EPA Plan for the Federal Certification of Applicators of Restricted Use Pesticides Within Indian Country; Proposed Revisions; Notice of Availability and Request for Comment, 12244-12249 [2020-04189]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
12244
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 41 / Monday, March 2, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Act and applicable federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the proposed rule does
not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Feb 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
40 CFR Part 171
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jackie Mosby, Field and External Affairs
Division (7506P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 305–7102; email address:
Mosby.Jackie@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0037; FRL–10005–59]
I. General Information
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: February 25, 2020.
Gregory Sopkin,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2020–04230 Filed 2–28–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
EPA Plan for the Federal Certification
of Applicators of Restricted Use
Pesticides Within Indian Country;
Proposed Revisions; Notice of
Availability and Request for Comment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
EPA is announcing proposed
revisions to the EPA-administered
federal pesticide applicator certification
plan to certify applicators of restricted
use pesticides in areas of Indian country
that are not covered by any other EPAapproved certification plan. After this
proposed plan is finalized and
implemented, certification of
applicators in Indian country will be
administered by EPA, unless a tribe
submits its own tribal certification plan,
enters into a tribal-EPA agreement, or
opts out of the revised EPA Plan. EPA
is soliciting comments on EPA’s
proposed revisions to the federal
certification plan in Indian country
where no other EPA-approved plan
applies.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 1, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0037, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an individual or
business that is seeking certification to
apply restricted use pesticides (RUPs),
as defined under section 3(d) of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136a
et seq.) and 40 CFR part 152, subpart I,
in areas of Indian country where no
other EPA-approved plan applies. This
action may, however, be of interest to
those involved in agriculture and
anyone involved with the distribution
and application of pesticides for
agricultural purposes. Others involved
with pesticides in a non-agricultural
setting may also be affected. Since other
entities may also be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all
the specific entities that may be affected
by this action. You may be potentially
affected by this action if you are: A state
lead agency (SLA), tribe, or federal
agency who administers a certification
program for pesticides applicators or a
pesticide safety educator; or other
person who provides pesticide safety
training for pesticide applicator
certification or recertification. This
document also addresses EPA’s work on
a government-to-government basis with
tribes (see Unit VIII.). If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, please
consult the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 41 / Monday, March 2, 2020 / Proposed Rules
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When preparing and submitting your
comments, see the commenting tips at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
comments.html.
II. What action is the Agency taking?
EPA is announcing its proposed
revisions to the EPA-administered
federal pesticide applicator certification
plan (EPA Plan) to certify applicators of
RUPs in Indian country and seeks
public comment. This proposed EPA
Plan describes the process by which
EPA will implement a program for the
certification of applicators of RUPs in
areas of Indian country based upon the
certification requirements enumerated
at 40 CFR part 171. The proposed EPA
Plan, in its entirety, is included in the
docket (Ref. 1).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
III. What is the Agency’s authority for
this plan?
The proposed EPA Plan will be
implemented under the authority of
FIFRA section 11(a)(1), and in
accordance with the regulations found
at 40 CFR 171.307(c) and 171.311.
Additional enforcement authorities are
found in FIFRA sections 8, 9, 12, 13, 14,
and 23.
IV. Background
Under FIFRA, EPA has the authority
to classify registered pesticides as either
‘‘restricted use’’ or ‘‘general use.’’
Pesticides (or a particular use or uses of
a pesticide) that may generally cause,
without additional regulatory
restrictions, unreasonable adverse
effects on the environment, including
injury to the applicator, shall be
classified for ‘‘restricted use.’’ FIFRA
section 3(d)(1)(C), 7 U.S.C.
136a(d)(1)(C). If the classification is
made because of hazards to the
applicator, the pesticide may only be
applied by or under the direct
supervision of a certified applicator.
FIFRA section 3(d)(1)(C)(i), 7 U.S.C.
136a(d)(1)(C)(i). If the classification is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Feb 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
made because of potential unreasonable
adverse effects on the environment, the
pesticide may only be applied by or
under the direct supervision of a
certified applicator or subject to such
other restrictions as the Administrator
may provide by regulation. FIFRA
section 3(d)(1)(C)(ii), 7 U.S.C.
136a(d)(1)(C)(ii). To be certified, an
individual must be determined to be
competent with respect to the use and
handling of pesticides covered by the
certification. FIFRA section 11(a), 7
U.S.C 136i(a).
It was the intent of Congress that
persons desiring to use RUPs should be
able to obtain certification under
programs approved by EPA, as reflected
in FIFRA sections 11 and 23. 7 U.S.C.
136i, 136u. The regulations addressing
federal agency, state, and tribal
development and submission of
certification plans to EPA are contained
at 40 CFR part 171. It is EPA’s position
that federal agency, state, and tribal
plans are generally best suited to the
needs of that particular federal agency,
state, or tribe and its citizens. States and
tribes, however, are not required to
develop their own plans. Where EPA
has not approved a state or tribal
certification plan, the Agency is
authorized to implement a plan
administered by EPA for the federal
certification of applicators of RUPs
pursuant to FIFRA section 11.
In 2014, EPA announced the
finalization and implementation of an
EPA-administered certification plan for
Indian country (2014 EPA Plan) (Ref. 2).
The 2014 EPA Plan described the
process by which EPA would
implement a program for the
certification of applicators of RUPs in
Indian country based upon the
certification requirements enumerated
at 40 CFR part 171 at the time. The
entire 2014 EPA Plan is available in
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–
0037 at https://www.regulations.gov.
In 2017, EPA published a final rule
(2017 Rule) updating the regulation at
40 CFR part 171 concerning the
certification of RUP applicators (Ref. 3).
The 2017 Rule ensured that federal
certification program standards
adequately protect applicators, the
public, and the environment from risks
associated with use of RUPs. The 2017
Rule sought to improve the competency
of certified applicators of RUPs, to
increase protection for noncertified
applicators using RUPs under the direct
supervision of a certified applicator
through enhanced pesticide safety
training and standards for supervision
of noncertified applicators, and to
establish a minimum age requirement
for certified and noncertified applicators
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12245
using RUPs under the direct supervision
of a certified applicator.
Recognizing EPA’s commitment to
work more closely with tribal
governments to strengthen
environmental protection in Indian
country, the 2017 Rule provided more
practical options for establishing
certification programs in Indian
country. The 2017 Rule offers three
options for tribes to establish valid EPArecognized/approvable certification
programs in Indian country, along with
a fourth ‘‘opt-out’’ option, all which are
detailed in Appendix A of the ‘‘Tribal
Certification Plan Outline’’ document
(Ref. 4). The three options for
establishing a certification mechanism
are as follows:
1. Tribal Reliance on Certifications
Issued by Specified Jurisdictions (TribalEPA Agreement): A tribe may establish
a certification plan with the relevant
EPA region(s) through a written
agreement per 40 CFR 171.307(a) where
the tribe specifies certain federal
agencies, states, and/or tribes whose
certified applicators will be authorized
to use RUPs in the tribe’s areas of Indian
country. The nature and extent of a
tribe’s role in implementing a 40 CFR
171.307(a) plan will be negotiated with
the appropriate EPA region and
specified in the written agreement.
2. Certifications Issued by a Tribe
(Tribal Certifications): A tribe may
choose to submit its own new or revised
certification plan to the appropriate EPA
region for approval per 40 CFR
171.307(b). A tribal certification plan
needs to demonstrate that the plan
meets all requirements of 40 CFR
171.303 applicable to state certification
plans, except that the tribe’s plan will
not be required to meet the
requirements of 40 CFR
171.303(b)(6)(iii) with respect to
provisions for criminal penalties, or any
other requirements for assessing
criminal penalties.
3. EPA-administered Certification
Plan (EPA Plan): In any area of Indian
country not covered by a certification
plan established under either option 1
or 2, the Agency will implement the
proposed EPA Plan once it is finalized
as provided in 40 CFR 171.307(c),
except where a tribe has elected to opt
out. Under the EPA Plan, the Agency
would be responsible for certifying
private and commercial applicators to
use or supervise the use of RUPs. Tribes
may impose additional restrictions or
requirements on use of RUPs through
tribal codes, laws, regulations or other
tribal procedures, but would not
generally be involved in the certification
process. The existing 2014 EPA Plan
will remain in full effect until the
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
12246
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 41 / Monday, March 2, 2020 / Proposed Rules
proposed EPA Plan under this option is
finalized, no later than March 4, 2022.
Once finalized, some components of the
2014 EPA Plan may remain in effect
while EPA prepares to implement the
revised EPA Plan.
A fourth option for tribes is the ability
to opt out of the proposed EPA Plan for
Indian country. If a tribe chooses to opt
out, the Agency will not implement the
proposed EPA Plan in the area of Indian
country where the chairperson or
equivalent elected leader of the relevant
tribe provides the Agency, during the
comment period initiated by this Notice,
a written statement of the tribe’s
position that the proposed EPA Plan
should not be implemented per 40 CFR
171.307(c)(2). EPA’s website will have
additional information on the process of
opting out of the proposed EPA Plan
after the comment period ends (https://
www.epa.gov/pesticide-applicatorcertification-indian-country).
Currently, most of Indian country is
covered by the 2014 EPA Plan. EPA
expects that most areas of Indian
country will choose to continue being
covered by the 2014 EPA Plan and by
the proposed EPA Plan once it is
finalized. Tribes that choose to continue
to be covered by the EPA-administered
Plan for Indian country do not need to
notify EPA. Tribes that are currently
covered by the 2014 EPA Plan that
intend to develop either a certification
plan or a tribal-EPA agreement can do
so at any time and are not bound by the
March 4, 2020 deadline in order to
remain covered under the 2014 EPA
Plan.
There are four tribal certification
plans that received approval under 40
CFR 171.10(a)(2) prior to the 2017
Rule—those for the Three Affiliated
Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian
Reservation, the Cheyenne River Sioux
Tribe, the Rosebud Sioux Tribe, and the
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort
Hall Reservation. EPA also implemented
a separate federal plan for the Navajo
Nation prior to the 2017 Rule. In
addition, EPA is aware of three tribes,
the Santee Sioux Tribe of Nebraska, the
Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation, and
the White Earth Band of Chippewa
Indians, that entered a Memorandum of
Understanding with a state pursuant to
40 CFR 171.10(a)(1) prior to the 2017
revisions to 40 CFR part 171. EPA is
aware that among these tribes there are
some tribes that plan to submit revised
certification plans in accordance with
the new regulations at 40 CFR
171.307(a) or (b). Tribes with an existing
certification plan that do not submit a
revised certification plan by March 4,
2020 will be covered by the 2014 EPA
Plan until the proposed EPA Plan is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Feb 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
finalized and implemented, unless a
tribe decides to opt out of the proposed
EPA Plan.
V. Summary of the Proposed EPA Plan
EPA is proposing a new EPA Plan for
those areas of Indian country not
covered by any other EPA-approved
certification plan. This proposed EPA
Plan provides for the certification of
applicators of RUPs, references for
training noncertified applicators who
use RUPs under the supervision of a
certified applicator, pesticide dealer
reporting and recordkeeping, and
enforcement consistent with the
requirements of 40 CFR part 171. EPA
will administer routine maintenance
activities associated with implementing
this plan, including application
processing, database management and
recordkeeping, and will conduct
inspections and take enforcement
actions as appropriate. The final
revisions to the proposed EPA Plan will
be made after the results of the tribal
consultation and public comments are
taken into consideration. Once finalized
and fully implemented, the revised EPA
Plan will supersede all previous
versions of the EPA Plan, including the
version published on February 6, 2014.
Implementation of the EPA Plan once
finalized may be staggered based on
when each section of the finalized plan
is brought into compliance.
A. Area(s) of Indian Country To Be
Covered by the Proposed Plan
EPA intends to implement this
Federal certification plan in ‘‘Indian
country,’’ as defined at 40 CFR 171.3,
where no other EPA-approved plan
applies, and where tribes have not
‘‘opted-out’’ of coverage under the
proposed EPA Plan. ‘‘Indian country’’ is
defined at 40 CFR 171.3 as:
(a) All land within the limits of any
Indian reservation under the
jurisdiction of the United States
Government, notwithstanding the
issuance of any patent, and, including
rights-of-way running through the
reservation;
(b) All dependent Indian communities
within the borders of the United States
whether within the original or
subsequently acquired territory thereof,
and whether within or without the
limits of a state; and
(c) All Indian allotments, the Indian
titles to which have not been
extinguished, including rights-of-way
running through the same.
The definition of Indian country in 40
CFR 171.3 is identical to the definition
of that term in 18 U.S.C. 1151.
Consistent with the statutory
definition of Indian country, as well as
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
federal case law interpreting this
statutory language, EPA treats lands
held by the federal government in trust
for Indian tribes that exist outside of
formal reservations as informal
reservations, and thus as Indian
country.
B. Proposed Procedures and
Requirements for Private Applicator
Certification and Recertification
EPA is proposing to continue to make
available two options for private
applicators seeking a federal certificate
under the proposed EPA Plan.
1. Option to submit documentation of
a currently valid certificate. Consistent
with the 2014 EPA Plan, a private
applicator seeking federal certification
under this option must submit
documentation of a currently valid
certificate as a private applicator
authorized to apply federally-designated
RUPs through an EPA-approved
certification plan for a state or tribe with
a contiguous boundary to the relevant
area of Indian country along with a
completed Pesticide Applicator
Certification Form.
The applicator may submit certificates
from multiple jurisdictions, if necessary,
to support a certification pursuant to the
proposed EPA Plan that covers multiple
areas of Indian country that are located
within different states within a region.
If an applicator seeking federal
certification is unable to obtain
certification through an adjacent state or
tribal program, the applicator may
submit documentation of certification
from another state or tribal program.
EPA will determine whether to waive
further demonstration of competency
based on verification that the use
conditions and pest pressures in the
area where the applicator is certified are
similar to where the applicator intends
to apply.
a. Duration of certificate. Federal
certificates for private applicators under
this option will expire at the expiration
date of the underlying certificate, or on
the date the certificate is suspended or
revoked, whichever is earlier.
b. Renewal/recertification. Private
applicators must complete the
recertification requirements of the
underlying state or tribe’s certificate and
submit documentation.
2. Option to complete the EPA
training course. Private applicators
seeking federal certification under this
option will need to submit
documentation of completion of the
EPA training course along with a
completed Pesticide Applicator
Certification Form. While the
framework of this option is consistent
with the 2014 EPA Plan, identification
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 41 / Monday, March 2, 2020 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
verification has been enhanced and the
current EPA training course will be
revised to be in compliance with 40 CFR
part 171. Private applicators will receive
a general federal certificate; however, a
private applicator with a federal
certificate under this option alone is not
sufficient to authorize the purchase, use,
or supervision of the use of the RUP in
the categories of sodium cyanide
predator control, sodium fluoroacetate
predator control, soil fumigation, nonsoil fumigation, and aerial pest control.
Additional certificates will be needed
for those categories. Private applicators
seeking to obtain a federal certificate to
apply sodium cyanide and sodium
fluoroacetate in Indian country under
this proposed EPA Plan should refer to
Unit V.D. for more information.
a. Duration of certificate. Private
applicator federal certification by EPA
under this option expires after one year.
b. Renewal/recertification. For
recertification, private applicators
seeking a federal certificate under this
option must satisfactorily complete
EPA’s online course during the six
months preceding the expiration of their
current certificate. Recertification
through this option expires after one
year.
C. Proposed Procedures and
Requirements for Commercial
Applicator Certification and
Recertification
EPA is keeping the option for
commercial applicators to obtain a
federal certificate by submitting
documentation of a currently valid
certification as a commercial applicator
authorized to use federally designated
RUPs through an EPA-approved federal
agency plan, or an EPA-approved state
or tribal certification plan with a
contiguous boundary to the relevant
areas of Indian country. EPA may issue
federal certificates to persons who are
certified as commercial applicators for
the same categories listed in their
underlying certificate, except for the
sodium cyanide and sodium
fluoroacetate predator control categories
(see Unit V.D.).
The applicator may submit certificates
from multiple jurisdictions, if necessary,
to support a certification pursuant to the
proposed EPA Plan that covers multiple
areas of Indian country that are located
within different states within a
particular EPA region. If an applicator
seeking federal certification is unable to
obtain certification through an adjacent
state or tribal program, the applicator
may submit documentation of
certification from another state or tribal
program. EPA will determine whether to
waive further demonstration of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Feb 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
competency based on verification that
the use conditions and pest pressures in
the area where the applicator is certified
are similar to where the applicator
intends to apply.
1. Duration of certification. For
commercial applicators, a federal
certificate issued by EPA for commercial
applicators under this proposed EPA
Plan expires at the expiration date of the
underlying certificate, or on the date the
certificate is suspended or revoked,
whichever is earlier.
2. Renewal/recertification. For
recertification, commercial applicators
must complete the recertification
requirements of the underlying federal
agency, state, or tribe’s certificate and
submit documentation of the currently
valid certificate.
D. Proposed Categories for Certification
EPA expects that most, if not all,
applicators certified under the proposed
EPA Plan will already be certified
according to the categories and
standards of a jurisdiction adjacent to
the particular areas of Indian country.
Where an applicator seeks certification
under the proposed EPA Plan in
reliance on another jurisdiction’s
certification that differs from the
categories in 40 CFR 171.101 and
171.105, the certification will be limited
to the scope of the underlying
certification. Where EPA issues original
certification to private applicators, the
categories and standards of 40 CFR
171.105 will apply.
EPA is proposing to keep the predator
control categories available: Sodium
cyanide capsules used with ejector
devices and sodium fluoroacetate used
in livestock protection collars. A federal
certificate will only include these two
predator control categories if:
• The relevant Indian tribe for the
area of Indian country at issue has
obtained its own registrations for the
products within these two categories
and conducts its own monitoring and
supervision, or
• A federal employee has a valid
underlying state certificate for these
categories.
E. Pesticide Dealer Reporting and
Recordkeeping Requirements
EPA proposes that each RUP retail
dealer in areas of Indian country where
the proposed EPA Plan will apply must
keep records and submit reports to EPA
as set forth in 40 CFR 171.311(f).
F. Proposed Arrangements for
Enforcement of the EPA Plan
EPA will, as appropriate, exercise its
FIFRA authorities to enforce this EPA
Plan in applicable areas of Indian
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12247
country and in line with the EPA Policy
for the Administration of Environmental
Programs on Indian Reservations (Ref.
5), Guidance on the Enforcement
Principles Outlined in the 1984 Indian
Policy (Ref. 6), and Questions and
Answers on the Tribal Enforcement
Process (Ref. 7).
EPA will monitor compliance under
this EPA Plan by conducting
inspections, as appropriate, for misuse
of RUPs, training and supervision of
noncertified applicators, and required
recordkeeping at applicators’ places of
business and at use sites and by
investigating incidents, accidents, and
complaints. EPA will also conduct
inspections of RUP dealers and certified
applicators in Indian country to ensure
that RUP dealers are maintaining the
required records in accordance with 40
CFR 171.311(f).
EPA’s decisions to deny, modify,
suspend, or revoke a certificate, or take
other enforcement action under FIFRA,
will be made in conformance with the
FIFRA Enforcement Response Policy
(Ref. 8). EPA’s enforcement actions are
conducted consistent with applicable
EPA policies and guidance on
enforcement-related and tribal-related
matters.
VI. Specific Comments Are Sought on
the Proposed EPA Plan
EPA is seeking comments on the
entire proposed EPA Plan and is
particularly interested in comments on
the following issues:
1. Predator control categories. In the
proposed EPA Plan, there are two
scenarios where a federal certificate will
be given for sodium cyanide or sodium
fluoroacetate predator control
categories: (1) If the relevant Indian tribe
for the area of Indian country at issue
has obtained its own registration for the
products and conducts its own
monitoring and supervision or (2) if a
federal employee has obtained a state
certification for these categories. EPA is
seeking comments on whether EPA
should continue to provide sodium
cyanide and sodium fluoroacetate as
categories for federal certification to
apply in Indian country.
2. Identification verification. The
proposed EPA Plan specifies that an
identification ‘‘includes a photograph
and date of birth, such as a driver’s
license, passport, military identification,
Department of Motor Vehicle
identification card, or other verifiable
identification. Private applicators who
do not have a verifiable photographic
identification must attest their identity
by providing a signed statement form a
chairperson or equivalent elected leader
of the relevant tribe affirming the
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
12248
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 41 / Monday, March 2, 2020 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
private applicator’s age and identity.’’
EPA is seeking comments on whether
this is a reasonable means for tribes to
ascertain identity verification, and
whether there are any barriers for tribes
where this identification verification
would not work.
3. Private applicator certification.
Under FIFRA section 11(a)(1), for
Federal certification plans, EPA must
offer a no-test option for private
applicators. For more background, see
Unit V.B. of this document. EPA
proposes that private applicators who
wish to obtain Federal certification
under the no-test provision submit
documentation of attendance and
completion of an EPA-approved
training. EPA is seeking comments on
whether there are other methods or
recommendations to assure private
applicator competency in the absence of
passing a certification exam.
VII. Tribal Governments’ Option To Not
Participate in the EPA Plan for Indian
Country
In any area of Indian country not
covered by an EPA-approved
certification plan, the Agency will
finalize and implement the proposed
EPA Plan under 40 CFR 171.311 for
certifying private and commercial
applicators to use or supervise the use
of RUPs (see 40 CFR 171.307(c)).
However, tribes may opt out of being
covered by the proposed EPA Plan as
described under 40 CFR 171.307(c)(2).
In order to opt out of coverage under
the proposed EPA Plan, a tribe must
notify EPA of the tribe’s position by
submitting a signed written statement
from the chairperson or equivalent
elected leader of the relevant tribe. The
written statement must be addressed to
the Director of the Field and External
Affairs Division, Jackie Mosby, and
submitted to EPA by one of the
following methods:
• Via the docket: A tribe may submit
notification via the docket of the tribe’s
position that the EPA Plan should not
be implemented in their area of Indian
country.
• Via mail: A tribe may submit
notification via mail of the tribe’s
position to opt out of coverage under the
proposed EPA Plan to: Jackie Mosby,
Director, Field and External Affairs
Division, Office of Pesticide Programs,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW (7506P),
Washington, DC 20460.
• Via email: A tribe may submit via
email of the tribe’s position to the
appropriate EPA staff listed in
Appendix A of the ‘‘Tribal Certification
Plan Outline’’ document and cc: Emily
Ryan at ryan.emily@epa.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Feb 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
The opt-out statement should be
submitted prior to June 1, 2020. EPA
plans to establish a process for opting
out of the proposed EPA Plan after this
date. EPA’s website will have additional
information on that process at https://
www.epa.gov/pesticide-applicatorcertification-indian-country.
Should the chairperson or equivalent
elected leader of the relevant tribe opt
out of the proposed EPA Plan, the
Agency will not implement the finalized
version of this EPA Plan within the
tribe’s Indian country, and there will be
no lawful use of RUPs in the affected
areas of Indian country (except where
authorized by federal agency certified
applicators). The application of RUPs
will remain generally prohibited in
these areas of Indian country unless and
until a listed tribe obtains EPA approval
of a tribal certification plan under 40
CFR 171.307(a) or (b), or a tribe submits
to EPA a written statement from the
chairperson or equivalent elected leader
requesting implementation of this EPA
Plan in their area of Indian country.
Tribes that intend to be covered by
the proposed EPA plan do not have to
submit a written statement to receive
coverage. Additionally, in areas of
Indian country where this EPA Plan
applies, tribes may choose to further
restrict or prohibit the use of RUPs in
their areas of Indian country through the
implementation of tribal codes, laws,
regulations, or other applicable
requirements. This EPA Plan does not
supersede such tribal requirements.
Applicators of RUPs in Indian country
must comply with any applicable tribal
restrictions or prohibitions on the use of
RUPs.
VIII. Consultation With Tribal
Governments
Consistent with its statutory
authorities and the Federal
government’s trust responsibility to
federally-recognized tribes, EPA has
worked with the tribes on a governmentto-government basis to appropriately
develop a certification program that will
help ensure the protection of human
health and the environment in Indian
country. EPA is planning to hold
consultation with the tribes in February
and April 2020 to ensure development
of the final revised EPA Plan effectively
meets their needs and those of RUP
applicators in Indian country.
EPA has previously consulted with
the tribes on the 2017 Rule. In April
2019, EPA conducted three early
engagement sessions on the 2017 Rule
to inform federally-recognized tribes on
the 2017 revisions, discuss
implementation of the 2017 Rule, and
how this rule may affect tribes. These
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
sessions provided an overview of new
federal standards for an EPA-approved
certification plan to apply RUPs and
options for certification of applicators in
Indian country. The 2020 outreach and
consultation will perform a similar
function, posing specific questions to
the tribes as EPA moves towards
finalizing the EPA Plan by March 4,
2022 and the implementation schedule
that will be included with the final
revision of the EPA Plan. EPA engages
with the tribes on a variety of pesticiderelated initiatives by collaborating with
the Tribal Pesticide Program Council
(TPPC), a tribal technical resource and
program and policy development
dialogue group, focused on pesticides
issues and concerns.
EPA will finalize the proposed EPA
Plan in consultation with tribes
consistent with, among other things, the
following policies, orders, and
guidance:
• ‘‘EPA Policy for the Administration
of Environmental Programs on Indian
Reservations,’’ November 8, 1984;
• ‘‘Guidance on the Enforcement
Principles Outlined in the 1984 Indian
Policy,’’ January 17, 2001;
• Executive Order 13175,
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments,’’ November
6, 2000, which was reaffirmed by
Presidential memorandum, ‘‘Tribal
Consultation,’’ November 5, 2009; and
• ‘‘EPA Policy on Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribes,’’ May
4, 2011.
IX. References
The following is a listing of the
documents that are specifically
referenced in this document. The docket
includes these documents and other
information considered by EPA,
including documents that are referenced
within the documents that are included
in the docket, even if the referenced
document is not physically located in
the docket. For assistance in locating
these other documents, please consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
1. EPA. DRAFT EPA Plan for the Federal
Certification of Applicators of Restricted
Use Pesticides within Indian Country.
January 21, 2020.
2. EPA. Final EPA Plan for the Federal
Certification of Applicators of Restricted
Use Pesticides Within Indian Country;
Notice of Implementation. Notice.
Federal Register (79 FR 7185, February
6, 2014) (FRL–9904–18).
3. EPA. Certification of Pesticide Applicators;
Final Rule. Federal Register (82 FR 952,
January 4, 2017) (FRL–9956–70).
4. EPA. Tribal Certification Plan Outline:
Resource to Support Development of
Tribal Plans to Certify Applicators of
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 41 / Monday, March 2, 2020 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Restricted use Pesticide in Indian
Country. 2020.
5. EPA. EPA Policy for the Administration of
Environmental programs on Indian
Reservations. November 8, 1984.
6. EPA. Guidance on the Enforcement
Principles Outlined in the 1984 Indian
Policy. January 17, 2001.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Feb 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
7. EPA. Questions and Answers on the Tribal
Enforcement Process. April 17, 2007.
8. EPA. FIFRA Enforcement Response Policy.
December 2009.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136–136y.
PO 00000
Dated: February 25, 2020.
Alexandra Dapolito Dunn,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical
Safety and Pollution Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2020–04189 Filed 2–28–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
12249
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 41 (Monday, March 2, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12244-12249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-04189]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 171
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0037; FRL-10005-59]
EPA Plan for the Federal Certification of Applicators of
Restricted Use Pesticides Within Indian Country; Proposed Revisions;
Notice of Availability and Request for Comment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is announcing proposed revisions to the EPA-administered
federal pesticide applicator certification plan to certify applicators
of restricted use pesticides in areas of Indian country that are not
covered by any other EPA-approved certification plan. After this
proposed plan is finalized and implemented, certification of
applicators in Indian country will be administered by EPA, unless a
tribe submits its own tribal certification plan, enters into a tribal-
EPA agreement, or opts out of the revised EPA Plan. EPA is soliciting
comments on EPA's proposed revisions to the federal certification plan
in Indian country where no other EPA-approved plan applies.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 1, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0037, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jackie Mosby, Field and External
Affairs Division (7506P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 305-7102; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
individual or business that is seeking certification to apply
restricted use pesticides (RUPs), as defined under section 3(d) of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C.
136a et seq.) and 40 CFR part 152, subpart I, in areas of Indian
country where no other EPA-approved plan applies. This action may,
however, be of interest to those involved in agriculture and anyone
involved with the distribution and application of pesticides for
agricultural purposes. Others involved with pesticides in a non-
agricultural setting may also be affected. Since other entities may
also be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the
specific entities that may be affected by this action. You may be
potentially affected by this action if you are: A state lead agency
(SLA), tribe, or federal agency who administers a certification program
for pesticides applicators or a pesticide safety educator; or other
person who provides pesticide safety training for pesticide applicator
certification or recertification. This document also addresses EPA's
work on a government-to-government basis with tribes (see Unit VIII.).
If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to
a particular entity, please consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
[[Page 12245]]
the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside
of the disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within
the disk or CD-ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In
addition to one complete version of the comment that includes
information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain
the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
II. What action is the Agency taking?
EPA is announcing its proposed revisions to the EPA-administered
federal pesticide applicator certification plan (EPA Plan) to certify
applicators of RUPs in Indian country and seeks public comment. This
proposed EPA Plan describes the process by which EPA will implement a
program for the certification of applicators of RUPs in areas of Indian
country based upon the certification requirements enumerated at 40 CFR
part 171. The proposed EPA Plan, in its entirety, is included in the
docket (Ref. 1).
III. What is the Agency's authority for this plan?
The proposed EPA Plan will be implemented under the authority of
FIFRA section 11(a)(1), and in accordance with the regulations found at
40 CFR 171.307(c) and 171.311. Additional enforcement authorities are
found in FIFRA sections 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, and 23.
IV. Background
Under FIFRA, EPA has the authority to classify registered
pesticides as either ``restricted use'' or ``general use.'' Pesticides
(or a particular use or uses of a pesticide) that may generally cause,
without additional regulatory restrictions, unreasonable adverse
effects on the environment, including injury to the applicator, shall
be classified for ``restricted use.'' FIFRA section 3(d)(1)(C), 7
U.S.C. 136a(d)(1)(C). If the classification is made because of hazards
to the applicator, the pesticide may only be applied by or under the
direct supervision of a certified applicator. FIFRA section
3(d)(1)(C)(i), 7 U.S.C. 136a(d)(1)(C)(i). If the classification is made
because of potential unreasonable adverse effects on the environment,
the pesticide may only be applied by or under the direct supervision of
a certified applicator or subject to such other restrictions as the
Administrator may provide by regulation. FIFRA section 3(d)(1)(C)(ii),
7 U.S.C. 136a(d)(1)(C)(ii). To be certified, an individual must be
determined to be competent with respect to the use and handling of
pesticides covered by the certification. FIFRA section 11(a), 7 U.S.C
136i(a).
It was the intent of Congress that persons desiring to use RUPs
should be able to obtain certification under programs approved by EPA,
as reflected in FIFRA sections 11 and 23. 7 U.S.C. 136i, 136u. The
regulations addressing federal agency, state, and tribal development
and submission of certification plans to EPA are contained at 40 CFR
part 171. It is EPA's position that federal agency, state, and tribal
plans are generally best suited to the needs of that particular federal
agency, state, or tribe and its citizens. States and tribes, however,
are not required to develop their own plans. Where EPA has not approved
a state or tribal certification plan, the Agency is authorized to
implement a plan administered by EPA for the federal certification of
applicators of RUPs pursuant to FIFRA section 11.
In 2014, EPA announced the finalization and implementation of an
EPA-administered certification plan for Indian country (2014 EPA Plan)
(Ref. 2). The 2014 EPA Plan described the process by which EPA would
implement a program for the certification of applicators of RUPs in
Indian country based upon the certification requirements enumerated at
40 CFR part 171 at the time. The entire 2014 EPA Plan is available in
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0037 at https://www.regulations.gov.
In 2017, EPA published a final rule (2017 Rule) updating the
regulation at 40 CFR part 171 concerning the certification of RUP
applicators (Ref. 3). The 2017 Rule ensured that federal certification
program standards adequately protect applicators, the public, and the
environment from risks associated with use of RUPs. The 2017 Rule
sought to improve the competency of certified applicators of RUPs, to
increase protection for noncertified applicators using RUPs under the
direct supervision of a certified applicator through enhanced pesticide
safety training and standards for supervision of noncertified
applicators, and to establish a minimum age requirement for certified
and noncertified applicators using RUPs under the direct supervision of
a certified applicator.
Recognizing EPA's commitment to work more closely with tribal
governments to strengthen environmental protection in Indian country,
the 2017 Rule provided more practical options for establishing
certification programs in Indian country. The 2017 Rule offers three
options for tribes to establish valid EPA-recognized/approvable
certification programs in Indian country, along with a fourth ``opt-
out'' option, all which are detailed in Appendix A of the ``Tribal
Certification Plan Outline'' document (Ref. 4). The three options for
establishing a certification mechanism are as follows:
1. Tribal Reliance on Certifications Issued by Specified
Jurisdictions (Tribal-EPA Agreement): A tribe may establish a
certification plan with the relevant EPA region(s) through a written
agreement per 40 CFR 171.307(a) where the tribe specifies certain
federal agencies, states, and/or tribes whose certified applicators
will be authorized to use RUPs in the tribe's areas of Indian country.
The nature and extent of a tribe's role in implementing a 40 CFR
171.307(a) plan will be negotiated with the appropriate EPA region and
specified in the written agreement.
2. Certifications Issued by a Tribe (Tribal Certifications): A
tribe may choose to submit its own new or revised certification plan to
the appropriate EPA region for approval per 40 CFR 171.307(b). A tribal
certification plan needs to demonstrate that the plan meets all
requirements of 40 CFR 171.303 applicable to state certification plans,
except that the tribe's plan will not be required to meet the
requirements of 40 CFR 171.303(b)(6)(iii) with respect to provisions
for criminal penalties, or any other requirements for assessing
criminal penalties.
3. EPA-administered Certification Plan (EPA Plan): In any area of
Indian country not covered by a certification plan established under
either option 1 or 2, the Agency will implement the proposed EPA Plan
once it is finalized as provided in 40 CFR 171.307(c), except where a
tribe has elected to opt out. Under the EPA Plan, the Agency would be
responsible for certifying private and commercial applicators to use or
supervise the use of RUPs. Tribes may impose additional restrictions or
requirements on use of RUPs through tribal codes, laws, regulations or
other tribal procedures, but would not generally be involved in the
certification process. The existing 2014 EPA Plan will remain in full
effect until the
[[Page 12246]]
proposed EPA Plan under this option is finalized, no later than March
4, 2022. Once finalized, some components of the 2014 EPA Plan may
remain in effect while EPA prepares to implement the revised EPA Plan.
A fourth option for tribes is the ability to opt out of the
proposed EPA Plan for Indian country. If a tribe chooses to opt out,
the Agency will not implement the proposed EPA Plan in the area of
Indian country where the chairperson or equivalent elected leader of
the relevant tribe provides the Agency, during the comment period
initiated by this Notice, a written statement of the tribe's position
that the proposed EPA Plan should not be implemented per 40 CFR
171.307(c)(2). EPA's website will have additional information on the
process of opting out of the proposed EPA Plan after the comment period
ends (https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-applicator-certification-indian-country).
Currently, most of Indian country is covered by the 2014 EPA Plan.
EPA expects that most areas of Indian country will choose to continue
being covered by the 2014 EPA Plan and by the proposed EPA Plan once it
is finalized. Tribes that choose to continue to be covered by the EPA-
administered Plan for Indian country do not need to notify EPA. Tribes
that are currently covered by the 2014 EPA Plan that intend to develop
either a certification plan or a tribal-EPA agreement can do so at any
time and are not bound by the March 4, 2020 deadline in order to remain
covered under the 2014 EPA Plan.
There are four tribal certification plans that received approval
under 40 CFR 171.10(a)(2) prior to the 2017 Rule--those for the Three
Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation, the Cheyenne
River Sioux Tribe, the Rosebud Sioux Tribe, and the Shoshone-Bannock
Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation. EPA also implemented a separate
federal plan for the Navajo Nation prior to the 2017 Rule. In addition,
EPA is aware of three tribes, the Santee Sioux Tribe of Nebraska, the
Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation, and the White Earth Band of Chippewa
Indians, that entered a Memorandum of Understanding with a state
pursuant to 40 CFR 171.10(a)(1) prior to the 2017 revisions to 40 CFR
part 171. EPA is aware that among these tribes there are some tribes
that plan to submit revised certification plans in accordance with the
new regulations at 40 CFR 171.307(a) or (b). Tribes with an existing
certification plan that do not submit a revised certification plan by
March 4, 2020 will be covered by the 2014 EPA Plan until the proposed
EPA Plan is finalized and implemented, unless a tribe decides to opt
out of the proposed EPA Plan.
V. Summary of the Proposed EPA Plan
EPA is proposing a new EPA Plan for those areas of Indian country
not covered by any other EPA-approved certification plan. This proposed
EPA Plan provides for the certification of applicators of RUPs,
references for training noncertified applicators who use RUPs under the
supervision of a certified applicator, pesticide dealer reporting and
recordkeeping, and enforcement consistent with the requirements of 40
CFR part 171. EPA will administer routine maintenance activities
associated with implementing this plan, including application
processing, database management and recordkeeping, and will conduct
inspections and take enforcement actions as appropriate. The final
revisions to the proposed EPA Plan will be made after the results of
the tribal consultation and public comments are taken into
consideration. Once finalized and fully implemented, the revised EPA
Plan will supersede all previous versions of the EPA Plan, including
the version published on February 6, 2014. Implementation of the EPA
Plan once finalized may be staggered based on when each section of the
finalized plan is brought into compliance.
A. Area(s) of Indian Country To Be Covered by the Proposed Plan
EPA intends to implement this Federal certification plan in
``Indian country,'' as defined at 40 CFR 171.3, where no other EPA-
approved plan applies, and where tribes have not ``opted-out'' of
coverage under the proposed EPA Plan. ``Indian country'' is defined at
40 CFR 171.3 as:
(a) All land within the limits of any Indian reservation under the
jurisdiction of the United States Government, notwithstanding the
issuance of any patent, and, including rights-of-way running through
the reservation;
(b) All dependent Indian communities within the borders of the
United States whether within the original or subsequently acquired
territory thereof, and whether within or without the limits of a state;
and
(c) All Indian allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been
extinguished, including rights-of-way running through the same.
The definition of Indian country in 40 CFR 171.3 is identical to
the definition of that term in 18 U.S.C. 1151.
Consistent with the statutory definition of Indian country, as well
as federal case law interpreting this statutory language, EPA treats
lands held by the federal government in trust for Indian tribes that
exist outside of formal reservations as informal reservations, and thus
as Indian country.
B. Proposed Procedures and Requirements for Private Applicator
Certification and Recertification
EPA is proposing to continue to make available two options for
private applicators seeking a federal certificate under the proposed
EPA Plan.
1. Option to submit documentation of a currently valid certificate.
Consistent with the 2014 EPA Plan, a private applicator seeking federal
certification under this option must submit documentation of a
currently valid certificate as a private applicator authorized to apply
federally-designated RUPs through an EPA-approved certification plan
for a state or tribe with a contiguous boundary to the relevant area of
Indian country along with a completed Pesticide Applicator
Certification Form.
The applicator may submit certificates from multiple jurisdictions,
if necessary, to support a certification pursuant to the proposed EPA
Plan that covers multiple areas of Indian country that are located
within different states within a region. If an applicator seeking
federal certification is unable to obtain certification through an
adjacent state or tribal program, the applicator may submit
documentation of certification from another state or tribal program.
EPA will determine whether to waive further demonstration of competency
based on verification that the use conditions and pest pressures in the
area where the applicator is certified are similar to where the
applicator intends to apply.
a. Duration of certificate. Federal certificates for private
applicators under this option will expire at the expiration date of the
underlying certificate, or on the date the certificate is suspended or
revoked, whichever is earlier.
b. Renewal/recertification. Private applicators must complete the
recertification requirements of the underlying state or tribe's
certificate and submit documentation.
2. Option to complete the EPA training course. Private applicators
seeking federal certification under this option will need to submit
documentation of completion of the EPA training course along with a
completed Pesticide Applicator Certification Form. While the framework
of this option is consistent with the 2014 EPA Plan, identification
[[Page 12247]]
verification has been enhanced and the current EPA training course will
be revised to be in compliance with 40 CFR part 171. Private
applicators will receive a general federal certificate; however, a
private applicator with a federal certificate under this option alone
is not sufficient to authorize the purchase, use, or supervision of the
use of the RUP in the categories of sodium cyanide predator control,
sodium fluoroacetate predator control, soil fumigation, non-soil
fumigation, and aerial pest control. Additional certificates will be
needed for those categories. Private applicators seeking to obtain a
federal certificate to apply sodium cyanide and sodium fluoroacetate in
Indian country under this proposed EPA Plan should refer to Unit V.D.
for more information.
a. Duration of certificate. Private applicator federal
certification by EPA under this option expires after one year.
b. Renewal/recertification. For recertification, private
applicators seeking a federal certificate under this option must
satisfactorily complete EPA's online course during the six months
preceding the expiration of their current certificate. Recertification
through this option expires after one year.
C. Proposed Procedures and Requirements for Commercial Applicator
Certification and Recertification
EPA is keeping the option for commercial applicators to obtain a
federal certificate by submitting documentation of a currently valid
certification as a commercial applicator authorized to use federally
designated RUPs through an EPA-approved federal agency plan, or an EPA-
approved state or tribal certification plan with a contiguous boundary
to the relevant areas of Indian country. EPA may issue federal
certificates to persons who are certified as commercial applicators for
the same categories listed in their underlying certificate, except for
the sodium cyanide and sodium fluoroacetate predator control categories
(see Unit V.D.).
The applicator may submit certificates from multiple jurisdictions,
if necessary, to support a certification pursuant to the proposed EPA
Plan that covers multiple areas of Indian country that are located
within different states within a particular EPA region. If an
applicator seeking federal certification is unable to obtain
certification through an adjacent state or tribal program, the
applicator may submit documentation of certification from another state
or tribal program. EPA will determine whether to waive further
demonstration of competency based on verification that the use
conditions and pest pressures in the area where the applicator is
certified are similar to where the applicator intends to apply.
1. Duration of certification. For commercial applicators, a federal
certificate issued by EPA for commercial applicators under this
proposed EPA Plan expires at the expiration date of the underlying
certificate, or on the date the certificate is suspended or revoked,
whichever is earlier.
2. Renewal/recertification. For recertification, commercial
applicators must complete the recertification requirements of the
underlying federal agency, state, or tribe's certificate and submit
documentation of the currently valid certificate.
D. Proposed Categories for Certification
EPA expects that most, if not all, applicators certified under the
proposed EPA Plan will already be certified according to the categories
and standards of a jurisdiction adjacent to the particular areas of
Indian country. Where an applicator seeks certification under the
proposed EPA Plan in reliance on another jurisdiction's certification
that differs from the categories in 40 CFR 171.101 and 171.105, the
certification will be limited to the scope of the underlying
certification. Where EPA issues original certification to private
applicators, the categories and standards of 40 CFR 171.105 will apply.
EPA is proposing to keep the predator control categories available:
Sodium cyanide capsules used with ejector devices and sodium
fluoroacetate used in livestock protection collars. A federal
certificate will only include these two predator control categories if:
The relevant Indian tribe for the area of Indian country
at issue has obtained its own registrations for the products within
these two categories and conducts its own monitoring and supervision,
or
A federal employee has a valid underlying state
certificate for these categories.
E. Pesticide Dealer Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements
EPA proposes that each RUP retail dealer in areas of Indian country
where the proposed EPA Plan will apply must keep records and submit
reports to EPA as set forth in 40 CFR 171.311(f).
F. Proposed Arrangements for Enforcement of the EPA Plan
EPA will, as appropriate, exercise its FIFRA authorities to enforce
this EPA Plan in applicable areas of Indian country and in line with
the EPA Policy for the Administration of Environmental Programs on
Indian Reservations (Ref. 5), Guidance on the Enforcement Principles
Outlined in the 1984 Indian Policy (Ref. 6), and Questions and Answers
on the Tribal Enforcement Process (Ref. 7).
EPA will monitor compliance under this EPA Plan by conducting
inspections, as appropriate, for misuse of RUPs, training and
supervision of noncertified applicators, and required recordkeeping at
applicators' places of business and at use sites and by investigating
incidents, accidents, and complaints. EPA will also conduct inspections
of RUP dealers and certified applicators in Indian country to ensure
that RUP dealers are maintaining the required records in accordance
with 40 CFR 171.311(f).
EPA's decisions to deny, modify, suspend, or revoke a certificate,
or take other enforcement action under FIFRA, will be made in
conformance with the FIFRA Enforcement Response Policy (Ref. 8). EPA's
enforcement actions are conducted consistent with applicable EPA
policies and guidance on enforcement-related and tribal-related
matters.
VI. Specific Comments Are Sought on the Proposed EPA Plan
EPA is seeking comments on the entire proposed EPA Plan and is
particularly interested in comments on the following issues:
1. Predator control categories. In the proposed EPA Plan, there are
two scenarios where a federal certificate will be given for sodium
cyanide or sodium fluoroacetate predator control categories: (1) If the
relevant Indian tribe for the area of Indian country at issue has
obtained its own registration for the products and conducts its own
monitoring and supervision or (2) if a federal employee has obtained a
state certification for these categories. EPA is seeking comments on
whether EPA should continue to provide sodium cyanide and sodium
fluoroacetate as categories for federal certification to apply in
Indian country.
2. Identification verification. The proposed EPA Plan specifies
that an identification ``includes a photograph and date of birth, such
as a driver's license, passport, military identification, Department of
Motor Vehicle identification card, or other verifiable identification.
Private applicators who do not have a verifiable photographic
identification must attest their identity by providing a signed
statement form a chairperson or equivalent elected leader of the
relevant tribe affirming the
[[Page 12248]]
private applicator's age and identity.'' EPA is seeking comments on
whether this is a reasonable means for tribes to ascertain identity
verification, and whether there are any barriers for tribes where this
identification verification would not work.
3. Private applicator certification. Under FIFRA section 11(a)(1),
for Federal certification plans, EPA must offer a no-test option for
private applicators. For more background, see Unit V.B. of this
document. EPA proposes that private applicators who wish to obtain
Federal certification under the no-test provision submit documentation
of attendance and completion of an EPA-approved training. EPA is
seeking comments on whether there are other methods or recommendations
to assure private applicator competency in the absence of passing a
certification exam.
VII. Tribal Governments' Option To Not Participate in the EPA Plan for
Indian Country
In any area of Indian country not covered by an EPA-approved
certification plan, the Agency will finalize and implement the proposed
EPA Plan under 40 CFR[thinsp]171.311 for certifying private and
commercial applicators to use or supervise the use of RUPs (see 40 CFR
171.307(c)). However, tribes may opt out of being covered by the
proposed EPA Plan as described under 40 CFR 171.307(c)(2).
In order to opt out of coverage under the proposed EPA Plan, a
tribe must notify EPA of the tribe's position by submitting a signed
written statement from the chairperson or equivalent elected leader of
the relevant tribe. The written statement must be addressed to the
Director of the Field and External Affairs Division, Jackie Mosby, and
submitted to EPA by one of the following methods:
Via the docket: A tribe may submit notification via the
docket of the tribe's position that the EPA Plan should not be
implemented in their area of Indian country.
Via mail: A tribe may submit notification via mail of the
tribe's position to opt out of coverage under the proposed EPA Plan to:
Jackie Mosby, Director, Field and External Affairs Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW (7506P), Washington, DC 20460.
Via email: A tribe may submit via email of the tribe's
position to the appropriate EPA staff listed in Appendix A of the
``Tribal Certification Plan Outline'' document and cc: Emily Ryan at
[email protected].
The opt-out statement should be submitted prior to June 1, 2020.
EPA plans to establish a process for opting out of the proposed EPA
Plan after this date. EPA's website will have additional information on
that process at https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-applicator-certification-indian-country.
Should the chairperson or equivalent elected leader of the relevant
tribe opt out of the proposed EPA Plan, the Agency will not implement
the finalized version of this EPA Plan within the tribe's Indian
country, and there will be no lawful use of RUPs in the affected areas
of Indian country (except where authorized by federal agency certified
applicators). The application of RUPs will remain generally prohibited
in these areas of Indian country unless and until a listed tribe
obtains EPA approval of a tribal certification plan under 40 CFR
171.307(a) or (b), or a tribe submits to EPA a written statement from
the chairperson or equivalent elected leader requesting implementation
of this EPA Plan in their area of Indian country.
Tribes that intend to be covered by the proposed EPA plan do not
have to submit a written statement to receive coverage. Additionally,
in areas of Indian country where this EPA Plan applies, tribes may
choose to further restrict or prohibit the use of RUPs in their areas
of Indian country through the implementation of tribal codes, laws,
regulations, or other applicable requirements. This EPA Plan does not
supersede such tribal requirements. Applicators of RUPs in Indian
country must comply with any applicable tribal restrictions or
prohibitions on the use of RUPs.
VIII. Consultation With Tribal Governments
Consistent with its statutory authorities and the Federal
government's trust responsibility to federally-recognized tribes, EPA
has worked with the tribes on a government-to-government basis to
appropriately develop a certification program that will help ensure the
protection of human health and the environment in Indian country. EPA
is planning to hold consultation with the tribes in February and April
2020 to ensure development of the final revised EPA Plan effectively
meets their needs and those of RUP applicators in Indian country.
EPA has previously consulted with the tribes on the 2017 Rule. In
April 2019, EPA conducted three early engagement sessions on the 2017
Rule to inform federally-recognized tribes on the 2017 revisions,
discuss implementation of the 2017 Rule, and how this rule may affect
tribes. These sessions provided an overview of new federal standards
for an EPA-approved certification plan to apply RUPs and options for
certification of applicators in Indian country. The 2020 outreach and
consultation will perform a similar function, posing specific questions
to the tribes as EPA moves towards finalizing the EPA Plan by March 4,
2022 and the implementation schedule that will be included with the
final revision of the EPA Plan. EPA engages with the tribes on a
variety of pesticide-related initiatives by collaborating with the
Tribal Pesticide Program Council (TPPC), a tribal technical resource
and program and policy development dialogue group, focused on
pesticides issues and concerns.
EPA will finalize the proposed EPA Plan in consultation with tribes
consistent with, among other things, the following policies, orders,
and guidance:
``EPA Policy for the Administration of Environmental
Programs on Indian Reservations,'' November 8, 1984;
``Guidance on the Enforcement Principles Outlined in the
1984 Indian Policy,'' January 17, 2001;
Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,'' November 6, 2000, which was
reaffirmed by Presidential memorandum, ``Tribal Consultation,''
November 5, 2009; and
``EPA Policy on Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribes,'' May 4, 2011.
IX. References
The following is a listing of the documents that are specifically
referenced in this document. The docket includes these documents and
other information considered by EPA, including documents that are
referenced within the documents that are included in the docket, even
if the referenced document is not physically located in the docket. For
assistance in locating these other documents, please consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
1. EPA. DRAFT EPA Plan for the Federal Certification of Applicators
of Restricted Use Pesticides within Indian Country. January 21,
2020.
2. EPA. Final EPA Plan for the Federal Certification of Applicators
of Restricted Use Pesticides Within Indian Country; Notice of
Implementation. Notice. Federal Register (79 FR 7185, February 6,
2014) (FRL-9904-18).
3. EPA. Certification of Pesticide Applicators; Final Rule. Federal
Register (82 FR 952, January 4, 2017) (FRL-9956-70).
4. EPA. Tribal Certification Plan Outline: Resource to Support
Development of Tribal Plans to Certify Applicators of
[[Page 12249]]
Restricted use Pesticide in Indian Country. 2020.
5. EPA. EPA Policy for the Administration of Environmental programs
on Indian Reservations. November 8, 1984.
6. EPA. Guidance on the Enforcement Principles Outlined in the 1984
Indian Policy. January 17, 2001.
7. EPA. Questions and Answers on the Tribal Enforcement Process.
April 17, 2007.
8. EPA. FIFRA Enforcement Response Policy. December 2009.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136-136y.
Dated: February 25, 2020.
Alexandra Dapolito Dunn,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2020-04189 Filed 2-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P