Environmental Considerations Associated With Micro-Reactors, 11127-11129 [2020-03856]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 38 / Wednesday, February 26, 2020 / Notices
B. Submitting Comments
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC will post all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
comment submissions into ADAMS.
The NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to OMB, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment into ADAMS.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
II. Background
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the NRC recently
submitted a request for renewal of an
existing collection of information to
OMB for review entitled, ‘‘NRC Forms
366, 366A, and 366B, Licensee Event
Report.’’ The NRC hereby informs
potential respondents that an agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and that a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
The NRC published a Federal
Register notice with a 60-day comment
period on this information collection on
September 16, 2019 (84 FR 48650).
1. The title of the information
collection: NRC Forms 366, 366A, and
366B, Licensee Event Report.
2. OMB approval number: 3150–0104.
3. Type of submission: Revision.
4. The form number if applicable:
NRC Forms 366, 366A and 366B.
5. How often the collection is required
or requested: As needed per 10 CFR
50.73, ‘‘Licensee event report system.’’
6. Who will be required or asked to
respond: The holder of an operating
license under 10 CFR part 50 or a
combined license under 10 CFR part 52
(after the Commission has made the
finding under section 52.103(g)).
7. The estimated number of annual
responses: 350.
8. The estimated number of annual
respondents: 98 (number of operating
nuclear units in the U.S.).
9. An estimate of the total number of
hours needed annually to comply with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Feb 25, 2020
Jkt 250001
the information collection requirement
or request: The total estimated burden
for completing Licensee Event Reports
is 28,000 hours (based on 80 hours for
each of 350 reports).
10. Abstract: Part of the NRC’s
function is to license and regulate the
operation of commercial nuclear power
plants to ensure protection of public
health and safety and the environment
in accordance with the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954 (the Act) as amended. In
order for the NRC to carry out these
responsibilities, licensees must report
significant events in accordance with
section 50.73, so that the NRC can
evaluate the events to determine what
actions, if any, are warranted to ensure
protection of public health and safety or
the environment. Section 50.73 requires
reporting on NRC Forms 366, 366A, and
366B.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day
of February 2020.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David C. Cullison,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–03826 Filed 2–25–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Environmental Considerations
Associated With Micro-Reactors
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Draft interim staff guidance;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is soliciting public
comment on its draft Interim Staff
Guidance (ISG), ‘‘Environmental
Considerations Associated with Microreactors.’’ The NRC staff is preparing for
the environmental reviews of
prospective design, license, and permit
applications for advanced nuclear
power reactors (advanced reactors),
including micro-reactors. The purpose
of this ISG is to modify existing
guidance and provide supplemental
guidance to assist the NRC staff in
determining the scope and scale of
environmental reviews of micro-reactor
applications.
DATES: Submit comments by May 11,
2020. Comments received after this date
will be considered if it is practical to do
so, but the Commission is able to ensure
consideration only for comments
received before this date.
SUMMARY:
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2020–0051. Address
questions about NRC docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301–287–9127; email:
Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individuals listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• Mail comments to: Office of
Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN–7–
A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, ATTN: Program Management,
Announcements and Editing Staff.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack
Cushing, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards, telephone: 301–
415–1424, email: Jack.Cushing@nrc.gov
and Mallecia Sutton, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, telephone: 301–
415–0673, email: Mallecia.Sutton@
nrc.gov. Both are staff of the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
[NRC–2020–0051]
PO 00000
11127
Sfmt 4703
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2020–
0051 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2020–0051.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. The documents entitled,
‘‘Micro-Reactor License Application
COL–ISG–029, ‘Environmental
Considerations Associated with Microreactors,’ ’’ and ‘‘Regulatory Analysis for
Draft Interim Staff Guidance (ISG) 029,’’
are available in ADAMS under
Accession No. ML20054B832.
E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM
26FEN1
11128
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 38 / Wednesday, February 26, 2020 / Notices
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2020–
0051 in your comment submission. The
NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC will post all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
comment submissions into ADAMS.
The NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment into ADAMS.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
II. Background
The purpose of this ISG is to modify
existing guidance and provide
supplemental guidance to assist the
NRC staff in determining the scope and
scale of environmental reviews of
micro-reactor applications. The
guidance highlights unique
considerations for micro-reactors in
each resource area typically covered in
the staff’s environmental review. The
ISG also offers guidance on identifying
considerations and approaches to
simplify and shorten the environmental
reviews for micro-reactors relative to the
environmental reviews that the NRC has
previously performed for other nuclear
facilities, such as large light-water
reactors (LWRs). The ISG outlines what
the NRC staff considers to be an
appropriate scope and level of detail for
the specific aspects of an environmental
review needed to document a microreactor licensing action. A micro-reactor
may have some, but not necessarily all,
of the following characteristics:
• Occupies only a small area of land,
disturbs only previously disturbed
lands, or both.
• Uses zero or only small quantities
of resources, such as water or fuel.
• Releases zero or only small
quantities of emissions to the
environment.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Feb 25, 2020
Jkt 250001
• Avoids environmentally sensitive
areas such as wetlands and floodplains.
• Avoids areas with cultural, historic,
or environmental justice significance.
• Avoids habitat for threatened or
endangered species.
• Uses mitigation to reduce impacts.
• Involves only low levels of
employment for both construction and
operation.
• Uses simpler designs than those for
large LWRs, with limited interfaces with
the exterior environment.
While the ISG is designed to aid the
NRC staff in developing a micro-reactor
environmental impact statement, the
staff recognizes the value of the
guidance as a supplemental source of
insight into the NRC’s environmental
review process that can inform the
development of an applicant’s
environmental report. Applicants
should scale their level of effort
appropriately when preparing
Environmental Reports (ERs),
commensurate with the significance of
the impact on the resource area being
addressed.
The scope of the ISG is limited to
environmental review considerations
specific to micro-reactors, such as the
following:
• Pre-application interactions
• purpose and need for the proposed
project
• size of the proposed project and
resources used
• land use
• water resources
• terrestrial and aquatic ecology
• socioeconomics and environmental
justice
• historic and cultural resources
• need for power and alternatives
• meteorology and air quality
• radiological and nonradiological
health
• postulated accidents
• severe accident mitigation alternatives
(SAMAs);
• acts of terrorism
• fuel cycle impacts, transportation of
fuel and waste, and continued storage
of spent fuel
• cumulative impact analysis
• consistency with safety licensing
documents
• incorporation by reference
The NRC staff will continue to look
for other opportunities to effectively
streamline environmental reviews and
work with prospective applicants to
identify opportunities to streamline ERs
and still meet the NRC’s regulations.
III. Backfitting, Issue Finality, and
Forward Fitting Discussion
The guidance in this draft ISG–029
clarifies how the NRC will approach
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
environmental reviews for a microreactor application for combined
license, early site permit, construction
permit, operating license and limited
work authorization. Issuance of this
draft ISG, if finalized, would not
constitute backfitting as defined in
section 50.109 of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) (the
Backfit Rule) and as described in NRC
Management Directive 8.4,
‘‘Management of Backfitting, Forward
Fitting, Issue Finality, and Information
Requests;’’ would not affect the issue
finality of an approval under 10 CFR
part 52; and would not constitute
forward fitting as that term is defined
and described in Management Directive
8.4. The staff’s position is based upon
the following considerations:
1. The draft ISG positions, if finalized,
would not constitute backfitting or
forward fitting or affect issue finality,
inasmuch as the ISG would be internal
guidance to NRC staff.
The ISG provides interim guidance to
the staff on how to review an
application for NRC regulatory approval
in the form of licensing. Changes in
internal staff guidance, without further
NRC action, are not matters that meet
the definition of backfitting or forward
fitting or affect the issue finality of a
part 52 approval.
2. Current or future applicants are
not–with limited exceptions not
applicable here–within the scope of the
backfitting and issue finality regulations
and forward fitting policy.
Applicants are not, with certain
exceptions, covered by either the Backfit
Rule or any issue finality provisions
under 10 CFR part 52. This is because
neither the Backfit Rule nor the issue
finality provisions under 10 CFR part
52—with certain exclusions discussed
below—were intended to apply to every
NRC action which substantially changes
the expectations of current and future
applicants.
The exceptions to the general
principle are applicable whenever an
applicant references a 10 CFR part 52
license (e.g., an early site permit) and/
or NRC regulatory approval (e.g., a
design certification rule) with specified
issue finality provisions or a
construction permit under 10 CFR part
50. The staff does not, at this time,
intend to impose the positions
represented in the draft ISG section (if
finalized) in a manner that would
constitute backfitting or affect the issue
finality of a part 52 approval. If, in the
future, the staff seeks to impose a
position in the draft ISG (if finalized) in
a manner that constitutes backfitting or
does not provide issue finality as
described in the applicable issue finality
E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM
26FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 38 / Wednesday, February 26, 2020 / Notices
provision, then the staff would need to
address the Backfit Rule or the criteria
for avoiding issue finality as described
in the applicable issue finality
provision.
The Commission’s forward fitting
policy generally does not apply when an
applicant files an initial licensing action
for a new facility. Nevertheless, the staff
does not, at this time, intend to impose
the positions represented in the draft
ISG section (if finalized) in a manner
that would constitute forward fitting. If,
in the future, the staff seeks to impose
a position in the draft ISG (if finalized)
in a manner that constitutes forward
fitting, then the staff would need to
address the forward fitting criteria in
Management Directive 8.4.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day
of February 2020.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph P. Doub,
Acting Chief, Environmental Review New
Reactors Branch, Division of Rulemaking,
Environmental, and Financial Support, Office
of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2020–03856 Filed 2–25–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CP2020–97]
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing for the
Commission’s consideration concerning
a negotiated service agreement. This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: February 28,
2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
17:22 Feb 25, 2020
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
1. Docket No(s).: CP2020–97; Filing
Title: Notice of United States Postal
Service of Filing a Functionally
Equivalent Global Expedited Package
Services 7 Negotiated Service
Agreement and Application for NonPublic Treatment of Materials Filed
Under Seal; Filing Acceptance Date:
February 20, 2020; Filing Authority: 39
CFR 3015.5; Public Representative:
1 See Docket No. RM2018–3, Order Adopting
Final Rules Relating to Non-Public Information,
June 27, 2018, Attachment A at 19–22 (Order No.
4679).
I. Introduction
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
I. Introduction
The Commission gives notice that the
Postal Service filed request(s) for the
Commission to consider matters related
to negotiated service agreement(s). The
request(s) may propose the addition or
removal of a negotiated service
agreement from the market dominant or
the competitive product list, or the
modification of an existing product
currently appearing on the market
dominant or the competitive product
list.
Section II identifies the docket
number(s) associated with each Postal
Service request, the title of each Postal
Service request, the request’s acceptance
date, and the authority cited by the
Postal Service for each request. For each
request, the Commission appoints an
officer of the Commission to represent
the interests of the general public in the
proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505
(Public Representative). Section II also
establishes comment deadline(s)
pertaining to each request.
The public portions of the Postal
Service’s request(s) can be accessed via
the Commission’s website (https://
www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of
the Postal Service’s request(s), if any,
can be accessed through compliance
with the requirements of 39 CFR
3007.301.1
The Commission invites comments on
whether the Postal Service’s request(s)
in the captioned docket(s) are consistent
with the policies of title 39. For
request(s) that the Postal Service states
concern market dominant product(s),
applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39
U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3010, and 39
CFR part 3020, subpart B. For request(s)
that the Postal Service states concern
competitive product(s), applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements
include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633,
39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and
39 CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comment
deadline(s) for each request appear in
section II.
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11129
Christopher C. Mohr; Comments Due:
February 28, 2020.
This Notice will be published in the
Federal Register.
Erica A. Barker,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–03819 Filed 2–25–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–88253; File No. SR–ICC–
2019–010]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Partial Amendment No. 1 and Partial
Amendment No. 2, Relating to
Amendments to the ICC Clearing Rules
To Address Non-Default Losses, on an
Accelerated Basis
February 20, 2020.
I. Introduction
On August 8, 2019, ICE Clear Credit
LLC (‘‘ICC’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
amend ICC’s Clearing Rules (the
‘‘Rules’’) 3 to address treatment of losses
not related to a Clearing Participant
default. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on August 28, 2019.4 The
Commission received comments
regarding the proposed rule change.5
On October 4, 2019, the Commission
designated a longer period of time for
Commission action on the proposed rule
change until November 26, 2019.6 On
October 7, 2019, ICC filed a partial
amendment (‘‘Partial Amendment No.
1’’) to modify the proposed rule
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein
have the meanings specified in the Rules.
4 Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit
LLC; Proposed Rule Change, Security-Based Swap
Submission, or Advance Notice Relating to the ICC
Clearing Rules; Exchange Act Release No. 86729
(Aug. 22, 2019); 84 FR 45191 (Aug. 28, 2019) (SR–
ICC–2019–010) (‘‘Notice’’).
5 Comments are available at https://www.sec.gov/
comments/sr-icc-2019-010/sricc2019010.htm.
6 Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit
LLC; Notice of Designation of Longer Period for
Commission Action on Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Amendments to the ICC Clearing Rules
To Address Non-Default Losses; Exchange Act
Release No. 87225 (Oct. 4, 2019); 84 FR 54712 (Oct.
10, 2019) (SR–ICC–2019–010).
2 17
E:\FR\FM\26FEN1.SGM
26FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11127-11129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03856]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2020-0051]
Environmental Considerations Associated With Micro-Reactors
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Draft interim staff guidance; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is soliciting
public comment on its draft Interim Staff Guidance (ISG),
``Environmental Considerations Associated with Micro-reactors.'' The
NRC staff is preparing for the environmental reviews of prospective
design, license, and permit applications for advanced nuclear power
reactors (advanced reactors), including micro-reactors. The purpose of
this ISG is to modify existing guidance and provide supplemental
guidance to assist the NRC staff in determining the scope and scale of
environmental reviews of micro-reactor applications.
DATES: Submit comments by May 11, 2020. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission
is able to ensure consideration only for comments received before this
date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2020-0051. Address
questions about NRC docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301-287-9127; email: [email protected]. For technical
questions, contact the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document.
Mail comments to: Office of Administration, Mail Stop:
TWFN-7-A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001, ATTN: Program Management, Announcements and Editing Staff.
For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack Cushing, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, telephone: 301-415-1424, email:
[email protected] and Mallecia Sutton, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, telephone: 301-415-0673, email: [email protected].
Both are staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555-0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2020-0051 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain
publicly-available information related to this action by any of the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2020-0051.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected]. The documents entitled, ``Micro-
Reactor License Application COL-ISG-029, `Environmental Considerations
Associated with Micro-reactors,' '' and ``Regulatory Analysis for Draft
Interim Staff Guidance (ISG) 029,'' are available in ADAMS under
Accession No. ML20054B832.
[[Page 11128]]
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2020-0051 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information
that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment
submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into
ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Background
The purpose of this ISG is to modify existing guidance and provide
supplemental guidance to assist the NRC staff in determining the scope
and scale of environmental reviews of micro-reactor applications. The
guidance highlights unique considerations for micro-reactors in each
resource area typically covered in the staff's environmental review.
The ISG also offers guidance on identifying considerations and
approaches to simplify and shorten the environmental reviews for micro-
reactors relative to the environmental reviews that the NRC has
previously performed for other nuclear facilities, such as large light-
water reactors (LWRs). The ISG outlines what the NRC staff considers to
be an appropriate scope and level of detail for the specific aspects of
an environmental review needed to document a micro-reactor licensing
action. A micro-reactor may have some, but not necessarily all, of the
following characteristics:
Occupies only a small area of land, disturbs only
previously disturbed lands, or both.
Uses zero or only small quantities of resources, such as
water or fuel.
Releases zero or only small quantities of emissions to the
environment.
Avoids environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands
and floodplains.
Avoids areas with cultural, historic, or environmental
justice significance.
Avoids habitat for threatened or endangered species.
Uses mitigation to reduce impacts.
Involves only low levels of employment for both
construction and operation.
Uses simpler designs than those for large LWRs, with
limited interfaces with the exterior environment.
While the ISG is designed to aid the NRC staff in developing a
micro-reactor environmental impact statement, the staff recognizes the
value of the guidance as a supplemental source of insight into the
NRC's environmental review process that can inform the development of
an applicant's environmental report. Applicants should scale their
level of effort appropriately when preparing Environmental Reports
(ERs), commensurate with the significance of the impact on the resource
area being addressed.
The scope of the ISG is limited to environmental review
considerations specific to micro-reactors, such as the following:
Pre-application interactions
purpose and need for the proposed project
size of the proposed project and resources used
land use
water resources
terrestrial and aquatic ecology
socioeconomics and environmental justice
historic and cultural resources
need for power and alternatives
meteorology and air quality
radiological and nonradiological health
postulated accidents
severe accident mitigation alternatives (SAMAs);
acts of terrorism
fuel cycle impacts, transportation of fuel and waste, and
continued storage of spent fuel
cumulative impact analysis
consistency with safety licensing documents
incorporation by reference
The NRC staff will continue to look for other opportunities to
effectively streamline environmental reviews and work with prospective
applicants to identify opportunities to streamline ERs and still meet
the NRC's regulations.
III. Backfitting, Issue Finality, and Forward Fitting Discussion
The guidance in this draft ISG-029 clarifies how the NRC will
approach environmental reviews for a micro-reactor application for
combined license, early site permit, construction permit, operating
license and limited work authorization. Issuance of this draft ISG, if
finalized, would not constitute backfitting as defined in section
50.109 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) (the
Backfit Rule) and as described in NRC Management Directive 8.4,
``Management of Backfitting, Forward Fitting, Issue Finality, and
Information Requests;'' would not affect the issue finality of an
approval under 10 CFR part 52; and would not constitute forward fitting
as that term is defined and described in Management Directive 8.4. The
staff's position is based upon the following considerations:
1. The draft ISG positions, if finalized, would not constitute
backfitting or forward fitting or affect issue finality, inasmuch as
the ISG would be internal guidance to NRC staff.
The ISG provides interim guidance to the staff on how to review an
application for NRC regulatory approval in the form of licensing.
Changes in internal staff guidance, without further NRC action, are not
matters that meet the definition of backfitting or forward fitting or
affect the issue finality of a part 52 approval.
2. Current or future applicants are not-with limited exceptions not
applicable here-within the scope of the backfitting and issue finality
regulations and forward fitting policy.
Applicants are not, with certain exceptions, covered by either the
Backfit Rule or any issue finality provisions under 10 CFR part 52.
This is because neither the Backfit Rule nor the issue finality
provisions under 10 CFR part 52--with certain exclusions discussed
below--were intended to apply to every NRC action which substantially
changes the expectations of current and future applicants.
The exceptions to the general principle are applicable whenever an
applicant references a 10 CFR part 52 license (e.g., an early site
permit) and/or NRC regulatory approval (e.g., a design certification
rule) with specified issue finality provisions or a construction permit
under 10 CFR part 50. The staff does not, at this time, intend to
impose the positions represented in the draft ISG section (if
finalized) in a manner that would constitute backfitting or affect the
issue finality of a part 52 approval. If, in the future, the staff
seeks to impose a position in the draft ISG (if finalized) in a manner
that constitutes backfitting or does not provide issue finality as
described in the applicable issue finality
[[Page 11129]]
provision, then the staff would need to address the Backfit Rule or the
criteria for avoiding issue finality as described in the applicable
issue finality provision.
The Commission's forward fitting policy generally does not apply
when an applicant files an initial licensing action for a new facility.
Nevertheless, the staff does not, at this time, intend to impose the
positions represented in the draft ISG section (if finalized) in a
manner that would constitute forward fitting. If, in the future, the
staff seeks to impose a position in the draft ISG (if finalized) in a
manner that constitutes forward fitting, then the staff would need to
address the forward fitting criteria in Management Directive 8.4.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day of February 2020.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph P. Doub,
Acting Chief, Environmental Review New Reactors Branch, Division of
Rulemaking, Environmental, and Financial Support, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2020-03856 Filed 2-25-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P