Notice of Availability of a Record of Decision for the Construction of a New U.S. Land Port of Entry in Madawaska, Maine, and a New Madawaska-Edmundston International Bridge, 12302-12303 [2020-04252]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
12302
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 41 / Monday, March 2, 2020 / Notices
increase the incentives and ability of the
remaining firms to coordinate.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
V. Entry
Entry into the Low-Density Foam
markets would not be timely, likely, or
sufficient in magnitude, character, and
scope to deter or counteract the
anticompetitive effects of the proposed
Acquisition. A new entrant with a single
pouring plant would face significant
barriers to entry, such as higher
procurement costs for critical inputs,
including the various chemicals, which
make up a substantial portion of the cost
of polyurethane foam. No new
polyurethane foam pouring plants have
opened in the Pacific Northwest, the
Midwest States or Mississippi for many
years. In fact, the number of plants in
these regions has steadily decreased as
industry participants have consolidated
and closed numerous overlapping
plants.
VI. The Consent Agreement
The Consent Agreement eliminates
the competitive concerns raised by the
proposed Acquisition by requiring the
merging parties to divest foam-pouring
plants located in Kent, Washington;
Elkhart, Indiana; and Tupelo,
Mississippi to Future Foam, a privately
held competitor based in Council Bluffs,
Iowa. Future Foam is a leading producer
of low-density conventional foam but
currently has a limited presence in the
Pacific Northwest, Mississippi, and the
Midwest States. The divestiture package
consists of the following assets and
rights: FXI’s Kent, Washington
polyurethane foam plant, Innocor’s
Elkhart, Indiana plant, and Innocor’s
Tupelo, Mississippi plant, including
each plant’s production facilities,
warehouses, storage facilities,
equipment, offices, fabricating
operations, transportation assets, and all
other related businesses, operations and
assets; formulas, technologies and other
intangible rights and property relating to
the facilities; and licenses to shared
intellectual property. Additionally, the
Order requires that, at the request of
Future Foam, FXI must provide
transitional assistance for up to twelve
months following the divestiture date.
These services include logistical and
administrative support. The Order also
includes other standard terms designed
to ensure the viability of the divested
business. The provisions of the
proposed Consent Agreement positions
Future Foam to become an effective
competitor in the markets for LowDensity Foam in the Pacific Northwest,
the Midwest States, and Mississippi in
order to maintain the competition that
currently exists.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Feb 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
Under the Order, FXI is required to
divest the three plants no later than 10
days from the close of its acquisition of
Innocor. If the Commission determines
that Future Foam is not an acceptable
acquirer, or that the manner of the
divestitures is not acceptable, the Order
requires FXI to either unwind the sale
of rights and assets to Future Foam and
then divest the assets to a Commissionapproved acquirer within 120 days of
the date the Order becomes final, or
modify the divestiture to Future Foam
in the manner the Commission
determines is necessary to satisfy the
requirements of the Order.
The Order also requires a monitor to
oversee FXI’s compliance with the
obligations set forth in the Order. If FXI
does not fully comply with the
divestiture and other requirements of
the Order, the Commission may appoint
a Divestiture Trustee to divest the three
facilities and perform FXI’s other
obligations consistent with the Order.
The Order also requires that FXI and
One Rock Capital shall not, without
providing advance written notification
to the Commission, acquire any
polyurethane foam production plant in
the states of Indiana, Michigan,
Mississippi, Ohio, Oregon, and
Washington for a period of ten years
from the date the Order is issued.
The purpose of this analysis is to
facilitate public comment on the
Consent Agreement to aid the
Commission in determining whether it
should make the Consent Agreement
final. This analysis is not an official
interpretation of the proposed Consent
Agreement and does not modify its
terms in any way.
By direction of the Commission.
April J. Tabor,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–04182 Filed 2–28–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
[Notice–PBS–2020–02; Docket No. 2020–
0002; Sequence No. 7]
Notice of Availability of a Record of
Decision for the Construction of a New
U.S. Land Port of Entry in Madawaska,
Maine, and a New MadawaskaEdmundston International Bridge
Public Buildings Service (PBS),
General Services Administration (GSA);
Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA); Maine Department of
Transportation (MaineDOT).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice of availability of a
Record of Decision.
ACTION:
Pursuant to the requirements
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations,
GSA Order ADM 1095.1F
Environmental Considerations in
Decision Making, the GSA PBS NEPA
Desk Guide, the FHWA Policy Guide,
and FHWA’s Environmental Impact and
Related Procedures, the GSA PBS,
FHWA, and MaineDOT, in cooperation
with the U.S. Coast Guard and in
coordination with the U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP), announce the
availability of a Record of Decision
(ROD) for the proposed new U.S. land
port of entry (LPOE) in Madawaska,
Maine, and new International Bridge
between Madawaska, Maine, and
Edmundston, New Brunswick, Canada.
ADDRESSES: GSA, FHWA, and
MaineDOT will have copies of the ROD
for review at the Town of Madawaska
Town Office on 328 St. Thomas Street,
Suite 101, Madawaska, Maine 04756.
Further information, including an
electronic copy of the ROD, may be
found online on the following websites:
• gsa.gov/madawaskalpoe
• https://www.maine.gov/mdot/
planning/studies/meib/
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexas Kelly, Project Manager, GSA,
New England Region, 10 Causeway
Street, 11th Floor, Boston, MA 02222,
by phone at 617–549–8190, or by email
at alexandria.kelly@gsa.gov; or Cheryl
Martin, Assistant Division
Administrator, FHWA, Edmund S.
Muskie Federal Building, 40 Western
Avenue, Room 614, Augusta, ME 04330,
by phone at 207–512–4912, or by email
at cheryl.martin@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the Proposed Action is to
provide for the long-term safe and
efficient flow of current and projected
traffic volumes, including the
movement of goods and people between
Edmundston, New Brunswick, and
Madawaska, Maine. The Proposed
Action is needed because (1) the
existing International Bridge is nearing
the end of its useful life, and (2) the
existing Madawaska LPOE is
substandard, inhibiting the agencies
assigned to the LPOE from adequately
fulfilling their respective missions.
The existing Madawaska-Edmundston
International Bridge opened to traffic in
1921 and its design life has been
exceeded. Notable bridge deficiencies
are (1) substandard roadway width and
clearance, (2) foundation susceptible to
undermining, (3) piers cracked and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 41 / Monday, March 2, 2020 / Notices
deteriorated, (4) significant steel
corrosion, (5) bridge capacity is
insufficient, and (6) deficiencies
prompting the bridge posting on
October 27, 2017, from 50 tons to 5 tons.
A Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) and ROD were
published in January 2007, which
addressed the construction of a new
Madawaska LPOE.
Built in 1959, the current LPOE
suffers from facility, operational, and
site deficiencies, and does not meet
current CBP mission and operational
requirements for a LPOE. A few noted
deficiencies: (1) Lack of office and
inspection areas, (2) deficient inbound
and outbound passenger and
commercial processing areas, (3)
inadequate queuing space for vehicles,
and (4) inability to meet the
Architectural Barriers Act. In
furtherance of the LPOE Project, GSA
previously acquired approximately nine
acres of land but did not commence
construction.
A Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (SEIS) was needed
due to a change in circumstance: The
decision by MaineDOT and New
Brunswick Department of
Transportation and Infrastructure
(NBDTI) to include alternatives for
addressing deficiencies to the existing
Madawaska—Edmundston International
Bridge. The SEIS addresses changes to
the Proposed Action, including an
updated design in accordance with
current GSA and CBP requirements, a
new International Bridge, and
additional land acquisition.
A Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (FSEIS)/Final
Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation
were issued for public review and
comment on October 4, 2019. The FSEIS
identified the Preferred Alternative for
the new U.S. LPOE and new
International Bridge location and
design; described the environmental
impacts of the proposed project and
proposed mitigation; and addressed
comments received on the Draft
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement/Draft Programmatic Section
4(f) Evaluation issued on November 26,
2018. The 30-day comment period for
the FSEIS/Final Programmatic Section
4(f) ended on November 4, 2019.
The ROD states what the decision is;
identifies the alternatives considered,
including the environmentally preferred
alternative; and discusses mitigation
plans, including enforcement and
monitoring commitments. In the ROD,
the agencies discuss all the factors that
were contemplated when reaching their
decision on whether to, and if so how
to, proceed with the Proposed Action.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Feb 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
The ROD discusses all practical means
to avoid or minimize environmental
harm that have been adopted.
The GSA considered three build
alternatives for the LPOE FSEIS/Final
Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation;
the FHWA and MaineDOT considered
three build alternatives for the
International Bridge. The Selected
Alternative is identified as LPOE
Alternative C and Bridge Alternative 2
from the FSEIS/Final Programmatic
Section 4(f) Evaluation. LPOE
Alternative C and Bridge Alternative 2
are the environmentally preferred
alternatives for the LPOE and
International Bridge, respectively.
LPOE Alternative C was identified as
the Preferred LPOE Alternative because
it furthers the purpose of the project and
satisfies the needs for the project. The
Preferred LPOE Alternative: (1) Provides
enough space for safe and efficient flow
of traffic through the LPOE; (2) provides
enough space for the operations of the
LPOE to function efficiently; (3) meets
MaineDOT’s access management
guidelines and the entrance and exit to
the LPOE would be approved by
MaineDOT; (4) provides a safer location
and distance between the outbound and
inbound driveways; (5) provides enough
open space to accommodate the
necessary length of road to descend
from the bridge landing elevation (538)
to the elevation of Mill Street (520)
without a steep road grade, and
provides safer maintenance and
circulation in winter conditions; (6)
provides increased line of sight, safety
and security for CBP personnel to carry
out their mission and operations; (7)
allows inbound and outbound
driveways to connect to Mill Street,
eliminating the need for B-trains to use
Main Street; and, (8) provides enough
space for seasonal snow storage and
future expansion.
Bridge Alternative 2 was identified as
the Preferred Bridge Alternative
because, although it would have one
more pier in the Saint John River than
another alternative considered, the piers
to support the bridge would be smaller,
decreasing the risks for ice jamming in
the river. While Bridge Alternative 2
would have similar construction
impacts and comparable costs (both
construction and long-term operation
and maintenance) to other alternatives,
Bridge Alternative 2 would take
approximately six months less time to
construct.
The FSEIS/Final Programmatic
Section 4(f) Evaluation includes a
comprehensive summary of the
mitigation measures and commitments
from the GSA, FHWA, and MaineDOT
in support of the development of the
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12303
Preferred LPOE Alternative and the
Preferred Bridge Alternative to further
avoid and minimize adverse impacts.
Dated: February 11, 2020.
Glenn Rotondo,
Regional Commissioner, Public Buildings
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–04252 Filed 2–28–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–FP–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[Document Identifier CMS–10146, CMS–
10062, CMS–10242 and CMS–685]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) is announcing
an opportunity for the public to
comment on CMS’ intention to collect
information from the public. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), federal agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed
extension or reinstatement of an existing
collection of information, and to allow
a second opportunity for public
comment on the notice. Interested
persons are invited to send comments
regarding the burden estimate or any
other aspect of this collection of
information, including the necessity and
utility of the proposed information
collection for the proper performance of
the agency’s functions, the accuracy of
the estimated burden, ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected, and the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology to
minimize the information collection
burden.
DATES: Comments on the collection(s) of
information must be received by the
OMB desk officer by April 1, 2020.
ADDRESSES: When commenting on the
proposed information collections,
please reference the document identifier
or OMB control number. To be assured
consideration, comments and
recommendations must be received by
the OMB desk officer via one of the
following transmissions: OMB, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: CMS Desk Officer, Fax
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 41 (Monday, March 2, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12302-12303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-04252]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
[Notice-PBS-2020-02; Docket No. 2020-0002; Sequence No. 7]
Notice of Availability of a Record of Decision for the
Construction of a New U.S. Land Port of Entry in Madawaska, Maine, and
a New Madawaska-Edmundston International Bridge
AGENCY: Public Buildings Service (PBS), General Services
Administration (GSA); Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); Maine
Department of Transportation (MaineDOT).
ACTION: Notice of availability of a Record of Decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the requirements of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations, GSA Order ADM 1095.1F Environmental Considerations in
Decision Making, the GSA PBS NEPA Desk Guide, the FHWA Policy Guide,
and FHWA's Environmental Impact and Related Procedures, the GSA PBS,
FHWA, and MaineDOT, in cooperation with the U.S. Coast Guard and in
coordination with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP),
announce the availability of a Record of Decision (ROD) for the
proposed new U.S. land port of entry (LPOE) in Madawaska, Maine, and
new International Bridge between Madawaska, Maine, and Edmundston, New
Brunswick, Canada.
ADDRESSES: GSA, FHWA, and MaineDOT will have copies of the ROD for
review at the Town of Madawaska Town Office on 328 St. Thomas Street,
Suite 101, Madawaska, Maine 04756. Further information, including an
electronic copy of the ROD, may be found online on the following
websites:
gsa.gov/madawaskalpoe
https://www.maine.gov/mdot/planning/studies/meib/
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexas Kelly, Project Manager, GSA,
New England Region, 10 Causeway Street, 11th Floor, Boston, MA 02222,
by phone at 617-549-8190, or by email at [email protected]; or
Cheryl Martin, Assistant Division Administrator, FHWA, Edmund S. Muskie
Federal Building, 40 Western Avenue, Room 614, Augusta, ME 04330, by
phone at 207-512-4912, or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the Proposed Action is to
provide for the long-term safe and efficient flow of current and
projected traffic volumes, including the movement of goods and people
between Edmundston, New Brunswick, and Madawaska, Maine. The Proposed
Action is needed because (1) the existing International Bridge is
nearing the end of its useful life, and (2) the existing Madawaska LPOE
is substandard, inhibiting the agencies assigned to the LPOE from
adequately fulfilling their respective missions.
The existing Madawaska-Edmundston International Bridge opened to
traffic in 1921 and its design life has been exceeded. Notable bridge
deficiencies are (1) substandard roadway width and clearance, (2)
foundation susceptible to undermining, (3) piers cracked and
[[Page 12303]]
deteriorated, (4) significant steel corrosion, (5) bridge capacity is
insufficient, and (6) deficiencies prompting the bridge posting on
October 27, 2017, from 50 tons to 5 tons.
A Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and ROD were
published in January 2007, which addressed the construction of a new
Madawaska LPOE.
Built in 1959, the current LPOE suffers from facility, operational,
and site deficiencies, and does not meet current CBP mission and
operational requirements for a LPOE. A few noted deficiencies: (1) Lack
of office and inspection areas, (2) deficient inbound and outbound
passenger and commercial processing areas, (3) inadequate queuing space
for vehicles, and (4) inability to meet the Architectural Barriers Act.
In furtherance of the LPOE Project, GSA previously acquired
approximately nine acres of land but did not commence construction.
A Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) was needed due
to a change in circumstance: The decision by MaineDOT and New Brunswick
Department of Transportation and Infrastructure (NBDTI) to include
alternatives for addressing deficiencies to the existing Madawaska--
Edmundston International Bridge. The SEIS addresses changes to the
Proposed Action, including an updated design in accordance with current
GSA and CBP requirements, a new International Bridge, and additional
land acquisition.
A Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS)/Final
Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation were issued for public review and
comment on October 4, 2019. The FSEIS identified the Preferred
Alternative for the new U.S. LPOE and new International Bridge location
and design; described the environmental impacts of the proposed project
and proposed mitigation; and addressed comments received on the Draft
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Draft Programmatic Section
4(f) Evaluation issued on November 26, 2018. The 30-day comment period
for the FSEIS/Final Programmatic Section 4(f) ended on November 4,
2019.
The ROD states what the decision is; identifies the alternatives
considered, including the environmentally preferred alternative; and
discusses mitigation plans, including enforcement and monitoring
commitments. In the ROD, the agencies discuss all the factors that were
contemplated when reaching their decision on whether to, and if so how
to, proceed with the Proposed Action. The ROD discusses all practical
means to avoid or minimize environmental harm that have been adopted.
The GSA considered three build alternatives for the LPOE FSEIS/
Final Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation; the FHWA and MaineDOT
considered three build alternatives for the International Bridge. The
Selected Alternative is identified as LPOE Alternative C and Bridge
Alternative 2 from the FSEIS/Final Programmatic Section 4(f)
Evaluation. LPOE Alternative C and Bridge Alternative 2 are the
environmentally preferred alternatives for the LPOE and International
Bridge, respectively.
LPOE Alternative C was identified as the Preferred LPOE Alternative
because it furthers the purpose of the project and satisfies the needs
for the project. The Preferred LPOE Alternative: (1) Provides enough
space for safe and efficient flow of traffic through the LPOE; (2)
provides enough space for the operations of the LPOE to function
efficiently; (3) meets MaineDOT's access management guidelines and the
entrance and exit to the LPOE would be approved by MaineDOT; (4)
provides a safer location and distance between the outbound and inbound
driveways; (5) provides enough open space to accommodate the necessary
length of road to descend from the bridge landing elevation (538) to
the elevation of Mill Street (520) without a steep road grade, and
provides safer maintenance and circulation in winter conditions; (6)
provides increased line of sight, safety and security for CBP personnel
to carry out their mission and operations; (7) allows inbound and
outbound driveways to connect to Mill Street, eliminating the need for
B-trains to use Main Street; and, (8) provides enough space for
seasonal snow storage and future expansion.
Bridge Alternative 2 was identified as the Preferred Bridge
Alternative because, although it would have one more pier in the Saint
John River than another alternative considered, the piers to support
the bridge would be smaller, decreasing the risks for ice jamming in
the river. While Bridge Alternative 2 would have similar construction
impacts and comparable costs (both construction and long-term operation
and maintenance) to other alternatives, Bridge Alternative 2 would take
approximately six months less time to construct.
The FSEIS/Final Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation includes a
comprehensive summary of the mitigation measures and commitments from
the GSA, FHWA, and MaineDOT in support of the development of the
Preferred LPOE Alternative and the Preferred Bridge Alternative to
further avoid and minimize adverse impacts.
Dated: February 11, 2020.
Glenn Rotondo,
Regional Commissioner, Public Buildings Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-04252 Filed 2-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-FP-P
