Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From the Manufacturing of Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels, and Other Allied Surface Coating Products, 8229-8230 [2020-02828]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules II. What is being addressed in this document? III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? IV. What action is the EPA taking? V. Incorporation by Reference VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0033; FRL–10004– 98–Region 7] Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From the Manufacturing of Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels, and Other Allied Surface Coating Products Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by Missouri on February 15, 2019. The submission revises a Missouri regulation that controls emissions from facilities that manufacture paints, varnishes, enamels, and other allied surface coating products. The revisions to this rule include adding incorporations by reference to other State rules, including definitions specific to the rule, revising unnecessarily restrictive language, making other administrative wording changes, and do not impact the stringency of the SIP or air quality. Approval of these revisions will ensure consistency between state and federallyapproved rules. DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 16, 2020. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– OAR–2020–0033 to https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID No. for this rulemaking. Comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov/, including any personal information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Will Stone, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913) 551–7714; email address stone.william@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: Table of Contents I. Written Comments VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:36 Feb 12, 2020 Jkt 250001 I. Written Comments Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2020– 0033, at https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. 8229 III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The State provided public notice on this SIP revision from June 15, 2018, to September 6, 2018, and received four comments. The State revised the rule based on the comments submitted. In addition, as explained above and in more detail in the technical support document which is part of this document, the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing regulations. IV. What action is the EPA taking? The EPA is proposing to approve Missouri’s request to revise 10 CSR 10– 2.300. We are processing this as a proposed action because we are soliciting comments on this proposed action. Final rulemaking will occur after consideration of any comments. V. Incorporation by Reference In this document, the EPA is proposing to include regulatory text in an EPA final rule that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the Missouri Regulations described in the proposed amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth II. What is being addressed in this below. The EPA has made, and will document? continue to make, these materials The EPA is proposing to approve generally available through revisions to 10 Code of State Regulation www.regulations.gov and at the EPA (CSR) 10–2.300, Control of Emissions Region 7 Office (please contact the from the Manufacturing of Paints, person identified in the FOR FURTHER Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels and Other INFORMATION CONTACT section of this Allied Surface Coating Products in the preamble for more information). Missouri SIP. Missouri made several VI. Statutory and Executive Order revisions to the rule. These revisions are Reviews described in detail in the technical Under the CAA, the Administrator is support document (TSD) included in required to approve a SIP submission the docket for this action. that complies with the provisions of the Missouri received four comments Act and applicable Federal regulations. from EPA during the comment period. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Missouri responded to all comments as Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the noted in the State submission included EPA’s role is to approve state choices, in the docket for this action. Missouri provided that they meet the criteria of responded to EPA’s comments and, as the CAA. Accordingly, this action described in the TSD for this action, merely approves state law as meeting amended the rule in response to some Federal requirements and does not of EPA’s comments. EPA finds that impose additional requirements beyond Missouri has adequately addressed the those imposed by state law. For that comments. reason, this action: Therefore, EPA is proposing to • Is not a significant regulatory action approve the revisions to this rule subject to review by the Office of because it will not have a negative Management and Budget under impact on air quality. Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM 13FEP1 8230 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866. • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not involve technical standards; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: February 6, 2020. James Gulliford, Regional Administrator, Region 7. For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend 40 CFR part 52 as set forth below: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart AA—Missouri 2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising the entry ‘‘10–2.300’’ to read as follows: ■ § 52.1320 List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by * Identification of plan. * * (c) * * * * * EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS Missouri citation State effective date Title EPA approval date Explanation Missouri Department of Natural Resources * * * * * * * Chapter 2—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area * * 10–2.300 ........................... * * * * * * Control of Emissions from Manufacturing of Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels and Other Allied Surface Coating Products. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2020–02828 Filed 2–12–20; 8:45 am] 2/28/2019 * ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS [EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0039; FRL–10005– 03–Region 7] Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Removal of Control of Emissions From the Application of Automotive Underbody Deadeners Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: 17:36 Feb 12, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 * [Date of publication of the final rule in the Federal Register], [Federal Register citation of the final rule]. * BILLING CODE 6560–50–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 * * * The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Missouri on December 3, 2018, and supplemented by letter on May 22, 2019. Missouri requests that the EPA remove a rule related to control of emissions from the application of automotive underbody deadeners in the Kansas City, Missouri area from its SIP. This removal does not have an adverse effect on air quality. The EPA’s proposed approval of this rule revision SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM 13FEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8229-8230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02828]



[[Page 8229]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0033; FRL-10004-98-Region 7]


Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From the 
Manufacturing of Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels, and Other Allied 
Surface Coating Products

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing 
approval of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by 
Missouri on February 15, 2019. The submission revises a Missouri 
regulation that controls emissions from facilities that manufacture 
paints, varnishes, enamels, and other allied surface coating products. 
The revisions to this rule include adding incorporations by reference 
to other State rules, including definitions specific to the rule, 
revising unnecessarily restrictive language, making other 
administrative wording changes, and do not impact the stringency of the 
SIP or air quality. Approval of these revisions will ensure consistency 
between state and federally-approved rules.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 16, 2020.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2020-0033 to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 
instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID 
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received will be posted without 
change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal 
information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and 
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Written 
Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this 
document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Will Stone, Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner 
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913) 551-7714; email 
address [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and 
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Written Comments

    Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2020-
0033, at https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot 
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any 
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any 
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a 
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment 
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA 
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located 
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other 
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA 
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, 
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

II. What is being addressed in this document?

    The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to 10 Code of State 
Regulation (CSR) 10-2.300, Control of Emissions from the Manufacturing 
of Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels and Other Allied Surface 
Coating Products in the Missouri SIP. Missouri made several revisions 
to the rule. These revisions are described in detail in the technical 
support document (TSD) included in the docket for this action.
    Missouri received four comments from EPA during the comment period. 
Missouri responded to all comments as noted in the State submission 
included in the docket for this action. Missouri responded to EPA's 
comments and, as described in the TSD for this action, amended the rule 
in response to some of EPA's comments. EPA finds that Missouri has 
adequately addressed the comments.
    Therefore, EPA is proposing to approve the revisions to this rule 
because it will not have a negative impact on air quality.

III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?

    The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP 
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also 
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The 
State provided public notice on this SIP revision from June 15, 2018, 
to September 6, 2018, and received four comments. The State revised the 
rule based on the comments submitted. In addition, as explained above 
and in more detail in the technical support document which is part of 
this document, the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of 
the CAA, including section 110 and implementing regulations.

IV. What action is the EPA taking?

    The EPA is proposing to approve Missouri's request to revise 10 CSR 
10-2.300. We are processing this as a proposed action because we are 
soliciting comments on this proposed action. Final rulemaking will 
occur after consideration of any comments.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, the EPA is proposing to include regulatory text 
in an EPA final rule that includes incorporation by reference. In 
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to 
incorporate by reference the Missouri Regulations described in the 
proposed amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has 
made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available 
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 7 Office (please 
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section of this preamble for more information).

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735,

[[Page 8230]]

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under 
Executive Order 12866.
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology 
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not 
involve technical standards; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or 
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does 
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct 
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by 
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: February 6, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend 
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart AA--Missouri

0
2. In Sec.  52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising 
the entry ``10-2.300'' to read as follows:


Sec.  52.1320   Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                        EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             State
       Missouri citation                  Title            effective   EPA approval date        Explanation
                                                              date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Chapter 2--Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10-2.300.......................  Control of Emissions       2/28/2019  [Date of           ......................
                                  from Manufacturing of                 publication of
                                  Paints, Varnishes,                    the final rule
                                  Lacquers, Enamels and                 in the Federal
                                  Other Allied Surface                  Register],
                                  Coating Products.                     [Federal
                                                                        Register
                                                                        citation of the
                                                                        final rule].
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-02828 Filed 2-12-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.