Approval and Conditional Approval of California Air Plan Revision, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District, Reasonably Available Control Technology, 8181-8185 [2020-00780]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
adjustment activities will occur as
required.
No Takings Implications
The Agency has analyzed this final
rule in accordance with the principles
and criteria found in E.O. 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights, and has determined that the rule
does not pose the risk of a taking of
protected private property.
Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the
Public
This final rule does not contain any
recordkeeping or reporting requirements
or other information collection
requirements as defined in 5 CFR part
1320 that are not already required by
law, or are not already approved for use,
and therefore imposes no additional
paperwork burden on the public.
Accordingly, the review provisions of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3521), and its
implementing regulations at 5 CFR part
1320, do not apply.
National Environmental Policy Act
Agency regulations at 36 CFR
220.6(d)(2) (73 FR 43093) exclude from
documentation in an environmental
assessment or impact statement ‘‘rules,
regulations, or policies to establish
Service-wide administrative procedures,
program processes, or instructions.’’ The
Agency has concluded that the revisions
to regulations effected in this final rule
fall within this category of actions and
that no extraordinary circumstances
exist which would require preparation
of an environment assessment or
environmental impact statement.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Energy Effects
This final rule has been reviewed
under E.O. 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.’’ It
has been determined that this final rule
does not constitute a significant energy
action as defined in E.O. 13211.
Civil Justice Reform
The Agency has analyzed this rule in
accordance with the principles and
criteria of Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. The Agency has not
identified any State or local laws or
regulations that conflict with this
regulation or that would impede full
implementation of this rule.
Nevertheless, in the event that such
conflicts were to be identified, the final
rule, if implemented, will preempt the
State or local laws or regulations found
to be in conflict. However, in that case,
(1) no retroactive effect will be given to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Feb 12, 2020
Jkt 250001
this final rule; and (2) the USDA will
not require the use of administrative
proceedings before parties could file
suit in court challenging its provisions.
Unfunded Mandates
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531–1538), the Agency has assessed
the effects of this final rule on State,
local, and Tribal governments and the
private sector. This final rule does not
compel the expenditure of $100 million
or more by any State, local, or Tribal
governments, or anyone in the private
sector. Therefore, statements as
described under sections 202 and 205 of
the Act are not required.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 254
Community facilities, National
forests.
Therefore, for the reasons set forth in
the preamble, the Forest Service amends
part 254 of title 36 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 254—LANDOWNERSHIP
ADJUSTMENT
determination of public interest is
made.
*
*
*
*
*
■
5. Add § 254.38 to read as follows:
§ 254.38
Disposition of proceeds.
(a) The net proceeds derived from any
sale or exchange in § 254.32(c) shall be
deposited in the fund commonly known
as the ‘‘Sisk Act’’ account.
(b) Amounts deposited shall be
available until expended for:
(1) Acquisition of land or interests in
land for administrative sites for the
National Forest System in the State from
which the amounts were derived; or
(2) Acquisition of land or interests in
land for inclusion in the National Forest
System in that State, including land or
interests in land that enhance
opportunities for recreational access.
Dated: January 29, 2020.
James E. Hubbard,
Undersecretary, Natural Resources and
Environment.
[FR Doc. 2020–02299 Filed 2–12–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Subpart C—Conveyance of Small
Tracts
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
1. The authority citation for part 254,
subpart C, continues to read:
40 CFR Part 52
■
Authority: Pub. L. 97–465; 96 Stat. 2535.
2. Amend § 254.32 by revising the
section heading, and adding paragraph
(c) to read as follows:
8181
[EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0431; FRL–10004–
30–Region 9]
■
§ 254.32 Encroachments and other
improvements.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) This subpart also allows
conveyance of parcels that are used as
a cemetery (including a parcel of not
more than one acre adjacent to the
parcel used as a cemetery), a landfill, or
a sewage treatment plant under a special
use authorization issued or otherwise
authorized by a Forest Service official.
3. Amend § 254.35 by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 254.35
Limitations.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The value of Federal lands
conveyed in any transaction, pursuant
to this subpart, shall not exceed
$500,000.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Amend § 254.36 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 254.36
Determining public interest.
(a) All pertinent requirements of this
subpart must be met before a
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Approval and Conditional Approval of
California Air Plan Revision, Imperial
County Air Pollution Control District,
Reasonably Available Control
Technology
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve in part and conditionally
approve in part revisions to the Imperial
County Air Pollution Control District
(ICAPCD or ‘‘District’’) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These revisions concern the
ICAPCD’s Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) requirements for
the 2008 8-hour ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
and negative declarations for several
source categories. We are approving the
local SIP revisions to demonstrate that
RACT is implemented as required under
the Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘the Act’’).
DATES: These rules are effective on
March 16, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
13FER1
8182
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0431. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eugene Chen, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4304, chen.eugene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On September 19, 2019 (84 FR 49202),
the EPA proposed to approve and
conditionally approve the ICAPCD’s
‘‘Reasonably Availability Control
Technology Analysis for the 2017
Imperial County State Implementation
Plan for the 2008 8-hr Ozone Standard’’
(2017 RACT SIP), which was submitted
to the EPA by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) on November
14, 2017, for approval as a revision to
the California SIP. The 2017 RACT SIP
also included ICAPCD’s Minute Order
No. 20, which adopted the 2017 RACT
SIP and negative declarations for the
2017 RACT SIP.
Specifically, the EPA proposed to
conditionally approve the ICAPCD’s
2017 RACT SIP with respect to Rule
415, Transfer and Storage of Gasoline,
and to approve the remainder of the
2017 RACT SIP. The EPA proposed to
fully approve the ICAPCD’s negative
declarations for the 2017 RACT SIP.
We proposed to approve and
conditionally approve the 2017 RACT
SIP and negative declarations because
we determined that with the exception
of the deficiency identified in Rule 415,
they complied with the relevant CAA
requirements, and the District and
CARB made commitments to revise Rule
415 that were sufficient to allow for a
conditional approval with respect to
sources covered by the Control
Techniques Guidelines source category
Control of Hydrocarbons from Tank
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Feb 12, 2020
Jkt 250001
Truck Gasoline Loading Terminals
(EPA–450/2–77–026). Our proposed
action contains more information on the
submitted documents and our
evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted, and
there is no change to our assessment of
the SIP submittals as described in our
proposed action. Therefore, as
authorized in section 110(k)(3) and
(k)(4) of the Act, the EPA is
conditionally approving the ICAPCD’s
2017 RACT SIP with respect to Rule
415, Transfer and Storage of Gasoline,
and approving the remainder of
ICAPCD’s 2017 RACT SIP. In addition,
the EPA is fully approving the ICAPCD’s
negative declarations for the 2017 RACT
SIP.
The EPA is also making a nonsubstantive change to 40 CFR
52.222(a)(12), combining existing
paragraphs 52.222(a)(12)(i) and
52.222(a)(12)(ii) by moving the text of
paragraph 52.222(a)(12)(ii), ‘‘Submitted
on December 21, 2010 and adopted on
July 13, 2010,’’ to precede the CTG table
in paragraph 52.222(a)(12)(i). The
negative declarations that are being
added in this rulemaking action are
being placed in paragraph
52.222(a)(12)(ii).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
13FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by April 13, 2020.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(530) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan—in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(530) The following plan was
submitted on November 14, 2017 by the
Governor’s designee.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional Materials.
(A) Imperial County Air Pollution
Control District.
(1) Imperial County 2017 State
Implementation Plan for the 2008 8Hour Ozone Standard, adopted
September 12, 2017, Chapter 7
(‘‘Reasonably Available Control
Technology Assessment’’).
(2) Imperial County 2017 State
Implementation Plan for the 2008 8Hour Ozone Standard, adopted
September 12, 2017, Appendix B
(‘‘Reasonably Available Control
Technology Analysis for the 2017
Imperial County State Implementation
Plan for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone
Standard’’).
(B) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 52.222 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(12) to read as
follows:
(a) * * *
(12) Imperial County Air Pollution
Control District.
(i) Submitted on December 21, 2010
and adopted on July 13, 2010.
CTG
document No.
Title
Aerospace .......................................
Automobile and Light-duty Trucks,
Surface Coating of.
EPA–453/R–97–004, Aerospace CTG and MACT.
EPA–450/2–77–008, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume II:
Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks.
EPA–453/R–08–006, Control Techniques Guidelines for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings.
EPA–450/2–77–008, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume II:
Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks.
EPA–453/R–08–004, Controls Techniques Guidelines for Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing.
EPA–450/2–78–032, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume VII:
Factory Surface Coating of Flat Wood Paneling.
EPA–453/R–06–004, Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood Paneling Coatings.
EPA–453/R–06–003, Control Techniques Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing.
EPA–450/2–78–033, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources, Volume III:
Graphic Arts—Rotogravure and Flexography.
EPA–450/2–77–034, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume V:
Surface Coating of Large Appliances.
EPA–453/R–07–004, Control Techniques Guidelines for Large Appliance Coatings.
EPA–450/3–82–009, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners.
EPA–453/R–06–002, Control Techniques Guidelines for Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing.
EPA–450/2–77–033, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume IV:
Surface Coating of Insulation of Magnet Wire.
EPA–450/2–77–032, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume III:
Surface Coating of Metal Furniture.
EPA–453/R–07–005, Control Techniques Guidelines for Metal Furniture Coatings.
EPA–453/R–08–003, Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings.
Cans and Coils, Surface Coating of
Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing .......
Flat Wood Paneling, Surface Coating of.
Flexible Packing Printing ................
Graphic Arts—Rotogravure and
Flexography.
Large Appliances, Surface Coating
of.
Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners .......
Offset Lithographic Printing and
Letterpress Printing.
Magnet Wire, Surface Coating for
Insulation of.
Metal Furniture Coatings ................
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Dated: December 30, 2019.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
8183
Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic
Parts Coatings.
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and
Products, Surface Coating of.
Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives
Natural Gas/Gasoline Processing
Plants Equipment Leaks.
Paper, Film and Foil Coatings ........
Petroleum Refineries ......................
Pharmaceutical Products ................
Pneumatic Rubber Tires, Manufacture of.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Feb 12, 2020
EPA–450/2–78–015, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume IV:
Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products.
EPA–453/R–08–005, Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives.
EPA–450/2–83–007, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Equipment Leaks from Natural Gas/Gasoline
Processing Plants.
EPA–453R–07–003, Control Techniques Guidelines for Paper, Film and Foil Coatings.
EPA–450/2–77–025, Control of Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems, Wastewater Separators, and Process Unit Turnarounds.
EPA–450/2–78–036, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment.
EPA–450/2–78–029, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products.
EPA–450/2–78–030, Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires.
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
13FER1
8184
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
CTG
document No.
Title
Polyester Resin ...............................
EPA–450/3–83–008, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Manufacture of High-Density
Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyrene Resins.
EPA–450/3–83–006, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Synthetic Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin Manufacturing Equipment.
EPA–453/R–94–032, Shipbuilding/Repair.
EPA–450/3–84–015, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes in
Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry.
EPA–450/4–91–031, Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry.
EPA–453/R–96–007, Wood Furniture.
Shipbuilding/Repair .........................
Synthetic Organic Chemical ...........
Wood Furniture ...............................
(ii) The following negative
declarations for the 2008 8-hour ozone
September 12, 2017, and submitted to
the EPA on November 14, 2017.
CTG document No.
Title
EPA–450/2–77–008 ........................
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume II: Surface Coating of
Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Solvent Metal Cleaning.
Control of Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems, Wastewater Separators, and Process Unit Turnarounds.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume III: Surface Coating of
Metal Furniture.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume IV: Surface Coating of Insulation of Magnet Wire.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume V: Surface Coating of
Large Appliances.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume VI: Surface Coating of
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume VII: Factory Surface
Coating of Flat Wood Paneling.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume VIII: Graphic Arts—Rotogravure and Flexography.
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment.
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners.
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Synthetic Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin Manufacturing Equipment.
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Equipment Leaks from Natural Gas/Gasoline Processing Plants.
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Manufacture of High-Density Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyrene Resins.
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes in Synthetic Organic
Chemical Manufacturing Industry.
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations in
Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry.
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations.
Control Techniques Guidelines for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Operations (Surface Coating).
EPA–450/2–77–022 ........................
EPA–450/2–77–025 ........................
EPA–450/2–77–032 ........................
EPA–450/2–77–033 ........................
EPA–450/2–77–034 ........................
EPA–450/2–78–015 ........................
EPA–450/2–78–029 ........................
EPA–450/2–78–030 ........................
EPA–450/2–78–032 ........................
EPA–450/2–78–033 ........................
EPA–450/2–78–036 ........................
EPA–450/3–82–009 ........................
EPA–450/3–83–006 ........................
EPA–450/3–83–007 ........................
EPA–450/3–83–008 ........................
EPA–450/3–84–015 ........................
EPA–450/4–91–031 ........................
EPA–453/R–96–007 .......................
EPA–453/R–94–032, 61 FR 44050;
8/27/96.
EPA–453/R–97–004, 59 FR 29216;
6/06/94.
EPA–453/R–06–001 .......................
EPA–453/R–06–002 .......................
EPA–453/R–06–003 .......................
EPA–453/R–06–004 .......................
EPA 453/R–07–003 ........................
EPA 453/R–07–004 ........................
EPA 453/R–07–005 ........................
EPA 453/R–08–003 ........................
EPA 453/R–08–003 ........................
EPA 453/R–08–003 ........................
EPA 453/R–08–003 ........................
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
NAAQS were adopted by the Imperial
County Air Pollution Control District on
EPA 453/R–08–003 ........................
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
453/R–08–004 ........................
453/R–08–005 ........................
453/R–08–006 ........................
453/B16–001 ..........................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Feb 12, 2020
Aerospace (CTG & MACT).
Control Techniques Guidelines for Industrial Cleaning Solvents.
Control Techniques Guidelines for Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing.
Control Techniques Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing.
Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood Paneling Coatings.
Control Techniques Guidelines for Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings.
Control Techniques Guidelines for Large Appliance Coatings.
Control Techniques Guidelines for Metal Furniture Coatings.
Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings, Table 2—Metal Parts
and Products.
Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings, Table 3—Plastic Parts
and Products.
Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings, Table 4—Automotive/
Transportation and Business Machine Plastic Parts.
Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings, Table 5—Pleasure
Craft Surface Coating.
Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings, Table 6—Motor Vehicle Materials.
Control Techniques Guidelines for Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials.
Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives.
Control Techniques Guidelines for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings.
Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry.
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
13FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
4. Section 52.248 is amended by
adding paragraph (i) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.248 Identification of plan—conditional
approval.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) The EPA is conditionally
approving a portion of the California SIP
revision submitted on November 14,
2017 demonstrating that control
measures in the Imperial County Air
Pollution Control District implement
RACT for the 2008 8-hour National
Ambient Air Quality Standards. The
conditional approval is based on a
commitment from the state to submit
new or revised rules that will correct
deficiencies in Rule 415, Transfer and
Storage of Gasoline to establish RACTlevel controls for sources covered by the
Control Techniques Guidelines source
category Control of Hydrocarbons from
Tank Truck Gasoline Loading Terminals
(EPA–450/2–77–026). If the State fails to
meet it commitment by one year from
the date of this conditional approval,
the conditional approval is treated as a
disapproval.
[FR Doc. 2020–00780 Filed 2–12–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2019–0043; FRL–10004–
67–Region 6]
Air Plan Approval; Texas; Revisions to
Control of Air Pollution by Permits for
New Construction or Modification
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Federal Clean
Air Act (CAA or the Act), the United
States Environmental Protection Agency
(U.S. EPA) is finalizing approval of
revisions to the Texas (TX) State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on
February 22, 2019, that revised the
State’s New Source Review (NSR)
permitting rules contained in Title 30 of
the Texas Administrative Code (TAC)
Chapter 116 Control of Air Pollution by
Air Permits for New Construction or
Modification. Our final action on the
February 22, 2019, submittal also
addresses portions of an April 16, 2014,
SIP submittal pertaining to the
permitting of Greenhouse Gas (GHG)
emissions that were subsequently
invalidated by the U.S. Supreme Court.
The February 22, 2019, submittal
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Feb 12, 2020
Jkt 250001
appropriately removes these provisions
from the Texas SIP.
DATES: This rule is effective on March
16, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R06–OAR–2019–0043. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the EPA Region 6 Office, 1201
Elm Street, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas
75270.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Layton, EPA Region 6 Office,
Air Permits Section (ARPE), 1201 Elm
Street, Suite 500, Dallas, TX 75270,
214–665–2136, layton.elizabeth@
epa.gov. To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment with Ms. Elizabeth Layton
or Mr. Bill Deese at 214–665–7253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ means the EPA.
I. Background
The background for this action is
discussed in depth in our November 4,
2019, proposal (84 FR 59325). In that
document we proposed to approve
revisions to the Texas SIP submitted
February 22, 2019, by the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality
(TCEQ) that revise the State’s New
Source Review (NSR) provisions
pertaining to air quality permits for the
control of air pollution by amending the
criteria for air pollution control permits
for new construction or modification, as
well as make other non-substantive
revisions. The February 22, 2019,
submittal included the removal of
provisions originally submitted on April
16, 2014, that relate to the permitting of
Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHGs) for
‘‘non-anyway’’ sources that were later
invalidated by the Supreme Court in
Utility Air Regulatory Group (UARG) v.
EPA (134 S. Ct. 2427 (2014)). See the
proposed rulemaking (84 FR 59325) for
more details. We proposed to approve
the removal of these provisions that
were impacted by the Court’s ruling.
The comments received on our
proposed rulemaking are outlined in the
section below.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8185
II. Response to Comments
We received four public comments on
the proposal. One commenter (State of
Texas) supported our proposed approval
and agreed with the EPA’s
determination that the revisions to the
Texas SIP were consistent with the CAA
and the applicable federal rules and
regulations relating to air pollution
control. We received three anonymous
public comments. One commenter
opposed the approval of provisions
relating to GHGs, another commenter
opposed approving the Texas SIP, and
one commenter opposed the approval of
previously SIP-approved regulations
containing provisions that waive permit
renewal fees for members of the military
on active duty stationed outside of the
State of Texas. All public comments
submitted are in the public docket to
this rulemaking. Our responses to the
comments are discussed below.
Comment: The State of Texas
supported the EPA’s proposed approval
action and agreed with our
determination that the revisions to the
Texas SIP were consistent with the CAA
and applicable federal rules and
regulations pertaining to air pollution
control.
Response: The EPA appreciates the
supportive comment from the State of
Texas. No changes will be made to the
proposed rule as a result of the
comment.
Comment: One anonymous
commenter stated that the EPA should
not approve portions of 30 TAC section
116.196(a) that specifically pertain to
the exemption from permit renewal fees
if a permit holder is on active duty in
the U.S. Armed Forces and is serving
outside the State of Texas. The
commenter argues that if the permit
holder is in fact serving in the military,
then the TCEQ/EPA should require a
secondary ‘‘responsible official’’ to
submit timely permit renewal
applications and the TCEQ/EPA should
not grant exemptions from permit
renewal fees as an approved provision
in the SIP. The commenter states that
this provision should be considered a
state-only provision and not be
approved into the SIP.
Response: As a threshold matter, the
EPA must respond to all significant
comments received. While considering
significant comments, a determination
must be made regarding the comment’s
relevance, i.e., if the subject matter of
the comment is relevant to the specific
action being reviewed and submitted for
approval. The EPA is only required to
respond to comments that are
determined to be relevant, meaning in
part that any such comment, after our
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
13FER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8181-8185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00780]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2019-0431; FRL-10004-30-Region 9]
Approval and Conditional Approval of California Air Plan
Revision, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District, Reasonably
Available Control Technology
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve in part and conditionally approve in part revisions
to the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District (ICAPCD or
``District'') portion of the California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These revisions concern the ICAPCD's Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACT) requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and negative declarations
for several source categories. We are approving the local SIP revisions
to demonstrate that RACT is implemented as required under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or ``the Act'').
DATES: These rules are effective on March 16, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID
[[Page 8182]]
No. EPA-R09-OAR-2019-0431. All documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through
https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene Chen, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-
4304, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On September 19, 2019 (84 FR 49202), the EPA proposed to approve
and conditionally approve the ICAPCD's ``Reasonably Availability
Control Technology Analysis for the 2017 Imperial County State
Implementation Plan for the 2008 8-hr Ozone Standard'' (2017 RACT SIP),
which was submitted to the EPA by the California Air Resources Board
(CARB) on November 14, 2017, for approval as a revision to the
California SIP. The 2017 RACT SIP also included ICAPCD's Minute Order
No. 20, which adopted the 2017 RACT SIP and negative declarations for
the 2017 RACT SIP.
Specifically, the EPA proposed to conditionally approve the
ICAPCD's 2017 RACT SIP with respect to Rule 415, Transfer and Storage
of Gasoline, and to approve the remainder of the 2017 RACT SIP. The EPA
proposed to fully approve the ICAPCD's negative declarations for the
2017 RACT SIP.
We proposed to approve and conditionally approve the 2017 RACT SIP
and negative declarations because we determined that with the exception
of the deficiency identified in Rule 415, they complied with the
relevant CAA requirements, and the District and CARB made commitments
to revise Rule 415 that were sufficient to allow for a conditional
approval with respect to sources covered by the Control Techniques
Guidelines source category Control of Hydrocarbons from Tank Truck
Gasoline Loading Terminals (EPA-450/2-77-026). Our proposed action
contains more information on the submitted documents and our
evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted, and there is no change to our
assessment of the SIP submittals as described in our proposed action.
Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) and (k)(4) of the Act,
the EPA is conditionally approving the ICAPCD's 2017 RACT SIP with
respect to Rule 415, Transfer and Storage of Gasoline, and approving
the remainder of ICAPCD's 2017 RACT SIP. In addition, the EPA is fully
approving the ICAPCD's negative declarations for the 2017 RACT SIP.
The EPA is also making a non-substantive change to 40 CFR
52.222(a)(12), combining existing paragraphs 52.222(a)(12)(i) and
52.222(a)(12)(ii) by moving the text of paragraph 52.222(a)(12)(ii),
``Submitted on December 21, 2010 and adopted on July 13, 2010,'' to
precede the CTG table in paragraph 52.222(a)(12)(i). The negative
declarations that are being added in this rulemaking action are being
placed in paragraph 52.222(a)(12)(ii).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a
[[Page 8183]]
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 13, 2020. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: December 30, 2019.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(530) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan--in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(530) The following plan was submitted on November 14, 2017 by the
Governor's designee.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional Materials.
(A) Imperial County Air Pollution Control District.
(1) Imperial County 2017 State Implementation Plan for the 2008 8-
Hour Ozone Standard, adopted September 12, 2017, Chapter 7
(``Reasonably Available Control Technology Assessment'').
(2) Imperial County 2017 State Implementation Plan for the 2008 8-
Hour Ozone Standard, adopted September 12, 2017, Appendix B
(``Reasonably Available Control Technology Analysis for the 2017
Imperial County State Implementation Plan for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone
Standard'').
(B) [Reserved]
* * * * *
0
3. Section 52.222 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(12) to read as
follows:
(a) * * *
(12) Imperial County Air Pollution Control District.
(i) Submitted on December 21, 2010 and adopted on July 13, 2010.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CTG document No. Title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aerospace......................... EPA-453/R-97-004, Aerospace CTG and
MACT.
Automobile and Light-duty Trucks, EPA-450/2-77-008, Control of
Surface Coating of. Volatile Organic Emissions from
Existing Stationary Sources--Volume
II: Surface Coating of Cans, Coils,
Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and
Light-Duty Trucks.
EPA-453/R-08-006, Control Techniques
Guidelines for Automobile and Light-
Duty Truck Assembly Coatings.
Cans and Coils, Surface Coating of EPA-450/2-77-008, Control of
Volatile Organic Emissions from
Existing Stationary Sources--Volume
II: Surface Coating of Cans, Coils,
Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and
Light-Duty Trucks.
Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing..... EPA-453/R-08-004, Controls
Techniques Guidelines for
Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing.
Flat Wood Paneling, Surface EPA-450/2-78-032, Control of
Coating of. Volatile Organic Emissions from
Existing Stationary Sources--Volume
VII: Factory Surface Coating of
Flat Wood Paneling.
EPA-453/R-06-004, Control Techniques
Guidelines for Flat Wood Paneling
Coatings.
Flexible Packing Printing......... EPA-453/R-06-003, Control Techniques
Guidelines for Flexible Package
Printing.
Graphic Arts--Rotogravure and EPA-450/2-78-033, Control of
Flexography. Volatile Organic Emissions from
Existing Stationary Sources, Volume
III: Graphic Arts--Rotogravure and
Flexography.
Large Appliances, Surface Coating EPA-450/2-77-034, Control of
of. Volatile Organic Emissions from
Existing Stationary Sources--Volume
V: Surface Coating of Large
Appliances.
EPA-453/R-07-004, Control Techniques
Guidelines for Large Appliance
Coatings.
Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners...... EPA-450/3-82-009, Control of
Volatile Organic Compound Emissions
from Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners.
Offset Lithographic Printing and EPA-453/R-06-002, Control Techniques
Letterpress Printing. Guidelines for Offset Lithographic
Printing and Letterpress Printing.
Magnet Wire, Surface Coating for EPA-450/2-77-033, Control of
Insulation of. Volatile Organic Emissions from
Existing Stationary Sources--Volume
IV: Surface Coating of Insulation
of Magnet Wire.
Metal Furniture Coatings.......... EPA-450/2-77-032, Control of
Volatile Organic Emissions from
Existing Stationary Sources--Volume
III: Surface Coating of Metal
Furniture.
EPA-453/R-07-005, Control Techniques
Guidelines for Metal Furniture
Coatings.
Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic EPA-453/R-08-003, Control Techniques
Parts Coatings. Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal
and Plastic Parts Coatings.
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and EPA-450/2-78-015, Control of
Products, Surface Coating of. Volatile Organic Emissions from
Existing Stationary Sources--Volume
IV: Surface Coating of
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and
Products.
Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives EPA-453/R-08-005, Control Techniques
Guidelines for Miscellaneous
Industrial Adhesives.
Natural Gas/Gasoline Processing EPA-450/2-83-007, Control of
Plants Equipment Leaks. Volatile Organic Compound Equipment
Leaks from Natural Gas/Gasoline
Processing Plants.
Paper, Film and Foil Coatings..... EPA-453R-07-003, Control Techniques
Guidelines for Paper, Film and Foil
Coatings.
Petroleum Refineries.............. EPA-450/2-77-025, Control of
Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems,
Wastewater Separators, and Process
Unit Turnarounds.
EPA-450/2-78-036, Control of
Volatile Organic Compound Leaks
from Petroleum Refinery Equipment.
Pharmaceutical Products........... EPA-450/2-78-029, Control of
Volatile Organic Emissions from
Manufacture of Synthesized
Pharmaceutical Products.
Pneumatic Rubber Tires, EPA-450/2-78-030, Control of
Manufacture of. Volatile Organic Emissions from
Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber
Tires.
[[Page 8184]]
Polyester Resin................... EPA-450/3-83-008, Control of
Volatile Organic Compound Emissions
from Manufacture of High-Density
Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and
Polystyrene Resins.
EPA-450/3-83-006, Control of
Volatile Organic Compound Leaks
from Synthetic Organic Chemical
Polymer and Resin Manufacturing
Equipment.
Shipbuilding/Repair............... EPA-453/R-94-032, Shipbuilding/
Repair.
Synthetic Organic Chemical........ EPA-450/3-84-015, Control of
Volatile Organic Compound Emissions
from Air Oxidation Processes in
Synthetic Organic Chemical
Manufacturing Industry.
EPA-450/4-91-031, Control of
Volatile Organic Compound Emissions
from Reactor Processes and
Distillation Operations in
Synthetic Organic Chemical
Manufacturing Industry.
Wood Furniture.................... EPA-453/R-96-007, Wood Furniture.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) The following negative declarations for the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS were adopted by the Imperial County Air Pollution Control
District on September 12, 2017, and submitted to the EPA on November
14, 2017.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CTG document No. Title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA-450/2-77-008.................. Control of Volatile Organic
Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources--Volume II: Surface Coating
of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics,
Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks.
EPA-450/2-77-022.................. Control of Volatile Organic
Emissions from Solvent Metal
Cleaning.
EPA-450/2-77-025.................. Control of Refinery Vacuum Producing
Systems, Wastewater Separators, and
Process Unit Turnarounds.
EPA-450/2-77-032.................. Control of Volatile Organic
Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources--Volume III: Surface
Coating of Metal Furniture.
EPA-450/2-77-033.................. Control of Volatile Organic
Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources--Volume IV: Surface Coating
of Insulation of Magnet Wire.
EPA-450/2-77-034.................. Control of Volatile Organic
Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources--Volume V: Surface Coating
of Large Appliances.
EPA-450/2-78-015.................. Control of Volatile Organic
Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources--Volume VI: Surface Coating
of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and
Products.
EPA-450/2-78-029.................. Control of Volatile Organic
Emissions from Manufacture of
Synthesized Pharmaceutical
Products.
EPA-450/2-78-030.................. Control of Volatile Organic
Emissions from Manufacture of
Pneumatic Rubber Tires.
EPA-450/2-78-032.................. Control of Volatile Organic
Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources--Volume VII: Factory
Surface Coating of Flat Wood
Paneling.
EPA-450/2-78-033.................. Control of Volatile Organic
Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources--Volume VIII: Graphic Arts--
Rotogravure and Flexography.
EPA-450/2-78-036.................. Control of Volatile Organic Compound
Leaks from Petroleum Refinery
Equipment.
EPA-450/3-82-009.................. Control of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry
Cleaners.
EPA-450/3-83-006.................. Control of Volatile Organic Compound
Leaks from Synthetic Organic
Chemical Polymer and Resin
Manufacturing Equipment.
EPA-450/3-83-007.................. Control of Volatile Organic Compound
Equipment Leaks from Natural Gas/
Gasoline Processing Plants.
EPA-450/3-83-008.................. Control of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions from Manufacture of High-
Density Polyethylene,
Polypropylene, and Polystyrene
Resins.
EPA-450/3-84-015.................. Control of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions from Air Oxidation
Processes in Synthetic Organic
Chemical Manufacturing Industry.
EPA-450/4-91-031.................. Control of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions from Reactor Processes
and Distillation Operations in
Synthetic Organic Chemical
Manufacturing Industry.
EPA-453/R-96-007.................. Control of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions from Wood Furniture
Manufacturing Operations.
EPA-453/R-94-032, 61 FR 44050; 8/ Control Techniques Guidelines for
27/96. Shipbuilding and Ship Repair
Operations (Surface Coating).
EPA-453/R-97-004, 59 FR 29216; 6/ Aerospace (CTG & MACT).
06/94.
EPA-453/R-06-001.................. Control Techniques Guidelines for
Industrial Cleaning Solvents.
EPA-453/R-06-002.................. Control Techniques Guidelines for
Offset Lithographic Printing and
Letterpress Printing.
EPA-453/R-06-003.................. Control Techniques Guidelines for
Flexible Package Printing.
EPA-453/R-06-004.................. Control Techniques Guidelines for
Flat Wood Paneling Coatings.
EPA 453/R-07-003.................. Control Techniques Guidelines for
Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings.
EPA 453/R-07-004.................. Control Techniques Guidelines for
Large Appliance Coatings.
EPA 453/R-07-005.................. Control Techniques Guidelines for
Metal Furniture Coatings.
EPA 453/R-08-003.................. Control Techniques Guidelines for
Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic
Parts Coatings, Table 2--Metal
Parts and Products.
EPA 453/R-08-003.................. Control Techniques Guidelines for
Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic
Parts Coatings, Table 3--Plastic
Parts and Products.
EPA 453/R-08-003.................. Control Techniques Guidelines for
Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic
Parts Coatings, Table 4--Automotive/
Transportation and Business Machine
Plastic Parts.
EPA 453/R-08-003.................. Control Techniques Guidelines for
Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic
Parts Coatings, Table 5--Pleasure
Craft Surface Coating.
EPA 453/R-08-003.................. Control Techniques Guidelines for
Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic
Parts Coatings, Table 6--Motor
Vehicle Materials.
EPA 453/R-08-004.................. Control Techniques Guidelines for
Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing
Materials.
EPA 453/R-08-005.................. Control Techniques Guidelines for
Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives.
EPA 453/R-08-006.................. Control Techniques Guidelines for
Automobile and Light-Duty Truck
Assembly Coatings.
EPA 453/B16-001................... Control Techniques Guidelines for
the Oil and Natural Gas Industry.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 8185]]
* * * * *
0
4. Section 52.248 is amended by adding paragraph (i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.248 Identification of plan--conditional approval.
* * * * *
(i) The EPA is conditionally approving a portion of the California
SIP revision submitted on November 14, 2017 demonstrating that control
measures in the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District
implement RACT for the 2008 8-hour National Ambient Air Quality
Standards. The conditional approval is based on a commitment from the
state to submit new or revised rules that will correct deficiencies in
Rule 415, Transfer and Storage of Gasoline to establish RACT-level
controls for sources covered by the Control Techniques Guidelines
source category Control of Hydrocarbons from Tank Truck Gasoline
Loading Terminals (EPA-450/2-77-026). If the State fails to meet it
commitment by one year from the date of this conditional approval, the
conditional approval is treated as a disapproval.
[FR Doc. 2020-00780 Filed 2-12-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
