Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From the Manufacturing of Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels, and Other Allied Surface Coating Products, 8229-8230 [2020-02828]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0033; FRL–10004–
98–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of
Emissions From the Manufacturing of
Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels,
and Other Allied Surface Coating
Products
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by Missouri on
February 15, 2019. The submission
revises a Missouri regulation that
controls emissions from facilities that
manufacture paints, varnishes, enamels,
and other allied surface coating
products. The revisions to this rule
include adding incorporations by
reference to other State rules, including
definitions specific to the rule, revising
unnecessarily restrictive language,
making other administrative wording
changes, and do not impact the
stringency of the SIP or air quality.
Approval of these revisions will ensure
consistency between state and federallyapproved rules.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 16, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2020–0033 to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID No. for this
rulemaking. Comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on sending
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Will
Stone, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality
Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219;
telephone number (913) 551–7714;
email address stone.william@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Feb 12, 2020
Jkt 250001
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2020–
0033, at https://www.regulations.gov.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
8229
III. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. The State provided
public notice on this SIP revision from
June 15, 2018, to September 6, 2018,
and received four comments. The State
revised the rule based on the comments
submitted. In addition, as explained
above and in more detail in the
technical support document which is
part of this document, the revision
meets the substantive SIP requirements
of the CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is proposing to approve
Missouri’s request to revise 10 CSR 10–
2.300. We are processing this as a
proposed action because we are
soliciting comments on this proposed
action. Final rulemaking will occur after
consideration of any comments.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
proposing to include regulatory text in
an EPA final rule that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the Missouri
Regulations described in the proposed
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
II. What is being addressed in this
below. The EPA has made, and will
document?
continue to make, these materials
The EPA is proposing to approve
generally available through
revisions to 10 Code of State Regulation www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
(CSR) 10–2.300, Control of Emissions
Region 7 Office (please contact the
from the Manufacturing of Paints,
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels and Other INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
Allied Surface Coating Products in the
preamble for more information).
Missouri SIP. Missouri made several
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
revisions to the rule. These revisions are
Reviews
described in detail in the technical
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
support document (TSD) included in
required to approve a SIP submission
the docket for this action.
that complies with the provisions of the
Missouri received four comments
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
from EPA during the comment period.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Missouri responded to all comments as
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
noted in the State submission included
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
in the docket for this action. Missouri
provided that they meet the criteria of
responded to EPA’s comments and, as
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
described in the TSD for this action,
merely approves state law as meeting
amended the rule in response to some
Federal requirements and does not
of EPA’s comments. EPA finds that
impose additional requirements beyond
Missouri has adequately addressed the
those imposed by state law. For that
comments.
reason, this action:
Therefore, EPA is proposing to
• Is not a significant regulatory action
approve the revisions to this rule
subject to review by the Office of
because it will not have a negative
Management and Budget under
impact on air quality.
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
8230
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: February 6, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry
‘‘10–2.300’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1320
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri citation
State
effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 2—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
*
*
10–2.300 ...........................
*
*
*
*
*
*
Control of Emissions from Manufacturing of Paints,
Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels and Other Allied
Surface Coating Products.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–02828 Filed 2–12–20; 8:45 am]
2/28/2019
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
[EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0039; FRL–10005–
03–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Removal
of Control of Emissions From the
Application of Automotive Underbody
Deadeners
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
17:36 Feb 12, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
[Date of publication of the
final rule in the Federal
Register], [Federal
Register citation of the
final rule].
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
*
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of
Missouri on December 3, 2018, and
supplemented by letter on May 22,
2019. Missouri requests that the EPA
remove a rule related to control of
emissions from the application of
automotive underbody deadeners in the
Kansas City, Missouri area from its SIP.
This removal does not have an adverse
effect on air quality. The EPA’s
proposed approval of this rule revision
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8229-8230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02828]
[[Page 8229]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0033; FRL-10004-98-Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From the
Manufacturing of Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels, and Other Allied
Surface Coating Products
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing
approval of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by
Missouri on February 15, 2019. The submission revises a Missouri
regulation that controls emissions from facilities that manufacture
paints, varnishes, enamels, and other allied surface coating products.
The revisions to this rule include adding incorporations by reference
to other State rules, including definitions specific to the rule,
revising unnecessarily restrictive language, making other
administrative wording changes, and do not impact the stringency of the
SIP or air quality. Approval of these revisions will ensure consistency
between state and federally-approved rules.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 16, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2020-0033 to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Written
Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Will Stone, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913) 551-7714; email
address [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2020-
0033, at https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
II. What is being addressed in this document?
The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to 10 Code of State
Regulation (CSR) 10-2.300, Control of Emissions from the Manufacturing
of Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels and Other Allied Surface
Coating Products in the Missouri SIP. Missouri made several revisions
to the rule. These revisions are described in detail in the technical
support document (TSD) included in the docket for this action.
Missouri received four comments from EPA during the comment period.
Missouri responded to all comments as noted in the State submission
included in the docket for this action. Missouri responded to EPA's
comments and, as described in the TSD for this action, amended the rule
in response to some of EPA's comments. EPA finds that Missouri has
adequately addressed the comments.
Therefore, EPA is proposing to approve the revisions to this rule
because it will not have a negative impact on air quality.
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
State provided public notice on this SIP revision from June 15, 2018,
to September 6, 2018, and received four comments. The State revised the
rule based on the comments submitted. In addition, as explained above
and in more detail in the technical support document which is part of
this document, the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of
the CAA, including section 110 and implementing regulations.
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is proposing to approve Missouri's request to revise 10 CSR
10-2.300. We are processing this as a proposed action because we are
soliciting comments on this proposed action. Final rulemaking will
occur after consideration of any comments.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is proposing to include regulatory text
in an EPA final rule that includes incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the Missouri Regulations described in the
proposed amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 7 Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735,
[[Page 8230]]
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: February 6, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry ``10-2.300'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective EPA approval date Explanation
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 2--Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10-2.300....................... Control of Emissions 2/28/2019 [Date of ......................
from Manufacturing of publication of
Paints, Varnishes, the final rule
Lacquers, Enamels and in the Federal
Other Allied Surface Register],
Coating Products. [Federal
Register
citation of the
final rule].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-02828 Filed 2-12-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
