NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule-Phase 2 Extension, 11909-11927 [2020-02889]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
worked. Generally, this certification will
be required monthly, resulting in
monthly payments.
*
*
*
*
*
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control numbers 2900–0178
and 2900–0465)
[FR Doc. 2020–03884 Filed 2–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3680(c), 3680(g), 3689)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Subpart K—All Volunteer Force
Educational Assistance Program
(Montgomery GI Bill—Active Duty)
40 CFR Parts 9, 122, 123, 127, 403, and
503
5. The authority citation for part 21,
Subpart K continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), chs. 30, 36,
and as noted in specific sections.
6. Amend § 21.7140 by:
a. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(ii);
■ b. Adding an authority citation for
paragraph (c)(2); and
■ c. Revising the information collection
approval at the end of the section.
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
■
§ 21.7140 Certifications and release of
payments.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) VA has received from the training
establishment a certification of hours
worked.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 3034, 3680(g))
*
*
*
*
*
(The Office of Management and Budget has
approved the information collection
provisions in this section under control
numbers 2900–0178, 2900–0695, and 2900–
0698)
Subpart L—Educational Assistance for
Members of the Selected Reserve
7. The authority citation for part 21,
Subpart L continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 10 U.S.C. ch. 1606; 38 U.S.C.
501(a), 512, ch. 36, and as noted in specific
sections.
8. Amend § 21.7640 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a)(3)(ii); and
■ b. Revising the information collection
approval at the end of the section.
The revisions read as follows:
■
§ 21.7640
Release of payments.
*
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control numbers 2900–0073
and 2900–0178)
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) VA has received certification by
the training establishment of the
reservist’s hours worked.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
[EPA–HQ–OECA–2019–0408; FRL–10005–
21–OECA]
RIN 2020–AA52
NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule—
Phase 2 Extension
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA published the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Electronic Reporting Rule
(‘‘NPDES eRule’’) on 22 October 2015.
The 2015 rule required EPA and states
to modernize Clean Water Act (CWA)
reporting. The NPDES eRule included a
phased implementation schedule. In
this notice, EPA proposes postponing
the compliance deadlines for Phase 2
implementation by three years and
providing states with additional
flexibility to request additional time as
needed. Further, this notice proposes
changes to the NPDES eRule that would
clarify existing requirements and
eliminate some duplicative or outdated
reporting requirements. Taken together,
these changes are designed to save the
NPDES authorized programs
considerable resources, make reporting
easier for NPDES-regulated entities,
streamline permit renewals, ensure full
exchange of NPDES program data
between states and EPA, enhance public
transparency, improve environmental
decision-making, and protect human
health and the environment.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 28, 2020. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
comments on the information collection
provisions are best assured of
consideration if the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
receives a copy of your comments on or
before March 30, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OECA–2019–0408, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11909
edited or withdrawn. EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://
www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information, please contact
Mr. Carey A. Johnston, Office of
Compliance (mail code 2222A),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number: 202–566–
1014; or email: johnston.carey@epa.gov
(preferred). Also see the following
website for additional information
regarding the rulemaking: https://
www.epa.gov/compliance/npdesereporting.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
II. Background
III. Changes to Phase 2 Compliance Deadlines
IV. Alternative Phase 2 Compliance
Deadlines
V. Clarifying Edits for More Efficient
Implementation and 2019 NPDES
Updates Rule Changes
VI. Assistance to States To Implement Phase
2
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
Entities potentially affected by this
action include all NPDES-permitted
facilities, whether covered by an
individual permit or general permit,
industrial users located in cities without
approved local pretreatment programs,
facilities subject to EPA’s biosolids
regulations, and governmental entities
that have received NPDES program
authorization or are implementing
portions of the NPDES program in a
cooperative agreement with EPA. These
entities include:
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
11910
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Category
Examples of regulated entities
Facilities seeking coverage under an individual
NPDES permits, general permit, or subject to
an NPDES inspection.
Publicly-owned treatment works (POTW) facilities, treatment works treating domestic sewage
(TWTDS), municipalities, counties, stormwater management districts, state-operated facilities, Federally-operated facilities, industrial facilities, construction sites, and concentrated
animal feeding operations (CAFOs).
Industrial facilities discharging to POTWs and for which the designated pretreatment Control
Authority is EPA or the authorized state, tribe, or territory rather than an approved local
pretreatment program.
Class I sludge management facilities (as defined in 40 CFR 503.9(c)), POTWs with a design
flow rate equal to or greater than one million gallons per day, and POTWs that serve 10,000
people or more.
States and territories that have received NPDES program authorization from EPA, that are implementing portions of the NPDES program in a cooperative agreement with EPA, or that
operate NPDES-permitted facilities.
Tribes that have received NPDES program authorization from EPA, that are implementing portions of the NPDES program in a cooperative agreement with EPA, or that operate NPDESpermitted facilities.
Federal facilities with a NPDES permit and EPA Regional Offices acting for those states,
tribes, and territories that do not have NPDES program authorization or that do not have
program authorization for a particular NPDES subprogram (e.g., biosolids or pretreatment).
Industrial users located in cities without approved local pretreatment programs.
POTWs and other facilities subject to EPA’s
biosolids regulations.
State and territorial governments .......................
Tribal governments .............................................
Federal governments ..........................................
This table is not intended to be an
exhaustive list, but rather provides some
examples of the types of entities
potentially regulated by this action.
Other types of entities not listed in this
table may also be regulated. If you have
questions regarding the applicability of
this proposed action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
B. What action is the agency taking?
EPA published the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Electronic Reporting Rule (‘‘NPDES
eRule’’) on 22 October 2015. The 2015
rule required EPA and states to
modernize Clean Water Act (CWA)
reporting for municipalities, industries
and other facilities. The rule divided
implementation into two ‘‘Phases.’’ The
deadline for Phase 1 implementation
passed on December 21, 2016. The
deadline for Phase 2 is currently
December 21, 2020. Some state
authorized NPDES programs have
provided feedback to EPA on how to
improve Phase 2 implementation of the
NPDES eRule and, in particular, have
recommended changes to the schedule
for Phase 2 implementation to allow
both EPA and states sufficient time to
develop and implement the information
technology solutions necessary for
electronic reporting of the Phase 2 data
(see DCN 0001 to 0009). This notice
proposes a change to the compliance
deadlines for Phase 2 implementation
and other changes to the NPDES eRule
to allow for a smoother transition from
paper to electronic reporting for the
NPDES program.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
C. What is the agency’s authority for
taking this action?
Pursuant to the Clean Water Act
(CWA), 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., EPA
promulgated the NPDES eRule, which
added a new part to title 40 (40 CFR part
127) and made changes to existing
NPDES regulations. The EPA
promulgated the NPDES eRule under
authority of the CWA sections 101(f),
304(i), 308, 402, and 501. EPA is using
the same authority to propose the
changes in this notice. EPA notes that
the Congressional Declaration of Goals
and Policy of the CWA specifies in
section 101(f) that ‘‘It is the national
policy that to the maximum extent
possible the procedures utilized for
implementing this chapter shall
encourage the drastic minimization of
paperwork and interagency decision
procedures, and the best use of available
manpower and funds, so as to prevent
needless duplication and unnecessary
delays at all levels of government.’’
Harnessing information technology
that is now a common part of daily life
is an important step toward reaching the
goals of the CWA. EPA is promulgating
this rule under the authority of CWA
section 304(i) that authorizes EPA to
establish minimum procedural and
other elements of state programs under
section 402, including reporting
requirements and procedures to make
information available to the public. In
addition, EPA is promulgating this rule
under section 308 of the CWA. Section
308 of the CWA authorizes EPA to
require access to information necessary
to carry out the objectives of the Act,
including sections 301, 305, 306, 307,
311, 402, 404, 405, and 504. Section 402
of the CWA establishes the NPDES
permit program for the control of the
discharge of pollutants into the nation’s
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
waters. EPA is promulgating this rule
under CWA sections 402(b) and (c),
which require each authorized state,
tribe, or territory to ensure that permits
meet certain substantive requirements,
and provide EPA information from
point sources, industrial users, and
authorized programs in order to ensure
proper oversight. Finally, EPA is
promulgating this rule under the
authority of section 501, which
authorizes EPA to prescribe such
regulations as are necessary to carry out
provisions of the Act.
D. What are the incremental costs and
benefits of this action?
EPA identified only minimal
incremental costs of this proposed rule
as the overall impact of these proposed
changes would be to allow states to
more efficiently implement the NPDES
eRule. EPA proposes postponing the
compliance deadlines for Phase 2
implementation by three years and
providing states with additional
flexibility to request an extension if
more time is necessary but with no
extension allowed beyond December 21,
2026.
This rule also proposes changes to the
NPDES eRule that would clarify existing
requirements and eliminate some
duplicative or outdated reporting
requirements. For example, EPA
proposes to eliminate three data
elements from the minimum set of
NPDES program data (Appendix A to 40
CFR part 127): Reportable
Noncompliance Tracking, Reportable
Noncompliance Tracking Start Date, and
Applicable Categorical Standards. This
will reduce the costs to authorized
NPDES programs in collecting,
managing, and sharing these data. EPA
also anticipates that the clarifications
contained in this proposed rule will
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
help states avoid unnecessary
implementation costs. For example, the
proposed changes would make clear
that the electronic reporting
requirement for Notices of Termination
(NOTs) applies only to general permit
covered facilities (see Table 1 to
Appendix A, 40 CFR part 127) and not
to individually permitted facilities.
II. Background
EPA published the NPDES eRule on
22 October 2015. The 2015 rule required
EPA and states to modernize Clean
Water Act (CWA) reporting for
municipalities, industries and other
facilities. That rule replaced most paperbased NPDES reporting requirements
with electronic reporting. This rule
converted the following paper reports to
electronic: (1) Discharge Monitoring
Reports (DMRs); (2) general permit
reports (e.g., Notices of Intent to
discharge in compliance with a general
permit); and (3) other specified program
reports. The NPDES eRule included a
phased implementation schedule (40
CFR 127.26). Most states and permittees
have successfully implemented Phase 1
of the NPDES eRule, which includes
electronic submission of DMRs and the
Federal Biosolids Annual Report where
EPA is the Regulatory Authority.
The NPDES eRule requires EPA to
calculate electronic reporting
participation rates for each authorized
NPDES program six months after the
deadline for conversion from paper to
electronic submissions and annually
thereafter [see 40 CFR 127.26(j)]. The
compliance deadlines for Phase 1 of the
NPDES eRule were 21 December 2016
and they included NPDES Data Groups
No. 3 (Discharge Monitoring Reports or
‘‘DMRs’’) and No. 4 [Sewage Sludge/
Biosolids Annual Program Reports,
where EPA implements the biosolids
program (40 CFR part 503)]. EPA’s first
three assessments have shown
considerable progress in Phase 1
implementation (see DCN 0012—0014),
although more work needs to be done to
achieve the full benefits of Phase 1.
Current tracking of Phase 1
implementation is available through the
‘‘NPDES eRule Readiness Dashboard.’’
See: https://echo.epa.gov/trends/npdeserule-dashboard-public.
Electronic submission of all other
reports and notices covered by the
NPDES eRule are part of Phase 2
implementation. See Table 1 to 40 CFR
127.16. The online ‘‘NPDES eRule Phase
2 Implementation Dashboard’’ provides
an inventory of all general permits and
program reports covered by the NPDES
eRule. See: https://edap.epa.gov/public/
extensions/eRule_Phase2/eRule_
Phase2.html. This dashboard also
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
provides an updated view of EPA’s
progress in gathering information and
deploying NPDES electronic reporting
tools for Phase 2 general permits and
program reports (see DCN 0015).
EPA and states are now focusing on
implementing Phase 2 of the NPDES
eRule and also continuing to work on
completing Phase 1 reporting deadlines.
EPA and states are now gathering
information and deploying NPDES
electronic reporting tools for Phase 2
reports. EPA and states are collaborating
and sharing information through
multiple workgroups. The EPA-state
General Permit and Program Report
Technical Workgroup focuses on the
EPA Regional and state general permits
and program reports that will use EPA’s
NPDES Electronic Reporting Tool (NeT)
for Phase 2 data.
The EPA-state NPDES Noncompliance
Report (NNCR) workgroup discusses
how to identify, categorize, sort, and
display violations on the NNCR. This
workgroup is discussing how best to
implement the new NNCR regulations
in 40 CFR 123.45. EPA held three
listening sessions with the EPA-state
NNCR workgroup to discuss updated
language in 40 CFR 123.45. States
provided feedback on how to clarify the
category I noncompliance criteria for
enforcement order violations, permit
effluent limit violations, and reporting
violations. EPA incorporated comments
and other minor clarifying text and
formatting issues from these workgroup
discussions in this proposed rule.
EPA received letters from authorized
NPDES programs on how to improve
Phase 2 implementation of the NPDES
eRule which recommended changes to
the schedule for Phase 2
implementation to allow both EPA and
states sufficient time to develop and
implement the information technology
solutions necessary for electronic
reporting of the Phase 2 data (see DCN
0001 to 0009). In response to the
feedback from the states in the letters
and oral communications, this notice
proposes changes to the NPDES eRule to
allow for a smoother transition from
paper to electronic reporting for the
NPDES program.
EPA collected these changes over the
past few years as EPA and states began
implementing the NPDES eRule. These
suggested changes are intended to
clarify and streamline NPDES eRule
implementation. These changes also
update the required minimum set of
NPDES program data to include recent
changes to the NPDES program. EPA
recently updated the NPDES permit
application regulations (40 CFR 122.21)
and the related forms with the 2019
NPDES Applications and Program
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11911
Updates final rule. See February 12,
2019; 84 FR 3324. Taken together, these
data standardizations and the
corresponding electronic reporting
requirements are designed to save the
NPDES authorized programs
considerable resources, make reporting
easier for NPDES-regulated entities,
streamline permit renewals (as permit
writers typically review previous
noncompliance events during permit
renewal), improve the accuracy and
completeness of NPDES program data
shared with EPA from authorized states,
ensure transparency of NPDES program
data to the public, improve
environmental decision-making, and
protect human health and the
environment.
Finally, in a separate rulemaking, EPA
has proposed to update the minimum
set of NPDES program data (Appendix
A to 40 CFR part 127) for the municipal
separate storm sewer systems (MS4s)
sector. See April 20, 2019; 84 FR 18200.
These changes to the NPDES eRule will
correct obsolete citations and current
inconsistencies with the newly
modified MS4 Phase II regulations. See
December 8, 2016; 81 FR 89320. These
updates would not change the burden
associated with complying with the
NPDES eRule but, rather, the changes
would assist permitting authorities and
MS4 permittees in implementing
NPDES electronic reporting. Today’s
proposal does not address those
previously-proposed changes to the
MS4 data elements.
III. Changes to Phase 2 Compliance
Deadlines
This notice proposes to postpone the
compliance deadlines for Phase 2
implementation of the NPDES eRule
from December 21, 2020, to December
21, 2023 (see Table 1 to 40 CFR 127.16).
EPA has received feedback from
authorized NPDES programs on how to
improve Phase 2 implementation of the
NPDES eRule. This state feedback, in
particular, recommended changes to the
schedule for Phase 2 implementation to
allow both EPA and states sufficient
time to develop and implement the
information technology solutions
necessary for electronic reporting of the
Phase 2 data (see DCN 0001 to 0009).
One letter submitted by the Association
of Clean Water Agencies (‘‘ACWA’’)
noted that, ‘‘the new deadline should
take into consideration the resources
and time EPA will need to invest in
updating ICIS–NPDES, the resources
and time EPA will need to invest to
complete work on the NPDES Electronic
Tool, known as ‘‘NeT,’’ and the
resources and time states will then need
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
11912
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
to complete their implementation of the
rule given the new information.’’
The reason for this proposal is to
allow EPA additional time to complete
the development of electronic tools that
the States may use to comply with the
electronic reporting requirements. EPA
had intended for these tools to be
available as an option for the states to
use by December 2020, but EPA has
experienced unexpected delays since
EPA promulgated the 2015 NPDES Rule.
These delays include the modernization
of its pre-existing electronic reporting
tool for the collection of DMRs (called
‘‘NetDMR’’) and the switch from using
a commercially license software
platform to an open-source software
platform for general permits and
program reports (called ‘‘NPDES
Electronic Report Tool’’ or ‘‘NeT’’). The
NetDMR changes involved migrating
tens of thousands of NetDMR users to
the Agency’s Central Data Exchange
(CDX) system for account management.
This simplified NetDMR account
management for EPA, states, and
NetDMR users. EPA made the switch to
open-source software platform for NeT
to lower its costs. EPA estimates that
these tools will be available by
December 21, 2023 (see DCN 0017). EPA
has gathered basic information on all
general permits and program reports
that will use NeT (see NPDES eRule
Phase 2 Implementation Dashboard).
EPA expects to build the necessary NeT
applications in order to meet the new
Phase 2 compliance deadlines as it has
already deployed general permit
electronic reporting tools for more than
27,000 facilities that are subject to
federal or authorized state general
permits (approximately 55% of the
estimated number of facilities that will
use NeT). An extension of the Phase 2
compliance deadlines will also assist
states who have experienced similar
challenges in developing the
information technology infrastructure to
implement electronic reporting tools for
their general permit covered facilities.
The following are the proposed
regulatory changes that EPA is
considering for the Phase 2 compliance
deadlines:
• Change the Phase 2 compliance
deadlines in Table 1 to 40 CFR 127.16
from December 21, 2020, to December
21, 2023 for general permit reports and
program reports.
• Change the Phase 2 compliance
deadlines in the NPDES regulations in
40 CFR parts 122, 403, and 503. These
provisions originated the reporting
requirements.
EPA proposes to change the Phase 2
compliance (deadline) date for the
following NPDES reporting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
requirements in 40 CFR parts 122, 403,
and 503:
• Low Erosivity Waivers (LEW)—40
CFR 122.26(b)(15)(i)(C);
• No Exposure Certifications (NOE)—
40 CFR 122.26(g)(1)(iii);
• Notice of Intent to discharge
(NOI)—40 CFR 122.28(b)(2)(i);
• Small Municipal Separate Storm
Sewer System (MS4) Program Report—
40 CFR 122.34(d)(3);
• Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event
Report—40 CFR 122.41(l)(6)(i),
122.41(l)(7), 122.41(m)(3)(i), and
122.41(m)(3)(ii);
• Medium or Large MS4 Program
Report—40 CFR 122.42(c);
• CAFO Annual Report—40 CFR
122.42(e)(4);
• Notice of Terminations (NOT)—40
CFR 122.64(c);
• Significant Industrial User
Compliance Reports in Municipalities
Without Approved Pretreatment
Programs—40 CFR 403.12(e) and (h);
• Pretreatment Program Report—40
CFR 403.12(i); and
• Biosolids Annual Report—40 CFR
503.18, 503.28, 503.48.
In addition to moving the compliance
deadlines to December 21, 2023, EPA
proposes to add a reference to the
proposed alternative Phase 2
compliance deadlines provisions at 40
CFR 127.24(e) or (f). This is discussed
in more detail below. Other than the
changes to the deadlines for complying
with Phase 2 compliance deadlines and
the addition of the reference to the
alternative Phase 2 compliance
deadlines provisions, EPA is not
proposing any changes to the
requirements in these sections and will
not respond to any public comments on
issues other than the dates.
Finally, EPA regulations set the NNCR
publication date at December 21, 2021.
EPA originally picked this date as it
needed time to develop this report and
that it was one year after the Phase 2
compliance deadlines for electronic
reporting. As previously noted, EPA and
states have made significant progress in
implementing Phase 1 and EPA has held
frequent meetings with states on how to
develop the NNCR.
EPA does not see the need to extend
the NNCR publication compliance
deadline for an additional three years,
as it has some Phase 1 data that can be
incorporated into the NNCR. EPA plans
to incorporate Phase 2 data into the
NNCR as these data become available.
The benefit of this approach would be
to give EPA, states, and the public a
complete inventory of facilities with
violations based on the most currently
available set of NPDES program data.
This will help EPA and states identify
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
noncompliance issues that might impact
human health or the environment.
However, EPA needs additional time
to work with states on completing Phase
1 reporting and how best to categorize
and display non-compliance in the
NNCR based on Phase 1 data. In
addition, EPA is already working with
states on reducing the level of
Significant Non-Compliance with
NPDES requirements using the Phase 1
data as one of its National Compliance
Initiatives for 2020–2023.1 Therefore,
EPA is proposing to delay the public
release date of the NNCR by one year,
to December 21, 2022. This date will
allow EPA and states to use the new
NNCR as EPA is making decisions on its
next round of National Compliance
Initiatives. EPA solicits comment on
this proposed NNCR publication date.
IV. Alternative Phase 2 Compliance
Deadlines
In addition to changing the Phase 2
compliance deadline, EPA is proposing
new regulatory provisions to create
additional flexibility for Phase 2
compliance deadlines in case they are
needed. These new provisions respond
to the requests from ACWA and other
authorized NPDES programs for more
time to develop and implement the
information technology solutions
necessary for electronic reporting of the
Phase 2 data (see DCN 0001 to 0009).
The EPA proposes a new regulatory
provision [40 CFR 127.24(e)] that would
allow authorized NPDES programs to
request additional time beyond
December 21, 2023 to implement Phase
2 of the NPDES eRule. Under this
provision, an authorized NPDES
program would send a request for EPA
to review and approval. This request
would identify the facilities, general
permits, program reports, or data
elements for which the authorized
NPDES program needs additional time
beyond December 21, 2023. For
example, under this option a state could
seek approval from the EPA to postpone
implementation of electronic reporting
for a NPDES general permit until an
agreed-upon time after December 21,
2023, but no later than December 21,
2026. This waiver might be helpful if a
state has a permit or program report that
is a lower priority for electronic
reporting (e.g., a general permit that
provides coverage for 10 or fewer
NPDES-regulated entities) and for which
electronic reporting tool development is
delayed.
1 See the following website for details: https://
www.epa.gov/enforcement/fy2020-fy2023-nationalcompliance-initiatives.
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
While states may make multiple
requests for compliance deadline
extensions beyond December 21, 2023,
the proposed rule would not allow EPA
to grant extensions beyond December
21, 2026. Each alternative Phase 2
compliance deadline request would
need to:
• Be submitted to EPA by the
Director, as defined in 40 CFR 122.2;
• Identify each general permit,
program report, and related data
elements covered by the request and the
corresponding alternative compliance
deadline(s);
• Identify each facility covered by the
request and the corresponding
alternative compliance deadline(s)
(Note: This only applies if the request
covers some but not all facilities
covered by the relevant general permit
or program report requirement);
• Be submitted at least 120 days prior
to the then-applicable compliance
deadline(s) in Table 1 to 40 CFR 127.16
or a previously EPA approved
alternative compliance deadline; and
• Provide a rationale for the delay
and enough details (e.g., tasks,
milestones, roles and responsibilities,
necessary resources) to clearly describe
how the program will successfully
implement electronic reporting for
general permit, program report, and
related data elements covered by the
request.
EPA would review each alternative
Phase 2 compliance deadline request to
determine if it provides enough detail to
accurately assess if the state has a
reasonable plan to deploy electronic
reporting by the requested alternative
Phase 2 compliance deadline. EPA
would return alternative Phase 2
compliance deadline requests with
insufficient detail back to the Director
within 30 days of receipt and provide
recommendations. EPA would approve
or deny each complete alternative Phase
2 compliance deadline request within
120 days of receipt of a sufficiently
detailed request. EPA would provide
notice to the authorized NPDES program
of EPA’s approval or denial. The
authorized NPDES program could reapply if the initial request were denied
by EPA.
Under the proposal, EPA could elect
to deny an alternative Phase 2
compliance deadline request and then
could continue to follow the procedure
in the existing rule for determining the
initial recipient of electronic NPDES
information (see 40 CFR 127.27). EPA
must become the initial recipient of
electronic NPDES information from
NPDES-regulated facilities if the state,
tribe, or territory does not consistently
maintain electronic data transfers in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
compliance with the NPDES eRule [see
40 CFR 127.27(d)(2)]. EPA would
update its website with each alternative
Phase 2 compliance deadline request
and the corresponding Agency approval
or denial notice. EPA would provide
updated information at: https://
www.epa.gov/compliance/npdesereporting. EPA would also update its
website and online ‘‘NPDES eRule
Phase 2 Implementation Dashboard’’ to
clearly identify the approved alternative
Phase 2 compliance deadlines for each
facility, general permit report, program
report, and related data elements by
authorized NPDES program.
EPA is also proposing a separate
regulatory provision [40 CFR 127.24(f)]
that would authorize EPA to, on its own
initiative, allow for additional time for
one or more states to implement NPDES
electronic reporting beyond December
21, 2023. Under this proposal, EPA
could establish an alternative Phase 2
compliance deadline for electronic
reporting and data sharing for one or
more facilities, general permit reports,
program reports, and related data
elements (see Table 2 to Appendix A to
40 CFR part 127). Under the proposal,
EPA could set an alternative Phase 2
compliance deadline for up to three
years but not beyond December 21,
2026. EPA would update its website and
online ‘‘NPDES eRule Phase 2
Implementation Dashboard’’ to clearly
identify the alternative Phase 2
compliance deadlines for each facility,
general permit report, program report,
and related data elements by authorized
NPDES program. Separately, EPA would
provide notice to the one or more
authorized NPDES program covered by
each alternative Phase 2 compliance
deadline through email or letters. This
notice would include a rationale for the
delay and enough details (e.g., tasks,
milestones, roles and responsibilities,
necessary resources) to clearly describe
how EPA would successfully implement
electronic reporting for general permit,
program report, and related data
elements covered by the extension. This
additional flexibility would also allow
more time for EPA and authorized
NPDES programs to resolve any issues
related to the sharing of Phase 2 data.
V. Clarifying Edits for More Efficient
Implementation and 2019 NPDES
Updates Rule Changes
The following are proposed clarifying
edits to the 2015 NPDES eRule. These
changes are based on EPA and state
experience over the past few years
during NPDES eRule implementation.
These proposed changes are intended to
clarify and streamline NPDES eRule
implementation. The last two changes
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11913
also include two new data sharing
requirements related to NAICS codes
and variance requests that were recently
added to the NPDES application forms.
See the 2019 NPDES Applications and
Program Updates Rule (February 12,
2019; 84 FR 3324).
A. Correct the Title for 40 CFR 123.45
EPA proposes to delete ‘‘by the
Director’’ in the title for this section.
EPA proposes this deletion as the
NPDES eRule eliminated the previous
noncompliance reports that were
authored by state NPDES programs and
replace them with one noncompliance
report (i.e., NPDES Noncompliance
Report or ‘‘NNCR’’). The NNCR is
authored by EPA rather than any state
‘‘Director.’’
B. Provide Greater Clarity and
Specificity for the NNCR Category I
Noncompliance Definitions
The NPDES eRule also eliminated
state noncompliance reporting [e.g.,
Quarterly Noncompliance Report
(QNCR), Annual Noncompliance Report
(ANCR)] and required EPA to produce a
public inventory of NPDES violations
(called the NPDES Noncompliance
Report or ‘‘NNCR’’). The NPDES eRule
also revised and update the violation
classification definitions to specifically
identify Category I violations with all
other violations as Category II
violations. EPA proposes the following
changes to the NNCR Category I
violation classification definitions,
which are listed at 40 CFR 123.45(a)(2).
EPA regulatory:
• Re-order the violation categories to
better match the order EPA previously
used in the pre-2015 version of 123.45
for the Category I noncompliance
definitions;
• Correct the label and definition
used for violations of administrative or
judicial enforcement orders;
• Correct the label for permit effluent
limit violations;
• Clarify the definition of Category I
noncompliance for reporting violations;
and
• Clarify the text in Appendix A to 40
CFR 123.45 and update the formatting to
correctly show labels and groups of
pollutants.
EPA solicited feedback from the EPAstate NNCR workgroup on these
proposed changes. EPA received
feedback from states that it would be
helpful to re-order the noncompliance
categories to better match the order EPA
used prior to promulgating the 2015
NPDES eRule. States also provided
feedback to EPA that several NNCR
Category I definitions should be
clarified and refined. States suggested
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
11914
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
that EPA change ‘‘Compliance schedule
violations’’ to ‘‘Enforcement order
violations,’’ as this category of
violations relates to violations of ‘‘any
requirement or condition in
administrative or judicial enforcement
orders, other than compliance
construction violations and reporting
violations.’’ This proposed change
would remove the word ‘‘permit’’ from
this definition as these types of
violations are not related to permit
requirements. EPA is proposing to
change the label ‘‘Effluent limits’’ to
‘‘Permit effluent limits’’ as this category
of violations only relates to violations or
effluent limits that are in NPDES
permits.
States also suggested deleting the
word ‘‘complete’’ in the ‘‘Reporting
violations’’ violation category. Some
states indicated that this definition
could be interpreted to mean that the
submission of an incomplete report
could trigger Category I noncompliance
(e.g., failure to report one value on a
DMR as opposed to the entire DMR).
EPA proposes to delete the word
‘‘complete’’ to make clear that a
Category I reporting violation only
occurs when an NPDES-regulated entity
fails to file an entire report within the
appropriate reporting period.
EPA is retaining in the NNCR the
identification of Category I reporting
violations for facilities that do not
provide the required data for an entire
DMR but instead report a noncompliant
reason for not providing these data. An
example of this kind of noncompliance
is when a facility fails to conduct any
sampling or analysis during the
reporting period as required by its
NPDES permit. The facility would use
the DMR form to report this
noncompliance to the authorized
NPDES program. These noncompliant
reasons at the DMR form level will
continue to be classified as Category I
noncompliance reporting violations.
States also requested more clarity on
the type of reporting violations that
would always trigger Category I
noncompliance. EPA is proposing to
retain the 30-day grace period and list
the reports that must be filed within 30
days: (1) Final compliance schedule
progress reports; (2) Discharge
Monitoring Reports [see 40 CFR
122.41(l)(4)(i)], and (3) program reports
[see 40 CFR 127.2(f)]. These reports are
critical compliance monitoring
information and closely align with
NPDES eRule (see Table 1 to 40 CFR
127.16). EPA is also retaining violations
of the twenty-four reporting and fiveday reporting NPDES requirements [see
40 CFR 122.41(l)(6)] in the ‘‘Reporting
violations’’ violation category as these
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
reporting violations relate to
‘‘noncompliance which may endanger
health or the environment.’’ States also
provided feedback that they would like
the ability to use their discretion to
identify other reporting violations as
Category I violations. EPA notes that the
NNCR already includes this flexibility
as the ‘‘Other violations’’ category
includes, ‘‘any violation or group of
violations, which in the discretion of
the Director or EPA, are considered to
be of concern.’’
Finally, EPA proposes to clarify the
text in Appendix A to 40 CFR 123.45
and update the formatting to correctly
show labels and groups of pollutants.
These proposed clarifications would fix
an inaccurate reference and use the
same wording from the ‘‘Violation
classifications’’ section of the NNCR.
EPA intends no substantive change to
the scope of Category I noncompliance
through these changes.
C. Correct Appendix A Deficiency
Descriptions To Match Current Practices
of Authorized NPDES Programs
EPA proposes to delete the last
sentence in the data description for the
following four ‘deficiency’ data
elements in Appendix A to 40 CFR part
127: ‘‘The values for this data element
will distinguish between
noncompliance and significant
noncompliance (SNC).’’
• Deficiencies Identified Through the
Biosolids/Sewage Sludge Compliance
Monitoring
• Deficiencies Identified Through the
MS4 Compliance Monitoring
• Deficiencies Identified Through the
Pretreatment Compliance Monitoring
• Deficiencies Identified Through the
Sewer Overflow/Bypass Compliance
Monitoring
EPA is also proposing to delete the
regulation citation to 40 CFR 123.45 for
these four data elements.
EPA proposes to delete the last
sentence in the data description for the
four ‘deficiency’ data elements as only
violations affect compliance status. This
change would make clear that these four
‘deficiency’ data elements should not be
used to affect compliance status. These
separate data elements mirror the
current inspection and violation
identification practices of authorized
NPDES programs. In general, EPA and
state inspectors document their findings
made during inspections and note any
‘deficiencies.’ EPA created four different
‘deficiency’ data elements to identify
and track these instances of potential
noncompliance. The inspector’s
manager will typically review these
‘deficiencies’ and decide if any of them
warrant separate identification as
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
violations. These violations are already
tracked with the ‘‘Violation Code’’ data
element. Deleting this sentence from the
descriptions for these four data elements
will eliminate any potential confusion
as to whether the identified deficiency
automatically created an instance of
non-compliance.
D. Correct Data Element Name and
Description and Reference for Biosolids
or Sewage Sludge—Land Application or
Surface Disposal Deficiencies
EPA proposes to rename the
‘‘Biosolids or Sewage Sludge—Land
Application or Surface Disposal
Deficiencies’’ data element to ‘‘Biosolids
or Sewage Sludge—Violations’’ and
update the related data description.
EPA mislabeled the ‘‘Biosolids or
Sewage Sludge—Land Application or
Surface Disposal Deficiencies’’ data
element in the NPDES eRule. This
element is part of the Federal biosolids
annual report and allows NPDESregulated entities to self-report
violations on all regulated biosolids
management practices (i.e., land
application, surface disposal, and
incineration) (see 22 October 2015; 80
FR 64079). This change also makes clear
that this data element tracks selfreported violations for the three
biosolids management practices
regulated under EPA’s Federal biosolids
regulations (40 CFR part 503). EPA is
also proposing to add the corresponding
CFR reference for the biosolids
incineration annual report (40 CFR
503.48). This change will help reduce
confusion with the data element
‘‘Deficiencies Identified Through the
Biosolids/Sewage Sludge Compliance
Monitoring;’’ these deficiencies are not
violations and do not affect compliance
status.
E. Correct the Title of the ‘‘Sewer
Overflow/Bypass Event Report’’ in Table
1 of Appendix A and Table 1 of 40 CFR
127.16
EPA used an incorrect title in two
sections of the NPDES eRule for the
report that provides information on
sewer overflows and bypass events. EPA
used the incorrect title, ‘‘Sewer
Overflow Event Reports [40 CFR
122.41(l)(6) and (7)],’’ at Table 1 to 40
CFR 127.16 and Table 1 to Appendix A,
40 CFR part 127. The correct title is,
‘‘Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports
[40 CFR 122.41(l)(4), (6), (7), and
122.41(m)(3)].’’ EPA used the correct
title in all other references to this report.
EPA is also proposing to make
conforming changes to the ‘‘Program
area’’ column and the ‘‘Minimum
frequency’’ column in Table 1
(Appendix A 40 CFR part 127).
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
F. Deletion of the Following Two Data
Elements: Reportable Noncompliance
Tracking and Reportable
Noncompliance Tracking Start Date
EPA proposes deleting the following
two data elements as these data are no
longer used for EPA’s national NPDES
program:
• Reportable Noncompliance
Tracking; and
• Reportable Noncompliance
Tracking Start Date.
EPA mistakenly included these two
data elements in Appendix A. These
two data elements are no longer needed
to address unforeseen circumstances
when the authorized NPDES program
needs to turn off automatic violation
detection by EPA’s NPDES data system.
The current recommended approach to
turn off compliance tracking in EPA’s
NPDES data system is for EPA or
authorized NPDES programs to use the
Permit Compliance Tracking Status and
DMR Non-Receipt data elements. See
‘‘NPDES Electronic Reporting
Implementation Guidance for Tracking
Compliance and Major Designations,’’
28 December 2016, https://
www.epa.gov/compliance/data-entryguidance-and-technical-papers.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
G. Provide Greater Clarity for the
‘‘Facility Concentrated Aquatic Animal
Production (CAAP) Status’’ Data
Element Name and Description
EPA proposes to make changes to the
‘‘Facility CAAP Status’’ data element
name and description. States provided
feedback to EPA that the current name
and description of this data element
could be interpreted to mean that this
data element applies to all NPDESregulated entities as the current data
description provides ‘‘Yes’’ and ‘‘No’’ as
example reference values. This
interpretation implies that states would
need to provide a ‘‘Yes’’ or ‘‘No’’ for all
NPDES-regulated entities.
The proposed changes would make
clear that this data element only applies
to aquatic animal production facilities.
The proposed change would ensure that
states do not need to share these data
with EPA for facilities that do not have
aquatic animal production (i.e., lower
data entry burden for states). Moreover,
the proposed changes would also
provide the information necessary to
distinguish between the two CAAP
identification methods. EPA proposes to
change the name of this data element
from ‘‘Facility CAAP Designation’’ to
‘‘Facility CAAP Status.’’ The proposed
change from ‘‘Designation’’ to ‘‘Status’’
makes clear that this data element tracks
both methods for identifying an aquatic
animal production facility as a CAAP
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
facility. The first method is solely based
on production amounts provided by the
facility and the second method is a
manual designation process performed
by the authorized NPDES program.
• Method #1 (Based on Facility
Production Data)—CAAP identification
is automatic based on the comparison of
permit application/NOI information
against the criteria used in EPA’s CAAP
NPDES regulations (see 40 CFR
122.24(b)); and
• Method #2 (Authorized NPDES
Program Designation)—Using a case-bycase approach the RA may designate
any warm or cold-water aquatic animal
production facility as a concentrated
aquatic animal production facility upon
determining that it is a significant
contributor of pollution to waters of the
United States (see 40 CFR 122.24(c)).
The two methods are sequenced as
follows. Facilities seeking NPDES
permit coverage that acquire the CAAP
status under Method #1 are not
evaluated under Method #2 [i.e.,
Facility CAAP Status is set to ‘‘Yes
(Based on Facility Production Data)’’].
Conversely, facilities seeking NPDES
permit coverage that do not acquire
CAAP status under Method #1 can be
designated by the authorized NPDES
program as a CAAP facility under
Method #2 [i.e., Facility CAAP Status is
set to ‘‘Yes (Authorized NPDES Program
Designation)’’]. The proposed changes
would also require NPDES programs to
share data with EPA on aquatic animal
production facilities that they inspect
under Method #2 and found to not be
a CAAP facility [i.e., Facility CAAP
Status is set to ‘‘No (Authorized NPDES
Program Determination)’’].
H. Provide Greater Clarity on the ‘Permit
Component’ Data Element With Respect
to Unpermitted Facilities
EPA proposes changes to the ‘‘Permit
Component’’ data element description
to clarify its applicability to
unpermitted facilities subject to NPDES
inspections. EPA proposes these
changes as EPA’s regulations require
authorized NPDES programs to have
‘‘inspection and surveillance procedures
to determine, independent of
information supplied by regulated
persons, compliance or noncompliance
with applicable program requirements.’’
See 40 CFR 123.26(b). EPA’s NPDES
Compliance Monitoring Strategy (CMS)
also provides compliance monitoring
goals for authorized NPDES programs
and guidance regarding inspection of
facilities without NPDES permit
coverage.2 For example, this document
2 U.S. EPA, 2014. Issuance of Clean Water Act
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11915
notes, ‘‘Regions and states should also
conduct compliance monitoring
activities to locate industrial facilities
that have failed to obtain permit
coverage or file a ‘no exposure
certification’ under 40 CFR 122.26(g).
Inspections of unpermitted industrial
stormwater facilities, including those
with ‘no exposure certification,’ will
count toward the annual industrial
stormwater coverage goal of 10%.’’ 3
EPA provided a discussion of when
states must share data on unpermitted
facilities with EPA in the preamble to
the final rule (October 22, 2015; 80 FR
64078).
This change would clarify that this
data element applies to unpermitted
facilities when states are required by
EPA regulations to share data about
these unpermitted facilities with EPA.
This change would also update the
regulatory citation for this data element
to explicitly include certain
unpermitted facilities [e.g., certain
unpermitted facilities subject to a CWA
NPDES inspection, facilities regulated
by the Federal biosolids regulation (40
CFR part 503)]. This change would help
EPA and states ensure that unpermitted
facilities can be properly sorted into
their respective NPDES programs (e.g.,
industrial stormwater, construction
stormwater, CAFOs). EPA estimates that
this change would only be a minor
increase in costs to states as most states
already share these data for tracking
compliance with the CMS and other
programmatic needs. For example, EPA
uses this data element to mask facility
information in public search tools for
unpermitted Concentrated Animal
Feeding Operations (CAFOs) and
Animal Feeding Operations (AFOs) that
EPA or state inspectors found were not
discharging and do not require an
NPDES permit (see 22 October 2015; 80
FR 64092).
I. Provide Greater Clarity on the Notice
of Termination (NOT) Electronic
Reporting Requirements
EPA proposes to make changes to the
Notice of Termination (NOT) section in
the NPDES regulations (40 CFR
122.64(c)). The NPDES eRule made clear
that the electronic reporting
requirement for NOTs only applied to
general permit covered facilities (see
Table 1 to Appendix A, 40 CFR part
127). This proposed language clarifies
the electronic reporting requirement for
NOTs and helps ensure that the state
Compliance Monitoring Strategy, Memorandum
from Lisa Lund, Director, Office of Compliance, July
21. See https://www.epa.gov/compliance/cleanwater-act-national-pollutant-discharge-eliminationsystem-compliance-monitoring.
3 Ibid, Page 15.
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
11916
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
burden associated with implementing
the NPDES eRule is minimized.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
J. Provide Greater Clarity on the
‘‘Applicable Effluent Limitations
Guidelines’’ Data Element and Delete
the Duplicative Data Element,
‘‘Applicable Categorical Standards’’
EPA proposes to update the data
description for the ‘‘Applicable Effluent
Limitations Guidelines’’ data element to
make clear that this data element
applies to all NPDES-regulated entities
and to clarify EPA’s expectation that the
authorized NPDES program should
identify all applicable effluent
limitations guidelines. Making these
changes will also allow EPA to delete
the ‘‘Applicable Categorical Standards’’
data element. EPA is also proposing to
make conforming changes to the
regulatory citation and ‘‘NPDES Data
Group’’ columns in Table 2 (Appendix
A to 40 CFR part 127).
This proposed change will help
reduce the burden on states to create a
duplicative data element, ‘‘Applicable
Categorical Standards.’’ This change
will help ensure that EPA and states
have an accurate inventory of facilities
that meet the applicability criteria of the
one or more effluent guidelines as well
as allow EPA to maintain an accurate
inventory of facilities that do not have
any applicable effluent guidelines.
Finally, these changes will also help
reduce state data sharing burden as the
data description makes clear that the
Control Authority can use pretreatment
program report and the state can use the
NOI submissions to manage these data.
K. Provide Greater Clarity on the
‘‘Receiving Waterbody Name for
Permitted Feature’’ Data Element Name
and Description
EPA proposes to delete the word
‘‘Receiving’’ from the ‘‘Receiving
Waterbody Name for Permitted Feature’’
data element name and update the data
description. EPA is also proposing to
add conforming regulatory citations to
40 CFR 122.21(f)(9) for this data element
as well as the ‘‘Source Water for Cooling
Purposes’’ data element.
EPA recently updated the NPDES
regulations governing individual NPDES
permit applications (see 12 February
2019; 84 FR 3324). The Rule added 40
CFR 122.21(f)(9), requires individual
permit applications to include the
following cooling water information:
‘‘An indication of whether the facility
uses cooling water and the source of the
cooling water.’’ EPA now proposes a
conforming change to the data element
in Appendix A. This proposed change
would also make clear that this data
element is optional for other intake
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
structures. EPA proposes to update the
data sharing requirements for both
individual and general permit covered
facilities. This would ensure that there
is consistent and complete reporting
nationwide of industrial classification
data, which are useful for regulatory
decisions and program oversight.
L. Requiring NAICS Code Data To
Match the 2019 NPDES Applications
and Program Updates Final Rule
EPA proposes to update the data
descriptions for the ‘‘NAICS Code’’ and
‘‘NAICS Code Primary Indicator’’ data
elements. EPA is also proposing to add
conforming regulatory citations to 40
CFR 122.21(f)(3) and 122.28(b)(2)(ii) for
these data elements.
EPA proposes these changes to
conform to its updated NPDES permit
application regulations (see 12 February
2019; 84 FR 3324), which became
effective on June 12, 2019. Since this
date, applicants for EPA-issued NPDES
permits are required to meet the new
application requirements. EPA proposes
to update each of the eight NPDES
application forms to conform to the
February 12, 2019 final rule and
improve clarity and usability. States that
are authorized to administer the NPDES
program might require use of EPA’s
application forms or might have
developed their own state-specific
application forms. In either case, the
final NPDES Applications and Program
Updates Rule provides states up to one
year to make conforming programmatic
and regulatory changes, and up to two
years if statutory changes are needed.
The 2019 NPDES Applications and
Program Updates Final Rule requires
permit applications to include data on
the four-digit Standard Industrial
Classification (SIC) codes and the sixdigit NAICS codes. Prior to this 2019
rulemaking, EPA only required NPDES
permit applications to include SIC code
data. EPA is proposing to update the
data sharing requirements for both
individual and general permit covered
facilities. This would ensure that there
is consistent and complete reporting
nationwide of industrial classification
data, which are useful for regulatory
decisions and program oversight. EPA is
proposing to require states to share
these NAICS code data with EPA when
they approve NPDES permit coverage.
This will help lower the
implementation costs to states.
M. Add Variance Data Elements to
Appendix A To Match the 2019 NPDES
Applications and Program Updates
Final Rule
EPA proposes to make changes to
variance related data elements in
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Appendix A as well as add new
variance related data elements. These
variances relate to the following
provisions in the CWA:
• Fundamentally different factors
(FDFs) (CWA section 301(n));
• Non-conventional pollutants (CWA
section 301(c) and (g));
• Water quality related effluent
limitations (CWA Section 302(b)(2));
• Thermal discharges (CWA Section
316(a)); and
• Discharges to marine waters (CWA
Section 301(h))].
EPA proposes to make conforming
changes to the data element citations.
EPA proposes to amend Table 2 to
Appendix A for these variance data
elements to include references to 40
CFR 123.41 (‘Sharing of Information’)
for variances that do not expire (e.g.,
FDFs) as well as references to NPDES
permit application variance information
sections at 40 CFR 122.21(f)(10) and
122.21(j)(1)(ix).
EPA proposes to include these revised
and new data elements in the minimum
set of NPDES program data (Appendix
A to 40 CFR part 127) as these data
would allow EPA and states to better
track variance requests and related
statuses for the NPDES program. EPA
recently updated the NPDES permit
application regulations (40 CFR 122.21)
and the related forms with the 2019
NPDES Applications and Program
Updates final rule. EPA proposes
updating the data sharing requirements
for both individual and general permit
covered facilities. This would ensure
that there is consistent and complete
reporting nationwide of variance data.
EPA is proposing to require states to
share these variance data with EPA
when they approve NPDES permit
coverage. This approach will integrate
with the authorized NPDES program’s
data collection and sharing activities.
VI. Assistance to States To Implement
Phase 2
EPA will continue to provide
technical assistance and support to
authorized NPDES programs during the
transition to electronic reporting. This
includes building electronic reporting
tools for authorized NPDES programs
that elect to use these tools and to
support the development of new data
transfer protocols. Authorized NPDES
programs can request EPA’s assistance
for electronic reporting by submitting a
request to NPDESeReporting@epa.gov.
EPA offers authorized programs
financial assistance through the
Exchange Network Grant Program. This
program provides funding to states,
territories, and federally recognized
Indian tribes to support the
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
development of the National
Environmental Information Exchange
Network. The primary outcome
expected from Exchange Network
assistance agreements is improved
access to, and exchange of, high-quality
environmental data from public and
private sector sources. More information
on this program is available at: https://
www.epa.gov/exchangenetwork/
exchange-network-grant-program.
EPA will continue to work with
authorized NPDES programs to
implement NPDES electronic reporting.
This includes the use of workgroups to
help authorized NPDES programs share
data with EPA and to provide
recommendations on how EPA should
build the NNCR. Authorized NPDES
programs can contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to learn how to join
these workgroups.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was therefore not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This action is not an Executive Order
13771 regulatory action because this
action is not significant under Executive
Order 12866.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection activities
in this proposed rule have been
submitted for approval to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the PRA. The Information Collection
Request (ICR) document that the EPA
prepared has been assigned EPA ICR
number [2617.01]. You can find a copy
of the supporting statement for this ICR
in the docket for this rule (see DCN
0016). It is briefly summarized here.
EPA has primary responsibility for
ensuring the CWA’s NPDES program is
effectively and consistently
implemented nationwide, thus ensuring
that public health and environmental
protection goals of the CWA are met.
EPA is taking this action pursuant to
CWA sections 101(f), 304(i), 308, 402,
and 501. The accurate, complete, and
timely information collected under this
ICR will help EPA and states more
efficiently implement the 2015 NPDES
eRule. The improved information
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
sharing would increase transparency
and accountability and help EPA and
authorized NPDES programs collaborate
and measure progress in implementing
the 2015 NPDES eRule. This
information collection would provide
EPA with more timely, consistent, and
accurate inventory of all general permits
and program reports, the number of
facilities that must electronically submit
reports, and the online location of state
electronic reporting tools.
Receiving current high-level data on
general permits and program reports is
critical to EPA’s ability to oversee and
manage authorized NPDES programs.
Authorizing the burden under this ICR
will allow EPA to provide timely
assistance to authorized NPDES
programs as they implementation the
NPDES eRule. The general permits and
program reports inventory will help
promote efficiencies in NPDES eRule
implementation as states will be able to
use this information to identify other
states that have already developed
electronic reporting tools. Additionally,
with the implementation of this
information collection activity,
regulated entities would be able to
ensure that they are fully aware of the
compliance deadlines and electronic
reporting tools for their reporting
obligations.
Respondents/affected entities: This
ICR covers the 47 states and one U.S.
Territory authorized to implement the
NPDES program.
Respondent’s obligation to respond:
EPA is taking this action pursuant to
CWA sections 101(f), 304(i), 308, 402,
and 501.
Estimated number of respondents:
This ICR covers the 48 authorized
NPDES programs.
Frequency of response: EPA estimates
that twelve authorized NPDES programs
will provide updated information on
general permits and program reports
and the related electronic reporting
tools each month. Additionally, all 48
authorized NPDES programs will
conduct an annual review and update of
EPA’s inventory. Finally, EPA estimates
that approximately 15 authorized
NPDES programs will prepare and
submit an alternative Phase 2
compliance deadline request during the
three-year period covered by the ICR.
Total estimated burden: 416 hours
(per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR
1320.3(b).
Total estimated cost: $25,418 (per
year), includes $0 annualized capital or
operation & maintenance costs.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11917
control number. The OMB control
numbers for the EPA’s regulations in 40
CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
Submit your comments on the
Agency’s need for this information, the
accuracy of the provided burden
estimates and any suggested methods
for minimizing respondent burden to
the EPA using the docket identified at
the beginning of this rule. You may also
send your ICR-related comments to
OMB’s Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs via email to OIRA_
submission@omb.eop.gov, Attention:
Desk Officer for the EPA. Since OMB is
required to make a decision concerning
the ICR between 30 and 60 days after
receipt, OMB must receive comments no
later than March 30, 2020. The EPA will
respond to any ICR-related comments in
the final rule.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities. This action does not affect
small entities as the proposed changes
in this action only cover states, tribes,
and territories that have NPDES
program authorization. The RFA defines
‘‘small governmental jurisdiction’’ as
the government of a city, county, town,
township, village, school district, or
special district with a population of less
than 50,000 (5 U.S.C. 601(5)). For the
purposes of the RFA, States and tribal
governments are not considered small
governments.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain an
unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C.
1531–1538, and does not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. The
proposed changes in this action help
streamline the implementation of the
NPDES eRule and provide states with
more flexibility. EPA estimates that the
additional time and flexibility afforded
by the proposed changes will help lower
the implementation costs.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
11918
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Water
pollution control.
This action does not have tribal
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. This action does not affect
small entities as the proposed changes
in this action only cover states, tribes,
and territories that have NPDES
program authorization. Currently there
are no tribal governments that are
authorized for the NPDES program.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
40 CFR Part 123
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13045 because it is not
economically significant as defined in
Executive Order 12866, and because the
EPA does not believe the environmental
health or safety risks addressed by this
action present a disproportionate risk to
children. The proposed changes in this
action only cover states, tribes, and
territories that have NPDES program
authorization.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
J. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Automatic data processing, Electronic
data processing, Hazardous substances,
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Sewage disposal, Waste treatment and
disposal, Water pollution control.
40 CFR Part 403
Environmental protection,
Confidential business information,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waste treatment and
disposal, Water pollution control.
Environmental protection, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Sewage disposal.
Dated: January 31, 2020.
Andrew R. Wheeler,
Administrator.
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
■
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 9
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 135 et seq., 136–136y;
15 U.S.C. 2001, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2601–2671;
21 U.S.C. 331j, 346a, 31 U.S.C. 9701; 33
U.S.C. 1251 et seq., 1311, 1313d, 1314, 1318,
1321, 1326, 1330, 1342, 1344, 1345 (d) and
(e), 1361; E.O. 11735, 38 FR 21243, 3 CFR,
1971–1975 Comp. p. 973; 42 U.S.C. 241,
242b, 243, 246, 300f, 300g, 300g–1, 300g–2,
300g–3, 300g–4, 300g–5, 300g–6, 300j–1,
300j–2, 300j–3, 300j–4, 300j–9, 1857 et seq.,
6901–6992k, 7401–7671q, 7542, 9601–9657,
11023, 11048.
2. In § 9.1, add the entry ‘‘127.24’’ in
numerical order under the undesignated
center heading ‘‘NPDES Electronic
Reporting’’ to read as follows:
■
Environmental protection, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
40 CFR Part 122
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Jkt 250001
*
OMB control No.
*
*
*
NPDES Electronic Reporting
*
*
*
127.24 .......................
*
*
*
*
2020–NEW
*
*
*
40 CFR Part 127
PART 9—OMB APPROVALS UNDER
THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
The EPA believes that this action does
not have disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority populations, lowincome populations and/or indigenous
peoples, as specified in Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The proposed changes in this action
only cover states, tribes, and territories
that have NPDES program authorization.
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous substances, Indians-lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Water pollution control.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40
CFR parts 9, 122, 123, 127, 403, and 503
as follows:
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
40 CFR Part 503
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
40 CFR citation
§ 9.1 OMB approvals under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00053
*
Fmt 4702
*
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
*
PART 122—EPA ADMINISTERED
PERMIT PROGRAMS: THE NATIONAL
POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
ELIMINATION SYSTEM
3. The authority citation for part 122
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: The Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.
1251 et seq.
4. In § 122.26, revise paragraphs
(b)(15)(i)(C) and (g)(1)(iii) to read as
follows:
■
§ 122.26 Storm water discharges
(applicable to State NPDES programs, see
§ 123.25).
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(15) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) As of December 21, 2023 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40
CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all certifications
submitted in compliance with
paragraphs (b)(15)(i)(A) and (B) of this
section must be submitted electronically
by the owner or operator to the Director
or initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR
127.2(b), in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in
all cases, subpart D to part 3), § 122.22,
and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127
is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting.
Prior to this date, and independent of 40
CFR part 127, owners or operators may
be required to report electronically if
specified by a particular permit or if
required to do so by state law.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Submit the signed certification to
the NPDES permitting authority once
every five years. As of December 21,
2023 or an EPA-approved alternative
date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
certifications submitted in compliance
with this section must be submitted
electronically by the owner or operator
to the Director or initial recipient, as
defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to part 3), § 122.22, and 40
CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements
for electronic reporting. Prior to this
date, and independent of 40 CFR part
127, owners or operators may be
required to report electronically if
specified by a particular permit or if
required to do so by state law.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. In § 122.28, revise paragraph
(b)(2)(i) to read as follows:
§ 122.28 General permits (applicable to
State NPDES programs, see § 123.25).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * * (i) Except as provided in
paragraphs (b)(2)(v) and (vi) of this
section, dischargers (or treatment works
treating domestic sewage) seeking
coverage under a general permit shall
submit to the Director a notice of intent
to be covered by the general permit. A
discharger (or treatment works treating
domestic sewage) who fails to submit a
notice of intent in accordance with the
terms of the permit is not authorized to
discharge, (or in the case of sludge
disposal permit, to engage in a sludge
use or disposal practice), under the
terms of the general permit unless the
general permit, in accordance with
paragraph (b)(2)(v), contains a provision
that a notice of intent is not required or
the Director notifies a discharger (or
treatment works treating domestic
sewage) that it is covered by a general
permit in accordance with paragraph
(b)(2)(vi). A complete and timely, notice
of intent (NOI), to be covered in
accordance with general permit
requirements, fulfills the requirements
for permit applications for purposes of
§§ 122.6, 122.21, and 122.26. As of
December 21, 2023 or an EPA-approved
alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or
(f)), all notices of intent submitted in
compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the
discharger (or treatment works treating
domestic sewage) to the Director or
initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR
127.2(b), in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in
all cases, subpart D to part 3), § 122.22,
and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127
is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting.
Prior to this date, and independent of 40
CFR part 127, discharger (or treatment
works treating domestic sewage) may be
required to report electronically if
specified by a particular permit or if
required to do so by state law.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
6. In § 122.34, revise paragraph (d)(3)
to read as follows:
■
§ 122.34 Permit requirements for regulated
small MS4 permits.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) Reporting. Unless the permittee is
relying on another entity to satisfy its
NPDES permit obligations under
§ 122.35(a), the permittee must submit
annual reports to the NPDES permitting
authority for its first permit term. For
subsequent permit terms, the permittee
must submit reports in year two and
four unless the NPDES permitting
authority requires more frequent
reports. As of December 21, 2023 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40
CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all reports
submitted in compliance with this
section must be submitted electronically
by the owner, operator, or the duly
authorized representative of the small
MS4 to the NPDES permitting authority
or initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR
127.2(b), in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in
all cases, subpart D to part 3), § 122.22,
and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127
is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting.
Prior to this date, and independent of 40
CFR part 127, the owner, operator, or
the duly authorized representative of
the small MS4 may be required to report
electronically if specified by a particular
permit or if required to do so by state
law. The report must include:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. In § 122.41, revise paragraphs
(l)(6)(i), (l)(7), (m)(3)(i) and (ii) to read
as follows:
§ 122.41 Conditions applicable to all
permits (applicable to State programs, see
§ 123.25).
*
*
*
*
*
(l) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) The permittee shall report any
noncompliance which may endanger
health or the environment. Any
information shall be provided orally
within 24 hours from the time the
permittee becomes aware of the
circumstances. A report shall also be
provided within 5 days of the time the
permittee becomes aware of the
circumstances. The report shall contain
a description of the noncompliance and
its cause; the period of noncompliance,
including exact dates and times), and if
the noncompliance has not been
corrected, the anticipated time it is
expected to continue; and steps taken or
planned to reduce, eliminate, and
prevent reoccurrence of the
noncompliance. For noncompliance
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11919
events related to combined sewer
overflows, sanitary sewer overflows, or
bypass events, these reports must
include the data described above (with
the exception of time of discovery) as
well as the type of event (combined
sewer overflows, sanitary sewer
overflows, or bypass events), type of
sewer overflow structure (e.g., manhole,
combine sewer overflow outfall),
discharge volumes untreated by the
treatment works treating domestic
sewage, types of human health and
environmental impacts of the sewer
overflow event, and whether the
noncompliance was related to wet
weather. As of December 21, 2023 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40
CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all reports related
to combined sewer overflows, sanitary
sewer overflows, or bypass events
submitted in compliance with this
section must be submitted electronically
by the permittee to the Director or initial
recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b),
in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to part 3), § 122.22, and 40
CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements
for electronic reporting. Prior to this
date, and independent of 40 CFR part
127, permittees may be required to
electronically submit reports related to
combined sewer overflows, sanitary
sewer overflows, or bypass events under
this section by a particular permit or if
required to do so by state law. The
Director may also require permittees to
electronically submit reports not related
to combined sewer overflows, sanitary
sewer overflows, or bypass events under
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) Other noncompliance. The
permittee shall report all instances of
noncompliance not reported under
paragraphs (l)(4), (5), and (6) of this
section, at the time monitoring reports
are submitted. The reports shall contain
the information listed in paragraph
(l)(6). For noncompliance events related
to combined sewer overflows, sanitary
sewer overflows, or bypass events, these
reports shall contain the information
described in paragraph (l)(6) and the
applicable required data in appendix A
to 40 CFR part 127. As of December 21,
2023 or an EPA-approved alternative
date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
reports related to combined sewer
overflows, sanitary sewer overflows, or
bypass events submitted in compliance
with this section must be submitted
electronically by the permittee to the
Director or initial recipient, as defined
in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with
this section and 40 CFR part 3
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
11920
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(including, in all cases, subpart D to part
3), § 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40
CFR part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic
reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127,
permittees may be required to
electronically submit reports related to
combined sewer overflows, sanitary
sewer overflows, or bypass events under
this section by a particular permit or if
required to do so by state law. The
Director may also require permittees to
electronically submit reports not related
to combined sewer overflows, sanitary
sewer overflows, or bypass events under
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) * * *
(3) * * * (i) Anticipated bypass. If the
permittee knows in advance of the need
for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice,
if possible, at least ten days before the
date of the bypass. As of December 21,
2023 or an EPA-approved alternative
date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
notices submitted in compliance with
this section must be submitted
electronically by the permittee to the
Director or initial recipient, as defined
in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with
this section and 40 CFR part 3
(including, in all cases, subpart D to part
3), § 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40
CFR part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic
reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127,
permittees may be required to report
electronically if specified by a particular
permit or if required to do so by state
law.
(ii) Unanticipated bypass. The
permittee shall submit notice of an
unanticipated bypass as required in
paragraph (l)(6) of this section (24-hour
notice). As of December 21, 2023 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40
CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all notices
submitted in compliance with this
section must be submitted electronically
by the permittee to the Director or initial
recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b),
in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to part 3), § 122.22, and 40
CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements
for electronic reporting. Prior to this
date, and independent of 40 CFR part
127, permittees may be required to
report electronically if specified by a
particular permit or if required to do so
by state law.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. In § 122.42, revise paragraphs (c)
and (e)(4) to read as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
§ 122.42 Additional conditions applicable
to specified categories of NPDES permits
(applicable to State NPDES programs, see
§ 123.25).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Municipal separate storm sewer
systems. The operator of a large or
medium municipal separate storm
sewer system or a municipal separate
storm sewer that has been designated by
the Director under § 122.26(a)(1)(v) must
submit an annual report by the
anniversary of the date of the issuance
of the permit for such system. As of
December 21, 2023 or an EPA-approved
alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or
(f)), all reports submitted in compliance
with this section must be submitted
electronically by the owner, operator, or
the duly authorized representative of
the MS4 to the Director or initial
recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b),
in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to part 3), § 122.22, and 40
CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements
for electronic reporting. Prior to this
date, and independent of 40 CFR part
127, the owner, operator, or the duly
authorized representative of the MS4
may be required to report electronically
if specified by a particular permit or if
required to do so by state law. The
report shall include:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(4) Annual reporting requirements for
CAFOs. The permittee must submit an
annual report to the Director. As of
December 21, 2023 or an EPA-approved
alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or
(f)), all annual reports submitted in
compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the
permittee to the Director or initial
recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b),
in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to part 3), § 122.22, and 40
CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements
for electronic reporting. Prior to this
date, and independent of 40 CFR part
127, the permittee may be required to
report electronically if specified by a
particular permit or if required to do so
by state law. The annual report must
include:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. In § 122.64, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
§ 122.64 Termination of permits
(applicable to State programs, see § 123.25).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Permittees that wish to terminate
their permit must submit a Notice of
Termination (NOT) to their permitting
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
authority. If requesting expedited permit
termination procedures, a permittee
must certify in the NOT that it is not
subject to any pending State or Federal
enforcement actions including citizen
suits brought under State or Federal
law. As of December 21, 2023 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40
CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all NOTs
submitted by general permit covered
facilities in compliance with this
section must be submitted electronically
by the permittee to the Director or initial
recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b),
in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D), § 122.22, and 40 CFR part
127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to
undo existing requirements for
electronic reporting. Prior to this date,
and independent of 40 CFR part 127, the
permittee may be required to report
electronically if specified by a particular
permit or if required to do so by state
law.
PART 123—STATE PROGRAM
REQUIREMENTS
10. The authority citation for part 123
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.
1251 et seq.
11. In § 123.45:
a. Revise the section heading.
b. Revise the introductory text.
c. Revise paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through
(iv).
■ d. Revise appendix A to § 123.45.
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
■
■
§ 123.45 Noncompliance and program
reporting.
As of December 21, 2022, EPA must
prepare public (quarterly and annual)
reports as set forth here from
information that is required to be
submitted by NPDES-regulated facilities
and the State Director.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Enforcement order violations.
These include violations of any
requirement or condition in
administrative or judicial enforcement
orders, other than compliance
construction violations and reporting
violations.
(ii) Compliance construction
violations. These include failure to start
construction, complete construction, or
achieve final compliance within 90 days
after the date established in a permit,
administrative or judicial order, or
regulation.
(iii) Permit effluent limit violations.
These include violations of permit
effluent limits that exceed the ‘‘Criteria
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
11921
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
for Category I Permit Effluent Limit
Violations’’ in appendix A to § 123.45.
(iv) Reporting violations. These
include failure to submit a required
report within 30 days after the date
established in a permit, administrative
or judicial order, or regulation. These
reports only include final compliance
schedule progress reports, Discharge
Monitoring Reports [see 40 CFR
122.41(l)(4)(i)], and program reports [see
40 CFR 127.2(f)]. In addition, these
violations also include any failure to
comply with the reporting requirements
at 40 CFR 122.41(l)(6).
*
*
*
*
*
Appendix A to § 123.45—Criteria for
Category I Permit Effluent Limit
Violations
This appendix describes the criteria for
reporting Category I violations of NPDES
permit effluent limits in the NPDES
noncompliance report (NNCR) as specified
under paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this section.
Any violation of an NPDES permit is a
violation of the Clean Water Act (CWA) for
which the permittee is liable. As specified in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, there are two
categories of noncompliance, and the table
below indicates the thresholds for violations
in Category I. An agency’s decision as to
what enforcement action, if any, should be
taken in such cases, shall be based on an
analysis of facts, legal requirements, policy,
and guidance.
Violations of Permit Effluent Limits
The categorization of permit effluent limit
violations depends upon the magnitude and/
or frequency of the violation. Effluent
violations shall be evaluated on a parameterby-parameter and outfall-by-outfall basis. The
criteria for Category I permit effluent limit
violations apply to all Group I and Group II
pollutants and are as follows:
a. Criteria for Category I Violations of
Monthly Average Permit Effluent Limits—
Magnitude and Frequency
Violations of monthly average permit
effluent limits which exceed or equal the
product of the Technical Review Criteria
(TRC) times the permit effluent limit and
occur two months in a six-month period. The
TRCs for the two groups of pollutants are as
follows:
• Group I Pollutants (TRC) = 1.4
• Group II Pollutants (TRC) = 1.2
The following is a listing of the Group I
and Group II pollutants.
Group I Pollutants
•
•
•
•
•
•
Potassium
Sulfur
Sulfate
Total Alkalinity
Total Hardness
Other Minerals
Metals
• Aluminum
• Cobalt
• Iron
• Vanadium
Group II Pollutants
Metals (all forms)
• Other metals not specifically listed under
Group I
Inorganic
• Cyanide
• Total Residual Chlorine
Oxygen Demand
• Biochemical Oxygen Demand
• Chemical Oxygen Demand
• Total Oxygen Demands
• Total Organic Carbon
• Other
Solids
• Total Suspended Solids (Residues)
• Total Dissolved Solids (Residues)
• Other
Nutrients
• Inorganic Phosphorus Compounds
• Inorganic Nitrogen Compounds
• Other
Organics
• All organics are Group II except those
specifically listed under Group I
b. Criteria for Category I Violations of
Monthly Average Permit Effluent Limits—
Chronic Violations of monthly average
permit effluent limits which are exceeded in
any four months in a six-month period.
PART 127—NPDES ELECTRONIC
REPORTING
12. The authority citation for part 127
continues to read as follows:
■
Detergents and Oils
• MBAS
• NTA
• Oil and Grease
• Other detergents or algicides
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
13. In § 127.16, revise the table in
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
Minerals
• Calcium
• Chloride
• Fluoride
• Magnesium
• Sodium
§ 127.16 Implementation of electronic
reporting requirements for NPDES
permittees, facilities, and entities subject to
this part [see § 127.1(a)].
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 1—COMPLIANCE DEADLINES FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSIONS OF NPDES INFORMATION
Compliance deadlines for electronic
submissions 1
NPDES information
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
General Permit Reports [Notices of Intent to discharge (NOIs); Notices of Termination (NOTs);
No Exposure Certifications (NOEs); Low Erosivity Waivers (LEWs) and other Waivers] [40
CFR 122.26(b)(15), 122.28, and 122.64].
Discharge Monitoring Reports [40 CFR 122.41(l)(4)] .....................................................................
Biosolids Annual Program Reports [40 CFR part 503] ...................................................................
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) Annual Program Reports [40 CFR
122.42(e)(4)].
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Program Reports [40 CFR 122.34(d)(3) and
122.42(c)].
POTW Pretreatment Program Annual Reports [40 CFR 403.12(i)] ................................................
Significant Industrial User Compliance Reports in Municipalities Without Approved Pretreatment
Programs [40 CFR 403.12(e) and (h)].
Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports [40 CFR 122.41(l)(4), (6), (7), and 122.41(m)(3)] ...........
CWA 316(b) Annual Reports [40 CFR part 125 subparts I, J, and N] ...........................................
1 EPA
December 21, 2023.
December 21, 2016.
December 21, 2016 (when the Regional Administrator is the Director) 2
December 21, 2023 (when the state, tribe or
territory is the authorized NPDES program).2
December 21, 2023.
December 21, 2023.
December 21, 2023.
December 21, 2023.
December 21, 2023.
December 21, 2023.
may approve an alternative compliance deadline for general permit reports and program reports in accordance with § 127.24(e) and (f).
Director is defined in 40 CFR 122.2.
2 Note:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
11922
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
*
*
14. In § 127.21, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
■
§ 127.21 Data to be reported electronically
to EPA by states, tribes, and territories.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) States, tribes, and territories that
have received authorization from EPA to
implement the NPDES program must
electronically transfer these data, listed
in § 127.21(a), to EPA within 40 days of
the completed activity or within 40 days
of the receipt of a report from an NPDES
permittee, facility, or entity subject to
this part [see § 127.1(a)]. EPA may set an
alternative compliance deadline for data
sharing for one or more facilities,
general permit reports, program reports,
and related data elements (see 40 CFR
127.24) provided this alternative
compliance date does not extend
beyond December 21, 2026.
■ 15. In § 127.24:
■ a. Revise the section heading.
■ b. Add paragraphs (e) and (f).
The revision and additions read as
follows:
§ 127.24 Responsibilities regarding review
of waiver requests from NPDES permittees,
facilities, and entities subject to this part
[see § 127.1(a)] and alternative compliance
deadlines.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(e) A state, tribe, or territory that is
designated by EPA as the initial
recipient [see §§ 127.2(b) and 127.27] for
an NPDES data group [as defined in
§ 127.2(c)] may submit a request to EPA
to establish an alternative compliance
deadline for electronic reporting of one
or more general permit reports, program
reports, and related data elements (see
Table 2 to appendix A). A State may
request to establish an alternative
compliance deadline for up to three
years beyond the currently-applicable
date but not beyond December 21, 2026.
It is the duty of the authorized NPDES
program to re-apply for a new
alternative compliance deadline.
(1) The alternative compliance
deadline request shall:
(i) Be submitted to EPA by the
Director, as defined in 40 CFR 122.2;
(ii) Identify each general permit,
program report, and related data
elements covered by the request and the
corresponding alternative compliance
deadline(s);
(iii) Identify each facility covered by
the request and the corresponding
alternative compliance deadline(s)
(Note: This only applies if the request
covers some but not all facilities subject
to the general permit or program report
requirement);
(iv) Be submitted at least 120 days
prior to the applicable compliance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
deadline in Table 1 to 40 CFR 127.16 or
an alternative compliance deadline
previously approved by EPA; and
(v) Provide a rationale for the delay
and enough details (e.g., tasks,
milestones, roles and responsibilities,
necessary resources) to clearly describe
how the program will successfully
implement electronic reporting for
general permit, program report, and
related data elements covered by the
request.
(2) EPA will review each alternative
compliance deadline request to see if it
provides enough detail to accurately
assess if the state has a reasonable plan
to deploy electronic reporting by the
requested alternative compliance
deadline. EPA will return alternative
compliance deadline requests with
insufficient detail back to the Director
within 30 days of receipt and provide
recommendations. EPA will approve or
deny each complete alternative
compliance deadline request within 120
days of receipt. EPA will provide notice
to the authorized NPDES program of
EPA’s approval or denial. The
authorized NPDES program may reapply if the initial request is denied by
EPA.
(3) EPA will update its website after
it approves a request to clearly identify
the approved alternative compliance
deadlines for each facility, general
permit report, program report, and
related data elements by authorized
NPDES program. EPA will also post
each alternative compliance deadline
request and the corresponding Agency
approval or denial notice after each
determination. EPA will provide
updated information at: https://
www.epa.gov/compliance/npdesereporting.
(f) EPA may, as it deems appropriate,
establish an alternative compliance
deadline for electronic reporting and
data sharing for one or more facilities,
general permit reports, program reports,
and related data elements (see Table 2
to appendix A) in one or more states.
EPA may establish an alternative
compliance deadline up to three years
beyond the currently applicable date,
but in no event beyond December 21,
2026. Separately, EPA will provide
notice to the one or more authorized
NPDES program covered by each
alternative compliance deadline. This
notice will include a rationale for the
delay and enough details (e.g., tasks,
milestones, roles and responsibilities,
necessary resources) to clearly describe
how it will successfully implement
electronic reporting for general permit,
program report, and related data
elements covered by the extension. EPA
will update its website to clearly
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
identify the alternative compliance
deadlines for each facility, general
permit report, program report, and
related data elements by authorized
NPDES program.
■ 16. In appendix A to part 127:
■ a. In table 1:
■ i. Revise the entry ‘‘9’’.
■ b. In table 2:
■ i. Revise the entries ‘‘Permit
Component’’, ‘‘Applicable Effluent
Limitations Guidelines’’, ‘‘NAICS
Code’’, and ‘‘NAICS Code Primary
Indicator’’ under the ‘‘Basic Permit
Information’’ center heading.
■ ii. Delete the ‘‘Reportable
Noncompliance Tracking’’ and
‘‘Reportable Noncompliance Tracking
Start Date’’ entries under the ‘‘Basic
Permit Information’’ center heading.
■ iii. Revise the entry ‘‘Receiving
Waterbody Name for Permitted Feature’’
to ‘‘Waterbody Name for Permitted
Feature’’ and related description under
the ‘‘Permitted Feature Information’’
center heading.
■ iv. Revise the center heading from
‘‘Animal Feeding Operation Information
on NPDES Permit Application or Notice
of Intent’’ to ‘‘Animal Feeding
Operation Information.’’
■ v. Revise the entry ‘‘Facility CAAP
Designation’’ to ‘‘Facility CAAP Status’’
and related description under the
proposed revised ‘‘Animal Feeding
Operation Information’’ center heading.
■ vi. Delete the entry ‘‘Applicable
Categorical Standards’’ under the
‘‘Pretreatment Information on NPDES
Permit Application or Notice of Intent
(this includes permit application data
required for all new and existing
POTWs [40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)]’’ center
heading.
■ vii. Revise the entry ‘‘Source Water for
Cooling Purposes’’ under the ‘‘Cooling
Water Intake Information on NPDES
Permit Application or Notice of Intent’’
center heading.
■ viii. Revise the center heading from
‘‘CWA section 316(a) Thermal Variance
Information on NPDES Permit
Application or Notice of Intent’’ to
‘‘NPDES Variance Information.’’
■ ix. Revise the entry ‘‘Thermal
Variance Request Type’’ to ‘‘Variance
Type’’ and ‘‘Thermal Variance Granted
Date’’ to ‘‘Variance Action Date’’ and
related descriptions under the proposed
revised center heading ‘‘NPDES
Variance Information.’’
■ x. Add the following entries
‘‘Variance Request Version’’, ‘‘Variance
Status’’, and ‘‘Variance Submission
Date’’ under the proposed revised center
heading ‘‘NPDES Variance
Information.’’
■ xi. Revise the entries ‘‘Deficiencies
Identified Through the Biosolids/
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
11923
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Sewage Sludge Compliance
Monitoring’’, ‘‘Deficiencies Identified
Through the MS4 Compliance
Monitoring’’, ‘‘Deficiencies Identified
Through the Pretreatment Compliance
Monitoring’’, and ‘‘Deficiencies
Identified Through the Sewer Overflow/
Bypass Compliance Monitoring’’ under
the ‘‘Compliance Monitoring Activity
Information (Program Data Generated
from Authorized NPDES Programs and
EPA)’’ center heading.
xii. Revise the entry ‘‘Biosolids or
Sewage Sludge—Land Application or
Surface Disposal Deficiencies’’ to
‘‘Biosolids or Sewage SludgeViolations’’ under the ‘‘Compliance
Monitoring Activity Information (Data
Elements Specific to Sewage Sludge/
Biosolids Annual Program Reports)’’
center heading.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
Appendix A to Part 127—Minimum Set
of NPDES Data
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 1—DATA SOURCES AND REGULATORY CITATIONS 1
NPDES
Data group
No. 2
9 ................
NPDES data group
Program area
*
*
*
Sewer Overflow/Bypass
Sewer Overflows and ByEvent Reports [40 CFR
pass Events.
122.41(l)(4), (6), (7),
and 122.41(m)(3)].
*
*
Data
provider
Minimum frequency 3
*
NPDES Permittee ............
*
*
*
Within 5 days of the time the permittee becomes aware of the
sewer overflow event (health or environment endangerment);
Monitoring report frequency specific in permit (all other sewer
overflow and bypass events); At least 10-days before the date
of the anticipated bypass; and Within 5-days of the time the
permittee becomes aware of the unanticipated bypass.
*
*
*
*
*
1 Entities
regulated by a NPDES permit will comply with all reporting requirements in their respective NPDES permit.
2 Use the ‘‘NPDES Data Group Number’’ in this table and the ‘‘NPDES Data Group Number’’ column in Table 2 of this appendix to identify the source of the required data entry. EPA notes that electronic systems may use additional data to facilitate electronic reporting as well as management and reporting of electronic data.
For example, NPDES permittees may be required to enter their NPDES permit number (‘‘NPDES ID’’—NPDES Data Group 1 and 2) into the applicable electronic reporting system in order to identify their permit and submit a Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR—NPDES Data Group 3). Additionally, NPDES regulated entities may
be required to enter and submit data to update or correct erroneous data. For example, NPDES permittees may be required to enter new data regarding the Facility
Individual First Name and Last Name (NPDES Data Group 1 and 2) with their DMR submission when there is a facility personnel change.
3 The applicable reporting frequency is specified in the NPDES permit or control mechanism, which may be more frequent than the minimum frequency specified in
this table.
TABLE 2—REQUIRED NPDES PROGRAM DATA
Data name
*
*
*
NPDES data
group No.
(see Table 1)
CWA, regulatory (40 CFR), or
other citation
Data description
*
*
*
*
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Basic Permit Information
*
Permit Component ..........................
*
*
*
*
This will identify one or more applicable NPDES subprograms (e.g.,
pretreatment, CAFO, CSO, POTW, biosolids/sewage sludge,
stormwater) for the permit record. This field is only required when
the permit includes one or more NPDES subprograms. This data
element is also required for unpermitted facilities when the authorized NPDES programs is required to share facility, inspection, violation, or enforcement action data regarding these facilities with
EPA’s national NPDES data system.
*
122.2, 122.21, 122.21(j)(6),
122.21(q), 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
123.26, 123.41(a), 123.43(d),
403.10, and 501.19.
*
*
Applicable Effluent Limitations
Guidelines.
*
*
*
*
This data element will identify the one or more applicable effluent limitations guidelines and new source performance standards for the
facility by the corresponding 40 CFR part number (e.g., part 414—
Organic chemicals, plastics, and synthetic fibers point source category, part 433—Metal Finishing point source category). For Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs) this data element will track the one
or more applicable categorical standards even when the CIU is
subject to one or more local limits that are more stringent than the
applicable categorical standards. This data element will also identify
if there are no applicable effluent limitations guidelines, new source
performance standards, or categorical standards for the facility (including Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)). This data element can
be updated by the Control Authority for SIUs and CIUs through
submission of the Pretreatment Program Reports [40 CFR
403.12(i)]. Additionally, the authorized NPDES program can automate the creation of these data through submission of the Notices
of Intent to discharge (NOI) [40 CFR 122.28(b)(2)(ii)].
*
122.21, 122.21(j)(6), 122.21(q),
122.44, 122.44(j), 122.28(b)
(2)(ii), 403.10(e), 403.10(f),
403.12(i).
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
1, 2.
1, 2, and 7.
11924
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2—REQUIRED NPDES PROGRAM DATA—Continued
Data description
*
NAICS Code ....................................
*
*
*
*
The one or more six-digit North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes/descriptions that represents the economic activity of the facility. This field is required to be shared with the U.S.
EPA when authorized NPDES programs approve NPDES permit
coverage after June 12, 2021 (i.e., two years after the effective
date of the 2019 NPDES Applications and Program Updates Rule).
See February 12, 2019; 84 FR 3324.
NAICS Code Primary Indicator .......
This data element will identify the primary economic activity, NAICS
code, of the facility. This data element is required for electronic
data transfer between state and EPA systems. This field is required
to be shared with the U.S. EPA when authorized NPDES programs
approve NPDES permit coverage after June 12, 2021 (i.e., two
years after the effective date of the 2019 NPDES Applications and
Program Updates Rule). See February 12, 2019; 84 FR 3324.
*
*
*
NPDES data
group No.
(see Table 1)
CWA, regulatory (40 CFR), or
other citation
Data name
*
*
*
40 CFR 122.21(f)(3),
1, 2, and 7.
122.28(b)(2)(ii), EPA SIC/NAICS
Data Standard, Standard No.
EX000022.2, 6 January 2006,
Office of Management and
Budget, Executive Office of the
President, Final Decision on
North American Industry Classification System (62 FR 17288),
403.10(f).
40 CFR 122.21(f)(3),
1, 2, and 7.
122.28(b)(2)(ii), EPA SIC/NAICS
Data Standard, Standard No.
EX000022.2, 6 January 2006,
Office of Management and
Budget, Executive Office of the
President, Final Decision on
North American Industry Classification System (62 FR 17288),
403.10(f).
*
*
*
Permitted Feature Information
*
Waterbody Name for Permitted
Feature.
*
*
*
*
*
The name of the waterbody that is or will likely receive the discharge
from each permitted feature. If the permitted feature is a cooling
water intake structure, this data element is the name of the source
water. Authorized NPDES programs can also use this data element
to identify the name of the source water for other intake structures
that are permitted features.
*
*
*
*
122.21, 122.21(f)(9),
122.28(b)(2)(ii).
*
*
*
1,2.
*
Animal Feeding Operation Information
Facility CAAP Status .......................
*
The unique code/description to indicate whether the facility includes
Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production (CAAP) and the CAAP
identification method [e.g., ‘‘Yes (Based on Facility Production
Data)’’, ‘‘Yes (Authorized NPDES Program Designation)’’]. This field
also applies when an authorized NPDES program has conducted
an on-site inspection of an aquatic animal production facility and
determined that the facility should not be regulated under the
NPDES permit program [e.g., ‘‘No (Authorized NPDES Program
Determination)’’]. This data element only applies to aquatic animal
production facilities. This data element can be automatically generated from production data that is provided by aquatic animal production facilities.
*
*
*
122.21(i)(2), 122.24, 122.25,
122.28(b)(2)(ii).
*
*
1,2.
*
Cooling Water Intake Information on NPDES Permit Application or Notice of Intent
*
Source Water for Cooling Purposes
*
*
*
*
*
* * * * *
*
*
*
*
*
122.21(f)(9), 122.21(r),
122.28(b)(2)(ii), 125.86, 125.95,
125.136, 401.14 and CWA section 316(b).
*
*
* * * * *
*
NPDES Variance Information
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Variance Type .................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
The unique code(s)/description(s) that describes the type for each
variance request submitted by the NPDES-regulated entity [e.g.,
fundamentally different factors (CWA Section 301(n)), non-conventional pollutants (CWA Section 301(c) and (g)), water quality related
effluent limitations (CWA Section 302(b)(2)), thermal discharges
(CWA Section 316(a)), discharges to marine waters (CWA Section
301(h))]. This field is required to be shared with the U.S. EPA when
authorized NPDES programs approve NPDES permit coverage
after June 12, 2021 (i.e., two years after the effective date of the
2019 NPDES Applications and Program Updates Rule). See February 12, 2019; 84 FR 3324.
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
122.21(f)(10), 122.21(j)(1)(ix),
122.28(b)(2)(ii), 123.41, subpart
H of 125 and CWA section
316(a).
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
1.
11925
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2—REQUIRED NPDES PROGRAM DATA—Continued
NPDES data
group No.
(see Table 1)
Data name
Data description
CWA, regulatory (40 CFR), or
other citation
Variance Request Version ..............
The unique code(s)/description(s) that describe whether each variance request from the NPDES-regulated entity is a new request,
renewal, or a continuance for variances that do not expire. This
field is required to be shared with the U.S. EPA when authorized
NPDES programs approve NPDES permit coverage after June 12,
2021 (i.e., two years after the effective date of the 2019 NPDES
Applications and Program Updates Rule). See February 12, 2019;
84 FR 3324.
The unique code(s)/description(s) that describes the status for each
the variance request submitted by the NPDES-regulated entity
(e.g., pending, approved, denied, withdrawn by NPDES-regulated
entity, terminated). This field is required to be shared with the U.S.
EPA when authorized NPDES programs approve NPDES permit
coverage after June 12, 2021 (i.e., two years after the effective
date of the 2019 NPDES Applications and Program Updates Rule).
See February 12, 2019; 84 FR 3324.
This is the date for each variance request submitted by the NPDESregulated entity to the NPDES permitting authority. The date must
be provided in YYYY–MM–DD format where YYYY is the year, MM
is the month, and DD is the day. This field is required to be shared
with the U.S. EPA when authorized NPDES programs approve
NPDES permit coverage after June 12, 2021 (i.e., two years after
the effective date of the 2019 NPDES Applications and Program
Updates Rule). See February 12, 2019; 84 FR 3324.
This is the date for each variance request when the NPDES permitting authority approves (grants, renews), denies, or terminates a
variance request as well as the date when the NPDES-regulated
entity withdraws the variance request. For variances that do not expire, entire the original action date. The date must be provided in
YYYY–MM–DD format where YYYY is the year, MM is the month,
and DD is the day. This field is required to be shared with the U.S.
EPA when authorized NPDES programs approve NPDES permit
coverage after June 12, 2021 (i.e., two years after the effective
date of the 2019 NPDES Applications and Program Updates Rule).
See February 12, 2019; 84 FR 3324.
* * * * *
122.21(f)(10), 122.21(j)(1)(ix),
122.28(b)(2)(ii), 123.41, subpart
H of 125 and CWA section
316(a).
1.
122.21(f)(10), 122.21(j)(1)(ix),
122.28(b)(2)(ii), 123.41, subpart
H of 125 and CWA section
316(a).
1.
122.21(f)(10), 122.21(j)(1)(ix),
122.28(b)(2)(ii), 123.41, subpart
H of 125 and CWA section
316(a).
1.
122.21(f)(10), 122.21(j)(1)(ix),
122.28(b)(2)(ii), 123.41, subpart
H of 125 and CWA section
316(a).
1.
Variance Status ...............................
Variance Submission Date ..............
Variance Action Date ......................
Public Notice of Section 316(a) Requests.
*
*
*
*
* * * * *
*
*
* * * * *
*
Compliance Monitoring Activity Information (Program Data Generated from Authorized NPDES Programs and EPA)
Deficiencies Identified Through the
Biosolids/Sewage Sludge Compliance Monitoring.
Deficiencies Identified Through the
MS4 Compliance Monitoring.
Deficiencies Identified Through the
Pretreatment Compliance Monitoring.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Deficiencies Identified Through the
Sewer Overflow/Bypass Compliance Monitoring.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
This is the unique code/description that that identifies each deficiency
in the facility’s biosolids and sewage sludge program (40 CFR part
503) for each compliance monitoring activity (e.g., inspections, audits) by the regulatory authority. This data element includes unique
codes to identify when the facility failed to comply with any applicable permit requirements or enforcement actions.
This is the unique code/description that that identifies each deficiency
in the MS4’s program to control stormwater pollution for each compliance monitoring activity (e.g., inspections, audits) by the regulatory authority. This data element includes unique codes to identify
when the MS4 failed to comply with any applicable permit requirements or enforcement actions.
This is the unique code/description that that identifies each deficiency
in the POTW’s authorized pretreatment program for each
pretreatment compliance monitoring activity (e.g., inspections, audits) by the regulatory authority. These unique codes include: (1)
Failure to enforce against pass through and/or interference; (2) failure to submit required reports within 30 days; (3) failure to meet
compliance schedule milestones within 90 days; (4) failure to issue/
reissue control mechanisms to 90% of SIUs within 6 months; (5)
failure to inspect or sample 80% of SIUs within the past 12 months;
and (6) failure to enforce standards and reporting requirements.
This is the unique code/description that that identifies each deficiency
in the POTW’s control of combined sewer overflows, sanitary sewer
overflows, or bypass events for each compliance monitoring activity
(e.g., inspections, audits) by the regulatory authority. This data element includes unique codes to identify when a POTW has failed to
provide 24-hour notification to the NPDES permitting authority or
failed to submit the Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Report within the
required 5-day period. This data element also includes unique
codes to identify when the POTW failed to comply with any applicable long-term CSO control plan, permit requirements, or enforcement actions.
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
123.26, 123.41(a), and CWA section 308.
1.
123.26, 123.41(a), and CWA section 308.
1.
123.26, 123.41(a), 403.10, and
CWA section 308.
1.
122.41(h), 122.41(l)(6) and (7),
122.43, 123.26, 123.41(a), and
CWA sections 308 and
402(q)(1).
1.
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
11926
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2—REQUIRED NPDES PROGRAM DATA—Continued
Data name
*
*
*
NPDES data
group No.
(see Table 1)
CWA, regulatory (40 CFR), or
other citation
Data description
*
*
*
*
Compliance Monitoring Activity Information (Data Elements Specific to Sewage Sludge/Biosolids Annual Program Reports)
*
Biosolids or Sewage Sludge—Violations.
*
*
*
*
*
This data element is applicable to facilities that use land application,
active surface disposal site (e.g., monofills, surface impoundments,
lagoons, waste piles, dedicated disposal sites, and dedicated beneficial use sites), and/or incineration. This data element uses one or
more unique codes/descriptions to identify all violations. This includes violations of additional or more stringent requirements (40
CFR 503.5), sampling and analysis requirements (40 CFR 503.8),
land application requirements (40 CFR 503, Subpart B), surface
disposal requirements (40 CFR 503, Subpart C), pathogen and
vector attraction reduction requirements (40 CFR 503, Subpart D),
and incineration requirements (40 CFR 503, Subpart E).
*
*
*
*
*
503.18, 503.28, 503.48 .................. 4.
*
*
*
Notes: (1) The NPDES program authority may pre-populate these data elements and other data elements (e.g., Federal Registry System ID) in the NPDES electronic reporting systems in order to create efficiencies and standardization. For example, the NPDES program authority may configure their electronic reporting system to automatically generate NPDES IDs for control mechanisms for new facilities reported on a Pretreatment Program Report [40 CFR 403.12(i)]. Additionally, the
NPDES program authority can decide whether to allow NPDES regulated entities to override these pre-populated data.
(2) The data elements in this table conform to EPA’s policy regarding the application requirements for renewal or reissuance of NPDES permits for discharges from
municipal separate storm sewer systems (see 61 FR 41698; 6 August 1996).
(3) The data elements in this table are also supported by the Office Management and Budget approved permit applications and forms for the NPDES program.
(4) These data will allow EPA and the NPDES program authority to link facilities, compliance monitoring activities, compliance determinations, and enforcement actions. For example, these data will provide several ways to make the following linkages: linking violations to enforcement actions and final orders; linking single event
violations and compliance monitoring activities; linking program reports to DMRs; linking program reports to compliance monitoring activities; and linking enforcement
activities and compliance monitoring activities.
PART 403—GENERAL
PRETREATMENT REGULATIONS FOR
EXISTING AND NEW SOURCES OF
POLLUTION
17. The authority citation for part 403
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
18. In § 403.12, revise paragraphs
(e)(1), (h), and (i) to read as follows:
■
§ 403.12 Reporting requirements for
POTW’s and industrial users.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * * (1) Any Industrial User
subject to a categorical Pretreatment
Standard (except a Non-Significant
Categorical User as defined in
§ 403.3(v)(2)), after the compliance date
of such Pretreatment Standard, or, in the
case of a New Source, after
commencement of the discharge into the
POTW, shall submit to the Control
Authority during the months of June
and December, unless required more
frequently in the Pretreatment Standard
or by the Control Authority or the
Approval Authority, a report indicating
the nature and concentration of
pollutants in the effluent which are
limited by such categorical Pretreatment
Standards. In addition, this report shall
include a record of measured or
estimated average and maximum daily
flows for the reporting period for the
Discharge reported in paragraph (b)(4) of
this section except that the Control
Authority may require more detailed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
reporting of flows. In cases where the
Pretreatment Standard requires
compliance with a Best Management
Practice (or pollution prevention
alternative), the User shall submit
documentation required by the Control
Authority or the Pretreatment Standard
necessary to determine the compliance
status of the User. At the discretion of
the Control Authority and in
consideration of such factors as local
high or low flow rates, holidays, budget
cycles, etc., the Control Authority may
modify the months during which the
above reports are to be submitted. For
Industrial Users for which EPA or the
authorized state, tribe, or territory is the
Control Authority, as of December 21,
2023 or an EPA-approved alternative
date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
reports submitted in compliance with
this section must be submitted
electronically by the industrial user to
the Control Authority or initial
recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b),
in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to part 3), 40 CFR 122.22, and
40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements
for electronic reporting. Prior to this
date, and independent of 40 CFR part
127, the Industrial Users for which EPA
or the authorized state, tribe, or territory
is the Control Authority may be
required to report electronically if
specified by a particular control
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
mechanism or if required to do so by
state law.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Reporting requirements for
Industrial Users not subject to
categorical Pretreatment Standards. The
Control Authority must require
appropriate reporting from those
Industrial Users with Discharges that are
not subject to categorical Pretreatment
Standards. Significant Non-categorical
Industrial Users must submit to the
Control Authority at least once every six
months (on dates specified by the
Control Authority) a description of the
nature, concentration, and flow of the
pollutants required to be reported by the
Control Authority. In cases where a
local limit requires compliance with a
Best Management Practice or pollution
prevention alternative, the User must
submit documentation required by the
Control Authority to determine the
compliance status of the User. These
reports must be based on sampling and
analysis performed in the period
covered by the report, and in
accordance with the techniques
described in 40 CFR part 136 of this
chapter and amendments thereto. This
sampling and analysis may be
performed by the Control Authority in
lieu of the significant non-categorical
Industrial User. For Industrial Users for
which EPA or the authorized state, tribe,
or territory is the Control Authority, as
of December 21, 2023 or an EPAapproved alternative date (see 40 CFR
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
127.24(e) or (f)), all reports submitted in
compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the
industrial user to the Control Authority
or initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR
127.2(b), in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in
all cases, subpart D to part 3), 40 CFR
122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR
part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic
reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127, the
Industrial Users for which EPA or the
authorized state, tribe, or territory is the
Control Authority may be required to
report electronically if specified by a
particular control mechanism or if
required to do so by state law.
(i) Annual POTW reports. POTWs
with approved Pretreatment Programs
shall provide the Approval Authority
with a report that briefly describes the
POTW’s program activities, including
activities of all participating agencies, if
more than one jurisdiction is involved
in the local program. The report
required by this section shall be
submitted no later than one year after
approval of the POTW’s Pretreatment
Program, and at least annually
thereafter, and must include, at a
minimum, the applicable required data
in appendix A to 40 CFR part 127. The
report required by this section must also
include a summary of changes to the
POTW’s pretreatment program that have
not been previously reported to the
Approval Authority and any other
relevant information requested by the
Approval Authority. As of December 21,
2023 or an EPA-approved alternative
date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
annual reports submitted in compliance
with this section must be submitted
electronically by the POTW
Pretreatment Program to the Approval
Authority or initial recipient, as defined
in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with
this section and 40 CFR part 3
(including, in all cases, subpart D to 40
CFR part 3), 40 CFR 122.22, and 40 CFR
part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements
for electronic reporting. Prior to this
date, and independent of 40 CFR part
127, the Approval Authority may also
require POTW Pretreatment Programs to
electronically submit annual reports
under this section if specified by a
particular permit or if required to do so
by state law.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
PART 503—STANDARDS FOR THE
USE OR DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE
SLUDGE
19. The authority citation for part 503
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Sections 405(d) and (e) of the
Clean Water Act, as amended by Pub. L. 95–
217, sec. 54(d), 91 Stat. 1591 (33 U.S.C.
1345(d) and (e)); and Pub. L. 100–4, title IV,
sec. 406(a), (b), 101 Stat., 71, 72 (33 U.S.C.
1251 et seq.).
■
20. Revise § 503.18 to read as follows:
§ 503.18
Reporting.
Class I sludge management facilities,
POTWs (as defined in § 501.2 of this
chapter) with a design flow rate equal to
or greater than one million gallons per
day, and POTWs that serve 10,000
people or more shall submit a report on
February 19 of each year. As of
December 21, 2016, all reports
submitted in compliance with this
section must be submitted electronically
by the operator to EPA when the
Regional Administrator is the Director
in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to part 3), 40 CFR 122.22, and
40 CFR part 127. As of December 21,
2023, or an EPA-approved alternative
date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
reports submitted in compliance with
this section must be submitted
electronically in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in
all cases, subpart D to 40 CFR part 3),
40 CFR 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40
CFR part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic
reporting. Prior to the compliance
deadlines for electronic reporting (see
Table 1 in 40 CFR 127.16), the Director
may also require operators to
electronically submit annual reports
under this section if required to do so
by state law.
(a) The information in § 503.17(a),
except the information in § 503.17
(a)(3)(ii), (a)(4)(ii) and in (a)(5)(ii), for
the appropriate requirements on
February 19 of each year.
(b) The information in
§ 503.17(a)(5)(ii)(A) through (a)(5)(ii)(G)
on February 19th of each year when 90
percent or more of any of the
cumulative pollutant loading rates in
Table 2 of § 503.13 is reached at a land
application site.
■ 21. Revise § 503.28 to read as follows:
§ 503.28
Reporting.
Class I sludge management facilities,
POTWs (as defined in 40 CFR 501.2)
with a design flow rate equal to or
greater than one million gallons per day,
and POTWs that serve 10,000 people or
more shall submit a report on February
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
11927
19 of each year. As of December 21,
2016, all reports submitted in
compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the operator
to EPA when the Regional
Administrator is the Director in
compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to 40 CFR part 3), 40 CFR
122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. As of
December 21, 2023, or an EPA-approved
alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or
(f)), all reports submitted in compliance
with this section must be submitted
electronically in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in
all cases, subpart D to 40 CFR part 3),
40 CFR 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40
CFR part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic
reporting. Prior to the compliance
deadlines for electronic reporting (see
Table 1 in 40 CFR 127.16), the Director
may also require operators to
electronically submit annual reports
under this section if required to do so
by state law.
■ 22. Revise § 503.48 to read as follows:
§ 503.48
Reporting.
Class I sludge management facilities,
POTWs (as defined in § 501.2 of this
chapter) with a design flow rate equal to
or greater than one million gallons per
day, and POTWs that serve a population
of 10,000 people or greater shall submit
a report on February 19 of each year. As
of December 21, 2016, all reports
submitted in compliance with this
section must be submitted electronically
by the operator to EPA when the
Regional Administrator is the Director
in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to 40 CFR part 3), 40 CFR
122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. As of
December 21, 2023, or an EPA-approved
alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or
(f)), all reports submitted in compliance
with this section must be submitted
electronically in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in
all cases, subpart D to part 3), 40 CFR
122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR
part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic
reporting. Prior to the compliance
deadlines for electronic reporting (see
Table 1 in 40 CFR 127.16), the Director
may also require operators to
electronically submit annual reports
under this section if required to do so
by state law.
[FR Doc. 2020–02889 Filed 2–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\28FEP1.SGM
28FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11909-11927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02889]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 9, 122, 123, 127, 403, and 503
[EPA-HQ-OECA-2019-0408; FRL-10005-21-OECA]
RIN 2020-AA52
NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule--Phase 2 Extension
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA published the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Electronic Reporting Rule (``NPDES eRule'') on 22
October 2015. The 2015 rule required EPA and states to modernize Clean
Water Act (CWA) reporting. The NPDES eRule included a phased
implementation schedule. In this notice, EPA proposes postponing the
compliance deadlines for Phase 2 implementation by three years and
providing states with additional flexibility to request additional time
as needed. Further, this notice proposes changes to the NPDES eRule
that would clarify existing requirements and eliminate some duplicative
or outdated reporting requirements. Taken together, these changes are
designed to save the NPDES authorized programs considerable resources,
make reporting easier for NPDES-regulated entities, streamline permit
renewals, ensure full exchange of NPDES program data between states and
EPA, enhance public transparency, improve environmental decision-
making, and protect human health and the environment.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 28, 2020. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), comments on the information collection
provisions are best assured of consideration if the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) receives a copy of your comments on or
before March 30, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OECA-2019-0408, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. EPA
may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish
to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents
located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information, please
contact Mr. Carey A. Johnston, Office of Compliance (mail code 2222A),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202-566-1014; or email:
[email protected] (preferred). Also see the following website for
additional information regarding the rulemaking: https://www.epa.gov/compliance/npdes-ereporting.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
II. Background
III. Changes to Phase 2 Compliance Deadlines
IV. Alternative Phase 2 Compliance Deadlines
V. Clarifying Edits for More Efficient Implementation and 2019 NPDES
Updates Rule Changes
VI. Assistance to States To Implement Phase 2
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
Entities potentially affected by this action include all NPDES-
permitted facilities, whether covered by an individual permit or
general permit, industrial users located in cities without approved
local pretreatment programs, facilities subject to EPA's biosolids
regulations, and governmental entities that have received NPDES program
authorization or are implementing portions of the NPDES program in a
cooperative agreement with EPA. These entities include:
[[Page 11910]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Examples of regulated entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facilities seeking coverage Publicly-owned treatment works (POTW)
under an individual NPDES facilities, treatment works treating
permits, general permit, or domestic sewage (TWTDS), municipalities,
subject to an NPDES counties, stormwater management
inspection. districts, state-operated facilities,
Federally-operated facilities,
industrial facilities, construction
sites, and concentrated animal feeding
operations (CAFOs).
Industrial users located in Industrial facilities discharging to
cities without approved POTWs and for which the designated
local pretreatment programs. pretreatment Control Authority is EPA or
the authorized state, tribe, or
territory rather than an approved local
pretreatment program.
POTWs and other facilities Class I sludge management facilities (as
subject to EPA's biosolids defined in 40 CFR 503.9(c)), POTWs with
regulations. a design flow rate equal to or greater
than one million gallons per day, and
POTWs that serve 10,000 people or more.
State and territorial States and territories that have received
governments. NPDES program authorization from EPA,
that are implementing portions of the
NPDES program in a cooperative agreement
with EPA, or that operate NPDES-
permitted facilities.
Tribal governments........... Tribes that have received NPDES program
authorization from EPA, that are
implementing portions of the NPDES
program in a cooperative agreement with
EPA, or that operate NPDES-permitted
facilities.
Federal governments.......... Federal facilities with a NPDES permit
and EPA Regional Offices acting for
those states, tribes, and territories
that do not have NPDES program
authorization or that do not have
program authorization for a particular
NPDES subprogram (e.g., biosolids or
pretreatment).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This table is not intended to be an exhaustive list, but rather
provides some examples of the types of entities potentially regulated
by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this table may
also be regulated. If you have questions regarding the applicability of
this proposed action to a particular entity, consult the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
B. What action is the agency taking?
EPA published the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Electronic Reporting Rule (``NPDES eRule'') on 22 October 2015.
The 2015 rule required EPA and states to modernize Clean Water Act
(CWA) reporting for municipalities, industries and other facilities.
The rule divided implementation into two ``Phases.'' The deadline for
Phase 1 implementation passed on December 21, 2016. The deadline for
Phase 2 is currently December 21, 2020. Some state authorized NPDES
programs have provided feedback to EPA on how to improve Phase 2
implementation of the NPDES eRule and, in particular, have recommended
changes to the schedule for Phase 2 implementation to allow both EPA
and states sufficient time to develop and implement the information
technology solutions necessary for electronic reporting of the Phase 2
data (see DCN 0001 to 0009). This notice proposes a change to the
compliance deadlines for Phase 2 implementation and other changes to
the NPDES eRule to allow for a smoother transition from paper to
electronic reporting for the NPDES program.
C. What is the agency's authority for taking this action?
Pursuant to the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., EPA
promulgated the NPDES eRule, which added a new part to title 40 (40 CFR
part 127) and made changes to existing NPDES regulations. The EPA
promulgated the NPDES eRule under authority of the CWA sections 101(f),
304(i), 308, 402, and 501. EPA is using the same authority to propose
the changes in this notice. EPA notes that the Congressional
Declaration of Goals and Policy of the CWA specifies in section 101(f)
that ``It is the national policy that to the maximum extent possible
the procedures utilized for implementing this chapter shall encourage
the drastic minimization of paperwork and interagency decision
procedures, and the best use of available manpower and funds, so as to
prevent needless duplication and unnecessary delays at all levels of
government.''
Harnessing information technology that is now a common part of
daily life is an important step toward reaching the goals of the CWA.
EPA is promulgating this rule under the authority of CWA section 304(i)
that authorizes EPA to establish minimum procedural and other elements
of state programs under section 402, including reporting requirements
and procedures to make information available to the public. In
addition, EPA is promulgating this rule under section 308 of the CWA.
Section 308 of the CWA authorizes EPA to require access to information
necessary to carry out the objectives of the Act, including sections
301, 305, 306, 307, 311, 402, 404, 405, and 504. Section 402 of the CWA
establishes the NPDES permit program for the control of the discharge
of pollutants into the nation's waters. EPA is promulgating this rule
under CWA sections 402(b) and (c), which require each authorized state,
tribe, or territory to ensure that permits meet certain substantive
requirements, and provide EPA information from point sources,
industrial users, and authorized programs in order to ensure proper
oversight. Finally, EPA is promulgating this rule under the authority
of section 501, which authorizes EPA to prescribe such regulations as
are necessary to carry out provisions of the Act.
D. What are the incremental costs and benefits of this action?
EPA identified only minimal incremental costs of this proposed rule
as the overall impact of these proposed changes would be to allow
states to more efficiently implement the NPDES eRule. EPA proposes
postponing the compliance deadlines for Phase 2 implementation by three
years and providing states with additional flexibility to request an
extension if more time is necessary but with no extension allowed
beyond December 21, 2026.
This rule also proposes changes to the NPDES eRule that would
clarify existing requirements and eliminate some duplicative or
outdated reporting requirements. For example, EPA proposes to eliminate
three data elements from the minimum set of NPDES program data
(Appendix A to 40 CFR part 127): Reportable Noncompliance Tracking,
Reportable Noncompliance Tracking Start Date, and Applicable
Categorical Standards. This will reduce the costs to authorized NPDES
programs in collecting, managing, and sharing these data. EPA also
anticipates that the clarifications contained in this proposed rule
will
[[Page 11911]]
help states avoid unnecessary implementation costs. For example, the
proposed changes would make clear that the electronic reporting
requirement for Notices of Termination (NOTs) applies only to general
permit covered facilities (see Table 1 to Appendix A, 40 CFR part 127)
and not to individually permitted facilities.
II. Background
EPA published the NPDES eRule on 22 October 2015. The 2015 rule
required EPA and states to modernize Clean Water Act (CWA) reporting
for municipalities, industries and other facilities. That rule replaced
most paper-based NPDES reporting requirements with electronic
reporting. This rule converted the following paper reports to
electronic: (1) Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs); (2) general permit
reports (e.g., Notices of Intent to discharge in compliance with a
general permit); and (3) other specified program reports. The NPDES
eRule included a phased implementation schedule (40 CFR 127.26). Most
states and permittees have successfully implemented Phase 1 of the
NPDES eRule, which includes electronic submission of DMRs and the
Federal Biosolids Annual Report where EPA is the Regulatory Authority.
The NPDES eRule requires EPA to calculate electronic reporting
participation rates for each authorized NPDES program six months after
the deadline for conversion from paper to electronic submissions and
annually thereafter [see 40 CFR 127.26(j)]. The compliance deadlines
for Phase 1 of the NPDES eRule were 21 December 2016 and they included
NPDES Data Groups No. 3 (Discharge Monitoring Reports or ``DMRs'') and
No. 4 [Sewage Sludge/Biosolids Annual Program Reports, where EPA
implements the biosolids program (40 CFR part 503)]. EPA's first three
assessments have shown considerable progress in Phase 1 implementation
(see DCN 0012--0014), although more work needs to be done to achieve
the full benefits of Phase 1. Current tracking of Phase 1
implementation is available through the ``NPDES eRule Readiness
Dashboard.'' See: https://echo.epa.gov/trends/npdes-erule-dashboard-public.
Electronic submission of all other reports and notices covered by
the NPDES eRule are part of Phase 2 implementation. See Table 1 to 40
CFR 127.16. The online ``NPDES eRule Phase 2 Implementation Dashboard''
provides an inventory of all general permits and program reports
covered by the NPDES eRule. See: https://edap.epa.gov/public/extensions/eRule_Phase2/eRule_Phase2.html. This dashboard also provides
an updated view of EPA's progress in gathering information and
deploying NPDES electronic reporting tools for Phase 2 general permits
and program reports (see DCN 0015).
EPA and states are now focusing on implementing Phase 2 of the
NPDES eRule and also continuing to work on completing Phase 1 reporting
deadlines. EPA and states are now gathering information and deploying
NPDES electronic reporting tools for Phase 2 reports. EPA and states
are collaborating and sharing information through multiple workgroups.
The EPA-state General Permit and Program Report Technical Workgroup
focuses on the EPA Regional and state general permits and program
reports that will use EPA's NPDES Electronic Reporting Tool (NeT) for
Phase 2 data.
The EPA-state NPDES Noncompliance Report (NNCR) workgroup discusses
how to identify, categorize, sort, and display violations on the NNCR.
This workgroup is discussing how best to implement the new NNCR
regulations in 40 CFR 123.45. EPA held three listening sessions with
the EPA-state NNCR workgroup to discuss updated language in 40 CFR
123.45. States provided feedback on how to clarify the category I
noncompliance criteria for enforcement order violations, permit
effluent limit violations, and reporting violations. EPA incorporated
comments and other minor clarifying text and formatting issues from
these workgroup discussions in this proposed rule.
EPA received letters from authorized NPDES programs on how to
improve Phase 2 implementation of the NPDES eRule which recommended
changes to the schedule for Phase 2 implementation to allow both EPA
and states sufficient time to develop and implement the information
technology solutions necessary for electronic reporting of the Phase 2
data (see DCN 0001 to 0009). In response to the feedback from the
states in the letters and oral communications, this notice proposes
changes to the NPDES eRule to allow for a smoother transition from
paper to electronic reporting for the NPDES program.
EPA collected these changes over the past few years as EPA and
states began implementing the NPDES eRule. These suggested changes are
intended to clarify and streamline NPDES eRule implementation. These
changes also update the required minimum set of NPDES program data to
include recent changes to the NPDES program. EPA recently updated the
NPDES permit application regulations (40 CFR 122.21) and the related
forms with the 2019 NPDES Applications and Program Updates final rule.
See February 12, 2019; 84 FR 3324. Taken together, these data
standardizations and the corresponding electronic reporting
requirements are designed to save the NPDES authorized programs
considerable resources, make reporting easier for NPDES-regulated
entities, streamline permit renewals (as permit writers typically
review previous noncompliance events during permit renewal), improve
the accuracy and completeness of NPDES program data shared with EPA
from authorized states, ensure transparency of NPDES program data to
the public, improve environmental decision-making, and protect human
health and the environment.
Finally, in a separate rulemaking, EPA has proposed to update the
minimum set of NPDES program data (Appendix A to 40 CFR part 127) for
the municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) sector. See April 20,
2019; 84 FR 18200. These changes to the NPDES eRule will correct
obsolete citations and current inconsistencies with the newly modified
MS4 Phase II regulations. See December 8, 2016; 81 FR 89320. These
updates would not change the burden associated with complying with the
NPDES eRule but, rather, the changes would assist permitting
authorities and MS4 permittees in implementing NPDES electronic
reporting. Today's proposal does not address those previously-proposed
changes to the MS4 data elements.
III. Changes to Phase 2 Compliance Deadlines
This notice proposes to postpone the compliance deadlines for Phase
2 implementation of the NPDES eRule from December 21, 2020, to December
21, 2023 (see Table 1 to 40 CFR 127.16). EPA has received feedback from
authorized NPDES programs on how to improve Phase 2 implementation of
the NPDES eRule. This state feedback, in particular, recommended
changes to the schedule for Phase 2 implementation to allow both EPA
and states sufficient time to develop and implement the information
technology solutions necessary for electronic reporting of the Phase 2
data (see DCN 0001 to 0009). One letter submitted by the Association of
Clean Water Agencies (``ACWA'') noted that, ``the new deadline should
take into consideration the resources and time EPA will need to invest
in updating ICIS-NPDES, the resources and time EPA will need to invest
to complete work on the NPDES Electronic Tool, known as ``NeT,'' and
the resources and time states will then need
[[Page 11912]]
to complete their implementation of the rule given the new
information.''
The reason for this proposal is to allow EPA additional time to
complete the development of electronic tools that the States may use to
comply with the electronic reporting requirements. EPA had intended for
these tools to be available as an option for the states to use by
December 2020, but EPA has experienced unexpected delays since EPA
promulgated the 2015 NPDES Rule. These delays include the modernization
of its pre-existing electronic reporting tool for the collection of
DMRs (called ``NetDMR'') and the switch from using a commercially
license software platform to an open-source software platform for
general permits and program reports (called ``NPDES Electronic Report
Tool'' or ``NeT''). The NetDMR changes involved migrating tens of
thousands of NetDMR users to the Agency's Central Data Exchange (CDX)
system for account management. This simplified NetDMR account
management for EPA, states, and NetDMR users. EPA made the switch to
open-source software platform for NeT to lower its costs. EPA estimates
that these tools will be available by December 21, 2023 (see DCN 0017).
EPA has gathered basic information on all general permits and program
reports that will use NeT (see NPDES eRule Phase 2 Implementation
Dashboard). EPA expects to build the necessary NeT applications in
order to meet the new Phase 2 compliance deadlines as it has already
deployed general permit electronic reporting tools for more than 27,000
facilities that are subject to federal or authorized state general
permits (approximately 55% of the estimated number of facilities that
will use NeT). An extension of the Phase 2 compliance deadlines will
also assist states who have experienced similar challenges in
developing the information technology infrastructure to implement
electronic reporting tools for their general permit covered facilities.
The following are the proposed regulatory changes that EPA is
considering for the Phase 2 compliance deadlines:
Change the Phase 2 compliance deadlines in Table 1 to 40
CFR 127.16 from December 21, 2020, to December 21, 2023 for general
permit reports and program reports.
Change the Phase 2 compliance deadlines in the NPDES
regulations in 40 CFR parts 122, 403, and 503. These provisions
originated the reporting requirements.
EPA proposes to change the Phase 2 compliance (deadline) date for
the following NPDES reporting requirements in 40 CFR parts 122, 403,
and 503:
Low Erosivity Waivers (LEW)--40 CFR 122.26(b)(15)(i)(C);
No Exposure Certifications (NOE)--40 CFR
122.26(g)(1)(iii);
Notice of Intent to discharge (NOI)--40 CFR
122.28(b)(2)(i);
Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Program
Report--40 CFR 122.34(d)(3);
Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Report--40 CFR
122.41(l)(6)(i), 122.41(l)(7), 122.41(m)(3)(i), and 122.41(m)(3)(ii);
Medium or Large MS4 Program Report--40 CFR 122.42(c);
CAFO Annual Report--40 CFR 122.42(e)(4);
Notice of Terminations (NOT)--40 CFR 122.64(c);
Significant Industrial User Compliance Reports in
Municipalities Without Approved Pretreatment Programs--40 CFR 403.12(e)
and (h);
Pretreatment Program Report--40 CFR 403.12(i); and
Biosolids Annual Report--40 CFR 503.18, 503.28, 503.48.
In addition to moving the compliance deadlines to December 21,
2023, EPA proposes to add a reference to the proposed alternative Phase
2 compliance deadlines provisions at 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f). This is
discussed in more detail below. Other than the changes to the deadlines
for complying with Phase 2 compliance deadlines and the addition of the
reference to the alternative Phase 2 compliance deadlines provisions,
EPA is not proposing any changes to the requirements in these sections
and will not respond to any public comments on issues other than the
dates.
Finally, EPA regulations set the NNCR publication date at December
21, 2021. EPA originally picked this date as it needed time to develop
this report and that it was one year after the Phase 2 compliance
deadlines for electronic reporting. As previously noted, EPA and states
have made significant progress in implementing Phase 1 and EPA has held
frequent meetings with states on how to develop the NNCR.
EPA does not see the need to extend the NNCR publication compliance
deadline for an additional three years, as it has some Phase 1 data
that can be incorporated into the NNCR. EPA plans to incorporate Phase
2 data into the NNCR as these data become available. The benefit of
this approach would be to give EPA, states, and the public a complete
inventory of facilities with violations based on the most currently
available set of NPDES program data. This will help EPA and states
identify noncompliance issues that might impact human health or the
environment.
However, EPA needs additional time to work with states on
completing Phase 1 reporting and how best to categorize and display
non-compliance in the NNCR based on Phase 1 data. In addition, EPA is
already working with states on reducing the level of Significant Non-
Compliance with NPDES requirements using the Phase 1 data as one of its
National Compliance Initiatives for 2020-2023.\1\ Therefore, EPA is
proposing to delay the public release date of the NNCR by one year, to
December 21, 2022. This date will allow EPA and states to use the new
NNCR as EPA is making decisions on its next round of National
Compliance Initiatives. EPA solicits comment on this proposed NNCR
publication date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See the following website for details: https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/fy2020-fy2023-national-compliance-initiatives.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Alternative Phase 2 Compliance Deadlines
In addition to changing the Phase 2 compliance deadline, EPA is
proposing new regulatory provisions to create additional flexibility
for Phase 2 compliance deadlines in case they are needed. These new
provisions respond to the requests from ACWA and other authorized NPDES
programs for more time to develop and implement the information
technology solutions necessary for electronic reporting of the Phase 2
data (see DCN 0001 to 0009).
The EPA proposes a new regulatory provision [40 CFR 127.24(e)] that
would allow authorized NPDES programs to request additional time beyond
December 21, 2023 to implement Phase 2 of the NPDES eRule. Under this
provision, an authorized NPDES program would send a request for EPA to
review and approval. This request would identify the facilities,
general permits, program reports, or data elements for which the
authorized NPDES program needs additional time beyond December 21,
2023. For example, under this option a state could seek approval from
the EPA to postpone implementation of electronic reporting for a NPDES
general permit until an agreed-upon time after December 21, 2023, but
no later than December 21, 2026. This waiver might be helpful if a
state has a permit or program report that is a lower priority for
electronic reporting (e.g., a general permit that provides coverage for
10 or fewer NPDES-regulated entities) and for which electronic
reporting tool development is delayed.
[[Page 11913]]
While states may make multiple requests for compliance deadline
extensions beyond December 21, 2023, the proposed rule would not allow
EPA to grant extensions beyond December 21, 2026. Each alternative
Phase 2 compliance deadline request would need to:
Be submitted to EPA by the Director, as defined in 40 CFR
122.2;
Identify each general permit, program report, and related
data elements covered by the request and the corresponding alternative
compliance deadline(s);
Identify each facility covered by the request and the
corresponding alternative compliance deadline(s) (Note: This only
applies if the request covers some but not all facilities covered by
the relevant general permit or program report requirement);
Be submitted at least 120 days prior to the then-
applicable compliance deadline(s) in Table 1 to 40 CFR 127.16 or a
previously EPA approved alternative compliance deadline; and
Provide a rationale for the delay and enough details
(e.g., tasks, milestones, roles and responsibilities, necessary
resources) to clearly describe how the program will successfully
implement electronic reporting for general permit, program report, and
related data elements covered by the request.
EPA would review each alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline
request to determine if it provides enough detail to accurately assess
if the state has a reasonable plan to deploy electronic reporting by
the requested alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline. EPA would return
alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline requests with insufficient
detail back to the Director within 30 days of receipt and provide
recommendations. EPA would approve or deny each complete alternative
Phase 2 compliance deadline request within 120 days of receipt of a
sufficiently detailed request. EPA would provide notice to the
authorized NPDES program of EPA's approval or denial. The authorized
NPDES program could re-apply if the initial request were denied by EPA.
Under the proposal, EPA could elect to deny an alternative Phase 2
compliance deadline request and then could continue to follow the
procedure in the existing rule for determining the initial recipient of
electronic NPDES information (see 40 CFR 127.27). EPA must become the
initial recipient of electronic NPDES information from NPDES-regulated
facilities if the state, tribe, or territory does not consistently
maintain electronic data transfers in compliance with the NPDES eRule
[see 40 CFR 127.27(d)(2)]. EPA would update its website with each
alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline request and the corresponding
Agency approval or denial notice. EPA would provide updated information
at: https://www.epa.gov/compliance/npdes-ereporting. EPA would also
update its website and online ``NPDES eRule Phase 2 Implementation
Dashboard'' to clearly identify the approved alternative Phase 2
compliance deadlines for each facility, general permit report, program
report, and related data elements by authorized NPDES program.
EPA is also proposing a separate regulatory provision [40 CFR
127.24(f)] that would authorize EPA to, on its own initiative, allow
for additional time for one or more states to implement NPDES
electronic reporting beyond December 21, 2023. Under this proposal, EPA
could establish an alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline for
electronic reporting and data sharing for one or more facilities,
general permit reports, program reports, and related data elements (see
Table 2 to Appendix A to 40 CFR part 127). Under the proposal, EPA
could set an alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline for up to three
years but not beyond December 21, 2026. EPA would update its website
and online ``NPDES eRule Phase 2 Implementation Dashboard'' to clearly
identify the alternative Phase 2 compliance deadlines for each
facility, general permit report, program report, and related data
elements by authorized NPDES program. Separately, EPA would provide
notice to the one or more authorized NPDES program covered by each
alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline through email or letters. This
notice would include a rationale for the delay and enough details
(e.g., tasks, milestones, roles and responsibilities, necessary
resources) to clearly describe how EPA would successfully implement
electronic reporting for general permit, program report, and related
data elements covered by the extension. This additional flexibility
would also allow more time for EPA and authorized NPDES programs to
resolve any issues related to the sharing of Phase 2 data.
V. Clarifying Edits for More Efficient Implementation and 2019 NPDES
Updates Rule Changes
The following are proposed clarifying edits to the 2015 NPDES
eRule. These changes are based on EPA and state experience over the
past few years during NPDES eRule implementation. These proposed
changes are intended to clarify and streamline NPDES eRule
implementation. The last two changes also include two new data sharing
requirements related to NAICS codes and variance requests that were
recently added to the NPDES application forms. See the 2019 NPDES
Applications and Program Updates Rule (February 12, 2019; 84 FR 3324).
A. Correct the Title for 40 CFR 123.45
EPA proposes to delete ``by the Director'' in the title for this
section. EPA proposes this deletion as the NPDES eRule eliminated the
previous noncompliance reports that were authored by state NPDES
programs and replace them with one noncompliance report (i.e., NPDES
Noncompliance Report or ``NNCR''). The NNCR is authored by EPA rather
than any state ``Director.''
B. Provide Greater Clarity and Specificity for the NNCR Category I
Noncompliance Definitions
The NPDES eRule also eliminated state noncompliance reporting
[e.g., Quarterly Noncompliance Report (QNCR), Annual Noncompliance
Report (ANCR)] and required EPA to produce a public inventory of NPDES
violations (called the NPDES Noncompliance Report or ``NNCR''). The
NPDES eRule also revised and update the violation classification
definitions to specifically identify Category I violations with all
other violations as Category II violations. EPA proposes the following
changes to the NNCR Category I violation classification definitions,
which are listed at 40 CFR 123.45(a)(2). EPA regulatory:
Re-order the violation categories to better match the
order EPA previously used in the pre-2015 version of 123.45 for the
Category I noncompliance definitions;
Correct the label and definition used for violations of
administrative or judicial enforcement orders;
Correct the label for permit effluent limit violations;
Clarify the definition of Category I noncompliance for
reporting violations; and
Clarify the text in Appendix A to 40 CFR 123.45 and update
the formatting to correctly show labels and groups of pollutants.
EPA solicited feedback from the EPA-state NNCR workgroup on these
proposed changes. EPA received feedback from states that it would be
helpful to re-order the noncompliance categories to better match the
order EPA used prior to promulgating the 2015 NPDES eRule. States also
provided feedback to EPA that several NNCR Category I definitions
should be clarified and refined. States suggested
[[Page 11914]]
that EPA change ``Compliance schedule violations'' to ``Enforcement
order violations,'' as this category of violations relates to
violations of ``any requirement or condition in administrative or
judicial enforcement orders, other than compliance construction
violations and reporting violations.'' This proposed change would
remove the word ``permit'' from this definition as these types of
violations are not related to permit requirements. EPA is proposing to
change the label ``Effluent limits'' to ``Permit effluent limits'' as
this category of violations only relates to violations or effluent
limits that are in NPDES permits.
States also suggested deleting the word ``complete'' in the
``Reporting violations'' violation category. Some states indicated that
this definition could be interpreted to mean that the submission of an
incomplete report could trigger Category I noncompliance (e.g., failure
to report one value on a DMR as opposed to the entire DMR). EPA
proposes to delete the word ``complete'' to make clear that a Category
I reporting violation only occurs when an NPDES-regulated entity fails
to file an entire report within the appropriate reporting period.
EPA is retaining in the NNCR the identification of Category I
reporting violations for facilities that do not provide the required
data for an entire DMR but instead report a noncompliant reason for not
providing these data. An example of this kind of noncompliance is when
a facility fails to conduct any sampling or analysis during the
reporting period as required by its NPDES permit. The facility would
use the DMR form to report this noncompliance to the authorized NPDES
program. These noncompliant reasons at the DMR form level will continue
to be classified as Category I noncompliance reporting violations.
States also requested more clarity on the type of reporting
violations that would always trigger Category I noncompliance. EPA is
proposing to retain the 30-day grace period and list the reports that
must be filed within 30 days: (1) Final compliance schedule progress
reports; (2) Discharge Monitoring Reports [see 40 CFR 122.41(l)(4)(i)],
and (3) program reports [see 40 CFR 127.2(f)]. These reports are
critical compliance monitoring information and closely align with NPDES
eRule (see Table 1 to 40 CFR 127.16). EPA is also retaining violations
of the twenty-four reporting and five-day reporting NPDES requirements
[see 40 CFR 122.41(l)(6)] in the ``Reporting violations'' violation
category as these reporting violations relate to ``noncompliance which
may endanger health or the environment.'' States also provided feedback
that they would like the ability to use their discretion to identify
other reporting violations as Category I violations. EPA notes that the
NNCR already includes this flexibility as the ``Other violations''
category includes, ``any violation or group of violations, which in the
discretion of the Director or EPA, are considered to be of concern.''
Finally, EPA proposes to clarify the text in Appendix A to 40 CFR
123.45 and update the formatting to correctly show labels and groups of
pollutants. These proposed clarifications would fix an inaccurate
reference and use the same wording from the ``Violation
classifications'' section of the NNCR. EPA intends no substantive
change to the scope of Category I noncompliance through these changes.
C. Correct Appendix A Deficiency Descriptions To Match Current
Practices of Authorized NPDES Programs
EPA proposes to delete the last sentence in the data description
for the following four `deficiency' data elements in Appendix A to 40
CFR part 127: ``The values for this data element will distinguish
between noncompliance and significant noncompliance (SNC).''
Deficiencies Identified Through the Biosolids/Sewage
Sludge Compliance Monitoring
Deficiencies Identified Through the MS4 Compliance
Monitoring
Deficiencies Identified Through the Pretreatment
Compliance Monitoring
Deficiencies Identified Through the Sewer Overflow/Bypass
Compliance Monitoring
EPA is also proposing to delete the regulation citation to 40 CFR
123.45 for these four data elements.
EPA proposes to delete the last sentence in the data description
for the four `deficiency' data elements as only violations affect
compliance status. This change would make clear that these four
`deficiency' data elements should not be used to affect compliance
status. These separate data elements mirror the current inspection and
violation identification practices of authorized NPDES programs. In
general, EPA and state inspectors document their findings made during
inspections and note any `deficiencies.' EPA created four different
`deficiency' data elements to identify and track these instances of
potential noncompliance. The inspector's manager will typically review
these `deficiencies' and decide if any of them warrant separate
identification as violations. These violations are already tracked with
the ``Violation Code'' data element. Deleting this sentence from the
descriptions for these four data elements will eliminate any potential
confusion as to whether the identified deficiency automatically created
an instance of non-compliance.
D. Correct Data Element Name and Description and Reference for
Biosolids or Sewage Sludge--Land Application or Surface Disposal
Deficiencies
EPA proposes to rename the ``Biosolids or Sewage Sludge--Land
Application or Surface Disposal Deficiencies'' data element to
``Biosolids or Sewage Sludge--Violations'' and update the related data
description.
EPA mislabeled the ``Biosolids or Sewage Sludge--Land Application
or Surface Disposal Deficiencies'' data element in the NPDES eRule.
This element is part of the Federal biosolids annual report and allows
NPDES-regulated entities to self-report violations on all regulated
biosolids management practices (i.e., land application, surface
disposal, and incineration) (see 22 October 2015; 80 FR 64079). This
change also makes clear that this data element tracks self-reported
violations for the three biosolids management practices regulated under
EPA's Federal biosolids regulations (40 CFR part 503). EPA is also
proposing to add the corresponding CFR reference for the biosolids
incineration annual report (40 CFR 503.48). This change will help
reduce confusion with the data element ``Deficiencies Identified
Through the Biosolids/Sewage Sludge Compliance Monitoring;'' these
deficiencies are not violations and do not affect compliance status.
E. Correct the Title of the ``Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Report'' in
Table 1 of Appendix A and Table 1 of 40 CFR 127.16
EPA used an incorrect title in two sections of the NPDES eRule for
the report that provides information on sewer overflows and bypass
events. EPA used the incorrect title, ``Sewer Overflow Event Reports
[40 CFR 122.41(l)(6) and (7)],'' at Table 1 to 40 CFR 127.16 and Table
1 to Appendix A, 40 CFR part 127. The correct title is, ``Sewer
Overflow/Bypass Event Reports [40 CFR 122.41(l)(4), (6), (7), and
122.41(m)(3)].'' EPA used the correct title in all other references to
this report. EPA is also proposing to make conforming changes to the
``Program area'' column and the ``Minimum frequency'' column in Table 1
(Appendix A 40 CFR part 127).
[[Page 11915]]
F. Deletion of the Following Two Data Elements: Reportable
Noncompliance Tracking and Reportable Noncompliance Tracking Start Date
EPA proposes deleting the following two data elements as these data
are no longer used for EPA's national NPDES program:
Reportable Noncompliance Tracking; and
Reportable Noncompliance Tracking Start Date.
EPA mistakenly included these two data elements in Appendix A.
These two data elements are no longer needed to address unforeseen
circumstances when the authorized NPDES program needs to turn off
automatic violation detection by EPA's NPDES data system. The current
recommended approach to turn off compliance tracking in EPA's NPDES
data system is for EPA or authorized NPDES programs to use the Permit
Compliance Tracking Status and DMR Non-Receipt data elements. See
``NPDES Electronic Reporting Implementation Guidance for Tracking
Compliance and Major Designations,'' 28 December 2016, https://www.epa.gov/compliance/data-entry-guidance-and-technical-papers.
G. Provide Greater Clarity for the ``Facility Concentrated Aquatic
Animal Production (CAAP) Status'' Data Element Name and Description
EPA proposes to make changes to the ``Facility CAAP Status'' data
element name and description. States provided feedback to EPA that the
current name and description of this data element could be interpreted
to mean that this data element applies to all NPDES-regulated entities
as the current data description provides ``Yes'' and ``No'' as example
reference values. This interpretation implies that states would need to
provide a ``Yes'' or ``No'' for all NPDES-regulated entities.
The proposed changes would make clear that this data element only
applies to aquatic animal production facilities. The proposed change
would ensure that states do not need to share these data with EPA for
facilities that do not have aquatic animal production (i.e., lower data
entry burden for states). Moreover, the proposed changes would also
provide the information necessary to distinguish between the two CAAP
identification methods. EPA proposes to change the name of this data
element from ``Facility CAAP Designation'' to ``Facility CAAP Status.''
The proposed change from ``Designation'' to ``Status'' makes clear that
this data element tracks both methods for identifying an aquatic animal
production facility as a CAAP facility. The first method is solely
based on production amounts provided by the facility and the second
method is a manual designation process performed by the authorized
NPDES program.
Method #1 (Based on Facility Production Data)--CAAP
identification is automatic based on the comparison of permit
application/NOI information against the criteria used in EPA's CAAP
NPDES regulations (see 40 CFR 122.24(b)); and
Method #2 (Authorized NPDES Program Designation)--Using a
case-by-case approach the RA may designate any warm or cold-water
aquatic animal production facility as a concentrated aquatic animal
production facility upon determining that it is a significant
contributor of pollution to waters of the United States (see 40 CFR
122.24(c)).
The two methods are sequenced as follows. Facilities seeking NPDES
permit coverage that acquire the CAAP status under Method #1 are not
evaluated under Method #2 [i.e., Facility CAAP Status is set to ``Yes
(Based on Facility Production Data)'']. Conversely, facilities seeking
NPDES permit coverage that do not acquire CAAP status under Method #1
can be designated by the authorized NPDES program as a CAAP facility
under Method #2 [i.e., Facility CAAP Status is set to ``Yes (Authorized
NPDES Program Designation)'']. The proposed changes would also require
NPDES programs to share data with EPA on aquatic animal production
facilities that they inspect under Method #2 and found to not be a CAAP
facility [i.e., Facility CAAP Status is set to ``No (Authorized NPDES
Program Determination)''].
H. Provide Greater Clarity on the `Permit Component' Data Element With
Respect to Unpermitted Facilities
EPA proposes changes to the ``Permit Component'' data element
description to clarify its applicability to unpermitted facilities
subject to NPDES inspections. EPA proposes these changes as EPA's
regulations require authorized NPDES programs to have ``inspection and
surveillance procedures to determine, independent of information
supplied by regulated persons, compliance or noncompliance with
applicable program requirements.'' See 40 CFR 123.26(b). EPA's NPDES
Compliance Monitoring Strategy (CMS) also provides compliance
monitoring goals for authorized NPDES programs and guidance regarding
inspection of facilities without NPDES permit coverage.\2\ For example,
this document notes, ``Regions and states should also conduct
compliance monitoring activities to locate industrial facilities that
have failed to obtain permit coverage or file a `no exposure
certification' under 40 CFR 122.26(g). Inspections of unpermitted
industrial stormwater facilities, including those with `no exposure
certification,' will count toward the annual industrial stormwater
coverage goal of 10%.'' \3\ EPA provided a discussion of when states
must share data on unpermitted facilities with EPA in the preamble to
the final rule (October 22, 2015; 80 FR 64078).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ U.S. EPA, 2014. Issuance of Clean Water Act National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Compliance Monitoring
Strategy, Memorandum from Lisa Lund, Director, Office of Compliance,
July 21. See https://www.epa.gov/compliance/clean-water-act-national-pollutant-discharge-elimination-system-compliance-monitoring.
\3\ Ibid, Page 15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This change would clarify that this data element applies to
unpermitted facilities when states are required by EPA regulations to
share data about these unpermitted facilities with EPA. This change
would also update the regulatory citation for this data element to
explicitly include certain unpermitted facilities [e.g., certain
unpermitted facilities subject to a CWA NPDES inspection, facilities
regulated by the Federal biosolids regulation (40 CFR part 503)]. This
change would help EPA and states ensure that unpermitted facilities can
be properly sorted into their respective NPDES programs (e.g.,
industrial stormwater, construction stormwater, CAFOs). EPA estimates
that this change would only be a minor increase in costs to states as
most states already share these data for tracking compliance with the
CMS and other programmatic needs. For example, EPA uses this data
element to mask facility information in public search tools for
unpermitted Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) and Animal
Feeding Operations (AFOs) that EPA or state inspectors found were not
discharging and do not require an NPDES permit (see 22 October 2015; 80
FR 64092).
I. Provide Greater Clarity on the Notice of Termination (NOT)
Electronic Reporting Requirements
EPA proposes to make changes to the Notice of Termination (NOT)
section in the NPDES regulations (40 CFR 122.64(c)). The NPDES eRule
made clear that the electronic reporting requirement for NOTs only
applied to general permit covered facilities (see Table 1 to Appendix
A, 40 CFR part 127). This proposed language clarifies the electronic
reporting requirement for NOTs and helps ensure that the state
[[Page 11916]]
burden associated with implementing the NPDES eRule is minimized.
J. Provide Greater Clarity on the ``Applicable Effluent Limitations
Guidelines'' Data Element and Delete the Duplicative Data Element,
``Applicable Categorical Standards''
EPA proposes to update the data description for the ``Applicable
Effluent Limitations Guidelines'' data element to make clear that this
data element applies to all NPDES-regulated entities and to clarify
EPA's expectation that the authorized NPDES program should identify all
applicable effluent limitations guidelines. Making these changes will
also allow EPA to delete the ``Applicable Categorical Standards'' data
element. EPA is also proposing to make conforming changes to the
regulatory citation and ``NPDES Data Group'' columns in Table 2
(Appendix A to 40 CFR part 127).
This proposed change will help reduce the burden on states to
create a duplicative data element, ``Applicable Categorical
Standards.'' This change will help ensure that EPA and states have an
accurate inventory of facilities that meet the applicability criteria
of the one or more effluent guidelines as well as allow EPA to maintain
an accurate inventory of facilities that do not have any applicable
effluent guidelines. Finally, these changes will also help reduce state
data sharing burden as the data description makes clear that the
Control Authority can use pretreatment program report and the state can
use the NOI submissions to manage these data.
K. Provide Greater Clarity on the ``Receiving Waterbody Name for
Permitted Feature'' Data Element Name and Description
EPA proposes to delete the word ``Receiving'' from the ``Receiving
Waterbody Name for Permitted Feature'' data element name and update the
data description. EPA is also proposing to add conforming regulatory
citations to 40 CFR 122.21(f)(9) for this data element as well as the
``Source Water for Cooling Purposes'' data element.
EPA recently updated the NPDES regulations governing individual
NPDES permit applications (see 12 February 2019; 84 FR 3324). The Rule
added 40 CFR 122.21(f)(9), requires individual permit applications to
include the following cooling water information: ``An indication of
whether the facility uses cooling water and the source of the cooling
water.'' EPA now proposes a conforming change to the data element in
Appendix A. This proposed change would also make clear that this data
element is optional for other intake structures. EPA proposes to update
the data sharing requirements for both individual and general permit
covered facilities. This would ensure that there is consistent and
complete reporting nationwide of industrial classification data, which
are useful for regulatory decisions and program oversight.
L. Requiring NAICS Code Data To Match the 2019 NPDES Applications and
Program Updates Final Rule
EPA proposes to update the data descriptions for the ``NAICS Code''
and ``NAICS Code Primary Indicator'' data elements. EPA is also
proposing to add conforming regulatory citations to 40 CFR 122.21(f)(3)
and 122.28(b)(2)(ii) for these data elements.
EPA proposes these changes to conform to its updated NPDES permit
application regulations (see 12 February 2019; 84 FR 3324), which
became effective on June 12, 2019. Since this date, applicants for EPA-
issued NPDES permits are required to meet the new application
requirements. EPA proposes to update each of the eight NPDES
application forms to conform to the February 12, 2019 final rule and
improve clarity and usability. States that are authorized to administer
the NPDES program might require use of EPA's application forms or might
have developed their own state-specific application forms. In either
case, the final NPDES Applications and Program Updates Rule provides
states up to one year to make conforming programmatic and regulatory
changes, and up to two years if statutory changes are needed.
The 2019 NPDES Applications and Program Updates Final Rule requires
permit applications to include data on the four-digit Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) codes and the six-digit NAICS codes.
Prior to this 2019 rulemaking, EPA only required NPDES permit
applications to include SIC code data. EPA is proposing to update the
data sharing requirements for both individual and general permit
covered facilities. This would ensure that there is consistent and
complete reporting nationwide of industrial classification data, which
are useful for regulatory decisions and program oversight. EPA is
proposing to require states to share these NAICS code data with EPA
when they approve NPDES permit coverage. This will help lower the
implementation costs to states.
M. Add Variance Data Elements to Appendix A To Match the 2019 NPDES
Applications and Program Updates Final Rule
EPA proposes to make changes to variance related data elements in
Appendix A as well as add new variance related data elements. These
variances relate to the following provisions in the CWA:
Fundamentally different factors (FDFs) (CWA section
301(n));
Non-conventional pollutants (CWA section 301(c) and (g));
Water quality related effluent limitations (CWA Section
302(b)(2));
Thermal discharges (CWA Section 316(a)); and
Discharges to marine waters (CWA Section 301(h))].
EPA proposes to make conforming changes to the data element
citations. EPA proposes to amend Table 2 to Appendix A for these
variance data elements to include references to 40 CFR 123.41 (`Sharing
of Information') for variances that do not expire (e.g., FDFs) as well
as references to NPDES permit application variance information sections
at 40 CFR 122.21(f)(10) and 122.21(j)(1)(ix).
EPA proposes to include these revised and new data elements in the
minimum set of NPDES program data (Appendix A to 40 CFR part 127) as
these data would allow EPA and states to better track variance requests
and related statuses for the NPDES program. EPA recently updated the
NPDES permit application regulations (40 CFR 122.21) and the related
forms with the 2019 NPDES Applications and Program Updates final rule.
EPA proposes updating the data sharing requirements for both individual
and general permit covered facilities. This would ensure that there is
consistent and complete reporting nationwide of variance data. EPA is
proposing to require states to share these variance data with EPA when
they approve NPDES permit coverage. This approach will integrate with
the authorized NPDES program's data collection and sharing activities.
VI. Assistance to States To Implement Phase 2
EPA will continue to provide technical assistance and support to
authorized NPDES programs during the transition to electronic
reporting. This includes building electronic reporting tools for
authorized NPDES programs that elect to use these tools and to support
the development of new data transfer protocols. Authorized NPDES
programs can request EPA's assistance for electronic reporting by
submitting a request to [email protected].
EPA offers authorized programs financial assistance through the
Exchange Network Grant Program. This program provides funding to
states, territories, and federally recognized Indian tribes to support
the
[[Page 11917]]
development of the National Environmental Information Exchange Network.
The primary outcome expected from Exchange Network assistance
agreements is improved access to, and exchange of, high-quality
environmental data from public and private sector sources. More
information on this program is available at: https://www.epa.gov/exchangenetwork/exchange-network-grant-program.
EPA will continue to work with authorized NPDES programs to
implement NPDES electronic reporting. This includes the use of
workgroups to help authorized NPDES programs share data with EPA and to
provide recommendations on how EPA should build the NNCR. Authorized
NPDES programs can contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to learn how to join these workgroups.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
This action is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because this action is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection activities in this proposed rule have
been submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the PRA. The Information Collection Request (ICR) document
that the EPA prepared has been assigned EPA ICR number [2617.01]. You
can find a copy of the supporting statement for this ICR in the docket
for this rule (see DCN 0016). It is briefly summarized here.
EPA has primary responsibility for ensuring the CWA's NPDES program
is effectively and consistently implemented nationwide, thus ensuring
that public health and environmental protection goals of the CWA are
met. EPA is taking this action pursuant to CWA sections 101(f), 304(i),
308, 402, and 501. The accurate, complete, and timely information
collected under this ICR will help EPA and states more efficiently
implement the 2015 NPDES eRule. The improved information sharing would
increase transparency and accountability and help EPA and authorized
NPDES programs collaborate and measure progress in implementing the
2015 NPDES eRule. This information collection would provide EPA with
more timely, consistent, and accurate inventory of all general permits
and program reports, the number of facilities that must electronically
submit reports, and the online location of state electronic reporting
tools.
Receiving current high-level data on general permits and program
reports is critical to EPA's ability to oversee and manage authorized
NPDES programs. Authorizing the burden under this ICR will allow EPA to
provide timely assistance to authorized NPDES programs as they
implementation the NPDES eRule. The general permits and program reports
inventory will help promote efficiencies in NPDES eRule implementation
as states will be able to use this information to identify other states
that have already developed electronic reporting tools. Additionally,
with the implementation of this information collection activity,
regulated entities would be able to ensure that they are fully aware of
the compliance deadlines and electronic reporting tools for their
reporting obligations.
Respondents/affected entities: This ICR covers the 47 states and
one U.S. Territory authorized to implement the NPDES program.
Respondent's obligation to respond: EPA is taking this action
pursuant to CWA sections 101(f), 304(i), 308, 402, and 501.
Estimated number of respondents: This ICR covers the 48 authorized
NPDES programs.
Frequency of response: EPA estimates that twelve authorized NPDES
programs will provide updated information on general permits and
program reports and the related electronic reporting tools each month.
Additionally, all 48 authorized NPDES programs will conduct an annual
review and update of EPA's inventory. Finally, EPA estimates that
approximately 15 authorized NPDES programs will prepare and submit an
alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline request during the three-year
period covered by the ICR.
Total estimated burden: 416 hours (per year). Burden is defined at
5 CFR 1320.3(b).
Total estimated cost: $25,418 (per year), includes $0 annualized
capital or operation & maintenance costs.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for the
EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
Submit your comments on the Agency's need for this information, the
accuracy of the provided burden estimates and any suggested methods for
minimizing respondent burden to the EPA using the docket identified at
the beginning of this rule. You may also send your ICR-related comments
to OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs via email to
[email protected], Attention: Desk Officer for the EPA. Since
OMB is required to make a decision concerning the ICR between 30 and 60
days after receipt, OMB must receive comments no later than March 30,
2020. The EPA will respond to any ICR-related comments in the final
rule.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This action
does not affect small entities as the proposed changes in this action
only cover states, tribes, and territories that have NPDES program
authorization. The RFA defines ``small governmental jurisdiction'' as
the government of a city, county, town, township, village, school
district, or special district with a population of less than 50,000 (5
U.S.C. 601(5)). For the purposes of the RFA, States and tribal
governments are not considered small governments.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The proposed
changes in this action help streamline the implementation of the NPDES
eRule and provide states with more flexibility. EPA estimates that the
additional time and flexibility afforded by the proposed changes will
help lower the implementation costs.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
[[Page 11918]]
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This action does not affect small entities as
the proposed changes in this action only cover states, tribes, and
territories that have NPDES program authorization. Currently there are
no tribal governments that are authorized for the NPDES program. Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is
not economically significant as defined in Executive Order 12866, and
because the EPA does not believe the environmental health or safety
risks addressed by this action present a disproportionate risk to
children. The proposed changes in this action only cover states,
tribes, and territories that have NPDES program authorization.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The
proposed changes in this action only cover states, tribes, and
territories that have NPDES program authorization.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 9
Environmental protection, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
40 CFR Part 122
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Water pollution control.
40 CFR Part 123
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous substances, Indians-lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Water pollution control.
40 CFR Part 127
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Automatic data processing, Electronic data processing, Hazardous
substances, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sewage disposal, Waste treatment and disposal, Water
pollution control.
40 CFR Part 403
Environmental protection, Confidential business information,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Waste treatment and disposal,
Water pollution control.
40 CFR Part 503
Environmental protection, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Sewage disposal.
Dated: January 31, 2020.
Andrew R. Wheeler,
Administrator.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40
CFR parts 9, 122, 123, 127, 403, and 503 as follows:
PART 9--OMB APPROVALS UNDER THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 135 et seq., 136-136y; 15 U.S.C. 2001,
2003, 2005, 2006, 2601-2671; 21 U.S.C. 331j, 346a, 31 U.S.C. 9701;
33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., 1311, 1313d, 1314, 1318, 1321, 1326, 1330,
1342, 1344, 1345 (d) and (e), 1361; E.O. 11735, 38 FR 21243, 3 CFR,
1971-1975 Comp. p. 973; 42 U.S.C. 241, 242b, 243, 246, 300f, 300g,
300g-1, 300g-2, 300g-3, 300g-4, 300g-5, 300g-6, 300j-1, 300j-2,
300j-3, 300j-4, 300j-9, 1857 et seq., 6901-6992k, 7401-7671q, 7542,
9601-9657, 11023, 11048.
0
2. In Sec. 9.1, add the entry ``127.24'' in numerical order under the
undesignated center heading ``NPDES Electronic Reporting'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 9.1 OMB approvals under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
40 CFR citation OMB control No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPDES Electronic Reporting
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
127.24.................................... 2020-NEW
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
PART 122--EPA ADMINISTERED PERMIT PROGRAMS: THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
0
3. The authority citation for part 122 continues to read as follows:
Authority: The Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
0
4. In Sec. 122.26, revise paragraphs (b)(15)(i)(C) and (g)(1)(iii) to
read as follows:
Sec. 122.26 Storm water discharges (applicable to State NPDES
programs, see Sec. 123.25).
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(15) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) As of December 21, 2023 or an EPA-approved alternative date
(see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all certifications submitted in
compliance with paragraphs (b)(15)(i)(A) and (B) of this section must
be submitted electronically by the owner or operator to the Director or
initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with
this section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to
part 3), Sec. 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements for electronic reporting. Prior
to this date, and independent of 40 CFR part 127, owners or operators
may be required to report electronically if specified by a particular
permit or if required to do so by state law.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Submit the signed certification to the NPDES permitting
authority once every five years. As of December 21, 2023 or an EPA-
approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
certifications submitted in compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the owner or operator to the Director or
initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in
[[Page 11919]]
compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in all
cases, subpart D to part 3), Sec. 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR
part 127 is not intended to undo existing requirements for electronic
reporting. Prior to this date, and independent of 40 CFR part 127,
owners or operators may be required to report electronically if
specified by a particular permit or if required to do so by state law.
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 122.28, revise paragraph (b)(2)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 122.28 General permits (applicable to State NPDES programs, see
Sec. 123.25).
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * * (i) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(v) and (vi)
of this section, dischargers (or treatment works treating domestic
sewage) seeking coverage under a general permit shall submit to the
Director a notice of intent to be covered by the general permit. A
discharger (or treatment works treating domestic sewage) who fails to
submit a notice of intent in accordance with the terms of the permit is
not authorized to discharge, (or in the case of sludge disposal permit,
to engage in a sludge use or disposal practice), under the terms of the
general permit unless the general permit, in accordance with paragraph
(b)(2)(v), contains a provision that a notice of intent is not required
or the Director notifies a discharger (or treatment works treating
domestic sewage) that it is covered by a general permit in accordance
with paragraph (b)(2)(vi). A complete and timely, notice of intent
(NOI), to be covered in accordance with general permit requirements,
fulfills the requirements for permit applications for purposes of
Sec. Sec. 122.6, 122.21, and 122.26. As of December 21, 2023 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
notices of intent submitted in compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the discharger (or treatment works treating
domestic sewage) to the Director or initial recipient, as defined in 40
CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3
(including, in all cases, subpart D to part 3), Sec. 122.22, and 40
CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127, discharger (or treatment works treating
domestic sewage) may be required to report electronically if specified
by a particular permit or if required to do so by state law.
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec. 122.34, revise paragraph (d)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 122.34 Permit requirements for regulated small MS4 permits.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) Reporting. Unless the permittee is relying on another entity to
satisfy its NPDES permit obligations under Sec. 122.35(a), the
permittee must submit annual reports to the NPDES permitting authority
for its first permit term. For subsequent permit terms, the permittee
must submit reports in year two and four unless the NPDES permitting
authority requires more frequent reports. As of December 21, 2023 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
reports submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically by the owner, operator, or the duly authorized
representative of the small MS4 to the NPDES permitting authority or
initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with
this section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to
part 3), Sec. 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements for electronic reporting. Prior
to this date, and independent of 40 CFR part 127, the owner, operator,
or the duly authorized representative of the small MS4 may be required
to report electronically if specified by a particular permit or if
required to do so by state law. The report must include:
* * * * *
0
7. In Sec. 122.41, revise paragraphs (l)(6)(i), (l)(7), (m)(3)(i) and
(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 122.41 Conditions applicable to all permits (applicable to
State programs, see Sec. 123.25).
* * * * *
(l) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) The permittee shall report any noncompliance which may endanger
health or the environment. Any information shall be provided orally
within 24 hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the
circumstances. A report shall also be provided within 5 days of the
time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The report shall
contain a description of the noncompliance and its cause; the period of
noncompliance, including exact dates and times), and if the
noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is
expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate,
and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. For noncompliance events
related to combined sewer overflows, sanitary sewer overflows, or
bypass events, these reports must include the data described above
(with the exception of time of discovery) as well as the type of event
(combined sewer overflows, sanitary sewer overflows, or bypass events),
type of sewer overflow structure (e.g., manhole, combine sewer overflow
outfall), discharge volumes untreated by the treatment works treating
domestic sewage, types of human health and environmental impacts of the
sewer overflow event, and whether the noncompliance was related to wet
weather. As of December 21, 2023 or an EPA-approved alternative date
(see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all reports related to combined sewer
overflows, sanitary sewer overflows, or bypass events submitted in
compliance with this section must be submitted electronically by the
permittee to the Director or initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR
127.2(b), in compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3 (including,
in all cases, subpart D to part 3), Sec. 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127.
40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing requirements for
electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and independent of 40 CFR
part 127, permittees may be required to electronically submit reports
related to combined sewer overflows, sanitary sewer overflows, or
bypass events under this section by a particular permit or if required
to do so by state law. The Director may also require permittees to
electronically submit reports not related to combined sewer overflows,
sanitary sewer overflows, or bypass events under this section.
* * * * *
(7) Other noncompliance. The permittee shall report all instances
of noncompliance not reported under paragraphs (l)(4), (5), and (6) of
this section, at the time monitoring reports are submitted. The reports
shall contain the information listed in paragraph (l)(6). For
noncompliance events related to combined sewer overflows, sanitary
sewer overflows, or bypass events, these reports shall contain the
information described in paragraph (l)(6) and the applicable required
data in appendix A to 40 CFR part 127. As of December 21, 2023 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
reports related to combined sewer overflows, sanitary sewer overflows,
or bypass events submitted in compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the permittee to the Director or initial
recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3
[[Page 11920]]
(including, in all cases, subpart D to part 3), Sec. 122.22, and 40
CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127, permittees may be required to
electronically submit reports related to combined sewer overflows,
sanitary sewer overflows, or bypass events under this section by a
particular permit or if required to do so by state law. The Director
may also require permittees to electronically submit reports not
related to combined sewer overflows, sanitary sewer overflows, or
bypass events under this section.
* * * * *
(m) * * *
(3) * * * (i) Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance
of the need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice, if possible, at
least ten days before the date of the bypass. As of December 21, 2023
or an EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
notices submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically by the permittee to the Director or initial recipient,
as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to part 3), Sec.
122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127, permittees may be required to report
electronically if specified by a particular permit or if required to do
so by state law.
(ii) Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an
unanticipated bypass as required in paragraph (l)(6) of this section
(24-hour notice). As of December 21, 2023 or an EPA-approved
alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all notices submitted
in compliance with this section must be submitted electronically by the
permittee to the Director or initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR
127.2(b), in compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3 (including,
in all cases, subpart D to part 3), Sec. 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127.
40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing requirements for
electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and independent of 40 CFR
part 127, permittees may be required to report electronically if
specified by a particular permit or if required to do so by state law.
* * * * *
0
8. In Sec. 122.42, revise paragraphs (c) and (e)(4) to read as
follows:
Sec. 122.42 Additional conditions applicable to specified categories
of NPDES permits (applicable to State NPDES programs, see Sec.
123.25).
* * * * *
(c) Municipal separate storm sewer systems. The operator of a large
or medium municipal separate storm sewer system or a municipal separate
storm sewer that has been designated by the Director under Sec.
122.26(a)(1)(v) must submit an annual report by the anniversary of the
date of the issuance of the permit for such system. As of December 21,
2023 or an EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)),
all reports submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically by the owner, operator, or the duly authorized
representative of the MS4 to the Director or initial recipient, as
defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with this section and 40 CFR
part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to part 3), Sec. 122.22,
and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127, the owner, operator, or the duly
authorized representative of the MS4 may be required to report
electronically if specified by a particular permit or if required to do
so by state law. The report shall include:
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(4) Annual reporting requirements for CAFOs. The permittee must
submit an annual report to the Director. As of December 21, 2023 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all annual
reports submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically by the permittee to the Director or initial recipient,
as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to part 3), Sec.
122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127, the permittee may be required to report
electronically if specified by a particular permit or if required to do
so by state law. The annual report must include:
* * * * *
0
9. In Sec. 122.64, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 122.64 Termination of permits (applicable to State programs,
see Sec. 123.25).
* * * * *
(c) Permittees that wish to terminate their permit must submit a
Notice of Termination (NOT) to their permitting authority. If
requesting expedited permit termination procedures, a permittee must
certify in the NOT that it is not subject to any pending State or
Federal enforcement actions including citizen suits brought under State
or Federal law. As of December 21, 2023 or an EPA-approved alternative
date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all NOTs submitted by general
permit covered facilities in compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the permittee to the Director or initial
recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D), Sec.
122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127, the permittee may be required to report
electronically if specified by a particular permit or if required to do
so by state law.
PART 123--STATE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
0
10. The authority citation for part 123 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
0
11. In Sec. 123.45:
0
a. Revise the section heading.
0
b. Revise the introductory text.
0
c. Revise paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (iv).
0
d. Revise appendix A to Sec. 123.45.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 123.45 Noncompliance and program reporting.
As of December 21, 2022, EPA must prepare public (quarterly and
annual) reports as set forth here from information that is required to
be submitted by NPDES-regulated facilities and the State Director.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Enforcement order violations. These include violations of any
requirement or condition in administrative or judicial enforcement
orders, other than compliance construction violations and reporting
violations.
(ii) Compliance construction violations. These include failure to
start construction, complete construction, or achieve final compliance
within 90 days after the date established in a permit, administrative
or judicial order, or regulation.
(iii) Permit effluent limit violations. These include violations of
permit effluent limits that exceed the ``Criteria
[[Page 11921]]
for Category I Permit Effluent Limit Violations'' in appendix A to
Sec. 123.45.
(iv) Reporting violations. These include failure to submit a
required report within 30 days after the date established in a permit,
administrative or judicial order, or regulation. These reports only
include final compliance schedule progress reports, Discharge
Monitoring Reports [see 40 CFR 122.41(l)(4)(i)], and program reports
[see 40 CFR 127.2(f)]. In addition, these violations also include any
failure to comply with the reporting requirements at 40 CFR
122.41(l)(6).
* * * * *
Appendix A to Sec. 123.45--Criteria for Category I Permit Effluent
Limit Violations
This appendix describes the criteria for reporting Category I
violations of NPDES permit effluent limits in the NPDES
noncompliance report (NNCR) as specified under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)
of this section. Any violation of an NPDES permit is a violation of
the Clean Water Act (CWA) for which the permittee is liable. As
specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, there are two
categories of noncompliance, and the table below indicates the
thresholds for violations in Category I. An agency's decision as to
what enforcement action, if any, should be taken in such cases,
shall be based on an analysis of facts, legal requirements, policy,
and guidance.
Violations of Permit Effluent Limits
The categorization of permit effluent limit violations depends
upon the magnitude and/or frequency of the violation. Effluent
violations shall be evaluated on a parameter-by-parameter and
outfall-by-outfall basis. The criteria for Category I permit
effluent limit violations apply to all Group I and Group II
pollutants and are as follows:
a. Criteria for Category I Violations of Monthly Average Permit
Effluent Limits--Magnitude and Frequency
Violations of monthly average permit effluent limits which
exceed or equal the product of the Technical Review Criteria (TRC)
times the permit effluent limit and occur two months in a six-month
period. The TRCs for the two groups of pollutants are as follows:
Group I Pollutants (TRC) = 1.4
Group II Pollutants (TRC) = 1.2
The following is a listing of the Group I and Group II
pollutants.
Group I Pollutants
Oxygen Demand
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Total Oxygen Demands
Total Organic Carbon
Other
Solids
Total Suspended Solids (Residues)
Total Dissolved Solids (Residues)
Other
Nutrients
Inorganic Phosphorus Compounds
Inorganic Nitrogen Compounds
Other
Detergents and Oils
MBAS
NTA
Oil and Grease
Other detergents or algicides
Minerals
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Sodium
Potassium
Sulfur
Sulfate
Total Alkalinity
Total Hardness
Other Minerals
Metals
Aluminum
Cobalt
Iron
Vanadium
Group II Pollutants
Metals (all forms)
Other metals not specifically listed under Group I
Inorganic
Cyanide
Total Residual Chlorine
Organics
All organics are Group II except those specifically listed
under Group I
b. Criteria for Category I Violations of Monthly Average Permit
Effluent Limits--Chronic Violations of monthly average permit
effluent limits which are exceeded in any four months in a six-month
period.
PART 127--NPDES ELECTRONIC REPORTING
0
12. The authority citation for part 127 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
0
13. In Sec. 127.16, revise the table in paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 127.16 Implementation of electronic reporting requirements for
NPDES permittees, facilities, and entities subject to this part [see
Sec. 127.1(a)].
* * * * *
Table 1--Compliance Deadlines for Electronic Submissions of NPDES
Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance deadlines for
NPDES information electronic submissions \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Permit Reports [Notices of Intent December 21, 2023.
to discharge (NOIs); Notices of
Termination (NOTs); No Exposure
Certifications (NOEs); Low Erosivity
Waivers (LEWs) and other Waivers] [40 CFR
122.26(b)(15), 122.28, and 122.64].
Discharge Monitoring Reports [40 CFR December 21, 2016.
122.41(l)(4)].
Biosolids Annual Program Reports [40 CFR December 21, 2016 (when the
part 503]. Regional Administrator is
the Director) \2\
December 21, 2023 (when the
state, tribe or territory
is the authorized NPDES
program).\2\
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation December 21, 2023.
(CAFO) Annual Program Reports [40 CFR
122.42(e)(4)].
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) December 21, 2023.
Program Reports [40 CFR 122.34(d)(3) and
122.42(c)].
POTW Pretreatment Program Annual Reports December 21, 2023.
[40 CFR 403.12(i)].
Significant Industrial User Compliance December 21, 2023.
Reports in Municipalities Without Approved
Pretreatment Programs [40 CFR 403.12(e)
and (h)].
Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports [40 CFR December 21, 2023.
122.41(l)(4), (6), (7), and 122.41(m)(3)].
CWA 316(b) Annual Reports [40 CFR part 125 December 21, 2023.
subparts I, J, and N].
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA may approve an alternative compliance deadline for general
permit reports and program reports in accordance with Sec. 127.24(e)
and (f).
\2\ Note: Director is defined in 40 CFR 122.2.
[[Page 11922]]
* * * * *
0
14. In Sec. 127.21, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 127.21 Data to be reported electronically to EPA by states,
tribes, and territories.
* * * * *
(b) States, tribes, and territories that have received
authorization from EPA to implement the NPDES program must
electronically transfer these data, listed in Sec. 127.21(a), to EPA
within 40 days of the completed activity or within 40 days of the
receipt of a report from an NPDES permittee, facility, or entity
subject to this part [see Sec. 127.1(a)]. EPA may set an alternative
compliance deadline for data sharing for one or more facilities,
general permit reports, program reports, and related data elements (see
40 CFR 127.24) provided this alternative compliance date does not
extend beyond December 21, 2026.
0
15. In Sec. 127.24:
0
a. Revise the section heading.
0
b. Add paragraphs (e) and (f).
The revision and additions read as follows:
Sec. 127.24 Responsibilities regarding review of waiver requests
from NPDES permittees, facilities, and entities subject to this part
[see Sec. 127.1(a)] and alternative compliance deadlines.
* * * * *
(e) A state, tribe, or territory that is designated by EPA as the
initial recipient [see Sec. Sec. 127.2(b) and 127.27] for an NPDES
data group [as defined in Sec. 127.2(c)] may submit a request to EPA
to establish an alternative compliance deadline for electronic
reporting of one or more general permit reports, program reports, and
related data elements (see Table 2 to appendix A). A State may request
to establish an alternative compliance deadline for up to three years
beyond the currently-applicable date but not beyond December 21, 2026.
It is the duty of the authorized NPDES program to re-apply for a new
alternative compliance deadline.
(1) The alternative compliance deadline request shall:
(i) Be submitted to EPA by the Director, as defined in 40 CFR
122.2;
(ii) Identify each general permit, program report, and related data
elements covered by the request and the corresponding alternative
compliance deadline(s);
(iii) Identify each facility covered by the request and the
corresponding alternative compliance deadline(s) (Note: This only
applies if the request covers some but not all facilities subject to
the general permit or program report requirement);
(iv) Be submitted at least 120 days prior to the applicable
compliance deadline in Table 1 to 40 CFR 127.16 or an alternative
compliance deadline previously approved by EPA; and
(v) Provide a rationale for the delay and enough details (e.g.,
tasks, milestones, roles and responsibilities, necessary resources) to
clearly describe how the program will successfully implement electronic
reporting for general permit, program report, and related data elements
covered by the request.
(2) EPA will review each alternative compliance deadline request to
see if it provides enough detail to accurately assess if the state has
a reasonable plan to deploy electronic reporting by the requested
alternative compliance deadline. EPA will return alternative compliance
deadline requests with insufficient detail back to the Director within
30 days of receipt and provide recommendations. EPA will approve or
deny each complete alternative compliance deadline request within 120
days of receipt. EPA will provide notice to the authorized NPDES
program of EPA's approval or denial. The authorized NPDES program may
re-apply if the initial request is denied by EPA.
(3) EPA will update its website after it approves a request to
clearly identify the approved alternative compliance deadlines for each
facility, general permit report, program report, and related data
elements by authorized NPDES program. EPA will also post each
alternative compliance deadline request and the corresponding Agency
approval or denial notice after each determination. EPA will provide
updated information at: https://www.epa.gov/compliance/npdes-ereporting.
(f) EPA may, as it deems appropriate, establish an alternative
compliance deadline for electronic reporting and data sharing for one
or more facilities, general permit reports, program reports, and
related data elements (see Table 2 to appendix A) in one or more
states. EPA may establish an alternative compliance deadline up to
three years beyond the currently applicable date, but in no event
beyond December 21, 2026. Separately, EPA will provide notice to the
one or more authorized NPDES program covered by each alternative
compliance deadline. This notice will include a rationale for the delay
and enough details (e.g., tasks, milestones, roles and
responsibilities, necessary resources) to clearly describe how it will
successfully implement electronic reporting for general permit, program
report, and related data elements covered by the extension. EPA will
update its website to clearly identify the alternative compliance
deadlines for each facility, general permit report, program report, and
related data elements by authorized NPDES program.
0
16. In appendix A to part 127:
0
a. In table 1:
0
i. Revise the entry ``9''.
0
b. In table 2:
0
i. Revise the entries ``Permit Component'', ``Applicable Effluent
Limitations Guidelines'', ``NAICS Code'', and ``NAICS Code Primary
Indicator'' under the ``Basic Permit Information'' center heading.
0
ii. Delete the ``Reportable Noncompliance Tracking'' and ``Reportable
Noncompliance Tracking Start Date'' entries under the ``Basic Permit
Information'' center heading.
0
iii. Revise the entry ``Receiving Waterbody Name for Permitted
Feature'' to ``Waterbody Name for Permitted Feature'' and related
description under the ``Permitted Feature Information'' center heading.
0
iv. Revise the center heading from ``Animal Feeding Operation
Information on NPDES Permit Application or Notice of Intent'' to
``Animal Feeding Operation Information.''
0
v. Revise the entry ``Facility CAAP Designation'' to ``Facility CAAP
Status'' and related description under the proposed revised ``Animal
Feeding Operation Information'' center heading.
0
vi. Delete the entry ``Applicable Categorical Standards'' under the
``Pretreatment Information on NPDES Permit Application or Notice of
Intent (this includes permit application data required for all new and
existing POTWs [40 CFR 122.21(j)(6)]'' center heading.
0
vii. Revise the entry ``Source Water for Cooling Purposes'' under the
``Cooling Water Intake Information on NPDES Permit Application or
Notice of Intent'' center heading.
0
viii. Revise the center heading from ``CWA section 316(a) Thermal
Variance Information on NPDES Permit Application or Notice of Intent''
to ``NPDES Variance Information.''
0
ix. Revise the entry ``Thermal Variance Request Type'' to ``Variance
Type'' and ``Thermal Variance Granted Date'' to ``Variance Action
Date'' and related descriptions under the proposed revised center
heading ``NPDES Variance Information.''
0
x. Add the following entries ``Variance Request Version'', ``Variance
Status'', and ``Variance Submission Date'' under the proposed revised
center heading ``NPDES Variance Information.''
0
xi. Revise the entries ``Deficiencies Identified Through the Biosolids/
[[Page 11923]]
Sewage Sludge Compliance Monitoring'', ``Deficiencies Identified
Through the MS4 Compliance Monitoring'', ``Deficiencies Identified
Through the Pretreatment Compliance Monitoring'', and ``Deficiencies
Identified Through the Sewer Overflow/Bypass Compliance Monitoring''
under the ``Compliance Monitoring Activity Information (Program Data
Generated from Authorized NPDES Programs and EPA)'' center heading.
xii. Revise the entry ``Biosolids or Sewage Sludge--Land
Application or Surface Disposal Deficiencies'' to ``Biosolids or Sewage
Sludge-Violations'' under the ``Compliance Monitoring Activity
Information (Data Elements Specific to Sewage Sludge/Biosolids Annual
Program Reports)'' center heading.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 127--Minimum Set of NPDES Data
* * * * *
Table 1--Data Sources and Regulatory Citations 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPDES Data group
No. 2 NPDES data group Program area Data provider Minimum frequency 3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
9................. Sewer Overflow/Bypass Sewer Overflows and NPDES Permittee..... Within 5 days of the time
Event Reports [40 Bypass Events. the permittee becomes
CFR 122.41(l)(4), aware of the sewer
(6), (7), and overflow event (health
122.41(m)(3)]. or environment
endangerment);
Monitoring report
frequency specific in
permit (all other sewer
overflow and bypass
events); At least 10-
days before the date of
the anticipated bypass;
and Within 5-days of the
time the permittee
becomes aware of the
unanticipated bypass.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Entities regulated by a NPDES permit will comply with all reporting requirements in their respective NPDES
permit.
\2\ Use the ``NPDES Data Group Number'' in this table and the ``NPDES Data Group Number'' column in Table 2 of
this appendix to identify the source of the required data entry. EPA notes that electronic systems may use
additional data to facilitate electronic reporting as well as management and reporting of electronic data. For
example, NPDES permittees may be required to enter their NPDES permit number (``NPDES ID''--NPDES Data Group 1
and 2) into the applicable electronic reporting system in order to identify their permit and submit a
Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR--NPDES Data Group 3). Additionally, NPDES regulated entities may be required
to enter and submit data to update or correct erroneous data. For example, NPDES permittees may be required to
enter new data regarding the Facility Individual First Name and Last Name (NPDES Data Group 1 and 2) with
their DMR submission when there is a facility personnel change.
\3\ The applicable reporting frequency is specified in the NPDES permit or control mechanism, which may be more
frequent than the minimum frequency specified in this table.
Table 2--Required NPDES Program Data
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CWA, regulatory (40
Data name Data description CFR), or other NPDES data group No.
citation (see Table 1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Permit Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Permit Component................... This will identify one or 122.2, 122.21, 1, 2.
more applicable NPDES 122.21(j)(6),
subprograms (e.g., 122.21(q),
pretreatment, CAFO, CSO, 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
POTW, biosolids/sewage 123.26, 123.41(a),
sludge, stormwater) for 123.43(d), 403.10,
the permit record. This and 501.19.
field is only required
when the permit includes
one or more NPDES
subprograms. This data
element is also required
for unpermitted
facilities when the
authorized NPDES programs
is required to share
facility, inspection,
violation, or enforcement
action data regarding
these facilities with
EPA's national NPDES data
system.
* * * * * * *
Applicable Effluent Limitations This data element will 122.21, 122.21(j)(6), 1, 2, and 7.
Guidelines. identify the one or more 122.21(q), 122.44,
applicable effluent 122.44(j),
limitations guidelines 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
and new source 403.10(e),
performance standards for 403.10(f), 403.12(i).
the facility by the
corresponding 40 CFR part
number (e.g., part 414--
Organic chemicals,
plastics, and synthetic
fibers point source
category, part 433--Metal
Finishing point source
category). For
Categorical Industrial
Users (CIUs) this data
element will track the
one or more applicable
categorical standards
even when the CIU is
subject to one or more
local limits that are
more stringent than the
applicable categorical
standards. This data
element will also
identify if there are no
applicable effluent
limitations guidelines,
new source performance
standards, or categorical
standards for the
facility (including
Significant Industrial
Users (SIUs)). This data
element can be updated by
the Control Authority for
SIUs and CIUs through
submission of the
Pretreatment Program
Reports [40 CFR
403.12(i)]. Additionally,
the authorized NPDES
program can automate the
creation of these data
through submission of the
Notices of Intent to
discharge (NOI) [40 CFR
122.28(b)(2)(ii)].
[[Page 11924]]
* * * * * * *
NAICS Code......................... The one or more six-digit 40 CFR 122.21(f)(3), 1, 2, and 7.
North American Industry 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
Classification System EPA SIC/NAICS Data
(NAICS) codes/ Standard, Standard
descriptions that No. EX000022.2, 6
represents the economic January 2006, Office
activity of the facility. of Management and
This field is required to Budget, Executive
be shared with the U.S. Office of the
EPA when authorized NPDES President, Final
programs approve NPDES Decision on North
permit coverage after American Industry
June 12, 2021 (i.e., two Classification
years after the effective System (62 FR
date of the 2019 NPDES 17288), 403.10(f).
Applications and Program
Updates Rule). See
February 12, 2019; 84 FR
3324.
NAICS Code Primary Indicator....... This data element will 40 CFR 122.21(f)(3), 1, 2, and 7.
identify the primary 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
economic activity, NAICS EPA SIC/NAICS Data
code, of the facility. Standard, Standard
This data element is No. EX000022.2, 6
required for electronic January 2006, Office
data transfer between of Management and
state and EPA systems. Budget, Executive
This field is required to Office of the
be shared with the U.S. President, Final
EPA when authorized NPDES Decision on North
programs approve NPDES American Industry
permit coverage after Classification
June 12, 2021 (i.e., two System (62 FR
years after the effective 17288), 403.10(f).
date of the 2019 NPDES
Applications and Program
Updates Rule). See
February 12, 2019; 84 FR
3324.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permitted Feature Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Waterbody Name for Permitted The name of the waterbody 122.21, 122.21(f)(9), 1,2.
Feature. that is or will likely 122.28(b)(2)(ii).
receive the discharge
from each permitted
feature. If the permitted
feature is a cooling
water intake structure,
this data element is the
name of the source water.
Authorized NPDES programs
can also use this data
element to identify the
name of the source water
for other intake
structures that are
permitted features.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Animal Feeding Operation Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facility CAAP Status............... The unique code/ 122.21(i)(2), 122.24, 1,2.
description to indicate 122.25,
whether the facility 122.28(b)(2)(ii).
includes Concentrated
Aquatic Animal Production
(CAAP) and the CAAP
identification method
[e.g., ``Yes (Based on
Facility Production
Data)'', ``Yes
(Authorized NPDES Program
Designation)'']. This
field also applies when
an authorized NPDES
program has conducted an
on-site inspection of an
aquatic animal production
facility and determined
that the facility should
not be regulated under
the NPDES permit program
[e.g., ``No (Authorized
NPDES Program
Determination)'']. This
data element only applies
to aquatic animal
production facilities.
This data element can be
automatically generated
from production data that
is provided by aquatic
animal production
facilities.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cooling Water Intake Information on NPDES Permit Application or Notice of Intent
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Source Water for Cooling Purposes.. * * * * * 122.21(f)(9), * * * * *
122.21(r),
122.28(b)(2)(ii),
125.86, 125.95,
125.136, 401.14 and
CWA section 316(b).
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPDES Variance Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Variance Type...................... The unique code(s)/ 122.21(f)(10), 1.
description(s) that 122.21(j)(1)(ix),
describes the type for 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
each variance request 123.41, subpart H of
submitted by the NPDES- 125 and CWA section
regulated entity [e.g., 316(a).
fundamentally different
factors (CWA Section
301(n)), non-conventional
pollutants (CWA Section
301(c) and (g)), water
quality related effluent
limitations (CWA Section
302(b)(2)), thermal
discharges (CWA Section
316(a)), discharges to
marine waters (CWA
Section 301(h))]. This
field is required to be
shared with the U.S. EPA
when authorized NPDES
programs approve NPDES
permit coverage after
June 12, 2021 (i.e., two
years after the effective
date of the 2019 NPDES
Applications and Program
Updates Rule). See
February 12, 2019; 84 FR
3324.
[[Page 11925]]
Variance Request Version........... The unique code(s)/ 122.21(f)(10), 1.
description(s) that 122.21(j)(1)(ix),
describe whether each 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
variance request from the 123.41, subpart H of
NPDES-regulated entity is 125 and CWA section
a new request, renewal, 316(a).
or a continuance for
variances that do not
expire. This field is
required to be shared
with the U.S. EPA when
authorized NPDES programs
approve NPDES permit
coverage after June 12,
2021 (i.e., two years
after the effective date
of the 2019 NPDES
Applications and Program
Updates Rule). See
February 12, 2019; 84 FR
3324.
Variance Status.................... The unique code(s)/ 122.21(f)(10), 1.
description(s) that 122.21(j)(1)(ix),
describes the status for 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
each the variance request 123.41, subpart H of
submitted by the NPDES- 125 and CWA section
regulated entity (e.g., 316(a).
pending, approved,
denied, withdrawn by
NPDES-regulated entity,
terminated). This field
is required to be shared
with the U.S. EPA when
authorized NPDES programs
approve NPDES permit
coverage after June 12,
2021 (i.e., two years
after the effective date
of the 2019 NPDES
Applications and Program
Updates Rule). See
February 12, 2019; 84 FR
3324.
Variance Submission Date........... This is the date for each 122.21(f)(10), 1.
variance request 122.21(j)(1)(ix),
submitted by the NPDES- 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
regulated entity to the 123.41, subpart H of
NPDES permitting 125 and CWA section
authority. The date must 316(a).
be provided in YYYY-MM-DD
format where YYYY is the
year, MM is the month,
and DD is the day. This
field is required to be
shared with the U.S. EPA
when authorized NPDES
programs approve NPDES
permit coverage after
June 12, 2021 (i.e., two
years after the effective
date of the 2019 NPDES
Applications and Program
Updates Rule). See
February 12, 2019; 84 FR
3324.
Variance Action Date............... This is the date for each 122.21(f)(10), 1.
variance request when the 122.21(j)(1)(ix),
NPDES permitting 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
authority approves 123.41, subpart H of
(grants, renews), denies, 125 and CWA section
or terminates a variance 316(a).
request as well as the
date when the NPDES-
regulated entity
withdraws the variance
request. For variances
that do not expire,
entire the original
action date. The date
must be provided in YYYY-
MM-DD format where YYYY
is the year, MM is the
month, and DD is the day.
This field is required to
be shared with the U.S.
EPA when authorized NPDES
programs approve NPDES
permit coverage after
June 12, 2021 (i.e., two
years after the effective
date of the 2019 NPDES
Applications and Program
Updates Rule). See
February 12, 2019; 84 FR
3324.
Public Notice of Section 316(a) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Requests.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance Monitoring Activity Information (Program Data Generated from Authorized NPDES Programs and EPA)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deficiencies Identified Through the This is the unique code/ 123.26, 123.41(a), 1.
Biosolids/Sewage Sludge Compliance description that that and CWA section 308.
Monitoring. identifies each
deficiency in the
facility's biosolids and
sewage sludge program (40
CFR part 503) for each
compliance monitoring
activity (e.g.,
inspections, audits) by
the regulatory authority.
This data element
includes unique codes to
identify when the
facility failed to comply
with any applicable
permit requirements or
enforcement actions.
Deficiencies Identified Through the This is the unique code/ 123.26, 123.41(a), 1.
MS4 Compliance Monitoring. description that that and CWA section 308.
identifies each
deficiency in the MS4's
program to control
stormwater pollution for
each compliance
monitoring activity
(e.g., inspections,
audits) by the regulatory
authority. This data
element includes unique
codes to identify when
the MS4 failed to comply
with any applicable
permit requirements or
enforcement actions.
Deficiencies Identified Through the This is the unique code/ 123.26, 123.41(a), 1.
Pretreatment Compliance Monitoring. description that that 403.10, and CWA
identifies each section 308.
deficiency in the POTW's
authorized pretreatment
program for each
pretreatment compliance
monitoring activity
(e.g., inspections,
audits) by the regulatory
authority. These unique
codes include: (1)
Failure to enforce
against pass through and/
or interference; (2)
failure to submit
required reports within
30 days; (3) failure to
meet compliance schedule
milestones within 90
days; (4) failure to
issue/reissue control
mechanisms to 90% of SIUs
within 6 months; (5)
failure to inspect or
sample 80% of SIUs within
the past 12 months; and
(6) failure to enforce
standards and reporting
requirements.
Deficiencies Identified Through the This is the unique code/ 122.41(h), 1.
Sewer Overflow/Bypass Compliance description that that 122.41(l)(6) and
Monitoring. identifies each (7), 122.43, 123.26,
deficiency in the POTW's 123.41(a), and CWA
control of combined sewer sections 308 and
overflows, sanitary sewer 402(q)(1).
overflows, or bypass
events for each
compliance monitoring
activity (e.g.,
inspections, audits) by
the regulatory authority.
This data element
includes unique codes to
identify when a POTW has
failed to provide 24-hour
notification to the NPDES
permitting authority or
failed to submit the
Sewer Overflow/Bypass
Event Report within the
required 5-day period.
This data element also
includes unique codes to
identify when the POTW
failed to comply with any
applicable long-term CSO
control plan, permit
requirements, or
enforcement actions.
[[Page 11926]]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance Monitoring Activity Information (Data Elements Specific to Sewage Sludge/Biosolids Annual Program
Reports)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Biosolids or Sewage Sludge-- This data element is 503.18, 503.28, 4.
Violations. applicable to facilities 503.48.
that use land
application, active
surface disposal site
(e.g., monofills, surface
impoundments, lagoons,
waste piles, dedicated
disposal sites, and
dedicated beneficial use
sites), and/or
incineration. This data
element uses one or more
unique codes/descriptions
to identify all
violations. This includes
violations of additional
or more stringent
requirements (40 CFR
503.5), sampling and
analysis requirements (40
CFR 503.8), land
application requirements
(40 CFR 503, Subpart B),
surface disposal
requirements (40 CFR 503,
Subpart C), pathogen and
vector attraction
reduction requirements
(40 CFR 503, Subpart D),
and incineration
requirements (40 CFR 503,
Subpart E).
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes: (1) The NPDES program authority may pre-populate these data elements and other data elements (e.g.,
Federal Registry System ID) in the NPDES electronic reporting systems in order to create efficiencies and
standardization. For example, the NPDES program authority may configure their electronic reporting system to
automatically generate NPDES IDs for control mechanisms for new facilities reported on a Pretreatment Program
Report [40 CFR 403.12(i)]. Additionally, the NPDES program authority can decide whether to allow NPDES
regulated entities to override these pre-populated data.
(2) The data elements in this table conform to EPA's policy regarding the application requirements for renewal
or reissuance of NPDES permits for discharges from municipal separate storm sewer systems (see 61 FR 41698; 6
August 1996).
(3) The data elements in this table are also supported by the Office Management and Budget approved permit
applications and forms for the NPDES program.
(4) These data will allow EPA and the NPDES program authority to link facilities, compliance monitoring
activities, compliance determinations, and enforcement actions. For example, these data will provide several
ways to make the following linkages: linking violations to enforcement actions and final orders; linking
single event violations and compliance monitoring activities; linking program reports to DMRs; linking program
reports to compliance monitoring activities; and linking enforcement activities and compliance monitoring
activities.
PART 403--GENERAL PRETREATMENT REGULATIONS FOR EXISTING AND NEW
SOURCES OF POLLUTION
0
17. The authority citation for part 403 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
0
18. In Sec. 403.12, revise paragraphs (e)(1), (h), and (i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 403.12 Reporting requirements for POTW's and industrial users.
* * * * *
(e) * * * (1) Any Industrial User subject to a categorical
Pretreatment Standard (except a Non-Significant Categorical User as
defined in Sec. 403.3(v)(2)), after the compliance date of such
Pretreatment Standard, or, in the case of a New Source, after
commencement of the discharge into the POTW, shall submit to the
Control Authority during the months of June and December, unless
required more frequently in the Pretreatment Standard or by the Control
Authority or the Approval Authority, a report indicating the nature and
concentration of pollutants in the effluent which are limited by such
categorical Pretreatment Standards. In addition, this report shall
include a record of measured or estimated average and maximum daily
flows for the reporting period for the Discharge reported in paragraph
(b)(4) of this section except that the Control Authority may require
more detailed reporting of flows. In cases where the Pretreatment
Standard requires compliance with a Best Management Practice (or
pollution prevention alternative), the User shall submit documentation
required by the Control Authority or the Pretreatment Standard
necessary to determine the compliance status of the User. At the
discretion of the Control Authority and in consideration of such
factors as local high or low flow rates, holidays, budget cycles, etc.,
the Control Authority may modify the months during which the above
reports are to be submitted. For Industrial Users for which EPA or the
authorized state, tribe, or territory is the Control Authority, as of
December 21, 2023 or an EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR
127.24(e) or (f)), all reports submitted in compliance with this
section must be submitted electronically by the industrial user to the
Control Authority or initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b),
in compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in all
cases, subpart D to part 3), 40 CFR 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR
part 127 is not intended to undo existing requirements for electronic
reporting. Prior to this date, and independent of 40 CFR part 127, the
Industrial Users for which EPA or the authorized state, tribe, or
territory is the Control Authority may be required to report
electronically if specified by a particular control mechanism or if
required to do so by state law.
* * * * *
(h) Reporting requirements for Industrial Users not subject to
categorical Pretreatment Standards. The Control Authority must require
appropriate reporting from those Industrial Users with Discharges that
are not subject to categorical Pretreatment Standards. Significant Non-
categorical Industrial Users must submit to the Control Authority at
least once every six months (on dates specified by the Control
Authority) a description of the nature, concentration, and flow of the
pollutants required to be reported by the Control Authority. In cases
where a local limit requires compliance with a Best Management Practice
or pollution prevention alternative, the User must submit documentation
required by the Control Authority to determine the compliance status of
the User. These reports must be based on sampling and analysis
performed in the period covered by the report, and in accordance with
the techniques described in 40 CFR part 136 of this chapter and
amendments thereto. This sampling and analysis may be performed by the
Control Authority in lieu of the significant non-categorical Industrial
User. For Industrial Users for which EPA or the authorized state,
tribe, or territory is the Control Authority, as of December 21, 2023
or an EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR
[[Page 11927]]
127.24(e) or (f)), all reports submitted in compliance with this
section must be submitted electronically by the industrial user to the
Control Authority or initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b),
in compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in all
cases, subpart D to part 3), 40 CFR 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR
part 127 is not intended to undo existing requirements for electronic
reporting. Prior to this date, and independent of 40 CFR part 127, the
Industrial Users for which EPA or the authorized state, tribe, or
territory is the Control Authority may be required to report
electronically if specified by a particular control mechanism or if
required to do so by state law.
(i) Annual POTW reports. POTWs with approved Pretreatment Programs
shall provide the Approval Authority with a report that briefly
describes the POTW's program activities, including activities of all
participating agencies, if more than one jurisdiction is involved in
the local program. The report required by this section shall be
submitted no later than one year after approval of the POTW's
Pretreatment Program, and at least annually thereafter, and must
include, at a minimum, the applicable required data in appendix A to 40
CFR part 127. The report required by this section must also include a
summary of changes to the POTW's pretreatment program that have not
been previously reported to the Approval Authority and any other
relevant information requested by the Approval Authority. As of
December 21, 2023 or an EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR
127.24(e) or (f)), all annual reports submitted in compliance with this
section must be submitted electronically by the POTW Pretreatment
Program to the Approval Authority or initial recipient, as defined in
40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3
(including, in all cases, subpart D to 40 CFR part 3), 40 CFR 122.22,
and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127, the Approval Authority may also require
POTW Pretreatment Programs to electronically submit annual reports
under this section if specified by a particular permit or if required
to do so by state law.
* * * * *
PART 503--STANDARDS FOR THE USE OR DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE SLUDGE
0
19. The authority citation for part 503 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sections 405(d) and (e) of the Clean Water Act, as
amended by Pub. L. 95-217, sec. 54(d), 91 Stat. 1591 (33 U.S.C.
1345(d) and (e)); and Pub. L. 100-4, title IV, sec. 406(a), (b), 101
Stat., 71, 72 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.).
0
20. Revise Sec. 503.18 to read as follows:
Sec. 503.18 Reporting.
Class I sludge management facilities, POTWs (as defined in Sec.
501.2 of this chapter) with a design flow rate equal to or greater than
one million gallons per day, and POTWs that serve 10,000 people or more
shall submit a report on February 19 of each year. As of December 21,
2016, all reports submitted in compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the operator to EPA when the Regional
Administrator is the Director in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to part 3), 40 CFR
122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. As of December 21, 2023, or an EPA-
approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all reports
submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically in compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3
(including, in all cases, subpart D to 40 CFR part 3), 40 CFR 122.22,
and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to the compliance
deadlines for electronic reporting (see Table 1 in 40 CFR 127.16), the
Director may also require operators to electronically submit annual
reports under this section if required to do so by state law.
(a) The information in Sec. 503.17(a), except the information in
Sec. 503.17 (a)(3)(ii), (a)(4)(ii) and in (a)(5)(ii), for the
appropriate requirements on February 19 of each year.
(b) The information in Sec. 503.17(a)(5)(ii)(A) through
(a)(5)(ii)(G) on February 19th of each year when 90 percent or more of
any of the cumulative pollutant loading rates in Table 2 of Sec.
503.13 is reached at a land application site.
0
21. Revise Sec. 503.28 to read as follows:
Sec. 503.28 Reporting.
Class I sludge management facilities, POTWs (as defined in 40 CFR
501.2) with a design flow rate equal to or greater than one million
gallons per day, and POTWs that serve 10,000 people or more shall
submit a report on February 19 of each year. As of December 21, 2016,
all reports submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically by the operator to EPA when the Regional Administrator
is the Director in compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3
(including, in all cases, subpart D to 40 CFR part 3), 40 CFR 122.22,
and 40 CFR part 127. As of December 21, 2023, or an EPA-approved
alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all reports submitted
in compliance with this section must be submitted electronically in
compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in all
cases, subpart D to 40 CFR part 3), 40 CFR 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127.
40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing requirements for
electronic reporting. Prior to the compliance deadlines for electronic
reporting (see Table 1 in 40 CFR 127.16), the Director may also require
operators to electronically submit annual reports under this section if
required to do so by state law.
0
22. Revise Sec. 503.48 to read as follows:
Sec. 503.48 Reporting.
Class I sludge management facilities, POTWs (as defined in Sec.
501.2 of this chapter) with a design flow rate equal to or greater than
one million gallons per day, and POTWs that serve a population of
10,000 people or greater shall submit a report on February 19 of each
year. As of December 21, 2016, all reports submitted in compliance with
this section must be submitted electronically by the operator to EPA
when the Regional Administrator is the Director in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to 40 CFR
part 3), 40 CFR 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. As of December 21, 2023,
or an EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
reports submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically in compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3
(including, in all cases, subpart D to part 3), 40 CFR 122.22, and 40
CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to the compliance
deadlines for electronic reporting (see Table 1 in 40 CFR 127.16), the
Director may also require operators to electronically submit annual
reports under this section if required to do so by state law.
[FR Doc. 2020-02889 Filed 2-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P