Regional Infrastructure Accelerator Program, 12062-12063 [2020-04099]
Download as PDF
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
12062
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Notices
source of illumination. Evaluators stood
immediately in front of, and at the
centerline of, the Alfa Romeo Giulia
vehicle while its headlamps were being
used as the source of illumination.
Evaluators were asked if they were able
to distinguish a difference between the
reflex reflectors.
Four different scenarios were
subjectively evaluated as described
below:
Subjective Evaluation F: Alfa Romeo
Giulia Low Beam Headlamps used as a
light source at the center of the
pavement shining towards the two
Dodge Journey vehicles.
Subjective Evaluation G: Alfa Romeo
Giulia High Beam Headlamps used as a
light source at the center of the
pavement shining towards the two
Dodge Journey vehicles.
Subjective Evaluation H: Alfa Romeo
Giulia Low Beam Headlamps used as a
light source at the left edge of pavement
(146 inches to the left of the centerline
of pavement) shining towards the two
Dodge Journey vehicles.
Subjective Evaluation J: Alfa Romeo
Giulia Low Beam Headlamps used as a
light source at the right edge of
pavement (150 inches to the right of the
centerline of pavement) shining towards
the two Dodge Journey vehicles.
Findings: None of the eight evaluators
were able to distinguish any luminous
intensity differences of the light being
reflected to their eyes from the Dodge
Journey front side reflex reflectors that
were being illuminated by the
headlamps of the Alfa Romeo Giulia in
the four subjective evaluations that were
conducted.
FCA US concluded by expressing its
belief that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety, and that its petition to be
exempted from providing notification of
the noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
the subject equipment and vehicles that
FCA US no longer controlled at the time
it determined that the noncompliance
existed. However, any decision on this
petition does not relieve equipment and
vehicle distributors and dealers of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant equipment and
vehicles under their control after FCA
US notified them that the subject
noncompliance existed.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
Delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8)
Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020–04106 Filed 2–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
[Docket No. DOT–OST–2020–0023]
Regional Infrastructure Accelerator
Program
Build America Bureau, U.S.
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for Information (RFI).
AGENCY:
The Fixing America’s Surface
Transportation Act (FAST),1 enacted in
December 2015, authorized the
establishment of a Regional
Infrastructure Accelerator
Demonstration Program (the Program) to
assist entities in developing improved
infrastructure priorities and financing
strategies for the accelerated
development of a project that is eligible
for funding under the Transportation
Infrastructure Finance and Innovation
Act (TIFIA) Program under Chapter 6 of
Title 23, United States Code. The
Further Consolidated Appropriations
Act, 2020 enacted on December 20, 2019
appropriated $5 million for this
Program.2
The Build America Bureau (the
Bureau) of the U.S. Department of
Transportation (Department or DOT) is
seeking input from interested parties
with the intent to gather as much
information as possible before
implementing the Program.
The Bureau is issuing this RFI on the
most effective, transparent and
expedient way to implement the
Program. Information gleaned from this
effort will help inform the development
of the Program and approach to
designating and funding Regional
Infrastructure Accelerators that will: (1)
Serve a defined geographic area; and (2)
act as a resource to qualified entities in
the geographic area in accordance with
Section 1441 of the FAST Act.
SUMMARY:
1 Public
Law 114–94, 129 Stat. 1312, 1435.
Law 116–94, div. H, tit. I, H.R. 1865 at
413 (as enrolled December 20, 2019).
Responses to this RFI are due no
later than 11:59 p.m. 30 days after
publication of this notice. The Bureau
may hold an RFI information session(s)
before the due date.
ADDRESSES: All responses MUST be
submitted electronically via email to the
Bureau at ria@dot.gov. Questions
regarding the RFI may be submitted to
the Bureau at ria@dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information regarding this RFI
please contact Sam Beydoun via email
at sam.beydoun@dot.gov or via
telephone at 202–366–2300. A TDD is
available at 202–366–3993.
DATES:
Background
The Bureau is responsible for driving
transportation infrastructure
development projects in the United
States through innovative financing
programs. Its mission is to provide
access to the Bureau’s credit programs
in a streamlined, expedient and
transparent manner. In accomplishing
its mission, the Bureau also provides
technical assistance and encourages
innovative best practices in project
planning, financing, delivery, and
monitoring. The Bureau draws upon the
full resources of the Department of
Transportation to best utilize the
expertise of the Department’s Operating
Administrations while promoting a
culture of innovation and customer
service.
The Transportation Infrastructure
Finance and Innovation Act of 1998 3
established a Federal credit program
(TIFIA Program) for eligible
transportation projects under which the
Department may provide three forms of
credit assistance—secured (direct)
loans, loan guarantees, and standby
lines of credit. The TIFIA Program’s
fundamental goal is to leverage federal
funds by attracting substantial private
and other non-Federal co-investment to
support critical improvements to the
Nation’s surface transportation system.
Eligible recipients of TIFIA credit
assistance include State departments of
transportation, transit operators, special
authorities, local governments and
private entities.
Demonstration Program
Section 1441 of the FAST Act (https://
www.transportation.gov/buildamerica/
programs-and-services/regionalinfrastructure-accelerators) authorizes
the Program to assist in developing
improved infrastructure priorities and
financing strategies for the accelerated
development of eligible projects. It is
envisioned that Regional Infrastructure
2 Public
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3 Codified
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
as 23 U.S.C. 601–609.
28FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Notices
Accelerator(s) will act as a resource and
help facilitate delivery of projects
within a designated geographic region
while promoting investment in covered
infrastructure projects. The Further
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020
appropriated $5 million to carry out the
Program.
The goal of this RFI is to engage
interested parties to obtain input into
the most effective, transparent and
expedient ways to structure and deliver
the Program. Respondents to this RFI
are encouraged to provide related
information and answers to one or more
of the following:
Structure
(1) What would be an effective form
of the accelerator that could influence
the development of infrastructure
projects, and what type of structure and
authority would be required for the
establishment of a regional accelerator?
Are there examples of such entities from
around the country and abroad, or in
other sectors that could be used as a
model for the Program?
(2) What barriers such as regulatory,
technical and institutional (public or
private) would hinder implementation?
What authority should the accelerator(s)
have to effectively carry out its mission?
Geographic Diversity
(1) What is the most effective regional
approach in achieving geographic
diversity?
(2) What consideration should be
given to urban versus rural areas,
regional verses statewide or multi-State
accelerators?
(3) Given the appropriated amount ($5
million), what would be the optimum
range and most effective number of
awards for regional accelerators? What
would be an appropriate size program to
consider in addressing the needs of
priority infrastructure projects in rural
areas?
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Qualifications
(1) What resources, competencies and
experience would be required from and
within an accelerator? The approach
should consider the resources required
in accelerating the development of
smaller rural projects and assisting
inexperienced or under-resourced
regions.
(2) If external resources and expertise
would be contemplated, what would be
the acquisition strategy while ensuring
transparency and accountability?
(3) What is the best way to conduct an
effective and transparent selection
process? What evaluation criteria
should the Bureau consider?
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
Approach
(1) What is the most effective
approach to achieve the goals of the
Program through an accelerator? In
responding, please address
considerations for the creation, selection
and designation of regional
accelerator(s).
(2) What actions are required to plan,
implement and assess effectiveness of
regional accelerators? If your response
considers a phased approach, what
would be the activities, resources and
timelines for each phase? If new entities
are considered, how much time would
be needed to stand up a regional
accelerator and what would be the
major challenges?
(3) How could an accelerator leverage
the Federal funding beyond the initial
Federal support? If feasible, could a
standalone, self-funded and sustainable
model continue to deliver the intended
benefits under the Program?
(4) Rural transportation infrastructure
is of critical interest to the Department.
How could Regional Infrastructure
Accelerators assist in supporting
priority programs in the region such as
Rural Opportunities to Use
Transportation for Economic Success
(ROUTES) and the Bureau’s Railroad
Rehabilitation & Improvement
Financing (RRIF) credit program that
further accelerate projects?
Measures of Success
(1) How would Bureau assess and
monitor the success of the program in
accomplishing the goals and objectives?
(2) What would be appropriate key
performance indicators that help
measure the effectiveness of this
demonstration program? Please consider
the planned activities under the
Program as indicated in Section 1441 of
the FAST Act.
Other Considerations
(1) What else should the Bureau
consider (in addition to the statutory
criteria in Section 1441 of the FAST
Act) and/or do to ensure an effective
and successful regional accelerator
program?
RFI Review
Individuals or entities wishing to
respond to the RFI should state their
role as well as knowledge and
experience in developing or delivering
such programs. The Bureau may request
additional clarifying information from
any or all respondents. Responses shall
not exceed 10 pages and have no
smaller than 12-point font with 1-inch
margin all around. Any additional
documents (e.g. white papers, brochure
materials) would be considered.
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12063
However, only the first 10 pages will be
reviewed. The Bureau is not seeking and
will not accept any unsolicited
proposals through this RFI.
This RFI does NOT constitute a
Request for Proposal and is not to be
construed as a commitment, implied or
otherwise, by the Bureau or the
Department that a procurement action
will be issued. Any response related to
this RFI is not a request to be added to
a bidders list or to receive a copy of a
solicitation. There is no entitlement to
payment for direct or indirect costs or
charges arising as a result of any
potential inquiries regarding this
solicitation. The Bureau may not
respond to any specific questions or
comments submitted in response to this
notice or information provided as a
result of this notification. This RFI is
solely for information and planning
purposes and should not be construed
as a commitment by Bureau or
Department for any other purpose.
All interested parties are encouraged
to respond fully to this RFI. The Bureau
is in no way obligated by the
information received and submission by
respondents to the RFI is strictly
voluntary. Not responding to the RFI
does not preclude participation in any
future procurement or grant program, if
any is issued. However, the Bureau
places tremendous value on information
received and may utilize it to
implement and finalize its Program
development strategy.
ALL INFORMATION SUBMITTED
SHALL BE UNCLASSIFIED. DO NOT
SUBMIT ANY PROPRIATARY OR
PRICING INFORMATION.
Issued in Washington, DC on February 24,
2020.
Morteza Farajian,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2020–04099 Filed 2–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
United States Mint
Public Meeting; Notification of Citizens
Coinage Advisory Committee
Notification of Citizens Coinage
Advisory Committee March 10–11,
2020, Public Meeting.
ACTION:
The United States Mint
announces the Citizens Coinage
Advisory Committee (CCAC) public
meeting scheduled for March 10, 2020
and March 11, 2020.
Date: March 10, 2020 and March 11,
2020.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12062-12063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-04099]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
[Docket No. DOT-OST-2020-0023]
Regional Infrastructure Accelerator Program
AGENCY: Build America Bureau, U.S. Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for Information (RFI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST),\1\
enacted in December 2015, authorized the establishment of a Regional
Infrastructure Accelerator Demonstration Program (the Program) to
assist entities in developing improved infrastructure priorities and
financing strategies for the accelerated development of a project that
is eligible for funding under the Transportation Infrastructure Finance
and Innovation Act (TIFIA) Program under Chapter 6 of Title 23, United
States Code. The Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 enacted
on December 20, 2019 appropriated $5 million for this Program.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 114-94, 129 Stat. 1312, 1435.
\2\ Public Law 116-94, div. H, tit. I, H.R. 1865 at 413 (as
enrolled December 20, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Build America Bureau (the Bureau) of the U.S. Department of
Transportation (Department or DOT) is seeking input from interested
parties with the intent to gather as much information as possible
before implementing the Program.
The Bureau is issuing this RFI on the most effective, transparent
and expedient way to implement the Program. Information gleaned from
this effort will help inform the development of the Program and
approach to designating and funding Regional Infrastructure
Accelerators that will: (1) Serve a defined geographic area; and (2)
act as a resource to qualified entities in the geographic area in
accordance with Section 1441 of the FAST Act.
DATES: Responses to this RFI are due no later than 11:59 p.m. 30 days
after publication of this notice. The Bureau may hold an RFI
information session(s) before the due date.
ADDRESSES: All responses MUST be submitted electronically via email to
the Bureau at [email protected]. Questions regarding the RFI may be submitted
to the Bureau at [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information regarding this
RFI please contact Sam Beydoun via email at [email protected] or via
telephone at 202-366-2300. A TDD is available at 202-366-3993.
Background
The Bureau is responsible for driving transportation infrastructure
development projects in the United States through innovative financing
programs. Its mission is to provide access to the Bureau's credit
programs in a streamlined, expedient and transparent manner. In
accomplishing its mission, the Bureau also provides technical
assistance and encourages innovative best practices in project
planning, financing, delivery, and monitoring. The Bureau draws upon
the full resources of the Department of Transportation to best utilize
the expertise of the Department's Operating Administrations while
promoting a culture of innovation and customer service.
The Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of
1998 \3\ established a Federal credit program (TIFIA Program) for
eligible transportation projects under which the Department may provide
three forms of credit assistance--secured (direct) loans, loan
guarantees, and standby lines of credit. The TIFIA Program's
fundamental goal is to leverage federal funds by attracting substantial
private and other non-Federal co-investment to support critical
improvements to the Nation's surface transportation system. Eligible
recipients of TIFIA credit assistance include State departments of
transportation, transit operators, special authorities, local
governments and private entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Codified as 23 U.S.C. 601-609.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Demonstration Program
Section 1441 of the FAST Act (https://www.transportation.gov/buildamerica/programs-and-services/regional-infrastructure-accelerators) authorizes the Program to assist in developing improved
infrastructure priorities and financing strategies for the accelerated
development of eligible projects. It is envisioned that Regional
Infrastructure
[[Page 12063]]
Accelerator(s) will act as a resource and help facilitate delivery of
projects within a designated geographic region while promoting
investment in covered infrastructure projects. The Further Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2020 appropriated $5 million to carry out the
Program.
The goal of this RFI is to engage interested parties to obtain
input into the most effective, transparent and expedient ways to
structure and deliver the Program. Respondents to this RFI are
encouraged to provide related information and answers to one or more of
the following:
Structure
(1) What would be an effective form of the accelerator that could
influence the development of infrastructure projects, and what type of
structure and authority would be required for the establishment of a
regional accelerator? Are there examples of such entities from around
the country and abroad, or in other sectors that could be used as a
model for the Program?
(2) What barriers such as regulatory, technical and institutional
(public or private) would hinder implementation? What authority should
the accelerator(s) have to effectively carry out its mission?
Geographic Diversity
(1) What is the most effective regional approach in achieving
geographic diversity?
(2) What consideration should be given to urban versus rural areas,
regional verses statewide or multi-State accelerators?
(3) Given the appropriated amount ($5 million), what would be the
optimum range and most effective number of awards for regional
accelerators? What would be an appropriate size program to consider in
addressing the needs of priority infrastructure projects in rural
areas?
Qualifications
(1) What resources, competencies and experience would be required
from and within an accelerator? The approach should consider the
resources required in accelerating the development of smaller rural
projects and assisting inexperienced or under-resourced regions.
(2) If external resources and expertise would be contemplated, what
would be the acquisition strategy while ensuring transparency and
accountability?
(3) What is the best way to conduct an effective and transparent
selection process? What evaluation criteria should the Bureau consider?
Approach
(1) What is the most effective approach to achieve the goals of the
Program through an accelerator? In responding, please address
considerations for the creation, selection and designation of regional
accelerator(s).
(2) What actions are required to plan, implement and assess
effectiveness of regional accelerators? If your response considers a
phased approach, what would be the activities, resources and timelines
for each phase? If new entities are considered, how much time would be
needed to stand up a regional accelerator and what would be the major
challenges?
(3) How could an accelerator leverage the Federal funding beyond
the initial Federal support? If feasible, could a standalone, self-
funded and sustainable model continue to deliver the intended benefits
under the Program?
(4) Rural transportation infrastructure is of critical interest to
the Department. How could Regional Infrastructure Accelerators assist
in supporting priority programs in the region such as Rural
Opportunities to Use Transportation for Economic Success (ROUTES) and
the Bureau's Railroad Rehabilitation & Improvement Financing (RRIF)
credit program that further accelerate projects?
Measures of Success
(1) How would Bureau assess and monitor the success of the program
in accomplishing the goals and objectives?
(2) What would be appropriate key performance indicators that help
measure the effectiveness of this demonstration program? Please
consider the planned activities under the Program as indicated in
Section 1441 of the FAST Act.
Other Considerations
(1) What else should the Bureau consider (in addition to the
statutory criteria in Section 1441 of the FAST Act) and/or do to ensure
an effective and successful regional accelerator program?
RFI Review
Individuals or entities wishing to respond to the RFI should state
their role as well as knowledge and experience in developing or
delivering such programs. The Bureau may request additional clarifying
information from any or all respondents. Responses shall not exceed 10
pages and have no smaller than 12-point font with 1-inch margin all
around. Any additional documents (e.g. white papers, brochure
materials) would be considered. However, only the first 10 pages will
be reviewed. The Bureau is not seeking and will not accept any
unsolicited proposals through this RFI.
This RFI does NOT constitute a Request for Proposal and is not to
be construed as a commitment, implied or otherwise, by the Bureau or
the Department that a procurement action will be issued. Any response
related to this RFI is not a request to be added to a bidders list or
to receive a copy of a solicitation. There is no entitlement to payment
for direct or indirect costs or charges arising as a result of any
potential inquiries regarding this solicitation. The Bureau may not
respond to any specific questions or comments submitted in response to
this notice or information provided as a result of this notification.
This RFI is solely for information and planning purposes and should not
be construed as a commitment by Bureau or Department for any other
purpose.
All interested parties are encouraged to respond fully to this RFI.
The Bureau is in no way obligated by the information received and
submission by respondents to the RFI is strictly voluntary. Not
responding to the RFI does not preclude participation in any future
procurement or grant program, if any is issued. However, the Bureau
places tremendous value on information received and may utilize it to
implement and finalize its Program development strategy.
ALL INFORMATION SUBMITTED SHALL BE UNCLASSIFIED. DO NOT SUBMIT ANY
PROPRIATARY OR PRICING INFORMATION.
Issued in Washington, DC on February 24, 2020.
Morteza Farajian,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2020-04099 Filed 2-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P