Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Proposed Amendments to the Marketing Order No. 966 and Referendum Order, 10096-10099 [2020-03369]
Download as PDF
10096
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 85, No. 35
Friday, February 21, 2020
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 966
[Doc. No.: AMS–SC–19–0068; SC19–966–3]
Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Proposed
Amendments to the Marketing Order
No. 966 and Referendum Order
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum
order.
AGENCY:
This rulemaking proposes
amendments to Marketing Order No.
966, which regulates the handling of
tomatoes grown in Florida. The
proposed amendments would change
the Florida Tomato Committee’s
(Committee) size, length of the terms of
office, and quorum requirements.
DATES: The referendum will be
conducted from May 11, 2020, through
June 1, 2020. The representative period
for the referendum is October 1, 2018,
through September 30, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons with
questions may send comments to the
Docket Clerk, Marketing Order and
Agreement Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202)
720–8938.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Geronimo Quinones, Marketing
Specialist, or Andrew Hatch,
Rulemaking Services Branch Chief,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, Stop 0237, Washington, DC
20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Geronimo.Quinones@usda.gov or
Andrew.Hatch@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Feb 20, 2020
Jkt 250001
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposal, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
proposes amendments to regulations
issued to carry out a marketing order as
defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposal
is issued under Marketing Order No.
966, as amended (7 CFR part 966),
regulating the handling of tomatoes
grown in Florida. Part 966 (referred to
as the ‘‘Order’’) is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The
Committee locally administers the
Order and is comprised of tomato
producers and handlers operating
within the area of production.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
13563 and 13175. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive
Order 12866 review. Additionally,
because this proposed rule does not
meet the definition of a significant
regulatory action, it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive
Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum
titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing
Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017, titled ‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
This proposal has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This proposed rule is
not intended to have retroactive effect.
This proposed rule shall not be deemed
to preclude, preempt, or supersede any
State program covering tomatoes grown
in Florida.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
no later than 20 days after the date of
entry of the ruling.
Section 1504 of the Food,
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(2008 Farm Bill) (Pub. L. 110–246)
amended section 8c(17) of the Act,
which in turn required the addition of
supplemental rules of practice to 7 CFR
part 900 (73 FR 49307; August 21,
2008). The amendment of section 8c(17)
of the Act and additional supplemental
rules of practice authorize the use of
informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 553) to
amend Federal fruit, vegetable, and nut
marketing agreements and orders. USDA
may use informal rulemaking to amend
marketing orders based on the nature
and complexity of the proposed
amendment, the potential regulatory
and economic impacts on affected
entities, and any other relevant matters.
AMS has considered these factors and
has determined that the amendments
proposed are not unduly complex and
the nature of the proposed amendments
is appropriate for utilizing the informal
rulemaking process to amend the Order.
The proposed amendments were
unanimously recommended by the
Committee following deliberations at
two public meetings held on November
1, 2018, and February 27, 2019. The
proposals would amend the Order by
changing the Committee’s size, the
length of term of office, and quorum
requirements.
A proposed rule soliciting comments
on the proposed amendments was
issued on September 23, 2019 and
published in the Federal Register on
October 1, 2019 (84 FR 52044). No
comments were received. AMS will
conduct a producer referendum to
determine support for the proposed
amendments. If appropriate, a final rule
will then be issued to effectuate the
amendments if they are favored by
producers in the referendum.
The Committee’s proposals would
amend the Order by changing the
Committee’s size, the length of term of
office, and quorum requirements.
Proposal 1—Reduce Committee Size
Section 966.22 provides that the
Committee consists of 12 members and,
for each member of the Committee,
E:\FR\FM\21FEP1.SGM
21FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 35 / Friday, February 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules
there must be an alternate who has the
same qualifications as the member. This
proposal would amend § 966.22 by
reducing the size of the Committee from
12 to 10 members. The requirement that
each member have an alternate with the
same qualifications as the member
would remain unchanged.
Since promulgation of the Order in
1995, the Florida tomato industry has
seen reductions of about 80% in the
number of tomato producers and 33% of
registered handlers. Industry
consolidation and land development
pressure have also contributed to this
decline. Decreasing the Committee’s
size from 12 members to 10 members
would make Committee membership
more reflective of today’s industry and
enable it to fulfill quorum requirements.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposal 2—Revise Term of Office
Section 966.23 requires Committee
members and their alternates to serve
for one year.
This proposal would change § 966.23
by revising the term of office for
producer members from one year to two
years beginning on August 1 and ending
as of July 31. Currently, the nominating
process for the 12 members and
alternate members is conducted
annually. This proposed change would
reduce the annual turnover on the
Committee and provide time for new
members and alternates to learn the
details of Committee operations and
business.
Proposal 3—Revise Quorum
Requirements
Currently, § 966.32 states that eight
members of the Committee shall
constitute a quorum, and the same
number of concurring votes shall be
required to pass any motion or approve
any Committee action.
The proposed change would modify
§ 966.32 to allow six members to
constitute a quorum. The requirement
that the same number of concurring
votes (six) shall be required to pass any
motion or approve any Committee
action would remain unchanged. The
Committee is experiencing difficulties
filling all seats and obtaining a quorum
at meetings since several seats have
been vacant. Adjusting the current
requirements would enable the
Committee to operate fully and increase
the chance of reaching a quorum during
scheduled meetings. These changes
would help to streamline the
Committee’s operations and increase its
effectiveness.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Feb 20, 2020
Jkt 250001
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered
the economic impact of this action on
small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 75 producers
of Florida tomatoes in the production
area and 37 handlers subject to
regulation under the Order. Small
agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration
(SBA) as those having annual receipts
less than $1,000,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $30,000,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
According to industry and Committee
data, the average annual price for fresh
Florida tomatoes during the 2017–18
season was approximately $12.56 per
25-pound container, and total fresh
shipments were 25.9 million containers.
Using the average price and shipment
information, the number of handlers,
and assuming a normal distribution, the
majority of handlers have average
annual receipts less than $30,000,000
($12.56 times 25.9 million containers
equals $325,304,000 divided by 37
handlers equals $8,792,000 per handler)
and may be classified as small entities.
With an estimated producer price of
$6.00 per 25-pound container, the
number of Florida tomato producers,
and assuming a normal distribution, the
average annual producer revenue is
above $1,000,000 ($6.00 times 25.9
million containers equals $155,400,000
divided by 75 producers equals
$2,072,000 per producer). Thus, the
majority of producers of Florida
tomatoes may be classified as large
entities.
The proposed amendments would
change the Committee’s size, the length
of term of office, and quorum
requirements.
The Committee unanimously
recommended the proposed
amendments at public meetings on
November 1, 2018 and February 27,
2019. If these proposals are approved in
a referendum, there would be no direct
financial effects on producers or
handlers. However, these proposed
changes would decrease administrative
costs to producers and Committee staff.
This action would save time and work
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10097
for producers and Committee staff, by
avoiding the annual requirement to
prepare multiple nomination notices
and meetings, and the administrative
and travel expenses that are required to
carry out these annual duties.
Since 1995, the number of producers
and handlers operating in the industry
has decreased, which makes it difficult
to find enough members to fill positions
on the Committee. Decreasing the
Committee’s size would make it more
reflective of today’s industry. No
economic impact is expected if the
proposed amendments are approved
because they would not establish any
new regulatory requirements on
handlers, nor would they have any
assessment or funding implications.
There would be no change in financial
costs, reporting, or recordkeeping
requirements if this proposal is
approved.
Alternatives to this proposal,
including making no changes at this
time, were considered by the
Committee. Due to changes in the
industry, AMS believes the proposals
are justified and necessary to ensure the
Committee’s ability to locally
administer the program. Reducing the
size of the Committee would enable it
to satisfy membership and quorum
requirements fully, thereby ensuring a
more efficient and orderly flow of
business.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178
(Vegetable and Specialty Crops). No
changes in those requirements are
necessary because of this action. Should
any changes become necessary, they
would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
This proposed rule would impose no
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
Florida tomato handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public-sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this action.
E:\FR\FM\21FEP1.SGM
21FEP1
10098
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 35 / Friday, February 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules
The Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the Florida
tomato production area. All interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and encouraged to participate
in Committee deliberations on all
issues. Like all Committee meetings, the
November 1, 2018, and February 27,
2019, meetings were public, and all
entities, both large and small, were
encouraged to express their views on
the proposals.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on October 1, 2019 (84 FR
52044). Copies of the rule were mailed
or sent via facsimile to all Committee
members and Florida tomato handlers.
Finally, the proposed rule was made
available through the internet by USDA
and the Office of the Federal Register. A
60-day comment period ending
December 2, 2019, was provided to
allow interested persons to respond to
the proposal. No comments were
received, so no changes will be made to
the amendments as proposed.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Findings and Conclusions
The findings and conclusions and
general findings and determinations
included in the proposed rule set forth
in the October 1, 2019, issue of the
Federal Register are hereby approved
and adopted.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Marketing Order
Annexed hereto and made a part
hereof is the document entitled ‘‘Order
Amending the Order Regulating the
Handling of Tomatoes Grown in
Florida.’’ This document has been
decided upon as the detailed and
appropriate means of effectuating the
foregoing findings and conclusions. It is
hereby ordered, that this entire
proposed rule be published in the
Federal Register.
Referendum Order
It is hereby directed that a referendum
be conducted in accordance with the
procedure for the conduct of referenda
(7 CFR part 900.400–407) to determine
whether the annexed order amending
the Order regulating the handling of
tomatoes grown in Florida is approved
by growers, as defined under the terms
of the Order, who during the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Feb 20, 2020
Jkt 250001
representative period were engaged in
the production of tomatoes in the
production area. The representative
period for the conduct of such
referendum is hereby determined to be
October 1, 2018, through September 30,
2019.
The agents designated by the
Secretary to conduct the referendum are
Steven Kauffman and Christian D.
Nissen, Southeast Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324–
3375, Fax: (863) 325–8793, or Email:
Steven.Kauffman@usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@usda.gov,
respectively.
Order Amending the Order Regulating
the Handling of Tomatoes Grown in
Florida 1
Findings and Determinations
The findings hereinafter set forth are
supplementary to the findings and
determinations which were previously
made in connection with the issuance of
the Order; and all said previous findings
and determinations are hereby ratified
and affirmed, except insofar as such
findings and determinations may be in
conflict with the findings and
determinations set forth herein.
1. The Order, as amended, and as
hereby proposed to be further amended,
and all the terms and conditions thereof,
would tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act;
2. The Order, as amended, and as
hereby proposed to be further amended,
regulates the handling of tomatoes
grown in Florida in the same manner as,
and is applicable only to, persons in the
respective classes of commercial and
industrial activity specified in the
Order;
3. The Order, as amended, and as
hereby proposed to be further amended,
is limited in application to the smallest
regional production area which is
practicable, consistent with carrying out
the declared policy of the Act, and the
issuance of several orders applicable to
subdivisions of the production area
would not effectively carry out the
declared policy of the Act;
4. The Order, as amended, and as
hereby proposed to be further amended,
prescribes, insofar as practicable, such
different terms applicable to different
parts of the production area as are
necessary to give due recognition to the
differences in the production and
1 This order shall not become effective unless and
until the requirements of § 900.14 of the rules of
practice and procedure governing proceedings to
formulate marketing agreements and marketing
orders have been met.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
marketing of tomatoes produced in the
production area; and
5. All handling of tomatoes produced
or packed in the production area as
defined in the Order is in the current of
interstate or foreign commerce or
directly burdens, obstructs, or affects
such commerce.
Order Relative to Handling
It is therefore ordered, that on and
after the effective date hereof, all
handling of tomatoes grown in Florida
shall be in conformity to, and in
compliance with, the terms and
conditions of the said Order as hereby
proposed to be amended as follows:
The provisions of the proposed
marketing order amending the Order
contained in the proposed rule issued
by the Administrator on September 23,
2019 and published in the Federal
Register (84 FR 52044) on October 1,
2019, will be and are the terms and
provisions of this order amending the
Order and are set forth in full herein.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 966
Tomatoes, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 14, 2020.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Agricultural Marketing
Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part
966 as follows:
PART 966—TOMATOES GROWN IN
FLORIDA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 966 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In § 966.22 revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 966.22
Establishment and membership.
(a) The Florida Tomato Committee,
consisting of 10 producer members, is
hereby established. For each member of
the committee there shall be an alternate
who shall have the same qualifications
as the member.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 966.23 revise paragraph (a) as
follows:
§ 966.23
Term of office.
(a) The term of office of committee
members, and their respective
alternates, shall be for 2 years and shall
begin as of August 1 and end as of July
31.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\21FEP1.SGM
21FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 35 / Friday, February 21, 2020 / Proposed Rules
4. In § 966.32 revise paragraph (a) as
follows:
■
§ 966.32
Procedure.
(a) Six members of the committee
shall be necessary to constitute a
quorum and the same number of
concurring votes shall be required to
pass any motion or approve any
committee action.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–03369 Filed 2–20–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2019–1021; Project
Identifier MCAI–2019–00120–E]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; GE Aviation
Czech s.r.o. Turboprop Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to
supersede airworthiness directive (AD)
2016–07–13 and AD 2018–03–22 which
apply to certain GE Aviation Czech s.r.o.
M601D–11, M601E–11, M601E–11A,
M601E–11AS, M601E–11S, and M601F
turboprop engines. AD 2016–07–13
requires inspection of the engine power
turbine (PT) disk and, if found damaged,
its replacement with a part eligible for
installation. AD 2018–03–22 requires
the removal of certain engine PT disks
identified by part number (P/N)
installed on the affected engines. Since
the FAA issued AD 2016–07–13 and AD
2018–03–22, the manufacturer
identified additional P/Ns and serial
numbers (S/Ns) of engine PT disks
affected by damage or non-conformity.
This proposed AD would require an
inspection of the engine PT disk and, if
found damaged, its replacement with a
part eligible for installation. This
proposed AD would also require the
removal of certain engine PT disks
identified by P/N installed on the
affected engines. The FAA is proposing
this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by April 6, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Feb 20, 2020
Jkt 250001
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202 493 2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12 140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact GE Aviation Czech
s.r.o., Beranovy´ch 65, 199 02 Praha 9—
Letnˇany, Czech Republic; phone: +420
222 538 111; fax +420 222 538 222;
email: tp.ops@ge.com. You may view
this service information at the FAA,
Engine and Propeller Standards Branch,
1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA
01803. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 781–238–7759.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
1021; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, the
mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mehdi Lamnyi, Aerospace Engineer,
ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:
781–238–7743; fax: 781–238–7199;
email: Mehdi.Lamnyi@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD.
Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section.
Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2019–1021;
Project Identifier MCAI–2019–00120–E’’
at the beginning of your comments. The
FAA specifically invites comments on
the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
this NPRM. The FAA will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend this NPRM because of
those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information as described in the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10099
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
FAA will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
Confidential Business Information
(CBI) is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Mehdi Lamnyi,
Aerospace Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA,
1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA
01803. Any commentary that the FAA
receives which is not specifically
designated as CBI will be placed in the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Discussion
The FAA issued AD 2016–07–13,
Amendment 39–18458 (81 FR 20222,
April 7, 2016), (‘‘AD 2016–07–13’’), and
AD 2018–03–22, Amendment 39–19195
(83 FR 6455, February 14, 2018), (‘‘AD
2018–03–22’’) for certain GE Aviation
Czech s.r.o. M601D–11, M601E–11,
M601E–11A, M601E–11AS, M601E–
11S, and M601F turboprop engines. AD
2016–07–13 requires inspection of the
engine PT disk and, if found damaged,
its replacement with a part eligible for
installation. AD 2016–07–13 resulted
from the discovery of damage to certain
engine PT disks during engine shop
visits. AD 2018–03–22 requires the
removal of certain engine PT disks
installed on the affected engines. AD
2018–03–22 resulted from a design
review by the manufacturer that
determined engine PT rotors with
certain engine PT disks have less
overspeed margin than originally stated
during product certification.
The FAA issued AD 2016–07–13 to
prevent failure of the engine PT disk,
which could result in release of highenergy debris, damage to the engine,
E:\FR\FM\21FEP1.SGM
21FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10096-10099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03369]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 35 / Friday, February 21, 2020 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 10096]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 966
[Doc. No.: AMS-SC-19-0068; SC19-966-3]
Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Proposed Amendments to the Marketing
Order No. 966 and Referendum Order
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rulemaking proposes amendments to Marketing Order No.
966, which regulates the handling of tomatoes grown in Florida. The
proposed amendments would change the Florida Tomato Committee's
(Committee) size, length of the terms of office, and quorum
requirements.
DATES: The referendum will be conducted from May 11, 2020, through June
1, 2020. The representative period for the referendum is October 1,
2018, through September 30, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons with questions may send comments to the
Docket Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Geronimo Quinones, Marketing
Specialist, or Andrew Hatch, Rulemaking Services Branch Chief,
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS,
USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-
0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email:
[email protected] or [email protected].
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491,
Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
proposes amendments to regulations issued to carry out a marketing
order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposal is issued under
Marketing Order No. 966, as amended (7 CFR part 966), regulating the
handling of tomatoes grown in Florida. Part 966 (referred to as the
``Order'') is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.'' The Committee locally administers the Order and is comprised
of tomato producers and handlers operating within the area of
production.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule
in conformance with Executive Orders 13563 and 13175. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review.
Additionally, because this proposed rule does not meet the definition
of a significant regulatory action, it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum
titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order
of January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This proposed rule is not intended to have retroactive
effect. This proposed rule shall not be deemed to preclude, preempt, or
supersede any State program covering tomatoes grown in Florida.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed no later than 20 days after the date of
entry of the ruling.
Section 1504 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(2008 Farm Bill) (Pub. L. 110-246) amended section 8c(17) of the Act,
which in turn required the addition of supplemental rules of practice
to 7 CFR part 900 (73 FR 49307; August 21, 2008). The amendment of
section 8c(17) of the Act and additional supplemental rules of practice
authorize the use of informal rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 553) to amend
Federal fruit, vegetable, and nut marketing agreements and orders. USDA
may use informal rulemaking to amend marketing orders based on the
nature and complexity of the proposed amendment, the potential
regulatory and economic impacts on affected entities, and any other
relevant matters.
AMS has considered these factors and has determined that the
amendments proposed are not unduly complex and the nature of the
proposed amendments is appropriate for utilizing the informal
rulemaking process to amend the Order.
The proposed amendments were unanimously recommended by the
Committee following deliberations at two public meetings held on
November 1, 2018, and February 27, 2019. The proposals would amend the
Order by changing the Committee's size, the length of term of office,
and quorum requirements.
A proposed rule soliciting comments on the proposed amendments was
issued on September 23, 2019 and published in the Federal Register on
October 1, 2019 (84 FR 52044). No comments were received. AMS will
conduct a producer referendum to determine support for the proposed
amendments. If appropriate, a final rule will then be issued to
effectuate the amendments if they are favored by producers in the
referendum.
The Committee's proposals would amend the Order by changing the
Committee's size, the length of term of office, and quorum
requirements.
Proposal 1--Reduce Committee Size
Section 966.22 provides that the Committee consists of 12 members
and, for each member of the Committee,
[[Page 10097]]
there must be an alternate who has the same qualifications as the
member. This proposal would amend Sec. 966.22 by reducing the size of
the Committee from 12 to 10 members. The requirement that each member
have an alternate with the same qualifications as the member would
remain unchanged.
Since promulgation of the Order in 1995, the Florida tomato
industry has seen reductions of about 80% in the number of tomato
producers and 33% of registered handlers. Industry consolidation and
land development pressure have also contributed to this decline.
Decreasing the Committee's size from 12 members to 10 members would
make Committee membership more reflective of today's industry and
enable it to fulfill quorum requirements.
Proposal 2--Revise Term of Office
Section 966.23 requires Committee members and their alternates to
serve for one year.
This proposal would change Sec. 966.23 by revising the term of
office for producer members from one year to two years beginning on
August 1 and ending as of July 31. Currently, the nominating process
for the 12 members and alternate members is conducted annually. This
proposed change would reduce the annual turnover on the Committee and
provide time for new members and alternates to learn the details of
Committee operations and business.
Proposal 3--Revise Quorum Requirements
Currently, Sec. 966.32 states that eight members of the Committee
shall constitute a quorum, and the same number of concurring votes
shall be required to pass any motion or approve any Committee action.
The proposed change would modify Sec. 966.32 to allow six members
to constitute a quorum. The requirement that the same number of
concurring votes (six) shall be required to pass any motion or approve
any Committee action would remain unchanged. The Committee is
experiencing difficulties filling all seats and obtaining a quorum at
meetings since several seats have been vacant. Adjusting the current
requirements would enable the Committee to operate fully and increase
the chance of reaching a quorum during scheduled meetings. These
changes would help to streamline the Committee's operations and
increase its effectiveness.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant
to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are
brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting
on their own behalf.
There are approximately 75 producers of Florida tomatoes in the
production area and 37 handlers subject to regulation under the Order.
Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts less than
$1,000,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as those
whose annual receipts are less than $30,000,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
According to industry and Committee data, the average annual price
for fresh Florida tomatoes during the 2017-18 season was approximately
$12.56 per 25-pound container, and total fresh shipments were 25.9
million containers. Using the average price and shipment information,
the number of handlers, and assuming a normal distribution, the
majority of handlers have average annual receipts less than $30,000,000
($12.56 times 25.9 million containers equals $325,304,000 divided by 37
handlers equals $8,792,000 per handler) and may be classified as small
entities.
With an estimated producer price of $6.00 per 25-pound container,
the number of Florida tomato producers, and assuming a normal
distribution, the average annual producer revenue is above $1,000,000
($6.00 times 25.9 million containers equals $155,400,000 divided by 75
producers equals $2,072,000 per producer). Thus, the majority of
producers of Florida tomatoes may be classified as large entities.
The proposed amendments would change the Committee's size, the
length of term of office, and quorum requirements.
The Committee unanimously recommended the proposed amendments at
public meetings on November 1, 2018 and February 27, 2019. If these
proposals are approved in a referendum, there would be no direct
financial effects on producers or handlers. However, these proposed
changes would decrease administrative costs to producers and Committee
staff. This action would save time and work for producers and Committee
staff, by avoiding the annual requirement to prepare multiple
nomination notices and meetings, and the administrative and travel
expenses that are required to carry out these annual duties.
Since 1995, the number of producers and handlers operating in the
industry has decreased, which makes it difficult to find enough members
to fill positions on the Committee. Decreasing the Committee's size
would make it more reflective of today's industry. No economic impact
is expected if the proposed amendments are approved because they would
not establish any new regulatory requirements on handlers, nor would
they have any assessment or funding implications. There would be no
change in financial costs, reporting, or recordkeeping requirements if
this proposal is approved.
Alternatives to this proposal, including making no changes at this
time, were considered by the Committee. Due to changes in the industry,
AMS believes the proposals are justified and necessary to ensure the
Committee's ability to locally administer the program. Reducing the
size of the Committee would enable it to satisfy membership and quorum
requirements fully, thereby ensuring a more efficient and orderly flow
of business.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178 (Vegetable
and Specialty Crops). No changes in those requirements are necessary
because of this action. Should any changes become necessary, they would
be submitted to OMB for approval.
This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large Florida tomato
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public-sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this action.
[[Page 10098]]
The Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the
Florida tomato production area. All interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and encouraged to participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the November
1, 2018, and February 27, 2019, meetings were public, and all entities,
both large and small, were encouraged to express their views on the
proposals.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on October 1, 2019 (84 FR 52044). Copies of the rule were
mailed or sent via facsimile to all Committee members and Florida
tomato handlers. Finally, the proposed rule was made available through
the internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 60-day
comment period ending December 2, 2019, was provided to allow
interested persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were
received, so no changes will be made to the amendments as proposed.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the
previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Findings and Conclusions
The findings and conclusions and general findings and
determinations included in the proposed rule set forth in the October
1, 2019, issue of the Federal Register are hereby approved and adopted.
Marketing Order
Annexed hereto and made a part hereof is the document entitled
``Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Tomatoes Grown in
Florida.'' This document has been decided upon as the detailed and
appropriate means of effectuating the foregoing findings and
conclusions. It is hereby ordered, that this entire proposed rule be
published in the Federal Register.
Referendum Order
It is hereby directed that a referendum be conducted in accordance
with the procedure for the conduct of referenda (7 CFR part 900.400-
407) to determine whether the annexed order amending the Order
regulating the handling of tomatoes grown in Florida is approved by
growers, as defined under the terms of the Order, who during the
representative period were engaged in the production of tomatoes in the
production area. The representative period for the conduct of such
referendum is hereby determined to be October 1, 2018, through
September 30, 2019.
The agents designated by the Secretary to conduct the referendum
are Steven Kauffman and Christian D. Nissen, Southeast Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324-3375, Fax: (863) 325-8793, or
Email: [email protected] or [email protected],
respectively.
Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Tomatoes Grown in
Florida 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This order shall not become effective unless and until the
requirements of Sec. 900.14 of the rules of practice and procedure
governing proceedings to formulate marketing agreements and
marketing orders have been met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Findings and Determinations
The findings hereinafter set forth are supplementary to the
findings and determinations which were previously made in connection
with the issuance of the Order; and all said previous findings and
determinations are hereby ratified and affirmed, except insofar as such
findings and determinations may be in conflict with the findings and
determinations set forth herein.
1. The Order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be further
amended, and all the terms and conditions thereof, would tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act;
2. The Order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be further
amended, regulates the handling of tomatoes grown in Florida in the
same manner as, and is applicable only to, persons in the respective
classes of commercial and industrial activity specified in the Order;
3. The Order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be further
amended, is limited in application to the smallest regional production
area which is practicable, consistent with carrying out the declared
policy of the Act, and the issuance of several orders applicable to
subdivisions of the production area would not effectively carry out the
declared policy of the Act;
4. The Order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be further
amended, prescribes, insofar as practicable, such different terms
applicable to different parts of the production area as are necessary
to give due recognition to the differences in the production and
marketing of tomatoes produced in the production area; and
5. All handling of tomatoes produced or packed in the production
area as defined in the Order is in the current of interstate or foreign
commerce or directly burdens, obstructs, or affects such commerce.
Order Relative to Handling
It is therefore ordered, that on and after the effective date
hereof, all handling of tomatoes grown in Florida shall be in
conformity to, and in compliance with, the terms and conditions of the
said Order as hereby proposed to be amended as follows:
The provisions of the proposed marketing order amending the Order
contained in the proposed rule issued by the Administrator on September
23, 2019 and published in the Federal Register (84 FR 52044) on October
1, 2019, will be and are the terms and provisions of this order
amending the Order and are set forth in full herein.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 966
Tomatoes, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 14, 2020.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural
Marketing Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part 966 as follows:
PART 966--TOMATOES GROWN IN FLORIDA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 966 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. In Sec. 966.22 revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 966.22 Establishment and membership.
(a) The Florida Tomato Committee, consisting of 10 producer
members, is hereby established. For each member of the committee there
shall be an alternate who shall have the same qualifications as the
member.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 966.23 revise paragraph (a) as follows:
Sec. 966.23 Term of office.
(a) The term of office of committee members, and their respective
alternates, shall be for 2 years and shall begin as of August 1 and end
as of July 31.
* * * * *
[[Page 10099]]
0
4. In Sec. 966.32 revise paragraph (a) as follows:
Sec. 966.32 Procedure.
(a) Six members of the committee shall be necessary to constitute a
quorum and the same number of concurring votes shall be required to
pass any motion or approve any committee action.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-03369 Filed 2-20-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P