Regulatory Reform Initiative: Rules of Procedure Governing Cases Before the Office of Hearings and Appeals, 7893-7894 [2020-02494]
Download as PDF
7893
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 85, No. 29
Wednesday, February 12, 2020
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 134
RIN 3245–AH01
Regulatory Reform Initiative: Rules of
Procedure Governing Cases Before the
Office of Hearings and Appeals
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
With this deregulatory action,
the U.S. Small Business Administration
(SBA) is revising regulations regarding
rules of procedure governing cases
before the office of hearings and appeals
to remove an unnecessary regulatory
provision and to clarify an existing rule
of procedure.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 13, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN: 3245–AH01, by any
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier:
Ashley Cloud, Office of Hearings and
Appeals, U.S. Small Business
Administration, 409 Third Street SW,
Washington, DC 20416.
SBA will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
submit confidential business
information (CBI), as defined in the User
Notice at https://www.regulations.gov,
please submit the information to Ashley
Cloud, Office of Hearings and Appeals,
409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC
20416, or send an email to OHA@
sba.gov. Highlight the information that
you consider to be CBI and explain why
you believe SBA should hold this
information as confidential. SBA will
review the information and make the
final determination on whether it will
publish the information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Delorice Price Ford, Assistant
Administrator, Office of Hearings and
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Feb 11, 2020
Jkt 250001
with regulatory reform initiatives and
policies; or are associated with
Executive Orders or other Presidential
directives that have been rescinded or
substantially modified.
Appeals, (202) 401–8200 or
delorice.ford@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background Information
A. Part 134, Rules of Procedure
Governing Cases Before the Office of
Hearings and Appeals
SBA is proposing to remove § 134.317
from its regulations because the
procedure addressed in this regulation,
the return of size appeal case files, is no
longer necessary. Case files are now
transmitted electronically to the Office
of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) from
SBA’s Area Offices, which eliminates
the need to return paper records by
mail. SBA is also revising § 134.714 to
clarify that the decision of a Judge
regarding a status protest appeal from a
Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB)
or Economically Disadvantaged WomenOwned Small Business (EDWOSB) is
SBA’s final agency decision and
becomes effective upon issuance.
B. Executive Order 13771
On January 30, 2017, President Trump
signed Executive Order 13771, Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs, which, among other objectives, is
intended to ensure that an agency’s
regulatory costs are prudently managed
and controlled so as to minimize the
compliance burden imposed on the
public. For every new regulation an
agency proposes to implement, unless
prohibited by law, this Executive Order
requires the agency to (i) identify at
least two existing regulations that the
agency can cancel; and (ii) use the cost
savings from the cancelled regulations
to offset the cost of the new regulation.
C. Executive Order 13777
On February 24, 2017, the President
issued Executive Order 13777,
Enforcing the Regulatory Reform
Agenda, which further emphasized the
goal of the Administration to alleviate
the regulatory burdens placed on the
public. Under Executive Order 13777,
agencies must evaluate their existing
regulations to determine which ones
should be repealed, replaced, or
modified. In doing so, agencies should
focus on identifying regulations that,
among other things: Eliminate jobs or
inhibit job creation; are outdated,
unnecessary or ineffective; impose costs
that exceed benefits; create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
II. Section by Section Analysis
A. § 134.317
Return of the Case File
SBA is proposing to remove § 134.317
of its regulations, which currently states
that upon issuance of a decision, OHA
will return the case file to the
transmitting Area Office. When a size
appeal is filed, SBA’s Area Office will
often mail the original paper protest file
to OHA for review. Pursuant to
§ 134.317, OHA will then send the
original file back to the Area Office at
the conclusion of the appeal process.
For several years, however, OHA has
transitioned many of its processes to
electronic transmission and storage.
OHA will now transition this part of the
size appeal process to a completely
electronic method. Therefore, neither
the Area Offices nor OHA will need to
mail the paper protest file back and
forth. As such, this regulation is no
longer necessary.
B. § 134.714 When must the Judge
issue his or her decision?
SBA is proposing to add language to
§ 134.714 of its regulations to clarify
that decisions issued by OHA pursuant
to WOSB or EDWOSB status protest
appeals are considered final agency
decisions. Currently, the rule is silent
on the issue, which could lead to
confusion since other size and status
appeal regulations in part 134 clearly
state that the OHA decision is a final
agency decision. See § 134.316(d) (size
appeals), § 134.409(a) (8(a) appeals), and
§ 134.515(a) (Service-Disabled VeteranOwned Small Business Concern status
protest appeals). SBA does not follow a
different process for women-owned
businesses. For example, OHA’s WOSB/
EDWOSB appeal decisions currently
state that the decision is the final agency
decision. As such, SBA believes that the
proposed revision for § 134.714 will
clarify that the Judge’s decision in a
WOSB or EDWOSB status protest appeal
is the final agency decision and that the
decision becomes effective upon
issuance.
E:\FR\FM\12FEP1.SGM
12FEP1
7894
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 29 / Wednesday, February 12, 2020 / Proposed Rules
III. Compliance With Executive Orders
12866, 13771, 12988, and 13132, the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.,
Ch. 35), and the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612)
A. Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this rule
does not constitute a significant
regulatory action for purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and is not a
major rule under the Congressional
Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801, et seq.
B. Executive Order 13771
This proposed rule is expected to be
an Executive Order deregulatory action
with an annualized net savings of
$28,733 and a net present value of
$410,478, both in 2016 dollars.
This rule proposes to remove
§ 134.317, Return of the case file,
because it is no longer necessary. Case
files will now be transmitted
electronically to OHA from the Area
Office, eliminating the need to return
paper records by mail. This rule will
eliminate significant costs related to
packing, labeling, and shipping case
files from the transmitting Area Office
and returning those files by mail. OHA
receives and returns approximately 120
case files per fiscal year to the Area
Offices, for a total of 240 shipments.
Assuming it takes 45 minutes to prepare
the shipment, printing, and mailing the
files and that a GS–13 analyst performs
this work at a wage of $112,393 plus 30
percent for benefits, or $146,111 ($73
hourly), this would save the government
$13,140, annually. The cost of each
shipment is approximately $70, which
would save the government an
additional $16,800 for a total savings of
$29,940 per year, in current dollars.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Executive Order 12988
This action meets applicable
standards set forth in section 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden. The action does not have
retroactive or preemptive effect.
D. Executive Order 13132
This rule does not have federalism
implications as defined in Executive
Order 13132. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in the
Executive Order. As such, it does not
warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Feb 11, 2020
Jkt 250001
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
§ 134.714 When must the Judge issue his
or her decision?
The SBA has determined that this
final rule does not impose additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C. chapter 35.
* * * The Judge’s decision is the
final agency decision and becomes
effective upon issuance.
F. Regulatory Flexibility Act
[FR Doc. 2020–02494 Filed 2–11–20; 8:45 am]
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires administrative agencies to
consider the effect of their actions on
small entities, small non-profit
businesses, and small local
governments. Pursuant to the RFA,
when an agency issues a rule, the
agency must prepare an analysis that
describes whether the impact of the rule
will have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. If not, the RFA permits agencies
to certify to that effect. SBA believes
that the removal of § 134.317 will only
impact itself and that it will save SBA
the costs associated with mailing paper
files back and forth during the appeal
process. SBA therefore certifies that this
rule has ‘‘no significant impact upon a
substantial number of small entities’’
within the meaning of the RFA.
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 134
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Equal employment
opportunity, Lawyers, Organizations
and functions (Government agencies).
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in
the preamble, SBA proposes to amend
13 CFR part 134 as follows:
PART 134—RULES OF PROCEDURE
GOVERNING CASES BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS
1. The authority citation for part 134
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504; 15 U.S.C. 632,
634(b)(6), 634(i), 637(a), 648(l), 656(i), and
687(c); 38 U.S.C. 8127(f); E.O. 12549, 51 FR
6370, 3 CFR, 1986 Comp., p. 189.
Subpart J issued under 38 U.S.C.
8127(f)(8)(B).
Subpart K issued under 38 U.S.C.
8127(f)(8)(A).
Source: 61 FR 2683, Jan. 29, 1996, unless
otherwise noted.
§ 134.317
[Removed and Reserved]
2. Remove and reserve § 134.317.
3. Amend § 134.714 by adding a
sentence at the end of the section to
read as follows:
■
■
PO 00000
Jovita Carranza,
Administrator.
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0026; Product
Identifier 2018–SW–052–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Airbus Helicopters Model AS332C,
AS332C1, AS332L, AS332L1, AS332L2,
and EC225LP helicopters. This
proposed AD would require revising the
Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM) for your
helicopter and either installing placards
or removing the hoist arm. This
proposed AD was prompted by a failure
of a right-hand (RH) side lateral sliding
plug door (sliding door) to jettison. The
actions of this proposed AD are
intended to address an unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by March 13, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12FEP1.SGM
12FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7893-7894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02494]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 29 / Wednesday, February 12, 2020 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 7893]]
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 134
RIN 3245-AH01
Regulatory Reform Initiative: Rules of Procedure Governing Cases
Before the Office of Hearings and Appeals
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: With this deregulatory action, the U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) is revising regulations regarding rules of
procedure governing cases before the office of hearings and appeals to
remove an unnecessary regulatory provision and to clarify an existing
rule of procedure.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 13, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN: 3245-AH01, by
any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier: Ashley Cloud, Office of
Hearings and Appeals, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third
Street SW, Washington, DC 20416.
SBA will post all comments on https://www.regulations.gov. If you
wish to submit confidential business information (CBI), as defined in
the User Notice at https://www.regulations.gov, please submit the
information to Ashley Cloud, Office of Hearings and Appeals, 409 Third
Street SW, Washington, DC 20416, or send an email to [email protected].
Highlight the information that you consider to be CBI and explain why
you believe SBA should hold this information as confidential. SBA will
review the information and make the final determination on whether it
will publish the information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Delorice Price Ford, Assistant
Administrator, Office of Hearings and Appeals, (202) 401-8200 or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background Information
A. Part 134, Rules of Procedure Governing Cases Before the Office of
Hearings and Appeals
SBA is proposing to remove Sec. 134.317 from its regulations
because the procedure addressed in this regulation, the return of size
appeal case files, is no longer necessary. Case files are now
transmitted electronically to the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA)
from SBA's Area Offices, which eliminates the need to return paper
records by mail. SBA is also revising Sec. 134.714 to clarify that the
decision of a Judge regarding a status protest appeal from a Women-
Owned Small Business (WOSB) or Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned
Small Business (EDWOSB) is SBA's final agency decision and becomes
effective upon issuance.
B. Executive Order 13771
On January 30, 2017, President Trump signed Executive Order 13771,
Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs, which, among
other objectives, is intended to ensure that an agency's regulatory
costs are prudently managed and controlled so as to minimize the
compliance burden imposed on the public. For every new regulation an
agency proposes to implement, unless prohibited by law, this Executive
Order requires the agency to (i) identify at least two existing
regulations that the agency can cancel; and (ii) use the cost savings
from the cancelled regulations to offset the cost of the new
regulation.
C. Executive Order 13777
On February 24, 2017, the President issued Executive Order 13777,
Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda, which further emphasized the
goal of the Administration to alleviate the regulatory burdens placed
on the public. Under Executive Order 13777, agencies must evaluate
their existing regulations to determine which ones should be repealed,
replaced, or modified. In doing so, agencies should focus on
identifying regulations that, among other things: Eliminate jobs or
inhibit job creation; are outdated, unnecessary or ineffective; impose
costs that exceed benefits; create a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with regulatory reform initiatives and policies; or are
associated with Executive Orders or other Presidential directives that
have been rescinded or substantially modified.
II. Section by Section Analysis
A. Sec. 134.317 Return of the Case File
SBA is proposing to remove Sec. 134.317 of its regulations, which
currently states that upon issuance of a decision, OHA will return the
case file to the transmitting Area Office. When a size appeal is filed,
SBA's Area Office will often mail the original paper protest file to
OHA for review. Pursuant to Sec. 134.317, OHA will then send the
original file back to the Area Office at the conclusion of the appeal
process. For several years, however, OHA has transitioned many of its
processes to electronic transmission and storage. OHA will now
transition this part of the size appeal process to a completely
electronic method. Therefore, neither the Area Offices nor OHA will
need to mail the paper protest file back and forth. As such, this
regulation is no longer necessary.
B. Sec. 134.714 When must the Judge issue his or her decision?
SBA is proposing to add language to Sec. 134.714 of its
regulations to clarify that decisions issued by OHA pursuant to WOSB or
EDWOSB status protest appeals are considered final agency decisions.
Currently, the rule is silent on the issue, which could lead to
confusion since other size and status appeal regulations in part 134
clearly state that the OHA decision is a final agency decision. See
Sec. 134.316(d) (size appeals), Sec. 134.409(a) (8(a) appeals), and
Sec. 134.515(a) (Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Concern
status protest appeals). SBA does not follow a different process for
women-owned businesses. For example, OHA's WOSB/EDWOSB appeal decisions
currently state that the decision is the final agency decision. As
such, SBA believes that the proposed revision for Sec. 134.714 will
clarify that the Judge's decision in a WOSB or EDWOSB status protest
appeal is the final agency decision and that the decision becomes
effective upon issuance.
[[Page 7894]]
III. Compliance With Executive Orders 12866, 13771, 12988, and 13132,
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C., Ch. 35), and the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612)
A. Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
rule does not constitute a significant regulatory action for purposes
of Executive Order 12866 and is not a major rule under the
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801, et seq.
B. Executive Order 13771
This proposed rule is expected to be an Executive Order
deregulatory action with an annualized net savings of $28,733 and a net
present value of $410,478, both in 2016 dollars.
This rule proposes to remove Sec. 134.317, Return of the case
file, because it is no longer necessary. Case files will now be
transmitted electronically to OHA from the Area Office, eliminating the
need to return paper records by mail. This rule will eliminate
significant costs related to packing, labeling, and shipping case files
from the transmitting Area Office and returning those files by mail.
OHA receives and returns approximately 120 case files per fiscal year
to the Area Offices, for a total of 240 shipments. Assuming it takes 45
minutes to prepare the shipment, printing, and mailing the files and
that a GS-13 analyst performs this work at a wage of $112,393 plus 30
percent for benefits, or $146,111 ($73 hourly), this would save the
government $13,140, annually. The cost of each shipment is
approximately $70, which would save the government an additional
$16,800 for a total savings of $29,940 per year, in current dollars.
C. Executive Order 12988
This action meets applicable standards set forth in section 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. The action does not
have retroactive or preemptive effect.
D. Executive Order 13132
This rule does not have federalism implications as defined in
Executive Order 13132. It will not have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in the Executive Order. As
such, it does not warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
The SBA has determined that this final rule does not impose
additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.
F. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires administrative
agencies to consider the effect of their actions on small entities,
small non-profit businesses, and small local governments. Pursuant to
the RFA, when an agency issues a rule, the agency must prepare an
analysis that describes whether the impact of the rule will have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
If not, the RFA permits agencies to certify to that effect. SBA
believes that the removal of Sec. 134.317 will only impact itself and
that it will save SBA the costs associated with mailing paper files
back and forth during the appeal process. SBA therefore certifies that
this rule has ``no significant impact upon a substantial number of
small entities'' within the meaning of the RFA.
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 134
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Equal employment
opportunity, Lawyers, Organizations and functions (Government
agencies).
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the preamble, SBA proposes
to amend 13 CFR part 134 as follows:
PART 134--RULES OF PROCEDURE GOVERNING CASES BEFORE THE OFFICE OF
HEARINGS AND APPEALS
0
1. The authority citation for part 134 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504; 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 634(i),
637(a), 648(l), 656(i), and 687(c); 38 U.S.C. 8127(f); E.O. 12549,
51 FR 6370, 3 CFR, 1986 Comp., p. 189.
Subpart J issued under 38 U.S.C. 8127(f)(8)(B).
Subpart K issued under 38 U.S.C. 8127(f)(8)(A).
Source: 61 FR 2683, Jan. 29, 1996, unless otherwise noted.
Sec. 134.317 [Removed and Reserved]
0
2. Remove and reserve Sec. 134.317.
0
3. Amend Sec. 134.714 by adding a sentence at the end of the section
to read as follows:
Sec. 134.714 When must the Judge issue his or her decision?
* * * The Judge's decision is the final agency decision and becomes
effective upon issuance.
Jovita Carranza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020-02494 Filed 2-11-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P