Trichloroethylene; Draft Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Risk Evaluation and TSCA Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) Meetings; Notice of Availability, Public Meetings, and Request for Comment, 11079-11082 [2020-03866]

Download as PDF khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 38 / Wednesday, February 26, 2020 / Notices (FRL–9997–63). 3. EPA. Information Relevant to Prioritization for Propanol, [(1-methyl-1,2ethanediyl)bis(oxy)]bis-. Docket ID: EPA–HQ–OPPT–2019–0122. Available at https://www.regulations.gov. 4. EPA. Information Relevant to Prioritization for Propanol, 1(or 2)-(2methoxymethylethoxy)-, acetate. Docket ID: EPA–HQ–OPPT–2019–0121. Available at https://www.regulations.gov. 5. EPA. Information Relevant to Prioritization for Propanol, [2-(2butoxymethylethoxy)methylethoxy]-. Docket ID: EPA–HQ–OPPT–2019–0118. Available at https://www.regulations.gov. 6. EPA. Information Relevant to Prioritization for Propanol, oxybis-. Docket ID: EPA– HQ–OPPT–2019–0124. Available at https://www.regulations.gov. 7. EPA. Summary of General Public Comments and Responses on the Proposed Designation of Low-Priority Substances under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). January 16, 2020. 8. EPA. Summary of Chemical-Specific Public Comments and Responses on the Proposed Designation of Low-Priority Substances under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). January 16, 2020. 9. EPA. Procedures for Prioritization of Chemicals for Risk Evaluation Under the Toxic Substances Control Act. Notice. Federal Register. (82 FR 33753, September 18, 2017) (FRL–9964–24). 10. EPA. Approach Document for Screening Hazard Information for Low-Priority Substances Under TSCA. August 2019. EPA Document ID No. 740B19008. Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. Washington, DC. Available at https:// www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPAHQ-OPPT-2019-0450-0002. 11. EPA. Procedures for Prioritization of Chemicals for Risk Evaluation under TSCA: Response to Public Comments; SAN 5943; RIN 2070–AK23; EPA–HQ– OPPT–2016–0636. 2017. EPA. Health and Environmental Research Online: A Database of Scientific Studies and References. Available at https:// hero.epa.gov/hero/. 12. S. Rep. No. 114–67, 114th Cong., 1st Sess. 2015. Available at https:// www.congress.gov/114/crpt/srpt67/ CRPT-114srpt67.pdf. 13. EPA. ‘‘A Working Approach for Identifying Potential Candidate Chemicals for Prioritization.’’ (https:// www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/ 2018-09/documents/preprioritization_ white_paper_9272018.pdf). September 26, 2018. (Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.) Dated: February 19, 2020. Andrew R. Wheeler, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2020–03869 Filed 2–25–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:22 Feb 25, 2020 Jkt 250001 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA–HQ–OPPT–2019–0500; FRL–10005– 52] Trichloroethylene; Draft Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Risk Evaluation and TSCA Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) Meetings; Notice of Availability, Public Meetings, and Request for Comment Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: EPA is announcing the availability of and soliciting public comment on the draft Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) risk evaluation of trichloroethylene (TCE). EPA is also submitting the same document to the TSCA Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) for peer review and is announcing that there will be an inperson public meeting of the TSCA SACC to consider and review the draft risk evaluation. Preceding the in-person meeting, there will be a preparatory virtual public meeting for the panel to consider the scope and clarity of the draft charge questions for the peer review. The purpose of conducting risk evaluations under TSCA is to determine whether a chemical substance presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment under the conditions of use, including an unreasonable risk to a relevant potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulation. SUMMARY: DATES: Virtual Meeting: The preparatory virtual meeting will be held on March 3, 2020, from 1:00 p.m. to approximately 4:00 p.m. (EST). You must register online on or before March 3, 2020 to receive the webcast meeting link and audio teleconference information. Submit your comments for the preparatory virtual meeting, or request time to present oral comments, on or before noon, February 28, 2020. In-Person Meeting: The in-person meeting will be held on March 24–26, 2020, from 8:00 a.m. to approximately 5:30 p.m. (EST) (final times for each day will be provided in the meeting agenda that will be posted in the docket at https://www.regulations.gov and the TSCA SACC website at https:// www.epa.gov/tsca-peer-review). Any comments submitted on the draft risk evaluation on or before March 18, 2020, will be provided to the TSCA SACC committee for their consideration before the meeting. Comments received after PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 11079 March 18, 2020 and prior to the oral public comment period during the meeting will be available to the SACC for their consideration during the meeting. Please submit requests to present oral comments during the inperson meeting on or before March 18, 2020, to be included on the meeting agenda. All comments received by the end of the comment period will be considered by EPA. Comments: All comments on the draft risk evaluation must be received on or before April 27, 2020. For additional instructions, see Unit III. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. ADDRESSES: Virtual Meeting: Please visit https:// www.epa.gov/tsca-peer-review to register. In-Person Meeting: The location of the in-person meeting will be at the Washington Plaza Hotel, 10 Thomas Circle NW, Washington, DC 20005. Comments. Submit your comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2019–0500, by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. • Mail: OPPT Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. • Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. Requests to present oral comments and requests for special accommodations. Submit requests for special accommodations, or requests to present oral comments during the virtual meeting and/or in-person peer review meeting to the Designated Federal Official (DFO) listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by the deadline identified in the DATES section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: TSCA SACC: Dr. Todd Peterson, DFO, Office of Science Coordination and Policy (7201M), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (202) 564–6428; email address: peterson.todd@epa.gov. E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM 26FEN1 11080 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 38 / Wednesday, February 26, 2020 / Notices Draft Risk Evaluation: Dr. Stan Barone, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (7403M), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (202) 564–1169; email address: barone.stan@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES A. Does this action apply to me? This action is directed to the public in general. This action may be of interest to persons who are or may be required to conduct testing and those interested in risk evaluations of chemical substances under TSCA, 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq. Since other entities may also be interested in this draft risk evaluation, the EPA has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be affected by this action. B. What is EPA’s authority for taking this action? TSCA section 6, 15 U.S.C. 2605, requires EPA to conduct risk evaluations to ‘‘determine whether a chemical substance presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment, without consideration of costs or other nonrisk factors, including an unreasonable risk to a potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulation identified as relevant to the risk evaluation by the Administrator, under the conditions of use.’’ 15 U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(A). TSCA sections 6(b)(4)(A) through (H) enumerate the deadlines and minimum requirements applicable to this process, including provisions that provide instruction on chemical substances that must undergo evaluation, the minimum components of a TSCA risk evaluation, and the timelines for public comment and completion of the risk evaluation. TSCA also requires that EPA operate in a manner that is consistent with the best available science, make decisions based on the weight of the scientific evidence and consider reasonably available information. 15 U.S.C. 2625(h), (i), and (k). The statute identifies the minimum components for all chemical substance risk evaluations. For each risk evaluation, EPA must publish a document that outlines the scope of the risk evaluation to be conducted, which includes the hazards, exposures, conditions of use, and the potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations that EPA expects to consider. 15 U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(D). The statute further provides that each risk evaluation must also: (1) Integrate and assess available information on hazards and exposures VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:22 Feb 25, 2020 Jkt 250001 for the conditions of use of the chemical substance, including information that is relevant to specific risks of injury to health or the environment and information on relevant potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations; (2) describe whether aggregate or sentinel exposures were considered and the basis for that consideration; (3) take into account, where relevant, the likely duration, intensity, frequency, and number of exposures under the conditions of use; and (4) describe the weight of the scientific evidence for the identified hazards and exposures. 15 U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(F)(i)–(ii) and (iv)–(v). Each risk evaluation must not consider costs or other nonrisk factors. 15 U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(F)(iii). The statute requires that the risk evaluation process last no longer than three years, with a possible additional six-month extension. 15 U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(G). The statute also requires that the EPA allow for no less than a 30day public comment period on the draft risk evaluation, prior to publishing a final risk evaluation. 15 U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(H). C. What action is EPA taking? EPA is announcing the availability of and seeking public comment on the draft risk evaluation of the chemical substance identified in Unit II. EPA is seeking public comment on all aspects of the draft risk evaluation, including any preliminary conclusions, findings, and determinations, and the submission of any additional information that might be relevant to the draft risk evaluation, including the science underlying the risk evaluation and the outcome of the systematic review associated with the chemical substance. This 60-day comment period on the draft risk evaluation satisfies TSCA section 6(b)(4)(H), which requires EPA to ‘‘provide no less than 30 days public notice and an opportunity for comment on a draft risk evaluation prior to publishing a final risk evaluation’’ and 40 CFR 702.49(a), which states that ‘‘EPA will publish a draft risk evaluation in the Federal Register, open a docket to facilitate receipt of public comment, and provide no less than a 60day comment period, during which time the public may submit comment on EPA’s draft risk evaluation.’’ In addition to any new comments on the draft risk evaluation, the public should resubmit or clearly identify any previously filed comments, modified as appropriate, that are relevant to the draft risk evaluation and that the submitter feels have not been addressed. EPA does not intend to respond to comments submitted prior to the release of the draft risk evaluation PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 unless they are clearly identified in comments on the draft risk evaluation. EPA is also submitting the draft risk evaluation and associated supported documents to the TSCA SACC for peer review and announcing the meeting for the peer review panel. All comments submitted to the docket on the draft risk evaluation by the deadline identified in the DATES section will be provided for consideration to the TSCA SACC peer review panel, which will have the opportunity to consider the comments during its discussions. D. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA? 1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD–ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD–ROM the specific information that is claimed CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. 2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ comments.html. II. Draft TSCA Risk Evaluation A. What is EPA’s risk evaluation process for existing chemicals under TSCA? The risk evaluation process is the second step in EPA’s existing chemical process under TSCA, following prioritization and before risk management. As this chemical is part of the first ten chemical substances undergoing risk evaluation, the chemical substance was not required to go through prioritization (81 FR 91927, December 19, 2016) (FRL–9956–47). The purpose of conducting risk evaluations is to determine whether a chemical substance presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment, under the conditions of use, including an unreasonable risk to a relevant potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulation. As part of this process, EPA must evaluate both hazard and exposure, not consider costs or other nonrisk factors, use reasonably available information and approaches in a E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM 26FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 38 / Wednesday, February 26, 2020 / Notices manner that is consistent with the requirements in TSCA for the use of the best available science, and ensure decisions are based on the weight-ofscientific-evidence. The specific risk evaluation process that EPA has established by rule to implement the statutory process is set out in 40 CFR part 702 and summarized on EPA’s website at https:// www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managingchemicals-under-tsca/risk-evaluationsexisting-chemicals-under-tsca. As explained in the preamble to EPA’s final rule on procedures for risk evaluation (82 FR 33726, July 20, 2017) (FRL– 9964–38), the specific regulatory process set out in 40 CFR part 702, subpart B will be followed for the first ten chemical substances undergoing risk evaluation to the maximum extent practicable. B. What is trichloroethylene? Trichloroethylene (TCE) has a widerange of uses in consumer and commercial products and in industry. An estimated 84% of TCE’s annual production volume is used as an intermediate in the manufacture of the hydrofluorocarbon HFC–134a. Another 15% of TCE production volume is used as a degreasing solvent, leaving approximately 1% for other uses. The total aggregate production volume decreased from 220.5 to 171.9 million pounds between 2012 and 2015. Information about the problem formulation and scope phases of the TSCA risk evaluation for this chemical is available at https://www.epa.gov/ assessing-and-managing-chemicalsunder-tsca/risk-evaluationtrichloroethylene-tce-0. III. TSCA SACC khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES A. What is the purpose of the TSCA SACC? The TSCA SACC was established by EPA in 2016 and operates in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. Appendix 2 et seq. The TSCA SACC provides expert independent scientific advice and consultation to the EPA on the scientific and technical aspects of risk assessments, methodologies, and pollution prevention measures and approaches for chemicals regulated under TSCA. The TSCA SACC is comprised of experts in: Toxicology; human health and environmental risk assessment; exposure assessment; and related sciences (e.g., synthetic biology, pharmacology, biotechnology, nanotechnology, biochemistry, biostatistics, physiologically based VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:22 Feb 25, 2020 Jkt 250001 pharmacokinetic modelling (PBPK) modeling, computational toxicology, epidemiology, environmental fate, and environmental engineering and sustainability). When needed, the committee will be assisted in their reviews by ad hoc participants with specific expertise in the topics under consideration. B. How can I access the TSCA SACC documents? EPA’s background documents, related supporting materials, and draft charge questions to the TSCA SACC are available on the TSCA SACC website and in the docket established for the specific chemical substance. In addition, EPA will provide additional background documents (e.g., TSCA SACC members participating in this meeting and the meeting agenda) as the materials become available. You may obtain electronic copies of these documents, and certain other related documents that might be available, in the docket at https://www.regulations.gov and the TSCA SACC website at https:// www.epa.gov/tsca-peer-review. After the public meeting, the TSCA SACC will prepare meeting minutes summarizing its recommendations to the EPA. The meeting minutes will be posted on the TSCA SACC website and in the relevant docket. C. What do I need to know about the TSCA SACC public meetings? The focus of the public meetings is to peer review EPA’s draft risk evaluation. After the peer review process, EPA will consider peer reviewer comments and recommendations and public comments, in finalizing the risk evaluation. The draft risk evaluation contains: Discussion of chemistry and physical-chemical properties; characterization of conditions of use; environmental fate and transport assessment; human health exposures; environmental hazard assessment; risk characterization; risk determination; and a detailed description of the systematic review process developed by the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics to search, screen, and evaluate scientific literature for use in the risk evaluation process. D. How do I participate in the public meetings? You may participate in the public meetings by following the instructions in this unit. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, it is imperative that you identify the corresponding docket ID number in the subject line on the first page of your request. PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 11081 1. Preparatory virtual meeting. The preparatory virtual meeting will be conducted via webcast and telephone. You may participate in the preparatory virtual meeting by registering to join the webcast. You may also submit written or oral comments. i. Registration. You must register to participate in the preparatory virtual meeting. To participate by listening or making a comment during this meeting, please go to the EPA website to register: https://www.epa.gov/tsca-peer-review. Registration online will be confirmed by an email that will include the webcast meeting link and audio teleconference information. ii. Written comments. Written comments for consideration during the preparatory virtual meeting should be submitted, using the instructions in ADDRESSES and this unit, on or before the date set in the DATES section. iii. Oral comments. Requests to make brief oral comments to the TSCA SACC during the preparatory virtual meeting should be submitted when registering online or with the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT on or before noon on the date set in the DATES section. Oral comments before the TSCA SACC during the preparatory virtual meeting are limited to approximately 5 minutes due to the time constraints of this virtual meeting. 2. In-person meeting. You may participate in the in-person public meeting by attending and by providing written or oral comments. The in-person meeting may also be webcast. Please refer to the TSCA SACC website at https://www.epa.gov/tsca-peer-review for information on how to access the webcast. Please note that for the inperson meeting, the webcast is a supplementary public process provided only for convenience. If difficulties arise resulting in webcasting outages, the inperson meeting will continue as planned. i. Seating at the meeting. Seating at the meeting will be open and on a firstcome basis. ii. Written comments. To provide the TSCA SACC the time necessary to consider and review your comments, written comments must be submitted by the date set in the DATES section and using the instructions in the ADDRESSES section and this unit. Comments received after the date set in the DATES section and prior to the end of the oral public comment period during the meeting will still be provided to the TSCA SACC for their consideration. iii. Oral comments. To be included on the meeting agenda, submit your request to make brief oral comments at the inperson meeting to the DFO listed under E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM 26FEN1 11082 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 38 / Wednesday, February 26, 2020 / Notices FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT on or before the date set in the DATES section. The request should identify the name of the individual making the presentation, the organization (if any) the individual will represent, and any requirements for audiovisual equipment. Oral comments before TSCA SACC during the in-person meeting are limited to approximately 5 minutes unless prior arrangements have been made. In addition, each speaker should email their comments and presentation to the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, preferably, at least 24 hours prior to the oral public comment period. (Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.) Dated: February 19, 2020. Andrew R. Wheeler, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2020–03866 Filed 2–25–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Notice of Agreements Filed The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the agreements to the Secretary by email at Secretary@ fmc.gov, or by mail, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573. Comments will be most helpful to the Commission if received within 12 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of agreements are available through the Commission’s website (www.fmc.gov) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523– 5793 or tradeanalysis@fmc.gov. Agreement No.: 012139–003. Agreement Name: ML/MSC Oceania Space Charter Agreement. Parties: Maersk A/S and Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. Filing Party: Wayne Rohde; Cozen O’Connor. Synopsis: The amendment updates the name of the Maersk entity that is a party to the Agreement. Proposed Effective Date: 2/14/2020. Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/ FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/ AgreementHistory/306. Agreement No.: 011741–024. Agreement Name: U.S. Pacific CoastOceania Agreement. Parties: Maersk A/S; Hapag-Lloyd AG; and ANL Singapore Pte. Ltd. Filing Party: Wayne Rohde; Cozen O’Connor. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:22 Feb 25, 2020 Jkt 250001 Synopsis: The amendment updates the name of the Maersk entity that is a party to the Agreement. Proposed Effective Date: 2/14/2020. Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/ FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/ AgreementHistory/601. Agreement No.: 012448–002. Agreement Name: ECUS/ECSA Slot Exchange Agreement. Parties: Maersk A/S; Hapag-Lloyd AG; and Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. Filing Party: Wayne Rohde; Cozen O’Connor. Synopsis: The amendment updates the name of the Maersk entity that is a party to the Agreement. Proposed Effective Date: 2/14/2020. Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/ FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/ AgreementHistory/1929. Agreement No.: 011707–018. Agreement Name: Gulf/South America Discussion Agreement. Parties: BBC Chartering Carriers GmbH & Co. KG; Industrial Maritime Carriers, LLC; and Seaboard Marine Ltd. Filing Party: Wayne Rohde; Cozen O’Connor. Synopsis: The amendment deletes ZEAMARINE Carrier GmbH as a party and replaces it with Industrial Maritime Carriers, L.L.C. Proposed Effective Date: 4/3/2020. Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/ FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/ AgreementHistory/684. Dated: February 21, 2020. Rachel Dickon, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2020–03882 Filed 2–25–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6731–AA–P FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION [File No. 191 0074] Rent-to-Own Store Swaps; Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public Comment Federal Trade Commission. Proposed consent agreement; request for comment. AGENCY: ACTION: The consent agreements in this matter settle alleged violations of federal law prohibiting unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order to Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the complaints and the terms of the consent orders—embodied in the consent agreements—that would settle these allegations. DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 27, 2020. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Interested parties may file comments online or on paper, by following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Please write: ‘‘Rent-to-Own Store Swaps; File No. 191 0074’’ on your comment, and file your comment online at https://www.regulations.gov by following the instructions on the webbased form. If you prefer to file your comment on paper, please mail your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite CC–5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW, 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC 20024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Lipinsky (206–220–4473), Federal Trade Commission, 915 Second Avenue, Room 2896, Seattle, WA 98174. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is hereby given that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days. The following Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement and the allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC website (for February 20, 2020), at this web address: https://www.ftc.gov/newsevents/commission-actions. You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to consider your comment, we must receive it on or before March 27, 2020. Write ‘‘Rent-toOwn Store Swaps; File No. 191 0074’’ on your comment. Your comment— including your name and your state— will be placed on the public record of this proceeding, including, to the extent practicable, on the https:// www.regulations.gov website. Postal mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit your comments online through the https:// www.regulations.gov website. If you prefer to file your comment on paper, write ‘‘Rent-to-Own Store Swaps; File No. 191 0074’’ on your comment and on the envelope, and mail your comment to the following address: ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM 26FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11079-11082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03866]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0500; FRL-10005-52]


Trichloroethylene; Draft Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Risk 
Evaluation and TSCA Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) 
Meetings; Notice of Availability, Public Meetings, and Request for 
Comment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is announcing the availability of and soliciting public 
comment on the draft Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) risk 
evaluation of trichloroethylene (TCE). EPA is also submitting the same 
document to the TSCA Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) for 
peer review and is announcing that there will be an in-person public 
meeting of the TSCA SACC to consider and review the draft risk 
evaluation. Preceding the in-person meeting, there will be a 
preparatory virtual public meeting for the panel to consider the scope 
and clarity of the draft charge questions for the peer review. The 
purpose of conducting risk evaluations under TSCA is to determine 
whether a chemical substance presents an unreasonable risk of injury to 
health or the environment under the conditions of use, including an 
unreasonable risk to a relevant potentially exposed or susceptible 
subpopulation.

DATES: 
    Virtual Meeting: The preparatory virtual meeting will be held on 
March 3, 2020, from 1:00 p.m. to approximately 4:00 p.m. (EST). You 
must register online on or before March 3, 2020 to receive the webcast 
meeting link and audio teleconference information. Submit your comments 
for the preparatory virtual meeting, or request time to present oral 
comments, on or before noon, February 28, 2020.
    In-Person Meeting: The in-person meeting will be held on March 24-
26, 2020, from 8:00 a.m. to approximately 5:30 p.m. (EST) (final times 
for each day will be provided in the meeting agenda that will be posted 
in the docket at https://www.regulations.gov and the TSCA SACC website 
at https://www.epa.gov/tsca-peer-review). Any comments submitted on the 
draft risk evaluation on or before March 18, 2020, will be provided to 
the TSCA SACC committee for their consideration before the meeting. 
Comments received after March 18, 2020 and prior to the oral public 
comment period during the meeting will be available to the SACC for 
their consideration during the meeting. Please submit requests to 
present oral comments during the in-person meeting on or before March 
18, 2020, to be included on the meeting agenda. All comments received 
by the end of the comment period will be considered by EPA.
    Comments: All comments on the draft risk evaluation must be 
received on or before April 27, 2020. For additional instructions, see 
Unit III. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: 
    Virtual Meeting: Please visit https://www.epa.gov/tsca-peer-review 
to register.
    In-Person Meeting: The location of the in-person meeting will be at 
the Washington Plaza Hotel, 10 Thomas Circle NW, Washington, DC 20005.
    Comments. Submit your comments, identified by docket identification 
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0500, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business 
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted 
by statute.
     Mail: OPPT Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Requests to present oral comments and requests for special 
accommodations. Submit requests for special accommodations, or requests 
to present oral comments during the virtual meeting and/or in-person 
peer review meeting to the Designated Federal Official (DFO) listed 
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by the deadline identified in the 
DATES section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: TSCA SACC: Dr. Todd Peterson, DFO, 
Office of Science Coordination and Policy (7201M), Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (202) 564-6428; email address: 
[email protected].

[[Page 11080]]

    Draft Risk Evaluation: Dr. Stan Barone, Office of Pollution 
Prevention and Toxics (7403M), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 
(202) 564-1169; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. This action may 
be of interest to persons who are or may be required to conduct testing 
and those interested in risk evaluations of chemical substances under 
TSCA, 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq. Since other entities may also be 
interested in this draft risk evaluation, the EPA has not attempted to 
describe all the specific entities that may be affected by this action.

B. What is EPA's authority for taking this action?

    TSCA section 6, 15 U.S.C. 2605, requires EPA to conduct risk 
evaluations to ``determine whether a chemical substance presents an 
unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment, without 
consideration of costs or other nonrisk factors, including an 
unreasonable risk to a potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulation 
identified as relevant to the risk evaluation by the Administrator, 
under the conditions of use.'' 15 U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(A). TSCA sections 
6(b)(4)(A) through (H) enumerate the deadlines and minimum requirements 
applicable to this process, including provisions that provide 
instruction on chemical substances that must undergo evaluation, the 
minimum components of a TSCA risk evaluation, and the timelines for 
public comment and completion of the risk evaluation. TSCA also 
requires that EPA operate in a manner that is consistent with the best 
available science, make decisions based on the weight of the scientific 
evidence and consider reasonably available information. 15 U.S.C. 
2625(h), (i), and (k).
    The statute identifies the minimum components for all chemical 
substance risk evaluations. For each risk evaluation, EPA must publish 
a document that outlines the scope of the risk evaluation to be 
conducted, which includes the hazards, exposures, conditions of use, 
and the potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations that EPA 
expects to consider. 15 U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(D). The statute further 
provides that each risk evaluation must also: (1) Integrate and assess 
available information on hazards and exposures for the conditions of 
use of the chemical substance, including information that is relevant 
to specific risks of injury to health or the environment and 
information on relevant potentially exposed or susceptible 
subpopulations; (2) describe whether aggregate or sentinel exposures 
were considered and the basis for that consideration; (3) take into 
account, where relevant, the likely duration, intensity, frequency, and 
number of exposures under the conditions of use; and (4) describe the 
weight of the scientific evidence for the identified hazards and 
exposures. 15 U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(F)(i)-(ii) and (iv)-(v). Each risk 
evaluation must not consider costs or other nonrisk factors. 15 U.S.C. 
2605(b)(4)(F)(iii).
    The statute requires that the risk evaluation process last no 
longer than three years, with a possible additional six-month 
extension. 15 U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(G). The statute also requires that the 
EPA allow for no less than a 30-day public comment period on the draft 
risk evaluation, prior to publishing a final risk evaluation. 15 U.S.C. 
2605(b)(4)(H).

C. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is announcing the availability of and seeking public comment on 
the draft risk evaluation of the chemical substance identified in Unit 
II. EPA is seeking public comment on all aspects of the draft risk 
evaluation, including any preliminary conclusions, findings, and 
determinations, and the submission of any additional information that 
might be relevant to the draft risk evaluation, including the science 
underlying the risk evaluation and the outcome of the systematic review 
associated with the chemical substance. This 60-day comment period on 
the draft risk evaluation satisfies TSCA section 6(b)(4)(H), which 
requires EPA to ``provide no less than 30 days public notice and an 
opportunity for comment on a draft risk evaluation prior to publishing 
a final risk evaluation'' and 40 CFR 702.49(a), which states that ``EPA 
will publish a draft risk evaluation in the Federal Register, open a 
docket to facilitate receipt of public comment, and provide no less 
than a 60-day comment period, during which time the public may submit 
comment on EPA's draft risk evaluation.'' In addition to any new 
comments on the draft risk evaluation, the public should resubmit or 
clearly identify any previously filed comments, modified as 
appropriate, that are relevant to the draft risk evaluation and that 
the submitter feels have not been addressed. EPA does not intend to 
respond to comments submitted prior to the release of the draft risk 
evaluation unless they are clearly identified in comments on the draft 
risk evaluation.
    EPA is also submitting the draft risk evaluation and associated 
supported documents to the TSCA SACC for peer review and announcing the 
meeting for the peer review panel. All comments submitted to the docket 
on the draft risk evaluation by the deadline identified in the DATES 
section will be provided for consideration to the TSCA SACC peer review 
panel, which will have the opportunity to consider the comments during 
its discussions.

D. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through 
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the 
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or 
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as 
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the 
specific information that is claimed CBI. In addition to one complete 
version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy 
of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI 
must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so 
marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set 
forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting 
your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.

II. Draft TSCA Risk Evaluation

A. What is EPA's risk evaluation process for existing chemicals under 
TSCA?

    The risk evaluation process is the second step in EPA's existing 
chemical process under TSCA, following prioritization and before risk 
management. As this chemical is part of the first ten chemical 
substances undergoing risk evaluation, the chemical substance was not 
required to go through prioritization (81 FR 91927, December 19, 2016) 
(FRL-9956-47). The purpose of conducting risk evaluations is to 
determine whether a chemical substance presents an unreasonable risk of 
injury to health or the environment, under the conditions of use, 
including an unreasonable risk to a relevant potentially exposed or 
susceptible subpopulation. As part of this process, EPA must evaluate 
both hazard and exposure, not consider costs or other nonrisk factors, 
use reasonably available information and approaches in a

[[Page 11081]]

manner that is consistent with the requirements in TSCA for the use of 
the best available science, and ensure decisions are based on the 
weight-of-scientific-evidence.
    The specific risk evaluation process that EPA has established by 
rule to implement the statutory process is set out in 40 CFR part 702 
and summarized on EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-evaluations-existing-chemicals-under-tsca. As explained in the preamble to EPA's final rule on 
procedures for risk evaluation (82 FR 33726, July 20, 2017) (FRL-9964-
38), the specific regulatory process set out in 40 CFR part 702, 
subpart B will be followed for the first ten chemical substances 
undergoing risk evaluation to the maximum extent practicable.

B. What is trichloroethylene?

    Trichloroethylene (TCE) has a wide-range of uses in consumer and 
commercial products and in industry. An estimated 84% of TCE's annual 
production volume is used as an intermediate in the manufacture of the 
hydrofluorocarbon HFC-134a. Another 15% of TCE production volume is 
used as a degreasing solvent, leaving approximately 1% for other uses. 
The total aggregate production volume decreased from 220.5 to 171.9 
million pounds between 2012 and 2015.
    Information about the problem formulation and scope phases of the 
TSCA risk evaluation for this chemical is available at https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-evaluation-trichloroethylene-tce-0.

III. TSCA SACC

A. What is the purpose of the TSCA SACC?

    The TSCA SACC was established by EPA in 2016 and operates in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. 
Appendix 2 et seq. The TSCA SACC provides expert independent scientific 
advice and consultation to the EPA on the scientific and technical 
aspects of risk assessments, methodologies, and pollution prevention 
measures and approaches for chemicals regulated under TSCA.
    The TSCA SACC is comprised of experts in: Toxicology; human health 
and environmental risk assessment; exposure assessment; and related 
sciences (e.g., synthetic biology, pharmacology, biotechnology, 
nanotechnology, biochemistry, biostatistics, physiologically based 
pharmacokinetic modelling (PBPK) modeling, computational toxicology, 
epidemiology, environmental fate, and environmental engineering and 
sustainability). When needed, the committee will be assisted in their 
reviews by ad hoc participants with specific expertise in the topics 
under consideration.

B. How can I access the TSCA SACC documents?

    EPA's background documents, related supporting materials, and draft 
charge questions to the TSCA SACC are available on the TSCA SACC 
website and in the docket established for the specific chemical 
substance. In addition, EPA will provide additional background 
documents (e.g., TSCA SACC members participating in this meeting and 
the meeting agenda) as the materials become available. You may obtain 
electronic copies of these documents, and certain other related 
documents that might be available, in the docket at https://www.regulations.gov and the TSCA SACC website at https://www.epa.gov/tsca-peer-review.
    After the public meeting, the TSCA SACC will prepare meeting 
minutes summarizing its recommendations to the EPA. The meeting minutes 
will be posted on the TSCA SACC website and in the relevant docket.

C. What do I need to know about the TSCA SACC public meetings?

    The focus of the public meetings is to peer review EPA's draft risk 
evaluation. After the peer review process, EPA will consider peer 
reviewer comments and recommendations and public comments, in 
finalizing the risk evaluation. The draft risk evaluation contains: 
Discussion of chemistry and physical-chemical properties; 
characterization of conditions of use; environmental fate and transport 
assessment; human health exposures; environmental hazard assessment; 
risk characterization; risk determination; and a detailed description 
of the systematic review process developed by the Office of Pollution 
Prevention and Toxics to search, screen, and evaluate scientific 
literature for use in the risk evaluation process.

D. How do I participate in the public meetings?

    You may participate in the public meetings by following the 
instructions in this unit. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, it is 
imperative that you identify the corresponding docket ID number in the 
subject line on the first page of your request.
    1. Preparatory virtual meeting. The preparatory virtual meeting 
will be conducted via webcast and telephone. You may participate in the 
preparatory virtual meeting by registering to join the webcast. You may 
also submit written or oral comments.
    i. Registration. You must register to participate in the 
preparatory virtual meeting. To participate by listening or making a 
comment during this meeting, please go to the EPA website to register: 
https://www.epa.gov/tsca-peer-review. Registration online will be 
confirmed by an email that will include the webcast meeting link and 
audio teleconference information.
    ii. Written comments. Written comments for consideration during the 
preparatory virtual meeting should be submitted, using the instructions 
in ADDRESSES and this unit, on or before the date set in the DATES 
section.
    iii. Oral comments. Requests to make brief oral comments to the 
TSCA SACC during the preparatory virtual meeting should be submitted 
when registering online or with the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT on or before noon on the date set in the DATES 
section. Oral comments before the TSCA SACC during the preparatory 
virtual meeting are limited to approximately 5 minutes due to the time 
constraints of this virtual meeting.
    2. In-person meeting. You may participate in the in-person public 
meeting by attending and by providing written or oral comments. The in-
person meeting may also be webcast. Please refer to the TSCA SACC 
website at https://www.epa.gov/tsca-peer-review for information on how 
to access the webcast. Please note that for the in-person meeting, the 
webcast is a supplementary public process provided only for 
convenience. If difficulties arise resulting in webcasting outages, the 
in-person meeting will continue as planned.
    i. Seating at the meeting. Seating at the meeting will be open and 
on a first-come basis.
    ii. Written comments. To provide the TSCA SACC the time necessary 
to consider and review your comments, written comments must be 
submitted by the date set in the DATES section and using the 
instructions in the ADDRESSES section and this unit. Comments received 
after the date set in the DATES section and prior to the end of the 
oral public comment period during the meeting will still be provided to 
the TSCA SACC for their consideration.
    iii. Oral comments. To be included on the meeting agenda, submit 
your request to make brief oral comments at the in-person meeting to 
the DFO listed under

[[Page 11082]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT on or before the date set in the DATES 
section. The request should identify the name of the individual making 
the presentation, the organization (if any) the individual will 
represent, and any requirements for audiovisual equipment. Oral 
comments before TSCA SACC during the in-person meeting are limited to 
approximately 5 minutes unless prior arrangements have been made. In 
addition, each speaker should email their comments and presentation to 
the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, preferably, at 
least 24 hours prior to the oral public comment period.

(Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.)

    Dated: February 19, 2020.
Andrew R. Wheeler,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020-03866 Filed 2-25-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.