.0 on the Monongahela River. The purpose of
this rule is to ensure safety of vessels and the navigable waters in
the safety zone before, during, and after the scheduled work.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone from March 2, 2020 through
March 20, 2020. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters from
mile 28.0 to mile 30.0 on the Monongahela River near Pittsburgh, PA.
The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels
and these navigable waters before, during, and after a scheduled
maintenance activity. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter
the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a
designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the safety zone. The safety zone will impact
a 2-mile stretch of the Monongahela River for 19 days, and vessel
traffic would be able to safely transit around this safety zone.
Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners
via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule would allow
vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The
[[Page 12440]]
term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard received 0 comments
from the Small Business Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast
Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, thisrule would not have a significant economic impact on
any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone lasting from March 2, 2020 through March 20, 2020 from mile
28.0 to mile 30.0 on the Monongahela River near Pittsburgh, PA. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T08-0057 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T08-0057 Safety Zone; Monongahela, Mile 28.0 to Mile 30.0,
Pittsburgh, PA.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of the Monongahela River from mile 28.0 to mile 30.0.
(b) Effective period. This section is effective from March 2, 2020
through March 20, 2020.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23, entry of persons and vessels into this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit
Pittsburgh (COTP) or a designated representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the
zone must request permission from the COTP or a designated
representative. The COTP's representative may be contacted at 412-221-
0807.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the COTP or a designated representative. Designated COTP
representatives include United States Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, and petty officer.
(d) Information broadcasts. The Captain COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public through Local Notice to Mariners
(LNMs), Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs), and/or Marine Safety
Information Bulletins (MSIBs), as appropriate.
Dated: February 27, 2020.
A.W. Demo,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit
Pittsburgh.
[FR Doc. 2020-04387 Filed 3-2-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P