General Updates and Elimination of Certain TAAF and PWEDA Regulations, 8373-8383 [2020-00453]
Download as PDF
8373
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 85, No. 31
Friday, February 14, 2020
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Economic Development Administration
13 CFR Parts 302 and 315
[Docket No.: 191218–0119]
RIN 0610–AA80
General Updates and Elimination of
Certain TAAF and PWEDA Regulations
Economic Development
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Economic Development
Administration (‘‘EDA’’), U.S.
Department of Commerce (‘‘DOC’’), is
issuing a final rule to update the
agency’s regulations implementing the
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms
(‘‘TAAF’’) provisions of the Trade Act of
1974, as amended (‘‘Trade Act’’), and
the Public Works and Economic
Development Act of 1965, as amended
(‘‘PWEDA’’). The changes to the TAAF
program regulations clarify the process
for import-impacted U.S. manufacturing
firms, oil and natural gas production
firms, and service firms to obtain
technical assistance—identified in the
Trade Act as ‘‘adjustment assistance’’—
through the TAAF program, reorganize
the regulations to make them easier to
read and understand, incorporate best
practices, and bring the regulations into
closer alignment with the program’s
statutory requirements. The result will
be to ease the burden on firms seeking
adjustment assistance through the
TAAF program and make it easier for
Trade Adjustment Assistance Centers
(‘‘TAACs’’) to work with firms. EDA is
also eliminating certain TAAF and
PWEDA regulations that are
unnecessary or duplicative because they
describe requirements already
established in other regulations or
award documentation.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
March 16, 2020.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Feb 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
EDA received no comments
on the notice of proposed rulemaking
(‘‘NPRM’’) that preceded this final rule,
so there are no comments for EDA to
post to the Federal Rulemaking Portal,
www.regulations.gov. For convenience,
after the final rule becomes effective,
EDA plans to update the full text of
EDA’s regulations, as amended, and
post it on EDA’s website at https://
www.eda.gov/about/regulations.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ryan Servais, Attorney Advisor, Office
of the Chief Counsel, Economic
Development Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1244 Speer
Boulevard, Suite 431, Denver, CO
80204; telephone: (303) 844–4403.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Background
Through strategic grant investments
that foster job creation and attract
private investment, EDA supports
development in economically distressed
areas of the United States to prepare
these areas for growth and success in
the worldwide economy.
EDA is issuing this final rule to
update the agency’s regulations
implementing the TAAF program (Part
I) and PWEDA (Part II). The changes
will ease the burden on firms and
grantees by eliminating unnecessary and
duplicative regulations and clarifying
and reorganizing the regulations to
make them easier to understand.
The updates will also incorporate best
practices. For example, EDA is adding a
requirement that firms must begin
implementation of their Adjustment
Proposal (‘‘AP’’) within six months after
the AP is approved by EDA. Firms that
do not begin implementation within six
months after approval must update and
re-submit their AP, and then request reapproval before any Adjustment
Assistance may be provided. EDA is
also incorporating changes that will
enable firms to amend their APs within
two years of EDA approval and that will
require firms to complete
implementation of the APs within five
years of approval. These are existing
best practices and help to ensure that
APs reflect current conditions and are
maximally effective.
The updates will align the regulations
more closely with statutory
requirements. Specifically, EDA refers
to imported articles or services that
compete with and are substantially
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
equivalent to the petitioning firm’s as
‘‘directly competitive or like,’’ as
written in the Trade Act, rather than
simply ‘‘directly competitive.’’ In
addition, EDA is clarifying all references
to ‘‘days’’ as ‘‘calendar days,’’ to reflect
this usage in the Trade Act, a change
that will also speed up the time within
which EDA is required to make
determinations regarding firm eligibility
and assistance.
On August 19, 2019, EDA published
an NPRM in the Federal Register
requesting public comments on the
general updates and elimination of
certain TAAF and PWEDA regulations
contained in this final rule (84 FR
42831). The public comment period
closed on September 18, 2019. EDA
received no comments in response to
the NPRM. For this reason, this final
rule contains no changes to the
rulemaking that was proposed in the
NPRM, apart from two technical
corrections. The first technical
correction changes several instances of
‘‘Adjustment Plan’’ to ‘‘Adjustment
Proposal.’’ ‘‘Adjustment Plan’’ is not a
defined term; ‘‘Adjustment Proposal’’ is
the correct term that should be used
throughout. The second technical
correction, to revised 13 CFR 315.15,
eliminates an improper citation to the
Tariff Act and is discussed below in Part
I.
Lastly, because this rule will remove
certain regulations and will make it
easier for firms and EDA grantees to
comply with the requirements for the
TAAF and EDA grant programs, it is
considered a ‘‘deregulatory action’’
pursuant to the April 5, 2017, OMB
guidance memorandum implementing
Executive Order 13771 (M–17–21).
Part I: Updates to TAAF Program
Regulations
Trade Act Background
Authorized under chapter 3 of title II
of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.
2341–2355), the TAAF program assists
import-impacted U.S. manufacturing
firms, oil and natural gas production
firms, and service firms with developing
and implementing projects to regain
global competitiveness, expand markets,
strengthen operations, and increase
profitability, thereby increasing U.S.
jobs.
The TAAF program provides costsharing technical assistance to eligible
import-impacted U.S. manufacturing
E:\FR\FM\14FER1.SGM
14FER1
8374
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
firms, oil and natural gas production
firms, and service firms in all 50 States,
the District of Columbia, and the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
Technical assistance is provided
through a nationwide network of 11
TAACs, which are non-profit or
university-affiliated entities.
TAACs provide eligible firms with
customized assistance from industry
experts knowledgeable about the unique
needs, challenges, and opportunities
facing industries in their respective
regions. Firms work with TAACs to
apply for certification of eligibility for
TAAF assistance. Firms demonstrate
their eligibility by documenting that
they have experienced a decline in sales
or a decline or impending decline in
employment or worker hours, and that
an increase of imports of directly
competitive goods or services
contributed importantly to such
declines. EDA then renders a decision
regarding the firms’ eligibility.
TAACs work closely with eligible
firms’ management to identify the firms’
strengths and weaknesses and then
develop customized business recovery
plans, APs, which are designed to
stimulate recovery and growth. The
TAAF program pays up to 75 percent of
the costs of developing APs. EDA
reviews firms’ APs and determines
whether or not to approve them. When
an AP has been approved, firm
management and TAAC staff jointly
identify consultants with the specific
expertise to help the firm implement the
AP. If the cost exceeds the simplified
acquisition threshold, consultants are
selected through a competitive
procurement process.
Overview of Changes to the TAAF
Regulations
The discussion that follows presents
an overview of substantive changes by
subpart letter and section number.
Subpart A
EDA is transferring §§ 315.4 and 315.5
from subpart A to subpart B. This
change will retain all general provisions
within subpart A, while consolidating
the regulations regarding TAAC
selection, operation, role, and coverage
within subpart B.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Section 315.1
EDA is replacing this section with a
new programmatic description of
TAAF’s purpose. The revised section
more clearly lays out the process by
which EDA executes its responsibilities
concerning the TAAF program, as
delegated by the Secretary of Commerce,
and the process by which firms work
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Feb 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
with TAACs to request and obtain
Adjustment Assistance.
consistent with the intent of the TAAF
program as established in the Trade Act.
Section 315.2
Decreased Absolutely
EDA is making a minor change to the
definition of Decreased Absolutely to
add language clarifying that a firm’s
sales or production must have declined
by a minimum of five percent relative to
its sales or production during the
applicable time period and that the
decline is independent of industry or
market fluctuations and relative only to
the previous performance of the firm
unless EDA determines that such
limitations would not be consistent with
the purposes of the Trade Act.
EDA is making changes to the
definitions identified below.
Adjustment Assistance
EDA is making three revisions to the
definition of Adjustment Assistance.
First, EDA is removing the reference to
‘‘or industries.’’ As explained further in
the discussion of the changes to
§ 315.17, EDA is eliminating its
regulations related to the provision of
trade adjustment assistance to
industries. EDA has historically not
provided separate industry-wide
assistance programs because firms
within impacted industries have
solicited help through TAAF on an
individual basis and because there has
been no demand for industry-wide
assistance. In addition, EDA provides
expedited review of petitions and APs
from firms within impacted industries.
When the U.S. International Trade
Commission (‘‘ITC’’) makes an injury
determination, in accordance with
chapter 3 of the Trade Act, EDA
provides expedited consideration to
petitions by firms in the affected
industry, as well as expedited assistance
in preparing and processing AP
applications to such firms. EDA believes
this individualized approach has been
effective in facilitating adjustments
within both firms and industries. The
removal of regulations that reference
trade adjustment assistance to industries
will help prevent potential confusion
regarding the availability of a parallel
industry program. In the event that EDA
does determine it is appropriate to
provide trade adjustment assistance for
industries, EDA will promulgate new
regulations to implement the program.
Second, EDA is revising the definition
to clarify that Adjustment Assistance
refers to technical assistance provided
by TAACs. The current regulation is
ambiguous and could be interpreted
such that EDA provides the technical
assistance directly, which is not the
case. Third, EDA is adding to the
definition a statement that EDA
determines what type of assistance is
provided and adding a list of the types
of assistance that this may include:
Preparing a firm’s petition for
certification of eligibility, developing an
AP, and implementing an AP.
Adjustment Proposal
EDA is revising the definition for
Adjustment Proposal, clarifying that the
AP is a firm’s plan for improving its
competitiveness in the marketplace,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Directly Competitive
EDA is revising the defined term
Directly Competitive to add the words
‘‘or Like’’ to the end, such that the term
will be Directly Competitive or Like.
This change will more closely align this
term with the terminology of the Trade
Act. EDA is further revising this
definition by adding language that
clarifies the linkage between this
definition and the reference to firms that
engage in exploring, drilling, or
producing oil or natural gas. By adding
the phrase ‘‘For the purposes of this
term,’’ before the final sentence in this
definition, EDA reinforces the
requirement in Section 251 of the Trade
Act that firms that engage in these types
of activities be considered as producing
articles that are directly competitive
with imported oil and natural gas for the
purposes of TAAF eligibility.
Firm
EDA is capitalizing the term,
‘‘Unjustifiable Benefits,’’ as referenced
in this definition. This change is the
result of EDA adding a definition for
Unjustifiable Benefits, as described
below. EDA is further revising this
definition by adding to the subdefinition of Subsidiary, which is
included as a category of firm that may
be considered jointly with another firm
that is requesting Adjustment
Assistance pursuant to TAAF in an
effort to prevent Unjustifiable Benefits.
EDA is qualifying the definition of
Subsidiary by adding an explanation
that a firm acquired by another firm but
which operates independently of the
acquiring firm is considered an
Independent Subsidiary and may be
considered separately from the
acquiring firm as eligible for Adjustment
Assistance. This change reflects existing
practice and addresses a growing trend
in petitions requesting Adjustment
Assistance for firms that have been
acquired by another firm but continue to
operate independently after the
E:\FR\FM\14FER1.SGM
14FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
acquisition, generally retaining the same
management, maintaining control over
management decisions, and otherwise
continuing operations without
significant change.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Increase in Imports
EDA is modifying this definition by
moving the second sentence of this
definition to the revised subpart C
(Certification of firms) as a new
paragraph (c) in § 315.6 (Certification
Requirements). EDA believes this
sentence is more appropriately located
in subpart C as a description of one
method for a firm to demonstrate that it
meets the eligibility requirements for
Certification to apply for Adjustment
Assistance. The sentence provides that
a firm may submit certifications from a
firm’s customers that account for a
significant percentage of the firm’s
decrease in sales or production, that the
customers increased their purchase of
imports of Directly Competitive or Like
Articles or Services from a foreign
country.
Partial Separation
EDA is changing the definition of
Partial Separation by replacing language
denoting that this definition is with
respect to any employment in a firm
with language which clarifies that a
Partial Separation occurs when there
has been no increase in overall
employment at the firm and either of the
conditions currently described in this
definition exist: (1) A reduction in an
employee’s work hours to 80 percent or
less of the employee’s average weekly
hours during the year of such reductions
as compared to the preceding year; or
(2) a reduction in the employee’s weekly
wage to 80 percent or less of his/her
average weekly wage during the year of
such reduction as compared to the
preceding year. EDA occasionally
receives petitions submitted by firms
whose overall employment figures have
increased within the periods of time in
question and which, nonetheless, assert
that there has been a Partial Separation
with regards to a certain portion of their
workforce’s work hours or weekly
wages. EDA believes that this revision
should resolve the apparent confusion
caused by the current wording and
clarify that a firm does not meet the
eligibility criteria if its overall
employment has increased during the
relevant time period.
Service Sector Firm
EDA is revising the definition of
Service Sector Firm to remove the last
two sentences of the definition because
they are already included in the
definition of firm.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Feb 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
Total Separation
EDA is streamlining and clarifying the
definition of Total Separation by
removing the phrase ‘‘with respect to
any employment in a firm’’ and adding
the words ‘‘in a firm’’ after ‘‘the laying
off or termination of employment of an
employee.’’
Unjustifiable Benefits
As noted above, EDA is also adding a
definition for Unjustifiable Benefits.
Under this new definition, Unjustifiable
Benefits describe Adjustment Assistance
inappropriately accruing to the benefit
of (1) other firms that would not
otherwise be eligible when provided to
a firm or (2) any predecessor or
successor firm, or any affiliated firm
controlled or substantially beneficially
owned by substantially the same person,
rather than treating these entities as a
single firm. EDA believes that this is an
important concept that should be fully
explained to help firms understand
TAAF eligibility requirements.
Section 315.3
EDA is not changing this section.
Subpart B
EDA is revising this subpart to
consolidate and clarify all regulations
regarding TAAC selection, operations,
and coverage. The revised subpart B,
entitled ‘‘TAAC Provisions,’’ would be
inserted after § 315.3 and would include
revised §§ 315.4 and 315.5, which
would be transferred to subpart B from
subpart A.
Section 315.4
EDA is revising paragraph (a) of this
section to better describe the TAAC
selection process.
EDA is revising paragraph (b) of this
section to replace the existing language
with an explanation that TAACs are
awarded cooperative agreements that
are subject to all Federal laws and to
Federal, Department, and EDA policies,
regulations, and procedures applicable
to Federal financial assistance awards,
including 2 CFR part 200, Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards, and that TAACs work
closely with EDA and import-impacted
firms.
Section 315.5
EDA is re-designating paragraph (a)(1)
as paragraph (a) and, in that same
paragraph, revising the third sentence in
order to clarify that information
regarding all of the TAACs’ service
areas, rather than just particular
geographic areas, are available at the
websites listed in that section.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8375
EDA is re-designating paragraphs
(a)(2) and (3) as paragraphs (b) and (c),
respectively. EDA is also streamlining
newly re-designated paragraph (c) by
renumbering paragraphs (i) and (ii) as
(1) and (2), respectively, and by
rewording newly re-designated
paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) to provide
enhanced clarity on the types of
Adjustment Assistance a TAAC may
provide to a firm.
EDA is removing existing paragraphs
(b), (c), and (d) in their entirety. EDA
believes these paragraphs are
unnecessary, as these provisions and
requirements will generally be covered
in the Notice of Funding Opportunity
used to announce the availability of
funding for TAAC awards.
Subpart C
EDA is revising subpart C to
consolidate all regulations regarding the
certification of firms. The revised
subpart C will include §§ 315.6 through
315.10.
Section 315.6
EDA is moving the matching share
requirements for APs as set forth in
current paragraph (c)(2) to the new
§ 315.11 (‘‘Adjustment Proposal
Process’’) in subpart D (‘‘Adjustment
Proposals’’). EDA is eliminating the
remaining requirements in § 315.6,
which are duplicative of other
regulations in this part and provide no
additional guidance or clarity to TAACs
or firms. Finally, EDA is re-designating
the current § 315.7 as § 315.6.
In addition to these revisions, as
noted above in the discussion regarding
revisions to the definition of Increase in
Imports at § 315.2, EDA is adding a new
paragraph (c) to revised § 315.6 and
moving into this paragraph the language
formerly located in the definition of
Increase in Imports that enabled firms to
help demonstrate that they meet the
eligibility requirements for Adjustment
Assistance by submitting certification
from the firm’s customers that account
for a significant percentage of the firms’
decrease in sales or production, that the
customers increased their purchase of
imports of Directly Competitive or Like
Articles or Services from a foreign
country. EDA is further adding to this
new paragraph (c) a sentence specifying
that such certification from a firm’s
customer must be submitted directly to
a TAAC or to EDA. EDA believes this
addition will ease some confusion by
firms, some of which have requested
their customers to provide such
certification directly to the firms which
subsequently pass on the certifications
to EDA through the TAACs.
E:\FR\FM\14FER1.SGM
14FER1
8376
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Section 315.7
EDA is re-designating the current
§ 315.8 as § 315.7.
EDA is revising paragraph (b)(5) to
clarify the additional requirements for
publicly-owned corporations when
submitting financial information as part
of their petitions for certification. EDA
is revising the paragraph to clarify that
publicly-owned corporations should
submit copies of the most recent Form
10–K annual reports (or Form 10–Q
quarterly reports, as appropriate) filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission for the entire period
covered by the petition.
EDA is also revising paragraph (b)(6)
to make clear the information required
regarding a firm’s customers.
Specifically, EDA is replacing the
qualifier that the description relates to
the ‘‘major’’ customers of the firm with
one that identifies the customers as
‘‘accounting for a significant percent of
the firm’s decline.’’ EDA is further
revising this paragraph to clarify that
firms should submit information
regarding those customers’ purchases or
the firm’s unsuccessful bids if there are
no customers fitting the description
outlined in this paragraph.
EDA is revising paragraph (f) to clarify
that, in order to withdraw a petition for
certification, the petitioner must submit
a request for withdrawal before EDA
makes a determination regarding
approval or denial of the certification.
EDA is revising paragraphs (g)(1) and
(2) of this section. EDA is revising
paragraph (g)(1) in order to make clear
that EDA may request additional
material from a firm beyond what was
submitted with the firm’s original
petition if necessary to make a
determination regarding the firm’s
eligibility for Adjustment Assistance. In
addition, EDA is revising paragraph
(g)(1) to insert the word ‘‘calendar’’
before the word ‘‘days.’’ EDA is also
making similar revisions to all
references to ‘‘days’’ found throughout
part 315. EDA is making these changes
to clarify that all references to ‘‘days’’
within part 315 refer to calendar days as
the current regulations are not clear on
whether these references to ‘‘days’’ are
calendar or business days. EDA is
revising paragraph (g)(2) to clarify that
firms may not resubmit a petition
within one year from the date of a
denial without a waiver from EDA
issued for good cause.
Section 315.8
EDA is re-designating the current
§ 315.9 as § 315.8.
For the reasons discussed above, EDA
is inserting the word ‘‘calendar’’ in front
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Feb 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
of the word ‘‘days’’ in the introductory
paragraph to this section.
EDA is revising paragraph (b)(2) to
clarify that, when someone other than
the petitioner requests a public hearing
on an accepted petition, the requester
must include a statement describing the
nature of the requester’s interest in the
proceedings.
EDA is also revising paragraph (d) of
this section to clarify that EDA will
publish a notice of a public hearing in
the Federal Register only if EDA has
made the determination that the
requesting party has a substantial
interest in the hearing.
Section 315.9
EDA is re-designating the current
§ 315.10 as § 315.9.
EDA is also revising paragraphs (a),
(b), and (d) to replace the word
‘‘Failure’’ at the beginning of each of
those paragraphs with the words ‘‘The
firm failed’’ to provide clarity regarding
which entity’s omission triggers the loss
of benefits. EDA is further revising
paragraph (d) to read: ‘‘The firm failed
to diligently pursue an approved
Adjustment Proposal, and five years
have elapsed since the date of
certification.’’
Section 315.10
EDA is re-designating the current
§ 315.11 as § 315.10.
EDA is revising paragraphs (a) and (b)
of this section by inserting the word
‘‘calendar’’ before the word ‘‘days’’ for
the reasons mentioned above.
EDA is removing the designation of
paragraph (d) and adding the sentence
that formerly stood alone as paragraph
(d) to the end of paragraph (c) in this
same section. EDA believes this
reorganization will reduce potential
confusion by placing all requirements
regarding the steps EDA takes when it
terminates a certification in a single
paragraph.
Subpart D
EDA is not changing the designation
or heading of this subpart. However,
EDA is revising this subpart to include
§§ 315.11 and 315.12.
Section 315.11
Section 315.11 will be revised to
combine requirements currently
contained in other sections of part 315
and add new language to reflect best
practices. The section heading will be
revised to ‘‘Adjustment Proposal
Process.’’
EDA is moving paragraphs (a)(2) and
(3) from the current § 315.6 to the
revised § 315.11 as paragraphs (a) and
(b) within this section in order to
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
consolidate AP procedures within a
single section. In order to more clearly
reflect the requirements of the Trade
Act, EDA is moving the requirement
established in the current § 315.16(a),
which says APs must be submitted to
EDA for approval within two years after
the date of Certification, to the new
§ 315.11(a).
In addition to moving the
requirements that currently exist in
§ 315.6(a)(3) to the revised § 315.11(b),
EDA is adding language to these
requirements that will require firms to
begin implementation of their approved
AP within six months after approval.
EDA is also adding a requirement that
firms that do not begin implementation
within six months after approval must
update and re-submit their AP for reapproval before any Adjustment
Assistance may be provided. These
additions reflect long-standing practice
and will help firms to ensure that their
APs reflect the most up-to-date
economic conditions and financial
situation and, consequently, that the
firms will receive the most effective
Adjustment Assistance.
EDA is adding a paragraph (c) to this
section that discusses how EDA will
make a determination regarding an AP
no later than 60 calendar days after
receipt of the AP, which incorporates
the requirement from Section 252(b)(2)
of the Trade Act.
EDA is also adding a paragraph (d) to
this section. EDA is moving the
matching share requirements for
Adjustment Assistance from the existing
§ 315.6(b)(2) to this paragraph. In
addition, EDA is adding a sentence
stating that certified firms may request
no more than the amount established by
EDA for total Adjustment Assistance
over the entire lifetime of the firm. This
addition incorporates current practice,
established to ensure that the maximum
number of eligible firms are able to
receive Adjustment Assistance and to
encourage certified firms to
appropriately plan and implement their
Adjustment Proposals within
established funding limits.
EDA is adding a paragraph (e) to this
section and specifying within this
paragraph that firms may request EDA
approval to amend their APs within two
years from the date of EDA approval of
their initial APs. This new language
incorporates current practice and allows
firms to update their APs as needed
within the two-year time frame to
address any unexpected changes in their
situation, new information, or a need to
re-direct resources to areas of greatest
need.
EDA is also adding a paragraph (f) to
this section. Paragraph (f) requires firms
E:\FR\FM\14FER1.SGM
14FER1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
to complete implementation of their
APs within five years of EDA approval
of their initial APs. This added language
reflects current practice and EDA’s
expectation that firms who request
Adjustment Assistance are financially
and operationally prepared to engage in
the TAAF program and will implement
their AP in a timely way.
EDA is adding a paragraph (g) to this
section to address what occurs if a
certified firm is transferred, sold, or
otherwise acquired by another firm
during the five-year period established
in paragraph (f). Paragraph (g) requires
a certified firm that is transferred, sold,
or otherwise acquired by another firm
during the five-year period of
Adjustment Assistance to notify EDA no
later than 30 calendar days following
the transfer, sale, or acquisition. EDA
will then make a determination as to
whether the firm remains eligible for
Adjustment Assistance. This new
language incorporates current practice
and is designed to resolve any confusion
about how firms and TAACs should
handle this scenario.
Finally, EDA is adding a paragraph (h)
to this section. Paragraph (h) will
require firms that receive Adjustment
Assistance to provide data regarding the
firms’ sales, employment, and
productivity upon completion of the
program and each year for the two-year
period following completion. This
language incorporates into the
regulations reporting requirements
established in Section 255A of the Trade
Act, which requires EDA to report
annually to Congress on data regarding
the TAAF program for the preceding
fiscal year.
revised, subpart E will include
§§ 315.13 and 315.14. EDA is moving
the requirements regarding persons
engaged by firms to expedite petitions
and APs as found in the current § 315.14
(Certifications) and the requirements
regarding conflicts of interest that are
contained the current § 315.15 (Conflicts
of interest), both of which are found in
the current subpart C, to subpart E. EDA
believes this reorganization and new
location will make it easier for firms to
read and understand the regulations and
will help clarify that these provisions
apply to firms at all stages of the TAAF
program.
Section 315.12
EDA is re-designating the current
§ 315.16 as § 315.12. As discussed
above, EDA is eliminating paragraph (a)
of this section after moving the
requirement that firms must submit
their APs to EDA within two years of
the date of certification to § 315.11(a).
EDA is eliminating the current
§ 315.12 (Recordkeeping). With the
proposed revisions to § 315.4(b), which
states that TAAC cooperative
agreements are subject to all Federal
laws and to Federal, Department, and
EDA policies, regulations, and
procedures applicable to Federal
financial assistance awards, including 2
CFR part 200, the current § 315.12 is no
longer needed as recordkeeping
requirements are adequately addressed
in those materials.
Section 315.14
EDA is moving the requirements
found in the current § 315.15 to
§ 315.14. EDA is also revising these
requirements by modifying the list of
firm representatives subject to the
conflicts of interest requirements to
parallel the list of firm representatives
identified in the revised § 315.13.
Subpart E
EDA is revising the heading for this
subpart to ‘‘Protective Provisions.’’ As
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Feb 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
Section 315.13
EDA is moving the requirements for
firms to certify in writing to EDA the
names of any attorneys, agents, and
other Persons engaged by or on behalf
of the firm for the purpose of expediting
Petitions for Adjustment Assistance and
the fees paid or to be paid to any such
Person, as found in the current § 315.14,
to § 315.13. EDA is further revising
these requirements by clarifying, in
paragraph (a), that they apply to both
Adjustment Assistance and APs.
EDA is eliminating the current
§ 315.13 (Audit and examination). With
the proposed revisions to § 315.4(b),
which states that TAAC cooperative
agreements are subject to all Federal
laws and to Federal, Department, and
EDA policies, regulations, and
procedures applicable to Federal
financial assistance awards, including 2
CFR part 200, the current § 315.13 is no
longer needed as audit and examination
requirements are adequately addressed
in those materials.
Subpart F
EDA is adding subpart F, entitled
‘‘International Trade Commission
Investigations.’’ Subpart F sets forth,
through § 315.15, what actions EDA
takes when the ITC makes an affirmative
finding under section 202(b) of the
Trade Act regarding injury or threat of
injury to an industry.
Section 315.15
EDA is re-designating the current
§ 315.17 as § 315.15 and is revising the
heading of this section to ‘‘Affirmative
Findings.’’ EDA is also removing the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8377
designation ‘‘(a)’’ from the first
paragraph of this section and
eliminating paragraphs (b) and (c) to
reflect the fact that EDA, historically,
has not provided Adjustment Assistance
for the establishment of industry-wide
programs for new product development,
export development, or other uses
consistent with the purposes of the
Trade Act because there has been no
demand for such programs. As noted
above in the discussion regarding
changes to the definition of Adjustment
Assistance in § 315.2, firms within
impacted industries have sought
Adjustment Assistance through TAAF
on an individual basis rather than
through industry-wide solutions. EDA
also provides expedited review of
petitions and APs from firms within
industries for which the ITC has
determined that increased imports are a
substantial cause of serious injury or
threat thereof under section 202(b) of
the Trade Act. This individualized
approach enables EDA to support
adjustments at the firm level, while
having a cumulative impact at the
industry level.
EDA is replacing within this
paragraph the language stating that EDA
will provide to firms in the identified
industry assistance in the preparation
and processing of petitions and
applications for benefits; EDA instead
will include language establishing
notification to TAACs and expedited
review of petitions and APs from firms
within the specified industry. EDA
believes these revisions more clearly
describe the assistance EDA provides to
industries in response to determinations
made by the ITC under the Trade Act.
This revised section contains one
technical correction to the proposed
revision in the NPRM published in the
Federal Register on August 19, 2019 (84
FR 42831). The correction is to
eliminate an improper citation to the
Tariff Act. The proposed revision to this
section provided that EDA would notify
TAACs and provide expedited review of
petitions and APs from Firms within an
industry for which the ITC has made an
affirmative finding under section 202(b)
of the Trade Act or under sections 705
or 735 of the Tariff Act. Determinations
made under section 202(b) of the Trade
Act concern serious injury or threat
thereof to a domestic injury, while
determinations made under sections 705
or 735 of the Tariff Act concern lesser
material injury or threat thereof to a
domestic industry. Pursuant to section
202(g) of the Trade Act, EDA is only
required to provide expedited review of
petitions submitted by firms in
industries for which the ITC has made
E:\FR\FM\14FER1.SGM
14FER1
8378
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
an affirmative determination under
section 202(b) of the Trade Act.
Part II: Updates to PWEDA Regulations
PWEDA Background
PWEDA is EDA’s organic authority
and the primary legal authority under
which EDA awards grants. Other legal
authorities include the Trade Act and
the Stevenson-Wydler Technology
Innovation Act of 1980. Under PWEDA,
EDA provides financial assistance to
both rural and urban distressed
communities by fostering
entrepreneurship, innovation, and
productivity through investments in
infrastructure development, capacity
building, and business development in
order to attract private capital
investments and new and better jobs to
regions experiencing substantial and
persistent economic distress.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Overview of Eliminated PWEDA
Regulations
EDA is eliminating certain provisions
within part 302 of the PWEDA
regulations that are unnecessary or
already established in other regulations
or award documentation. Specifically,
EDA is eliminating the regulations
located at 13 CFR 302.4, 302.5, and
302.14. These regulations describe: The
responsibilities of EDA grant recipients
to maintain records, how information
supplied to EDA may be subject to
public release under the Freedom of
Information Act or Privacy Act, how
government auditors may need access to
various records, and that grant
recipients are subject to the governmentwide relocation assistance and land
acquisition policies. These regulations
can be removed because notice of these
terms and conditions is already
provided to grant recipients through
other Department of Commerce-wide or
government-wide regulations as well as
in specific documentation EDA provides
to each grant recipient. Specifically,
recipients of EDA financial assistance
are already subject to the requirements
related to the Freedom of Information
Act or Privacy Act currently described
in § 302.4 through 15 CFR part 4 and the
Standard Terms and Conditions of an
EDA award. Similarly, the relocation
and land acquisition policies currently
found in § 302.5 are already applicable
to all EDA financial assistance
recipients under government-wide
regulations found at 49 CFR part 24.
Finally, the record-keeping
requirements currently located in
§ 302.14 duplicate the requirements of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Feb 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
Section 608 of PWEDA (42 U.S.C. 3218),
2 CFR 200.333 and 200.336, and the
Standard Terms and Conditions of an
EDA award.
In addition, EDA is eliminating 13
CFR 302.11. Beginning with the
enactment of the original section 502 of
PWEDA (42 U.S.C. 3192) in 1998,
Congress has required EDA to maintain
an economic development information
clearinghouse on matters related to
economic development, economic
adjustment, disaster recovery, defense
conversion, and trade adjustment
programs and activities. See Public Law
105–393. With the EDA Reauthorization
Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108–373 (Oct. 27,
2004)), Congress amended section 502
to require EDA to, among other things,
maintain this information clearinghouse
online. The current regulation adds
nothing of value to the requirements
already in place under section 502 and
consequently should be eliminated.
Classification
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Prior notice and opportunity for
public comment are not required for
rules concerning public property, loans,
grants, benefits, and contracts (5 U.S.C.
553(a)(2)). EDA’s programs, including
the TAAF program, are financial
assistance programs provided through
grants and cooperative agreements. As
such, prior notice and an opportunity
for public comment are not required
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other
law, and the analytical requirements of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.) are inapplicable. Although
EDA did choose to publish an NPRM in
the Federal Register requesting public
comments on the content of this final
rule (84 FR 42831), EDA received no
comments in response to the NPRM,
and thus has received no input from the
public bearing on the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. For these reasons, a
regulatory flexibility analysis has not
been prepared.
Executive Orders No. 12866, 13563, and
13771
This final rule was drafted in
accordance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 13771. The Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) has
determined that this final rule is not
significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and Executive Order
13563.
This rule is a deregulatory action that
has a neutral effect on the costs to firms,
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
organizations, and all other stakeholders
to comply with the regulations
discussed in this notice of final rule. It
is therefore considered to have a total
incremental cost of zero pursuant to the
April 5, 2017, OMB guidance
memorandum implementing Executive
Order 13771 (M–17–21).
Congressional Review Act
This final rule is not major under the
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801
et seq.).
Executive Order No. 13132
Executive Order 13132 requires
agencies to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ is defined in
Executive Order 13132 to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’ This
final rule does not contain policies that
have federalism implications.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (‘‘PRA’’)
requires that a Federal agency consider
the impact of paperwork and other
information collection burdens imposed
on the public and, under the provisions
of PRA section 3507(d), obtain approval
from OMB for each collection of
information it conducts, sponsors, or
requires through regulations.
Notwithstanding any other provision of
law, no person is required to respond to,
nor shall any person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
PRA unless that collection displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
The following table provides the only
collections of information (and
corresponding OMB Control Numbers)
set forth in this final rule. These
collections of information are necessary
for the proper performance and
functions of EDA. This final rule does
not include a new information
collection requirement and will, thus,
use previously approved information
collections to collect information
relevant to a petition for certification of
eligibility for trade adjustment
assistance or an AP.
E:\FR\FM\14FER1.SGM
14FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Part or section
of this
final rule
Nature of request
Form/Title/OMB control No.
315.7(b) ..............
Firms seeking certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance must complete Form ED–840P, which provides EDA with the information needed to determine if a
firm is eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance.
315.12 ................
The information for Adjustment Proposals is collected pursuant to the same OMB control
number as Form ED–840P (0610–0091). Firms certified by EDA as eligible to apply for
trade adjustment assistance must prepare an Adjustment Proposal and submit it to EDA
for approval within two years after the date of certification. This provides EDA with the information needed to determine whether the Adjustment Proposal meets the requirements
of the Trade Act and 13 CFR part 315.
Form ED–840P, Petition by a
firm for Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (0610–
0091).
Adjustment Proposal (0610–
0091).
§ 315.1
List of Subjects
13 CFR Part 302
Community development, Grant
programs-business, Grant programshousing and community development,
Technical assistance.
13 CFR Part 315
Administrative practice and
procedure, Community development,
Grant programs-business, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Trade
adjustment assistance.
For the reasons discussed above, EDA
is amending 13 CFR chapter III as
follows:
PART 302–GENERAL TERMS AND
CONDITIONS FOR INVESTMENT
ASSISTANCE
1. The authority citation of part 302
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 2341 et seq.; 42 U.S.C.
3150; 42 U.S.C. 3152; 42 U.S.C. 3153; 42
U.S.C. 3192; 42 U.S.C. 3193; 42 U.S.C. 3194;
42 U.S.C. 3211; 42 U.S.C. 3212; 42 U.S.C.
3216; 42 U.S.C. 3218; 42 U.S.C. 3220; 42
U.S.C. 5141; 15 U.S.C. 3701; Department of
Commerce Delegation Order 10–4.
§§ 302.4 and 302.5
■
■
[Removed]
3. Remove § 302.11.
§ 302.14
■
[Removed]
2. Remove §§ 302.4 and 302.5.
§ 302.11
[Removed]
4. Remove § 302.14.
PART 315—TRADE ADJUSTMENT
ASSISTANCE FOR FIRMS
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
8379
5. Revise the authority citation of part
315 to read as follows:
■
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 2341–2356; 42 U.S.C.
3211; Title IV of Pub. L. 114–27, 129 Stat.
373; Department of Commerce Delegation
Order 10–4.
■
6. Revise § 315.1 to read as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Feb 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
Purpose and scope.
Chapter 3 of title II of the Trade Act
of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2341–2355)
establishes the responsibilities of the
Secretary of Commerce concerning the
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms
(TAAF) program. The regulations in this
part lay out those responsibilities as
delegated to EDA by the Secretary. EDA
executes these responsibilities through
cooperative agreements that support a
network of Trade Adjustment
Assistance Centers (TAACs). The
TAACs assist Firms in petitioning EDA
for certification of eligibility to receive
Adjustment Assistance. EDA certifies
the eligibility of Firms. The TAACs then
provide Adjustment Assistance to Firms
through the development and
implementation of Adjustment
Proposals.
■ 7. Amend § 315.2 by:
■ a. Revising the introductory text and
the definitions for ‘‘Adjustment
Assistance’’ and ‘‘Adjustment
Proposal’’;
■ b. In the definition of ‘‘Decreased
Absolutely’’, revising the introductory
text;
■ c. Removing the definition of
‘‘Directly Competitive’’ and adding the
definition of ‘‘Directly Competitive or
Like’’ in its place;
■ d. In the definition of ‘‘Firm’’, revising
the introductory text and paragraph (4);
■ e. Revising the definition of ‘‘Increase
in Imports’’;
■ f. In the definition of ‘‘Partial
Separation’’, revising the introductory
text;
■ g. Revising the definitions of ‘‘Service
Sector Firm’’ and ‘‘Total Separation’’;
and
■ h. Adding in alphabetical order a
definition for ‘‘Unjustifiable Benefits’’.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 315.2
Definitions.
In addition to the defined terms set
forth in § 300.3 of this chapter, the
following terms used in this part shall
have the meanings set forth below:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Adjustment Assistance means
technical assistance provided to Firms
by TAACs under chapter 3 of title II of
the Trade Act. The type of assistance
provided is determined by EDA and
may include one or more of the
following:
(1) Assistance in preparing a Firm’s
petition for certification of eligibility;
(2) Assistance to a Certified Firm in
developing an Adjustment Proposal for
the Firm; and
(3) Assistance to a Certified Firm in
implementing an Adjustment Proposal.
Adjustment Proposal means a
Certified Firm’s plan for improving the
Firm’s competitiveness in the
marketplace.
*
*
*
*
*
Decreased Absolutely means a Firm’s
sales or production has declined by a
minimum of five percent relative to its
sales or production during the
applicable prior time period, and this
decline is:
*
*
*
*
*
Directly Competitive or Like means
imported articles or services that
compete with and are substantially
equivalent for commercial purposes
(i.e., are adapted for the same function
or use and are essentially
interchangeable) as the Firm’s articles or
services. For the purposes of this term,
any Firm that engages in exploring or
drilling for oil or natural gas, or
otherwise produces oil or natural gas,
shall be considered to be producing
articles directly competitive with
imports of oil and with imports of
natural gas.
Firm means an individual
proprietorship, partnership, joint
venture, association, corporation
(includes a development corporation),
business trust, cooperative, trustee in
bankruptcy or receiver under court
decree, and includes fishing,
agricultural or service sector entities
and those which explore, drill or
otherwise produce oil or natural gas.
See also the definition of Service Sector
E:\FR\FM\14FER1.SGM
14FER1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
8380
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Firm. Pursuant to section 259 of chapter
3 of title II of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C.
2351), a Firm, together with any
predecessor or successor firm, or any
affiliated firm controlled or
substantially beneficially owned by
substantially the same person, may be
considered a single Firm where
necessary to prevent Unjustifiable
Benefits. For purposes of receiving
benefits under this part, when a Firm
owns or controls other Firms, the Firm
and such other Firms may be considered
a single Firm when they produce or
supply like or Directly Competitive
articles or services or are exerting
essential economic control over one or
more production facilities. Accordingly,
such other Firms may include a(n):
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Subsidiary—a company (either
foreign or domestic) that is wholly
owned or effectively controlled by
another company. A Firm that has been
acquired by another Firm but which
maintains operations independent of the
acquiring Firm is considered an
Independent Subsidiary and may be
considered separately from the
acquiring Firm as eligible for TAAF
assistance.
Increase in Imports means an increase
in imports of Directly Competitive or
Like Articles or Services with articles
produced or services supplied by a
Firm.
*
*
*
*
*
Partial Separation occurs when there
has been no increase in overall
employment at the Firm and either of
the following applies:
*
*
*
*
*
Service Sector Firm means a Firm
engaged in the business of supplying
services.
*
*
*
*
*
Total Separation means the laying off
or termination of employment of an
employee in a Firm for lack of work.
Unjustifiable Benefits means
Adjustment Assistance inappropriately
accruing to the benefit of:
(1) Other Firms that would not
otherwise be eligible when provided to
a Firm; or
(2) Any predecessor or successor
Firm, or any affiliated Firm controlled
or substantially beneficially owned by
substantially the same person, rather
than treating these entities as a single
Firm.
§§ 315.4, 315.5, and 315.6
[Removed]
8. Sections 315.4 through 315.6 are
removed.
■ 9. Revise subparts B through E and
add subpart F to read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Feb 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
Subpart B—TAAC Provisions
Sec.
315.4 TAAC selection and operation.
315.5 The role and geographic coverage of
the TAACs.
Subpart C—Certification of Firms
315.6 Certification requirements.
315.7 Processing petitions for certification.
315.8 Hearings.
315.9 Loss of certification benefits.
315.10 Appeals, final determinations, and
termination of certification.
Subpart D—Adjustment Proposals
315.11 Adjustment Proposal process.
315.12 Adjustment Proposal requirements.
Subpart E—Protective Provisions
315.13 Persons engaged by Firms to
expedite petitions and Adjustment
Proposals.
315.14 Conflicts of interest.
Subpart F—International Trade Commission
Investigations
315.15 Affirmative findings.
Subpart B—TAAC Provisions
§ 315.4
TAAC selection and operation.
(a) EDA solicits applications from
organizations interested in operating a
TAAC through Notice of Funding
Opportunity announcements laying out
selection and award criteria. The
following entities are eligible to apply:
(1) Universities or affiliated
organizations;
(2) States or local governments; or
(3) Non-profit organizations.
(b) Entities selected to operate the
TAACs are awarded cooperative
agreements and work closely with EDA
and import-impacted firms. TAAC
cooperative agreements are subject to all
Federal laws and to Federal,
Department, and EDA policies,
regulations, and procedures applicable
to Federal financial assistance awards,
including 2 CFR part 200.
§ 315.5 The role and geographic coverage
of the TAACs.
(a) TAACs are available to assist
Firms in obtaining Adjustment
Assistance in all 50 U.S. States, the
District of Columbia, and the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. TAACs
provide Adjustment Assistance in
accordance with this part either through
their own staffs or by arrangements with
outside consultants. Information
concerning TAACs and their coverage
areas may be obtained from the TAAC
website at https://www.taacenters.org or
from EDA at https://www.eda.gov.
(b) Prior to submitting a petition for
Adjustment Assistance to EDA, a Firm
should determine the extent to which a
TAAC can provide the required
Adjustment Assistance. EDA will
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
provide Adjustment Assistance through
TAACs whenever EDA determines that
such assistance can be provided most
effectively in this manner. Requests for
Adjustment Assistance will be made
through TAACs.
(c) A TAAC generally provides
Adjustment Assistance by:
(1) Helping a Firm to prepare its
petition for eligibility certification; and
(2) Assisting Certified Firms with
diagnosing their strengths and
weaknesses, and with developing and
implementing an Adjustment Proposal.
Subpart C—Certification of Firms
§ 315.6
Certification requirements.
(a) General. Firms apply for
certification through a TAAC by
completing a petition for certification.
The TAAC will assist Firms in
completing such petitions at no cost to
the Firms. EDA evaluates Firms’
petitions based on the requirements set
forth in § 315.7. EDA may certify a Firm
as eligible to apply for Adjustment
Assistance under section 251(c) of the
Trade Act (19 U.S.C. 2341) if it
determines that the petition for
certification meets one of the minimum
certification thresholds set forth in
paragraph (b) of this section. In order to
be certified, a Firm must meet the
criteria listed under any one of the five
circumstances described in paragraph
(b) of this section.
(b) Minimum certification
thresholds—(1) Twelve-month decline.
Based upon a comparison of the most
recent 12-month period for which data
are available and the immediately
preceding 12-month period:
(i) A Significant Number or
Proportion of Workers in the Firm has
undergone Total or Partial Separation or
a Threat of Total or Partial Separation;
(ii) Either sales or production, or both,
of the Firm has Decreased Absolutely; or
sales or production, or both, of any
article or service that accounted for not
less than 25 percent of the total
production or sales of the Firm during
the 12-month period preceding the most
recent 12-month period for which data
are available have Decreased
Absolutely; and
(iii) An Increase in Imports has
Contributed Importantly to the
applicable Total or Partial Separation or
Threat of Total or Partial Separation,
and to the applicable decline in sales or
production or supply of services.
(2) Twelve-month versus twenty-four
month decline. Based upon a
comparison of the most recent 12-month
period for which data are available and
the immediately preceding 24-month
period:
E:\FR\FM\14FER1.SGM
14FER1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(i) A Significant Number or
Proportion of Workers in the Firm has
undergone Total or Partial Separation or
a Threat of Total or Partial Separation;
(ii) Either average annual sales or
production, or both, of the Firm has
Decreased Absolutely; or average annual
sales or production, or both, of any
article or service that accounted for not
less than 25 percent of the total
production or sales of the Firm during
the 24-month period preceding the most
recent 12-month period for which data
are available have Decreased
Absolutely; and
(iii) An Increase in Imports has
Contributed Importantly to the
applicable Total or Partial Separation or
Threat of Total or Partial Separation,
and to the applicable decline in sales or
production or supply of services.
(3) Twelve-month versus thirty-six
month decline. Based upon a
comparison of the most recent 12-month
period for which data are available and
the immediately preceding 36-month
period:
(i) A Significant Number or
Proportion of Workers in the Firm has
undergone Total or Partial Separation or
a Threat of Total or Partial Separation;
(ii) Either average annual sales or
production, or both, of the Firm has
Decreased Absolutely; or average annual
sales or production, or both, of any
article or service that accounted for not
less than 25 percent of the total
production or sales of the Firm during
the 36-month period preceding the most
recent 12-month period for which data
are available have Decreased
Absolutely; and
(iii) An Increase in Imports has
Contributed Importantly to the
applicable Total or Partial Separation or
Threat of Total or Partial Separation,
and to the applicable decline in sales or
production or supply of services.
(4) Interim sales or production
decline. Based upon an interim sales or
production decline:
(i) Sales or production has Decreased
Absolutely for, at minimum, the most
recent six-month period during the most
recent 12-month period for which data
are available as compared to the same
six-month period during the
immediately preceding 12-month
period;
(ii) During the same base and
comparative period of time as sales or
production has Decreased Absolutely, a
Significant Number or Proportion of
Workers in such Firm has undergone
Total or Partial Separation or a Threat
of Total or Partial Separation; and
(iii) During the same base and
comparative period of time as sales or
production has Decreased Absolutely,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Feb 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
an Increase in Imports has Contributed
Importantly to the applicable Total or
Partial Separation or Threat of Total or
Partial Separation, and to the applicable
decline in sales or production or supply
of services.
(5) Interim employment decline.
Based upon an interim employment
decline:
(i) A Significant Number or
Proportion of Workers in such Firm has
undergone Total or Partial Separation or
a Threat of Total or Partial Separation
during, at a minimum, the most recent
six-month period during the most recent
12-month period for which data are
available as compared to the same sixmonth period during the immediately
preceding 12-month period; and
(ii) Either sales or production of the
Firm has Decreased Absolutely during
the 12-month period preceding the most
recent 12-month period for which data
are available; and
(iii) An Increase in Imports has
Contributed Importantly to the
applicable Total or Partial Separation or
Threat of Total or Partial Separation,
and to the applicable decline in sales or
production or supply of services.
(c) Evidence of an increase in imports.
EDA may consider as evidence of an
Increase in Imports a certification from
the Firm’s customers that account for a
significant percentage of the Firm’s
decrease in sales or production, that
they have increased their purchase of
imports of Directly Competitive or Like
Articles or Services from a foreign
country, either absolutely or relative to
their acquisition of such Like Articles or
Services from suppliers located in the
United States. Such certification from a
Firm’s customer must be submitted
directly to a TAAC or to EDA.
§ 315.7 Processing petitions for
certification.
(a) Firms shall consult with a TAAC
for guidance and assistance in the
preparation of their petitions for
certification.
(b) A Firm seeking certification shall
complete a Petition by a Firm for
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (Form
ED–840P or any successor form) with
the following information about such
Firm:
(1) Identification and description of
the Firm, including legal form of
organization, economic history, major
ownership interests, officers, directors,
management, parent company,
Subsidiaries or Affiliates, and
production and sales facilities;
(2) Description of goods or services
supplied or sold;
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8381
(3) Description of imported Directly
Competitive or Like Articles or Services
with those produced or supplied;
(4) Data on its sales, production and
employment for the applicable 24month, 36-month, or 48-month period,
as required under § 315.6(b);
(5) One copy of a complete auditor’s
certified financial report for the entire
period covering the petition, or if not
available, one copy of the complete
profit and loss statements, balance
sheets and supporting statements
prepared by the Firm’s accountants for
the entire period covered by the
petition. In addition, publicly-owned
corporations should also submit copies
of the most recent Form 10–K annual
reports (or Form 10–Q quarterly reports,
as appropriate) filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
for the entire period covered by the
petition;
(6) Information concerning customers
accounting for a significant percent of
the Firm’s decline and the customers’
purchases (or the Firm’s unsuccessful
bids, if there are no customers fitting
this description); and
(7) Such other information as EDA
considers material.
(c) EDA shall determine whether the
petition has been properly prepared and
can be accepted. Promptly thereafter,
EDA shall notify the petitioner that the
petition has been accepted or advise the
TAAC that the petition has not been
accepted, but may be resubmitted at any
time without prejudice when the
specified deficiencies have been
corrected. Any resubmission will be
treated as a new petition.
(d) EDA will publish a notice of
acceptance of a petition in the Federal
Register.
(e) EDA will initiate an investigation
to determine whether the petitioner
meets the requirements set forth in
section 251(c) of the Trade Act (19
U.S.C. 2341) and § 315.6.
(f) A petition for certification may be
withdrawn if EDA receives a request for
withdrawal submitted by the petitioner
before EDA makes a certification
determination or denial. A Firm may
submit a new petition at any time
thereafter in accordance with the
requirements of this section and § 315.6.
(g) Following acceptance of a petition,
EDA will:
(1) Make a determination based on the
Record as soon as possible after the
petitioning Firm or TAAC has submitted
all requested material. In no event may
the determination period exceed 40
calendar days from the date on which
EDA accepted the petition; and
(2) Either certify the petitioner as
eligible to apply for Adjustment
E:\FR\FM\14FER1.SGM
14FER1
8382
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Assistance or deny the petition. In
either event, EDA shall promptly give
written notice of action to the petitioner.
Any written notice to the petitioner of
a denial of a petition shall specify the
reason(s) for the denial. A petitioner
shall not be entitled to resubmit a
petition within one year from the date
of denial unless EDA waives the oneyear limitation for good cause.
§ 315.8
Hearings.
EDA will hold a public hearing on an
accepted petition if the petitioner or any
interested Person found by EDA to have
a Substantial Interest in the proceedings
submits a request for a hearing no later
than 10 calendar days after the date of
publication of the notice of acceptance
in the Federal Register, under the
following procedures:
(a) The petitioner or any interested
Person(s) shall have an opportunity to
be present, to produce evidence and to
be heard.
(b) A request for public hearing must
be delivered by hand or by registered
mail to EDA. A request by a Person
other than the petitioner shall contain:
(1) The name, address and telephone
number of the Person requesting the
hearing; and
(2) A complete statement of the
relationship of the Person requesting the
hearing to the petitioner and the subject
matter of the petition, and a statement
of the nature of the requesting party’s
interest in the proceedings.
(c) If EDA determines that the
requesting party does not have a
Substantial Interest in the proceedings,
a written notice of denial shall be sent
to the requesting party. The notice shall
specify the reasons for the denial.
(d) If EDA determines that the
requesting party does have a Substantial
Interest in the proceedings, EDA shall
publish a notice of a public hearing in
the Federal Register, containing the
subject matter, name of petitioner, and
date, time and place of the hearing.
(e) EDA shall appoint a presiding
officer for the hearing who shall
respond to all procedural questions.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 315.9
Loss of certification benefits.
EDA may terminate a Firm’s
certification or refuse to extend
Adjustment Assistance to a Firm for any
of the following reasons:
(a) The Firm failed to submit an
acceptable Adjustment Proposal within
two years after date of certification.
While approval of an Adjustment
Proposal may occur after the expiration
of such two-year period, a Firm must
submit an acceptable Adjustment
Proposal before such expiration.
(b) The Firm failed to submit
documentation necessary to start
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Feb 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
implementation or modify its request for
Adjustment Assistance consistent with
its Adjustment Proposal within six
months after approval of the Adjustment
Proposal, where two years have elapsed
since the date of certification. If the
Firm anticipates needing a longer period
to submit documentation, it should
indicate the longer period in its
Adjustment Proposal. If the Firm is
unable to submit its documentation
within the allowed time, it should
notify EDA in writing of the reasons for
the delay and submit a new schedule.
EDA has the discretion to accept or
refuse a new schedule.
(c) EDA has denied the Firm’s request
for Adjustment Assistance, the time
period allowed for the submission of
any documentation in support of such
request has expired, and two years have
elapsed since the date of certification.
(d) The Firm failed to diligently
pursue an approved Adjustment
Proposal, and five years have elapsed
since the date of certification.
§ 315.10 Appeals, final determinations,
and termination of certification.
(a) Any petitioner may appeal in
writing to EDA from a denial of
certification, provided that EDA
receives the appeal by personal delivery
or by registered mail within 60 calendar
days from the date of notice of denial
under § 315.7(g). The appeal must state
the grounds on which the appeal is
based, including a concise statement of
the supporting facts and applicable law.
The decision of EDA on the appeal shall
be the final determination within the
Department. In the absence of an appeal
by the petitioner under this paragraph
(a), the determination under § 315.7(g)
shall be final.
(b) A Firm, its representative, or any
other interested domestic party
aggrieved by a final determination
under paragraph (a) of this section may,
within 60 calendar days after notice of
such determination, begin a civil action
in the United States Court of
International Trade for review of such
determination, in accordance with
section 284 of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C.
2395).
(c) Whenever EDA determines that a
Certified Firm no longer requires
Adjustment Assistance or for other good
cause, EDA will terminate the
certification and promptly publish
notice of such termination in the
Federal Register. The termination will
take effect on the date specified in the
published notice. EDA shall
immediately notify the petitioner and
shall state the reasons for any
termination.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Subpart D—Adjustment Proposals
§ 315.11
Adjustment Proposal process.
(a) Firms certified in accordance with
the procedures described in §§ 315.6
and 315.7 must prepare an Adjustment
Proposal and submit it to EDA for
approval within two years after the date
of certification.
(b) EDA determines whether to
approve the Adjustment Assistance
requested in the Adjustment Proposal
based upon the evaluation criteria set
forth in § 315.12. Upon approval, a
Certified Firm may submit a request to
the TAAC for Adjustment Assistance to
implement an approved Adjustment
Proposal. Firms must begin
implementation within six months after
approval. Firms that do not begin
implementation within six months after
approval must update, re-submit their
Adjustment Proposal, and request reapproval before any Adjustment
Assistance may be provided.
(c) EDA will make a determination
regarding the Adjustment Proposal no
later than 60 calendar days upon receipt
of the Adjustment Proposal.
(d) Adjustment Assistance is subject
to matching share requirements. Each
Certified Firm must pay at least 25
percent of the cost of preparing its
Adjustment Proposal. Each Certified
Firm requesting $30,000 or less in total
Adjustment Assistance in its approved
Adjustment Proposal must pay at least
25 percent of the cost of that
Adjustment Assistance. Each Certified
Firm requesting more than $30,000 in
total Adjustment Assistance in its
approved Adjustment Proposal must
pay at least 50 percent of the cost of that
Adjustment Assistance. Certified Firms
may request no more than the amount
as established by EDA for total
Adjustment Assistance over the entire
lifetime of the firm.
(e) Firms may request EDA approval
to amend their Adjustment Proposals
within two years from the date of EDA
approval of their initial Adjustment
Proposal.
(f) Firms must complete
implementation of their Adjustment
Proposals within five years of EDA
approval of their initial Adjustment
Proposal.
(g) If a Certified Firm is transferred,
sold, or otherwise acquired by another
Firm during the five-year period of
Adjustment Assistance, the Firm must
notify EDA no later than 30 calendar
days following the transfer, sale, or
acquisition. EDA will then make a
determination as to whether the Firm
remains eligible for Adjustment
Assistance. EDA will make this
E:\FR\FM\14FER1.SGM
14FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
determination no later than 60 calendar
days following notification by the Firm.
(h) In accordance with Section 255A
of chapter 3 of title II of the Trade Act
(19 U.S.C. 2345a), Firms that receive
Adjustment Assistance must provide
data regarding the Firms’ sales,
employment, and productivity upon
completion of the program and each
year for the two-year period following
completion.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 315.12 Adjustment Proposal
requirements.
EDA evaluates Adjustment Proposals
based on the following:
(a) The Adjustment Proposal must
include a description of any Adjustment
Assistance requested to implement such
proposal, including financial and other
supporting documentation as EDA
determines is necessary, based upon
either:
(1) An analysis of the Firm’s
problems, strengths, and weaknesses
and an assessment of its prospects for
recovery; or
(2) If EDA so determines, other
available information;
(b) The Adjustment Proposal must:
(1) Be reasonably calculated to
contribute materially to the economic
adjustment of the Firm (i.e., that such
proposal will constructively assist the
Firm to establish a competitive position
in the same or a different industry);
(2) Give adequate consideration to the
interests of a sufficient number of
separated workers of the Firm, by
providing, for example, that the Firm
will:
(i) Give a rehiring preference to such
workers;
(ii) Make efforts to find new work for
a number of such workers; and
(iii) Assist such workers in obtaining
benefits under available programs; and
(3) Demonstrate that the Firm will
make all reasonable efforts to use its
own resources for its recovery, though
under certain circumstances, resources
of related Firms or major stockholders
will also be considered; and
(c) The Adjustment Assistance
identified in the Adjustment Proposal
must consist of specialized consulting
services designed to assist the Firm in
becoming more competitive in the
global marketplace. For purposes of this
paragraph (c), Adjustment Assistance
generally consists of knowledge-based
services such as market penetration
studies, customized business
improvements, and designs for new
products. Adjustment Assistance does
not include expenditures for capital
improvements or for the purchase of
business machinery or supplies.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Feb 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
8383
Subpart E—Protective Provisions
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
§ 315.13 Persons engaged by Firms to
expedite petitions and Adjustment
Proposals.
Federal Aviation Administration
EDA will provide no Adjustment
Assistance to any Firm unless the
owners, partners, members, directors, or
officers thereof certify in writing to
EDA:
(a) The names of any attorneys,
agents, and other Persons engaged by or
on behalf of the Firm for the purpose of
expediting petitions for such
Adjustment Assistance or Adjustment
Proposals; and
(b) The fees paid or to be paid to any
such Person.
§ 315.14
Conflicts of interest.
EDA will provide no Adjustment
Assistance to any Firm under this part
unless the owners, partners, members,
directors, or officers thereof execute an
agreement binding them and the Firm
for a period of two years after such
Adjustment Assistance is provided, to
refrain from employing, tendering any
office or employment to, or retaining for
professional services any Person who,
on the date such assistance or any part
thereof was provided, or within one
year prior thereto, shall have served as
an officer, attorney, agent, or employee
occupying a position or engaging in
activities which involved discretion
with respect to the provision of such
Adjustment Assistance.
Subpart F—International Trade
Commission Investigations
§ 315.15
Affirmative findings.
Whenever the International Trade
Commission makes an affirmative
finding under section 202(b) of the
Trade Act (19 U.S.C. 2252) that
increased imports are a substantial
cause of serious injury or threat thereof
with respect to an industry, EDA will
notify the TAACs and provide
expedited review of petitions and
Adjustment Proposals from Firms
within the specified industry.
Dated: January 6, 2020.
John Fleming,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Economic Development.
[FR Doc. 2020–00453 Filed 2–13–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–24–P
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0673; Product
Identifier 2019–NM–101–AD; Amendment
39–19832; AD 2020–02–20]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is superseding
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014–24–
07, which applied to certain Airbus SAS
Model A318 series airplanes; Model
A319–111, –112, –113, –114, –115,
–131, –132, and –133 airplanes; A320–
211, –212, –214, –231, –232, and –233
airplanes; and Model A321–111, –112,
–131, –211, –212, –213, –231, and –232
airplanes. AD 2014–24–07 required
repetitive rototest inspections for
cracking; corrective actions if necessary;
and modification of the torsion box,
which terminates the repetitive
inspections. This AD continues to
require the actions in AD 2014–24–07,
with certain revised compliance times,
as specified in a European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD,
which is incorporated by reference. This
AD was prompted by a report of a crack
found in the side box beam flange of the
fuselage at the frame (FR) 43 level
during a fatigue test campaign. The FAA
is issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective March 20,
2020.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publication listed in this AD
as of March 20, 2020.
ADDRESSES: For the material
incorporated by reference (IBR) in this
AD, contact the EASA, KonradAdenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 89990
1000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu;
internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may
find this IBR material on the EASA
website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available in the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14FER1.SGM
14FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8373-8383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00453]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 2020 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 8373]]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Economic Development Administration
13 CFR Parts 302 and 315
[Docket No.: 191218-0119]
RIN 0610-AA80
General Updates and Elimination of Certain TAAF and PWEDA
Regulations
AGENCY: Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Economic Development Administration (``EDA''), U.S.
Department of Commerce (``DOC''), is issuing a final rule to update the
agency's regulations implementing the Trade Adjustment Assistance for
Firms (``TAAF'') provisions of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(``Trade Act''), and the Public Works and Economic Development Act of
1965, as amended (``PWEDA''). The changes to the TAAF program
regulations clarify the process for import-impacted U.S. manufacturing
firms, oil and natural gas production firms, and service firms to
obtain technical assistance--identified in the Trade Act as
``adjustment assistance''--through the TAAF program, reorganize the
regulations to make them easier to read and understand, incorporate
best practices, and bring the regulations into closer alignment with
the program's statutory requirements. The result will be to ease the
burden on firms seeking adjustment assistance through the TAAF program
and make it easier for Trade Adjustment Assistance Centers (``TAACs'')
to work with firms. EDA is also eliminating certain TAAF and PWEDA
regulations that are unnecessary or duplicative because they describe
requirements already established in other regulations or award
documentation.
DATES: This final rule is effective on March 16, 2020.
ADDRESSES: EDA received no comments on the notice of proposed
rulemaking (``NPRM'') that preceded this final rule, so there are no
comments for EDA to post to the Federal Rulemaking Portal,
www.regulations.gov. For convenience, after the final rule becomes
effective, EDA plans to update the full text of EDA's regulations, as
amended, and post it on EDA's website at https://www.eda.gov/about/regulations.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Servais, Attorney Advisor, Office
of the Chief Counsel, Economic Development Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1244 Speer Boulevard, Suite 431, Denver, CO
80204; telephone: (303) 844-4403.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Through strategic grant investments that foster job creation and
attract private investment, EDA supports development in economically
distressed areas of the United States to prepare these areas for growth
and success in the worldwide economy.
EDA is issuing this final rule to update the agency's regulations
implementing the TAAF program (Part I) and PWEDA (Part II). The changes
will ease the burden on firms and grantees by eliminating unnecessary
and duplicative regulations and clarifying and reorganizing the
regulations to make them easier to understand.
The updates will also incorporate best practices. For example, EDA
is adding a requirement that firms must begin implementation of their
Adjustment Proposal (``AP'') within six months after the AP is approved
by EDA. Firms that do not begin implementation within six months after
approval must update and re-submit their AP, and then request re-
approval before any Adjustment Assistance may be provided. EDA is also
incorporating changes that will enable firms to amend their APs within
two years of EDA approval and that will require firms to complete
implementation of the APs within five years of approval. These are
existing best practices and help to ensure that APs reflect current
conditions and are maximally effective.
The updates will align the regulations more closely with statutory
requirements. Specifically, EDA refers to imported articles or services
that compete with and are substantially equivalent to the petitioning
firm's as ``directly competitive or like,'' as written in the Trade
Act, rather than simply ``directly competitive.'' In addition, EDA is
clarifying all references to ``days'' as ``calendar days,'' to reflect
this usage in the Trade Act, a change that will also speed up the time
within which EDA is required to make determinations regarding firm
eligibility and assistance.
On August 19, 2019, EDA published an NPRM in the Federal Register
requesting public comments on the general updates and elimination of
certain TAAF and PWEDA regulations contained in this final rule (84 FR
42831). The public comment period closed on September 18, 2019. EDA
received no comments in response to the NPRM. For this reason, this
final rule contains no changes to the rulemaking that was proposed in
the NPRM, apart from two technical corrections. The first technical
correction changes several instances of ``Adjustment Plan'' to
``Adjustment Proposal.'' ``Adjustment Plan'' is not a defined term;
``Adjustment Proposal'' is the correct term that should be used
throughout. The second technical correction, to revised 13 CFR 315.15,
eliminates an improper citation to the Tariff Act and is discussed
below in Part I.
Lastly, because this rule will remove certain regulations and will
make it easier for firms and EDA grantees to comply with the
requirements for the TAAF and EDA grant programs, it is considered a
``deregulatory action'' pursuant to the April 5, 2017, OMB guidance
memorandum implementing Executive Order 13771 (M-17-21).
Part I: Updates to TAAF Program Regulations
Trade Act Background
Authorized under chapter 3 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974 (19
U.S.C. 2341-2355), the TAAF program assists import-impacted U.S.
manufacturing firms, oil and natural gas production firms, and service
firms with developing and implementing projects to regain global
competitiveness, expand markets, strengthen operations, and increase
profitability, thereby increasing U.S. jobs.
The TAAF program provides cost-sharing technical assistance to
eligible import-impacted U.S. manufacturing
[[Page 8374]]
firms, oil and natural gas production firms, and service firms in all
50 States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico. Technical assistance is provided through a nationwide network of
11 TAACs, which are non-profit or university-affiliated entities.
TAACs provide eligible firms with customized assistance from
industry experts knowledgeable about the unique needs, challenges, and
opportunities facing industries in their respective regions. Firms work
with TAACs to apply for certification of eligibility for TAAF
assistance. Firms demonstrate their eligibility by documenting that
they have experienced a decline in sales or a decline or impending
decline in employment or worker hours, and that an increase of imports
of directly competitive goods or services contributed importantly to
such declines. EDA then renders a decision regarding the firms'
eligibility.
TAACs work closely with eligible firms' management to identify the
firms' strengths and weaknesses and then develop customized business
recovery plans, APs, which are designed to stimulate recovery and
growth. The TAAF program pays up to 75 percent of the costs of
developing APs. EDA reviews firms' APs and determines whether or not to
approve them. When an AP has been approved, firm management and TAAC
staff jointly identify consultants with the specific expertise to help
the firm implement the AP. If the cost exceeds the simplified
acquisition threshold, consultants are selected through a competitive
procurement process.
Overview of Changes to the TAAF Regulations
The discussion that follows presents an overview of substantive
changes by subpart letter and section number.
Subpart A
EDA is transferring Sec. Sec. 315.4 and 315.5 from subpart A to
subpart B. This change will retain all general provisions within
subpart A, while consolidating the regulations regarding TAAC
selection, operation, role, and coverage within subpart B.
Section 315.1
EDA is replacing this section with a new programmatic description
of TAAF's purpose. The revised section more clearly lays out the
process by which EDA executes its responsibilities concerning the TAAF
program, as delegated by the Secretary of Commerce, and the process by
which firms work with TAACs to request and obtain Adjustment
Assistance.
Section 315.2
EDA is making changes to the definitions identified below.
Adjustment Assistance
EDA is making three revisions to the definition of Adjustment
Assistance. First, EDA is removing the reference to ``or industries.''
As explained further in the discussion of the changes to Sec. 315.17,
EDA is eliminating its regulations related to the provision of trade
adjustment assistance to industries. EDA has historically not provided
separate industry-wide assistance programs because firms within
impacted industries have solicited help through TAAF on an individual
basis and because there has been no demand for industry-wide
assistance. In addition, EDA provides expedited review of petitions and
APs from firms within impacted industries. When the U.S. International
Trade Commission (``ITC'') makes an injury determination, in accordance
with chapter 3 of the Trade Act, EDA provides expedited consideration
to petitions by firms in the affected industry, as well as expedited
assistance in preparing and processing AP applications to such firms.
EDA believes this individualized approach has been effective in
facilitating adjustments within both firms and industries. The removal
of regulations that reference trade adjustment assistance to industries
will help prevent potential confusion regarding the availability of a
parallel industry program. In the event that EDA does determine it is
appropriate to provide trade adjustment assistance for industries, EDA
will promulgate new regulations to implement the program.
Second, EDA is revising the definition to clarify that Adjustment
Assistance refers to technical assistance provided by TAACs. The
current regulation is ambiguous and could be interpreted such that EDA
provides the technical assistance directly, which is not the case.
Third, EDA is adding to the definition a statement that EDA determines
what type of assistance is provided and adding a list of the types of
assistance that this may include: Preparing a firm's petition for
certification of eligibility, developing an AP, and implementing an AP.
Adjustment Proposal
EDA is revising the definition for Adjustment Proposal, clarifying
that the AP is a firm's plan for improving its competitiveness in the
marketplace, consistent with the intent of the TAAF program as
established in the Trade Act.
Decreased Absolutely
EDA is making a minor change to the definition of Decreased
Absolutely to add language clarifying that a firm's sales or production
must have declined by a minimum of five percent relative to its sales
or production during the applicable time period and that the decline is
independent of industry or market fluctuations and relative only to the
previous performance of the firm unless EDA determines that such
limitations would not be consistent with the purposes of the Trade Act.
Directly Competitive
EDA is revising the defined term Directly Competitive to add the
words ``or Like'' to the end, such that the term will be Directly
Competitive or Like. This change will more closely align this term with
the terminology of the Trade Act. EDA is further revising this
definition by adding language that clarifies the linkage between this
definition and the reference to firms that engage in exploring,
drilling, or producing oil or natural gas. By adding the phrase ``For
the purposes of this term,'' before the final sentence in this
definition, EDA reinforces the requirement in Section 251 of the Trade
Act that firms that engage in these types of activities be considered
as producing articles that are directly competitive with imported oil
and natural gas for the purposes of TAAF eligibility.
Firm
EDA is capitalizing the term, ``Unjustifiable Benefits,'' as
referenced in this definition. This change is the result of EDA adding
a definition for Unjustifiable Benefits, as described below. EDA is
further revising this definition by adding to the sub-definition of
Subsidiary, which is included as a category of firm that may be
considered jointly with another firm that is requesting Adjustment
Assistance pursuant to TAAF in an effort to prevent Unjustifiable
Benefits. EDA is qualifying the definition of Subsidiary by adding an
explanation that a firm acquired by another firm but which operates
independently of the acquiring firm is considered an Independent
Subsidiary and may be considered separately from the acquiring firm as
eligible for Adjustment Assistance. This change reflects existing
practice and addresses a growing trend in petitions requesting
Adjustment Assistance for firms that have been acquired by another firm
but continue to operate independently after the
[[Page 8375]]
acquisition, generally retaining the same management, maintaining
control over management decisions, and otherwise continuing operations
without significant change.
Increase in Imports
EDA is modifying this definition by moving the second sentence of
this definition to the revised subpart C (Certification of firms) as a
new paragraph (c) in Sec. 315.6 (Certification Requirements). EDA
believes this sentence is more appropriately located in subpart C as a
description of one method for a firm to demonstrate that it meets the
eligibility requirements for Certification to apply for Adjustment
Assistance. The sentence provides that a firm may submit certifications
from a firm's customers that account for a significant percentage of
the firm's decrease in sales or production, that the customers
increased their purchase of imports of Directly Competitive or Like
Articles or Services from a foreign country.
Partial Separation
EDA is changing the definition of Partial Separation by replacing
language denoting that this definition is with respect to any
employment in a firm with language which clarifies that a Partial
Separation occurs when there has been no increase in overall employment
at the firm and either of the conditions currently described in this
definition exist: (1) A reduction in an employee's work hours to 80
percent or less of the employee's average weekly hours during the year
of such reductions as compared to the preceding year; or (2) a
reduction in the employee's weekly wage to 80 percent or less of his/
her average weekly wage during the year of such reduction as compared
to the preceding year. EDA occasionally receives petitions submitted by
firms whose overall employment figures have increased within the
periods of time in question and which, nonetheless, assert that there
has been a Partial Separation with regards to a certain portion of
their workforce's work hours or weekly wages. EDA believes that this
revision should resolve the apparent confusion caused by the current
wording and clarify that a firm does not meet the eligibility criteria
if its overall employment has increased during the relevant time
period.
Service Sector Firm
EDA is revising the definition of Service Sector Firm to remove the
last two sentences of the definition because they are already included
in the definition of firm.
Total Separation
EDA is streamlining and clarifying the definition of Total
Separation by removing the phrase ``with respect to any employment in a
firm'' and adding the words ``in a firm'' after ``the laying off or
termination of employment of an employee.''
Unjustifiable Benefits
As noted above, EDA is also adding a definition for Unjustifiable
Benefits. Under this new definition, Unjustifiable Benefits describe
Adjustment Assistance inappropriately accruing to the benefit of (1)
other firms that would not otherwise be eligible when provided to a
firm or (2) any predecessor or successor firm, or any affiliated firm
controlled or substantially beneficially owned by substantially the
same person, rather than treating these entities as a single firm. EDA
believes that this is an important concept that should be fully
explained to help firms understand TAAF eligibility requirements.
Section 315.3
EDA is not changing this section.
Subpart B
EDA is revising this subpart to consolidate and clarify all
regulations regarding TAAC selection, operations, and coverage. The
revised subpart B, entitled ``TAAC Provisions,'' would be inserted
after Sec. 315.3 and would include revised Sec. Sec. 315.4 and 315.5,
which would be transferred to subpart B from subpart A.
Section 315.4
EDA is revising paragraph (a) of this section to better describe
the TAAC selection process.
EDA is revising paragraph (b) of this section to replace the
existing language with an explanation that TAACs are awarded
cooperative agreements that are subject to all Federal laws and to
Federal, Department, and EDA policies, regulations, and procedures
applicable to Federal financial assistance awards, including 2 CFR part
200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit
Requirements for Federal Awards, and that TAACs work closely with EDA
and import-impacted firms.
Section 315.5
EDA is re-designating paragraph (a)(1) as paragraph (a) and, in
that same paragraph, revising the third sentence in order to clarify
that information regarding all of the TAACs' service areas, rather than
just particular geographic areas, are available at the websites listed
in that section.
EDA is re-designating paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) as paragraphs (b)
and (c), respectively. EDA is also streamlining newly re-designated
paragraph (c) by renumbering paragraphs (i) and (ii) as (1) and (2),
respectively, and by rewording newly re-designated paragraphs (c)(1)
and (2) to provide enhanced clarity on the types of Adjustment
Assistance a TAAC may provide to a firm.
EDA is removing existing paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) in their
entirety. EDA believes these paragraphs are unnecessary, as these
provisions and requirements will generally be covered in the Notice of
Funding Opportunity used to announce the availability of funding for
TAAC awards.
Subpart C
EDA is revising subpart C to consolidate all regulations regarding
the certification of firms. The revised subpart C will include
Sec. Sec. 315.6 through 315.10.
Section 315.6
EDA is moving the matching share requirements for APs as set forth
in current paragraph (c)(2) to the new Sec. 315.11 (``Adjustment
Proposal Process'') in subpart D (``Adjustment Proposals''). EDA is
eliminating the remaining requirements in Sec. 315.6, which are
duplicative of other regulations in this part and provide no additional
guidance or clarity to TAACs or firms. Finally, EDA is re-designating
the current Sec. 315.7 as Sec. 315.6.
In addition to these revisions, as noted above in the discussion
regarding revisions to the definition of Increase in Imports at Sec.
315.2, EDA is adding a new paragraph (c) to revised Sec. 315.6 and
moving into this paragraph the language formerly located in the
definition of Increase in Imports that enabled firms to help
demonstrate that they meet the eligibility requirements for Adjustment
Assistance by submitting certification from the firm's customers that
account for a significant percentage of the firms' decrease in sales or
production, that the customers increased their purchase of imports of
Directly Competitive or Like Articles or Services from a foreign
country. EDA is further adding to this new paragraph (c) a sentence
specifying that such certification from a firm's customer must be
submitted directly to a TAAC or to EDA. EDA believes this addition will
ease some confusion by firms, some of which have requested their
customers to provide such certification directly to the firms which
subsequently pass on the certifications to EDA through the TAACs.
[[Page 8376]]
Section 315.7
EDA is re-designating the current Sec. 315.8 as Sec. 315.7.
EDA is revising paragraph (b)(5) to clarify the additional
requirements for publicly-owned corporations when submitting financial
information as part of their petitions for certification. EDA is
revising the paragraph to clarify that publicly-owned corporations
should submit copies of the most recent Form 10-K annual reports (or
Form 10-Q quarterly reports, as appropriate) filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission for the entire period covered by the
petition.
EDA is also revising paragraph (b)(6) to make clear the information
required regarding a firm's customers. Specifically, EDA is replacing
the qualifier that the description relates to the ``major'' customers
of the firm with one that identifies the customers as ``accounting for
a significant percent of the firm's decline.'' EDA is further revising
this paragraph to clarify that firms should submit information
regarding those customers' purchases or the firm's unsuccessful bids if
there are no customers fitting the description outlined in this
paragraph.
EDA is revising paragraph (f) to clarify that, in order to withdraw
a petition for certification, the petitioner must submit a request for
withdrawal before EDA makes a determination regarding approval or
denial of the certification.
EDA is revising paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this section. EDA is
revising paragraph (g)(1) in order to make clear that EDA may request
additional material from a firm beyond what was submitted with the
firm's original petition if necessary to make a determination regarding
the firm's eligibility for Adjustment Assistance. In addition, EDA is
revising paragraph (g)(1) to insert the word ``calendar'' before the
word ``days.'' EDA is also making similar revisions to all references
to ``days'' found throughout part 315. EDA is making these changes to
clarify that all references to ``days'' within part 315 refer to
calendar days as the current regulations are not clear on whether these
references to ``days'' are calendar or business days. EDA is revising
paragraph (g)(2) to clarify that firms may not resubmit a petition
within one year from the date of a denial without a waiver from EDA
issued for good cause.
Section 315.8
EDA is re-designating the current Sec. 315.9 as Sec. 315.8.
For the reasons discussed above, EDA is inserting the word
``calendar'' in front of the word ``days'' in the introductory
paragraph to this section.
EDA is revising paragraph (b)(2) to clarify that, when someone
other than the petitioner requests a public hearing on an accepted
petition, the requester must include a statement describing the nature
of the requester's interest in the proceedings.
EDA is also revising paragraph (d) of this section to clarify that
EDA will publish a notice of a public hearing in the Federal Register
only if EDA has made the determination that the requesting party has a
substantial interest in the hearing.
Section 315.9
EDA is re-designating the current Sec. 315.10 as Sec. 315.9.
EDA is also revising paragraphs (a), (b), and (d) to replace the
word ``Failure'' at the beginning of each of those paragraphs with the
words ``The firm failed'' to provide clarity regarding which entity's
omission triggers the loss of benefits. EDA is further revising
paragraph (d) to read: ``The firm failed to diligently pursue an
approved Adjustment Proposal, and five years have elapsed since the
date of certification.''
Section 315.10
EDA is re-designating the current Sec. 315.11 as Sec. 315.10.
EDA is revising paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section by inserting
the word ``calendar'' before the word ``days'' for the reasons
mentioned above.
EDA is removing the designation of paragraph (d) and adding the
sentence that formerly stood alone as paragraph (d) to the end of
paragraph (c) in this same section. EDA believes this reorganization
will reduce potential confusion by placing all requirements regarding
the steps EDA takes when it terminates a certification in a single
paragraph.
Subpart D
EDA is not changing the designation or heading of this subpart.
However, EDA is revising this subpart to include Sec. Sec. 315.11 and
315.12.
Section 315.11
Section 315.11 will be revised to combine requirements currently
contained in other sections of part 315 and add new language to reflect
best practices. The section heading will be revised to ``Adjustment
Proposal Process.''
EDA is moving paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) from the current Sec.
315.6 to the revised Sec. 315.11 as paragraphs (a) and (b) within this
section in order to consolidate AP procedures within a single section.
In order to more clearly reflect the requirements of the Trade Act, EDA
is moving the requirement established in the current Sec. 315.16(a),
which says APs must be submitted to EDA for approval within two years
after the date of Certification, to the new Sec. 315.11(a).
In addition to moving the requirements that currently exist in
Sec. 315.6(a)(3) to the revised Sec. 315.11(b), EDA is adding
language to these requirements that will require firms to begin
implementation of their approved AP within six months after approval.
EDA is also adding a requirement that firms that do not begin
implementation within six months after approval must update and re-
submit their AP for re-approval before any Adjustment Assistance may be
provided. These additions reflect long-standing practice and will help
firms to ensure that their APs reflect the most up-to-date economic
conditions and financial situation and, consequently, that the firms
will receive the most effective Adjustment Assistance.
EDA is adding a paragraph (c) to this section that discusses how
EDA will make a determination regarding an AP no later than 60 calendar
days after receipt of the AP, which incorporates the requirement from
Section 252(b)(2) of the Trade Act.
EDA is also adding a paragraph (d) to this section. EDA is moving
the matching share requirements for Adjustment Assistance from the
existing Sec. 315.6(b)(2) to this paragraph. In addition, EDA is
adding a sentence stating that certified firms may request no more than
the amount established by EDA for total Adjustment Assistance over the
entire lifetime of the firm. This addition incorporates current
practice, established to ensure that the maximum number of eligible
firms are able to receive Adjustment Assistance and to encourage
certified firms to appropriately plan and implement their Adjustment
Proposals within established funding limits.
EDA is adding a paragraph (e) to this section and specifying within
this paragraph that firms may request EDA approval to amend their APs
within two years from the date of EDA approval of their initial APs.
This new language incorporates current practice and allows firms to
update their APs as needed within the two-year time frame to address
any unexpected changes in their situation, new information, or a need
to re-direct resources to areas of greatest need.
EDA is also adding a paragraph (f) to this section. Paragraph (f)
requires firms
[[Page 8377]]
to complete implementation of their APs within five years of EDA
approval of their initial APs. This added language reflects current
practice and EDA's expectation that firms who request Adjustment
Assistance are financially and operationally prepared to engage in the
TAAF program and will implement their AP in a timely way.
EDA is adding a paragraph (g) to this section to address what
occurs if a certified firm is transferred, sold, or otherwise acquired
by another firm during the five-year period established in paragraph
(f). Paragraph (g) requires a certified firm that is transferred, sold,
or otherwise acquired by another firm during the five-year period of
Adjustment Assistance to notify EDA no later than 30 calendar days
following the transfer, sale, or acquisition. EDA will then make a
determination as to whether the firm remains eligible for Adjustment
Assistance. This new language incorporates current practice and is
designed to resolve any confusion about how firms and TAACs should
handle this scenario.
Finally, EDA is adding a paragraph (h) to this section. Paragraph
(h) will require firms that receive Adjustment Assistance to provide
data regarding the firms' sales, employment, and productivity upon
completion of the program and each year for the two-year period
following completion. This language incorporates into the regulations
reporting requirements established in Section 255A of the Trade Act,
which requires EDA to report annually to Congress on data regarding the
TAAF program for the preceding fiscal year.
Section 315.12
EDA is re-designating the current Sec. 315.16 as Sec. 315.12. As
discussed above, EDA is eliminating paragraph (a) of this section after
moving the requirement that firms must submit their APs to EDA within
two years of the date of certification to Sec. 315.11(a).
EDA is eliminating the current Sec. 315.12 (Recordkeeping). With
the proposed revisions to Sec. 315.4(b), which states that TAAC
cooperative agreements are subject to all Federal laws and to Federal,
Department, and EDA policies, regulations, and procedures applicable to
Federal financial assistance awards, including 2 CFR part 200, the
current Sec. 315.12 is no longer needed as recordkeeping requirements
are adequately addressed in those materials.
Subpart E
EDA is revising the heading for this subpart to ``Protective
Provisions.'' As revised, subpart E will include Sec. Sec. 315.13 and
315.14. EDA is moving the requirements regarding persons engaged by
firms to expedite petitions and APs as found in the current Sec.
315.14 (Certifications) and the requirements regarding conflicts of
interest that are contained the current Sec. 315.15 (Conflicts of
interest), both of which are found in the current subpart C, to subpart
E. EDA believes this reorganization and new location will make it
easier for firms to read and understand the regulations and will help
clarify that these provisions apply to firms at all stages of the TAAF
program.
Section 315.13
EDA is moving the requirements for firms to certify in writing to
EDA the names of any attorneys, agents, and other Persons engaged by or
on behalf of the firm for the purpose of expediting Petitions for
Adjustment Assistance and the fees paid or to be paid to any such
Person, as found in the current Sec. 315.14, to Sec. 315.13. EDA is
further revising these requirements by clarifying, in paragraph (a),
that they apply to both Adjustment Assistance and APs.
EDA is eliminating the current Sec. 315.13 (Audit and
examination). With the proposed revisions to Sec. 315.4(b), which
states that TAAC cooperative agreements are subject to all Federal laws
and to Federal, Department, and EDA policies, regulations, and
procedures applicable to Federal financial assistance awards, including
2 CFR part 200, the current Sec. 315.13 is no longer needed as audit
and examination requirements are adequately addressed in those
materials.
Section 315.14
EDA is moving the requirements found in the current Sec. 315.15 to
Sec. 315.14. EDA is also revising these requirements by modifying the
list of firm representatives subject to the conflicts of interest
requirements to parallel the list of firm representatives identified in
the revised Sec. 315.13.
Subpart F
EDA is adding subpart F, entitled ``International Trade Commission
Investigations.'' Subpart F sets forth, through Sec. 315.15, what
actions EDA takes when the ITC makes an affirmative finding under
section 202(b) of the Trade Act regarding injury or threat of injury to
an industry.
Section 315.15
EDA is re-designating the current Sec. 315.17 as Sec. 315.15 and
is revising the heading of this section to ``Affirmative Findings.''
EDA is also removing the designation ``(a)'' from the first paragraph
of this section and eliminating paragraphs (b) and (c) to reflect the
fact that EDA, historically, has not provided Adjustment Assistance for
the establishment of industry-wide programs for new product
development, export development, or other uses consistent with the
purposes of the Trade Act because there has been no demand for such
programs. As noted above in the discussion regarding changes to the
definition of Adjustment Assistance in Sec. 315.2, firms within
impacted industries have sought Adjustment Assistance through TAAF on
an individual basis rather than through industry-wide solutions. EDA
also provides expedited review of petitions and APs from firms within
industries for which the ITC has determined that increased imports are
a substantial cause of serious injury or threat thereof under section
202(b) of the Trade Act. This individualized approach enables EDA to
support adjustments at the firm level, while having a cumulative impact
at the industry level.
EDA is replacing within this paragraph the language stating that
EDA will provide to firms in the identified industry assistance in the
preparation and processing of petitions and applications for benefits;
EDA instead will include language establishing notification to TAACs
and expedited review of petitions and APs from firms within the
specified industry. EDA believes these revisions more clearly describe
the assistance EDA provides to industries in response to determinations
made by the ITC under the Trade Act.
This revised section contains one technical correction to the
proposed revision in the NPRM published in the Federal Register on
August 19, 2019 (84 FR 42831). The correction is to eliminate an
improper citation to the Tariff Act. The proposed revision to this
section provided that EDA would notify TAACs and provide expedited
review of petitions and APs from Firms within an industry for which the
ITC has made an affirmative finding under section 202(b) of the Trade
Act or under sections 705 or 735 of the Tariff Act. Determinations made
under section 202(b) of the Trade Act concern serious injury or threat
thereof to a domestic injury, while determinations made under sections
705 or 735 of the Tariff Act concern lesser material injury or threat
thereof to a domestic industry. Pursuant to section 202(g) of the Trade
Act, EDA is only required to provide expedited review of petitions
submitted by firms in industries for which the ITC has made
[[Page 8378]]
an affirmative determination under section 202(b) of the Trade Act.
Part II: Updates to PWEDA Regulations
PWEDA Background
PWEDA is EDA's organic authority and the primary legal authority
under which EDA awards grants. Other legal authorities include the
Trade Act and the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980.
Under PWEDA, EDA provides financial assistance to both rural and urban
distressed communities by fostering entrepreneurship, innovation, and
productivity through investments in infrastructure development,
capacity building, and business development in order to attract private
capital investments and new and better jobs to regions experiencing
substantial and persistent economic distress.
Overview of Eliminated PWEDA Regulations
EDA is eliminating certain provisions within part 302 of the PWEDA
regulations that are unnecessary or already established in other
regulations or award documentation. Specifically, EDA is eliminating
the regulations located at 13 CFR 302.4, 302.5, and 302.14. These
regulations describe: The responsibilities of EDA grant recipients to
maintain records, how information supplied to EDA may be subject to
public release under the Freedom of Information Act or Privacy Act, how
government auditors may need access to various records, and that grant
recipients are subject to the government-wide relocation assistance and
land acquisition policies. These regulations can be removed because
notice of these terms and conditions is already provided to grant
recipients through other Department of Commerce-wide or government-wide
regulations as well as in specific documentation EDA provides to each
grant recipient. Specifically, recipients of EDA financial assistance
are already subject to the requirements related to the Freedom of
Information Act or Privacy Act currently described in Sec. 302.4
through 15 CFR part 4 and the Standard Terms and Conditions of an EDA
award. Similarly, the relocation and land acquisition policies
currently found in Sec. 302.5 are already applicable to all EDA
financial assistance recipients under government-wide regulations found
at 49 CFR part 24. Finally, the record-keeping requirements currently
located in Sec. 302.14 duplicate the requirements of Section 608 of
PWEDA (42 U.S.C. 3218), 2 CFR 200.333 and 200.336, and the Standard
Terms and Conditions of an EDA award.
In addition, EDA is eliminating 13 CFR 302.11. Beginning with the
enactment of the original section 502 of PWEDA (42 U.S.C. 3192) in
1998, Congress has required EDA to maintain an economic development
information clearinghouse on matters related to economic development,
economic adjustment, disaster recovery, defense conversion, and trade
adjustment programs and activities. See Public Law 105-393. With the
EDA Reauthorization Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-373 (Oct. 27, 2004)),
Congress amended section 502 to require EDA to, among other things,
maintain this information clearinghouse online. The current regulation
adds nothing of value to the requirements already in place under
section 502 and consequently should be eliminated.
Classification
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Prior notice and opportunity for public comment are not required
for rules concerning public property, loans, grants, benefits, and
contracts (5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2)). EDA's programs, including the TAAF
program, are financial assistance programs provided through grants and
cooperative agreements. As such, prior notice and an opportunity for
public comment are not required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other
law, and the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are inapplicable. Although EDA did choose to
publish an NPRM in the Federal Register requesting public comments on
the content of this final rule (84 FR 42831), EDA received no comments
in response to the NPRM, and thus has received no input from the public
bearing on the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. For these reasons, a regulatory flexibility analysis has not been
prepared.
Executive Orders No. 12866, 13563, and 13771
This final rule was drafted in accordance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 13771. The Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'')
has determined that this final rule is not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563.
This rule is a deregulatory action that has a neutral effect on the
costs to firms, organizations, and all other stakeholders to comply
with the regulations discussed in this notice of final rule. It is
therefore considered to have a total incremental cost of zero pursuant
to the April 5, 2017, OMB guidance memorandum implementing Executive
Order 13771 (M-17-21).
Congressional Review Act
This final rule is not major under the Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.).
Executive Order No. 13132
Executive Order 13132 requires agencies to develop an accountable
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State and local
officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in Executive Order 13132 to include
regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government.'' This final rule does not contain policies that have
federalism implications.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
(``PRA'') requires that a Federal agency consider the impact of
paperwork and other information collection burdens imposed on the
public and, under the provisions of PRA section 3507(d), obtain
approval from OMB for each collection of information it conducts,
sponsors, or requires through regulations. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required to respond to, nor shall any
person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection
of information subject to the PRA unless that collection displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
The following table provides the only collections of information
(and corresponding OMB Control Numbers) set forth in this final rule.
These collections of information are necessary for the proper
performance and functions of EDA. This final rule does not include a
new information collection requirement and will, thus, use previously
approved information collections to collect information relevant to a
petition for certification of eligibility for trade adjustment
assistance or an AP.
[[Page 8379]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part or section of Form/Title/OMB
this final rule Nature of request control No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
315.7(b)............. Firms seeking certification of Form ED-840P,
eligibility to apply for trade Petition by a
adjustment assistance must firm for
complete Form ED-840P, which Certification
provides EDA with the of Eligibility
information needed to to Apply for
determine if a firm is Trade
eligible to apply for trade Adjustment
adjustment assistance. Assistance
(0610-0091).
315.12............... The information for Adjustment Adjustment
Proposals is collected Proposal (0610-
pursuant to the same OMB 0091).
control number as Form ED-840P
(0610-0091). Firms certified
by EDA as eligible to apply
for trade adjustment
assistance must prepare an
Adjustment Proposal and submit
it to EDA for approval within
two years after the date of
certification. This provides
EDA with the information
needed to determine whether
the Adjustment Proposal meets
the requirements of the Trade
Act and 13 CFR part 315.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Subjects
13 CFR Part 302
Community development, Grant programs-business, Grant programs-
housing and community development, Technical assistance.
13 CFR Part 315
Administrative practice and procedure, Community development, Grant
programs-business, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Trade
adjustment assistance.
For the reasons discussed above, EDA is amending 13 CFR chapter III
as follows:
PART 302-GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR INVESTMENT ASSISTANCE
0
1. The authority citation of part 302 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 2341 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 3150; 42 U.S.C.
3152; 42 U.S.C. 3153; 42 U.S.C. 3192; 42 U.S.C. 3193; 42 U.S.C.
3194; 42 U.S.C. 3211; 42 U.S.C. 3212; 42 U.S.C. 3216; 42 U.S.C.
3218; 42 U.S.C. 3220; 42 U.S.C. 5141; 15 U.S.C. 3701; Department of
Commerce Delegation Order 10-4.
Sec. Sec. 302.4 and 302.5 [Removed]
0
2. Remove Sec. Sec. 302.4 and 302.5.
Sec. 302.11 [Removed]
0
3. Remove Sec. 302.11.
Sec. 302.14 [Removed]
0
4. Remove Sec. 302.14.
PART 315--TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE FOR FIRMS
0
5. Revise the authority citation of part 315 to read as follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 2341-2356; 42 U.S.C. 3211; Title IV of Pub.
L. 114-27, 129 Stat. 373; Department of Commerce Delegation Order
10-4.
0
6. Revise Sec. 315.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 315.1 Purpose and scope.
Chapter 3 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2341-
2355) establishes the responsibilities of the Secretary of Commerce
concerning the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms (TAAF) program.
The regulations in this part lay out those responsibilities as
delegated to EDA by the Secretary. EDA executes these responsibilities
through cooperative agreements that support a network of Trade
Adjustment Assistance Centers (TAACs). The TAACs assist Firms in
petitioning EDA for certification of eligibility to receive Adjustment
Assistance. EDA certifies the eligibility of Firms. The TAACs then
provide Adjustment Assistance to Firms through the development and
implementation of Adjustment Proposals.
0
7. Amend Sec. 315.2 by:
0
a. Revising the introductory text and the definitions for ``Adjustment
Assistance'' and ``Adjustment Proposal'';
0
b. In the definition of ``Decreased Absolutely'', revising the
introductory text;
0
c. Removing the definition of ``Directly Competitive'' and adding the
definition of ``Directly Competitive or Like'' in its place;
0
d. In the definition of ``Firm'', revising the introductory text and
paragraph (4);
0
e. Revising the definition of ``Increase in Imports'';
0
f. In the definition of ``Partial Separation'', revising the
introductory text;
0
g. Revising the definitions of ``Service Sector Firm'' and ``Total
Separation''; and
0
h. Adding in alphabetical order a definition for ``Unjustifiable
Benefits''.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 315.2 Definitions.
In addition to the defined terms set forth in Sec. 300.3 of this
chapter, the following terms used in this part shall have the meanings
set forth below:
Adjustment Assistance means technical assistance provided to Firms
by TAACs under chapter 3 of title II of the Trade Act. The type of
assistance provided is determined by EDA and may include one or more of
the following:
(1) Assistance in preparing a Firm's petition for certification of
eligibility;
(2) Assistance to a Certified Firm in developing an Adjustment
Proposal for the Firm; and
(3) Assistance to a Certified Firm in implementing an Adjustment
Proposal.
Adjustment Proposal means a Certified Firm's plan for improving the
Firm's competitiveness in the marketplace.
* * * * *
Decreased Absolutely means a Firm's sales or production has
declined by a minimum of five percent relative to its sales or
production during the applicable prior time period, and this decline
is:
* * * * *
Directly Competitive or Like means imported articles or services
that compete with and are substantially equivalent for commercial
purposes (i.e., are adapted for the same function or use and are
essentially interchangeable) as the Firm's articles or services. For
the purposes of this term, any Firm that engages in exploring or
drilling for oil or natural gas, or otherwise produces oil or natural
gas, shall be considered to be producing articles directly competitive
with imports of oil and with imports of natural gas.
Firm means an individual proprietorship, partnership, joint
venture, association, corporation (includes a development corporation),
business trust, cooperative, trustee in bankruptcy or receiver under
court decree, and includes fishing, agricultural or service sector
entities and those which explore, drill or otherwise produce oil or
natural gas. See also the definition of Service Sector
[[Page 8380]]
Firm. Pursuant to section 259 of chapter 3 of title II of the Trade Act
(19 U.S.C. 2351), a Firm, together with any predecessor or successor
firm, or any affiliated firm controlled or substantially beneficially
owned by substantially the same person, may be considered a single Firm
where necessary to prevent Unjustifiable Benefits. For purposes of
receiving benefits under this part, when a Firm owns or controls other
Firms, the Firm and such other Firms may be considered a single Firm
when they produce or supply like or Directly Competitive articles or
services or are exerting essential economic control over one or more
production facilities. Accordingly, such other Firms may include a(n):
* * * * *
(4) Subsidiary--a company (either foreign or domestic) that is
wholly owned or effectively controlled by another company. A Firm that
has been acquired by another Firm but which maintains operations
independent of the acquiring Firm is considered an Independent
Subsidiary and may be considered separately from the acquiring Firm as
eligible for TAAF assistance.
Increase in Imports means an increase in imports of Directly
Competitive or Like Articles or Services with articles produced or
services supplied by a Firm.
* * * * *
Partial Separation occurs when there has been no increase in
overall employment at the Firm and either of the following applies:
* * * * *
Service Sector Firm means a Firm engaged in the business of
supplying services.
* * * * *
Total Separation means the laying off or termination of employment
of an employee in a Firm for lack of work.
Unjustifiable Benefits means Adjustment Assistance inappropriately
accruing to the benefit of:
(1) Other Firms that would not otherwise be eligible when provided
to a Firm; or
(2) Any predecessor or successor Firm, or any affiliated Firm
controlled or substantially beneficially owned by substantially the
same person, rather than treating these entities as a single Firm.
Sec. Sec. 315.4, 315.5, and 315.6 [Removed]
0
8. Sections 315.4 through 315.6 are removed.
0
9. Revise subparts B through E and add subpart F to read as follows:
Subpart B--TAAC Provisions
Sec.
315.4 TAAC selection and operation.
315.5 The role and geographic coverage of the TAACs.
Subpart C--Certification of Firms
315.6 Certification requirements.
315.7 Processing petitions for certification.
315.8 Hearings.
315.9 Loss of certification benefits.
315.10 Appeals, final determinations, and termination of
certification.
Subpart D--Adjustment Proposals
315.11 Adjustment Proposal process.
315.12 Adjustment Proposal requirements.
Subpart E--Protective Provisions
315.13 Persons engaged by Firms to expedite petitions and Adjustment
Proposals.
315.14 Conflicts of interest.
Subpart F--International Trade Commission Investigations
315.15 Affirmative findings.
Subpart B--TAAC Provisions
Sec. 315.4 TAAC selection and operation.
(a) EDA solicits applications from organizations interested in
operating a TAAC through Notice of Funding Opportunity announcements
laying out selection and award criteria. The following entities are
eligible to apply:
(1) Universities or affiliated organizations;
(2) States or local governments; or
(3) Non-profit organizations.
(b) Entities selected to operate the TAACs are awarded cooperative
agreements and work closely with EDA and import-impacted firms. TAAC
cooperative agreements are subject to all Federal laws and to Federal,
Department, and EDA policies, regulations, and procedures applicable to
Federal financial assistance awards, including 2 CFR part 200.
Sec. 315.5 The role and geographic coverage of the TAACs.
(a) TAACs are available to assist Firms in obtaining Adjustment
Assistance in all 50 U.S. States, the District of Columbia, and the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. TAACs provide Adjustment Assistance in
accordance with this part either through their own staffs or by
arrangements with outside consultants. Information concerning TAACs and
their coverage areas may be obtained from the TAAC website at https://www.taacenters.org or from EDA at https://www.eda.gov.
(b) Prior to submitting a petition for Adjustment Assistance to
EDA, a Firm should determine the extent to which a TAAC can provide the
required Adjustment Assistance. EDA will provide Adjustment Assistance
through TAACs whenever EDA determines that such assistance can be
provided most effectively in this manner. Requests for Adjustment
Assistance will be made through TAACs.
(c) A TAAC generally provides Adjustment Assistance by:
(1) Helping a Firm to prepare its petition for eligibility
certification; and
(2) Assisting Certified Firms with diagnosing their strengths and
weaknesses, and with developing and implementing an Adjustment
Proposal.
Subpart C--Certification of Firms
Sec. 315.6 Certification requirements.
(a) General. Firms apply for certification through a TAAC by
completing a petition for certification. The TAAC will assist Firms in
completing such petitions at no cost to the Firms. EDA evaluates Firms'
petitions based on the requirements set forth in Sec. 315.7. EDA may
certify a Firm as eligible to apply for Adjustment Assistance under
section 251(c) of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C. 2341) if it determines that
the petition for certification meets one of the minimum certification
thresholds set forth in paragraph (b) of this section. In order to be
certified, a Firm must meet the criteria listed under any one of the
five circumstances described in paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) Minimum certification thresholds--(1) Twelve-month decline.
Based upon a comparison of the most recent 12-month period for which
data are available and the immediately preceding 12-month period:
(i) A Significant Number or Proportion of Workers in the Firm has
undergone Total or Partial Separation or a Threat of Total or Partial
Separation;
(ii) Either sales or production, or both, of the Firm has Decreased
Absolutely; or sales or production, or both, of any article or service
that accounted for not less than 25 percent of the total production or
sales of the Firm during the 12-month period preceding the most recent
12-month period for which data are available have Decreased Absolutely;
and
(iii) An Increase in Imports has Contributed Importantly to the
applicable Total or Partial Separation or Threat of Total or Partial
Separation, and to the applicable decline in sales or production or
supply of services.
(2) Twelve-month versus twenty-four month decline. Based upon a
comparison of the most recent 12-month period for which data are
available and the immediately preceding 24-month period:
[[Page 8381]]
(i) A Significant Number or Proportion of Workers in the Firm has
undergone Total or Partial Separation or a Threat of Total or Partial
Separation;
(ii) Either average annual sales or production, or both, of the
Firm has Decreased Absolutely; or average annual sales or production,
or both, of any article or service that accounted for not less than 25
percent of the total production or sales of the Firm during the 24-
month period preceding the most recent 12-month period for which data
are available have Decreased Absolutely; and
(iii) An Increase in Imports has Contributed Importantly to the
applicable Total or Partial Separation or Threat of Total or Partial
Separation, and to the applicable decline in sales or production or
supply of services.
(3) Twelve-month versus thirty-six month decline. Based upon a
comparison of the most recent 12-month period for which data are
available and the immediately preceding 36-month period:
(i) A Significant Number or Proportion of Workers in the Firm has
undergone Total or Partial Separation or a Threat of Total or Partial
Separation;
(ii) Either average annual sales or production, or both, of the
Firm has Decreased Absolutely; or average annual sales or production,
or both, of any article or service that accounted for not less than 25
percent of the total production or sales of the Firm during the 36-
month period preceding the most recent 12-month period for which data
are available have Decreased Absolutely; and
(iii) An Increase in Imports has Contributed Importantly to the
applicable Total or Partial Separation or Threat of Total or Partial
Separation, and to the applicable decline in sales or production or
supply of services.
(4) Interim sales or production decline. Based upon an interim
sales or production decline:
(i) Sales or production has Decreased Absolutely for, at minimum,
the most recent six-month period during the most recent 12-month period
for which data are available as compared to the same six-month period
during the immediately preceding 12-month period;
(ii) During the same base and comparative period of time as sales
or production has Decreased Absolutely, a Significant Number or
Proportion of Workers in such Firm has undergone Total or Partial
Separation or a Threat of Total or Partial Separation; and
(iii) During the same base and comparative period of time as sales
or production has Decreased Absolutely, an Increase in Imports has
Contributed Importantly to the applicable Total or Partial Separation
or Threat of Total or Partial Separation, and to the applicable decline
in sales or production or supply of services.
(5) Interim employment decline. Based upon an interim employment
decline:
(i) A Significant Number or Proportion of Workers in such Firm has
undergone Total or Partial Separation or a Threat of Total or Partial
Separation during, at a minimum, the most recent six-month period
during the most recent 12-month period for which data are available as
compared to the same six-month period during the immediately preceding
12-month period; and
(ii) Either sales or production of the Firm has Decreased
Absolutely during the 12-month period preceding the most recent 12-
month period for which data are available; and
(iii) An Increase in Imports has Contributed Importantly to the
applicable Total or Partial Separation or Threat of Total or Partial
Separation, and to the applicable decline in sales or production or
supply of services.
(c) Evidence of an increase in imports. EDA may consider as
evidence of an Increase in Imports a certification from the Firm's
customers that account for a significant percentage of the Firm's
decrease in sales or production, that they have increased their
purchase of imports of Directly Competitive or Like Articles or
Services from a foreign country, either absolutely or relative to their
acquisition of such Like Articles or Services from suppliers located in
the United States. Such certification from a Firm's customer must be
submitted directly to a TAAC or to EDA.
Sec. 315.7 Processing petitions for certification.
(a) Firms shall consult with a TAAC for guidance and assistance in
the preparation of their petitions for certification.
(b) A Firm seeking certification shall complete a Petition by a
Firm for Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (Form ED-840P or any successor form) with the following
information about such Firm:
(1) Identification and description of the Firm, including legal
form of organization, economic history, major ownership interests,
officers, directors, management, parent company, Subsidiaries or
Affiliates, and production and sales facilities;
(2) Description of goods or services supplied or sold;
(3) Description of imported Directly Competitive or Like Articles
or Services with those produced or supplied;
(4) Data on its sales, production and employment for the applicable
24-month, 36-month, or 48-month period, as required under Sec.
315.6(b);
(5) One copy of a complete auditor's certified financial report for
the entire period covering the petition, or if not available, one copy
of the complete profit and loss statements, balance sheets and
supporting statements prepared by the Firm's accountants for the entire
period covered by the petition. In addition, publicly-owned
corporations should also submit copies of the most recent Form 10-K
annual reports (or Form 10-Q quarterly reports, as appropriate) filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the entire period
covered by the petition;
(6) Information concerning customers accounting for a significant
percent of the Firm's decline and the customers' purchases (or the
Firm's unsuccessful bids, if there are no customers fitting this
description); and
(7) Such other information as EDA considers material.
(c) EDA shall determine whether the petition has been properly
prepared and can be accepted. Promptly thereafter, EDA shall notify the
petitioner that the petition has been accepted or advise the TAAC that
the petition has not been accepted, but may be resubmitted at any time
without prejudice when the specified deficiencies have been corrected.
Any resubmission will be treated as a new petition.
(d) EDA will publish a notice of acceptance of a petition in the
Federal Register.
(e) EDA will initiate an investigation to determine whether the
petitioner meets the requirements set forth in section 251(c) of the
Trade Act (19 U.S.C. 2341) and Sec. 315.6.
(f) A petition for certification may be withdrawn if EDA receives a
request for withdrawal submitted by the petitioner before EDA makes a
certification determination or denial. A Firm may submit a new petition
at any time thereafter in accordance with the requirements of this
section and Sec. 315.6.
(g) Following acceptance of a petition, EDA will:
(1) Make a determination based on the Record as soon as possible
after the petitioning Firm or TAAC has submitted all requested
material. In no event may the determination period exceed 40 calendar
days from the date on which EDA accepted the petition; and
(2) Either certify the petitioner as eligible to apply for
Adjustment
[[Page 8382]]
Assistance or deny the petition. In either event, EDA shall promptly
give written notice of action to the petitioner. Any written notice to
the petitioner of a denial of a petition shall specify the reason(s)
for the denial. A petitioner shall not be entitled to resubmit a
petition within one year from the date of denial unless EDA waives the
one-year limitation for good cause.
Sec. 315.8 Hearings.
EDA will hold a public hearing on an accepted petition if the
petitioner or any interested Person found by EDA to have a Substantial
Interest in the proceedings submits a request for a hearing no later
than 10 calendar days after the date of publication of the notice of
acceptance in the Federal Register, under the following procedures:
(a) The petitioner or any interested Person(s) shall have an
opportunity to be present, to produce evidence and to be heard.
(b) A request for public hearing must be delivered by hand or by
registered mail to EDA. A request by a Person other than the petitioner
shall contain:
(1) The name, address and telephone number of the Person requesting
the hearing; and
(2) A complete statement of the relationship of the Person
requesting the hearing to the petitioner and the subject matter of the
petition, and a statement of the nature of the requesting party's
interest in the proceedings.
(c) If EDA determines that the requesting party does not have a
Substantial Interest in the proceedings, a written notice of denial
shall be sent to the requesting party. The notice shall specify the
reasons for the denial.
(d) If EDA determines that the requesting party does have a
Substantial Interest in the proceedings, EDA shall publish a notice of
a public hearing in the Federal Register, containing the subject
matter, name of petitioner, and date, time and place of the hearing.
(e) EDA shall appoint a presiding officer for the hearing who shall
respond to all procedural questions.
Sec. 315.9 Loss of certification benefits.
EDA may terminate a Firm's certification or refuse to extend
Adjustment Assistance to a Firm for any of the following reasons:
(a) The Firm failed to submit an acceptable Adjustment Proposal
within two years after date of certification. While approval of an
Adjustment Proposal may occur after the expiration of such two-year
period, a Firm must submit an acceptable Adjustment Proposal before
such expiration.
(b) The Firm failed to submit documentation necessary to start
implementation or modify its request for Adjustment Assistance
consistent with its Adjustment Proposal within six months after
approval of the Adjustment Proposal, where two years have elapsed since
the date of certification. If the Firm anticipates needing a longer
period to submit documentation, it should indicate the longer period in
its Adjustment Proposal. If the Firm is unable to submit its
documentation within the allowed time, it should notify EDA in writing
of the reasons for the delay and submit a new schedule. EDA has the
discretion to accept or refuse a new schedule.
(c) EDA has denied the Firm's request for Adjustment Assistance,
the time period allowed for the submission of any documentation in
support of such request has expired, and two years have elapsed since
the date of certification.
(d) The Firm failed to diligently pursue an approved Adjustment
Proposal, and five years have elapsed since the date of certification.
Sec. 315.10 Appeals, final determinations, and termination of
certification.
(a) Any petitioner may appeal in writing to EDA from a denial of
certification, provided that EDA receives the appeal by personal
delivery or by registered mail within 60 calendar days from the date of
notice of denial under Sec. 315.7(g). The appeal must state the
grounds on which the appeal is based, including a concise statement of
the supporting facts and applicable law. The decision of EDA on the
appeal shall be the final determination within the Department. In the
absence of an appeal by the petitioner under this paragraph (a), the
determination under Sec. 315.7(g) shall be final.
(b) A Firm, its representative, or any other interested domestic
party aggrieved by a final determination under paragraph (a) of this
section may, within 60 calendar days after notice of such
determination, begin a civil action in the United States Court of
International Trade for review of such determination, in accordance
with section 284 of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C. 2395).
(c) Whenever EDA determines that a Certified Firm no longer
requires Adjustment Assistance or for other good cause, EDA will
terminate the certification and promptly publish notice of such
termination in the Federal Register. The termination will take effect
on the date specified in the published notice. EDA shall immediately
notify the petitioner and shall state the reasons for any termination.
Subpart D--Adjustment Proposals
Sec. 315.11 Adjustment Proposal process.
(a) Firms certified in accordance with the procedures described in
Sec. Sec. 315.6 and 315.7 must prepare an Adjustment Proposal and
submit it to EDA for approval within two years after the date of
certification.
(b) EDA determines whether to approve the Adjustment Assistance
requested in the Adjustment Proposal based upon the evaluation criteria
set forth in Sec. 315.12. Upon approval, a Certified Firm may submit a
request to the TAAC for Adjustment Assistance to implement an approved
Adjustment Proposal. Firms must begin implementation within six months
after approval. Firms that do not begin implementation within six
months after approval must update, re-submit their Adjustment Proposal,
and request re-approval before any Adjustment Assistance may be
provided.
(c) EDA will make a determination regarding the Adjustment Proposal
no later than 60 calendar days upon receipt of the Adjustment Proposal.
(d) Adjustment Assistance is subject to matching share
requirements. Each Certified Firm must pay at least 25 percent of the
cost of preparing its Adjustment Proposal. Each Certified Firm
requesting $30,000 or less in total Adjustment Assistance in its
approved Adjustment Proposal must pay at least 25 percent of the cost
of that Adjustment Assistance. Each Certified Firm requesting more than
$30,000 in total Adjustment Assistance in its approved Adjustment
Proposal must pay at least 50 percent of the cost of that Adjustment
Assistance. Certified Firms may request no more than the amount as
established by EDA for total Adjustment Assistance over the entire
lifetime of the firm.
(e) Firms may request EDA approval to amend their Adjustment
Proposals within two years from the date of EDA approval of their
initial Adjustment Proposal.
(f) Firms must complete implementation of their Adjustment
Proposals within five years of EDA approval of their initial Adjustment
Proposal.
(g) If a Certified Firm is transferred, sold, or otherwise acquired
by another Firm during the five-year period of Adjustment Assistance,
the Firm must notify EDA no later than 30 calendar days following the
transfer, sale, or acquisition. EDA will then make a determination as
to whether the Firm remains eligible for Adjustment Assistance. EDA
will make this
[[Page 8383]]
determination no later than 60 calendar days following notification by
the Firm.
(h) In accordance with Section 255A of chapter 3 of title II of the
Trade Act (19 U.S.C. 2345a), Firms that receive Adjustment Assistance
must provide data regarding the Firms' sales, employment, and
productivity upon completion of the program and each year for the two-
year period following completion.
Sec. 315.12 Adjustment Proposal requirements.
EDA evaluates Adjustment Proposals based on the following:
(a) The Adjustment Proposal must include a description of any
Adjustment Assistance requested to implement such proposal, including
financial and other supporting documentation as EDA determines is
necessary, based upon either:
(1) An analysis of the Firm's problems, strengths, and weaknesses
and an assessment of its prospects for recovery; or
(2) If EDA so determines, other available information;
(b) The Adjustment Proposal must:
(1) Be reasonably calculated to contribute materially to the
economic adjustment of the Firm (i.e., that such proposal will
constructively assist the Firm to establish a competitive position in
the same or a different industry);
(2) Give adequate consideration to the interests of a sufficient
number of separated workers of the Firm, by providing, for example,
that the Firm will:
(i) Give a rehiring preference to such workers;
(ii) Make efforts to find new work for a number of such workers;
and
(iii) Assist such workers in obtaining benefits under available
programs; and
(3) Demonstrate that the Firm will make all reasonable efforts to
use its own resources for its recovery, though under certain
circumstances, resources of related Firms or major stockholders will
also be considered; and
(c) The Adjustment Assistance identified in the Adjustment Proposal
must consist of specialized consulting services designed to assist the
Firm in becoming more competitive in the global marketplace. For
purposes of this paragraph (c), Adjustment Assistance generally
consists of knowledge-based services such as market penetration
studies, customized business improvements, and designs for new
products. Adjustment Assistance does not include expenditures for
capital improvements or for the purchase of business machinery or
supplies.
Subpart E--Protective Provisions
Sec. 315.13 Persons engaged by Firms to expedite petitions and
Adjustment Proposals.
EDA will provide no Adjustment Assistance to any Firm unless the
owners, partners, members, directors, or officers thereof certify in
writing to EDA:
(a) The names of any attorneys, agents, and other Persons engaged
by or on behalf of the Firm for the purpose of expediting petitions for
such Adjustment Assistance or Adjustment Proposals; and
(b) The fees paid or to be paid to any such Person.
Sec. 315.14 Conflicts of interest.
EDA will provide no Adjustment Assistance to any Firm under this
part unless the owners, partners, members, directors, or officers
thereof execute an agreement binding them and the Firm for a period of
two years after such Adjustment Assistance is provided, to refrain from
employing, tendering any office or employment to, or retaining for
professional services any Person who, on the date such assistance or
any part thereof was provided, or within one year prior thereto, shall
have served as an officer, attorney, agent, or employee occupying a
position or engaging in activities which involved discretion with
respect to the provision of such Adjustment Assistance.
Subpart F--International Trade Commission Investigations
Sec. 315.15 Affirmative findings.
Whenever the International Trade Commission makes an affirmative
finding under section 202(b) of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C. 2252) that
increased imports are a substantial cause of serious injury or threat
thereof with respect to an industry, EDA will notify the TAACs and
provide expedited review of petitions and Adjustment Proposals from
Firms within the specified industry.
Dated: January 6, 2020.
John Fleming,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Economic Development.
[FR Doc. 2020-00453 Filed 2-13-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-24-P