Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 10689-10691 [2020-03653]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 37 / Tuesday, February 25, 2020 / Notices
The Commission has appointed
Thomas A. Carpenter, D.V.M., as
Monitor to ensure that Compassion First
and NVA comply with all of their
obligations pursuant to the Consent
Agreement and to keep the Commission
informed about the status of the transfer
of rights and assets to MedVet. Dr.
Carpenter possesses relevant experience
and expertise regarding issues relevant
to the divestiture, including experience
as a monitor in previous FTC matters.
If the Commission determines that
MedVet is not an acceptable acquirer of
the divested assets, or that the manner
of the divestitures is not acceptable, the
parties must unwind the sale of rights
and assets to MedVet and divest them
to a Commission-approved acquirer
within six months of the date on which
the Consent Agreement becomes final.
In that circumstance, the Commission
may appoint a trustee to divest the
rights and assets if the parties fail to
divest them as required.
The purpose of this analysis is to
facilitate public comment on the
proposed Consent Agreement. It is not
intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the proposed Consent
Agreement or to modify its terms in any
way.
By direction of the Commission.
April J. Tabor,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–03687 Filed 2–24–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–20–20IP; Docket No. CDC–2020–
0021]
Proposed Data Collection Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
AGENCY:
The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of
its continuing effort to reduce public
burden and maximize the utility of
government information, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies the opportunity to comment on
a proposed and/or continuing
information collection, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
This notice invites comment on a
proposed information collection project
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:34 Feb 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
titled ‘‘Occupational Driver Safety at
Intersections.’’ The purpose of this data
collection is to gather experimental
information in the CDC Motor Vehicle
Safety Research Laboratory on the
effects of occupation, vehicle type,
vehicle approach speed, signal light
logic, and emergency response status on
emergency vehicle driver decisionmaking at intersections. The
information will also be used to
formulate science-based safety
recognition training materials and an
advanced driver assistant tool to
enhance occupational driver (e.g., law
enforcement officers and firefighters)
safety at intersections.
DATES: CDC must receive written
comments on or before April 27, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CDC–2020–
0021 by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
Regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Mail: Jeffrey M. Zirger, Information
Collection Review Office, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 1600
Clifton Road NE, MS–D74, Atlanta,
Georgia 30329.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
Docket Number. CDC will post, without
change, all relevant comments to
Regulations.gov.
Please note: Submit all comments
through the Federal eRulemaking portal
(regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the
address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of
the information collection plan and
instruments, contact Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Information Collection Review Office,
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS–
D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; phone:
404–639–7570; Email: omb@cdc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal agencies
must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each
collection of information they conduct
or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also
requires Federal agencies to provide a
60-day notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each new
proposed collection, each proposed
extension of existing collection of
information, and each reinstatement of
previously approved information
collection before submitting the
collection to the OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, we are
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10689
publishing this notice of a proposed
data collection as described below.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments that will help:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
5. Assess information collection costs.
Proposed Project
Occupational Driver Safety at
Intersections—New—National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The mission of the National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) is to promote safety and health
at work for all people through research
and prevention. Nearly 40% of all traffic
crashes occur at intersections.
Erroneous decision-making while
crossing a signalized intersection is a
significant risk factor for drivers. Such
decision-making is even more
challenging for occupational drivers
(e.g., police and fire truck drivers) due
to their job demands, special vehicle
characteristics, and frequency of crash
risk exposure. NIOSH has initiated a
laboratory simulation study on effects of
occupation, vehicle type, vehicle
approach speed, signal light logic, and
emergency response status on
emergency vehicle driver decisionmaking at intersections to advance the
safety of approximately 900,000 law
enforcement officers and 1,134,400
career and volunteer firefighters.
Study results will be used to develop
science-based safety recognition training
materials for emergency vehicle drivers
and their employers to enhance driver
safety at intersections. The information
also will be used to (1) determine the
optimal time/distance to activate a
traffic signal preemption system for
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
10690
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 37 / Tuesday, February 25, 2020 / Notices
emergency vehicles to obtain the rightof-way at intersections, and (2)
conceptualize an advanced driver
assistant system (ADAS) that provides
signal light status and issues a
preemptive warning when an
emergency vehicle approaches an
intersection at an unsafe speed limit
based on the vehicle and environmental
conditions. The system will assist
occupational drivers in decision making
while crossing a signalized intersection.
Thirty-two fire truck drivers, 32 law
enforcement officers (LEOs), and 32
general passenger vehicle drivers will be
recruited for the experiment. The
driving task for fire truck drivers and
LEOs will consist of responding to an
emergency call and returning to the base
station. The general passenger vehicle
drivers serve as the baseline reference;
they will drive a sedan, simulating
normal daily driving conditions. LEOs
will perform an additional driving task
(off-duty condition) using a sedan (same
weight and size as the LEO cruiser) on
a separate visit for the experiment. The
drivers’ performance (e.g., perception
and response time, stopping accuracy,
and stress level) and safety outcomes
(e.g., deceleration at intersection,
clearance to intersection, red light
running time, and red light running
frequency) will be analyzed, based on
vehicle locations, vehicle speeds, and
drivers’ heart rates.
A follow-up study will evaluate the
effectiveness of a driver assistant tool
(derived from the first experiment) on
the drivers’ decision-making and overall
safety outcomes. The driver assistant
tool would be (1) either an algorithm to
activate a traffic signal preemption
system at optimal time/distance for
emergency vehicles to obtain the rightof-way at intersections or, (2) an
advanced driver assistant system that
provides signal light status and issues a
preemptive warning when an
emergency vehicle approaches an
intersection at an unsafe speed limit.
Half of the participants from the first
experiment (i.e., 16 truck drivers, 16
LEOs, and 16 general passenger vehicle
drivers) and 48 new participants (16
from each of the three groups) will be
recruited. The design of this experiment
in terms of nature of tasks and outcome
measures will be the same as those for
the first experiment.
The two experiments will utilize 192
research participants. An additional six
participants may be recruited to replace
dropouts during the study due to
simulator sickness. The data collection
for the two experiments will take three
years in total. Informed consent and the
data collection are expected to take 3–
3.5 hours (total) to complete for
Experiment 1 and 4–4.5 hours for
Experiment 2 for each participant. The
total estimated annualized burden hours
are 341. There are no costs to the
respondents other than their time.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Type of respondents
Form name
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Officers
Pre-Enrollment Confirmation Email .................................
Participation Data Collection Form ..................................
Informed Consent form—including participant orientation
Motion Sickness Screen Form .........................................
Pre and post drive simulator sickness assessment x5
scenarios x3 conditions.
Sharpened Romberg Postural Stability Test x2 states x3
conditions.
Practice Roadmap—Driving practice in simulator x3
conditions.
Actual test—120 minutes x3 conditions ..........................
Pre-Enrollment Confirmation Email .................................
Participation Data Collection Form ..................................
Informed Consent form—including participant orientation
Motion Sickness Screen Form .........................................
Pre and post drive simulator sickness assessment x5
scenarios x2 conditions.
Sharpened Romberg Postural Stability Test x2 states x2
conditions.
Practice Roadmap—Driving practice in simulator x2
conditions.
Actual test—120 minutes x2 conditions ..........................
Pre-Enrollment Confirmation Email .................................
Participation Data Collection Form ..................................
Informed Consent form—including participant orientation
Motion Sickness Screen Form .........................................
Pre and post drive simulator sickness assessment x5
scenarios x1 condition.
Sharpened Romberg Postural Stability Test x2 states x1
condition.
Practice Roadmap—Driving practice in simulator x1
condition.
Actual test—120 minutes x1 condition ............................
Pre-Enrollment Confirmation Email .................................
Participation Data Collection Form ..................................
Informed Consent form—including participant orientation
Motion Sickness Screen Form .........................................
Pre and post drive simulator sickness assessment x5
scenarios x1 condition.
Sharpened Romberg Postural Stability Test x2 states x1
condition.
Acceptance of Advanced Driver Assistance System x1
condition.
Practice Roadmap—Driving practice in simulator x1
condition.
Experiment 1: Firefighter ........................
Experiment 1: General civilian ...............
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Experiment 2: Law Enforcement Officers
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:14 Feb 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Average
burden
per response
(in hrs.)
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
11
11
11
11
11
1
1
1
1
1
1/60
1/60
20/60
2/60
1
1
1
4
1
11
11
1
30/60
6
11
1
48/60
9
11
11
11
11
11
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
360/60
1/60
1/60
20/60
2/60
40/60
66
1
1
4
1
7
11
1
20/60
4
11
1
36/60
7
11
11
11
11
11
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
240/60
1/60
1/60
20/60
2/60
20/60
44
1
1
4
1
4
11
1
10/60
2
11
1
16/60
3
11
11
11
11
11
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
120/60
1/60
1/60
20/60
2/60
20/60
22
1
1
4
1
4
11
1
10/60
2
11
1
40/60
7
11
1
16/60
3
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
Total burden
(in hrs.)
10691
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 37 / Tuesday, February 25, 2020 / Notices
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS—Continued
Number of
responses per
respondent
Actual test—120 minutes x1 condition ............................
Pre-Enrollment Confirmation Email .................................
Participation Data Collection Form ..................................
Informed Consent form—including participant orientation
Motion Sickness Screen Form .........................................
Pre and post drive simulator sickness assessment x5
scenarios x1 condition.
Sharpened Romberg Postural Stability Test x2 states x1
condition.
Acceptance of Advanced Driver Assistance System x1
condition.
Practice Roadmap—Driving practice in simulator x1
condition.
Actual test—120 minutes x1 condition ............................
Pre-Enrollment Confirmation Email .................................
Participation Data Collection Form ..................................
Informed Consent form—including participant orientation
Motion Sickness Screen Form .........................................
Pre and post drive simulator sickness assessment x5
scenarios x1 condition.
Sharpened Romberg Postural Stability Test x2 states x1
condition.
Acceptance of Advanced Driver Assistance System x1
condition.
Practice Roadmap—Driving practice in simulator x1
condition.
Actual test—120 minutes x1 condition ............................
11
11
11
11
11
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
120/60
1/60
1/60
20/60
2/60
20/60
22
1
1
4
1
4
11
1
10/60
2
11
1
40/60
7
11
1
16/60
3
11
11
11
11
11
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
120/60
1/60
1/60
20/60
2/60
20/60
22
1
1
4
1
4
11
1
10/60
2
11
1
40/60
7
11
1
16/60
3
11
1
120/60
22
..........................................................................................
....................
........................
........................
341
Form name
Experiment 2: Firefighter ........................
Experiment 2: General civilian ...............
Total .................................................
Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Lead, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of Science,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2020–03653 Filed 2–24–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–20–20HN; Docket No. CDC–2020–
0016]
Proposed Data Collection Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
AGENCY:
The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of
its continuing effort to reduce public
burden and maximize the utility of
government information, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies the opportunity to comment on
a proposed and/or continuing
information collection, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
This notice invites comment on a
proposed information collection project
titled National Outbreak Reporting
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
21:14 Feb 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
System (NORS). NORS collects data on
all waterborne and foodborne disease
outbreaks and enteric disease outbreaks
transmitted by contact with
environmental sources, infected persons
or animals, or unknown modes of
transmission.
CDC must receive written
comments on or before April 27, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CDC–2020–
0016 by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
Regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Mail: Jeffrey M. Zirger, Information
Collection Review Office, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 1600
Clifton Road NE, MS–D74, Atlanta,
Georgia 30329.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
Docket Number. CDC will post, without
change, all relevant comments to
Regulations.gov.
DATES:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Average
burden
per response
(in hrs.)
Number of
respondents
Type of respondents
Please note: Submit all comments through
the Federal eRulemaking portal
(regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the
address listed above.
To request
more information on the proposed
project or to obtain a copy of the
information collection plan and
instruments, contact Jeffrey M. Zirger, of
the Information Collection Review
Office, Centers for Disease Control and
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total burden
(in hrs.)
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS–
D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; phone:
404–639–7570; Email: omb@cdc.gov.
Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal agencies
must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each
collection of information they conduct
or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also
requires Federal agencies to provide a
60-day notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each new
proposed collection, each proposed
extension of existing collection of
information, and each reinstatement of
previously approved information
collection before submitting the
collection to the OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, we are
publishing this notice of a proposed
data collection as described below.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments that will help:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 37 (Tuesday, February 25, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10689-10691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03653]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[60Day-20-20IP; Docket No. CDC-2020-0021]
Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and
Recommendations
AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce public burden and maximize the
utility of government information, invites the general public and other
Federal agencies the opportunity to comment on a proposed and/or
continuing information collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. This notice invites comment on a proposed
information collection project titled ``Occupational Driver Safety at
Intersections.'' The purpose of this data collection is to gather
experimental information in the CDC Motor Vehicle Safety Research
Laboratory on the effects of occupation, vehicle type, vehicle approach
speed, signal light logic, and emergency response status on emergency
vehicle driver decision-making at intersections. The information will
also be used to formulate science-based safety recognition training
materials and an advanced driver assistant tool to enhance occupational
driver (e.g., law enforcement officers and firefighters) safety at
intersections.
DATES: CDC must receive written comments on or before April 27, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CDC-2020-
0021 by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Jeffrey M. Zirger, Information Collection Review
Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road
NE, MS-D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and Docket Number. CDC will post, without change, all relevant comments
to Regulations.gov.
Please note: Submit all comments through the Federal eRulemaking
portal (regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan
and instruments, contact Jeffrey M. Zirger, Information Collection
Review Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton
Road NE, MS-D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; phone: 404-639-7570; Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal agencies must obtain approval from
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also requires
Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of information, including each new
proposed collection, each proposed extension of existing collection of
information, and each reinstatement of previously approved information
collection before submitting the collection to the OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, we are publishing this notice of a
proposed data collection as described below.
The OMB is particularly interested in comments that will help:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses.
5. Assess information collection costs.
Proposed Project
Occupational Driver Safety at Intersections--New--National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The mission of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH) is to promote safety and health at work for all people
through research and prevention. Nearly 40% of all traffic crashes
occur at intersections. Erroneous decision-making while crossing a
signalized intersection is a significant risk factor for drivers. Such
decision-making is even more challenging for occupational drivers
(e.g., police and fire truck drivers) due to their job demands, special
vehicle characteristics, and frequency of crash risk exposure. NIOSH
has initiated a laboratory simulation study on effects of occupation,
vehicle type, vehicle approach speed, signal light logic, and emergency
response status on emergency vehicle driver decision-making at
intersections to advance the safety of approximately 900,000 law
enforcement officers and 1,134,400 career and volunteer firefighters.
Study results will be used to develop science-based safety
recognition training materials for emergency vehicle drivers and their
employers to enhance driver safety at intersections. The information
also will be used to (1) determine the optimal time/distance to
activate a traffic signal preemption system for
[[Page 10690]]
emergency vehicles to obtain the right-of-way at intersections, and (2)
conceptualize an advanced driver assistant system (ADAS) that provides
signal light status and issues a preemptive warning when an emergency
vehicle approaches an intersection at an unsafe speed limit based on
the vehicle and environmental conditions. The system will assist
occupational drivers in decision making while crossing a signalized
intersection.
Thirty-two fire truck drivers, 32 law enforcement officers (LEOs),
and 32 general passenger vehicle drivers will be recruited for the
experiment. The driving task for fire truck drivers and LEOs will
consist of responding to an emergency call and returning to the base
station. The general passenger vehicle drivers serve as the baseline
reference; they will drive a sedan, simulating normal daily driving
conditions. LEOs will perform an additional driving task (off-duty
condition) using a sedan (same weight and size as the LEO cruiser) on a
separate visit for the experiment. The drivers' performance (e.g.,
perception and response time, stopping accuracy, and stress level) and
safety outcomes (e.g., deceleration at intersection, clearance to
intersection, red light running time, and red light running frequency)
will be analyzed, based on vehicle locations, vehicle speeds, and
drivers' heart rates.
A follow-up study will evaluate the effectiveness of a driver
assistant tool (derived from the first experiment) on the drivers'
decision-making and overall safety outcomes. The driver assistant tool
would be (1) either an algorithm to activate a traffic signal
preemption system at optimal time/distance for emergency vehicles to
obtain the right-of-way at intersections or, (2) an advanced driver
assistant system that provides signal light status and issues a
preemptive warning when an emergency vehicle approaches an intersection
at an unsafe speed limit. Half of the participants from the first
experiment (i.e., 16 truck drivers, 16 LEOs, and 16 general passenger
vehicle drivers) and 48 new participants (16 from each of the three
groups) will be recruited. The design of this experiment in terms of
nature of tasks and outcome measures will be the same as those for the
first experiment.
The two experiments will utilize 192 research participants. An
additional six participants may be recruited to replace dropouts during
the study due to simulator sickness. The data collection for the two
experiments will take three years in total. Informed consent and the
data collection are expected to take 3-3.5 hours (total) to complete
for Experiment 1 and 4-4.5 hours for Experiment 2 for each participant.
The total estimated annualized burden hours are 341. There are no costs
to the respondents other than their time.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Number of Number of burden per Total burden
Type of respondents Form name respondents responses per response (in (in hrs.)
respondent hrs.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Experiment 1: Law Enforcement Pre-Enrollment 11 1 1/60 1
Officers. Confirmation
Email.
Participation Data 11 1 1/60 1
Collection Form.
Informed Consent 11 1 20/60 4
form--including
participant
orientation.
Motion Sickness 11 1 2/60 1
Screen Form.
Pre and post drive 11 1 1 11
simulator
sickness
assessment x5
scenarios x3
conditions.
Sharpened Romberg 11 1 30/60 6
Postural
Stability Test x2
states x3
conditions.
Practice Roadmap-- 11 1 48/60 9
Driving practice
in simulator x3
conditions.
Actual test--120 11 1 360/60 66
minutes x3
conditions.
Experiment 1: Firefighter...... Pre-Enrollment 11 1 1/60 1
Confirmation
Email.
Participation Data 11 1 1/60 1
Collection Form.
Informed Consent 11 1 20/60 4
form--including
participant
orientation.
Motion Sickness 11 1 2/60 1
Screen Form.
Pre and post drive 11 1 40/60 7
simulator
sickness
assessment x5
scenarios x2
conditions.
Sharpened Romberg 11 1 20/60 4
Postural
Stability Test x2
states x2
conditions.
Practice Roadmap-- 11 1 36/60 7
Driving practice
in simulator x2
conditions.
Actual test--120 11 1 240/60 44
minutes x2
conditions.
Experiment 1: General civilian. Pre-Enrollment 11 1 1/60 1
Confirmation
Email.
Participation Data 11 1 1/60 1
Collection Form.
Informed Consent 11 1 20/60 4
form--including
participant
orientation.
Motion Sickness 11 1 2/60 1
Screen Form.
Pre and post drive 11 1 20/60 4
simulator
sickness
assessment x5
scenarios x1
condition.
Sharpened Romberg 11 1 10/60 2
Postural
Stability Test x2
states x1
condition.
Practice Roadmap-- 11 1 16/60 3
Driving practice
in simulator x1
condition.
Actual test--120 11 1 120/60 22
minutes x1
condition.
Experiment 2: Law Enforcement Pre-Enrollment 11 1 1/60 1
Officers. Confirmation
Email.
Participation Data 11 1 1/60 1
Collection Form.
Informed Consent 11 1 20/60 4
form--including
participant
orientation.
Motion Sickness 11 1 2/60 1
Screen Form.
Pre and post drive 11 1 20/60 4
simulator
sickness
assessment x5
scenarios x1
condition.
Sharpened Romberg 11 1 10/60 2
Postural
Stability Test x2
states x1
condition.
Acceptance of 11 1 40/60 7
Advanced Driver
Assistance System
x1 condition.
Practice Roadmap-- 11 1 16/60 3
Driving practice
in simulator x1
condition.
[[Page 10691]]
Actual test--120 11 1 120/60 22
minutes x1
condition.
Experiment 2: Firefighter...... Pre-Enrollment 11 1 1/60 1
Confirmation
Email.
Participation Data 11 1 1/60 1
Collection Form.
Informed Consent 11 1 20/60 4
form--including
participant
orientation.
Motion Sickness 11 1 2/60 1
Screen Form.
Pre and post drive 11 1 20/60 4
simulator
sickness
assessment x5
scenarios x1
condition.
Sharpened Romberg 11 1 10/60 2
Postural
Stability Test x2
states x1
condition.
Acceptance of 11 1 40/60 7
Advanced Driver
Assistance System
x1 condition.
Practice Roadmap-- 11 1 16/60 3
Driving practice
in simulator x1
condition.
Actual test--120 11 1 120/60 22
minutes x1
condition.
Experiment 2: General civilian. Pre-Enrollment 11 1 1/60 1
Confirmation
Email.
Participation Data 11 1 1/60 1
Collection Form.
Informed Consent 11 1 20/60 4
form--including
participant
orientation.
Motion Sickness 11 1 2/60 1
Screen Form.
Pre and post drive 11 1 20/60 4
simulator
sickness
assessment x5
scenarios x1
condition.
Sharpened Romberg 11 1 10/60 2
Postural
Stability Test x2
states x1
condition.
Acceptance of 11 1 40/60 7
Advanced Driver
Assistance System
x1 condition.
Practice Roadmap-- 11 1 16/60 3
Driving practice
in simulator x1
condition.
Actual test--120 11 1 120/60 22
minutes x1
condition.
------------------------------------------------------------
Total...................... .................. ........... .............. .............. 341
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Lead, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific
Integrity, Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2020-03653 Filed 2-24-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
