Air Plan Approval; California; San Diego County Air Pollution Control District, 10611-10613 [2020-03403]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 37 / Tuesday, February 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
service (e.g., business reply mail and
Bulk Parcel Return Service).
*
*
*
*
*
10.0 Postage Due Weight Averaging
Program
10.1
Basic Information
10.1.1
Description
[Revise the second sentence of 10.1.1
to read as follows:]
* * * This program, subject to
application, approval, and
authorization, is available for customers
who receive a minimum of 50,000
combined postage due parcels and flats
or Bulk Parcel Return Service (BPRS)
pieces. * * *
10.1.2
Index
General Qualification
*
[Revise the second sentence of 10.1.2
to read as follows:]
* * * Returns can include all classes
of mail where postage due fees are
assessed, including BPRS return pieces.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
[Delete 11.0, Scan-Based Payment, in
its entirety.]
*
*
*
*
*
M
609 Filing Indemnity Claims for Loss
or Damage
1.0
General Filing Instructions
*
*
1.3
Who May File
*
*
*
A claim may be filed by:
*
*
*
*
[Revise the text of items c and d to
read as follows:]
c. Only the account holder, for USPS
Returns packages that are insured as
identified by the account holder’s
mailer identification (MID) and the
applicable STC for insurance imbedded
into the IMpb on the label, and for
which the account holder has provided
electronic data that supports the value
of the merchandise being returned (see
503.4.3.1a).
d. Only the mailer, when the mailer
has added and paid for insurance on
USPS Returns service packages.
*
*
*
*
*
*
3.0 Providing Evidence of Insurance
and Value
3.1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
for USPS Returns service under 503.3.0,
the mailer must use one of the
following:
[Revise the text of item e1 to read as
follows:]
1. A Detail Record in their Shipping
Services file version 1.6 or higher
(which includes the USPS Tracking
number of the insured item, total
postage paid, insurance fee paid,
declared value, mailing date, origin ZIP
Code, delivery ZIP Code) along with the
recipient name and address information
for the accountable extra services
pieces.
*
*
*
*
*
Evidence of Insurance
* * * Examples of acceptable
evidence are:
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise the introductory text of item e
to read as follows:]
e. For insured mail or COD mail paid
using MMS or eVS under 705.2.0, or for
insured mail paid using an EPS account
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:34 Feb 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise the heading and text under
‘‘merchandise return service’’ to read as
follows (re-alphabetize heading and text
after revision):]
USPS Returns Service, 505.3.0
accounts 505.3.1.2
adding extra services (by the mailer),
505.3.1.3
adding extra services (by the permit
holder), 505.3.1.3
advanced deposit account, 505.3.1.2
applying for a permit, 505.3.1.2
format for label, 505.3.1.4
general information, 505.3.1.1
*
*
*
*
*
R
*
*
*
*
*
Reply Mail
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise the ‘‘merchandise return
service’’ entry to read as follows (realphabetize entry after revision):]
USPS Returns service, 505.3.0
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[Delete ‘‘merchandise return service’’.]
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise the ‘‘USPS return services’’
entry to read as follows:]
USPS Returns service, 505.3.0
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–03170 Filed 2–24–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
Fmt 4700
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0556; FRL–10004–
14–Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; California; San
Diego County Air Pollution Control
District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the San Diego
County Air Pollution Control District
(SDCAPCD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). This
revision concerns emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) from
adhesive material application
operations. We are approving a local
rule that regulates these emission
sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA
or the ‘‘Act’’).
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective on March
26, 2020.
DATES:
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0556. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
ADDRESSES:
Sfmt 4700
Christine Vineyard, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. By phone: (415) 947–4125 or by
email at vineyard.christine@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
Joshua J. Hofer,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
Frm 00057
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Return Services
PO 00000
10611
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
E:\FR\FM\25FER1.SGM
25FER1
10612
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 37 / Tuesday, February 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
I. Proposed Action
On October 21, 2019 (84 FR 56156),
the EPA proposed to approve the
following rule into the California SIP.
Local agency
Rule No.
Rule title
Amended
Submitted
SDCAPCD ..............................
67.21
Adhesive Material Application Operations ..............................
05/14/08
08/09/17
We proposed to approve this rule
because we determined that it complies
with the relevant CAA requirements.
Our proposed action contains more
information on the rule and our
evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received 2 comments
supporting EPA’s approval of Rule 67.21
for the protection of human health and
the environment.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment of the rules as
described in our proposed action.
Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving this rule into the California
SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
SDCAPCD rule described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:34 Feb 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by April 27, 2020. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 11, 2019.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\25FER1.SGM
25FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 37 / Tuesday, February 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(503)(i)(B) to read
as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan-in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(503) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) San Diego County Air Pollution
Control District.
(1) Rule 67.21, ‘‘Adhesive Material
Application Operations,’’ amended on
May 14, 2008.
(2) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–03403 Filed 2–24–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
I. Background
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2019–0553; FRL–10005–
49–Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia; 2019 Amendments to West
Virginia’s Ambient Air Quality
Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Schulingkamp, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air &
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. The telephone number is (215)
814–2021. Mr. Schulingkamp can also
be reached via electronic mail at
schulingkamp.joseph@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On December 23, 2019 (84 FR 64243),
EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) for the State of
West Virginia. In the NPRM, EPA
proposed approval of a formal SIP
revision submitted on May 6, 2019. The
formal SIP revision updates the version
of the NAAQS and the associated
monitoring reference and equivalent
methods for those NAAQS that West
Virginia incorporates by reference into
the State’s legislative rules and the SIP.
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA
Analysis
This SIP revision was submitted by
the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection (WVDEP) in
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
order to update the State’s incorporation
Agency (EPA) is approving a state
by reference of the primary and
implementation plan (SIP) revision
secondary NAAQS and the ambient air
submitted by the State of West Virginia.
monitoring reference and equivalent
This revision updates the effective date
methods, found in 40 CFR parts 50 and
of the national ambient air quality
53, respectively. Currently, West
standards (NAAQS) and the associated
Virginia’s EPA-approved SIP includes
monitoring reference and equivalent
the older version of West Virginia
methods for those NAAQS which West
regulation 45CSR8 which incorporates
Virginia incorporates into its State
by reference 40 CFR parts 50 and 53 as
regulations and the SIP. EPA is
these Federal regulations existed on
approving this revision to the West
June 1, 2017. West Virginia has since
Virginia SIP in accordance with the
adopted at the State level a revision to
requirements of the Clean Air Act
45CSR8 which now incorporates by
(CAA).
reference the Federal regulations at 40
DATES: This final rule is effective on
CFR parts 50 and 53 as these regulations
March 26, 2020.
existed on June 1, 2018. Following EPA
approval of this SIP revision, the EPAADDRESSES: EPA has established a
approved West Virginia SIP will reflect
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2019–0553. All that 40 CFR parts 50 and 53, as they
existed on June 1, 2018, are part of the
documents in the docket are listed on
EPA-approved West Virginia SIP. EPA
the https://www.regulations.gov
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:34 Feb 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10613
notes that since June 1, 2017, EPA
reviewed the primary standards for
oxides of nitrogen (NOX), as required by
CAA section 109(d), but chose to retain
the 1-hour and annual nitrogen dioxide
(NO2) standards without revision. See
83 FR 17226. Thus, EPA has not made
any changes to the ambient air quality
standards, ambient air monitoring
reference methods, or any ambient air
monitoring equivalent methods in 40
CFR parts 50 and 53 since West Virginia
last incorporated by reference into
45CSR8 the NAAQS and monitoring
methods in 40 CFR parts 50 and 53 as
they existed on June 1, 2017. Other
specific requirements and the rationale
for EPA’s proposed action are explained
in the NPRM and will not be restated
here.
III. Response to Comments
EPA received five sets of anonymous
comments in response to the NPRM.
Three of the commenters supported
West Virginia’s updating of its
incorporation by reference of the
NAAQS. EPA thanks these commenters
but will otherwise only respond to the
question contained in one of these
comments. Two of the comments were
difficult to interpret but did not appear
to support the rulemaking. EPA’s best
effort to interpret and respond to these
two comments is represented in this
section of this rulemaking action.
Comment 1: The first commenter was
generally supportive of the action but
also asked when the revision of the
effective date in this rulemaking would
take place.
Response 1: The provisions of West
Virginia’s amended regulation, 45CSR8,
became effective at the State level on
June 1, 2019. EPA’s approval of this
revision into the SIP will become
effective 30 days after this final rule is
published in the Federal Register. For
the specific effective date of EPA’s
approval, see the DATES section of this
document.
Comment 2: One commenter asked
why EPA was requiring rules about the
NAAQS and asked why EPA requires
the NAAQS. The commenter suggested
that EPA stop requiring states like West
Virginia to adopt rules like this and
allow West Virginia to remove these
rules. The commenter also generally
expressed opinions irrelevant to this
rulemaking.
Response 2: The Clean Air Act is a
Federal law (statute) adopted by
Congress and approved by the
President. Section 109 of the CAA
requires that the Administrator adopt
NAAQS for certain air pollutants which,
in the judgment of the Administrator,
are necessary to protect the public
E:\FR\FM\25FER1.SGM
25FER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 37 (Tuesday, February 25, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10611-10613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03403]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2019-0556; FRL-10004-14-Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; California; San Diego County Air Pollution
Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a revision to the San Diego County Air Pollution
Control District (SDCAPCD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) from adhesive material application operations.
We are approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the ``Act'').
DATES: This rule is effective on March 26, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2019-0556. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Vineyard, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 947-4125 or by
email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
[[Page 10612]]
I. Proposed Action
On October 21, 2019 (84 FR 56156), the EPA proposed to approve the
following rule into the California SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SDCAPCD............................. 67.21 Adhesive Material 05/14/08 08/09/17
Application Operations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve this rule because we determined that it
complies with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rule and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received 2 comments supporting EPA's approval of
Rule 67.21 for the protection of human health and the environment.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rules
as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in
section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving this rule into
the California SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
SDCAPCD rule described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office
(please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by April 27, 2020. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 11, 2019.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
[[Page 10613]]
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(503)(i)(B) to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan-in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(503) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) San Diego County Air Pollution Control District.
(1) Rule 67.21, ``Adhesive Material Application Operations,''
amended on May 14, 2008.
(2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-03403 Filed 2-24-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
